The Real George Bernard Shaw – Fabian Socialist and Hitlerian Advocate of Mass Murder!

Westminsters favourite brand of Politician- Fabians- THE PLACE STINKS WITH THEM!

The Real George Bernard Shaw – Fabian Socialist and Hitlerian Advocate of Mass Murder!

By Neil Foster, 8th September 2010

Scanning through the Irish papers this morning I came across this piece on George Bernard Shaw in both the Irish Times and the Irish Examiner. These are supposedly competing publication but both carry word for word this sickening tribute to an evil monster who’s been mythologised and portrayed as one of Ireland’s finest.

http://www.independent.ie/national-news/shaws-pictures-tell-a-whole-new-story-2329090.html

This disgusting creature was in his day an ardent supporter of Mussolini and Hitler and a founding member of the Fabian Society.

http://www.fabians.org.uk/

The Fabian Society would claim that they are a purely socialist organisation. They were co founded by Shaw’s friend Lady Astor. David Cameron, the ‘con’servative leader and Prime Minister of Britain is also a member as well as being as being related by marriage into the Astor family. Coincidence?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/david-cameron/5245604/David-Camerons-mother-in-law-Lady-Astor-on-the-pain-of-losing-Ivan.html

I’m not going to waste my time going through the article suffice to say that is an insult to the average person who, if they spent 5 minutes researching Shaw would find a far different personality than this sickening portrayal of a supposed genius of his day.

What I want to show you here is the depraved mind of a ‘man’ who thought and stated quite clearly what he thought of the ordinary person on the street far removed from his elitist circle of psychopaths.

The word ‘psychopath’ has been used in many articles on this site and others to describe an attribute of politicians, royalty and the wider aristocracy which they all seem to share to one degree or another. George Bernard Shaw is no different. The only difference between Shaw and many others of his sick fraternity is that he was a man of many words who had trouble containing himself when it came to his views on humanity. Here are just a few examples:

EXTERMINATION OF THE “SOCIALLY INCOMPATIBLE”

“The notion that persons should be safe from extermination as long as they do not commit willful murder, or levy war against the Crown, or kidnap, or throw vitriol, is not only to limit social responsibility unnecessarily, and to privilege the large range of intolerable misconduct that lies outside them, but to divert attention from the essential justification for extermination, which is always incorrigible social incompatibility and nothing else.”

Source: George Bernard Shaw, “On the Rocks” (1933), Preface.

USE OF GAS CHAMBERS

“We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …

A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people’s time to look after them.”

Source: George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express, March 4, 1910.

KILLING THOSE “UNFIT TO LIVE”

“The moment we face it frankly we are driven to the conclusion that the community has a right to put a price on the right to live in it … If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level, and the only solution that will create a sense of full social responsibility in modern populations?”

Source: George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296.

These are not isolated statements made at some point in his life. These statements and many others were made over decades consistently and repetitively. Here’s another:

“Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well.”

George Bernard Shaw: The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928, pg. 470)

Read the full article here: http://oneworldscam.com/?p=8032

Whats’ wrong with Britain- need you ask that question?

UK Taxman lets Goldman Sachs escape paying £10 million bill – But if YOU don’t pay? Prison
on November 9,

Pathocracy Paddy
September 8, 2010 at 14:26
There’s only so much you can fit in an article. Let’s pad it out some more.

George Bernard Shaw
“You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world; who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there, and say, now sir or madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If you can’t justify your existence; if you’re not pulling your weight in the social group; if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then clearly we cannot use the big organisation of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us, and it can’t be of very much use to yourself”.
George Bernard Shaw
Caught on film in The Soviet Story
…see this excellent film

“I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly, deadly by all means but humane, not cruel”.
George Bernard Shaw
The Listener Feb 7th 1934
………………………………………………………..chemtrails??????

This mass-murdering vegetarian so-called genius thinks he’s doing you a favour exterminating you for being so thick. Carry on calling these creeps psychopaths Neil. Actually you are being too kind. Scumbag is more appropriate!
Pity the rest of the scumbags haven’t as BIG A MOUTH as Shaw, who said what all the scubags really think of the rest of us tax-slaves.

Dandy
September 9, 2010 at 13:18
Silly creature, he left himself out of these various categories. But of course, I doubt he was thinking of himself when pointing out all the low life miscreants leaching off ‘society’ as if it were its own living organism not made of individual human beings! Thank god he was for humane extermination! Might as well not even tell the special targets that they are marked for death, save them the stress.
I say we take these ‘genius social empaths’ and give them what they want, a world without us peons: lock ‘em in solitary confinement, left only to their own delusions as company for the rest of their lives. It’s the only humane thing to do to take away their suffering, poor fellas.

Guy Jones
September 9, 2010 at 13:54
I think it is a real shame that all of these super keen Eugenecists never think to lead the way joyfully into the gaschamber of brotherly love. For they so Loved the rest of Humanity that they sacrificed themselves freely so that the rest of us could crack on and enjoy our existence in the material plane, without the inconvenience of their laws, taxes, hegeminous wars of conquest and the general daily attack on our liberties and well being. After all if you are going to enforce a cull then those over the age of retirement and therefore unproductive to the greater collective should be considered for termination first. So I propose that Ted Turner, Henry Kissinger, David Rockerfella, Queen Elizabeth the 2nd, Prince Phillip (Mr Queen ER II), Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands and all of the rest of the aristo coffin dodger brigade should be forced to lead the charge and do their bit for cleansing the gene pool of unwanted shite. (under their own rules of useless parasites getting the chop of course). And if G.B. shaw was still stealing oxygen from those of us who actully contribute I would say push him up front because it was his idea, so he should do the decent thing and test it out for the rest of us. Of course I jest, or do I? I can never tell these days must be all the GMO food and chem trails and electromagentic pollution making me more angry and less tolerant of unwanted members of my species.

marcus
September 9, 2010 at 14:19
It has always been a shock and a shame to see the honor and affection that has been applied to this old wolf in sheep’s clothing, with everyone believing, or pretending, that he was a nice old chap, amusingly eccentric and feisty. He did write a couple of moderately nice plays but then he spoiled it all by going behind the scenes and planning the utter enslavement and destruction of the masses of the people. Monstrous evil, exhaling from the mouth of hell like a plague of vampires, that was his real legacy. How much egotism and elitism does it take to reach the pinnacle of lunacy that he attained? The world should begin to repudiate such murderous pirates, and begin also to rehabilitate some of its actual heroes who were given just the opposite treatment. Anyway, welcome to Planet Crazy.

Ian de Montfort
September 9, 2010 at 17:29
The Astor’s like many of the leading families are Jewish, although they would openly deny this.

They like many of their Khazar family have been involved with Slavery, War and many other evils foisted upon the unsuspecting Human Race. Churchill, Stalin, Roosevelt, and so too possibly Hitler, were all Ashkanazi Jews, Zionist Jews everyone of them. (By the way, nearly 115,000 Jewish soldiers served in combat roles during the third reich).

And if you don’t like what I have written here then do your research. The Fabien Society, like most of the biggest institutions on Earth are run and controlled by the same Cabalistic elite, and are supported by those they greatly reward. This is the truth. The truth that will tell you that they see them selves as superior to every other being in creation. They even see themselves as being superior to the real Jews of Semitic origin.

This is not an anti-Semitic statement as I do not oppose the right of Palestinians, who are Semitic, as are Arabs to the right of their own determination. Most modern day Jews are not Semitic. They are of Khazar, or Ashkenazi origin. These fakes converted to Judaism in and around 750 AD. They have corrupted many aspects of Judaism and are Cabbalists in reality. They are of Sub-Turkic origin, and have no connection to Palestine in a million years. But what they do have a connection to more than any other being is deceit, lies, propaganda and murder. This is the truth.

avs
September 10, 2010 at 18:47
I find it low to associate Hitler with mass murder and to call George Bernard Shaw a mass murderer – all he is to me is a myoptic idiot who should himself be killed – a weak minded individual of no worth whatsoever to my knowledge. A man who seems to like by your standards being associated with people who in my honest to goodness opinion knew how to lead and who weren´t going around marching after somebody who was different just to profit from it. I find it difficult to fully comprehend the allied madness behind what I consider to be this anti – Hitler nonsense. Did this man know Hitler or any of his associates personally? If that is not the case , what right does he have to assert Hitler to have been the ´evil monser´he says he was?

Neil F
September 10, 2010 at 18:52
It’s well documented that Hitler and Stalin were both funded by the same banking families of New York and London, the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Du Ponts, JP Morgan etc, the same banking families who are now dragging the world deliberately into a New World Order feudal system and to suggest Hitler wasn’t a monster is ridiculous.

Neil Foster,
Co-Editor,
The Sovereign Independent

avs
September 10, 2010 at 18:52
I do understand George Bernard Shaw´s desire to kill people nonetheless as presented in this article. I feel that people like George Bernard Shaw may desire to kill large segments of the human population in an unsuccessful effort at mass killings because they themselves in the end will be the biggest losers. Mr. moderator – I am not intending to insult your intelligence or views with my comment. Ian De Montfort I don´t see anything wrong with Kabballah. It´s one of the most beautiful weltanshaungs I have seen evolve into the knowledge systems they have become as of today. There are Jews as of today who oppose Palestinian occupation because according to the Torah it is illegal to construct a State in Palestine. In the Torah Israel is understood as being humanity as a whole and not some kinda land somewhere.
Thank goodness I am not a political zionist and my goodness me how much corruption there is in all this global conspiracy thingy. But I believe honestly that it will be defeated.

avs
September 10, 2010 at 19:01
Hey Neil,

I understand your remarks on that Hitler and Stalin were both funded by whom you assume to be ´the same banking families of New York and London , the Rockefellers , Rotchilds , Du Ponts , JP Morgan , etc´. I believe myself that Adolf Hitler was funded by the numinous and honourable culture of his time – the German people and that he very rarely used money from their financial support. I believe that Adolf Hitler genuinely and sincerely opposed the Union Bank and therefore refosed cooperation with these Rockefellers , Rotchilds , Du Ponts , JP Morgans of your´s. I do not know the Rockefellers , Rotchilds , Du Ponts , JP Morgans myself. I believe that Adolf Hitler sincerely opposed the banking elite of countries whose banks he deemed were detrimental to German interests , and thus , was not a supporter of any banking elite whom he considered to be detrimental to his country or his peoples´interest.
I also believe that when Hitler heard that Stalin had decided to cooperate with these ´elite families´, then Hitler decided to refuse to support Stalin anymore and opposed from then on his domestic and foreign policies. As of ´elitism´ , when I began to recover from my nervous breakdown , I decided to conclude that today´s real elite , are the world´s plants and trees , and thus not those elite which have been considered to be the politically correct ones. In my honest opinion , to suggest that Hitler wasn´t a monser isn´t ridiculous at all. When I look into Hitler´s eyes , I see the eyes of a man I believe was a good person , an honourable person who saw no desire whatsoever to commit most of the crimes he has been associated with.
When I look into the eyes of Barack H. Obama , I see a person who may be very detrimental to the people of the United States as we know most of American civilization as of present. I don´t want to insult you or to be rude – so these are merely my views. I also wish you to know I was not around during World War II , so I am no authority on most or any of those events this era has been part of. Furthermore , I believe that Adolf Hitler´s weltanshaung or world – view , was a kind of Janiism , in where God is considered to be nature. I say so with pride in my heart and with joy , that I believe that Adolf Hitler was a good man – but I do not ask those who may disaggree with my views , to aggree with my belief.

Ian de Montfort
September 14, 2010 at 12:51
A few things that may enlighten AVS

‘The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events:
Just consider the following:

Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).

Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish handswhen bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike campsPresident Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jewsamong the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jewsthe leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to terrible ‘anti-semitism’?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H NicholsonPeacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.

The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed and lavishly displayed by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.”

Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s bookDisgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black,The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.

To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah ArendtEichmann in Jerusalem p 7).

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

“There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

“The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athenavol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

“The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267), and “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

E-mail comment received:

I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII. The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the ownership of the media, banks and businesses.

Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn’t make sense based upon Germany’s population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest discussion during my classes.

I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer.

I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast. The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white supremacist.’

MORE LIKE BLACKMAIL AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS- THE GUILT THING WASN’T AROUND THEN- THAT CAME LATER WITH THE BBC SHIT AND HOLLYWOODS STORIES.

ISRAEL INVENTED TERRORISM- YOU WERE SLOW ON THAT ONE!

http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=7948