THE EARTH DOLLAR….”FABIAN SOCIALIST GLOBAL CAKE IS ABOUT 95% BAKED”

Key Influences on Changes in the last Millennium
Influences on NSW Council Policies
“The Obedience of Australia” – Peter Jones 1993

FABIAN INFLUENCE ON COUNCIL DEVELOPMENTS IN NEW ZEALAND
“COMMUNIST” COUNCILS IN NEW ZEALAND and their hidden Fabian Socialist 2006
“Draft Ten Year Plan” to confiscate all freehold properties through rate
rises and taxes By John Christian © John Christian April 2006

A The Basis of Local Government
B City of London Corporation
C The Beginning of Socialism in London
D Fabian Society
E Fabian Society “Five Year Plan”
F Fabian Society Privatization of the World
G “Sovietization” of Local Government in New Zealand
H Communist “Sustainable Development”
I World Conservation Bank
J Communist “SmartGrowth”
K Bribery of Local Government Politicians
L Pauperization of Pensioners and the Middle Class
M Borrowing Powers of Councils and the Stealing of Ratepayer’s Properties

This ‘paper’ is written in the public interest, and may be freely reprinted
or republished, in full or in part, for profit or not, by whomsoever wishes
to use it.

A THE BASIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Before I outline the “Communist” basis of the New Zealand City, District
and Regional Council draft Ten Year Plan policies (announced by most
councils in March/April 2006), it is first necessary to provide a brief
history of global “local government” in order to fully understand the real
essence of what I write about.

Although the modern system of local and regional government can be directly
traced back to Babylon, when in King Nebuchadnezzar’s time (605-562 B.C.),
the city was divided up into ten distinct regions or districts ruled by
princes, under whom were mayoral governors, captains, judges, treasurers,
councilors and sheriffs ­ in modern times the system of local government
that we have throughout the world is derived exclusively from the City of
London Corporation.

B CITY OF LONDON CORPORATION

The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, private, independent,
sovereign state occupying approximately one square mile within the heart
of the greater London area inside the old Roman walls of London.

It either directly or indirectly, controls all mayors, councils, regional
councils, multi-national and trans-national banks, corporations, judicial
systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in
London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank (through N. M. Rothschild & Sons
London Italian subsidiary Torlonia), European Central Bank, United States
Federal Reserve (which is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight
British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for International
Settlementsin Switzerland (which is also British-controlled and oversees
all of the Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and last but
not least, the communist European Union and communist United Nations
Organization.

The supreme ruler of the City is the Lord Mayor who is elected once a year
and lives in the Mansion House.

The City has a resident population of about 5,000 that rises to about two
million during the week when people surge in and out each day to work.

The financial centre of the world, it is often termed the ‘wealthiest square
mile on earth.’The full title of the Square Mile’s governing body is the ‘Mayor,
Aldermen and Commons of the City of London in Common Council Assembled.’

The Court of leadership consists of the Lord Mayor, 25 Aldermen and 130
Common Councilmen.

All of the giant, largely Jewish international banks and corporations in the
City of London that control the world are members of one or another of the
Twelve Great Livery Companies domiciled in Guildhall (or the Hall of the City
of London Corporation).

As the result of a ‘gentleman’s agreement’ between the sovereign and
the City merchants and bankers made many hundreds of years ago, the Lord
Mayor is officially head of the Corporation and is allowed to operate
independently of the sovereign.

However, the wealth of the world held in the Corporation ultimately is the
sovereign’s, because, should the gentleman’s agreement break down, the
sovereign has the power to “rescind” the Corporation’s independence.

The Queen sometimes refers to the Corporation as “The Firm.”

While ostensibly the power of the monarchy appears to be diminishing as
the Queen voluntarily gives her Commonwealth countries their independence
and they become republics chartered to the United Nations, and she
actively works toward abolishing the sovereignty of Britain as the UK
is broken up and divided into regions of the European Union ­ her City
of London Corporation multi-national banks and corporations are quietly
taking over the world.

All of the big banks and companies in both New Zealand and Australia
are either directly or indirectly City of London-controlled.

In ancient times the City marshals and sheriffs were employed to ensure
that all the “council” rates and taxes were paid to the City on behalf
of the king.

After the conquest of William the Conqueror in 1066, who first
brought the Jewish bankers to London from France, the Jews developed
written credit agreements for the king, (in French called “mort-gages” ­ mort ‘death’gage
‘bond’) and it was the marshal’s and sheriff’s jobs to ensure that
all the interest payments of these “death-bonds” were paid to the Jews
on behalf of the king.

During the reign of Richard I (the Lionheart) after the serious downturn
in the economy as the result of the cost and tax impositions of the
Crusades, (read “Blondel’s Song” by David Boyle to understand how 25%
of the wealth of England was required in standard Silver Ingots to free
Richard the Lionheart from not Saladdin but the Holy Roman Emperor !”)
many farmers, business people and peasants had defaulted on their
“mort-gages” throughout England.

As the result, the Jews promptly commenced seizing the commoner’s property
for not paying the interest, rates and taxes to the City and King.

Subsequently, a rapid increase in hate against the “King’s Jews” was
initiated.

This led to the massacre of Jews at York in 1190. New York in America
was later named by British Jewish immigrant bankers in memory of the event.

For 100 years the commoner’s hate against the “King’s Jews” fermented until
1290, when, under pressure from the people, Edward III finally suspended
the Mayoralty and reluctantly banished all Jews from his kingdom when
16,000 left England ­ and didn’t begin to return until around the reign of
Elizabeth I 1558-1603) when the enormous power of the City really began to
accelerate with the opening of the world’s first stock exchange in London
­ and has continued unabated to the present day.

[***According to the Jewish History Books the Jews returned to England after
the death of Oliver CROMWELL nearly 75 years later.

CROMWELL had won the Civil War in England in 1660 and formed the first
republic or “The Commonwealth” in England

The Jews of Amsterdam approached Cromwell in 1655 to allow them to return
England but a decision was not reached.

According to the Jewish History Books there was a competition between the
Dutch Jews and the Portuguese Jews over the Trade with South America.
Three Centuries of Anglo Jewish History VD LIPMAN P30

It appears that the Portuguese Jews may have funded the return of Charles
II as the minutes of the Board of Deputies of British Jews were written in
Portuguese for the first 60 years
ref “The History of the Jews: From Cromwell’s Commonwealth to the Napoleonic
Era” Simon DUBNOC, Moshe SPIEGEL (translator).

However this rivalry stimulated the formation of many trading companies in
England including The Formation of the East India Company

When in 1694 the Scots tried to emulate the trading English juggernaut
with the ill-fated Scottish East India Company “Darien Expedition” the
Scots may have been deliberately lured into bankruptcy to sign the Union
of Parliaments.

The Darien Expedition was promoted in Scotland by William PATERSON who is
credited as being the founder of the Bank of England.

However the Expedition was a monumental disaster and resulted in the
Union of Parliaments between England and Scotland***]

While there have been rare occasions when the Lord Mayor and Commalty of
the City, as a result of their colossal wealth and power have been able to
subtly out-maneuver the monarch, as to their cost, Richard II, Charles I
and James II were to learn to their fate ­ generally speaking this has
been the exception rather than the rule.

Ultimately, whoever successfully rules must have the “will” of the people.

Historically, in the City many although certainly not all monarchs, have
ruled with the “will” of their subjects.

But rarely, if ever, have the bankers, rich barons or knights been
respected in this position.

More often than not they’ve been consistently hated.

Even when monarchs have done a poor job, provided they have still had
the “will” of the people, the wealthy bankers’ position has been extremely
“perilous” to say the least.

After forty years of misrule by Henry III, the Lord Mayor, Thomas
Fitzthomas (1261-1264) and the Aldermen defied the king.

On this particular occasion the Lord Mayor ended up being thrown into
the Tower where he died.

Henry III vetoed nine Mayors in his long reign, and jailed another who
died in prison.

On one occasion the threat to the Lord Mayor’s massive wealth and power
has not come directly from the monarch, but from the people themselves.

Mayor Nicholas Brembre(1383-1385)had been a king’s man during the peasant’s
revolt, and was knighted by Richard II (similar to Sir Barry Curtis, Mayor
of Manukau City in New Zealand today) for curbing the ambitions of his
uncle, John of Gaunt.

But Brembre had few friends among the common people having deposed the
popular Mayor Adam Stable, and when he re-imposed the hated Poll Tax which
had caused the revolt, the mob turned on him.

He was given a mockery of a trial and was then hanged, drawn and quartered.

Understandably, therefore, from the time of Richard II most of the “Lord
Mayors” in the City of London and others in the realm became very “cautious”
and “hesitant” about any proposal which could be seen as an “unreasonable
demand” to levy rates or taxes for the City and king.

However, today these events have all but been forgotten.

From the time of William the Conqueror in 1066 up to the time of the
Reformation the City of London Corporation was Roman Catholic.

(The modern global “company” and “corporate” business system that we
know today grew out of the old Roman Catholic dioceses in England which
were the world’s first “corporations”).

During the reigns of Henry VIII (1491-1547) and Elizabeth I (1558-1603)
when the Church of England, knights and barons took over the assets of the
Catholic Church in England, the City then became Protestant.

Gradually, as the people of England apostatized and turned away from the
Protestant King James Bible and Christianity in general, both Roman
Catholic and Protestant, in the late 1800’s the City and Monarchy became
rabidly Socialist.

C THE BEGINNING OF SOCIALISM IN LONDON

The religion of Socialism is based primarily on the teachings of the pagan
Greek philosopher and writer Plato, and especially his book The Republic,
in which 400 years before the time of Christ he dreamed of a “World
Republic” headed not by a president, but by a royal “world philosopher
king” or “prince” like himself of course!).

Both Karl Marx and Hitler were great students of Plato.

It is only inevitablethat the planned reformed United Nations and EU will
one day be headed by this “Philosopher Prince”.

Socialism officially first began in 1880 in London when H. M. Hyndman
founded the Rose Street Club which was dedicated to the destruction of
Christianity in England.

In 1884 the group changed its name and came to be called the Social
Democratic Federation.

Its early members deceptively called themselves “Christian Socialists”.

Later the group’s membership included the Jew, Karl Marx’s daughter,
Eleanor Marx and her husband Professor Aveling.

Behind the scenes the group was largely controlled by Engels, Karl Marx’s
partner.

Because Hyndman would not obey the orders of Engels, Eleanor Marx and her
husband split off with William Morris the poet and others and started
an opposition group which they called the Socialist League.

On January 4, 1884, members and past members of the Social Democratic
Federation, the Socialist League and others founded the Fabian Society.

D FABIAN SOCIETY

The first meeting of the Fabian Society was held at the home of Mr E. R.
Pease, a member of the London Stock Exchange.

Two of the leading members were George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb.

Other early members were Eleanor Marx, theosophist and occultist Annie
Besant, and author H. G. Wells.

The name of the society was suggested by the Spiritualist, Frank Podmore,
who named it after the brilliant, elderly, third century Roman general,
censor and consul, Quintus Fabius (Maximus Verrucosus)(303-203 BC) who
was made a dictator in 221-217 BC and, with his small band of fighting
guerillas and superior cunning, successfully defended Rome by defeating
Hannibal’s much bigger and mighty Carthaginian army through “gradualism”
and “terrorism” during the time of the second Punic War.

Initially he kept to the hills and cunningly hampered the enemy’s progress
by cutting off their food and supply lines with “delaying tactics” until
Rome could assemble enough men to defend the city successfully.

During the war, his slow, “gradual,” delaying tactics were greatly
disapproved of by his soldiers and the civilians and earned him the
name of ‘Cunctator’ ­ the ‘Delayer.’

But later, after the triumph, his skill and wisdom was highly appreciated.

He died in his 100th year in 203 BC.

Fabian Socialism is a “mixture” of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism
all bundled together.

owever, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and subtle.

The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that
Communists take your house by directly sending in the “secret police”
to knock your front door down ­ Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly
and cleverly ­by “gradually” taking your individual rights away, by
“gradually” increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you
can’t pay them, they send in their regional “council tax inspectors”
to take your house away ­ but the end result is the same.

ritish PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior’s globalist
“war on terror” is a classic Fabian Socialist strategy.

The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887 and included
the statement: “The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of
Marxism the abolition of private property etc.” (of course this does
not apply to the elect oligarchy at the top who end up owning the lot!).

Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in defense of
Bolshevism.

It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New Civilization.

In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US Senate Committee on the
Judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M. Bogolepov, a former Red Army officer
stated that the entire text had been prepared by himself in the Soviet
Foreign Office.

Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the Fabian Society (commissioned
by author/playwright co-founder George Bernard Shaw) today (now archived)
is a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.”

Until recently it also appeared on the Fabian glass window (now removed)
in the Beatrice Webb House at Dorking, Surrey. (see enclosures)

Today the Fabian Society is among other things the intellectual wing of
the British Labour Party.

Before Tony Blair became British Prime Minister in May 1997, he was
Chairman of the Fabian Society.

Since the 1997 British general election there have been around 200 Fabian
MP’s in the House of Commons, some of whom have formed almost
entire Labour Cabinets including Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, Jack Straw,
David Blunkett, Peter Hain, Patricia Hewitt, John Reid, Ruth Kelly, Alan
Milburn and Clare Short.

Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire British government.

They are resident in all parties and sit on all important select committees,
commissions and organizations allied to the government.

A good web-site on the subject is: http://www.lindsayjenkins.com/

The Fabian Society literally controls the European Union. German-born
Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston since 1997, and
member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, was
one of two House of Commons’ Representatives on the European Convention
and a member of the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe.

The Presidium was the drafting body that created the draft Constitution
for Europe.

In her book, The Making of Europe’s Constitution , published in December
2003 by the Fabian Society, p. 20-21, Gisela writes: “In the early months,
the Presidium members would meet in a small room in the Justus Lipsius
Building some fifteen minute walk from the European Parliament.

Attendance was limited to the thirteen members, the Secretary General Sir
John Kerr, his deputy and the press officer. Sir John Kerr, a former
Permanent Secretary of the British Foreign Office, conducted the proceedings
inside the Presidium and in the plenary sessions of the Convention with
deft diplomatic skill as might be expected from someone who John Major
called ‘Machiavelli’ in his autobiography.

The best description of his talents I heard was: ‘When Kerr comes up to
you and asks for the time, you wonder why me and why now?’

On several occasions, we would retreat to the Val Duchess ­ a small palace
used by the Belgian foreign minister. It was at one of the dinners at Val
Duchess that the skeleton of the draft constitution was given to members
of the presidium in sealed brown envelopes the weekend before the public
presentation.

We were not allowed to take the documents away with us.

Just precisely who drafted the skeleton, and when, is still unclear to me,
but I gather much of the work was done by Valery Giscard d’Estaing and
Sir John Kerr over the summer.

There was little time for informed discussion, and even less scope for
changes to be made.”

Today the Labour Parties in both New Zealand and Australia are closely
affiliated to the Fabian Society in London.

When Australian Labour Party Prime Minister Bob Hawke (a Rhodes Scholar),
was guest of honour at the Fabian Society’s Centenary Commemoration
Dinnerin Melbourne on May 18, 1984, he said: “I gladly acknowledge the
debt of my own government to Fabianism. Earlier I dealt at some length
with the principle of the inevitability of ‘gradualness.’

There is another important idea, a method more than a principle ­ which
becomes closely associated with Fabianism.

Sydney Webb called it ‘permeation.’

Today it would be called ‘consensus.’

Webb put it this way. Most reformers think that all they have to do in a
political democracy is to obtain a majority. This is a profound mistake.

What has to be changed is not only the vote that is cast, but also the
mental climate in which Parliament and Government both live and work.

That I find to be an accurate description of the approach I and my
colleagues have tried to bring to the affairs of the nation in our
first term of office.”

In June 2001, at the Federal Government joint standing committee on
treaties inquiry into whether Australia should support a statute of the
UN International Criminal Court which would affect the “sovereignty” of
all Australians, when criticized by an Australian patriotic group,
Labour Party Senator Chris Schacht, sarcastically exclaimed he had been
a member of the Fabian Society for 20 years ­ and further, said;

“You probably were not aware that us Fabians have taken over the CIA,
KGB, M15, ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the
World Bank and many other organizations”.

“That is why Tony Blair, as part of the 2006 Commonwealth Games Closing
Celebrations in Melbourne on March 26, was also invited by Labour officials
and business leaders to speak to the Australian Parliament in Canberra on
March 27 about his Fabian “war against terror,” and “intelligence matters”
where he said; “The war against terror was as much a battle about values
as it was about arms.”

And why, after the Australian Government meeting, he flew directly to New
Zealand on March 28 to speak about the same subject at a meeting in the
Auckland Town Hall, hosted by the New Zealand Labour Party Prime Minister,
Helen Clark, and the Auckland Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

After which he participated (by video-link) in the International Climate
Change Conference in Wellington on March 29, and later discussed with
Prime Minister Helen Clark his (“Fabian Society”) “initiative to set up a
unit in the NZ public service to enable their respective Labour Governments
to co-operate more closely on policy development” (NZ Herald, March 28,
2006 pg. A3) and on “security ­ intelligence matters” as communist China
is brought into the fold.

In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic banking
families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover of Russia.

Trotsky in his biography refers to some of the loans from these British
financiers going back as far as 1907.

By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were
co-ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner.

The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately
to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the world
through the UN and EU.

E FABIAN SOCIETY “FIVE YEAR PLAN”

The British plan to takeover the world and bring in a “New World Order” began
with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University.

Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan
Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to
indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish
a secret society for leading business and banking leaders around the world
who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist world government.

Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan.

At first the society was called Milner’s Kindergarten, then in 1909 it came
to be called The RoundTable.

It was to work closely with the London School of Economics founded in 1894
by Fabian Socialist leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield).

Today former Rhodes Scholars (such as Bill Clinton), Fabian Business RoundTable
members, and graduates from the London School of Economics (the primary
Fabian Socialist training school in the world) dominate the global banking,
business and political systems in every country.

The British Fabian Society plan to takeover the world by the City of London
financial community was first published in a book entitled “All These Things”
by a New Zealand author and journalist, A. N. Field.

The book was first published in 1936 by Omni Publications in the United States
(and censored in New Zealand).The document, called “Freedom and Planning” was
secretly circulated in 1932 by the inner councils of the members of the
Political Economic Plan, otherwiseknown as “P.E.P.” in London.

The then chairman of the organization was a City of London Jew, Israel
Moses Sieff, who was the reputed author of the plan.

The headquarters of P.E.P. were at 16 Queen Anne’s Gate, London.

Mr Sieff was also chairman and financier of Marks and Spencer’s’ chain
stores and vice-president of the British Zionist Society.

Centered around City of London Jewry’s international financiers in the Bank
of England subsidiary, the Bankers Industrial Development Company, the essence
of the document “Freedom and Planning” was (and still is) to gradually
“Sovietize” the world based on their “Five Year Plan” inaugurated in Moscow
in 1927-28 in the Soviet Union.

Basically the plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire productive
capacity of each country throughout the world into a series of great “State-owned”
departments, which would then be “corporatized”, then “privatized” to City of
London Corporation International banks and corporations which they control.

Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with most of the
land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways, communications, media,
roads, electricity, energy, food, water, waste management, housing, farms,
commercial property, schools, hospitals, police, social welfare, Inland
Revenue etc. transferred into statutory corporations, companies or land
trusts which indirectly would be owned by City of London banks.

The”peasants” would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and small
assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main assets of each
country would be owned by their multi-national corporations and banks.

In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World
Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world.

Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole world
would eventually be transferred into a Communist “United Nations” World
Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country would be “regionalized” and
ruled through “Regional Councils” through a United Nations dictatorship
called a “Parliamentary Assembly” which would be just another name for a
Soviet “Central Committee” ­ and all independent, sovereign, national
governments would be totally abolished.

F FABIAN SOCIETY PRIVATIZATION OF THE WORLD

As the result of the P.E.P. Plan originally formulated in 1932, right now
every country’s “State assets” (owned in trust by the State on behalf of
the people) are being frantically “privatized” by City of London-controlled
banks and corporations primarily under the directions of two leading
Fabian Socialist writers ­ Sir Roger Douglas and John Redwood.

Sir Roger Douglas’s book “Unfinished Business” and John Redwood’s book
“Public Enterprise in Crisis” are the primary handbooks being used by
central and local government finance ministers and officers all around
the world to sell off each nation’s “family silver” and State assets ­
with the more “sensitive” public assets being transferred into Fascist-type
Public-Private Partnerships (PPP’s) which are designed to make the public
masses and peasantry “think” that they have some degree of control ­ when
in reality they have none as the real ownership of the assets are held by
the City of London banks and corporations who fund them.

Until relatively recently, John Redwood was head of N. M. Rothschild &
Sons London global Overseas Privatization Unit that is coordinating the
entire global privatization process.

Sir Roger has been contracted as a consultant by City of London Banks, the
World Bank and others to advise on national privatization programs as well.

Fabian Society “Regionalization” of the World through UN and EU Control of
Regional and City Councils

All of the countries in the world currently are being “regionalized”.

Presently, for example, the whole of the United States is being “regionalized”
and the EU Committee of the Regions, based in Brussels, is “regionalizing”
every country in the European Union.

As the result of this radical “regionalization” process, Britain has now
already been effectively abolished, having been divided up into 9 separate
regions of the EU, plus Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

This cunning process, which is being “gradually” implemented to destroy
the power of the central national government in each country, is commonly
referred to as “Devolution” by the Queen and Fabian Society.

Unlike the rest of the autonomous regions in the UK which, like most of the
other regions in the EU that have become virtually powerless through their
representation in the European Parliament which is now only a “talking shop”,
the City of London Corporation as a separate region by itself within the
Union now rules it.

This is because all of the Commissioners are appointed (not elected) to the
uropean Commission by City of London-controlled business leaders and bankers
in their respective countries.

Right now throughout the UK all city councils and regional councils are
dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent’s properties,
while at the same time they are quickly expanding their debt levels for
unaffordable capital works programs via loans from City of London
banks ­ which policies are deliberately intended to prepare for the
councils'”privatization” whilst transferring the local government in each
country to “regional councils” ­ which ultimately will become or be controlled
by “Regional Parliamentary Assemblies,” identical to the old structure in the
former Soviet Union ­ which first regionalized then abolished the national
governments before they set up their republican socialist police state.

G “SOVIETIZATION” OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN NEW ZEALAND

In New Zealand, the blatant UN “Sovietization” of the entire country was
implemented by the Hon. Dr. Michael Bassett, Minister of Local Government,
through the Local Government Amendment Act (No.2) in 1989.

This radical act reduced more than 600 different local authorities throughout
the country to 94: 13 regional councils, 74 district or city councils and
seven special authorities.

This new structure of local government deftly created by the act divided
the whole country up into 14 “Soviet-styled” regions governed by 13 regional
councils and a district council (with the Airborne Region being unique in
that its district council was also to become the regional council for that area).

Under the 1989 Act, the district and city councils were designed to continue
to provide essential services such as water supply, roads, sewage disposal
and rubbish collection (which all ultimately would be “privatized” or
transferred into “Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP’s) which would finally
end up being foreign-owned) and the regional councils would take over many
of the responsibilities performed in the past by many special purpose
authorities formerly carried out by such agencies as catchment boards,
harbor boards, pest and noxious plant authorities etc.

Ultimately, this devious plan is to transfer many of the Central Government
tasks and responsibilities to regional councils as well, which will be further
subtly rationalized to become or be controlled by “Sovietized” Regional
Development Agencies and Regional Parliamentary Assemblies ­to rule their
unwary serfs and peasants under strict Communist United Nations and
Marxist EU socialist law.

These processes are now well advanced and are almost complete in Britain,
and are accelerating in all other countries,including the United States.

One could say that the Fabian Socialist global “cake is about 95% baked!”

H COMMUNIST “SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT”

In 1992 at the “communist” United Nations Conference on the Environment and
Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janero, Brazil, co-chaired by former Soviet
Union President Mikhail Gorbachev and N. M. Rothschild-London agent Canadian
billionaire Maurice Strong, the UN unveiled a radical environmental
philosophical agenda which “inverted” the traditional values reflected in
the Bible, Magna Carta and US Constitution (which put man under God at the
head of his creation and dominion i.e. a man’s rights were to have
superiority over those of animals, fish, plants, trees and forests etc.)

At the Earth Summit in Rio, an old pagan concept was introduced which
“inverted” all of our existing, constitutional, democratic, personal and
property rights and values espoused by Christianity ­ and transferred
them to the environment and the religion of mother-earth Gaia worship.

In this religion, a tree becomes more valuable than a human being.

A rare bird more valuable than a hospital.

This United Nations program of action unveiled in Rio was called Agenda 21.

It is 300 pages long and is very complex.

Primarily it is designed to be implemented with other radical UN documents
such as the Global Biodiversity Assessment (1100 pages), promoted by the
UN Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II.

The first Habitat conference was held in 1974 and specifically identified
private property ownership as a threat to the peace and equality of the
environment.

It proposed to revolutionize the development of the land and cities of each
country under strict “Soviet-style” environmental guidelines, called
“Sustainable Development.”

The UN’s communist secret agenda through “environmentalism” and “sustainable
development” is very cunning and has deceived a lot of well-meaning people.

Most people genuinely want to protect the environment and ensure that the
earth’s resources are “sustainable” for future generations there is no doubt.

But the communist goal of “sustainable development” and “environmentalism”
has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment or sustainability
­ it is all about abolition of property rights, and ultimately, collectivization
of housing and farms under corporate State control.

Under this system, farmers and property owner’s rights would be effectively
extinguished and overridden by strict Environmental and Sustainable Development
resource consents and laws.

They would be told where they could farm, what “sustainable” land they could
“develop,” (sustainable development) what trees they could plant or cut down,
what fertilizer if any they could apply, and they would need “consents” and
licenses for everything under the sun.

City dwellers would be in the same dire predicament, and have their homes
confiscated, or they’d be severely fined, if they cut down a heritage tree,
washed their car, boat or dishes using detergent, or used the privatized
corporation’s water when they shouldn’t, especially if they were nabbed
under their friendly “Neighbourhood Watch Scheme,” which scheme, incidentally,
was first implemented in the Soviet Union.

Socialism is very subtle.

The penalty for cutting a tree down without the appropriate government consent
would become worse than murder.

Not only would you have to license your dog, to own a dog you would have to be
licensed too.

Farmers would need to be licensed to operate their collectivized farms, spray
weeds, care for cattle and drive their tractors under new Soviet-styled
“health and safety” laws.

All tradesmen and professional workers would have to be accredited and licensed,
as would all Christian pastors and churches, and any other persons or
institutions that could be likely to criticize their Soviet bosses.

All potential young parents would need to have a license to have children,
and if there was any family genetic weakness of some sort in their
state-controlled doctor’s medical records, no license would be given

In the end you would need a license or permit to take your boat on a lake,
take your kid fishing off a wharf, or travel between towns or cities.

In other words ­ full-blown Marxism.

The United Nations policy of “Sustainable Development” introduced in 1992
at the UNCED at Rio de Janero, and implemented through Habitat II and the
UN World Commission on Environment and Development ­ is taken directly
from the USSR Constitution, chapter 2, article 18, which reads:

“In the interests of the present and future generations, the necessary
steps are taken in the USSR to protect and make scientific, rational use
of the land and its mineral and water resources, and the plant and animal
kingdoms to preserve the purity of air and water, ensure reproduction of
natural wealth, and improve the human environment.”

National Party Prime Minister, Jim Bolger, attended the UN Earth Summit in
Rio de Janero in 1992 and signed on behalf of New Zealand to commit the
country to Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development.

Labour Party Prime Minister Helen Clark attended the follow-up summit in
Johannesburg August 26 ­ September 4 2002 aptly called the “World Summit
for Sustainable Development,” where she attended the head of state sessions.

The summit has since been nicknamed “Rio+10 because it marked the 10th
anniversary of the first Earth Summit at Rio.

NZ Environment Minister Marion Hobbs led a 35-strong delegation to the giant
summit, and was one of five vice-presidents nominated by the UN to lead the
summit comprised of about 45,000 delegates.

Not only was N. M. Rothschild agent, Maurice Strong, Secretary-General
of the UN 1992 Rio Earth Summit, he personally worked with UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan to appoint three of his own Earth Charter Commissioners to the
12-man advisory panel of the Johannesburg Summit.

I WORLD CONSERVATION BANK

In September 1987, the 4th World Wilderness Congress was held in Denver,
Colorado, USA, which established the World Conservation Bank.

The congress was setup by none other than London’s (late) Baron Edmond de
Rothschild, chairman of Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild, Geneva,
Switzerland, and one of the trustees of the International Wilderness
Foundation that sponsored the conference.

Approximately 1500 of the world’s most powerful bankers and leaders
attended the congress, which was chaired by Rothschild agent and Canadian multi
billionaire, Maurice Strong.

At the congress, Edmond de Rothschild designated eminent financier I. Michael
Sweatman to be the first president of the World Conservation Bank.

Sweatman wrote the forward of the banks charter.

Leading insiders of the biggest banks and UN agencies in the world were
present,including Maurice Strong “Mr Sustainable,” David Rockefeller head
of the ChaseManhattan Bank “Mr Development” and Mr David Ruckleshaus head
of the UN Environmental Protection Agency “Mr Environment” ­ of course!

The World Conservation Bank is destined to become the final World Bank and
the “de-coupling mechanism” for City of London parent banks to take over the
assets of every country of the world.

The essence of their secret plan is this: After an orchestrated period of global
financial chaos triggered by a major war in the Middle East or man-made state
of emergency or natural disaster, in which most of the world’s banks will be
deliberately collapsed in the process, (wiping everybody’s savings out in the
crash), key City of London banking parent creditors, are going to takeover
all the “mort-gages” (death-bonds) and assets of the world, and transfer them
to the World Conservation Bank.

The plan is very esoteric and cunning, and very difficult for most to understand.

Already most government treasury departments are preparing for such an event.

As part of the preparation for this momentous event, all of the world’s individual
currencies are to be merged into two or three major currency groups, two of which
are the euro and US dollar.

Finally, these currencies are to be replaced with the World Conservation Bank’s
new electronic global currency, the “Earth Dollar.”

This new currency is deceptively to be issued against the collateral of 34 percent
of the Earth’s surface that is presently being transferred into huge UN Heritage
Parks and Conservation areas in every country across the globe,under the crafty
deception “Sustainable Development.”

In short, the biggest banking conspiracy and deception ever to face mankind!

George W. Hunt, (95 Camino Basque, Boulder, Colorado 80302, U.S.A.), a US businessman,
attended the congress and produced a video about it exposing their wicked and
incredibly deceptive plans.

On his video he plays excerpts of key speeches recorded at the congress.

One such speech was made by David Lang, a leading US financier and close
personal friend and business partner of Maurice Strong, who said:”When the
auditor finally gets his hands into the balance sheet, I suggest therefore that
this be sold not through a democratic process. That would take too long and
devour far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder unfortunately
which populates the earth.

We have to take an almost elitist program that we can see beyond our swollen
bellies and look to the future in time frames and in results ­ which are not
easily understood or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down
to some sort of simplistic definition.””CANNON-FODDER!” ­ this is what these
leading, arrogant, banking conspirators of the UN “Sustainable Development,”
“SmartGrowth,” and World Conservation policies think of the world general
population ­ including all New Zealanders.

THESE are the wicked men that all the millions and millions of naïve local/
central government politicians and business leaders throughout the world are
now following.

The New Zealand government has already met its commitment and transferred
over 34 per cent of the entire country’s land area into UN Heritage Areas
and Conservation Parks under this deceptive plan.

New Zealanders need to wake up and wake up fast.

J COMMUNIST “SMARTGROWTH”

The main business facilitators and organizations of the UN Sustainable
Development policies in the Asia-Pacific Region are the Pacific Rim Institute
of Sustainable Management, the NZ Business Council for Sustainable
Development and the Melbourne-based Sustainable Investment Research Group(SIRIS).

Equity in this group, SIRIS, coincidentally, is held by IOOF Funds Management
and broking house JBWere ­ that provide research for N.M. Rothschild & Sons’
Ethical Share Trust based in London.

The 1995 session the United Nations General Assembly passed a number of rules.
Rule 61, 62 and 63 gave local government, civil organizations and private
citizens the right to participate directly in the development and implementation
of these documents.Directed by the IMF, World Bank, UN, and Prince of Wales
International Business Leaders Forum, the philosophy of “sustainable development”
basicallysays that there are too many people on planet earth and there are not
enough resources to go around.

What we need to do is urgently reduce the population, preserve, conserve,and
“ration” the remaining resources ­ and that the United Nations is the only body
that can do it.

The World Bank already has a huge statistical database on countries and individuals
­ what they produce and what resources they consume, water, energy,food, raw materials,
heat, waste, health, social services etc.

If the net figure is a plus, they are considered to be good productive worldcitizens.

If it is a negative, they are in line for liquidation.

These are all basically the same old Socialist/Communist ideas as the
“Marxist/Leninist” philosophy and “planned economy” that permeated the old Soviet Union.

In 1992 at Rio, another key “Soviet-styled” strategy proposed by the Agenda
21 Programme of Action from the United Nations Conference on the Environment and
Development (UNCED) was “SmartGrowth.”

This agenda can be found in a UN companion book called “Global Biodiversity
Assessment” published by Cambridge University Press.

It proposes to model all the cities of the world on the Israel Moses Seif P.E.P
plan, and the “planned” economic system of development used by Lenin and Stalin
under the old Communist Soviet system of local government. The UN “SmartGrowth” legislation in the United States was first passed inthe State of Maryland in March 1997. Since then, it has been gradually introduced by city and district councils all around the world ­ including our own here in New Zealand.Of course, rarely if ever will you hear of the policy coming from a foul brood of UN international bankers. While virtually all of the general public are oblivious of this fact, usually individual councils will be happy to credit themselves as authors of the plans. K BRIBERY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLITICIANSBased on a City of London corporate banking formula, a policy to provide “more appropriate rates of remuneration for council members” was planned for in the Local Government Act (No.2) 1989. This was essentially recommended to effectively “bribe” City Council, District Council, Regional Council and Community Board members throughout New Zealand, particularly in the bigger councils, to implement the FabianSocialist policies from the Central Government and Treasury which aimed to dramatically increase property rates and taxes in the future, whetherratepayers or constituents agreed with them or not.Subsequently, these sweeping remuneration changes were proposed by the politically appointed Higher Salaries Commission on April 2002 increasing1 Auckland Mayor John Banks annual salary from $47,007 to $146,107, a pay rise of $99,1002 Manukau Mayor Sir Barry Curtis a pay rise of $35,111,3 Hamilton Mayor David Braithwaite a pay rise of $27,381,4 Auckland Regional Council Chairwoman Gwen Bull a pay rise $37,872 and 5 Tauranga Mayor Jan Beange a pay rise of $9461. Since April 2002, it is not just a coincidence that these are precisely thecouncils that have been amongst the biggest culprits who have demanded themost onerous rates rise from their struggling citizens. For example, Tauranga City’s proposed average rate rise for the 2006-2007 year was leveled at 16.3 per cent (when inflation, wage rises, benefits, pensions etc. and the change in the consumer price index was running at about 3 per cent). Even a five year old kindergarten child knows that this huge disparity is entirely unfair and “unsustainable” for the majority of their citizens,yet these highly paid Lord Mayors, Councilors and UN vassals of the realmhave the cheek and audacity to call their plans “SmartGrowth” and “Sustainable Development.” L PAUPERIZATION OF PENSIONERS AND THE MIDDLE CLASSJust as there is a “close relationship” between the remuneration rises of leading local body politicians with the overall level of council rate-risedemand, so there is a “close relationship” between the level of council rate-rise impositions and the financial status of people living in each council ward or constituency.The Fabian bankers already “own” the properties held by ratepayers with a “mort-gage” on them. This includes all private homes, farms, businesses and commercial property, local and central government debt. All young people with student loans and welfare beneficiary groups also come under this category.By and large central bankers believe this group is not a worry as they are already under their strict control and firmly in their grip through welfare dependency or mort-gage “death-bond” fealty. But the one group that Fabian Socialists hate the most are the “freehold” property-owners.Hence, this group, more often than not, is the “middle class” that is predominantly comprised of middle-aged citizens and more particularlypensioners who are generally the most asset-rich. As a result of this phenomenon, all global residential property taxation and ratepayer tax policies are now being subtly targeted against these particular groups to confiscate all their properties. Essentially the Fabian City of London banks envisage this to be achievedthrough a variety of measures including onerous council rate-rises, capitalgains taxes on more

ALL LABOUR PRIME MINISTERS HAVE BEEN FABIANS- GET YOUR HEAD AROUND THAT LABOUR VOTERS!!

http://www.halisa-eu.net/mgt/FTA/glc/#F

A LADY ELDERLY ON RADIO JUST SAID ” THE COUNTRY IS IN A TERRIBLE MESS- THAT IT’S CAPITALISM TO BLAME THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT IS NOT ANYWHERE NEAR AS GOOD AS THE LAST ONES”…………..THEREI LIES THE PROBLEM- THIS IS NOT PURELY CAPITALISM – THIS GOVERNMENT IS A FABIAN ONE AS LABOUR BEFORE- WE NOW SEE THEIR GRADUALIST OUTCOME THAT HAS DEVASTATED THIS COUNTRY–AND IT AIN’T FINISHED YET!!

RED KEN AIDED BY ANOTHER LEFT WING GOON ARE IN THE LBC RADIO SEAT TODAY- SPOUTING THEIR COMMIE AGENDA – HOW CONFIDENT THE COMMUNISTS ARE!!!

PRETENSE CAN ONLY EXIST A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME- REALITY WILL COME ONE DAY- THEN?

George Orwell – 1984 Book 3, Chapter 3
– Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

George Orwell – 1984
– If you want to imagine the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.