The Death of American Democracy by Anthony Lawson
July 8, 2011
Anthony Lawson has produced an excellent new video entitled “The Death of American Democracy”. This video deals with the corrupting influence of fifth column Zionists who undermine the American republic from within the corridors of power. This video is highly-recommended viewing.
sample of comments left first few…
@alawson911 Such a well made intelligent video, Its nice to see people using their time and skills to make great work like this, you sir have all my respect ! (for what its worth) lol
Mankindfails 3 weeks ago
User@Mankindfails
Thank you. The respect of someone like you is worth far more than the respect of the majority of the so-called world leaders who are wrecking our planet.
alawson911 3 weeks ago 3
35K views?!
Amazing viewing outreach!
thumminxy 1 month ago 3
AMERICAS’ POODLE- NO WAY- ISRAELS POODLES!!
http://www.bollyn.com/home#article_13085
ISRAELS’ WARS FOUGHT WITH GENTILE BLOOD!!
BRITISH men and women are fighting in Afghanistan. It has nothing to do with 9-11 and everything to do with constructing a gas pipeline to carry Israeli-owned gas to India and China.
A BRITISH soldier in Afghanistan fighting for the Zionist agenda and its state founded on terrorism.
ZOG OF BRITAIN SACRIFICING BRITONS BLOOD FOR THAT OF ISRAELIS!!!!
Centurean2\'s Weblog 
Bollyn’s research is supported by his readers.
Please, donate today.
http://www.bollyn.com/home#article_13085
History, facts and truth are all Divine products, and must prevail.
– Charles A. Briggs
My research and analysis of 9-11 is very different from what you will find anywhere in the controlled mainstream media or alternative press. My 9-11 material will not be discussed in any of the 9-11 conferences or media coverage in the coming week not because it is incorrect or biased in any way. The only reason my 9-11 writings are not discussed in the media is because they get much too close to the truth, which is something nobody in the media wants to go anywhere near.
The American people are woefully deceived about what really happened on 9-11 and have become enslaved to lies, which is why U.S. troops are killing and being killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. The population of the United States is burdened by deception primarily because most Americans blindly trust in the cherished notion that they have a “free press”. Trusting what they hear on television, Americans are terribly misinformed by the deception of the controlled media and press.
The American troops in Afghanistan are not waging war to protect the United States or to defend any American ideal. They are killing and dying in an evil war of conquest in a place few Americans had ever been prior to October 2001. Very few Americans understand why U.S. men and women are fighting in Afghanistan. It has nothing to do with 9-11 and everything to do with constructing a gas pipeline to carry Israeli-owned gas to India and China.
An American soldier in Afghanistan fighting for the Zionist agenda and its state founded on terrorism.
The controlled media is lying through its teeth to the American people just like the C.I.A., the F.B.I., and the so-called “elected” members of Congress and the U.S. government. Any person or agency who is party to deceiving the American people is clearly not on their side. These liars are the domestic enemies of the American republic. To deceive the people into sending their sons, husbands, fathers, and daughters to fight wars of aggression is criminal and treasonous.
My mission is to simply expose the deception in order to give the American people the information they need to protect themselves and their families. I need your help to do that. Please, contribute to Bollyn.com. Thank you.
“The fact that you are giving your book [Solving 9-11] away for free, which I’m sure you worked very hard at, is even all the more impressive. May your work enlighten everyone.”
– R.W., professional flight instructor, USA
I saw your article on 9-11 in the Tehran Times yesterday and I was very impressed with your research. I had read about the Israel connection some time ago but after reading your article it put everything into perspective… [Noam] Chomsky and others have been writing about Israel for many years, but they are unwilling to really get to the heart of their activities like you have.
– Dr. C.J., Grand Junction, Colorado
“You are providing a unique and needed perspective on current events.”
– V.G. in Massachusetts
The European press is much more honest than the Zionist-controlled press in the United States about Israel and its egregious act of piracy on May 31, 2010. Such critical perspectives and information about Israeli state terrorism are not found in the U.S. media.
Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit.
– Socrates (469-399 B.C.) in Plato’s Politiea (Republic)
My research and writings are available on this website thanks to the contributions of concerned citizens who donate to my work. Thousands of people visit my website, read, copy and repost my material. My recent article “How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11” , for example, is currently found on thousands of websites — but very few readers contribute.
The information and original articles found on my website are the result of years of research. You won’t find such accurate and detailed information (and analysis) anywhere else, least of all in the controlled press of the United States. A recent editorial by veteran American journalist Alex Beam (Newsweek and Boston Globe) explains that the controlled press in the U.S. has a long history of publishing stories that are nothing but lies:
In Luce’s day, a cadre of gorgeous, brilliant women from the Seven Sisters colleges backstopped this modern-day rendering plant as fact-checkers. In the late 1970s, about half the fact-checkers were men, so in addition to pouring vodka I checked facts, a process that left me bleakly cynical about journalistic accuracy. We would publish whole stories that were lies — Francois Mitterrand’s plan to destroy the French economy was a recurring theme — but at least the names were spelled correctly.
– “Ye Olde Newsweek” by Alex Beam
HOW TO SUPPORT MY WORK – I am not compensated for my research and do not carry any advertising on my site, but my efforts take time and money. Support from my readers is what keeps this website going. If you find my work worthwhile, please donate to Bollyn.com today by clicking on the donation button in the left-hand margin or send a donation via PayPal (choose the “personal gift” method) to bollyn@bollynbooks.com — Thank you for your support.
Bollyn and Professor Steven Jones examine the evidence of Thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center at B.Y.U. in the spring of 2006. Jones subsequently found large amounts of super-Thermite in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers proving that the WTC had been exploded using a extremely advanced nano-composite of Thermite. This evidence proves that neither Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the pre-planned demolition of the three towers on 9-11. The government explanations for the cause of the three collapses are nothing but fabrications and lies.
BRITISH men and women are fighting in Afghanistan. It has nothing to do with 9-11 and everything to do with constructing a gas pipeline to carry Israeli-owned gas to India and China.
A BRITISH soldier in Afghanistan fighting for the Zionist agenda and its state founded on terrorism.
ZOG OF BRITAIN SACRIFICING BRITONS BLOOD FOR THAT OF ISRAELIS!!!!
HOW SWEET IT MUST BE TO HAVE SUCH A SELECTIVE MEMORY- FORGET WHAT YOUR OWN CRIMES??
http://www.pgorg.com/russianholocaust.html
10 TO 12 MILLION STARVED TO DEATH….
Judaic Russian Holocaust
The word “holocaust” is linked quite correctly with the Jews but not in the way presented by the Jewish-controlled Press which carefully ignores one of the real Jewish Holocausts – the Russian Revolution. This was probably one of the bloodiest genocidal revolutions ever perpetrated. The figures of those who died runs to 20-30 million. It saw the destruction of the aristocracy, the intelligentsia and the peasants -the term “kulak” which is linked with this homicide derived from the word for a “fist” was originally used by the peasants to distinguish exploitive elements, i.e. usurers, sub-renters of land, etc.,from the farming peasantry. During collectivisation the term “kulak” was used against any peasant – rich or poor – who was opposed to entering the collective farms.
The political theory of Communism was entirely Jewish from its inception whilst the Bolshevik Revolution was funded by Jewish bankers. Thus the two apparently diametrically opposing theories – communism and capitalism – both stemmed from the same people. Their intention (as it is still) is the destruction of the existing social systems, attacking religion and the family in order to establish a Jewish-controlled state over a voiceless proletariat. The book “The Whisperers” by Orlando Figes clearly shows the fear engendered by constant surveillance and the creation of imaginary “enemies of the people” which transformed ordinary people into voiceless sheep afraid even to bleat, a situation that is rapidly taking root elsewhere in the world. Interestingly enough however the book avoids all mention of the dominant Judaic character of the Bolcheviks although when an Anti-Jewish sentiment arose among the ethnic Russians after the end of the war the Jewish “victims” are accorded sympathetic publicity. Perhaps this was necessary in order to get the book published?
The Communist regime created the largest concentration camps and the most horrendous slave labour system of the 20th century, in which millions of gentiles and Christians were slaughtered ( cf. C. Andrew and O. Gordievsky, KGB: The Inside Story and N.Y. Times, Oct. 22, 1990, p. 82.) None of these camps are being preserved for posterity. Most were destroyed long ago by special military brigades; (cf. Michael Specter, “Cold Reminder,” N.Y. Times, Dec. 3, 1994).
The movement was staffed in its upper echelons by Judaic Communists and yet the world is comparatively silent about the identity of the persons who were its architects. Auschwitz is on the tip of every tongue but who has heard of Kolyma, Magadan, the Solovetsky islands and the other infernal Soviet centres of human destruction in eastern Siberia? Who has seen films and books about the millions of human beings worked, frozen and starved to death in the construction of the White Sea-Baltic Canal, over which stood a triumphant, colossal statue of the Judaic Communist mass murderer Genrikh Yagoda?
The Judaic Communist epoch of mass murder has disappeared into history in one of the great vanishing acts of all time. Only practised deceivers, with all the sleight of hand of the most accomplished stage magicians, could pull off such a coup against the rest of humanity. The ability to trick mankind into focusing nearly all expiatory sentiment, monuments and commemoration on Judaic victims and brand the words “war crime” and “holocaust” – on Germany and upon Germans alone as their proprietary trademark, must be regarded as one of the most masterful achievements of psychological warfare in the annals of illusion.
Israeli power has expanded commensurate with the expansion of “Holocaust” propaganda, as noted by the Israeli author Moshe Leshem :
“Israelis and American Jews fully agree that the memory of the Holocaust is an indispensable weapon – one that must be used relentlessly against their common enemy. …Jewish organizations and individuals thus labour continuously to remind the world of it. In America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust memory is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which is government-funded.” ( Balaam’s Curse, p. 228)
The self-hating Germans are not the only targets of corrosive gas chamber guilt. The Catholic Church (the main target) is now no more than a Judaic version of Catholicism helped along by the last Jewish Pope – whilst the Protestants have become a huge turkey flock toadying in search of Judaic sanctification and approbation. Their saviour called the Jewish leadership of his time, “the children of hell” (Matthew 23:15) but those who presume to speak in His name today, call them the saints and sages of the cosmos.
Only in such a profoundly falsified world soaked in fraud could the international media sit by, uninterested, as the great-great grandson of the blood-drenched Jewish Red Army commander Leon Trotsky, David Axelrod, shot to death an elderly Palestinian couple in November 1990, as part of an Israeli “Kach” terror group raid.
Sixteen million ethnic Germans were forcibly expelled from Silesia, Moravia and the Volga regions of the eastern territories at the end of the World War II. Ask anyone on the street today – “Have you heard?” The answer will be no.
The Steven Spielberg movie images of cattle cars jammed with human cargo are reserved for Jewish victims alone. The 800,000 mostly Muslim Chechens deported by Judaic commissars and savagely stuffed into railway cars to Kazakhstan, where a quarter of a million died enroute, do not meet Hollywood’s standard of cinematic focus.
The Soviet cattle car deportations afflicted more than a half-million Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Christians who were shipped to the Gulag. 12% of the entire Baltic population was either deported to Siberia or executed by the Jewish Soviet Secret Police. Who knows of it? Who cares? Who tries to keep this history from repeating? Instead, in 1995 the president of Lithuania made a pilgrimage to the Israeli gas chamber shrine at Yad Vashem to grovel and beg “forgiveness” for his people who were the victims of the Jewish Communist murderers. To seek forgiveness in all humility is ordained when it is predicated on the truth. To do so based on false witness in order to idolize the Pharisees is a mockery of justice.
“The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss…Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.”
(Statement of President Richard Nixon in 1971, as recorded at the White House on tape and released by the National Archives in 1999. The reference is to Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss. (Sources: N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)
A letter sent to the Vatican by Pius XII in 1919, when he was Bishop Eugenio Pacelli and papal nuncio in Munich…reports on his deputy’s unpleasant encounter with Bolshevik revolutionaries who were then terrorizing Catholic priests and the German bourgeoisie. The letter describes the leader, Max Lieven as a ‘… Russian and a Jew.’ The letter also describes Mr. Lieven’s companions, ‘…Jews like the rest of them.’…Bishop Pacelli’s description of Jewish Communists…was hardly uncommon 80 years ago.” (N.Y. Times, Nov. 3, 1999).
Chaim Bermant, writing in the Jewish Chronicle (Aug. 30, 1991), says:
“It was Communism which toppled the hated Czars, Communism which removed Jewish disabilities and proscribed anti-Semitism, and Communism which, in its early days at least, opened the doors to Jewish advancement.
The top Communist Judaic official Zinoviev stated:
“Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Volodarsky, let there be floods of the blood of the bourgeoisie–more blood! As much as possible!”
(Krasnaya Gazeta, Sept. 1, 1918).
Lenin declared, “We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class.” His partner in crime, Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) stated: “The interests of the revolution require the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class.” Who were these bourgeoisie? Certainly not Jews. Trotsky gave a clue to their identity in a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper, Daily Forward: “The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere.” Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime punishable by death. (Izvestia, July 27, 1918).
The Judaic Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest control. Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant “bourgeoisie” was their prime motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian peasantry of Russia as so many vermin, beginning with Lenin’s attack on them in the summer of 1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been almost completely ignored in Western history.
The Siberian novelist Valentin Rasputin wrote in 1990:
“I think today the Jews here in Russia should feel responsible for the sin of having carried out the revolution and for the shape it took. They should feel responsible for the terror…that existed during the revolution and especially after the revolution…their guilt is great. They perpetrated the relentless campaign against the peasant class whose land was brutally expropriated by the state and who themselves were ruthlessly murdered.”
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s biographer recounts what it was like to grow up as a Russian Christian child among the children of the Jewish communist elite:
“By the age of ten he had the cross ripped from his neck by jeering Pioneers and for over a year was held up to ridicule… Solzhenitsyn was, as a boy, exposed to students whose parents had an officially superior status. Most of the members of the Young Pioneers and Komsomol movements, at least in Rostov, were Jewish children…” (Michael Scammell, Solzhenitsyn: A Biography, p. 64).
According to the internationally-syndicated RNS wire service (reprinted in “The Christian News,” Jan. 8, 1996, p. 2), “Some 200,000 (Christian) clergy, many crucified, scalped and otherwise tortured, were killed during the approximately 60 years of communist rule in the former Soviet Union, a Russian commission reported Monday (Nov. 27, 1995)…40,000 churches (were) destroyed in the period from 1922 to 1980…”
In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
The following is a list of some top Judaic Communist murderers, commissars, spies, assassins and propagandists (aliases are listed in parentheses). This list is by no means comprehensive.
V.I. Lenin, supreme dictator.
Leon Bronstein (Trotsky) : supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army.
Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) : executive, Soviet Secret Police.
Solomon Lozovsky : deputy Soviet foreign minister.
Maxim Wallach (Litvinov) : Soviet foreign minister.
Yuri Andropov: director, Soviet KGB, later supreme dictator of the Soviet Union.
Jacob Sverdlov : first president of the Soviet Union. Sverdlov ordered the massacre of the Czar’s family–women and children–in the town named after Catherine the Great, Yekaterinburg, (renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in honor of the murderer).
Jacob Yurovsky : commander, Soviet Secret Police. Yurovsky led the death squad which carried out Sverdlov’s order for the murder of the Czar’s family.
Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich : chief mass murderer for Stalin, ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
Mikhail Kaganovich : deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of slave labor, brother of Lazar.
Rosa Kaganovich : Stalin’s mistress; sister of Lazar.
Paulina Zhemchuzina: member of the Central Committee and wife of Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov.
Olga Bronstein : officer, Soviet Cheka Secret Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.
Lavrenti Beria. Beria was Stalin’s party associate and confidante from their native Georgia. In 1938 he was put in charge of the dreaded NKVD. Beria was responsible for the infamous Katyn massacre of captive Polish soldiers and intellectuals. Beria was also in charge of the Gulag prison system that sent millions to oblivion. Beria was noted for having his bodyguards kidnap young schoolgirls so that he could rape them in his Lubyanka office, which doubled as a torture chamber.
Genrikh Yagoda : chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer extraordinaire.
Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel : founders, the Gulag death camp system.
Lev Inzhir, commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration.
Boris Berman : executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother of Matvei.
K.V. Pauker : chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police.
Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk : commissars of death camps and slave labour, supervised the mass deaths of labourers during the construction of the White Sea-Baltic Canal.
Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army; officer, Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the Spanish Civil War. He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and peasants in Spain.
Yona Yakir : general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee.
At least one hundred Soviet generals were Jewish (cf. Canadian Jewish News, April 19, 1989).
Generals who were not themselves Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among these were Marshal Voroshilov, Marshal Bulganin, Marshal Peresypkin and General Pavel Sudoplatov (Sudoplatov assassinated hundreds of Christian leaders including Ukranian Catholic Archbishop Teodor Romzha). This Jewish wife “insurance policy” extended to Politburo members such as Andrei Andreyev and Leonoid Brezhnev.
Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted Christian peasants as hideous, money-grabbing parasites.
KOMZET : commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on land seized from murdered Christians in Ukraine; funded by Jewish-American financier Julius Rosenwald.
Ilya Ehrenburg , Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of anti-German hate material dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg instigated the Soviet Red Army rape and murder of German civilians. Referring to German women, Ehrenburg gloated to the advancing Red Army troops, “that blonde hag is in for a bad time.”
The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the extermination of the entire German people (cf. Pravda, April 14, 1945. [Pravda was also published in a Yiddish edition, Einikeyt). Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize. He willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem ‘Holocaust’ Museum.
Solomon Mikhoels : commissar of Soviet propaganda.
Soviet film propagandists: Mark Donsky, Leonid Lukov, Yuli Reisman, Vasily Grossman,Yevgeny Gabrilovich, Boris Volchok and Lillian Hellman (old movies written by her continue to be broadcast on American telelvision).
Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC): new form of the Bolshevik YEVKOM, Stalin’s recruiting conduit for funding money, supplies and political influence for Soviet Russia from world Jewry as well as the dissemination of gas chamber atrocity propaganda (cf. The Black Book).
Nikolai Bukharin: Lenin’s chief theorist.
Samuel Agursky : commissar.
Karl Radek : member, Central Committee.
Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin): commissar.
A.A. Yoffe : commissar.
David Ryazanov : advisor to Lenin.
Lev Grigorievich Levin : physician, poisoner of Stalin’s enemies.
Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev): member of the Central Committee.
Ivan Maisky : Soviet Ambassador to Britain.
Bela Kun (Kohen) : supreme dictator of Hungary in 1919. Kun was later Stalin’s chief terrorist in the Crimea. Kun’s eventual successor was Matyas Rakosi, Jewish Communist mass murderer of Christians in Hungary. According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 14, 1997, Jews “…played key roles in ushering Communist rule into Hungary. In fact, during the brutal oppression of the early 1950s, the regime’s top five leaders were Jews. ”
Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade): commander, Yugoslav Communist People’s Army. Tito’s top butcher of hundreds of thousands of Croatian Christians. Pijade later served as president of the Yugoslav Communist Parliament. At least eighteen generals in the Yugoslav Communist People’s Army were Jewish. The Yugoslavian communist party sent massive arms shipments to Jewish fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.
In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Jewish communists: the torturer Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police; the Politboro commander Jacob Berman and commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski . These men murdered or deported to Kolyma and the other Arctic death camps, tens of thousands of Catholic Poles.
As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observes, “The average Pole could not but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the country – Berman and Minc – were both Jewish as was the dreaded security official Rozanski .” (N.Y. Review of Books, Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).
It is interesting to note that the previous “Polish” (with a Jewish mother) occupant of the papacy, John Paul II , consistently lent his prestige and his presence to canonizations and commemorations of politically correct victims of the Nazis. Nowhere did this Pope breathe a word about the openly Jewish, Communist massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics, Croatian Catholics, Lithuanian Catholics–he was too busy, intoning the Shoah, referring to the heirs of the Pharisees as “our Elder Brothers in the Faith” giving official recognition to an Israeli state which even many orthodox, Haredi rabbis regard as a blasphemous and abominable entity, and attacking the German people as “the image of the beast.”
——————————————————————————–
IRAN ISN’T PLANNING TO RULE THE WORLD EITHER MR NETTY-YAHOO!
http://www.pgorg.com/talmudic.html
The Talmudic New World Order
Mention conspiracy and everyone runs for cover.
It is extremely rare today to find information about the ancient conspiracy due to the mass censorship of the printed word and the unwillingness of the general population to consider as a possibility something which they have been brought up since birth to see as outrageous and ridiculous. Every generation is born into a world of greater and greater censorship and illusion. Eventually it will be impossible to trace the true history of the Jews and their destructive influence. Everyone will have become so “Judaizised” that the very thought of a Judaic oppression would be alien to the minds of all.
:” It is part of the moral tragedy with which we are dealing that words like democracy, freedom, rights, freedom, justice which have so often inspired heroism and have led men to give their lives for things which make life worthwhile, can also become a trap, the means of destroying the very things men desire to uphold.”
( Sir Norman Angell (1874 – 1967), 1956.)
The question whether this Talmudic conspiracy actually exists must be asked and the evidence presented. That it is long standing is proved from the Bible:
Jeremiah around 590 BC: 11.9: “And the ‘I am’ said unto me : a conspiracy is found among the men of Judah and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem”
Ezekiel around 585 BC: 22.25 :
“There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey they have devoured souls…”
22.6 :
: “Her priests have violated my law…”
22-27:
“Her princes in the midst thereof are like wolves ravening the prey to shed blood and to destroy souls to get dishonest gain”
The implementation of the Talmudic New World Order was clearly seen and accurately predicted in the eighteenth century by Benjamin Franklin:
“For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate and that they have been exiled from their homeland as they called Palestine but, gentlemen, if the world gave it to them in fee simple, they would , once it had been given to them, have found some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only amongst themselves. They must subsist amongst other people not of their race . If you do not exclude them in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, whilst they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands.”
(From a statement made at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787.)
The evidence for the existence of a plan is shown from the various Jewish Encyclopaedias and the most revealing insight into the modus agendi and the modus operandi of the world manipulators is acquired by reading the Protocols.
Not only does this document illuminate the reason for the massive success of international Zionism but it provides profound insight into every single political situation of the last century and sheds great light on much of what has transpsired for the past 2000+ years on the world stage.
Subsequent to their arrival in western Europe, many Jews came out of the ghetto and took part in all the great revolutions of the 19th century, including the revolution of 1829 and the revolution of 1848, and the overthrow of one of the last monarchs still opposing Jewish advancement – the Romanov dynasty of Russia. The Jews had long thought to overthrow the Czar and it was up to Jewish philosophers such as Hess and Marx to contrive a philosophy that could make such overthrow possible, financed by the international Jewish bankers of New York, London and Hamburg.
In its article on Socialism, the Jewish Encyclopaedia published in 1905 freely admits that Jews in Russia were ripe for revolution. The later Encyclopaedia Judaica states:
” the communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life particularly in the 1920s and 1930s and during and after World War II.”
The Judaica in fact presents an extensive list of the most powerful Jewish leaders of socialism. It says :
” anti-Semitism drove the bulk of Russian Jewish youth into the ranks of the Bolchevik regime”.
When the White Russians attempted heroically to regain their freedom from the Jews, the Judaica says:
“compact Jewish masses were legalised by the bolcheviks to depress such counter-revolution. Jews and native Russians were engaged in a death struggle over the destiny of Russia.”
Unfortunately the Jewish masses won. A rare photo shows the first People’s Commissariat and from left to right all were Jews. In 1918 intelligence services of the western powers were buzzing with reports that communism was an international conspiracy forumulated by atheist Jews as inded it was and is.
None other that Nikita Kruschev give an eye-opening view of just how many Jews were still in the Soviet Government. Speaking to a delegation of French socialists Kruschev admitted in 1956:
“the government has found in some of its departments a heavy concentration of Jewish people – upwards of 50% of the staff “.
Because communism has been top heavy with Jews, Soviet policy of so-called anti-semitism much protested by Jews in the West may in reality be but a ploy to distract the world from communism’s Jewish past.
The Jewish Encyclopaedia states in its article on socialism says
“the passion of many Jews to socialise the world was not confined to Russia, as peddlars of socialism, Jews must be reckoned as among the pioneers of the socialist parties of America.”
Jews have been active in the United States in all radical movements : socialist and communist. They also dominate the American Civil Liberty Union.
The main function of the ACLU is to attempt to protect the communist and their advocacy of force and violence to overthrow the government. Today the ACLU is led by Jewish national director, Aaron Glassen. The feminist movement within the agenda of free abortions and lesbian rights also contained a lopsided number of Jews in its national leadership.
It will be seen therefore that a study of Jewish literature in a synagogue library reveals there does exist a tendency towards Jewish domination of our society.
Where is all this heading?
In 1865 a certain Jewish rabbi named Rzeichorn delivered a speech at Prague which is a very accurate summary of many aspects of the Protocols. It is also a stark eye-opener for anyone who harbours the impression that true Orthodox Judaism is a religion like others based upon the pursuit of spiritual betterment, love and universal peace. Just like the Protocols the plan described within has provably come to pass.
“Gold in the hands of experts will always be the most useful weapon for those who possess it and an object of envy for those who are without it. With gold one can buy the most upright consciences. With gold one can fix the value of every stock, or every merchandise, one can loan it to states that afterwards one holds at one’s mercy. Already the principal banks, the stock exchanges throughout the world, the loans to all the governments are in our hands. The other great power is the Press by ceaselessly repeating certain ideas the Press in the end makes them considered as true. The theare renders similar services. Everywhere theatre and press follow our directives.”
“An indefatigable campaign in favour of the democratic form of government will divide the Gentiles amongst themselves in political parties, and we shall thus destroy the unity of their nations. We will sow the seed of discord. Powerless they will have to accept the law of our banks, always united, always devoted to our cause.”
“We will push the Christians into war by judicious exploitation of their pride. They will massacre each other and thus make more space where we can place our own people. The possession of land has always procured influence and power. In the name of social justice and equality we will divide the great properties. We will give small fragments of these properties to the peasants who desire them with all their heart but who will soon be indebted to us by the very exploitation of these properties. Our capital will enable us to become the real masters. In our turn we shall become the great owners of land and this possession will assure our power.”
“Let us use all our force to replace the circulation of gold by that of paper. Our banks will absorb the gold and we shall decide then what value the paper money will have. This will make us the masters of every man’s existence. We will have amongst ourselves many fine orators capable of feigning enthusiasm and of convincing the masses. We will send them among the nations to announce the changes that will make for the happiness and prosperity of mankind. By gold and by flattery we will win the proloteriat who will take on their shoulders the job of exterminating Christian capitalism. We will promise to the workers salaries that they have never even dared dream of, but we will also heighten the price of all necessities, so much so that our profits will be even greater.”
“In this manner we will prepare the revolutions that the Christians will conduct themselves and out of which we shall collect the fruits. By our jokes and by our attacks we will render their priests ridiculous and eventually odious. Their religion as ridiculous and as odious as their priests.”
The above agenda is so similar to that outlined in the Protocols of Zion that it cannot but be part of the same conspiracy.
More dramatically however the agenda outlined in the Protocols was foreshadowed with over two thousand years of similar documents, edicts and statements.
Both Communism and Zionism can be seen to be the two means by which the Protocols unfolded in the early twentieth century, whilst communism acted to tear down the Russian aristocratic system and to replace it with a tyranny and dictatorship led predominantly by Jews, thus placing a vast area of territory and human resources into the hands of the conspirators.
Zionism used the false accusation of the need for the establishment of the prophesised Jewish homeland to re-home the eastern Jews who were being persecuted in Russia. In fact as is shown from Government documents of the time the accusation of mass anti-Semitism and pogroms in Russia at the turn of the century against the Jews is massively exaggerated. This was essentially a press-led propaganda tactic employed in the west to further the aims of Zionist interest and to ease the passage of the mass of Eastern Jews who immigrated to the west in the late l9th and early 20th century.
Since the Second World War, the sole subject of the ancient conspiracy – the Jewish hatred of the Gentile nations – and the historical records which show the massive destructive influence which Jews have had upon mankind have all been made taboo.
The reaction to exposure of the ancient conspiracy is merely a pre-programmed pavlovian reaction created and instilled by the very perpetrators of the same ancient conspiracy. And today very few will dare speak above a whisper of that all-encompassing Judaic oppression of mankind.
By an interesting “coincidence” President Franklin Roosevelt from a Jewish family had 72 advisers around him when he led the USA into World War II, of which 52 were known Jews. The Elders of Zion, the Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish authority since Biblical times officially numbered 71.
Whilst in Britain in 1999 the Labour government admitted that it has 72 official “advisers” or spin doctors “- professional liars.
Recent world political history has been provably controlled and manipulated by Russian Jews who have no racial ties or origin in the land of Palestine
In 1920 Lord Northcliff, the owner of several newspapers as well as being joint proprietor of The TImes caused to be published in the Times an article called “The Jewish Peril – a Disturbing Pamphlet – Call for enquiry”. This article on the Protocols called for a proper investigation into the document. In February 1922 he set about a fervently anti-Zionist mission – a series of articles about what was really going on in Palestine.
On August 14th 1922 Northcliff died of “ulcerated endocarditis”. He had been confronted on a train to Evian-les-Bains in June by the editor of the Times, Wickham Steed, with a doctor who had certified Northcliff ” nsane” . On the strength of this he was barred from entering the offices of the Times by a police guard and the staff were ordered to ignore his communications. All of this without showing any outward signs of madness to those who later commented on his appearance and state of mind. However he had stated that he believed his life was in danger and that he was being poisoned.
This whole story was suppressed until the publication of the official history of the Times thirty years later in 1952. This one man, who had enough power to challenge the Protocols and Zionism on an international stage to an audience of millions and who was committed to illuminating the world as to the true agenda, had been removed.
.The often cited “fact” that the Protocols are a proven fraud is easily dismissed. It is entirely untrue and is based on a very specific court case. On the 26th June 1933 the Federation of Jewish Communities in Switzerland and the Berne Jewish Community brought an action against the members of the Swiss National Front seeking a judgement that the Protocols were a forgery and a prohibition of their publication.
The procedure of the court was an astounding fraud. The provisions of the Swiss Civil Code being deliberately set aside. 16 witnesses were called to the Plaintiffs but only one of the 40 witnesses called by the Defendants was allowed a hearing. The judge allowed the Plaintiff to appoint two private stenographers to keep the register of the proceedings during the hearing of their witnesses instead of entrusting the task to a court official. In view of these and similar irregularities it was not suprising that after the case had lasted just on two years the court pronounced the Protocols to be a forgery and demoralising literature. The decision was given on the 14th May 1935, but it was announced in the Jewish Press before it was delivered by the Court.
On the lst November 1937 the Swiss Court of Criminal Appeal squashed this judgement in its entirety. Jewish propagandists however still declare that the Protocols were “proved” to be a forgery.
Winston Churchill (himself of course an “agent”) wrote:
“It would almost seem that the Gospel of the Christ and the Gospel of Anti Christ were destined to originate amongst the same people. Can it be that such pervasive Jewish control which we are seeing today is the harbinger of even greater Jewish control to come?”
In the Book of Revelations a great harlot is described ruling the world riding on a horned-headed beast. Throughout the Old Testament Israel was described as a harlot, the mother of spiritual whoredom among nations. Is the harlot of Revelations actually Israel riding upon her false Messiah the anti-Christ?
Today many believe that Israel is on the road to fulfil one of the prophecies of Isaiah. A great Jewish temple is being planned A priestly class called the Cohn is being readied. Ritual sacrifices are being studied. Truly prophecy is being fulfilled. Christianity is being effectively outlawed. If a Christian were to walk in any town in Israel giving out New Testaments he could be sentenced to prison for five years.
Israel is not moving towards Christ she is moving towards her false Messiah as Christ. In Anti Christ Israel hopes to find all the worldly power and glory which Jesus denied her but she will not find it as the Bible teaches.
The place of Nature in Religion
At the outset of the century the ideas with mass followings remained the great religions. Their doctrines include various injunctions about nature.
The god of the ancient Hebrews enjoins:
” Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds and over every living thing that moves upon the earth” . Genesis 1:26-29
This and other biblical passages Genesis 9 :1-23 ” God tells Noa hand his sons:
“be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every bird of the air and upon everything that creeps upon the ground and all the fish of the sea; into your hand they are delivered. Every moving thing shall be food for you and as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.”
Who could ask for clearer licence to appropriate all the net primary productivity of the planet? These and other and other biblical passages inspired an argument to the effect that Christianity or the Judeo-Christain tradition uniquely encouraged environmental despoliation.
Every durable body of scripture is ambiguous, self contradictory and amenable to different interpretations to suit different circumstances, but these and other constraints affected environmental outcomes only modestly.
A variation on the Judeo-Christain theme is the notion that Western humanism, rationalism or the scientific revolution uniquely licensed environmental mayhem by depriving nature of its sacred character. It is true that western science helped recast environments everywhere indirecly by fomenting technological change.
Environmental change on earth is as old as the planet itself. Homo Sapiens has altered earthly environments for about four million years but there has never been anything like the twentieth century.
p>For most of human history people could not pollute the air except by kicking up a little dust. Then half a million years ago fire was harnessed. Landscapes were torched, releasing carbon dioxide and other gases into the air. But this made little atmospheric impact. Natural processes including the steady work of trillions of microbes and the occasional major volcanic eruption governed the atmosphere.
Since 1900 one thing above all else accounts for air pollution – fossil fuel combusion. In 1900 coal combustion caused most of the air pollution. Most of the things that changed environments came from economic activities.
The human race has undertaken a gigantic uncontrolled experiment on the earth and in environmental history the twentieth century stands alone because of the acceleration of so many processes that bring ecological change. Most of these processes are not new, timber has been cut, ore has been mined, wastes have been generated, crops have been grown and animals hunted for a long time. But since 1945 these things have been done more than ever before.
The ecological peculiarity of the twentieth century is a matter of scale. Air pollution previously only had a local impact but it has now grown on so comprehensive and large a scale that it affects the fundamentals of global atmospheric chemistry.
The environmental history of the twentieth century is different not only because ecological changes were greater and faster but also with increased intensities. For example incremental increases in fishing brought total collapse in some oceanic fisheries. Accumulation of many increased itensities may throw some grand switches producing some very basic changes on the earth.
The twentieth century would also appear equally unusual if one chartered the long term use of fresh water use, timber use or mineral use for industrial output All of these boomed after 1900 as did the generation of solid waste and of air and water pollution.
The use of artificial fertilisers allowing perhaps an extra two billion people to eat , systematically widened the gaps between rich and poor farmers around the world. Fertilisers mostly miss targets and become water pollutants . Estimates vary but something between half of the fertilisers applied end up in the waters of agricultural communities and their downstream neighbours.
The impact of chemical fertilisers did not stop with chemistry. They strongly influenced the choice of crops after 1950. Those that respond well to fertilisers, maize for example, spread far and wide replacing those that did not. Hence the trend towards more and more people eating fewer and fewer varieties of food. Two-thirds of grains now come from three plants: rice, wheat and maize.
Chemical fertiliser use also made food production dependent upon the fossil fuels needed for fertiliser production. It has recast the global phosphorus and nitrogen cycles and strongly favours all species that thrive on heavy diets of these nutrients. Whilst the chemistry industries of the twentieth century replenish the soil nutrients they have helped to contaminate the soil.
The effects of these planetary changes to humanity remain as yet unclear.
IRAN HASN’T TAKEN OVER AMERIKA!!
Judeo Christianity BULLSHIT
http://www.pgorg.com/judeoxianity.html
What happened to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John? By what surreptitious means has the New Testament, the handbook of Christianity, lost its place?
The main target for anyone aiming for full control had to be either to eliminate religion altogether or to blend it into an agreable format. In the West the main target was the Catholic Church the only bastion of Christianity until the fifteenth century.
Misguided Christians have been used to fight and support war from the 11th century Crusades to 20th century Iraq. The names have changed but the message has not. The Pope Urban 11 is said to have told the bishop and earls who were to lead the First Crusaders it was up to them to rid the Holy Land of infidels so “Jesus could return there.” The only difference now was “so that the Jews could return there”.
Ever since the 16th century reformation movement began, the countries of Europe have mainly been divided between Catholicism and different branches of Protestantism. In Great Britain the Protestant branch became known as the Anglican Church. The church came under the patronage of successive Protestant royal families, a tradition which was interrupted now and then, but managed to survive until the present day.
The United States by its very beginnings was a fertile ground for the new apostate churches to take root. The first settlers arrived with the Bible in one hand and their weapons in the other. A recent poll found that 59 percent of American evangelicals believe Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
At the time of the American Revolution and the wars against the British Empire, the Anglican Church in the United States was separated from its British counterpart, forming the Episcopal Church. This change had been necessary, as all the Anglican clergy had to swear allegiance to the British monarch. The Episcopal Church however did retain its classical Anglican theology.
Without doubt, like all man-made institutions, the church had its fair share of those who under the guise of serving God and preparing the way for the flock to enter the hereafter ensured for themselves a comfortable if not luxurious time on earth. However aside from them it must be remembered that for many the closure of the monasteries was a disaster. They had after all supplied the only available hospitals, places of learning and sanctuaries for the poor while the lands they held soon fell into the grasp of those only too happy to change their religion in exchange for monetary gain.
Slowly and steadily Christianity broke up into a myriad of different sects while the Catholic church was invaded by a variety of Jewish converts – notably the Borgias who managed to show how bad a Pope could really be. Step by step every effort was made to discredit the priesthood, whilst various Calvinists, Baptists and others, ranging from the strict adherents to the Old Testament chipped away at the fabric of Christianity, some even going as far as denying Jesus had existed.
Hand in hand with the concerted effort to discredit Christianity in every way possible another alternative belief reared its head. Not really classified as a religion but offering esoteric beliefs and enough secrecy to make it appealing. This was Freemasonry and it is strange to note how many men in high places in England and the continent joined.
Those who adopted the Old Testament and its teachings seemed oblivious of the fact that these teachings were specifically directed not at all people but to their own particular tribe.
To quote Voltaire’s comment on the Jews
“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”
Judeo Christianity
What does the term mean? Judaism overrun by Christianity? Christianity overrun by Judaism? Did not Christianity grow out of opposition to Judaism? Did not Christ throw the buyers and sellers from the temple? Was not Christ crucified at the behest of the Jews? Are not parts of the Talmud filled with vilification of both Christ and his mother? How can they be linked? The two beliefs differ profoundly. The one intensely racist the other with the instruction to “Teach all peoples”
The Jewish scholar Dr. Joseph Klausner in his book “Jesus of Nazareth” expressed the Judaic viewpoint that Christ’s teachings were “…so irreconcilable with the spirit of Judaism, ” containing “the germs from which there could and must develop in course of time a non-Jewish and even anti-Jewish teaching.”
Gershon Mamlak, an award-winning Jewish Zionist intellectual, recently claimed that the “Jesus tradition ” is in direct conflict to Judaism’s role as the Chosen people”.
Confusion over the origin of Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity is the root of the Judeo-Christian myth. Biblical scholars Robert and Mary Coote clearly show in their book ” Politics and the Making of the Bible” that neither is Christianity a patched up Judaism, nor is Rabbinic Judaism automatically synonymous with the religion of Moses and the old Hebrews.
In their book the Cootes illustrate the religious climate in Judea two millennia ago:
“The cults, practices, and scriptures of both groups, rabbis and bishops, differed from those of the temple; thus we reserve the terms Jew, Jewish, and Judaism for the rabbis and those under their rule and use Judean, contrary to custom, for the common source of Judaism and Christianity… Despite the ostensible merging of Judean and Jew even in certain New Testament passages and by the rabbis who became rulers of Palestine in the third century and continued to use Hebrew and Aramaic more than Greek, the roots of Christianity were not Jewish. Christianity did not derive from the Judaism of the pharisees, but emerged like Judaism from the wider Judean milieu of the first century….”
The few New Testament ‘proof texts’ utilised by Christian Zionists and secular proponents of the modern Judeo-Christian myth are the product of poor translation. Messianic Jewish writer Malcolm Lowe in his paper “Who Are the Ioudaioi?” concludes, like Robert and Mary Coote, that the Greek word “Ioudaioi” in the New Testament should be translated as “Judeans”, rather than the more usual “Jews”.
Few Christians are aware that the translators of Scripture often mistranslated the word “Jew” from such words as “Ioudaioi” (meaning from, or being of, as a geographic area, Judean). The word Judean, mistranslated as “Jew” in the New Testament, never possessed a valid religious connotation, but was simply used to identify members of the native population of the geographic area known as Judea. Also it is important to understand that in the Scriptures, the terms “Israel”, “Judah” and “Jew” are not synonymous, nor is the House of Israel synonymous with the House of Judah. The course of history is widely divergent for the peoples properly classified under each of these titles. Accordingly, the authoritative 1980 Jewish Almanac says,
“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”
A writer for The Dearborn Independent, published in Michigan in 1922, summarised the problem thus: “The pulpit has also the mission of liberating the Church from the error that Judah and Israel are synonymous. The reading of the Scriptures which confuse the tribe of Judah with Israel, and which interpret every mention of Israel as signifying the Jews, is at the root of more than one-half the confusion and division traceable in Christian doctrinal statements.”
Jesus Christ and the Pharisees
The New Testament Gospels reveal an intense conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees, one of the two principal Judean religious sects (see Matthew chapter 3, verse 7; Matthew chapter 5, verse 20; Matthew chapter 23, verses 13-15, 23-29; Mark chapter 8, verse 15; Luke chapter 11, verse 39). Much of this controversy was centred on what was later to become the foundation and highest authority of Judaism, the Talmud. In the time of Jesus Christ, this bore the name of “The Tradition of the Elders” (see Matthew chapter 15, verses 1-9).
While the Pharisees recognized the laws of Moses, they also claimed that there was a great body of oral tradition which was of at least equal authority with the written Law – and many claimed that the Tradition was of greater authority. By their tradition, they undertook to explain and elaborate upon the Law. This was the “Tradition of the Elders”, to which the name of Talmud was later given and which had its beginning in Babylon, during the Babylon captivity of the people of Judah.
This Judaism was very different from the religion of the ancient Israelites. The late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, who was the Chief Rabbi of the United States, expressed this conclusively when he said: “The return from Babylon, and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud, marks the end of Hebrewism, and the beginning of Judaism.” The Jewish Encyclopedia says that the Talmud is actually “the product of the Palestinian and Babylonian schools and is generally referred to as “the Babylonian Talmud”.
Dr. Boaz Cohen in Everyman’s Talmud states the Talmud is the work of “numerous Jewish scholars over a period of some 700 years, roughly speaking, between 200 [B.C.] and 500 [A.D.].”
Christian Zionism
The socalled Christian Zionism is co-opted by a foreign lobby, AIPAC, and used to carry out Israeli objectives. AIPAC and its powers were well documented in 1994, in “One Nation under Israel” by Andrew J Hurley, and published by We Hold These Truths.
The Southern Baptist pastor Jerry Falwell who died in 2007 may have been the first leader to recognize the potential for linking dispensational Christianity with Zionism and harness its combined power into a political movement with loyalty to the state of Israel as its primary mission. In the early 1980s, Falwell called his fledgling army “The Moral Majority.” It was later referred to as the “Christian Right.” Today the millions of people who have made the present state of Israel the centrepiece of their Christian religion have been given the name “Christian Zionists.”
“We Hold These Truths” describes both the Christian Zionist leaders and their misled followers as “Judeo-Christians,” a broadly accepted term, to reflect the fact that the religion they are following is no longer traditional Christianity, but one into which Judaism was injected, producing a radically altered hybrid.
Judeo-Christianity (also called “evangelicalism,” dispensationalism, or Christian Zionism) is by any name, an apostate-cult, meaning it practises, in part, a deviant path of following Christ.
Judeo-Christianity ascribes holiness to a foreign political state, Israel, for this reason Judeo-Christianity can easily be used by its leader, and by the leaders of Israel, to carry out a political agenda that favours that foreign political state over and ahead of the interests of America, or any other country except Israel. Israel’s well-established desire to see Iraq destroyed and its oil divided up resulted in the first gulf war in 1991 and the present contemplated devastation of Iran. AIPAC and many American businessmen have profit interests in war and campaigned for new wars as a matter of business, but it is the Judeo-Christians who have provided the grassroots clout to keep the War On Islam churning.
“The Passion of Christ”, a Hollywood film written and directed by Mel Gibson was premiered in America and Britain on February 25, 2004.
On that day the Center Simon Wiesenthal published in the New York Times a communiqué written by its founder, Rabbi Marvin Hier, responding in advance to an article he knew would be published later. The Rabbi, who makes films about the Holocaust, stated he was filled with dismay “if as I think, Mel Gibson’s film is aimed at scorning the reforms of the Second Vatican Council.” (The Council of the Vatican that not only successfully changed the language in which the Catholic mass was celebrated butalso rejected the idea that Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus.)
The role of the “Christian right”
Another concept has now entered the scene: the “TheoCons” or the “Christian Right”, although there is nothing very Christian about their thinking nor can it be judged as “Right.” More accurately it should be named the “Judeo-Christian Right”.
Mark Weber in August 2009 said :
“Many critics of Israel and its policies make a sharp distinction between Israel and its state ideology, Zionism, on the one hand, and Judaism, or the Jewish religious tradition and outlook, on the other…..In fact, the often cruel and arrogant policies of Israel, …..are not an aberration, but rather are deeply rooted in Jewish religious writings and in centuries of Jewish tradition. Most people prefer pleasant myths to unpleasant truths, and prefer to believe what is most comfortable and agreeable. That’s one reason why so many of us like to think that all religions share common humanistic core values, and are all striving, each in its own way, toward the same ultimate truth.
But Judaism is not just “another religion.” It’s unique among the world’s major religions. The core values and ethos of Judaism are markedly unlike those of Christianity, Islam, and the other great faiths.
Christians believe that Jesus suffered and died for all people,…. Muslims believe that the message of the Koran is meant for all humanity,….But that’s not the message of Judaism. Its teachings are not meant for all people. Its morality is not universal. Judaism is a religion for one particular people. The Jewish religion is based not on a relationship between God and humanity, but rather on a “covenant,” or contract, between God and a “chosen” people — …
The Talmud
The Jewish Encyclopedia admits that the Talmud slanders Jesus Christ and admits that, in the Jewish legends concerning Jesus found in the Talmud and Midrash and in ” the life of Jesus” ( Toledot Yeshu) that originated in the Middle Ages. there is the tendency to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing to him illegitimate birth, magic, and a shameful death.
” La Science des Esprits”, by the 19th century occultist, Eliphas Levi, admits that the Cabalistic Toledot Yeshu and similar Talmudic teachings were purposely hidden from Christians.
In 1242, the Talmud was put on trial and ordered to be burned, by King Louis IX, because of its vicious slanders against Jesus Christ and Christians. It was stated that The Talmud encouraged the robbery and deception of Christians as a virtue and that it was permitted to break a promise, and so on….
The stories contained in Toledot Yeshu and similar teachings were well-known in Jewish circles, but did not come to the knowledge of Gentiles or Christians until Raymond Martin translated the Toledot Yeshu into Latin. Later, Martin Luther summarized it in German under the name Schem Hamphorasch; Luther’s exposé is available in French in Gustave Brunet’s, Evangiles Apocryphes.
According to “Geschichte der Juden”, by the Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz, the image presented of Jesus Christ is simply as an initiate of Essenism; in other words, Jesus was just performing the miracles that any adept in the mystery religions could do.
When the Jewish teachings regarding Jesus Christ were discovered in the early 1600’s, a cover-up ensued. In 1631, a Jewish synod in Poland ordered the offending passages to be expunged, and that these teachings were to be passed on orally to young Jews by Rabbis.
Defining Christianity
One major reason why the role of the organized Jewish community is a problem in any society is because most Jews manifest a strong loyalty to a foreign country, Israel, …. There is however another reason why the role of the Jewish community is also a harmful one. Jews are encouraged to regard themselves as separate from the rest of humanity, and as members of a community with interests quite distinct from those of everyone else. This “Us vs. Them” attitude is rooted in the Jewish religion, and in centuries of tradition.
Christians are supposed to live their lives in accord with the teachings of Jesus as laid out in the four Gospels of the New Testament, just as Muslims are called upon to live their lives in accord with the Koran. Similarly, Jews are supposed to live in accord with the principles laid out in the Hebrew scriptures, the “Tanakh,” which is also known as the Old Testament. …. For some orthodox Jewish leaders, the “chosen people” is not just a superior or privileged group but that Jews and non-Jews are practically different species….”
To quote from Michel Chossudovsky in “America’s Holy Crusade against the Muslim World” August 30 2010 :
“We have reached a decisive transition in the evolution of US military doctrine. The “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT) directed against Al Qaeda launched in the wake of 9/11 is evolving towards a full-fledged “war of religion”, a “holy crusade” directed against the Muslim World.”
” In the wake of 9/11, the Muslim community in most Western countries was markedly on the defensive. …The fact that the 9/11 attacks were not instigated by Muslims has rarely been acknowledged by the Muslim community. Al Qaeda’s ongoing relationship to the CIA, its role as a US sponsored “intelligence asset” going back to the Soviet-Afghan war is not mentioned.”
…”Since the early 1980s, Washington has covertly supported the most conservative and fundamentalist factions of Islam, largely with a view to weakening secular, nationalist and progressive movements in the Middle East and Central Asia. It is known and documented that the fundamentalist Wahhabi and Salafi missions from Saudi Arabia, dispatched not only to Afghanistan but also to the Balkans and to the Muslim republics of the former Soviet republics were covertly supported by US intelligence.”
“… The proposed Ground Zero mosque is allegedly being funded by “the radical rogue Islamic state of Iran … as the United States is stepping up sanctions on the regime in retaliation for its support of terrorism and what is feared to be an illegal nuclear-weapons development program.”
The rising tide of xenophobia, sparked by the proposed Ground Zero mosque and community center, has all the appearances of a PSYOP (Psychological Operation) which contributes to fomenting hatred against Muslims throughout the Western World. The objective is to instil fear, rouse and harness citizens’ unbending support for the next stage of America’s “long war”, which consists in waging “humanitarian” aerial attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran, portrayed by the media as endorsing the terrorists.
A “war of religion” is unfolding, with a view to justifying a global military crusade. In the inner consciousness of many Americans, the “holy crusade” against Muslims is justified.”
The following is an extract from the article “The Myth of a Judeo-Christian Tradition” from New Dawn Magazine No.23 Feb-March 1994:
“This is an age in which news has been superseded by propaganda, and education by brain-washing and indoctrination. From the advertising used to sell poor quality goods, to the classes in schools designed to make children into conditioned robots of the State, the art of persuasion has displaced the simple virtue of truth.
Since the end of the Second World War we have been bombarded from all sides with references to the Western world’s “Judeo-Christian religion,” and “our Judeo-Christian heritage.” We are told by both church leaders and scholars that our society is based on a supposed “Judeo-Christian tradition”.
.The notion of “Judeo-Christian religion” is an unquestioned — almost sacrosanct — part of both secular and church thinking. American Christian leader Prof. Franklin H. Littel, a vocal supporter of the Zionist state, frankly declared that “to be Christian is to be Jewish,” and that consequently it was the duty of a Christian to put support for the “land of Israel” above all else. Pat Boon, the North American singer and evangelist, said there are two kinds of Judaism, one Orthodox and the other Christian…
Back in 1992 both Newsweek magazine and the Israeli Jerusalem Post newspaper simultaneously printed extensive articles scrutinising the roots of the sacrosanct Judeo-Christian honeymoon!
The statement heading the Newsweek article read: “Politicians appeal to a Judeo-Christian tradition, but religious scholars say it no longer exists.” The Jerusalem Post article’s pull quote announced: “Antisemitism is a direct result of the Church’s teachings, which Christians perhaps need to re-examine.”
“For scholars of American religion,” Newsweek states, “the idea of a single Judeo-Christian tradition is a made-in-America myth that many of them no longer regard as valid.” It quotes eminent Talmudic scholar Jacob Neusner: “Theologically and historically, there is no such thing as the Judeo-Christian tradition. It’s a secular myth favoured by people who are not really believers themselves.”
Newsweek cites authorities who indicate that “the idea of a common Judeo-Christian tradition first surfaced at the end of the 19th century but did not gain popular support until the 1940s, as part of an American reaction to Nazism . . ,” and concludes that, “Since then, both Jewish and Christian scholars have come to recognize that — geopolitics apart — Judaism and Christianity are different, even rival religions.”
The Jerusalem Post accused the Christian Church of being responsible for the Holocaust. The French Jewish scholar Jules Isaac was quoted as saying: “Without centuries of Christian catechism, preaching, and vituperation, the Hitlerian teachings, propaganda and vituperation would not have been possible.”
Rabbi Louis Finkelstein in Volume 1 of “The Pharisees, the Sociological Background of their Faith” says, “Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaption of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.”
According to The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, (1942) p.474 : “The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. ”
Moshe Menuhim explains that the Babylonian Talmud embodied all the laws and legends, all the history and ‘science,’ all the theology and folklore, … It became the principal guide to life and object of study, and it gave Judaism unity, cohesion and resilience throughout the dark ages.”
In Judaism and the Christian Predicament, 1966, p.159 Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser admitted, “…it is the Talmud that guides the life and spirit of the Jewish people.”
Both Jewish and Christian scholars agree that it was Jesus Christ’s flagrant rejection of this “Tradition of the Elders” and his open confrontation with the powerful Pharisees that created the climate that led to his death. Historically, Christian thinkers argued that the Talmud was directly responsible for the rejection of Christ.
Justin Martyr (c100-165 A.D.) was indeed the earliest and most significant of these post-Apostolic church apologists. Following in the theological footsteps of Paul, who taught that the Gospel was the fulfilment of Moses and the Prophets, Justin argued that “Jesus Christ had come to restore true religion and to denounce the hypocrisy of the religion of Judea.” Here there is not only a clear separation of Christianity and Judaism, but a direct challenge to Judaism’s core dogma of a Chosen Nation.
The Zionist author Uri Zimmer’s “Torah-Judaism and the State of Israel” : states “The Jewish people, Rabbi Judah Halevy (the famous medieval poet and philosopher) explains in his ‘Kuzari’, constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant…although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowed with a ‘second soul’ that renders them a separate species.”
Rabbi Martin Siegel, reflecting a Messianic zeal, was quoted in the 18 January 1972 edition of New York Magazine as declaring: “I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.”
Dr. Mamlak admits that “many Jews have filled the ranks of the various revolutionary movements” (op. cit., p.32) in order to satisfy this urge.”
Dr. Gordon Ginn, an American Christian scholar, made a very valid point when he noted: “It is most interesting, indeed, that rabbis as well as Jewish scholars such as Mamlak and White agree with orthodox, historical Christianity that ‘Judeo-Christian’ is a contradiction in terms, even though that truth is yet to be discovered by contemporary evangelical and fundamentalist Christians” (Smyrna, August, 1993).
Mark Weber deserves the last word:
Christianity and Judaism are two distinct religious inheritances, despite all the superficial attempts by modern scholars to manufacture a naive “Judeo-Christianity.” The very term “Judeo-Christian” is a mischievous misnomer without historical or Scriptural validity. The religions of the world are the product of progressive revelation to a diverse humanity, separately expressing as they do the great metaphysical realities of life. Attempts to distort or eliminate these unique, ancient and divinely ordained patterns, through non-divine syncretism and politically-motivated concoctions, is both anti-traditional and truly diabolical.”
OVER-REPRESENTED IN US GOVERNMENT AND BRITISH ONE TOO…
http://www.pgorg.com/thejewishcentury.html
ZIONIST NWO…
The Twenty First Century – the Century of the Jew
For generations now a slow, intrusive force has been moving towards its goal – complete control of the world.
The snake of the Protocols has its mouth almost on its tail.The victims of this force, the rest of humanity, are as effectively coralled as a herd of sheep.
The United States is completely managed by Jews, as are all the other Western countries.
The East too is being pulled into the fold – the only apparent dissidents – the targets now of NATO are China, Russia, Iran with Libya and certain other middle eastern countries that have failed to enter the fold.
Venezuela virtually stands alone in South America.
All major corporations are Jewish controlled. Most religions have been infiltrated.
How it might be asked was it done this gigantic enslavement? By use of the fact that humanity is a herd animal and follows a leader in the same way as the zebra, the kongoni and the giraffe. It follows for the same reasons as the animals. Humanity labours under the delusion that humans – a very small branch on the tree of life – are somehow the epitome, the final magnificent product, of evolution. The Jews of course go even further in the self delusionment and claim to be the chosen people.
If indeed we do succeed to destroy ourselves and at the moment it looks that way, maybe taking with us the majority of the eukaryotes and thus erasing evidence of our presence effectively, there will still remain those long standing inhabitants of the planet the bacteria.
At birth the human mind is a blank slate on which information is stored and it is on this basis on which the individual builds. A european child taken from birth into a hut in the jungle will acquire the information obtained from its adoptive parents. This early influence plays an important part in a human’s life. Unfortunately at the moment via the various methods of transporting information the child like everyone else is subjected to a constant barrage of pictures, sounds and information from all sides. Open-mouthed, all this is ingested, like gluttons at a gargantuan feast surfeited by the bounty offered, and rendered incapable of making any judgment at all, so bloated everything tastes the same.
Controlling this deluge of information is therefore a very important part of the acquisition of power and of its retention. The aim being that with each succeeding generation less and less of the truth is ever told.
Does this alleged Jewish control really exist?
To quote from Mark Weber:
“United States support for Israel and its policies did not come about because Americans are more intelligent, humane or enlightened than, say, Norwegians, Japanese or Irish. No, the US-Israel alliance is, rather, a consequence, a result, of the Jewish-Zionist grip on American political and cultural life.
This intimidating power is not a new or recent phenomenon. Thirty years ago, Jewish American scholar Alfred M. Lilienthal dealt with this in his detailed study, The Zionist Connection. He wrote:
“How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American people?… It is the Jewish connection, the tribal solidarity among themselves and the amazing pull on non-Jews, that has molded this unprecedented power … The Jewish connection covers all areas and reaches every level. Most Americans may not even sense this gigantic effort, but there is scarcely a Jew who is not touched by its tentacles…”
Alfred Lilienthal went on to say:
“The extent and depth to which organised Jewry reached – and reaches – in the U.S. is indeed awesome … The most effective component of the Jewish connection is probably that of media control … Jews, toughened by centuries of persecution, have risen to places of prime importance in the business and financial world… Jewish wealth and acumen wields unprecedented power in the area of finance and investment banking, playing an important role in influencing U.S. policy toward the Middle East … In the larger metropolitan areas, the Jewish-Zionist connection thoroughly pervades affluent financial, commercial, social, entertainment, and art circles.”
Although Jews make up only about two or three percent of the US population, they wield immense power and influence — vastly more than any other ethnic or religious group. As Jewish author and political science professor Benjamin Ginsberg has pointed out:
“Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual and political life. Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade’s corporate mergers and reorganisations. Today, though barely two percent of the nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief executive officers of the three major television networks and the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation’s largest newspaper chain and the most influential single newspaper, The New York Times … The role and influence of Jews in American politics is equally marked …
“Jews are only three percent of the nation’s population and comprise eleven percent of what this study defines as the nation’s elite. However, Jews constitute more than 25 percent of the elite journalists and publishers, more than 17 percent of the leaders of important voluntary and public interest organisations, and more than 15 percent of the top ranking civil servants.”
Two well-known Jewish writers, Seymour Lipset and Earl Raab, went into this in their 1995 book, Jews and the New American Scene. They wrote
:“During the last three decades Jews [in the United States] have made up 50 percent of the top two hundred intellectuals … 20 percent of professors at the leading universities … 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington … 59 percent of the directors, writers, and producers of the 50 top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers, and producers in two or more primetime television series.”
The influence of American Jewry in Washington, as the Israeli daily Jerusalem Post has noted, is “far disproportionate to the size of the community, Jewish leaders and U.S. officials acknowledge. But so is the amount of money they contribute to [election] campaigns.” One member of the influential Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations “estimated Jews alone had contributed 50 percent of the funds for [President Bill] Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign.”
Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, said during a speech in Boston in 2002: “But you know as well as I do that, somehow, the Israeli government is placed on a pedestal [in the US], and to criticise it is to be immediately dubbed anti-Semitic … People are scared in this country, to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful – very powerful.”
Some time ago the Jewish Chronicle published a list of Jewish MPs in the UK parliament. It named 24 in total, encompassing 12 Conservatives, 10 Labour, and two Liberal Democrats. Author and peace activist Stuart Littlewood elaborated on these figures and presented the following analysis:
“The Jewish population in the UK is 280,000 or 0.46 per cent. There are 650 seats in the House of Commons so, as a proportion, Jewish entitlement is only three seats. The conclusion is pretty obvious. With 24 seats, Jews are eight times over-represented. Which means, of course, that other groups must be under-represented, including Muslims…If Muslims, for instance, were over-represented to the same extent as the Jews (i.e. eight times) they’d have 200 seats. All hell would break loose.”
A question must be raised here. Why are Jews overwhelmingly over-represented in the British parliament, in British and American political pressure groups, in political fundraising and in the media?
The New Yorker reported that at a conference Haim Saban, the Israeli-American, multibillionaire media mogul, described his pro-Israeli formula, outlining “three ways to be influential in American politics…make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.”
Jewish control is so entrenched that It is all done in the open. In front of TV cameras from all over the world, listed Israeli Propaganda author as well as British Foreign Secretary David Miliband gave the Israelis a green light to operation Cast Lead, suggesting in Sderot that “Israel should, above all, seek to protect its own citizens.” Miliband, in practice, made all complicit in a colossal war crime committed by Israel. Staunch Zionist Lord Levy funded the Labour party when this party launched a criminal war that intended to erase the last pocket of Arabic resistance to Zionism. He also wasn’t at all shy about it. In the media, shameless Jewish Chronicle writers David Aaronovitch and Nick Cohen enthusiastically advocated the same criminal war in the name of ‘moral interventionism’. Nick Cohen also founded the Euston Manifesto ‘think tank’ to support dubious Neocon ideologies on this side of the pond.
Levy, Cohen, Aaronovitch, Miliband are all in line with Saban’s formula: influence, donations, think tanks, media. Yet they don’t necessarily know Saban, and may never even have heard about the Zionist media mogul. It isn’t necessary. The fact is, Saban didn’t invent anything himself. His formula is deeply brewed in the Judaic religious tradition, Jewish culture and ideology.
Was Christianity distorted to fulfil this ambition?
A study of history shows that Christianity has not played the expected role of a religion based by its founder on love for one’s neighbour. It’s conversion of the “heathens” as far back as the ninth century was by force and frequently bloody, while Christianity itself is now slipping into the Judaic fold. Is it too far-fetched to ask whether this may not have been its intended role from the beginning? How for instance has the Bible – the Testament of the group Jesus Christ attacked and who ultimately caused his death – inveigled itself into the Christian religion? Did Paul of Tarsus play a double role? A jew, a Roman citizen …..? Certainly without him a bunch of illiterate fishermen would never have been able to establish a religion. A religion that men like Charlemagne and the Emperor Constantine realised would have value as a universal religion.
The Vikings at the time of their incursions into Europe were “heathens” and focused many of their attacks on Christian strongholds not only with the desire for loot but also to destroy the “new” religion.
Northern heathendom had an “end-time” called Ragnarok or the “fate of the gods” as described by Snorri Sturluson writing in Iceland around 1220 and depicted “three years of catastrophic snowfall, wind and frost separated from each other by summers of black sunlight ….where the inhabitants surrendered to greed, incest and civil war….. at the climax, the forces of chaos which they had succeeded in containing would finally burst from their restraints. Midgardscormen, the GREAT WORLD-ENCIRCLING SERPENT, (the “snake” of the Protocols?) would come lunging out of the ocean, dragging the tides in over the land.” There then ensues a great battle which ends when a great fire consumes everything and the light vanishes.
The eariest written history of Russia, the Russian Primary Chronicle written in Kiev by the monk Nestor in the early twelfth century regarding the formation of the Kievan or Old Russian State makes special mention of the importance of securing the trade route along the Dnieper to Constantinople which entailed the subjugation of the various Slav tribes that controlled different stretches of the rivers. These tribes had all previously been tributaries of the Khazars a semi-nomadic Turko-Tartar tribe that was the other power in the region between the Black Sea and the Caspian and so controlled trade relations between the Islamic world and northern and western Europe. The transference of these tributary rights was an important first step in the struggle of the Rus to wrest regional hegemony of this part of south eastern Europe away from the Khazars.
A number of Baltic Slav tribes had converted to Christianity and Vladimir the sole ruler of the Kievan state set about determining which of the major religions to choose: Islam which had been the religion of the Volga Bulgars since 922, Judaism to which the Khazars living south of the Bulgars had converted around 865 or Greek Christianity. He invited representatives to speak out in defence of their faith and finally settled on the Byzantine.
Is it too fanciful to link the one thousand four hundred years it took to overcome that defeat when the Jews (i.e the Ashkenazim descendants of the Khazars) were released from their ghettoes and flooded Europe and America in the late eighteen hundreds with the eradication of the Russian ruling class?
The Book of Esther
The Book of Esther is a biblical story that is the basis for the celebration of Purim, the most joyous Jewish festival. The book tells the story of an attempted Judeocide, but it also tells a story in which Jews manage to change their fate by means of political influence. In the story, the Jews do manage to rescue themselves and exact revenge, through infiltration into the corridors of power. The moral of the Biblical story is clear. If Jews want to survive, they have to make their way into the corridors of power and bond with the rulers of the world. With Esther, Mordechai and Purim in mind, AIPAC, Levy, ADL, David Milliband, Saban and the notion of ‘Jewish power’ all appear to be an embodiment of a deep Biblical, tribal and cultural ideology.
In an interesting twist, although the story is presented as an historic tale, the historical accuracy of the Book of Esther is largely disputed by most modern Bible acholars and historians. The lack of any clear corroboration between any of the details of the story with what is known of Persian History from classical sources has led scholars to come to the conclusion that the story is mostly, or even totally fictiious.
In other words, though the Jewish moral is clear, the attempted genocide is fictional. Seemingly, the Book of Esther sets its (Jewish) followers into a collective Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder. It transforms a fictional fantasy of ‘destruction’ into a vivid ‘ideology of survival’. And indeed, some read the story as an allegory of quintessentially assimilated Jews who discover that they are targets of anti-Semitism, but are also in a position to save themselves and their fellow Jews.
The Book of Esther exists to form a coherent exilic tribal identity. It introduces the Holocaust mentality. Furthermore, it fixes the conditions which turn the Holocaust into reality, the text shapes the reality. In practice, it is the fearful mind that sets itself into a tragic trap of self-fulfilling prophecy. The Shoa ideology matures into a real event.
Interestingly the Book of Esther (in the Hebrew version) is one of only two books of the Bible that do not directly mention God (the other is Song of Songs). As in the case of Zionist secular ideology and the Holocaust religion, in the Book of Esther it is the Jews who believe in themselves, in their own power, in their uniqueness, in their sophistication, in their ability to influence, in their ability to take over kingdoms, and in their ability to save themselves. The Book of Esther is all about empowerment. It conveys the essence of Jewish power, as described by Haim Saban and performed by AIPAC.
Having said all that and having acknowledged that behind most of the problems assailing the world today, the corporations, the banking houses, the governments there are faces and the faces are in the main Jewish. Why then is it not aacknowledged? Is it because the temerity of such a suggestion brings with it the fear of repercussion? Humanity is suffering under an all-encompassing malaise and, as with any ailment, the only way to effect a cure is to attack the root cause.
——————————————————————————–
Finding out the Truth about 911 has been a long journey back into history understanding and finding the truth one small piece at a time. Waking up America! End the Federal Reserve! Shut down the CFR and Expose Aipacs control over the Government and the Bankers in our Government! How the bankers are using the Government to Control you! CFR Zionist Bankers Media Control set up by the JP Morgan! Censorship of important things you need to know! Is this ok with you? Get the Bankers out of GOV
911truthseekers 2 years ago
ShareRemoveFlag for spamBlock UserUnblock UserTop Comments
the jewish spy Jonathan Pollard advised the USA govt never to allow jews access to secured files since their first loyalty would always be to Israel. Read about the gay governor Jim McGreevey who resigned after Israel targeted him with gay operative Golan Cipel from the Israel Defense Forces. Israel tried to blackmail McGreevey into appointing jews to key positions where they could gain access to secured files. Read also about AIPAC spies Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman.
HENRY FORD JNR ON READING THEM- SAID- FRUAD OR NOT- WHATS’ WRITTEN IS HAPPENING!
http://www.pgorg.com/m345.html
The Protocols of Zion – True or False?
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, unpleasant as it is, is a document that should be read by anyone who wishes to understand the direction world politics is taking today.
The following paragraphs reflect the document, Protocol by Protocol, merely highlighting and quoting the salient features, with no attempt to present it in its entirety for it is a lengthy diatribe. For those who have not yet read the complete work,and wish to do so, there are many sites on the web where it is available.
——————————————————————————–
Protocol 1
…3. It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power,… and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare. …
…6. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact….
7. In our day the power, which has replaced that of the rulers … is the power of Gold.
8.Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes… it is in our power.
11…. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, but we must in no wise be guided by them.
l2. Our right lies in force.
15. Our power …will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible…
17. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught.
20. A people, left to itself, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power…
22. Behold the alcoholic animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom …..Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. …
26. In all corners of the earth the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. … It gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card – the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim…
27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man….
Protocol 2
1. It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains.
2.The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the art of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game….
3. Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words. … To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.
5. In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. …Thanks to the Press we have got the GOLD in our hands, …Each victim on our side is worth, in the sight of God, a thousand goyim.
Protocol 3
l. To-day I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path we have trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the symbolic snake, by which we symbolise our people. When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be locked in its coil as in a powerful vice.
2…..We have made a gulf between the far-seeing sovereign power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart.
3. … Of states we have made gladiatorial arenas where a lot of confused issues contend … a little more and disorders and bankruptcy will be universal.
5. …. Republican rights for a poor man are no more than a bitter piece of irony, for the necessity he is under of toiling almost all day gives him no present use of them, …
6. The people, under our guidance, have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their one and only defence….
7. We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the workers – socialists, anarchists, communists. The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers (employees/slaves) were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite – in the diminution – the killing of the goyim.
8. By want and the envy and hatred which it engenders we shall move the mobs and with their hands we shall wipe out all those who hinder us on our way.
10. …The true knowledge of the structure of society, into the secrets of which we do not admit the goyim, would demonstrate to all men that they may not become a source of human suffering, arising from an education which does not correspond with the work which individuals are called upon to do. …
11. … We shall create by all the secret subterranean methods open to us and with the aid of gold, which is all in our hands, a universal economic crisis whereby we shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers..delighted to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose property they will then be able to loot.
l6…At the present day we are, as an international force, invincible, because if attacked by some we are supported by other States.
Protocol 4
2. …Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.
4. In order to give the goyim no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus, all nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain, and, in the race for it , will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the goyim, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.
5. The intensified struggle for superiority… will foster a strong aversion towards the higher political and towards religion. Their only guide is gain, that is Gold, which they will erect into a veritable cult, for the sake of those material delights which it can give….
Protocol 5
l. … We shall create an intensified centralisation of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community….
3. In the times when the peoples looked upon kings on their thrones as on a pure manifestation of the will of God, they submitted without a murmur to the despotic power of kings: but .. when we insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights, they began to regard the occupants of thrones as mere ordinary mortals.
5. For a time perhaps we may be successfully dealt with by a coalition of the goyim of all the world: but from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them… We have set one against another the personal, and national reckonings of the goyim, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered ..over the past twenty centuries…
6….And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth. God has endowed us with genius that we may be equal to our task. …All the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine, which is in our hands, and that engine of the machinery of States is – Gold.
7. Capital, if it is to co-operate untrammelled, must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade. This is already being put in execution by an unseen hand in all quarters of the world.
8. In all ages the people of the world,… have accepted words for deeds, … and rarely pause to note whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall establish show institutions. …
10. In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment, by giving expression, from all sides to so many contradictory opinions … as will suffice to make the goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth. This is the first secret.
11. The second secret requisite is to multiply to such an extent, national failings; habits, passions, conditions of civil life. so that people in consequence will fail to understand one another…By all these means we shall so wear down the goyim, that they will be compelled to offer us international power. …
Protocol 6
l. We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which, even large fortunes of the goyim will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom, together with the credit of the States on the day after the political smash…
4.The aristocracy of the goyim as a political force, is dead. We need not take it into account, but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us . It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land.
6. At the same time we must intensively patronise trade and industry. …What we want is that industry should drain off from the land both labour and capital and, by means of speculation, transfer into our hands all the money of the world…
7. To complete the ruin of the industry of the goyim we shall bring to the assistance of speculation, the luxury which we have developed among the goyim, that a greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up everything. We shall raise the rate of wages, which, however, will not bring any advantage to the workers for, at the same time, we shall produce a rise in prices of the first necessaries of life, alleging that it arises from the decline of agriculture and cattle breeding….. we shall further undermine,.. sources of production by accustoming the workers to anarchy and to drunkenness. …
Protocol 7
1. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get is that there should be, in all the States of the world, besides, ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires, devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.
2.Throughout Europe and in other continents also, we must create ferments, discord and hostility. In the first place we keep in check all countries … and in the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States.
4.The principal factor of success in the political is the secrecy of its undertakings, the word should not agree with the deeds of the diplomat.
5. We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction favoured by our widely conceived plan…. by means of that so-called “Great Power” – the Press, which, with few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands.
Protocol 8
1. Control of bankers, industrialists and capitalists. We must arm ourselves with all the weapons which our opponents might employ against us…..Our directorate must surround itself with all these forces of civilisation….Needless to say that the talented assistants of authority will be taken not from among the goyim.
3. For a time, until there will no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our State to our brother-Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and reputation are such that between them and the people lies an abyss, persons who in case of disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear, this in order to make them defend our interests to their last gasp.
Protocol 9
2…. The words of the liberal, .. are in effect the words of our masonic watchword, namely, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity”. …Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us, it is only pro forma at our discretion and by our direction, for their anti-semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren.
9. In order to annihilate the institutions of the goyim,… we have taken hold of the ends of the springs which move their mechanism. These springs lay in a strict but just sense of order; we have replaced them by the chaotic licence of liberalism. We have got our hands into the adminstration of the law; into the conduct of elections; into the press; into liberty of the person; but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence.
10. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim, by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false, although it is by us they have been inculcated.
13. You may say that the goyim will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a manoeuvre of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail – the undergrounds, metropolitans, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organisations and archives.
Protocol 10
2. The mob cherishes a special affection and respect for the geniuses of political power and accepts all their deeds of violence.
5. …we must have everybody vote without distinction of classes and qualifications, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes. In this way, by inculcating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the goyim the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off… In this way we shall create a blind mighty force, which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents…
6. Under various names there exists, in all countries, approximately one and the same thing: Representation; Ministry; Senate; State Council; Legislative and Executive Corps…. These institutions have divided up among themselves all the functions of government…. If we injure one part in the machinery of State, the State falls sick, like a human body and .. will die.
9. When we introduced into the State organism the poison of Liberalism its whole political complexion underwent a change…
l0. Liberalism produced Constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the goyim, namely Despotism; and a constitution… is nothing but a school of discords… The tribune of the “talkeries” has, no less effectively than the Press; condemned the rulers to inactivity and impotence… for which reason indeed they have been in many countries, deposed. Then it was that the era of republics became a possibility… and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government – by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, or slaves. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the goy peoples.
l3. In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favour of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain… then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans. …Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal. …
16. The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so. …
18. …the moment for this recognition will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence – a matter which we shall arrange for – of their rulers, will clamour “Away with them and give us one king over all the Earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders- frontiers; nationalities; religions; State debts…
19. But you yourselves know perfectly well that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations, it is indispensable to trouble in all countries, the people’s relations with their governments… by the inoculation of disease; by want, so that the goyim see no other course open to them than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.
Protocol 11
4. The goyim are a flock of sheep and we are their wolves.
7. For what purpose then have we invented this whole policy and insinuated it into the minds of the goy…For what indeed if not in order to obtain in a roundabout way, what is, for our scattered tribe unattainable by the direct road. It is this which has served as the basis for our organisation of secret Masonry, which is not known to, and aims which are not even so much as suspected by these goy cattle, attracted by us to the “show” army of Masonic Lodges, in order to throw dust in the eyes of their fellows.
8. God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of the dispersion and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.
Protocol 12
3. … What is the part played by the press to-day? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose, or else it serves selfish ends of parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves….. I beg you to note that among those making attacks upon us will also be organs established by us, but they will attack exclusively points that we have pre-determined to alter.
4. Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control.
12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions – aristocratic, republican, revolutionary even anarchical.
Protocol 13
1. The need for daily bread forces the goyim to keep silence and be our humble servants.
3. In order to distract people who may be too troublesome…we further distract them with amusements; games; pastimes; passions; people’s palaces… Soon we shall begin through the press to propose competitions in art; in sport of all kinds; will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more disaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone …
6. Who will ever suspect then that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries…
Protocol 14
l….We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief….
5. In countries known as progressive and enlightened we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable literature…
Protocol 15
1. When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the aid of coups d’etat… we shall slay without mercy all who take arms to oppose our coming into our kingdom…
3. In the goy societies, in which we have planted and deeply rooted discord and protestantism, the only possible way of restoring order is to employ merciless measures that prove the direct force of authority….Such was, until recent times, the Russian autocracy, the one and only serious foe we had in the world, without counting the Papacy…
4…. We shall create and multiply free masonic lodges in all the countries of the world…for these lodges we shall find our principal intelligence office and means of influence…Their composition will be made up of all strata of society. The most secret political plots will be known to us and fall under our guiding hands…
5. The class of people who most willingly enter into secret societies are those who live by their wits, careerists and in general people mostly light minded…. It is natural that we and no other should lead masonic activities for we know whither we are leading ; we know the final goal of every form of activity, whereas the goyim have knowledge of nothing…
6. The goyim enter the lodges out of curiosity, or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie…. These tigers in appearance have the souls of sheep and the wind blows freely through their heads…
8. And how far-seeing were our learned elders in ancient times, when they said, that to attain a serious end, it behoves not to stop at any means or to count the victims sacrificed for the sake of that end… We have not counted the victims of the seed of the goy cattle, though we have sacrificed many of our own ….
9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves. We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it, not even the victims themselves of our death sentence, they all die when required. as of from a normal kind of illness… knowing this, even the brotherhood in its turn dare not protest…. Whilst preaching liberalism to the goy we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioning submission.
10. Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim has been reduced to a minimum. …judges decide as we dictate to them…through persons who are our tools, though we do not appear to have anything in common with them – by newspaper opinion or by other means.
12. When comes the time of our overt rule, the time to manifest the blessing we shall remake all legislatures.
13. … The aureole of our power demands suitable, that is, cruel, punishments for the slightest infringement for the sake of gain, of its supreme prestige….
15. In these days the judges of the goyim create indulgences to every kind of crime; not having a just understanding of their office, because the rulers of the present age, in appointing judges to office, take no care to inculcate in them a sense of duty and consciousness of the matter which is demanded of them. ….
17. We shall root out liberalism from the important strategic posts of our government … I have to remark that all the money in the world will be concentrated in our hands, consequently it is not our government that has to fear expense.
20. Our government will have the appearance of a patriarchal paternal guardianship on the part of the ruler. …
21. …the right to compel the execution of duty is the direct obligation of a government which is a father for its subjects. It has the right of the strong that it may use it for the benefit of directing humanity towards that order which is defined by nature, namely, submission. …
22. We are obliged without hesitation to sacrifice individuals, who commit a breach of established order…
Protocol 16
1. In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces, except ours, we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism – the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction. …
3. The ill-guided acquaintance of a large number of persons with questions of polity, creates utopian dreamers and bad subjects, as you can see for yourselves from the example of the universal education. …
4. Classicism, as also any form of study of ancient history,… we shall replace with the study of the programme of the future. We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the goyim. …
7. We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction. …
8. In a word, knowing, by the experience of many centuries, that people live and are guided by ideas, that these ideas are imbibed by people only by the aid of education … we shall swallow up and confiscate to our own use, the last scintilla of independence of thought…
Protocol 17
2. We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us…. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of the Christian religion; as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them. …
3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards the court …
5. But, in the meantime, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, we shall overtly lay a finger on existing churches, but we shall fight against them by criticism calculated to produce schism.
9. Just as nowadays our brethren are obliged, at their own risk, to denounce to the kabal; apostates of their own family, or members who have been noticed doing anything in opposition to the kabal…
Protocol 18
2. …It must be remembered that the prestige of authority is lessened if it frequently discovers conspiracies against itself: this implies a presumption of consciousness of weakness…
4 If we should admit this thought, as the goyim have done and are doing, we should ipso facto be signing a death-sentence…
8. With the establishment of official defence, the mystical prestige of authority disappears…
Protocol 19
3. In order to destroy the prestige of heroism, for political crime, we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder and every kind of abominable and filthy crime…
4. We have done our best, and I hope we have succeeded, to obtain that the goyim should not arrive at this means of contending with sedition. It was for this reason that through the Press and in speeches, indirectly – in cleverly compiled school books on history, we have advertised the martyrdom alleged to have been accredited by sedition-mongers for the idea of the commonweal. This advertisement has increased the contingent of liberals and has brought thousands of goyim into the ranks of our livestock cattle.
Protocol 20
2. When we come into our kingdom our autocratic government will avoid, from a principle of self-preservation, sensibly burdening the masses of the people with taxes, remembering that it (the government) plays the part of father and protector.
30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is – an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.
33. If the superficiality of goy kings on their thrones in regard to State affairs and the venality of ministers, or the want of understanding of financial matters on the part of other ruling persons, have made their countries debtors to our treasuries, to amounts quite impossible to pay, it has not been accomplished without, on our part, heavy expenditure of trouble and money.
37. But it is a proof of the genius of our chosen mind that we have contrived to present the matter of loans to them in such a light that they have even seen in them an advantage to themselves.
41. The goy rulers, whom we once upon a time advised should be distracted from State occupations by representative receptions, observance of etiquette, entertainments, were only screens to our rule. …
42. You know to what they have been brought by this carelessness, to which pitch of financial disorder they have arrived, notwithstanding the astonishing industry of their peoples …
Protocol 21
2. We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending to the goy governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States.
3. States announce that such a loan is to be concluded and open subscriptions for their own bills of exchange….. In a few days the treasury safes are as they say overflowing and there is more money than they can do with, the subscription it is alleged, covers many times over the issue total of the loan; in this lies the whole stage effect …
4. But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans… and when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, but only the interest on it. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit …
Protocol 22
2. In our hands the greatest power of our day – gold; in two days we can procure from our storehouses any quantity we may please.
Protocol 23
The final two Protocols, Nos. 23 and 24, present a blueprint for the government of the future.
Instilling Obedience.
Cutting down of luxury goods – the supreme lord to replace all existing rulers.
Protocol 24
Qualities of the Ruler.
Selecting and training the seed of David.
Signed by the representatives of Zion, of the 33rd degree.
——————————————————————————–
It is an unpleasant, malevolent document.
Great efforts have been made to suppress it for its purported “anti-Semitism”, though claims of forgery have never been proved.
The strongest proof that the Protocols are exactly what they purport to be is the fact that world history has followed the precepts laid down in the document.
(1). The “conspiracy” IS of long standing. (Protocol 5, para. 5. Protocol 13, para. 6)
The similarity in its content to previous documents, dating back more than two thousand years proves that a “conspiracy” of some kind existed.
Around 590 B.C in Jeremiah verse ll.9, states:
And the “I am” said unto me, a conspiracy is found among the men of Judah and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.”
And again in Ezekiel 22.35 a little later:
“There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like the roaring lion ravening the prey; they have devoured souls:..”
There seems to have been trouble between those who followed the Torah and those who followed the Talmud, which was the writings of apostate Levitical priests who ruled with an iron hand of tyranny – and still do.
The similarity of the Protocols and the advice (quoted elsewhere on this site) that Chemor, Chief Rabbi of Spain received from the Grand Sanhedrin (Elders of Zion) in 1492, is unlikely to have been a coincidence.
The “Original Writings of the Order of the Illuminati”, founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, stated as their aim to destroy the existing order of society and replace it with a new World Order.
The document created such a furore when it became public that the order was legally suppressed. However it never ceased to exist and exists to this day under societies such as Freemasonry.
in 1865 a Jewish rabbi named Rzeichorn delivered a speech at Prague. It is a very accurate summary of many aspects of the Protocols.
“Gold in the hands of experts will always be the most useful weapon for those that possess it and an object of envy for those who are without it.
With gold one can buy the most upright consciences, with gold one can fix the value of every stock, the price of every merchandise; one can loan it to States that afterwards one holds at one’s mercy.
Already the principal banks, the stock exchanges throughout the world, the loans to all the governments are in our hands.
The other great power is the Press. By ceaselessly repeating certain ideas, the press in the end makes them considered as truths. The theatre renders similar services, everywhere theatre and press follow our directives. By an indefatigable campaign in favour of the Democratic form of government, we will divide the Gentiles amongst themselves in political parties, we shall thus destroy the unity fo their nations, we will sow the seeds of discord. Powerless, they will have to accept the law of our bank, always united, always devoted to our cause.”
The earliest Israelite holy works (The Torah) right up to the latest (Talmud and Zohar) have continually promised that the world would be delivered to the true Israelites and that the Gentile nations would be consumed, grafted into and ruled by the Chosen people who would govern them. Herein lies the ancient roots of the “conspiracy”.
(2).Jewish bankers and Jewish money DO control world politics today. (Protocol 5, para.(7) Protocol 8, para.(1))
This aspect has been dealt with more fully on the Home Page of this site.
(3).Religion HAS BEEN undermined. (Protocol 4, para. (5), Protocol 14, para.(1), Protocols 17, para. (2))
The Christian religion has been subjected to schisms, starting with Martin Luther and the split from the Roman church.
The vast upheaval to the Western World occasioned by the “Reformation” resulted in three monarchs losing their lives and left a legacy of bitterness that resulted in the Thirty Years War and changed the pattern of Europe leaving it ready to receive the “liberal” doctrines of the “Enlightenment”, while the Protestant churches began to lean heavily on the Jewish Old Testament.
It should be questioned how much of this split was due to the banker Jacob Fugger’s agreeing to broker the deal of the increased sale of indulgences to pay for Leo X vast building programmes? It was this same banking house that financed Colombus’s trip to the New World (through Ferdinand and Isabella) whereby the silver from Potosi was channelled into the bank’s coffers. Later the same banker championed Charles V’s election as Holy Roman Emperor, thus opening the door to the subsequent rape of the riches of South America.
Erasmus said in 1518:
I see (the Jews) a nation full of most tedious fabrications, who spread a kind of fog over everything. Talmud, Cabbala, Tetragrammaton, Gates of Light – words, words, words, I would rather have Christ mixed up with Scotus than with that rubbish of theirs.
Luther published a book in 1543 “On the Jews and their lies”.
Max Weber, a nineteenth-century German sociologist in 1904 suggested that there was a causal link between the two phenomena, the Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, more particularly between Calvinist Protestantism and modern capitalism. (See R. H. Towney’s book “Religion and the Rise of Capitalism”.)
Certainly the “Reformation” created an upheaval throughout Europe. The traumas and divisions of later French history are often attributed to the Revolution of 1789. In fact they take their roots from this period and the murderous bitternesses which it encouraged.
Any dissent creates vulnerability.
A recent article in the Washington Post headed “Republican Washington’s ‘Official rabbi'” quotes Rabbi Daniel Lapin as saying “Wealth is a consequence of doing the right thing and this is one of the secrets of Jewish success.” Here the meaning of the “right thing” is ambivalent.
In Gentile terms “the right thing” means “the honorable thing”. But politics, religion and economics are now ruled by the Jewish ethic where the end justifies the means. Protocol 1, Para. (22)….”we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end…”
(4).The monarchies and aristocracies of most of Europe HAVE BEEN removed. (Protocol 3, paras.(2) and (6), Protocol 6, para. (4))
This has been done with considerable bloodshed, i.e. the French and the Russian Revolutions, (both of which were Jewish inspired.) The British monarchy, bereft of power, are constantly under fire, whilst the aristocracy have been forced by taxation to sell their land.
(5).The Press (now including methods of communication like radio and television not thought of when the Protocols were written) IS entirely in Jewish hands. (Protocol 2, para.(5), Protocol 7 para.(5), Protocol 9, para.(9), Protocol 12, paras. (3). (4) and (12) )
Again this is dealt with more fully on the Home Page.
(6).Youth and education HAVE BEEN undermined. Here “Feminism” has played its part with disruption of the family unit. (Protocol 9, paras.(9) and (10),Protocol 10 para.(5),Protocol 16, paras.(1),(4) and (8).
(7).Freemasonry and various other offshoots – notably the Bilderberg Group – ARE agents of the Protocols’ agenda. Protocols 4, para (2), Protocol 11, para (7), Protocol 15, para. (4).
(8). Liberalism HAS BEEN the cry throughout the twentieth century with Democracy its catchword. Puppet presidents HAVE BEEN placed in power. (No one surely believes that men like Bush and Blair really pull the strings, surrounded as they are by a Jewish cabal?) (Protocol 9, para. (2), Protocol 10, paras. (9),(10) and (13).
(9).Fraudulent claims HAVE BEEN used to hoodwink the “goyim”: i.e. the myth of Einstein, and the Holocaust whilst the 9/11 “highjack” and the bomb explosions in London have been used to disrupt and terrorise. (Protocol l para (22). and Protocol 9, para (13).)
(10).Monopolies HAVE BEEN created in all sections of industry.(Protocol 6, para. (l).)
(11). Supposed “anti-semitism” IS constantly used to counter attack any suggestion of Jewish misdemeanours. (Protocol 9, para (2) and Protocol 11, Para (8) )
(12).The “hidden hand” of the Protocols DOES hold its fellow Jews in thrall. (Protocol l7, (9) )
Israel’s economic situation is dependent upon “donations” from fellow Jewry.
——————————————————————————–
Bearing in mind that the document was written in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Is it feasible to suppose that a “forger” could have predicted, so accurately, the situation of the world today? The only possible verdict on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is that they are, what they purport to be, the blueprint for world dominion by a Jewish Kabal.
——————————————————————————–
The Prop-Masters
Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia transform themselves into “survivors” of “the Holocaust”
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html
NOT FOR ME THE TURNING OF THE CHEEK- THAT WAY IT GETS WHACKED!
The portraits above are of the same man but in two different incarnations. On the left we see Martin “Gray” in retirement after a successful career peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits as a saintly “Holocaust Survivor” who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of the Treblinka “gas chamber.” The earlier portrait on the right is of the youthful Gray as a decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the forerunner of the KGB), responsible for the murder of millions of Christians and gentiles in Russia and Eastern Europe. Even Establishment researchers have had to admit that Gray’s book is as phony as the antiques he peddled. But Gray’s scam is symbolic of countless other Communist ghouls who have managed to land on their feet in the West, disguised as poor, persecuted “Survivors of the Holocaust” and feted as the saints and martyrs of the universe. Meanwhile the holocaust they perpetrated against millions of Christians slips further down the dark environs of Orwell’s memory hole.
In chapter 13 of Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist, Dickens notes that Fagin has an inexhaustible supply of props and disguises.
NOT DOWN MY MEMORY HOLE IT DOESN’T!!