Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky

Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky

2011

Source – Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake

Many years ago I read a fascinating discussion of the “tactics of mistake.” This essentially entailed using a target’s prejudices and preconceptions to mislead them as to the origin and intent of the attack, entrapping them in a tactical situation that later worked to the attacker’s strategic advantage.

This is what unfolded in the 9/11 attacks that led us into the matrix of wars and conflicts, present (Afghanistan and Iraq), planned (Iran and Syria) and projected (Jordan and Egypt), that benefit Israel and no other country — although I concede that many private contractors and politicians are doing very well for themselves out of the death and misery of others.

I am also absolutely certain as a strategic analyst that 9/11 itself, from which all else flows, was a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation. But Mossad did not do it alone. They needed local help within America (and perhaps elsewhere) and they had it, principally from some alumni of PNAC (the misnamed Project for a New American Century) and their affiliates within and outside of the US Government (USG), who in the 9/11 attacks got the “catalytic event” they needed and craved to take the US to war on Israel’s behalf, only eight months after coming into office.
– Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake

Alan Sabrosky’s latest article about 9/11 is an excellent analysis of great historical importance. Sabrosky believes, as I do, that the terror attacks that ushered in the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror” were part of an Israeli military intelligence/Zionist fifth column false-flag operation. It is very important for the public to see that a person with Dr. Sabrosky’s insight and credentials as a military strategist is openly supporting the thesis I have been researching and developing for the better part of the past 10 years.

I have investigated and written about the hypothesis that 9/11 was an Israeli false-flag operation since September 2001, and was for many years like one hand clapping. I was the only journalist working on an hypothesis that was strictly taboo in the mainstream (i.e. Zionist-controlled) media – and the 9/11 “truth” movement. I was banned from most 9/11 “truth” conferences and prevented from speaking at forums where I was supposed to speak. To have Dr. Sabrosky finally validate my thesis with his extremely insightful and articulate analysis is a great relief. I have paid a very heavy price for writing about a subject most would simply prefer to ignore.

There is, however, one point I would add to Sabrosky’s analysis. There is something about the Zionist state of Israel that is not widely known, but that needs to be clearly understood. That is the salient fact that Israel is ruled by a small group of absolutely ruthless extremists who have been raised as the sons and disciples of zealous Zionist terrorists. The ruling Likud party, currently headed by prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was actually founded by Menachem Begin, the former head of the Irgun – a notorious terrorist organization in Palestine in the 1930s and 1940s.

Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Zionist who once served as the personal secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder of the Betar and Irgun, described the Irgun as a terrorist movement in “The Rise of Terrorism”, a chapter from Promise and Fulfilment – Palestine 1917-1949, his book about the creation of the state of Israel:

Irgun was from the beginning organized on the strictly conspiratorial lines of a terrorist underground movement.

…and about the Stern Gang, also known as LEHY or LEHI (Lohmey Heruth Israel), Koestler wrote:

The Sternists were believers in unrestricted and indiscriminate terror.

What is not widely known is that it was the leaders of these two Zionist terrorist factions that created the Likud party in 1973 – and who came to power in Israel in 1977. Since then, this extremist party of terrorists has ruled Israel for most of the time. The first political leaders from the Likud that came to power in Israel were Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, the former terrorist leaders of the Irgun and Stern Gang. It should be noted that this is when the Israeli planning for the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 began. In 1979, Isser Harel, the former head of the Mossad, told an American Zionist of the “Arab terrorist” plan to attack the tallest buildings in New York City. 9/11, however, was not really planned or carried out by Arabs, but by Israelis who sought to deceive the world by placing the blame on Arab Muslims.

Zionism is a movement in which a form of social Darwinism has taken place. That is to say that the most extremist, ruthless, cut-throat, and unscrupulous political players have prevailed over the less violent Zionists. Israelis often complain that they wanted Athens but got Sparta. This is true; they got Sparta in spades.

The Israeli leaders that followed Begin and Shamir have been no less ruthless and unscrupulous in their actions. In early 2001, when Ariel Sharon was elected prime minister, I warned that he was a known genocidaire and terrorist. What else should one expect from such a leader besides more terrorism and killing? As history has shown, this is exactly what we got.

Source: Dr. Alan Sabrosky, “Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake”, 28 June 2011, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/28/demystifying-911-israel-and-the-tactics-of-mistake/

Questions about Olmert’s 9/11 Visit to NYC

June 15, 2011

In an effort to learn more about Ehud Olmert’s secret visit to New York City on the eve of 9/11, I sent the following question to Shaul and Meir Levy of Wings beachwear company after trying to reach them through their New York City-based real estate company, the Wings Group. The Levy brothers, Israeli immigrants of Syrian ancestry, have become extremely wealthy selling beach towels, sun lotions, and beachwear. I was trying to get answers from Shaul and Meir Levy about their meeting with Ehud Olmert in New York City on September 10, 2001. Although the meeting was reported in a 2004 article about the Betar football club in the Jerusalem Post there has been no discussion of Olmert’s 9/11 visit elsewhere. The Levys are evidently not interested in answering my questions.

Shaul Levy (here with his wife Elaine) has made millions from his chain of beachwear and souvenir shops in the Carolinas, Florida, Massachusetts, Texas, and California. Levy gave $2 million to create a Chabad Lubavitch center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. He and his brother were co-owners of the right-wing anti-Arab Betar football club of Jerusalem, which is supposedly the reason they met with Ehud Olmert in New York City on the eve of 9/11. If that is really all their meeting was about why has it been kept secret?

The Levy brothers, Syrian Jewish immigrants from Israel, came to the United States in 1967. They oddly named their beachwear chain after the “wings” emblem given to Israeli pilots in the air force. Their beach stores in Florida are usually staffed by young Israeli men fresh out of the military. How much sense does that make? The Wings company has a documented history of allowing the Israeli men running their warehouses to sexually abuse female employees. Such boorish behavior is actually quite typical in Israeli military operations. Is the Wings network providing logistical services for the Mossad?

The Levy brothers’ retail stores are usually stand along operations with large warehouse spaces in the rear. This does not make a lot of sense. Is there an off-the-books backdoor business that has enabled the Levys to become millionaires in a competitive market in which most merchants barely break even? Every other store in Florida sells beach paraphernalia, including the corner drug store. How is it possible for the Levys to have done so well with so much competition? Are they running more than beachwear through their network of stores? Where does all the money come from?

The Levy brothers have grown their Wings business into plazas…

turning small stores like this one (in the Brompton in 1990) at 200 E 86th Street in New York City (a beach store in Manhattan?)…

into large commercial properties.

The Wings Group is based at 666 Broadway in this building in which they own the majority of the floors, according to their website. The 666 building is also home to Ariel Levy’s Avenue Real Estate.

Some of the Wings Group properties are clearly engaged in logistics, like the Levys’ Palmetto Center in Myrtle Beach…

like this unmarked warehouse building at their Airport Industrial Park at Myrtle Beach airport in South Carolina…

or this Miami warehouse next to the Opa-Locka airport in Miami…

or this row of warehouse type buildings at 170-180 Jacobs Lane near the Myrtle Beach airport…

and next to this huge warehouse run by the Israeli Rafi Moshe in Socastee, South Carolina. Why would an Israeli come to America to run a warehouse in South Carolina?

The warehouse is actually the home of the Israeli-run Strand Imports at 550 George Bishop Parkway – 1 mile from the Myrtle Beach International Airport. Why are the Levy’s invested in warehouse properties near airports on the East Coast? Is the Levy network involved in drug smuggling? Is the Wings operation the real reason Israeli “art students” were snooping around DEA offices prior to 9/11? If you run a large drug smuggling operation you need a multi-state logistics network and inside information from law enforcement agencies to protect the operation. See the DEA report “Suspicious Activities Involving Israeli Art Students at DEA Facilities”

The Wings group is also developing residential real estate projects in Costa Rica, along the coast – but of course…

and in Jaffa, the old Palestinian port city near Tel Aviv…

and, of course, in Jerusalem – the Israeli occupied capital city of Palestine. The Levys are very much involved in Israel, especially with the ruling extreme right-wing Betar/Likud faction of Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, and Benjamin Netanyahu. So why did the Levy brothers meet with Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem, in New York City on the eve of 9/11, and why has this visit been kept secret by the U.S. media and political class?

BOLLYN’S OPEN LETTER TO THE LEVY BROTHERS

I called the Wings Group and asked to speak with Shaul or Meir. I was told by a receptionist named Andrea that I should send my questions by email. After two days, I have not received any response so I am posting the email that I sent as an open letter:

Question for Shaul and Meir Levy about Betar and Olmert
Monday, June 13, 2011 7:52 AM
From: “Christopher Bollyn”
To: reception@wingsgroup.com
CC: ariel.levy@wingsgroup.com

Shaul and Meir Levy,

I am a journalist working on an article about Ehud Olmert and the Betar football club. These questions are for the purpose of this article.

The Jerusalem Post reported that you were formerly co-owners of the Betar football club:

“Three years ago, Betar was sold to a four-man consortium (US businessmen Meir and Shaul Levy, local businessman Meir Finegel, and Jerusalem real estate agent Sasson Shem Tov, who pulled out a few weeks ago), following a meeting in New York with then-mayor Ehud Olmert on September 10, 2001. There were no other potential buyers.”

Source: “A fallen empire,” by Daniel Ben-Tal, Jerusalem Post, July 23, 2004

I assume Meir Finegel is actually Meir Panigel? How long were you owners of the Betar club? What was the purpose of the meeting in New York with Ehud Olmert on September 10, 2001? Where did this meeting take place? Did Mr. Olmert remain in New York until September 11, 2001?

Thank you for your consideration of my request,

Christopher Bollyn

Israel and 9/11: Mossad in Florida

June 6, 2008
Reposted from Bollyn.info

Roy Sarfati, on the left, is the son of the Israeli weapons smuggler, Maurice Sarfati, who runs the family business and websites under the alias Moshe Tzorfati. Does these Americans really know who they are doing business with?

Is the Israeli Weapons Dealer Maurice Sarfati Still Doing Business in Miami?

Maurice Sarfati, the Miami-based Israeli who brokered the 1989 sale of Israeli weapons to the Medellin drug lord Rodriguez Gacha of the Colombian drug cartel, is apparently still doing business in the Miami area under the alias, Moshe Tzorfati.

Sarfati was one of the Israelis who supplied 500 machine guns (Uzis and Galil assault rifles) and other weapons to one of Colombia’s most notorious drug traffickers. The illegal weapons transfer was directed by three Israelis, Maurice R. Sarfati, Yair G. Klein, and Israeli Brig. General (Res.) Pinchas Shachar. The deal was financed by Bank Hapoalim, an Israeli bank in New York.

The Colombian authorities discovered the Israeli-made weapons and hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition when they searched the ranch of Jose Rodriguez Gacha after he was ambushed and killed by the Colombian police.

Jane Hunter wrote about the Miami-based Israeli weapons dealers in an article entitled “Covert Operations: The Human Factor.” The article appeared in The Link in August 1992.

Hunter wrote about Pinhas Shachar (Shahar):

Shachar, according to a British television report, was a Mossad agent and an “undercover representative” of the state-owned Israeli Military Industries (IMI). He was part of a network of Israeli arms dealers in Miami that had been selling Israeli weapons to Latin America since 1982.

And about Yair Klein:

Klein’s work in Colombia, where his Israeli-licensed security company, Spearhead Ltd., trained the hit squads of the Medellin cocaine cartel in assassination and bombing techniques, was beginning to attract unwelcome attention. In August 1989, a promotional film that Spearhead made of the training exercises in Colombia would fall into the hands of Colombian authorities and, to Israel s acute embarrassment, it would be aired by television stations around the world. Colombian authorities would lay much of the blame for the 1989 assassination of a leading presidential candidate, a series of massacres, and the bombings of a passenger aircraft and the headquarters of the domestic intelligence agency on Spearhead’s tutelage. In 1988, Klein was in Antigua, looking for a new way to provide arms to his Medellin client, Jose Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha.

About the Sarfati Weapons Deal:

In 1988 Shachar, Klein and Sarfati convinced Antiguan officials to provide a false front to ship $381,500 worth of rifles and ammunition to Medellin boss Rodriguez Gacha. Gen. Shachar placed the order with IMI. His name, Klein’s and Sarfati’s would all appear on the paperwork for the sale and, when the operation was exposed, Shachar would quickly depart for Israel.

In March 1989, Israel dispatched the Medellin’s guns on a ship, escorted by Captain Philip Earon, subsequently the deputy mayor of Eilat. The arms would be discovered in January 1990, buried on a farm belonging to Gacha’s son, with papers and serial numbers identifying Israel as the source. Already fending off charges that it had sanctioned, or assigned, the Spearhead training team to Columbia, Israel insisted that Antigua had ordered the weapons fair and square. Although, after intense international pressure, it put Klein on trial and handed him a token conviction, Israel insists to this day that its security maestros were training Colombian ranchers.

Klein, depending on which story you believe, was paid in cocaine delivered to him in Israel or in narco-dollars delivered in the U.S. and subsequently transported to Israel by a network of Orthodox Jews specializing in laundering.

Sarfati used his melon farm as a front for Israeli activities with the Colombian drug cartel. Sarfati’s illegal business activities on Antigua had been bankrolled with U.S. taxpayer money from the Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC), an agency of the U.S. government.

Sarfati’s OPIC loan application had been submitted for his company called Roydan (Antigua) Limited. The Roydan company is apparently the combined names of his two sons, Roy J. Sarfati and Dan A. Sarfati.

By July 1988, Roydan Ltd. was $8 million in debt. By February 1989, Sarfati’s Roydan Ltd. was no longer in existence, but Sarfati was.

Sarfati had received $1.3 million in loans from OPIC in 1985 and 1986, the Washington Post reported in November 1990. OPIC later suspected that not all of the money ended up in melons. In 1988, OPIC sued Sarfati for defaulting on the loans.

The Post article reported:

The loan requirements of the Overseas Private Investment Corp. read like those of any bank in the United States. The only difference is that OPIC is a government agency and if a borrower doesn’t pay back a loan, American taxpayers are the losers.

Under the circumstances, one would expect OPIC to be tight with its money. But one would be disappointed. In recent years OPIC, which lends money for business ventures in developing countries, has come under increasing scrutiny for risky loan practices. Now an investigation into an arms deal threatens to resurrect one loan that OPIC would just as soon keep buried.

Although there is no evidence that Sarfati was involved in arms trafficking at the time the loans were made, court documents from OPIC’s 1988 lawsuit when Sarfati defaulted indicate he was a risky loan. OPIC did a marginal job in checking out Sarfati before handing him $1.3 million.

For example, in 1983 Sarfati had the Bank of Credit and Commerce in Miami send OPIC a letter of recommendation. The bank called Sarfati “one of our valued customers” and said he had five companies with accounts at the bank. Sarfati later testified in the lawsuit that three of the companies either had no assets or never got off the ground.

In 1988, the General Accounting Office looked into Sarfati and found that if OPIC had looked closely enough, it would have found that the melon business was showing a loss before OPIC gave Sarfati a second loan.

Maurice Sarfati is apparently still doing business in Miami under the name Moshe Tzorfati. The Sarfati family has a website called the D.R.I.M. group, which apparently uses the first initial of the four family members: Dan, Roy, Ilana, and Maurice — or Moshe.

The website http://www.drimgroup.com says this about the D.R.I.M. Group:

Established in 1995, The D.R.I.M. GROUP is a multi faceted group of companies, with diversified activities:

-Strategic Consulting in sophisticated financing vehicles for income producing real estate and other specific type of businesses.

-Commercial Aviation Consulting.

-Research and Development of a treatment method (Patent pending) for speech dysfluency (stuttering), language and communication disorders.

-Development of specialized centers in traditional and alternative healthcare.

The website provides the contact information:

USA :
4601 Sheridan Street
Suite 301
Hollywood, FLORIDA 33021
Tel: 954-965 6924
954-965 6925
Fax: 954-965 6926

MTzorfati@drimgroup.com

MTzorfati is evidently Moshe Tzorfati, whose website domain is registered at: 19901 E Country Club Dr., Apt. 2101, in Miami. This is in the Zip Code area of 33180, where the Sarfati family (ies) have several residences and relations.

Moshe Tzorfati and Maurice Sarfati are both listed as living at 20314 NE 34th Court. After his criminal role was exposed in supplying weapons to the Colombian drug cartel, he evidently decided to change the spelling of his name. Maurice Sarfati is the name of a famous French actor but that name could no longer be used in Miami and the United States.

Here is Sarfati’s old listing from the U.S. Public Records Index:

Name: Maurice Sarfati (along with Ilana and Roy J.)
Birth Date: Jun 1941
Street address: 20314 NE 34th CT
City: Miami
County: Miami-Dade
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180
Phone Number: 305-466-1832
Record Number: 829168268

Here he is after his Israeli makeover with an new Hebrew alias:

Name: Moshe Tzorfati
Street address: 20314 NE 34th CT
City: Miami
County: Miami-Dade
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180
Phone Number: 305
Record Number: 838149884

It is interesting that the Sarfati’s D.R.I.M. group is involved in aviation, finance, and healthcare. Here are the sections from the website:

Aviation

The Aviation Consulting Division has extensive experience in commercial aviation. Specifically in the formation of start up companies for passengers transport, charter programs, and cargo airline.

The Aviation Consulting Division, provides a variety of services, including over-flight rights, landing rights, and opening new routes. Such services were provided to governments, international travel corporations, and airlines. We are uniquely placed to facilitate aircraft refurbishing and pre sale inspections.

Financing

The Financial Strategic Consulting Division developed a structure specifically designed for qualified start up or existing corporations acquiring income producing real estate, to use this vehicle, and seek financing under certain terms, by way of a Private Offering(rule 144-A). This ready structure reduces considerably the time and costs, usually required.

The D.R.I.M. GROUP engaged a leading legal institution, and a team of experts in sophisticated Asset Backed Securities transactions, to adapt the structure.

Healthcare

Communication Disorders

The D.R.IM. GROUP developed a comprehensive treatment program,The Ultimate TM SpeechCare Systems, for individuals who stutter. Innovative and unique techniques, presently under patent review, were developed by Roy J. Sarfati, MS,CCC-SLP, and incorporated for the first time in specific intensive treatment programs for children and adults. Our team consist of highly trained clinicians in a variety of fields, is at the forefront of progress.

Rejuvenation and Anti-Aging

This program is one of the most sophisticated and comprehensive available today. Headed and developed by Dr. Cass Terry MD,Ph.D., one of the world leading experts in this field, the program is designed to address every facet of aging and rejuvenation.

Geriatric and Rehabilitation Centers

The D.R.I.M. GROUP began diversifying into healthcare in 1997. Its team designed and developed a unique program for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Centers, operated with the state of the art technology.

The activities of the Sarfati family clearly show how Israeli criminals working with their network in Miami are able to operate with impunity. At least for the illegal transfer of weapons to the Colombian drug cartel Maurice Sarfati (a.k.a. Moshe Tzorfati) should be prosecuted and tried. Why has the U.S. government not pursued its case against Sarfati, the Israeli criminal who masterminded illegal Colombian weapons deals from his home in Miami?

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, “9-11: The Florida Connection”, 21 May 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-the-florida-connection

The Sarfati Connection, Art Students & Israeli Support to Colombian Drug Lords

June 5, 2008
Reposted from Bollyn.info

“Some day, perhaps, if it’s decided that the stories can be told, you’ll see that the state [ Israel ] has been involved in acts which are a thousand times more dirty than anything going on in Colombia . But these things were decided by the government, in cabinet meetings. As long as the government decides to do something, something that the national interest demanded, then it is legitimate. But if an individual wants to do the same thing, it isn’t. That’s just the way it is. It’s very simple.”
– Rafael “Raful” Eitan (killed by a wave), Jerusalem Post, September 1, 1989

Ehud Olmert, the current prime minister of Israel, held a very secret meeting in New York City with two Israeli businessmen, Shaul and Meir Levy, the day before 9-11. Olmert, who was then mayor of Jerusalem, was so secretive about his pre-9-11 meeting that nobody even knew about it for three years after 9-11. Why was the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem in New York City the day before 9-11 and why has his visit been kept secret?

Shaul Levy of Myrtle Beach and New York City, met with Ehud Olmert in New York City on September 10, 2001. The Levy brothers have apparently done very well selling tee shirts and beach towels. They are now deeply involved in real estate with their Wings Group and have given $2 million to start a Chabad Lubavitch house in Myrtle Beach. Is there a secret to their success?

A Wings store belonging to Shaul and Meir Levy…

and their logo, the wings of the Israeli air force.

I then raise the logical question: Were the men Olmert met, Israelis from the extreme right-wing Likud party and owners of a chain of beach stores in Florida called Wings, somehow connected to the Florida-based network of fake Israeli art students who tried to infiltrate offices of the Drug Enforcement Agency (D.E.A.) and other U.S. government offices in 1999-2001?

There is, in fact, a very remarkable connection between Dror Levy, the Israeli military “computer systems analyst” who later became the vice president and marketing director for the Levy brothers, and one of the team leaders of the Israeli “art students” casing DEA offices in Florida. The evidence suggests that the Levys, the Israelis Olmert met in New York on September 10, 2001, are part of the Israeli intelligence network in Florida.

Dror Levy and a leader of the “art students,” allegedly named Hanane Sarfati, actually lived at the same address – 4220 Sheridan Street, Hollywood ( Florida ).

WHO IS SARFATI?

The Sarfati family is well known in Israel – and Colombia . Maurice Sarfati, an Israeli living in Miami, caused an international scandal in 1990 when it was discovered that he sold Israeli weapons to Colombia ‘s most ruthless cocaine traffickers. This weapons transfer was approved at the highest levels of the Israeli military state.

The weapons smuggler Maurice Sarfati and his family live in the same neighbourhood to this day and may be related to the Sarfati mentioned below. It is also possible that they are the same people.

Maurice Sarfati was the broker in the Israeli government’s shipment in April 1989 of 500 automatic weapons through the Caribbean nation of Antigua to the boss of the Medellin Cartel, Jose Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha. The Israeli weapons were later used to assassinate the Colombian presidential candidate Luis Carlos Galan. This is the highly illegal situation which prompted the above quote from the late Rafael Eitan. As you can see by what Eitan said, this is actually quite normal business for Israel. (They do much worse.)

SARFATI & THE ART STUDENTS

The DEA report about the Israeli students says this about one of the leaders, a “Hanane Sarfati”:

…The name of her “Team Leader” and/or “Boss” is Hanane SARFATI, and the name of the art school is BEZALEL. The “boss” was to pick the art students up in downtown Tampa at approximately 5:00 p.m. Additional surveillance revealed a dark-colored mini van, driven by a white male with dark hair, picking up approximately six females, all carrying similar “portfolios,” in a crowded area during downtown Tampa rush hour. The Florida license plate on the van was U71 DLD, a 1991 red Dodge mini-van, registered to Hanane SARFATI, W/M, DOB 06/03/1977, 4220 Sheridan St. #303, Hollywood, FL, and 701 S. 21st Ave., Hollywood, FL. A Florida Driver’s License check revealed S613-320-77-203-0 to belong to Hinane SARFATI, 4220 Sheridan St.,, #303 , Hollywood , FL. This license has been suspended and is not currently valid…

80. S/A David Keikin interviewed subject Hanan SERFATY. SERFATY stated that he served in the Israeli military between the ages of 18-21. He further indicated that he arrived in the U.S. approximately one year ago at the age of 23. When questioned as to what he did between the ages of 21 and 24, he refused to answer. The interviewing agent indicated that SERFATY’s command of the English language was excellent, even the utitilization of slang words. SERFATY indicated that he resides in Hollywood , FL , with a phone number of (954) 478-1006. He further related that he purchases the paintings from an Anglo male, TOM (LNU) for $8.00-$15.00/piece, In turn, each piece of artwork is subsequently sold for $50-80. TOM (LNU) allegedly resides in Hollywood/Ft. Lauderdale area, and reportedly has a storage unit in south Florida where he keeps the artwork to be picked up.

81. It should be noted that in SERFATY’s possession were deposit and withdrawal slips for Washington Mutual Bank account #038300002297689, dating, from December 19, 2000 through February 21, 2001. The fifty-one (51) slips were for transactions at various banks in Dade and Broward County , FL , banks, specifically in Coral Gables , Miami , Hollywood , Aventura, and Tamarac , The deposits for the timeframe totaled $93,252.00, with withdrawals totaling $86,000. Also in SERFATY’s possession were four (4) deposit slips for First Union Bank account #1010017986436, from February 26, 2001 through March 1, 2001, totaling $14,250.

The index of Israeli suspects at the end of the report says this about Sarfati, or Serfaty:

39. SERFATY, Hanan, aka Hanane SARFATI: NADDIS negative, 4220 Sheridan St., #303 , Hollywood , FL 33.021, and 701 S. 21 Ave., Hollywood , FL , DOB 06/03/1977, 6′, FL DL S613-320-77-203-0, registered owner of red mini-van FL tag # U71 DLD, phone number (954) 478-1006, cellular phone number (954) 478-0961.

What a small world Hollywood must be. Dror Levy lived at the very same house as Hanan Sarfati:

Name: Dror Levy
Address: 4200 Sheridan St
City: Hollywood
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33021-3662
Phone Number: 954-985-0851
Residence Years: 1996

There are only six phone listings for a “Dror Levy” in the United States between 1993 and 2002 and they are all in Florida:

Dror Levy Hollywood Florida 954-985-0851 1996
Dror Levy Hollywood Florida 954-435-5802 2002
Dror Levy Miami Florida 305-792-9492 1999 2000
Dror Levy Ft. Lauderdale Florida 954-472-1952 1997 – 2001
Dror Levy St. Petersburg Florida 813-360-6132 1996
Dror Levy Clearwater Beach Florida 727-466-0941 2000

Dror Levy had this address prior to 9-11:

Name: Dror Levy
Address: 3300 NE 191St St
City: Miami
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180-2451
Phone Number: 305-792-9492
Residence Years: 1999 2000

There also happened to be another man named Sarfati who lived at this address with Dror Levy. This Sarfati had the same name of the notorious weapons smuggler. What a coincidence – or is it?

Name: Maurice Sarfati
Birth Date: 1975
Street address: 3300 NE 191st St
City: Miami
County: Miami-Dade
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180

There is much more to this story. Who are Hanane and Maurice Sarfati and where have they gone? What has become of Dror Levy? Is he the same Dror Levy who is now a director of the Israeli-run DSP Group, Inc., headed by the son of Itzhak Shamir?

Are these Sarfatis related to the Israeli weapons smuggler, Maurice Sarfati? Is it more than a coincidence that they shared the same address as Dror Levy, the Israeli who ran Levy brothers’ Wings operation in Florida?

Source: http://www.rebelnews.org/component/content/article/7860

Behind Closed Doors: Israelis Dismissed from 9/11 Trial

June 12, 2011

Court document of 26 May 2011 showing that the Israeli Mossad company that controlled passenger screening operations in Boston on 9/11 has been dismissed from the 9/11 litigation. Why would Donald Migliori and Mary Schiavo, attorneys for the victim’s family, allow this to happen? How can it be that the company responsible for allowing armed terrorists onto the planes is not held culpable for the losses on 9/11?

The 9/11 litigation process is incestuous business. David Werner Sass, a senior partner of the law firm of McLaughlin & Stern (law firm for ICTS), has been a director of ICTS since 2002. Allowing a Zionist judge to administer “justice” has resulted in gross injustices for the 9/11 relatives and the nation. This cannot stand.

Ehud Olmert, the disgraced former prime minister of Israel and mayor of Jerusalem, is currently fighting for his life in an Israeli court. Olmert, a disciple of the notorious Israeli terrorist Yitzhak Shamir, was in New York City on an unexplained secret visit on 9/11. Will the Israeli court ask him to explain the purpose of his secret trip? Olmert, a protege of Shamir, served as minister for minority affairs from 1988-1990 (during the First Intifada) and as Minister of Health during Shamir’s regime from 1986-1992.

Olmert has a long history of criminal activity and indictments in Israel. He is clearly one of the architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 as can be seen by his secret visit to New York City on September 10-11, 2001. When will we see U.S. authorities calling for Olmert’s arrest, along with the other Zionist masterminds of 9/11?

Sources close to the 9/11 litigation informed me that International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 terrorism case, was dismissed from the lawsuit last week. This was discussed in a document of 12 May 2011 that indicates that this move was on Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein’s agenda for May 16. The Mossad-linked company ICTS had apparently filed a motion to be dismissed from the lawsuit. ICTS is the Israeli parent company of Huntleigh USA, the passenger screening outfit that allegedly allowed armed terrorists to board the planes in Boston on 9/11, according to the official version of events. On 26 May 2011, with the assent of attorneys for the plaintiffs, ICTS was dismissed from the 9/11 litigation. This is completely outrageous, like all the other injustice the 9/11 relatives have suffered in the court of the Orthodox Jew Zionist Alvin K. Hellerstein.

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein presides over all 9/11 litigation. As a devoted Zionist Jew, Hellerstein has a fundamental conflict of interest because the key defendant in the 9/11 trial is ICTS, the Israeli company that allowed the armed terrorists to board the airplanes. Hellerstein has a second blatant conflict of interest in that his son Joseph is a lawyer in a law firm that represents the owners of ICTS. Hellerstein has obstructed justice for the relatives and the nation by preventing an open trial to determine who is truly responsible for the terror attacks of 9/11.

The Zionist judge Alvin K. Hellerstein discussed dismissing ICTS, the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 litigation, as this 12 May 2011 court document from the Bavis family case shows.

Judge Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9/11 litigation. His son Joseph is a lawyer in Israel with Amit, Pollak, and Matalon, a law firm which represents the Israeli owners of ICTS and Huntleigh USA. In 2001, ICTS was run by a team of Israelis including the Harel brothers, Boaz and Ezra, and Menachem Atzmon. Atzmon is a convicted Israeli criminal who was involved in illegal fund-raising for the Likud party of Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, and Menachem Begin. Olmert was in New York City on the eve of 9/11 and probably remained to observe the crime. Ezra Harel “died” at age 53 on a yacht off the coast of Spain in November 2003 after being indicted with his father Aryeh Mualem of serious financial fraud in Israel. Ezra Harel reportedly owned a 65 percent controlling stake in ICTS when he left the scene.

The St. Louis company Huntleigh USA was a wholly owned subsidiary of ICTS, which had been bought by the Harel brothers, two well known financial fraudsters. As the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported on 14 September 2001:

Huntleigh is an odd blend of hometown business ownership and international security expertise. The U.S. subsidiary is owned by ICTS International NV, a publicly held company based in the Netherlands, which trades on the Nasdaq market in the United States. It has contracts in 50 U.S. airports and 30 airports elsewhere….

ICTS had a harder edge from its very beginning. It was founded in 1987 by former security officials of Israel’s El Al airlines and bought in 1994 by Leedan, a Dutch investment holding company owned by two brothers, Ezra Harel and Boaz Harel. The former commander in chief of the Israeli air force, Amos Lapidot, is still on the board.

The following list is the directors and executives of ICTS in 2002. Boaz Harel was Chairman of ICTS USA (1994), Inc. He was Chairman and Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS International N.V. from March 2004 to August 2004. Prior to this, Boaz Harel was a Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS from January 1, 1996 to November 12, 2001:

Ezra Harel (supposedly deceased 2003) 52 Chairman of the Supervisory Board
Menachem Atzmon 58 Member of the Supervisory Board
Matthew Albert Nissim 69 Member of the Supervisory Board, Secretary
Elie Housman 63 Member of the Supervisory Board
Moshe Winer 53 Member of the Supervisory Board
David W. Sass 67 Member of the Supervisory Board
Melvin F. Lazar 63 Member of the Supervisory Board and
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Lynda Davey 48 Member of the Supervisory Board
Lior Zouker 54 President and Chief Executive Officer
Joseph Yahav 46 Vice President International
Stefan Vermeulen 32 Chief Financial Officer
Doron Zicher 44 Vice President – Products & Technology

BETAR – THE SHANGHAI CONNECTION AT ICTS

Matthew Albert Nissim was clearly a key elder partner for the Harel brothers at ICTS and before. He had been Co-Managing Director of Leedan International Holdings and served as President of ICTS-USA (1994) Inc. since January 1994. He was also Secretary of ICTS International since January 1994. From 1994 to 1995, he served as Managing Director of ICTS International B.V. Nissim served as President of Harel & Partners from 1991 to 1994. He has also a Director with them of Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. since September 25, 1997. He served as a Director of ICTS International NV and also served as its Member of the Supervisory Board from 2002 to December 6, 2006.

Nissim is not just an older partner with the Harel brothers, he is one of the key players in the 9/11 false-flag terrorism with other members of the Betar (Zionist militia) from China. Shaul Eisenberg, Mossad’s mega-agent in China and Japan, was also involved with the Betar brigades in China in the 1930s and 40s. Eisenberg is the smoking gun between these Betar Likudniks from China and 9/11. Eisenberg owned Atwell, a Mossad company that tried to get the security contract for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (World Trade Center, airports, harbors, tunnels, etc.) in 1987. Rafi Eitan, Shalom Bendor, and Zvi Malkin were involved in this attempt to obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center. Ehud Olmert’s father and uncle were founding members of the Betar brigades in Harbin and Shanghai, China. Matthew Albert Nissim of ICTS was born in Shanghai. The fact that at least three architectural level players in the 9/11 attacks came from the Zionist communities of China suggests that this may be a key link between the masters of terrorism. For more on the Mossadniks who controlled security at the World Trade Center see The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11.

There is a saying in U.S. courts that the side that gets the most evidence excluded wins. In my trial the Zionist judge excluded all evidence that proved a conspiracy by the undercover police to injure me when they invaded my home in August 2006, and he refused to allow my expert witness to testify on the propriety of the actions taken by the police. The judge’s wife, Robin Warman Riebman, is active in the Chicago chapter of ORT America, a Zionist organization in which Stephanie Pritzker is the regional director. Stephanie is the daughter of Michael L. Pritzker, a Chicago attorney with a documented criminal history. Prior to becoming a director of ORT, Pritzker was an executive with the Jewish Federation/Jewish United Fund of Chicago. The Pritzker family, owners of Hyatt Hotels, is a wealthy and powerful Zionist family from Chicago. It is through Zionist networks like ORT that orders from higher-level Zionists can be passed to the judge through his wife. This is exactly what happened in my case in the corrupt court of Hyman I. Riebman.

Judge Riebman, for example, did not even sanction the police for intentionally destroying the video evidence they had made of the assault, a clear violation of police regulations. He then allowed Michael Barber, the Hoffman Estates police officer who worked with the Department of Homeland Security, to testify on the effects and risks of using a TASER, based solely on information he had been given by TASER International. Furthermore, it was Barber who had tortured me with a TASER while I was handcuffed and pinned to the ground with him on my back and Timothy Stoy kneeling on my temple. On the stand both Stoy and Barber clearly lied about having given a verbal TASER warning, while none had been given. Guess who won the battle in Riebman’s court of injustice?

Hyman I. Riebman is the corrupt Cook County judge who presided over the seriously flawed Bollyn trial…

and his son Elliott is a defense attorney for former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich. Here Blagojevich defense attorneys Aaron Goldstein, left, and Elliott Riebman are seen leaving court.

In the trial for the family of Mark Bavis, who died on 9/11, the judge is now seeking to remove from the trial the Israeli company who was responsible for passenger screening on 9/11. The evidence has already been removed, now Judge Hellerstein wants to remove the culprits.

The only remaining wrongful death case is Mary Bavis vs UAL Corporation, et al. This case represents the only 9/11 trial that will ever be held and should be of great concern to all Americans. The flagrant conflict of interest on the part of the judge cannot be ignored. Judge Hellerstein must be removed from the case and a new process begun for all of the 9/11 families who have not been treated fairly in the tort litigation.

The simplest way to remove Judge Hellerstein is to show that his son’s law firm has represented the owners of ICTS and Huntleigh USA. I am doing that with the following documents to show that Amit, Pollak, and Matalon (Joseph Z. Hellerstein is “of counsel” with Amit, Pollak, and Matalon) represents entities that include the owners of ICTS:

Amit, Pollak, and Matalon represents BOS (Better Online Solutions), Cukierman Investments, and Catalyst Fund. Edouard Cukierman is Chairman of the Board of Directors of BOS, the founder and CEO of Catalyst Funds, and the Chairman of Cukierman & Co Investment House.

Edouard Cukierman (left) is the founder and CEO of Catalyst Funds and Chairman of Cukierman & Co Investment House. Here he poses with his partners Yair Shamir, son of the notorious Stern Gang terrorist Yitzhak Shamir, and Boaz Harel, owner of ICTS with his brother and other Israeli criminals on 9/11.

Yair Shamir is the son of the notorious terrorist and murderer Yitzhak Shamir of the Stern Gang. Shamir, born Icchak Jeziernicky in Ruzhany, Russia, served as prime minister of Israel from 1983-1984, and from 1986 to 1992. It was during Shamir’s reign that preparations for 9/11 were being made. In 1987, for example, a high-level Mossad company owned by Shaul Eisenberg tried to get the security contract for the World Trade Center. It was rejected when it was discovered that it was headed by known Israeli criminals who had stolen materials to make nuclear bombs from the United States. Why was ICTS, a company run by convicted Israeli criminals, allowed to provide security services in U.S. airports?

Cukierman is also Chairman of the Board of BOS, a.k.a. Better Online Solutions of Israel.
Source: http://www.boscorporate.com/?CategoryID=172

Boaz Harel, co-owner (with his brother Ezra) and Chairman of ICTS International, is President & Managing Partner at Cukierman Investments. This fact is often omitted from his biographical data but can be seen here:

Source: Boaz Harel, President & Managing Partner of Catalyst Fund and Cukierman Investments

The following two legal documents show that Amit, Pollak, and Matalon of Tel Aviv is on the record as being legal counsel for Cukierman, Catalyst, and BOS. They include such statements as this, “The validity of the ordinary shares, including the ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of the note and the exercise of the warrants, will be passed upon for us by Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co., our Israeli counsel.”

http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?ID=4126697&SessionID=Cx2VHv6UTlKsQP7

and: http://secwatch.com/filings/view.jsp?formid=7351724&page=1

It should be noted that Edouard Cukierman is also “an officer of the Israel Defense Forces Spokesman Unit”. This shows his connection to the state of Israel and its military forces.

Edouard Cukierman is the founder and CEO of Catalyst Investments and Chairman of Cukierman & Co. Investment House. He is also on the Board of Sar-El, an Israeli Defense Forces volunteer organization. He serves as an Officer of the IDF Spokesman Unit, and is part of the Hostage & Crisis Negotiation Team (Reserves).

The Boleyns and the English Bible

The Boleyns and the English Bible
February 3, 2011

Wherefore I do beseech you all, for the love of our Lord God, that you do at all seasons hold by the truth, and speak it, and embrace it.
– George Boleyn’s last words, 17 May 1536

The Great Bible of 1539 was the first authorized English Bible. King Henry VIII commanded that a Bible be put in every parish in the kingdom.

Today, the Bible is the most popular book in the English language. When we read the Holy Scripture or hear it read in church we treat it with reverence, but it has not always been that way. In the 1520s, hundreds of Bibles, the first copies printed in English, were burned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of London.

The first complete edition of the English New Testament by Tyndale was published in Worms in 1526. It was illegal to own and those who had copies faced execution. The Bibles were confiscated and burned by Roman authorities. The whole printing was bought up by the church and burned in St. Paul’s by Bishop Cuthbert Tunstall.

William Tyndale, the Father of the English Bible, was strangled and burned at the stake.

In 1536, William Tyndale, the Roman Catholic priest who translated the Bible from Greek and Hebrew, was strangled and burned at the stake near Brussels. Branded a heretic and hounded by agents of Rome, Tyndale lived and worked on the English Bible in exile in Antwerp, Marburg, and Worms for the last 12 years of his life. His New Testament, translated directly from Greek, was first published in Worms in 1526.

Tyndale was strangled and burned at the stake in 1536 in Brussels. “Lord, open the King of England’s eyes” were Tyndale’s last words.

“While William Tyndale was praying in his dying moments that God would open the eyes of the King of England, God had already answered the prayer in his own way: he had used a woman to influence the King and the nation with the gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ. That woman was Anne Boleyn,” wrote Kath Dredge in Anne Boleyn: One Short Life that Changed the English-speaking World by Colin Hamer.

The four-hundred year old King James Bible that we use today is essentially the Tyndale translation, which is the basis for about 85 percent of the King James Version of 1611. The Tyndale Bible allowed the people to read the Scriptures in English for the first time. The first book of Holy Scripture printed in England was a copy of Tyndale’s New Testament, printed on vellum and presented to Anne Boleyn, the Queen of England, in 1536. Anne already had a personal copy from the Antwerp printing in 1534, which she openly displayed – although it was a banned book.

“The Newe Testament, dylygently corrected and compared with the Greke by Willyan Tindale. Antwerp, 1534.” Anne Boleyn’s personal copy of Tyndale’s New Testament, with her coat of arms at the bottom.

The Boleyn family had been instrumental in bringing the Scripture to the people in the English language. “Promoting the vernacular Bible was clearly a Boleyn family enterprise,” Eric Ives writes in The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn. To understand how revolutionary the English Bible was in the 1530s we need to consider that for seven centuries after the conversion of England to Christianity (in the Third Century), the common man had no access to the text of the Scriptures. It was not until 1538, when Henry VIII commanded the clergy to install the Great Bible in a convenient place in every parish church that the common people were able to read the Bible in English.

The Gospel of John translated by William Tyndale

In Catholic England the Scriptures were in Latin, often read by priests who understood very little of the text. The Church of Rome wielded immense political power and owned one-third of the kingdom. Keeping the Holy Scriptures out of the hands of the people was essential for the Church to maintain its power over the people and their king. Anne Boleyn, the second wife of King Henry VIII, was dedicated to liberating England from the clutches of the Church of Rome, a mission for which she paid the ultimate price.

In “George Boleyn, Religion and the Reformation,” Claire Ridgway points out that the Boleyns were “reformist Catholics”:

Until Henry VIII broke with the Church of Rome, England was a devoutly Roman Catholic country. Henry himself was fervently Catholic and, until his desire for a divorce led him to a break with Rome, he actively persecuted religious reformists. This led to the Pope giving him the title, ‘Defender of the Faith’, a title he was immensely proud of. Despite Henry’s active persecution of those who failed to conform to the orthodox Catholic faith, Thomas Boleyn favoured reform of the church, as did his youngest two children. It was their religious idealism which bred in zealous Catholics a hatred of them which continued long after their deaths, and which spawned many of the rumours, innuendos and slanders against them that persist to this day.
Reform amounted to a desire to rid the church of increasing greed and corruption, for the rites of the faith to be reformed, and for the word of God to be accessible to the masses. George and Anne Boleyn were not only devotees of this idealism; in time they came to embody it…They sought reform of the Catholic religion, not a complete departure from it, and both of them died as Catholics. They obviously supported a break with Rome because that was essential in order for Anne to become Queen, but their passion for reform did not mean that they altered their basic religious beliefs, and for them, the break also meant that the reforms which they envisioned could be brought to fruition. They died as reformist Catholics, not as Protestants.

Anne and her brother George were beheaded in May 1536. George Boleyn, a close advisor of King Henry VIII, said these last words before he was killed:

Truly so that the Word should be among the people of the realm I took upon myself great labour to urge the king to permit the printing of the Scriptures to go unimpeded among the commons of the realm in their own language. And truly to God I was one of those who did most to procure the matter to place the Word of God among the people because of the love and affection which I bear for the Gospel and the truth of Christ’s words.
– George Boleyn’s scaffold speech, 17 May 1536

Anne Boleyn in the Tower by Edouard Gibot (1835)
“True religion in England had its commencement and its end with your mother.”
– Alexander Ales to Elizabeth I from ‘A brief treatise or cronikelle of the most vertuous Ladye Anne Bulleyne, late Queen of England’ by William Latimer.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Hamer, Colin, Anne Boleyn: One Short Life that Changed the English-speaking World, Day One Publications, Leominster, U.K., 2007
http://www.dayonebookstore.com/index.php?_a=viewProd&productId=4172

“Biblical Literature”, The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, University of Chicago, 1974

Chambers Biographical Dictionary, edited by Una McGovern, Edinburgh, Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd., 2003

Denny, Joanna, Anne Boleyn: A New Life of England’s Tragic Queen, Da Capo Press 2007

Ives, Eric, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, Blackwell Publishing 2005

Ridgway, Claire, “George Boleyn, Religion and the Reformation”, TheAnneBoleynFiles.com, 16 April 2010

George Boleyn, Religion and the Reformation

http://www.bollyn.com/home#article_13084

12 responses to “Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky

  1. Henri Levi another with a selective memory!

    Judean Bolshavik revolution Henri?
    Starvation of millions of Ukranians Henri?
    Concentration Camps Poland Henri?
    Just to be going on with!

    Uganda was acceptable to the real Jews that lived in Palestine- it was the Russian Fake ones that wanted the ME!

    Gilad Atzmon: The French Philosopher
    Friday, February 4, 2011 at 9:44AM Gilad Atzmon
    What makes one a philosopher? Probably, the capacity to aim at the essence of things, while celebrating the love of wisdom (philo-sophos). Though Bernard-Henri Lévy presents himself as a French philosopher, he seems to lack that elementary capacity. Unlike a true philosopher, Levy engages in an endless spin, typical to a Hasbara agent.

    A few days ago the Huffington Post gave a platform to the alleged ‘philosopher’ Levy.

    Levy doesn’t approve of the BDS (Boycott, Disinventment, Sanctions) campaign. He claims it is “anti democratic”. I was expecting Levy to eloquently advocate ‘freedom of speech’ and human rights, but the Zionist ‘intellectual’ failed miserably. Levy followed the well-trodden Judeo centric Zionist template and spread half-baked ideas that hardly form an argument. Pathetically, in most cases, Levy’s ranting proves counter effective to his cause.

    “First of all” he said, “one boycotts totalitarian regimes, not democracies… One can boycott Sudan, guilty of the extermination of part of the population of Darfur. One can boycott China, guilty of massive violations of human rights in Tibet and elsewhere. “

    For some bizarre reason, Levy seems to be convinced that his beloved Jews-only state is an ‘exemplary democracy’. “One does not boycott the only society in the Middle East where Arabs read a free press, demonstrate when they wish to do so, send freely elected representatives to parliament, and enjoy their rights as citizens.” says Levy.

    I guess that Levy either, doesn’t know or just pretends not to know that in the ‘Jews only democracy’ laws are racially orientated. The Law of Return, for instance, favours Jews and Jews only. Levy should also learn about the case of MK Azmi Bishara who had to run for his life for suggesting that Israel be better transformed into ‘state of its citizens’ based on equality.

    But it actually goes much further; Levy’s argument is totally flawed and counterproductive to his Zionist cause. It is actually democracies, rather than dictatorships, that should be subject to humanitarian boycotts; it is in democracies where people are complicit in their government crimes. We must boycott Israel because in the Jewish state every citizen is culpable in the war crimes committed by the democratically elected government. We must boycott Israel because 94% of its Jewish population supported the IDF’s genocidal tactics during Operation Cast Lead. We must boycott Israel because its State-terror policies are a reflection of the public’s true will as proven in polls and democratic elections.

    According to Levy, in a democracy the voters have the power to sanction, modify, and reverse the position of their government. It would be fabulous if Levy could enlighten us and suggest how exactly the Jews only Democracy is progressing towards an acceptance of universal rights for all.

    Like all Hasbara agents, Levy is outraged by the attempt to de-legitimise Israel, yet, the philosopher in him fails to tell us what is exactly so wrong in de-legitimising a racially driven murderous collective. I also wonder what is so unacceptable about de-legitimising a state that was illegitimate to start with.

    Levy doesn’t approve of the ‘one state’ enthusiasts. He far prefers to divide the land into two states. Someone better remind the lame mind that Israel is currently one state that is located between the river and the sea. Those who support one state are actually far from being radical. They have their feet on the ground. They accept Israel being one state, with one international dialling code, one electric grid and one sewage system. However, the supporters of one state also realise that one state Israel is dominated by Jewish Talmudic racism that is far more vicious than Nazi ideology. The one staters also realise that by the time Jewish racist ideology will be defeated this one state between the river and the sea, will be Palestine.

    Levy is furious with one state advocate Ali Abunimah, co-founder of Electronic Intifada who according to him “does not hesitate to compare Israel to Nazi Germany.” It would be slightly useful, if ‘philosopher’ Levi would be kind enough to suggest to us once and for all, what is so wrong about comparing the Jews only State with the Aryan only State also known as Nazi Germany.

    Towards the end of his Huffington Post article, Levy comes with something that could almost pass for an argument. For Levy, the Western world should have hoped to be “cured of its worst criminal past”. It would be helpful and productive if Levy and other Zionists grasp that it’s actually the West’s problematic past that shapes our criticism of the Israeli murderous present. It is our troubled past that makes us into enemies of racist Israel.

    I was looking forward to read a Zionist ‘thinker’ advocating Israel. Levy obviously failed. However, I’ll admit, that like Levy, I also have reservations regarding the BDS movement; for instance I believe that if the demand to boycott Israeli academics is valid, we should also boycott academics and intellectuals who advocate Israeli policies and Zionism worldwide, because Israel is racist to the bone and racism must be opposed. If the BDS movement is taking itself seriously, it should also move forward and demand to boycott Levy, Alan Dershowitz, David Hirsh and many others.

    On one hand, a move like this would prove the BDS movement’s integrity. On the other hand, as an advocate of freedom of speech, I actually want Dershowitz, Hirsh and Levy to speak their minds. I believe that together with Mark Regev, they are the best promoters of Zionist tribal morbidity.

    Watch Hasbara Levy in action

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-the-french-philosopher.html

    Angel of death a far more apt name.

    Can’t stomach his gob– video in link of the inciter to wars, example Libya

  2. Iain Dale Mr Naive suggested tonight that Blair should be the envoy to sort out the Israel/Palestine thing…..unbiased?

    A ZIONIST -WHAT A CHOICE…

    Regev »
    Thursday
    Feb032011
    Gilad Atzmon: The Man With The White Yarmulke
    Thursday, February 3, 2011 at 10:21AM Gilad Atzmon

    Three days ago Jerusalem urged its ‘Western allies’ to support Mubarak. Yesterday war criminal Tony Blair complied submissively suggesting that “Mubarak is immensely courageous and a force for good.”

    The former British PM, who lied to us all, launched an illegal war based on a false dossier and made all of us complicit in the murder of 1.5 million Iraqis, praised the Egyptian president over his role in ‘peace negotiations’. Blair seems to follow the Israeli instructions and warns “against a rush to elections that could bring Muslim Brotherhood to power.”

    Blair argued that the west was right to back Mubarak despite his authoritarian regime because he had maintained peace with Israel. In short, according to the former British PM, ‘democratic enthusiasm’ is better pushed aside for the sake of the Jewish State’s interests. No wonder Lord Levy and the Labour Friends of Israel spent so many sheckels keeping Blair and Labour in power.

    Speaking to Piers Morgan on CNN, Blair defended his backing for Mubarak. “I’ve worked with him on the Middle East peace process between the Israelis and the Palestinians …I have to say, he’s been immensely courageous and a force for good.”

    One may have to agree with Blair that Mubarak’s treacherous actions against his people, the Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims could be interpreted as a ‘courageous act’. Similarly, some can also see Blair’s relentless, treacherous surrender to Zionist interests on the expense of humanity as courageous. We can only hope that both leaders are brought to justice either by their people or by an international court. This would certainly appropriate their ‘courage’ within the right context.

    It seems as if Blair managed to succumb to Zio-Talmudic supremacy. “The region has unique problems that make political change different from the democratic revolutions in Eastern Europe,” he said. “The principal issue was the presence of Islamist parties that will use democracy to gain power and then undermine the freedoms people seek.” For Blair, democracy and freedom are great except when applied to Muslims. I am left bewildered, what about the ‘freedom to be Muslim’? I am also perplexed by Blair’s fascination with democracy. As far as I can recall, it was American democracy that annihilated Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was Blair’s democratically elected government that launched the criminal war in Iraq. It is also democratic Britain that fails to follow due process and lock Blair, his legal adviser and prime members of his cabinet behind bars.

    Mr Blair, before you preach democracy to others, you should look in the mirror.

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-the-man-with-the-white-yarmulke.html

    HAD HE WORN THAT HERE- HE’D NEVER HAVE BECOME PRIME-MINISTER!

  3. The Libyan Rebels And The Israeli Connection

    THE MAN WITH THE SELECTIVE MEMORY- CAN’T RECALL THE JUDEA BOLSHAVIKS OR THE UKRANIAN FORCED STARVATION- HUNGARY 1956 ETC ETC ETC…UGANDA WAS FINE FOR THE REAL JEWS- FOR FAKE RUSSIAN JEWS -THEY WANTED PALESTINE!
    HENRI LEVY ANGEL OF DEATH!

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-the-french-philosopher.html

    MIDDLE EAST ENVOY BLAIR- A ZIONIST- WHAT A BLOODY STITCH UP!

    Gilad Atzmon: The Man With The White Yarmulke »
    Friday
    Feb042011
    Gilad Atzmon: The French Philosopher
    Friday, February 4, 2011 at 9:44AM Gilad Atzmon
    What makes one a philosopher? Probably, the capacity to aim at the essence of things, while celebrating the love of wisdom (philo-sophos). Though Bernard-Henri Lévy presents himself as a French philosopher, he seems to lack that elementary capacity. Unlike a true philosopher, Levy engages in an endless spin, typical to a Hasbara agent.

    A few days ago the Huffington Post gave a platform to the alleged ‘philosopher’ Levy.

    Levy doesn’t approve of the BDS (Boycott, Disinventment, Sanctions) campaign. He claims it is “anti democratic”. I was expecting Levy to eloquently advocate ‘freedom of speech’ and human rights, but the Zionist ‘intellectual’ failed miserably. Levy followed the well-trodden Judeo centric Zionist template and spread half-baked ideas that hardly form an argument. Pathetically, in most cases, Levy’s ranting proves counter effective to his cause.

    “First of all” he said, “one boycotts totalitarian regimes, not democracies… One can boycott Sudan, guilty of the extermination of part of the population of Darfur. One can boycott China, guilty of massive violations of human rights in Tibet and elsewhere. “

    For some bizarre reason, Levy seems to be convinced that his beloved Jews-only state is an ‘exemplary democracy’. “One does not boycott the only society in the Middle East where Arabs read a free press, demonstrate when they wish to do so, send freely elected representatives to parliament, and enjoy their rights as citizens.” says Levy.

    I guess that Levy either, doesn’t know or just pretends not to know that in the ‘Jews only democracy’ laws are racially orientated. The Law of Return, for instance, favours Jews and Jews only. Levy should also learn about the case of MK Azmi Bishara who had to run for his life for suggesting that Israel be better transformed into ‘state of its citizens’ based on equality.

    But it actually goes much further; Levy’s argument is totally flawed and counterproductive to his Zionist cause. It is actually democracies, rather than dictatorships, that should be subject to humanitarian boycotts; it is in democracies where people are complicit in their government crimes. We must boycott Israel because in the Jewish state every citizen is culpable in the war crimes committed by the democratically elected government. We must boycott Israel because 94% of its Jewish population supported the IDF’s genocidal tactics during Operation Cast Lead. We must boycott Israel because its State-terror policies are a reflection of the public’s true will as proven in polls and democratic elections.

    According to Levy, in a democracy the voters have the power to sanction, modify, and reverse the position of their government. It would be fabulous if Levy could enlighten us and suggest how exactly the Jews only Democracy is progressing towards an acceptance of universal rights for all.

    Like all Hasbara agents, Levy is outraged by the attempt to de-legitimise Israel, yet, the philosopher in him fails to tell us what is exactly so wrong in de-legitimising a racially driven murderous collective. I also wonder what is so unacceptable about de-legitimising a state that was illegitimate to start with.

    Levy doesn’t approve of the ‘one state’ enthusiasts. He far prefers to divide the land into two states. Someone better remind the lame mind that Israel is currently one state that is located between the river and the sea. Those who support one state are actually far from being radical. They have their feet on the ground. They accept Israel being one state, with one international dialling code, one electric grid and one sewage system. However, the supporters of one state also realise that one state Israel is dominated by Jewish Talmudic racism that is far more vicious than Nazi ideology. The one staters also realise that by the time Jewish racist ideology will be defeated this one state between the river and the sea, will be Palestine.

    Levy is furious with one state advocate Ali Abunimah, co-founder of Electronic Intifada who according to him “does not hesitate to compare Israel to Nazi Germany.” It would be slightly useful, if ‘philosopher’ Levi would be kind enough to suggest to us once and for all, what is so wrong about comparing the Jews only State with the Aryan only State also known as Nazi Germany.

    Towards the end of his Huffington Post article, Levy comes with something that could almost pass for an argument. For Levy, the Western world should have hoped to be “cured of its worst criminal past”. It would be helpful and productive if Levy and other Zionists grasp that it’s actually the West’s problematic past that shapes our criticism of the Israeli murderous present. It is our troubled past that makes us into enemies of racist Israel.

    I was looking forward to read a Zionist ‘thinker’ advocating Israel. Levy obviously failed. However, I’ll admit, that like Levy, I also have reservations regarding the BDS movement; for instance I believe that if the demand to boycott Israeli academics is valid, we should also boycott academics and intellectuals who advocate Israeli policies and Zionism worldwide, because Israel is racist to the bone and racism must be opposed. If the BDS movement is taking itself seriously, it should also move forward and demand to boycott Levy, Alan Dershowitz, David Hirsh and many others.

    On one hand, a move like this would prove the BDS movement’s integrity. On the other hand, as an advocate of freedom of speech, I actually want Dershowitz, Hirsh and Levy to speak their minds. I believe that together with Mark Regev, they are the best promoters of Zionist tribal morbidity.

    Watch Hasbara Levy in action

  4. WAR CRIMINALS CAN ADMIT GUILT AND REMAIN FREE……DEPENDS WHERE THE WARS ARE AND FOR WHOM!

  5. ROTHSCHILD BANKERS WITH ALL THEIR TRILLIONS AND STILL THATS NOT ENOUGH……………..ZIONIST NWO

    WHAT A WORLD THEY CREATE.

  6. Pingback: Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky. “US Military Knows Izrael did 911 False Flag” « WorldNewsRecord

  7. Pingback: Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky. “US Military Knows Izrael did 911 False Flag” « NewsRecord

  8. Pingback: Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky. “US Military Knows Izrael did 911 False Flag” « 911Investigate

  9. Pingback: Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky. “US Military Knows Izrael did 911 False Flag” « 9/11 Controlled Demolition

  10. Pingback: Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky. “US Military Knows Izrael did 911 False Flag” « UsNewsRecord

  11. WITH FRIENDS LIKE THIS AMERICA DOESN’T NEED ANY ENEMIES!!

Leave a comment