Western Race Hatred Laws: Keep The Caucasions Down…..

Western Race Hatred Laws: Keep the Caucasians Down

Front page / Opinion / Columnists
10.12.2009 Source: Pravda.Ru

Pages: 12

Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.

BREAKING NEWS

Russia Tests Fifth Generation Fighter Jet

Russia’s Fifth Generation Plane on Maiden Flight
More…

These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.

In practical terms, what this means is 1. A murder is not just a murder if hate is involved. Say again? This means certain lives are worth more than others, a protected class, another insult to Christ and justice. 2. If the local jury trial is considered to lenient, then those globalist elites of the West can try the person again for “hate” or rather in actuality for the same crime, twice. Again, an insult to justice that Western serfs bow, grin and bare.

But this gets worse, since in practice, the elites decide who is a racist and who is not, they use these laws sparingly to keep the native population down, shackled and paranoid of the knock on the door.

In America, anti white violence is exploding, an average of 12 people per day are killed by their illegals and three times more whites and Asians are killed by blacks than vice versa. The same can be found in England. The head of the Justice Department, Hader, even stated that he approved the double standard used on whites. He did this in front of a parliamentary committee, with no real out cry by the totalitarians. As if any should be expected.

Speak the truth and shame the devil on Pravda.ru forum

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/111032-0/

7 responses to “Western Race Hatred Laws: Keep The Caucasions Down…..

  1. “When the director van Gogh is brutally murdered by an Islamic assailant, not a hate crime. However, his Dutch film, showing the plight of the women under Islam, [snip], that is a hate crime [snip] supported by the Western femiNazis [snip]. Luckily, in [Eastern Europe] this idiocy does not exist. Murder is murder [snip], and defense of the local culture is paramount. Westerners [snip], you deserve this, since the vast majority of you take it and swallow it, like the good little castrated serfs you are. Enjoy your extinction, as you loaf around on your Chinese couches.”

  2. where the Democrats came in- inc Obama!!

    Peter Brimelow highlighted the most salient feature of neosocialism in a prescient 1993 article about the racial demagoguery destroying America’s mortgage banking:

    “Classical socialism called for direct state ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange. Neosocialism just aims at political control. Socialism claimed to be more efficient. Neosocialism claims to be more equitable. Above all, neosocialism professes to combat “racism,” since this magic word cows all opposition. Apparent neosocialist objective of the season: commandeering the banking system and forcing it to subsidize key client constituencies.”

    community worker…..gives you the hint…………..give em a mortgage-we know- you know= they can’t afford to pay the bugger back—but way down the line—-Commies get their pay back.

    We in 2010 with half a brain can see that!

  3. Enter the Fabian Socialists’ with their pervi ways..and bans!
    Fabian policies were implemented and followed for decades’ when they themselves appeared to be in the sin bin……………..1945 a year to regret forever more!!!

    Socialism is a road to serfdom, as F.A. Hayek has famously diagnosed. It is only the arrogance and greed for power of the socialist elites ruling the West — excepting only a Liechtenstein here and there, or a Thatcher/Reagan once in a half century — that the serfs themselves don’t know it. That’s because their state-fashioned schooling and mental laundry by mass media enforce an omertà on the brilliant Austrian and his ideas.

  4. VOTE LIBLABCONS’ GET MORE OF THIS…………….NEXT TIME IT COULD BE YOU!!

    http://frontpagemag.com/2010/01/21/geert-wilders-freedom-on-trial/

    OUR FREEDOM ON TRIAL!!!!!!!

    It’s the kind of scene one might expect to see in a hard-line Sharia court in Saudi Arabia: a man facing trial for the putative “crime” of insulting Islam. But the defendant in this case is Dutch MP Geert Wilders and the ominous setting for his trial is none other than his native Netherlands. This week, Wilders, the leader of the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) and an outspoken critic of Islam and Islamic extremism, went on trial on politically loaded charges of inciting hatred and discrimination toward Islam. The outcome of the trial, which could yet result in jail time or a financial penalty for Wilders, will reveal just how far Europe’s multicultural enforcers are willing to go to silence free speech in order to appease the continent’s increasingly restive and radicalized Muslim populations. In his remarks from the trial, reprinted below, Wilders offers a powerful statement about the stakes involved: nothing less than freedom itself. – The Editors

    *

    Wilders: Mister Speaker, judges of the court,

    I would like to make use of my right to speak for a few minutes.

    Freedom is the most precious of all our attainments and the most vulnerable. People have devoted their lives to it and given their lives for it. Our freedom in this country is the outcome of centuries. It is the consequence of a history that knows no equal and has brought us to where we are now.

    I believe with all my heart and soul that the freedom in the Netherlands is threatened. That what our heritage is, what generations could only dream about, that this freedom is no longer a given, no longer self-evident.

    I devote my life to the defence of our freedom. I know what the risks are and I pay a price for it every day. I do not complain about it; it is my own decision. I see that as my duty and it is why I am standing here.

    I know that the words I use are sometimes harsh, but they are never rash. It is not my intention to spare the ideology of conquest and destruction, but I am not any more out to offend people. I have nothing against Muslims. I have a problem with Islam and the Islamization of our country because Islam is at odds with freedom.

    Future generations will wonder to themselves how we in 2010, in this place, in this room, earned our most precious attainment. Whether there is freedom in this debate for both parties and thus also for the critics of Islam, or that only one side of the discussion may be heard in the Netherlands? Whether freedom of speech in the Netherlands applies to everyone or only to a few? The answer to this is at once the answer to the question whether freedom still has a home in this country.

    Freedom was never the property of a small group, but was always the heritage of us all. We are all blessed by it.

    Lady Justice wears a blindfold, but she has splendid hearing. I hope that she hears the following sentences, loud and clear:

    It is not only a right, but also the duty of free people to speak against every ideology that threatens freedom. Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States was right: The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

    I hope that the freedom of speech shall triumph in this trial.

    In conclusion, Mister Speaker, judges of the court.

    This trial is obviously about the freedom of speech. But this trial is also about the process of establishing the truth. Are the statements that I have made and the comparisons that I have taken, as cited in the summons, true? If something is true then can it still be punishable? This is why I urge you to not only submit to my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of freedom of speech. But I ask you explicitly to honour my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of Islam. I refer not only to Mister Jansen and Mister Admiraal, but also to the witness/experts from Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Without these witnesses, I cannot defend myself properly and, in my opinion, this would not be an fair trial.

    TROOPS ARE DYING FOR WHAT?

    TAXES ARE PAID FOR WHAT?

    DEMOCRACY IS WHERE?

    EURABIA APPROACHING FAST!!

Leave a comment