EU’s International Military Police Force (EGF) Can Squash Public Disobedience *
Wise Up Journal
16.09.2009
By Gabriel O’Hara
Don’t worry about French UN troops, Spanish UN troops, Romanian UN troops or any other UN troops being used to quell rebellions in western nations due to bank bailouts or any other unpopular or corrupt acts by government. Not when you have the international military police force at the hands of the EU. Never heard of it? Read below.
The EU’s military police force can be deployed to squash public disobedience making sure the the status quo – otherwise called “public order” – is maintained keeping the public in order for it’s managers.
The following is official text from the European Gendarmerie Force, September 16th 2009:
“The European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) is an initiative of 5 EU Member States – France, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal and Spain – aimed at improving the crisis management capability in sensitive areas. Since Wednesday, 17th December 2008, the High Level Interdepartmental Committee Meeting (CIMIN) decided to welcome the Romanian Gendarmerie to become a full member of the EGF. Therefore the EGF consists from that moment of 6 member states.
“EGF responds to the need to rapidly conduct all the spectrum of civil security actions, either on its own or in parallel with the military intervention, by providing a multinational and effective tool.
“The EGF will facilitate the handling of crisis that require management by police forces, usually in a critical situation
“Based in Vicenza in the ‘Generale Chinotto’ barracks
“EGF goal is to provide the International Community with a valid and operational instrument for crisis management, first and foremost at disposal of EU, but also of other International Organizations, as NATO, UN and OSCE, and ad hoc coalitions.
“Turkey joins European Gendarmerie force as Observer”
“Partners Military Gendarmerie (Poland)”
The following text was taken from the European Gendarmerie Force’s FAQ page:
“[EGF] is capable to be integrated in a military crisis management tool”
“[EGF] is able and willing to perform all kinds of police missions, in both substitution and strengthening missions;”
“[EGF] is designed to be committed rapidly thanks to its permanent HQ and its logistic unit.”
“Furthermore, it is excellently suitable for deployment parallel with or immediately after a military operation to maintain public order and safety as well as in situations where local police services are not (sufficiently) deployed.”
“In case of an operation involving both military and police components, the EU’s action on Petersburg-tasks requires a strong synergy between the police and military components”
International Military Police
“This diversity is a qualitative asset for the European Union (as was concluded in Conference of National Police Commissioners in 2001 and other meetings and was recalled at the Warnsveld Chiefs of Police Conference on international police missions, in October 2004). ”
“Q.4.d. Can a Military Police force participate with EGF in an international mission?
“Ans. Yes. Belonging to the military forces, a Military Police force can participate under the same conditions as any other military unit.”“contributors are the armed forces of the States of the EGF Participants or any other (identified) third party.“
Who will be in political control of EGF with integrated military and police forces?
“The EGF can be deployed on request and under the mandate of international organisations as the EU, the UN, the OSCE, NATO or of an ad hoc coalition, either on its own (because the mission is so specific that only gendarmerie-like forces can be deployed) or together with other military and/or police services. In these cases the strategic management and political control is in the hands of the appropriate body of the international organisation or ad hoc coalition.”
Birth and evolution of the EU’s integrated Military Police Force
“civilian police forces have declared their commitment to the EU police capacities, during the Ministerial Conference in Brussels on November 19th, 2001. There is a framework that allows these forces to be used for the benefit of the EU”
“Being able to do so the EGF capacities fit in smoothly with present EU crisis management concepts (like the concept of Integrated Police Units) and operations and are likely to evolve after the entry into force of the Constitution;“
The Constitution mentioned above is the EU Constitution renamed the Lisbon Treaty after the French and Dutch ordinary public rejected it, who subsequently are not allowed vote again on it’s implications as no votes are not tolerated in a POST democratic EU.
All power centres such as the EGF, EU, UN, IMF and other notables are birthed then slowly expanded/developed/evolved by legal amendments. The full power status of these organisations would never be accepted by the public from the get go. The public do accept weakened embryo organisations and systems then don’t notice when it slowly develops. Slow deception is the only way these organisations can achieve the full power envisioned by their founders.
The new federal Union superior to its member states which would be created by the Lisbon Treaty repackaged Constitution was birthed as the European Coal and Steel Community.
“The pooling of coal and steel production should immediately provide for the setting up of common foundations for economic development as a first step in the federation of Europe.”
– Schumann Declaration, 9 May 1950, announcing the formation of the European Coal and Steel Community
Guy Verhofstadt, Belgian Prime Minister: “The Constitution is the capstone of a European Federal State”
– Financial Times, 21 June 2004
The European Gendarmerie Force work for the managers of the status quo and will be used to protect it. The status quo has people at the top of the hierarchy managing the ordinary public by deception.
If the public do not appreciate this deception you have to agree it is their right to fire the systems of mismanagement and scrap these power centres setup under various guises. Unless you believe we should be ruled.
Related:
Great Britain, Embryo of World Government – 1938 RIIA Report *
Art. 21.2.h TEU of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty: “promote an international system” and “global governance”
Art. 1 TEU: “The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community”
Art. 47 TEU: “The Union shall have legal personality.”
Art 37 TEU: “The Union may conclude agreements with one or more States or international organisations in areas covered by this Chapter.”
Art. 42.3 TEU: “Member States shall make civilian and military capabilities available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy”
Watch: END OF NATIONS – EU Takeover & the Lisbon Treaty (Film) by Wise Up Journal
Exclusive Video Interview With Jim Corr – The Lisbon Treaty (video) *
Under Lisbon: Citizenship of a New Federal State (Video)*
Federalists Accused Of ‘Hijacking’ European Parliament Opening
Proof that over 80% of EU nations’ laws come from the EU *
Examples of laws impossible for voters to change – thanks to the EU *
Irish Daily Mail: Pedophilia and the dark heart of the EU’s parliament *
http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=1124 Eurogendfor-above the law- Notice how cops and minsters act outside the laws and just give the two finger salute-under the EUSSR Thats’ how it is!!
letting them think for you…
Great Britain, Embryo of World Government – 1938 RIIA Report *
AlanWattSentientSentinel.eu
04.05.2007
By Alan Watt
1938 Report from Royal Institute of International Affairs’ Global Meeting”
After the main NAFTA, or Free Trade negotiations (the actual free trade negotiations was a pre-cursor of NAFTA – it was the major setting up of the unification for the Americas), only an actual edited report was given and made available to the public. The rest was sealed and not for public consumption, and put in a vault outside Ottawa where it’ll stay for 30–50 years. They keep telling you you’re so free – you live in the freest countries in the world. The more they say it, the more people believe it, and when you show them something that’s not on the mainstream media, they disbelieve it. They truly have been trained, like Zbigniew Brzezinski said, to let the media do their reasoning and their thinking for them.
http://www.wiseupjournal.com//?p=1000 THE FABIAN NWO…Sound like a working mans party to you- or the fraud that it’s always been?
DESTROYING OUR FOOD INDEPENDENCE- A MASSIVE DANGER- JUST THINK FOR A MINUTE!
EU farm subsidies paid to big business
Telegraph
18.07.2009
By Bruno Waterfield
EU agriculture subsidies worth billions of pounds under the CAP are being paid out to businesses and multinational corporations with little connection to traditional farming.
The subsidies have included payments to Haribo, the sweet manufacturer, and Coca-Cola.
New information gathered by the researchers Farmsubsidy.org since May this year has shown that over 13 billion euros (£11 billion) – about a quarter of the £47.5 billion spent under the EU’s Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), is paid to big business and industry, not farmers.
The CAP consumes 42 per cent of the EU’s budget at a annual cost to every citizen of £95, a bill of £380 a year for the average British family.
Ligabue, an Italian caterer, serving luxury cruise ships and airlines, received 148,000 euros of export subsidies in 2008 for the dairy and creamer sachets consumed by international travellers.
Haribo qualified for 332,000 euros in farming subsidies for the sugar used in its “gummy bears” produced in Germany.
In France, the EU country that benefits the most from farm subsidies, over 103 million euros every year boosts the profits of sugar manufacturers – companies that do not own any farms.
Groupe Doux, a French chicken processor, raises no poultry itself but pocketed 62.8 million euros.
In Britain, Tate & Lyle Europe benefited from the taxpayer to the tune of 134 million euros in 2007.
Arids Roma, a Spanish construction company, received 1.59 million euros for road-making materials under EU rural development budgets that are a growing part of the CAP.
Another Spanish construction company, Pasquina, also benefited for EU farm cash, getting1.13 million euros for an asphalt factory.
A report from the European Court of Auditors last December found that serious problems existed in the accounting for EU rural development projects worth £10 billion a year.
The data gathered by the campaign group Farmsubsidy.org has also found a significant shift in agriculture subsidies away from farmers to some of Europe’s richest landowners, including the Royal family and the Roman Catholic Church.
The Queen and other European royals, as well as aristocrats, including the Duke of Westminster, have also shared in the payments.
The Queen qualified for £473,500 in farm aid in 2008 for Sandringham Farms, her 20,000-acre retreat and home to four generations of British monarchs since 1862.
The Duke of Westminster, Britain’s third richest person with a fortune estimated at £6.5 billion, benefited from a public EU subsidy of £486,534. His Polish dairy businesses, Top Farms, benefited by more than 8 million euros in subsidies from 2006 to 2007.
Related:
EU “Democracy” Unveiled *
13 Critical Lisbon Treaty Facts – Must Read *
Farmers furious at EU’s sheep microchip scheme
Former EU commissioner tells the media that Bilderberg helped create the Euro *
http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=1071
NOTICE HOW FOR YEARS THE MEDIA AIDED GIVING BRITISH FARMERS THE TAG OF MOANERS- AKIN TO WHAT THEY DID TO SADDAM AND OTHER LEADERS BEFORE WE BOMBED THEM…MAKES IT EASIER FIRST TO DEMONISE THE TARGET.
FANCY RELYING ON LIBYA FOR FOOD- OR ONE OF THE OTHER ARAB STATES WITHIN THE EUMED?
BUILDING ON FARMLAND- THE MILLIONS OF HOMES NOW NEEDED DUE TO THE FABIAN IMPORTATION OF THE THIRD WORLD TO THIS SMALL ISLAND- ENSURES FUTURE STARVATION AND RELIENCE ON DODGY STATES FOR OUR FOOD-STUFF.
TRUSTING THIS LOT- WHEN THEY CAN’T EVEN ADMIT TO WHO THEY REALLY ARE!!
COMRADE PRUDENCE BROWNSNKI JUST ONE FABIAN OF THE HUNDREDS- SCHEMING IN WESTMINSTER!!!
Whats up- waiting for the small tash to appear- and jackbooted armed cops on the street…that ain’t gonna happen- armed cops are here already- accepted part of the scenery-CONDITIONING!!
Nottalotta..difference ZZ UK Cops
Centurean2\'s Weblog 
BRITISH POLICE BEING DOWNGRADED- WITH DUMB ARSE ENTRY- PSCOs JUST ON A PAR WITH TRAFFIC WARDENS….MILIBAND HAS GIVEN PERMISSION FOR EUROGEND TO ENTER BRITAIN!!
FANCY ARMED FOREIGNERS INC TURKS ON OUR STREETS?
WOULD ONE BRITISH MAN HAVE VOLUNTEERED IN WW2 HAD THEY KNOWN THE TRUTH- WITHIN 65 YEARS THE UK WOULD BE HANDED TO THE GERMAN/FRANCO AXIS?
TRICKED INTO WAR!!
Proof that over 80% of EU nations’ laws come from the EU *
Wise Up Journal
05.06.2009
The text below is extracts taken from an open letter by the National Platform EU Research & Information Centre. It was published to counter Fine Gael’s, Irish political party’s, false claim that only 30% of laws are due to the EU. The Centre proves why the claim is obviously false, clear for all to see, and proves that the EU accounts for over 80% of laws for it’s member states such as Ireland, Germany and the UK etc. This figure will increase if the Lisbon treaty is passed by Irish voters. The Irish public are the only public in the EU having a vote on the Lisbon treaty and they have to do so twice because they did not say yes last time.
The National Platform EU Research & Information Centre
By Anthony Coughlan, Sectary of the National Platform EU Research & Information Centre
“It is true that we are experiencing an ever greater, inappropriate centralisation of powers away from the Member States and towards the EU. The German Ministry of Justice has compared the legal acts adopted by the Federal Republic of Germany between 1998 and 2004 with those adopted by the European Union in the same period. Results: 84 percent come from Brussels, with only 16 percent coming originally from Berlin” – Former German President Dr Roman Herzog, also former president of the German Constitutional Court, excerpts from article in Welt Am Sonntag, 14 January 2007, co-authored with Lüder Gerkin
Fine Gael’s claim that the EU was the “source of less than 30% of Irish laws.”
Fine Gael’s figure is vitiated completely by the fact that they do not count EU Regulations, which are EU legal acts that are directly applicable and binding in EU Member States without the intervention of national legislatures (see Note below). Many of these Regulations relate to agricultural and fisheries for instance, where they are very numerous.
In contrast to EU regulations, EU Directives are translated into national laws by means of acts of the Oireachtas [Irish government]. A Directive, as you know, is a general injunction from the EU to do such-and-such, but how it is done is left to national Governments and legislatures to decide.
Another point undermining Fine Gael’s figure is that all Acts of the Oireachtas implementing EU Directives do not mention the EU or refer to the relevant EU Directive as their source, although certainly some do. So the Fine Gael statement that only one-fifth of Acts of the Oireachtas make reference to EU legislation does not cover all EU-derived Acts.
To get a true picture one needs to count all legislative acts that the Irish State and Irish citizens must obey – primary national legislation, statutory instruments, directly applicable EU regulations and the special category of EU legislation known as EU “decisions”, which are binding on the Member States they are directed to. Moreover, all EU-derived Acts of the Oireachtas and statutory instruments should be counted, not just those that explicitly mention the EU.
It is hard to get accurate figures for the relative proportion of legal acts originating in Brussels and those originating in the national parliaments of the different EU States. Attempts to get these figures from Government sources are usually fobbed off by the national authorities as too difficult to work out.
I read recently of a question in the British House of Commons re the relative proportion of legal acts originating in the UK and the EU, which elicited a Ministerial response that it would be an excessive administrative burden to obtain the figures.
The reluctance by national Governments to provide this information is surely itself significant.
The only exact figures that I have come across are those produced in Germany by the German Ministry of Justice. With Teutonic thoroughness these stated in answer to a parliamentary question in the Bundestag in 2005 that between 1998 and 2004, 23,167 legal acts were adopted in Germany, of which 18,917, some 84% of the total, were of EU origin; so that less than one-fifth originated domestically.
These figures were cited by former German President Dr Roman Herzog, who is also a past president of the German Constitutional Court, in a well-known article in Welt am Sonntag which he co-authored in 2007. This article and the figures it gives have been widely quoted, for their source seems unimpeachable, and they are the basis of the 80% figure which Fine Gael dismisses.
Below are relevant excerpts from Herzog’s article:
“EU legislation will apply in general across the board for all EU countries , so the absolute number of legal acts for different countries coming from the EU should be broadly similar, although not exactly so. For example land-locked EU countries like Slovakia and Hungary will not be affected by EU fisheries regulations as island countries like Ireland and Britain will be.
“Also the tempo of domestic and EU legislation will vary from country to country and from year to year. The years following the introduction of some major piece of EU law is likely to have more implementing regulations than other years.
“It seems fair to say, however, in the light of the authoratative German figures and taking account of directly applicable EU regulations, that a good majority – probably around two-thirds or more – of legal acts each year in the EU Member States now emanate from Brussels.
“This proportion would increase further if the EU Constitution, now embodied in the Lisbon Treaty, were to be come into force. Under Lisbon the EU would obtain powers to adopt legislative acts in relation to some 40 new areas or matters. These relate mainly to crime, justice and policing, public services, immigration, energy, transport, tourism, sport, culture, public health and the EU budget.”
____________
EU REGULATIONS AS DIRECTLY APPLICABLE IN MEMBER STATES
“A regulation has general application, is binding in its entirety and is directly applicable in all member states … Thus regulations are the most powerful lawmaking tools available to the Community institutions. Without any intervention by national governments or legislatures, regulations become part of the national legal systems of each member state”
– S.Weatherill and P. Beaumont, EU Law, page 150, 1999 edition
____________
Former German President Dr Roman Herzog, also former president of the German Constitutional Court, excerpts from article in Welt Am Sonntag, 14 January 2007, co-authored with Lüder Gerkin:
“It is true that we are experiencing an ever greater, inappropriate centralisation of powers away from the Member States and towards the EU. The German Ministry of Justice has compared the legal acts adopted by the Federal Republic of Germany between 1998 and 2004 with those adopted by the European Union in the same period. Results: 84 percent come from Brussels, with only 16 percent coming originally from Berlin…
“Against the fundamental principle of the separation of powers, the essential European legislative functions lie with the members of the executive …
“The figures stated by the German Ministry of Justice make it quite clear. By far the large majority of legislation valid in Germany is adopted by the German Government in the Council of Ministers, and not by the German Parliament …
“And so the question arises whether Germany can still be referred to unconditionally as a parliamentary democracy at all, because the separation of powers as a fundamental constituting principle of the constitutional order in Germany has been cancelled out for large sections of the legislation applying to this country …
“The proposed draft Constitution does not contain the possibility of restoring individual competencies to the national level as a centralisation brake. Instead, it counts on the same one-way street as before, heading towards ever greater centralisation …
“Most people have a fundamentally positive attitude to European integration. But at the same time, they have an ever increasing feeling that something is going wrong, that an untransparent, complex, intricate, mammoth institution has evolved, divorced from the factual problems and national traditions, grabbing ever greater competencies and areas of power; that the democratic control mechanisms are failing: in brief, that it cannot go on like this…”
____________
Related:
Examples of laws impossible for voters to change – thanks to the EU *
For more information on the EU watch Wise Up Journal’s documentary End of Nations.
Irish Daily Mail: Pedophilia and the dark heart of the EU’s parliament *
EU will elect 18 extra MEPs despite Ireland’s no vote on the Lisbon treaty
EU Spends More On PR Than Coca-Cola’s Worldwide Advertising *
http://WWW.WISEUPJOURNAL.COM
We need 650 MPs FOR WHAT?
I read recently of a question in the British House of Commons re the relative proportion of legal acts originating in the UK and the EU, which elicited a Ministerial response that it would be an excessive administrative burden to obtain the figures.
The reluctance by national Governments to provide this information is surely itself significant.
THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING NATIONAL STATS-IMMIGRATION STATS THE LOT!!
DIG UP ADOLF WE’D GET MORE TRUTH OUT OF HIM!
Information referenced in this video
Death Penalty: Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the ECHR
CFR & ECHR are legally binding under Lisbon
– http://www.eucharter.org/home.php?page_id=9
Art. 48 TEU of the Lisbon Treaty: “The Treaties may be amended in accordance by an ordinary revision procedure or by simplified revision procedures”
Art. 1 TEU: “The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community”
Art. 47 TEU: “The Union shall have legal personality.”
Art 37 TEU: “The Union may conclude agreements with one or more States or international organisations in areas covered by this Chapter.”
Art. 21.2.h TEU: “promote an international system” and “global governance”
26.4 TEU:” The common foreign and security policy” will use “national and Union resources.”
Art. 42.3 TEU: “Member States shall undertake progressively to improve their military capabilities.”
Art. 42.3 TEU: “Member States shall make civilian and military capabilities available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy”
EU President: Art. 15 TEU: “The European Council shall elect its President, by a qualified majority, for a term of two and a half years, renewable once.”
Since EU membership, we estimate European vessels have taken up to €200 billion worth of fish out of our waters – Mr Ebbie Sheehan, Irish Fishermens Organisation. Ireland received €60 Billion. Conned out of €140 billion, more if processing is included.
Bureaucrat quote: Day said the treaty will give the EU the power to “speak with one voice in helping to shape THE new world order.”
(Irish Times, 7 Sept 2009) – Catherine Day, Secretary-General of the European Commission.
Also watch: END OF NATIONS – EU Takeover & the Lisbon Treaty (Film) by Wise Up Journal
Think-why is the media so silent on any of this?
You are not a real citizen of the EU because the EU is not a real Union and citizenship is stated as “notional” [ theoretical – not real – imaginary]. The Lisbon Treaty would make us real citizens of a new federal state legally called the European Union. It would be legally a new union, federal state separate from it’s members, for the first time. We would be real citizens of this new entity for the first time, with real rights and duties superior to our national citizenship. This is being brought in by deception and you are not being told the full implications of the changes proposed in the treaty.
For more information:
http://www.wiseupjournal.com
http://www.nationalplatform.org
For a free newspaper with information on Lisbon, the EU, vaccinations and the banking crisis: the Sovereign Independent
Download a consolidate reader-friendly edition of the treaty
For a more detailed video: End of Nations – EU Takeover and the Lisbon Treaty
TRANSPARENCY COMRADE BROWNSKI’S WORD….
CITIZENS OF A NEW FEDERAL STATE—————–FORCED ONTO US ALL!!
You Are Here: 1. Dignity > Art 2. Right to Life
….Art 2. Right to LifeDefinition
1. Everyone has the right to life.
2. No one shall be condemned to the death penalty, or executed.
Legal Explanations
1. Paragraph 1 of this Article is based on the first sentence of Article 2(1) of the ECHR, which reads as follows:
1. ‘Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law …’
2. The second sentence of the provision, which referred to the death penalty, was superseded by the entry into force of Article 1 of Protocol No 6 to the ECHR, which reads as follows:
‘The death penalty shall be abolished. No-one shall be condemned to such penalty or executed’.
Article 2(2) of the Charter is based on that provision.
3. The provisions of Article 2 of the Charter correspond to those of the above Articles of the ECHR and its Protocol. They have the same meaning and the same scope, in accordance with Article 53(3) of the Charter. Therefore, the ‘negative’ definitions appearing in the ECHR must be regarded as also forming part of the Charter:
a) Article 2(2) of the ECHR:
‘Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
in defence of any person from lawful violence;
in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained;
in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.’
b) Article 2 of the Protocol No 6 to the ECHR:
‘A State may make provision in its law for the death penalty in respect of acts committed in time of war or of imminent threat of war; such a penalty shall be applied only in the instances laid down in the law and in accordance with its provisions…’.
WE CAN’T HANG KILLERS OF LITTLE CHILDREN—-BUT FOR DISSENT WE CAN AND SHALL!
FABIAN FASCISM IS STILL FASCISM!!!