On the day some drug pushing slag is flown back to soft touch Britain pregnant as usual, we have a Real Brit on hunger strike in WELSH PRISON!
STOP THE NWO
show details 17:12 (1 hour ago) Reply
BBC finally reports on Maurice Kirk’s prison hunger strike while SMEARING him
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8184627.stm
Ex-vet in prison hunger strike
Maurice Kirk got into trouble in the US after landing his plane by President Bush’s ranch
A former vet being held on remand in prison on firearms charges is over 20 days into a hunger strike in a protest over a court appearance.
Maurice Kirk, 64, from Llantwit Major, Vale of Glamorgan, has been refused permission to appear in court for a bail hearing rather than by video link.
Mr Kirk, who was struck off the veterinary register, is being held in the hospital wing, say his family.
The Prisons Service confirmed a prisoner in Cardiff was refusing food.
Mr Kirk, who was struck off by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons seven years ago for “disgraceful” conduct, is an amateur pilot and a former drinking friend of the late actor Oliver Reed.
He was arrested and threatened with deportation from the United States after landing a plane near President George Bush’s Texas ranch last year while on a round-the-world flight attempt.
The case concerns an allegation that he bought a replica World War One bi-plane which came with a decommissioned and triggerless Lewis machine gun.
I’ve asked him to eat but he has no intentions of taking food until he considers he is treated fairly
Kirstie Kirk
It is claimed he sold the gun a year ago and was arrested in June by South Wales Police for possession of a firearm and offering it for sale without proper authority.
He was released on unconditional bail by Barry magistrates but the police successfully challenged the decision to free him.
Mr Kirk has said under the law of habeas corpus he has the right to appear in person in court to argue the case for being released on bail.
Mr Kirk’s wife Kirstie, 49, said: “I am very worried about my husband – he can only go on like this for another 10 days at the most.
“Maurice is a man of principles and he is also very stubborn.
“He already has health problems and he is losing weight.
“I’ve asked him to eat but he has no intentions of taking food until he considers he is treated fairly.”
She said their 10-year-old daughter was “distraught with worry”.
‘Coffin’
A Prisons Service statement read: “A prisoner at HMP Cardiff is refusing food.
“Guidance to prison staff on managing food refusal states that food refusal should always be taken seriously.
“The prisoner should be helped to find constructive ways to meet his or her underlying need, for example through the application process, the Independent Monitoring Board, Request and Complaint procedure or contacting a lawyer or MP.
“A multi-disciplinary approach to managing those refusing food is encouraged, and healthcare staff should be involved at an early stage in order to assess the prisoner’s physical and mental health.
“Healthcare staff may wish to involve their local primary care trust for specialist dietary advice.”
Mr Kirk’s MP John Smith has taken up the case and is awaiting a response from the ministry.
Mr Kirk’s legal representative Patrick Cullinane added: “We are really worried that they will be bringing him out of that prison in a coffin.
“I have known Maurice for a long time – he is a strong-willed man so I don’t expect him to back down.”
–~–~———~–~—-~————~——-~–~—-~
INTERNATIONAL MENS ORGANISATION
LATEST WEB ADDRESS AT
http://www.intmensorg.info
BACK UP WEB ADDRESS
http://www.internationalmensorganisation.info
THE 1689 ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS IS WHAT HE NEEDS- THIS IS WHY MPs TRY TO DENY IT’S EXISTANCE-EXCEPT WHEN FOR THEIR OWN USE!!
HE HAS A RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS- AND TO BEAR ARMS!!
THE ISLAMIC BBC SHOULD BE CALLED WHAT IT IS—A GOVERNMENT COMMON PURPOSE SOVIET GOB PIECE….PROPAGANDA NETWORK!
Centurean2\'s Weblog 
THE RIGHTS OF EVERY REAL BRITON!
The 1689 Bill of Rights
::Declarations of Rights, both historic and from around the world:: Magna Carta or Great Charter of Great Britain, 1215 1689 Bill of Rights [Great Britain] Bill of Rights in the United States of America, 1791 [U.S.A] Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 1789 [France] Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (section 1 – Basic Rights), 1949 [Germany] Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (selected clauses), 1867 to 1997 [Canada] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950 United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 United Nations Covenant on Economic, Social,and Cultural Rights, 1966 United Nations Convention against Genocide, 1985 (summary) United Nations Convention against Torture, 1985 (summary) Summary of United Nations Agreements on Human Rights
Web abelard.org
An Act for declaring the rights and liberties of the subject and settling the succession of the crown
WHEREAS THE LORDS SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL, AND COMMONS, ASSEMBLED AT WESTMINSTER, LAWFULLY, FULLY, AND FREELY REPRESENTING ALL THE ESTATES OF THE PEOPLE OF THIS REALM, DID UPON THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, IN 1689,[1] PRESENT UNTO THEIR MAJESTIES THEN CALLED AND KNOWN BY THE NAMES AND STYLE OF WILLIAM AND MARY, PRINCE AND PRINCESS OF ORANGE, BEING PRESENT IN THEIR PROPER PERSONS, A CERTAIN DECLARATION IN WRITING, MADE BY THE SAID LORDS AND COMMONS, IN THE WORDS FOLLOWING:
Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counselors, judges, and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the protestant religion, and the laws and liberties of this kingdom.
By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws, and the execution of laws, without consent of parliament.
By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates, for humbly petitioning to be excused concurring to the said assumed power.
By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called, The court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes.
By levying money for and to the use of the crown, by pretence of prerogative, for other time, and in other manner, than the same was granted by parliament.
By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace, without consent of parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law.
By causing several good subjects, being protestants, to be disarmed, at the same time when papists were both armed and employed, contrary to law.
By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in parliament.
advertising
disclaimer
By prosecutions in the court of King’s bench, for matters and causes cognizable only in parliament; and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses.
And whereas of late years, partial, corrupt, and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason, which were not freeholders.
And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases, to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subject.
And excessive fines have been imposed; and illegal and cruel punishments inflicted.
And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures, before any conviction or judgment against the persons, upon whom the same were to be levied.
All of which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes, and freedom of this realm.
And whereas the said late King James II having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his highness the Prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the lords spiritual and temporal, and divers principal persons of the commons) cause letters to be written to the lords spiritual and temporal, being protestants; and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs, and cinque-ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them, as were of right to be sent to parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the 22 January, 1689 in order to make such an establishment, as that their religion, laws, and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted; upon which letters, elections have been accordingly made,
And thereupon the said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid; do in the first place (as their ancestors in like cases have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties, declare:
That the pretended power of suspending of laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament, is illegal.
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws, or the executions of laws, by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.
That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature are illegal and pernicious.
That levying money for or to the use of the crown, by pretence of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal.
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of parliament, is against law.
That the subjects which are protestants, may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by law.
advertising
disclaimer
That election of members of parliament ought to be free. That the freedom of speech, and debates or proceedings in parliament, ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.
That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials of high treason ought to be freeholders.
That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction, are illegal and void.
And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, parliaments ought to be held frequently.
And they do claim, demand, and insist upon all and singular the premisses, as their undoubted rights and liberties; and that no declarations, judgments, doings, or proceedings, to the prejudice of the people in any of the said premisses, ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter into consequence or example; to which demand of their rights they are particularly encouraged by the declaration of this highness the prince of Orange, as being the only means for obtaining a full redress and remedy therein. Having therefore an entire confidence, That his said highness the Prince of Orange will perfect the deliverance so far advanced by him, and will still preserve them from the violation of their rights, which they have here asserted, and from all other attempts upon their religion, rights, and liberties, the said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, assembled at Westminster, do resolve,
That William and Mary prince and princess of Orange, be, and be declared, King and Queen of England, France and Ireland, and the dominions thereunto belonging, to hold the crown and royal dignity of the said kingdoms and dominions to them the said prince and princess during their lives, and the life of the survivor of them; and that the sole and full exercise of the regal power be only in, and executed by the said prince of Orange, in the names of the said prince and princess, during their joint lives; and after their deceases, the said crown and royal dignity of the said kingdoms and dominions to be to the heirs of the body of the said princess; and for default of such issue to the princess Anne of Denmark and the heirs of her body; and for default of such issue to the heirs of the said prince of Orange.
And the lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, do pray the said prince and princess to accept the same accordingly. And that the oaths hereafter mentioned be taken by all persons of whom the oaths of allegiance and supremacy might be required by law, instead of them; and that the said oaths of allegiance and supremacy may be abrogated.
“I, A.B. do sincerely promise and swear, That I will be faithful, and bear true allegiance, to their Majesties, King William and Queen Mary: So help me God.”
“I, A.B. do swear, That I from my heart abhor, detest, and abjure as impious and heretical, that damnable doctrine and position, That princes excommunicated or deprived by the pope, or any authority of the see of Rome, may be deposed or murdered by their subjects, or any other whatsoever. And I do declare, That no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm, So help me God.”
Upon which their said Majesties did accept the crown and royal dignity of the kingdoms of England, France, and Ireland, and the dominions thereunto belonging, according to the resolution and desire of the said lords and commons contained in the said declaration. And thereupon their Majesties were pleased, that the said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, being the two houses of parliament, should continue to sit, and with their Majesties royal concurrence make effectual provision for the settlement of the religion, laws and liberties of this kingdom, so that the same for the future might not be in danger again of being subverted; to which the said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, did agree and proceed to act accordingly.
Now in pursuance of the premisses, the said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, in parliament assembled, for the ratifying, confirming and establishing the said declaration, and the articles, clauses, matters, and things therein contained, by the force of a law made in due form by authority of parliament, do pray that it may be declared and enacted; that all and singular the rights and liberties asserted and claimed in the said declaration are the true, ancient, and indubitable rights and liberties of the people of this kingdom, and so shall be esteemed, allowed, adjudged, deemed, and taken to be, and that all and every the particulars aforesaid shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed, as they are expressed in the said declaration; and all the officers and ministers whatsoever shall serve their Majesties and their successors according to the same in all times to come.
advertising
disclaimer
Whereas it hath been found by experience, that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this protestant kingdom, to be governed by a popish prince, or by any King or Queen marrying a papist. The said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, do further pray that it may be enacted, that all and every person and persons that is, are or shall be reconciled to, or shall hold communion with, the see or church of Rome, or shall profess the popish religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be excluded, and be for ever incapable to inherit, possess, or enjoy the crown and government of this realm, and Ireland, and the dominions belonging thereunto, or any part of the same, or to have, use, or exercise any regal power, authority, or jurisdiction within the same. In all and every such case or cases the people of these realms shall be, and are hereby absolved of their allegiance. The said crown and government shall from time to time descend to, and be enjoyed by such person or persons, being protestants, as should have inherited and enjoyed the same, in case the said person or persons so reconciled, holding communion, or professing, or marrying as aforesaid, were naturally dead.
Every King and Queen of this realm, who at any time hereafter shall come to and succeed in the imperial crown of this kingdom, shall on the first day of the meeting of the first parliament, next after his or her coming to the crown, sitting his or her throne in the house of peers, in the presence of the lords and commons therein assembled, or at his or her coronation, before such person or persons who shall administer the coronation oath to him or her, at the time of his or her taking the said oath (which shall first happen) make, subscribe, and audibly repeat the declaration mentioned in the statute made in the thirtieth year of the reign of King Charles the Second, intituled, An act for the more effectual preserving the King’s person and government, by disabling papists from sitting in either house of parliament. But if it shall happen, that such King or Queen, upon his or her succession to the crown of this realm, shall be under the age of twelve years, then every such King or Queen shall make, subscribe, and audibly repeat the said declaration at his or her coronation, or the first day of the meeting of the first parliament as aforesaid, which shall happen after such King or Queen shall have attained the said age of twelve years.
All which their Majesties are contented and pleased shall be declared, enacted, and established by authority of this present parliament, and shall stand, remain, and be the law of this realm for ever; and the same are by their said Majesties, by and with the advice and consent of the lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, in parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, declared, enacted, and established accordingly.
It be further declared and enacted by the authority aforesaid, that from and after this present session of parliament, no dispensation by “notwithstanding” of or to any statute, or any part thereof, shall be allowed, but that the same shall be held void and of no effect, except a dispensation be allowed of in such a statute, and except in such cases as shall be specially provided for by one or more bill or bills to be passed during this present session of parliament. Provided that no charter, or grant, or pardon, granted before the three and twentieth day of October [1689] shall be any ways impeached or invalidated by this act, but that the same shall be and remain of the same force and effect in law, and no other than as if this act had never been made.
[An original version of this Act, with the archaic spelling, is available at http://www.holbornchambers.co.uk/rights_profs/BOR.htm%5D
End notes
1 At the time this Act was passed, the years began at Easter and the Julian Calendar was in effect. However, on this site the modern dating of the Gregorian calendar is used.
——————————————————————————–
WORDS THAT FOREVER MAKE EUSSR ENTRY ILLEGAL..
AND TREATIES WITH THE USA TO EXTRADITE BRITISH SUBJECTS!
And I do declare, That no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm, So help me God.”
FOR ALL TIME!!!!!!
ILLEGAL EUSSR!!! H/T Adrian.
Good to see that you’ve not been duped by Marxist Nu Labour and their propaganda wing – The Biased Broadcasting Corporation.
The only thing I can pick you up on is the The 1689 Bill of Rights, which Comrade Blair ensured is now nothing but useless scraps of paper. He gave our country away to the Soviet Socialist European Union and his Commy bum buddy Brown (A self confessed Marxist) signed the deed.
It’s the price we have paid for losing the cold war my friend.
I take in the BBC first thing, being a very early rises, mainly for a laugh!
Example, an interview with some gun club from the UK thats about to get TV airtime, as the interview drew to a close, the female host asked the guy wasn’t he duty bound to give a fair and balanced report.
JUST LIKE WOT WE DO, At this point my coffee went splattering across the surface of my breakfast bar, recalling how balanced the BBC ARE NOT!!
They’d like nothing more than for folk to believe that the 1689 is now debunked, don’t believe a word of it, it’s gotten me out of some illegal fines!!
Blair thought he was the master of the universe, but when he comes up against ENGLISH Laws the TRUE laws of this country he’s not even anywhere near master, were the people to realise the REAL POWER lays with them!!
Recently, when parliament was threatened with rules that they felt would curb their freedom of speech, guess what they screamed out?
” We must protect our bill of rights under the 1689 act, we can chop and change to suit” That from a Fabian/Labour MP. RADIO 4.
Within the bill of rights, it states very clear- THIS IS FOR ALL TIME. They recognised that somewhere down the line we’d get some TRYANNY coming along that would usher in TOTALITARIANISM. they inbuilt protection for us all.
They now speak of re-writing the bill of rights ammending it!
Meaning- remove the parts that protect us, the parts that protect the CoE, the parts that makes their EUSSR entry illegal- their FINES,etc etc etc.
We’re on our own, we’ve a lying media with it’s paid traitors, and a Westminster MAFIA acting outside the laws!
NOTE, how they used the elites PAEDO ring in Dunblane to remove the right to bear arms, yet the bill states FOR ALL TIME!
please READ these LINKS…Had we a free press and media with journo’s that were free and not tied to the EUSSR, The voters would be informed, but has we haven’t then others do their work for free, just love of country something these Fascist’s know nothing about!!
Applicable to the ILLEGAL ACT OF EUSSR- CoE-EXTRADITION TREATIES.
. And I do declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God.
http://tpuc.org/Bill_of_Rights_1689 They rely on our not knowing our own bill of rights!!
History from a different perspective – a ‘Constitutional Sovereign’ and the real truth about the Bill of Rights 1689.
… was over seen by William III following its creation by the Bill of Rights 1689. This document was created by its preamble document the … ‘decent’ that has been maintained right up to our present queen Elizabeth II. Parliament achieved all they could wish …
Fixed Penalty Notices: Fraudulent coercion of voluntary payments.
… the law which we all have the right and duty to excersise our use of. This article will help you understand what the court system … a double yellow line, you get one. A notice is not a bill. A notice is not a demand. A notice is nothing more than… an OFFER. It …
THE PUPPET SHOW OF THE CENTURY, PART ONE
… that is cast into the future for payment at a time when our currency becomes substance backed once again (“can only be done by Royal Proclamation” * Gold Standards Act 1925 Bill 227 21/09/1931* ) So this can’t be right, if this was
ETC ETC ETC…KNOW YOUR RIGHTS- WE HAVE THEM ALL!!
Bear in mind this was written by a constitutional expert- the daughter of an high court judge. her story blacked out here in this supposedly free country.
his paper “Communist” Councils in New Zealand John Christian describes the Fabian Society thus — “a mixture” of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism all bundled together. However, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and subtle. The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists take your house by directly sending in the “secret police” to knock your front door down ? Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly and cleverly ? by “gradually” taking your individual rights away, by “gradually” increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you can’t pay them, they send in their regional “council tax inspectors” to take your house away ? but the end result is the same’. It has long been a Fabian aim to incrementally downgrade the Monarchy of Great Britain but they are too subtle to overtly push for abolition.
http://eurorealistnewsletter.blogspot.com/2008/10/elizabeth-becketts-submission-august.html
The power given to Her Majesty was entrusted to her by her subjects for their protection. Our special laws are based on this. The Queen promised to safeguard our laws and customs and in return has received the power to govern us. The signing of the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty represents a high-jacking of the power of the people. The British Constitution was hard won and it was made by the people. In 1274 Edward 1st was crowned. The Archbishops, Barons and freemen told him that he had to swear to protect our laws and customs. He refused — and was informed by the aforesaid Archbishops, Barons and freemen that in that case they would get another king–upon which ultimatum he made oath.
Tony Blair had the death penalty for treason repealed shortly before leaving office. In the case of Rex-v-Thistlewood (1820)
treason was defined as ‘any action which attempts to overthrow or destroy the Constitution’ being the words of the Treason Act 1795 which Tony Blair repealed. Blair has been Chairman, or in politically correct terms ‘Chair’ of the Fabian Society. He unveiled George Bernard Shaw’s ‘Fabian Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing’ stained glass window at the London School of Economics in 2007. But what is the true nature of the Fabian Society? It’s image is that of a socialist ‘think tank’, but its influence worldwide since 1884 has been enormous.
We are told that ignorance of the law is no excuse yet our British Constitution is no longer taught in British schools. Universities confirm that knowledge of the British Constitution plays little or no part in their law syllabuses. In George Orwell’s novel 1984 the character Winston repeats obediently “Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past?
Elizabeth Beckett said: “The Queen’s prerogative power was taken illegally by Tony Blair and Lord Falconer, but they did not take her common law pre-eminence by which I have taken this action. Nor did they take her prerogative of mercy as indicated in the Tragos Archipelago appeal reported in the Daily Telegraph Mat 24th 2007.”
MASTER OF THE ROLLS.
a) that the debt should be made under the Nordic system
b) that it should be safeguarded as belonging legally to the Taxpayers NOT the Government.
a) The Queen should be asked to prorogue parliament immediately as a temporary arrangement until there has been an election.
b) a national government of convention should hold the fort. (The Queen was unfortunately taught about the constitution by Sir Henry Martin who became a Fabian in 1921. She has apparently not grasped the significance of her position and her Coronation Oath and imagines that she is subordinate to her ministers.)
c) I consider that as Master of the Rolls in this terrible time it must be for you to try to disabuse her of this and hold chapter 61 of Magna Carta to her notice. (Various people have suggested Princess Anne as Queen in her place since Prince Charles has not grasped the Christian importance of our constitution in Magna Carta and throughout our history – our early Christianity, starting from c. AD 50, has been central to wars from without and within against ‘this dear land’; Magna Carta as a defence against William of Normandy’s laws. Llanfranc was the imposed archbishop of Canterbury and the invasion was inspired by Papal direction.
d) I write to you since Lord Faulkner acted unconstitutionally in putting before Parliament that the Royal Prerogative belonged to himself and the Prime Minister in the Constitution Reform Act of 2005. You will know Sir Edward Coke’s clear description that the prerogative could not be taken from the monarch – even by act of Parliament, agreed by Halsbury.
Your position as effectively deputy Lord Chancellor gives you authority to support us, the people of England and Scotland. On the other hand, government has shown a lack of constitutional restraint and even lack of knowledge of the laws of this country both in the Constitution Reform Act and further acts that have forced me and others to ask you to use the strength of your position acting as the executive guardian the people of this country and contracted to the monarchy by law. As the substitute Lord Chancellor, when the other appointee betrayed his position a by treasonous claim initially defined by the 1351 Treason Act.
I have take two steps in the defence of our position
a) I have laid Information with the court lawyer at Newcastle, Mr. Brown, that by making the Queen sign the Lisbon Constitution, Mr. Gordon Brown, acted treasonably against various Acts, his own Oath of Allegiance, and his Privy Councillor Oath. (This perjury should legally remove him from Parliament.)
A TRUE PATRIOT WITH BALLS BRAINS AND COURAGE IN TONS!!
WE HAVE A RUMP PARLIAMENT!
c) Tax on fuel should be reduced since its effect is arbitrary by any taxable logic.
So Mr. Blair altered legal aid so much that even people on my income (less than £9,000 pa) cannot get it and treason needs a very narrow certificate from the lawyers. I therefore ask you to take the steps necessary under 2a) above if it is by any means within your power.
I am taking a case on the illegality of some aspects of council tax in the high court: I was granted oral review, but thought it wiser to have counsel rather than act on my own and Leolyn Price CB QC has kindly agreed to represent me.
The lowering of trust apparently intentionally has led to loss to shareholders for whom legal protection is needed. The people in Parliament seem to have little knowledge of the law nor the legal protection of the people, only the desire for power and in this case globalisation. William Blackstone said, “Law is not a matter of opinion.” This, our representatives seem not to have learnt.
CAN YOU SEE WHY THIS COURT CASE WAS GIVEN A NEWS BLACKOUT?
THE REAL LAWS WE MUST OBEY!
NOT THE FAKE FOREIGN POWER ONES WHICH MEAN STUFF ALL HERE!
http://tpuc.org/Common-Law
MARXIST/COMMUNIST- NOW WEAR THE FABIAN CLOTHING….IN THE HOPE OF DUPING A DUMBED DOWN PEOPLE’S.
I’m no Marxist therefore refuse to follow their Marxist doctrine…SHAME THAT THE TORIES AND LIBDEMS DO!!
BH, This might also interest you!
Amazing details of exactly what asylum seekers MUST BY LAW be given for free.
Were you aware? No you were not… And you are not allowed to become aware either.
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007
ASYLUM SCANDAL
We know they’re going to move asylum seekers in there. All the flats have been done up, central heating, the works. And they’ve put up brand new net curtains. That’s a sure sign.
This is the kind of message that we have been hearing from angry locals all over Britain for the last couple of years. Many of the details change, but the total renovations and the highly visible net curtains crop up time and time again.
So too do the denials by local councils that the premises concerned are going to house asylum seekers. And almost as regular is the spectacle of those same councils being forced to eat their words within weeks as local residents wake up to find that new neighbours from Albania and Somalia have been moved in overnight.
The repetition of this pattern over the entire country has been something of a mystery up until now. Strangest of all has been the sight of so many councils telling lies to local residents and newspapers alike, even though the bureaucrats and local councillors telling the lies must know that they will be exposed and discredited within weeks. Just such a sequence of events, for example, played a major role in the by-election victory of our Robin Evans in Blackburn last autumn.
Secret Tenancy Agreement
The answers to this puzzle lies in a secret 26-page document the Revised Tenancy Agreement April 2001 – produced by the Secretary of State for the Home Office, acting through the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. Its very existence is supposed to be secret, Section 3 (p), on page 8 has this warning for people or companies thinking of making money out of housing asylum seekers:
The Landlord’s attention is drawn to the Official Secrets Acts 1911-1989. The landlord shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that all individuals engaged on any work in connection with this Agreement have notice that these statutory provisions apply to them and shall continue to apply after the expiry or termination of the Term.
Continues….Proving what LIARS are ministers at all levels are…..YOU PAY…
http://tpuc.org/node/60
Link to original source- The Home Office.+
Provided by a BNP council member to the non political group Public defenders at TPUC…No wonder the Westminster mob, fear allowing other eyes into their tight cabal!
The South Wales police who have a number of allegations of corruption against them, including from Maurice Kirk. Maurice was arrested by the very same South Wales Police for selling an old non-working WWII machine gun… as dangerous as an old wheel barrow.
I’m not suggesting that the South Wales police have thrown in him prison to shut him up, but if anybody else made that suggestion, I don’t think I would argue.
After reading an update a few days ago from Mens international org, that was exactly the impression i was left with, akin to the old Soviet Union.
After all they threw anyone that dissented into mental institutions too, re-programming i guess, here we call it diversity training!
https://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/