Monthly Archives: September 2009

Two wars collide: Old soldiers of WWII pay anniversary tribute to hero of Afghanistan…

 

The war in which they fought had begun exactly seven decades ago.

But on the most solemn of anniversaries yesterday, proud old soldiers of the Second World War reaffirmed their bond with the fighting men of today.

With heads bowed in dignified mourning, they paid their respects at the funeral of one of the latest servicemen to perish in Afghanistan.

Craftsman Anthony Lombardi, 21, from the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, was killed last month when the vehicle he was driving was blown apart in Helmand province. 

Enlarge    FUNERAL CORTEGE OF R.E.M.E. SOLDIER ANTHONY LOMBARDI

Tribute to a hero: Royal British Legion Veterans lower their flags as Craftsman Lombardi’s coffin passes

 

REME CREST

In battle: Craftsman Lombardi and the crest of the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers

As the cortege drove through his home town of Scunthorpe, the poignancy of the occasion was etched on the faces of the veterans.

For yesterday, of course, also marked the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of war with Germany.

They didn’t know Craftsman Lombardi – a father of one – personally. 

 

 

 

But they had all lived through war, lost loved ones and experienced the suffering the soldier’s death must be causing his friends and family.

Craftsman Lombardi’s fiancee, Ellie Blakey, carried their one-year-old son Harvey to the service, which was attended by 200 mourners including his parents Helen and Walter and his three brothers.

A tribute from Miss Blakey was read out by the vicar. 

Enlarge    FUNERAL CORTEGE OF R.E.M.E. SOLDIER ANTHONY LOMBARDI

Respectful: Old soldiers bow as Mr Lombardi’s cortege passes. The funeral also marked the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of the Second World War on September 3, 1939

Harvey, 1, the son of Craftsman Anthony Lombardi, is held by a mourner at his fathers funeral service at Woodlands in Scunthorpe
Harvey, 1, the son of Craftsman Anthony Lombardi, is held by a mourner

Safe and sound: Craftsman Lombardi’s son Harvey sleeps in a family member’s arms  

 

Enlarge     FUNERAL CORTEGE OF R.E.M.E. SOLDIER ANTHONY LOMBARDI STOPS AT SCUNTHORPE CENOTAPH

Latest fatality: The funeral cortege pauses briefly as hundreds line the streets in Scunthorpe

It went: ‘My prince charming, I can’t explain what I’m feeling right now. I just hope you’re taking care up there. I love you and always will and I make this promise to bring Harvey up the best I possibly can and let him know how amazing you are.

‘The best dad and fiancee ever. I love you always, your princess Ellie and little soldier Harvey. We love you, our hero.’

As well as the funeral of Craftsman Lombardi, two other services were held yesterday for young soldiers killed in Afghanistan.

Fusilier Simon Annis, 22, and Fusilier Louis Carter, 18, were killed in an explosion as they went to help their wounded section commander.

Fusilier Annis’s funeral was held in the same church in Salford where he married seven months ago.

His bride Caroline returned as a heartbroken widow, dressed in black instead of white.

Caroline Annis, the wife of Fusilier Simon Annis, at her husband's funeral at St John the Baptist, Irlam, Manchester
Fusilier Simon Annis

Heartbreak: Caroline (left) at the funeral of her husband Fusilier Simon Annis, 22, in Salford, where the couple were married seven months ago

The coffin of Simon Annis is carried into the church of St John the Baptist, Irlam, Manchester. He was killed trying to save a comrade

Fallen soldier: The coffin of Simon Annis is carried into the church of St John the Baptist, Irlam, Manchester. He was killed trying to save a comrade

Fusilier Annis’s elder brother Stuart led tributes to the fallen soldier, speaking of his brother’s love for Caroline, to whom he had proposed last Christmas Day.

‘I know that Caroline made Simon the proudest man in the world and was the love of his life,’ he said.

Hundreds also lined the streets of Nuneaton, Warwickshire, to pay tribute to Fusilier Carter, described as a ‘hero’ and a dedicated soldier with ‘ maturity beyond his years’.

Fusilier Louis Carter, 18Hero: Fusilier Louis Carter, 18, was described as a dedicated soldier at his funeral

 

But there was nothing more symbolic than the sight of veterans from all services out in force as Craftsman Lombardi’s cortege passed slowly by the cenotaph in Scunthorpe and on to the crematorium chapel.

For Vic Read, a Second World War naval veteran, it was a time to remember lost friends as well as pay tribute to a fallen soldier.

‘I feel for the families who are left behind. It is the hardest on them,’ he said. ‘I am proud to be here but it gets you thinking about the friends you left behind – people you will never see again.

‘People forgot about those who died in our war, more than they should have, but now they remember. It takes the thought of somebody dying to remember those who died before.

‘But seeing all these people here to honour another brave soldier shows they are remembering.’

The two wars in which the old soldiers and Craftsman Lombardi fought could hardly be more different.

The present war against the Taliban involves far less manpower and is taking place in Afghanistan’s hot, dusty and unforgiving terrain.

The enemy hides in foothills and alleyways, snipes from rooftops and attacks with hidden bombs.

At home, most people go about their daily lives unaffected by events there. The Second World War, by contrast, stretched across the globe and every Briton was involved in the Allied effort to defeat Hitler.

It was a war fought in the skies above England, on the sea and across the fields of France as well as the jungles of Burma, while women and children were bombed in their beds at home.

Yet the conflicts are both marked by the courage and sacrifice of those on the front line. 

Veterans from all services were out in force to honour Craftsman Lombardi

Moving: Veterans from all services were out in force to honour Craftsman Lombardi

Ron Taft, 86, a veteran from Mr Lombardi’s regiment who joined up at 19, said: ‘I fought for five years and although it is a different type of war they are fighting now, young men still end up dead.

‘It is depressing, it makes me think what my father must have felt when I went to war. This man had a child and it’s his family that will have to deal with it.

‘The whole situation is very poignant but I am glad I came to honour this soldier.’

UNKNOWN ,POSSIBLY MOTHER OR WIFE OF LOMBARDI

Grief: Sarah McCorkindale (left), the High Sheriff of Lincolnshire and the sister of Diana, Princess of Wales, and Craftsman Lombardi’s mother, Helen

Enlarge    ROYAL BRITISH LEGION VETERANS AT THE FUNERAL OF R.E.M.E. SOLDIER ANTHONY LOMBARDI AT SCUNTHORPE CENOTAPH, SOUTH YORKSHIRE

Shared experiences: Royal British Legion Veterans (top) and a wreath at the Scunthorpe Cenotaph

 

Enlarge     WREATH LAID AT SCUNTHORPE CENOTAPH AFTER THE FUNERAL CORTEGE OF R.E.M.E. SOLDIER ANTHONY LOMBARDI STOPS AT SCUNTHORPE CENOTAPH

 

The service for Craftsman Lombardi, from the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, was also attended by Princess Diana’s sister, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, 54, in her role as High Sheriff of Lincolnshire.

• Two more fatalities have taken the number of British troops killed in Afghanistan to 212, including 41 in July and August this year.

The Ministry of Defence confirmed a soldier from the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers was killed in an explosion in Babaji district in Helmand on Wednesday.

A second soldier, from 2nd Battalion The Mercian Regiment, died from a gunshot wound he sustained on a foot patrol in Babaji yesterday. Their families have been informed. 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210981/Two-wars-collide-Hundreds-line-streets-funeral-Afghan-solider-joins-WWII-veteran-parade.html#ixzz0Q8NW13OE

The inconvenient truth about ozone-puncturing Two Jags_

The preposterous figure of Two Jags has apparently been reincarnated as something called the Council of Europe’s ‘rapporteur’ on climate change. That’s a new one on me. Wasn’t the dwarf in Time Bandits called Rapporteur?

I’ve no idea what a rapporteur does, but I would imagine it involves a lot of first-class air travel, five-star hotels and lobster suppers. There’s probably a bird thrown in, too.

Two Jags is flying to China this week to deliver a lecture on global warming. That’s right, he’s jetting halfway round the world and back to talk about the need to cut carbon emissions.

John Prescott cartoon

 

Don’t these people have any idea how ridiculous they are?

What astonishes me is that anyone, especially in my trade, takes him seriously. Two Jags is a circus act. Come to think of it, the dwarf in Time Bandits had considerably more gravitas than Prescott.

Yet, in some quarters, he’s treated as a proper person. Yesterday’s Independent carried an interview with Two Jags, in which he announced that Europe’s target of cutting emissions by 80 per cent was nowhere near tough enough. The paper even ran an editorial praising Prescott’s authenticity.

The only thing authentic about this old fraud is his ocean-going, ozone-puncturing hypocrisy and self-importance.

I didn’t christen him Two Jags without reason. This was the man who insisted on having not one, but two ‘gas guzzling’ limousines.

He had his wife chauffeured 200 yards along the seafront at the Labour conference so her hairdo wouldn’t get windswept. Pauline’s creosote-thick hairspray has probably done more damage to the atmosphere than a fleet of SUVs.

Two Jags took a helicopter back to central London from the rugby league final at Wembley and commandeered an RAF flight to turn on the Blackpool illuminations.

After giving a speech on the importance of public transport to the railwaymen’s union in Scarborough, he made an ostentatious display of boarding a train home.

He then got off at the next station, where his driver was waiting with the Jag to convey him back to London in air-conditioned, eight-cylinder, 15-miles-to-the-gallon luxury.

Once he returns from China, he will embark on a tour of Britain, lecturing schoolchildren about global warming. We can assume he won’t be travelling by bike.

When he was ‘in charge’ of the environment, he was so concerned about the delicate eco-balance that he ordered tens of thousands of houses to be built on flood plains.

Yet now we are asked to believe that he is a born-again Al Gore. According to the Indy, he is the brilliant global player who brokered the Kyoto deal in 1997 and ‘is now returning to a major role in climatechange politics’.

All you need to know about the Kyoto ‘deal’ is that the rest of the world ignored it, while here in Britain it has been used as a catch-all excuse for everything from the extortionate tax on petrol to fining people £500 for putting out their dustbins on the wrong day.

In one sense, I suppose you could argue that Kyoto was a success, since the world has actually been getting colder over the past decade, despite China opening a new coal-fired power station every five minutes.

That inconvenient truth has not deterred the climate-change industry-from cranking up the rhetoric, inventing ever-tougher targets and dreaming up an exciting range of new rules, fines and punishments.

Britain’s ridiculous obsession with ‘man-made global warming’ has prevented our building a new generation of power stations.

As a result, we are facing the looming prospect of rolling power cuts in the not-too-distant future.

But you won’t find a forest of windmills in the back garden of Two Jags’ turreted mansion.

Just as Al Gore consumes enough electricity to power a small town and flies by private jet to deliver his lavishly rewarded pieties on polar bears, so Two Jags, too, thinks that cutting your carbon footprint is for the little people.

This week, The Guardian – which is The Independent with adverts – carried a spread about everyday people who were doing their bit for the planet.

They boasted about how they were going to eat more root vegetables, wear thicker undies and travel by train not car.

A more self-righteous, self-flagellating bunch you’d be hard-pressed to find outside of, er, the pages of The Guardian.

But even though I think they’re all barking mad, at least they are prepared to make some kind of self- sacrifice in pursuit of their quasi-religious crusade.

Two Jags was conspicuous by his absence. While those poor, deluded saps are turning down the thermostat, shivering in their thermals and eating their own toenail clippings, you won’t catch him chowing down on turnips or taking a slow boat to China.

Our esteemed ‘rapporteur’ will relax in the rear seat of his limo or at the front of the plane, tucking into the finest food flown in from around the world. And to hell with the ice caps.

He will continue to leave a trail of yeti-sized carbon footprints as he tours the globe lecturing the rest of us on how we’re all responsible for razing the rainforests.

In the great debate about nonexistent global warming, this freeloading, flatulent, frequent-flying fool is about as relevant as the polar bear on Fox’s glacier mints.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1211080/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-The-inconvenient-truth-ozone-puncturing-Two-Jags.html#ixzz0Q8JyMMW1

British plumber dies after locals in Spanish resort beat him into a coma with baseball bats- Becoming A Habit Lately….

R.I.P. Mr Charnock.
It has started to become regular stories in the news recently, that british holiday makers are being attacked by Spannish or Cypriot people( while on holiday in Cyprus). Every report says that gangs have descended onto the poor british tourist, even while with his kids, and beat them up with base ball bats, etc, and even going so far as to kill them.
The locals have said that they hate the british !! ( newspapers report)
This doesn’t seem to be a ‘one off’ , its happened far too many times recently.

I hope the Spannish police find and punnish the guilty thugs who did this. 

– karen, north east, uk, 04/9/2009 06:56

Click to rate     Rating   28

Report abuse

Four people have been arrested in connection with the attack, Spanish police have confirmed

I know these violent crimes also happen in UK. At least we are aware of our no go areas.

A good reason to scatch Magaluf from next years holiday list. 

– John McCorquodale, Fort Erie. Canada, 04/9/2009 04:43

Click to rate     Rating   38

Report abuse

Is this the same Spain that refuses to fight terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan? 

– Derek McDonald, Saigon, Vietnam., 04/9/2009 04:35

Click to rate     Rating   27

Report abuse

This is happening more and more in Spain, its time we stopped going there. They have taken British money for forty years and now its time we went somewhere else. Thailand is where I now live and although further away it is cheaper, hotter, full of culture, beautiful and very friendly. One type we dont need here is the drunken bar crawling types or sex tourists. But there is no where else like Thailand on this planet and dont be put of by news of political unrest its still a very safe place to holiday. 

– goldie206, Korat Thailand, 04/9/2009 04:23

Click to rate     Rating   22

Report abuse

Headlines say locals.. insinuating that they are spanish yet police havn’t confirmed that yet. lots of different nationality’s live in Mallorca Romanians. Africans Morrocans. British. Lets wait and see the outcome before blaming the Spanish 

– tonana, bath, 04/9/2009 00:57
A British man has died after getting into a fight with a gang of vicious locals while on holiday in Majorca.

Anthony Charnock was hit repeatedly with baseball bats in popular holiday resort Magaluf before falling into a coma.

The 44-year-old’s family flew from Immingham in Lincolnshire to be by his side but he died yesterday after spending four days in hospital.

Magaluf, Majorca. Popular: Many Brits head to Magaluf each summer

A plumber, Mr Charnock is said to have got into a violent confrontation in the car park outside the three-star hotel he was staying in.

His friend, Nicky White -also a plumber – told the Grimsby Telegraph: ‘He was the kindest, funniest, most genuine man you would ever wish to meet. He lived life to the full. He would never go looking for trouble.’

Paul Stocks, also a friend, said: ‘He was a great lad, got on with everyone and was the life and soul of the party.”He was still young at heart and always enjoyed himself, and worked hard.’

Four people have been arrested in connection with the attack, Spanish police have confirmed.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1211032/British-plumber-dies-locals-Spanish-resort-beat-coma-baseball-bats.html#ixzz0Q8IXGvN6

BP lobbied Jack Straw before he changed mind over Lockerbie bomber…

From The Times
September 4, 2009

BP lobbied Jack Straw before he changed mind over Lockerbie bomber

<!– Remove following

to not show photographer information –>

(BP)

<!– Remove following

to not show image description –>

BP feared damage to its interests after $900m Libya exploration deal

<!– Remove following

to not show enlarge option –><!–

 

–>

 Tom Baldwin and Philip Webster

    <!–

    –>


    Jack Straw was personally lobbied by BP over Britain’s prisoner transfer agreement with Libya just before he abandoned efforts to exclude the Lockerbie bomber from the deal.

    The Times has learnt that the Justice Secretary took two telephone calls from Sir Mark Allen, a former M16 agent, who was by then working for BP as a consultant, on October 15 and November 9, 2007.

    Having signed a $900 million oil exploration deal with Libya earlier that year, BP feared that its commercial interests could be damaged if Britain delayed the prisoner transfer agreement (PTA) through which the Gaddafi regime hoped to secure the return home of Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi.

    For six months, talks with Libya were deadlocked as Britain — under pressure from the devolved Scottish government — vainly sought to ensure that the deal would not cover al-Megrahi.

    Related Links
    • Qatar raised al-Megrahi case with Salmond
    • Former spy who masterminded Libyan diplomacy
    • Where’s yer special relationship noo?

    On December 19, 2007, Mr Straw wrote to Kenny MacAskill, the Scottish Justice Minister, to say that he had been unable to secure an exclusion for al-Megrahi from the deal. “The wider negotiations with the Libyans are reaching a critical stage and in view of the overwhelming interests for the United Kingdom I have agreed that in this instance the PTA should be in the standard form and not mention any individual,” he wrote.

    Britain has faced criticism from the Obama Administration for signing the transfer agreement despite a decade-old promise to the US that anyone convicted of the Lockerbie bombing would serve out the sentence in Britain.

    The fresh disclosures last night may yet throw doubt over Gordon Brown’s assertion on Wednesday that there had been “no conspiracy, no cover-up, no double-dealing, no deal on oil, no attempt to to instruct Scottish ministers, no private assurances by me to Colonel Gaddafi”.

    An aide to the Justice Secretary confirmed last night that Sir Mark, who had dealt often with Mr Straw when he was Foreign Secretary, “wanted to know what was happening with the PTA and get Jack’s perspective”. He added: “BP wanted to make its case because they were concerned that not making progress might have an effect on their deal with Libya.”

    The Times has learnt that Sir Mark, a pivotal figure in negotiations leading to Libya’s renunciation of weapons of mass destruction in 2003, was also instrumental in securing the BP oil deal. In 2005 he flew to Libya with Lord Browne of Madingley, then the BP chief executive, to meet Colonel Gaddafi and oil chiefs.

    Although in his telephone conversations with Mr Straw, Sir Mark is said to have avoided explicit reference to al-Megrahi’s fate, a government source acknowledged that this would have been unnecessary because it was “well known that the Libyans were resisting pressure for an exclusion” — and that was holding up the treaty. It is understood that between the two calls, Justice Department officials had concluded that the negotiating position agreed between the British and Scottish governments was unsustainable.

    Mr Straw’s aide said: “Jack has always stated that he took into account the overall impact of the agreement across a whole range of issues — and those included trade. He took this decision in the certain knowledge that the Scottish government always had a veto on releasing al-Megrahi.”

    Last week BP flatly denied that it made any representations to the Government over the impact of the prisoner transfer deal on the oil contract with Libya. BP rejected suggestions that Libya was putting pressure on its operations over al-Megrahi’s release.

    Last night, however, a spokesman said: “BP did bring to the attention of the Government in late 2007 our concerns about the slow progress in concluding a PTA with Libya. Like many others we were aware that delay might have negative consequences for UK commercial interests including ratification of BP’s exploration agreement. We did not press for any particular kind of PTA, we were just hoping for an end to the delays concluding it.”

    Last month Libya passed a directive instructing foreign companies to appoint Libyan heads. While some described it as another step in the creeping nationalisation of Libya’s oil industry, an oil executive told The Times that it was unlikely to be implemented and that often such directives were largely for internal consumption.

    Libya has long demanded political concessions in exchange for business deals. A representative of the Russian oil company OAO Lukoil was jailed briefly when commercial negotiations with Libya hit trouble in 2007.

    When police in Geneva arrested Colonel Gaddafi’s son Hannibal and pregnant daughter-in-law on assault charges, reprisals led to Swiss businessmen in Tripoli being detained, oil exports being cut and $5 billion withdrawn from Switzerland’s banks.

    The BP oil deal was signed when Tony Blair shook hands with Colonel Gaddafi on plans for a prisoner transfer deal in 2007. Oliver Miles, a former ambassador in Tripoli and vice-chairman of the Libyan British Business Council, said: “BP was thrown out for political reasons in the 1970s and only returned when the politics were right. During the PTA negotiations, I heard from business people in Libya that the authorities there may have played the BP card again. Certainly, if al-Megrahi had died in prison, the Libyans were saying that all bets are off.”

    Nick Day, a former MI5 agent and the chief executive of the business intelligence firm Diligence, which has helped British companies to enter Libya, said: “It was an open secret on the ground there that other oil firms were not encountering the same difficulties that BP had … because the issue of al-Megrahi was unresolved.

    “Any government has the overwhelming priority of ensuring the economic wellbeing of the country, protecting national security and furthering bilateral relations. This is clearly what Britain was doing in this case — and there is nothing wrong with it. The problem is that governments do not always feel able to tell people the whole truth.”

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6820931.ece

    Derek Clifton wrote:
    What a surprise – fancy a leading Labour politician getting involved in the oil business; well, I suppose it is one way of greasing a few palms before the election!
    September 4, 2009 11:03 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Alex Penn wrote:
    ” Jim Read wrote:
    100 years ago the world was controlled by 5 families, maybe due to oil finds in the middle east this has extended somewhat!”

    Yes, now it’s 5 corporations.

    September 4, 2009 9:48 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Jim Read wrote:
    100 years ago the world was controlled by 5 families, maybe due to oil finds in the middle east this has extended somewhat!
    September 4, 2009 9:31 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Benjamin Alvares wrote:
    Where politics and big business is concerned truth is always the first casualty. Britain should hang her head in shame for the misdeeds of her leaders and will eventually pay a heavy price because dishonesty never pays in the long run.
    September 4, 2009 8:23 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Robinson John wrote:
    Boudicca Iceni

    What will a public enquiry achieve without hard documentary evidence? Surely it can only conclude that this government did what governments do.

    September 4, 2009 7:59 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Steve B wrote:
    Well what a surprise! New Labour lecture us about values but totally lack any of their own. They have taken us into a surveillance society but operate in their own secret world. They preach about corporate accountability but refuse to be held to account themselves. Much more will come to light and the consequences of Blair and Browns incompetence will haunt us for decades.
    September 4, 2009 7:58 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Boudicca Icenii wrote:
    Everything we learn about this saga lends more weight to the general belief that Gordon has lied to the electorate(again) about the Government’s involvement.

    We need a full public enquiry.

    September 4, 2009 7:24 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Joe Postin wrote:
    This government demonstrated it kowtowing to business when the Saudi corruption investigation was dropped.
    Shameful then, shameful now.
    You drop your moral guard at your peril, what sort of an creature are you when you are prepared to morally compromise on such a scale.
    September 4, 2009 5:10 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Piers Hopkins wrote:
    Oh dear. My cynicism suggests we are not really surprised, realism intones at the necessity of governments to act according to a different moral plane to yours or mine and yet the humanism that is inherent to my very core still shudders.
    September 4, 2009 4:40 AM BST on UK-TimesOnline
    Permalink
    Ralph Williams wrote:
    Since the days of Lord Browne, Labour gets pneumonia every time BP sneezes. So much for the notion that socialists have principles … or are even socialists!
    September 4, 2009

    HEGELIAN DIALECTIC, PANDEMIC & CREATIVE DESTRUCTION….

    HEGELIAN DIALECTIC, PANDEMIC & CREATIVE DESTRUCTION

     

    By Nancy Levant
    August 7, 2009
    NewsWithViews.com

    Creative Destruction

    Creative Destruction is not a new concept. It is, however, a new-age term for the Hegelian Dialectic. Call it what you want, the global results are the same.

    In order to achieve one-world governance, existing systems all over the globe had to be dismantled and eliminated. For instance, national sovereignty, national loyalty, national patriotism, personally selected lifestyles, individual beliefs and preferences, and naturally occurring communities versus socially engineered “communities” had to be dismantled, eliminated, and redefined by think tankers financed by philanthropic and government money.

    In order to achieve such a tremendous undertaking, money (specifically wages) had to be strategically controlled. Hence, the wildly successful America had to eliminate its jobs. Jobs = wages. Wages = personally selected lifestyles, individual beliefs and preferences, and naturally occurring communities.

    Next, the one-world think tankers told us that love of country and specifically patriotism led to “ethnic” battles, conflicts, and domestic terrorism. They also told us that the political expression of and belief in individual freedom was the religious concept of chronically stupid and terrorist-leaning radicals. Keeping in mind that America always accepted immigrants from every country – immigrants and their religious beliefs – the wealthy think tankers decided to incorporate illegal immigration in order that America could be far more “multicultural” and at the same time elevate “racism” to new definitions and levels.

    Multi-million illegal immigrants + multi-million jobs eliminated + multi-million nationals losing jobs and homes = a new and improved recipe for racism. Why, you ask? The reasons why are obvious: 1) People are blamers by nature, 2) “race cards” have always been political manipulators and weapons for all kinds of people and agendas, and 3) all people are more comfortable around life-kinds, which is exactly why the world is divided up into like-kind regions. It is called human nature. In the natural world, it is called biology. However, in the world of social engineering on a global scale, it is called the collection of private property, individual freedom, privately owned guns, personal opinions, and middle class wages. It is called the assured collecting of global wealth and natural resources from the world’s people. It is called socially engineered theft on a highly professional scale. The wealthy think tankers and the Caucasian powers behind them claim they stand for fairness and equity for the rabble work forces of the world. However, the world remains embroiled in non-stop wars, genocides, death by unusual disease and unnecessary hunger, and growing poverty–except for the world’s top and constant one or two percent.

    Creative Destruction commands the slow death of nature. In order to achieve the global collection of private property under corporate global governance, nature had to become terminally ill, so we were told, by the merciless treatment of the land-owning rabble. However, before we the rabble were told of our merciless treatment of nature, hundreds of millions of acres all over the world were locked down, without our knowledge, in the form of Biosphere Reserves, conservation corridors, and World Heritage Sites. (To this day, ask your neighbors about Biosphere Reserves. They’ve never heard of them).

    Add to these hundreds of millions of acres every individual burg’s watershed systems, state, local, and Federal parks, all the “governed” wetlands, not to mention 90% of the American West and 95% of the State of Alaska and the “international territories” of the Great Lakes “region,” Cascadian “region,” and the now infamous Southwestern International Border “region” where America’s first Third World guerilla war between international drug cartels is currently taking place as the Creative Destruction mechanism for assisting the United Nations to eliminate the Second Amendment. Isn’t it amazing to watch America become a Third World loser nation by Creative Destructive design? Who would have thought it, and it took a bunch of Ivy Leaguers to come up with this extraordinary plan to enrich themselves through financial service to their billionaire masters. You go, boys and girls!

    Creative Destruction is actually an excellent oxymoron – certainly one of the top ten best of all time – but it is still and only the Hegelian Dialectic. For me, it is sad to think of those who could have stood for and funded truth. Imagine what could have happened if the world’s criminal governing cartels would have been exposed by their many insiders, flunkies, prostitutes, and the few who surely understood The Plan in action. Specifically, think of America’s wealth in Hollywood, for instance, or in the music or publishing businesses. Think of the many people who were blessed with great success in this country. How sad that not one person came forward to champion freedom from criminal governing cartels and elite thieves. How sad that they ran with the pack to protect themselves instead of championing truth and actual freedom for the world’s people. How sad that we are crushed over and over and over again by the mind and heart-numbing sin of greed. How sad that wealth-based arrogance leads to the fear of humanity, which always leads to inhumanity.

    As we walk ourselves straight into another dark period of human history, freedom will disappear from our consciousness as we experience the Creative Destruction of the potential for global human freedom. Once the best government that the world ever produced is forgotten, and the last generation of Constitution-understanding people is gone, Socialism/Fascism/Communism, or as the wealthy think tankers like to call it – Communitarianism – will once again try to repress the world’s masses by reducing them to useful (translation: lowly paid) laborers for the sole advantage of the world’s one percent. This we call democracy.

    Creative Destruction has produced world democracy. And this is why America now hires and operates a homeland paramilitary consisting of international forces – a new system which holds practice drills in our cities and rural areas in case of, what?…who knows? Ask the wealthy think tankers. My guess is the much advertised pandemic, which will make triple billionaires of even more pharmaceutical corporations while ensuring the democracy of massive global depopulation goals. At any rate, I’m sure the paramilitary connection is thoroughly mapped out as that reality continues to internationalize its growing forces.

    It is also important to understand that Creative Destruction works in unexpected ways. For example, you will find this article disturbing:

    Couple this article with current military plans to assist FEMA with new and forthcoming quarantine laws, and the plot sickens. Just realize that something is afoot in this new nation of ours, and all is seemingly planned. There should be nothing as frightening to you as 1) a seemingly planned pandemic, 2) a new homeland paramilitary for American civilians, 3) forcing vaccines into your bodies, and 4) plans to force-quarantine (translation: imprison) American people for being sick with a designer virus.

    Creative Destruction? I would say so.

    Please join Darren Weeks and myself every Saturday morning on the Republic Broadcasting Network’s Govern America talk show every Saturday morning 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M., Eastern Standard Time. Bring your knowledge, research, and opinions to the people. Please join us. Click here to listen live.

    If you haven’t read my book, I recommend it, as well. To order The Cultural Devastation of American Women by Nancy Levant, click here.

    © 2009 Nancy Levant

    Nancy Levant is a renowned writer for Constitutional governance and American culture. She is the author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (and her dreadful timing).

    She is an opponent of deceptive governance and politicians, global governance by deception, political feminism, the public school system, political economics based upon manufactured wars and their corporate benefactors, and the Federal Reserve System. She is also a nationwide and lively radio personality. To book an engagement with Nancy Levant, send an email request to:

    Not available

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy137.htm

    Abandoned piglet is lost and hound: Giant farm dog saves baby pig’s bacon by adopting it as one of its own….

    A giant farm dog and a tiny piglet cuddle up as if they were family after the baby runt was dismissed by its own mother.

    Surrogate mum Katjinga, an eight-year-old Rhodesian Ridgeback, took on motherly duties for grunter Paulinchen – a tiny pot-bellied pig – and seems to be taking the adoption in her stride.

    Lonely Paulinchen was luckily discovered moments from death and placed in the care of the dog who gladly accepted it as one of her own. Thankfully for the two-week old mini porker, Katjinga fell in love with her at first site and saved her bacon.

    Enlarge    Dog and baby piglet

    Motherly love: Baby piglet feeds on its new surrogate mum

    And the unlikely relationship has made the wrinkly piggy a genuine sausage dog. In these adorable images Paulinchen can even be seen trying to suckle from her gigantic new mum.

    The two animals live together on a huge 20-acre farm in Hoerstel, Germany, where Katjinga’s owners Roland Adam, 54, and his wife Edit, 44, a bank worker, keep a pair of breeding Vietnamese pigs.

    Baby piglet and farm dog

    Nose place like home: The baby piglet nuzzles up to its new mum

    Property developer Roland found the weak and struggling piglet after she was abandoned by the rest of her family one evening after she was born.

    He said: “The pigs run wild on our land and the sow had given birth to a litter of five in our forest.
    “I found Paulinchen all alone and when I lifted her up she was really cold.

    Baby piglet feeding on farm dog

    Feeding time: Piglet’s new canine mother has no problem providing milk for the youngster

    “I felt sure some local foxes would have taken the little pig that very night so I took it into my house and gave her to Katinga.

    “She had just finished with a litter of her own, who are now 10 months, so I thought there was a chance she might take on the duties of looking after her. “Katinga is the best mother you can imagine. She immediately fell in love with the piggy. Straight away she started to clean it like it was one of her own puppies.

    Farm dog and baby piglet

    Doting: Caring pooch checks up on her new addition

    “Days later she started lactating again and giving milk for the piggy. She obviously regards it now as her own baby.”

    Mum of the year? Quite possibly.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210909/Abandoned-piglet-lost-hound-Giant-farm-dog-saves-baby-pigs-bacon-adopting-own.html#ixzz0Q4Yn6YQ7

    OPEN HIS HEART-BROWNSKI HASN’T GOT ONE!

    And so it continues, a Saharan mirage of evasion, opacity and shimmering ellipsis, semi-truth quite possibly built on a wink, a nudge and a longstanding injustice.

    In the saga of the Lockerbie bombing, Gordon Brown has still not told us what he thinks of the release of the sickly Libyan convicted of Britain’s worst terrorist attack. Why not?

    The full diplomatic details may never be known, but the immediate upshot for Mr Brown is political paralysis  –  all because he will not open his heart to the British electorate.

    Hero's welcome: Megrahi (left) and Gaddafi's sonHero’s welcome: Megrahi (left) and Gaddafi’s son

    What IS his personal opinion on the Megrahi affair? Is he hiding something? Has realpolitik prevailed? Or does the PM perhaps even think Abdelbaset al Megrahi was innocent of the terrible bombing of Pan Am flight 103?

    If Mr Brown’s silence is simply a question of grimy national economic interests, his silence is discreditable. But if it is based on doubts about the sentencing of Megrahi in a special court in the Netherlands eight years ago, might it perhaps be something more understandable?

    Last week, Mr Brown claimed that he was ‘repulsed’ by the hero’s welcome Megrahi received at Tripoli airport, yet he would not say if he disapproved of the decision to stick him on the aeroplane in the first place.

    Yesterday, while at some employment promotion in the Midlands, would the PM reveal his feelings about Megrahi’s release?

    The answer was ‘no’. Mr Brown issued denials. He told us what had not happened. There had been no underhand deals. There had been ‘no cover-up’. Negatives abounded. But where was the description of his own gut feelings?

    Politically, the collateral damage spreads. A few hours earlier, Foreign Secretary David Miliband veered from tetchy to legalistic as he kept repeating a tortuous form of words about how he and Mr Brown had not been ‘actively seeking the death of Mr Megrahi in prison’.

    Does any British minister  –  apart, presumably, from those at the Ministry of Defence  –  ever ‘actively seek’ deaths?

    Mr Miliband’s deliberate phrase was unconvincing. The Foreign Office’s Department of Obfuscation must have worked hard to come up with that one.

    Meanwhile, Tory leader David Cameron popped up on the TV screens, smooth as double cream, tanned as Des O’Connor. How assertive he seemed in comparison to the Prime Minister.

    Alex Salmond, leader of the Scottish National Party, also performed confidently in the media storm, fluent with his explanations, bombastic in his tone.

    Again, what a contrast this made to the scowling, fretful form of Mr Brown. Repeatedly yesterday he insisted that he had done ‘the right thing’, but for all the world he looked and sounded like a man keeping awkward secrets close to his chest.

    Mr Brown’s autumn is in danger of being kyboshed by this controversy. That may not even change if Megrahi dies of cancer as quickly as his doctor predicts.

    This chapter of events has shown us something about Mr Brown’s character. For that reason, the whys and wherefores of the story will continue to be debated at least until next year’s general election.

    In a bind: Gordon BrownIn a bind: Gordon Brown

    Did Mr Brown approve of the Scottish government’s decision to free Megrahi? Did he lobby for the release? Did he possibly even indicate to Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi, with a lifted eyebrow here and a wafted hand there, that he would allow the ailing Megrahi to walk free? Questions, questions, questions.

    The Prime Minister’s conduct in this affair reminds me of the mess one of our terrier puppies landed itself in the other day.

    The creature decided to investigate my son’s football goal and its net. Soon it became terribly tangled. The netting was wrapped all round its paws and neck. Each time the puppy tried to twist and release itself, the netting only became tighter, to the point that it was nearly strangled.

    Mr Brown is in a similar bind. His initial reluctance to comment was attributed to his being on holiday, yet that did not stop him offering congratulations to the England cricket XI on beating Australia.

    Then we were told he could not discuss the issue because it was a ‘quasi-judicial matter’. Political aides often throw this term around when they are playing for time.

    Further excuses were offered for Mr Brown’s disinclination to elaborate on the Megrahi affair. It was, we were told, a matter for the independent Scottish government, quite beyond his remit as Her Majesty’s Prime Minister.

    With each twist of the net, with each porky pie, each unpersuasive claim, Mr Brown becomes further removed from the sanctuary of honesty. If national interest has indeed been placed above raw justice, should we not be told?

     

     

     

    Voters have coped with the spectacle of our Government dealing with Irish Republicanism. They are mature enough to hear the Prime Minister admit that strategic relationships with Libya are worth a few days of freedom for the dying Megrahi, if that is the case.

    It strikes me that there are two possible explanations for Mr Brown’s hesitant conduct on the Megrahi affair. The first, plain and simple, is incompetence. A tempting conclusion. He is a poor communicator and his first instinct has often been to dither.

    The second possibility is that, in his heart, Mr Brown does not think Megrahi was responsible for the Lockerbie bomb and that he has been happy to see him released on the quite proper grounds that he deserves some freedom before dying of cancer.

    There is a considerable and respectable body of opinion in Scotland which takes the view that Megrahi was wrongly scapegoated.

    One of its most persistent advocates is the former Labour MP and one-time Father of the House of Commons, Tam Dalyell, who organised a record number of parliamentary debates about Megrahi. Mr Dalyell is an old acquaintance of Mr Brown.

    I am led to believe that he has on occasion talked deeply to Mr Brown about Megrahi. In Mr Brown’s Kirkcaldy constituency, furthermore, there are eloquent voices in the Church of Scotland who believe Megrahi was wrongly convicted.

    The Lockerbie campaigner Dr Jim Swire, who lost his daughter Flora in the bombing, is not convinced of Megrahi’s guilt and believes ‘it would be abominable cruelty to force him to die in a foreign country, away from his beloved family’.

    It may be an impolitic thing for him to admit, but if the British Prime Minister did, indeed, think that the Lockerbie bomber should never have served time for mass murder, should he not have the courage of his convictions and say so?

    We may have to wait many years before we discover what Gordon Brown really thinks, but in the meantime we are left with a smog of obfuscation which is suffocating not only the Prime Minister, but also his government.

     

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1210836/Lies-evasion-real-reason-Brown-wanted-free-Lockerbie-bomber.html#comments#ixzz0Q4Zx1zSM

     

    Terminally-ill care scheme is ‘death pathway’, warn experts                   

    They say patients are wrongly being assessed as close to death, then denied food and fluid and sedated with a ' chemical cosh' until they die.They say patients are wrongly being assessed as close to death, then denied food and fluid and sedated with a ‘ chemical cosh’ until they die.

    NHS doctors are prematurely ending the lives of terminally-ill patients, experts warn today.

    They say patients are wrongly being assessed as close to death, then denied food and fluid and sedated with a ‘ chemical cosh’ until they die.

    This ‘tick box’ approach can make it harder to see signs of improvement, creating a ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’ that they will die.

    Meanwhile, relatives have to endure the agony of watching their loved ones being refused food and drink.

    The claims come in a open letter from six experts in palliative care.

    The warning involves a scheme called the Liverpool Care Pathway, designed to limit the suffering of patients in their final hours.

    It was developed by the Marie Curie cancer charity and has been extended to other medical conditions and adopted by hundreds of hospices, care homes and hospitals.

    But the experts, led by Professor Peter Millard, Emeritus Professor of Geriatrics at the University of London and Dr Peter Hargreaves, a consultant in palliative medicine at St Luke’s cancer centre in Guildford, claim the scheme is causing a ‘national crisis’ in patient care

    They say they have personally taken patients off it and seen them live for ‘ significant’ amounts of time.

    The letter, published in the Daily Telegraph, will renew the debate about doctors ‘playing God’ with lives.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1210848/Terminally-ill-care-scheme-death-pathway-warn-experts.html#ixzz0Q4amVWQt

    Brain-eating killer claimed two more victims because of ‘systematic’ NHS failures….

     

    Enlarge    Peter Bryan Cannibal: Peter Bryan was allowed to live as an out-patient

    A ‘systematic failure’ in the treatment of a schizophrenic allowed him to murder a friend and eat parts of his brain before he went on to kill a fellow patient in Broadmoor,two separate reports have revealed.

    Convicted killer Peter Bryan was given permission to live in a hostel in north London where he could come and go as he pleased.

    He had been admitted to a secure hospital after beating shop assistant Nisha Sheth to death with a hammer in 1993.

    But eight years later, mental health experts decided he could live in the community under supervision.

    In 2002 he moved to the hostel and at the beginning of 2004 social workers applied for his transfer to ‘low support accommodation’ but four weeks later Bryan murdered his friend Brian Cherry, 43, and cooked and ate his flesh.

    In a damning report into the case, authors found that while living in the community Bryan was looked after by an inexperienced social worker and a psychiatrist who had never worked with a convicted killer.

    The report found ‘there was, however, a systemic failure to ensure that the key professionals allocated to care for Peter Bryan in the community had the necessary experience to deal with someone with his forensic history and complex presentation.

    ‘The two professionals, who were a supervising psychiatrist and social supervisor, for this unusual and complicated patient were a general adult psychiatrist who never before had had responsibility for a patient who had killed someone, and a very inexperienced social worker who had no training in mental health.’

    Following the killing, Bryan was sent to Broadmoor but within two months killed fellow patient Richard Loudwell, 59.

    The report outlined a catalogue of errors in the way East London NHS Foundation Trust dealt with Bryan.

    Nisha Sheth
    BRIAN CHERRY

    Bryan’s victims: Shop assistant Nisha Sheth, left, was beaten to death in 1993. Brian Cherry, a friend of Bryan’s, was butchered in 2004

    A psychiatrist and social worker assigned to him should never have been given the responsibility for taking care of Bryan while he was in the community, it concluded.

    He was transferred to the medium secure ward of the John Howard Centre in Hackney, north east London, after spending seven-and-a-half years in a high secure unit at Rampton Hospital.

     

     

    It was typical that a patient in his condition would spend around two years at such a centre.

    But after just six months he was transferred as a secured patient to a forensic hostel – Riverside House in north London.

    It was there that an ‘inexperienced’ social worker was appointed to look after him.

    The report found he had been a general social worker for only five months.

    The panel said: ‘He had no training in mental health and no experience as a social worker working with psychiatric patients, let alone mentally disordered offenders.’

    The social worker was not ‘an appropriate choice’ to care for Bryan, the report found.

    A supervising psychiatrist assigned to him at this stage was also found to have never had responsibility for someone who had committed murder.

    Enlarge     What police found: A graphic of the scene after Bryan killed and dismembered Brian Cherry

    This led to a ‘lack of effective management of Bryan in the community’.

    The report also criticised the decision to reduce the dosage of medication Bryan was receiving at the hostel after he complained to staff.

    This reduction could have been a factor in the eventual deterioration of his mental health, the report found.

    Enlarge     Peter Bryan is led from court in handcuffs after he was jailed for life for murdering Mr Cherry

    This led in 2003 to Bryan being placed in a position where he was allowed to self-medicate.

    The trust was also criticised after it emerged that it had not acted swiftly enough after an allegation that he indecently assaulted a 17-year-old girl.

    The report said it was ‘seriously concerned’ that despite the allegation, no attempt was made by the hostel or his social worker to contact the Home Office at the earliest possible opportunity.

    Following the alleged indecent assault, Bryan was moved ‘for his own safety’ from the hostel after being threatened by the girl’s family.

    He was temporarily placed on a psychiatric ward at the Newham Centre in London in early February 2004 but just two weeks later Bryan was given permission to leave the ward temporarily.

    He went straight to a DIY shop where he bought a claw hammer, Stanley knife and a screwdriver and then went to kill Brian Cherry.

    Police were called to Cherry’s flat to discover a semi-naked Bryan brandishing a carving knife and covered in dried blood.

    Both of Cherry’s arms and one of his legs had been severed from his body.

    In the kitchen parts of Cherry’s flesh were found cooking in a frying pan.

    Bryan told police following his arrest: ‘I ate his brains with butter. It was really nice.’

    He was sent to Broadmoor but shortly after his arrival he struck again, killing Loudwell.

    A second report released today criticised West London Mental Health NHS Trust for failures in the case.

    Loudwell died after sustaining serious head injuries in the attack, which took place in the dining room of the ward.

    No staff were present in the dining room at the time.

    The report said Bryan had been intending to kill Loudwell for some time prior to the attack.

    Loudwell complained that he was being bullied by other patients, but his pleas to staff were ignored, the report found.

    Enlarge     Tarpaulin covers the flat in Walthamstow, the scene of a murderous act of cannibalism on victim Brian Cherry

    ‘Bullying was not treated sufficiently seriously by any member of the clinical team, nor was it given the priority it merited in Loudwell’s case.’

    The report criticised the Trust for not carrying out a risk assessment on Bryan before he attacked Loudwell.

    The report stated: ‘Had a risk assessment been carried out properly, then it is likely that Peter Bryan would have been recognised as highly dangerous.’

    The report found that it was ‘not appropriate’ that patients on the ward were allowed out of the sight of staff.

    The health trusts involved apologised for failures in the handling of the case but revealed that nobody had been disciplined as a result.

    Bryan was able to function in such a way that made it difficult for even experienced health professionals to detect just how dangerous he was, the reports found.

    Dr Robert Dolan, chief executive of East London NHS Foundation Trust, said: ‘We offer our deepest and most sincere condolences to everyone affected by this case.

    Enlarge     Forensic scientists arrive at the Walthamstow flat in 2004 after the dismembered body was found

    ‘Peter Bryan clearly had a very severe and complex mental illness. In his lengthy contact with a range of services and a range of professionals, he was able to function at a high social level and did not display any of the typical behaviour or symptoms one would associate with a severe mental illness.

    ‘We accept that elements of the care provided to Mr Bryan could have been better but we also note that the independent report does not say the killing of Mr Cherry could have been predicted.’

    He said an action plan had been implemented following the case to improve the trust’s quality of care.

    Peter Cubbon, chief executive of West London Mental Health NHS Trust, apologised to Mr Loudwell’s family.

    He said: ‘He was a patient in our care and we failed to ensure his safety.

    ‘We also failed Peter Bryan and our apology is unequivocal.’

    Following Mr Loudwell’s death, the Trust has reduced the number of patients on the ward where the killing took place.

    There are now also increased numbers of qualified nurses working on the ward and more patient observation.

    Enlarge     Third killing: Broadmoor Hospital outside the Berkshire town of Crowthorne, where Peter Bryan murdered Richard Loudwell

    Asked about the Bryan case, health minister Mike O’Brien told BBC Radio 4’s World at One: ‘This is something that raises some very worrying issues and we want to be sure we look at this with a great deal of care.

    ‘If changes are necessary they will be made.’

    Shadow Health Minister Anne Milton said: ‘This shocking report shows a complete failure of mental health and social services to protect both the public and a very sick mentally ill man.

    ‘It appears that there were repeated mistakes that ended in tragic consequences for the victims and their families and our sympathy is with them having to face the loss of a relative in such horrific circumstances.

    ‘Everyone has been let down and we need to make sure that systems are in place to ensure that mentally ill people who are such a risk to the public are in specialist secure care, not wandering our streets.’

    Barbara Young, chairman of the Care Quality Commission, added: ‘This is a disturbing and tragic story.

    ‘Providing healthcare to this group of patients requires a high degree of skill and expertise.

    ‘But this report clearly illustrates just how badly things can go wrong when secure institutions have poor safeguards in place to protect people.

    ‘We have already taken action at Broadmoor. Our recent investigation identified a series of problems and proposed significant improvements that will make the service safer. We have been encouraged by the response.’

    Loudwell’s family hit out over the way they have been treated. His sister, who is not named, said: ‘The terrible feelings that this family experienced from when we initially learned of the attack on Richard have turned to anger and cynicism.’

    She said the family have never forgotten that another family are still suffering from Loudwell’s own actions after he killed pensioner Joan Smythe in 2002, but ‘expected that people would be kept safe from Richard, and that he would be kept safe from others’ once inside Broadmoor.

    His family said he called his mother from the ward the day before he was attacked to say he feared for his life and was being bullied.

    A family spokeswoman said they were ‘truly unprepared for the shocking scale and catalogue of failings at all levels and in all disciplines of staff at Broadmoor which contributed to Richard’s death’.

    She said family members were ‘horrified’ when they were given details of what happened to Loudwell in March 2009.

    In a statement, Loudwell’s sister condemned ‘the way that we have been treated by the trust, the long delay in the trust accepting or apologising for the collective failings that led to Richard’s death, and the apparent persistent failure of the trust to learn the lessons from their failure to keep Richard safe’.

    Kate Maynard, the family’s solicitor, added they had been left with the ‘difficult decision’ of whether to try to represent themselves at an upcoming inquest into Loudwell’s death or ‘invest their life savings in legal costs’.

    ‘This state of affairs is deeply unjust,’ she said. 

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210923/Brain-eating-convicted-killer-freed-murder-social-worker-bungles.html#ixzz0Q4We9MMa

    Muslim “Community Leader” Arrested For Lying Over BNP Kidnap Story!!

     Muslim community leader arrested for ‘making up BNP story’

    A Muslim community leader who claimed he was kidnapped from his home at knifepoint and dumped in woodland after a BNP hate campaign has been arrested for perverting the course of justice.

    Noor Ramjanally, 36, alleged that he was abducted by two men, bundled into a car boot, driven to Epping Forest in Essex and ordered to stop his religious work.

    The BNP had been accused of whipping up racial tensions in the area after it issued an inflammatory leaflet about Mr Ramjanally’s Islamic community group – the first in Loughton.

    Muslim community leader Noor RamjanallyElements of doubt: Local Muslim community leader Noor Ramjanally has been arrested for perverting the course of justice

     

    His alleged ordeal became a cause celebre among the Muslim community both locally and nationally after it was reported in the national press.

    But today, Mr Ramjanally was, himself, arrested amid suggestions that he made the whole incident up.

    An Essex Police spokesman said: “A man has been arrested in connection with an ongoing police investigation into an alleged abduction in west Essex.

    “Police were contacted on Monday August 24 by a man who stated that he had been abducted from his home in the Valley Hill area of Loughton.

    “On Thursday September 3, police arrested a 36 year-old man from the town on suspicion of perverting the course of justice.”

    Mr Ramjanally had also alleged that his Loughton home was firebombed in July and that he had received hate mail threatening his family.

    BNP leaflet attacking the proposed development of Mosques in the Loughton area of EssexAnti-Islam: BNP leaflet attacking the proposed development of Mosques in the Loughton area of Essex

    Recalling the supposed abduction, he said: “I have got the whole UK Muslim community behind me now. I am not just on my own.”  And after the alleged arson attack, high-profile community figures, including Loughton Mayor Ken Angold-Stephens, religious leaders, teachers and members of the police attended the hall where he holds prayer sessions in a show of support.

    Telling of the ‘kidnapping’, Mr Ramjanally claimed he feared he was about to be murdered when the car stopped and one of the kidnappers said ‘Let’s do it here.”  Instead, the pair were said to have marched him deep into the forest in silence before warning him: “We don’t want the Islamic group in Loughton’.

    Married father-of-one Mr Ramjanally, said he thought the attack had been inspired by the BNP.

    In the latest edition of the BNP’s ‘Epping Forest Patriot’, delivered to many households in Loughton, it attacked his hiring of a local hall on Friday afternoons for two hour Jumu’ah prayer sessions.

    Under a picture of a union flag being eaten away by the Islamic moon and crescent, the leaflet says: ‘In parts of neighbouring Redbridge and east London the Islamification process is almost complete. 

    ‘Cockney culture destroyed and East End community spirit just a fading memory.’

    ‘The BNP love Loughton and we’ll do all in our power to prevent Islam creeping into our town.’  The BNP, which has four councillors in the area, believes the Islamic group is a prelude to building a mosque. Its leaflet is headed in capital letters: “No mosques in Loughton!” 

    Mr Ramjanally said: “The men did not say anything about the BNP or who they were, but  it is only the BNP who want my Islamic group out of Loughton.

    He added: “I believe the BNP campaign has inspired the violence.”

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1211011/Muslim-community-leader-arrested-making-BNP-story.html#ixzz0Q4QKJGT8

    SO NOW THE TRUTH INSPIERS VIOLENCE- WHAT A COCKEYED VIEW THE PRAT HAS!

    Marxist Traitors Brownski And Miliband…Signing EUSSR Constitution Illegal….

     

    http://www.youtube.com/user/FMWatkins#play/all/uploads-all/2/pIjEZMH9GT0

    UAF/Searchlight Nightmare About To Come True…

    The UAF / Searchlight Nightmare About to Come True

    The ultimate nightmare for the UAF and Searchlight is about to come true – when the BNP amends its constitution as then the BNP and its candidates cannot be called ‘Racists’ anymore.

    This is why the Equality Commission case is the ultimate phyrric victory, for all they will have done is remove in one stroke the entire list of labels they like to define us by.

    They will no longer be able to call us racist or nazi, as the National Black Police Officers Association and the BNP will have similar definitions of their membership in our constitution – so if the NBPA arent a ‘racist’ group then the BNP cannot be called a ‘racist’ group.

    The ONLY real weapon the enemies of Britain have against the BNP is the label ‘racist’ or ‘nazis’ that they use in their newspapers and magazines to smear us with and undermine our vote – but once the BNP amends is constitution in such a way that we no longer define our ‘white only membership’ on the grounds of race or skin colour then the BNP cannot be called racist anymore.

    As long as the BNP have a ‘white only’ membership criteria for membership that is not based on race or skin colour, then we are completely legal.

    The fact that only a handful of non-whites may probably wish to join the party will be irrelevant – the fact remains that the BNP as an organisation can no longer be called racist as an organisation.

    If a few idiotic reds and agent provocateur non-whites joined the party and caused trouble, then as long we kicked them out for any reason other than their race or skin colour that would be 100 % legal. We can remove anyone we want from the party if they cause us problems as long as the grounds for doing so arent unlawful eg their race or skin colour.

    If a few dozen reds or agent provocateurs joined the party then we will have amended the constitution in such a way as to ensure they have to have, for example, 5 years continual membership before they can become full members – and that way they have to subsidise the party for five years with their donations before we kick them out for any reason we wish to kick them out for when we discover they are only in the party to cause trouble.

    This amendment to our constitution also has implications for the NUS ‘No Platform Policy’, as the no platform policy is based on the ‘fact’ that the BNP is a ‘racist’ party, but once the constitution is amended then No Platform has come down for the BNP and we must be allowed, under the Education Acts that require all colleges and universities to respect free speech, to organise, campaign and participate in all political activities on university campuses.

    This will allow us to set up outreach programmes across the country to reach disaffected youth directly.

    The ban on the BNP by the Police, Trades Unions and other organisations would also have to removed and annulled, as the BNP could not any longer be classified as racist organisations by those bodies.

    In one stroke we will have brought down all the walls they have erected to contain us !

    Another interesting position will be that the BNP can now emphasise CULTURE as well as ethnic and indigenous rights.

    This is where I would expect a lot of support and potential votes in elections from patriotic, loyal Non-white British citizens, such as those who have served in the British Army.

    The issue of defending British Culture has been sadly neglected by the BNP for a long time due to the emphasis on race and ethnicity.

    By tapping into the rich vein of anger about the erosion of British culture, British values, British heritage, British laws and British civil rights and liberties in all communities – we can unlock massive public support.

    If a couple of proud non-white British servicemen with their army service medals wanted to attend the RWB and talk about their experiences, or the experiences of the crack addicted, heroin addicted, beaten, shot or raped children who suffered as a result of the governments asylum and immigration policy because they have been shipping in scum from around the world into the country and dumping them into poor white working class and poor non-white working class communities – then that would make superb propaganda for us.

    If a few non-whites stood up and demanded at a BNP event the end of the Islamisation of Britain, an end to multi-culturalism, an end to mass immigration and the need to repatriate illegal immigrants, criminals and bogus asylum seekers and also about the dangers of diversity – can you imagine how the media, the white liberals and lemmings would react !

    If no non-white members joined the party, and NONE chose to attend the RWB – then whats the problem !

    The fact is that there will probably be a handful of sincere non-whites who would wish to join the party, and if they are prepared to join the BNP and agree with the amended version of the constitution and its emphasis on defending the rights and liberties of the Indigenous British people and defending British culture, then I cannot see that being a problem.

    Those whose political interests and desire is to to protect, defend and represent the interests of the Indigenous British community will still be able to do so, whilst those in the party whose emphasis is on defending British culture will also be able too.

    The fact is that as anyone who has a relative in the British Army will tell you, there are many proud, patriotic and nationalist non-whites in this country who have woken up and realised that the multi-cultural society is a complete disaster.

    They came to this country in order to live in a British society with a British culture.

    They have seen the erosion of British culture and British values and this replaced with the evil and pernicious multi-cultural hellhole we have today.

    If they joined the BNP we could put them on our leaflets saying they are BNP members and supporters, and then when the white middle class idiots of the UAF or the white liberal idiots in the trades unions that assist Searchlight distribute their leaflets saying the BNP are ‘racists’, they will just look like total idiots to the public.

    It will be very difficult to call us racists if we have non-whites endorsing our politics and party.

    The fact is that we could even go on the attack – there are NO blacks or non-whites who work for the Zionist Searchlight gang, so we can attack them as being anti-Black when they operate in our communities !

    Apart from Weyman Bennett, the token leader of the UAF, there are virtually no non-whites in the UAF either.

    Many nationalists are so intellectually insular that they forget one important fact ;

    If Britain was an all white nation but with a non-British culture then our country and people would be destroyed.

    A degenerate culture spawns a degenerate people.

    The role of culture in our society is rarely appreciated by nationalists, for the simple fact is that if we had an all white Britain but we had a communist, liberal or consumerist society (as we have today) then our people and would still be destroyed.

    In order for us to save our people we must organise as a people and also replace the present cultural poisons that contaminate our nation, society and people.

    A degenerate culture spawns a degenerate people.

    The issue for nationalists has never just been about race or ethnicity, it has always been about culture as well – as the culture of a nation moulds the people.

    Therefore a continuum of interests exists between the indigenous British people and naturalised British citizens who are patriots and who want to defend British culture.

    They like us do not want to see an Islamified Britain, a Britain which is controlled by global corporations that peddle filth and pervsersity to our people, they dont want to live in a Britain where Christianity has been replaced with Sharia Law and honour killings, they dont want their kids shot with guns imported into the UK by WHITE Albanian and Russian gangsters, they dont want their kids on heroin imported into the UK by Islamist gangsters, they dont want their kids smoking crack sold to them by bogus asylum seeker and criminal gangs from the Third World, they dont want British culture replaced by American Bling culture and its worship of money and murder, they dont want to see Britain ruled by the EU and forced to accept in millions of asylum seekers from the Third World who import in AIDS and tuberculosis, they dont want their kids taught at primary school the joys and delights of anal sex, they dont want their teenage 12 year old daughters give the pill by liberal doctors and teachers so they can have under age sex and get sexual diseases, they dont want Britain to become a nation where British culture is something stuffed inside dusty glass boxes in museums.

    They want to live in a Britain with a British culture – which is the very reason they came to the country in the first place.

    In fact non-whites are more militant than most liberal brain damaged whites about immigration – they demand an end to mass immigration as they know that if it continues there will one day be a civil war, and they dont want their kids dragged into it.

    Whilst most whites in this country have become so cowed by the endless screams of ‘racist’ at them that they have become ‘liberals by default’ through their apathy, silence and cowardice – the non-whites of this country have never experienced that level of brainwashing and conditioning.

    Whilst whites have become gutless arse lickers of the liberal elite, the non-whites in the UK are not afraid to speak out on the issue of immigration.

    Recent documentaries and polls have revealed that non-whites are as worried, or more worried, about immigration than many whites are.

    This decision by the Equality Commission to attack the BNP is the most stupid thing they could ever have done, for by so doing they have destroyed the only real power they ever had to utilise against us.

    The race relations acts do not prevent whites from forming their own white only groups, all they have to do is ensure they are not dim enough to make them membership associations, as any membership assocation over 25 people comes under the race relations acts.

    All they need to do is have a small committee of ten people as main organisers of these groups and then collect e mails and phone numbers of people who wish to attend events, meetings, rock gigs, festivals etc etc.

    Instead of breaking the law, we have to evolve to out think the law.

    The last thing the government and the liberal elite want us to do is think.

    As long as we are ‘haters’ then we are not a threat, as hate is an emotion that cloouds judgement.

    The glory of the white race is its ability for rational thought, and this is what has taken us to the moon, developed the technologies of modern civilisation and the wonders of Western Civilisation.

    The thing the liberal elite fears most is that we start to out think them.

    The BNP is the only MAINSTREAM Nationalist political party in Europe to have a membership policy that is illegal, even the Front National, the Vlaams Belang and other mainstream political party all have non-white members.

    When a political party goes mainstream, as the BNP has, then it can no longer pretend it can ignore the law.

    If were a tiny political cult on the margins of society with no council seats or any political representation – like the National Front – then we could do as we want and not be bothered.

    The National Front has not been taken to court as they are a political irrelevance.

    If the National Front suddenly started winning council seats and european seats then they would find themselves in court like the BNP.

    The NF may try and say ‘we would spend all our millions of pounds of funds and members fees on fighting this case if they came for us’ when in fact their membership fees income wouldnt pay the legal fees to get advice from a QC or barrister before even fighting the case.

    The NF, if it attacks the BNP on this issue, needs to reveal publically what all its money reserves are and what its yearly income is – and if it is less than half a million pounds to fight a similar case then they are talking out of their arse.

    The fact is that the NF wouldnt have the money to fight this case.

    They are lucky in regard to the fact that they are a political failure, as that way they remain off the political radar and will be left alone.

    No doubt some of the more hypocritical leaders of the NF, like Eddy ‘Ready Steady Cook’ Morrisson will try and get the more extremist BNP members to join the NF and no doubt a few will go – and if they want to waste their time, money and energy on posture politics with an insignificant political cult on the margins of society, then they are free to do so. If the Nazi Saluters and golliwog burners want to join the NF then they are free to do so.

    That means we get on with the real job of getting into power.

    We can then get on with the real work of getting into Parliament and changing the laws.

    All true Revolutionary Nationalists realise that it is not how we get into power that matters, it is what we do when we get into power.

    We have to abide by the laws our enemies enact, until we are in power and we can annul them and pass our own laws that benefit us.

    We already have to abide by existing laws on political donations, registration of political parties, what we can put on our leaflets, what we can say at meetings etc etc – so why is it some people think we can simply ignore the laws that exist around membership associations under the Race Relations Act !

    The Nationalist Revolution begins in Parliament, but in order to get into Parliament we have to play the political game whose rules are defined by our enemies.

    If we do not play the game we get kicked off the field – and if we are no longer able to operate and function as a political party then we cannot get into Parliament to save our people, culture and nation.

    The Nationalist Revolutionary understands the nature of the society they are forced to live in, and they evolve and adapt in order to ensure their survival of themselves, the political movement they support and the political party they support.

    The SOLE aim of us being involved in the political process is to get into power, as only then can we enact the Nationalist Revolution that will save our people, culture and society.

    Onwards and Upwards !

     
     
    OVER TO YOU- WEYMAN BENNETT- SHIT- NOW YOU’LL HAVE TO WORK FOR YOUR MONEY!!