Does the UN Plan Full-Spectrum Domination?

Does the UN Plan Full-Spectrum Domination?

Monday, February 13, 2012 – by Staff Report

Bank Ki-moonUnited Nations boss Ban Ki-moon and his top deputies gathered in secret last year to chart the future course of humanity through “sustainable development,” a controversial concept the UN equates with “saving the planet” in what would ultimately entail a radical and complete transformation of human civilization. But even though the erection of a global so-called “green-economy” regime is a top UN Tweet. – New American

Dominant Social Theme: UN is focused on making things better for the environment.

Free-Market Analysis: The New American has posted an article focusing on the renewed United Nation’s “green” push. We covered this at the beginning of February in an article entitled, “Now UN Plans to Guide Nations’ ‘Best Practices’ Around the World.” You can see it here: Now UN Plans to Guide Nations’ ‘Best Practices’ Around the World.

The article points out that that there was a “closed door” session held about three months ago on Long Island that dealt with this new green agenda within the context of an upcoming Conference on Sustainable Development (UN CSD) in Rio de Janeiro. Here’s some more:

The confidential minutes of the meeting, obtained and posted online by Fox News last week, outline the goals and agenda for the global sustainability gathering this June — dubbed Rio+20 — that will be held on the 20th anniversary of the 1992 Earth Summit. Using environmentalism as the rationale, that conference laid the groundwork for the global effort the UN hopes to expand and solidify in the years to come.

According to critics and the UN itself, however, the global body and its allies around the world have ambitions that go far beyond simply protecting the environment. In fact, many experts — especially in the United States — fear that the UN actually envisions a global government, an erosion of private-property rights, and even an end to the individual freedoms enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. And based on UN documents dealing with “sustainability,” the concerns appear to be justified.

During the secretive October meeting on sustainability, attended by the leaders of the United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB), Secretary General Ban made more than a few bold statements. He said, for example, that pursuing “sustainable development” was the “greatest imperative of the current generation of leadership, as well as of UN system organizations,” according to the minutes.

As we’ve tried to point out in several articles, however, the renewed UN green push is actually part of a much larger UN program that seems to be gradually falling into place. After a period of quietude as a result of the various global warming setbacks the UN has received, there seems to be a determination to attack.

Who’s behind it? Why, the same Anglosphere elite that generally wants to build world government. There are often attempts to claim that the Anglosphere is divided by geography and power but, in fact, at the top level all the facilities of the Anglosphere seem to work together. If one follows such things, one can almost visualize the strategy unfolding and even predict it, on occasion.

As best we can tell, the Anglosphere – via Britain, American and Israel mostly – is trying to create a maximum amount of chaos in the world on the way to introducing more formal world government. The UN is just one more weapon in the arsenal.

The tools the power elite uses include dominant social themes – fear-based promotions that frighten middle classes into giving up power and wealth to specially created globalist institutions. The UN is prime among these.

While the New American focuses mainly on the environmental aspects of what the UN has in mind, our initial article laid out a three-pronged attack. We pointed out that a pilot project was already underway in Thailand that sought to implement new UN initiatives. Here are the UN’s three “new” priorities based on a new UN five-year plan (shades of the USSR):

The UNPAF 2012-16 is closely aligned with the following three development strategies contained in the RTG’s 11th National Economic and Social Development Plan (NESDP 2012- 2016):

− Promoting the just society: The UN system will support social reform for equity and empowerment, including strengthening the social protection system, enhancing human rights and access to justice, and improving the quality of information for and analysis of issues in social policy. It will also provide support for specific social programmes that are the focus of particular UN agencies.

− Strengthening economic cooperation in the region: The UN system will support Thailand as an effective development partner in the international community and support the development of a creative economy in view of the important role this will play in strategically positioning Thailand as a socio-economic regional actor.

− Managing natural resources and the environment towards sustainability: The UN system will support Thailand in responding to the challenges of climate change, and work on issues with respect to the nexus between poverty and the environment and energy and the environment.

One can see from this Thailand project that the UN has returned to the fray with a full plate of globalist enterprises. These include a sociopolitical and economic element as well as the environmental aspect. The UN’s environmental focus may be the key to unlocking the larger program that the UN wants to implement. It also puts the wars that the Anglosphere has been pursuing into an even larger focus.

It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the West’s wealthiest families have launched the recent disparate wars in part to intimidate current power brokers, especially in the developing world where many of these military engagements have been fought.

Conclusion: One could speculate that the UN is the other arm of a vast strategic pincer. Having waged wars of intimidation, the elites are now rolling out a full UN program of global domination.

Posted by Ol’ Grey Ghost on 02/14/12 06:57 PM

@ rossbcan & Danny B:

You two might like this one…

Click to view link

Divide and conquer through the “Gentle Way” by using your opponents’ weight against each other first…

Click to view link

Login To Reply

Posted by PB on 02/14/12 05:13 PM

What many miss about Agenda 21 is that it also entials government healthcare. I’m already seeing this trickle down through one state in the US. Scroll down and read sections 30 and 31. Click to view link Section 30: The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies… . Smart Growth and Population Health are linked hand in hand because a smarter designed city would encourage more walking opposed to driving. Green is the color of those who are too yellow to be red.

Login To Reply

Posted by rossbcan on 02/14/12 10:59 AM

Posted by Danny B on 02/14/12 10:41 AM
Ross & Grey Ghost, if you take a look at recent legislation like NDAA ,,, look at the voting record, you get the impression that GOV is terrified at the thought of what will happen when the “free lunch” is taken away. It was passed almost unanimously. Outside of desperate measures, GOV is paralyzed.
Click to view link
Legislators see Americans buying millions of firearms. They are getting a bit nervous as to where those firearms will be pointed. GOV even claims that returning GIs may be potential terrorists.
I suspect that GOV envisions a bank-holiday where NO credit transactions can be posted or cleared. I don’t have a definitive answer but, I suspect that EBT cards [food stamps] would not clear.
“200 million guns are loaded, Satan cries take aim”
Click to view link

cry havoc and, slip the dogs of war

when you are up against the insane possessing godlike hubris and ignorance opinineing that they get to choose who lives and dies, there can be no impartial bystanders, just collateral damage.

Joining the fray and fighting for restoration of the “rule of law” is the only option with any hope, faint as it is of survival:

Click to view link

CHOOSE carefully:

Click to view link

… plus the samll matter of being able to look in the mirror and owning the consequences of your own actions / inactions for those whom have achieved this obvious truth, the corollory / cost of freedom.

It is live free, or, die trying. All other choices ARE “the choice to die”, with no possibility of a meaningful life apart from being a cog in someone’s machinations, to be discarded when you are no longer “of use”.

Login To Reply

Posted by Danny B on 02/14/12 10:41 AM

Ross & Grey Ghost, if you take a look at recent legislation like NDAA ,,, look at the voting record, you get the impression that GOV is terrified at the thought of what will happen when the “free lunch” is taken away. It was passed almost unanimously. Outside of desperate measures, GOV is paralyzed.
Click to view link
Legislators see Americans buying millions of firearms. They are getting a bit nervous as to where those firearms will be pointed. GOV even claims that returning GIs may be potential terrorists.
I suspect that GOV envisions a bank-holiday where NO credit transactions can be posted or cleared. I don’t have a definitive answer but, I suspect that EBT cards [food stamps] would not clear.
“200 million guns are loaded, Satan cries take aim”
Click to view link

Login To Reply

Posted by Jedediah Smith on 02/14/12 10:34 AM

Studying the evidence, a very good case can be made that the UN, NATO, and the US itself (in particular the US military) are being used to push the globalist one world order agenda. I wonder how co-operative the leadership of other countries are in regards to global full spectrum dominance. Putin seems to be resisting. He’s not thrilled by the drive to surround Russia militarily and economically. He’s likely under the kind of pressures that have been applied by various NGOs in other countries – the weapon of manipulated ‘democracy’. What is going on behind the scenes in China is a mystery. Perhaps the leadership of that very old civilization don’t want to be dominated by a bunch of pikers who have only been around for a few centuries.
In the U.S., the people and the US Constitution are the enemies of the NWO of course. Media manipulated ‘democracy’ is a weapon used against Americans, just like in the various ‘color revolutions’ overseas. The Baby Boomers have been propagandized using the ‘environmental’ and ‘population’ angles since Earth Day many decades ago.

Login To Reply

Posted by rossbcan on 02/14/12 10:20 AM

Posted by Ol’ Grey Ghost on 02/14/12 09:26 AM
Sounds a lot like this…

Click to view link

The best way to trap a rodent so one can kill it is to use bait…

Exactly.

Don’s feed the animals because, when the feed stops, the entitled get feral and, eat YOU.

There are too many of us for elites to kill, so, we are manipulated to turn on each other while they plan to sit in bunkers and eat popcorn, watching the divine comedy of the machinationations they have set in motion play out. Then, they will be forced to realize that, without the productive to prey on, they must and will turn on and eat each other to survive until ALL resources are consumed.

It will not be the meek who inherit the earth, it will be radioactive cockroaches, assuming ANY life can survive.

BTW, always enjoy your practical approach…

Login To Reply

Posted by Ol’ Grey Ghost on 02/14/12 09:26 AM

Posted by rossbcan on 02/14/12 07:34 AM
“That should get the kill numbers up a bit higher.”

That fits with my general conclusion that unsustainable entitlements (something from nothing), which have been railed against by the personally responsible, morally aware and productive for all of recorded history was and is nothing but a “bait and switch” fruad to get criminals entrenched in positions of hierarchical control based on “smash and grab” promises that cannot, under any conditions be kept.

So, the “age of reneg” is upon us and, our slavers realize their support base (the entitled) are about to turn, as one and demand “where’s OUR beef”, only to be met with “the cupboard is bare” and the reactionary wrath this will invoke from a large, perhaps the majority segment of society.

So, they must kill us, before we kill them.

Sounds a lot like this…

Click to view link

The best way to trap a rodent so one can kill it is to use bait…

Login To Reply

Posted by vivek on 02/14/12 08:03 AM

Posted by vivek on 02/14/12 08:02 AM
United Kingdom
United States
United Kingdom

Need one say more? It’s all in the words, in the symbols, in the things we look at but cannot see.

Vivek

Click to view link

Pardon, I meant:

United Kingdom
United States
United Nations… ..

Vivek

Login To Reply

Posted by vivek on 02/14/12 08:02 AM

United Kingdom
United States
United Kingdom

Need one say more? It’s all in the words, in the symbols, in the things we look at but cannot see.

Vivek

Click to view link

Login To Reply

Posted by rossbcan on 02/14/12 07:34 AM

Posted by Danny B on 02/13/12 08:44 PM
The claim is made by an FBI chief that chemtrails are the work of the U.N.
Click to view link
This would indicate that the U.N. isn’t at all “toothless”. Why would so many countries cooperate with the U.N.? Near as I can tell, many countries have a huge demographic problem of too many old people. The chemtrails would likely attack those with compromised immune systems.
This seems to be borne out by the sharp rise in respiratory disease.
Click to view link
Click to view link

Also, there is a sharp increase in the % of people who need to go to ICU for their respiratory problem. Part of “sustainability” seems to include killing off the non-producers. The U.N. seems to have taken on the job.

That’s not to say that home-grown solutions aren’t also at work to cut down population.
Rumsfeld got approval for Aspartame. People caught on and it was renamed “amino sweet”.
Evidently, that wasn’t killing enough people so,, along comes Neotame.
Click to view link
That should get the kill numbers up a bit higher.

“That should get the kill numbers up a bit higher.”

That fits with my general conclusion that unsustainable entitlements (something from nothing), which have been railed against by the personally responsible, morally aware and productive for all of recorded history was and is nothing but a “bait and switch” fruad to get criminals entrenched in positions of hierarchical control based on “smash and grab” promises that cannot, under any conditions be kept.

So, the “age of reneg” is upon us and, our slavers realize their support base (the entitled) are about to turn, as one and demand “where’s OUR beef”, only to be met with “the cupboard is bare” and the reactionary wrath this will invoke from a large, perhaps the majority segment of society.

So, they must kill us, before we kill them.

Login To Reply

Posted by Danny B on 02/13/12 08:44 PM

The claim is made by an FBI chief that chemtrails are the work of the U.N.
Click to view link
This would indicate that the U.N. isn’t at all “toothless”. Why would so many countries cooperate with the U.N.? Near as I can tell, many countries have a huge demographic problem of too many old people. The chemtrails would likely attack those with compromised immune systems.
This seems to be borne out by the sharp rise in respiratory disease.
Click to view link
Click to view link

Also, there is a sharp increase in the % of people who need to go to ICU for their respiratory problem. Part of “sustainability” seems to include killing off the non-producers. The U.N. seems to have taken on the job.

That’s not to say that home-grown solutions aren’t also at work to cut down population.
Rumsfeld got approval for Aspartame. People caught on and it was renamed “amino sweet”.
Evidently, that wasn’t killing enough people so,, along comes Neotame.
Click to view link
That should get the kill numbers up a bit higher.

Login To Reply

Posted by rossbcan on 02/13/12 06:12 PM

“Does the UN Plan Full-Spectrum Domination?”

Plan all they want. Without a “tax” to place the productive in servitude, thereby acquiring the “power to coerce”, they are impotent. Elites are too cheap to risk their “own” ill gotten gains. Without the productive (unseen hand), on side, NOTHING happens, apart from a “race to the bottom”:

Click to view link

Login To Reply

Posted by DwightMann on 02/13/12 04:07 PM

It seems that the UN is trying to usurp the constitutional rights that we Americans live by.
As far as I am concerned
Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US
They need to set up shop somewhere else

Login To Reply

Posted by Ol’ Grey Ghost on 02/13/12 03:42 PM

Here’s a short story of what happened when we tried to go “green” down on the farm…

Click to view link

Now the reports are coming out that instead of more warming…

Click to view link

the planet might be expecting another Little Ice Age.

Click to view link

Doesn’t that make you feel downright foolish for not having a fireplace , or two, put in that new “green” house you just had built?

http://thedailybell.com/3607/Does-the-UN-Plan-Full-Spectrum-Domination

RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS- A RIGHT REMOVED BY TYRANTS!

Happy Bill of Rights Day to Brits and Americans
By the 18th century, men and women in Britain had struggled for more than a thousand years to affirm these rights—

The freedom to own and sell property
The right to habeas corpus and to trial by jury
The right not to be fined excessively or punished cruelly
The right to be silent under interrogation
The right to speak freely
The right to your house, free of government searches or seizure—‘your home is your castle’
The right to petition your government
The right not to have soldiers quartered in your home
The right to bear arms.

As we’ve noted in our book, the Americans who fought for freedom were British subjects. Many of their ancestors had arrived in America from Britain. In the run-up to the American Revolution, Americans told the Lord Mayor of London that they were fighting for “the bright inheritance of English freedom”.

So it’s not surprising that the rights listed above became part of the US Constitution as the Bill of Rights. There were a few other key amendments, such as the 10th Amendment, which affirmed that powers not designated to the federal government belonged to the people and the states.

On December 15th 1791, the US Constitution was amended with the Bill of Rights. We think it’s a day to celebrate. Brits may be pleased that Americans took their inspiration seriously, and carefully wrote out the rights for which Brits had fought for more than ten centuries.

Let’s not forget them.

We edit and post this piece every year.

http://www.britsattheirbest.com/archives/004319.php

CAMERON TO WRITE A BILL OF RIGHTS- WHY WOULD HE- WHEN WE ALREADY HAVE ONE- WHICH INCLUDES THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS- FREEDOM FROM THEIR UNLAWFUL FINES ETC ETC ETC?

One response to “Does the UN Plan Full-Spectrum Domination?

  1. http://www.britsattheirbest.com/archives/004319.php

    http://thedailybell.com/3607/Does-the-UN-Plan-Full-Spectrum-Domination

    The freedom to own and sell property
    The right to habeas corpus and to trial by jury
    The right not to be fined excessively or punished cruelly
    The right to be silent under interrogation
    The right to speak freely
    The right to your house, free of government searches or seizure—‘your home is your castle’
    The right to petition your government
    The right not to have soldiers quartered in your home
    The right to bear arms.

    BEAR ARMS- GONE!

    TRIAL BY JURY- ONLY FOR SOME!

    The right to speak freely REMOVED BY CULTURAL MARXISM!

    The right not to be fined excessively or punished cruelly
    DUSTBIN FINES ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC……ALL UNLAWFUL!

    WHAT RIGHTS HAVE WE LEFT- ALL BECAUSE OF OUR APATHY….THATS’ HOW TYRANNY MOVES IN, AND IT HAS!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s