THE ZIONIST PROTECTION RACKET
December 16, 2005
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
A “protection racket” is a scam where an aggressor instigates an attack, blames a bogeyman, and then offers to protect the victim from this bogeyman in return for money and power.
The “War on Terror” is a protection racket. The aggressor is the world financial elite known as the “Crown” based in the City of London. Their instrument is the Zionist project, specifically Israel, the Mossad and its Neo Con allies.
The victim is the people of the United States and the West in general. The goal is the overthrow of Western Civilization, and the establishment of a world police state called the “New World Order.”
“Zionism is but an incident of a far reaching plan,” said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. “It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.”
The head of the Department of Homeland Security is Israeli dual citizen and Zionist Michael Chertoff. He was the New Jersey State Attorney when five Mossad agents were arrested after witnesses saw them congratulating themselves on the destruction of the World Trade Center. Their van tested positive for explosives. (See Chris Bollyn article below.) Speculators who shorted airline stocks before 9-11 have been identified as Israelis apparently.
“ANTI SEMITISM” THE ORIGINAL PROTECTION RACKET
The Jewish elite regards the Jewish rank-and-file as pawns to be manipulated. “Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren,” says the author of Protocols of the Elders of Zion (9-2) a “forgery” that reads like the blueprint of the New World Order.
Jews had to be terrorized into setting up Israel as a “national home,” i.e. colonizing the Middle East and creating a center of world government. World Finance funded the Nazis. Zionists actively collaborated with them. See “The Holocaust as Mental Paradigm.” See also “Zionism: A Conspiracy Against Jews”
Zionist betrayal is the reason Jews went passively to their deaths, says Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld in his book “Holocaust Victims Accuse.” Non-Zionist Jews were worth more dead than alive to the Zionist leadership who, Shonfeld says, reaped the moral and financial capital from their “sacrifice.” See my “Zionism: Compulsory Suicide for Jews.”
The Jewish elite has a long history of manipulating Jews in this manner. For example, in 1950 a wave of anti Semitism and terrorism in Iraq made Naeim Giladi, 21, join the Zionist underground. Giladi was imprisoned, tortured and sentenced to death by Iraqi authorities.
He escaped and fled to Israel only to discover that the bombings had been engineered by his fellow Zionists to dupe Iraqi Jews into going to Israel. An ancient community was deprived of its wealth and reduced to second-class citizen status in Israel, replacing Palestinian labor. See my “Zionists Double Crossed Iraqi Jews”
Israel provoked attacks from its neighbors in order to “retain its moral tension” according to the secret diary of Prime Minister Moshe Sharett. The state must “invent dangers” to start war and thereby “acquire our space,”
he wrote. See “The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror.”
“ANTI SEMITISM” BECOMES “ANTI AMERICANISM”
The pogrom on Sept. 11 2001 was designed to stampede Americans into forfeiting their civil rights and invading the Middle East.
There is a drumbeat in the media to convince Americans that they are victims of Muslim fanatics. This propaganda campaign is carried out by Neo Cons (a.k.a. Zionists.) In his book, “The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America,” Michael Collins Piper writes:
“In the build-up to the Iraq war, Zionist propagandists and the media increasingly began touting the message to Americans that “the whole world is against us”… and the Israelis are our only real solid dependable ally …The theme that anti Americanism had run rampant was instilled in Americans for the very purpose of making them “anti” everyone who refused to support the…Iraq war…and the more broad ranging Zionist agenda.” (157)
Sound familiar? This is the tactic they use on Jews. See my “How Jews are Brainwashed and Manipulated.”
Piper says that Zionism is being equated with Americanism. Zionist agents like Nathan Sharansky crafted the overblown and specious rhetoric of Bush’s second inaugural speech that committed the US to advancing the Zionist agenda using force.
History provides a sobering warning as to where this could be leading. In his essay, The Nature of Zionism, Russian author Vladimir Stepin writes,
“During the civil war in Russia, the Zionists also performed another task. Using some units of the Red Army – Trotsky was the chairman of the country’s Revolutionary Military Council – they organized the Jewish pogrom in Seversk.
The result of this was the “Law on Those Involved in Pogroms” of 27 July 1918. In accordance with this law, a monstrous Zionist terror raged in Russia for ten years: a person accused of anti-Semitism was, without any argument being allowed, declared to be involved in pogroms and placed against the wall to be shot.
Not only anti-Zionists, but the best representatives of the intelligentsia of Russia, could be accused of being anti-Semitic, and so too could anyone one felt like accusing of it. People saw who was exercising power in Russia and expressed their discontent with it. 90% of the members of the Cheka – the Soviet security organ, 1918-1922 – were Zionists.
Apart from the law on those involved in pogroms, the Zionists practiced genocide against the ethnic groups inhabiting Russia, and they did so by accusing people of counter-revolutionary activities, sabotage, and so on, irrespective of whether or not the people in question really had conducted such activities. It was standard practice merely to put them against the wall to be shot.”
My hunch is that the central banking elite, using Masonic secret societies in the military and intelligence agencies, is responsible for 90% of terrorism. The purpose is to manipulate people into advancing the goals of the New World Order, which includes destroying true religion, nation states, democracy, race and family. In their mind, they have to destabilize and enslave us to protect their monopoly on government credit i.e. money creation.
They are running a protection racket to protect us from their artificial”terror.” Zionists or Americans who carry out their agenda could end up holding the bag if something goes wrong, or as I should say right.
Remember they are challenging the greatest power in the universe: God, or Truth as witnessed in the souls of all human beings. They are most vulnerable now on the 9-11 attackwhich they perpetrated. If we rise up as one to demand the truth about this atrocity, their obscene criminal enterprise will start to unravel.
The nature of Zionism
By Vladimir Stepin
Published – in Russian – in Moscow, 1993
Translated into English – for Radio Islam – by Clive Lindhurst.
•Preface – By means of terror
•The Foundations of Zionism
•The Path Towards Achieving Power Over the World
•The Directors of Chaos
•How Zionism Penetrated into Russia
•How the Zionist Revolution Was Prepared
•The Zionists’ Activities in Russia
•Stalin and Zionism
•The Chief Power of Zionism
•The Tactics of Zionism
•How Zionism Can Be Defeated
•Zionism’s Ideology: Judaism
•The Tactics of Operating on the Sly
•Information is the Holy of Holies
•The Zionists’ “Cultural” Activities
•The Kahal: Basis of the Organizational Structure
•The End Justifies the Means
•Money is Power
•Antisemitism: Zionism’s Weapon
◦The Catechism of the Jew in the Former Soviet Union
◦What We Do Not Like About the Zionists
◦Peter the Great and His Daughter on the Jews
◦The Jewish Question
More information – about Zionism´s Judaism – from (a Jew), professor Israel Shahak
BY MEANS OF TERROR
Leyba Davidovich Trotsky, whose real name was David Bronstein, said: “We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one.
“We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars quake and pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution’s funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence… At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian! What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia – officers, academics and writers!…”
Taken from the “Memoirs” of Aron Simanovich, a jeweller at the court of the Tsar’s Imperial Majesty.
From the newspaper “Russkoye slovo”, No. 1.
THE FOUNDATIONS OF ZIONISM
Zionism! How much meaning there lies within this one word! Pain and hatred, power and craftiness, refinement and cruelty, hope and self-importance, arrogance and contempt, good organization and stability.
What is Zionism? And why does it give rise to such contradictory emotions, depending on whether the person is a Zionist or, because he is subjected to the effects of Zionism, knows what it is like to experience it and thus has some understanding of what it consists of? Let us try to look into these questions.
Let us state at the outset that, in using the term “Zionism”, we are referring not merely to the political tendency which officially took shape at the end of the 19th century, but also to the ideology upon which that tendency is based and which existed long before the founders of modern Zionism (Hess in 1862, Pinsker in 1882, Herzl in 1896, Ahad Ha-‘Am in 1902, Jabotinsky in 1906) published their views in the press. This ideology has led to Zionism being practised through the centuries and is still menacingly active today. Today there is no end to this activity in sight.
The foundations of Zionism were formulated in ancient times, some three thousand years ago, and they are:
1. The Jews are God’s chosen people.
2. All other peoples are merely two-legged animals (goys).
3. The Jews have both the right and the obligation to rule the world.
The second and third points of this three-in-one formula actually follow from the first. The formula, which was the brainchild of an undoubtedly talented politician, was among the foundations of the religion of Judaism (see the book of Deuteronomy in the Old Testament). At that time people understood very well that if one is to lend force to one’s intentions, one must express them as religious ideas. And one must also strengthen not only the religion but also its influence on people.
Another reason why this villainous formula is a stroke of genius is that, irrespective of religion, it is a most powerful way of influencing a person who believes that he belongs to the Jewish people. The only point is that if – as has been possible in recent times – he does not believe in religion, then the words “God’s chosen people” are replaced by “the people chosen by nature” or simply by “the chosen people”. This is because nationalism forms the basis of this formula. And if someone’s opinions have not yet become firmly fixed, it is so easy, merely by a little application, to convince him that he is a member of what, in terms of intelligence, talent, audacity, etc., is the best of all nations, and that no other nation is fit to hold a candle to that one nation. In recent times, this task of persuasion has even been accomplished with people whose opinions had previously become firmly fixed in another direction.
We are not going to refute this formula: it is impossible to persuade Zionists to change their views, because this formula was instilled into them in early childhood, and the Gentile nations do not of course agree with the idea that they are two-legged animals, even if they have been led to believe that the Jews are the “chosen” people and have the ability and the right to rule the world. The only people who need a refutation of this formula are those who regard themselves as Jews but are at the same time not convinced Zionists. But we do hope that the observations that follow will be useful to such people too. As we shall show below, there do not appear to be very many such people – however unfortunate that fact may be.
Another point is that the power of this formula lies in that it legitimizes and sanctifies the idea of robbing other nations. Why need we care about two-legged animals? If we are the chosen people and it is our inalienable right, and even our duty, to rule other peoples, then God himself ordered us to grow rich at their expense, as the saying goes. In this way nationalism is placed on a material basis. Rob and rule! Rule and rob! Money and power! From the time the above-mentioned formula begins to operate, this becomes both a means and an end, but it nevertheless also becomes a more important means, a means for attaining the main objective contained in the third item of the formula: the Jews must have, and will have, undivided, absolute power over the whole world. The only point is that the money and the power, but particularly the power, will be achieved soundlessly, without attracting attention, and without occupying the leading rôles until the very end.
THE PATH TOWARDS ACHIEVING POWER
OVER THE WORLD
It appears fantastic that anyone should have possessed the audacity to originate the plan of achieving, with the use of such a small force, a goal which has so far been achieved by no one, namely power over the world. It seems impossible firstly to calculate the strategy and tactics of the task of achieving this goal, secondly to ensure the steadiness of the movement, and thirdly to preserve the organizational integrity of those striving to accomplish the plan. After all, there were still centuries to come!
Of course, the audacity involved is colossal. But, firstly, although the originator of the plan did not hope to achieve the objective rapidly, he hardly supposed that its accomplishment would be so long delayed. Secondly, the methodical principle used in pursuing the plan is practically unfailing: it consists in operating very imperceptibly and from within. Thirdly, proper consideration was given to organizational questions relating to integrity, loyalty, and the ways and means of carrying on the movement. Fourthly, the three-in-one formula provided the basis for self-development in moving towards the objective. Fifthly, it should be acknowledged that the Jewish people at that time, who were the initial material (for that is how the originator of the plan regarded them), were rather well chosen for this task and, after being suitably worked on, actually proved capable of moving purposefully towards the goal.
Movement towards this objective then began. It brought untold disasters not only to the Jewish people itself, but to all the nations of the world. Every time the Zionists, with their strong hand, reached for the throat of a nation, that nation resisted this and responded with extreme measures. The Jewish people suffered as a result.
This first occurred long ago in Egypt. Moses almost took Egypt captive from within. He and his Zionist assistants exercised an extraordinarily strong influence. But the Pharaoh realized this, saw that the Jews were clearly soon going to seize power and decided to exterminate this nation. Moses’ agents reported this to him, and he led the Jews out of Egypt. This time, the matter was concluded by merely exiling them, even though it was ostensibly a voluntary exile. (The formal aspects of this event are described in the Bible. And that description very much resembles the truth. At least, the behaviour of the Zionists and the response they received very much resemble what was to take place more than once in the succeeding centuries.)
The Zionists succeeded in turning their first failure into a success. They were to make this procedure a rule of theirs. Having arrived in Palestine, they slaughtered the nation living there and founded the kingdom of Israel-Judaea. But they did not cease their Zionist expansion, but increased it. From that time on all the neighbouring countries began to feel the effects of Zionist penetration and although, formally speaking, they were free and great powers, they came under the power of the financial capitalism of the Zionists. They were ensnared and suffocated by the strong tentacles of the money octopus, and were permeated by the network of the Zionist secret service, which was pro-Zionist in inclination, and also by the local secret service which the Zionists had captured for themselves. That secret service attained colossal influence in the particular country, and its activities aroused hatred among that country’s population, and finally even among its rulers. It was then that pogroms took place.
Egypt was to find the Zionists intolerable once again. It was at that time, in 928 BC, that the Egyptian troops destroyed the country and the kingdom of Israel-Judaea was divided into two: Israel and Judaea. Assyria did the same, destroying the kingdom of Israel in 722 BC, and Babylon destroyed Judaea in 586 BC. Judaea, re-established in 122 BC, was finally destroyed by Rome in the first century AD. The Zionists’ attempts to crush the great powers of antiquity were not crowned with success. But not only did they not abandon their goal, but they also found a way of approaching it in a way which, although less rapid, was more consistent, expansive and realistic, and lay in subjecting the “main” country to their will and, through that country, ruling the world. From that time on the whole world became subjected to the plan of expansion and penetration from within. However, the old method of trying to crush an individual country still continued for centuries and, on each occasion, ended in a great massacre of Jews, and frequently in the expulsion of those who survived. This occurred in Italy in 855, in England in 1290, in France under Philip the Fair, in Spain in 1492, and on other occasions, and in the twentieth century it occurred in Germany from 1932-1945 and in Russia from 1937-1938. However, Germany was an isolated phenomenon, because here there had not merely been the usual Zionist penetration from within before the pogroms took place, but the Zionists also faced competition from a new aspirant for world domination, namely German fascism. And each time it was, in the final analysis, the Jewish nation who suffered. But this was of no concern to Zionists. The gold which they had previously managed to extort from the respective countries was the weapon they employed for their further expansion. They had already succeeded in moving it out of the countries in question and putting it by for further use. Revenge was taken on them, but they also had their successes – if the innumerable calamities which they caused to other nations can be described as successes.
THE DIRECTORS OF CHAOS
The history of the world must be rewritten so as to give account of the guiding, imperious influence which Zionism has had upon countries, peoples and events. Unfortunately, the noiseless work of Zionism has gone largely unnoticed by historians, or rather it appears to have been inevitable that it should go unnoticed, as it is not customary to leave for posterity any documents relating to this matter. If any works containing any hints in that regard did appear, they were promptly removed from circulation (see the section in the text below on how Zionists deal with publications). Zionists have at all times endeavoured to organize situations, or at least to involve themselves in situations, from which they would be able to derive important material benefits. One example of such situations was wars, especially conquests. Apart from carrying out one task or another relating to re-drawing the maps of countries and of nations and shaping the world to move it in a direction favourable to the attainment of the Zionist goal, a quite narrow and specific interest was also being pursued: that of gold. The war booty gained by the conquerors, and the sums in interest derived from financing one measure or another, finally fell to the benefit of the Zionists; at any rate, they always found a way of grabbing a large sum of money for themselves.
Let us point out just a few elements of their work of guidance. Using the method of egging the rulers on, described below, they organized: the “unifying” operations which Philip of Macedonia performed for Greece; the conquests of Alexander the Great; the Huns’ campaign against Europe; the defeat of Rome by the Ostrogoths and Vandals (here they were repaying Rome for its annihilation of Judaea); the invasions of Genghis Khan, Bati and Tamerlane; the conquests of Mexico and Peru; etc. Some people take the view that they had a hand in Hitler’s conquests, however paradoxical this might appear, and however blasphemous these activities of the Zionists might be towards the Jewish nation. These conquests caused countless disasters and suffering to people. Entire nations disappeared from the face of the earth. Other nations were thrown back by many centuries in their development and became immeasurably weakened. But people’s sufferings, and the life and development of nations and cultures, were of no consequence to Zionists. Their plans and activities were determined by gold and by progress towards the Zionist aim of dominating the world.
The Zionists have, in the name of that aim, organized such a great number of other large and small wars, conspiracies, oustings of governments, coups, revolutions, and other large-scale measures. The Zionists owe an immeasurable debt of blood to every nation in the world.
HOW ZIONISM PENETRATED INTO RUSSIA
Russia, too, did not escape the attention of the Zionists. The Kaganate, the state which was located on the south-eastern borders of Russia and was ruled by the Khazar tribe, was Jewish in its religious makeup and pursued the usual Zionist policies towards Russia. Russia, following the example previously set by other states in their treatment of Zionists, was finally unable to endure this, and Svyatoslav annihilated the Khazars in 969 AD. But the Zionists remained unpacified and, in 1175, organized a conspiracy which included the killing of Prince Andrey Bogolyubskiy. All the Jews were slaughtered in response to this and the Russian princes, meeting at an assembly, resolved no longer to admit Jews to Russia. There were no more Zionists in Russia until the time of Catherine the Great. To be more precise, there were almost no Zionists, because they managed to penetrate with the aid of Freemasonry, which is in the vanguard of Zionism and is one of its tentacles, and also with the aid of intermarriage, more details on which will be found below. Specifically, some people hold the view that Boris Godunov was a Zionist. Keeping himself in the background as Zionists always do, he noiselessly organized the slaughter of the nobility and seized power as a result.
Once, when the part of the Ukraine on the left bank of the river Dnepr was joined to Russia, the Zionists had a chance of attacking Russia, but the Cossacks slaughtered them to a man. (They later tried to revenge themselves on the Cossacks by issuing the decree of 1919 on the extermination of the Cossacks.) The Polish landowners sold to the Jews the right to make use of their lands with all that they contained by way of humans and animals. The lessees of the land, by paying the landowner the sum laid down in the agreement, extorted from the Ukrainians a considerably larger amount – for themselves. The extent of the oppression was incredible. During the uprising of Bogdan Khmelnitskiy, all the Jews, along with the Poles and Polish Christian priests, were slaughtered in the cruellest fashion. Once again, the Jewish people suffered for the sins of the Zionists.
In 1764, the Polish king Kazimir dissolved the Zionist representative assembly known as the Sejm. For six hundred years prior to this, Poland had served as a refuge for the Jews and given them land and freedom. They even had their own Sejm and their own courts of law. As stated above, Poland allowed the Jews to fleece their subordinates. And what did the Jews pay to Poland in return for this? The Zionists organized the partitionings of Poland. As a result of the three partitionings, in 1772, 1776 and 1796, a considerable part of Poland, and half a million Jews into the bargain, fell to Russia. The law on not allowing Jews into Russia was broken without any prior arrangement. Can Catherine the Great have thought that matters would end in this way when reaching her agreement with the Zionists’ envoys on the partitionings of Poland? Taking fright at what she had done, Catherine then restricted the settlement of Jews in Russia to the Pale of Settlement, but with reservations and exceptions. Merchants of the first and second orders, persons with higher education, and certain other categories of Jews, were permitted to live outside the Pale of Settlement, and by applying sufficient cunning it was possible to make fairly extensive use of this. But in 1804 Alexander I gave permission for everyone to have an equal education, thereby evidently hoping to tame the Jewish nation. What little knowledge he had of Zionists!
In the second half of the nineteenth century it became utterly clear that the policy of assimilation had failed. The Jews had not amalgamated with Russia, but had begun to crush her, firstly by making a fortune out of the genocide which, by means of alcohol, was being committed against the Russian, Ukrainian, Byelorussian and other nations, and secondly by seizing control of the finances, the courts of law, the taxation system, trade, industry, the press, education, etc. Then, in 1887, the so-called “percentage rate” was introduced: the number of members of any ethnic group, or denomination as it was called at that time, who entered the institutions of higher education had to be proportionate to the number of members of that ethnic group living in the locality in question. One would think that this procedure prescribed a just uniformity for all nations. But the Zionists howled: “Antisemitism!” (By the way, they often use this word to intimidate their political opponents and stupefy anyone else. We shall refer below to the sources of so-called antisemitism.) They were in any case also very dissatisfied with the State monopoly on vodka. They took three decisions. The first was to go to America and strengthen Zionism there: Zionists had established a fairly firm grip on the United States by the middle of the 19th century. The second was to settle in the Promised Land. After lengthy debates they decided that this would be Palestine, their “historical homeland”. The third was, by overthrowing the Russian government and seizing power, to turn Russia herself into a Promised Land for the Jews. All these three paths were to be pursued in parallel. In addition, it was decided to wage a more clearly open struggle than previously: powerful and varied Zionist organizations were to be set up, employing not only their own, but also all the other, ideologies and tendencies. The activity of the already existing organizations, especially the Freemasonic organizations, was to be intensified. The Zionist secret service, and the Zionist influence, were to penetrate the whole world to a still greater degree. In particular, they were to penetrate Russia, in order to prepare for the seizure of power and for subsequent government. The world only actually began to notice Zionism after the “World Zionist Organization” (founded 1897) and a great number of other organizations had been created. There were some 500 such organizations in Russia alone by the time the revolution began. This served to make people think that the ideology and practice of Zionism were also created precisely at that time. But in reality the Zionists had merely come out into the open and were pursuing their activities legally. As we have said, Zionism has been putting its ideology into practice for three thousand years.
Emigration to America received a powerful impetus. A further one and a half million Jews had emigrated there by the end of the century. By 1917, the number of Jews remaining in Russia was six million. The Jews also began to take possession of Palestine. And as for Russia, whole volumes would be required to describe the activities upon which the Zionists were, and still are, engaged in Russia. We shall describe them only briefly.
HOW THE ZIONIST “REVOLUTION” WAS PREPARED
In carrying out their own decision, the Zionists entered upon the revolutionary movement in Russia on a massive scale. They had taken part in such revolutionary activity before then: the Decembrists’ movement in 1825, the Liberal and Democratic movements, the Populist movement, the organization of the Social Democratic groups. Of course, in all this they had been pursuing their own aims of subjecting these movements to the tasks of Zionism.
In 1898, seizing the initiative from the Social Democrats in Russia, the Zionists organized the Russian Social Democratic Workers’ Party. It is to be noted that this was done immediately after the World Zionist Organization was created in 1897. Of the nine delegates present at the first conference of the Russian Social Democratic Workers’ Party, eight were Zionists: Katz, Mutnik, Tuchapsky, Kremer, Petrusevich, Edelman, Vannovsky and Vigdorchik. They constituted 89% of the conference. The Zionists also created the Socialist Revolutionary party from the remains of the Populist movement, with a Zionist called Gotz playing an important part. They created the Constitutional Democrats’ Party, the People’s Socialist Party, and others. The principle of Zionism is to use different routes and methods to move towards a single goal. Decentralization, broadness of scope, becoming familiar with any outward appearance they care to adopt, and with any external goals which they zealously pursue, pretending to be entirely serious about what they are doing: all this constitutes the powerful and methodical approach which has for centuries enabled Zionists to subject everything to their will.
It is known that it was not the Bolsheviks who carried out the revolution of February 1917. Kerensky, Guchkov, Chkheidze and others were all Freemasons serving the Zionists. It is thought that Milyukov was the only member of the Provisional Government who was not a Freemason. For further details on Freemasonry, see below. That is to say, the February 1917 revolution was, in the final analysis, carried out by Zionists and for Zionists. The Russian bourgeoisie was used by the Zionists merely as a buffer to soften the impact of the revolution and, as we have already mentioned, the same applies to the Socialist Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks, the Constitutional Democrats and others.
The Zionists played an essential part in the revolution of October 1917. The Party, the State, the public organizations, the People’s Commissariats and other departments all had an overwhelmingly large number of Zionists among their top leaders. In summer of 1918, there were, in Petrograd alone, 271 Zionists in the highest echelon of power and only 17 non-Zionists. 265 of these 271 had come with Trotsky from New York. In practical terms, it was Trotsky, and not Lenin, who ruled the country.
THE ZIONISTS’ ACTIVITIES IN RUSSIA
The Zionists started on their task of establishing a Promised Land for themselves – in Russia and by using the slaves who inhabited Russia, of course. In this process, Trotsky was in favour of seizing power over the world, of carrying out a “worldwide revolution”. This is Trotsky’s theory of “permanent revolution”. The various ethnic groups inhabiting Russia were to be slain, thus enabling the Zionists to conquer the whole world. A. Zinovyev, Kamenev, Rykov and other Zionists disguising themselves as Bolsheviks were inclined towards the idea of establishing the Promised Land in Russia, and this is the basic difference between the positions adopted by Zinovyev and Trotsky. Contrary to what the pro-Zionist press is now telling us over and over again, the difference between them was by no means merely one of personal ambition.
As stated above, we shall not be describing all the activities of the Zionists in Russia. We shall only dwell on some of them.
The Zionists organized the civil war in Russia. It was beneficial to them because of their aim of slaughtering the cream of the Russian people, who were the gentry. This was to be done by taking away from the nation its possible leaders, the transmitters of its culture, and its strong genetic stock, while at the same time also doing away with the bourgeoisie and the more powerful peasants and, on the other hand, also eliminating the representatives of another life style, namely the best of the workers and peasants. They needed (and here the line taken by Zinovyev predominated) to undermine the strength of the Russian people, in order, subsequently, better to be able to work on those people and turn them into obedient tools and slaves of Zion. But the civil war was beneficial to Trotsky too. He hoped to be at the head of the revolutionary armies and then, after conquering the internal enemy, to throw those armies into battle against the other countries which were the external enemy. He wanted, within those countries, to organize disintegration, sabotage, diversions, coups and revolutions, and to do this with the aid of the Zionists and pro-Zionists in those countries, as well as by making use of the genuine revolutionaries living there. His aim was worldwide revolution: that is, he wished to turn Marx’s idea into its opposite, and he wanted Zion to take over the world. This was actually the very reason why the Polish military campaign against Soviet Russia was provoked. If the line taken by Zinovyev had not predominated, the Russian cavalry would have captured Warsaw and utterly destroyed Poland. And then, in accordance with Trotsky’s plan, the turn of other countries would have come. The best sons of Russia, that emaciated country, were to lay down their lives in the name of the Zionists’ fantastic plans!
During the civil war in Russia, the Zionists also performed another task. Using some units of the Red Army – Trotsky was the chairman of the country’s Revolutionary Military Council – they organized the Jewish pogrom in Seversk. The result of this was the “Law on Those Involved in Pogroms” of 27 July 1918. In accordance with this law, a monstrous Zionist terror raged in Russia for ten years: a person accused of antisemitism was, without any argument being allowed, declared to be involved in pogroms and placed against the wall to be shot. Not only anti-Zionists, but the best representatives of the intelligentsia of Russia, could be accused of being antisemitic, and so too could anyone one felt like accusing of it. People saw who was exercising power in Russia and expressed their discontent with it. 90% of the members of the Cheka – the Soviet security organ, 1918-1922 – were Zionists. Apart from the law on those involved in pogroms, the Zionists practised genocide against the ethnic groups inhabiting Russia, and they did so by accusing people of counter-revolutionary activities, sabotage, and so on, irrespective of whether or not the people in question really had conducted such activities. It was standard practice merely to put them against the wall to be shot.
The major operations conducted by the Zionists included setting up a system of prison camps. Skilfully using as a pretext the interests of discipline and orderliness, Trotsky and Dzershinzky organized the concentration camps in 1918. These were a monstrous machinery for exterminating the people of Russia, a machinery of oppression and intimidation, a machinery of undivided power.
STALIN AND ZIONISM
In 1937-1938, Stalin made the Zionists feel the brunt of the system which they themselves had created and which had at that time already pulverized a great part of the Russian nation. Frenkel, Firin, Rappoport and others like them were in charge of the prison camps. The vast majority of those who are now said to have been made the victims during the period of the Stalinist repressions were in fact victimized in the pre-Stalin period, that is to say in the first few years after the revolution and civil war. As we have said, the real leadership of the country was in Trotsky’s hands at that time. What is more, up until 1937-1938, Russia was ruled by an apparatus in which Zionists had a tremendous preponderance. It was only after that date that the real leadership of the country passed to Stalin and his government apparatus. Everything that had been done in the provinces before then was done in Stalin’s name but by no means according to Stalin’s method. This applies particularly to the introduction of collective farming. The excessive steps taken in dispossessing the better-off Russian farmers, and the massive repressions against the peasants, were the work of the pro-Zionist State machinery, which was in fact glad of the opportunity to work once again on the genetic stock of the Russian people and cause it to deteriorate.
The pro-Zionist press now severely criticizes Stalin for allegedly working only for the sake of his own power, claiming that it was lust for power that guided him. But this criticism is unfounded. The methods he used were admittedly not the most worthy – he borrowed them from his enemies -, but he worked for the benefit of the Russian people. He defended that people’s very life and development. It was really the Zionists who were the enemies of the people. Stalin was defending the lives of the present-day inhabitants of Russia too! This is because the Zionists, after gaining their victory, will only allow pure-blooded Jews to live on Earth. Everyone else is nothing but dust, and dust must be wiped away. We shall be referring to this objective more than once in what follows.
Why did the Zionists allow Stalin in, and why did they not eliminate him at the very outset or at a later date? Because he deceived them! They thought he was one of theirs. Alliluyeva, his second wife, was a Jewess. At the beginning of his career as Secretary General of the Party, Stalin surrounded himself with Jews. Until 1937 it was not obvious that Stalin’s chief goal was to liquidate Zionism in the Soviet Union. Even after 1937, Stalin gave the impression of having no claims upon the Zionists: Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich, whose very name made him a convenient cover for Stalin against any accusations of antisemitism, was one of Stalin’s closest aides and outlived him by many years. Nevertheless, the Zionists outplayed Stalin in this regard, following an age-old practice of theirs: whatever may happen, and however many Jews may be sacrificed, the main point is that at least one Zionist must remain at the very top. He will then be able to revive the Zionist cause. This is what Kaganovich actually did after the death of Stalin, and he had, though very cautiously, already been engaged on this matter during World War Two and the post-war years.
Stalin eliminated Trotsky by making use of Zinovyev and Kamenev, and then eliminated the latter two by making use of Rykov and Bukharin. The way in which Stalin did this is widely known, and we shall not be dwelling on it. Although insidious, it was a customary political method. What is less well known is another matter: the purging of Zionists in the Party and State apparatus began as early as 1929. Secret methods, rather than open measures such as arrest and trial, were employed here. From that time onwards, Stalin found himself in a situation where he might, albeit at a later stage, be declared a political criminal. The methods by which he worked were, as we have said, borrowed from his Zionist opponents: when in Rome, do as the Romans do. Those methods went far beyond the limits of what is done in civilized countries. But he deliberately practised such methods. He saw no possibility of liquidating Zionism by any other means, and this was later to cost him the loss of his reputation. Secret methods of eliminating one’s opponents were too costly, but from 1931 onwards they became considerably less expensive: Zionists, pro-Zionists, and those who were caught in the trap of Zionism, began to be proclaimed as members of the opposition and as counter-revolutionaries. Work began on arresting them, giving them a trial for the sake of appearances, and liquidating them. This method is related to the appearance of Beria within Stalin’s entourage. Of course, Beria wanted to pursue his own career and his own well-being. But he realized that he could only attain his objectives by assisting Stalin in the latter’s chief aims. Beria did this painstakingly, and not, of course, without deriving benefit for himself: he also liquidated many people who simply did not suit him personally. Such a method is of course dishonest and inhumane. But Stalin was compelled to employ it. If he had openly declared that he was kicking out the Zionists, the latter would immediately have accused him of antisemitism and he would have been classed under the same category as Hitler. As we have already said, Hitler, in serving the aim of the fascist ideology, namely the seizure by German National Socialism of power over the world, was striving to destroy Zionism, his most powerful rival, and in this he was using as a pretext his far-fetched theory of the racial inferiority of the Jews. If Stalin had made such a declaration, he would have been removed from power because, as we have noted, the country’s leadership at that time consisted predominantly of Zionists: in the Party, the State, the army, the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs, culture, education, the trade unions, and so on. The situation only changed after the purges of 1937 and 1938. But even then Stalin was unable to state openly that those whom he opposed were of course not counter-revolutionaries, spies, saboteurs, conspirators, or the like, but were Zionists pursuing their methods and objectives, and were quite simply enemies of the people. Despite the falseness of the accusations, the term “enemies of the people” is, however surprising this might appear, true only of Zionists! He was compelled to resort to false accusations in order to rid the peoples of the Soviet Union of a very great danger and save them from their most vicious enemies. But, when faced by Hitler’s invasion, he could not announce his struggle against the Zionist Jews, because he would have been proclaimed a racist. Stalin’s authority would have been mightily undermined if he had announced publicly that he had been compelled to resort to deceit. He also hoped that the remaining Zionists had understood everything and would continue to serve the country and not work towards the goals of Zion. (Even such a furious battler against Zionism as Stalin did not, even to the very end, understand the Zionists’ nature: Zionism is indestructible as long as there are Zionists.) But it seems to us that this was a mistake. After the peoples of the Soviet Union and world public opinion had first been prepared, the whole matter should have been openly announced by way of a preliminary step. Zionism’s struggle to attain its goals is a centuries-old process. And the nations of the world must understand the danger of Zionism once and for all. However, it may be that this would nevertheless have been a political mistake just at that time: Hitler waved his anti-Jewish flags too vigorously when going about his task of seizing power over the world. It is also not impossible that Stalin wished to announce the whole truth to the people immediately after completely liquidating Zionism in the Soviet Union. He managed to do neither the one nor the other, but nevertheless undoubtedly dealt Zionism a most powerful blow.
Let us return again to the beginning of the 1930s. In 1932, Stalin was finally able to operate freely: his Jewish wife committed suicide. The possibility cannot though be ruled out that it was not in fact suicide, but was the work of someone else. It was a mistake by the Zionists not to eliminate Stalin at the 17th Party Conference in 1934. They tried to do so, but for some reason they did not bring the matter to its conclusion. Can this have been because Kirov, their new protégé, who himself had a Jewish wife (Markus), refused to oppose Stalin? Beria then organized the elimination of Kirov, without first warning Stalin. Although this was a very dirty business – Kirov, not a bad man, had been murdered -, Stalin nevertheless kept silent: the political advantages of eliminating Kirov were too great. What is more, it is not yet known whether or not Kirov, after Stalin’s removal, would have started to bring to its conclusion the business of the struggle against Zionism.
Stalin realized that there was no time to lose. In 1937-38, after thorough preparations, he struck a massive blow against the Zionists. An enormous number of Zionists, pro-Zionists, and persons whom the Zionists had in their clutches and who were working for them, were arrested and repressed, mostly under far-fetched pretexts. But these were the operations of the Soviet system of planning which, by reason of its nature, sometimes produces very negative results. Apart from persons who were really pro-Zionist, a tremendous number of people were also repressed who were very useful to the country and were actively working for it. Certain factors contributed to this. Firstly, the instructions were not clear: who was the enemy? Secondly, both the central and the local authorities wished to achieve distinction. Overfulfilling the government’s plans was so fashionable in the Soviet Union, and so too was fulfilling them at any price. Thirdly, Zionism was conducting its direct operations here too. The Zionists understood Stalin’s objective and decided, when being removed from their positions of influence, to harm him as much as possible. Every Zionist who had been arrested gave the names of honest people. These were the best, most intelligent and most dedicated people, both Party members and non-Party members. The Zionists alleged that these people had been involved in organizing and carrying out the counter-revolutionary activities, espionage, and other operations, which were being conducted by the Zionists. These people, suffering the physical effects of interrogation – a method of operation introduced by the Zionists in 1918 -, took the guilt upon themselves, in this way signing their own death warrants. It sometimes happened that honest people endured torture, denied being guilty, and were released. Kovpaka Rudnev, the future commissar, is one example.
Today the question is asked how it was possible, on the verge of war with Hitler, for the Soviet government to deal its own army such a crippling and very powerful blow. But imagine what would have happened if this had not been done! The regular, peacetime staff of the army was pro-Zionist throughout. Trotsky, as far back as the time when he was chairman of the Revolutionary Military Committee, took great trouble to make the army pro-Zionist. What is more, once the Zionists have penetrated any system, they always then endeavour to pervade it with their people.
In “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, which in our view were undoubtedly written by the Zionists in order to conceal their true goals and to demonstrate how wise their rulership would be, it is said that the aim of Zionism is to establish the rule of Zion on earth, with the Zionist ruler having intellectual control over all the nations on earth; there will be slavery, but the slaves will live comparatively well. However, slavery is unreliable. History shows that a slave-owning system is finally destroyed by the slaves themselves.
In 1952, nine prominent Moscow doctors, most of them Jews, poisoned their patients in the Kremlin by order of the American-Jewish United Distribution Committee. In doing this they were working for the benefit of the international Jewish conspiracy. This actually happened, and is by no means the made-up story the pro-Zionist press constantly tells us it was. After the poisoning, countless Jews were arrested over a period of three months. All this ushered in the events of 1953. The special trains stood empty in the environs of Moscow, waiting to take on board the Zionists who were subject to arrest and exile. Everything was ready for the final offensive, when Stalin suffered a stroke. Was this a coincidence? It served the Zionists’ purposes too much for that. Did the Zionist god punish Stalin and prevent him from achieving his aims? Such ideas are stories one tells to little children! It seems to us that further researches will uniformly show that the Zionists physically eliminated Stalin. They won that round, and began to develop their success. But this was of course made more difficult by the fact that those at the head of the Party were already fully informed of the Zionists’ activities and prevented their expansion as far as possible. Nevertheless, they did not decide to publicize the whole truth about Zionism. Here we are touching upon one of the most important characteristics of the entire way in which Zionism moves towards its goal.
THE CHIEF POWER OF ZIONISM
The chief power of Zionism lies in being silent. The main point is that, whatever may happen, the whole truth about Zionism cannot be permitted to become widely known. That would mean the failure of the whole affair. An agreement to keep quiet is reached not only with their own people, but also with the most furious opponent of Zionism: they must keep quiet. Deal the blow, but keep quiet! A strong man is vulnerable because of his strength, and the Zionists say that there is no need to explain anything to people because, so they say, the danger has been eliminated, and you have done the business by using methods which are obviously not clean. The Zionists tell you that your descendants will condemn you for applying such methods, and that you will suffer other disadvantages; a weak person is vulnerable because of his weakness, a greedy person because of his greed, a cowardly person because of his cowardice, and so on. So keep quiet about what you have done! Each time, all this is supported by the necessary actions and means. And these may be of any kind! They have kept silent through the centuries! Of course, some facts do slip through the net, and it is not possible to keep one’s eye on everything. There is a fairly rich anti-Zionist literature at present, but it is only partial. It is not complete, and it does not clearly and precisely state the goals of Zionism, but the chief point is that Zionists are most careful to remove and liquidate such literature, never permitting it a wide distribution under any circumstances. Silence and secrecy are the main power of Zionism. They are the reason for its successes, and they are the factor that brings the Zionists victory!
Realizing that for the time being they could only dream of achieving political power in the Soviet Union, they started on their usual siege operations, except that, as is customary with them, it was siege from within. They began disintegrating the economy, the culture, and the unity of ideas, and also began placing their people in widely differing locations and penetrating into the Party, the trade unions, the Communist Youth League, as well as into important – though not yet very highly placed – positions in the administrative and economic apparatus. In particular, they did this with the aid of people who regarded themselves as Jews because the Zionists had dinned that notion into them, while at the same time inculcating Zionist ideas into them. They were in fact only partially Jewish – they were one-half Jewish, or one-quarter, and so on. Formally, according to their passports, they were not regarded as Jews. The Zionists also achieved it by making considerable use of Gentiles who were for one reason or another dependent on Zion because they were married to Jewesses, had been bought, corrupted, won over, had merely realized the power of Zion and the benefit to be derived from serving Zion, or were dependent on it for some similar reason.
In the State system of economic management, the Party, the trade unions, etc., considerable work was done on removing honest and intelligent people who were dedicated to their ideals and replacing them by egoistic, dull-witted, obtuse, incompetent people intent on personal benefits. Of course, this refers not to staff members who were pervaded through and through with Zionism, but to other staff members who were not Zionist. It refers to the staff of long-suffering Mother Russia. Those who nevertheless overcame the Zionist obstacles became corrupted to an increased extent and were given a new outlook. They were bribed in every possible way with benefits and advantages, and were made to become unprincipled. They were drawn into machinations, and then into crimes and so on. Those who did not submit to this new outlook were either driven away or isolated; in any event, it became extremely difficult for them to make any upward progress. In this way, people whom the country needed were not admitted into the Party, and by the same token they could not enter on the path towards leadership: if you were not a Party member you could not rise very high in the Soviet Union. In addition, when any possibility of a replacement arose, a person who precisely suited the Zionists was installed in the post in question. The principle of “the worse they are, the better they are” is an old method of disintegrating a system. In this way the staff of the Party, the administration, the local and national councils of government, the trade unions, and so on, were converted within a fairly short period into what they are today. Now the Zionists howl out louder than anyone else their complaints against the Soviet government apparatus. But it is the very apparatus which they themselves created and are still pampering today.
Zionists achieved particular “successes” with the economy. By organizing the systematic disintegration and looting of the country (the Zionists have sent the gold to those same banks where the booty they have obtained throughout the ages is kept preserved), by acting so as to ensure that they gained a tidy sum from every measure taken, from every piece of building work, every reconstruction project, etc., by causing confusion in affairs of all kinds, by not allowing any order to become established, by suppressing sound ideas and initiatives (it is easier to fish in murky waters), and by preventing invention, rationalization and the introduction of worthwhile undertakings and ideas, and so on and so forth, the Zionists have reduced Russia to its present state. Of course, the general law of privileges for egoists and swindlers, which applies in every hierarchical system, has here operated simultaneously with the activities of the Zionists. It is the law of the natural deterioration of a system whose self-regulation is weak. The Zionists have always endeavoured not to permit the creation of a mechanism capable of establishing self-regulation. If there were such a mechanism, it would be extremely difficult for them to conduct their destructive, predatory operations. Turning over a country and making it capitalist – with Zionists on top, of course – is a different matter and is what they are strenuously striving to achieve at present. We shall refer to this below.
One of the chief reasons why Khrushchov exposed Stalin’s personality cult was the desire for nuclear disarmament. This was bound to work for the Zionists’ benefit. (The atomic bomb planned by the Zionists was the first to operate in practice, and the thermonuclear bomb, created by Sakharov, a Zionist, also went into action.) Of course, disarmament is a splendid thing. But America – which, as we have said, had become pervaded through and through with Zionism by the middle of the 19th century, and still is today – had to be paid for such a step. Zionists demanded that the Soviet Union should, by way of payment, trample on Stalin, rehabilitate those whom he had repressed, and bring about change in the usages prevalent in the Soviet Union. The excuse of combating a totalitarian régime made it easier for the Zionists to operate. A personality cult is of course an unattractive thing. Contrary to what is thought, Stalin started on this cult neither in order to extol his personality, nor to gratify his lust for power. Rather, he did it to strengthen his position in his struggle against Zionism and because he believed that he needed the cult in order to rule the country effectively, and also that it would give him some further opportunities in his rulership. At that time the country’s population was ignorant of politics. Stalin wanted to rule solely by means of a régime of unlimited personal power, based not merely on violence, but also on voluntary hero-worship organized on a mass scale and supported by political campaigning, with ideas being instilled into people’s minds. The cult and its consequences had to be actually liquidated, and without causing a stir.
THE TACTICS OF ZIONISM
Zionists are very flexible. They are prepared to change horses very rapidly. They will form their ranks anew the moment they feel that their current policy is failing. They will introduce whichever new organizations and designations are convenient, and will change their tack in their policies and tactics as soon as they realize that it is better to act differently. The one point about them that remains unchanged is their movement towards their goal. In the case of Russia, this is movement towards taking complete control of that country. They find that one of the ways of doing this lies in capturing the apparatus of power from within. In the leadership of the parties, trade unions, and any other public organizations, both locally and at a higher level, they replace people who are not convenient to them, or who merely belong to someone else and are not under their command, and install their own people instead. This soundless revolution is carried out on the sly. This will be done even if it means going through a civil war. The sufferings of the Russian people, its almost complete destruction in the melting pot of the civil war, and the devastation of the country, are of no consequence to the Zionists: their goal is the future welfare of the only “God-chosen” people. They are not at all concerned about anyone else. Not the least of their methods lies in causing disunity among young people. Video libraries showing a cult of violence and pornography, the destruction of literature, of the cinema, of music and of culture generally, the pro-Zionist press, the battle against patriotism and statehood, and so on – all this is aimed at ensuring that the future military serviceman, after Zionists have worked on him in the manner required, will, at a time to be determined by them, turn his weapon against his own people and will start fighting for the aims of the Zionists, which he has been led to believe will benefit him personally.
The Zionists are now leading Russia into capitalism, because they did not manage to establish their grip on her by the demagogic use of communist ideas. The particular ideology that they were employing has always been a matter of complete indifference to them. They are ready to adopt any guise and any ideology and modify it for the sake of their aims. And now they need capitalism.
Still, they had evidently clearly understood that capitalism is more beneficial to them: the gold of the world is mostly in their hands, and it is easier for them to take a controlling shareholding in the economic management of the country when production is privately owned than when it is State-owned. Once economic power has been seized, it is easier to take political power. This is the reason for the mass campaign being conducted in favour of capitalism, portraying its benefits. Capitalism undoubtedly has its economic benefits, especially when one considers the colossal demolition which the Zionists carried out in Russia. The fact is that, except for the war years, the whole history of Russia since the October 1917 revolution has consisted firstly of the struggle against Zionism and secondly of the work of destruction which Zionism conducted against Russia, against her economy, her ideology and her culture.
But the pro-capitalism campaign employs every possible way of keeping quiet about the defects of capitalism, which are already operating in Russia with full force: rising crime, racketeering, pornography, drug addiction, prostitution and other “benefits”. The Zionists play on the simple feelings of the philistine public, telling them that life is better under capitalism, that there is greater material provision, that there is more opportunity for personal initiative, that there is not the pressure of the one ruling ideology, and so on. They say that it was the communists who reduced the country to its present state. The population are being fooled again. While promising to give benefits to the population, and at the outset actually giving them, the Zionists will ultimately bring matters to the stage where mass prison camps and crematoria, or some other sinister monstrosities, are introduced: their merciless minds will be capable of devising some evil business. Ultimately they will reach the stage where everyone except pure-blooded Jews will be physically destroyed. The present leadership’s flirtation with Zionism will produce nothing good.
A different kind of activity is required today. Patriotism, the nation’s good sense and strength, and the way in which the nation strives for goodness, justice and constructiveness, must be the foundation here! And the Zionists can go to the devil! There is no need to assist them in their aims. They are strong enough without such assistance. Many people have been undone by hoping to use the Zionists and then outplay them. Zionism is tenacious and difficult to defeat. But it can be defeated, though not by playing into its hands – such a method is doomed from the outset.
HOW ZIONISM CAN BE DEFEATED
The chief weapon for defeating Zionism is publicity. Everyone must be told the truth. Everyone must know, understand, and achieve a proper feeling for, the whole truth about Zionism and Zionists: its aims, history, strategy, tactics, current condition and current struggle. They must understand the danger, the mortal danger. They must understand that Zionism is the enemy of all people, is the enemy of each individual person, and is in fact your enemy too. It is even the enemy of the Jews and the Zionists, and that is no paradox. Everyone must go into battle against it, and conduct a merciless, unyielding fight to the finish, until complete victory over Zionism has been achieved, until mankind has been rid of the threat of Zionism’s victory, of the danger of Zionism, of Zionism altogether!
Specifically, everyone who comes upon the present work which he is now reading must make the maximum effort to reproduce it, publish it (preferably in a massive print run), to distribute it in his locality as well as across Russia, and also outside Russia. The author is not worried that he may be regarded as vainglorious. But it is perfectly clear to him that the Zionists will make the maximum effort to liquidate this work and, if that does not succeed, to cast aspersions on it. The more people learn the truth, the more difficult it will be for Zionists to attain their objectives. Every person on earth must know the contents of the present work and, in consequence, know considerably more about Zionism than he did previously. The same applies to the distribution of other anti-Zionist literature and information. It must be done both orally and in writing, by action and financial support, both personally and by organizing others. Spread the truth about Zionism and fight against it with all the means possible! Become united and organized! But do not stop being vigilant, and lose no time! And victory will be ours!
Despite all the defeats and failures which it suffers from time to time, Zionism nevertheless makes progress, gradually gathering the whole world into its hands and completing its gigantic task of entirely taking over the world. What gives it such strength? What are the organizational and tactical principles enabling it always to feel victorious?
ZIONISM’S IDEOLOGY: JUDAISM
“PROUD TO BE A ZIONIST” DAVID CAMERON….PM!