(and you thought the oil was for the U.S.)

Oil pipelines to Israel. (click for larger image)

You are looking at the reason for the war against Iraq. This war was initiated by Ehud Barak for Israel’s strategic benefit!

Thats what Israel does. It has its intelligence organization, Mossad, carry out false flag operations and deceives others into attacking their enemies. In short they get others to fight their wars for them.

Israel is in the midst of its plan to use the United States military, which it controls, to conquer Iraq and divert Iraqi oil to the Haifa refinery via the Mosul to Haifa pipeline. The U.S. has built airbases at H1, H2 and H3 (which stand for Haifa 1, 2 and 3) to protect this strategic pipeline. The pipeline is used to send oil to Israel. Paid for with the blood of American soldiers that die in Iraq. See: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria’s Invasion PDF

Iraq is being turned into another Palestine state for Israel.

This war was fought in order to secure Israel’s future. Israel, being a parasite nation, needed to create an income stream that would continue if funding from the United States should dry up. They have been working on the plan to steal Iraqi oil for years. Read Israel’s Blitzkrieg on Middle East Oil PDF by Joe Vialls for more on this.

To quote Mr. Vialls article, “… they are already planning to steal 1,825 million barrels of Iraqi oil per annum. Taking a nominal price of US $25.00 per barrel … the Israeli-Jewish terrorists stand to make a cool US $45,625,000,000.00 each year …. ” [Thats over 45 1/2 Billion dollars a year or $125 million each day!!!]

Mr. Vialls claims that the 45 billion a year jackpot is more than just a lot of money, it’s a matter of survival for Israel.

The reshaping of the Middle East by America’s military will allow Israel to:
(1) Control the strategic oil reserves in this region which will ensure low cost oil to Israel and ensure their economic survival.
(2) Ensure Israel is the dominant military force and the sole nuclear equipped military power in the region for many years to come .
(3) Neutralize Israel’s enemies in the region.
(4) Expand borders per “Greater Israel”. The Nile forming the border on the West through Egypt, and the Euphrates on the East through Turkey, Syria and Iraq.
(5) Allow even further expansion of borders to encompass surrounding countries.

Israel has become the 3rd largest exporter of weapons in the world PDF, selling everything from Uzis to PHALCON airborne early warning systems. Defense Ministry figures show Israeli weapons export contracts were worth $4.1 billion in 2002. Only the United States with $13.2 billion and Russia with $4.4 billion sold more weapons that year.

Israel’s possesses the fourth largest army in the world.

Israel is the only nuclear enabled country in the Middle East. Israel has overtaken England to become the worlds 5th largest nuclear power, roughly equivalent to France and China in the size and sophistication of its nuclear arsenal. Recent reports indicate that Israel has deployed five different nuclear weapons designs. It is estimated to have 2000-5000 conventional nuclear warheads and many micro nuclear devices like the bomb that destroyed the Sari Club in Bali. (These new nuclear devices only emit alpha radiation that is invisible to a standard geiger counter). In addition they have the neutron bombs, (that can kill people and leave the buildings intact) and hydrogen bombs PDF. Hydrogen bombs are currently the most fearsome and intimidating weapon on earth, capable of causing over 60000 times the damage of a nuclear bomb like the one used on Nagasaki. The Hydrogen bomb is so intimidating that most nations vow never to produce it, though it is really not much harder than producing regular nukes. When we are talking WMD, this is the big Kahuna.

Israel has the capability to take out every major city in Europe. Israel refuses to sign the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) or to allow inspections of its nuclear facilities by International inspectors.

Israel stands in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council Resolutions. A further 33 resolutions against Israel has not seen the light of day thanks to the United States vetoing power on the Security Council.

Nuclear disarmament must begin with Israel. Until that time, Arab states in the region have an inalienable “right” and “obligation” to develop similar weapons (of mass destruction) to counter this overwhelming threat to their nations and peoples.

Since Israel possess such a large nuclear arsenal, they are able to blackmail the United States into supplying them conventional weapons. They have been known to sell those weapons and technologies to other countries, once they are given to them. The Patriot missile, the Phoenix air-to-air missile, the Lavi fighter, based on the F-16, have all been sold to Beijing. Only direct U.S. intervention prevented Israel from selling Beijing AWACS technology.

Zionist forces are in control of the United States. When Ariel Sharon said:

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres, October 3rd, 2001, as reported on Kol Yisrael
— it was no idle chatter. He was telling the truth. They have gained control through the Federal Reserve System PDF and control of the central banks. The Illuminati and their Zionist agents also employ nuclear blackmail PDF. They are firmly in control of Australia, Germany and England as well as the U.S. Their allies will unite to fight the good fight for the greater good of Israel.

Just follow the trail of the money!

The United States has given Israel over 90 billion dollars in foreign aid. They continue this aid at a time when U.S. schools no longer can afford textbooks. Yet the standard 3 billion dollars of yearly aid goes on. Then there’s the 12 billion in loan guarantees. And now Israel is asking for (and received) a 400% increase in aid. estimates the foreign aid to Israel to be closer to 8 billion yearly. I estimate that Israel receives 9.5 billion a year in aid. Here is the break down:
Foreign Aid: $3 billion, Loan Guarantees (normally): $2 billion (Note: the U.S. Congress has forgiven ALL loans to Israel in the past), private tax deductible donations: $1 billion, Israeli bonds: $500 million, Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) which guarantees all Israel’s oil needs in the event of a crisis: $3 billion (The Oil funding is camouflaged in the Defense budget) = Total $9.5 billion.

This $9.5 billion of aid is the standard rate. However, 2003 was an exceptionally good year for Israel. AFTER the Israeli army killed Rachel Corrie with a bulldozer, (which by the way was most likely paid for with your U.S. tax dollars), the U.S. rewarded Israel by giving them an additional $9B in loan guarantees, $1B in military aid – [Would Israel have received $20 billion if they had killed 2 American college students?]

So in 2003 Israel hit the lottery to the tune of a cool $19.5 billion. Or, put in another way, in 2003, Israel received $53.4 Million dollars a day from the traitors in Congress. Thats a very solid return on the AIPAC contributions that Israel pays out to U.S. Congressmen.

This is part of a broader package of up to $75 billion as emergency aid, directly connected to the war on Iraq. This amounts to 2500% increase in aid to support Israel in a war that they have claimed they are not involved in. Who is benefiting from the war on Iraq? Follow the trail of the money!

Each year Congress forgives loans made to Israel which costs U.S. Taxpayers more than all the foreign aid handed out.

Former congressman James Traficant states that Israel gets handed between $15-$20 billion dollars a year when it is all added up. This is happening while Americans are losing their homes and con’t afford proper health care.

In February, 2007 Israel is seeking to secure a further $500 million of annual military aid PDF from the traitors in Washington.

Some sources indicate with all the hidden costs including the Strategic Petroleum Reserve factored in, the figure is more like $3 Trillion dollars !!!) Thomas R. Stauffer does. The summary of Stauffer’s research was published in the June 2003 issue of The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. See this article for more: The Real Cost Of US Support For Israel.

Israel has installed one of, if not the most, sophisticated missile defense systems in the world. They were the first country in the world to use laser’s to intercept missiles, at America’s expense of course. In 2000 Israel introduced the Tactical High Energy Laser/Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator (THEL/ACTD), the world’s first high-energy laser weapon system designed for operational use, to shoot down a rocket carrying a live warhead. In contrast, in December 2002 Resident Bush ordered the U.S. military to begin deployment of their own national missile defense system to protect the United States.

Israel has launched its own spy satellite in 2002. A professor at the Israeli Technion-Israel Institute of Technology argued that the recent launch of an Israeli satellite means Israel “has established [its] capability to launch, by means of a missile, a payload to any location on the face of the earth.”

Israel has acquired three Dolphin class diesel submarines in 2002 that it is arming with newly designed cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. According to Pentagon and Israeli officials, Israel now has a triad of land-, sea- and air-based nuclear weapons for the first time. Now, Germany has agreed to sell Israel another two Dolphin-class submarines.

Israel has its own radar warning system and has created a vast Home Front Command to prepare citizens and medical services for potential attacks.

U.S. military has plugged Israel into real-time war monitoring in the war on Iraq. Israel and the United States have set up a joint command post next to the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv at which Israeli army officers will be able to view real-time pictures of the movements of American war planes over Iraq in the event of a war.
In addition, an American early warning system that is hooked directly into U.S. intelligence satellites over Iraq was transferred to Israel a few weeks ago, [February, 2003] giving Israel direct access to information on any Iraqi missile launches at its territory, with no delays and no filtering.

This War Is Also About Water – Israel needs new water sources to allow Israeli expansion plans. Iraq is the major source of water in the Middle East. Just as the war in Afghanistan was fought for the Unocal oil pipeline this war is being fought for oil and water pipelines to Israel.
Israel is now conducting assassinations of American citizens on American soil under the guise of “fighting terrorism” with the blessings of the US Government.

If a member of Congress were to merely question anything about Zionist political influence in Washington they would be committing career suicide. Many feel that Israel blackmails politicians involved in pedophile rings and uses photographs to control their votes. Very high level politicians have been implicated as well as Bushes.

In conclusion the evidence that Israel is behind the invasion on Iraq is more than circumstantial. You just need to look at who stands to gain from all this. Those that can’t understand why Dubya is so determined to attack Iraq, probably haven’t considered that Israel is running the show. If you just look at who stands to gain from Iraqi oil you see the picture but it doesn’t seem to be the whole thing. But when you add the dancing Israelis and Senator Graham’s statements about foreign governments involvement in 911 and Sharon’s orders on who Bush is to attack next, the whole picture begins to get in focus.

For those who feel ‘so what if thousands of Iraqis die, as long as America ends up with the oil’. Those people will be disappointed also. Sure, Bush’s buddies, the large corporations will get contracts to rebuild Iraq and make huge profits, but the BIG profits will be from Iraqi oil flowing to Israel. The Bush regime has already indicated it will not support lifting UN sanctions on Iraq unless Saddam’s successors agree to supply Israel with oil. US efforts to get Iraqi oil to Israel are not surprising. Under a 1975 Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) engineered by Henry Kissinger, the US guaranteed all Israel’s oil needs in the event of a crisis. The MoU, which has been quietly renewed every five years, also committed the USA to construct and stock a supplementary strategic reserve for Israel, equivalent to some US$3bn in 2002. Special legislation was enacted to exempt Israel from restrictions on oil exports from the USA.

To ensure the security of the Mosul to Haifa pipeline, the U.S. needs to neutralize Syria. Syria is too much of a risk. Israel wants the Mosul to Haifa pipeline to be secure for many years to come. Two US-made ‘democratic’ regimes in the region, one in Baghdad and the other in Damascus, would secure the flow of Iraqi oil to Israel and free the country from its dependence on pricey Russian oil. The entire Middle East will be reshaped in line with these concerns.

Oil Pipeline to Haifa: Voice of the White House November 11, 2005 PDF


“Neocons are dumb, stupid animals (who think they are God’s gift to the world)
to be used as pawns for Illuminati global domination”

–Webber Dec. 1, 2006

The Sanitized Version of Neoconservatism PDF by Stephen Sniegoski / Intifada Palestine 27. Jun, 2011

just a tiny part of the sites content.

This was a link re Iran war 2006 …

War Without End
The global war against terror, news about the illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate puppet presidents, the war criminal Tony Blair, September 11th 2001, the USS Liberty and New World Order crimes against humanity.

File not Found

Please use the site search to find what you are looking for, or go to the main index page.
Alternatively, you can sign a petition to prosecute the War Criminal Tony Blair by going to

missing PDF file..

Israel’s Olmert wants US to ‘deal with’ (bomb!) Iran PDF May 21, 2006

Mossad High probability that Rohm Emanual is “Mega”, the top-level Mossad agent in the Reagan administration, who was said to have run a number of Israeli agents, including US Navy spy Jonathan Pollard. Rahm Emanuel’s father, Benjamin M. Emanuel was a member of the Irgun, a Zionist terrorist group that operated in Palestine from 1931 to 1948. The Irgun blew up buildings and killed hundreds of innocent people in order to achieve the goals of militant Zionism in occupied Palestine. The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946 (Palestine), which resulted in the deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews, and in the wounding of 58, was not just an act of “Jewish extremists,” but a premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in agreement with the highest Jewish political authorities in Palestine– the Jewish Agency and its head David-Ben-Gurion. The Irgun even has a website with pictures of the buildings they blew up before they demolished the World Trade Center with Thermite and high explosives:
The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the “Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad – Israeli Intelligence.”
Articles on Emanuel:
Rahm Emanuel’s Father Specialized in Bus Bombings in Palestine PDF Wayne Madsen Special to Jan-26-2011
The ties that bind. Remember Rahm Emanuel’s rent-free D.C. apartment? The owner: A BP adviser PDF June 7, 2010
Was the Obama Administration involved in the Planning of the Israeli Attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla? PDF by Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, June 6, 2010 – Rahm Emmanuel, Obama’s White House chief of Staff was in Tel Aviv a week prior to the attacks. Confirmed by press reports, he had meetings behind closed doors with Prime Minister Netanyahu (May 26) as well as a private visit with President Shimon Peres on May 27.
Rahm’s MOSSAD mafia PDF March 14, 2010
Rahm Emanuel – Israeli Spy PDF By Wayne Madsen 2008 11 19
Criminalizing Criticism Of Israel PDF By Paul Craig Roberts 5-9-9 – As soon as he gets the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 passed, it will become a crime for any American to tell the truth about Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and theft of their lands.
Idiot Jew Rahm Emanuel’s Knuckle Cracking Habit and his Brown Finger Puppet PDF By: Crack_Smoke_Republican on: 16.03.2009
Rahm Emanuel to Disarm America Video Dont Be Obama Zombies February 03, 2009
Obama’s partisan, profane confidant reins it in PDF By Mark Leibovich January 25, 2009
How Rahm Emanuel Made Mega-Millions and Bought His Way to Power PDF By Ben Protess, ProPublica December 9, 2008
Rahm Emanuel – Israeli Spy PDF By Wayne Madsen 11-15-8
Pakis Know More About Rahm Than Americans PDF By By Kaleem Omar 11-15-8 – Obama’s chief-of-staff-designate Rahm Emanuel is the son of a former Zionist terrorist
Rahm Emanuel: One of the Biggest Recipients of Wall Street Money in Congress PDF November 7th, 2008
The Israeli Who Will Run the Obama White House PDF by Christopher Bollyn 06 November 2008
Obama Picks Rahm Emanuel As Chief Of Staff PDF
Son of a Zionist Terrorist PDF by Christopher Bollyn 17 November 2006

2B) US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner – Rothschild agent
Articles on Geithner:
Geithner’s ‘Dirty Little Secret’ The Entire Global Financial System Is At Risk PDF By F. William Engdahl 3-31-9

2C) Peter R. Orszag ————-Director of the Office of Management and Budget

by Joe Vialls

Part 1

January – December 2002

from Vialls Website

recovered through WayBackMachine website

In early March 2001, a leading European intelligence agency received disturbing news from its most senior and trusted agent in Tel Aviv. Aware of growing international resistance to its ruthless and murderous suppression of the Palestinians, the Israeli Cabinet had met to discuss the limited ways in which it could proceed with its plans to annex the rest of Palestine, with or without the support of principal ally America, or the “International Community”.

At the time, the Israeli Cabinet had no idea that the subject matter of its March meeting would later become one of the prime reasons for the September attack on the World Trade Center.

The Israeli Cabinet was seriously worried. Despite effective control of the western media by the Jewish-American lobby, risk assessment conducted in Tel Aviv showed there was still a high probability that continued ruthless Israeli activity in Palestine, would lead in turn to increased sanctions by the western nations. Initially the sanctions would take the form of decreased arms shipments to Israel, followed later by increasingly large cuts in overseas financial “aid”, still provided in the main by unwitting American taxpayers.

Sooner or later financial aid might dry up completely, but this was not the worst case scenario.

Eventually, if western public opinion became strident enough, America and Europe might feel compelled to impose a complete oil embargo on Israel. With no natural resources of its own, and only limited strategic oil reserves in the country, Israel’s armed forces would grind to a complete standstill in only a few weeks. Aircraft and battle tanks have an almost insatiable thirst for petroleum products, and when those products run out, the aircraft and tanks are no more use to their owners than chunks of aluminum and steel waiting for the recycling smelters.

Clearly then, the Israeli Cabinet had to find an alternate source of oil, and find it quickly. Moreover, bearing in mind they would no longer be able to pay for the oil because of financial sanctions, the new source would have to be “free”. Back in the sixties, ambitious Israelis had made detailed plans to acquire just such an alternate source of oil by force, but the plans had to be shelved for geopolitical reasons. Those geopolitical restrictions no longer existed in 2001, so the old plans were taken out of storage, dusted off, and renamed Operation Shekhinah.

Stealing oil reserves from another nation is certainly not an original idea. The closest historical precedent for Operation Shekhinah was probably back in 1941, when Roosevelt imposed a total oil embargo on Japan during the first American “War on Terror”.

Seeing conflict as inevitable and recognizing its desperate need for an alternate source of oil, the Japanese responded accordingly, acutely aware that in order to reach and utilize the oil reserves in the Dutch East Indies, it would first have to overwhelm the [then] vastly superior US Navy.

It was in this context that Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Japanese Combined Fleet, suggested an air attack on the US Pacific Fleet, which had moved from its usual base at San Diego on the American west coast, to a mid-Pacific location at Pearl Harbor in May 1940. Yamamoto’s plan was a development of the traditional Japanese defensive strategy. He gambled on a surprise attack to destroy the American naval capability in the Pacific, including its all-important aircraft carriers, and create enough time, perhaps six months, to enable Japan to complete its territorial conquests.

Simultaneous attacks by the Japanese army on Hong Kong, Malaya, the Philippines, Guam and the Dutch East Indies would capture the strategically important bases and areas rich in raw materials Japan felt was vital for its national survival and would also now be needed to sustain its war with America. The rest, as they say, is history.

Along much the same lines, and for similar strategic reasons in 2001, Israel intended to launch a surprise attack against southern Iraq, capture its southern oil fields, then use the old existing Trans Arabian Pipeline [“Tapline”], to pump the oil back to its own refineries at Haifa. Technical details of the operation will be provided later in this report, and in part two to follow, but first we need to examine the chances of the operation succeeding, and the subsequent reaction of the western nations and Russia.

Back in the sixties, when the operation was first planned by Israel, the British, Russians and Europeans had huge investments in the middle east, so an outraged backlash against Israel would have been immediate, and probably terminal for any ongoing “Jewish State” in Palestine.

It was on this basis that the Iraqi plan was shelved and left to gather dust. However, during the years that followed, the entire geopolitical landscape changed. By March 2001, the Israeli Cabinet considered the risks to be minimal, and probably non-existent if Operation Shekhinah was handled correctly. What had changed the odds was the new status of Iraq.

During the late eighties and nineties, the fledgling “New World Order” and the media had spent millions of dollars demonizing President Saddam Hussein, to the point where he was eventually regarded by 95% of the western public as “The Butcher of Baghdad”. Not only was this Iraqi demon allegedly manufacturing weapons of mass destruction almost identical to those stored in America, he was also the tyrant who “gassed his own Kurds at Halabja”.

President Hussein did no such thing. In February 1990 the US Army War College published a report titled “Iraqi Power & US Security in the Middle East”, which proved the Kurds of Halabja died as the direct result of an Iranian Phosgene gas attack. But the western media, firmly in the grip of the Jewish-American lobby, wasn’t going to let the hard truth get in the way of its frantic vilification campaign.

In light of Saddam Hussein’s new demonic status, the Israeli Cabinet reasoned in March 2001 that no one would now object to Israel taking strenuous action against this “known war criminal and killer of babies”. Instead, it was calculated that the action would be seen by the western public as daring.

Once again the brave Jews would have taken a stand against a dictator in the sacred name of democracy; and hopefully the western public would not notice the millions of barrels of stolen Iraqi oil flowing back to its refineries in Haifa.

And even if they did notice, what could they do about it with Israel already in occupation?

Before Operation Shekhinah could be launched, Israel needed its own “tame” Arabs on the ground in both northern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq. Detailed plans of the area had to be drawn up or updated, and airfields and assembly points for incoming Israeli aircraft and ground troops arranged. In order to avoid suspicion or unwanted prying eyes, Israeli agents infiltrated the areas and started offering certain Shi’ite Muslims in the area “free passage” to other countries away from their enemy Saddam Hussein, plus spending money to take with them, in exchange for their ramshackle homes in the area.

Predictably there was no shortage of takers, and by mid April 2001 the preliminary operation was in full swing.

Droves of Shi’ite Muslims quietly started departing the area for America, Europe and Australasia at enormous cost to the Israelis. Buying entire people smuggling operations was an incredibly expensive business, to which had to be added the ad hoc payments to the migrants and other significant expenses. Once again America unwittingly came to the rescue, with certain financial institutions in the World Trade Center laundering most of the massive funds needed.

This activity was conducted with alacrity, because Israel had offered a dazzling quid pro quo to its financial juggernaut in New York City. Once firmly established in southern Iraq, the new Israel would be at the crossroads of middle east oil, not only with direct control of the giant southern Iraqi fields, but also within easy striking distance of Kuwait, northern Iran, and the northern Iraqi pipeline routes.

From this position of enormous strength, Israel would be able to either control or blackmail the local states into marketing their oil in an “organized way”, rather than allowing any old Tom Dick or Harry to buy the stuff on the Rotterdam Spot Market. Using sophisticated insider trading techniques, OPEC would be neutered, and world oil supplies would come under the exclusive de facto control of NYMEX and the New York Stock Exchange in the World Trade Center.

Concurrent with this activity, the Jewish-American Lobby was frantically urging the White House and US Department of State to step up its enforcement of the illegal “no fly” zones over northern and southern Iraq.

The records show that attacks did indeed increase during this period, though the American and British pilots could not have known they were being deliberately used to “blind” the Iraqi air defenses, and ensure they stayed blinded in the run up to Israel’s Operation Shekhinah. When the Israeli surprise attack was finally launched, there would be not the slightest chance of detection by Baghdad until it was too late.

The possibility of military intervention by the United States seemed to trouble the Israeli Foreign Minister, but risk assessment came to the rescue and calmed his fears. Though a few US military aircraft based in Kuwait would probably have to be destroyed, either on the ground or in the air, it was calculated that this would not be a problem in technical or public relations terms.

Technically, the Israeli aircraft had home-grown fire control systems vastly superior to their American equivalents, and could be relied on to shoot down the US jets swiftly and with the minimum of fuss. In public relations terms the Israelis would later claim it was a case of “mistaken identity”, twist a few arms and grease a few palms in Washington, and the whole affair would be swept under the carpet.

Once again the Israeli Cabinet had a sound precedent for this, in the form of the USS Liberty.

On 8 June 1967, during the Six Day War between Israel and the Arab States, the unarmed American intelligence ship USS Liberty was attacked for 75 minutes by Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats.

Thirty-four men died and 172 were wounded. Despite the proven fact that the USS Liberty was far offshore in international waters, and flying a bright, clean American flag, Israel insisted it was all a terrible case of mistaken identity, which it most certainly was not. Israel attacked the USS Liberty in an attempt to “blind” the American intelligence ship and prevent it forwarding details of Israel’s pre-emptive strikes to the Pentagon.

The Jewish-American Lobby went to work with a vengeance in Washington, twisting arms and handing out pieces of silver. So effective was the lobbying that the murder of thirty four American sailors on the unarmed USS Liberty went largely unnoticed by the public, and the media was predictably silent on the matter.

Though the Liberty’s Captain William Loren McGonagle was later awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty, it was presented to him quietly at the Washington Navy Yard, rather than the White House as is customary.
American politicians had bent over backwards to avoid embarrassing the murderers of the thirty-four American sailors.

The Israeli Cabinet thus knew full well that any American “collateral damage” during Operation Shekhinah could be swept under the carpet in exactly the same way.

By early June 2001 the trickle of Shi’ite “migrants” out of northern Saudi and southern Iraq had swelled to a flood, which came to the attention of at least two more European intelligence agencies. For reasons unknown but presumably acting on orders, the Shi’ites were all woodenly claiming they were Afghans, which was not a good move. Afghans speak Farsi but these people couldn’t speak a word of it, which is hardly surprising. The native language in both northern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq is Arabic.

Around this time Russia also became aware of the pending Israeli operation, though it is not yet known whether the information was leaked by a European agency, or provided direct by one of its own agents in Tel Aviv.

But what was known by all by this time, was the actual start date for Operation Shekhinah: 2 October 2001, the first day of a seven-day Jewish holiday, and thus a most unlikely period in which expect an attack by Israel.

Things then went very quiet for a few weeks until 12 July, when Pravda, still considered by many as the establishment voice of Russia’s old guard communists who control the military and intelligence agencies, printed a story on its page one entitled “Will the Dollar and America Fall Down on August 19? That’s the Opinion of Dr. Tatyana Koryagina”.

Was Mother Russia using this expert, and deliberately citing the wrong date, in order to distance herself from involvement in the upcoming 11 September attack on the World Trade Center?

Tapline – the Sidon terminal

In order to get a true feel for the importance of oil to Israel, it is necessary to take a stroll back through history, to a time when the sky was continually lit by the flashes of heavy artillery shells and exploding bombs, as nations around the globe struggled with World War Two.

But as the two sides struggled with the other, an entirely separate third battle was being fought behind the scenes. While the Americans, the British and their allies fought savagely and died in their thousands for secular democracy, others were fighting a covert quasi-religious war.

Zionists worldwide were actively plotting to overthrow Palestine in order to provide a “haven” for poor dispossessed Jews from around the globe, especially those who had suffered at the hands of the Nazis in Germany.

Naturally the Zionists insisted that they had no territorial ambitions, confirmed by Ben Gurion, who stated the easternmost Israeli border would be “the Syrian Desert, including the furthest edge of Transjordan.” So no real problem. Just relocate a few thousand Palestinians to make way for the Jews, and everyone would be happy.

As historical documents show, and modern Zionists freely admit, this was propaganda intended only for the gullible masses. The true intent of the Zionist elite was a smash and grab raid of staggering proportions, securing territory from the Mediterranean coast and the River Nile in the west, to the River Euphrates in the east, together forming the new Greater Israel.

By the end of the Second World War, the “new” Israel was shaping up as the biggest and most exciting game in town.

Control of this vast block of territory would allow its new owners to completely dominate the crossroads of traditional world trading routes, regulate world oil shipping routes including the Suez Canal, and [effectively] control the Persian Gulf.

In common with all 20th Century engagements, the battle for Greater Israel would require vast quantities of oil to drive the machines of war: Oil which the British and Iraqis had already piped into the port city of Haifa to serve the British naval and military bases in the Eastern Mediterranean.

By 1946 two pipelines fed the refineries and loading terminals at Haifa: the first a ten-inch line running direct from Iraq to Palestine, and the second a sixteen-inch line running from Iraq to Palestine via Jordan. Also on the drawing board that year was a new mammoth thirty-inch line from Bahrain and Saudi Arabia to Palestine, nicknamed the “Tapline”.

Thus if the Zionists planned their attacks swiftly and efficiently, they would be able to sweep through Palestine, Jordan, and Iraq, using the existing refineries and pipelines to meet the needs of their war machine.

Once the territory had been conquered, the newly created Greater Israel could and would charge the Saudi’s and Bahraini’s vast Tapline royalties, and massive fees for the use of “its” refineries in Haifa. It was heady stuff, but by the time the Jews had finished slashing and burning their way though western Palestine in 1948, unwisely killing British as well as Palestinian citizens on the way, someone somewhere had already blown the whistle on their overall strategic ambitions.

As if by magic, the ten-inch and sixteen-inch lines oil were cut at source, and the Arabs started to fight back. Because the Jews were not exactly the darlings of the western world in 1948, and were strapped for both cash and oil, they had to call a temporary halt in what was to become Israel up until the next aggressive expansionist attempt during 1967.

But significantly, in 1948 the Zionists had established a firm “beachhead” for Greater Israel.

The need to sever the pipelines had dealt a severe blow to the Arabs, who were now faced with transporting most of their oil out through the Persian Gulf, a extra distance of more than 5,000 nautical miles on the way to market. True a small pipeline still ran from Iraq through Syria to the northern Lebanese port of Tripoli, but it carried only a tiny fraction of the oil. So in the end the thirty-inch Trans Arabian Pipeline (Tapline) was built, though not without significant difficulty.

Syrian parliamentary objections necessitated the CIA-aided 1949 coup in Damascus to secure “right of way” over the Golan Heights. Two CIA agents, one of them Miles Copeland, simply installed a Syrian Government prepared to sign the new right of way agreement, and Tapline was re-routed around the northern tip of Israel to the southern Lebanese port of Sidon.

The psychological impact of Tapline on the Israelis from its opening during 1950, should not be underestimated. Robbed of what they believed to be their historical birthright, by a lack of oil to drive their war machine on to a Greater Israel, they were now forced to watch impotently as that very oil flowed by, tantalizingly close to their border on the Golan Heights.

On any single day, when the wind was not blowing and the air was still, they could hear the muted hum and swishing as nearly 500,000 barrels of sweet black crude oil flowed straight past, on its way to Sidon and the export markets.

Then in 1967 the Israelis launched their “Pearl Harbor” surprise attack on the Arab nations, blitzing the latter’s air forces on the ground, and expanding their own territory to include the Sinai in the south, and the extended Golan Heights in the north.

The Israeli’s would have taken more if they thought they could get away with it, but once again international public opinion and limited pressure from America forced a halt. What went almost unnoticed was that for the first time since its opening back in 1950, the Tapline now ran through the Israeli-occupied part of the Golan Heights, rather than through Syria.

This incredibly important new strategic reality seemed to escape the attention of everyone, including the premier American Military Academy at West Point.

Nowadays the maps in the West Point Reference Library show lots of interesting tidbits about Israeli advances, roads and other mundane geographical features in and around the Golan, but not a glimpse of Tapline (below map).

Clearly where American military strategy is concerned, a pair of cleverly-sited Israeli machine gun nests on a hill in the Golan facing Syria, are more important that an oil pipeline large enough to fuel Israel’s entire army on its journey to the River Euphrates in Iraq.

Due to the failed Syrian attempt to take back the Golan Heights in 1973, and a host of other destabilizing factors including Israeli pipeline sabotage and problems in the Lebanon, all oil transportation in the western [Syrian and Lebanese] portions of the line ceased in 1976.

That portion of the line was evacuated of all crude oil and the installations in Lebanon were handed over to the Lebanese government in 1983, after the Israeli invasion of that country.

The western section of the Tapline was not destroyed, and currently sits idle, still capable of transporting up to 500,000 barrels of oil per day. Until 1991 the eastern section of the Tapline was used to supply Jordan, but Saudi Arabia terminated this arrangement to display displeasure with Jordanian support for Iraq during the Gulf War.

Tapline was and remains a central feature of Israel’s strategic plans to take Greater Israel by force, despite western objections, and despite threatened western sanctions designed to moderate its behavior.

Much of the detailed current planning for Operation Shekhinah will be covered in Part Two of this report, because we first need to look at new geopolitical alliances in the area. After all, logic dictates that if the Israelis reasoned they could use Tapline back in 1967, why did they not do so then? The simple answer is that on top of the lethal problem of Iraq, they would have faced fierce resistance from just about every Arab nation in the Middle East, and from Iran.

A spectacular defeat would have been inevitable.

But then along came the very convenient Gulf War and everything changed. Though the demonization of Saddam Hussein is known to every western television viewer, the more subtle aspects of Middle East politics are not. Because they felt threatened, three Arab states in particular were forced embrace America and American troops.

Kuwait was obviously the first because its territory was occupied by Iraq, but was followed swiftly by Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, who rapidly found themselves overwhelmed by thousands of disrespectful British and American soldiers dropping empty Coco Cola cans and other assorted trash all over the sacred religious routes to Mecca.

The soldiers were supposed to go home after the Gulf War of course, but as we all know, the Americans and Brits like to “hang out” in their colonies for a little while after hostilities cease, normally for about fifty years. This quaint Anglo Saxon tradition swiftly led to tensions in the area so great, that by the mid 1990s the two smaller partners, Kuwait and Bahrain, were seriously worried about being left out in the cold.

If, as seemed likely, the Saudi’s were eventually obliged to remove the American soldiers from their sovereign territory, Kuwait and Bahrain might be forced to do the same under sustained pressure from their local populations. Huge problem: If you send the Americans and Brits home, then who will protect you from big bad Saddam Hussein?

Certainly not Saudi Arabia, which has barely enough weapons to protect itself.

On hearing about this delicate problem, Israel held a series of secret talks with senior officials from Kuwait and Bahrain during late 1997, aimed at finding a mutually agreeable solution. It was agreed that both Emirates would be prepared to pump oil to Israel, provided the Israelis provided a defensive barrier between them and Iraq. Discreetly of course, because neither Emirate could possibly allow Israelis on its own territory.

Limited tactical requirements were discussed, including the expensive relocation of Shi’ite Muslims out of northern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq, a process which as we already know continued to accelerate until a few days before the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York.

A year after the secret tripartite meetings, in what seemed at first to be an unconnected incident, the Jordanian Government found to its horror that a corrupt official had quietly dug up and sold more than fifty kilometers of disused sixteen-inch oil pipeline, originally used to pump oil between Iraq and Palestine.

It transpired that this pipe was in perfect order, and carefully inspected as such by the mystery cash buyer. When interrogated, the official admitted his guilt but had no idea who the end user might be. Checks established the buyer was not Syrian, Saudi, Egyptian or Palestinian. So who?

Now this is a difficult one. Let me see… The buyer was secretive, meaning he did not wish to attract attention or arouse suspicion on the open market. In order to arouse suspicion on the open market in the first place, the buyer must have come from a country with no oil reserves of its own.

Somebody jog my memory here: How far is it from the Golan Heights down to the refinery at Haifa?

Before we start wallowing around in crude oil and pipelines, we need to briefly revisit the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center.

Though it is obvious to most readers that the attack was driven at least in part by concern over control of the Middle East, it is not yet entirely clear whether this was the primary motivation, and if we reasonably exclude Arabs living in Afghan caves, we do not yet have the real villain. The coordination and precision of the attacks on New York and Washington, point to the direct involvement of one or more first-world government agencies. The resulting chaos was unquestionably as strategic as it was deadly.

The global impact of Operation Shekhinah cannot be overstated. Allowing Israel to position itself in southern Iraq, steal the oil and thereby place itself beyond sanction, would be grossly irresponsible. Not only would the “new” Israel directly threaten the remaining Arab States, it would indirectly also threaten Britain, Europe, Russia, Japan and China.

We know that information about Operation Shekhinah was received by at least some of these countries by late March 2001, but we do not know how many. Operation Shekhinah could easily turn the global strategic balance upside down, a reality that one or more of the countries listed above might not be prepared to allow.

As noted earlier, the only visible peripheral clue we have to the possibility of direct first-world involvement is the outspoken Dr. Tatyana Koryagina, who Pravda quoted on 12 July in its page-one article “Will the Dollar and America Fall Down on August 19?”.

In fact this article was based on an earlier meeting at the Russian Duma on 29 June, attended by leading figures including American presidential hopeful Lyndon Larouche, a self-styled economic “expert” who for years has advocated a complete change in the global economic structure.

All the participants at the Duma that day, agreed America was a huge financial pyramid due to crash soon, but some vigorously challenged Dr Koryagina on the method, i.e. how could this be done without a war, without missiles, or bomb strikes?

Tatyana Koryagina, known to be close to President Vladimir Putin, responded in a cryptic manner:

“Besides bombs and missiles, there are other kinds of weaponry, much more destructive ones”. She went on to explain further: “The U.S. has been chosen as the object of financial attack because the financial center of the planet is located there. The effect will be maximal. The strike waves of economic crisis will spread over the planet instantly and will remind us of the blast of a huge nuclear bomb.”

End quote.

The US has been “chosen”? What an interesting Freudian choice of words, Tatyana!

Conspiracy or coincidence?

Despite the curiosity value, on balance we are forced to settle for coincidence because we have no hard proof of guilt. Certainly in the aftermath of 9/11 Dr Koryagina has been proved unerringly correct, because massive economic shock waves are still spreading outwards across the planet, five months later. But direct involvement?

To use this minimal information to claim the Russians were directly involved in the WTC attack, is as ridiculous as pointing the finger at Great Britain on the flimsy grounds that British-owned Barclays Capital, was the only company known to have closed its office in 1 WTC and moved its employees to 222 Broadway, shortly before the attack took place.

Stirring stuff, but it was all part of larger relocation plan. On 5 September 2001, Barclays plc announced it would be moving all of its staff from the City and the West End of London, to Canary Wharf in Docklands, many miles to the east.

Put simply, we cannot really tell from pointing fingers at different people and different companies whether there is any tangible connection between the WTC attack and Shekhinah. All we know for sure is that the resulting chaos slowed the operation down drastically. Quite apart from funding the huge bill for moving vast numbers of Shi’ite Arabs out of northern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq, sympathetic financiers located in the World Trade Center were also funding and coordinating another critical part of the project, massive quantities of specialist lightweight pipeline.

By looking at the Tapline maps shown at the bottom of this page, it is easy to see that the main prize of Operation Shekhinah, the 30/31 inch Aramco Tapline, runs primarily over Saudi territory, and obviously does not touch either Iraq in the east or Israel in the west.

In the long term after the invasion, it will obviously be possible to “construct proper 30/31” extensions of this large pipeline, but not in the short term with half the world likely calling for economic and oil sanctions against the Jewish State. Though Israel had significant stockpiles of smaller bore pipe, it was of the variety than has to be laid manually, and was extremely heavy. What was needed for use during the first few weeks or months after the pre-emptive strike on Iraq, was lightweight pipeline that could be laid in days.

At the time of the attack on the World Trade Center, financiers within were in the final phases of ordering this special lightweight pipeline, needed in the short term to “link” with the existing big-bore Aramco Tapline in Jordan, and pump a limited quantity of oil across the Israeli border to the refinery at Haifa. The lightweight pipeline was also needed for the eastern end, to connect pipelines in southern Iraq to the Tapline in northern Saudi Arabia.

Israel needed [and still needs] a total of more than 250 MILES of this special lightweight pipeline, carefully ordered in small lots through front companies from a variety of manufacturers, to avoid obvious questions being asked.

The cost was so incredibly high that discreet major banking involvement was deemed essential. Moving the Shi’ites Muslims out of the immediate area was desirable though not essential to the operation, but the high pressure pipeline certainly was. Without the special pipeline Shekhinah might be terminally compromised, a problem the Israelis were desperately trying to rectify as recently as last week.

Selecting the correct type of pipe had been a long and difficult process. After much research into pipelines of every type, the Israeli planners settled on a modern, lighter, and larger bore version of “Pluto”, a top secret continuous pipeline laid across the English Channel by the Allies in the closing stages of World War II.

Because the Allied planners knew nothing about the oil industry, they approached Mr. AC Hartley, a born problem-solver and Anglo-Iranian Oil’s chief Engineer.

Hartley’s innovative proposal was, since you can’t assemble the pipe at sea, why not manufacture it in one continuous length, and deploy it rapidly off the back of a ship, in the way submarine telegraph cables had been laid.

The pipeline had to be of small diameter, to keep size and weight manageable.

Hartley remembered that a difficult pumping problem in Iran’s hills had been solved using a three-inch diameter pipe carrying fluid at 1,500 psi, which brought 100,000 gallons per day 40 miles between pumping stations.

Finally, under Hartley’s direction, the British company Siemens developed the Hais (short for Hartley-Anglo-Iranian-Siemens) cable: a lead pipe swathed in insulation, reinforced by steel wire, and coated in tar and yarn. Before the war was over, several pipelines were laid across the English Channel, pumping a combined total of 1.35 million gallons per day.

Though little known to members of the public, “Pluto” played a critical part in oiling the Allied war machine in western Europe.

Continuous pipe technology has come a very long way since World War II, so the pipe ordered by the Israelis is quite different to that used by the Allies. Remember also that there is no requirement for sub sea work in the eastern and western “extensions” of the Tapline. The Israeli pipe can be laid straight onto the ground, supported where necessary by special air bags originally designed for underwater work in the North Sea.

To generate the required high pressure in the western pipeline, three prefabricated diesel-powered pumping stations have been ordered, with a fourth as backup. Planners are confident that pumping equipment for the eastern extension of the Tapline can be “borrowed” or “requisitioned” from the Iraqis.

With Kuwait and Bahrain tacitly in tow, and the Saudis sidelined, the main threats to Operation Shekhinah should theoretically be Jordan and Syria. After all, this plan calls for a large chunk of Jordanian territory to be “annexed”, a favorite Jewish pastime, but not one likely to meet with the approval of the Jordanian people.

Obviously the main threat to Israel on Jordanian territory will come from the Jordanian military, which has been given some very strange orders these past few months after spending decades fiercely guarding its border with Israel. King Abdullah has now quietly confirmed he no longer regards Israel as a threat, and is ordering major units of the Jordanian Army to relocate south, in order to face possible threats from the largely fictional “Al Qaeda Network”.

Though no details are to hand, it is understood that a secret meeting has already taken place between Israeli and Jordanian government officials, intended to discreetly force King Abdullah’s hand in return for a “consideration”, namely oil. He may have little choice in the matter. Jordan is an exceedingly poor country with about $6 billion in external debt, and about half a million Palestinian refugees to care for.

Until 1990 Saudi Arabia provided “grace and favor” oil to Jordan along the Aramco Tapline, but swiftly shut down the pumps in 1991 when King Hussein voiced support for President Hussein of Iraq. They were never turned back on.

After the Gulf War, Iraq started supplying Jordan with its critical oil, but what will happen post-Shekhinah when Israel has control of southern Iraq? It is understood that Israel has offered to continue Jordan’s oil supply provided it agrees not to “interfere” with Israeli operations in the north of the country. Because of recent inexplicable Jordanian military movements to the south, this information is considered reliable.

Syria will not be so easy to hold in check, because it has a history of fighting Israel at every twist and turn, and furthermore has a border in close proximity to the “hijacked” western end of the Tapline. To beef up this particular border and minimize the risk, Israel intends to extend some existing border minefields far to the east, in a bid to keep out the Syrian armor.

Beyond that, Israeli air superiority will have to suffice.

It should be noted very carefully though, that in every sense Syria is the wild card in the pack. If Israel seriously underestimates Syrian military equipment, skill and determination, that country can and will terminate not only Operation Shekhinah, but also the Jewish State. The same will apply if Israel sends too large an occupation force to southern Iraq, thereby leaving itself wide open to an attack on what it fondly regards as its “Home Land”, i.e. Palestine.

Saudi Arabia, the unwitting and unwilling host to Operation Shekhinah, is steadily being publicly and very deliberately undermined. By the time the Israeli strike aircraft hit their first targets in southern Iraq, Saudi Arabia will be so frightened of losing control of all its oilfields, no defensive action will be taken in the north of the country.

The discreet threats always use the fictional Saudi “Al Qaeda” connection as an excuse, illustrated in this instance by the Wall Street Journal, the most powerful newspaper in New York, and possibly the world.

On Friday 4 January 2002, Ralph Peters wrote:

“Since Sept. 11, the Saudis have mounted a well-funded campaign to convince Americans that they bear no blame for anything. But they’re worried. It long has been a Saudi assumption that they could buy whatever influence they needed in America, and they have, indeed, had many an influential American on their payroll, from lawyers and lobbyists to businessmen and out-of-work politicians. They joke about us as they would about prostitutes, and regard us as no better, if more enduringly useful. Their strategy worked as long as the rest of America slept. But the Saudis learned, after the attacks on New York and Washington, that the American people as a whole cannot be bought. Not even with cheap oil.

“The same voices that cautioned us to do nothing meaningful against terrorism now warn that any alternative to the current Saudi regime might be even worse. That is a coward’s argument. The Saudi cancer will continue to metastasize if we shy away from treating it, and any new government on the Arabian peninsula is likelier to be scrutinized and contained than the checkbook terrorists of the royal family. Why not give change a chance, instead of supporting the most repressive and vicious monarchy remaining on this earth?

“We must begin by confronting the Saudis and giving them the clear choice President Bush offered the rest of the world: Either you are with us in the fight against terror, or you are against us. There can be no middle ground–especially not for terrorism’s most enduring sponsors. We must work against the Saudis’ campaign of religious hatred and subversion around the world. And we must begin looking for other regional partners, from a liberated Iraq to a future Iran.

“Finally, we must be prepared to seize the Saudi oil fields and administer them for the greater good. Imagine if, instead of funding corruption and intolerance, those oil revenues built clinics, secular schools and sewage systems throughout the Middle East. Far from being indispensable to our security, the Saudis are a greater menace to it than any other state, including China.

“Terrorism is not going to disappear, no matter how successful our military, diplomatic and economic efforts. Those efforts can, however, greatly reduce the appeal of terrorism to prospective acolytes and diminish dramatically its power and reach, while denying hard-core terrorists safe havens. Our efforts are off to a superb beginning, and there is much reason for optimism, so long as the strength of will of this and future administrations does not waver. … “

End quote

Part 2

17 April 2003 – 20 October 2003

from Vialls Website

recovered through WayBackMachine website

On 21 March 2003, the British and Australian Special Air Services Regiments [SAS]

were unwittingly tasked with protecting “Israeli Assets” H2 and H3 in Iraq’s Western Desert.

Their British and Australian political masters stood these elite troops into clear and present danger,

without ever explaining the real reason for their presence.

When Part One of Operation Shekhinah (above) was first published in January 2002, it was viewed by many as a work of complete fiction.

“Where is the proof,” my mainly Jewish critics asked, “that Israel intends to illegally invade Iraq and steal its strategic oil reserves?”

At the time, I asked everyone to examine the evidence and reach their own conclusions, because I was not yet ready to divulge the fact that this critical intelligence was sourced directly from the offices of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. I had every intention of living long enough to write this sequel, an ambition that may have been thwarted by Israel if I had revealed my source at that early stage.

Those readers wishing to review part one should click on the links at the top or bottom of this page, but in summary, the March 2001 Israeli operational planning envisaged a lightning strike on southern Iraq, followed by captured oil supplies being back-flowed to Haifa via the existing Trans Arabian Pipeline [Tapline].

Possible protests by the “International Community” about the Blitzkrieg were to be stifled by the Zionist-controlled media in New York and Washington, DC, who would explain patiently that this was merely a surgical strike against the “Evil Tyrant Saddam Hussein”.

Shekhinah planning accelerated through the northern summer of 2001, with a firm invasion date set for 2 October 2001, the first day of a seven-day Jewish holiday, and thus a most unlikely time to expect an Israeli attack. Then, as if from nowhere, the Zionist-banking center in New York was razed to the ground on 11 September 2001.

At a single stroke, the World Trade Center attack removed Shekhinah’s reserve funding and its critical equipment supply from America, including a large number of F15 Strike Eagle ground attack aircraft, instantly relegating the premeditated Israeli invasion of Iraq to the back burner.

Thwarted in this first attempt to expand their territory to a “Greater Israel” stretching east to the Iranian border, the Zionists were forced to find another way of gaining control of Iraq’s oil reserves. So in early April 2002, George W. Bush was programmed to start attacking the “Evil Tyrant Saddam Hussein” and his fictional “Weapons of Mass Destruction” on television.

With the Israeli-Jewish lobby pressing all the right buttons, George Dubya completely redefined the term “megalomania’, occasionally dribbling spittle down his shirt front as he made countless speeches aimed at directing hatred towards the Iraqi President.

Without their knowledge or consent, American and other “Coalition” troops, and countless Iraqi citizens were about to be sacrificed on the high altar of Zion. As the fresh-faced youngsters took up their positions for the fight ahead, most did so believing that this was a heroic western effort to rid the world of “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, while a cynical minority nodded sagely, muttering under their breath that America really wanted to steal Iraq’s oil reserves.

As this report proves with hard evidence, both claims are completely false. On the weapons side, UN Chief Inspector Hans Blix had already made it very clear to the Security Council that, in his view, Iraq no longer possessed any long range Scud missiles, nor any viable chemical or biological weapons.

By the time American-British-Australian invasion forces had cluster-bombed their way to the Iraqi capital of Baghdad, this first reality had become became self-evident.

Though defensive chemical warfare suits and atropine antidotes were found in plenty, clearly positioned to protect Iraqi troops from an [expected] American VX nerve gas attack, there were no Iraqi “Weapons of Mass Destruction” to be found.

That leaves American domination and theft of Iraqi oil, right? No, it does not.

The American and British oil multinationals already have enough oil and gas reserves for their needs in various countries around the world, without taking on a hostile country recognized in oilfield geopolitical terms as a Russian client. Oil is a strategic military asset, and the American oil multinationals knew then, and they still know now, that taking this insane Iraqi road could easily lead to World War III.

Forget any and all television ramblings by “Texan Oilman” George Bush, who would have trouble distinguishing between an oil wellhead and a retail gas pump. Like most politicians, George has grabbed seats on the boards of a couple of minor oil companies for the cash benefits, but that is all. The problem for George, is that he has so far failed to provide a valid American motive for Operation Iraqi Freedom.

All crimes including the illegal invasion of a sovereign nation like Iraq, require opportunity, motive and method. Any policeman on the street will happily confirm this. Out of these three criteria, motive is by far the most important, for without it the crime would not be committed in the first place. A drug addict is motivated to steal by an uncontrollable need for narcotics, and a car thief is motivated to steal by the need to convert identifiable goods into anonymous cash.

The Israeli-Jewish lobby’s motive for the original Operation Shekhinah, and latterly for Operation Iraqi Freedom, was and is based on the certainty that the American economy and social structure is in steep decline. Unless the Israel-Jewish lobby could somehow find a massive independent income stream, the parasitic Jewish State would completely collapse in less than a decade.

We will examine this harsh reality later in the report.

On the first day of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the British and Australian SAS, in the company of unspecified American special forces, were deployed to the Western Desert of Iraq in order to “protect” two strategic “airfields” code-named H2 and H3, which “might” be used to fire Scud missiles at Israel.

This despite the fact that everyone from the UN Secretary General down to the most humble of weapons inspectors, knew the claim was pathetic rubbish. The last of Iraq’s scuds were destroyed many years ago.

What you were told quite clearly by the media, however, is that these highly trained specialist troops, normally reserved for strategic reconnaisance ahead of the main military force, had mysteriously been assigned to the mere “sideshow” of protecting the Jewish State.

In Australia, this startling announcement was promptly followed by visits and telephone calls from former Israeli Prime Minister Barak, and current Prime Minister Sharon, publicly heaping lavish praise on Australian Prime Minister John Howard, for protecting Israel against Scud missiles, which Israel itself already knew no longer existed. So exactly what were these two Prime Ministers thanking Australia for?

The short answer is that “airfields” H2 and H3 are actually “Haifa 2” and “Haifa 3”, critical pumping stations on the oil pipeline that originally ran all the way from Mosul in the north of Iraq to Haifa in Palestine, and pumped oil until 1948. During that year Palestine was invaded by the “Jewish State”, at which time Iraq blocked the pipeline near its western end.

But recent Israeli claims that this Mosul to Haifa pipeline is nowadays “dilapidated”, “out of action” and “runs through Syria” are intentional disinformation.

As you can see on the map above, the Mosul to Haifa pipeline runs all the way down the Western Desert of Iraq, then crosses into Jordan rather than Syria, continuing west to a point near Amman, just a few miles short of the Israeli border. Until very recently, Iraq pumped free oil along this pipeline to Jordan, as a way of saying thank you for Jordan’s support during the 1990-1991 Gulf War. “Free” oil for Israel has thus always been tantalizingly close, and is the sole reason for “Operation Iraqi Freedom”.

For unspecified reasons that are now becoming much clearer, Bush, Blair and Howard demanded that the best special forces in the western world should defend a line running from H3 in the south, to Mosul in the north. By an odd coincidence perhaps, this is the exact route of “Israel’s” Mosul to Haifa pipeline.

Proof that this initial Israeli objective of securing the pipeline as far north as Mosul had been achieved, was inadvertently provided by Jane’s Defence Weekly on 3 April 2003.

“The parading on Al Jazeera television of UK equipment in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul on 31 March provided a brief glimpse into the SAS role in toppling Saddam Hussein’s regime. Footage showed Iraqi civilians jubilantly driving a Land Rover through the streets of the city, then a quad-bike and a collection of weapons being displayed at an Iraqi military base.

“This included hand-held rocket launchers, 40mm grenades, machine guns and specialized radio equipment, suggesting this was not from an conventional British Army unit. The location of the incident, far from the main UK operating area around Kuwait and Basra, immediately led to media speculation that the highly secretive 22nd SAS Regiment was in some way involved.”

According to Russian Military Intelligence [GRU] reports, this was indeed the case. In a chilling report released on 2 April, twenty-four hours before Jane’s wrote about the Land Rover, quad-bike and other special forces equipment in Mosul, the GRU stated:

“Tactical attack units from the American 82nd Airborne Division and the 22nd SAS Regiment, earlier deployed to northern Iraq near the town of Al-Buadj, were destroyed and dispersed as the result of a daylong battle with the Iraqi troops. The exact number of [coalition] losses is still being verified.

“Intercepted radio communications show that the coalition troops are retreating in small groups and have no exact information about their own losses. Currently the remaining units are trying to reach the Kurdish-controlled territory. It is believed that up to 30 [coalition] soldiers were killed or captured by the Iraqis.”

The Mosul to Haifa pipeline is a “bonus” not originally envisioned under the original 2001 Operation Shekhinah, which called only for the capture of southern Iraq and the old Trans Arabian Pipeline, which runs east to west along the extreme northern edge of Saudi Arabia [see above map].

The original 2001 Operation Shekhinah was a “can do” solo Israeli objective, bearing in mind the sheer distance over flat desert separating Baghdad from Basrah, and Israel’s overwhelming air superiority. If the Iraqi Republican Guard moved south over the desert in an attempt to intervene, they would be swiftly decimated by state-of-the-art Israeli aircraft, all provided free of charge by generous American taxpayers.

With the rich Mosul to Haifa pipeline now added to the war booty, predicted profits have already gone through the roof, with Israeli traders excitedly muttering to each other about “New Rotterdam” becoming the jewel in the Israeli-Jewish crown. At a more subtle level, the hijacked oil supplies are intended to help fund the planned expansion of the Jewish State, east to the Iranian border.

Nowadays, visible Israeli-Jewish greed for free Iraqi oil borders on the obscene. Less than a week ago while body bags containing dead Americans and Britons were still piling up in Kuwait refrigerated storage [believe me, you really don’t want to know how many], Israeli-Jews were already starting to gloat publicly about their future oil wealth.

A leading Tel Aviv newspaper explained:

“Israel’s National Infrastructures Minister Yoseph Paritzky is already meeting with Jordanian officials about the [Mosul-Haifa] pipeline, on the assumption that a pro-Western government will be set up following the US-led war.

“Minister Paritzky reportedly believes that restarting the pipeline could reduce Israel’s fuel costs by 25 percent and turn Haifa into “the Rotterdam of the Middle East” – a major oil export terminal. UPI quotes international relations researcher Dr. Hooman Peimani of Geneva as saying that the venture will reduce Israel’s dependence on Russian crude and the cost of its energy imports.”

What the newspaper failed to report, was that on the very same day Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called American Secretary of State Colin Powell, instructing him to start pumping oil as quickly as possible.

Evidently, indicted war criminal Ariel Sharon wished to make it crystal clear exactly who was really in control of American foreign policy, and in charge of US military assets.

Before examining exactly how the “New Rotterdam” expects to operate, we should first answer the obvious question of “Why bother with Operation Shekhinah at all?”

It is an open secret that when the powerful Israeli-Jewish lobby snaps its fingers in New York, American taxpayer cash and defense equipment is immediately provided by the shipload. Which of course brings us right back to the failing American economy and social structures mentioned earlier in this report.

Since early 2000, it has been obvious to most informed analysts that America’s economy and employment have been in ever-decreasing decline, made worse by several nations switching their oil trading from US Dollars to Euros. If the situation worsens, perhaps triggered by OPEC switching all oil trade to Euros, with China and Japan panicked into converting their own massive holdings to Euros, the United States Dollar will crash completely, driving America into a depression of hitherto unimaginable severity.

The Jewish State is a true parasite, wholly dependent on massive American funding in order to survive. Remove that funding either intentionally or accidentally, and the Jewish State would be overrun and destroyed in a matter of months. Though the entire Middle East now hates America with a passion, it reserves its deepest loathing for the Jewish invaders, who, every single day without end, bring more death and destruction to the helpless women and children of Palestine.

So what is a poor parasite to do, when its host appears to be running out of the fiscal nourishment it depends on for its very survival? Most normal parasites would seek out a new host, but this is an impossible task for the Jewish State. There is simply no other country on earth capable of generating sufficient revenue to cope with the greed and corruption in Tel Aviv.

The only answer of course was Operation Shekhinah “mark two”, renamed Operation Iraqi Freedom and designed to provide the Jewish State with massive income streams from stolen Iraqi oil. The prime objectives were to decapitate [murder] President Saddam Hussein, decimate the Iraqi military structure, and destabilize the country completely.

After that, a carefully selected “Military Governor” would be installed, followed by a carefully selected “Interim Administrator”, both of whom could be relied on to look after Israel’s best interests, rather than those of America. The Israeli-Jewish lobby in New York vetted a few possible candidates, then made their final choices.

The new “Military Governor” of Iraq will be retired American Lieutenant General Jay Garner, a very close and ardent supporter of Israel. In fact, Garner is a member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), a cabal of Jewish American military officers who have long advocated putting Israel’s security needs before those of the United States.

From Israel’s viewpoint, Garner is their perfect point man in Iraq, guaranteed to solve any little “problems” that might be encountered while setting up the two massive oil pipelines running from Iraq to Haifa.

Following in Jay Garner’s footsteps will be new “Interim Administrator” Ahmad Chalabi, who was convicted in Jordan in 1992 of 31 charges of embezzlement and misuse of funds while running the Petra Bank, a known Mossad front. Chalabi was sentenced to 22 years imprisonment, but somehow managed to “escape” from police custody in Amman before he could be transported to prison.

With a Mossad man in place and ready to select the final “democratic” Government of Iraq, Israel predictably feels very confident that any and all other little problems with oil supplies for New Rotterdam can be swiftly resolved, either with a few shekels or with a bullet.

Iraq was [apparently] already conquered by coalition forces and [apparently] under western control, so the impatient Israeli-Jewish lobby immediately pointed George W. Bush and Co. at Syria, which, as I noted back in January 2002, is the wild card in the Shekhinah pack, because of its close proximity to the massive oil pipelines running along its southern border, from Iraq to the New Rotterdam at Haifa:

“It should be noted very carefully though, that in every sense Syria is the wild card in the pack. If Israel seriously underestimates Syrian military equipment, skill and determination, that country can and will terminate not only Operation Shekhinah, but also the Jewish State. The same will apply if Israel sends too large an occupation force to southern Iraq, thereby leaving itself wide open to an attack on what it fondly regards as its ‘Home Land’, i.e. Palestine.”

Obviously I wrote this paragraph many months before the Israeli-Jewish lobby managed to suborn the entire US Military for a massive attack across the length and breadth of Iraq. This changed things considerably in the planning phase, with Israel now intent on using American firepower to eliminate the Syrian risk completely

After the Bush-Rumsfeld-Powell choir launched the catchy new “Syria is Harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction” jingle on 14 April, Powell gave a speech to the Israeli-Jewish lobby AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee], confirming that the US will not stop with Iraq:

“Syria can continue direct support for terrorist groups and the dying regime of Saddam Hussein, or it can embark on a different and more hopeful course. Either way, Syria bears the responsibility for its choices — and for the consequences.” [Wild applause and hooting from the audience, largely composed of powerful and well-connected establishment Jews.]

The word “consequences” has only one meaning in the megalomaniac worlds of the US State Department and the Israeli-Jewish lobby.

Syria must immediately agree to replace President Bashar al-Assad with Ahmad Chalabi’s younger brother, or be bombed back into the Stone Age.

Theoretically then, only a few thousand more American cluster bombs on Damascus lie between Israel and its staggering quantities of black gold flowing through New Rotterdam, made possible solely by Coalition firepower and Coalition lives.

Israeli-Jews will be able to strut their stuff on the streets of Tel Aviv, as tons of freshly minted Shekels cascade all over the entire city.

To hell with America!

In reality, things are set to be a whole lot more difficult than that. The academic Israeli-Jewish lobby planners in New York were living in a dream world where nothing could go wrong, and who in turn were advised by resplendent retired generals in business suits. The closest any of these jokers ever got to real combat, was driving a Jeep around the Pentagon car park on Halloween.

As Jay Garner and Ahmad Chalabi hide nervously behind bodyguards in southern Iraq, they know that things are not what they were planned to be.

Peter Arnett and Robert Fisk have already confirmed that Saddam Hussein was not decapitated in the bunker-buster attack, meaning that he, his two sons and the Iraqi Command Council are still out there somewhere.

Military counts have confirmed that very few Republican Guardsmen were killed in the coalition attacks, in turn meaning that somewhere in Iraq there are 300,000 trained soldiers with at least one rifle each. All are now in civilian clothes, and all hate America and Israel with a passion bordering on fanaticism. Very likely arranged in small cells of four to six men, these soldiers will probably wait until sheer cost forces America to remove much of its heavy armor from the country.

After that, Iraq will probably resemble Northern Ireland at the height of IRA power, but on a much larger scale. If you can imagine a Northern Ireland nearly twice the size of Vietnam, containing 299,900 more trained shooters than the IRA, you will probably be close to the reality of Iraq after most of the coalition invaders withdraw to the south.

Then there is the small problem of sorting out the vast oilfields and pumping crude to Israel, the main objective of “Operation Iraqi Freedom”. Speaking as a former oilfield troubleshooter, I can assure you this will be an impossible task if the Iraqis wish to block it. There are a thousand ways to sabotage the operation, not the least of which is picking off the workers with sniper rifles. Sooner or later, no one will want to go to work at all.

Externally, Russia might be a problem, though Vladimir Putin has assured the world that the nine Russian warships and three nuclear submarines currently on their way to the northern Indian Ocean, “will only be engaging in exercises with the Indian Navy”. Thank heavens for that, because the Russian fleet is packing enough nuclear punch to completely wipe out Saudi Arabia, or the eastern seaboard of America!

History has taught us however, that the poker-faced “Black-Belt Vlad” [only to personal friends at his Dojo], can sometimes be rather economical with the truth, making it essential to listen to retired admirals in Moscow if you want to get the whole picture.

Two weeks ago, one of these admirals commented,

“It is interesting that a very large amphibious assault ship with commandos and tanks on board, has been included in the fleet.”

When he was predictably asked what sort of target the assault ship might be used against, the Admiral replied,

“Oh, for attacking and capturing a small port, perhaps the size of Umm Qasr or Basrah.”

During 1933, famous author H. G. Wells wrote a book called The Shape of Things to Come, in which he accurately forecast that World War II would start, “out of a conflict between Germany and Poland circa 1939”.

In the same book, Wells also wrote that World War III was to commence, “from some future [unidentified] event in Basrah, Iraq.”

Update, 19 April 2003
Israel Officially Approaches Turkish Labor For Help Stealing Iraqi Oil

At 16:36 local time on 17 April in Istanbul, Turkey, less than 24 hours after this Operation Shekhinah report was first linked on the Internet, it was reported that Israel has already approached Turkish contracting firms to re-activate the Mosul to Haifa Pipeline.

This report from

“Israel has made an offer to Turkish contacting firms to reactivate the Mosul-Haifa pipeline, which has been closed for the last 55 years. Not only the Israeli government but also Israeli firms have reportedly approached Turkish companies for an oil pipeline that would provide transportation of 5 million barrels of oil from northern Iraq to the Israeli port of Haifa.

“Turkish Contractors Union Chairman Nihat Ozdemir confirmed the offers from Israel and noted that a considerable part of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline construction had been carried out by Turkish firms. Pointing out that Turkish construction firms had important experience in the subject of international oil transportation, Ozdemir said that it was ‘normal’ that Turkish firms had been chosen to rebuild the pipeline.”

For those readers puzzled by what at first appears to be a ‘one-time-only’ transportation of 5 million barrels of oil, is it pointed out that oil pipeline contracts are quoted in barrels per day [bbpd] continuous flow. This means that the Israeli-Jews have indirectly advised us though Turkey, that they are already planning to steal 1,825 million barrels of Iraqi oil per annum.

Taking a nominal price of US$25.00 per barrel FOB “New Rotterdam” [after the deduction of engineering expenses and bribes], the Israeli-Jewish terrorists stand to make a cool US$ 45,625,000,000.00 each year over the bodies of thousands of dead Iraqi, American and British soldiers, deliberately sacrificed in the deserts and cities of Iraq for the “Greater Good of Israel”.

The fact that the Israeli-Jews will probably not be allowed to get away with it, does nothing to diminish their despicable cold-blooded planning and intent.

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul is now aware of Israeli intent, and is stated to be “very angry”, which may the diplomatic understatement of the year. Since sanctions were imposed in Iraq after Gulf War I, Turkey has lost at least US$6 billion in oil transit and handling fees, which has left Turkey all but destitute. Thus Gul is unlikely to stand by and watch this essential income stream destroyed forever by Tel Aviv.

Local media reports suggest that Turkey currently has around 60,000 troops with a very large quantity of armor on the northern Iraqi border, which lies within easy striking range of Mosul. The next few weeks and months might turn out to be very interesting.

The prestigious “Jane’s Intelligence” organization in Britain has shown a passing interest in this Israeli thirst for Iraqi oil, and has posted a cautious analysis, which can be read by clicking here.

Update, 22 April 2003
Bush Demands Iraqi Airfields to Protect “Israeli” Oil

US Marine tear down statue of Saddam Hussein in Paradise Square, Baghdad, at 1130 hrs on 9 April 2003.

Four hours after this American public relations spectacular,

the real Saddam Hussein appears less than six miles north of Paradise Square,

mobbed by armed supporters!

US Marine tear down statue of Saddam Hussein in Paradise Square, Baghdad, at 1130 hrs on 9 April 2003. Four hours after this American public relations spectacular, the real Saddam Hussein appears less than six miles north of Paradise Square, mobbed by armed supporters!

In a move once that once again reinforces the accuracy of the original Operation Shekhinah intelligence, George Dubya Bush has demanded four “key” airfields for an ongoing “strategic alliance with the new Government of Iraq.” To say this is premature would be seriously understating the case. As of yesterday, American forces had actual physical control of less than three-percent of sovereign Iraq.

For those who remember Vietnam, the pattern will seem disturbingly familiar:

America has now installed several small but heavily defended “Fire Bases” across Iraq [including Paradise Square, Baghdad], and is using media trickery to try to convince the public that these tiny fire bases represent the complete conquest of Iraq.

The public certainly believed this pathetic media rubbish about Vietnam, right up to the point where Americans were finally and desperately evacuated from the roof of the US Embassy in downtown Saigon.

Back then, the Vietcong and North Vietnamese Army controlled roughly 97% of South Vietnam, i.e. all of the country except the tiny American fire bases, plus three heavily defended airfields and a few brothels in Saigon. One way and another, this led to 50,000 Americans being repatriated to the United States in body bags.

Today, the Iraqi Republican Guard and Home Guard Units control roughly 97% of greater Iraq, and the serious killing will probably commence when temperatures exceed 50°C, just a few weeks from now.

The actual positions of Dubya’s four new “key” bases shown on the map above are critical.

The New York Times reports,

“One will be at the international airport just outside Baghdad, according to Bush administration officials, while the others will be at Tallil, near An Nasiriyah in the south; at an isolated airstrip called H-1 in the western desert, along an old oil pipeline that runs to Jordan; and at the Bashur air field in the Kurdish north”


H1 [Pumping Station Haifa 1] has at last been mentioned officially, obliging the Israeli-Jews to upgrade last month’s very deceptive,

“old Haifa-Mosul pipeline that once used to run through Syria” to the somewhat more accurate “old [operational] oil pipeline that runs to Jordan”.

Even a cursory glance at the large maps above shows how strategic these bases are, specifically in terms of protecting the massive Israeli-Jewish theft of Iraqi oil to Haifa, the “New Rotterdam”. The H1 you were never told about before, is located just south of the pipeline manifold where American forces recently cut the flow of oil from Iraq to Syria.

This airfield will be used to effectively “control” Eastern Syria. Bashur in the north will be used to crush any Kurdish dissent, while Tallil will guard the old Tapline from Saudi Arabia. Well, theoretically at least. Before using H1, the Americans will have to do a lot of hard work laying and extending the runways.

At present, the rough airstrip at H1 is suitable only for light aircraft servicing the pipeline pumping station. ,

“There will be some kind of a long-term defense relationship with a new Iraq, similar to Afghanistan,” said one senior American administration official.

Yeah, right!

Nowadays Afghan puppet president Hamid Karzai, who was installed by New York to protect the CIA’s heroin trade from Afghanistan through to the Golden Triangle, is completely surrounded by angry Afghan warlords, who kill American soldiers whenever and wherever they want to. A true though disturbing sign of things to come in the new Israeli-Jewish ‘Democratic’ Iraq.

On a lighter note, it seems that US Central Command in Qatar lied to us yesterday, which I feel sure will come as an enormous surprise to everyone!

Apparently in an attempt to deflect attention away from the very real Mosul to Haifa pipeline that the SAS has been inadvertently protecting for Israel, the PR folk hastily rushed out some really pretty pictures which, they claimed, showed the SAS “guarding captured Iraqi aircraft at a secret airfield west of Baghdad”.

What these [unidentifiable] hooded men are guarding is a very rare Russian aircraft known as the Mig 25-PU.

Known generically to the world as the Mig 25 “Foxbat”, this version is a two-seat interceptor trainer produced in numbers so small that every aviation buff in the world knows where they all are. Iraq had never bought any Mig 25-PUs, has not borrowed or been given any Mig 25-PUs, so this official picture from US Central Command cannot have been shot in Iraq. It really is that simple…

The headgear worn by these heroes is mildly interesting, because it is very similar if not identical to that worn by Russian special forces, normally but not always in Russia. The colors on the aircraft indicate that is most likely one belonging to Tajikistan, where certain units of the SAS [hush my mouth…] went on exercise a year or two ago. Remember Exercise “Enduring Freedom”?

Someone really should have a quiet word with US Central Command. If you know their telephone number, call and tell them that if they really want to fool the western public, their PR folk really should use a picture of an aircraft that most people will actually believe is [or can be] in Iraq.

Try to stick to the ubiquitous Mig 21.

Almost everyone in the Middle East has a few of these, including Saddam…

Update, 06 May 2003
The London Observer “Outs” Israeli Plans to Steal Iraqi Oil

“Plans to build a pipeline to siphon oil from newly conquered Iraq to Israel are being discussed between Washington, Tel Aviv and potential future government figures in Baghdad. The plan envisages the reconstruction of an old pipeline, inactive since the end of the British mandate in Palestine in 1948, when the flow from Iraq’s northern oilfields to Palestine was re-directed to Syria.

“Now, its resurrection would transform economic power in the region, bringing revenue to the new US-dominated Iraq, cutting out Syria and solving Israel’s energy crisis at a stroke. It would also create an end less and easily accessible source of cheap Iraqi oil for the US guaranteed by reliable allies other than Saudi Arabia – a keystone of US foreign policy for decades and especially since 11 September 2001.

“Until 1948, the pipeline ran from the Kurdish-controlled city of Mosul to the Israeli port of Haifa, on its northern Mediterranean coast. The revival of the pipeline was first discussed openly by the Israeli Minister for National Infrastructures, Joseph Paritzky, according to the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz .

“The paper quotes Paritzky as saying that the pipeline would cut Israel’s energy bill drastically – probably by more than 25 per cent – since the country is currently largely dependent on expensive imports from Russia. US intelligence sources confirmed to The Observer that the project has been discussed. One former senior CIA official said: ‘It has long been a dream of a powerful section of the people now driving this administration [of President George W. Bush] and the war in Iraq to safeguard Israel’s energy supply as well as that of the United States.

‘The Haifa pipeline was something that existed, was resurrected as a dream and is now a viable project – albeit with a lot of building to do.’ The editor-in-chief of the Middle East Economic Review , Walid Khadduri, says in the current issue of Jane’s Foreign Report that ‘there’s not a metre of it left, at least in Arab territory’.

“To resurrect the pipeline would need the backing of whatever government the US is to put in place in Iraq, and has been discussed – according to Western diplomatic sources – with the US-sponsored Iraqi National Congress and its leader Ahmed Chalabi, the former banker favoured by the Pentagon for a powerful role in the war’s aftermath.

“Sources at the State Department said that concluding a peace treaty with Israel is to be ‘top of the agenda’ for a new Iraqi government, and Chalabi is known to have discussed Iraq’s recognition of the state of Israel. The pipeline would also require permission from Jordan. Paritzky’s Ministry is believed to have approached officials in Amman on 9 April this year. Sources told Ha’aretz that the talks left Israel ‘optimistic’.

“James Akins, a former US ambassador to the region and one of America’s leading Arabists, said: ‘There would be a fee for transit rights through Jordan, just as there would be fees for Israel from those using what would be the Haifa terminal. ‘After all, this is a new world order now. This is what things look like particularly if we wipe out Syria. It just goes to show that it is all about oil, for the United States and its ally.’

“Akins was ambassador to Saudi Arabia before he was fired after a series of conflicts with then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, father of the vision to pipe oil west from Iraq. In 1975, Kissinger signed what forms the basis for the Haifa project: a Memorandum of Understanding whereby the US would guarantee Israel’s oil reserves and energy supply in times of crisis.

“Kissinger was also master of the American plan in the mid-Eighties – when Saddam Hussein was a key US ally – to run an oil pipeline from Iraq to Aqaba in Jordan, opposite the Israeli port of Eilat. The plan was promoted by the now Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and the pipeline was to be built by the Bechtel company, which the Bush administration last week awarded a multi-billion dollar contract for the reconstruction of Iraq.

“The memorandum has been quietly renewed every five years, with special legislation attached whereby the US stocks a strategic oil reserve for Israel even if it entailed domestic shortages – at a cost of $3 billion (£1.9bn) in 2002 to US taxpayers. This bill would be slashed by a new pipeline, which would have the added advantage of giving the US reliable access to Gulf oil other than from Saudi Arabia.”

For the Observer newspaper click Here.

Though this Observer report is a reasonable summary of current events in Iraq, and the advanced state of planning for Operation Shekhinah, it has been somewhat misled by the apparent absence of the Haifa Pipeline in Jane’s Foreign Report, which apparently states, ‘there’s not a meter of it left, at least in Arab territory’.

When it comes to pipelines of critical strategic value to Israel, map makers and newspaper editors alike seem to to develop a rare form of collective myopia. The Haifa pipeline still runs through Iraq and Jordan, is clearly visible from any airliner, and remains fully operational with pumping stations in place and well maintained.

So what about Israel’s second route for stealing Iraqi crude oil, the old “Tapline” running across the extreme northern edge of Saudi Arabia? What chance that another branch of the myopic media might try to tell you ‘there’s not a meter of it left, at least in Arab territory’?

Rest assured that if they do, they will be lying. The Trans Arabian Pipeline, just like the Haifa Pipeline, is currently not pumping, but it is full of oil, with pumping stations properly maintained. There is a slight glitch, however.

According to reliable inside sources, the western oil multinationals have refused to connect the pipelines or transfer Iraqi oil, because there is no proper “sovereign title” to the product, and they are not prepared to start World War III with Russia over the matter.

Update 20 October 2003
First Tacit American Admission of Defeat in Iraq

In the months following America’s illegal invasion of Iraq, it has become increasingly obvious that the northern pipeline from Mosul, planned to be reconnected to an export terminal in Haifa, is an impossible Zionist dream.

Whenever American troops approach the northern half of this particular pipeline [see map at top of page], they are shot at and often killed by Saddam Hussein’s Sunni counter-insurgency teams. Whenever American troops approach the southern half of the same pipeline, they are shot at and often killed by Muqtada Al-Sadr’s Shiite counter-insurgency teams.

While these attacks are actually taking place, additional Sunni and Shiite counter-insurgency teams repeatedly blow up large sections of the main and branch oil pipelines, making the movement of crude oil and refined product impossible. Thousands of kilometers of oil pipeline are exposed above ground level, which, as I accurately forecast before the invasion started, cannot be defended by American troops.

All oil pipelines are pressurized, meaning that any Iraqi with a simple RPG [Rocket Propelled Grenade] can shut down any part of any pipeline whenever he wants, with a single shot. The last time I bothered to check, Iraq still had more than 600,000 RPG rounds available, meaning that American troops can go on getting killed and maimed for the next ten years, without any significant oil flow from Iraq to Israel, or from Iraq to America.

Two weeks ago, in what may be the first tacit admission of defeat in northern and central Iraq, America ordered its principal puppet in Baghdad, Ahmed Chalabi, to approach Saudi Arabia with a plan to pump Iraqi crude south-west through pipeline IPSA-1, for “onward transmission to the Red Sea.”

In fact, IPSA-1 was Israel’s original choice for Operation Shekhinah in March 2001, when the plan was for IPSC-2 and IPSC-1 to intersect the Trans Arabian Pipeline [Tapline], for the onward transmission of stolen Iraqi oil to the port of Haifa in Israel.

Understandably perhaps, the “Red Sea” was not mentioned anywhere in the Shekhinah planning documents.

Though Chalabi’s approach came far too late in the day, it was without doubt the only plan that had even a remote chance of success, which is why the Israelis selected it months before their backers in Lower Manhattan were suddenly razed to the ground on 11 September 2001.

As a quick glance at the maps on this page show very well, IPSC-2 and IPSC-1 start in the huge southern Rumaila Field, then closely hug the Kuwaiti border before crossing the Neutral Zone into Saudi Arabia. When American forces are finally compelled to leave northern and central Iraq and retreat to the south, it is not difficult to see the logic of America’s latest desperate tactical plan.

Though 150,000 American troops have absolutely no chance of defeating and holding greater Iraq, there is no reason to believe they could not hold defensive positions in the relatively small portion of Iraq to the south of an east-west line drawn across the top of the Rumaila Field at Basra. Theoretically, this would then give America absolute control of the massive Rumaila Field, of the oil export terminals near Basra, and finally control of land pipelines running south-west, which are well out of reach of Iraqi Sunni & Shiite counter-insurgency teams.

Unfortunately for America, the Saudi Government knows only too well who pulls George Bush’s puppet strings, and it also knows about Operation Shekhinah.

Al Jazeera reported on 20 October 2003 [link below] that Chalabi’s approach was smoothly rebuffed by the Saudis, with an anonymous Aramco official saying the Iraqis,

“don’t know what they are talking about. The pipeline is not in a stage to be utilized.”

The Saudis know as well as I do that there is nothing wrong with either IPSC-1 or IPSC-2, both of which remain full of oil [to exclude oxygen and avoid corrosion], and could be put back into operation in less than three months, as could the Tapline across to Jordan and then on to Israel. Unfortunately for Chalabi and his bunch of cutthroats in Baghdad, the Saudis kicked the Americans out of the Kingdom only last year, and very sensibly refuse to let them back in.

Shipping substantial quantities of crude oil out of Iraq via the Persian Gulf remains unthinkable, with significant dangers on the al Faw peninsula, and also from Iran just a few kilometers away.

With the northern and western pipelines to Turkey and Israel now in tatters, IPSC-1 is the sole remaining route along which Israel and America can steal Iraqi crude oil, but they have left it too late.

More Information

Al Jazeera Report 20 October 2003

Large scale planning map of Iraq, including existing pipelines

Maps etc…

Iraq Oil to be Shipped to Israel
Apr 15, 2008 … U.S. checking possibility of pumping oil from northern Iraq to Haifa, via Jordan … into the possibility of laying a new pipeline via Jordan and Israel. … So this is one of the main reasons American troops are dying in action….

It is all about Israel’s need for oil
The US had gotten Israel’s ally, Turkey, to agree to send 10000 troops into northern Iraq which will be east of the syrian oil fields. …. Syria is between 350 and 400 miles as the crow flies not as the pipe lays as you can see from the mountains….

History, facts and truth are all Divine products, and must prevail.
– Charles A. Briggs

My research and analysis of 9-11 is very different from what you will find anywhere in the controlled mainstream media or alternative press. My 9-11 material will not be discussed in any of the 9-11 conferences or media coverage in the coming week not because it is incorrect or biased in any way. The only reason my 9-11 writings are not discussed in the media is because they get much too close to the truth, which is something nobody in the media wants to go anywhere near.

The American people are woefully deceived about what really happened on 9-11 and have become enslaved to lies, which is why U.S. troops are killing and being killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. The population of the United States is burdened by deception primarily because most Americans blindly trust in the cherished notion that they have a “free press”. Trusting what they hear on television, Americans are terribly misinformed by the deception of the controlled media and press.

The American troops in Afghanistan are not waging war to protect the United States or to defend any American ideal. They are killing and dying in an evil war of conquest in a place few Americans had ever been prior to October 2001. Very few Americans understand why U.S. men and women are fighting in Afghanistan. It has nothing to do with 9-11 and everything to do with constructing a gas pipeline to carry Israeli-owned gas to India and China.

An American soldier in Afghanistan fighting for the Zionist agenda and its state founded on terrorism.

The controlled media is lying through its teeth to the American people just like the C.I.A., the F.B.I., and the so-called “elected” members of Congress and the U.S. government. Any person or agency who is party to deceiving the American people is clearly not on their side. These liars are the domestic enemies of the American republic. To deceive the people into sending their sons, husbands, fathers, and daughters to fight wars of aggression is criminal and treasonous.

My mission is to simply expose the deception in order to give the American people the information they need to protect themselves and their families. I need your help to do that. Please, contribute to Thank you.

“The fact that you are giving your book [Solving 9-11] away for free, which I’m sure you worked very hard at, is even all the more impressive. May your work enlighten everyone.”
– R.W., professional flight instructor, USA

I saw your article on 9-11 in the Tehran Times yesterday and I was very impressed with your research. I had read about the Israel connection some time ago but after reading your article it put everything into perspective… [Noam] Chomsky and others have been writing about Israel for many years, but they are unwilling to really get to the heart of their activities like you have.
– Dr. C.J., Grand Junction, Colorado

“You are providing a unique and needed perspective on current events.”
– V.G. in Massachusetts

The European press is much more honest than the Zionist-controlled press in the United States about Israel and its egregious act of piracy on May 31, 2010. Such critical perspectives and information about Israeli state terrorism are not found in the U.S. media.

Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit.
– Socrates (469-399 B.C.) in Plato’s Politiea (Republic)

My research and writings are available on this website thanks to the contributions of concerned citizens who donate to my work. Thousands of people visit my website, read, copy and repost my material. My recent article “How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11” , for example, is currently found on thousands of websites — but very few readers contribute.

The information and original articles found on my website are the result of years of research. You won’t find such accurate and detailed information (and analysis) anywhere else, least of all in the controlled press of the United States. A recent editorial by veteran American journalist Alex Beam (Newsweek and Boston Globe) explains that the controlled press in the U.S. has a long history of publishing stories that are nothing but lies:

The Oil Racket and Greater Israel
By Eduardo S. B.
March 8, 2003

“The Jews might have had Uganda, Madagascar and other places for the establishment of a Jewish Fatherland, but they want absolutely nothing except Palestine: not because the Dead Sea water by evaporation can produce five trillion dollars worth of metaloids and powdered metal; not because the sub-soil of Palestine contains twenty times more petroleum than all the combined reserves of the two Americas {this was first thought to be a lie, but it actually referred to Greater Israel}; but because Palestine is the crossroads of Europe, Asia and Africa, because Palestine constitutes the veritable center of world political power, the strategic center for world control.”
– Dr. Nahum Goldman, former President of the World Jewish Congress

The American raison d’être for war against Iraq is being publicized as a battle against terrorists and against nations that are affiliated with terrorist acts. The real reason has very little to do with terrorism or any other “threats” against the United States. We will understand that the truth behind this war campaign has everything to do with the ideal for a greater Israel and its growing manipulation of oil interests. As we draw closer to war, the State propaganda has become very intense. Nevertheless, officials are having great difficulty finding evidence against Saddam Hussein.

“In their search for hidden Iraqi arms, U.N. inspectors have so far faced little conflict, have found little evidence and have received little outside intelligence to guide them, said one inspector. ‘We haven’t found an iota of concealed material yet,’ the inspector said on condition of anonymity,” – Los Angeles Times – December 31, 2002

We will soon learn that Israel has more at stake against Iraq than any other nation. Certainly, their vast intelligence (i.e. Mossad) would provide any evidence, no matter how small, for convincing America that it should go to war with Iraq. Hence, the lack of “outside intelligence” is simply because there is no evidence. From the same article, we learn that United Nation inspectors have meticulously inspected the Iraqi government.

“But the inspectors’ roster of frustrations is long. There are 110 U.N. weapons experts in Iraq, 100 searching for chemical and biological weapons and 10 looking for evidence of a nuclear program. Their mission is nearly impossible – trying to find suspected caches of material or documents in a country about the size of California.” (However, the number of UN agents could have been increased dramatically. Even with this number in a country of this size, any sophisticated program of weapon development could be easily located.)

“Their work is relentless – sometimes the different teams conduct seven inspections a day, which means early wake-up calls, long drives and intense searches. Monday was that kind of day as inspectors made seven visits, including one to a water-purification plant and one to a missile factory.”

“To keep their plans secret from wiretaps, moles or eavesdropping devices, inspectors operate like spies, passing notes about the day’s plans rather than speaking aloud, and driving their U.N. jeeps in circles to confound those trying to determine their destination.”

With no real evidence, the Jewish media rely on ad hominems for convincing the American public that Saddam Hussein must somehow have weapons of mass destruction. Every UN report has provided virtually no evidence against Iraq of the existence of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. Why would the United States government ignore other rogue nations posing a far more urgent threat arising from illegal weapons of mass destruction? Why is the US ignoring the dangerous nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan and concentrating on Iraq? Why has the US chosen “diplomacy” with a recalcitrant nation of North Korea instead of Iraq? The answer has everything to do with the United States’ foreign policy and its present economy. There is no question the US foreign policy is being dictated by Israel. One has to wonder why American policy is identical to Israel’s. Israel’s Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon has stated publicly that after the US government goes to war with Iraq, he wants the State Department to attack Iran. Curiously, no response has been provided from the Bush’s Administration concerning Sharon’s statement. Writer, Chris Conole in his article – “Superpower Junkie”[1] gives us another impelling reason to our current economic woes by declaring our present monetary system is about to collapse, as any pyramid scheme eventually does. He articulates that wars will bring willing dupes into the scheme and draw existing “members” deeper into debt. These two components are essential for any pyramid scheme to survive. Oxford University, Professor David Harvey,[2] a distinguished geographer, echoes what Conole has already revealed in that the US government’s policy for war relates to the US economy and its affliction with the pyramid-debt related occurrence of an over-accumulation of capital. Indeed, this problem has been developing since the early 1970s. The Federal Reserve has tried every available means of solving it and sustaining the United States’ global dominance. As has been in the past, the only remaining, politically viable option is war.

Israel and its American-Jewish lobby’s extraordinary influence over the political spectrum of the United States has dictated the governmental spending of millions of dollars toward demonizing Saddam Hussein. It is now true that the majority of Americans know Hussein as the “Butcher of Baghdad.” Repeatedly, we are told this evil dictator “gassed his own Kurdish people;” at Halabja, Iraq. Contrary to this claim however, is the published US Army War College report of February 1990. The study entitled – “Iraqi Power & US Security in the Middle East” provided clear evidence the Kurds of Halabja died as a direct consequence of an Iranian Phosgene gas attack. Another extraordinary propaganda lie perpetrated was that the retreating Iraqis set blaze to the Kuwaiti oil fields.[3] We now learn from ex-American veterans that it was American forces that set fire to these oil wells. We further learn that the nation of Kuwait was “slant-drilling” for oil in Iraqi territory, stealing Iraqi oil. The American Ambassador, April Glaspie met with Saddam Hussein at this time and expressed an interest in improving relations with the United States. He was told that the U.S. did not care what happened in the Gulf or what happened to Kuwait. Certainly, the Israel-first crowd and the Jewish media don’t want you to know about this. Instead, the American State Department greatly magnifies any “violation” of United Nation sanctions against Iraq. However, little is reported of Israel as being, by far the greatest world violator of some 68 UN resolutions.[4] Iraq does not come close in comparison to the number of UN violations by Israel.

As we watch the war drama unfold, we are presented with an orchestrated script from the Jewish controlled Western newsrooms. On one side, pundits claim there’s enough “evidence” already for justifying a war against Iraq. On the other side, pundits are appealing that we need to wait to assure that Saddam Hussein “comes clean.” The framed argument is that both sides are actually for war, but it’s a question on when to act. However, behind the scenes of this mass propaganda, there is a very different story taking shape.

“I devote my life to the rebirth of the Jewish State, with a Jewish majority, on both sides of the Jordan.”
– In 1934, Ze’ev Jabotinsky introduced for his youth movement followers the Betar Oath. – “Israeli: A History,” by Martin Gilbert, p. 76.

It is a story that we should be all too familiar with. As Jesus recognized and eloquently publicized: “Whereby their fruits we shall know them.” And it is by Canaan’s dictate to his sons (the Jews) that we should be well informed of his Will that commanded – “Five things did Canaan charge his sons: ‘Love each other (i.e. of this tribe only), love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters and never tell the truth.’ ” — Pesachis F. 113b. The ensuing facts will reveal how Zionist Israel covets the furthest edges of the trans-Jordan for its vast oil deposits. This may sound unusual to the novice at first. Certainly, why should anyone believe this little country; the home of the persecuted and “holocaust” Jews desire land that isn’t rightfully theirs? After all, they want to be left in peace without being victimized by “hateful” Muslims, right? If we look back into history and at about the time the nation of Israel was created, we will begin to understand and recognize that Israel is the proverbial wolf dressed in sheep’s clothing. We will find that the Zionist plan for Eretz Israel, or a greater Israel, was already envisioned and planned.

“Before the founding of the state, on the eve of its creation, our main interests was self-defense. To a large extent, the creation of the state was an act of self-defense. . . . Many think that we’re still at the same stage. But now the issue at hand is conquest, not self-defense. As for setting the borders— it’s an open-ended matter. In the Bible as well as in our history, there all kinds of definitions of the country’s borders, so there’s no real limit. No border is absolute. If it’s a desert— it could just as well be the other side. If it’s sea, it could also be across the sea. The world has always been this way. Only the terms have changed. If they should find a way of reaching other stars, well then, perhaps the whole earth will no longer suffice.” – David Ben-Gurion (born David Grun) in 1949 stated during one of the discussions with his aides. – “The First Israelis,” By Tom Segev, p.6.

Israel is a country with limited natural resources, and has insufficient strategic oil reserves as well. Indeed, it is a nation highly dependent on foreign aid, especially for financial and military assistance from the United States. From its conception, in 1948, Israel has always been a troubled and controversial nation politically and economically.

Zionists were not satisfied with the land they were dealt from the very beginning. They looked at it as a temporary settlement and that they would not quit until Eretz Israel was achieved. The Jewish state was born out of deceit and illegitimacy.[5],[6] After the Zionists signed the 1947 armistice agreement with its four neighboring nations, Israel immediately violated the 1947 United Nations GA partition plan. It expanded its borders 38 percent more than the area allotted to the “Jewish state.” Simha Falpan reports that 60 percent of the Israeli soldiers killed in action were found in conquered areas designated by the UN to be beyond the “Jewish state.[7]

Immediately, after the UN vote to partition Palestine, Menachem Begin, the commander of the Irgun and Israel’s future Prime Minster, stated publicly:

“The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized . . . Jerusalem was and will forever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever,” “The Iron Wall,” by Avi Shlaim, p. 25.

“The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to live up to his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today–but the boundaries of the Zionist aspirations are concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” – quote by David Ben-Gurion, “The Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities”, by Simha Falpan, p. 52-53.[8]

The Israeli campaign for annexation has never ceased. This explains why Israel is a “war” state. Indeed, they have been in a constant state of war since their inception. And, Jewish leaders have openly stated that the perpetual war will continue until greater Israel has been established.

Yigal Allon[9] wrote in article published just before the outbreak of the 1967 war:

“In . . . a new war, we must avoid the historic mistake of the War of Independence [1948] . . . and MUST NOT cease fighting until we achieve total victory, the territorial fulfillment of the Land Of Israel.” – Benny Morris, “Righteous Victims,” p. 321.

David Ben-Gurion stated to his son Amos in October of 1937:

“not the end, but only the beginning.” Its establishment would give a “powerful boost to our historic efforts to redeem the country in its entirety.” For the “Jewish state” would have “outstanding army– I have no doubt that our army will be among the world’s outstanding–and so I am certain that we won’t be constrained from settling in the rest of the country, either by mutual agreement and understanding with our Arab neighbors, or by some other way. . . I still believe . . . that after we become numerous and strong, the Arabs will understand that it is best for them to strike an alliance with us, and to benefit from our help, providing they allow us by their good will to settle in all parts of Palestine.” – Shabtai Teveth, “Ben-Gurion And The Palestinian Arabs, From Peace to War,” p. 188.[10]

Ben-Gurion plainly avowed his support to the establishment of a Jewish state on part of Palestine only as an intermediary stage. In 1938 he recorded:

“[I am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the basis of the assumption that after we build up a strong force following the establishment of the state–we will abolish the partition of the country and we will expand to the whole Land of Israel.” – Nur Masalha, “Expulsion Of The Palestinians,” p. 107. Tom Segev, p. 403.

“after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the [Jewish] state, we shall abolish partition and expand to the whole of the Palestine” (emphasis added). – Simha Falpan, [11] p. 22.

In recent times, the Israeli government has been aware of growing international resistance to its brutal and murderous suppression of the Palestinians. Despite the absolute control of the American media by Jewish moguls and lobbies, the Israeli cabinet (Knesset) was still worried that Western nations could impose sanctions against Israel if ruthless Intifada activity continued against Palestinians. If public opinion in the West somehow became vociferous enough, Western nations in North America and Europe might step up sanctions against Israel. Eventually they reasoned, it could lead to a gradual and full-fledged oil embargo against Israel. Prior to the bombing of the World Trade Centers (9-11), the scenario for sanctions was entirely possible. There was a growing public awareness to the Israeli government persecuting the Palestinian people. A growing number of outspoken authorities accused the Israeli government of advocating genocide. Others charged openly that Israel was in violation of the 1993 and 1995 Oslo Accords and was illegally seizing Palestinian land. Indeed, the Internet played an important role in derailing the Israeli master plan for Eretz Israel. Israeli Knesset members warned that sanctions against Israel’s armed forces would have a devastating effect against Israel’s plans. They estimated Israel’s armed forces would grind to a complete standstill in only a few weeks.

Israel’s intention for expansion is clear. A strong military is required to achieve this goal and Israel has attained one of the most advanced militaries in the world. Yet, the Zionist goal for a greater Israel has not been easy. Continuous conflict and Israel’s repeated violations of human rights have brought Israel’s policy under international scrutiny. World opinion against Israel is growing. Recently, 353 nations gathered for the 2001 UN Durban Conference in South Africa. 351 of those governments condemned Israel as a terrorist, apartheid, and racist state. Only two nations opposed the resolution – the United States and Israel. The growing pressure worldwide on the Zionist state has intensified the need to find an alternate source of oil, and to find it quickly. Israel’s costly war machine cannot survive without ample supplies of petroleum. Time is running out and they are in a desperate state to obtain oil.

Israel has implemented a strategic plan to make this happen. In fact, the blueprint for this plan has been around for decades. The blitzkrieg war tactic was implemented during the 1967 war and was successful in obtaining large tracts of land in a very short period. Before public opinion could react, Israel had already conquered the Sinai, the West Bank, and the Golan heights. Both the Sinai and the Golan Heights have strategic importance to Israel’s war machine.

“No Zionist can forgo the smallest portion of the Land of Israel. [A] Jewish state in part [of Palestine] is not an end, but a beginning . . . Our possession is important not only for itself … through this we increase our power, and every increase in power facilitates getting hold of the country in its entirety. Establishing a [small] state . . . will serve as a very potent lever in our historical effort to redeem the whole country.” – (From a written letter that Ben-Gurion wrote to his son in 1937 expressing his views about the Peel Commission proposal to partition Palestine). – Benny Morris, “Righteous Victims” p. 138.

The plan for achieving Eretz Israel has repeatedly been pushed as the Israeli “solution” in past conflicts only to be tabled as a result of unforeseen events. The plan, along with conquering the transjordan, calls for seizing control of the Persian Gulf oil. Certainly for greater Israel to be finalized Iraq must be subjugated and a puppet regime installed.

Not too many people are aware of the oil infrastructure that is already in place in the Middle East. Before Israel was in the news on a daily basis, there were already two oil pipelines built (by 1946) that fed the refineries and terminals of Israel’s port city, Haifa from the Muslim oil fields in the east. One pipeline ran directly from Iraq. The other ran from Iraq to Haifa through Jordan. In the 1950s an 1100-mile pipeline was built by the Trans-Arabian Pipeline Company (Tapline) and was a major factor in economic development of Lebanon after independence. It was a joint venture by Standard Oil of New Jersey (Esso), Standard Oil of California (Chevron), the Texas Company (Texaco) and Socony-Vacuum Oil Company (Mobil). The pipeline was the largest of its time, transporting Saudi Arabian oil from the gulf fields to the terminal at Zahrani south of Saida, where it was shipped to the markets of Europe and the United States. At the peak of its operations “Tapline” is said to have transported up to 30 percent of Aramco’s production of Saudi Arabian crude.[12]

Tapline has an interesting history. It was originally planned to run from Saudi Arabia’s Abqaiq oil fields to the port of Haifa in what was then known as Palestine. Haifa was already a modest terminal facility for the Iraqi Kirkuk oil field pipeline. However, oil magnates and politicians were concerned about the continuing conflict between the British Mandate and the Israeli independence movement. They consequently decided the Tapline Company develops an alternate route. A very similar situation concerning the instability of Afghanistan has occurred with the Bush Administration’s negotiations with the Taliban for building a pipeline from Kazakhstan through Afghanistan to the Pakistani port city of Karachi. It is well known that the American petroleum giant Unocal was very interested in this project and pursued it for years. However, in 1998 its efforts were thwarted because of the Afghanistan civil war and then after bin Laden was accused of blowing up two American embassies in Africa. This caused the Taliban to become diplomatically isolated. The regional instability halted any further discussions of the Afghanistan pipeline. Although, Bridas, a former Argentinean oil firm was favored by the Taliban and was willing to start building the pipeline despite the civil war.[13]

It is interesting to note, the Taliban was first funded and installed by the American government, but were then ultimately overthrown by the U.S. Taliban delegates met with State Department officials ante bellum and Unocal in Washington D.C. and may have infuriated their hosts with their continued interest in Unocal’s competitor Bridas, (Bridas has since merged with BP Amoco Argentina). There are several reports that describe the Bush administration’s negotiations concerning the pipeline with the Taliban including threats of war if the project was not allowed to pass through Afghanistan. The Taliban is now gone and a new Afghani President, Harmid Karzai has been installed in the Afghanistan government. It is more than coincidence that President Karzai was a former Unocal consultant.

Indeed there are huge economic benefits at stake concerning the Caspian Sea basin oil reserves. According to testimony before the US House of Representatives in March 1999 by the conservative think tank, Heritage Foundation, the Caspian Sea basin contains 15 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. These countries (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) also have confirmed gas deposits totaling not less than nine trillion cubic meters. Another study by the Institute for Afghan Studies estimated the total worth of oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Sea basin at around 3 trillion dollars at year 2000 prices.

On December 27, 2002, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan signed a framework agreement for a 3.2 billion dollar gas pipeline project. It becomes apparent that the war against terrorism in Afghanistan has been a smoke screen to allow special interests to build the pipeline through Afghanistan. The 9/11 disaster allowed for Halliburton; an oil drilling company that former CEO Dick Cheney directed, Unocal; an oil and gas pipeline construction company, Enron; an energy trading company, which has stakes in India (the Dabhol power plant) for selling energy, and other oil and gas entities to make the Afghanistan pipeline possible. The Bush family has close ties to all these entities, including the Saudi Bin Laden Group.

Several nations are vying for control of the Caspian Sea basin oil reserves. Israel is one of them. As a powerful lobbying force, they have been pushing for a proposed Baku-Ceyhan pipeline. Originally, the proposal was to extend from Baku, Azerbaijan, a port city on Caspian Sea to Ceyhan, Turkey. This would allow Israel to draw oil from it since Turkey is Israel’s only Middle East ally. Even though oil companies were overwhelmingly opposed to it, Israel insisted on building this most expensive pipeline. It is estimated one million barrels of oil is required for an economically viable Baku-Ceyhan pipeline to proceed. Unfortunately, Azerbaijan has found very disappointing amounts of oil in its territory. The Israeli and American interests are now proposing to obtain oil from Kazakhstan. On March 26, 2001, London’s Financial Times reported the U.S. “succeeded” in getting Kazakhstan to sign a memorandum that it “might” send oil across the Caspian to a future Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline.

It is doubtful that the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline will be built though. However, the Jewish state insisted on it to demonstrate to the Turkish government that its alliance with Israel is “profitable.” The fact remains though that if the pipeline was built, it would represent yet another Israeli raid on the U.S. treasury. Indeed, the American financial support for this welfare nation is endless. It has already cost the American people 134.8 billion dollars[14] from its inception sixty-five years ago; a burden that cannot continue. The estimated cost of the Baku-Ceyhan line if it was built is 1 to 2 billion dollars more than a pipeline through Iran. Not surprising, Israel is opposed to building a pipeline through Iran and has lobbied against it.

Tapline is increasingly a tempting source for Tel Aviv’s energy and economic problems. If the Americans had listened to the Jews, the pipeline would have terminated at Haifa and not Sidon. Ironically, it was by the Jew’s voracious quest to obtain Eretz Israel and the ensuing instability in the region that determined Tapline’s final destination, a consequence that the Zionists did not anticipate. The final route passes over the Golan Heights in Syria and ends at Sidon in Lebanon. This decision was not without political consequences though. The setback was a reason for the Jewish State to conquer the Golan Heights. Indeed, Israel recognizes controlling Tapline and altering its course (of about a hundred miles) to Haifa will bring very large profits to Israel’s economy. Is it possible that the American public will unwittingly pay for diverting Tapline to Haifa?

The history of building Tapline is eerily similar to the planned Afghanistan pipeline. On September 1, 1947, parliamentary ratification of the Tapline Accord was delayed for political and economic reasons. The Syrian parliament was critical of U.S. policy in Palestine (Israel), and it wanted more favorable commercial terms from the Tapline consortium. U.S. oil executives were unwilling to bend on matters of profit and when it appeared the Syrian negotiations might fail, a convenient military coup in Damascus solved the problem. Within two months concessions were approved, which lead to the construction of the pipeline at the Sidon end.[15]

A recent investigation of the military coup in Syria (first in their postwar history) indicate that American CIA agents Stephen Meade and Miles Copeland acted as the U.S. military attaché in Damascus and were directly involved in the coup in which Syrian colonel Husni Za’im seized power. According to Wilbur Eveland, a former CIA agent, the coup occurred for the specific purpose of obtaining the Syrian ratification of Tapline.[16] Douglas Little reported:

“Meade and Za’im completed planning for the coup in early 1949. On March 14, Za’im ‘requested U.S. agents [to] provoke and abet internal disturbances which [are] essential for coup d’etat’ or that U.S. funds be given him [for] this purpose as soon as possible.”[17]

According to the same author, the Assistant Secretary of State, George McGhee visited Damascus at a crucial moment during these events and “possibly” authorized ” U.S. support for [Husni] Za’im” in addition to discussing settlement of Palestinian refugees in Syria. It’s interesting that even then the United States was pressured on allowing “transfers” by this new Jewish nation. Already, the expulsion of Palestinians began so that the Jewish state might obtain a “demographic” advantage.

“The only reason that we agreed to discuss the [Peel commission proposed] partition plan,” Ben-Gurion wrote Moshe Sharett, “is mass immigration. Not in the future, and not according to abstract formula, but large immigration now.” – Shabtai Teveth, “Ben-Gurion And The Palestinian Arabs, From Peace to War,” p. 184.

Countless massacres took place in Beit Daras, Tantura, Deir Yassin, and in several other places. Innocent Palestinians were slaughtered in their homes and in the streets. Entire villages were destroyed. Palestinians were driven off their land by Jewish tactics of terror. Some were driven away at gunpoint while others fled for their lives as Zionist gangs attacked every Arab population center. As early as 1947 Ben-Gurion, the first Israeli Prime Minister spoke openly of the “partition” and the “transfer” of Palestinians. Rabbi Meir Kahane, founder of the militant Jewish Defense league, and Rehavam Ze’evi, a former Knesset member, advocated the transfer of Palestinians as well. It is clear by their statements the Palestinians were to be expelled from Palestine. Today, American and Israeli Jews talk of the very same issue. In an opinion poll administered by the University of Tel Aviv on March 2002, 46 percent of Israeli Jews supported the “Transfer” of Palestinians, while 60 percent favored” encouraging” Palestinians to leave on their own. Another tactic to force the Palestinians to flee is a variety of new taxes imposed on them, and at times abusive measures of collecting them. This includes midnight “tax raids,” confiscation, and onerous administrative requirements. These are tyrannical and punitive measures designed to make life as miserable as possible.

The term “transfer,” which is being advocated by the current Sharon Israeli government, is a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. History has clearly detailed the expulsion of Palestinians from their ancestral homeland and the massacres accompanying it.

If the American war against Iraq escalates, the Palestinians know the Israeli army will again covertly initiate their plan to force them from their homes and businesses. Past history has dictated that the Jewish government will, under the cover of world attention focused on the American invasion of Iraq, reinitiate their plan for Eretz Israel. If the international community does not stand up to Israel and halt its Zionist plans, the Jews will continue invading Arab lands, “transferring” civilian populations, murdering innocent women and children, destroying refugee camps, and laying siege to Christian churches. These abuses have been repeated time and again throughout their history. Israel will become more powerful and warlike by its successes for achieving Eretz Israel. Zionists, including Ben-Gurion, believe once Eretz Israel has been achieved, Jerusalem will become the world’s capital.

“Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents.” – David Ben-Gurion

“The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25 years. Jerusalem will one day become the Capital of World Peace.” – Nahum Sokolow, During the Zionist Congress at Carlsbad in 1922.

The USS Liberty is a testament of the American government hiding the voracious mission the Jewish State has for achieving Eretz Israel. Thirty-seven Americans died and one hundred seventy-four were wounded as a result of a proven attack against an unarmed American intelligence vessel. The Zionist Israeli government did not want the Americans to know about the pre-emptive strikes it made against its Muslim neighbors. As a consequence, the USS Liberty was attacked unmercifully by Israel. Somehow, the USS Liberty survived the 75-minute attack by Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats despite their brightly displayed U.S. flag during the entire assault. The survivors of the USS Liberty have all denied the rhetoric of “mistaken identity” presented by the Jewish government. Indeed, the Jewish-American Lobby has worked relentlessly to silence the voice of all the USS Liberty survivors. With their money power, the Jews have twisted the arms of American politicians to be silent on the issue. It has been an absolute disgrace that thirty-seven American sailors were victimized and murdered on an unarmed vessel and virtually not reported to the public. Indeed, the American media was predictably silent on the matter. For the first time in American history, American politicians had succumbed to Jewish interests to hide the murderers of thirty-seven American sailors. From thence the Israeli government knew that any Israeli damage to American protection could be swept under the carpet in exactly the same manner. Since this time, the Israeli influence has grown considerably.

The economy of the United States is racked with recession with no sight to its end. This puts the State Department under immense pressure. War has always been the remedy to past economic woes. With the Jew’s influence and immense political machinations, they are providing the Bush Administration with their solution. The promise for revenues from oil is a tempting investment, especially to oilmen like George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney. But, to whom will this war benefit? It is obvious Israel will benefit the most. Indeed, the time for fulfillment of Eretz Israel has drawn near for the Zionist State. With world criticism growing, the Canaanite tribe knows that the outcome of any war is anarchy. Out of confusion all deceit can be effectively propagated. They now believe American politicians have succumbed to their political lobbies and their influence will hide all their deceit.

“Five things did Canaan charge his sons: ‘Love each other (i.e. of this tribe only), love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters and never tell the truth.’ ” — Pesachis F. 113b.


[1] Chris Conole, “Superpower Junkie,” Feb. 16, 2003. Provides scintillating insights on why the present debt-based monetary system is really a legalized pyramid scheme that will soon collapse.

[2] George Monbiot, “Too much of a good thing Why the Iraqi War,” Feb. 2003

[3] James Buchanan, “US Forces Set Oil Fires In First Gulf War,” “Commentary — Was Anything They Told Us the Truth?”

[4] Paul Findley, “Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About US-Israeli Relationship,” 1995, makes the point that Israel, with the collusion of the power elite on our continent, has been successful over the decades in keeping the United Nations on the sidelines in efforts to find a solution to the Middle East problem and to create real peace:

[5] Howard M Sachar, “History of Israel from the rise of Zionism to the present time,” p.122.

[6] Benjamin H. Freedman, “Benjamin Freedman Speaks: A Jewish Defector Warns America.”

[7] Simha Falpan, “The Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities,” p. 198-199. Flapan is a recognized writer and peace activist who was at one time the National Secretary of Israel’s Mapam, and the director of its Arab Affairs department.

[8] Ibid.

[9] 1918-1980. An Israeli military commander, a statesman, and one of the leaders of the Labor movement.

[10] Shabtai Teveth (Weizmann Institute, Tel-Aviv University) is one of the few official Ben-Gurion’s biographers. Teveth researched in detail the evolution of Ben-Gurion’s beliefs (from declassified transcripts and personal dairy) regarding the “Arab question.”

[11] Simha Flapan, “The Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities”

[12] Aramco – The Arabian American Oil Company has had control and a virtual monopoly on exploration and production of crude oil in Saudi Arabia since the 1930’s.

[13] “The Oil Connection: Afghanistan and Caspian Sea oil pipeline routes”

[14] Richard Curtiss, “The Cost Of ‘Occupied’ Israel To The American People”

[15] According to William Chandler, former Tapline president, in a telephone interview on April 10, 1995, William Owen, counsel for Tapline, reportedly had close relations with William Donovan of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). The OSS was America’s first intelligence agency.

[16] Douglas Little, “Cold War and Covert Action,” p. 55. In an interview with Wilbur Eveland in Boston, Oct. 27, 1988, the former CIA agent in the Middle East confirmed that the 1949 coup was carried out by Miles Copeland to obtain Syrian ratification of Tapline.

[17] Ibid. p. 56. Author Laton McCartney reveals in his book – “Friends in High Places,” p. 115, the American corporation Bechtel was involved in the Syrian coup. He cites unidentified State Department officials and J. Rives Childes, U.S. Minister to Saudi Arabia who mention a “multinational corporation was involved in the coup. Of course, Bechtel Corporation officials deny this allegation. However, recently the allegation was confirmed by William Chandler and David Dodge in separate telephone interviews on April 10 and 12, 1995 and on April 22, 1995.



[1] Chris Conole, “Superpower Junkie,” Feb. 16, 2003. Provides scintillating insights on why the present debt-based monetary system is really a legalized pyramid scheme that will soon collapse.

Error 404 – Not Found



3 responses to “THE WAR FOR ISRAEL

  1. The war on Iraq:
    Conceived in Israel


    © 2003 WTM Enterprises
    All rights reserved.

    In a lengthy article in The American Conservative criticizing the rationale for the projected U.S. attack on Iraq, the veteran diplomatic historian Paul W. Schroeder noted (only in passing) “what is possibly the unacknowledged real reason and motive behind the policy — security for Israel.” If Israel’s security were indeed the real American motive for war, Schroeder wrote,

    It would represent something to my knowledge unique in history. It is common for great powers to try to fight wars by proxy, getting smaller powers to fight for their interests. This would be the first instance I know where a great power (in fact, a superpower) would do the fighting as the proxy of a small client state. [1]
    Is there any evidence that Israel and her supporters have managed to get the United States to fight for their interests?

    To unearth the real motives for the projected war on Iraq, one must ask the critical question: How did the 9/11 terrorist attack lead to the planned war on Iraq, even though there is no real evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11? From the time of the 9/11 attack, neoconservatives, of primarily (though not exclusively) Jewish ethnicity and right-wing Zionist persuasion, have tried to make use of 9/11 to foment a broad war against Islamic terrorism, the targets of which would coincide with the enemies of Israel.

    Although the term neoconservative is in common usage, a brief description of the group might be helpful. Many of the first-generation neocons originally were liberal Democrats, or even socialists and Marxists, often Trotskyites. They drifted to the right in the 1960s and 1970s as the Democratic Party moved to the antiwar McGovernite left. And concern for Israel loomed large in that rightward drift. As political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg puts it:

    One major factor that drew them inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights]. In the Reaganite right’s hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel’s security. [2]
    For some time prior to September 11, 2001, neoconservatives had publicly advocated an American war on Iraq. The 9/11 atrocities provided the pretext. The idea that neocons are the motivating force behind the U.S. movement for war has been broached by a number of commentators. For instance, Joshua Micah Marshall authored an article in The Washington Monthly titled: “Bomb Saddam?: How the obsession of a few neocon hawks became the central goal of U.S. foreign policy.” And in the leftist e-journal CounterPunch, Kathleen and Bill Christison wrote:

    The suggestion that the war with Iraq is being planned at Israel’s behest, or at the instigation of policymakers whose main motivation is trying to create a secure environment for Israel, is strong. Many Israeli analysts believe this. The Israeli commentator Akiva Eldar recently observed frankly in a Ha’aretz column that [Richard] Perle, [Douglas] Feith, and their fellow strategists “are walking a fine line between their loyalty to American governments and Israeli interests.” The suggestion of dual loyalties is not a verboten subject in the Israeli press, as it is in the United States. Peace activist Uri Avnery, who knows Israeli Prime Minister Sharon well, has written that Sharon has long planned grandiose schemes for restructuring the Middle East and that “the winds blowing now in Washington remind me of Sharon. I have absolutely no proof that the Bushies got their ideas from him. But the style is the same.” [3]
    In the following essay I attempt to flesh out that thesis and show the link between the war position of the neoconservatives and the long-time strategy of the Israeli Right, if not of the Israeli mainstream itself. In brief, the idea of a Middle East war has been bandied about in Israel for many years as a means of enhancing Israeli security, which revolves around an ultimate solution to the Palestinian problem.

    War and expulsion

    To understand why Israeli leaders would want a Middle East war, it is first necessary to take a brief look at the history of the Zionist movement and its goals. Despite public rhetoric to the contrary, the idea of expelling (or, in the accepted euphemism, “transferring”) the indigenous Palestinian population was an integral part of the Zionist effort to found a Jewish national state in Palestine. Historian Tom Segev writes:

    The idea of transfer had accompanied the Zionist movement from its very beginnings, first appearing in Theodore Herzl’s diary. In practice, the Zionists began executing a mini-transfer from the time they began purchasing the land and evacuating the Arab tenants…. “Disappearing” the Arabs lay at the heart of the Zionist dream, and was also a necessary condition of its existence…. With few exceptions, none of the Zionists disputed the desirability of forced transfer — or its morality.
    However, Segev continues, the Zionist leaders learned not to publicly proclaim their plan of mass expulsion because “this would cause the Zionists to lose the world’s sympathy.” [4]

    The key was to find an opportune time to initiate the expulsion so it would not incur the world’s condemnation. In the late 1930s, David Ben-Gurion wrote: “What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible in such great hours is not carried out — a whole world is lost.” [5] The “revolutionary times” would come with the first Arab-Israeli war in 1948, when the Zionists were able to expel 750,000 Palestinians (more than 80 percent of the indigenous population), and thus achieve an overwhelmingly Jewish state, though its area did not include the entirety of Palestine, or the “Land of Israel,” which Zionist leaders thought necessary for a viable state.

    The opportunity to grab additional land occurred as a result of the 1967 war; however, that occupation brought with it the problem of a large Palestinian population. By that time world opinion was totally opposed to forced population transfers, equating such a policy with the unspeakable horror of Nazism. The landmark Fourth Geneva Convention, ratified in 1949, had “unequivocally prohibited deportation” of civilians under occupation. [6] Since the 1967 war, the major question in Israeli politics has been: What to do with that territory and its Palestinian population?

    It was during the 1980s, with the coming to power of the right-wing Likud government, that the idea of expulsion resurfaced publicly. And this time it was directly tied to a larger war, with destabilization of the Middle East seen as a precondition for Palestinian expulsion. Such a proposal, including removal of the Palestinian population, was outlined in an article by Oded Yinon, titled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s,” appearing in the World Zionist Organization’s periodical Kivunim in February 1982. Yinon had been attached to the Israeli Foreign Ministry and his article undoubtedly reflected high-level thinking in the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. The article called for Israel to bring about the dissolution and fragmentation of the Arab states into a mosaic of ethnic groupings. Thinking along those lines, Ariel Sharon stated on March 24, 1988, that if the Palestinian uprising continued, Israel would have to make war on her Arab neighbors. The war, he stated, would provide “the circumstances” for the removal of the entire Palestinian population from the West Bank and Gaza and even from inside Israel proper. [7]

    Israeli foreign policy expert Yehoshafat Harkabi critiqued the war/expulsion scenario — referring to “Israeli intentions to impose a Pax Israelica on the Middle East, to dominate the Arab countries and treat them harshly” — in his very significant work, Israel’s Fateful Hour, published in 1988. Writing from a realist perspective, Harkabi concluded that Israel did not have the power to achieve that goal, given the strength of the Arab states, the large Palestinian population involved, and the vehement opposition of world opinion. He hoped that “the failed Israeli attempt to impose a new order in the weakest Arab state — Lebanon — will disabuse people of similar ambitions in other territories.” [8] Left unconsidered by Harkabi was the possibility that the United States would act as Israel’s proxy to achieve the overall goal.

    U.S. Realpolitik

    In the 1970s and 1980s, U.S. Middle Eastern policy, although sympathetic to Israel, was not identical to that of Israel. The fundamental goal of U.S. policy was to promote stable governments in the Middle East that would allow oil to flow reliably to the Western industrial nations. It was not necessary for the Muslim countries to befriend Israel — in fact they could openly oppose the Jewish state. The United States worked for peace between Israel and the Muslim states in the region, but it was to be a peace that would accommodate the demands of the Muslim nations — most crucially their demands involving the Palestinians.

    Pursuing its policy of ensuring the security of Middle East oil supplies, by the mid 1980s Washington was heavily supporting Iraq in her war against Iran, although for a while the United States had also provided some aid to Iran (viz. the Iran-contra scandal). Ironically, Donald Rumsfeld was the U.S. envoy who in 1983 paved the way for the restoration of relations with Iraq, relations which had been severed in 1967. The United States along with other Western nations looked upon Iraq as a bulwark against the radical Islamism of the Ayatollah’s Iran, which threatened Western oil interests. U.S. support for Iraq included intelligence information, military equipment, and agricultural credits. And the United States deployed the largest naval force since the Vietnam War in the Persian Gulf. Ostensibly sent for the purpose of protecting oil tankers, it ended up engaging in serious attacks on Iran’s navy.

    It was during this period of U.S. support that Iraq used poison gas against the Iranians and the Kurds, a tactic that the U.S. government and its media supporters now describe as so horrendous. In fact, U.S. intelligence facilitated the Iraqi use of gas against the Iranians. In addition, Washington eased up on its own technology export restrictions to Iraq, which allowed the Iraqis to import supercomputers, machine tools, poisonous chemicals, and even strains of anthrax and bubonic plague. In short, the United States helped arm Iraq with the very weaponry of horror that administration officials are now trumpeting as justification for forcibly removing Saddam from power. [9]

    When the Iran/Iraq war ended in 1988, the United States continued its support for Iraq, showering her with military hardware, advanced technology, and agricultural credits. The United States apparently looked to Saddam to maintain stability in the Gulf. But American policy swiftly changed when Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990. Neoconservatives were hawkish in generating support for a U.S. war against Iraq. The Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf, headed by Richard Perle, was set up to promote the war. [10] And neoconservative war hawks such as Perle, Frank Gaffney, Jr., A.M. Rosenthal, William Safire, and The Wall Street Journal held that America’s war objective should be not simply to drive Iraq out of Kuwait but also to destroy Iraq’s military potential, especially her capacity to develop nuclear weapons. The first Bush administration embraced that position. [11]

    But beyond that, the neocons hoped that the war would lead to the removal of Saddam Hussein and the American occupation of Iraq. However, despite the urgings of then-Defense Secretary Richard Cheney and Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, the full conquest of Iraq was never accomplished because of the opposition of General Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and General Norman Schwarzkopf, the field commander. [12] Moreover, the United States had a UN mandate only to liberate Kuwait, not to remove Saddam. To attempt the latter would have caused the U.S.-led coalition to fall apart. America’s coalition partners in the region, especially Turkey and Saudi Arabia, feared that the elimination of Saddam’s government would cause Iraq to fragment into warring ethnic and religious groups. That could have involved a Kurdish rebellion in Iraq that would have spread to Turkey’s own restive Kurdish population. Furthermore, Iraq’s Shiites might have fallen under the influence of Iran, increasing the threat of Islamic radicalism in the region.

    Not only did the Bush administration dash neoconservative hopes by leaving Saddam in place, but its proposed “New World Order,” as implemented by Secretary of State James Baker, conflicted with neoconservative/Israeli goals, being oriented toward placating the Arab coalition that supported the war. That entailed an effort to curb Israeli control of her occupied territories. The Bush administration demanded that Israel halt the construction of new settlements in the occupied territories as a condition for receiving $10 billion in U.S. loan guarantees for Israel’s resettlement of hundreds of thousands of immigrants from the former Soviet Union. Although Bush would cave in to American pro-Zionist pressure just prior to the November 1992 election, his resistance disaffected many neocons, causing some, such as Safire, to back Bill Clinton in the 1992 election. [13]

    To part two

  2. The actual reason Israel has iraq oil is because it has an analog military unlike use digital military. I personally built 24 analog blackhawk attack helicopters for israel, I know they only ones who could fight a war anymore. Jim Cyr

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s