23/1 Obama Assassination Said to be Legal Under Israeli Law

Obama Assassination Said to be Legal Under Israeli Law

Israeli Right to Kill President Supportable

… by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

How Subservient Must a President Be to Avoid Lobby Death Threats?
Last week, an obscure publication in Atlanta issued what seemed to be a “suggestion” that the Israeli government “eliminate” President Obama for “reasons of state.”

The argument made by an Andrew Adler, owner of the Jewish Times, a publication nearly a century old, has stirred much controversy?

Our question is, was Adler right in what he said? Can Israel legally kill a president?

Point one, of course, Israeli law allows it. Obama is a non-Jew and any non-Jew can be killed at any time according to Israeli law, even one living outside Israel if it is believed that he may some day cause harm to a Jew.

This is the legal basis for attacks on children in Gaza, that their deaths likely prevent them from growing up and harming Jews.

It is in the Torah and it is law. Also, America has traditionally respected such laws. In fact, President Obama may well have, through pro-Israeli statements, authorized his own execution.

Point two, American law including not only the Patriot Acts but the recent modifications of our constitution added to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 specifically authorize the use of deadly force if necessary should anyone, anywhere in the world, including US citizens, no exception made for the President of the United States, constitute or be believed to constitute a threat through support of or dialog with terrorists.

We have proof that President Obama has authorized dialog with the Taliban. In doing so, his signature on the NDAA has him signing his own death warrant.

Adelman and Newt – With the Koch Brothers Waiting to Spring the Tea Partiers
Point three establishes Israel’s need to kill Obama. The only possible Republican opponent of Obama is the utterly unelectable Newt Gingrich, serial philanderer and slimeball.

Recently, Shelden Adelson, billionaire casino boss gave Gingrich, laundered through a PAC (political action committee) $5 million. This money is, as we understand it, a down payment on a much higher figure meant to buy Gingrich’s thralldom to the Israeli Likudist faction.

As we understand it, Gingrich will allow Israel to stage a false flag nuclear attack on Chicago and, if needed reinstate the draft in order to put together sufficient land forces to invade Iran.

Following this, the world will suffer a series of pandemics, which will be, in reality, germ warfare, with miraculous cures coming online in time to hold world population at approximately 2 billion.

It will be a new “black death.” This is the why, the deindustrialization of the west, the genetically engineered disease delivery systems, the failure of all currencies and institutions as they no longer will matter.

They no longer matter now, as seen by those who look on themselves as being from “on high,” most of us are simply walking corpses anyway, the living dead who don’t know enough to fall down.

This is also why Gingrich and his close backers adhere to apocalypse rhetoric although Gingrich himself is an atheist.

This is Some ‘Preparing the Minds’ Work We Found on the Net – That Obama Deserves to be Killed as a Mortal Threat to Israel
The interesting point about Obama is how he fell into the trap so easily. Once one authorized rendition, one also legalizes the use of lethal force. One cannot exist without the other.

Every time Obama or others doft the “beenie,” the yamuka, they admit their own doom, the death of the goyim who is no longer of use to the Jew as stated in the King Torah.

When the most despicable of the abuses of the Torah are then carried into American law and applied as “counter-terrorism” acts, kidnapping, detention and murder without accountability, the idea of an American president being cited for extermination by a Jew as being an offense enters the realm of absurdity.

If Adelman says Gingrich must win and for Gingrich to win, Obama must die, and opposing Adelman and Israel, or defying Gingrich is also “offending the word of g-d,” the the punishment of he who has no name is applied, as law states, with full righteous vengeance.

To a sane person, all this must seem strange.

So an American who studied history, to a veteran who has fought in wars, these concepts of world domination, murder on command and erasing billions of people must seem beyond offensive, in fact they sound insane.

One might ask what kind of person might think this way.

Bush and Buds – Yep, They Got Him to Wear it, too.
Of recent years, these are the political theories of Henry Kissinger and George Herbert Walker Bush.

The Jewish part was thrown in to raise a few bucks, silence the liberals by dividing the Jews and to provide a stage for world conquest.

Without being able to blame Iran, there could be no new enemy. Without the obsession with Israel, the idea of caring what Iran does or does not do seems meaningless.

Iran is harmless.

So, why then must Obama die? What does it prove?

This is the question. In a world of powerlessness, can one man, one even so low as an American president, still make a difference, still alter history, still stop plans from moving forward?

Is this what Andrew Adler of the Atlanta Jewish Times telling us as a spokesman, continually denied by fellow Jews, but spokesman all the same, telling us?

Andrew Adler
If killing Obama is an answer to some then is crushing Gingrich the answer to saving the many?

If plans run deep as we suspect, billions to die, a planet cleansed of its human population as though they themselves were a disease, plans that show themselves only an inch under the surface, bio-weapons, chemical poisons, carefully engineered economic realignments for a world devoid of people, a world of workers and oligarchs, the obvious direction of so many years, can these plans be turned? Is destruction of humanity inevitable?

Are we really just cattle?

Once it was said that when mankind began playing with the atom he had sealed his doom. Oppenheimer had a quote involving “destroyer of worlds.” He did have a flare for the dramatic.

Yet out we go with a whimper, as opposed to Oppenheimer’s “bang.”

We are legislating ourselves out of existence, passing laws against our own futures, our lives, so much more than simple freedoms. We have legislated the freedom to live into the hands of those we will never know.

And so it goes.

Editing: Jim W. Dean


Charlotte NC Bill
January 23, 2012 – 6:08 pm
We goyim scum have only one reason to live: serve Israel…If we don’t serve the Whore of Babylon well or ( God forbid ) resist our predestined sub-servient position then we must be liquidated…Wow…what chutzpah-and the power to back it up…The people who rejected Jeshua for Barabbas are still rejecting peace, justice and Truth in favor of racial supremacism..But hey, they’re on the winning side….The fact that God’s enemies prosper more than His friends can really shake your faith if you let it…Only prayer and a miracle can save us from these people.

Log in to Reply haroldsmith
January 23, 2012 – 6:11 pm
One thing you can say for sure is this: having gratuitously murdered so many people himself, Obama is certainly *morally defenseless* against anyone doing the same to him.

Obama has worked hard, very hard, to overthrow the rule of law and to repudiate the Golden Rule or Doctrine of Reciprocity or whatever you want to call it, instead replacing it with the Satanic concept of “might makes right”. Thus by Obama’s own words and deeds, he’s in full agreement with Adler.

Log in to Reply ricohands
January 23, 2012 – 6:29 pm
Dealing with terrorists? But he deals with the nutty fuhrer on a daily basis.

Log in to Reply duckmrprezexclampt
January 23, 2012 – 7:40 pm
What planet are you people from? There must be a parallel universe because you all seem to understand each other.

Log in to Reply Brian
January 23, 2012 – 10:19 pm
Gordon, well done!

Log in to Reply Sami Jamil Jadallah
January 23, 2012 – 11:49 pm
This attitude toward Goyim is well established and promoted in Yashivas inside Israel and outside, including the US and is highly promoted among the IDF by the many Rabbis who are part of the defense establishment.. that is why killing an Arab in cold blood is done without blinking an eye…as we have seen during the War on Gaza, and as we have seen during the War on Lebanon… Perhaps it is time to look at all that are taught in all of the Yashivas accross the world…in the same way Zionists are demanding that all texts books in all Arab and Muslim counties must be subject to review by Zionists and Jewish organizations..

Log in to Reply
January 24, 2012 – 5:48 am
I have just finished watching “The Promise”, a 4 part series aired on Ch.4 in UK.
It deals with the creation of Israel in 1948 and the current state of things in Israel today – including the Israeli mindset. I highly recommend this as it gives a balanced account.
The fact that several Zionist organizations are calling for it to be banned is also a plus.
A DVD is due for release in February.

Log in to Reply
Jim W. Dean
January 24, 2012 – 6:57 am
Did you see it online or on the air in the UK? Have you seen trailers online?

Log in to Reply
January 24, 2012 – 3:56 pm
Here’s the info:

You can find the download here: http://www.google.ca/search?q=the+promise+2011+download&ie=utf-8&oe=ut

Break out the popcorn and enjoy.



Log in to Reply
January 24, 2012 – 3:59 pm
Sorry Jim – it messed up during copy and paste.

Here’s the info:

You can find the download here: http://www.google.ca/search?q=the+promise+2011+download&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Charlotte NC Bill
January 24, 2012 – 2:33 am
Damn right Sami..If, that is, there were justice in this world for us poor, stupid goyim…Unfortunately the world seems to belong to them..But Gordon was right the first time; the kill request is just meant to portray Obama as someone who actually has a spine…When, in fact, he’s just doing what his Talmudic masters are telling him-like any American errand boy president would, and will, do.

Log in to Reply Detlef Reimers
January 24, 2012 – 5:30 am
Haaretz mentions, that Adler resigned from his Office at the Atlanta Jewish Times:


I recommend to watch this marvellous smack of interview with him on ailtv.com:

I know, it’s really hard to look at this guy for the full time of 18 minutes, but you get more than only a feeling, about what is meant with all this scam. At the beginnig, he simply repeates his nasty self defending crap, which he already stated some days before.

Log in to Reply
January 24, 2012 – 11:39 am
Thanks for that link, Detlef. I’m glad I watched the vieo BEFORE lunch, on an empty stomach.

That snivelling, sobbing little douchebag makes me sick. It’s well known that sociopaths only “cry” or show sorrow for themselves, usually when they get caught.

I hope he “cries” all the way to Hell.

Log in to Reply Cold Wind
January 24, 2012 – 6:00 am
The real possibility the Israelis would quietly arrange for the assassination of President Obama is confirmed by the well documented role Israel played in the JFK assassination. See Michael Collins Piper’s ‘Final Judgement’. Sadly, we can expect the same configuration of ‘helpers’ from within our own Military to be on hand facilitating an Israeli directive to this purpose. See Fletcher Prouty’s ‘JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy’.

Log in to Reply Allesandro
January 24, 2012 – 7:35 am
Forgive me for asking, but, where do these monsters come from. They are NOT of this world, the world of humankind. Was it some sort of perverted alien species that was banished here, and now we must deal with them? It seems unthinkable, that our own people, are helping in this twisted, treacherous plot.

Log in to Reply
January 24, 2012 – 4:03 pm
Followers of the Fallen Angels perhaps?

Log in to Reply dalethorn
January 24, 2012 – 8:35 am
I would like to add that the *real* reason Israel got a few hundred thermonuclear bombs is not to threaten their Arab neighbors with. Nope. The real reason is to threaten us with, lest we ever decide to end our support for them. 7 or 8 bombs on missiles would take care of any Arab resistance, but the big arsenal makes them a threat to the whole world. And a few well-placed suitcase bombs could decide the fate of the world right now. Wouldn’t it be interesting if the real reason for the Patriot Act wasn’t to find terrorists of the Arab or Asian variety, but to find the real terrorists after all? Ya gotta admit, putting the public focus on Arabs and Muslims, bad though it is for foreign relations, is a great device to avoid alerting the real terrorists that they’re being pursued. That’s just speculation of course, and one can only hope with such bad legislation that there is some reasonable objective.

Log in to Reply
January 24, 2012 – 4:02 pm
I’ve often considered that as a reason for the Patriot Act.
We all know that the Israelis have good lawyers ….


Stalin’s death (March 6,1953) startled the world because the life of this man, who probably caused the death and enslavement of more human beings than any other in history, had come to seem endless, like the uncoiling of the serpent.[35] The circumstances of his death remain unclear, but the timetable of the events attending it may be significant.


had war come, another generation of Western youth would have gone to war, thinking their mission was to “destroy Communism.”

Stalin died. The West was spared war at that time and stumbled on, behind its Zionised leaders, towards the next disappointment,

No similar outcry was raised on behalf of the legion of human beings, a hundred times as numerous, whose plight was once more revealed. No threats of war or “destruction” were uttered against the Soviet Union on their account. On the contrary, the politicians and the press of the West urged them to remain quiet and simply to hope for “the liberation” which, by some untold means, one day would come to them from America, which had abandoned them in 1945.

If Israel had not attacked Egypt … if Britain and France had not joined in that attack … if these things had not happened the world would now know the answer to that question. Now it will never know, for the Zionist attack on Egypt, and the British and French participation in it, released the revolution from its dilemma; as if by magic, the eyes of the watching world turned from Hungary to the Middle East and Hungary was forgotten. Vainly did Mr. Nagy broadcast his appeal to the world the very next day, saying that 200,000 men with five thousand tanks were moving into Hungary.

Budapest was pulverized. On November 7 the voice of the last free Hungarian radio faded from the air (Radio Rakoczy at Dunapentele), as the voices of the Poles had faded in 1944 and of the Czechs in 1939, bequeathing their sorrows to “the West.”

“This is our last broadcast. We are being inundated with Soviet tanks and planes.” These words, the Vienna correspondent of the New York Times recorded, “were followed by a loud crashing sound. Then there was silence.”

At the end of November the Cuban delegate to the United Nations, a well-informed authority, stated that 65,000 people had been killed in Hungary. More than 100,000 by that time had fled across the frontier into Austria, a small country which upheld the tattered standard of “the West”

The Soviet Union was left undisturbed in its


work of massacre in Hungary while the great powers of the West began to dispute among themselves about Israel, Egypt and the Suez Canal; all the world turned to watch them, and the Soviet state, with the blood of a European nation on its hands, was able to join in the general anathema of Britain and France when they joined in the Israeli attack.

The Zionist State

In those years the little state misnamed “Israel” proved to be something unique in history. It was governed, as it was devised, set up and largely peopled, by non-semitic Jews from Russia, of the Chazar breed. Founded on a tribal tradition of antiquity, with which these folk could have no conceivable tie of blood, it developed a savage chauvinism based on the literal application of the Law of the Levites in ancient Judah. Tiny, it had no true life of its own and from the start lived only by the wealth and weapons its powerful supporters in the great Western countries could extort from these. During these years it outdid the most bellicose warlords of history in warlike words and deeds. Ruled by men of the same stock as those who wielded the terror in Poland and Hungary, it daily threatened the seven neighbouring Semitic peoples with the destruction and enslavement prescribed for them in Deuteronomy of the Levites.

It did this in the open belief that its power in the Western capitals was sufficient to deter the governments there from ever gainsaying its will, and to command their support in any circumstances. It behaved as if America, in particular, was its colony, and that country’s deeds conformed with that idea. Within its borders its laws against conversion and intermarriage were those of the much-cited Hitler; beyond its borders lay a destitute horde of Arabs, driven into the wilderness by it, whose numbers rose through childbirth to nearly a million as the eight years went by. These, and their involuntary hosts, were by repeated raid and massacre reminded that the fate of Deir Yasin yet hung over them too: “utterly destroy, man, woman and child , . . leave nothing alive that breatheth.” The Western countries, its creators, murmured reproof while they sent it money and the wherewithal of the war which they claimed to fear; thus, like Frankenstein, they created the destructive agency which they could not control.

The New York Times, which I judge to speak with authority for “the Jewish power” in the world, has often alluded to this secret compact, or capitulation, or whatever its nature is: for instance, “In essence, the political support the state of Israel has in the United States makes any settlement antagonistic to Israeli interests impossible for a United States administration to contemplate” (1956). If this merely alludes to control of the election-machine, it means that the process of parliamentary government through “free elections” has been completely falsified. In my opinion, that is the case in the West in this century.

The world would have raised a pandemonium of protest if a Kaiser or a Hitler had said such things. The ambition expressed by such words as “the full and undiminished programme of Zionism” is in fact boundless, for it is the political programme contained, in the guise of a compact with Jehovah, in the Torah; world dominion over “the heathen,” wielded from an empire stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. The support of Western governments gave reality to what otherwise would be the most absurd pretension in all history.

That the politicians of the West comprehended this full meaning of what they did seemed impossible until 1953, when a statement was made that implied full understanding. In May, 1953, Mr. Winston Churchill, then British Prime Minister, was in dispute with the Egyptian premier about the Suez Canal and threatened him, not with British but with Jewish retribution. He spoke, in Parliament, of the Israeli army as “the best in the Levant” and said that “nothing we shall do in the supply of aircraft to this part of the world will be allowed to place Israel at a disadvantage.” Then he added, in words closely akin to those of


Mr. Ben-Gurion and Rabbi Hillel Silver, that he “looked forward to the fulfilment of Zionist aspirations.”

Here, in an aside, is probably the largest commitment ever undertaken by a head of government on behalf of an unsuspecting nation. The Israeli parliament at once recorded its gratification at “Mr. Churchill’s friendly attitude towards the Israeli government now and towards the Zionist movement throughout its existence.” The public masses in England read the loaded words uncomprehendingly, if at all.

big Jewish state on both sides of the Jordan to take in all the Jews and to become the largest military power in the Near East”; Mr. William Zukerman).

Mr. Abrahams asked wonderingly, with an undernote even of alarm, if Mr. Churchill’s words could be genuinely intended, saying, “The Prime Minister is an old student of the Bible; he knows very well that the Zionist aspirations remain unfulfilled until Israel is fully restored within the historic boundaries, the land of the Ten Tribes.”

This “aspiration,” of course, cannot be “fulfilled” without universal war, and that is evidently why Mr. Abrahams was taken aback, and made almost aghast. Mr. Churchill’s words, if they were considered and deliberately intended, signified support for the grandiose ambition in all its literalness, and the final price of that could only be the extinction of “the West” as it has always been known.[45]


If the West, as these words implied, was secretly harnessed to the unqualified “fulfilment of Zionist aspirations,” that could only mean a greater war than the West had yet endured, in which its armies would play the parts of pawns in a ruinous game, for the purpose of dividing the Christian peoples, crushing the Muslim ones, setting up the Zionist empire, and thereafter acting as its janissaries. In this great gamble, Jews everywhere in the world, on whatever side of the apparent fighting line, would be expected under the “law of the return” to act in the overriding interest of Zion. What that might mean may be seen from an article published in the Johannesburg Jewish Herald of Nov. 10, 1950, about a secret episode of the Second War. It stated that when the production of atomic weapons began “a proposal was put forward to Dr. Weizmann to bring together some of the most noted Jewish scientists in order to establish a team which would bargain with the allies in the interest of Jewry … I saw the project as originally outlined and submitted to Dr. Weizmann by a scientist who had himself achieved some renown in the sphere of military invention.”


The threat is plain, in such words. As to “the fulfilment of Zionist aspirations,” by these or other means, Dr. Nahum Goldman, leader of the World Zionist Organization, made a significant statement to a Jewish audience at Johannesburg in August, 1950. Describing an interview with Mr. Ernest Bevin, then British Foreign Minister, Dr Goldman said, “This tiny country (Israel) is a very unique country, it is in a unique geographical position. In the days when trying to get the Jewish state with the consent of the British Government, and at one of the private talks I had with Mr. Bevin, he said, ‘Do you know what you are asking me to do? You are asking me to deliver the key to one of the most vital and strategic areas in the world.’ And I said, ‘It is not written in either the New or Old Testament that Great Britain must have this key.’”



Washington and London seemed equally ready. The effects are already plain to see and foresee, and these effects can no longer be dismissed as chance. Here a great plan is plainly moving to its fulfilment or fiasco, with the great nations of the West acting as its armed escort and themselves assured of humiliation if it succeeds; they are like a man who takes employment under the condition that his wage shall fall as the firm prospers.

At all its ill-omened stages this adventure has been discussed among the initiates as a plan. I earlier quoted the words of Max Nordau at the sixth Zionist Congress in 1903: “Let me show you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward … the future world war, the peace conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be erected.”

Twenty-five years later a leading Zionist in England, Lord Melchett, spoke in the same tone of secret knowledge to Zionists in New York: “If I had stood here in 1913 and said to you ‘Come to a conference to discuss the reconstruction of a national home in Palestine,’ you would have looked upon me as an idle dreamer, even if I had told you in 1913 that the Austrian archduke would be killed and that out of all that followed would come the chance, the opportunity, the occasion for establishing a national home for the Jews in Palestine. Has it ever occurred to you how remarkable it is that out of the welter of world blood there has arisen this opportunity? Do you really believe that we have been led back to Israel by nothing but a fluke?” (Jewish Chronicle, Nov. 9, 1928).

Today the third world war, if it comes, will obviously not be a “fluke”; the sequence of cause leading to consequence, and the identity of the controlling power, has been made visible by the developing fluid of time. Thirty-one years after Lord Melchett’s imperial pronouncement I was by chance (February, 1956) in South Carolina, and only by that chance, and the local newspaper, learned of a comment in similar vein, apparently inspired from a similar, Olympian source, about the third war. Mr. Randolph Churchill, Sir Winston’s son, was at that time visiting his family’s friend Mr. Bernard Baruch, whose residence is the Barony of Little Hobcaw in South Carolina. On emerging from his interview with this authority Mr. Randolph Churchill stated (Associated Press, Feb. 8, 1956) that “the tense Middle East situation could explode into armed conflict at any moment. But I don’t think civilization is going to stumble into the next war … World War III, if it comes, will be coldly calculated and planned rather than accidental.”


[2] Mr. Whittaker Chambers, an impressionable, rather morbid young American, was “captured” by the Communists at Columbia University, New York, in 1925 and became an agent and courier who, working under an alias, conveyed stolen official documents to his Communist superiors. In 1938 he sickened of his bondage and fled the party. In 1939, appalled by the alliance between Communism and Hitlerism, he tried to inform President Roosevelt of the infestation of government departments by Communist agents, and of the espionage that went on, but was rudely rebuffed, being told by a presidential emissary to “go jump in the lake.” As a precaution, he had secreted his proofs (photographs of hundreds of secret official documents) in a disused lift-shaft and in the course of years forgot them, for he heard nothing more until 1948! Then his name was mentioned in the course of an enquiry arising out of disclosures made by another former Communist agent, and he was sub-poenaed to give evidence. He did this and was at once sued for libel by a high government official, Mr. Alger Hiss, whom he incriminated of stealing highly secret papers and conveying them, through Mr. Chambers, to the Communists. For his own protection he then sought out his relative in New York and asked if the package, secreted in the disused service-lift shaft ten years before, was still there. Covered with dust, it was, and the enormity of its contents, examined again after ten years, startled even Mr. Chambers. He hid the packet in a pumpkin on his farm, where at last it came to light of day when his defence against the libel charge had to be produced. This led to the conviction of his accuser, Mr. Hiss, and to the partial exposure of a condition of Communist infestation in the American Government so deep and widespread, that American state policy obviously must, during the entire period of the Second World War, have been to a great extent under the direct influence of the world-revolutionary leaders in Moscow. (return)





One response to “23/1 Obama Assassination Said to be Legal Under Israeli Law

  1. http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_20.htm

    Associated Press, Feb. 8, 1956) that “the tense Middle East situation could explode into armed conflict at any moment. But I don’t think civilization is going to stumble into the next war … World War III, if it comes, will be coldly calculated and planned rather than accidental.”




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s