Did Rothschild Write The Protocols of Zion ?
September 21, 2003
Many people think “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is anti Semitic “hate literature” and a fraud.
Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that the book exhibits “the mind of genius.” Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn’t you say?
Solzhenitsyn said it exhibits “great strength of thought and insight…Its design…(increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm)…is well above the abilities of an ordinary mind…It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb.”
I’m afraid Protocols may be genuine. They are lectures addressed to Jewish Luciferians (Illuminati, Freemasons) detailing an incredible plan to overthrow western civilization, subjugate mankind, and concentrate “all the wealth of the world…in our hands.”
The lectures, typical of similar Illuminati documents, were leaked to the Czarist Secret police and published in Russia in 1905.
The issue of anti Semitism diverts attention from this plot which has been unfolding for over 200 years and is behind world government, September 11, Iraq, Homeland Security and the bogus “War on Terror.”
The plotters control the world’s wealth. Their multinational corporations use Freemason symbols in their logos. Shell and Citibank have the rising sun; Exxon the double cross, CBS and Time Warner the eye of Horus; Alcan and AOL, the circle in the triangle.
Their mass media, education and politics all create an illusion of democracy in order to control and defraud humanity. The Great Seal of the United States reflects the unhappy truth. It is also a Freemason symbol and bears the inscription “We have achieved New World Order.” Almost all American Presidents including George W. Bush are Freemasons or Illuminati.
Israel’s Star of David (interlaced triangles) is the Masonic symbol of the double divinity, Adonai and Lucifer.
The issue of anti Semitism is irrelevant because Jewish and non-Jewish Luciferians intermarried long ago. (See Milan Martin, Lucifer’s Children p.74) The elite now consists of humanity-haters of all stripes. No wonder corruption is endemic. As the Greeks say, “the fish rots from the head.”
Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) played a key role in advancing this monstrous conspiracy. He was a follower of the occult Cabbalism (or Lucifer worship) that is the basis of Illuminism and Freemasonry. (See Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.)
Researchers have speculated that Adam Weishaupt or Asher Ginzberg penned Protocols.At first I thought it was Rothschild himself. But because someone pointed out that the book refers to Nietzche and Darwin, it is more likely that Rothschild’s grandson, Lionel Nathan Rothschild (1809-1879) or someone like him, is the author. Lionel is the infamous Jewish banker “Sidonia” of Benjamin D’Israeli’s novel Coningsby(1844).
I came to this conclusion after reading Protocols 20-23, the “financial programme… the crowning and the decisive point of our plans.” These lectures require a detailed knowledge of finance and profound psychological insight. Moreover the author states that all power ultimately will reside in the “King of the Jews,” which is how the Rothschilds were known. In general the Protocols provide a compelling explanation of world events as they have transpired.
THE SOURCE OF POWER
The author makes clear that whoever creates money is sovereign. He ridicules the goyim kings for forfeiting this power and says that he doesn’t intend to repeat this mistake.” When we come into our Kingdom,” the government will change from being “a payer of tribute by loan operations…into a lender at a profit.”
“This measure will stop the stagnation of money, parasitic profits, and idleness which were useful for us among the goyim so long as they were independent but are not desirable under our rule.”
The Protocols is full of Talmudic contempt for non-Jews. “How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the goyim…What could have been simpler than to take the money they wanted from their own people? “…We “will put an end to those abuses to which we owe our mastery over the goyim, but which cannot be allowed in our Kingdom.” (178)
(I am using the L. Fry edition of The Protocols, entitled Waters Flowing Eastward, available from firstname.lastname@example.org)
COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, LIBERALISM, FEMINISM
Similarly the bankers have financed intellectuals and politicians to promote a mania for “senseless utopian principles” like “collectivism,” “freedom of conscience, equality and the like.” (182) They are designed to bring down the Old Order but will have no place in the New.
“We have set them on the hobbyhorse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of collectivism…They have never yet and they never will reflect that this hobbyhorse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality…” (159)
“The purely brute mind of the goyim is incapable of analysis and observation and still more of foreseeing whither a certain matter of settling a question may trend…Their eyes are open but see nothing before them…” (160)
“Everything in this world is in a state of submission, if not to man, then to … what is stronger. And so shall we be this something stronger for the sake of good.” (163)
THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
Estonian journalist Juri Lina has examined the recently opened Soviet archives and documented the connection between the Bolshevik Revolution and Jewish Illuminism in his book “Under the Sign of the Scorpion.” (1994)
I will probably devote a separate column to this. Suffice to say that Communism was the outcome of the plan outlined in Protocols. No wonder this book was banned in the USSR on pain of death! Its status in America is a measure of our condition.
Karl Marx, Lenin and Trotsky, all Jewish Freemasons, were essentially dysfunctional losers who were employed by the Illuminist bankers to hoodwink the masses. Lenin for example had been an unsuccessful lawyer who had only six cases in which he defended shoplifters. He lost them all. A week later he gave up the law to become a highly paid revolutionary.
Lenin declared: “Peace means quite simply the domination of Communism over the entire world.” His reign of terror caused nine million deaths but you never see him compared to Hitler. The secret police, the Cheka, dominated by Jews, published the names of 1.7 million people they murdered in 1918-1919, including 300,000 priests.
“A river of blood flowed through Russia,” Lina writes. “According to official Soviet Reports, 1,695,904 people were executed from January 1921 to April 1922. Among these victims were bishops, professors, doctors, officers, policemen, lawyers, civil servants, writers…Their crime was ‘anti social thinking’ ” (90)
Jews will never understand anti Semitism until they realize that it is not always based on irrational prejudice.
In 1920, Winston Churchill made a distinction between national and “International Jews.” He said the latter are behind “a worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality…
It played … a part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band …[has] gripped the Russian people by the hair and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
Our culture, not Protocols, is a hoax. Luciferian Communist Jews set an example for the Nazis. This is not a debating contest where I convince you to agree with me or vice versa. I am concerned only with the historical record. Our focus must be on establishing the truth.
Luciferians like Rothschild, Lenin and Hitler still control the planet and intend to enslave humanity. I’m afraid that this will become increasingly evident. I pray I am wrong. This is a debate I want to lose.
See “Protocols Forgery Argument is Flawed”
Before The Secret Doctrine and Mein Kampf; The Magnum Opus-Political Manifesto of the Occult: Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, by Albert Pike 33°
Protocols Forgery Argument is Flawed
December 14, 2003
Next to the Bible The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is perhaps the mostly widely read book in the world.
Published in Russia in 1903, it purports to be the leaked master plan for “Jewish world domination.” It is the kind of thing that would be studied at secret workshops of an occult society.
In different ways, both Zionists and Nazis have made it synonymous with virulent anti Semitism and genocide.
But surely Jews should not be blamed for the machinations of a tiny secret society. The vast majority of Jews would disavow this master plan if they believed it existed.
Surely one can condemn all racism and genocide in the strongest possible terms and still believe the Protocols are authentic.
In my opinion, the equation with anti Semitism is really a ploy to divert attention away from this master plan.
The plagiarism claim is part of a propaganda campaign waged by conscious and unconscious collaborators in academia and the media.
THE FORGERY CLAIM
We are told that The Protocols of Zion is a hoax, a “proven forgery” concocted by the Tsarist Political Police (the Okhrana) to incite anti Semitism and discredit revolutionaries.
But the “proof” is far from convincing.
It consists of three articles published in The London Times (August 16-18, 1921) by Philip Graves.
According to Graves, Protocols is a crude, chapter-by-chapter plagiarism of Maurice Joly’s Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864).
It was easy to make this claim while Joly’s book was unavailable. Napolean III’s police confiscated it as soon as it was published.
But it is available now and I invite you to compare the two texts. In my opinion, they are entirely different in tone, content and purpose. At 140 pages, Dialogues is twice as long as Protocols. Most of it finds no echo in the Protocols.
The crux of Graves’ argument is that certain references and passages in Protocols were lifted from Dialogues. He claims there are 50 of these and produces about a dozen.
Their striking resemblance to Protocols leaves little doubt that the author did refer to the Dialogues as part of his research. He had no compunction about borrowing or reshaping a few passages that struck his fancy.
Indeed Philip Graves is “struck by the absence of any effort on the part of the plagiarist to conceal his plagiarisms.”
That’s because he had nothing to hide.
He was not Graves’ “unimportant precis- writer employed by the court or by the Okhrana” to construct a hoax.
He was a diabolical genius crafting an original work. It is simplistic and disingenuous to characterize Protocols as a hoax.
Graves’ article smacks of a Zionist propaganda operation. Graves “expose” of Protocols appeared in August 1921 when Zionists were pressing the League of Nations to turn Palestine into a Jewish homeland under British Mandate.
Philip Grave tells the unlikely story that a “Mr. X” brought the Dialogues to him in Constantinople where he was the Times’ correspondent. Mr. X presented it as “irrefutable proof” that the Protocols are a plagiarism.
Mr. X was a White Russian, which seems incredible given the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He claims he bought the book from, get this, “a former member of the Okhrana” who had fled to Constantinople.
In The Controversy of Zion, (Chapter 34) Douglas Reed, a Times’ staffer at the time, provides additional background.
In May 1920, Lord Northcliffe, a part owner of The Times, printed an article about the Protocols entitled “The Jewish Peril, A Disturbing Pamphlet, A Call for an Enquiry. ” It concluded:
“An impartial investigation of these would-be documents and their history is most desirable…are we to dismiss the whole matter without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work unchecked?”
Then in May 1922 Northcliffe visited Palestine and wrote that Britain had been too hasty to promise it to the Jewish people when in fact it belonged to 700,000 Muslim Arab residents.
Mr. Wickham Steed, the editor of The Times of London in 1921 refused to print the article and Northcliffe tried to get him fired.
Somehow Steed was able to have Northcliffe declared “insane” and committed. Later Northcliffe complained he was being poisoned and died suddenly in 1922.
Douglas Reed was Northcliffe’s secretary but didn’t learn of these events until they appeared in the Official History of the Times in the 1950’s.
Clearly Northcliffe had offended some “big boys” when he opposed the British Mandate in Palestine. Why was it so important?
Israel is intended to be the capital of the Masonic World Government. They are already constructing the infrastructure. See “The Roots of Evil in Jerusalem.”
THE FORGERY CLAIM IN MORE DETAIL
Philip Graves and the other apologists are incorrect to claim the Protocols plagiarize the Dialogues chapter by chapter.
Graves writes that “the Seventh Dialogue…corresponds with the fifth, sixth, seventh and part of the eighth Protocol. ”
At eight pages, these Protocols are twice as long as the Seventh Dialogue.
They mostly contain material not in the Seventh Dialogue, or anywhere else. I will list a few examples from Protocol Five alone.
Protocol Five says “our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions” that it will “wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.”
In contrast Seventh Dialogue says, “Death, expropriation and torture should only play a minor role in the internal politics of modern states.”
Protocols Five says we “robbed [the goyim] of their faith in God” and “insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights” thereby undermining the authority of Kings. There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says, “we shall so wear down the goyim that they will be compelled to offer us international power [allowing us] gradually to absorb all State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government.” There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says the “engine” of all states is “in our hands” and that engine is “Gold.” “We were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth.” There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
ON THE OTHER HAND
The author of Protocols does select a few passages or references from Dialogues that appear unaltered (see Graves) or in different form.
For example, the Dialogues’ say: ” Everywhere might precedes right. Political liberty is merely a relative idea. The need to live is what dominates states as it does individuals.”
In Protocols this becomes, “From the law of nature right lies in might. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact, and one must know how to use it [political freedom] as a bait whenever it appears necessary to attract the masses … to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.” (Protocols 1)
Graves leaves out the last part to make the resemblance seem greater than it is.
Dialogues (7) say, “Revolutionary ferment which is suppressed in one’s own country should be incited throughout Europe.”
In Protocols (7) “Throughout all Europe … we must create ferments, discords, hostilities.” There is no reference to suppressing these in one’s own country.
The author of Protocols is not a forger creating a hoax, but a conspirator forging an original work.
SAME GENRE, DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS
Both books belong to the “immoral school” of political theory. Machiavelli pays homage to a long list of rulers “who are progenitors of my doctrine.” Both preach might makes right, “good” comes from evil, and the end justifies the means.
But the similarity ends there. The tone of the Dialogues is dry and theoretical. It is a debate between fictional political theorists: Montesquieu a champion of democracy and Machiavelli, a champion of tyranny. Dialogues is considered a critique of the reign of Napolean III.
Montesquieu asks how to quell the spirit of anarchy in society. Machiavelli prescribes a “monster called the state” which maintains a democratic artifice but is actually controlled by the “Prince.” He talks about how to suppress secret societies.
On the other hand, the tone of Protocols is frankly conspiratorial and subversive and pays homage to Lucifer. Protocols is a “strategic plan from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries come to naught.” (Protocol 1)
We are struck by a sense of relevance when reading Protocols. We immediately recognize its baneful influence in today’s world. See “Did Rothschild Write The Protocols of Zion?” “Protocols is the NWO Blueprint” and “Protocols Dominates Our Culture” .
Since Graves’ articles, there have been a few books arguing the “forgery” thesis. The latest is Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide (1970).
Graves and Cohn admit that “the Financial Programme” (Protocols 20-24) which the author calls “the crowning and decisive point of our plans” is largely original.
For serious researchers, Australian researcher Peter Myers presents pro and con views.
Goebbels said that propaganda is effective only when the reader doesn’t realize it is propaganda. It follows that dupes write the best propaganda. For example, see Rick Salutin, Protocols of Zion’s Critics.
One hundred million people were slaughtered in the last century but no one considers the possibility that the human race might have been subverted.
War is hell but no one thinks Satan worshipers might be behind it.
I suspect the Second World War was a battle for racial superiority between Jewish and Aryan wings of the Illuminati who in fact are united at the top.
The private central bankers of England, the U.S. and Nazi Germany made the war possible. They worked as one at the Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland. (See Charles Higham, Trading With the Enemy.)
The purpose of the war was to degrade, defraud and demoralize humanity. The Holocaust provided a rationale for the establishment of Israel as headquarters of the New World Order. Aryans, Jews and many others were sacrificed and exploited.
In my opinion, the outlawing of Protocols on pain of death in Bolshevik Russia and its execration in the West today proves its authenticity.
Mankind is in the grip of a diabolical conspiracy. In order to make good people do bad things, truth must be tailored to fit the political purpose. This is Communist and feminist teaching.
I would like to be proven wrong, but in the case of Protocols, the “forgery” argument is propaganda.
See “Protocols of Zion Updated”