Teenager Killed Outside His Mother’s House ‘Had Throat Slashed by Gang’

Raped, tortured then told: You are going to die slowly

Mary Ann Leneghan

By Stewart Payne

12:01AM GMT 14 Jan 2006

A 16-year-old schoolgirl was “executed” and her teenage friend left for dead by a drug gang out for revenge, a jury has been told.

Yesterday Reading Crown Court heard how the gang kidnapped and raped the girls, forced them to smoke heroin and crack cocaine and tortured them with knives, boiling water, kicks and punches, it was alleged.

After an ordeal that lasted hours in a tiny hotel room the girls were driven in the boot of a car in the dead of night to a park where they were made to kneel with pillow cases over their heads.

Mary Ann Leneghan was told that her death would be slow. She was repeatedly stabbed as she collapsed to the ground.

Her friend lifted her pillow case to see Mary Ann curled up in a ball, screaming in agony, as her attacker continued to plunge a knife into her.

Then the second girl, aged 18, was asked: “Are you ready to die yet?” She was shot in the forehead before her attackers fled, believing both to be dead.

“Miraculously”, the second girl survived. She regained consciousness and saw Mary Ann on the grass, making gasping noises. In a dazed state she stumbled out of the park and into the path of a man walking to work, who raised the alarm.

By the time police found Mary Ann, in Prospect Park, Reading, she had been dead for 15 minutes.

Her family held their heads in their hands and wept as the gruesome events of the night of May 7 last year were recounted by Richard Latham, QC, prosecuting, to a distressed jury.

He said that a gang of six men held the two girls responsible for one of their number being attacked by another group of men who robbed him of his drugs.

Adrian Thomas, 20, said the girls had “set him up” and recruited five friends in south London to exact a dreadful revenge, it was alleged. They found the two girls sitting in a car chatting to a friend outside a disused pub in Reading. They forced them to get out, bundled them into the boot of a car and drove to the Abbey House guest house in the town.

In room 19, not much larger than the double bed it contained, they spread towels on the floor to soak up blood. The girls were made to strip and were repeatedly punched, kicked and stabbed with the points of knives.

While Mary Ann was raped in a shower cubicle the other girl was sprayed with boiling sugared water which stuck to her body before she, too, was raped, it was claimed.

Both were forced to perform oral sex and to smoke drugs. The men laughed and encouraged each other.

“Most seriously of all,” said Mr Latham, the girls “were told throughout that they were going to die that night when the men had finished with them.”

They were told: “You must have known that we would come for you.”

The prosecution has based its case on the account of the surviving girl, who will be a witness later in the trial. “What she describes is simply horrific,” Mr Latham said.

He said that both girls were “not without their faults”. Mary Ann regularly “bunked off” school and neither was the sort of girl you would find “tucked up in bed at 10 o’clock at night”, he said. They were “young and naive”.

The girls knew Thomas, who had rented a flat in Reading. It was there that he was attacked and robbed. He blamed the girls for letting his attackers in by leaving a door open. Mr Latham said that when the gang found the girls in the car, one remarked: “Both of them at the same time. Just the two girls we’ve been looking for.” Once in the hotel they were subjected to “violence and degradation” over a long period.

Mr Latham said that not all of the gang members took part in everything that went on in the room and not all were present when the girls were taken to the park. But “they acted together in a joint enterprise to torture and kill these young women”.

Thomas, Michael Johnson, 19, Jamaile Morally, 22, Joshua Morally, 23, and Llewellyn Adams, 24, all from south London, and Indrit Krasniqi, 18, from west London, all deny the murder of Mary Ann and the attempted murder of her friend, who cannot be named because she is the victim of alleged sexual assaults.

They further deny kidnapping, grievous bodily harm and rape.

The trial continues.


Ah, bunked off school, they deserved what they got…..

When Paul a caller into Talksport radio mentioned this next case, the presentor knew nothing of it at all……
Programmes throughout the night and this morning are dedicated to the murder of Steven Lawrence.
A Government advisor a black guy stated on Nick Ferrari show LBC Radio today that were the two guys found guilty of Stevens murder only given 12 years in prison, which is the guideline for such a case as the guys were in their teens when the killing took place,he recommended 35 years!
Adding any less than 35 the black community would not be happy…………
We shall wait and see!

Teenager Killed Outside His Mother’s House ‘Had Throat Slashed by Gang’

Daily Mail (London), December 4, 2011

“The people chasing him comprised of a group of black males.” A teenager has been viciously stabbed to death as he tried to flee a gang of youths.

The victim, named locally as Danny O’Shea, was chased and had his throat slashed outside his mother’s front door in Newham, east London last night.

Paramedics fought for 30 minutes to save the 18-year-old’s life, but he was pronounced dead at the scene in front of horrified neighbours at 6.50pm.

Police have yet to establish whether the teen’s mother was in at the time when her son was chased 300 yards before the attack outside the house.

Tributes have already started pouring in to a memorial group on Facebook, which has attracted over 500 people.

Friends of Danny O’Shea today said the 18-year-old ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’.

Danny’s family were said to be too ‘devastated’ to speak about his death.

However a friend, speaking outside the family home, said: ‘Danny wouldn’t hurt a fly, he was completely harmless. ‘His family are devastated.’

A large patch of dried blood was still clearly visible opposite the groundfloor flat. A door of a neighbour’s home had been taken off for forensic testing and replaced.

Paramedics tried to revive Danny at the scene, but he was pronounced dead shortly after. There have been no arrests and police are appealing for witnesses to come forward.

Piles of flowers covered the drive of the family home, with balloons, a single candle and pictures with tributes including one from his sister reading ‘to my darling bro, we love you so much.

‘Dan you’re one in 1000′s millions RIP. Angel forever, love Jessie, Georgie, James, Lauren, Isabella and Phoebe.’

A steady stream of family and friends visited the family home, many in tears and some carrying flowers.

The teen’s grandfather, Michael O’Shea, told The Sunday Mirror: ‘He was a wonderful lad. We’re all in shock.’

A police spokesman said earlier that next of kin had been informed but formal identification had not yet taken place.

There have been no arrests.

John MacDonald, detective chief inspector of the Homicide and Serious Crime Command, said: ‘We believe that the victim may have been chased from Butchers Road at the junction of Hooper Road down into Boreham Avenue, E16.

‘The people chasing him comprised of a group of black males.’



February 10, 2009

Another Muslim Race Hate Attack on Kriss Donald’s Street

What could be described one if not THE most despicable race hate crimes in Scotland/Britain was the horrific murder of 15 year old schoolboy, Kriss Donald – who was tortured and killed by muslim gang/men for no other reason than the young lad was white. Even the left leaning oft muslim apologist newspaper, The Guardian, was compelled to report gruesome murder:

“The court had heard that Kriss was jumped on as he walked down a street near his home with a friend. As he was bundled into a car, he screamed: “Why me? I’m only 15.”

His mutilated body was found the next day on a walkway in the east end of the city. The slightly built boy had been beaten, held down and stabbed 13 times, then set on fire while he was still alive. Bleeding to death and burning, he tried to crawl towards the river Clyde but died in a ditch.

A passerby who found his body the following day thought he had stumbled across the carcass of a dead animal. ” LINK

More grisly details were found in The Independent

“The jury was told that Kriss was probably still alive when he was doused in petrol and set alight. Forensic experts said burns covered more than 70 per cent of his body. He was found on a walkway next to the river Clyde, near Celtic FC’s training ground, the next day.

Described as slightly built, Kriss was so badly beaten and stabbed that one of his ribs was severed. Prosecutors described his death as an “appalling crime of inhumanity against a defenceless boy”.

Other reports have even further agony being inflicted on Kriss Donald:

“Before he died, it is alleged that he was castrated, burned with cigarettes; his eyes were gouged out and he was stabbed repeatedly. Once on the waste ground he was doused with gasoline and set alight whilst still alive. He crawled a few metres and then, mercifully, died.” LINK

Three muslim men – each with multiple past convictions – were found guilt of the slaughter – Imran Shahid, 29, his brother Zeeshan Shahid, 28, and 27-year-old Mohammed Faisal Mushtaq of the abduction, assault and brutal killing on Monday March 15, 2004. – but only after they fled and tried to hide in Pakistan. LINK

The muslim MP who helped track down the abhorrent murderers and bring them back to Great Britain, was forced to give up his position due to “a campaign of fear” from fellow muslim “henchmen”:

“Britain’s first Muslim MP is to step down at the next election after he and his family received repeated death threats over his role in bringing three racist killers to justice. Mohammad Sarwar played a crucial part in securing the conviction of three Asian men for kidnapping, torturing and murdering the white schoolboy Kriss Donald in 2004. As a result, he has been subjected to a campaign of fear from the killers’ henchmen, including threats to kill his children and grandchildren.

After months of abuse, Mr Sarwar announced yesterday that he had decided to stand down as MP for Glasgow Central at the next election to concentrate on charity work. Although he denied his surprise decision was directly linked to the death threats, he admitted his family had come under extreme pressure since he successfully negotiated the return of Kriss’ killers from Pakistan.” LINK

Now comes the news that an innocent, light-hearted snowball fight, that took place on the same street where Kriss Donald was abducted- turned into yet another muslim on white British race hate crime: LINK and LINK

The public’s help is being sought by police after four white men were seriously assaulted by a group of Asian men in Glasgow after a snowball fight turned to violence.

The victims, all aged 20, were involved in a good-natured snowball fight with a group of Asian youths aged between 10 and 16 in Kenmure Street, Pollokshields, at around 8.30pm on Sunday.

…Officers are treating the attack as a racial incident.

All four victims were taken to the Victoria Infirmary suffering from various injuries, including head wounds and broken bones.

Local officials prefer to ignore – what the police describe as a “racial incident” – even going so far as to state that the Kriss Donald murder had no racial overtones:

“Pollokshields city councillor David Meikle said he was “shocked” by the incident and called for urgent action to clean up the community’s streets.

“There is a feeling that certain areas are run by Asian gangs who think they are above the law,” he said. “I agree there is a problem in that area with youth disorder. It just so happens that because of the make-up of the community, it is Asian men.”

Bill Fraser of Pollokshields Community Council said: “There is very little racial disharmony that I can see. There is a problem with youth disorder, which I think is the real issue here. think there were people who wanted to turn the Kriss Donald murder into a racial problem and it backfired. I said at the time I did not think it was the real issue.”This is a tight community and we do have a high proportion who are Asian but I don’t see there being are any race problems here.

Osama Saeed of the Scottish Islamic Foundation said: “There was a nuance about the Kriss Donald incident that people do not pick up on.”Pollokshields has been through tests, notably the Kriss Donald murder, and it has come through them. It is a very resilient community and it is one where people do intermingle. You don’t find those diverse areas a lot.”

As long as officials continue to ignore the obvious, act as apologists for racist muslim thugs and refuse to recognize that muslims can and are perpetrators of race hate attacks then Pollokshields, and other communities in Great Britain, will continue to see innocent victims of muslim hate crimes- attacked,beaten and murdered.


Charlene Downes – a murder too far for the MSM
The BNP website has a post on the truly macabre fate of fourteen-years old Charlene Downes. You can be sure they would not do so if the mainstream media was doing its job.

Charlene was last seen by her family on 3rd November, 2003. She had walked from her Blackpool home to the North Pier, and never returned. For more than two years the police pursued their enquiries diligently, categorising the case as a murder investigation as well as a “missing persons”. Some 3,000 men were DNA-tested during the course of the investigation, and an appeal was launched on the BBC’s “Crimewatch”.

A few days ago the breakthrough came and this brief report appeared – though originally in which paper, regional or national, I have not yet discovered.

The body of a missing schoolgirl may have been turned into burgers and kebabs and served up at a seaside fast food outlet.

Police fear the remains of 14 year old Charlene Downes, who went missing in November 2003, may also have been ground up into tile grout.

Iyad Albattikhi, 28, who ran the Funny Boyz takeaway in Blackpool, is charged with her murder.

The co-owner of the business Mohammed Raveshi, a 49 year old former social services worker and foster father, is charged with assisting in
the disposal of her body.

The men appeared at a hearing at Blackpool maistrates court yesterday.

The teenager whose body has never been found left home on Halloween saying she was meeting friends on Blackpool’s North Pier.

It was initially thought Charlene, a pupil at St George’s Church of England High School, had run away.

Appeals for her to come forward were subsequently posted in missing persons’ columns.

However six months after her disappearance police searched freezers at three Blackpool curry houses looking for her remains.

Well, try googling for Iyad Albattikhi. You will find no shocked national reportage of how an English child was slaughtered, her flesh rendered for burgers of all things and her bones for tile grout. You will find no claims that she was “academic”, nor that she had “high hopes” of a “bright future” when her “studies” were complete – she is not African, after all. Actually, you will find literally nothing.

One day in ten, fifteen, maybe twenty years, her abuser and killer will walk from his cell into the gentle, misty light of north-west England. He will be free and will, under English law, be considered to have repaid his debt to society.

Neither in the shameful failure to report the end of the police investigation now nor in the eventual punishment of the killer does our effeminated, debt-paid society honour her aright.

What are the liberal arguments for that, again? What is the argument for press censorship on crimes against whites? And what is the argument for keeping murderous animals – any murderous animals regardless of you-know-what – alive and breathing the fart-filled air in our prison system for a couple of decades?


Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Reality vs. Antiwhite Hollywood Fantasy

The viral video of Epic Beard Man has been turned into a film by the Hollyweirds.

Of course the new film Bad Ass distorts the original, real story out of all recognition. They say it is “based on a true story,” but here, instead of the white 67 year-old getting harassed on a public bus by an uppity black guy, it is two white skinheads picking on a poor, innocent Mexican! Of course!

As if they couldn’t just make a movie about Epic Beard Man. No: he’s white, so that would be rayyyycisss.

Our culture has a disease of the soul.

Hat tip: Scotsman.

Dec 22nd 2011

Di[e]versity Training Video – Training You How To Hate Whitey

Today we feature a form of Anti-White Media that we have heretofore neglected: the diversity training video.

Many of us have been forced to watch them when taking a new job. Has anyone ever noticed how over-the-top Anti-White they are?

What this video doesn’t tell you, but which is clear from the production company’s website, is that the non-whites it features are for the most part professional “diversity” consultants.

The most hostile man here, the colorfully dressed, mixed-race guy, Mr. Victor Lewis, has made a living airing Anti-White grievances. Therefore his spiel about the white guy “standing on the shoulders” of other races is likely scripted; it is probably a point he has made (and was likely paid to make) in front of audiences hundreds of times.

Meanwhile, the white guy they gang up on is just your average Joe. He’s not a professional advocate for white interests. He just runs a shop.

So here we have professional race hustlers and “diversity trainers” picking on this one white fall-guy. They put him on trial. Even the black guy he’s sitting next to, who acts as his lawyer, turns on him.

But if I had been in the room, I would have had to remind them that just about every race there had at one time gone through an expansionist phase. For instance, one of the men next to Mr. Lewis looks like he could be a Mongolian. Why doesn’t Mr. Lewis turn threateningly towards the Mongolian man and tell how he “stood on the shoulders of,” enslaved, dominated and decimated the white people of the Russian Steppe for hundreds of years? If the man happened to be Japanese, Mr. Lewis could have complained how the man’s ancestors enslaved the Koreans for thousands of years.

In fact, Mr. Lewis himself looks vaguely like Muammar Gaddafi. He could easily be part Arab or Moor. But he doesn’t turn to himself and say: You know, self, for hundreds of years you harassed all your neighbors; you killed and enslaved the Indo-European Persians; you converted them at the point of a sword to your oppressive religion; you conquered and killed and converted the people of Spain; you harried all weaker and less organized tribes, enslaved them when you could and justified that enslavement with your not-very-PC religious text, the Koran. Indeed, you have historically dominated your own women, who to this day are far less likely than a white European woman to maintain any sense of independence.

I could go on with critiques of Mr. Lewis, and shall: he singles out the white guy for such particular scorn, blaming him for the alleged wrongs of the white race as a whole.





Ethnic statistics given in this chapter, unless noted otherwise, are taken from the UK Census 2001, which can be viewed at the office of national statistics.

New Labour, since its 1997 campaign and election success, has consistently promised “equality” in Britain. Economic equality, social equality, gender equality, racial equality … they’ve promised equality across the board [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The apparent strive under New Labour to eliminate all prejudice and discrimination in British society has been a combined effort from the mainstream media, countless charitable organisations representing minority groups [1] [2] [3] [4] and of course the New Labour politicians. This has also created an interesting new facet in the world of business in the UK … diversity training.

On the surface its easy to assume that business managers, politicians and charities have simultaneously seen the light and decided to create a better, more equal world for us all. But what they’ve delivered is something very different.

Bear in mind, while reading this chapter, that New Labour and a compliant British media have wholeheartedly supported the implementation of police state laws in Britain, the demonization of Muslims and ethnic minorities as terrorists, the deportation of Asian men to face torture and long term imprisonment at Guantanamo Bay, the fabrication of WMD lies against Iraq, as well as the invasion and occupation of Iraq, which resulted in the deaths of over 100,000 Iraqi people. Never forget that New Labour and their allies have a great deal of blood on their hands. They are not the promoters of equality and human rights that they claim to be.

Meta discrimination

New Labour’s deputy leader, Harriet Harman, claims “Labour is the party of equality and we’ve done more than any government to promote fairness and equality.”, but the strive to give minority groups equal representation has been a selective one in that some minority groups are targeted for political / economic assistance and others are simply left to fend for themselves. I call this Meta Discrimination because it occurs at the decision making level of those who claim to promote equality. Here are some examples.

1) The pursuit of equality and social representation for Asians (which under the UK census doesn’t include the Chinese or other countries of the Far East / Orient) and black people is strong, but it is very weak for those from the Far East. Asians and black people are consistently encouraged to “integrate” into British culture [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and at times this appears to be against their will, yet East Asians (especially the Chinese) are not subject to this demand. East Asians are perfectly capable of integration, but are not subject to government pressure when they choose to form their own segregated neighbourhoods, nor are the rest of the population pressurized with ideas of “inclusion” of those from the Far East. There are eight Chinatowns in British cities, one of the major ones is in my home city of Liverpool. And there is virtually never any outcry against its presence.

2) While ethnic, cultural and religious segregation is deemed intolerable for Asians, segregation according to wealth is allowed to go on as usual with less political / media attention [1] [2] [3] and with children from poor and rich families being educated separately and under different conditions [1] [2] [3].

3) Race specific publications and leisure / community / entertainment events are frequently funded around specific ethnic minority groups [1] [2] [3], but white people / white British culture are almost universally excluded from holding such events in celebration of their own culture. For example there is a UK Black Pride organisation, which is backed by dozens of corporate and media sponsors, but there is no funding for white pride organisations. Those who do wish to celebrate their white ethnicity are left only with nazi-styled fascist groups, or BNP affiliated groups to turn to [1] [2] [3] [4]. We’ll return to this subject shortly.

4) Equality / representation for sufferers and ex-sufferers of mental illness is very limited. In fact for some mental illness groups the media systematically operates a demonization campaign. Sex offences, especially paedophilia, are the most extreme example of this [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. This has even contributed to a shortage of men who are willing to work with children and is depriving children of much needed male role models [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. It’s also led to adults fearing interraction with other people’s children in general [1] [2] [3] lest they be branded a potential sex predator. It’s led to parents keeping their children indoors lest they be attacked by a paedophile [1] [2]. And it’s led to false accusations / unfounded suspicions of paedophilic activity [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] against innocent members of the public, which are difficult for the accused to shake off even when they’ve been proven innocent. Paedophilia is a serious mental health condition that needs genuine, honest and rationale debate backed up by well funded and unbiased research. In contrast to this widespread phobia of child molestors, the media has in recent years increasingly portrayed children in an over sexualized way [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Should we not be arresting the creators of over sexualized childrens magazines and music videos on suspicion of disseminating paedophilic media content?

5) Other mental health disorders that are left behind under New Labour’s equality push are schizopherenia and personality / psychotic disorders. This is a field I have a lot of experience in through my own line of work. I’ve seen time and time again how mentally ill people are put into flats in the community and left to fend for themselves with minimal support, all justified under labels such as “independent living” and “the tenant’s choice”. My own father died under these circumstances and my ongoing efforts to hold the care agencies accountable has been met with strong institutional resistance despite over-whelming evidence. The mentally ill are often isolated under lax community care programs because their mental health problems make it difficult to form friendships / relationships in the community. This frequently drives the mentally ill person to drugs or alcohol as a form of escapism and control of anxiety, which in turn leads to addiction and occasionally their premature death. [1] [2] [3]. The mentally ill are also often demonized in the media and subject to imprisonment for crimes that are a result of their illness [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [5].

6) Demonization of teenagers is another area in which equal rights don’t seem to apply under New Labour’s Britain [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Like with mental illness and paedophilia, antisocial behaviour from teenagers requires genuine, rational and honest debate about the true causes stemming from the overall structure of our society. In particular, white teenage males are currently losing out in Britain [1] [2] [3], apparently due to an anti-education culture that has emerged in their social group. The overwhelming identity pressure of our current celebrity culture, as opposed to worthy role models, is also harmful to teenagers [1] [2] [3] [4]. Copycat suicides are one of the most bizarre examples of the harmful power of celebrity culture. The sexual emphasis of our media induced celebrity culture may be one of the reasons for Britain having the highest rate of teenage pregnacies in Europe.

7) An area of inequality that universally gets almost no attention at all is people’s level of intelligence. I’ve worked with the homeless for many years and have frequently met people who are socially hampered by low intelligence and poor education. They’re often semi-literate, have poor concentration spans and limited control of their emotions. Many women in this respect have gotten themselves pregnant at an early age, resulting in pressures to raise children on state benefits or in some cases their children have been taken away from them by the state, leaving them and their children emotionally wrecked by the separation. A person with higher than average intelligence generally stands a much greater chance of succeeding in higher education and the workplace. We generally accept that these people are entitled to live a better life due to their career efforts, but how much of it is simple differences of intelligence? We treat people with physical disabilities and severe learning disabilities with dignity by providing them with decent lifestyles in the community, as if they were fully contributing to the economy like the average citizen. So should a person of slightly below average intelligence, who is confined to less mentally challenging forms of employment, be penalized by a lower standard of living and lower social status? It’s highly debatable, but the point I’m making is that it’s an area of inequality that New Labour is neither capable or willing to tackle.

All these forms of meta discrimination bring into question the motives and competencies of New Labour in presenting themselves as champions of “equality”, “diversity” and “inclusion”. Why do they fight tooth and nail for some minority groups and not others? It’s a simple question, but the information avialable on the subject is complex.

However, one of the big giveaways about New Labour’s agendas can be found in a particular area of inequality that I haven’t yet mentioned.

An increase in economic inequality

The truest reflection of an equal society is on the level of economic comparisons. There’s no point celebrating different cultures with glossy brochures and multicultural events if the people from those cultures are kept in the poor house. This is the bar by which we should judge New Labour’s equality achievements.

Unfortunately, New Labour has not delivered its equality promises on the all important economic level [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Here are some statistics and snapshots from a powerpoint presentation by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) relating to their research document Racing Away? Income Inequality and the evolution of High Incomes.

•The richest 10% to 1% of adults receive approx 37-40% of total personal income
•The richest 1% to 0.1% of adults receive approx 11% of total personal income
•The richest 0.1% (top one thousandth) of adults receive approx 4.3% of total personal income
•The top 1% to 0.1% of earners (£100,000-150,000 per annum) pay 31.8% income tax
•The top 0.1% of earners (£350,000-800,000 per annum) pay 35.2% income tax
•Despite New Labour’s rhetoric about sexual equality in the workplace, the top 10% of earners are predominently male (approx 73%). This figure rises to over 90% for the top 0.1% of earners.


Notice how the wealth curve fires straight up for the richest one thousandth of Britain’s population, yet the income tax for this super rich class only goes up slightly. The following graph from the same powerpoint document illustrates a timeline in rises of income for the top 10%, 1% and 0.1% of Britain’s earners under New Labour since 1996-7.


Here is a short 2008 press release by the (IFS) concerning the same document.

The reasoning as to why New Labour has failed to achieve its promises of economic equality is a difficult subject because it leads into areas of debate that are emotionally challenging for many people. At the most base level the answer is very simple … their promises of equality are a deception to passify the population, while New Labour aligns itself with the agendas of the already super rich and the European Commission. That may sound like a harsh judgement, but bear with me as I further the case.

Unrealistic promises & ridiculous assumptions

The Labour party’s criteria for what constitutes equality is deeply flawed. Back in 1976 Labour introduced the Race Relations Act, clause 37 of which enables companies in Britain to deliver training only to specific racial groups, while excluding others.

37. Discriminatory training by certain bodies.— (1) Nothing in Parts II to IV shall render unlawful any act done in relation to particular work by [F153any person] in or in connection with—
(a) affording only persons of a particular racial group access to facilities for training which would help to fit them for that work; or
(b) encouraging only persons of a particular racial group to take advantage of opportunities for doing that work,

Basically the clause facilitates racist recruitment at the training level. The last sentence quoted above is interestingly vague. What kinds of “encouragement” of particular racial groups (and hence a lack of encouragement for others) are acceptable under the act? Here’s how the UK Film Council interprets this law under their so-called “positive action” recruitment policies.

Special encouragement such as targeted advertising and recruitment literature, reserving places for one gender on training courses or providing taster courses in non-traditional areas.

And another training organisation, Skillset, interprets it as follows:

The scheme was delivered under clause 37 of the Race Relations Act which allows training organisations to run programmes for people from black and ethnic origin groups which have been demonstrated to be under represented in a particular industry.

Clause 37, along with several other clauses in the Race Relations Act, enables direct exclusion of specific racial groups from training. It allows racism. The act doesn’t allow discrimination to occur directly at the recruitment level, but shifts the racist policy to the level of training, where it will be less noticed [1] [2] [3].
A year earlier, in 1975, Labour introduced the Sex Discrimination Act, which established the same rules, but this time allowing training to be targeted at one gender, while excluding the other.

So why would Labour introduce laws to combat discrimination, yet include clauses that specifically allow discrimination at the job training level? The first thing to note in this respect is that the act has served as a stepping stone to later policies introduced by New Labour, such as the Equality Act 2006, which was criticized in its early draft form for attempted legalizing of discrimination at the employment level [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Whenever Labour is in power it implements laws to facilitate discrimination, while claiming to fighting discrimination. They may as well be saying “We have to be racist to stop racism”.

The logic given within the acts is that if the racial makeup of a workplace is not equal to the ethnic makeup of the entire population then it can only be down to one thing … racism. New Labour leaders have an absurd belief that in a discrimination free society every workplace will have a staff team that is proportionally equal to the entire division of the population in terms of race, sexuality, religion, sexual orientation and disability, but the assumption is simply untrue. People from different social groups have different workplace interests. For example, we’re not going to get an equal percentage of males and females becoming makeup artists, construction workers, midwives or soldiers. White British people are less likely to work in the catering industries because our culture places less emphasis on the culinery arts. Japanese people have a much higher interest in animation than other cultures. Black men, particularly in America, have shown a much greater interest in becoming musicians. And Indian men tend to have more interest in the medical professions than white men do, hence they’re vastly over-represented as doctors.

The simple fact is that workforce disproportion is not in itself evidence of discrimination. It can just as easily be attributed to the preferences of different social groups.

In case the absurdity of New Labour’s equality crusade hasn’t sunk in yet, I’ll take my analogies a step further. In order to create a perfectly equal society that conforms to New Labour’s proportional expectations, in which no one has any advantage over anyone else and nobody is left with any reason to complain that they’re being discriminated against, here are some of the social changes we would have to achieve.

•Fashion magazines would have to recruit from a broad range of physcal types instead of discriminating in favor of “slim” and “attractive” models.
•Our legal institutions would have to adjust convictions so that the prison population was proportionally representative of the UK population. Currently it isn’t proportional.
•Stand up comedy and other forms of humour would have to be outlawed on the basis that most humour involves audiences relishing in the humiliation, embarrasment or misfortune of a particular individual or social group.
•People with ginger hair would have to be recruited to make up a 2 – 6% proportion of every workforce because that is the proportion of European populations falling into that hair colour group. To not do so could run the risk of a form of discrimination called “gingerism”.
•The social circles of every individual in the country would have to be monitored and adjusted to make sure they are proportionally socializing with the right kinds of people in the right numbers. If they aren’t then they may be racist.
•The content of all artistic media that depicts human beings would have to be monitored and adjusted to ensure the artist wasn’t showing preference in his choices of gender, age and race in his/her artwork.
•All verbal and written descriptions of scenarios involving a “him” or “her” protagonist would have to be replaced with a non-gender description.
•Competitive sports would have to be abolished because they encourage social oneupmanship, based partially on genetic differences between different individuals and sometimes between different races.
As an example of such ridiculous measures actually being taken, fire fighting services in Britain have now been given targets to recruit more women firefighters to combat sex discrimination [1] [2] [3]. Even the most hardcore feminist would have to admit that males have a physical constitution much more appropriate for the demanding tasks of a firefighter. Also included in this drive to remove apparent discrimination in the fire services was a series of recruitment days, which white male applicants were banned from taking part. The result of the entire scheme was that just one ethnic minority applicant was hired.

The following clip of a Margaret Thatcher speech is crude, but pinpoints that New Labour’s promise cannot be achieved without the party dictating what goes on not just in the workplace, but in the family home

New Labour’s promise of universal equality is no more realistic than the utopian dream of communism. It can never be achieved.

Inequality is a part of life and in some instances is appropriate. If two people of roughly equal ability and with similar work opportunities differ in their willingness to work then one of those people should and will end up earning more than the other. Ability, motivation and reliability should always be the traits that an employer looks for in both the public and private sectors, and if one particular racial, sexual or social group displays those qualities more consistently then so be it – they should get the jobs so that we can all reap the benefits of the best service.

Another fact that New Labour policy makers are in denial of is that people naturally group together according to sameness. This is true on all levels of society. Football fans are drawn to other football fans, rather than chess enthusiasts, and generally towards those who support the same football teams. Both men and women tend to have mostly same sex friends. Alcoholics and drug addicts tend to hang out with their own. 98% of marriages in the UK are between people of the same ethnicity. Corporate bosses hang out with other corporate bosses. Even politicans are socially drawn to members of the same political parties or at least those who share the same ideologies.

This seeking out of familiarity and mutual interest is especially true culturally. We have pubs in Britain that are specifically themed to Irish people and hence draw a higher percentage of regular Irish customers. As previously mentioned there are many Chinatowns in Britain. New Labour and the British mainstream media often present such cultural hotspots as xenophobic and based upon underlying feelings of racism [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8], but it’s the psychological similarities and mutual interests within any given culture that create its secular cohesion. The majority of the time skin colours are incidental. Evidence of this can be found in instances of “us and them” conflicts between groups of people sharing the same ethnic ancestry. For example, in North England personal feelings of rivalry are often displayed between white British people living in Manchester and Liverpool. Each group has a geographical and social cohesion of its own, despite being visually indistinguishable. Religion is another powerful example. People who have adopted opposing beliefs systems are not drawn to eachother. They are drawn to their own places of worship where they are surrounded by people who share their beliefs. This can even be said of New Labour leaders themselves – they are drawn to each other by mutual interests and shared beliefs.

Of course, from time to time people do naturally display a healthy interest in the lifestyles and beliefs of groups they aren’t familiar with, even if only to keep the peace. Its one of the core motives for holidaymakers. They like to explore and appreciate how other people live, even if they wouldn’t choose to live the same way. And this isn’t just done through holidays. People read both fiction and non-fiction books set in different cultures. They also watch foreign language films. This is how people naturally educate themselves about other cultures and celebrate their differences. And from time to time, people decide to make a lifestyle switch and adopt the lifestyle of a culture other than the one they’re born in.

But in New Labour’s fantasy reality the geographical separation of cultures must be erradicated so that every culture exists simultaneously, side-by-side, in every city, every street, every workplace and in every home. This is simply impossible. Throughout human history geographical proximity has been the key factor that bonds groups of people together. When people sharing the same land become divided into camps of incompatible belief systems they tend to reorganise themselves geographically to achieve separation and, if they’re willing, then establish a neighbourly tolerance and co-operation on matters of mutual interest.

The so-called “racist” element comes into play when groups of people with opposing belief systems happen to have different ethnicity. People sometimes forget about the psychological basis of their differences and begin to assume that skin colour is what separates them. Ask any classic “racist” why they feel hostility to another race and their feedback will primarily consist of objections to opposing economic interests and opposing perceptions of morality. One of the reasons the “racist” focuses on skin colour is because of its aesthetic simplicity, which is always a temptation for people who are angry and afraid, but its not the core reason for the “racist”s hostile position.

Misrepresenting Britain

So have New Labour simply gotten the wrong ideas into their heads about how to create a fair society, in which people have equal rights? Unfortunately the evidence suggests not.

A new trend emerging in Britain is the distortion of group statistics. An example of this, which I encountered a few years ago, is that the major funding bodies of the British film and TV industry have intentionally distorted ethnic statistics to give the impression that more white people are being employed than there actually are (See this article / video for more on the subject). The UK Film Council uses the ethnic workforce statistics of London (24% ethnic minority) to determine how its worforce should be ethnically proportioned. However, London is actually the central gathering place for the majority of film and tv production staff from all over Britain, so it should be the national ethnic statistics that are used. If the UK Film Council based its statistics on the national proportions of ethnicity in the UK (92% white) then its target for ethnic minority recruiting would drop from 24% to 8%. This manipulation of statistics causes white applicants for jobs and training to be discriminated against and thus underrepresented in the workforce. Another factor in UK Film Council recruiting is that the employment of short term contractors and full time employees are not differentiated ethnically. On that basis, full time work could be favorably given to one ethnic group, while short term contracts of just a few weeks per year could be given to another group. I also discovered the same distorting use of statistics at a company called Skillset, but this time the 35% ethnic minority statistic for inner London were used instead of the national statistic of 8%.

We see a similar statistical anomoly at the BBC. On the BBC’s Equality and Diversity page, workforce ethnicity targets are “12.5% for black and minority ethnic staff overall (status: 12% at 31 January 2009; 11% at 31 January 2008)”. Why 12.5% if only 8% of the British population are ethnic minorities? The BBC have already over-compensated by achieving a 12% ethnic minority proportion in 2009, but are continuing with an anti-white, racist recruitment and training campaign. If they really believe in proportional representation then they should be rolling it back to 8% to avoid unfairly excluding white candidates. The London Evening Standard correctly challenges the BBC’s axing of 1,800 jobs to save money, while spending £750,000 on ethnic recruiting.

Here is a case of a woman being rejected for a training progamme with the Environment Agency beacuse she was white English, as opposed to white Scottish, white Irish or white Welsh, but when pressed on the issue the Environmental Agency were unable to provide data demonstrating that the three target groups were unrepresented.

Britain’s police forces have been forced by the government to engage in positive discrimination recruitment practices. Gloustershire police were specifically caught out rejecting white male applicants on principle, but not rejecting a single female or ethnic minority candidate [1].

And here is a more recent example in which “a firm advertised a £38,000-a-year job for someone ‘preferably of Indian origin’.”

The institutional rejection of ethnic reality in Britain stems from government to newspapers to corporate promotion. The official statistics are that 92% of British citizens are white. Nevertheless, we’re bombarded daily with carefully orchestrated photos that give the impression Britain has an equal proportion of each race. Whether it’s school photo shoots for newspapers or corporate promotional brochures we find glossy images in which photograped individuals have been carefully selected by skin colour. We see people of differing cultures smiling gleefully to the camera as if they’re one big happy family. White people, and especially white males, are de-emphasized to give the impression that they exist in lesser numbers than they actually do. Privately owned business are not legally bound to do this, but they’ve been swept up in New Labour’s tidal wave of positive discrimination craftily disguised as “equality”. Companies now bend over backwards to give off a “diversity and equality” stance that will impress government officials and local newspaper editors. If a business wants positive newspaper coverage then their easiest option is to hold an event or campaign with the words “equality” and “diversity” in bold print.

Another point I’d like to add here, something the New Labour government and British media virtually never talk about, is that white people are actually a minority on a global scale and a proportionally decreasing minority at that [1]. Finding specific worldwide racial statistics is difficult, but a glance through this page at nationmaster.com and this page at cia.gov gives a clue as to just how small an ethnic group white people are. Of the world’s 6.8 billion people, China and India are populated by a combined 2.5 billion people, Indonesia / Brazil / Pakistan / Bangladesh / Nigeria comprise just under a billion, and Japan / Mexico / Phillipines / Vietnam / Ethiopia / Egypt comprise over half a billion. These 13 countries account for around 60% (4 billion) of total world population and have very few white people (well below 1% per country). The highest concentrations of white ethnicity are the United States (307 million, 77% white), Russia (140 million, 80% white), Germany (82 million, 91% white), France (64 million, no ethnic statistics available as they are illegal in that country) and United Kingdom (61 million, 92% white). So the five most highly populated, white ethnicity countries account for not much over half a billion – less than 10% of world population.

My aim with the above statistics is not to alarm you of a great threat against white culture. My point is that white people are a global minority and thus should not be discriminated against under the current spate of anti-white policies disseminated by New Labour. The irony is that the above countries comprising a non-white ethnicity equalling 60% of the world’s population (4 billion) are not running racial equality programmes to integrate large numbers of white people into their cultures. So why is New Labour doing it the other way here in Britain?

Double standards

Several of the statistics listed above indicate a double standard in New Labour’s equality laws, but the following example establishes the point even more firmly.

Recently I stumbled across a new local newspaper in my city called Liverpool Life. It’s a free newspaper that covers the usual combination of multiculturalism and save the environment stories that are spouted relentlessly by newspapers across the country. The first edition of the paper featured a bold front page caption “New Lodge Lane Cultural Quarter”. I had a glance through this paper as I’m usually interested in new media. On flicking to page 2 (scroll down in the above pdf link) I found a list of the paper’s editorial staff. They are listed as follows:

Editor – Belayet Hossain Ahmed

Contributors – Sarfarez Ali, Judi Woolley, Farhad ahmed, Abdul Aziz, Imam Amzad, Dr Abdul Hamid, John Gregory, Dr Mohammed Haris

Business Advisors – Dr Adel Ahmed, Peter Wensley

Arts and Music – John Lau, Professor Steven Small (University of California), David Jack, Midhat Khan

Marketing and Sales – Hossain

Marketing assistant (Distribution) – Noor Islam

Being that the person listed for marketing and sales (Hossain) is lacking in a last name, its likely that Belayet Hossain Ahmed (the editor) is doubling up as the marketing and sales contact. That makes a total of sixteen people comprising the editorial team. The really strange thing here is that ten of these sixteen staff members, including the main editor, have Asian names. Yet the newspaper itself isn’t marketed at Asian people. For argument’s sake let’s assume that Judy Woolley, John Gregory, Peter Wensley, John Lau and David Jack are white people. 63% of the editorial team have Asian names, yet only 4% of British people are Asian. Where is the proportional representation at Liverpool Life’s editorial team for the white 92% of Britain’s population?

New Labour’s equality laws are used to exclude white people from training, funding and jobs when workforce ethnicity statistics proportionally justify it (or when they can be manipulated to justify it), but when it’s white people who are left underrepresented the laws are not applied.

There is disproportion in other fields of work (for example over representation of Asians among taxi drivers and under-representation of white men in medical schools), but its very rare that we hear of “positive action” training and recruitment in those fields being targeted at white people to address the balance.

Another example of these double standards is the British media’s selective coverage of race related violence. The two most prominent examples in recent years are the murders of black teenagers (in unrelated incidents) Stephen Lawrence and Anthony Walker. In the case of Stephen Lawrence the murderers have never been found, but the media widely began to announce the attack as mosty likely race motivated. The officers conducting the investigation were accused of racism themselves in handling the case. The racial aspects of the case became the central theme of media coverage [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. In the Anthony Walker case a black teenager was killed by two white teenagers. Again, the racial aspects of the case became the central theme of media coverage [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

In comparison I’d like to refer you to a lesser known incident that for me was much closer to home. First, take a look at the only piece of news coverage related to the incident. The title is unusually lacking in emotional intensity: “Knife attacker is facing prison for Aigburth attack.” The attack was actually much more viscious than the news article suggests. It occurred while I was at work on a night shift. I came home in the morning to find police officers guarding the building where I lived. Upon entering I saw a deep pool of blood near a flat entrance on the ground floor and blood smeared on the door and surrounding walls. The officers explained that the attack actually occurred inside the flat, where there was a much greater amount of blood. In the following days I spoke to my neighbours who had overheard the incident, my landlord who had received further information form the police and relatives of the two victims. The story was consistent all around. Welsey McKenzie had stabbed the girl through the forearm, which caused her to lose so much blood she almost died and almost lost her arm. Wesley also attacked the male and stabbed him nearly thirty times. Luckily the male victim survived as well. Various people in my neighbourhood, who had been drinking in local pubs, said that they had seen Wesley on the same night, not long before the attack. He had apparently taken a lot of cocaine, had threatened various people in a pub because he was so severely under the influence of drugs and / or alcohol, and was already carrying the knife in his pocket.

The Wesley McKenzie knife attack incident was brimming with details suitable for a commercial newspaper to latch onto and publicize. Not only was it an incredibly violent incident involving the hot topics of knife-crime and drugs, but the incident also had potential racial overtones being that the identities of perpetrator and victims crossed racial boundaries. Notice that the very toned down article comes from a local newspaper, the Liverpool Echo. The news didn’t even make the national press. There is no mugshot of the perpetrator in the article as is often the case with knife attack convictions. The article doesn’t explain the physical extent and severity of the attack, or mention the drug factor. Why was the coverage limited to just one, toned-down article and why was the case not covered until after the court case was closed?

We could just assume the Liverpool Echo wanted to conduct mature and objective coverage of the McKenzie case, but have a read of these Liverpool Echo article titles relating to the murder of Anthony Walker (incidentally both the McKenzie and Walker attacks occurred in Liverpool). The article titles are listed chronologically according to the dates they were published.

•Boy 17 is quizzed in search for race killers
•Shame of our city
•Is racism on the increase in a city proud of its tolerance?
•the roots of racism in city of many cultures
•Our family suffered racial abuse before Anthony was killed
•Axe death fugitives to surrender
•Local group warned of rising tension and hate crime days before axe murder
•Race murder suspects arrested at airport
•Anti-racism project in memory of victim
•Police question seventh suspect over race murder
•Anti-racism concert attracts star line-up
•United against racism at Toxteth festival
•Filthy abuse, then an ambush, then the fatal axe blow
•Chilling racial abuse of Anthony
•Cousin found him with axe in his head
•Man who has admitted murder once brandished hunting knife in pub
•’He’s a thief and a liar’
•Abuse goes on night after night
•Victims terrorised as hate crimes soared in Knowsley
•Son’s overdose forced me to flee from racist neighbours
•Police will make it easier for victims to report hate crimes
•The reign of terror of Chomper & Ozzy
•Locals fear another race murder
•Evil yobs with no meaning to lives
•This was racist thuggery of a type that is poisonous to any civilised society – judge
•Police warn racists that they are being watched
•Life sentences for ‘poisonous racist thugs’
•Is Liverpool a uniquely racist city?
•’Racist message’ decision
•Murder victim’s sister to join battle against racism
•Anthony’s sister backs new drive to take on the racists
•Dominique in fight against racist threat
•Woman helped racist killers escape police
•I’ll talk to BNP about Anthony
•Walker ‘won’t meet BNP’
•Walker killer knifed in jail
•Walker race hate charge
•Man charged with posting racist comments
•Man appears in court over racist messages on Walker tribute site
•Anthony’s family in hate crime meeting
•Murdered teenager’s mother in line for race award
•The lies of a racist thug
•United in the fight against race hate
•’Teach your children tolerance and peace,’ says Walker mum
•Voices of peace in the face of hatred
•Gee honoured for her work to promote racial harmony
•£15,000 gift to kick out racism
•Anthony killing in race hate spotlight at lecture
•”Anthony’s murder was caused by legacy of slavery”
•Gee in call to help weed out hate crime
•Tribute to Anthony at slavery museum
•The battle against racism will be won slowly, says Gee
•Gee Walker: Why we need new anti-hate drive
(note: if the above article links cease to function try this link or visit the Liverpool Echo website and search their archives for ‘Anthony Walker’)

The above list is less than a third of all the coverage that the Liverpool Echo gave to the Anthony Walker case (the coverage is still going on after nearly five years). There are around 200 Anthony Walker related articles in the Echo website archives, yet the barely known Wesley McKenzie case received just one watered down article. Why have the Liverpool Echo taken a deliberate stance of maximum coverage of one murder case and minimal coverage of a drug fuelled knife attack that almost killed two people? We could partially attribute it to the fact that Anthony Walker died and that the two victims in the McKenzie case barely survived. However, there is an element that makes the McKenzie case more shocking and worthy of news coverage. Anthony Walker was murdered at age 18 by two men aged 17 and 20, but Wesley McKenzie was aged 33 and his victims were in their late teens, he was almost fifteen years their senior. Notice that the Echo article mentions Wesley’s age, but doesn’t give the age of his victims, Anthony Howard and Sarah Stanley.

Possible clues as to the motives of the Liverpool Echo in covering one case and not the other can be found in the way that they covered the Anthony Walker case. Their emphasis is consistently on the topic of racism. Anthony Walker’s murderers apparently shouted racist abuse at their victim before killing him and in many instances the Liverpool Echo emphasize the name calling as being even more shocking than the murder itself. The Echo’s position on the subject was firmly established far before the trial even took place – it was a racist attack, racism is evil, Liverpool is racist and must shed its evil. This tunnel vision coverage doesn’t take into account that the murderers were individuals with their own personal and social problems. The Liverpool Echo has decided to act as judge and jury in the case, branding the killers as “evil yobs” and accusing Liverpool’s predominantly white population of sharing responsibility for the murder by being inherently racist. The coverage is sickeningly immature and comes from trained journalists and editors who should know better.

Last, but not least, there are two details I’ve not yet mentioned about the Wesley McKenzie attack. 33 year old McKenzie was black and he was from London, not Liverpool. His two teenage victims were from Liverpool and they were white. Once again, this is something the Liverpool Echo didn’t mention … and I’d put money on it that it’s the same reason why no mugshot of Wesley was shown, as it usually is with news coverage of convictions for violent crimes [1] [2].

This kind of emphasis on racial conflict, with a preference for cases involving white males as the perpetrators of violence or abuse, is now a common theme in British media [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Here is one of the few exceptions I could find, in which a white male was the victim of an ethnic minority gang in a racially motived attack and was beaten so badly he ended up with brain damage [1] [2] [3]. Notice that the BBC avoids reporting the racism element of the case in which the white man was attacked [1], yet emphasizes the racism element in the Anthony Walker case, where the white men were the attackers [2].

Here is a case of an MP speaking out about attacks on white people being ignored in his consituency and consequently being accused of helping the BNP party, and here is an article in which an ethnic minority journalist saw fit to write an article about excessive media coverage of murders involving white perpetrators against ethnic minority victims.

Below is a selection of children and teenagers who have been murdered in Britain in recent years, several of whom have received only a fraction of the coverage that is given to that of the Anthony Walker case.

•Michael McCarthy, aged 19, white male killed by Mustafa Demirtas and Julian edwards
•Shaquille Smith, aged 14, black male murdered by gang of six black males
•Jamie Kelly aged 18, a white male killed in Liverpool just a few weeks before this article was written, murderer unknown
•Jodi Jones aged 14, white female murdered by her white boyfriend
•Danielle Beccan aged 14, white female, murderer unknown
•Damilola Taylor aged 10, black male killed by two black males
•Henry Bolombi aged 17, black male murdered by ethnic minority neighbourhood gang
And there are plenty more murdered teenagers out there.

So why did the Liverpool Echo latch onto the Anthony Walker case and emphasize its “racial attack” element as being more important than even the murder itself, while de-emphasizing other, equally tragic murders of teenagers? Are murdered teenagers who are not victims of white racism less important?

Political correctness – more meta discrimination

Under New Labour Britain has been swept by a tidal wave of political correctness. This has been in the areas of race [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], religion [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], gender [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and, with less frequency, sexual orientation [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], physical disabilities [1] [2] [3] [4], and age [1] [2] [3] [4].

The New Labour government, in combination with a strangely compliant mainstream media, has everybody treading on eggshells as to what they say in public and in the workplace, lest they offend someone from one of the above groups. Jokes about race, religion, gender and sexual orientation are responded to with “zero tolerance”. A person can lose their job or face a harsh fine just for uttering a statement that can be perceived offensively [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. The old “sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me” motto is apparently now out of fashion.

Political correctness has overtaken efficiency as the key target in the workplace. An employee can do their job badly or consistently turn up late … and when challenged on their performance can quickly claim themselves to be a victim of discrimination. All they have to do is claim that a colleague of a different colour, sex or religious disposition has said something that they found offensive and bingo … they can attribute their poor work performance to discrimination induced emotional stress. I’ve personally witnessed this in my own work environments.

This looming tension and fear of “racism” accusations has even infected tv programming, such as Big Brother, Strictly come Dancing, and Kilroy. However, there is little complaint when derogatory comments are made about white people [1] [2] [3]. Movie releases such as White Men Can’t Jump and White chicks are rife with white bashing content. Personally I can watch and enjoy those films without taking personal offence, but if we’re going to allow race humour against whites then it should be allowed against all. Under New Labour a film title such as Black Men Can’t Jump or Black Chicks would be ferociously attacked. Then there’s the book Stupid White Men, in which phoney activist / author Michael Moore openly blames every social problem on white men, but sources hardly any of his claims. He even openly calls for anti-white recruiting by employers.

As a point of interest Michael Moore seems to have very little problem getting corporate funding for release of his not-so-well-researched DVDs and books, yet more controversial and well researched or entertaining activists like Antony C. Sutton, Alex Jones, Brian Gerrish and Noam Chomsky are given barely a fraction of Moore’s coverage – depsite booming underground sales of their DVDs and books mainly by word of mouth. Moore gets the media coverage and funds because his messages are in line with the desires of his big business sponsors.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission

A key institution that plays a major role in New Labour’s “equality and diversity” agenda is the Equality and Human Rights Commission. The EHRC may have a morally upstanding name, but New Labour is very fond of using moral sounding rhetoric to implement immoral policies, just as the fascist US news channel FOX NEWS boldly displays its trademarked slogan “FAIR & BALANCED” repeatedly during its broadcasts. Let’s examine the EHRC in detail.

The home page of the EHRC website uses a massive font to emphasize its claimed agenda: “Our job is to promote equality and human rights, and to create a fairer Britain. We do this by providing advice and guidance, working to implement an effective legislative framework and raising awareness of your rights.”

A simple test as to whether the EHRC put its money where its mouth is, is to examine the proportional makeup of its central management team. At the time of writing the EHRC has fifteen commissioners, each selected by New Labour’s Minister for Women and Equality, Harriet Harman. Here is a list of the commissioners:

•Trevor Phillips (Chair)
•Baroness Margaret Prosser (Deputy Chair)

•Morag Alexander (Scotland Commissioner)

•Maeve Sherlock

•Joel Edwards

•Stephen Alambritis

•Ann Beynon OBE (Wales Commissioner)

•Professor Geraldine Van Bueren

•Kay Carberry CBE

•Meral Hussein Ece OBE

•Baroness Sally Greengross

•Dr Jean Irvine OBE

•Angela Mason

•Michael Smith

•Simon Woolley
The names I’ve highlighted in yellow are the male commissioners, of which there are only five. Of the five male commissioners, three are black and two are white. Black men represent approx 1% of the British population, but makeup 20% of the EHRC commission. White men makeup approx 46% of the British population, but makeup 13% of the EHRC commission. There are no ethnic minority females at the EHRC and not a single Asian or East Asian of either sex. The commission is 67% white females.

So if we apply the EHRC’s own proportional representation logic we instantly find that Harriet Harman, a white woman, has shown favoritism to her own gender group in her selection of the EHRC management team. It cannot be argued that Harman didn’t have enough white male candidates to select from because the site states that the commissioners “were chosen from more than 600 applicants”.

On the Our Job page the EHRC states ” For the first time, a statutory body has the responsibility to protect, enforce and promote equality across the seven “protected” grounds – age, disability, gender, race, religion and belief, sexual orientation and gender reassignment.” This reinforces my earlier comments about meta-discrimination. Mental health sufferers and those of below average intelligence are ignored by the EHRC.

The Our Job page concludes with a link to a PDF file called Two Years Making Changes, which explains the EHRC’s perception of its own achievements since being founded in 2006. The document begins with a typical diversity propaganda based selection of photos of people from different social groups, including those who aren’t represented among the commissioners themselves. Notice also the deliberate de-emphasis of white males.

The content of the document reveals the broad influence of the EHRC’s activities.

“We have extensive legal powers, including powers to conduct formal investigations, to take judicial reviews, and to assess how effectively public bodies are upholding the equality duties. In addition, we are charged with promoting and enforcing the Human Rights Act. We also seek to influence policy and use our power of our voice to make the case for change.”

“This autumn, parliament votes on a new equality bill, which will bring together and build upon existing equality legislation. It addresses both multiple discrimination and the underlying causes of much disadvantage: poverty and absence of aspiration. The Commission has worked hard to shape the bill, and we believe it will give us a sound legal basis on which to tackle the deep-rooted structural causes of inequality.”

“10 million distributed through our grants programme to 285 different groups delivering frontline services across the country”

“35,000 people received Equality News, our monthly e-bulletin”

“136,000 small and medium-sized businesses received our guidance on managing equality obligations during the downturn”

“3,500 stakeholders from across the country have been regularly involved in our work”

“Over 400 enforcement or pre-enforcement actions taken, of which over 80 per cent were resolved without the need to go to court.”

“Clock is a small digital agency employing 32 people, most of them men.” Note the double standard regarding the EHRCs emphasis on women commissioners in its own management team.

“The rise of the BNP to prominence in the 2009 European elections has been another area of concern to the Commission.” BNP did not rise to prominence. They won just two seats. The political party that the EHRC are really concerned about is UKIP (UK Independence Party), a non-racist party calling for a complete withdrawal of Britain from the EU. UKIP came second in the British 2009 European elections, winning 13 seats, and knocked New Labour into third place. Remember that the EHRC commission is appointed by a New Labour politician. We’ll return to the subject of UKIP soon.

“Using new powers, the Commission demanded that the party address potential breaches of the Race Relations Act. In August 2009 county court proceedings were issued against the party by the Commission in respect of BNP’s constitution and membership criteria. The case will be heard at Central London County Court on 15 October 2009.” Yet New Labour laws allow people to be denied the right to training, and hence jobs, on the basis of their ethnicity or gender.

“The launch of the second year of funding in May 2009 generated an unprecedented response, with more than 2,000 organisations applying for funding.” These financial incentives are New Labour’s way of bribing companies into their questionable equality laws.

“70% of people would be happy for their son or daughter to marry someone of a different race or faith”, yet only 2% of British mariages are interracial. This demonstrates that people can have a preference for being socially integrated with their own race without being racists. That’s a message New Labour doesn’t want the public to hear.

“We believe in empowering the individual. Nobody wants assumptions made about them because of their background or identity, be they a white man looking to retrain, a black woman who needs support for her business, a gay undergraduate, a young child from a run-down estate, a mother who wants to work or a disabled person looking for the right support.” Yet New Labour and EHRC are all for discrimination against white men for training, and their laws allow for it.

“As part of our commitment to creating a tolerant, fair society we work extensively with young people, aiming to create a ‘generation without prejudice’.” Again, this is the utopian dream that has no more basis in reality than Communism.

“We have received United Nations accreditation as an ‘A’ status National Human Rights Institution, giving the Commission international recognition and status as the independent body charged with promoting human rights in Britain.” This backing of the EHRC by a powerful globalist institution will become more significant later.

“1/3 of working Muslim women see themselves as future chief executives”. This seemingly random quote appears at the top of a page which outlines the EHRC’s Muslim Women Power List. There is a push for ethnic minority managers and female managers under New Labour, but the reasons for this are not about equality, as we shall discover shortly.

On the EHRC’s Race in Britain page is another example of a diversity propaganda photo, falsely depicting Britain as being more multiracial than it actually is. I’ve captured the picture and posted it below in case the original page is altered or deleted. Notice how white people are pushed into the background, especially the males.

Considering the above photo, it’s ironic that the EHRC has published a pdf file called Talent Not Tokenism. The document itself includes more diversity propaganda photos that are not proportionally representative of Britain’s population.

Another giveaway sign that the EHRC wants to manipulate statistics rather than present honest information is that it refuses to fund academic research. To fund research by external bodies would run the risk of information and statistics being published that go against the EHRC agenda of manipulating public opinion.

Even though the EHRC has only been up and running for three years, internal disagreements over policy direction have already led to the resignation of a handful of commissioners [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Some of this is over chairman Trevor Phillips [1], whose leadership was described by resigned commissioner Kay Hampton as “better suited to a political organisation rather than a human rights one”. Equally important is that the National Audit Office refused to sign off the EHRC accounts in 2009 due to irregularities, which was also the case at the Commission for Racial Equality (the forerunner of the EHRC) which was also chaired by Trevor Phillips.

EHRC chairman Trevor Phillips has also been criticized for taking highly paid consultancy work, in which he guided Channel 4 in their handling of a (possibly staged) race scandal concerning its tv program Big Brother [1] [2] [3]. It also seems that Phillips wanted to use entertainment programming like Big Brother to manipulate public opinion. The consultancy work was done through Phillips’ own private company The Equate Organisation and represented a conflict of interest with his highly paid (£110k) EHRC job. Apparently he has since resigned from Equate, but he is still the chairman for Pepper Productions, a company which “focuses on popular multi-cultural programming and documentaries”.

So is Trevor Phillips in it for human rights or for the money or for some alternative political agenda? The website for his Equate company is currently “closed for recontruction”. However, Rubensteinpublishing explains

“Its website, http://www.equate.org.uk, prominently features a picture of Mr Phillips on every page and identifies him as chair of the EHRC, as well as ‘one of the leading experts on equality and diversity policy in Europe’.”

“It is not all that uncommon for those in senior positions in regulatory bodies to profit from this by going into consultancy once their term of office has finished. To act for part of the time as the regulator, and also to run a profit-making business advising the regulated, is very different.”

“Trevor Phillips, as I understand, is not only chair of the Commission, but also acts as chair of its legal sub-committee. This committee has the responsibility for making the ultimate decision as to which organisations are investigated by the Commission to determine whether or not they have committed an unlawful act. It decides which individual claims the Commission will support and in which tribunal and court cases it will seek to intervene. Some of the organisations under consideration may be clients of Mr Phillips’ consultancy. How will this affect the views of EHRC staffers who have to propose priorities for action?”

“The Commission also has the important power of assessing the extent to which an organisation has complied with the public sector race, disability and gender equality duties, and of issuing a compliance notice for failure to comply. A key part of the public sector duty is the equality impact assessment. The EHRC has the job of vetting these, yet the Commission’s chair is now a principal of an organisation that markets carrying out equality impact assessments.”

“As chair of the EHRC, Mr Phillips is privy to a great deal of confidential information, both about the activities of the Commission itself and about Government plans. How will he manage to wall this knowledge off from the advice he gives as a consultant, or even from the contents of his ‘confidential’ client newsletter?”

“Mr Phillips should decide whether he wishes to be a management consultant or whether he wants to chair the Equality and Human Rights Commission.”

Despite all this evidence of corruption and self-interest on the part of Trevor Phillips, he was reappointed for an additional three year term as EHRC chairman by Harriet Harman (again). It seems that Phillips fits right in there with the corrupt New Labour top brass because he peddles “equality” lies for them. Incidentally, Trevor Phillips’ own promotional website, has a .eu extension rather than a .com or .co.uk. Keep that in mind as we will soon be exploring the EU’s role in Britain’s tidal wave of “equality and diversity” hypocrisy.

A similar story to that of Trevor Phillips is that of Lord Ouseley – he was chief exec of the Racial Equalities Commission (now merged into the EHRC) from 1993-2000. Then in 2000 he became director of Focus Consultancy Ltd and managing director of Different Realities Partnership Ltd (both profit-making consultancies specialising in equality, diversity and people management strategies) and chair of the Policy Research Institute on Ageing and Ethnicity (PRIAE). It seems that the promotion of racism paranoia by leaders of “diversity and equality” institutions leads to lucrative business opportunities on the side, but unlike Trevor Phillps, at least Lord Ouseley had the decency to wait until after his position at the REC before pursuing such business ventures.

In a nutshell the EHRC is a diversity propaganda front for New Labour, with Trevor Phillips calling the shots on behalf of New Labour bureaucrat Harriet Harman.

New Labour Cheap Labour

An area in which the British media has done its job more effectively – as in present multiple views on a given issue – is the subject of immigration. As mentioned in chapter two, Britain is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe and is becoming more so due to an open door immigration policy imposed by our EU membership.

Media coverage has bounced back and forth between accusations of racism against opposition to open door immigration and accusations of New Labour engaging in a smear campaign to label such opposition as racists [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8].

A key factor is that mass immigration and its corresponding increase in competition for UK jobs allows British companies to get away with paying lower wages both to British people and to immigrants (legal and illegal) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. The population increase also drives house price up both for both British people and immigrants.

So it’s entirely possible that New Labour’s grand-scale push for “equality and diversity” is underpinned by an agenda of winning support from influential British corporations seeking to profit from widely available cheap labour. This is a very similar situation to the United States’ corresponding “equality and diversity” media tidal wave being underpinned by corporations profiting from cheap labour imported from Mexico.

If the cheap labour motive is true here in Britain then isn’t this akin to sweatshops …. the corporate practice of setting up factories in poor countries to exploit cheap ethnic minority labour for profit (basically watered down, debt driven slavery)? The only real difference is that under New Labour the cheap workers are imported rather than the factories being exported. On this basis the racist accusational finger should be firmly pointed at New Labour and their corporate allies. It can also be pointed at the EU itself, which has repeatedly allowed workers from new EU member states to be paid lower wages than the populations of other EU countries in which they work [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

When we’re told that mass immigration is good for the economy the part that is usually left out is that the beneficiaries are the employers who get to pay lower wages. Employees (the majority of the population) lose out due to increased workplace competition.












4 responses to “Teenager Killed Outside His Mother’s House ‘Had Throat Slashed by Gang’

  1. http://www.collativelearning.com/NL%20NF%20NR%20-%204%20div%20eq%20smoke.html







    © by Rob Ager 2009


    Although the provocative title suggests an emphasis on national politics in Britain, this article will cover a range of issues from superpower relations to localized politics and media bias. My basic premise is that the absurd actions of the New Labour government in Britain are due to covert economic and political interference by the Council / Commission of the European Union. To demonstrate this I’ll first outline the undemocratic ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. Then I’ll offer a breakdown of the motives of the EU bureaucracy, as well as its corrupt operation and links to US-driven superpower politics. I’ll then offer a similar breakdown of Britain’s New Labour government and its links to the EU bureaucracy. Specifically, we’ll focus on engineered racial conflict as the key strategy for marginalizing euroskeptics and New Labour opposition. And lastly I’ll offer some tips for how you can help dismantle global fascism and engineered racism with specific emphasis on reconsidering your poltical loyalties and upping your levels of political activism. The false choice trap of only supporting major political parties such as New Labour and the Conservatives will also be covered in the final chapter.


    1) New Labour forces the Lisbon Treaty on Britain

    2) EU tactics and motives

    •Corruption in the EU and Financial Cost to the Member States
    •Decision-Making in the EU
    •Protection Against Foreign Threats (Eastern and Western)
    •EU Think Tank Networks
    3) New Labour tactics and motives

    •New Labour New Danger
    •War on terror
    •Iraq war
    •Conspiracy theories and activist demonstrations
    •From gold to Brown
    •MPs expenses
    •Party funding scandals
    •The Communist threat
    •Targeting Britain
    4) The “diversity & equality” smokescreen

    •Meta discrimination
    •An increase in economic inequality
    •Unrealistic promises & ridiculous assumptions
    •Misrepresenting Britain
    •Double standards
    •Political correctness – more meta discrimination
    •The Equality and Human Rights Commission
    •New Labour Cheap labour
    5) Conflict engineering and covert support for “right wing” groups

    •The British National Party
    •The English Defence League
    (The remaining chapters will soon be posted)


  3. http://jamie.kelly.gonetoosoon.org/memorial/

    I am jamie kelly aged 18 who was murdered in 2009 mum, i have come across this site by accident, you dont know by your artical how my son jamie was killed, well id like to tell you by you reading my website on gonetoosoon and also mothersagainstknivesjamiekelly.

    I will never get over his murder or the lack of justice for the people who did kill him but are free to walk our streets as a jury freed one guilty murderer, so now ive no faith in our justice system what so ever,

    thankyou lorraine a grieving mum who,s only child was murdered.

    • Lorriane, First you left your Telephone number at the end of your last comment,
      I cannot allow you to place yourself at such risk from loons etc.
      Here is your comment minus your details….

      As a mum of a murdered teen i find this website so interesting and so very true, i never thought about any of this untill now, you say that a clipping says jamie kelly was a white male, who say,s this? as my son jamie is mixed race and his father is black but no police asked me what race my son was so they judged for them self when writing about his murder, So im thinking now if his true race was written in a local paper would his horrific murder being stabbed 18 times by a few white older men be taken a bit more serious? who know,s hey. But this has sure given me somthing to think about regarding media attention on some murdered teenagers, my son,s death was brutal and yes he was held down while stabbed and beaten to death, he was just a child trying to stop a lad being stabbed by a girl who was never charged with anything. I hope now ive come across this for a good reason and i might get my son,s death heard for what it realy was and thats brutal and no justice done, maybe becaus of the police saying he was white, he was not dark but it is clear he is of a mixed race and now i do think that race matters to the media. Thankyou lorraine.

      What an heartrending story Lorraine, some murders get media attention some don’t.
      I really don’t know what to say, can’t say that I understand, clearly I can’t, all I can do is imagine the pain your childs brutal murder has left you in.

      I cannot recall any or much coverage on your son Jamies death, that is media failure, mixed race, white, black or Asian all murders should be reported without bias, by not doing so, the media stir up racism.

      Regarding your feeling that justice wasn’t served, perhaps contacting a justice organisation, they can guide you on what steps can be taken.


      Access to justice
      Rights are meaningless without the means to seek redress for their breach. We argue that access to justice is a fundamental right in itself – and we work to ensure that our courts and legal procedures are open to everyone, regardless of their wealth or circumstances.


      Sorry, means nothing much Lorraine, but I am sorry for your loss, no mother should have to bury her children, for a child, taken in such violence, his death must haunt you, as his mum. Sorry!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s