A short walk from Communitarian to Communism and you can stop by Community along the way.

A short walk from Communitarian to Communism and you can stop by Community along the way. (Is there a hint in there someplace?)

Communism refers to a theoretical system of social organization and a political movement based on common ownership of the means of production. As a political movement, communism seeks to establish a classless society. A major force in world politics since the early 20th century, modern communism is generally associated with The Communist Manifesto of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, according to which the capitalist profit-based system of private ownership is replaced by a communist society in which the means of production are communally owned.

This process, initiated by the revolutionary overthrow of the bourgeoisie, passes through a transitional period marked by the preparatory stage of socialism. Pure Communism has never been implemented, it remains theoretical: Communism is, in Marxist theory, the end-state, or the result of state-socialism. The word is now mainly understood to refer to the political, economic, and social theory of Marxist thinkers, or life under conditions of Communist party rule.

The Fabian Society founded in 1884 by British socialists Sidney and Beatrice Webb, George Bernard Shaw and others, the Fabian plan is to implement world socialism incrementally through legislation.

Their more radical counterparts, the Bolsheviks, fomented violent revolution in order to trigger the bloody birth pangs of what they also hoped for, a socialist world. Fabians seek a gradual path to the same totalitarian goal, Godless Communism.

Shaw named the society after the Roman General Fabius Cuncator, whose stealthy guerilla military tactics led to victory over the superior forces of the Carthaginian General, Hannibal. Cuncator avoided open battle, preferring the strategy of wearing down his opponent with elusive hit and run maneuvers.

Like their namesake, today’s Fabians seek to avoid an open confrontation with the forces of freedom and, subsequently, tend to shield their true agenda from the light of day.

The creed of the Society, written in 1887, was as follows:

“It (The Fabian Society) therefore aims at the reorganization of society by the emancipation of land and industrial Capital from individual and class ownership…The Society accordingly works for the extinction of private property in land…”

The Fabian plan was to infiltrate America by targeting our legal system.
Sidney and Beatrice Webb, in 1898, toured American Colleges where they cultivated a following amongst native socialist intellectuals. One of their Fabian converts, Felix Cohen, a law professor at Yale, wrote the following:

“It is possible to attempt the overthrow of capitalism as an economic system without at the same time attacking the substance of capitalist law…Socialists can learn from their adversaries that it is always possible to attack existing law, in the name of democracy, justice, and liberty, in the name of the great ideals of the American Constitution, and in the name of law itself.”

The Fabians sought to overthrow our system by changing the meaning of our stated legal concepts, and to codify those changes with cases brought by Fabian lawyers before Fabian Judges. The effect of this has been that while the technical wording of American law hasn’t changed much, the implementation has been transferred from the citizen and his elected representatives, to appointed bureaucrats. The Fabians have, diabolically, used our own laws to change the law. Freedom is the victim of these Socialist manipulations.

English intellectual Harold Laski, a Fabian disciple of the Webbs, founded the ACLU along with his American Fabian influenced associates Felix Frankfurter, Norman Thomas and John Dewey.

Other leftist founders included Rev Harry Ward, founder of the communist front Federal Council of Churches, William Z. Foster, Chairman of the American Communist Party and author of “Toward Soviet America,” Communist Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Socialist Eugene V. Debs, and Clarence Darrow, who was the ACLU attorney at the Scopes trial.

Each one of these figures would wield pivotal influence over American society and would contribute mightily toward the implementation of the long-term Fabian goal of atheist tyranny.

Frankfurter would go on to an appointment, by Franklin D. Roosevelt, to the Supreme Court where his progressive fingerprints can be found all over decisions transferring sovereign citizen rights to a “liberal” elite.

Harry Ward would be a significant force in subverting the American Protestant Church in the direction of godless humanism.

John Dewey is considered the father of “progressive” education, with the deliberate dumbing down tactics that dominate today.

Clarence Darrow spearheaded the implementation of the theory of evolution as a state mandated religious doctrine.

In the name of liberty, the Fabians seek to destroy individual rights. While they smugly wrap themselves in the Constitution, they plot to transfer power to bureaucracies staffed with their friends and paid for by those who’s freedoms they seek to usurp. They seek to entangle us in a jungle of laws, phrased in incomprehensible language, upon which we will not be able to extricate ourselves. Their central crusade is the eradication of GOD in public life.

http://www.chuckmorse.com

Hello everyone! Is anybody listening?

You have read the definition of communism; you have been introduced to Fabianism, now meet Communitariumism.

The Communitarian

Preamble
American men, women, and children are members of many communities–families; neighborhoods; innumerable social, religious, ethnic, work place, and professional associations; and the body politic itself. Neither human existence nor individual liberty can be sustained for long outside the interdependent and overlapping communities to which all of us belong. Nor can any community long survive unless its members dedicate some of their attention, energy, and resources to shared projects. The exclusive pursuit of private interest erodes the network of social environments on which we all depend, and is destructive to our shared experiment in democratic self-government. For these reasons, we hold that the rights of individuals cannot long be preserved without a communitarian perspective.

A communitarian perspective recognizes both individual human dignity and the social dimension of human existence.

A communitarian perspective recognizes that the preservation of individual liberty depends on the active maintenance of the institutions of civil society where citizens learn respect for others as well as self-respect; where we acquire a lively sense of our personal and civic responsibilities, along with an appreciation of our own rights and the rights of others; where we develop the skills of self-government as well as the habit of governing ourselves, and learn to serve others– not just self.

A communitarian perspective recognizes that communities and polities, too, have obligations–including the duty to be responsive to their members and to foster participation and deliberation in social and political life.

A communitarian perspective does not dictate particular policies; rather it mandates attention to what is often ignored in contemporary policy debates: the social side of human nature; the responsibilities that must be borne by citizens, individually and collectively, in a regime of rights; the fragile ecology of families and their supporting communities; the ripple effects and long-term consequences of present decisions. The political views of the signers of this statement differ widely. We are united, however, in our conviction that a communitarian perspective must be brought to bear on the great moral, legal and social issues of our time.

In the first paragraph they try to lay the ground work saying you cannot have individual rights without there being a community. In other words, the community secures your rights.

The third paragraph tries to say the only way to liberty is through communal living.

It goes on to say you have a duty to your community.

Look, all you need to know is what the Founding Fathers knew. You are born with your rights. No one gives them to you or provides them for you. They can never be taken away unless you willingly surrender them. They can only be suppressed by an oppressive government.

Communitarianism is the path to serfdom guaranteed.

They will say their position is only an argument not a movement like Fabianism. Fine, it still leads to tyranny and oppression of individual liberty. It is plainly anti individual and pro socialism which Marx knew leads to Communism

Of Course there’s more to the Communitarian path to serfdom than the preamble but it is all double speak. You enter a world where bad is good and good is bad. Where freedom is slavery and slavery is freedom.

So who is the father of this argument for the Communitarian?

His name is Amitai Etzioni.

According to his bio he received his Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of California, Berkeley in 1958. Then he served as a Professor of Sociology at Columbia University for 20 years. During part of that time, he was also Chairman of the department. He was a guest scholar at the liberal Brookings Institution in 1978 before he served as a Senior Advisor to the White House on domestic affairs from 1979-1980 with President Jimmy Carter. In 1980, Etzioni was named the first University Professor at The George Washington University, where he is the Director of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies. From 1987-1989, he served as the Thomas Henry Carroll Ford Foundation Professor at the Harvard Business School.

He was president of the American Sociological Association in 1994-95, 1989-90 founding president of the international Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, 1990 founded the Communitarian Network. He edited The Responsive Community: Rights and Responsibilities, the organization’s quarterly journal, from 1991-2004. 1991 found the press referring to Etzioni as the ‘guru’ of the communitarian movement.

Etzioni’s voice is heard in the media frequently.

Richard Posner, in 2001, named Etzioni among the top 100 American intellectuals

There’s more but you can go to his website and read that part.

Who are some of this “Guru’s” followers?

Enola Aird (Activist mother, Connecticut)

Rodolfo Alvarez (University of California, Los Angeles)

John B. Anderson (Presidential Candidate, 1980)

Benjamin R. Barber (Rutgers University; signing with exception to moral education section)

Robert N. Bellah (University of California, Berkeley)

Warren Bennis (University of Southern California)

Janice M. Beyer (University of Texas, Austin; signing with exception to the family section)

David Blankenhorn (President, Institute for American Values)

John E. Brandl (University of Minnesota; former Minnesota State Senator, Representative)

Joan Bronk (Former President, National Council of Jewish Women)

Christine K. Cassel (The University of Chicago)

James Childress (University of Virginia)

Bryce J. Christensen (President, The Family in America, The Rockford Institute)

Henry Cisneros (Former Mayor, San Antonio, Texas)

John C. Coffee (Columbia University Law School)

David Cohen (Co-Director, Advocacy Institute)

Anthony E. Cook (Georgetown University Law School)

Harvey Cox (Harvard Divinity School; signing with exception to cleaning up the polity section)

Thomas E. Cronin (Colorado College)

William D’Antonio (Catholic University)

Dennis DeLeon (Commissioner and Chairman, New York City Commission on Human Rights)

Thomas Donaldson (Georgetown University)

Joseph Duffey (President, The American University)

Thomas W. Dunfee (Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania)

Stuart E. Eizenstat (Attorney, Washington, D.C.)

Lloyd Elliott (President Emeritus, George Washington University)

Jean Bethke Elshtain (Vanderbilt University)

Amitai Etzioni (The George Washington University)

Chester E. Finn, Jr. (Vanderbilt University)

James Fishkin (University of Texas, Austin)

Carol Tucker Foreman (Partner, Foreman & Heidepriem)

Betty Friedan (New York City)

Francis Fukuyama (The Rand Corporation)

William A. Galston (University of Maryland)

John W. Gardner (Stanford University)

Neil Gilbert (University of California, Berkeley)

J. Richard Gilliland (President, Metropolitan Community College, Omaha, Nebraska)

Mary Ann Glendon (Harvard Law School)

T. George Harris (New York, NY)

David K. Hart (Brigham Young University)

F. Barton Harvey III (The Enterprise Foundation)

Jeffrey R. Henig (George Washington University)

Albert O. Hirschman (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton)

James Hunter (University of Virginia)

Nicholas deB. Katzenbach (Attorney, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, and former Attorney General of the United States)

Daniel Kemmis (Mayor, Missoula, Montana; signing with exception to second amendment section)

Lawrence J. Korb (The Brookings Institution)

Joyce A. Ladner (Vice President for Academic Affairs, Howard University)

Hillel Levine (Boston University)

George C. Lodge (Harvard Business School)

Malcolm Lovell, Jr. (President, National Planning Association)

Duncan MacRae, Jr. (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)

Frank Mankiewicz (Vice Chairman, Hill and Knowlton)

Gary Marx (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Thomas McCollough (Duke University)

Sanford N. McDonnell (Chairman Emeritus, McDonnell Douglas)

John L. McKnight (Northwestern University)

Catherine Milton (Executive Director, The Commission on National and Community Service)

Newton N. Minow (Former F.C.C. Chairman; Attorney, Chicago, Illinois)

Charles Moskos (Northwestern University)

Ilene H. Nagel (U.S. Sentencing Commission and Indiana University)

William C. Norris (Chairman, William C. Norris Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota)

John Parr (President, National Civic League)

Orlando Patterson (Harvard University)

Michael Pertschuk (Co-Director, Advocacy Institute)

Sylvia L. Peters (Founding Partner, The Edison Project)

Chase N. Peterson (President-Emeritus, University of Utah)

Grethe B. Peterson (University of Utah)

Terry Pinkard (Georgetown University)

David Popenoe (Rutgers University)

Alejandro Portes (Johns Hopkins University)

Lonnie C. Rich (City Council Member, Alexandria, Virginia)

Elliot L. Richardson (Partner, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and former Attorney General of the United States)

David Riesman (Harvard University; signing with exception to cleaning up the polity section)

Alice S. Rossi (Former President, American Sociological Association; Amherst, Massachusetts)

William D. Ruckelshaus (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Browning-Ferris Industries; Houston, Texas)

George Rupp (President, Rice University)

David Rusk (Former Mayor, Albuquerque, New Mexico)

Isabel Sawhill (Senior Fellow, The Urban Institute)

Kurt L. Schmoke (Mayor of Baltimore)

Claudine Schneider (Chair of the Board, Renew America)

Richard F. Schubert (President & CEO, Points of Light Foundation)

William F. Schulz (President, Unitarian Universalist Association)

Philip Selznick (University of California, Berkeley)

Albert Shanker (President, American Federation of Teachers)

Fred Siegel (Cooper Union)

Gillian Martin Sorensen (President, National Conference of Christians and Jews, Inc.)

Thomas Spragens, Jr. (Duke University)

Margaret O’Brien Steinfels (Editor, Commonweal)

Adlai E. Stevenson (Chicago, Illinois)

Peter L. Strauss (Columbia University)

William Sullivan (LaSalle University)

Robert Theobald (New Orleans, Louisiana)

Lester C. Thurow (Dean, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Daniel Thursz (President, The National Council on the Aging)

Kenneth Tollett (Howard University)

Barbara Dafoe Whitehead (Amherst, Massachusetts)

Dennis H. Wrong (New York University)

Daniel Yankelovich (President, Public Agenda Foundation)

American Alliance for Rights and Responsibilities.

Does it not make you sick to your stomach to read the names of those who are willing to surrender your freedom and commit you to serfdom? But it should offer you a view of how these folks view themselves. They view themselves as being enlightened which really means elitist.

I personally think they are very brave souls when I look back and see the bloody history of the Soviet Union. The Communitarians better hope that there vision to totalitarianism doesn’t follow the path that was followed in Russia, for in the beginning; it was the bourgeois who were slaughtered by the common man.

They’re all socialists and they all serve the same goal. That is:

To destroy the United States of America and everything it stands for.

Especially individual Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

There is a consistent tone amongst them all, and that is; individual freedom does not exist and a soviet system of controlled government with the elites as the supreme soviet.

“Few Americans describe themselves as socialists; European socialists, however, point out that in America — LIBERALISM — means the same as socialism in Europe. . . .” from:

A NINTH GRADE HISTORY TEXTBOOK

There is a battle raging over who will control the world. Who will sit at the top in this New World Order? Oh yes, there are others who have signed onto the United Nations plan for usurping your rights. Another group of elites called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). They may not call themselves Liberals and you might even call them conservatives but the one thing they all have in common and have agreed on is; the agenda for Sustainable Development or what is known as Agenda 21.

Agenda 21 sets up a soviet system of councils; seeks to put 50% of the world’s land under government control; institutes socialist policy of redistribution of wealth; controls education and health care; inventories, tracks and controls all resources of the world, including the human kind (meaning you); discourages belief systems that are based on the creation; introduces Mother Earth as the source of all things; and sells the package wrapped in a blanket of environmentalism to push your emotional buttons.

I don’t care what they say, how they present themselves, what argument they use, if they support implementation of Agenda 21 then they oppose individual liberty and what we know as “the American way of life”.

From the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Website

http://www.cfr.org/publication/4600/world_summit_on_sustainable_development.html

World Summit on Sustainable Development: Working Together to Build Prosperity

May 23, 2002

Speakers: Paula J. Dobriansky

Nigel Purvis

Purvis: Contrary to the Council on Foreign Relations ordinary practice, this event is on the record. Undersecretary Dobriansky has agreed kindly to answer a few questions from the audience at the conclusion of her address. This meeting will end promptly at 1:15 unless we exhaust questions from you beforehand. So please join me in welcoming [President G. W. Bush’s] Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs, Paula Dobriansky. (Applause)

Paula Dobriansky (PD): First, thank you, Nigel, for that very warm and also full introduction. And I’d also like to thank Anne Luzzatto and the Council on Foreign Relations team, as well as Jim Steinberg and the Bookings Institution. Really, I’m very delighted to be here this afternoon with all of you. In fact, as I look around the audience, I see many familiar faces. So I’m pleased to be here today with you. I’m really glad to have this opportunity to discuss our vision for meeting one of the great challenges of the new era in which we have entered. How to continue to widen the circle of hope and prosperity in ways that foster natural resource stewardship and environment protection for current and future generations. It is a vision for implementing sustainable development that we hope others will share as well.

We already have agreed upon Agenda 21 and the Millennium Declaration Goals. The world community does not need to negotiate new goals or create new global bureaucracies. If we are serious, Johannesburg must be about actual implementation. I think UN Secretary General Kofi Annan put it very well when he outlined this reality in a clear way by saying, quote: “The Summit aims to move from commitments, of which we have had plenty, 30 years ago and ten years ago, to action.” Unquote. But how can we best make progress in realizing the agenda that we have all agreed upon?

The members of this group read like the who’s who in the US Government, Corporate America and heads of NGOs and Foundations all across America. And if you don’t find their name there you’ll find it listed under the Trilateral Commission.

This is the biggest can of worms in the world. It’s like a rotten onion; every time you peel off a layer you find another layer that stinks worse.

This movement to dominate the New World Order has been described as rings within rings without the adjacent outer ring having knowledge they are actually being manipulated by their inner ring which remains consistent all the way inward to the real power center of only a select few who actually control the money of the world.

This all seems plausible because you run across names being involved where you would think they would not be, simply because on the surface and in the public view, the partner members are viewed as adversaries.

Moving on, we know Sustainable Development is Agenda 21 and Agenda 21 seeks to control your life. So right next door is Sustainable Sonoma County.

On their website you will find this double speak

Sustainable Sonoma County is a learning and action community that connects, inspires, and empowers people to align their thinking and action with their deep need for a life-affirming and sustainable world. SSC’s projects, events, workshops, research and publications engage people in the creation of an ecological, equitable, and prosperous society.

There it is, wrapped in the new religion, environmentalism.

I always wondered what was wrong with me, now I know, I need to be connected, inspired, and empowered to align my thinking and action with my deep need for a life-affirming and sustainable world. I’m sure I’ll find it in this new religion. While having my life re-affirmed, I think I might have to puke.

Why would anyone fall for this stuff?

I have yet to find a website from a “Sustainable” community in the United States of America that promotes or quotes the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights or the Founding Fathers. That is because they think the Founders and their documents are all out dated and are no longer useful, so they say. But frankly, they don’t dare because what they are promoting goes against everything in those documents and how our Founders thought. In other words, any and all “Sustainable” communities are anti American.

In Our Midst

Harbin Hot Springs, Middletown, CA, formally Heart Consciousness Church, has been listed as a communitarian community on FIC’s website.

FIC is the acronym for: The Fellowship for Intentional Community’s Non-profit Purposes, and when you look at FIC’s purposes listed on their website the first purpose is: “TO EMBRACE THE DIVERSITY THAT EXISTS AMONG COMMUNITIES and to facilitate increased interaction between communitarians and the wider culture;”…

Below is an excerpt from a huge website where you will probably find the answer to any question you might have about any of the topics on this page. It is called: The Anti Communitarian League and has a wealth of information.

God Bless America and all my fellow Americans!

Ever heard of Dr. Etzioni and his Communitarian Network? Most Americans haven’t. Americans are never told about the powerful and important role any of the “communitarian thinkers” have in the White House, the U.S. Senate or the House of Representatives. Americans do not vote for the advisers who work behind the scenes. His organizations operate at the highest levels of international discourse and within elite groups of academics working to “change the world” (as per Marx’s vision). Americans really have no idea what’s been going on in this country for the past few decades. Many of us refuse to believe it even once we know it is true. The undisputable fact is: Etzioni is here to dismantle and destroy our free nation. He may cloak his sinister purposes in lovely terminology that none of us understand, but that’s only because he was trained to use Fabian propaganda and promote moral dialogues based in the Hegelian dialectic. He calls his primary American organization The Responsive Community, but because he’s more “moral” than Americans, he never responds to his American critics.

The communitarian agenda is to eliminate all nations and establish an all-powerful, central global government. Maybe we need to know a little bit more about this guy.

For many elected and appointed U.S. re-development officials, Amitai Etzioni is the leading moral voice in the U.S. Regardless of his limited fame with American voters, Amitai Etzioni is probably the most influential voice in American politics today. And in case you’re wondering why you never heard of him, Etzioni considers working-class Americans to be too uneducated and too immoral to vote for officials (like himself) who hold the real power in the White House. We vote for Etzioni’s front men.

His “moral voice” can be heard everywhere from the Oval Office to the Pentagon to the PNAC to the sacred halls of American universities and law schools, across the globe to quiet little policy meetings in Europe. He’s a very well-connected internationalist with strong ties to the top global players in London (Fabians), Moscow (Gorbachev) and Jerusalem (Ben Gurion’s Zionist revolutionaries). He’s definitely a “somebody.”

Etzioni represents the confusion in modern party politics. His ideology controls the merger between the American left and right, although most Americans haven’t caught on to the name of it yet. When Etzioni’s name appears in the media, it’s usually as an “expert.” His resume is that of a revered elder statesman, but most Americans have never heard of him at all. Until Americans learn who Etzioni is and what his theory does, mass confusion and disorder will reign, and the potential for chaos and violence will grow. The progressive People For the American Way explain the rules of engangement against what they call the Radical Right’s Religious McCarthyism: “It is sad and disheartening, as well as reprehensible, that you would lend your name and position to such ugly and divisive political tactics,” says PFAW’s letter to Frist.”

Etzioni doesn’t play kid games. This is deadly serious and we have recently been warned that some people in D.C. consider him to be a very dangerous and powerful man. This is almost a joke because we are really just a couple little nobodies who believe our duty as citizens carries the weight of official U.S. law.

We’ve read so many blogs and articles of Americans trying vainly to explain why some leftists now sound like right-wingers (and visa-vera). Other Americans stick blindly to their “side” and totally blame the other side for what went wrong in D.C. The anti-Bush crowd focuses only on Bush and the far-right focuses on the loudest distractions the left can produce. Etzioni comes out of this fracas and calmly states that he is our new moderator. What few Americans know (and many refuse to accept) is both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush are great admirers of Dr. Amitai Etioni. BOTH U.S. Presidents implemented Etzioni’s plans for rebuilding American society from 1992 [Agenda 21] to today. A prolific writer, Etzioni has published a lot of ideas for helping the U.S. become a “better” society. Openly Fabian, he doesn’t even hide the fact that he’s a change agent for the dialectical revolution. He’s simply more moral than that now. Today, unlike the terrorist actions of the Etzioni Brigades in 1947, he uses propaganda and lies instead of bullets and bombs to achieve his goals. http://nord.twu.net/acl/etzioni.html

http://www.middletownca.com/LIBERAL-EQUALS-SOCIALIST.htm

5 responses to “A short walk from Communitarian to Communism and you can stop by Community along the way.

  1. BOLSHAVISM HEADING YOUR WAY!

    A short walk from Communitarian to Communism and you can stop by Community along the way.

    THEY CAN’T BOMB US INTO SUBMISSION SO THEY USED FABIAN GRADUALISM TO OBTAIN THE SAME GOALS!!

    INIT….THE THREE FABIAN STOOGES?

    ZOB OF BRITAIN!

  2. Today, unlike the terrorist actions of the Etzioni Brigades in 1947, he uses propaganda and lies instead of bullets and bombs to achieve his goals. http://nord.twu.net/acl/etzioni.html

    http://www.middletownca.com/LIBERAL-EQUALS-SOCIALIST.htm

  3. A Brilliant way of educating the uneducated and curious in British society.
    And why for those who take the time to read the above, will I hope, help the poor and excluded in society, to understand, the `working`s and intentions of the Socialist Marxist Political Elite…
    Whose intention is: to keep the masses, infantilised, with a poor grasp of language and communication skills.
    Which keeps them, voiceless and continues to make them easy to exploit.

    • Bright, Dumbed down peoples tend not to think for themselves allowing the elites to tell them what and when to think.

      Reading is the most important passtime we could adopt with authors like Douglas Reed around!

      convergence.html – Andrei Sakharov on East-West Convergence towards World Government (World Federalism) – How Anatoliy Golitsyn garbled the story, and how his misinterpretation is being taken up in the United States by George W. Bush. (02 02 22)

      coombs.html – The role of Dr H. C. Coombs as an agent for change in Australia (his economic policies; his Aboriginal legacies; an exchange between Dr Coombs and myself). (04 10 14)

      correctness.html – The Ancestry of Political Correctness – from the French Revolution to the Bolshevik Revolution and our own time.

      Mikhail Bakunin (c. 1871) on the Jews around Marx: “with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement”.

      “Jews reign … Too bad for anyone careless enough to displease them”. Similar statements were made by Nietzsche (nietzsche.html) and Dostoievsky (dostoievsky.html).
      Mikhail Bakunin warns of the Marxist Dictatorship (1873)

      courtois.html – The Black Book of Communism, by Stephane Courtois et al. The Communist terror in the USSR prior to Gorbachev, and in China under Mao (covers the Great Leap Forward). Why can’t its death-toll be memorialized? Was it deemed of little weight, compared to the visionary goal being pursued?
      Why is Nazism uniquely Evil but Communism respectable? Is it because, however it went wrong, Communism is seen as Idealistic or Universalist?
      Although Stalinism fell, have different kinds of Marxism – the Fabian, Green & Trotskyist kinds – conquered the West? Is this why the sins of Communism are being denied & forgotten?
      After Mao died, China under Deng abandoned Communism, adopting “Market Socialism” instead. (update 09 01 03)

      cultural-revolution.html – Chinese Shadows, by Simon Leys (Pierre Ryckmans). On China’s Cultural Revolution & Mao’s Destruction of China’s Heritage. Also has a bearing on the Cultural Revolution under way in the West. Simon Leys was the first Westerner to break the spell of Mao in “Left” circles. (09 01 06)

      curtis1.html – Lionel Curtis on why the British Empire should re-incorporate the United States and become a World-State: The Commonwealth of Nations (1911-16)

      curtis2.html – Lionel Curtis on why the British Empire should re-incorporate the United States and become a World-State: Civitas Dei: The Commonwealth of God (1938)

      danielou-paglia.html – Alain Danielou and Camille Paglia on the struggle between the Dionysian (Shivaite, Feminine) and the Patriarchial cultures (Apollonian, Monotheistic) in the last 5 millenia (01 11 10)

      danielou2.html – Alain Danielou on the similarities between Shivaism, Taoism, & the Cynic philosophers, and the contest between them and the rationalistic, moralistic religions (01 11 11)

      daoist.html – A Daoist (Taoist) Philosophy of Life (mine)

      death-of-stalin.html – The Death of Stalin, by Georges Bertoli, and The Death of Stalin: An Investigation by “Monitor”. The latter book shows that Stalin was overthrown by a coup d’etat. Stalin killed, directly and indirectly, millions of people; there is no question of making him a hero. But the murder of such a powerful man, and its cover-up, raise even more questions about who was controlling Communism. (02 03 26)

      de-tocqueville.html – Alexis De Tocqueville on Race in America (02 02 10)

      deutscher.html – When Trotsky applied for asylum in Britain, he was supported by Sidney & Beatrice Webb, H. G. Wells, Bernard Shaw & Keynes. (09 01 11}

      diamond.html – Jared Diamond summarises the case for an Indo-European expansion covering the last 5000 years diamond.html (02 02 10)

      diop.html – Cheikh Anta Diop argues that many Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans. The Great Sphinx had a negro head; a number of Pharaohs had negro features; Egyptian women had wavy braided “Afro” hair. Plus Martin Bernal on Diffusion. (02 07 06)

      disraeli.html – Benjamin Disraeli on Jews and Revolution; and on Nathan Mayer Rothschild

      dome.html – Will the 9-11 WTC attack lead to a World War over the Dome of the Rock? (01 09 14)

      dostoievsky.html – Dostoievsky’s non-fiction work The Diary of a Writer, published serially from 1873 to 1871: “… it is not for nothing that over there the Jews are reigning everywhere over stock-exchanges; it is not for nothing that they control capital … and … are also the masters of international politics … what is going to happen in the future is known to the Jews themselves: their reign, their complete reign is approaching !” (06 04 20)

      downing.html – F. Gerald Downing, Christ and the Cynics: the early Christians presented themselves, amid the Hellenistic culture of the Roman Empire, as very much like the Cynic philosophers (who were like Taoists). (01 09 12)

      drugs-and-banks.html – The only way to stop the Drug Trade is to target the money-laundering Banks behind it. (11 06 09)

      dspwomen.jpg – Never forget what the Trots did to our kids: a Democratic Socialist Party poster in Canberra

      einstein.html – The Apotheosis of Albert Einstein. Einstein as philosopher, as mentor or “universal man”, as Communist, as proponent of World Government, as scientist, as plagiarist, as Zionist (03 08 31)

      eir-dec03.html – article from EIR about Jewish-Moslem conflict over the Dome of the Rock

      engagement.html – we need new Rules of Engagement (and Disengagement) between the sexes

      engagement.html#1 – my advice on how to have a Home Birth and how to rear children.

      engdahl.html – F. William Engdahl, A Century of War – Britain’s promotion of Free Trade

      eth-civ.html – Ethnicity and Civilization: lessons from ancient Greece & ancient India

      freney.html – Denis Freney on the 1971 Springbok tour of Australia. This was a major setback for the apartheid regime in South Africa, and a mind-altering event in Australia. (07 03 01)

      fdr.zip – F.D.R.: My Exploited Father-in-Law, by Curtis B. Dall (03 06 12)

      finkelstein.html – Norman Finkelstein calls the Holocaust Industry a “Shakedown” (02 07 18)

      four-room-house.html – Manfred Bietak and the Hebrew/Israelite Four-Room houses at Avaris, the Hyksos capital in the north of Egypt. (08 08 26).

      freedman.html – Benjamin Freedman’s speech warning about Zionist control.

      freud.html – Thomas Szasz (himself Jewish) on Freud as the Jewish Avenger

      fries.html – Scholomo Avineri labels Jakob Fries an Anti-Semite & proto-Nazi

      garaudy.html – Roger Garaudy (a Marxist) on how dangerous it is to oppose Zionism

      gender.mp3 – You mustn’t say “Ladies and Gentlemen”. From the March 26, 1997 lecture on Gender policy, in the Diploma in Education course at the University of Canberra. The lecturer stated that it was wrong to say “good morning, ladies and gentlemen” or “good morning, boys and girls”, because this language is not “gender inclusive”. Instead one must say, “good morning, people”. Hear for yourself how new schoolteachers are being brainwashed. (02 12 18)

      6 minutes 41 seconds; you may need to turn the volume up.
      To download: gender.zip

      l-george.html – David Lloyd George, Prime Minister of Britain, explained in his Memoirs why his government made “a contract with Jewry” (the Balfour Declaration) in 1917. Leopold Amery, author of the final draft of that contract, acted for the British side but secretly identified as Jewish. Could he represent both parties simultaneously? If so, why keep his Jewish identity secret? Was a conflict of interest involved? His son was executed as a Nazi collaborator. (08 09 08)

      lilienthal.html – Alfred M. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection II, on Jewish domination of America. Lilienthal shows that Jews are a religion, contrary to Nazis who claim they are a race, and contrary to Zionists who claim they are a nation.

      lippmann.html – Walter Lippman shows how “Colonel” House, liasing with Lord (Sir Edward) Grey of the Anglo (Rhodes) conspiracy, persuaded Woodrow Wilson to join World War I. Lippman wanted the League of Nations to be a World Government with a World Army and a World Court. His book Men of Destiny is a collection of articles on these themes, originally published in various journals including Foreign Affairs. (03 01 07)

      List-National-System.doc – The National System of Political Economy, by Friedrich List, 1841, translated by Sampson S. Lloyd, 1885. About 935 KB (download). (06 01 16)

      locke.html – John Locke, philosopher of the “Glorious” English Revolution of 1688, which first put Britain in the clutches of the bankers (up to then, based in Amsterdam, after their expulsion from Spain), is a major “mentor” of the “Free Trade” movement and “English Parliamentianism”. Here, the real Locke is disclosed.

      lotus.html – The Jew in the Lotus: an encounter between religious Jews and Tibetan Buddhists reveals much about the inner life of both.

      maccoby.html – Hyam Maccoby, The Sacred Executioner: Abraham really did sacrifice Isaac: the Jewish Covenant began with a Human Sacrifice. Is this why the “Rock of Ages” is holy?

      macdonald.html – Kevin MacDonald’s book The Culture of Critique: the Jewish critique of Gentile culture. Jewish intellectual dominance, the New Left’s assault on Western culture.

      malcolm.html – James Malcolm facilitated the contract between the British Government and the Zionist faction of Jews that brought the US into World War I. It started out as a “Gentleman’s Agreement”, and was later formalized as the Balfour Declaration. James Malcolm on the Balfour Declaration – how it determined the outcome of World War I when it hung in the balance (10 04 20)

      mandate.html – Rabbi Harry Waton: God’s Mandate to the Jews

      marx-vs-the-peasant.html – Marxist policy on farming: Small private farms cf communal farms and state farms. (04 10 21)

      mcqueen.html – Humphrey McQueen calls Henry Lawson a Fascist & Nazi (01 10 31)

      marriage-malinowski.html – Bronislaw Malinowski debates Robert Briffault on Marriage. Malinowski, an Anthropologist who specialised in Sex-life and Marriage, condemns the attempt to abolish Marriage as a “disaster”. Briffault puts a Marxist view. (04 07 02)

      mfp.html – my speech opposing the Multi Function Polis, August 6, 1991

      mfp-reports.html – Quotes from the 13-volume Report on MFP-Adelaide, of 1991.

      mfp-saga.html – The story of the Multi-Function Polis, a high-tech city of the future, proposed by Japan’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry, to be built in Australia.

      money.html – Financing Sustainable Development, by John H. Hotson; Banana Republic? No, Banana Colony, by Dr H. C. Coombs. (03 06 15) Michael Hudson on Interest rates in Mesopotamia, Greece and Rome (03 09 22).

      money-masters.html – The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America, by Patrick S. J. Carmack and Bill Still. (03 06 09)

      moscow-vs-jerusalem.html – Before the creation of Israel, Jews overwhelmingly identified with the Soviet Union; it had been created by Jews, and many Jews were in top positions. Stalin stole it from them, but he used the same covert methods that Jews used, so it was not clear whether he or they were in charge; and as long as Trotsky was alive, there was a chance of his restoration. Once Israel was created, and Stalin observed how Soviet Jews rallied to it, Jews were gradually removed from the top positions they had held. A Cold War broke out between Moscow and Jerusalem. (08 08 25)

      moses.html – Sigmund Freud believed that Jewish Universalism was derived from the Monotheism of Egypt’s heretic Pharaoh Akhnaton. Freud wrote his last book, Moses and Monotheism, on this topic. (02 07 01)

      mount.html – Ferdinand Mount’s book The Subversive Family, about the Marxist-Feminist attack on Marriage and the Family (02 06 28)

      murray.html – John Courtney Murray, Thomas Aquinas on The Three Ways of Knowing God. The dialectical method of the Three Ways, first articulated by Aquinas with regard to human knowledge, was later applied by Hegel and Marx to historical processes.

      mushakoji.html – Kinhide Mushakoji on the political polarities of East Asia

      nat-soc-isr.html – Zeev Sternhell’s book The Founding Myths of Israel, about Israel’s Nationalist Socialist political system. (02 12 05)

      naz-jud.html – Rabbi Harry Waton: Nazism is an imitation of Judaism

      nedava.html – Joseph Nedava: Trotsky and the Jews

      needham-anthony.html – Joseph Needham on Cultural Diffusion between
      the Mid-East and China from around 1500 BC; David Anthony on the Opening
      of the Eurasian Steppe at 2000 BC. (02 07 07)

      neither.html – relates the name of this site, “Neither Aryan Nor Jew”, to St Paul’s phrase “Neither Jew Nor Greek”, and to the Cynic philosophers who put Greeks and non-Greeks on an equal footing.

      new-left.html – The New Left’s Cultural Revolution, which began in the 1960s, has split into its components. What these components have in common is “bottom-up” control: children “taking control” of their own lives, preventing their parents from raising them; women “taking control” of their lives and/or marriages. In the same way, the Soviet Union was supposed to be based on workers “taking control’ of the workplace; the Kronsdadt massacre, ordered by Trotsky, put an end to that illusion. (02 07 06)

      nietzsche.html – Nietzsche and Jewish Culture. Nietzsche opposed Christianity but supported Judaism

      nietzsche2.html – Nietzsche as an Aryanist: Nietzsche urged the overthrown of “moralism”, which he attributed to Zarathustra (Zoroaster) and his influence on Christianity via Second-Temple Judaism. Zionism, however, a reversion to “First Temple Judaism”, is free of that Moralism (02 02 07)

      from snippets we can learn so very much…

      red-symphony.html – by Dr. J. Landowsky; translated by George Knupffer. Stalin’s Formal Communism (Bonapartism) cf Trotsky’s Real Communism. Bears on the fact that Communism seems to be continuing, Trotskist/Fabian/New Left style, despite the fall of the USSR. Open Borders, Gay Marriage, the World Court, the Kyoto Protocol, “Hate” Laws which suppress open discussion, these are the signs. Stalin stole their conspiracy; his legacy had to be defeated, just as much as Aryanism and Christianity. (03 12 31)

      And they try to tell us Communism is dead….when every aspect of it is alive and progressing in the West!

      http://mailstar.net/download.html

      toynbee2.html – Toynbee on Trotsky and the Bolshevik Revolution. (03 04 19)

      tragedy.html – Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (on the bankers’ conspiracy)

      transciv.html – is Western Civilization dead?

      tribes.html – Joel Kotkin’s book Tribes, about the kinds of “Higher Tribalism” operating after the demise of the Nation-State. (02 12 07)

      trotsky.html – Seeing the real Trotsky. Trotsky explicitly promoted Radical Feminism, Youth Rebellion, Communal Childrearing and the Destruction of the Family, in his book The Revolution Betrayed. He describes the attack on all tradition launched by the Bolsheviks, and Stalin’s reversal of its extremes. (06 05 07)

      trots-ndp.html – How the Trotskyists destroyed the Nuclear Disarmament Party

      unravel.html – Unravelling Western Civilization

      ussr1924.html – the USSR Constitution of 1924: a World Federalism

      utopia.html – how Utopian thinking is destroying the West

      vanunu.html – Ari Ben-Menashe on the capture of Mordecai Vanunu: he was lured by a honey-trap. Also features Mossad agents posing as “Palestinian Terrorists”; and a special flight to Tehran of Israel air-force pilots disguised as civilians. (01 09 12)

      victimhood.html – Beyond Jewish Victimhood

      voltaire.html – inspiring quotes from Voltaire: The Man of Letters

      watonpgm.zip – Rabbi Harry Waton: complete text, Zipped

      wells-genetics.html – Spencer Wells is a Genetic Anthropologist. He is Director of the Genographic Project, operated by National Geographic to capture a “genetic snapshot” of humanity, before Globalization blurs our genetic trails. He shows that our genes record the history of the Great Migrations. (08 09 04)

      wells-lenin-league.html – H. G. Wells saw the end of World War I as an opportunity to create a new world. He supported both Lenin, and the attempt to create a World Government at the Treaty of Versailles. He also advocated the creation of a Jewish state. His ideas for a united world drew on Jewish thought, in discussions with David Lubin and Israel Zangwill; he also worked closely with Walter Lippman. Lubin and Zangwill were leading Zionists; Lippman, also a Jew, helped draft the Treaty of Versailles, and was later a member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission. Another friend, Leo Amery, was a secret Jew who drafted the Balfour Declaration. (02 02 18)

      WELL’S THAT WELL KNOWN FABIAN….STRANGE WHENEVER COMRADE BROWN MENTIONED THE NWO HE NEVER MENTIONED ….TOYNBEE ANOTHER FABIAN….toynbee.html – Arnold J. Toynbee was one of the leading intellectuals of the British Empire. He combined deep insight into Civilizational History, with propaganda for the One-World goals of Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table group. Here he writes about the formation of Judaism, and argues the case for World Government. (03 03 20)

      THEY NEVER MENTION JUDAISM IN CONNECTION TO THE NWO………….

      wtc.html – New webpage on 9/11 – was Mossad behind it? The recent Dubai assasination in which Mossad used stolen identities warrants re-examination of evidence that the identities of at least some of the alleged 9/11 hijackers had been stolen. The UK Telegraph interviewed four 9/11 Hijackers, ALIVE. And a Saudi Prince said that at least 7 of the alleged hijckers are alive. The best overview of 9/11 you’ll find anywhere, plus links to the best investigative sites for detailed follow-up. (10 03 22)

      http://mailstar.net/download.html

      The Zinoviev Letter; published in the London Daily Mail, 25 October, 1924, prior to the British election of that year. Selections and Comments by Peter Myers. Date April 29, 2001; update December 10, 2007.

      Write to me at contact.html.

      You are at http://mailstar.net/zinoviev.html.

      Correction December 10, 2007: the Zinoviev Letter was published in the London Daily Mail, not the Times.

      The Zinoviev Letter appears to be a letter from Gregory Zinoviev, head of the Comintern, to communists in Britain. The USSR Government claimed that it was forged; a standard “Left” line is that it was produced by British Intelligence (as, they claim, the Protocols was created by the Tsar’s intelligence service). Yet, given the deception about the true nature of Bolshevism, authenticity must be considered quite possible.

      Below are presented

      (1) the Zinoviev letter, (2) Volkogonov’s account of Zinoviev’s Comintern, (3) Robin Cook’s statement, as British Foreign Secretary, of 4 February, 1999.

      (1) the Zinoviev letter:

      Very Secret

      To the Central Committee, British Communist Party

      Executive Committee

      Third Communist International

      Presidium

      Sept. 15, 1924, Moscow

      Dear Comrades:

      The time is approaching for the Parliament of England to consider the Treaty concluded between the Governments of Great Britain and the U.S.S.R. for the purpose of ratification. The fierce campaign raised by the British bourgeoisie around the question shows the majority the same, together with reactionary circles, as against the treaty for the purpose of breaking off an agreement consolidating the ties between the proletariats of the two countries leading to the restoration of normal relations between England and the U.S.S.R. …

      … Organize a campaign of disclosure of the foreign policy of MacDonald. …

      The IKKI {Executive Committee of the Third Communist International} will willingly place at your disposal the wide material in its possession regarding the activities of British Imperialism in the Middle and Far East. …

      Armed warfare must be preceded by a struggle against the inclinations to compromise which are imbedded among the majority of British workmen, against the ideas of evolution and peaceful extermination of capitalism. Only then will it be possible to count on complete success of an armed insurrection. …

      … It would be desirable to have cells in all the units of the troops, particularly among those quartered in the large centres of the country, and also among the factories working on munitions and at military store depots. …

      In the event of danger of war, … it is possible to paralyze all military preparations of the bourgeoisie and make a start in turning an imperialist war into a class war. …

      Desiring you all success, both in organization and in your struggle.

      With Communist Greetings,

      President of the Presidium of the I.K.K.I.

      Zinoviev

      Member of the Presidium

      McManus

      Secretary Kuusinen

      (2) Volkogonov’s account of Zinoviev’s Comintern:

      Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: Life and Legacy, tr. & edited by Harold Shukman, HarperCollinsPublishers, London 1994, drawing on the archives opened after 1991. In the USSR, Colonel-General Volkogonov was Director of the Institute of Military History.

      {p. xxxi} Leninism was not restrained by national limits. With the aid of

      {p. xxxii} Comintern, established in Moscow in March 1919 and virtually an international section of the Russian Communist Party, he attempted to initiate revolutions wherever the possibility existed, and sometimes where it did not. In July 1920 he cabled Stalin in Kharkov: ‘The situation in Comintern is splendid. Zinoviev, Bukharin and I believe that we ought to encourage revolution in Italy right now. My own opinion is that we need to sovietize Hungary for the purpose, and maybe Czecho[slovakia][ and Romania.’ Emissaries were sent east and west, and on Lenin’s orders the Finance Commissariat made available millions of gold rubles ‘for the needs of the world revolution.’ Meanwhile Soviet citizens were dying in their hundreds of thousands from famine and disease. For Lenin, the Revolution was everything, and it could not be achieved without countless victims.

      {p. 391} … Zinoviev claimed time and again that the victory of Communist revolution in Europe was guaranteed, and that the Red Flag would soon be flying over all continents. He saw his primary task as helping to ferment armed uprisings wherever ‘the revolutionary situation was ripening’. When it proved impossible to do this, however, as for instance in Germany in 1921, when strikes and attempts at armed uprising petered out for lack of effective Communist leadership against a determined government, the putsches and plots ended in complete disaster. While the German police and troops were rounding up scattered conspirators, Zinoviev was in Moscow, shouting from the platform: “Arm yourselves, German proletarians! Wherever you can get hold of a gun, take it! Form soviets! Build a Red Army! Long live the proletarian revolution in Germany and the whole world!’ And he was trying to convince the Politburo that ‘the leaven of world revolution’ was already at work in the main capitalist countries. {end selection}

      (3) Robin Cook’s statement, as British Foreign Secretary, of 4 February, 1999:

      Foreign & Commonwealth Office, London THE ZINOVIEV LETTER: ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ Date: 04/02/99

      ARTICLE BY THE FOREIGN SECRETARY, MR ROBIN COOK, IN ‘THE GUARDIAN’ NEWSPAPER, THURSDAY 4 FEBRUARY 1999

      The Zinoviev letter has been shrouded in mystery for three-quarters of a century. Now the archives have been opened to public scrutiny.

      Today we are celebrating a remarkable exercise in openness. The Foreign Office is publishing a report on the Zinoviev letter – a 75-year-old mystery that has perplexed generations of historians and fascinated Labour supporters. The report is a first. The historian who compiled the report has had full access to MI5 and MI6 files. She has been given the exceptionally rare permission to quote from those files. Her report puts a huge amount of material into the public domain. The report and its annexes stretch to 126 pages. Archives that had been shut to public gaze for decades have now been exposed to the light.

      The story of the letter will already be familiar to many. On October 8, 1924, Britain’s first Labour government lost a vote of confidence in the House of Commons. The next day the Foreign Office was sent a copy of a letter, purporting to come from Grigori Zinoviev, the president of Comintern, addressed to the central committee of the Communist Party of Great Britain. The letter urged the party to stir up the British proletariat in preparation for class war.

      On October 25 the letter appeared in the Daily Mail. The political and diplomatic repercussions were immense. It was a major embarrassment for Ramsay MacDonald and the Labour Party. The Conservatives won the general election four days later. Relations between Britain and the Soviet Union soured, and Anglo-Soviet treaties were abandoned.

      For three-quarters of a century there has been speculation about the letter’s source and its timely appearance in the Daily Mail. After all those years, the letter continues to occupy a special place in Labour Party mythology. A year ago, the Lib Dem MP Norman Baker asked me in the House of Commons whether I would be prepared to open the MI6 files relating to the Zinoviev letter. I was not prepared simply to say no. I felt strongly that we ought to say rather more.

      So I commissioned the chief historian of the Foreign Office to study every available source about the letter and compile a report for publication.

      Her task was to put as much material into the public domain as she could, and to answer as many of the outstanding questions as possible. She has spent the past 12 months going through the archives of the Foreign Office, MI6 and MI5 – and American and Russian records as well. Her conclusions are fascinating.

      First, the provenance of the letter. Generations of Labour Party supporters and historians believed it was a forgery. They were right. {But what evidence does Robin Cook present?} We have no conclusive proof who sent it, but we are confident it was not Zinoviev.

      Second, the Foreign Office thought it was genuine. The main reason for this is because they got it through MI6 channels – a fact that has not been made public until today. They were also given corroborative proofs by MI6, which have now been shown to be suspect. But there is no evidence that MI6 forged the letter.

      Third, there is no evidence of an organised conspiracy against Labour by the intelligence agencies. There is, however, evidence that two of their officers were among those involved in leaking the letter to the press and to Conservative Central Office.

      Publishing this report allows us to bring the maximum amount of material into the public domain without betraying the trust of those who help Britain by co-operating with our intelligence agencies. It is a demonstration of our commitment to be as open as possible, and our recognition that being open with the British public is a British national interest.

      It has also been a unique exercise in international co-operation. We have had a great deal of help from the Russian Government.

      With the help of the Russian ambassador in London, our historian was able to mine an extensive archive in Moscow. And by giving us access to their documents, the Russian Government has allowed us to piece together the story from both sides. Their archives provided valuable collateral for the information in the MI6 archives.

      The report does not tie up every loose end. But by putting a huge amount of material into the public domain, it allows people to make up their own minds. Important questions remain, and may always go unanswered – such as who forged the letter {to phrase it that way makes the result a foregone conclusion; if Robin Cook “knows” it was forged, why doesn’t he present his evidence?}.

      New Labour is determined to end the culture of secrecy in Whitehall. We are moving government from the presumption that the least said the better, to the firm belief that the public has a right to know as much as possible. It is an important democratic principle. And the publication of this report is a celebration of it.

      {end of Robin Cook’s statement}

      The Jewish identities of Lenin and Trotsky: lenin-trotsky.html.

      Pitirim Sorokin and Dmitri Volkogonov describe the Kronstadt Massacre and Trotsky’s Role: kronstadt.html.

      The USSR Constitution of 1924: ussr1924.html.

      The early Soviet Union – after Lenin and Trotsky, but before Stalin’s ascendancy: soviet-union-early.html.

      Write to me at contact.html.

      http://mailstar.net/zinoviev.html

      YET THEY STILL STAND AS LABOUR MEMBERS AND NOT FABIAN COMMIES!

      Africa is the real Victim, yet the New York Times shows far less interest in it than in Jewish Victimhood; black Americans are the real Victims, yet their Victimhood has been hijacked by the Victimhood of the most wealthy group.

      Now Karl Marx, himself a Jew, alleged that Jewish wealth was not just a matter of intelligence, luck or hard work. In his article The Russian Loan, Marx wrote,

      “the Jews … monopolise the machinery of the loanmongering mysteries by concentrating their energies upon the barter of trade in securities, and the changing of money and negotiating of bills in a great measure arising therefrom. Take Amsterdam, for instance, a city harboring many of the worst descendants of the Jews whom Ferdinand and Isabella drove out of Spain, and who, after lingering awhile in Portugal, were driven thence also, and eventually found a safe place of retreat in Holland. … The smartest highwayman in the Abruzzi is not better posted up about the locale of the hard cash in a traveller’s valise or pocket than those Jews about any loose capital in the hands of a trader”.

      Far from being a hater of Christianity like the Bolsheviks who later usurped the socialist movement, Marx continued,

      “This Jew organisation of loanmongers is as dangerous to the people as the aristocratic organisation of landowners … Let us not be too severe upon these loanmongering gentry. The fact that 1855 years ago Christ drove the Jewish moneylenders out of the temple, and that the moneylenders of our age enlisted on the side of tyranny happen again chiefly to be Jews, is perhaps no more than a historical coincidence. The loanmongering Jews of Europe do only on a larger and more obnoxious scale what many others do on one smaller and less significant. But it is only because the Jews are so strong that it is timely and expedient to expose their organisation” (The Russian Loan, in Saul K. Padover (ed.) The Karl Marx Library, Vol. 5, p. 221).

      Can you imagine Trotsky making such statements?

      In his book The Making of Modern Zionism (p. 41), Schlomo Avineri discloses that the information about the connection between Judaism and capitalism was provided to Marx by none other than Moses Hess, the “red Rabbi” who later became one of the founders of modern Zionism through his book Rome and Jerusalem. Hess died in 1875, but in 1950 his remains were moved to Israel as a tribute to his role in Zionism (Avineri, p.36).

      Jewish finance has fostered Zionism: the Balfour Declaration was addressed, not to a Rabbi, but to Lord Rothschild the banker: c20-doc.html.

      And the same Jewish finance is very interested in World Government. Woodrow Wilson was a bankers’ President, who pushed a Free Trade bill through before the Federal Reserve Act enthroned the private bankers. Wilson later promoted the League of Nations as a World Government: oneworld.html.

      The Baruch Plan for World Government, in 1946, was drafted by Bernard Baruch of Wall Street, and David Lilienthal, both Jews: opensoc.html.BARUCHS’ FATHER WAS A KKK MEMBER!!

      A World Government, whatever its merits, is final: there’s no turning back, no trial period: all other options are surrendered. Therefore, scrutinising the movements or factions promoting it is legitimate and vital, even if that means challenging the powerful vested interests that pose as Victims.

      BILLIONAIRE VICTIMS….JUST MAKES ME WANNA WEEP!

      http://mailstar.net/victimhood.html

  4. Is Plan For Racial Strife
    Another Hoax?
    By Henry Makow PhD
    6-14-8

    Wikipedia will tell you that the book “A Racial Program for the 20th Century” (1912) is another anti-Semitic hoax. It says the book and author Israel Cohen didn’t exist.

    The reason for this lie? This book contains a famous passage that reveals the Illuminati-Communist race strategy, later applied to women and other minorities in the guise of “feminism” and “diversity”:

    “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

    Rep. Thomas Abernathy read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page.) Wikipedia tells you Abernathy read the quotation in a Letter to the Editor of the “Washington Star,” and the newspaper subsequently determined it was a hoax and apologized. “The quotation has retained some popularity among racists and anti-Semites to this day,” Wikipedia chortles .

    I have subsequently added this line to the Wiki entry: “However, the author fits the description of Israel Cohen (1879-1961) a prolific Zionist author who wrote the Foreword to Israel Zangwill’s ‘The Schnorrer’ as well as 30 other books. Like many purported ‘hoaxes,’ the quotations does describe events as they subsequently unfolded and the operations of the US Communist Party.” (http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php? Article=FinalWarn04)

    MYRON FAGAN

    “International” Jews, like other globalists, serve the Rothschilds’ sick megalomaniac program of world government dictatorship. “National” Jews, like other patriots, owe their first loyalty to their country and fellow citizens. Like Benjamin Freedman , Myron Fagan (1887-1972) was one of the latter, a courageous American who fought the bankers’ Communist agenda for the greater part of his life.

    Myron Fagan, a successful Broadway playwright and director, met Israel Cohen, Israel Zangwill and George Bernard Shaw at a party to celebrate the opening of Zangwill’s play “The Melting Pot” in 1910. He knew the three men to be founders of the Fabian Society. Cohen told Fagan he was planning to write “A Racial Program for the 20th Century” as a “humanitarian” follow up to “The Melting Pot.” At the time, Fagan didn’t realize that the play, which described how Jews and Blacks triumph against White prejudice, was pure propaganda, part of the Communist campaign of fostering “guilt” in white Liberals described above.

    It all fell into place in 1957 when Fagan read the “Washington Star” quotation in the context of the debate over school desegregation. In 1966, he recalled:

    “That book was published in 1913 … the NAACP and the ADL were created [by the bankers] almost simultaneously to carry out those directives. That was more than a half-century ago. Can there be any doubt that that was intended to launch our present Negro upheaval for a Black Revolution?

    “If that isn’t enough evidence, in 1935, the Communist Party’s ‘Workers Library Publishers’ issued a pamphlet entitled ‘THE NEGROES IN A SOVIET AMERICA.’ It urged the Negroes to rise up, especially in the South, and form a Soviet State in the South, and apply for admission into the Soviet Union … it contained implicit assurance that the ‘revolt’ would be supported by all American Reds, and on page 38 it promised that a Soviet government would confer greater benefits on Negroes than on Whites and that ‘Any act of discrimination or prejudice against a Negro will become a crime under the Revolutionary law …

    ” … When Abernathy published that Israel Cohen excerpt in the Congressional Record, we (Cinema Educational Guild, Inc.) promptly issued a ‘News-Bulletin’ in which we published the entire story — and warned of the coming Negro uprisings…

    “Two years went by and nobody even tried to deny the matter, but, suddenly, after two years, during which the ADL and similar groups had ferreted out ALL copies of the book and destroyed them, they announced that the whole thing was a fraud, that there never had been such a book, or an ‘Israel Cohen’ … Why did they wait two years? And how could they deny the existence of a writer named Israel Cohen in the face of all the books he had written? Copies of which I have. More important, bear in mind that Israel Cohen had been a prime mover in all ‘Fabian Socialist’ and Communist movements in England — also that I had met him in person when he actually discussed the book at that banquet.”

    (Fagan, “UN is Spawn of the Illuminati,” 1966)

    IMPLICATIONS

    1. Communism and Zionism are Rothschild proxies: two pincers in the banker’s plan for world government dictatorship, currently masquerading as “globalization.”

    2. Through Communism and Zionism, the Rothschilds duped many Jews into advancing their demented plan to enslave humanity. Happily the majority of Jews are not duped. They are either indifferent or opposed to world government and war.

    3. The promotion of women and minorities is part of an agenda to undermine the European heterosexual Christian character of Western society. So is mass immigration and interracial marriage. Most of what passes for modern culture (TV, movies, literature, punditry etc.) and politics are propaganda and social engineering. For example, opprobrium for “sexism” and “racism” are actually designed to undermine gender and race.

    4. “Guilt” is a huge weapon for them. Women were taught they were “oppressed “for centuries by virtue of having to raise their children while men performed hard labor and died in battle. Similarly the Illuminati have used guilt to give their Zionist and Communist agents immunity. The charge of “anti-Semitism” is a canard designed to disarm opposition to an evil and all pervasive occult power that holds mankind in its thrall.

    5. Another “hoax” –the “Protocols of Zion” states “We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the goyim.” (16-4) We’ll never know how many other books the bankers suppressed like /”A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century.”

    CONCLUSION

    I believe people should be promoted on the basis of merit, not race or gender. But let’s not pretend the bankers really care about women, homosexuals or minorities. As the above quotation implies, they are just a means to an end.

    Western society has been subverted by a satanic cult, Kabalistic Freemasonry, led by the central bankers. (Zionism and Communism are both branches of Freemasonry.) Their pyramid and Eye of Horus are on the US dollar and on corporate logos everywhere. To reach the top, you must literally serve the devil (or his disciples.) After instigating 9-11, they are using the “war on terror” as a pretext to erect a police state.

    On June 12, the Irish people temporarily stalled the advance of world government tyranny. Nevertheless, a Satanic Dispensation –the New World Order–has risen in our midst. We must find new ways to expose and resist it.

    Watch this 8-minute You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji6wLInmuX4&feature=related and hear Fagan describe how the bankers created the “Civil Rights” Movement.

    On line books By Myron Fagan http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname? key=Fagan%2C%20Myron%20C

    See also my “Communist Takeover Began Long Ago” http://www.henrymakow.com/000843.html

    and “Red Rose Parks-Fabricating an American Icon” http://www.savethemales.ca/001228.html

    Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of “Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order.” (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site http://www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving your comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com

    http://www.rense.com/general82/plan.htm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s