UK’s Brian Gerrish: David Cameron Has Committed ‘Treason’ 1/4

UK’s Brian Gerrish: David Cameron Has Committed ‘Treason’ 1/4

WESTMNISTER MOB- HAVE ALL COMMITTED TREASON!!

TheAlexJonesChannel on 4 Nov 2011

Paul Joseph Watson helps Alex host a power-packed 27 hour long money-bomb presentation today with guest, UK’s Brian Gerrish.
http://www.uknoncompliance.org/?p=191
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/

Brian Gerrish is a speaker and member of many valuable groups, all detailed below. His informative talks are available to watch on YouTube, and detail the depth and involvement of his work in exposing the corruption of the governmental systems, and also in helping many people who are the victims of their unlawful actions.

The British Constitution Group http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/

The UK Column http://www.ukcolumn.org/

Lawful Rebellion http://www.lawfulrebellion.org.uk/

Common Purpose Exposed http://www.cpexposed.com

Category:
People & Blogs

BEST NEWSPAPER IN THE UK- UKCOLUMN!!

LOL- JAMES MAX TODAY CALLED THE OCCUPY LONDON GROUP UNDEMOCRATIC DUE TO TRYING TO CHANGE THINGS BY OCCUPYING LONDON- LOBBYS ARN’T??

THE STENCH OF MARXISM IN BRITAIN – IS NOTHING NEW……CULTURAL MARXISM= POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!

NLP IN SCHOOLS- DEEP ARTICLE RE THIS SUBJECT IN LAST ISSUE OF UKCOLUMN…..AVAILABLE ONLINE AT UKCOLUMN SITE!

2 responses to “UK’s Brian Gerrish: David Cameron Has Committed ‘Treason’ 1/4

  1. Brian Gerrish is a speaker and member of many valuable groups, all detailed below. His informative talks are available to watch on YouTube, and detail the depth and involvement of his work in exposing the corruption of the governmental systems, and also in helping many people who are the victims of their unlawful actions.

    The British Constitution Group http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/

    The UK Column http://www.ukcolumn.org/

    Lawful Rebellion http://www.lawfulrebellion.org.uk/

    Common Purpose Exposed http://www.cpexposed.com

  2. Trotskyists, Fabians, Marxists, Communists, Fascists and Socialists, you would be hard pressed to put a cigarette paper between them. I ask, would you let your daughter marry one? Incidentally a Social democrat is a contradiction in terms. Amen!
    Moonbeamzz 1 month ago

    BANG ON…ADD TO THE ABOVE- ZIONISTS!!

    The conclusion cannot be escaped: if any honest explanation of his actions in this matter could be found Mr. Lloyd George would have given it. From this period in 1916-1917 the decay of parliamentary and representative government can be traced, both in England and America. If secret men could dictate major acts of American state policy and major operations of British armies, then clearly “election” and “responsible office” were terms devoid of meaning. Party distinctions began to fade in both countries, once this hidden, supreme authority was accepted by leading Western politicians, and the American and British electors began to be deprived of all true choice. Today this condition is general, and now is public. Leaders of all parties, before elections, make obeisance to Zionism, and the voter’s selection of president, prime minister or party makes no true difference.

    In November 1917 the American Republic thus became equally involved with Great Britain in Zionism, which has proved to be a destructive force. However, it was only one agency of “the destructive principle.” The reader will recall that in Dr. Weizmann’s Russian youth the mass of Jews there, under their Talmudic directors, were united in the revolutionary aim, and only divided between revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism.

    In the very week of the Balfour Declaration the other group of Jews in Russia

    271

    achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western politicians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself against the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their policies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revolution, too, was “anti-semitism.” Governments hampered by secret capitulations in any one direction cannot act firmly in any other, and the timidity of London and Washington in their dealings with the world-revolution, during the four decades to follow, evidently derived from their initial submission to “the web of intrigue” spun across the Atlantic between 1914 and 1917.

    After 1917, therefore, the question which the remainder of the 20th Century had to answer was whether the West could yet find in itself the strength to break free, or prise its political leaders loose, from this double thrall. In considering the remainder of this account the reader should bear in mind what British and American politicians were induced to do during the First World War.

    [14] Lord Sydenham, when he wrote of the “deadly accuracy” of the forecast in the “Protocols” of about 1900, might have had particularly in mind the passage, “… We shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal in case of need.” The situation here described became established practice during the present century. In 1950 President Truman sent American troops into Korea “to check Communist aggression,” without consulting Congress. Later this was declared to be a “United Nations” war and they were joined by troops of seventeen other countries under an American commander, General MacArthur. This was the first experiment in a “world government”-type war and its course produced Senator Taft’s question of 1952. “Do we really mean our anti-Communist policy?” General MacArthur was dismissed after protesting an order forbidding him to pursue Communist aircraft into their Chinese sanctuary and in 1953, under President Eisenhower, the war was broken off, leaving half of Korea in “the aggressor’s” hands. General MacArthur and other American commanders later charged that the order forbidding pursuit was made known to the enemy by “a spy ring responsible for the purloining of my top secret reports to Washington” (Life, Feb. 7, 1956), and the Chinese Communist commander confirmed this (New York Daily News, Feb. 13, 1956). In June 1951 two British Foreign Office officials, Burgess and Maclean, disappeared and in September 1955 the British Government, after refusing information for four years, confirmed the general belief that they were in Moscow and “had spied for the Soviet Union over a long period.” General MacArthur then charged that these two men had revealed the non-pursuit order to the Communist “aggressor” (Life, above-quoted).

    http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_31.htm

    DRUGS, BOOZE, FILTH DESTROYING THE FABRIC OF SOCIETY- POLICY THANKS’ TO WESTMINSTERS CABAL!!

    THEIR MASTERS ORDERS!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s