21/12 Groveling for Campaign Money Isolates America

Groveling for Campaign Money Isolates America

PHOTO- OBAMA..PICKING UP THE LAST HIS OF HIS 30 PIECES OF SILVER.

America’s growing isolation

By Alan Hart

A longer headline would have added the words because of President Obama’s grovelling for Jewish campaign funding and votes.

On 19 December, in the Jewish Daily Forward, Josh Nathan-Kazis wrote this:

“Top-level Jewish fundraisers from President Obama’s 2008 campaign are sticking with the president in 2012.

“Despite reports that President Obama faces a loss of Jewish funders due to his Middle East policy, analysis of a list of elite bundlers from his 2008 race shows no defections among the president’s top Jewish supporters in 2012.”

That’s not good news for the would-be presidents on the Republican side who are grovelling for Jewish campaign funds and votes.

On the same day, in what the BBC’s Barbara Plett called “a highly unusual move”, all the regional and political groupings on the UN Security Council sharply criticised Israeli settlement activities. They said in their statements that “continued settlement building threatened the chances of a future Palestinian state.” They also expressed dismay at rising settler violence. (“They” were the envoys representing the European Union, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Arab Group and a loose coalition of emerging states known as IBSA).

It was UK Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant who read the statement of the EU group.

“Israel’s continuing announcements to accelerate the construction of settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem, (1000 new housing units tendered for last week), send a devastating message. We believe that Israel’s security and the realisation of the Palestinians’ right to statehood are not opposing goals. On the contrary they are mutually reinforcing objectives. But they will not be achieved while settlement building and settler violence continues.”

As Barbara Plett noted, “Despite the unanimity of views, the envoys did not try to draft a single Security Council statement because they knew the US would veto it.” She also noted that the Obama administration’s stance was that “anything to do with Israeli-Palestinian peace talks belongs in a US-led bilateral process, not at the UN.” (In my opinion that’s hypocrisy of the highest order).

It could be said, and I do say, that such criticism of Israel’s settlement activities is 44 years too late. So what, really, is its significance?

My answer is in three parts.

The first is that it’s a strong indication of America’s growing isolation because of the Obama administration’s unconditional support for Zionism’s monster child.

The second, related, is that it seems to confirm what I have been saying and writing for several months – that behind closed doors almost all of the governments of the world, European governments in particular, are more than fed up with Israel’s contempt for and defiance of international law.

The third is that the governments of most of the member states of the UN have come to terms with the fact that Zionism’s assertion that a Palestinian state on the West Bank including East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip could and would pose a threat to Israel’s existence is propaganda nonsense of the highest order. (This, of course, is only of academic interest because the two-state solution has long been dead if not yet buried).

When I am thinking about Obama’s grovelling, my memory recalls a comment made to me by Dr. Hajo Meyer, the passionate anti-Zionist Nazi holocaust survivor and author of An Ethical Tradition Betrayed, The End of Judaism.

We had shared a platform in London and over breakfast the following morning I asked him a question. I said: “Hajo, you’re well into your eighties and you are being vilified by Zionism’s verbal hit-men for your efforts to unmask the Zionist monster. Why are you continuing with your truth-telling? Why don’t you sit back in peace and quiet and enjoy what’s left of your life?”

He replied with nine little words. “The first person I see every morning is me,” meaning “I have to live with myself.”

It’s more than reasonable to assume that Obama looks in the mirror from time to time. I wonder if he can live with himself.

Footnote: My comments on Israel’s response

Israel’s response as delivered by Karean Peretz, spokeswoman for Israel’s UN Mission, included this: “The main obstacle to peace, has been, and remains, the Palestinians’ claim to the so-called right of return and its refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state,”

That, too, is Zionist propaganda nonsense of the highest order.

Israel is not a Jewish state. How could it be when about a quarter of its citizens are Arabs and mainly Muslims? Israel could only be a Jewish state after it had resorted to a final round of ethnic cleansing. Israel is a Zionist state.

Because Arafat kept them informed through a secret channel, Israel’s leaders have long known that in the event of a two-state solution, the PLO was reluctantly reconciled to the reality of the right of return being confined to the territory of the Palestinian state, which would mean that only about 100,000 refugees would be able to return, with the rest having to accept financial compensation for the loss, theft, of their land and rights.

As I explain in my book Zionism, The Real Enemy of the Jews, when they decided they had no choice but to be pragmatic, Arafat and his leadership colleagues took a degree of comfort from two hopes. One was that all Palestinian refugees everywhere could and would have a Palestinian passport. The other was that if there was a two-state solution, it could evolve over one or two generations into one state for all – i.e. because in peace and partnership enough Israeli Jews would say something like, “We don’t need two states”. In the event of a one-state solution coming about by mutual consent, it was assumed on the Palestinian side at leadership level that, over time, all Palestinians who wanted to return would be able to return. So in theory the two-state solution was not necessarily the end-game on the right of return.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/21/groveling-for-campaign-money-isolates-america/

Tomer
December 21, 2011 – 9:55 am
A very nice picture of our president, we all can be real proud of him!!

Now, there are more roman catholics in the USA than jews, I suggest he travels to Rome and kisses the back side of the Pope.
Next up is the english queen, Elizabeth, after all the greatest national origin in the USA is GB.
The same procedure, Barack.
The second in line is Germany. They may not have a crowned head, however Angela has an ample rearend for a little snuggling up.
These cozy little campaigning can keep him busy right up to election day, as we have other nationalities who number more than the jews do.

Log in to Reply Groveling for Campaign Money Isolates America
December 21, 2011 – 10:58 am
[…] Living, Middle East, Palestine, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this […]

Log in to Reply Jane Harman and the Woodrow Wilson Center – A Cruel Betrayal
December 21, 2011 – 11:00 am
[…] […]

Log in to Reply ricohands
December 21, 2011 – 1:58 pm
1 state solution will be the only fair outcome as laid out in the White Paper of 1939.

, September 4th, 2010 | Posted by Alan Hart
ALAN HART: Obama Has Signalled His Coming Complete Surrender to Zionism and Its Lobby
3
Obama has signalled his coming complete surrender to Zionism and its lobby
By Alan Hart for Veterans Today

He did it with seven words. “Ultimately the U.S. cannot impose a solution.”

He was speaking at the White House the day before the start of the new round of direct talks between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, after he had met with them and Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak and Jordan’s King Abdullah II. (In my last post I anticipated Obama saying at the point of his complete surrender that “America can’t want peace more than the parties.” He also said that – ahead of schedule!)

Today there is a growing number of seriously well informed people of all faiths and none (including me) who believe there will only be peace if it is imposed.

Among those who have dared to say so in public is one of the most eminent Jewish gentlemen of our time, Henry Siegman. A former national director of the American Jewish Congress, he is president of the U.S./Middle East Project, which was part of the Council on Foreign Relations from 1994 until 2006 when it was established as an independent policy institute. He is also a research professor at the Sir Joseph Hotung Middle East Programme of the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London. During his more than 30 years of involvement in the Middle East peace process, he has published extensively on the subject and has been consulted by governments, international agencies and non-governmental organizations involved in the peace process. In a comment piece for the Financial Times on 23 February 2010, (quoted in Conflict Without End? the Epilogue to Volume 3 of the American edition of my book Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews), he wrote this:

“The Middle East peace process and its quest for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict that got under way nearly 20 years ago with the Oslo accords has undergone two fundamental transformations. It is now on the brink of a third.

“The first was the crossing of a threshold by Israel’s settlement project in the West Bank; there is no longer any prospect of its removal by this or any future Israeli government, which was the precise goal of the settlements’ relentless expansion all along. The previous prime minister, Ehud Olmert, who declared that a peace accord requires Israel to withdraw ‘from most, if not all’ of the occupied territories, ‘including East Jerusalem,’ was unable even to remove any of the 20 hilltop outposts Israel had solemnly promised to dismantle.

“A two-state solution could therefore come about only if Israel were compelled to withdraw to the pre-1967 border by an outside power whose wishes an Israeli government could not defy – the US. The assumption has always been that at the point where Israel’s colonial ambitions collide with critical US national interests, an American president would draw on the massive credit the US has accumulated with Israel to insist it dismantle its illegal settlements, which successive US administrations held to be the main obstacle to a peace accord.

“The second transformation resulted from the shattering of that assumption when President Barack Obama – who took a more forceful stand against Israel’s settlements than any of his predecessors, and did so at a time when the damage this unending conflict was causing American interests could not have been more obvious – backed off ignominiously in the face of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s rejection of his demand. This left prospects for a two-state accord dead in the water.”

On 16 August in a piece for the Huffington Post which was originally published by Ha’aretz in Hebrew, Siegman added this:

“Most Israelis, particularly the present government, have been blithely indifferent to repeated international condemnations of Israel’s systematic theft of Palestinian territory on which it has been settling its own Jewish population in blatant violation of international law. Yet their reaction to what they see as an attack on the “legitimacy” of the State of Israel, a concept foreign to international law, seems to bring them to the edge of hysteria.

“In fact, Israel’s legitimacy within its 1967 borders has never been challenged by the international community. It is its behavior on territory beyond its own borders to which the international community – including every U.S. administration – has objected. To construe the condemnation of violations of international law as anti-Semitism is absurd.

“It was not an anti-Semite seeking to delegitimize the Jewish state, but Theodore Meron, an internationally respected jurist and the legal advisor to Israel’s Foreign Ministry, who following the war of 1967 conveyed the following legal opinion to Israel’s Foreign Minister Abba Eban: ‘Civilian settlement in the administered territories contravenes explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention,’ to which Israel is a signatory. That Convention’s ban on population transfer is ‘categorical and not conditional upon the motives for the transfer or its objectives. The Convention’s purpose is to prevent settlement in occupied territory of citizens of the occupying state.’”

So yes, Israel’s leaders knew that settlements on Arab land occupied in 1967 are illegal. They simply didn’t give (and still today don’t give) a damn about international law. But this attitude, a mixture of extreme arrogance and insufferable self-righteousness, does not make them the main villains in the story of what happened after June 1967. The main villains were (and still are) the governments of the major powers and the one in Washington DC above all.

What they should have said to Israel in the immediate aftermarth of the 1967 war is: “You are not to build any settlements on occupied Arab land. If you do, you’ll be demonstrating your contempt for international law. In this event the international community will declare Israel to be an outlaw state and subject it to sanctions.”

If something like that riot act had been read to Israel there would have been peace many, many years ago. The pragmatic Arafat was reluctantly reconciled to the reality of Israel’s existence inside its pre-1967 borders as far back as 1968. In his gun and olive branch address to the UN General Assembly on 13 November 1974 he said so by obvious implication. Thereafter he put his credibility with his leadership colleagues and his people, and his life, on the line to get a mandate for unthinkable compromise with Israel. He got it at the end of 1979 when the Palestine National Council voted by 296 votes to 4 to endorse his two-state policy. What he needed thereafter was an Israeli partner for peace. He eventually got a probable one, Yitzhak Rabin, but he was assassinated by a Zionist fanatic. The more it became clear that Israel’s leaders were not interested in a genuine two-state solution for which Arafat had prepared the ground on his side, the more his credibility with his own people suffered.

It is in the context briefly sketched above that Obama’s seven words have their real meaning.

At the time of writing it seems reasonably clear that Obama is hoping that Abbas and his equally discredited Fatah leadership colleagues can be bribed and bullied into accepting what Netanyahu will eventually offer – crumbs from Zionism’s table. (My guess is that Abbas at a point will resign rather than trigger a Palestinian civil war). THE question is what will Obama do when Israel refuses to give enough to satisfy the demands and needs of the Palestinian people for a just about acceptable measure of justice?

We already know the answer. “Ultimately the U.S. cannot impose a solution.”

Effectively those seven words tell Israel’s leaders that they can go on imposing their will on the occupied and oppressed Palestinians with the comfort of knowing that Obama is not going to use the leverage he has, and every American president has had, to cause them, or try to cause them, to be serious about peace on terms virtually all Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims everywhere could accept, and which a rational Israeli government and people would accept with relief.

Put another way, those seven words are effectively a green light for Zionism alone to determine the future of the Palestinians, a future which at some point will most likely see the final ethnic cleansing of Palestine, followed by another great turning against the Jews (provoked by the Zionist state’s behaviour) and a Clash of Civilizations, Judeo-Christian v Islamic.

In his analysis on the day Obama delivered his seven words, Jeremy Bowen, the BBC’s admirable Middle East Editor, offered this thought. “There might not be room for many more failures. The conflict is changing. A religious war is now being grafted on what used to be fundamentally a competition for territory between two national movements. You can make deals with nationalists. It’s much harder with people who believe they’re doing God’s work.”

The next question asks itself. Why won’t Obama be the president to call and hold the Zionist state to account for its crimes, even when doing so is necessary for the best protection of America’s own interests?

Part of the answer is, of course, that he is no more willing than any of his predecessors to have a showdown with the Zionist lobby and its stooges in Congress and the mainstream media.

But there might be more to it.

In the privacy of his own mind Obama probably understands better than any of his predecessors how the conflict was created and what has sustained it. If that is the case, he will also know there’s no guarantee that real American-led pressure on Israel to be serious about peace would work and that it could be counter-productive.

I am a supporter in principle of the case and the need for the Zionist state of Israel to be totally isolated, boycotted and sanctioned as Apartheid South Africa was, eventually. But… The danger is that even the credible threat of a real boycott and sanctions could play into the hands of those Israeli leaders – Netanyahu has long been their standard bearer – who have brainwashed Israelis, most if not quite all, into believing that the world hates Jews, always has and always will, and that Israeli Jews have no choice but to tell the world to go to hell. In this context (and as I note in the Epilogue of the American edition of my book), I think it could and should be said that Zionism succeeded, probably beyond its own best expectations, in transforming the obscenity of the Nazi holocaust from a lesson against racism and fascism and all the evils associated with them into an ideology that seeks to justify anything and everything the Zionist state does. War crimes and all.

So it could be that in the privacy of his own mind, Obama knows it is already too late (not to mention too dangerous) to try to push Israel’s leaders much further than they are willing to go.

What, I wonder, will honest historians of the future make of what is happening right now? My guess is that they will conclude that when Obama launched his push for peace, the Zionist state was already a monster beyond control.

ABOUT ALAN HART:

Alan Hart has been engaged with events in the Middle East and their global consequences and terrifying implications – the possibility of a Clash of Civilisations, Judeo-Christian v Islamic, and, along the way, another great turning against the Jews – for nearly 40 years…

As a correspondent for ITN’s News At Ten and the BBC’s Panorama programme (covering wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world).
As a researcher and author.
As a participant at leadership level, working to a Security Council background briefing, in the covert diplomacy of the search for peace.
He’s been to war with the Israelis and the Arabs, but the learning experience he values most, and which he believes gave him rare insight, came from his one-to-one private conversations over the years with many leaders on both sides of the conflict. With, for example, Golda Meir, Mother Israel, and Yasser Arafat, Father Palestine. The significance of these private conversations was that they enabled him to be aware of the truth of what leaders really believed and feared as opposed to what they said in public for propaganda and myth-sustaining purposes.

It was because of his special relationships with leaders on both sides that, in 1980, he found himself sucked into the covert diplomacy of conflict resolution…

President Carter had been prevented by Prime Minister Begin from involving the PLO in the peace process, an opening made possible because Arafat had signalled, secretly and seriously, that he was ready to make peace with an Israel inside more or less its pre-1967 borders. Carter was in despair and said, in private, that events had once again proved that it was impossible to advance the peace process by institutional diplomacy (because of the pork-barrel nature of American politics and the Zionist lobby’s awesome influence). It was then suggested to Alan that he should undertake an unofficial, covert diplomatic mission to get an exploratory dialogue going between Arafat and Peres, with himself initially the linkman. The assumption at the time was that Peres would win Israel’s next election and deny Begin a second term. The initiative was funded by a small number of wealthy British Jews led by Marcus Sieff (the Chairman of Marks and Spencer) with the approval of Lord Victor Rothschild…. It happened and enough progress was made to get Peres and Arafat into public dialogue in the event of Peres winning the 1981 election. Unfortunately, and against all expectations, he did not.

In the course of this mission, Alan learned two things. The first was the truth about the miracle of Arafat’s leadership – his success in persuading his side (most of it) to be ready for unthinkable compromise with Israel for peace. (Which was why Alan wrote his first book Arafat: Terrorist or Peacemaker). The second was why it is difficult to impossible for any Israeli prime minister, even a rational, well-motivated one, to make peace on any terms the Palestinians can accept.

A decade later, this initiative became the Oslo process, which might have delivered peace if Prime Minister Rabin had not been assassinated by a gut-Zionist.

Alan has long believed that what peacemaking needs above all else is some TRUTH-TELLING, about many things but, especially, the difference between Zionist mythology and real history, and, the difference between Jews and Judaism on the one hand and Zionists and Zionism on the other. (The Zionism of the title and substance of Alan’s latest book is, of course, political Zionism or Jewish nationalism as the creating and sustaining force of the Zionist state, not what could be called the spiritual Zionism of Judaism).

Alan is also credited with having played a leading role in getting the ‘North-South’ issue onto the agenda for political and public debate throughout the Western world and beyond. In 1973, frustrated by the mainstream media’s refusal to come to grips with issues that really matter, he set up his own independent production company (World Focus) to research, film, edit and promote the first ever documentary on the full and true dimensions of global poverty and its implications for all.

The end product, a two-hour film titled FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT, had its world premiere, hosted by Secretary General Kurt Waldheim, at the formal opening of the 7th Special session of the UN General Assembly, (called to discuss the need for a New World Economic Order); was screened on television in most countries of the North; was versioned for schools in many countries; and became something of a standard work of reference. (The visual impact of the production was supplemented by statistics then new to the world including, for example, the estimate that, in the South, 15 million children under five were dying each year from a combination of malnutrition and easily preventable diseases – in a word, poverty).

To make the project work, Alan, on the strength of his international reputation, raised £1 million in grants from international development institutions and governments and put together a think-tank of world leaders to advise him.

Alan is a fiercely independent thinker. He hates all labels and isms and has never been a member of any political party or group. He prefers to judge issues on their merits. When asked what drives him, he used to say: “I have three children and, when the world falls apart, I want to be able to look them in the eye and say, ‘Don’t blame me. I tried.’” Today he gives an improved answer, one borrowed from a conversation with Dr. Hajo Meyer, a Nazi holocaust survivor and a passionate anti-Zionist. When Alan asked him why he was still campaigning at the age of 82 even though he was being reviled by Zionism, he replied: “The first person I see when I get up in the morning is me.” Alan, too, has to be able to live with himself. He believes that heaven and hell are states of mind. Hell, he says, “is when you know that the end of your life is approaching and that you have not used your talents and resources as well as you could have done to make a difference – i.e. when you realise upon reflection that you have wasted your life. Heaven is contemplation of the approach of death without fear because you know that, on balance, you’ve done your best to make a difference.”

http://www.zionismbook.com

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/09/04/alan-hart-obama-has-signalled-his-coming-complete-surrender-to-zionism-and-its-lobby/

wolf
September 5, 2010 – 12:10 pm
“IF OBAMA EVER CROSSES THE JEWS, an army of Jewish publishers, journalists and lobbyists will destroy him instantly. The Jews know of Obama’s alleged homosexual activities and his presidential ineligibility due to his birth in Kenya. In other words, the Jews who own America’s mainstream media, could ruin Obama in a minute.

Thus, the Jewish banking elite who work closely with their synagogue buddies at ABC, NBC, and CBS, have decided FOR Obama those whom he appoints as his key advisers and those whom he confirms as heads of the institutions connected with the White House.

A key component of Obama’s rise to power is rooted in Chicago, the Jewish breeding ground of Obama’s political career. A prime Jewish patron of Obama’s political ambitions was and remains, Abner Mikva, former Chicago Congressman, Federal judge and White House counsel to Bill Clinton.

Mikva is one of many influential Chicago Jews who have been among Obama’s earliest and most ardent backers. Through their large financial contributions and influence peddling, Obama’s Chicago enablers insured for themselves both a place in his administration and political leverage serving Jewish interests. These include the following, all of whom, are inter-connected:

-1- Bettylu Klutznik Saltzman, whose father, Phillip Klutznik (d 1999), served as President of B’nai B’rith
-2- Rahm Emanuel, former partner in Chicago’s branch of Wasserstein Investments, currently White House Chief of Staff
-3- Penny Pritzker, heiress to the Chicago-based Hyatt Hotel fortunes, now member of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board
-4- Lester Crown, Chairman of Chicago’s Crown Investments,
-5- Valerie Jarrett, former Chairman of the Chicago Stock Exchange, currently Obama’s Senior Adviser for Intergovernmental Affairs
-6- David Axelrod, founder of Axelrod & Associates which ran Obama’s senate and presidential campaigns, now Special Adviser to Obama.

As listed in the publication, The Barack Book, Jews have played and continue to play a key role in propping up Obama as a puppet for Jewish interests. Also listed in The Barack Book as amongst Obama’s Chicago ‘friends’ is The Joyce Foundation, a Gentile-sounding foundation, but is actually a Jewish organization that lobbies for gun confiscation of Gentiles, funded by the Jewish billionaire, George Soros.

Noted for his takeover of the Democratic party, Soros was the major financial contributor of Obama’s presidential campaign through his huge network of PACs and civic groups.

THERE ARE PRESENTLY 3 JEWS who have infiltrated the Obama administration, and for all practical and Jewish purposes, run the White House: George Soros, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner.”

(from “How the Jews Took the White House” by Nathanael Kapner at Real Zionist News)

Michael J Volz
September 6, 2010 – 2:50 pm
They can pull the plug on him at any given moment and he knows it! Will it be assassination or revelation of his dirty laundry?

They outed Kennedy,Nixon and Clinton!

Mike

Michael J Volz
September 8, 2010 – 9:30 am
PS,

What the poor man doesn’t realize is they will pull his plug if that suits their agenda whether he does everything they tell him or not.

The jews are not the saviors of “black” America. Ask Cythia Mckinney who has a brain and can think for herself!

Mike
Robman
September 7, 2010 – 9:36 pm
This website is little more than Saudi-sponsored anti-Semitic trash.

Puleeeze, readers/sponsors, don’t bore me with your crocodile tears of righteous indignation, “Oh, just because we criticize Israel, we’re anti-Semites, huh?”

Well, yes you are. Not so much because you criticize Israel, but because your criticism is informed by a moral standard that is not applied to any other country.

Even the EU’s working definition of anti-Semitism defines criticism of Israel in this context as anti-Semitism.

The fact is that in the original “Mandate of Palestine”, present-day Jordan was included. There were no “Palestinians” as a distinct national ethnic group then; “Palestinians” were anyone who lived in the mandate, Arab or Jew. However, to the extent that one can identify Palestinians as a distinct group warranting national self-determination, Jordan – part of the orginal Mandate, remember – is overwhelmingly populated by Palestinians.

The Palestinians often cite their majority status in the West Bank as grounds for sovereignty there. If that is so, why is the basic principle of “majority rule” of such vital importance in the West Bank….but utterly ignored right next door in Jordan?

I’m not saying Israel should hang onto the West Bank entirely. I’m for a confederation of Palestinian-majority and contiguous West Bank areas with Jordan, the REAL Palestinian state, plus confederation of Jewish-majority areas of the West Bank with Israel, and the whole of the West Bank maintained as a DMZ, policed not by foreign troops, but by joint Israeli-Palestinian police forces.

But before any of that can happen, the Palestinian leaders – credible leaders – have to amend the Palestinian National Charter so as to remove the language that declares the idea of Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people to be illegitimate. In other words, the Palestinians must indeed recognize Israel’s legitimacy as as Jewish state.

Abbas says it is not his “job” to define the national character of Israel. But if that were true, why does the very founding documents of his political movement make it his business to define Israel in the negative with respect to the Jews?

His failure to recognize Israel as a Jewish state makes about as much sense as Russia not recognizing Poland as a Polish state, or Turkey not recognizing Greece as a Greek state. But if this does not change, then no matter what is agreed to otherwise, it will be worthless. For when – not if – the Palestinian renege and renew fighting, as they always have, they will be able to say to the world community, that they cannot be held to the terms of an agreement with an “illegitimate” entity.

Netanyahu – as well as past Israeli leaders such as Olmert – have stressed the recognition issue. It was so important back at Oslo in 1993 that Arafat indeed promised to amend the Palestinian National Charter accordingly, and then predictably, he reneged. But your “Jewish dominated press” – what a joke – never reports on this. Instead, all we ever hear from national level print and broadcast media the world over is that this is all about “settlements”; i.e., everything is stalled because of “Israeli intransigence”.

Some Israelis may not have wanted to hang onto the West Bank in the wake of the 1967 war. But they were unanimous about hanging onto Jerusalem, and why shouldn’t they have been, after Jews were ethnically cleansed from there by the Jordanian Army in 1948? In 1967, the Israeli government in fact offered the Arabs the rest of the West Bank, minus Jerusalem, in return for peace. But instead she got the “three no’s of Kharthoum” – no recognition, no peace, no negotiations.

Now, no country in history – ever – has been compelled by a third party to return all lands obtained in the course of a defensive war. It is beyond dispute that the Jordanian Army attacked Israel without provocation in 1967 from that land. So, your interpretation of international law is completely backward: Israel is under NO LEGAL OR MORAL OBLIGATION WHATEVER to concede ONE SQUARE CENTIMETER of land to the Palestinians.

Moreover, international law only defines territory as “occupied” if it was, prior to hostilities, under someone else’s internationally recognized sovereignty. But this was not the case in the West Bank. Jordan’s occupation of the West Bank in the wake of the 1948 war was considered illegal by the UN, and was only recognized by Pakistan and Britain. It is not “occupied territory”, but rather, “disputed territory”.

Consider, for example, the territories of Alsace-Lorraine in France and Silesia in Poland. These were areas of mixed ethnicity claimed by both Germany and France in the former case and Germany and Poland in the latter case. Because of German aggression in both cases, she forfeited any claims to these territories. So, why should Israel – the target of Arab aggression – be compelled to give up the West Bank any more than Poland would be compelled to cede Silesia or France Alsace-Lorraine? As a practical matter, due to demographics, some part of the West Bank, perhaps, but again, legally and morally, based on clear historical precedents, they don’t have to give up anything.

And, even if Israel does cede the West Bank, why do the Jews who live there have to leave? That is what the PA requires. But Arabs can live in Israel – they make up 20% of the population. But in Palestinian lands, there can be NO JEWS. But that’s OK with you guys at this site, for that is your ultimate aim as well: NO MORE JEWS….except passive, “happy darkey”, “good nigger”-style Jews who know their place, this place being a perpetual minority, to be harassed and bullied whenever convenient. And what really tees you off about Israel – never mind any of your phony b.s. revisionist historical rationalizations – is that Israel and her Diaspora Jewish supporters are, so far as you are concerned, analogous to “uppity niggers”.

Oh, sure, you can easily dig around and find this Jew or that who hates Israel. Just like in the antebellum South, some blacks could be found who liked their masters, who thought slavery was just dandy. You can take the Jew out of the Ghetto, but you can’t always take the Ghetto out of the Jew, and there will always be some who are cowardly collaborators. And a lot of them work for Obama, as some of you have figured out! Know what that is, boys and girls? “Camouflage”, that’s what.

It’s all about “access”…and these pathetic examples of my ethnic brethren working for Obama demonstrate the delusion of so many subject peoples that if they have “access”, then everything is going to be OK. It hasn’t occurred to these fools that the Jewish Police in the Warsaw Ghetto had plenty of “access” to the local Nazi authorities….but I digress.

But, let’s cut the crap, shall we, Mr. Duff? How much are the Saudis stuffing in a Swiss bank account of yours to disseminate this garbage? Your military pension not enough, or are you just doing this for fun, because you just never could stand those darned Joos, especially the “uppity” ones who have the temerity to defend themselves? As long as we’re like Woody Allen or Jerry Seinfeld, we’re OK, someone wimpy and neurotic who entertains you and you can feel superior to, but if we hit back, ohh, that just makes your blood boil, doesn’t it? I must say, the most blatant anti-Semitism I’ve ever experienced was in the U.S. military, and I know your type real well, pal.

This site is pretty slick, I have to admit, though. Very nice, “patriotic” theme. “Veterans Today”…well, who could argue with “veterans” without being “unpatriotic”? I see you have links supporting the Ground Zero mosque…I have to wonder how many veterans – especially of Iraq and Afghanistan – like the idea of a Islamist triumphalist mosque being built next to Ground Zero, where there isn’t even a significant Moslem community to serve, led by a Kuwaiti-born Imam who said that Osama Bin Laden was “made in U.S.A.” I know a lot of veterans – I’m a veteran, by the way – and I’d hazard a highly educated guess that whoever is behind this site does not exactly have the best interests of the U.S. at heart.

Yeah, we gotta “put those uppity Zionists in their place”, eh? And then do what? Back the Arabs?

What do we stand for in this country? What do we fight for, what have we fought for? Not always the purest of motives in every case, but the two biggest and most expensive wars we ever fought – both in blood and treasure – were the Civil War and WW2. In both of these cases, we could have easily avoided war in the short term, and “cut a deal” that would have saved money and lives in the here and now. But our leaders wisely determined that the principles at stake were larger than that, and so we chose to fight. How many today would say that we should not have fought WW2? Or I suppose that was “for the Zionists too”, huh? Well, it wouldn’t surprise me if that were the position of this site…it is well-documented that the governments of most of Moslem SW Asia today can trace their political roots to leaders who openly sided with the Nazis.

All the same, we should abandon those pesky Zionists and side with some of the most backward and repressive regimes in the world, whose values fly in the face of everything we stand for, where there is no freedom of religion, no free press, no women’s rights, no labor rights, where child molestation is institutionalized (the UN estimates that there are 50 MILLION – YES, MILLION – child brides in SW Asia/NE Africa, between the ages of ten and fourteen, and some even younger than that. Yes, this sick society is who we should side with against those “evil Zionists”. I’m not saying Israel is perfect – what country is? – but compared to who they are fighting, they practically are.

You all disgust me, both the sponsors of this site, and most of the cretins posting above. Hey, I’ll make a deal with the lot of you, though. I’m a Jewish-American veteran of the U.S. Army. You other veterans on this site who hate Israel so much, you’ll probably say that people like me should “go back to Israel, if you love it so much.” (Of course, German-Americans who love Germany, Irish Americans who love Ireland, Polish Americans who love Poland, Greek Americans who love Greece, that is all OK, they can stay here…only Jews who love Israel have no right to be here, according to your ilk…).

BUT….I’ll tell you what. How about we ALL go to the places we are advocating for? YOU go to Gaza, or Jordan, or Egypt, or Iraq, or Saudi Arabia (they’re paying your bills, right, Mr. Duff?), and I’ll go to Israel. How’s that sound? I’ve been to Israel, it is very nice. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, I dunno…maybe you guys also like little girls and you’d be right at home there, for all I know….But just say the word if you want to take me up on this, willya? Not holding my breath….

Gordon Duff
September 7, 2010 – 11:10 pm
Robman,
You have done a moderately good job of putting out the ADL talking points. As for accusing me of taking money from the Saudis….and you being a Zionist stooge and small time suckup to a nation of sociopaths…please.
Next time the Mossad phones for advice, I will tell them to talk to the dumb shit on Bordeaux Place in Norfolk.
g

Robman
September 7, 2010 – 9:36 pm
This website is little more than Saudi-sponsored anti-Semitic trash.

Puleeeze, readers/sponsors, don’t bore me with your crocodile tears of righteous indignation, “Oh, just because we criticize Israel, we’re anti-Semites, huh?”

Well, yes you are. Not so much because you criticize Israel, but because your criticism is informed by a moral standard that is not applied to any other country.

Even the EU’s working definition of anti-Semitism defines criticism of Israel in this context as anti-Semitism.

SURELY YOU KNOW THAT THE EU WAS GIVEN IT’S ORDERS FROM THE ADL?

AMONGST THEIR OTHER DICTATES..

Decorating Public School Classrooms and Grounds With Holiday Symbols

SUPREME COURT JUDGE- GUESS WHO IT IS?

Religion as an Educational Lesson

While there are appropriate educational benefits to teaching about the diverse religious traditions and cultures of our country, school officials must be sure they do not give students the impression that one set of holidays or beliefs is more important or more acceptable than others.

——————————————————————————–
Introduction
——————————————————————————–
Religion in the Classroom
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Assemblies
——————————————————————————–
Performing Religious Music
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Displays
——————————————————————————–

Courts have stressed that “[r]eligion is a pervasive and enduring human phenomenon which is an appropriate, if not desirable, subject of secular study.” 12 In fact, “it might well be said that one’s education is not complete without a study of comparative religion or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization.”3

However, there is a critical difference between practicing religion and teaching about religion. Most importantly, it is constitutionally permissible for public schools to teach about religion but unconstitutional for public schools to observe religious holidays or practice religion.45 School officials and parents must be careful not to cross the line between “the laudable educational goal of promoting a student’s knowledge of and appreciation for this nation’s cultural and religious diversity, and the impermissible endorsement of religion forbidden by the Establishment Clause.” 6

The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on issues related to teaching about religious holidays in public schools, but its rulings in other cases involving religious freedom and lower court rulings about religious holidays in public schools are instructive regarding which activities are permissible or impermissible.

The Supreme Court has said that religion may only be studied when it is “presented objectively as part of a secular program of education.” 7 Such study must have a distinctly nonreligious purpose. For example, public school students in an English class may study passages from the Bible to better understand a work of literature that draws on Biblical sources. A course on American or European history might also include an in-depth study of the role of religion in shaping important historical events. It is important to remember that, in any context, the study of religion must not be coercive and must neither promote nor be hostile towards religion. 8

It is often appropriate to teach about the historical, contemporary and cultural aspects of religious holidays. From these lessons, young children often gain understanding and respect for the diverse cultures and beliefs in our country. Appropriate lessons about religious holidays could include discussions of the origins and meanings of holidays and how and when they are celebrated.

However, teachers should make sure not to cover a single holiday or religion, but instead to teach children about the holiday celebrations of a number of different traditions. For example, in any given year a number of holidays may occur in December – Christmas, Chanukah, Kwanzaa, Bill of Rights Day, and Bodhi Day (a Buddhist celebration) – and may be appropriate for a lesson on various celebrations held in the winter season. 9 In this context, it is permissible for teachers to display religious symbols, so long as they are used solely as a teaching aid and are displayed temporarily as part of an educational lesson. 10

Public School Students Performing Religious Music

——————————————————————————–
Introduction
——————————————————————————–
Religion in the Classroom
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Assemblies
——————————————————————————–
Performing Religious Music
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Displays
——————————————————————————–

School-sponsored singing of religious music poses slightly different concerns because so much choral music is religious. 15 Due to the dominance of religious music in serious choral music and the legitimate secular reasons for having public school students sing choral music, courts have been more lenient about allowing public school choirs to sing religious music. 16 Additionally, forbidding choirs to sing any music that is religious has been found to be hostile, not neutral, toward religion. 17 Therefore, it is usually permissible to allow public school groups to sing some religious music as part of a choral performance.

However, to avoid First Amendment violations, school choirs should not sing only religious music and should not focus on a particular holiday or denomination. Also, similar to school assemblies and other activities, school officials should allow public school children to be excused from singing religious music without fear of embarrassment or peer pressure.

For instance, at a winter public school choral concert, it is permissible to include some songs based on holidays such as Christmas or Chanukah. However, it would not be appropriate for a public school choir to perform a concert dominated by the songs of a single religious tradition.

It is also not appropriate for public schools to lead students in singing prayers, just as it is improper for schools to lead students in spoken prayer. 18 Courts have found no distinction in singing versus speaking prayers and have found that songs which “call on God for His blessing and contain an avowal of divine faith,” are not appropriate for public school students to sing. 19

Public school students may be allowed to perform at churches, synagogues or temples because courts have recognized that these venues often provide excellent acoustics and atmosphere for the singing of choral music. However, a public school choir should not sing at exclusively religious sites or only at venues of a particular denomination.

As with other public school activities that involve religion, school officials and parents should consider the effects of teaching religious music to impressionable young children.

Holiday Assemblies and Other Public School Activities

——————————————————————————–
Introduction
——————————————————————————–
Religion in the Classroom
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Assemblies
——————————————————————————–
Performing Religious Music
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Displays
——————————————————————————–

The study of religious holidays may also include “more than mere classroom instruction.” 11 For instance, public performances or presentations of music, literature and art are permissible, as long as they are “presented objectively as part of a secular program of education.” 12 A permissible purpose for such a program may be advancing students’ knowledge of society’s cultural and religious heritage. 13

However, religious music, literature, art or other religious activities should not dominate school activities. These activities are permissible only if they make up a small portion of a school-sponsored event. For instance, it may be permissible to have students act out a play which contains one scene where a family is shown opening presents on Christmas morning. However, school-sponsorship of a play about the birth of Jesus would be impermissible because such performances are inherently affirmations of a certain religious point of view.

School-sponsored activities should also focus on more than one religion and religious holiday. Depicting a diversity of beliefs and customs is important to teaching public school students about religion and culture. It also helps to ensure that public schools remain neutral and do not promote or denigrate any particular denomination or custom.

It is also important to provide students the opportunity to choose not to participate in activities they find offensive to their religious sensibilities. 14 School administrators must be sure that students have the option to make this choice and not be forced to participate out of embarrassment or peer pressure.

Religion as an Educational Lesson

While there are appropriate educational benefits to teaching about the diverse religious traditions and cultures of our country, school officials must be sure they do not give students the impression that one set of holidays or beliefs is more important or more acceptable than others.

——————————————————————————–
Introduction
——————————————————————————–
Religion in the Classroom
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Assemblies
——————————————————————————–
Performing Religious Music
——————————————————————————–
Holiday Displays
——————————————————————————–

Courts have stressed that “[r]eligion is a pervasive and enduring human phenomenon which is an appropriate, if not desirable, subject of secular study.” 12 In fact, “it might well be said that one’s education is not complete without a study of comparative religion or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization.”3

However, there is a critical difference between practicing religion and teaching about religion. Most importantly, it is constitutionally permissible for public schools to teach about religion but unconstitutional for public schools to observe religious holidays or practice religion.45 School officials and parents must be careful not to cross the line between “the laudable educational goal of promoting a student’s knowledge of and appreciation for this nation’s cultural and religious diversity, and the impermissible endorsement of religion forbidden by the Establishment Clause.” 6

The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on issues related to teaching about religious holidays in public schools, but its rulings in other cases involving religious freedom and lower court rulings about religious holidays in public schools are instructive regarding which activities are permissible or impermissible.

The Supreme Court has said that religion may only be studied when it is “presented objectively as part of a secular program of education.” 7 Such study must have a distinctly nonreligious purpose. For example, public school students in an English class may study passages from the Bible to better understand a work of literature that draws on Biblical sources. A course on American or European history might also include an in-depth study of the role of religion in shaping important historical events. It is important to remember that, in any context, the study of religion must not be coercive and must neither promote nor be hostile towards religion. 8

It is often appropriate to teach about the historical, contemporary and cultural aspects of religious holidays. From these lessons, young children often gain understanding and respect for the diverse cultures and beliefs in our country. Appropriate lessons about religious holidays could include discussions of the origins and meanings of holidays and how and when they are celebrated.

However, teachers should make sure not to cover a single holiday or religion, but instead to teach children about the holiday celebrations of a number of different traditions. For example, in any given year a number of holidays may occur in December – Christmas, Chanukah, Kwanzaa, Bill of Rights Day, and Bodhi Day (a Buddhist celebration) – and may be appropriate for a lesson on various celebrations held in the winter season. 9 In this context, it is permissible for teachers to display religious symbols, so long as they are used solely as a teaching aid and are displayed temporarily as part of an educational lesson. 10

e Crimes Laws

Leading the Way Against Violent Bigotry
ADL’s model hate crime statute provides for increased penalties for criminals who target their victims because of their personal characteristics, such as race, religion, national origin, gender or sexual orientation. Now, 45 states and the District of Columbia have enacted hate crimes laws based on (or similar to) ADL’s model, and, in 1993, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld such laws, ruling that they did not violate First Amendment rights.

The passage of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crime Prevention Act—the most important, comprehensive and inclusive federal hate crime law– is a direct result of ADL’s leadership in this area.

Hate Crime Laws: Punishment to Fit the Crime
ADL Urges FBI To Begin Collecting Hate Crimes Data on New Categories
ADL Hails Long Overdue Enactment Of Federal Hate Crime Law As A “Monumental Achievement For America”
The Hate Crime Bill is Now Law – What’s Next?
What You Need to Know: The New Federal Hate Crime Law (104KB .pdf)
An Introduction to Hate Crime Laws (152KB .pdf)
ADL Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Matthew Shepard Hate Crime Prevention Act

Hate Crime Laws: The ADL Approach
Hate crime statutes are necessary because the failure to recognize and effectively address this unique type of crime could cause an isolated incident to explode into widespread community tension.

Map: State Hate Crimes Statutory Provisions

FBI Hate Crime Statistics: A 10 Year Comparison
Hate Crime Statistics: Motivations for Hate Crimes

Hate Crimes Data Collection and Prosecutions: Frequently Asked Questions
The Anti-Defamation League & Cook County (IL) State’s Attorney’s Office have developed this FAQ to address some of the basic legal and practical considerations involved in labeling and charging a hate crime.

Improving Campus Hate Crime Data Collection
In an effort to support a provision that would improve campus hate crime data collection, ADL coordinated a sign-on letter with 80 national civil rights, religious, education, law enforcement and civic organizations calling on members of Congress to make changes that would give students and parents a more complete picture about campus safety.

How to Combating Bias and Hate Crimes: ADL Blueprint for Action
The Blueprint for Action is a compilation of ADL programs and initiatives aimed at combating bias and hate crimes.

Symbols are the most powerful communication tools that have ever existed. Because they have the ability to convey so much meaning, intent and significance in such a compact, immediately recognizable form, the effect that they have is tremendous. One need only reflect on the reverence or passion that symbols ranging from the American flag to the Star of David to the Christian cross to the Red Cross can evoke to be able to understand exactly how powerful a symbol can be.

Unfortunately, symbols can convey negative connotations as well as positive. Some symbols are meant to convey feelings of hate or anger, or meant to instill in those who see the symbols feelings of fear and insecurity. Hate symbols, for instance, can be found scrawled on the outside walls of synagogues, churches and schools; tattooed on the bodies of white supremacists; or displayed on jewelry or clothing. These symbols give extremists a sense of power and belonging, as well as a quick way of identifying others who share their beliefs. This database provides an overview of many such symbols frequently used by neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, racist skinheads, racist prison gangs and other hate or extremist groups or movements.

Users of this database should keep in mind, however, that few symbols ever represent just one idea or are used exclusively by one group. For example, the Confederate Flag is a symbol that is frequently used by white supremacists but which also has been used by people and groups that are not racist. To some it may signify pride in one’s heritage but to others it suggests slavery or white supremacy. Similarly, other symbols in this database may be significant to groups or individuals who are not extreme or racist. The descriptions here point out significant multiple meanings but may not be able to relay every single possible meaning of a particular symbol. For this reason, all of the symbols depicted here must be evaluated in the context in which they are used.

Graphic Symbols | Number Symbols | Racist Acronyms
White Power Music | About The Symbols

AND YOU THOUGHT WE FOLLOWED CHRISTIAN LAWS….

http://www.adl.org/hate_symbols/default.asp

HATE SYMBOL

HATE CRIME- HOAX CRIME

HATE CRIMES

ADL of Evil – Anti-Defamation League,anti-free speech terror

WE ALLOW THEM TO MAKE OUR LAWS!!

ADL

Identifying And Combating Hate

Leading the efforts to deter and counter hate-motivated crimes, the League drafted model hate crimes legislation in 1981, covering all hate crimes. Forty-five states have since enacted laws based on or similar to the model, which was unanimously deemed constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993.
As part of a joint effort, formed Partners Against Hate to provide outreach, education and training in techniques to prevent juvenile hate-related behavior.
Maintains an extensive online visual database of extremist symbols, logos and tattoos.
Education

Works to further the mission of combating hate through education. Its award-winning A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE® Institute programs provide anti-bias education and training with curriculums and materials available for Pre-K through university students, community groups, corporations, civic associations, religious organizations and law enforcement agencies.
Supports Holocaust awareness and education through its Braun Holocaust Institute and the Hidden Child Foundation/ADL®.

Religious Freedom
Regards the separation of church and state as essential to preserving religious freedom in our increasingly pluralistic society. Engaged in action to safeguard religious liberty throughout society, including in the workplace and classroom.
Interfaith Affairs

Builds and maintains relationships and dialogue with international, national and local religious leaders of all faiths. Monitors and attempts to resolve interfaith issues, and helps educate non-Jewish religious leaders about Jewish history, theology and philosophy.
Through the Bearing Witness program, a partnership with The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and the Archdiocese of Washington, provides Catholic school educators with the training and resources necessary to teach their students about anti-Semitism and the Holocaust.
Israel

Supports the Jewish State by advocating for Israel and explaining political and security issues and the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian/Israel-Arab conflict with U.S. policymakers, the media and the public through programs, publications and contact with officials.
Jerusalem Office hosts fact-finding missions to Israel and provides expertise on anti-bias training for Israeli educational, military and law enforcement institutions.
International Affairs
Monitors and combats global anti-Semitism and extremism and promotes the security and well being of Jewish communities around the world. Provides expertise to governments and non-government institutions worldwide.
A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE® Institute anti-bias training programs exist in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Japan, Italy, and the Netherlands, reaching educators, and law enforcement professionals. Youth in Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Austria and the United Kingdom have participated in peer-training programs.
Maintains an office in Moscow and a representative in Italy.

http://www.adl.org/about.asp?s=topmenu

THEIR ADL MESSAGE FALLS ON DEAF EARS!
IGNORE BNP TAG- I DO- IT’S NOTHING TO DO WITH DAVID DUKE.

rd Poplawski: The Making of a Lone Wolf
· American Muslim Extremists: A Growing Threat to Jews
· Don Black / Stormfront
· Hizb ut-Tahrir Emerges in America
· Backgrounder: Revolution Muslim
· American Front
· Public Enemy Number 1(PENI)
· Racist Skinhead Project
SPREADING HATE- I SEE!

Bigots on Bikes: The Growing Links between White Supremacists and Biker Gangs
In recent years, a disturbing trend has emerged on the white supremacist scene in the United States. More and more white supremacists are developing links to motorcycle clubs across the country, including outlaw motorcycle gangs frequently involved with criminal activity. ADL’s report examines the growing connections, cross-membership and cultural overlaps between outlaw motorcycle gangs and white supremacists, as well as the emergence of new, explicitly white supremacist biker groups across the country.

——————————————————————————–
Recently Featured Articles
· Fact Sheet: The Hutaree Militia
· Five Men Convicted of Conspiring to Attack in Fort Dix
· Far-Right and Muslim Extremists Gather in Baltimore
· Law Enforcement Personnel Honored for Combating Hate and Bigotry
· ADL Offers Resources As House Judiciary Committee Studies Racial Tensions In Jena, Louisiana
· White Supremacists Ratchet Up Anti-Hispanic Action
· Extremism in Florida: The Dark Side of the Sunshine

http://www.adl.org/learn/default.htm

OH DEAR- SLIPPED UP HERE!

The real enemy are the ones who tell us who our enemies are
racenemo 1 year ago

SUPREME COURT..ADL LACKEY!

http://www.youtube.com/user/abilzeria?v=0prmackoDfE

NOT A SINGLE MENTION OF BOLSHAVISM OR COMMUNISM….IDEOLOGIES THAT SLAUGHTERED MORE THAN ANY OTHER- HOW STRANGE IS THAT?

ADL Training and Resources to Assist Law Enforcement in Fighting Extremism and Terrorism

ADL Holds A Milestone Twentieth Advanced Training School Session
· ADL and Law Enforcement: Fighting Terror before 9/11 and Beyond
· ADL Trains Law Enforcement Executives on Terrorism

InfidelsExposed on 24 May 2011

All The American Armies Are Dying For no Cause, Theri Deaths are in Vain. US Army Are Realise That Jews Did 9/11 & Leave Army & Seek Asylum In Canada

More And More Of US Army Are Speaking Out Against War

Category:
Film & Animation

o1OpTiMuS1o on 18 Mar 2010

Repost and Spread 3-15-2010

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of studies at the US Army War College says that the military brass now know that Israel and those traitors within our nation committed the 911 attack
http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2010/03/dr-alan-sabrosky-former-directo…

Very important info, our government leaders have dual citizenship to Israel and now their part in 9/11 has been exposed, with Mossad behind 9/11 as well as rogue factions in the US government.

Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO’S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky’s teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. You can email Dr. Alan Sabrosky at: docbrosk@comcast.net

Category:
News & Politics

THE DANGER..FANATICS

There is a fanatical and corrupt faction within Zionism, which is actually a philosophy grounded in peaceful co-operation with Israel’s neighbours. The Jewish Encylopedia has a massive entry on the Zionist Manifesto well worth reading!….The crazy Zionist faction want to engineer an ‘End-Time’ scenario, in the psychotic belief that this event will ‘force’ their messiah figure to reveal himself (small “m” & “h’) and form a one world government under his divine rule. sounds like the Antichrist!
WarzSchoolchild 3 weeks ago

2009

Fascist Zionist control of America – The Death of the Republic

Music by Kevin Macleod

Map of SCO

Another map that expands on US-Israel-UK’s ambition to control Middle East/Central Asia to exploit oil

G. Washington’s farewell address of 1796

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp

http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=15

Attacking Iran will lead to unprecedented disaster for USA & Israel

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/3320

Prelude to Death Part II – The Consequences in the aftermath of Illegal and Immoral attack on Iran

http://gunsofthepatriots.blogspot.com/2008/08/prelude-to-death-part-ii-conseq…

Zionized Manifest Destiny of accursed Imperial U.S. in the final Great War

http://gunsofthepatriots.blogspot.com/2007/02/zionized-manifest-destiny-of-ac…

Zionist beast machine accelerates towards Destruction Part III

http://gunsofthepatriots.blogspot.com/2007/02/zionist-beast-machine-accelerat…

Zionist beast machine accelerates towards Destruction part IV

http://gunsofthepatriots.blogspot.com/2007/09/zionist-beast-machine-accelerat…

The thunderous Ferocity of Caspian Tiger’s Roar reverberates the wrath of Persian|Pan-Arabic Nationalism on Earth

http://gunsofthepatriots.blogspot.com/2007/01/thunderous-ferocity-of-caspian-…

The Forbidden Truth: Why U.S. & Israel trot out the Goblin to menace & induce fear to fuel war machines

http://gunsofthepatriots.blogspot.com/2008/04/forbidden-truth-why-us-israel-t…

Category:
News & Politics

THE TRUTH SPOKEN!!

A MASSIVE HOOVER- CLEANING UP THE SUPPLY THE MONEY- THEN WHAT FOLK’S?

3 responses to “21/12 Groveling for Campaign Money Isolates America

  1. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/09/04/alan-hart-obama-has-signalled-his-coming-complete-surrender-to-zionism-and-its-lobby/

    ANY LAWS THAT STINK- HERE ARE THE ONES THAT KICKED THEM OFF- SCHOOL EDUCATION NOTHING IS LEFT TO CHANCE.

    http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp

    FIRST TAKE CONTROL OF THE SUPREME COURT.

    Education
    Holocaust Education and Remembrance
    ADL’s Braun Holocaust Institute
    The Braun Holocaust Institute’s programs for educators, students, community leaders, and families explore the enduring impact of the Holocaust and apply its lessons to contemporary issues of prejudice and moral decision making. Through these efforts, the Institute hopes to ensure that the Holocaust – and the brutality that humankind inflicted upon itself – is never forgotten.

    NEW Echoes and Reflections- a multimedia curriculum on the Holocaust created for high schools.
    Rich with visual history testimony integrated into 10 multi-part lessons, this educational resource offers curriculum connections to issues of diversity, prejudice, bigotry, and modern-day genocide.

    While empathy-building activities in the classroom are a popular technique for engaging young people in the history of the Holocaust, the Anti-Defamation League strongly cautions against using simulation activities. For more information, suggested activities and resources download our handout: Teaching About the Holocaust: Why Simulation Activities Should Not Be Used
    (.pdf format -31 KB – requires Acrobat Reader)

    Survival to Service: Lessons on the Holocaust DIMENSIONS Online: A Journal of Holocaust Studies

    Programs for:

    All Audiences

    Yom HaShoah: Remembering and Learning from the Holocaust
    Resources and Classroom Activities Examining the Life of Abraham H. Foxman, Hidden Child of the Holocaust

    The Hidden Child Foundation/ADL
    Offers speakers, Holocaust programming and community support and is voluntarily staffed by survivors who were hidden from the Nazis as children during the Holocaust

    Courage to Care
    An ADL award honoring rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust.
    Middle and High School Students

    Paper Clips: Students Learning About the Holocaust
    “Paper Clips” tells the story of the students from rural Whitwell, Tennessee who set out to collect six million paper clips – one for each of the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust. ADL is deeply involved with “Paper Clips” and is committed to promoting the film’s message

    Annual Youth Leadership Mission to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, DC
    Brings 100 students from across the U.S. to the Washington DC Holocaust Memorial Museum for four days of learning and leadership

    Educators and School Administrators

    Bearing Witness
    The National Bearing Witness Summer Institute for Catholic School Teachers focuses on the history of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust as a starting point for addressing issues of diversity in contemporary society, with special attention given to the teaching these topics in a Catholic School setting.

    Resources and Sample Lessons for:
    Middle and High School Students

    Dimensions
    An online resource that features scholarly articles about the Holocaust and study guides for educators to implement these materials in the classroom.

    Children who Survived the Holocaust
    Features accounts of the war-time experiences of three child survivors; also includes Teachers Guide
    High School Students

    Resistance Role Plays
    A Sample Lesson from the Braun Holocaust Institute Curriculum for High School Students
    Grades 5 and Up

    About the Holocaust – A Handout
    Holocaust Chronology – A Handout
    Holocaust Glossary – A Handout
    Hidden Children – A Handout
    Nazi Anti-Jewish Laws – A Handout
    Color ID in Concentration Camps A Handout
    Supplementary Reading – A Handout
    Learn more about Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Restitution, and many other Holocaust-related topics at ADL’s Holocaust Page

    http://www.adl.org/education/edu_holocaust/default_holocaust.asp

    64 MILLION RUSSIAN CHRISTIANS CAN GO ..FOREVER FORGOTTEN!!

    WHY IS THAT?

    PrinceOsiris5 on 5 Dec 2010

    The Jewish Bolshevik murderers and pillagers of Russia and Eastern Europe.

    bloodstone1445 on 9 Nov 2010

    Robert Wilton’s works published in 1920 details the genetic backgrounds of all USSR & Bolshevik revolution leaders responsible for the genocide of up to 65 Million Russians.

    Astonishingly these records like thousands of others show over 90% of the 556 listed Bolshevik genocide leaders were mitochondrial Jews (racially). Among the approximate 500 Jewish leaders were famous names such as Stalin (Djugashvili), Trotsky (Bronstein) and Lenin (Ulyanov). Even Karl Marx the founding father of Marxist communism was Jewish.

    With Antisemitism made a capital punishment for Christians during the era of Bolshevism, it was notable that only around 2% of Russia’s entire populous was of Semitic blood.

    The Jewish people not only systematically murdered up to 65 Million Russian people as a premeditated act of genocide, their complete disregard for human life later lead 20 million more Russians to their deaths in WW2 with many Russian soldiers unarmed.

    – THIS HISTORY IS NOT “HEAR-SAY” –
    These historical records accord to the peer reviewed publications of the American Institute For Historical Review:
    – 41 point peer reviewed IHR publication:
    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
    – 21 volumes of over 1000 peer reviewed articles:
    http://www.ihr.org/journal/jhrarticles.shtml

    For further insight read: “Last Days of the Romanovs by George Gustav Telberg” http://books.google.com/boo

    Brief publication of Robert Wilton’s works:
    http://www.the7thfire.com/n

    Please watch: http://www.jewwatch.com/Video%20Archive/Jewish%20USSR.htm

    ** This video was not uploaded for a glimpse into the past… but for a glimpse into the future!
    The forgotten history of Russia will soon become the reality of America.
    ~ Americans – please see my channel!

    Category:
    People & Blogs

    HENCE THE ADL NEVER MENTION BOLSHAVIKS OR COMMIES!!

  2. BRITS TOO MATE!

    privacy121212 The US is sleeping or too busy watching Dancing With the Stars. They will wake up when standing in the soup lines. There is an influx of Russian jews coming to the US and a lot returning from Israel. Why? $’s what else do they get excited about. Money is their God.
    manchester2000ful 2 weeks ago

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s