G Edward Griffin – More Deadly Than War – Part 1 of 8

G Edward Griffin – More Deadly Than War – Part 1 of 8

AmericaFell on 6 Sep 2008

This 1960s lecture on communism warns how a nation can be weakened and destroyed from within. The trick is to convince the people that they must give up some of their freedom for some supposed greater good.

Links to informative news articles by The New American magazine:

Race and Revolution
Revolutionaries of all colors are playing the “race card” to cultivate conflict throughout the nation.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/844

Fanning the Flames of Rage
There’s a bloody race war coming to America — that is, if the fulminations of columnist Carl Rowan and others of his ilk incite enough rage and discontent.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/815

Jesse Jackson: “Problem Profiteer”
For more than three decades, Jackson played an important part in one of the Establishment’s most successful strategies: The creation of conflict as a pretext for a tyrannical “solution.”
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/666

Police, Race & Cincinnati’s Riots
The independence of America’s local police is being threatened by a double-team attack of revolutionary thugs on the street and scheming politicians at the federal level.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/659

Erasing the “Thin Blue Line”
Often accused of racism and frequently facing federal probes into their conduct, police across the nation are pulling out of minority neighborhoods.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/697

Local Police Under Siege
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/696

Anarchy in Los Angeles: Who Fanned the Flames, and Why?
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fus…

Looking Back on the LA Riot
Former LAPD Assistant Chief Bob Vernon recalls the dark days of the Los Angeles riot.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/taxonom…

Totally Radical!
The real radicals in Congress have openly embraced Marxist subversives and Communist front groups with nary a peep from the establishment media.
http://thenewamerican.com/node/905

“Respectable” Terrorists
In the 1960s, the Soviets began building an international network of terrorists. Today, veterans of that network hold key positions of respect in government and academia.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/845

Weapons of Mass Insurrection
Revolutionary zeal unites Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam with urban street gangs and radical Muslim regimes, creating a serious threat to America’s internal security.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/813

Terrorism’s True Roots
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/843

Shades of Subversion
Despite “winning” the Cold War and becoming the world’s last remaining superpower, America is still haunted by the ghosts of an old nemesis: Communist subversion.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/133

Iraq-Nam
John Birch Society founder Robert Welch discerned early on how the global Power Elite stage-manages contrived conflict to accomplish their subversive agenda.
http://thenewamerican.com/node/564

Recycling Radicalism
The militants running the “anti-war” demonstrations are following a plan to organize, mobilize, radicalize, militarize, and globalize.
http://thenewamerican.com/node/973

Category:
News & Politics

The Silent Infiltrators

The silent infiltrators
Americans were generally unaware of the insidious march of the Fabian type of socialist until the era of the socialist-communist fronts, because the ‘experts’ had failed to sound the alarm.

We previously mentioned that when the socialists joined hands with the communists, their united front groups practically
overnight attracted between ten and thirteen million Americans. Conversely, during the Hitler-Stalin pact, when the socialists felt betrayed by the communists and withdrew their support, the membership of these fronts melted away, and most of them went out of business altogether. The real strength of the socialist elements was thus demonstrated by both the growth .and the decline of these fronts.

Since the huge socialist-communist fronts disappeared, the tendency of our political commentators has been to consider leftist influence as equally diminished. This is a grave error. In the last century, Sidney Webb, the father of Fabian socialism, explained how those who have once been drawn into leftist activities continue to promote socialism thereafter. In speaking of socialist organizations, he stated:

“Their programmers and principles remain, and even their leaders, but their active membership is continually changing. A steady stream of persons influenced by socialist doctrines passes into them, but after a time most of these cease to attend meetings, the subjects of which have become familiar, and gradually discontinue their subscriptions. These persons are not lost to the movement; they retain their socialist tone of thought, and give effect to it in their trade unions, their clubs, and their political associations. But they often cease to belong to any distinctly socialist organization, where they are replaced by newer converts.”

SOME INTERESTING OLD VIDEOS’ IN LINK…NUCLEAR WEAPONS …DISARMING..ETC

Chapter 1 SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST BROTHERHOOD

Communists Copy Socialist Tricks

nists along with other atrocities are considered historically of less importance by die hard socialists than the ideological straw man called “Capitalism”. This demonstrates the great hold over the mind that emotional dogmatism has even in the face of torture, pain, blood and tears, and death. It also explains the comparative complacency of our left-wing extremists toward the current war waged against us by the world-wide Communist conspiracy, infinitely more menacing to the United States than Hitler, and reeking with unspeakable atrocities on a vaster scale, as compared with the fanatical hatred they displayed toward Hitler, after he broke his alliance with Stalin.

Communists copy socialist tricks

Generations before the formation of the Communist Party in the United States the socialist movement had created hundreds of local, regional and radical front groups, carefully camouflaged to lure thousands of innocents into these socialist dominated organizations,
which would then utilize deceptive issues built around reforms as a means of skillfully indoctrinating the “dupes” with socialist
beliefs.

********************
16… The cooperation of socialists after their members have been murdered or tortured barks back to the very beginning of the Bolshevik revolution. Bolsheviks killed hun· dreds of mensheviks (who were the Russian socialists) during and immediately after their take over of power in 1917. This was extended to other countries where the Bolsheviks secured a foothold such as Hungary, under Bela Kun in 1919, and during the Hitler-Stalin pact when Polish Jewish socialists fleeing from Hitler into Soviet Russia were executed, tortured or placed in Siberian slave labor camps. An outstanding incident of such murders was the killing of Victor Alter and Henryk Erlich, upon express orders of Stalin. This was done in spite of the fact that President F. D. Roosevelt had interceded on their behalf. Erlich and Alter were leaders of the Polish Jewish Socialist Bund, and were executed on the ridiculous charge that they were “nazi agents”. (Reference: Jerzy Gliksman, Tell the World, The Gresham Press, N. Y., 1948, pp. 13-19.) Although there was great agitation among some socialists over these and other murders of socialists by communists it did not prevent united front cooperation between the two movements. The next important phase of murders of socialists by communists occurred when the communists took over in Czechoslovakia in February, 1948. In short order, both Eduard Benes and Jan Masaryk. socialist heads of the previous government, were murdered by means of contrived suicide. Again, there was agitation amongst socialists over communist perfidy. When this subsided, again, there were united front pacts between socialists and communists throughout the world. This appears to be a congenital condition existing in the socialist movement which socialists cannot control. Reference: World Almanac, 1956, p. 146.
… Some other groups within the scope of the socialist influence were: Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, The Fellowship of Reconciliation, American Union against Militarism, Church Socialist League, International League of Working Women, National Consumers League, Ethical Culture Society and scores of other organizations.

Page 17

12… The Kremlin made a deal with socialist forces (Second International) throughout the world to fonn a united front in the drive towards socialism. That is why in this country the socialists, (Fabian and other varieties) during the Thirties, entered into the building of the giant radical fronts which today are commonly called communist fronts. Today, there is another communist -socialist united front program in progress. An official Kremlin expression of the united front policy enunciated by the Kremlin is as follows:

“Being of the opinion that unity of action is a pressing necessity and the truest road to the establishment of the political unity of the proletariarat as well, we declare that the Communist International and its sections are ready to enter into negotiations with the Second International (socialist parties-ed.) and its sections for the establishment of the unity of the working class in the struggle against the offensive of capital, against Fascism and the menace of Imperialist
war.”

Ref: United Front, Georgi Dimitroff, General Secretary of the Communist International
(published International Publishers, communist, N. Y., 1938). This is the main report delivered to the 7th World Congress of the Communist International in Moscow, August 7, 1935, p. 91.

13…. Among those who were connected with the communist superfront mentioned by Edgar Hoover, who were old activists in the socialistic movement, were: Devere Allen, Oscar Ameringer, Sherwood Anderson, Roger Baldwin, Mary McLeod Bethune, Prof. Franz Boas, Prof. George S. Counts, Malcolm Cowley, Jerome Davis, Paul De Krull, Melvin Douglas, Sherwood Eddy, Prof. Henry Pratt Fairchild, Dorothy Canfield Fisher, Mary Fox, Frank P. Graham, Rev. John Haynes Holmes, Langston Hughes, Freda Kirchwey, Joseph Lash, James Lerner, Max Lerner, E. C. Lindemann, Lola Maverick Lloyd, Robert Morss Lovett, Francis J. McConnell (Bishop), Lewis Mumford, A. J. Muste, Dr. Reinhold Niebuhr, Rev. A. Clayton Powell, Jr., Mrs. James Roosevelt, David J. Saposs, Frederick L. Schuman, Vida D. Scudder, Rev. Guy Emery Shipler, Upton Sinclair, Tucker P. Smith, Edgar Snow, Maxwell S. Stewart, Oswald Garrison Villard, Harry F. Ward, James Wechsler, Ella Winter, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise and James Waterman Wise. Although most of these were nominally socialists some of them were found to be also secret members of the pro-Soviet apparatus without belonging to the Communist Party. Ref.: Special Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives Seventy-eighth Congress Second Session H. Ris. 282, Appendix-Part IX, Communist Front Organizations, 1944, pp. 389, 390, 392, 396, 397, 402, 409, 410, 411, 417, 428.

Page 15

SAVAGE NATION….

Category Archives: Chapter-1 BROTHERHOOD
Post navigation← Older postsThe Socialist Cyst
Posted on February 23, 2011 by VERITAS
Reply
Chapter 1 SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST BROTHERHOOD

The Socialist Cyst

activity and communist front affinity(5). For years Mark Van Doren has actively engaged in movements which have been denouncing the system of private enterprise as guilty of cheating, lying and being immoral.

The children of these “progressives” have been raised upon a diet of unfettered self expression, according to John Dewey’s precepts. Not only their own children but the children of millions of Americans have been subjected to these “progressive” innovations. American cities, by and large, have been infected by juvenile delinquency which coincides with the growth of “progressive” education. The socialistic innovators of the progressive system, however, did not anticipate that the ravages of this method would reach their own offspring. In the case of Charles Van Doren the chickens seem to have come home to roost.

This is not the first time that an organized public furor was created as a smoke-screen to confuse the issue when prominent individual members of the clique known as the Establishment have been involved in some outstanding scandal.

The socialist cyst

On November 11, 1962, Alger Hiss, the accused Soviet spy and convicted perjurer, highlighted a nationwide television program entitled “The Political Obituary of Richard M. Nixon”(6). Although public reaction was loud and prompt in protesting this display of left-wing revenge against Nixon, a deeper significance lies behind the act.

Richard Nixon like many Americans was convinced that the fight against the enemies of America was restricted only to the com-

**************

5…Mark Van Doren has an extensive record of activity in communist fronts. Belonging
with him to the first front cited below were such persons as Sherwood Anderson, Roger Baldwin, Franz Boas, John Dewey, Charles E. Merriam, Hendrik W. Van Loon, and E. R. A. Seligman. These were all socialists of the Fabian type, and the organizations in question actually were socialist-communist fronts.
Among the communist fronts Mark Van Doren joined the American Society for Cultural Relations with Russia. (cited as communist. 1948, by a Congressional committee); called for the support of the National Student League (Daily Worker, Sept. 28, 1932, p. 2) which was cited as a “front organization of the Communist Party” by U. S. Attorney General Francis A. Biddle, May 28, 1942; and was active on behalf of the Schappes Defense Committee. This committee was set up to defend an admitted communist fired from City College of New York and jailed on the charge of perjury. (This committee was cited as communist by Attorney General Tom Clark, April 27, 1949).
6… Long Island Press, November 12, 1962, p. 2.

Page 12
_________________________________________________________________

Communists and their immediate hangers-on. He had built his reputation and his political fortunes mainly on his role in exposing Alger Hiss and the Soviet spy system in this country. Like many others he failed to understand that there is a working sympathy and understanding between all the major radical and left-liberal elements in opposing our institutions of individual liberty and free enterprise. The operations of this left-wing mass were clearly evident during the Hiss trials in 1948/49. All shades of radical opinion rallied behind Alger Hiss. They included such old Fabian socialist types as Felix Frankfurter and Mark Van Doren. Mark Van Doren was an English instructor at Columbia University in 1925. He was assigned as a Faculty Advisor to Whittaker Chambers, later the accuser of Alger Hiss. Mark Van Doren was also on the staff of the Nation, the left-wing periodical which has reflected throughout the years the philosophy of Fabian socialism in this country. Chambers wrote that “Mark Van Doren’s personal influence on his students was great-in my case, powerful and long-lasting.”

Van Doren’s influence was so great in developing a passion for socialism in the young Whittaker Chambers, that at the end of the 1925 school year Chambers quit Columbia University and joined the Communist Party.7 During the trial of Hiss for perjury, Mark Van Doren made available to the defense personal letters he had received years before from Chambers in an effort to discredit the charges against Alger Hiss.

Van Doren and his fellow-thinkers throughout the nation were influential enough to create a hysteria in behalf of Hiss which is unique in our own nation’s history. It was then that Chambers realized that “… when I took up my little sling and aimed at Communism, I also hit something else. What I hit was the forces of that great socialist revolution, which, in the name of liberalism, spasmodically, incompletely, somewhat formlessly, but always in the same direction, has been inching its ice cap over the nation for two decades”. (8)

Here Chambers put his finger directly upon the true forces of danger and disintegration in this country. The great social threat was not just the communist conspiracy but went much deeper. It represented a force which had been insinuating itself into the control centers of our country for a long time.

****************

7… Whittaker Chambers, Witness, Random House, N. Y., 1952, p. 164.
8…. ibid. p. 741.

Page 13

_______________________________________________________________

Chambers was mistaken in his estimate that at that time (1948) this force had been at work only for “two decades”. The elements of the socialist forces aiming for control of the United States can be traced back well over 100 years and during that entire period socialists often covered themselves with the specific designation of “social scientist”(9).

The communist menace in this country would be a relatively minor one if it did not operate under the protection of the massive socialistic movement that had grown within our society largely under the cover of other labels than “socialism”. Whittaker Chambers shrewdly observed that “Were it not for a socialist cyst within it, mere political expediency would scarcely stop any party from cleaning house of its Communists, a project that, pushed with vigor and sincerity, could only redound to its credit.”(10).

Common leftist goal

In order to understand this hidden menace a thorough reappraisal is needed of the true balance of the socialistic and communist movements here and of the actual influence they exert together and separately.

In the 1930′s there was an astounding growth of communist front organizations with tentacles reaching into almost every community in America. The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover states: “Take, for example, roof, or compound, fronts. Here a number of fronts, as in the nationality field, will form a super, over-all front such as the old American League Against War and Fascism, which at its peak claimed 7,500,000 members.”(11).

It seems impossible that millions of Americans suddenly would flock into a communist front apparatus without previous preparation and indoctrination. Even a superficial glance would indicate that a few thousand communists in the United States would find it physically impossible to swing such huge numbers of literate Americans into their apparatus in such a short space of time. Obviously some other force, or forces, had to work for years in order to create a receptive mental climate for left-wing affiliations among so many millions of Americans.

***************
9…. New York Tribune, 1842, passim. “Social Science” is the designation the socialists
adopted in the pages of that paper. A regular column by socialists appeared under the heading Social Science.
10…. Chambers, op. cit. p. 742 n.
11… J. Edgar Hoover, Masters 0/ Deceit, Henry Holt & Co., N. Y., p. 23l.

Page 14

____________________________________________________________________

Posted in Chapter-1 BROTHERHOOD | Leave a reply
Common Leftist Goal
Posted on February 22, 2011 by VERITAS
Reply

Chapter 1 SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST BROTHERHOOD

Common Leftist Goal

Chambers was mistaken in his estimate that at that time (1948) this force had been at work only for “two decades”. The elements of the socialist forces aiming for control of the United States can be traced back well over 100 years and during that entire period socialists often covered themselves with the specific designation of “social scientist”(9).

The communist menace in this country would be a relatively minor one if it did not operate under the protection of the massive socialistic movement that had grown within our society largely under the cover of other labels than “socialism”. Whittaker Chambers shrewdly observed that “Were it not for a socialist cyst within it, mere political expediency would scarcely stop any party from cleaning house of its Communists, a project that, pushed with vigor and sincerity, could only redound to its credit.”(10).

Common leftist goal

In order to understand this hidden menace a thorough reappraisal is needed of the true balance of the socialistic and communist movements here and of the actual influence they exert together and separately.

In the 1930′s there was an astounding growth of communist front organizations with tentacles reaching into almost every community in America. The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover states: “Take, for example, roof, or compound, fronts. Here a number of fronts, as in the nationality field, will form a super, over-all front such as the old American League Against War and Fascism, which at its peak claimed 7,500,000 members.”(11).

It seems impossible that millions of Americans suddenly would flock into a communist front apparatus without previous preparation and indoctrination. Even a superficial glance would indicate that a few thousand communists in the United States would find it physically impossible to swing such huge numbers of literate Americans into their apparatus in such a short space of time. Obviously some other force, or forces, had to work for years in order to create a receptive mental climate for left-wing affiliations among so many millions of Americans.

********************

9…. New York Tribune, 1842, passim. “Social Science” is the designation the socialists
adopted in the pages of that paper. A regular column by socialists appeared under the heading Social Science.
10…. Chambers, op. cit. p. 742 n.
11… J. Edgar Hoover, Masters 0/ Deceit, Henry Holt & Co., N. Y., p. 23l.

Page 14

http://thegreatdeceit.com/?cat=168

2 responses to “G Edward Griffin – More Deadly Than War – Part 1 of 8

  1. http://thegreatdeceit.com/?cat=168

    YOUR GOVERNMENT- FACT!!

    OH BOY IS IT FALLING…

    Permanent Deception-A Success

    The octopus of Fabian socialism stretches from England to the United States, with tentacles in Canada, New Zealand, Australia and other parts of the British Empire. The methods are devious, underhanded and fraught with deception, but they work. Fabian socialist propaganda is filled with charges of cheating, dishonesty, and conspiracy on the part of what they brand as “the capitalistic system”. In fact, it is their own methods of deception and patent dishonesty that are regularly planned and carried out, and deliberately concealed. This is the same method used by both Hitler and the Soviets to accuse their intended victims of the crimes which they were plotting to perpetrate on them. The Fabians’ political policy operates on a permanent basis of fraud to soften up and subvert our society so that it will eventually fall like ripe fruit into the hands of this self-appointed socialistic elite.

    Permanent deception-a success

    Even before the tum of the century, and continuing to the present day this basic strategy of concealment and deception has been quite frankly disclosed by both English and American Fabians in their intramural communications.

    An entirely different approach became the guiding standard of driving all of society into a socialist direction. One of the chief Fabians described their phenomenal success when he stated:

    “The Fabian Society succeeded because it addressed itself to its own class in order that it might set about doing the necessary brain work of planning Socialist organization for all classes, meanwhile accepting, instead of trying to supersede, the existing political organizations which it intended to permeate with the Socialist conception of human society.”

    Whereas, some other socialistic movements embraced a more frank public program which advocated bludgeoning society into accepting socialism, the Fabians adopted the covert policy of easing society into socialist forms by trick and deception. Their policy was, and is, never to run a candidate publicly as a Fabian Socialist.

    Fabians pursued a policy of “permeation” into established organizations. They called this the “permeation of the Radical Left”

    ***********************
    46…. Bernard Shaw, The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism, Brentano’s, N. Y., 1928, p. 186.
    47… Fabian Essays in Socialism. Walter Scott, London, 1889, p. 215.

    Page 32

    ___________________________________________________________________

    and explained carefully that by degrees through such permeation that society “will pass into collective control without there ever having been a party definitely and openly pledged to that end.” And that “according to this theory there will come a time, and that shortly, when the avowed Socialists and the much socialized Radicals will be strong enough to hold the balance in many constituencies, and sufficiently powerful in all to drive the advance candidate many pegs further than his own inclination would take him.” The Fabians also taught that the permeated parties “will thus be forced to make concessions and to offer compromise; and will either adopt a certain minimum number of the Socialist proposals, or allow to Socialists a share in the representation itself. Such concessions and compromises will grow in number and importance with each successive appeal to the electorate, until at last the game is won.” Although this was written by Sidney Webb, the father of Fabian Socialism in 1889, it is an almost exact blueprint of the Fabian operations in the United States today.

    Margaret Cole, a long time leader of Fabian socialism explains it succinctly:

    “What Fabian permeation meant was primarily ‘honeycombing’, converting either to Socialism or to parts of the immediate Fabian Programme, as set out in the continuous stream of Tracts and lectures, key persons, or groups of persons, who were in a position either to take action themselves or to influencing others, not merely in getting a resolution passed, or (say) inducing a Town Council to accept one of the clauses of the Adoptive Acts, but in ‘following up’, in making sure that the resolution or whatever it was did not remain on paper but was put into effect.”

    The technique of influencing great masses of people through small numbers of ‘socialistic experts’ properly placed or in a position where they can influence leaders is a time tested Fabian device. One can more easily understand many of the strange events occurring in our own country in the light of what Margaret Cole says in continuing
    her explanation of Fabian “permeation”:

    “It was not necessary that these ‘key persons’ should be members of the Fabian Society; often it was as well they

    **********************
    48… ibid p. 215
    49… Margaret Cole, The Story of Fabian Socialism, Stanford University Press, p. 85.

    IF FABIANS HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE- WHY DON’T THEY STAND AS FABIANS…..QT TO ED MILIBAND AND BALLS?

    CAMERON AND CLEGGY?

  2. The Americans for Democratic Action corresponds with the Union for Democratic Action which was a British Fabian socialist outgrowth in England. David C. Williams, the editor of the ADA World, the official organ of the Americans for Democratic Action, was also organizer of the leftist Union for Democratic Action in London. Of the 18 members of the National Executive Committee of the ADA in 1961 the overwhelming majority had connections with the League for Industrial Democracy or the Tamiment Institute and Library. The ADA has been a thinly camouflaged reflection of the L.I.D., Fabian master organization in America.

    A work issued by a Fabian publishing outlet states: “The League for Industrial Democracy, founded in 1905 on Fabian lines in New York by H. Laidler, has always kept closely in touch with British Fabians: the Fabian Society’s Annual Report from 1925 to 1930 listed it under Provincial Societies.”

    It is interesting to note that the British Fabian socialists consider the American Fabian socialists only a “provincial” section of the overall British Fabian socialist movement.

    The L.I.D. coordinated its tactics and activity with the British Fabian socialists. Actually English Fabianism had strong American

    **********************

    36… Sister M. Margaret Patricia McCarren (unpublished manuscript on Fabian Socialism in the United States)
    “NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH.
    The New School, founded by Charles Beard, John Dewey. Thorstein Veblen, and Alvin Johnson in 1919, was hailed by the Fabians in the New Statesman as the counterpart of the London School of Economics.” p. LX, LXI.
    37… Reference: Folder issued by We The People exposing the ADA, Oct. 1961, p. l. Also, Sister M. Margaret Patricia McCarren ibid., p. 90.
    38… This Little Band of Prophets: The British Fabians, Anne Freemantle, Mentor
    Books, published by The New American Library, 1960, p. 233. British edition, George
    Allen & Unwin, Ltd., 11 Dartmouth St. S.W. 1, London, England.

    Page 29

    _________________________________________________________________

    socialist overtones. Thomas Davidson, who inspired the first meetings in 1883, although of Scottish birth, was an American citizen and the chief driving force behind Fabian thinking was Henry George, the American single tax advocate.

    PLAYING YOU ALL FOR FOOLS!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s