7/12 U.S. Politicians’ Priority is Israel

snap same here this side of the pond…

U.S. Politicians’ Priority is Israel

by Bob Johnson

Actions speak louder than words. The actions of U.S. politicians let us know their number one concern is not their constituents. And it’s not America. Their number one concern is pleasing the very powerful Israel lobby.

A good example of this is the U.S. Senator from Florida, Marco Rubio. Within days of being elected to the United States Senate he went to the Jewish state of Israel! You would think that with the United States being in an economic depression, and with Rubio’s home state of Florida having an unemployment rate higher than the national average, his priority would be to immediately start working to bring jobs in to his state and to strengthen the U.S. economy, not visit a foreign country.

Another example of a political whore sucking up to Israel and its too powerful lobby is Newt Gingrich. What is Newt’s top priority if he becomes President?

Newt and the other political whores know who to pray to – the Israel lobby!
Is it to stop the loss of American jobs due to corporate greed and outsourcing? Is it to bring the banksters and their Wall Street cohorts who’ve plundered the savings and 401k retirement accounts of countless Americans to justice? Or is it to help the homeless veterans and children and families living in their cars or on the streets of America? NO! Newt’s top priority is to move the American embassy in Israel to Jerusalem!!!

The Yeshiva World reports that the first thing Newt says he’ll do on the very first day he is President is to move the U.S. embassy to the international city of Jerusalem. Newt’s pro-Israel priority is crystal clear. The article reads, “The National Council of Young Israel (NCYI) today praised Republican Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich for his pledge to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem in the event that he becomes President of the United States. If elected President, Gingrich committed that he would issue an executive order on his first day in office directing that the U.S. embassy in Israel be relocated from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.”

Newt says that Israel has the “right to choose its own capital.” What Newt seems to forget, or ignore, is Jerusalem is NOT a part of Israel. Israel choosing Jerusalem as its capital is like Mexico choosing Austin, Texas as its capital. Israel is the occupier of Jerusalem. And as the occupier of Jerusalem, the Jewish state is in violation of United Nations Resolution 478. In fact, Israel is in violation of more U.N. resolutions than all other countries combined!

Starting with George H.W. Bush through Obama, U.S. politicians have used violations of U.N. resolutions as excuses to start wars. This was done in the first Gulf war and it was done to start the unnecessary deadly and expensive war in Iraq. Obama will probably use it to start a war with Israel’s remaining two regional enemies of Syria and Iran. Since violation of U.N. resolutions are what wars are started over, isn’t it past time for America to invade Israel???

Remember back in 1982 when Israel withheld information that could have saved the lives of 241 U.S. Marines who were unnecessarily killed in Lebanon

A cartoon about USMC Captain Charles Johnson forcing three Israeli thanks to retreat.
(read the important book about the Mossad by a Mossad insider, By Way of Deception)? In that same time period and during that same Israeli invasion of Lebanon, one United States Marine Captain, Charles Johnson, forced three Israeli tanks to retreat while only using his 45! American forces could neutralize Israeli forces in a matter of weeks. (Here is a link to a more in-depth look at how Israel harassed our Marines and put their lives in danger for their own selfish reasons.)

All the pain and suffering the politicians cause America and the world by starting wars for Israel’s benefit, which is done to benefit their own selfish political careers, would be avoided if America followed the advice of the American founder and Deist George Washington. On several occasions Washington warned America against showing favoritism towards other nations as the U.S. now does towards Israel. Washington said, “My policy has been, and will continue to be, while I have the honor to remain in the administration of the government, to be upon friendly terms with, but independent of, all the nations of the earth. To share in the broils of none. To fulfill our own engagements. To supply the wants, and be carriers for them all: Being thoroughly convinced that it is our policy and interest to do so.”


argybargy2 on 28 Aug 2009

There are citizens of ONE other nation who have entirely to much power and influence in the U.S. Government.
These are the same people currently pushing our military and sons and daughters into war with Iraq. These are the same people who pushed the United States into war with Iraq. The result was another of Apartheid Fascist Israel’s enemies knocked out, ONE MILLION MURDERED Iraqi CIVILIAN men, women and children, thousands of American soldiers, mothers, fathers, sons and daughters dead… for what? Not one Iraqi attacked the United States.

Here is a list of the Foreigners who have Citizenship in Israel as well as the United States of America.
These men certainly have a loyalty to Israel.
Richard Pearl, Rahm Emmanuel ( White House Chief of Staff), Paul Wolfowitz, Marc Grossman, Elliot Abrams, Kenneth Adelman, Robert Satoff, Dov Zakheim, Henry Kissinger ( who says Obama is primed to lead the NEW WORLD ORDER!), Douglas Feith, Richard Haas, Scooter Libby, Michael Mokasey, Lawrence Franklin, Steve Goldsmith, Ari Fleischer, James Schlesinger, David Frun, Joshua Bolten, David Wurmser, Eliot Cohen, Mel Sembler, Joseph Gidelhorn, Steve Goldsmith.




5 responses to “7/12 U.S. Politicians’ Priority is Israel


    ngoftheseas on 6 Mar 2010

    Here are the legal documents for Noahide Laws as passed through Congress.

    News & Politics

    nameofthepen The link to these docs is in browser fields in photos……it’s : 102 congress HJ Res 104 Jan. 31 1991
    sighingoftheseas 1 year ago


    Noahide Laws / Legal Congress Documents.



    Felicia1708 on 7 Nov 2010

    FollowersofYah.com, This is the most anticipated film of our entire service in the FOY Ministry. Taken from the popular book titled, ‘The Imposter’ written by L. McGuire, (c) 2008 FOY Publications has blessed thousands. Therefore, the FOY Ministry felt that a DVD was a must to produce. After much hard works and long months, we are blessed to present you ‘The Imposter DVD’, written by L. McGuire.

    WARNING: This film is not sugar coated to please all who watch. Some may find this film offensive, nevertheless the truth must be told!

    Global Noahide Laws, Yahuwah, Yahushua YahushuaAnti-Semistism Review Act, AIPAC, In Defense of Israel, John Hagee, Stephenous, Steven, Stephen, Moshiach, Ha’Shem, Rabbi Meir Halevi, Rambam, Israel National News, Tiberis, CBN, Arutz Sheva News, Jewish Tribunal, 7th Trumpet, Rome, Roman Catholic Church, Pope Benedict 16, EU Parliament, Work Free Sunday, YHWH, God, Lord, Jesus, Christ




    12/16/2009 08:44
    More Jewish anti-Christian graffiti at the Cenacle
    by Joshua Lapide
    “We killed Jesus” and “Christians out”, extremists write. Urinating on the door has become an almost daily event. Graffiti are linked to a statement made by an Israeli deputy ministry claiming that the Vatican wants to claim sovereignty on Mount Zion.

    Jerusalem (AsiaNews) – A further outrage was committed last night against the Franciscan church adjoining the Cenacle on Mount Zion, next to the Room of the Last Supper (pictured, Benedict XVI’s visit in May 2009).
    Obscene graffiti on the doors leading to the church read “We killed Jesus”, “Christians out” (in English and Hebrew) and “F… off”, which were adorned with a “Star of David”, apparently so as to leave no one in doubt about the religious affiliation of the perpetrators.

    To make the point further, the assailants had urinated on the door and left a long trail of urine leading to it.

    According to churchmen at the site, the urination on the door of the shrine has become an almost daily event. Christian sources blame recent false statements attributed by the press to an Israeli deputy minister, suggesting the Vatican wants to claim sovereignty over Mount Zion, for inciting extremist Jewish elements to increase these, by now habitual, attacks.

    A few days ago, more graffiti on the wall of the Basilica of the Dormition, near the Cenacle, also read “Death to Christians” (see “”Death to Christians”: Hebrew graffiti next to Upper Room in Jerusalem,” in AsiaNews, 12 December 2009).



    The National “Jewish” Democratic Council therefore has its own long track record of falsehoods and, to use its favorite accusation against others, “smears.” It acquired most of this track record on Mr. Forman’s watch. The history of Mr. Obama’s new “Jewish outreach coordinator” must therefore be made very clear to Jewish voters as frequently as possible before next year’s election.

    As a side note, Mr. Forman just went on record as saying that Barack Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. The Nobel Peace Prize has become a sick joke during the past years, noting that the committee passed over Irena Sendler, a Pole who risked her life to save more than 2,500 Jews from the Nazis, in favor of the self-serving and self-enriching global warming charlatan Al Gore. NJDC naturally gave this a pass as well; after all, what has Irena Sendler done for the Democrat left lately, if ever?

    Next we come to Eric Yoffie of the Union for Reform Judaism, or at least what Mr. Yoffie calls Reform Judaism; it comes across to us as the DNC and/or the Brady Campaign with Jewish holidays. Mr. Yoffie came to our attention most recently for his denunciation of Glenn Beck. The reference paraphrases Yoffie as saying, “[T]he pundit had expressed himself hatefully and rudely against President Obama, who is Israel’s important and faithful ally.” Is “faithful ally” what Mr. Yoffie calls an individual who pressures Israel to reward terroristic violence with land concessions, and who equates Israeli civilians murdered by terrorists to Palestinian civilians who become collateral damage when terrorists use them as shields?

    [Mr. Obama said,] We see that spirit in the Israeli father whose son was killed by Hamas, who helped start an organization that brought together Israelis and Palestinians who had lost loved ones. That father said, “I gradually realized that the only hope for progress was to recognize the face of the conflict.” We see it in the actions of a Palestinian who lost three daughters to Israeli shells in Gaza. “I have the right to feel angry,” he said.

    Mr. Obama might as well equate the people who were murdered in the World Trade Center to Afghan civilians who were accidentally killed when our Armed Forces attacked Al Qaida. If he doesn’t understand the difference between willfully murdering civilians and killing them unintentionally — often because terrorists have used them as shields, which is a war crime — he has some real ethical problems. Then again, noting that his Justice Department has armed Mexican drug gangs the way Iran arms Palestinian and other terrorists, maybe he really doesn’t see a difference.

    Mr. Yoffie’s interpretation of Judaism is political indeed, as shown by his speech to the anti-Second Amendment Million Mom March in 2000:

    Is the need for sensible gun-control a religious issue? You bet it is.

    … Controlling guns is not only a political matter, it is a solemn religious obligation.

    … We are ready for a knock-down, drag-out, no-holds-barred battle against the NRA, which is the real criminals’ lobby in this country, and which is drenched in the blood of murdered children.

    … The American people, I believe, are ready for a leader who will take on the fanatics and support sensible gun control.

    It seems that the only thing Mr. Yoffie left out was the NRA’s secret recipe for making matzos from the blood of those murdered children (the classical anti-Semitic blood libel). As a Life Member of the NRA, I also resent Mr. Yoffie’s depiction of us as part of a “criminal’s lobby.”

    Mr. Yoffie also referred to guns as “idols.” Had he been in charge of the Jewish people in ancient times, we (including Christians, because the founder of Christianity was a Jew) would all be worshiping honest-to-Zeus idols because the Maccabees would have had no swords. If he had been in charge of Israel in 1948, the region would have become Judenrein within a week because the Jews would have had no guns.

    Mr. Yoffie and Mr. Forman have the First Amendment right to express political opinions, no matter how disagreeable. They do not, however, have the right to associate these views with the Jewish religion, and it is both the right and duty of Jewish voters to denounce them whenever they seek to do so.

    William A. Levinson, P.E. is the author of several books on business management, including content on organizational psychology as well as manufacturing productivity and quality.

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/obamas_jewish_outreach_director_and_his_anti-christian_hate_propaganda.html#ixzz1fwv8FBbm

    Damian Thompson
    Damian Thompson is Editor of Telegraph Blogs and a leader writer for the Daily Telegraph. He was once described by The Church Times as a “blood-crazed ferret”. He is on Twitter as HolySmoke.
    Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about
    By Damian Thompson Religion Last updated: July 29th, 2010

    753 Comments Comment on this article

    A Hasidic Jew in Poland. Some Jews are hostile to Christians
    The case of the Oxford lecturer in Jewish studies who says she was sacked after she converted to Christianity has thrown a spotlight on to an acutely sensitive subject. I have no idea whether Dr Tali Argov was treated unfairly – that’s for the employment tribunal to decide – but let’s not pretend that Jews who become Christians don’t face intense disapproval from their own community.

    Christian anti-Semitism, Muslim anti-Semitism, Christian Islamophobia, Muslim persecution of Christians – all of these are acceptable topics of debate. But not Jewish hostility to Christianity.

    You can understand why Jews might dislike the Christian religion: not only does it deify a man, the ultimate blasphemy for pious Jews just as it is for pious Muslims, but it’s also implicated in centuries of anti-Semitism. (I think its role in inspiring the Holocaust has been exaggerated, but that’s an argument for another day.)

    Sometimes Jewish antipathy to Christianity spills over into hostility towards Christians. There was a piece in the Independent the other day by Christina Patterson that went way over the top in describing the rudeness of Stamford Hill’s ultra-Orthodox Jews towards gentiles:

    When I moved to Stamford Hill, 12 years ago, I didn’t realise that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Ku Klux Klan convention. I didn’t realise that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs, and parking restrictions, were for people who hadn’t been chosen by God. And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad.

    Stephen Pollard, the brilliant editor of the Jewish Chronicle, described this as “pure, unrelenting unadulterated anti-Jewish bigotry,” on the part of Ms Patterson and indeed some of its undertones are disturbing. But monosyllabic terseness towards goyim? I’ve experienced it, and it’s maddening. Let me recommend a gripping book called Postville by the secular Jewish journalist Stephen Bloom, who records the extreme bad manners of Lubavitch Jews who moved en masse to a town in rural Iowa to run a huge kosher butchery. In the end, angry Christian townspeople, who had initially been welcoming, voted to annexe the land on which the factory was built, so they could tax and regulate it. Bloom, who felt the Lubavitchers had displayed “despicable” attitudes verging on racism, supported the move.

    Jewish hostility towards Christians isn’t confined to the ultra-Orthodox. A woman friend of mine tutored the daughter of a Jewish couple in north London. When she said she wanted to take a break for Christmas, the wife went bananas. “We do not allow that word to be spoken in this house,” she said. An unrepresentative incident, no doubt; but my friend’s attitude towards Judaism changed after it took place. And I could tell other stories, of unbelievable haughtiness by the leaders of Anglo-Jewry, which would have led to diplomatic incidents if the Christians involved weren’t afraid of being accused of anti-Semitism.

    I suppose I’m afraid of that, too, which is why I’m going to point out the following. This blog has often highlighted the alarming growth of Islamic anti-Jewish rhetoric, much of it flavoured by the propaganda of the Third Reich. I’ve drawn attention to the case of Baroness Tonge, the appalling Lib Dem peer who has called for an inquiry into allegations of Jewish organ-harvesting (and who still takes the party whip). I warned in advance that the Vatican was doing a stupid thing by lifting the excommunication of the Holocaust-denying Bishop Richard Williamson of the SSPX.

    But until now I’ve never written a word about Jewish prejudice against Christians, even though I’ve seen it at close hand, at a series of Jewish-run conferences I attended in America in the 1990s at which evangelical Christian believers were stereotyped as fanatics who needed only the right demagogue to turn them into murderous anti-Semites. If the conferences were being held now, I suspect most of the flak would be taken by Catholics.

    It would be interesting read a book on anti-Christian sentiment among modern Jews, including Jewish historians who invest heavily in the notion of Christian or gentile collective guilt for crimes committed by others. But such a book would have to come from the perspective of someone without an axe to grind (ie, not one of the anti-Semitic nutcases who are such a depressing presence in the blogosphere). And something tells me it will never be written.
    Tags: anti-semitism, Christina Patterson, Dr Tali Argov, Jews, Postville, Stephen Pollard, ultra-Orthodox Jews



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s