Jack Straw…Has the guy forgotten what happened in Judean Bolshavik Russia? before he calls the English violent and aggresive maybe he ought to recall a few of the millions slaughtered in the most evil ways, just because they were Christians…..Millions Jack!!!!
Nice guy ….his manners are non existant after all which country took him in?- typical way of thanking us, this Fabian Commie takes, takes and takes some more, all the while plotting the destruction of ENGLAND!
UK riots and the Criminality of Jack Straw | Veterans Today Aug 16, 2011 … Brothers in war crimes: Jack Straw, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. …. one of his
great-grandfathers was a German Jewish immigrant. … A Fabian also on his
admission- more a Stalinist…….his son “Will” ready to take his place! …
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/16/the-uk-riots-and-the-criminality-of-jack-straw/
Labour’s attack on Nick Griffin shows hypocrisy of globalist agenda … Justice Secretary Jack Straw of the Labour Party took on BNP leader Nick Griffin
in … Talmudic Jews, Freemasons, and the Fabian Society are currently the most …
http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/labour-s-attack-on-nick-griffin-shows-hypocrisy-of-globalist-agenda
TALMUDIC…FABIANS…HOW MANY ENGLISH FOLK KNOW THE TRUE NATURE OF WHAT THIS BAND OF MERRY GLOBALISTS ARE REALLY UPTO?
THIS ENGLISH GUY DOES!
We have been conquered, my people. But I know you, for I see you in myself. And that’s what makes me smile. For, like me, we are fighters. We are belligerent scrappers and storm-raisers. When we go to war, we fight to win. There is nothing more fearsome in this world than an Englishman at war. We are indefatigable. We are fury incarnate and the gates of hell shall not prevail before us.
Let us name but a few of the traitors who must hang when we institute Courts of National Reconciliation and Justice: Tony Blair (war criminal and profiteer), Gordon Brown (paedophile and the master of EU enforcement), David Cameron (Fabian Socialist and a hater of the English People), Jack Straw (Zionist traitor and racist), Harriet Harman (the most perverse “culture change” agent, who, incidentally, lived just across the road from me on Southwood Avenue in Highgate back in ’86), Lord Robertson (implicated in the staged Dunblane slaying of innocent schoolchildren and a well-known paedophile, also a former NATO chief), John Reid (one of Scotland’s most famous Mafia bosses who held the position of Home Secretary), Nick Clegg (a spineless Europhile and born liar who despises everything English), George Osborne (a chinless aristocrat without the slightest idea of how to tie his own shoe-laces, let alone put a knot in the British economy).
FABIAN, RED ED MILIBAND YESTERDAY TRIED TO GIVE THE COPS A KICKING- WATCH IT ED……YOU KNOW YOU’RE A SHIT SCARED LITTLE COWARD! 2006?
The coppers I knew when working in London were stressed beyond what most civilians would consider normal working practices. We’ve all seen images of front-line police troopers brutalising protesters, but that’s only what the media wishes you to see. Back in Bow Street, or whichever HQ they work from, those lads are shagged out, mentally and emotionally. They are on your side. When investigating, in my capacity as a journalist, the day-to-day life of an ordinary copper, I have seen grown policeman break down in tears at the sheer injustice of what they have to deal with.
I care not for class. My grandfather was a coal miner who died of the black lung and I care passionately for the working-class native and indigenous people of my nation, England. But I was raised in a middle-class environment and came to love many patricians one could ascribe to those emanating from the aristocracy. In the end, regardless of class, we’re all patriotic Englishmen.
Within the next ten years, we the English people, chosen from all others as the Light of the World, will re-take our nation, rebuild our manufacturing base, issue our own Credit Union-based currency, secede from the European Union, dissolve the United Kingdom, withdraw from the United Nations and the rapacious, blood-money grabbing scam of NATO and live proudly as a free and prosperous people, trading with all nations free of Zionist lobbying, able to feed ourselves from the arable produce of our fertile soils and eat abundantly of all that our seas offer as our non-delineated right.
Whether a Scouser, a Geordie, a Lankie, a Yorkie, a Brummie, or one of those insufferable Southerners, I tell you this: You must love one another. Let all divisions between you become as nought and open yourselves to what God intended you to be. For where there is no rancour and a concord between a people wedded to a love of liberty, there shall
reign peace and freedom.
And England shall be a free and independent nation again.
Ref: The Unoccupied Heart
———-
Michael James, an English republican patriot, is a blacklisted former
freelance journalist resident in Zionist-occupied Germany since 1992 with
additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland. He
advocates a Leaderless Resistance to destroy the Soviet European Union and prays for a free and independent England, shorn of all alliances with the
EU, UK, NATO, the UN, WTO, IMF, Israel and any other treacherous
international cabal or entity.
BEATEN DOWN FOR DECADES BY FABIAN AND ZIONIST COMMIES- STOP GIVING THEM YOUR MONEY- LET THEM EARN THEIR OWN,-DESTROYING ENGLAND IS WHAT THE SHYSTERS ARE UPTO,- LOOK AROUND – USE YOUR EYES, PARASITES!!
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=37741
UK riots and the Criminality of Jack Straw | Veterans Today Aug 16, 2011 … Brothers in war crimes: Jack Straw, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. …. one of his
great-grandfathers was a German Jewish immigrant. … A Fabian also on his
admission- more a Stalinist…….his son “Will” ready to take his place! …
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/16/the-uk-riots-and-the-criminality-of-jack-straw/
Labour’s attack on Nick Griffin shows hypocrisy of globalist agenda … Justice Secretary Jack Straw of the Labour Party took on BNP leader Nick Griffin
in … Talmudic Jews, Freemasons, and the Fabian Society are currently the most …
http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/labour-s-attack-on-nick-griffin-shows-hypocrisy-of-globalist-agenda
link removed from 2009 which wrote of fabian ministers pouring more money into schools where the children were not white…..helping them before helping white kids……Tory MP had written an open letter to ministers…how white kids suffered by bad education and money shortages for books etc…..but not so—other kids…only title left- must have worried them incase their pathetic voters saw it……………………
JACK…..WILL ..THE BOY TO TAKE DADDYO’S PLACE….RIGGED ELECTION……DYNASTIC MINISTERS ….WAS WILL THE DRUGGIE?
But, if Jack Straw is right and we need more prisons, he should be one of the first inmates, alongside Tony Blair, who he served so loyally throughout the 13 years of New Labour government.
Jack Straw was foreign secretary during the run up to the Iraq war in 2002-3. He was, the Iraq Inquiry tells us, the only member of Tony Blair’s cabinet to be fully informed of the prime minister’s discussions, negotiations and plans.
Straw knew that when George Bush and Tony Blair met at Bush’s Texas ranch in April 2002, they “signed in blood” a secret deal to invade Iraq, whatever the views of the United Nations or the people of the United States and Britain.
Just prior to that meeting, Straw told Blair in a secret memo that “legally there are two potential elephant traps“. Firstly, that “regime change per se is no justification for military action”. And secondly, that “the weight of legal advice here is that a fresh mandate [from the United Nations] may well be required”.
And it was Straw who was central in the attempt to bounce the United Nations into that second resolution to give a fig-leaf of legality to a war of unjustified aggression. He was rarely off our screens in 2002 telling us how Iraq was not giving access to the UN weapons inspectors, knowing that this simply was not true, as Hans Blix the chief UN inspector has pointed out, noting Straw’s “incorrect answers” — better known as lies — to the Iraq Inquiry.
And Straw knew it was a lie when on 11 February 2003, a few days before the biggest anti-war demonstration in British history, he said: “We have to strain every sinew, even at this late stage, to avoid war.”
Straw had already told Blair in his March 2002 memo that the US was going to war regardless, and later he was left in no doubt by the US secretary of state Colin Powell in March 2003, who told him, “We are going to war whatever Saddam does.”
The only sinew Straw was straining was to find a way to justify a war which was going to happen regardless of legality or whether most countries and most people in the world opposed it.
This is why he rejected the advice of his senior legal advisor at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), Sir Michael Wood, who told him in a memo that invading Iraq “would amount to the crime of aggression” and would be illegal under international law. It was the only time in Wood’s career, before or since, that his legal advice had not been accepted by a minister. Straw rejected advice that Iraq invasion was ‘unlawful’
And this is why Straw was dismissive of Sir Michael’s deputy FCO, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, who stated in her letter of resignation in March 2003, ” I cannot agree that it is lawful to use force against Iraq without a second [UN] Security Council resolution.”
Yet, despite all this evidence to the contrary, Jack Straw told the Iraq Inquiry that he would never “have been a party” to a war of regime change, which he said would be “improper and self-evidently unlawful”.
Straw is clearly a congenital liar whose ability to speak untruths is limitless. But he knew what would be the consequences of the war on Iraq, legal or not, because he described them in February 2003:
People will get killed and injured. That is the brutal and inevitable reality of war. Some of those killed will be innocent civilians; even those killed who are not innocent have souls, and wives, husbands, children who will suffer.
Straw knew he had it in his power stop this illegal war. In a written statement to the Iraq Inquiry in January 2010, he said he was “fully aware” that, as foreign secretary, his support for military action would be “critical” if the UK join the invasion of Iraq. “If I had refused that, the UK’s participation in the military action would not have been possible. there would almost certainly have been no majority in cabinet or in the Commons.”
This is tantamount to a confession that he colluded in mass murder. Not only would Britain have been unable to march “shoulder to shoulder” into the illegal war, but the inevitable resignation of Tony Blair and the fall of his government would have put enormous political pressure on the United States for at the least a postponement of its war plans.
The blood on Straw’s hands is no less than that of Tony Blair, for a war in which over one million Iraqis died, four million were made homeless and the country so devastated that today there is acute rationing of electricity, many areas have no access to clean water and a health service that was once the most developed in the region is in tatters.
So next time we hear David Cameron talk about “criminality pure and simple” and he tells “the lawless minority… you will pay for what you have done” we need to know if his definition of “criminality” extends beyond the crime of stealing a £3.50 bottle of water or receiving a pair of stolen running shorts.
Does it include what the the Nürnberg Tribunal, set up after World War II, following the trials of leading Nazis, called the supreme international crime:
To initiate a war of aggression … is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.
The Tribunal said individuals should be held accountable for “crimes against peace”, defined as the “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression”, which leaves little doubt about incrimination in the mass slaughter and devastation inflicted on Iraq by Jack Straw and his fellow conspirators — from Tony Blair, George Bush, and Colin Powell, to Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice and Donald Rumseld .
Jack Straw’s enthusiasm for jailing people predates his call on David Cameron to build more prisons to lock up rioters. The Blair years were marked by a doubling of the prison population to over 80,000, giving Britain the dubious accolade of locking up more of its citizens than any other European country. When Jack Straw became home secretary, he was ever hungry for more prison places.
It tell us much about the quality of justice in this country that the person in charge of building new prisons was someone who should have been incarcerated in one of the cells.
STRAW SERVES ISRAEL NOT ENGLAND!!
BY THE WAY JACK- WE DON’T NEED LESSONS FROM A TALMUDISTS ABOUT RACISM ETC THEY INVENTED IT!!!
THAT IS FACT……FASCISM ETC IS PLAINLY TALMUDIC….HITLER ACTUALLY FOLLOWED MUCH FROM THE TALMUD….DOUGLAS REEDS BOOK!!
Labour’s attack on Nick Griffin shows hypocrisy of globalist agenda
Add a comment Robert Stark, LA Nonpartisan Examiner
October 31, 2009 – Like this? Subscribe to get instant updates.
25 comments.0 SharePrintEmail
0SharePrintEmail.Justice Secretary Jack Straw of the Labour Party took on BNP leader Nick Griffin in a televised debate called Question Time that was watched by millions. Straw said he was “delighted to make the argument for people against the BNP.” Straw attacked Griffin as a racist, xenophobe, and a neo-nazi. Straw said that any party that bases itself on race is wrong and beyond the pale and falsely accused Griffin of being a holocaust denier. The Labour party has gone out of its way to vilify the BNP as a racist and fascist party.
During the debate Straw said “There isn’t a constitutional obligation to appear on Question Time. That gives the BNP a legitimacy they do not deserve. These people believe in the things that the fascists believed in the Second World War, they believe in what the National Front believe in. They believe in the purity of the Aryan race. It is a foul and despicable party.”
While Griffin has views that some may find objectionable, unlike Straw he has never caused the direct loss of innocent life through his policies. Jack Straw is a major leader of the Labour Party and was foreign secretary under Tony Blair. He oversaw Britain’s role in the war in Afghanistan, and the pre-emptive war in Iraq. Conbined the estimated loss of civilian life in these wars is up to one million. Even though Nick Griffin is anti-Muslim in the sense that he does not want Muslims immigrating to England, Straw is directly responsible for the deaths of Muslim civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan. Straw is also as strong supporter of Israel as a Jewish ethno-state but seems to hold a different standard in regards to British Nationalism.
Nick Griffin had an excellent response to the claims that he is a racist and fascist exposing who the real offenders are. He said, “Genocide, as codified by international law, of the United Nations convention, doesn’t just mean machine gunning or gassing people, wiping out populations. It also means arranging things so that the young people of any given population find it hard, some way or another, have a disadvantage to meet and to fall in love and have children. And there’s various ways, everything from taxes through to relentless multiracial propaganda, in which that war is waged against our people right now, day in and day out. And there’s another way. It’s depriving the young people of a population of a knowledge of their own heritage and their own culture and their own identity. And the United Nations says that is genocide, and that is precisely what is being done to us today.”
Recently Labour was exposed as secretly plotting to change the demographics of Britain through mass immigration without the consent of the electorate, because it would benefit their party’s agenda. The relevation surfaced last week in an article by Andrew Neather, a former speech writer and adviser for Tony Blair and Jack Straw. He was present at private Labour Party meetings where the plans were discussed. He said “mass immigration was the way that the government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.” Neather wrote a speech in 2000 for than immigration minister Barbara Roche calling for greater immigration, despite the fact that Labour promised its working class base it would not increase immigration. Jack Straw denied the allegations against his party.
There is a big difference between the nationalism advocated by the BNP and the imperialist policies of Labour. Neocons and neoliberals such as Labour believes that western nations can assimilate massive third world immigration yet at the same time colonize nations like Iraq and turn them into western style democracies. That globalist agenda is not just destroying western nations through large scale third world immigration but their imperialist foreign policy is destroying the middle east through wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Palestinian territories. The economic exploitation by international bankers and mutli-national corporations who these politicians support have destroyed the economies and natural resources of third world nations.
The combination of meddling in Muslims nations and allowing massive immigration from those nations is a recipe for disaster and that is what led to the terror attacks in London. The BNP’s is right that western nations should stop meddling in other nations affairs and end massive immigration. Even though this takes place in the UK, this is relevant to Americans since most of our major politicians follow the same ideology coined as “invade the world invite the world”.
.
Continue reading on Examiner.com Labour’s attack on Nick Griffin shows hypocrisy of globalist agenda – Los Angeles Nonpartisan | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/labour-s-attack-on-nick-griffin-shows-hypocrisy-of-globalist-agenda#ixzz1fmnskJIa
EXODUS WAS A MYTH..ALMOST ALL HOLLYWOOD SPINS IS MYTHS!
Judahites were to be organized as a permanent disruptive force among nations and for that reason, evidently, was invented; the Judaist scholars agree that nothing resembling the narrative in Exodus actually occurred.
Whether Moses even lived is in dispute. “They tell you”, said the late Rabbi Emil Hirsch, “that Moses never lived. I acquiesce. If they tell me that the story that came from Egypt is mythology, I shall not protest; it is mythology. They tell me that the book of Isaiah, as we have it today, is composed of writings of at least three and perhaps four different periods; I knew it before they ever told me; before they knew it, it was my conviction”.
Whether Moses lived or not, he cannot have led any mass-exodus from Egypt into Canaan (Palestine). No sharply-defined Israelitish tribes existed (says Rabbi Elmer Berger) at any time when anyone called Moses may have led some small groups out of Egyptian slavery. The Habiru (Hebrews) then were already established in Canaan, having reached it long before from Babylonia on the far side: Their name, Habiru, denoted no racial or tribal identity; it meant “nomads”. Long before any small band led by Moses can have arrived they had overrun large Canaanite areas, and the governor of Jerusalem reported to Pharaoh in Egypt, “The King no longer has any territory, the Habiru have devastated all the King’s territory”.
A most zealous Zionist historian, Dr. Josef Kastein, is equally specific about this. He will often be quoted during this narrative because his book, like this one, covers the entire span of the controversy of Zion (save for the last twenty-two years; it was published in 1933). He says, “Countless other Semitic and Hebrew tribes were already settled in the promised land which, Moses told his followers, was theirs by ancient right of inheritance; what matter that actual conditions in Canaan had long since effaced this right and rendered it illusory”.
Dr. Kastein, a fervent Zionist, holds that the Law laid down in the Old Testament must be fulfilled to the letter, but does not pretend to take the version of history seriously, on which this Law is based. In this he differs from Christian polemicists of the “every word is true” school. He holds that the Old Testament was in fact a political programme, drafted to meet the conditions of a time, and frequently revised to meet changing conditions.