Manipulation Of Your Mind by Government Agenda – Brian Gerrish

The pop song in the charts that  Mr Gerrish is speaking about telling teenagers TO KILL YOURSELF, between 52-53 minutes is called STAY AWAKE, have a listen and bare in mind this stuff is everywhere
NationalistDefender 1 month ago

@mickburke15 Far from monkeys, the Tavistock Institute is actually full of incredibly intelligent, highly devious and utterly corrupt psychopaths! I would suggest reading ‘The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations’ by Dr John Coleman. You’ll be surprised just how deep their influence goes..
GlasgowTruthGroup 1 week ago

mranthonyjhilder on 28 Sep 2011

A rcoones video:
Constitutional Convention – To Reassert Our Constitution

22nd October 2011 – Kings Hall Stoke On Trent
5th November 2011 – Friends House, London
http://www.ukcolumn.org/

Also see;;
Courts Afraid of Us Now & Lawful Bank – Roger Hayes British Constitution Group

Brian Gerrish gives a presentation in Bournemouth England about how The Nation is being subverted by suttle psychological techniques used by Schools, Media, Government. All meant to destabilise and change the nation. Direct attack upon the people and the culture.

“Keep Calm Carry on (wartime message) because We Have some very dangerous people now controlling the country. They are starting to really hurt people and are starting to pull the country apart…The violence is what they want…. if this happens we lose…in comes the Police State Measures..”. “The country is being subverted from the inside”. Through the use of: fraud, corruption, porn, drugs, child abuse, big brother, big society, codex alimentarius, wars, torture, vaccines, agenda 21, change, one world government, banksters, surveillance and more.

Filmed on Location by The Free World Alliance Camera Crew in England

http://freeworldfilmworks.com/

http://ourenglanduk.com/

http://commoncrime.net/

http://aircrap.org/

Category:
News & Politics

“CIVIL WAR IN BRITAIN WITHIN TWO YEARS- THIS REPORTED IN ITALY”

AS FROM 2012 UKCOLUMN WILL BE OUT EVERY MONTH….ANYONE WANTING REAL NEWS- DON’T MISS THIS FANTISTICALLY HONEST NEWSPAPER DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR……I CAN’T WAIT FOR IT’S ARRIVAL….LAST WEEK LATEST ISSUE WAS DROPPED INTO MY LETTERBOX….

ORDER ONLINE AT UKCOLUMN..NUMBER 10 TAKES COPIES!!

http://www.ukcolumn.org/

The Solution Begins With Glass Steagall
If Positive Money is not the answer, what can we do? The solution is actually not that hard.

We must begin with full Glass Steagall style banking separation now, today. Not this ring fencing nonsense being pushed by Mervyn King and George Osborne.

Article | December 2, 2011 – 12:00pm | By Mike Robinson
An analogy suggested to me, which I think is perfect, is to compare the financial system to a ship: naval architects invented watertight compartments in order to stop the ship sinking when holed. Full separation of retail and investment banking is equivalent to the watertight compartments and is the only way to guarantee the ship won’t sink. The ring fence idea is not watertight – there’s a gap at the top, just like the unsinkable Titanic.

If we were to separate the retail and investment banks in this way, the next step should be to look at the legitimacy of the “national” debt outstanding. I think we would find ourselves in the position that we could class 95% of the debt as gambling debt which we do not honour, and as a result of Glass Steagall, we could do that quite safely without risk to the economy or the retail banking sector. The investment banking sector would be permitted to sort out its own problems at this point. This is their biggest fear.

Then, as Positive Money demands, we look at how money is created, and (re)claim that process as a sovereign act. Then perhaps, with the correct consideration about how that was done, we would find we have no shortage of money to rebuild the nation.
Since as a result of writing off illegitimate national debt we are now free of all the interest payments to City of London parasites, we can use our new sovereign capability to create interest free money to rebuild the nation beginning with the real economic infrastructure we need to support a healthy economy – power, water, transport, plus health and education. This new credit would be issued in the form of loans to companies in the private sector, at a very low interest – repayable to the nation, not a bank. This credit would only be used for very large scale productive activities which become the driver for the wider real economy.

There will still be some pain for us – the small matter of a £2 trillion hole in the public sector pension pot, and a similarly sized hole in the national pension pot that we are all entitled to tap into. This money was stolen by the Blair/Brown governments. We also need to protect private pensions, currently invested in the global casino and losing money hand over fist, and savings.

Somewhere in there we need to shut down this parasite called the “Bank of England” which, as already discussed, is nothing whatever to do with England or Britain. Instead we would set up a national bank operating in the national interest, with full oversight and accountability.

And finally, we need to sort out the retail banking sector itself. For this we need a Lawful Bank.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/solution-begins-glass-steagall

Accusations of Student Abuse and Child Pornography Cover-up at Oxford & Cherwell Valley College
Alcohol consumed in classrooms, bullying, racism, health and safety breaches, pornographic videos, sexual and physical assaults, abuse of trust, and neglect are just some of the accusations against Oxford & Cherwell Valley College which have surfaced over the last eighteen months.

Article | December 2, 2011 – 11:34am

Nestled in David Cameron’s Conservative heartland, this leading college, states that it is the largest provider of further education training in Oxfordshire. According to the web page of college Principal and Chief Executive Sally Dicketts “We pride ourselves on the fact that we have something for everyone, we are all members of a vibrant and diverse community, and we are passionate about helping each individual to achieve their potential.”

Despite this welcoming accolade, former pupils and members of staff accuse Oxford & Cherwell Valley College management of collaborating in a calculated cover-up of a series of perverted and unpleasant activities in the college which started to manifest around 2007.

Allegations suggest that aside from sexual assaults on girls, students were encouraged to drink alcohol in classrooms and were shown pornographic material on college computers – in some cases on the private mobile phones of staff, including images involving children. Boys and girls also suffered bullying at the hands of staff, and those who attempted to warn senior managers of the horrendous activities, were reportedly warned off or pressurised to keep quiet.

Repeated complaints by staff and students did eventually force an investigation, but those present at the college at the time claim that the investigation led by Mr Ray Tregear, was biased so as to protect the college and cover-up the abuses.

Informers also claim that although Thames Valley Police did make some enquiries into abuse and pornography allegations these were low key, incompetent and involved officers working outside normal codes of conduct. Most surprising is that police did not impound computers for detailed forensic examination.

In February 2010 the Oxford Mail newspaper revealed that a Lecturer from the college had been suspended from his employment following complaints that he was showing pornography to pupils. Sources stated that he was later dismissed. It is alleged that this was most likely under a so called voluntary compromise agreement and gagging order. It is also understood that the college has spent some £233,000 on similar compromise agreements since January 2010.

The UK Column has recently learned that OSVC suddenly replaced some 200 computers in July 2010 after the accusations of abuses refused to die down. A local Oxford IT supplier apparently decommissioned the old machines including wiping hard drives.

Oxford and Cherwell Valley College Head Sally Dicketts and Thames Valley Police Chief Constable Sara Thornton are both connected with the Women’s Leadership Network and political charity Common Purpose.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/accusations-student-abuse-and-child-pornography-cover-oxford-cherwell-valley-college

7 responses to “Manipulation Of Your Mind by Government Agenda – Brian Gerrish

  1. http://www.thewatcherfiles.com

    The New World Order and the Talmud
    -Sherry Shriner
    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com

    The New World Order and the Talmud. What does the Talmud have to do with it? It’s the hidden cornerstone of the NWO agenda.

    I never realized it either until recently. I mean we’ve had spin doctors and disinfo agents over the past hundred years making sure we believed all the evils were beget through Catholicism. In fact, I think I just finally put the last piece to this NWO puzzle together. At least in my mind. Now it all makes sense. I love how God works. You never where you’re going until you’re already in it.

    The Talmud is the Satanic version of the Torah. The Jews have an oral version of the Torah called the Tenach, or which some call the Talmud, but the Talmud a minority of real Jews are familiar with is not the Talmud being used today. The Babylonian Talmud has taken precedence since 1905 and is blasphemous. In fact every Jew today is taught through this particular Talmud. It refers to Jesus as an idol, and His worshippers as idolaters. It claims Jesus was into beastiality and is burning in hell in a pool of semen. Now where would that come from? Satan Himself. The books of the Talmud are based on the teachings of the Pharisees. To understand why Jesus held such contempt towards this ancient sect of elitists, Christians must have some knowledge of the books of the Talmud—a set of 63 books written by ancient rabbis. These books contain the legal code which is the basis of todays Judaism and Jewish law. In fact, Talmudic Judaism is primarily a legal system in a literal sense. It
    has little to do with religion. It is more of an ancient political cult group with many followers who are not openly Jewish. This is why so many Jews openly claim to be Jewish and atheist at the same time.

    In fact the Talmud originated from the ancient Cabal occult and Pharisee sects. Jesus told them they were the Synogogue of Satan. Every Zionist today clings to what they think are the secret teachings of the Talmud. Welcome to the Internet where very little remains secret of anything. You can read some Tidbits about the Talmud at Talmud Tidbits
    Today the majority of Jews in Israel are practitioners of Pharisaic law—Talmudic law—which is the enemy of truth, Jesus, and God.

    I just posted the other day..
    THE NOAHIDE LAWS AND THE NWO. Why? Because George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah.
    WHAT ARE THE SEVEN LAWS OF NOAH AND WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH YOUR HEAD? It was studying this that brought me to the Talmud. Since the Noahide Laws are based on the Talmud.

    Do you get the connection? In the same Year George W. Bush announced the emergence of the New World Order, he proclaimed the United States as being based on the Noahide Laws. Nevermind that our country was based on God, or a Bill of Rights, or a Constitution to protect us from tyrants such as he was. In fact, nothing was done then and nothing is being done now. People just don’t understand what they’re talking about and accept whatever the media tells them to believe. We have been set up. Our political leaders have replaced God with Satan and have replaced our Constitution with Dictatorial Powers to completely enslave each one of us.

    God’s Watchmen are Sounding the Alarms and have been, but very few are listening.

    So back to the Talmud. Follow the bouncing ball…Satanists…Talmud..Pharisees..Illuminati…New World Order. Who are the Illuminati? They comprise of the Bolshevik Jews of old, the Lubavitch Jews of today, the Zionists, the Communists, almost every government in the world and secret society that takes oaths to Lucifer and participate in blood rituals whether sacrifices, drinking, or both. They’re practices in ritual and black magic are taken directly from the Talmud.

    Is there any doubt that our end was ordained at the beginning? You can trace the Talmud Satanists back to the worship of Molech and even before that. It’s ancient. Today it’s the same practices and old lies just repackaged with a new name called the New World Order. Read about Jewish Ritual Sacrifice, it will open your eyes and make you realize that everything we have today goes back to the occult practices of the earlier days.

    Every disgusting teaching or beliefs of the Talmud are the same beliefs that the Illuminati hold today. We’ve been steered away from the Jewish aspect. They shove(d) the evils of the Vatican at everyone so the focus is off of them. The real and Christian Jews of today disregard the Zionists and want nothing to do with them. The god of the Zionists is their army, building their military strength. What does Daniel say about the Antichrist? His god is one his fathers knew not, a god of forces.

    Doesn’t get any clearer than that. Most know the Antichrist would have to have Jewish blood for the Jews to be deceived into believing he’s their Messiah. The Antichrist is coming out of the NWO. Do you get the picture now? And just as Hitler, a forerunner, he’ll have Jewish blood, and he’ll be Talmudic…occultic.

    The Talmud Jews have been behind every major war and mass murder since the beginning of time. Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, just the more notable ones in our recent history. They even masterminded the Jewish Holocaust via the Nazi’s for political gain. They wanted their own Zionist state. To them, if you’re not a Talmudic Jew, you’re not a Jew at all. So sacrificing millions of “non-Jews” (Jews who worshipped only Torah) wasn’t a problem for them, in fact for them it was a Sacrifice and ritual to their God Satan.

    There seems to be a great divide amongst the Jews. Those who worship the true God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and those who completely rebel and have always caused the nation to fall into idolatry and sin. As in the past, as is today.

    So there’s really no big secret about who these NWO Satanists really are. They’ve been around for thousands of years in secret and occult societies. Infiltrating, deceiving, and persecuting God’s people under the guise of inquisitions, communism, and holocausts. And everything they’ve done, and everything they do, can be traced directly back to the Talmud.

    Talmud Tidbits

    Judaism vs. The Talmud

    Judaism vs. Talmudic Zionism

    Jews Oppposed to A Talmudic Zionist State

    Talmudic Jews and Ritual Murder

    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com

    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/talmud_nwo.htm

    TO ADD TO PERVY SEX FOR KIDS IN SCHOOL- NOW THE FABIAN PERVERTS ARE TO TEACH 12 YEAR OLDS ALL ABOUT GAMBLING…..NEVER MIND MATHS ETC…..TEACH YOUR KIDS HOW TO RESIDE IN THE GUTTER- THATS WHERE THE FABIAN COMMIES ARE TAKING THEM ALL….WHY THE ELITES DON’T SEND THEIR LITTLE ANGELS TO STATE SCHOOLS FOR PROPAGANDA LESSONS…

    ATTACKING THE MINDS OF CHILDREN ATTACKS BRITAIN FAR WORSE THAN ANY FOREIGN ARMY!!/.

  2. NAZI HUNTERS- WHY NOT HUNT THOSE IN CHARGE OF THE 1300 CAMPS IN POLAND?

    Solomon Morel (pictured at left): commandant of a post-war Communist concentration camp for Germans in Poland. Stalin deliberately put Jews in charge of such camps. Morel tortured and murdered thousands of Germans, sometimes with his bare hands (cf. “The Wrath of Solomon,” Village Voice, March 30, 1993 and John Sack, An Eye for an Eye). Morel is comfortably esconsed in Tel Aviv. German survivors of Morel’s camp have demanded he be tried as a war criminal, but for the Establishment media and the phony, partisan, “human rights” groups, bringing Morel to justice is simply a non-issue. After all, he murdered helpless Germans, so what’s the problem?

    German actions during World War Two must be viewed in a vacuum in order for the New World Order to advance its covert objective of Jewish supremacy.

    When Nazi actions are placed within the context of Jewish Communism’s abominable crimes against the Christian people of Russia and Eastern Europe, the public will begin to understand that Hitler and the Nazis were a reaction, however unbalanced and excessive, to the Jewish Communist genocide against millions of Christians and peasants in the East.

    This is why the crucial facts about Jewish Communism must never be documented in Hollywood films, discussed in university courses or pictured in contemporary news magazines. This is why Malcolm Muggeridge’s book, an eyewitness account of the Jewish Communist holocaust against Christians, Winter in Moscow, has been tightly suppressed.

    In the Sunday Telegraph (London, England: Nov. 18, 1990) the question is asked, “Why then has it (Winter in Moscow) never been republished? The answer may lie in Muggeridge’s handling of what was then called the ‘Jewish question.’…Winter in Moscow is acutely concerned with Jews…It was of course the case that a very disproportionate number of the early Bolsheviks were Jews and thus of commissars and apparatchiki…”

    Our documentation of these forbiden facts constitutes the chief motivation for the suppression attempts of such Stalinist censorship groups as the A.D.L. and Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both of these organizations would, if they could, have this writer jailed for publishing the documentation herein in Germany, France, or Austria. They regularly supply “intelligence files” to those governments on pro-Christian and pro-German writers. In 1995 the ADL sought to assist the prosecution of 69 year old American writer Hans Schmidt who was imprisoned in Germany for publishing a newsletter in Florida. These Judaic censors would like to have similar laws passed worldwide, resulting in the jailing of more writers and researchers who will not toe the party line or worship the Golden Calf.

    To give the other side of history, the revisionist side–to give voice to the voiceless millions of dead victims of Judaic Communism–is regarded as “hateful” by the vain Zionists who demand for themselves the right to vomit forth a daily barrage of sewage upon the sacred memory of our grandparents and ancestors. To defend against the dishonoring of our heritage and our ancestors, is surely not hate; it is the right of self-defense against psychological warfare.

    Copyright©2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II. All Rights Reserved
    RevisionistHistory.org

    TRY READING IT ALL…..

    HOLLYWOOD FILMS- LIE MACHINE

    The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, “one of its foremost intellectuals”( London Sunday Times, Aug. 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo).

    Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC’s terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist Party in 1986. (“Joe Slovo,” Jewish Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).

    http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html

    In 1951 communist and Marxist parties had twenty-three seats in the Israeli Knesset. The kibbutz system was the most powerful movement in the country and the most powerful kibbutz leaders were nearly all Marxists. The biggest Israeli holiday was May Day, celebrated with rallies, marches, red banners and red songs.

    As recently as 1987 the Israelis were providing the KGB with American intelligence secrets (cf. UPI dispatch by Richard Sale, Dec. 13, 1987 and The City Paper [Washington, DC], Jan. 15, 1988). Jonathan Jay Pollard was part of one such spy ring. British traitor and Communist spy Kim Philby was assisted in obtaining safe haven in the Soviet Union by the Israeli Mossad (cf. Sunday Telegraph [England], April 16, 1989). This was most appropriate since Philby’s KGB handler in Moscow was also Jewish.

    Romania’s communist regime received favorable trade deals from the U.S. for years due to Israeli pressure on Congress in its behalf (N.Y. Times, Jan. 18, 1992, p. 23). The notion that the Zionist Jewish movement was anti-communist is a fallacy. The truth is more complex. There was a left wing and a right wing within Zionism. The rightists, like the terrorists Jabotinsky and Stern, took a fascist approach. Leftist Zionists like David “I am a Bolshevik” Ben-Gurion admired the Soviet model of Jewish power and sought to incorporate it as the political economy of the Israeli state.

    PROUD TO BE ZIONIST- DAVID CAMERON- RIGGED ELECTION!

  3. From 1936-1939, when Stalin’s “International Brigade” forces were dispatched to Spain to fight the Catholics, Jewish Communists comprised the largest faction of his troops, “More than 40,000 volunteers fought in the International Brigade…A huge number of the volunteers were Jews: between 7,000 and 10,000 of the Internationals as a whole, more than one-third of the Americans.” Jewish Communist Milton Wolff was the last commander of the American contingent. Rabbi Hyman Katz joined in order to fight Spanish Christians. (cf. Jeffrey Sharlet, “Troublemakers,” Pakn Treger, Fall, 1997, pp. 16, 18 and 24).

    The Communists slaughtered 6,549 Spanish priests, 283 helpless nuns and 13 bishops. “In Ciudad Real in the center of Spain, the bishop and every single priest of the diocese were murdered; not one escaped.” –Dr. Warren H. Carroll, 70 Years of the Communist Revolution, pp. 184-185, 188-189. (Also cf. Justo Perez de Urbel, Catholic Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War [Kansas City, Missouri: The Angelus Press, 1993).

    Stalin’s propaganda agent in Spain was New Yorker Leon Rosenthal.

    On Oct. 16, 1948, 50,000 Jewish communists turned out in Moscow’s Red Square to welcome the first Israeli delegation to Moscow. Stalin supported Zionism’s 1947 Palestine partition plan, gave crucial recognition to the newly-created state of Israel and voted for Israel’s admission to the United Nations.

  4. IS THE POPE CATHOLIC- NOT WHEN HIS MOTHER WAS A JEWESS!

    With this record it is interesting to note that the Polish occupant of the papacy, John Paul II, consistently lent his prestige and his presence to canonizations and commemorations of politically correct victims of the Nazis. Nowhere did this Pope breath a word about the openly Jewish, Communist massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics, Croatian Catholics, Lithuanian Catholics–he was too busy, intoning the Shoah, referring to the heirs of the Pharisees as “our Elder Brothers in the Faith” giving official recognition to an Israeli state which even many orthodox, Haredi rabbis regard as a blasphemous and abominable entity, and attacking the German people as “the image of the beast.”

  5. 2011 MERKAL AND SARKOZY ACTING OUT THAT WHICH WAS SET IN PLACE DECADES AGO………………EVERYTHING IS ENGINEERED!

    16.11.1966 Column 530 Mr. A.J.Irvine, “It will be found that there is strong opposition in this country and, I think, on this side of the House, to federalism, and I share that opposition. There is certainly strong opposition to an excess of federalism, to any loss of identity of this Parliament, to any loss of sovereignty affecting foreign affairs, defence or certain aspects of our industrial and economic planning”.

    “The most interesting single feature of the Community at present is that, as I understand it, in our dislike of the federal solution we have a supporter in the President of France, and in the outlook of the French Government. The President’s objections to federalism, which I share and which are enormously influential inside the Community, might in some respects neutralise his objection to our special relation with the United States”.

    16th November 1966 Page 535. Sir Legge-Bourke. “The only respectable basis upon which anybody could be in favour of Britain’s entering the Common Market is by being at the same time entirely confederalist or federalist for Europe as a whole. A study of the Treaty of Rome shows straight away that inevitable it will involve political changes of a federal kind. How far and how fast and exactly how federal or confederal will be worked out as the years go by, but it is wrong to suppose that the Community can survive without a customs union being followed by a single currency, and it is wrong to suppose that the countries of the organisation can keep alive the vigour with which they started— and all credit to them— without developing politically with all this. To make that supposition is to fail to face what is in the Treaty, or is deliberately to deceive the people.

    “I believe that the Treaty was conceived in a spirit of high federalism. It was soon apparent to Europe that Britain was not overkeen on that idea, but Britain had to be brought in by the architects of the document. And so the whole thing was trimmed and as the negotiations developed, the emphasis was more and more on economics and less and less on the political side”.

    “I have long believed that the most important economic freedom for nations is the one freedom which was left out of the four Atlantic freedoms—the freedom of choice to do business with whomsoever one will on mutual beneficial terms. In other words, this is the right to discriminate in trade. This right was taken from us particularly by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which was signed by the first Labour Government after the war. Again, I do not want to hark back over what happened after that. I deeply regret that when it was returned to power the Conservative Party did not exercise the full rights which it had reserved through the mouth of Oliver Stanley and reassert our rights to alter our preferential tariffs and so on”.

    8th May 1967 Column 1088. The Prime Minister Mr Harold Wilson. “I should like to deal before I come to the political issue. One of them, on which certain anxieties have been expressed, is that the constitutional and legal implications for this country if we join the European Community. Here again, our examination of the Treaties and the other law emanating from the European Institutions, but even more of the way in which member states have been applying Community law, taking full account of realities prevailing in the member states, has greatly reassured us about the possible implications for Britain.”

    “It is important to realise that Community law is mainly concerned with industrial and commercial activities, with corporate bodies rather than private individuals. By far the greater part of our domestic law would remain unchanged after entry. Nothing in the Treaty would, for example, materially affect the general principles of the law of contract or tort or its Scottish equivalent, land law, the relations of landlord and tenant, housing, town and country planning, matrimonial law, or the law of inheritance. The constitutional rights and liberties of the individual such as habeas corpus and the presumption of innocence will, of course not be affected; not in any material sense will our criminal law. The main affect of Community law on our existing law is in the realms of commerce, Customs, restrictive practices and immigration and the operation of steel, coal and nuclear energy industries.”

    8th May 1967 Column 1109. Mr Turton. “The debate is historic, to follow the remarks of my Rt. Hon Friend, Sir Alec Douglas-Hume) It is historic because, if we join the Common Market, under Article 189 of the Treaty of Rome, NO Hon Member will be able to get up in this House and protest and vote against regulations which affect the economic or social welfare of his constituents. For many of us that is the main reason why we take the view which we hold on this issue”.

    “Last November, I and many of my Rt, Hon Friends asked for a White Paper on the constitutional issues. We felt that they were what all the country should know about. We have never had it. We have never had a White Paper on the economic issues. We have only had an article, a very fair and, I thought, damning article in The Times of last Monday.

    Column 1114. “I believe that acceptance of the Motion would lead to a betrayal of the Queen in Parliament, would be disloyal to our Commonwealth Members, and would put unendurable burdens on the British people”.

    8th May 1967 Column 1154. Mr Erec S. Heffer. “I also want us to go into the Community because I believe that a United States of Europe is absolutely essential, and I want to see a Socialist United States of Europe. That is the prospect. I believe that we can get a socialist United States of Europe.”

    Finally I will finish with Mr Peter Shore (as he was then) on 22 February 1972 column 1164. “When we consider the net effects of what we pay out and receive back, these arrangements are little short of a national disaster. No Government in their senses could have agreed to terms so clearly against and detrimental to our interests. It is difficult to imagine a system of taxation, a tax mix, that could impose a heavier and more disproportionate burden upon us than the particular tax mix that has emerged as the permanent tax system of the Community under the “own resources” rule. I do not say that was the Community’s purpose, but they have been extremely blind in not recognising the grievous effect this is bound to have upon us. Indeed, I cannot recall another example in history of a free country, without compulsion from outside, entering upon an arrangement so damaging to itself.”

    “Apart from being disastrous and unfair, these arrangements, as the Financial Secretary has made abundantly clear, constitutes a direct challenge to the most important power of Parliament, our exclusive control over taxation. As the Ways and Means Resolution makes clear, we shall permit the Community to tax the British people. We are acceding not just to the Treaty of Rome but to the Treaty of Luxembourg of April 1970, which specifically authorised the Community to have its own resources and to receive the yield of the three taxes to which I have referred.”

    “That agreement was a major development in the Community and I found it extraordinary that, in our debate last week, neither the Solicitor General nor the Prime Minister had anything to say about it. The Solicitor-General amused himself greatly by quoting from the 1967 White Paper on the legal and constitutional implications of Britain joining the Common Market but, in his efforts to show that the constitutional innovation of the Communities having directly applicable law in the United Kingdom was known in 1967, he totally, and to me surprisingly, omitted to mention the second and even greater constitutional innovation which occurred in 1970: the right of the Communities to tax directly the Member States”.

    “For the Prime Minister to say, as he did last Thursday, that the constitutional position has not changed in any single respect since the negotiations of 1961, when it was fully discussed in the House time and again, is stretching the truth to the greatest possible extent.”

    “This is a major development in the Communities, as a consequence of which there is a major intrusion into the sovereignty of Parliament. The strongest of all our constitutional principles is that Parliament, and in particular the House of Commons which represents the people of this country, alone has the right to levy taxation. That has been the basic constitutional doctrine. Because Parliament three centuries ago insisted on this right, we gradually brought the Crown and the Executive under the control of elected representatives. As we were reminded recently, Parliament made the supply of money to the Government conditional on the remedying of grievances. That was the way in which control by the House of Commons was brought about”.

    “There should be no doubt about what is intended here. It is not proposed that we should make a contribution to the Communities, which we can alter if we think it is too much or too little. It is not a contribution at all. The right to levy taxes, which are specified, is to be ceded to non-elected institutions of the Community without the further consent of Parliament of the British people
    As the Ways and Means Resolution puts it, we shall be,
    “giving effect to any charge to taxation of those Communities”
    That is quite unacceptable to us.”

    There are more, many, many more pages of these debates, for the debates on our entry into the Community cover a great many number of years. I hope I have proved, without a shadow of doubt, that most, if not all Members of Parliament knew what the Community was eventually, step by step, to become. Many Members of Parliament wanted to join, many did not. Again without a doubt, the truth of what the Community was to become was kept from the people of this Country. This was a complete betrayal to ALL in this Country. Today’s politicians can find out the true facts of our history regarding this County’s entry into the European Community in exactly the same way that I have. It just takes time and patience. It is all recorded, every sordid detail, (Britain’s shame) in Hansard.

    No matter how long ago these events took place, the Members of Parliament that are still alive, should and must be made accountable for their actions, in the same way that ‘today’s’ MPs will surely be
    2008-11-30

    LINK ABOVE ..REPOST!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s