Israel To U.S.: Don’t Delay Iraq Attack

Israel To U.S.: Don’t Delay Iraq Attack
ByDan Collins .

ZIONIST PUPPET BLAIR RESPONDED….SACRIFICING BRITISH TROOPS AND THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT IRAQI LIVES…..TODAY IT’S IRAN IN THE ISRAELI SIGHTS…..ATTACK IRAN OTHERWISE WE WILL- WELL GO AHEAD ISRAEL, ALONE!!

CBS) Israel is urging U.S. officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, an aide to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Friday.

Israeli intelligence officials have gathered evidence that Iraq is speeding up efforts to produce biological and chemical weapons, said Sharon aide Ranaan Gissin.

“Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose,” Gissin said. “It will only give him (Saddam) more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction.”

The United States has been considering a military campaign against Iraq to remove Saddam from power, listing him as one of the world’s main terrorist regimes. However, there is considerable world opposition to a U.S. strike.

As evidence of Iraq’s weapons building activities, Israel points to an order Saddam gave to Iraq’s Atomic Energy Commission last week to speed up its work, Gissin said.

“Saddam’s going to be able to reach a point where these weapons will be operational,” he said.

Meanwhile, Iraq told the United Nations on Friday that it will continue to discuss the return of U.N. weapons inspectors, but it insisted on conditions that Secretary-General Kofi Annan has already rejected.

In a 10-page letter to Annan, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri reaffirmed an Iraqi offer to hold a round of technical negotiations but he insisted they focus on outstanding issues related to Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction as well as “practical arrangements for the return of the inspection system in the future.”

Sabri was replying to a letter from Annan that rejected Iraq’s proposal to have chief weapons inspector Hans Blix and Iraqi experts determine outstanding disarmament issues of mass destruction and figure out how to resolve them before inspectors return to the country.

Also on Friday, President Bush said he knows there are “very intelligent people” who doubt the wisdom of attacking Iraq.

But he says Saddam Hussein is “thumbing his nose at the world” — and must be ousted.

Speaking to reporters near his Texas ranch, the president vowed to make his own decision — based on the best intelligence available.

Gissin also said Israel was not seeking to dictate the timing of a U.S. military campaign but said that, faced with the threat of one, Saddam was fast developing weapons.

While the Israeli government backs U.S. action against Iraq, there is also concern in Israel that in response, Iraq would launch missile attacks against Tel Aviv and other cities in Israel.

During the 1991 Gulf War, in which U.S.-led forces pushed back an Iraqi invasion of neighboring Kuwait, Iraq hit Israel with 39 Scud missiles — none of them with chemical or biological warheads — causing few casualties but extensive damage.

In an interview published Friday, Ben-Eliezer told the daily Yediot Ahronot that Israel would surely become a target during such a conflict and would consider retaliation in coordination with U.S. forces.

“We will be one of the main targets,” he told the newspaper. “What I told the Americans, and I repeat it: ‘Don’t expect us to continue to live with the process of restraint. If they hit us, we reserve the right of response.'”

Iraq has few chemical and biological weapons, Ben-Eliezer said. “We are taking this into account and we are prepared. But we are so far away from this right now that all this hysteria is simply unnecessary,” he said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/18/world/main519037.shtml

JOIN THE BRITISH ARMY FIGHT FOR ISRAEL…….THE ZOG DOESN’T TELL THE MEN AND WOMEN THAT PART.

7 responses to “Israel To U.S.: Don’t Delay Iraq Attack

  1. 2009 LISTEN

    Warmongers who sold you the Iraq war are pushing for a war with Iran.

    6 Feb 2009

    http://RepresentativePress.blogspot.com/2007/07/bush-is-ignorant-and-extremel
    High Quality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akWdJh7auVA&fmt=18

    See video: Apologize to the World Mr. Wallace and Return that Emmy

    See the other videos shown in this video here:
    http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=representativepress&view=videos&s

    “Leon Panetta, said he believed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons — contrary to the opinion of the intelligence community he is about to lead”

    that is DANGEROUS! Please pass this video on to others, we need to expose their lies to millions of Americans, not just thousands: http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2009/02/warmongers-who-sold-you-iraq-

    Category:
    News & Politics

  2. TheAlyonaShow on 24 May 2011

    This July an annual event, the “Christians United for Israel” conference billed as the premier pro-Israel event of the year aside from AIPAC, will take place here Washington, DC. Some of the headline speakers are Senator Joe Lieberman, FOX News host Glenn Beck and Walid Shoebat, who started a foundation warning about the dangers of Islam and he’s become a talking head about terrorism and Islam issues on several major TV networks.

    Category:
    News & Politics

    STIRRING UP HATRED …

    DHS pays to spread Islamophobia

    WORKING FOR ZIONIST FOR FREE….

  3. Bob Loblaw
    November 9, 2011 – 10:09 am
    Got my tin foil watch cap on as per usual. The question of why the Brits are totally controlled.. go right now and google The Gherkin. Look at the images. What you see is a giant nuke warhead with little 6 point-six-sides-and a hexagram flags all over it.. right in the middle of London. I was shocked when I first saw that thing. Literally my jaw flopped open and I stared and stared. The “bird” I was with looked at me like I was utterly nuts. I said “Don’t you see it?” She said “what?” I said that building is a symbol. It’s a cartoon of a giant warhead. All it needs is a big “H” painted on the side and maybe some fins at the bottom to make it complete.”

    What does that have to do with anything? Psychology.

    DaveE
    November 8, 2011 – 10:50 am
    “So what are we supposed to call an Israeli who rejects a perfectly reasonable Arab peace deal… like “get off our land and there’ll be no trouble”?

    How about calling them a Satanist? Not exactly original, I know, but that’s what more knowledgeable cats like Jesus of Nazareth came up with.
    60sstreetpunk
    November 8, 2011 – 3:33 pm
    Nice article. When I was naive I thought our government knew best but I smelled a rat when on active duty over 40 yrs ago.
    I knew something was really wrong and that we had entered or created a surreal world when US invaded Iraq in 2003.
    There is little to no truth in MSM so thanks for your story here. As for Ros-Lehtinen, mediocrity and worse is what makes up our government and lawmakers. This warmonger bigot and Israeli firster is inadequate and consistent with what helps run a less than mediocre government, If she starts a war I hope no one shows up for her party.

    Debbie Menon
    November 8, 2011 – 4:43 pm
    Thanks Stuart. How disgusting. Can’t believe they are once again lying.

    In case you missed this:

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29663.htm
    Fallujah Veteran: ‘I Served The 1%’

    By Ross Caputi

    It was on their behalf that I helped lay siege to Fallujah, helped kill thousands of civilians, helped displace hundreds of thousands of innocent people, and helped destroy an entire city.

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10907.htm

    Fallujah – The Hidden Massacre

    Veteran admits: Bodies melted away before us.

    Shocking revelation RAI News 24.

    US lied to Britain over use of napalm in Iraq war:

    Mr Ingram admitted to the Labour MP Harry Cohen in a private letter obtained by The Independent that he had inadvertently misled Parliament because he had been misinformed by the US. “The US confirmed to my officials that they had not used MK77s in Iraq at any time and this was the basis of my response to you,” he told Mr Cohen. “I regret to say that I have since discovered that this is not the case and must now correct the position.”

    Incinerating Iraqis; the napalm cover up :

    Two weeks ago the UK Independent ran an article which confirmed that the US had “lied to Britain over the use of napalm in Iraq”. (06-17-05) Since then, not one American newspaper or TV station has picked up the story even though the Pentagon has verified the claims.

    Warmongers eager for more blood-letting
    22
    What a spectacle they make of themselves, whooping and stomping to the frenzied beat of Tel Aviv’s drum, their dumb-ass chant getting ever shriller

    by Stuart Littlewood

    Are we expected to believe that Israel’s leaders, given their lawless and belligerent track record, are saner than Iran’s Ahmadjinadad?

    You can read about it on a British government website.

    “The UK and many other countries have serious concerns about the Iranian Government’s policies,” says the Foreign Office, “its failure to address serious international concerns about its nuclear programme; its support for terrorism and promotion of instability in its region; and its continued denial of human rights…”

    I really thought they were talking about Israel and had got the names muddled up. But no… “On Iran’s nuclear programme, we are actively seeking a solution through diplomatic engagement and sanctions to encourage compliance by Iran with the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and six UN Security Council resolutions.”

    Wow, does this means that Israel, which Iran is supposed to be threatening, is an innocent victim of Iranian aggression, is a menace to no-one, is suddenly co-operating with the IAEA and is now in full compliance with all those UN resolutions?

    This is hot news!

    The Foreign Office goes further: “Iran’s backing of Hizbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and other Palestinian Rejectionist Groups…”

    Just a minute. What exactly is a “rejectionist group”? I had to look it up in the Oxford dictionary. A rejectionist, it says, is a person who rejects a proposed policy, especially an Arab who refuses to accept a negotiated peace with Israel.

    Ah. So what are we supposed to call an Israeli who rejects a perfectly reasonable Arab peace deal… like “get off our land and there’ll be no trouble”? What do we call an Israeli who defies international law and denies the human rights of others? An Israeli who treats UN resolutions with contempt?

    “Rejectionist” Israel

    Rejectionism is an Israeli thing; it’s what they do, they specialise in it. Israel, let’s face it, is king of the rejectionist business.

    All this sabre-rattling and talk of pre-emptive strikes against Iran is getting on everyone’s nerves. Iran, after all, is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Israel is not. What does that tell us?

    The Treaty dates back to 1970 so Israel has had more than enough time to show good faith and come on board with the other 189 State parties. The NPT has more signatories than any other treaty of its kind. The only refuseniks – OK, let’s stay with the Foreign Office’s new buzzword – the only rejectionists are India, Israel and Pakistan.

    The British government says the international community must be prepared to “respond robustly” when a country withdraws from the NPT… “The NPT is not like any other treaty and the risks associated with its abuse are uniquely dangerous. We recommend immediate discussions at the UN Security Council if a country announces its intention to withdraw. The IAEA should be required to report immediately on the nuclear activities of that country.”

    It’s common sense really. So what about countries, like Israel, that have stacks of nukes and refused to sign up to the NPT in the first place? What about the “uniquely dangerous risks” in Israel’s case? Where’s the robust response? Is the UNSC addressing Israel’s rejectionism? Has the IAEA reported on Israel’s nuclear activities?

    As a matter of fact the IAEA is quite bothered about Israel. The BBC reported yesterday http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11709428 … “On 18 September 2009, the IAEA called on Israel to join the NPT and open its nuclear facilities to inspection. The resolution said that the IAEA ‘expresses concern about the Israeli nuclear capabilities, and calls upon Israel to accede to the NPT and place all its nuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA safeguards’…

    “Israel refuses to join the NPT or allow inspections. It is reckoned to have up to 400 warheads but refuses to confirm or deny this.”

    I’ve seen the 400 “deliverable” nukes figure before – it’s nearly twice Britain’s arsenal – also that European cities were targeted.

    Israel is the third or fourth largest nuclear force in the world and the only one in the Middle East. A 2006/7 report by the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission says: “Most unofficial estimates claim that Israel possesses a nuclear arsenal numbering in the hundreds, possibly larger than the British stockpile. Israel is widely believed to possess both fission and fusion bombs. It has an unsafeguarded plutonium production reactor and reprocessing capability and possibly some uranium enrichment capability, along with various other uranium-processing facilities.”

    It is the only state in the region that is not a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. It has signed but not ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. As regards biological and chemical weapons, Israel has not signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. It has signed but not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention.

    So why is the focus on Iran and not rejectionist Israel? Israel’s incessant foaming at the mouth over Iran has nothing to do with the alleged remark by Mr Ahmadjinadad to “wipe Israel off the map” – a remark he never made anyway. Long before that, back in 2002 and 2004 Israel was urging the international community to target Iran as soon as it had finished in Iraq and to strip Iran of WMD.

    Are we expected to believe that Israel’s leaders, given their lawless and belligerent track record, are saner than Iran’s Ahmadjinadad? Washington and London may believe such tosh but I doubt if anyone in the Middle East would. Or anyone else in Europe for that matter. A European Commission survey finds that the public believe Israel to be the biggest threat to world peace, greater than North Korea, Afghanistan or Iran.

    Eighty per cent of Conservative MPs preach that Israel’s enemies are our enemies but who is listening?

    War-war not jaw-jaw

    Perhaps the looniest thing I have heard lately is the passage through Congress of the ‘‘Iran Threat Reduction Act of 2011’’. Hidden away where it wouldn’t be noticed, under “General Provisions – Denial of Visas for Certain Persons of the Government of Iran” (Section 601), is this gem…

    (c) RESTRICTION ON CONTACT. — No person employed with the United States Government may contact in an official or unofficial capacity any person that — (1) is an agent, instrumentality, or official of, is affiliated with, or is serving as a representative of the Government of Iran; and (2) presents a threat to the United States or is affiliated with terrorist organizations. (d) WAIVER. — The President may waive the requirements of subsection (c) if the President determines and so reports to the appropriate congressional committees 15 days prior to the exercise of waiver authority that failure to exercise such waiver authority would pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the vital national security interests of the United States.

    It effectively bans diplomacy with Iran. Neither the President himself nor the Secretary of State nor any US diplomat or emissary is allowed to engage in negotiations or diplomacy with Iran unless the President can convince the “appropriate Congressional committees” (e.g. the House Foreign Affairs Committee whose strings are pulled by AIPAC) that not doing so would present “an unusual and extraordinary threat to the vital national security interests of the United States”.

    War-war is preferred to jaw-jaw. And it’s no surprise to discover that this nonsense was cooked up by Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) and Howard Berman (D-CA), who both lead the Foreign Affairs Committee.

    How clever is it to abandon all the channels of normal diplomacy? Those who support the measure must be desperate for more bloodshed – as long as they personally don’t have to act as cannon-fodder. Who can forget the chicken-hawks who casually ordered troops into Iraq and Afghanistan but would never dream of donning uniform and picking up a rifle themselves?

    The preamble to this junk piece of legislation states:

    In the 2006 State of the Union Address, President Bush stated that ‘‘The Iranian government is defying the world with its nuclear ambitions, and the nations of the world must not permit the Iranian regime to gain nuclear weapons. America will continue to rally the world to confront these threats…” In February 2009, President Obama committed the Administration to ‘‘developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon… Iran is a major threat to United States national security interests.”

    Is it really?

    Circulating in the background for years have been rumours speculating on the whereabouts of nuclear warheads dumped by a US B-52 which crashed in 1991. Did freelancers salvage them? Was the nuke exploded by North Korea in 2006 one of these? Does Iran have some? Is this what the panic’s about?

    Many people are quite sure that if the increasingly unhinged Israeli leadership, with finger on the nuke button, believed their unlawful ambitions in the Middle East were permanently thwarted, they would think nothing of taking the rest of the world to hell with them.

    WELL WE WE’RE WARNED THEIR WARHEADS ARE POINTING OUR WAY….THEY CALL MR DINNERJACKET CRAZY- YET IT’S ISRAEL THAT MADE THREATS TOWARDS EUROPE AND NOW AMERICA…TO TAKE US DOWN, THEIR WORDS EXACTLY!!

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/08/warmongers-eager-for-more-blood-letting/

  4. THERES’ POWER FOR YOU……………Israel refuses to join the NPT or allow inspections. It is reckoned to have up to 400 warheads but refuses to confirm or deny this.”

    I’ve seen the 400 “deliverable” nukes figure before – it’s nearly twice Britain’s arsenal – also that European cities were targeted.

    Israel is the third or fourth largest nuclear force in the world and the only one in the Middle East. A 2006/7 report by the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission says: “Most unofficial estimates claim that Israel possesses a nuclear arsenal numbering in the hundreds, possibly larger than the British stockpile. Israel is widely believed to possess both fission and fusion bombs. It has an unsafeguarded plutonium production reactor and reprocessing capability and possibly some uranium enrichment capability, along with various other uranium-processing facilities.”

    It is the only state in the region that is not a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. It has signed but not ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. As regards biological and chemical weapons, Israel has not signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. It has signed but not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention.

    WHO GAVE THEM IT…WE ALLOW

  5. …KINDA TELLS ME JUST WHO RULES THE WORLD ……THEIR POWER IS MASSIVE FOR A SHIT STRIP OF STOLEN LAND…..MIND THATS’ WHAT BANKERS MONEY BUYS….WESTERN GOVERNMENTS ON MASSE!

    NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL- GOYIM BLOOD IS PRECIOUS TO ME- IF NOT TO MINISTERS WHOSE BALLS HAVE ROTTED AWAY TOGETHER WITH THEIR BACKBONE

  6. WE KNOW WHO RUNS AMERICA –NOT AMERICANS!

    (c) RESTRICTION ON CONTACT. — No person employed with the United States Government may contact in an official or unofficial capacity any person that — (1) is an agent, instrumentality, or official of, is affiliated with, or is serving as a representative of the Government of Iran; and (2) presents a threat to the United States or is affiliated with terrorist organizations. (d) WAIVER. — The President may waive the requirements of subsection (c) if the President determines and so reports to the appropriate congressional committees 15 days prior to the exercise of waiver authority that failure to exercise such waiver authority would pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the vital national security interests of the United States.

    2007 TERRORISTS IN USA GOVERNMENT

    representativepress on 13 Mar 2007

    http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/03/democrats-risk-war-with-iran-

    http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/02/iranian-president-ahmadinejad

    From the AP article:
    “Conservative Democrats as well as lawmakers concerned about the possible impact on Israel had argued for the change in strategy.”

    “Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the leadership had decided to strip from a major military spending bill a requirement for Bush to gain approval from Congress before moving against Iran.”

    “Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said in an interview there is widespread fear in Israel about Iran”

    “”I didn’t think it was a very wise idea to take things off the table if you’re trying to get people to modify their behavior and normalize it in a civilized way,” said Rep. Gary Ackerman of New York.”

    Exposing the fact that politicians and pundits are lying about “why they hate us.”:
    http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/02/exposing-fact-that-politician

    Category:
    News & Politics

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s