List of the Traitors to Britain – the greatest crime in a thousand years
PHOTOGRAPH HERE TO PIN UP IN YOUR BOG HOLE OR TO PRACTISE DART THROWING.
The abolition of Britain is illegal under the British Constitution, and the criminal acts of the Queen and her Ministers have included the worst acts of treason in history. They secretly repealed the treason laws in 1998 (hidden in s36.3 of the Crime and Disorder Act) to save their own necks. The criminality of our ministers and parliament won’t save us – the EU’s Constitution will automatically abolish the British one, and they will have got away with the greatest crime in a thousand years.
List of Traitors to Scotland the United Kingdom
Since 1972 five European Union treaties have been signed abolishing our nation. As this is illegal under the British Constitution, our nation needed to be undermined with the methods listed below. The EU is succeeding exclusively through subversion by British traitors from inside the UK.
The EU has the laws of a police state, and a constitution that hands absolute power to unelected dictators; it specifically hands all military power (and that includes the nuclear weapons of Britain and France,) to these dictators. It is the Soviet system,
and creates a sham EU parliament with no power; it will abolish the nations of Great Britain and England.
The list of traitors according to the severity of their crime:
Traitor number 1. HM the Queen. Has committed five acts of treason signing EU treaties that abolish our nation. She is the only monarch to have broken her Coronation oath. Failed as the ultimate check and balance, failed to insist on a national ballot for the abolition of our nation.
Traitor number 2. Edward Heath. Committed an act of treason by passing the 1972 EU Communities Act, which is the enabling act to abolish our nation. He then lied in his White Paper and in his speeches this Act would not abolish our sovereignty. He started the entire illegal EU process. The fact he was a lifelong member of the Deutsche VersicherungsDienst intelligence department was not discovered until his death.
Its very important to understand the legal basis for treason. Firstly it has always been the most serious crime on the statute book, worse than murder. Treason
has long been the only crime punished by “hanging by the neck until dead.” Murderers only get life. The definition of treason is “a crime that undermines one’s government” or “the offence of acting to overthrow one’s government.” Philby, Maclean, Blunt,
Burgess committed treason, by selling secrets to the Russians, and would have got perhaps 15 years if they had returned. What Heath did was the ultimate act of
treason, not just undermining our nation, but abolishing it. If a court case had been brought, he would have got the ultimate penalty.
3. Tony Blair Committed three acts of treason, with three EU treaties. He is also an enthusiastic implementer of EU laws disguised as British laws, the latest being ID cards; he’s an enforcer of crippling EU regulations. Blair is the chief manufacturer of the EU police state in Britain (Scottish rite 33rd degree mason of Studholme lodge 1591 ).
4. John Major committed Treason with the Maastricht treaty; he also sold our main military and nuclear port, Devonport Dockyard, to Dick Cheney’s Haliburton Corporation for peanuts, his bribe was to be European MD of the Bush family’s Carlyle Weapons group, and $1 million pa for life, so he is definitely on the other side.
5. Margaret Thatcher committed Treason with the Single European Act. She is the only Prime minister who now regrets signing it. She’s still guilty – a murderer who apologises only has a mitigating circumstance. She’ll remain a traitor until her death. Like many top people on our side, she’s developed heart problems and is too ill to help.
The above four people have all committed treason, and prosecutions were pending. Tony Blair’s risk was the full force of the law for signing the Amsterdam Treaty amongst others. But in a stunning abuse of power, Tony Blair secretly repealed the treason laws, hidden in the Crime and Disorder Act, and the Queen signed it in
1998, saving both their necks.
There can be no worse criminal abuse of the law than this. …….To get off your own execution as a Prime Minister by repealing the law you are charged under……..The newspapers and media missed it entirely.
6. John Prescott, John Reid, Peter Mandleson, Alan Johnson, about a dozen, now cabinet ministers. Communists who’s allegiance in the 1960’s was to the Soviet Union, switched their loyalty to the European Union in the 1970’s; they’ve implemented the EU’s Frankfurt school subversion, and the 111,000 EU regulations that are criminalising us all. Took control of the Labour party away from patriotic traditionalists.
7. Ken Clarke, Douglas Hurd, Michael Hesletine, Geoffrey Howe, Chris Patten, Francis Maude, David Cameron etc. Pro-Europeans who have seized control of the Conservative leadership, imposing their own agenda, ignoring the wishes of Conservative voters; they sabotaged representative democracy. A vote for the Conservatives has been a vote for the EUdictatorship for 34 years, these are the traitors responsible.
The leaders of our three political parties get their orders from the European Union, not the British electorate, whom they neither serve nor care for. They’ve created a one party state: the three parties have almost identical policies, and all agree on the
abolition of Britain by the EU.
8. Julia Middleton, Managing Director of the Common Purpose government agency. Trained 19,500 local government, quango and NHS “leaders” for what they chillingly call the “Post democratic era.” Close to destroying the NHS, and local democracy, by
transferring power from councillors to the council executives, in preparation for the abolition of councillors with the EU regionalisation plan.
Common Purpose is the number one subversive body outside Parliament. Its graduates include Janet Paraskeva, head of the law society and Cressida Dick, the senior police officer who, with the backing of EU corpus juris, single handedly threw away our right to life and common law with her shoot to kill policy, which is still in force today. She was responsible for the killing of Jean de Menezes in Stockwell tube amongst others, and, although she’s a nobody and might be considered a murderer outside the police force, is getting breathtaking promotion, presumably to be appointed Chief of Police in this EU police state.
9. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). In charge of the handover of power to the EU, controls Common Purpose. Has put a “Monitoring Officer” into
every council in the land; they suspend councillors who speak out for the truth.
10. The Law Society, which I would prefer to call the Fraudulent Lawyers Protection Society on a local level, and the Constitutional Law Breaking Society on
the national level. Top lawyers have refused to uphold the British Constitution or enforce our laws where the EU is concerned; the Law Society is a home for
traitors. The very fact they had Janet Paraskewa, a Common Purpose leader at their head, shows how rotten they are.
11. Baroness Warnock, and a couple of hundred other dedicated senior subversives. Ruthless implementors of the German Frankfurt School’s subversion on behalf of
the EU. Over the last 40 years our churches and families have been undermined, with single parent and same sex parents encouraged, teachers have had their authority removed, sex and homosexual education is forced on many under 13s, and decades of political correctness have dumbed down our ability to speak out. The results fill our newspapers every day.
12. Our slovenly press and media. It is stunning that the press has missed all this, the biggest story in a thousand years. Truly the quality of our journalists is abysmal. No wonder the art of investigative journalism is dead. In the BBC’s case it’s simple
sabotage, with hundreds of Common Purpose people in positions of power.
Only 25,000 traitors versus 60 million. In total there are about 25,000 dedicated subversives at all levels of society in Britain, helped by 100,000 useful idiots. To oppose them are 60 million British people. So why are they winning?
Because the subversion these traitors have so carefully implemented over the last 50 years has worked: The young have no interest in politics; churches are empty; people have stopped speaking out; the public now just accepts every control, regulation, indignity, injustice and rule without complaint.
To defeat the EU you must expose these traitors in their constituencies, at their places of work, in the press, and tell as many people as you can what is happening. Refuse to comply at every opportunity.
COME ON- JOURNALISTS WANT TO KEEP THEIR JOBS- THEY CAN’T SPEAK THE TRUTH AND KEEP THEM CAN THEY?
The biggest contributing factor to the break down of the British society is
The biggest contributing factor to the break down of the British society is our government and the way it has changed the character of the majority.
Political Correctness is, amongst other things, is at the core of the way the British people now think. Ludicrous changes to the way we are supposed to speak are at the forefront of the change.
Political spin, alongside the complete nonsense propaganda spouted everyday by the likes of the tabloids and the BBC have corrupted the rational thinking of the populace. Political spin and an endless onslaught of “you should do this” or “you should say this” have shut down the thinking persons brain stems.
This has been done to stop us thinking, for a thinking person cannot be deceived. To continue their reign of lies and pure deceit that have to keep us in a sense of dullness, just accepting what they say as being true. Don’t think for yourself, for we will do it for you.
As people are more sucked in by this onslaught, they forget to object to the things that are changing around them. They might mown for a second and voice a pathetic outburst subdued by their lack of thinking, then return to the norm of their daily routine. Their propaganda controlled brain cannot, and will not even register, that they should be raising an objection to what they have just said. Their brain will not let them voice concern for it is dissent against the almighty executive, that their brain has been taught not speak out about.
Failing family values are not a concern anymore, as long as they can watch East Enders with a can of Stella. The true British values have died from the continual onslaught of government spouted crap.
Brainwash us, dilute us, destroy us, deceive us the list is never ending, the Fabians have reduced our country to something like an Equilibrium, all they need now is martial law and curfews to finish the job completely.
How many people will object? For the populace we decree “they are only doing it for our safety” as the disillusioned sheep imprison themselves further, with a blind image that “this must be the British way, for the government told me so”.
2009 BEFORE THE RIGGED ELECTION!
‘and you think the Conservative Party is the answer – think again?’
Marxists lead the Conservative Party
Over decades Marxists posing as Conservatives have taken control of the leadership of the Conservative Party. Ken Clarke, Douglas Hurd, Michael Heseltine, Geoffrey Howe, Chris Pattern, Francis Maude, David Cameron to name a few.
They follow in the steps of Ted Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, both lifelong members of the Deutsche Vericherungs Dienst Intelligence department, (DVD) a Marxist organisation that controls the development of the European Union.
These two were exposed just before Ted heath’s death, and both were eligible for EU bribes for signing the first EU treaty in 1972. We know Heath got his.
Whereas Labour leaders obey the EU because of the gravy train bribes they so look forward to, and the compromising information the EU holds on them, these Conservative leaders actually believe in the EU and its Soviet Constitution.
They are sabotaging and abolishing Britain because of their deeply held Marxist political convictions, and they believe they will end up as the party bosses in the new EU order.
A quick look at Soviet and French history shows they won’t: when democracy is withdrawn, as the EU plans in its constitution, laws and 111,000 regulations, it is always the most ruthless dictators that eliminate the likes of Ken Clarke, to seize power themselves.
It happened in France after 1797 and again after 1917, leading to the creation of the soviet state.
Not only do these Tory leaders make unguarded Marxist comments which expose their true feelings, they have links to Marxist organisations.
The Conservative Party set up the EU’s Common Purpose in 1970, the organisation that grew out of the Marxist Demos and Tavistock Institute, and which has already trained 24,000 local and national Government leaders for what they chillingly call the “ post democratic era”.
These are the people who will run the unelected local government when our 48 counties are abolished by the European Regionalisation plan. The 9 EU Regions created (we are the south west region, Area K, Lands End to Cheltenham and Poole, Regional Kontrol – unelected government- in Exeter) will not report to Westminster, which will no longer function, but to Brussels.
Francis Maude’s office admits he is very close to Julia Middleton, the CEO of Common Purpose, a chief engine of Eu subversion inside Britain.
You notice in meetings how Cameron looks to Francis Maude, British signatory to the EU’s Maastricht Treaty in 1992, for direction, and appears to take orders from him. In typical communist style it seems Francis Maude is the real leader of the Conservative party- the Number two generally weilds the real power in Soviet circles.
Maude is also chairman of Cchange, an organisation implementing part of the Frankfurt School’s subversion agenda, summarised as “change for changes sake with no replacement”.
People think that Cameron is changing the Conservative party. To change, you have to destroy the old and bring in the new. If there is nothing new of any substance to change to, you have only destroyed, and the subversion has worked.
It seems clear that Francis Maude, not Cameron, is behind the deliberate and carefully planned destruction of the Conservative Party; the aim is to prevent it from stopping the EU abolishing Britain.
In recent articles we have shown how the Fabians, no matter what party they are in, have continued their planned destruction of our country. The old Conservative party before it was infiltrated by the Fabians was actually protecting the people from the taxation onslaught, but not by being in the Commons. Asquiths lies and treason in 1911 (1911 Parliament Act) did not only remove the Prerogative Assent power from the Monarch (king George Vth) illegally but also destroyed the powers of the Lords.
In 1910 the Fabians Liberal Government in power was trying at that time to bring in to power, crippling taxation bills aimed at the poor and the working class. The Lords were stopping this from happening by vetoing the corrupt laws as they came through. Take modern day as an example of this in the opposite, because of the Lords having their powers removed, this has allowed the majority in the Commons to pass any corrupt tax law they like, with no one to stop them.
The most interesting part of all of this is the fact it was a Conservative Majority in the Lords, which was stopping the dictatorship in the Commons.
Taxation being used for a political ploy intended to destroy this country and resulting in a Police State we now live in.
Submitted by John Harris on Tue, 18/09/2007 – 15:38
John Harris 26.06.07
Enough about the negative, enough about what they are trying to do, to our once great country. Now to employ the energies of positive thought and simple logic to prove once and for all that our great country cannot be destroyed and neither can it’s Laws. (Declaration of Rights 1688)
TPUC combining the power of unity and resolve, to unearth the evidence needed, to reverse our countries dire position. To prove without doubt that Britain has a Constitutional set of Laws that are still in force today that cannot be repealed or changed in any way. To prove the changes that have been made to our True British Laws and our entry into the EU are, most certainly, Invalid.
We know our entry into the EU is illegal but that’s not the point. The point we should all be concerned about is the fact of how it was done? and how illegal the process was?
So how was it done? When did it start? Let us enlighten you, to coin a phrase.
Let us now present you with Facts and the references to them. Afterwards please feel free to not take our word for it. Check it out for yourselves – a simplistic system being used on all democracies in the world to simply destroy them. To make way for what? Gordon Brown knows, he talks about it all the time. Do you?
In 1911 Herbert Henry Asquith (Fabian Prime Minister) altered the format of the Monarch’s Assent. He said it was automatic because Queen Anne was the last Monarch to refuse a Bill. (A Bill on Militia 1707). In fact this meant that the Parliament Act of 1911 went through because George V being a new king did not realise. In fact the Parliament Act 1911 had gone before Edward VII in 1910.
To make this enormous and treasonous step of subjugating the Lords to the Commons, putting the Fiscal Prerogative into the hands of the majority in power in the Commons, was entirely against the power of the Fiscal Prerogative. Why? Because we have a Christian Constitution under which the Prerogative works, which simply means this: “Taxation taken from all the people cannot be used in a one party way.”
This has continued to this day and the Lords under the Parliament Act cannot make any amendments. So in reality Edward VII had refused to pass the Act, one year earlier, 200 years after Queen Anne and Edward VII said there should be an election under which the question of the powers of the House of Lords would be decided by the Electorate.
The Electorate gave Asquith fewer votes than before, so Asquith asked the Fabians in Parliament and Sinn Fein to help. Sinn Fein agreed to vote with Asquith if he agreed to destroy the House of Lords. So ever since then, due to the imbolance of the members of Parliament the laws that have gone through have been illegal. Because Asquith said the Royal Assent was automatic, far from it, the Royal Assent is an essential part (third part after Commons and Lords) to make an Act VALID. In the background the Fabians’ strategy, the Fabians are Globalizers, so they have used the Laws to destroy the Sovereignty of Britain.
All Laws that have gone through since 1911 are in fact Invalid and to subvert the authority of the Monarch is Treason. What successive Fabian governments (Labour and Conservative) have done, is to hand over our Sovereignty to Europe. They have filled our country with foreign people. Under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have made it possible to remove the Constitution and Parliament. They have made Assemblies to replace Parliament by Brussels.
Under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, Blair and Falconer took over the Prerogative powers from the Queen, which means the loss of the people’s power through their Allegiance and relation with the Queen.
The war with Iraq was not about oil but for globalisation and the main aim is to destroy our sovereignty and our independence. This all comes from Asquith’s lies and his treasonous gagging of the Monarchy. The Monarchy is the representative and the protector of the people through the Constitutional Laws made by the people. To complete their heinous crimes they are now going to make a Constitution of their own.
A simple question for you:
Q. Where do they get the money to do this?
A. From you and me, Stupid!!!! (sorry but the answer is so simple)
Under the terms of the 1911 Parliament Act the Fiscal Prerogative no longer works for all the people. Under the terms of taking as little money from the peoples pockets as is needed for the Government of this country, the terms now are taking as much as possible in order to establish Worldwide Power. Every time a Finance Bill (all Taxation including Council Tax) goes through the Commons it is Illegal, as it is against our Christian Constitution. Resulting in the conclusion – yes you’ve guessed it, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY as the current Taxation Policy in this country is illegal. (Council tax was derived from the Poor Law Subscription – the current system is linked to Government Taxation, totally invalid)
Please be aware of this fact: In following the existing police state laws (and not true British Law) you are acting against the Constitution.
Because of all the above, the Queen believes she cannot go against a Bill. The sad thing is she has been fooled, resulting in Her Majesty being accused of being a traitor after 5 separate treaties have gone through, in an attempt to abolish England, with Her Majesty allowing this to happen. In her defence we could tell you such things as she was taught by Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian, in the act of Fabianistic ways.
She has been told that no Monarch has sent a Bill back – this is completely false. They have deliberately turned us against the Queen and the House of Lords, the very people who can help us save our country but they must know we support them. How do we do this? simple! STOP PAYING ALL FORMS OF TAX NOW! they will soon get the message!
The Fabian government, now in the control of the pitiful Gordon (Globalizer) Brown relies on one thing and one thing only MONEY! Our Money. So stop giving it to them. As we have just proved Taxation in this country is Illegal so why are you still PAYING? This is not only about Income Tax, this is about every Tax.
Asquith’s lies and Treasonous actions in 1911 have resulted in, an amazing find, amazing because, we can now prove without doubt every Act that has been passed since 1911 is Invalid. Entry in to the EU Invalid, Council tax is Invalid, Inheritance tax is Invalid, every law against our Constitution is Invalid.
Recently it has been reported in the main stream media that Blair has been bribing Scotland to the tune of £7 Billion to stop them from leaving the United Kingdom (Devolution). The fact of the matter is this: If Scotland leaves, our current entry to the EU (albeit Illegal) will become invalid, as we would default on the original entry agreement: As a whole or not at all.
The simple fact is this: If Scotland leaves, the Fabian Globalizers have to start all over again, hence why Blair has been bribing Scotland. The people can only be fooled for so long and they know this. And guess who has paid all this money to Scotland? You got it! You and Me (Let alone all the money being paid to the Regional Assemblies). £7 BILLION OF OUR MONEY!! just to keep us prisoner in something that is completely Illegal in the first place.
FOR YOURS AND HER MAJESTY’S ATTENTION: Please take note.
Examples of Acts being sent back available in the House of Lords records office and various other books for your reference.
(1) Queen Victoria returned a bill on Commission in 1867 Quoted by Walter Bagehot, volume one, section D, number XLV (B) Page 395.
(2) William III sent back the reform act 1832 causing an Election. (Ref Governing Britain since 1945 by Nigel Knight)
(3) George III sent back a number of Bills about the American Colonies causing William Pitt to resign. (Ref John Bingley privately published and the House of Commons records office)
References to Asquith.
(1) Constin and Watson. Laws and Working of the Constitution 1784 – 1914
(2) How Parliament Works. Rogers and Walters (Available at all county Libraries and the Speakers Office in the House of Commons)
(3) Halsbury Law States Sir Edward Coke 1615 ….the prerogative power cannot be removed from a monarch even by an act of parliament…
(4) Halsbury law – Birth Right of the English People. (Available on the internet)
(5) Jowitt Dictionary of Law.
(6) The Acts at the Stationary office.
The Felony and Treason Act 1848.
The Treason Act 1351.
The Treason Act 1795.(*)
(*) Supposedly repealed by Blair in 1998. Couldn’t be repealed as it was made permanent in 1807.
The Great Betrayal of the British People Part 3 – The Fabian War from within.
The information contained in this article has been researched by Elizabeth Beckitt, Shaun O’Connell and John Harris.
A question of the royal prerogative is the power we give the queen to govern us. She is in charge of the Judiciary, the armed forces (of which she is the commander in chief). She is in charge of the church, royal assent, chief executive, treaties and foreign relations. These powers are given to ministers to use when necessary, they cannot be used outside our constitutional laws.
In are constitution these prerogative powers are a part of the Monarch and cannot be taken from her even by an act of parliament, so in the 2005 constitutional reform act Mr Blair and the Lord Chancellor (Lord Falconer) took them over with the exception of:
1.Appointment of Prime Minister
2.Assent to legislation
3.Prorogation and dissolution of parliament (the Queen accepts ministerial advice on the use of these powers)
The prerogative power is part of her contract with the people to govern them well. In the recent case 23rd May 2007 of the people of the Chagos Archipelago island’s before the appeal court, Margaret Beckett as the foreign secretary took the case to the court of appeal after two high court judges had found for the Chagosians and told her she would have to show good cause for a stay on their judgement. Lord justice Sedley said “…by making an order in council under the royal prerogative to stop the islanders returning was unlawful and an abuse of power…” The government claimed that under the royal prerogative powers that belong to the Queen, government ministers in her name were immune from judicial scrutiny. Indeed said lord justice Waller “…the decision had been taken by a minister acting without any restraint, indeed the crown maybe doing something but if she only knew the true position, she would prefer not to do and yet it is said that the government can hide behind the crown’s prerogative…”
The storey behind this is that Harold Wilson in the 60’s removed the people from their island Diego Garcia giving the USA a lease of this island so they could set up an air base to use to bomb Iraq and Afghanistan. A strategy that even then, was set in place so the Americans could wage air strikes against Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran from a conveniently placed air base. The Fabian strategy of globalisation has been on the table for a long time. Tony Blair was the head of the Fabian Society before becoming Prime minister.
Of the three judges in the appeal court was Master of the rolls Sir Anthony Clarke who refused a stay on the effect of their judgement allowing the islanders to return immediately. The judges condemned (as repugnant) Whitehall’s decision to “…exile a whole population in the 1960’s and 70’s…” and the solicitor said “…this is now the third time that the leader of the Chagosian community in exile, has proved to the satisfaction of English judges that nothing can separate his companions from their homeland…”
The present government has claimed for itself the royal prerogative without constraint. It is now claiming the right to alter the constitution made by our ancestors and take the power to declare war when this is an example of their almost insane use of it – in terms of the Chagosians. This is against chapter 29 of Magna Carta 1215, against the power we give the Queen and against us and our contract with the monarch.
Please note the following:
In 1215 King John had been excommunicated for signing Magna Carta which proclaimed our free church and Magna Carta itself was ordered to be destroyed. In 1215 chapter 39 lays down for the king “…No free man shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled or in any way victimised, neither will we attack him or send anyone to attack him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land…” there was no law for the Chagosians to be removed from their land.
400 years later Charles 1 warned the people before a rump parliament of 58 members backed by the army that “…power without law, making laws, means no man or his property is safe…”
In 1910 barely 300 years later a liberal government which was also Fabian took the first steps to give total power to the Commons.
Asquith put forward a bill to stop the power of the lords controlling the Commons against the treason and felony act of 1848 and to put all decisions on taxation into the hands of the Commons alone, thus destroying the Fiscal Prerogative.
Edward VII then king refused it and told him to take it to the country. Asquith did so and lost his majority. Edward VII died and a new young king George V came to the throne in 1911, his adviser on the constitutional affairs is traditionally the lord chancellor, in 1911 this was Lord Lore another Fabian. king George could not have known that people standing for parliament or taking on parliamentary power (who give an oath of allegiance to the monarch and the constitution) would betray or be intent on destroying it.
So when Asquith told him that the royal assent an essential part of any bill, if it is to become law was automatic because no bill had been sent back by any monarch since the time of Queen Anne 1707-08. This frame work was never put before parliament and has been accepted ever since although it is Treason, against the sovereign and has led to the invalidation of any subsequent law. Through the 30’s Ramsey McDonald another Fabian deputy prime minister would have seen to it that no alteration was made. We have since seen under Attley a Fabian, Harold Wilson a communist (from which Fabianism derives) Tony Blair who was the head of the Fabian society and now Gordon Brown who is also a Fabian continuing the strategy to destroy the sovereignty of this country (see Arthur Toynbee’s speech of 1931)
The most urgent concern is that these people are claiming they are going to make a new Constitution to replace our Constitution (that was made by us the people) with the usual grace of untruth for the people. The prerogative power is going to be in the hands of the Commons and the people without constraint, the people do not need a new constitution they have one already that is there to protect them, we hope we do not have to fight as our ancestors did to retain it. No democracy can function securely without Constitutional safe guards. Why? Because human beings are always striving for more power, this is why we have a sovereign bound by Constitutional Laws. To make the people Sovereign would give the Commons the power they crave, they act as though they have the power now but they know it is invalid. They need to force the people to commit Treason against the constitution, for their strategy to succeed, hence a new constitution with absolutely no constraint.
No democracy can function without a Constitution we have seen historically how Lenin, Hitler and Mugabe have destroyed theirs and a Ugandan lorry driver talking on news night said “…it is no good voting for another government they simply change the constitution making a banana republic…” For example this government has had a system of demonising other sovereign nations so they can then go to war thus: Serbia, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan and aiming for Iran because their interest is not the laws that constrain them but globalisation.
In the 1911 Parliament Act (void due to automatic assent) the majority party in power has all decision over taxation. In the fiscal prerogative – all taxation is for government administration and to leave as much money in the pockets of the tax payer as possible. It is not for paying corrupt leaders in Africa. The people of this country are generous and upright and will give generously to help people in Africa through charities and other ways, nor is it to be used for wars (under our Constitutional Laws we cannot go to war against another nation unless that nation declares war on us first FACT), more surveillance equipment , Id cards and a Police State to mention but a few. (to imprison the British people within their own nation, then trick them into abolishing it)
The taxation extension of bureaucracy in this country causes inflation. The civil servants advise on flood protection was robbed of 50 million pounds to pay for government propaganda.
In the interest of making “…every body equal laws…” that have been brought in to force social mobility but they are in fact stopping social mobility. Cardinal Wolsey was more powerful than a king and was the son of a butcher. Arch bishop Cranmer who wrote much of the prayer book was the son of a blacksmith. This government by social repression is causing a paralysis of social mobility on our taxation.
Pension credits have been wiped out to the loss of pensioners that have paid tax all their lives, council tax has the cost of immigrants, assemblies and Councillors pensions of which is really a service charge. We are having to pay 200 billion a year to Europe for the honour of having fisherman’s boats destroyed, farmers having their quotas removed and VAT on nearly everything we buy. The entry into Europe itself is none existent because of the Fabians automatic assent. Even under the automatic assent they have to use the prerogative power, which cannot function against the Constitution and they are using the royal prerogative power to make a further Constitution with Europe which will give them permission to remove our Constitution and this is TREASON.
“…treason you say, that does not exist anymore after it was repealed in the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act under section 36.3…” Well here’s a fact for you – The treason law could not be repealed as it was made permanent in 1807 and backed up by The Felony and Treason Act 1848.
These are the people we have elected to represent us. They are making out that everything they are doing is legal when it is not they are basically confidence tricksters. The constraint laid down by law upon all members of Parliament (including the Prime Minister) is in the Oath of Allegiance they swear to the monarch. To act against this Oath as they did in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 is plainly TREASON. That is why they now intend to do away with the Oath. For to remove this most essential part of which is ultimately, the only way they can have a seat in Parliament, is the final phase to destroy the Queen’s Prerogative powers and make the people sovereign – thus the Commons will have ultimate power without any form of constraint. Resulting in the duped people of England handing their country to the EU on a plate.
For your reference
The limitations of royal prerogative are clear. Sir Robert Howard: “No prerogative may be recognised that is contrary to Magna Carta or any other statute, or that interferes with the liberties of the subject. The courts have jurisdiction therefore, to enquire into the existence of any prerogative, it being a maxim of the common law that the king ought to be under no man, but under God and the law, because the law makes the king. If any prerogative is disputed, the courts must decide the question of whether or not it exists in the same way as they decide any other question of law. If a prerogative is clearly established, they must take the same judicial notice of it as they take of any other rule of law.”
Blackstone pointed out that English law was superior to that of other nations because liberty under the law was the purpose of the constitution: “A right of every Englishman is that of applying to the Courts of Justice for redress of injuries. Since the law in England is the supreme arbiter of every man’s life, liberty and property, Courts of Justice must at all times be open to the subject, and the law be duly administered therein.”
The Cambridge Law Journal, 1955, referring to (now Professor Sir, QC) William Wade’s The Basis of Legal Sovereignty, said that: “sovereign legislation depends for its authority on (what Salmond calls) an ‘ultimate legal principle’, i.e.: a political fact for which no purely legal explanation can be given. If no statute can establish the rule that the courts obey (the UK) parliament, similarly no statute can alter or abolish that rule. It is above and beyond the reach of statute…because it is itself the source of the authority of statute.
Have you heard of Common Purpose? Have you heard of the Fabian Society? Did you know they are connected?
John Prescott introduced a system into England called Common Purpose. If you are not aware of Common Purpose then please read this first before continuing.
Part of the rules laid down by Common Purpose are to hold meetings to Chatham House rules. which simply means “…nothing discussed in said meeting can be discussed in any way, outside of said meeting…” Now Chatham House is also the head quarters of the Fabian Society. John Prescott is a Fabian. Now Common Purpose’s sole objective is basically to: Infiltrate, Destroy then Recreate in a Fabianistic way.
Common Purpose has members in the NHS, BBC, the police, the legal profession, the church, many of Britain’s 7,000 quangos, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries, Parliament, and it controls many RDA’s (Regional Development Agencies).
Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police officer who authorised the “Shoot to kill” policy without reference to Parliament, the law or the British Constitution. Jean de Menezes was one of the innocents who died as a result. Her shoot to kill policy still stands today.
You might be interested to know that the man who taught the Queen about Constitutional Law was a Fabian by the name of Sir Henry Martin. Sir Henry went to Balliol College Oxford with Arthur Toynbee (another Fabian) who in turn taught the late Prime Minister Edward Heath. (please note: Oxford University promotes and teaches PPE. Blair, Cameron and numerous other top MP’s have degree’s in PPE.)
Arthur Toynbee said at the 4th meeting of the conference for: International Institutions for the Scientific Study of International Relations held June 8th – 10th 1931 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
“…I will not prophesise, I will merely repeat that we are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to rest this mysterious political force called Sovereignty, out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands. because to impugn the sovereign of the local national states of the world is still heresy, for which a statesman or a publicist can be, perhaps, not quite burnt at the stake but certainly ostracized and discredited. The dragon of the local Sovereign can still use it’s teeth and claw when it is bought to bay…”
The purpose of these conferences was to: by the leap of nations international cooperation to affiliate cooperation between institutions of international affairs of different countries.
In other words – Globalisation. Lets take for example the UK. We could have chose Serbia, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, America, Canada, the list is endless but we for now concentrate on England. So what did Toynbee mean by his speech. Basically to carry on with a process started in England by Asquith in 1911 by the Parliament Act 1911 to destroy England’s Sovereignty, then it’s Democracy and it’s Constitutional Laws. Leading the people of England into believing that what they are doing is for our own good, when on the contrary they are destroying our Sovereignty and our country. Changing the constitutional laws as they go Illegally to suit their globalistic needs, resulting in the loss of our constitution and our democracy for what reason a one world empire. As reported by the Times – The Brussels bureaucrat who would be emperor. José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission
“Now what we have is the first non-imperial empire. We have 27 countries that fully decided to work together and to pool their sovereignty. I believe it is a great construction and we should be proud of it.”
In case this page gets removed which has a habit of happening. we have copied it for permanent reference.
So for all of you who haven’t quite caught up the words “…pool their sovereignty…” are the key and the proof alone. How can we pool our sovereignty? We have a monarch bound by constitutional laws – or does this mean that our government have told the EU something they haven’t told us? Are they saying that our constitution and are monarch do not exist any more? Because it certainly seems that way. Does this mean that Gordon Brown wants the people to be sovereign, So we can pool our sovereignty with the EU – in other words except foreign rule. Do you see now how fitting Toynbee’s Fabian speech was in 1931 and how it fits in perfectly to what is going on now. Can you see how these people slowly undermine and destroy sovereign countries to achieve their goal.
Our Queen is no longer head of this country, she is in fact just an illusion. This is exactly what the Fabians want and are achieving and this is TREASON. Please read this or the Sunday Express report on this subject.
The Pledge – Successive governments using automatic assent.
The Turn – Completely ignoring constitutional law but making out what they are doing is legal.
The Prestige – Sovereignty destroyed, Constitution destroyed, Democracy destroyed, England destroyed.
The Fabians in government are doing their utmost to destroy our constitution and fool us into believing, that if the people become sovereign, the people themselves will govern our country – when the reality is the people will be governed by the EU and the EU will destroy this country.
NEWS BLACKOUT ON THIS STORY AT THE TIME- CENSORED IN A FREE DEMOCRACY- LOL!
Lady of 83, student of the British Constitution – stands up against our Treasonous Government
Will We the People support her? Or, as it has become
our custom, will we turn our heads and look the other way?
By David Heatherington
The Westminster News
As one flagrant breach of the Constitution is piled onto another, Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett is one of those who is prepared to stand up and fight.
When she discovered that her council tax bill was being used as a vehicle to extract money from her for a European Union inspired regional assembly, she went on the offensive.
She launched four legal cases against the government citing erosion of the Constitution, Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust and for Treason and Legal Fraud. Each time her paperwork was sent back marked “No such case known in Law”.
Now she is refusing to pay the local tax on her Old Vicarage house in Alston, Cumbria, and has been the subject of considerable harassment by bailiffs.
Mrs. Beckett, whose father was Ronald Brymer Beckett, a High Court Judge, has researched the British Constitution and states that there are three general principles governing the system of raising money for public purposes by compelling the payment by individuals of sums of money called taxes.
1) Subjects of every state ought to contribute to the support of the Government as nearly as possible in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue that they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state. In the observation or neglect of this maximum consists what is called equality or inequality taxation.
2) The tax that each individual is bound to pay ought to be certain and not arbitrary. The time, manner and quality of the payment ought to be certain and not arbitrary, clear to the contributor and to every other person.
3) Every tax ought to be so contrived as both to take out and keep out of the pockets of the people as little as possible over and above what it brings into the public treasury of the State.
Mrs Elizabeth Beckett handing over a letter to a Police Sergent in Penrith, Cumbria, asking the Chief Constable to protect her rights under the Constitution.
Mrs, Beckett has refused to pay her council tax to Eden District Council since discovering that some of the council tax money is then illegally siphoned-off for use by the European Union to create a new regional authority under its control.
Mrs Beckett believes her rights under the British Constitution are being flouted because the local authority is attempting to coerce her into payment of the rates before she has had the opportunity to appeal the matter to a higher court.
She says she has received numerous letters from council officers and visits from bailiffs to her old vicarage home in Alston, Cumbria, where she has been threatened with forcible confiscation of her property and with bankruptcy
Mrs. Beckett, who was a District Officer’s wife in India, believes that adding onto local taxes the cost of illegal immigrants or local assemblies that are a link to the European Union, itself a body not allowed under our Constitution, is illegal. Money raised for local councils should be described as a service charge, not a Tax.
Mrs. Beckett says the adding to our Service Charges of other items stems from the 1911 Parliament Act when the Marxists, Socialists, Fabians and Sinn Fein and the Liberal Government under Asquith took the power of Taxation from the King and the scrutiny of the Lords, so that the party that gets into power can tax in any way they like without any supervision or control.
“That Act is to this day illegal, but the words used to destroy the Lords were the same words used to get rid of the Queen’s authority,” she said.
“Our Constitution is clear:
We the people hold the power (we are a democracy but we are also a Constitutional Monarchy) but for the power of Government and giving assent to Bills, we give the power known as the Royal Prerogative, to the Queen to govern. She governs in our name and according to the laws that we brought in to prevent her or the people in Parliament, from taking over power.
Unfortunately this has been done both in the 1911 Parliament Act and in the Reform of the Constitution Act of 2005 when Blair and Lord Falconer took over the power we had given to the Queen for her lifetime. They then gave to Parliament the right to decide on whether or not to go to war instead of putting the power under our laws that say we cannot go to war unless someone is attacking us.”
Last week Mrs. Becket was told by a senior civil servant that Acts of Parliament now go straight into Law. They no longer require Royal Assent because the Queen’s agreement is automatic, due to Queen Anne being the last Monarch to refuse to accept a Bill passed by both Houses.“This is not in fact true as both George III, Queen Victoria and Edward VII all sent Bills back. This is a very serious matter as it means that all Bills that have not had assent are in fact invalid. “What this government has done is take from the people their inherent power under the Constitutional Law. This is the birthright of the British people and their sovereignty under the Act of Settlement.”The fact is that the British people are now fighting a ‘war from within.’
The strategy of our enemies is:
1.To abolish the Monarchy and all ordered government.
2.To abolish private property.
3.To abolish patriotism and nationalism.
4.To abolish the family unit.
5.To abolish organised religion.
I am not a citizen of Europe, I am an English subject, so I am an Englishman.
I am not a citizen of Europe, I am an English subject, so I am an Englishman. There is a great deal of difference between me and the people who govern us. For I will never say a loyal oath to another country or organisation, nor will I override the solemn oath I owe to the Crown and my country. A loyalty to my country that cannot and will not be divided or shared. John Harris
When you were born an English person (no matter what heritage your parents are) you were born with “Birthrights” that cannot be removed.
We are subjects of the crown we are not citizens this is our birthright as are the constitutional laws, that are there to protect us. We do have a constitution and it is about time that the people of England realised this.
Every constitution in the world was based on ours, this was not done by accident this was done on purpose – for this is the only way democracy can survive. We have been led to believe that we do not have a constitution but they seem to forget ours is the mother of all constitution’s. For to destroy democracy across the world, you have to first destroy the very place it all began – destroy the source and the rest will crumble. Why do you think they are so eager to destroy us?
By repeatedly saying our constitution does not exist they have duped the majority of the English people into believing this. So if this is the case why are there so many people not paying TV license fees and are not being prosecuted for it? Why can you still use a Statutory Declaration to over turn a ruling in a court of law against you? If they did not uphold the law of the land (common law) when you were prosecuted without your knowledge. How can people overturn congestion charge fines, parking fines any fine given to them without first being put before a court of law?
The reason is simple we still have Common Law written in the form of a constitution. That is why we can still do these things. This is not something magical, this is law that exists and has existed for hundreds of years – if it doesn’t exist, how could we possibly use it? The fact is: you do not know it is there for you to use, which coins the phase “knowledge is power” for that is exactly what it is.
The constitutional laws and being subjects of the Crown are birthrights, which in turn allows us to use these laws to there full effect, when we are presented or prosecuted under laws that belong to a foreign power i.e. the EU. These laws have no place in this kingdom nor do they possess any power over us. We do not have to abide by them, we do not have to follow them, all we need to do is follow true English Law and that will protect us. But we all have to make a solemn oath to follow this and unite to help each other and pledge our allegiance. For when we are born although none of us actually say the oath of allegiance out loud, we are bound by it, just as if we had said it. We cannot opt out of this and nor can it be removed from us, this happens because we were born in the great country of England.
We are turning our backs on our country and our fellow countrymen and women, because we have been led to believe that we have no constitutional laws to protect us. People are just excepting what the government say as being true and not contesting it. Sorry to burst your bubble but they are just confidence tricksters who live in a world of make believe.
They can not legally introduce a new constitution for we already have one that was made by the people for the people. Ask yourself this: “why would we, the people of England, want a constitution which was not written by a English person?” Well, why?
With unity of the English people comes the ability to use common law to it’s full affect. To be able to do this we must stand side by side and demand that our law is not abolished – I say our Law, because it does in fact belong to us. It does not belong to The Commons, The Lords or even the Queen they are our “civil servants” – the clue is in servants for that is exactly what they are. They are our servants, we are not theirs, hence the name, it is about time we all realised this. All three parts mentioned including the Queen are bound by constitutional restraint, they cannot act against it. Just because they have and continue to do so does not make what they are doing lawful, remember this!
Because the judiciary is as corrupt as the government (remember who controls it) it is getting harder to stand up in a court of law in England now and try to use Common Law on your own. It is still possible as I will prove in a while, but is becoming more difficult. You need people to back you up, unite with you and your cause and demand that The Common Law, is not only abided by but is allowed to be the only law you can be tried under. Many people are trying to do this and some are still successful but these cases are, I’m afraid to say, few and far between. So more of us must learn how to use our Laws, so the education must start.
A Statutory Declaration is quite easy to obtain as I have recently proven. Bailiffs called at my house to remove property to pay for a £30 fine I had refused to pay, after asking to be tried in a court of law. My rights for a trial were not given to me, resulting in case being heard without my knowledge. The bailiffs decided to remove a £5000 van in respect of it being sold to recover the £30 plus numerous charges that amounted to me owing them over £400. So I allowed them remove my van knowing full well I could get it back without paying a single penny.
The next day I rang Watford Magistrates court and made an application with Hemel Hempstead magistrates court for a Statutory Declaration. (part of our Constitutional Law) I went to the court and filled in the Declaration telling them exactly what had happened and the magistrate signed it allowing me to get my vehicle back and I didn’t pay a penny. Still to this day I have not heard from the court about the original £30 fine.
The full storey concerning this matter will be published by us very soon.
So my point is this: Even though they profess to have changed the law and profess that we do not have a constitution, why could I use the very law they say doe’s not exist. Law I used to over turn a ruling against me. A ruling I might add that was totally against our Common Law. Surely this Law couldn’t of magically just have appeared of course not, this has been in force for a long time, part of a set of laws provided for our protection.
By uniting we can apply pressure upon the judiciary, which in turn applies pressure against the people abusing the law in the first place. We as a nation have always stood side by side, brothers in arms for what we believe in. That unity has been destroyed by our government, the character of the English people has been changed. So now is the time for change of another sort, now is the time to stand up and be counted, now is the time to say “I am English and I am proud of it” we are not being racist by saying this, I am an Englishman for I was born in England, if this is not correct then please tell me why?
As individuals they will not listen to us but united they will have to for we possess something they need, something that is their life line, for without it they are nothing. What do we possess? We possess MONEY. For without this commodity they cannot carry on with financing this fiasco they call government in this country. Taxation as we have proven on our home page and subsequent articles is invalid and illegal. They rely on our tax money, and rely on these illegal taxes to pursue their dark need to destroy this country.
The trouble is until we all revolt and refuse to pay, this farce will just continue and I promise you it is only going to get worse. People in England because of the changes to our character will not for some reason open their eye’s to what is going on. Is the English way now just to moan, whimper and look the other way, about the changes and the amount of money we have to pay out? Because it certainly seems that way. Where has our fighting spirit gone, if I came to you and demanded money from you for a reason that was not legal, what would you say or do? I can only guess what the answer would be and even if you didn’t call the boy’s in blue, I know you would not give me a penny. So why do you pay the government? Why do you continually pay liars and thieves?
If you cannot answer these questions then I shall answer them for you. The reason why you still pay is FEAR, and if you can pay you just don’t CARE. That is the problem in a nut shell, one section of the country, keep paying even though they struggle too, because of the fear that if they don’t pay no one will stand by them to fight in their corner. Which leads us into the next section who can pay but just don’t care. I thought we were a caring nation, I thought that is what England stands for, caring for those in need. It always used to be, people looked out for each other and helped each other, so what has happened? Our character again has been changed, talk to people about these subjects and you will get one of two reactions FEAR or I don’t CARE and that’s it point blank.
This is why TPUC was born, to create unity within the English people. A organisation dedicated to raising funds and building support for those in need. Standing up for our rights and liberties and creating unity with the ability to help one another. To create a network of individuals with all types of skills, who are prepared to use their skills to help people for no personal gain. Creating a stronghold of English people who will not bow down to the oppressors in government, and their ludicrous laws and taxation. A network of people who are prepared to build up relations with like minded people across the world, who we will need as a our allies and they will need us as their allies, to reinstate democracy across the world.
We are a network of positive people who will not succumb to the negative around us. We will never give up on our country, nor it’s people. We offer truth, help and support to anyone who requires it, for this is the very foundation TPUC was built upon. We will never turn our backs or look the other way, for it is our obligation to help. It is our obligation to care, and it is our obligation to stand up for what you believe in. Unite with each other and find once again the true meaning and spirit of being English, for as long as the spirit of the English people exists, England can never be destroyed.
A new system is needed, so a new system must be built but to do this we must regress. We must regress back in time and rebuild a new system based on the old true values. Values that have been long forgot by the many but still reside in the hearts of the few. History is the key to our success as it holds all the clues to the future. We are the architects of the future, with history as our guide we can build the new system with the values of the true English way. We must do this to protect future generations from exactly what has happened to us. We must set in place a system that will never allow this to happen again to our great country and who must do this? We the people must do this.
In our recent articles entitled: The Great Betrayal of the British People parts one to three, we have portrayed a picture of our Queen, listed as a traitor, along side four other traitors. These people were named as traitors for the sole reason that they have signed all the treaties abolishing our country to the EU.
The last article published under this name, dealt with the Fabians intent to destroy this country. Also that our monarch the Queen was unaware that previous monarchs before her had sent back bills stopping them from becoming law. This is mainly based on the fact that her ministers have misled her, for they are from whom she receives her advice on concerning changes to law.
As Asquith said in 1911 “the royal assent was automatic”, does this mean our Queen has never actually signed anything? But surely if she has never signed anyone of the treaties, then why did she end up in court, along with her fellow traitors? The answer to this I feel is simple, maybe she did sign all the treaties so the Fabians had it cast in iron in case the royal assent concerning the treaties signed was put under scrutiny at any time. Maybe they convinced her that she must sign all treaties but bills put before her have no need for a signature. In reality we might never know what has occurred concerning these issues but what I do know is she has failed in her duty as our head of state and our protector to protect us and I cannot believe for one minute she doesn’t realise what is happening to our country.
Another aspect as well we have to consider is the fact she could possibly be in on the Fabians desire to destroy us. The mere fact the title our lady of Europe has been reserved for her makes you wonder. Prince Charles also has the title prince of Europe reserved as well. This points to the fact the royal family are in on what is happening. To further this why would John Major stand up in the Commons, after the signing of the Maastricht Treaty 7th February 1992 and say “the Queen is now a citizen of Europe”? For surely you cannot be a Monarch and a Citizen at the same time, especially considering the citizenship is of a foreign power.
I personally found it hard to accuse the Queen of being a traitor to this country, but I knew it had to be done to invoke the reaction to be able to access both sides of the story. Concerning the first part of this article I refer to my solemn oath to the Crown and country. This is an oath I stand by and I always will but I must add this, I am gravely disappointed with the conduct of our Queen. So something we must all ask ourselves now is this question?
(1) Is it now time for a new Monarch to reside over this country as it’s ruler, protector and head of state? A Monarch who will abide by the constraints of the constitution. A Monarch who will give the power back to lords, who will use the power of dissolution to remove the dictatorship from the Commons. A Monarch who will rule us with integrity, grace and fairness but above all else never allow a foreign power to destroy this country. A Monarch who will never accept that the royal assent is automatic. A Monarch who will not only recognise our constitution but a Monarch who will never let it be destroyed.
If a new monarch is required then I am afraid they cannot come from the Windsor household, as I fear none of them have the backbone to stand up to the Fabians in government. I also fear none of them have the loyalty needed to defend this country, for if they did we would not be in this dire mess, that we now find ourselves in.
The solemn oath to Crown and Country I owe as an Englishman, will never be divided or shared but for this to work, I need my Monarch to honour her oath (Coronation Oath) to this country and it’s constitutional laws. For as an Englishman I have sworn to defend my country and the people of my country. Alas my oath to my Queen is now in jeopardy as she has broken the contract she signed with me in 1953. My heart is saddened by this fact but never the less, it is true. If my Queen is willing to step centre stage and stop the destruction of England, then in turn my Oath will be restored in full. For part of being English is to offer the hand of clemency, as long as the person you offer it to, corrects their ways.
The Windsor family have a lot to prove if they want to stay where they are. For if they are not willing to stand by their people, their country and their constitutional laws, then a new line to the throne must be found who will.
This refusenik won’t pay tax to ‘insolvent body’, and nor should we.
This refusenik won’t pay tax to ‘insolvent body’, and nor should we.
John Kelly, a retired engineer from Exmouth, Devon, is a cussed fellow. For three years he has withheld part of his council tax because he objects to it being given to what he regards as an “insolvent body”. Twice he has been taken to court, and five times visited by the bailiffs, but so far not a penny has he handed over.
The South West Regional Assembly (SWRA) is one of those parts of John Prescott’s legacy left high and dry when an elected assembly was rejected in the North-East. Prescott set up eight unelected assemblies, as part of his plan to divide England under regional governments, hoping to have them legitimised as democratically elected bodies in referendums.
Despite the massive thumbs down to this idea, his assemblies are still in being, costing us all £360 million a year. They have been given statutory planning powers, including the right to compulsory purchase. But without democratic legitimacy, their status looks questionable, as Mr Kelly has tried to highlight.
In particular he focused on the fact that his own assembly, the SWRA, took on 50 employees, including a liability to fund their pensions. If regional assemblies are to be abolished, as the Tories half-promise to do, who will pick up that bill? The SWRA has no assets. Technically, therefore, it is what accountants call an “insolvent body”, to which it is not right, Mr Kelly argues, to give ratepayers’ money.
Faced with this anomaly, the SWRA linked up with two other bodies, the South West Local Government Association and the South West Provincial Employers Organisation (SWPEO), which runs training schemes for local employers. These three were given a shared secretariat, and it was then claimed that, because the other bodies did have assets, these would cover any pension liability.
In 2004, however, the Certification Officer, the watchdog on employers’ associations, questioned this arrangement. In February the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) confirmed that “there has not been a formal amalgamation of the SWPEO, the SWRA or any other body”, and that the Certification Officer was still looking into the matter.
When I put this to the SWRA, the reply on behalf of its chief executive, Bryony Holden – who said she was now chief executive of all three bodies – might have come from a different planet. For a start she denies that the SWRA has any employees at all.
They all now work for the “secretariat” that manages the affairs of all three bodies. The SWRA therefore has “no pension liability”. (Last year, in a letter to a local MEP, she stated that it had a “£1 million liability”.) Even though the SWRA doesn’t have a pension liability, the letter went on, one of the other three bodies has “ring-fenced” assets of £2.3 million, just in case a “future pension liability” should arise.
All this might sound plausible if the PAC had not determined that no legal merger between the three bodies has taken place. The Certification Officer confirmed last week that his enquiries are “still ongoing”.
Mr Kelly therefore continues to say he will be happy to pay his council tax when his council can prove that its contributions to the SWRA are properly authorised. The bailiffs still haven’t removed any of his goods, even though his debt after three years totals £838.
Meanwhile, the unelected SWRA continues to exercise its statutory powers, such as its plan, which has provoked uproar in Bath, to force the local council to accept an additional 15,500 houses around the city, many of them on green belt land. And if the people of Bath don’t agree with the diktats of this unelected body, what are they democratically supposed to do about it?
Without a constitution the Galileo project crashes
How would the millions of owners of Navstar tracking devices, using free signals provided by the US government’s global positioning satellites, feel if they had to pay a tax to the EU to help fund its own rival satellite system, Galileo? This is what would happen under the latest proposal from Brussels to bail out the most ambitious technical project the EU has ever embarked on.
Galileo was designed to establish the EU as a space superpower in its own right, and would pay for itself, in three ways. It could be used, first, to run an EU-wide road charging system; second, to charge all aircraft using EU air space, the famous “Single European Sky”; and, third, to sell missiles and other satellite-based weapons systems to China and other countries, making them dependent on Galileo.
All that member states such as Britain would have to do was put up the initial research and development funding – our bill is now approaching £500 million – and the money would then pour in. But one after another those funding schemes have fallen apart.
Galileo-based road charging proved technically unworkable. Charging airlines for using EU air space would have provoked retaliation from the US and others. The Chinese, having been made full partners in Galileo for a knock-down price, walked off with the technological know-how to set up a GPS system of their own.
The commercial consortia set up to run and pay for Galileo, seeing their potential sources of income dry up, pulled out. The only hope left, according to a “Communication” just put out by the E uropean C ommission, is to impose a levy on every satellite receiver sold in the EU, to pay for what has become its biggest white elephant.
There is another problem. The EU hasn’t actually got the legal power yet to operate a GPS system. It was due under the EU’s aborted constitution, which is one reason why they are so keen to get some version of it back on track. But why bother?
Galileo now seems so doomed that we may have to write off the £500 million we have spent on it, as just another of what our Government likes to call the “self-evident benefits” of Britain’s EU membership.
The fastest voters in the West
One of the wonders of modern democracy is the voting system in the EU Parliament. Most of the time, voting by the 785 MEPs in their vast glass and concrete chamber in Strasbourg is by show of hands. But on contentious issues they vote electronically. Visitors gaze in awe as MEPs punch away frenziedly at buttons, deciding issues they know nothing about, according to detailed lists supplied by their whips. In this way, as many as 1,500 amendments have been dealt with in 90 minutes. Thus are the laws that govern us made.
A keen student of this system is Graham Booth, a Ukip MEP, who describes a typical occasion this month when an amendment on a report on “EU Partnership in the Horn of Africa” was said to have been “rejected” on a show of hands. A call for an electronic vote proved that, on the contrary, the motion had been accepted – by 567 votes to 17. The chairman blamed this discrepancy on MEPs not “holding their hands high enough”.
When Mr Booth and a Czech colleague last year presented the president of the parliament with a list of similar blunders, calling for electronic voting to be mandatory, it was pointed out that the average two seconds longer needed to record each vote electronically might cause MEPs to miss their lunch or even their flights home. Naturally, lunch won over democracy.
Is it starting to sink in now? They have used Fabians techniques to destroy our country, by Fabian leaders. England is going to be abolished, and it has been done illegally. Stand up now and be counted and stop paying your Poll Tax Completely. It is Illegal, it is corrupt, and it is one of the ways we are paying to destroy our own country.
Stop Paying today as John Kelly is doing. Regional Assembly links:
•East of England Regional Assembly
•East Midlands Regional Assembly
•North East Assembly
•North West Regional Assembly
•Yorkshire and Humber Assembly
•South East England Regional Assembly
•South West Regional Assembly
•West Midlands Regional Assembly
•English Regions Network
Find out what area you are in, and what the EU have planned for your area.
We have recently been contacted by an 83 year old lady by the name of Elizabeth Becket, a lady who point blank refuses to pay her poll tax because as she say’s ‘it is Illegal’. Elizabeth has been threatened by Bailiffs, who have threatened to remove her belongings, and to break in to her house to do this.
Elizabeth is a frail old lady who cannot walk and has to use a wheel chair, she receives very little money from her pensions, but is still expected to pay Poll Tax. Like us Elizabeth knows that the Poll Tax system is illegal, and we will be covering this whole issue in the next few day’s, and gearing up our new campaign which we hope will show everyone in the UK why they should stop paying Poll Tax immediately!!!
More news items you should know about.
Household tax bills could be calculated on how much rubbish people throw away under plans unveiled by ministers this week, with families facing face fines if they fail to store food scraps in “slop buckets”.
The measures are expected to be contained in the Government’s long-awaited waste strategy document, to be launched by Environment Secretary David Miliband.
Mr Miliband is desperate to reduce the country’s waste mountain by encouraging people to recycle more and throw away less.
Local authorities could be allowed to introduce schemes that rewarded households for behaving in a “green” fashion, with one suggestion being that prolific recyclers receive council tax rebates.
According to the Sunday Times, Mr Miliband will set out recommendations that councils send food waste to “anaerobic digesters” – which would produce methane that can then be burnt for energy.
They may be allowed to punish people who do not save up their scraps for use in the process.
He is also likely to suggest that giant incinerators be used to “cleanly” burn more than a fifth of the rubbish that cannot be recycled.
Comment by mark Gittoes.
I personally think this is totally ridiculas, and yet again another way for local governments and councils to take even more money out of the British families pockets.
I also think that they haven’t thought this through at all, as with the seems of things, households with three occupants will be forced to recycle the same amount as a household with six occupants, you know the maths just don’t add up, the pounds will in someone’s pocket though.
INSPIGHT OF PAYING HIGH UNLAWFUL COUNCIL TAXES FOR REFUSE COLLECTION- IN LONDON NOW RESIDENTS HAVE TO PAY UPTO £90 A YEAR EXTRA TO HAVE THEIR GREEN GARDEN RUBBISH TAKEN AWAY- ALREADY PAID? WHO CARES WHEN SERFS JUST SAY YES, YES, YES MASTER!!
LONDON SEEMS TO BE THE TEST AREA- BEFORE IT SPREADS ACROSS THE UK- IMMIGRANTS DON’T KNOW OUR LAWS- OUR REAL ENGLISH LAWS NOT THE FAUX EUSSR ONES!
Fifty reasons to leave the EU
We joined the EU (EEC) in 1972. After 38 years inside we now know:
1. The European Union’s six constitutional treaties build a dictatorship.
2. The EU has the laws of a police state – enforced after the Lisbon Treaty, from 1st January 2009.
3. The EU’s 120,000 regulations will bring us a soviet style command economy and abject poverty.
4. Unelected EU dictators will control the nuclear weapons of former nations of Britain and France.
5. The EU ‘s six treaties will compel us to hand over all our armed forces to the EU.
6. Our armed forces and police have been told they will swear a new oath to the EU, or be fired.
7. The EU’s 120,000 regulations will rigidly control our personal lives – more than any nation in history.
8. EU regulations now cost us £100 billion a year. (Better Regulation Commission annual report 2005)
9. When enforced, those regulations will destroy most of our 4.5 million small businesses.
10. Up to 13.5 million will be unemployed after EU regulations close small businesses.
11. The 120,000 regulations will make us subject to continual arrest (SOCPA 2005).
12. There are now 3,095 “Crimes against the EU state” on the British statute book.
13. We will be stopped on the street for continual checks on our EU ID cards after 2009.
14. The EU’s Constitutional treaties replaced the British Constitution on 1st January 2009.
15. The EU treaties will close our Westminster Parliament after its 5 years expire on 5th May 2010.
16. The EU’s Road Pricing and then ID chips will keep the state informed of our exact position.
17. Huge taxes/fines by the EU’s Road Pricing, Congestion Charging and global warming policies.
18. The EU Regionalisation Plan will abolish England and our 48 counties in favour of 9 EU regions.
19. The 9 EU regions will report direct to Brussels, not to Westminster, which will be defunct.
20. The EU Regionalisation Plan will abolish our 19,579 councillors.
23. British common law mainly replaced by EU corpus Juris by 1992. Government is now above the law.
21. Police have shot 30 innocent people dead since 1992 and have not been successfully prosecuted.
22. 1,100 deaths in police custody since 1992 and no successful prosecutions.
24. Police Shoot to Kill policy now in force; illegal under British common law, OK under EU corpus juris.
25. EU conceived in Germany from 22nd June 1940 as the EEC – speech by Hermann Goering.
26. First EEC conference Berlin University 1942, 13 nation summit Berlin 1943 run by von Ribbentrop
27. After fall of Germany, the Germans switched the EU from a Nazi to a communist basis in1946.
28. Hitler’s Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence Department (DVD) still controls EU development.
29. Edward Heath, Geoffrey Rippon, Roy Jenkins recruited by the DVD in 1958 as saboteurs.
30. DVD has arranged finance to put pro-EU ownerships into British newspaper groups.
31. EU has been sabotaging Britain with German Frankfurt School techniques since the 1950’s.
33. The EU’s main subversive organisation in Britain, Common Purpose, was run from the ODPM.
34. The EU’s Common Purpose has trained 30,000 local leaders for “the post democratic era”
35. Common Purpose has been inside the NHS for 20 years, controls it, and has wrecked it.
36. Common Purpose has 400 staff inside the BBC censoring out anti-EU news and and current affairs.
37. Common Purpose has staff in hundreds of local newspapers censoring out anti-EU news
38. Common Purpose is transferring power from councillors to the unelected council executives.
39. Common Purpose has built the EU gravy trains inside local and national government.
40. Common Purpose has built most of Britain’s 8,500 quangos costing us £167 billion pa
41. These quangos bribe compliant, pro EU local officials and businessmen with £150,000+ salaries.
42. EU quangos are the reason your council tax is going through the roof.
43. The EU is utterly corrupt and cannot account for 95% of its expenditure (yes, ninety five % lost)
44. The EU has over 200,000 offshore bank accounts from which it pays bribes.
45. We now lose £45 billion a year trading with the EU. Outside, we had an even balance of payments.
46. EU Constitution is similar to the Soviet. And EU Commissioners similar to Soviet Politburo members.
47. The EU parliament is a sham with no power – just like the old Soviet parliament.
48. The leadership of the Conservative Party has been controlled by the EU since the 1960’s.
49. The Labour and Lib Dem leaderships EU controlled for 20 years – that’s why your vote doesn’t count.
50. The Amsterdam Treaty 1997 gave the EU control of our immigration, now running at 2.6 million pa.
51. Our infrastructure can’t cope with the 10 million immigrants the EU has let in since 1997.
52. 380,000 highly qualified British emigrate annually to escape from the EU and its overcrowding.
There are actually a lot more. I read a book with 101 reasons to leave the EU!
STOP BLAMING GERMANY AND GERMANS!!
IN A SPEECH given to the Israeli Knesset on March 19, 2008, Germany’s Chancellor, Angela Merkel, reiterated the decades-old reparations doctrine by saying: “Germans are filled with shame over the Jewish holocaust.”
The German media is now reporting that many Germans, particularly young people who no longer believe their teachers, are suffering from “holocaust fatigue” and no longer trust Berlin’s Zionist puppets, such as Angela Merkel, to tell them the truth. Yet even those who are brave enough to commit “heresy” and risk the wrath of the Jewish Inquisition are forced to whisper their dissent using coded language lest thy find themselves in a German Soviet Gulag, such as Mannheim.
Germany under its Zionist controlled leaders has now reached the point in which certain words used in German society will make one highly suspect. In Europe’s dissenting underground community these words are known as “Germany’s forbidden words.”
PUTTING A MUZZLE ON THE MOUTHS OF GERMANS
HIGHLY CHARGED WORDS which are monitored by the Zionist thought police express the true inner thoughts of most Germans. There are 5 words that could get a German in trouble:
1) “Leitkultur” – This word denotes the “predominant culture” of German and European social mores which most Germans wish to retain as part of their Germanic culture.
An example of the fallout which occurred after using the forbidden word “Leitkultur” was evidenced when Friedrich Merz, a former leading member of the Christian Democratic Union, used the term “Leitkultur von Deutschland” to describe what immigrants coming to Germany should aspire to.
Merz inspired, (as did Jurgen Molleman of the Free Democrats who is believed to have been “suicided” by Mossad in June 2003), an awakening German patriotism by striking a chord in a country where acceptance of “Alleinschuld,” (German guilt for WWII), continually propagated by Germany’s Jews and Zionist-leadership, is on the wane.
Merz’s use of the word “Leitkultur” sparked an intense national debate among ordinary people who long for a return to traditional German Christian values.
Leaders of the Zionist Jewish community attacked Merz with a vengeance. The German Jewish community leader, Paul Spiegel, the former President of the ADL-style Zentralrat der Juden in Deutschland, facetiously asked 200,000 people gathered at the disingenuously named We Stand Up for Humanity and Tolerance demonstration held in Berlin on November 9, 2000:
— “What’s all this talk of Leitkultur? Does German Leitkultur include hunting down foreigners and burning synagogues? Are we talking about a culture or about the prevailing values of democracy as stated in our national constitution?
“For Article One of that constitution states: ‘The dignity of mankind is inviolable. The duty of national power is its protection.’ Now the dignity of mankind is inviolable not just the dignity of European Christians!” —
(Read the full speech translated by Hanna Sachs Here
GERMANY WAS STRIPPED OF ALL POWER AFTER WW2!!!
BRITISH PEOPLE- WHAT POWER HAVE WE GOT IN REALITY?