Bye Bye England!! Number of secondary school children from ethnic minorities soars by 57% in ten years

Todays phone in at LBC immigrant kids outnumber white kids in our schools..Black callers said: “whats the problem with that”
Nick the presentor- gave some pathetic reply.

What was the problem when white folk were taking control in parts of Africa, after all – whats the problem with that?

Without a shot fired England has become a foreign country, conquered while the indigenous people were told to be tolerant- in other words PUT UP WITH IT.

White Europeans are forbidden to have their own countries..Americans are quickly learning that lesson.too late!

Retired ONS officer now living in Australia I recall saying…Stats should always be doubled sometimes trebled to get the correct stats.

Number of secondary school children from ethnic minorities soars by 57% in ten years

Study author describes ‘irrevocable change’
Trend seen right across England

In Tower Hamlets, pupils from ethnic minorities make up more than 80%

By Kate Loveys

Last updated at 1:33 AM on 17th November 2011

Comments (193)

White British pupils have become a minority in many secondary schools in England, according to a study.

The research found that the number of ethnic minority pupils has sharply risen by 57 per cent in ten years.

In some areas, including inner London boroughs, up to 67 per cent – just over two thirds – are from ethnic minorities.
Study: Black and Asian pupils now outnumber white children in London schools. Experts have warned of ‘very high’ levels of segregation (file picture)
In some individual secondary schools, the figure rises to 98 per cent of pupils, said the survey by King’s College London. The trend is seen right across England, showing that ethnic minority families are moving out of town centres to the suburbs.

Professor Chris Hamnett, a geographer who conducted the study, said the increase is not due to children who have recently arrived but pupils who were born in England.

He said patterns of birth rates indicate that the proportion of ethnic minority pupils will continue to increase in future decades. Such changes have become a lasting feature of the ethnic make-up of England’s population, added the professor.

He said his data reveals a ‘very substantial’ shift in the population, representing an ‘irrevocable’ change.
Surge: The percentage of ethnic minority pupils in 1999 compared to 2009
The study examined the changing demographics of schools from 1999 to 2009 following decades of migration to this country.

The 57 per cent increase in ethnic minority pupils came as the overall secondary school population rose 4.7 per cent.

There has also been a slight decline in the number of white pupils, a figure which also includes migrants from Eastern Europe.

Across the country, the proportion of ethnic minority pupils has risen in a decade from 11.5 per cent to 17 per cent.

Professor Hamnett forecasts that it is set to continue increasing to 20 per cent. He found that London has the highest proportion of ethnic minority pupils at 67 per cent.
Segregation: Brick Lane in the London area of Tower Hamlets. More than 90 per cent of pupils there are from an ethnic minority background
The capital was followed by Slough with 64 per cent, Leicester at 58 per cent, Birmingham at 52 per cent and Luton with 51 per cent. Manchester and Bradford both have 43 per cent.
There are also wide differences in the ethnic breakdowns of schools in different parts of the country.

In places such as Knowsley, near Liverpool, Cumbria and Durham, fewer than two per cent of secondary pupils are from ethnic minorities.

In the London boroughs of Brent, Tower Hamlets and Newham, the figure is above 80 per cent.

In primary schools, the government’s annual school census this year showed that 862,735 children, more than a quarter of pupils, are from an ethnic minority. The figure is up from 22 per cent in 2007.

When Labour took power in 1997, the total was 380,954. In Newham, only eight per cent of primary pupils are from a white British background.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062317/Number-black-Asian-children-London-schools-overtakes-white-pupils-time.html#ixzz1dxeqs6WL

Cannot express how bad i feel for the white populations living in the parts of the country with the highest %. I live in the North East (apparently the least effected) and i thought the primary schools here were bad! So many children not even able to speak English and so the education of the rest of the English-speaking students is put on hold whilst the teacher spends the majority of his/her time, on the impossible task of trying to explain an English lesson, to a child who doesn’t know the word ‘dog’ from ‘lamp’. I can’t even begin to imagine what it must be like in the likes of London, what a mess. I will always love my country, but the pride i used to feel for belonging to it has all but gone now.
– Not impressed, Newcastle Upon Tyne, 16/11/2011 22:45

I live in a “majority-minority” area in the USA. If you think skin color will not matter to the new majority, you are in for a shock. The native English will be blamed for every conceivable ill suffered by the new majority. If your hard work results in personal gain, your success will be seen as the result of racism and privilege. Quotas will have to be established to address the “disparate impact” in results caused by the legacy of English discrimination. You will be seen as the source of everyone else’s problems. In short, you will be the new Jews. Enjoy the fruits of Diversity!!
– BigRebel, Mississippi, USA, 16/11/2011 22:38

lol..the new jews- wasn’t it jews behind multiculturalism both in Europe and Amerika?

I challenge anybody to give ONE reason how this is a good thing for the country in ANY way – any takers?
– Tom, London, 16/11/2011 22:38

The races that integrate help to mitigate the issue somewhat – but there’s a hard-core that never will integrate and will eventually erode the values, beliefs and history of the UK. Although it seems to spell the end of the white British society, I don’t think there is a thing that can be done to prevent it. Labour have done the damage but even that, it appears, doesn’t make them unelectable. There’s a place for some immigration – but not when it overturns the indidgious peoples and their values.
– Sar, Belgium, 16/11/2011 22:37

Did you vote Labour? Thanks a lot, traitor.
– Peter, London, 16/11/2011 22:33

Humm…”ethnic minorities” eh? Based on these percentages it’s now the White indigenous population that’s the minority! I truly worry for my children’s future in this ruined country & god forbid anyone who tries to speak out…
– SQUEEZED MIDDLE, Home Counties UK, 16/11/2011 22:30

MAKE THE MAJORITY INTO A MINORITY AND NEVER ALLOW THEM TO BECOME THE MAJORITY AGAIN…SOME LEFT WING PROF IN EUROPE!

BASED ON THE REAL UK POPULATION OF 80 MILLION PLUS SINCE 2007- JUGGLE THE FIGURES AROUND TO REACH ANYWHERE NEAR THE TRUTH!

WARS KILLING OFF WHITES- VERY CONVENIENT!

7 responses to “Bye Bye England!! Number of secondary school children from ethnic minorities soars by 57% in ten years

  1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062317/Number-black-Asian-children-London-schools-overtakes-white-pupils-time.html

    Humm…”ethnic minorities” eh? Based on these percentages it’s now the White indigenous population that’s the minority! I truly worry for my children’s future in this ruined country & god forbid anyone who tries to speak out…
    – SQUEEZED MIDDLE, Home Counties UK, 16/11/2011 22:30

    KEEPING QUIET HELPED DIDN’T IT- HELPED THE COMMIES IN WESTMINSTER TO CHANGE WHAT WAS YOUR COUNTRY- INTO NOBODYS LAND ….GET BACK TO WORK TAXES NEEDED TO EDUCATE YOUR FUTURE OPPRESSORS!!

  2. LIBLABCON CONNED YOU ALL!

    Yes it’s the successive Governments, that have allowed this non-white immigration to flourish since the end of world war 2. But they’ve also encouraged white women to gain careers and put off having children, or to just have 1 or 2. Why is no other racial group encouraged to breed more responsibility? It all leaves a nasty taste in my mouth anyway and I worry what the future will bring.
    – Paul, Shropshire’ England, 16/11/2011 22:05

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062317/Number-black-Asian-children-London-schools-overtakes-white-pupils-time.html#ixzz1dxkEGT1R

    WHEN SENDING BRITISH CHILDREN OFF ALONE TO AUSTRALIA ETC- JUST AFTER WW2- THE GOVERNMENT WAS IMPORTING MALES FROM OUTSIDE OF EUROPE…SECRETLY!

    BET YOU STILL THINK GERMANY CAUSED WW2?

  3. THINK TODAYS MIDDLE EAST WARS..THEN READ ON..

    Therefore it was clear, in the light of the two world wars and their outcome in each case, that any war undertaken by “the West” against “Communism” would in fact be fought for the primary purpose of supplying the Zionist state with new inhabitants from Russia; that any Middle East war in which the West engaged would be waged for the primary purpose of enlarging the territory of the Zionist state, to accommodate this larger population; and that the two wars would effectively merge into one, in the course of which this dominant purpose would remain hidden from the embroiled masses until it was achieved, and confirmed by some new “world instrument”, at the fighting’s end.

    LIBLABCONS CONNED YOU ALL….

    http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/TheClimacteric3.htm

  4. Barbara Lerner Spectre is an Israeli activist, born American, who some ten years ago with a grant from the European Jewish Fund and the Swedish government founded a Jewish ‘study-institute’ with the name “PAIDEIA”..She says in an interview on Israeli IBA-News: 

”Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we [Jews] are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies [sic] that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multi-cultural mode,and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” The “European Jewish Fund” states on their homepage, that the organization is opposed to Jewish assimilation. In other words, multiculturalism is only for the goyim, not for Jews.

    LIBLABCON SERVING ZIONISTS NOT YOU!

    Excerpt from EJF homepage:
    “About the Fund – The Fund is also focused on addressing such serious threats to Jewish life in Europe as assimilation, anti-Semitism and racism. Assimilation is without a doubt an existential threat to European Jewry that is becoming ever graver. The threat must be addressed in a serious manner with programs that are aimed at reconnecting people with Jewish life.”

    

So putting those two Jewish org. partners together, as one entity, we find an organization doing everything they can to subvert the national identities of Europa, yet at the same time being active in striving to retain Jewish culture and national identity(i.e. Zionism). Talk about double standards, or as we say it in Swedish – ‘dubbelmoral [‘double-morality].



    The interview declaration also raises the question, why the woman activist can’t see the direct connection between the multicultural society she strives for – with it’s mass importation of Muslims – and the increase of Jew-hate,which now here in Sweden have become such a significant problem, that Jews are emigrating to Israel or other countries?

    The question comes to mind, if the woman thinks she has been given a license from Jehova to rule us ‘ĺower standing’ beings, as slaves to the Jews? Maybe Mrs. Spectre could inform us lesser human beings, why it is necessary to destroy all Christian European ethnic countries but all other ethnic countries (Asian, African, Arab — except Palestinian! etc. and especially Jewish) are OK?

    How is this not HATRED?




Mrs. Spectre´s subversive work also raise the question, if this kind of fanatical Zionist Jews (of whatever sex), once more in history will get their hands on the bayonets and rifle-triggers, to administer the new gulags and the new prospective genocides, exactly as they did 93 years ago in Czarist-Russia resulting in the largest blood-bathe in history? “

    Adopted from an article by Krister, in Sweden
    (for henrymakow.com)

    Category:
    Non-profits & Activism

    A fund supported by the ROTHSCHILDS!!

    Only 2% pat- well- who gave them such power?
    Via the ADL a massive protection ring!!

    America such a huge country- yet here we go again!!

    « Hardtalk Interview with Peace Activist Ken O’KeefeMerchants of the Myth »Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965
    July 7, 2010 by Ironlight

    Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review
    Kevin MacDonald
    California State University-Long Beach

    This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they reside as minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.

    Introduction
    Ethnic conflict is of obvious importance for understanding critical aspects of American history, and not only for understanding black/white ethnic conflict or the fate of Native Americans. Immigration policy is a paradigmatic example of conflict of interest between ethnic groups because immigration policy influences the future demographic composition of the nation. Ethnic groups unable to influence immigration policy in their own interests will eventually be displaced or reduced in relative numbers by groups able to accomplish this goal.

    This paper discusses ethnic conflict between Jews and gentiles in the area of immigration policy. Immigration policy is, however, only one aspect of conflicts of interest between Jews and gentiles in America. The skirmishes between Jews and the gentile power structure beginning in the late nineteenth century always had strong overtones of anti-Semitism.

    These battles involved issues of Jewish upward mobility, quotas on Jewish representation in elite schools beginning in the nineteenth century and peaking in the 1920s and 1930s, the anti-Communist crusades in the post-World War II era, as well as the very powerful concern with the cultural influences of the major media extending from Henry Ford’s writings in the 1920s to the Hollywood inquisitions of the McCarthy era and into the contemporary era. That anti-Semitism was involved in these issues can be seen from the fact that historians of Judaism (e.g., Sachar, 1992, p.620) feel compelled to include accounts of these events as important to the history of Jews in America, by the anti-Semitic pronouncements of many of the gentile participants, and by the self-conscious understanding of Jewish participants and observers.

    The Jewish involvement in influencing immigration policy in the United States is especially noteworthy as an aspect of ethnic conflict. Jewish involvement has had certain unique qualities that have distinguished Jewish interests from the interests of other groups favoring liberal immigration policies. Throughout much of this period, one Jewish interest in liberal immigration policies stemmed from a desire to provide a sanctuary for Jews fleeing from anti-Semitic persecutions in Europe and elsewhere. Anti-Semitic persecutions have been a recurrent phenomenon in the modern world beginning with the Czarist persecutions in 1881, and continuing into the post-World War II era in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. As a result, liberal immigration has been a Jewish interest because “survival often dictated that Jews seek refuge in other lands” (Cohen, 1972, p.341). For a similar reason, Jews have consistently advocated an internationalist foreign policy for the United States because “an internationally-minded America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign Jewries” (Cohen, 1972, p.342).

    However, in addition to a persistent concern that America be a safe haven for Jews fleeing outbreaks of anti-Semitism in foreign countries,
    there is evidence that Jews, much more than any other European-derived ethnic group in America, have viewed liberal immigration policies as a mechanism of ensuring that America would be a pluralistic rather than a unitary, homogeneous society (e.g., Cohen, 1972). Pluralism serves both internal (within-group) and external (between-group) Jewish interests. Pluralism serves internal Jewish interests because it legitimates the internal Jewish interest in rationalizing and openly advocating an interest in Jewish group commitment and non-assimilation, what Howard Sachar (1992, p.427) terms its function in “legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a majority’s host society.” The development of an ethnic, political, or religious monoculture implies that Judaism can survive only by engaging in a sort of semi-crypsis. As Irving Louis Horowitz (1993, p.86) notes regarding the longterm consequences of Jewish life under Communism, “Jews suffer, their numbers decline, and emigration becomes a survival solution when the state demands integration into a national mainstream, a religious universal defined by a state religion or a near-state religion.” Both Neusner (1987) and Ellman (1987) suggest that the increased sense of ethnic consciousness seen in Jewish circles recently has been influenced by this general movement within American society toward the legitimization of minority group ethnocentrism.

    More importantly, ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. This
    results in the diffusion of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism. Historically, major anti-Semitic movements have tended to erupt in societies that have been, apart from the Jews, religiously and/or ethnically homogeneous (MacDonald, 1994; 1998).

    Conversely, one reason for the relative lack of anti-Semitism in America compared to Europe was that “Jews did not stand out as a solitary group of [religious] non-conformists” (Higham, 1984, p.156). It follows also that ethnically and religiously pluralistic societies are more likely to satisfy Jewish interests than are societies characterized by ethnic and religious homogeneity among gentiles.

    Beginning with Horace Kallen, Jewish intellectuals have been at the forefront in developing models of the United States as a culturally and
    ethnically pluralistic society. Reflecting the utility of cultural pluralism in serving internal Jewish group interests in maintaining cultural separatism, Kallen personally combined his ideology of cultural pluralism with a deep immersion in Jewish history and literature, a commitment to Zionism, and political activity on behalf of Jews in Eastern Europe (Sachar 1992, p.425; Frommer, 1978). Kallen (1915; 1924) developed a “polycentric” ideal for American ethnic relationships. Kallen defined ethnicity as deriving from one’s biological endowment, implying that Jews should be able to remain a genetically and culturally cohesive group while nevertheless participating in American democratic institutions. This conception that the United States should be organized as a set of separate ethnic/cultural groups was accompanied by an ideology that relationships between groups would be cooperative and benign: “Kallen lifted his eyes above the strife that swirled around him to an ideal realm where diversity and harmony coexist” (Higham, 1984, p.209). Similarly in Germany, the Jewish leader Moritz Lazarus argued, in opposition to the views of the German intellectual Heinrich Treitschke, that the continued separateness of diverse ethnic groups contributed to the richness of German culture (Schorsch, 1972, p.63). Lazarus also developed the doctrine of dual loyalty which became a cornerstone of the Zionist movement.

    Kallen wrote his 1915 essay partly in reaction to the ideas of Edward A. Ross (1914). Ross was a Darwinian sociologist who believed that the
    existence of clearly demarcated groups would tend to result in between-group competition for resources. Higham’s comment is interesting because it shows that Kallen’s romantic views of group coexistence were contradicted by the reality of between-group competition in his own day. Indeed, it is noteworthy that Kallen was a prominent leader of the American Jewish Congress (AJCongress). During the 1920s and 1930s the AJCongress championed group economic and political rights for Jews in Eastern Europe at a time when there were widespread ethnic tensions and persecution of Jews, and despite the fears of many that such rights would merely exacerbate current tensions. The AJCongress demanded that Jews be allowed proportional political representation as well as the ability to organize their own communities and preserve an autonomous Jewish national culture. The treaties with Eastern European countries and Turkey included provisions that the state provide instruction in minority languages and that Jews have the right to refuse to attend courts or other public functions on the Sabbath (Frommer, 1978, p.162). Kallen’s idea of cultural pluralism as a model for America was popularized among gentile intellectuals by John Dewey (Higham, 1984, p.209), who in turn was promoted by Jewish intellectuals: “If lapsed Congregationalists like Dewey did not need immigrants to inspire them to press against the boundaries of even the most liberal of Protestant sensibilities, Dewey’s kind were resoundingly encouraged in that direction by the Jewish intellectuals they encountered in urban academic and literary communities” (Hollinger, 1996, p.24).

    https://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/06/16/jewish-involvement-in-shaping-american-immigration-policy-1881-1965/

  5. PEOPLE WITHOUT ANY POWER…….BULLSHIT!

  6. China for the “yellow” people
    Asia for the “brown” people
    Africa for the “black” people
    UK and Europe for black, brown, yellow!

    Will Brits or whites be colonising any of the above?

    They already have billions of people and are overpopulated, they also have their own languages and cultures. Biggest mistake was felling sorry and self-rightious about leaving people from former colonies into the UK because we tried to take over their countries, because pretty soon it is going to look like those countries were when we left them. Countries have been taking over other countries from time immemorial but they never brought their pass port printing machines to leave behind if they failed.

  7. It’s those behind it that concerns me most!!

    Dave19141918 you may find this interesting:
    Col. Richard Somers’ “Atlantic County” Regiment Nov. 1776 through Jan. 1777
    look up on Google this document will be first one on the list

    RESENT WON’T COME NEAR- WHEN IT BECOMES COMMON KNOWLEDGE THE PART PLAYED BY KHARZIA JEWS!!

    BURNING ONES FINGERS SHOULD TEACH- DON’T TOUCH THE FIRE- OBVIOUSLY SHE AND HER ILK DON’T LEARN ANYTHING!

    r

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s