Labour dragged into border fiasco over dropped passport checks..Millions of people are feared to have been allowed into Britain without full passport checks in a major new borders scandal.

ONLY EUROPEANS ELECT POLITICIANS TO RID THEM OF THEIR INDUSTRIES- RUIN THEM DUE TO BANKING FRAUD- DESTROY THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE- DESTROY ALL THEIR JOBS- THEN BRING IN THE THIRD WORLD SAYING- WE NEED MORE WORKERS TO DO JOBS THEY WON’T DO THEMSELVES- TALK ABOUT GETTING EXACTLY WHAT IS DESERVED- FROM BRITAIN TO AMERIKA EUROPEAN STOCK SEEM INCAPABLE OF DEFENDING WHAT IS THEIRS- THOSE THAT TRIED WERE BOMBED!

Labour dragged into border fiasco over dropped passport checks

Millions of people are feared to have been allowed into Britain without full passport checks in a major new borders scandal.

BUT WHEN STATS ARE SAID TO BE WRONG RE THE UK POPULATION THE SHYSTERS ARGUE TO THE DEATH THAT THEIRS ARE CORRECT?

LIBLABCONS CLOWARD AND PIVEN STRATEGY IN FULL SWING- WAIT FOR FOOD SHORTAGES- WATER ELECTRICITY ETC- THEN YOU’LL ALL ASK WHY!

The Dover scandal has the potential to be bigger than that at the airports Photo: ALAMY By David Barrett, and Alasdair Palmer
9:00PM GMT 12 Nov 2011
652 Comments
All but the most cursory checks were abandoned on passengers on British-registered coaches as they arrived at Dover, Britain’s biggest port.

Instead of passports being scanned electronically, border guards checked that the picture matched the holder. It means they were not cross-checked to a computer database to establish if the holder was a wanted terrorist, criminal or immigration offender.

The policy was in place for four years after being introduced when Labour was in power, but never disclosed to Parliament.

It was implemented because the French complained about congestion in Calais caused by backlogs at passport control.

Ministers discovered the scheme earlier this month and ended it ten days ago when the Border Agency official in charge of the southern ports was suspended, along with Brodie Clark, the director of the UK Border Force, who was accused of relaxing passport checks at airports on non-European Union citizens without ministers’ permission.

Related Articles
Theresa May dispute is an acid test
12 Nov 2011
May urged to release papers from border checks ‘fiasco’
09 Nov 2011
Border chief quits with broadside against May
08 Nov 2011
Border checks relaxed in second rule change
11 Nov 2011
Border official ‘gave away visas for tens of thousands of pounds’
A
The Dover scandal has the potential to be bigger than that at the airports and will add to political pressure on Theresa May, the Home Secretary.

It is estimated that up to 17 million coach passengers passed through Dover’s ferry terminal in the last four years, of whom the majority would have been on British-registered coaches.

It was not known last night if the policy was implemented at other ports, and whether it was operated around the clock or at the busiest times.

Relaxing controls at Dover is particularly damaging because the port has been identified as one of the main routes for illegal entry to the country.

Camps of people trying to make their way into Britain have sprung up in the French port, with repeated attempts to close them and stop smugglers using lorries or desperate people climbing onto trains and under vans and coaches to enter the UK.

Last night there were calls for a full statement on the suspension of checks at Dover, and for the Home Office to make clear whether it affected other ports on the south coast of England.

Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee said he would ask for detailed information on whether ministers were aware of the changes, when Mr Clark and Rob Whiteman, the UKBA chief executive, appear before MPs this week to be questioned on the airports scandal.

“This information raises serious concerns about the history of checks undertaken by the UKBA [United Kingdom Border Agency],” he said.

“We must ensure our border checks are not compromised and that the UKBA has the resources it needs to thoroughly check every individual coming into Britain.

“The committee will question Rob Whiteman and Brodie Clark this Tuesday on exactly what checks have been used and when and who was notified.”

The relaxed security checks were introduced during 2007. That year Jacqui Smith took over as home secretary from Dr John Reid, now Lord Reid of Cardowan, although it is unclear exactly when the changes were introduced.

The key question will be whether Labour ministers were informed. Coalition ministers were unaware of the policy until this month.

The UKBA’s shelving of full passport checks on coach passengers was understood to have been one of the reasons behind the decision to suspend Carole Upshall, director of the UK Border Force’s south and European operations. She was sent home on the same day as Mr Clark, who resigned last week.

He has denied acting without authorisation when he allowed non-European Union citizens to be let through passport controls without full checks when queues became unwieldy at airports.

Managers at the UKBA encouraged staff not to examine the contents of passport biometric microchips, and also dropped “warnings index checks” – the database of people who should be stopped at the border because they are due to be in limited circumstances.

But the revelation that potentially millions of travellers underwent even less rigorous security will raise yet more questions about the way the Home Office has failed to safeguard Britain’s borders.

An estimated 86,000 coaches pass through Dover every year. The Home Office refused to disclose if the scheme was limited to private hire coaches, which make up a significant proportion of coach traffic at the ports and would be likely to have mostly British passengers on board, or included scheduled services to Britain from destinations in Europe, which would include significant proportions of foreigners.

Mr Clark is due to give evidence on Tuesday to the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee, and the scandal is likely to be reignited as the former civil servant gives his first detailed account of his dealings with Mrs May and other ministers.

Mrs May has consistently denied that she authorised in any fashion the relaxation of controls at airports ordered by Mr Clark. She has been backed by his superior, Mr Whiteman, who issued a statement saying that Mr Clark had “admitted to me on November 2 that on a number of occasions this year he authorised his staff to go further than ministerial instruction”.

However, the emergence of separate relaxations at ports for British coaches may serve to increase political pressure on Mrs May.

Labour refused to comment last night on what its ministers knew when they were in government.

Chris Bryant, shadow immigration minister, said: “Theresa May needs to urgently publish the data we know exists and come clean about the scale of the problem – so we can learn lessons and make sure we stop illegal entrants in future.”

Separately, it has also emerged that security checks at Heathrow were significantly watered down on a previous occasion, leading to a dramatic fall in the number of foreign travellers who were refused permission to enter Britain.

During a two-day strike by immigration officers in October last year managers instituted what they described as “light touch” security with fewer checks.

Documents show 22 people were refused leave to enter on the day before the strike, but over the two day action nine were refused.

A Home Office spokesman said: “Nothing is more important than the integrity of our border in order to protect national security and reduce and control immigration.

“There are ongoing investigations into allegations regarding the relaxation of border controls without ministerial approval.

“UKBA ensured additional trained staff authorised to carry out all necessary checks were in place at the border during the strike last year.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/8886486/Labour-dragged-into-border-fiasco-over-dropped-passport-checks.html

THIS WAS INTENDED…..

change
1 minute ago
I feel like a immigrant in my own country because of this!

I wont get council housed because I work and dont have loads of kids I cant afford!

I have to wait 3 weeks before I can see a gp

I barely hear english spoken in the high street

All these things have come in the last 15 yrs

will38
3 minutes ago
I fail to understand all the political fuss about border controls or illegal immigrants or how Labour can be critical on anything this government does or does not, after their dismal years in office. In order to control our borders we have leave the EU and get rid of the Human Rights Act, that way would enable us to stop them coming in and those that managed to get in could be readily removed. We cannot do anything whilst we are in the EU and can’t remove any due to this very stupid Human Rights Act.

raw
3 minutes ago
What surprises me is the fact that a lot of people are surprised by this. A stroll down your local High Street will tell you that the claim by politicians that we have any sort of border control has been a pack of lies. I’m amazed that people still allow themselves to be persuaded by the Guardianista line that there is no problem, that this is in fact something to be celebrated. If you have the intelligence to see through such tripe don’t vote for the mainstream parties, vote UKIP.

LIKE UKIP WOULD BE ALLOWED TO CHANGE A DAMNED THING- FARAGE KNOWS THE 1689 ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS MAKES EU ENTRY ILLEGAL- BUT HE NEVER HAS MENTIONED THIS LITTLE GEM- THAT WOULD REFLECT BAD ON THE POLICE/QUEEN ETC- THEY ALLOW THIS TREASON TO CARRY ON- SO DOES UKIP!!

j
3 minutes ago
This makes Teressa May’s “showboating” at the Tory conference about the dangers the Human Rights act poses to our security look even more ridiculous. Incompetent hypocrit. Of course she can’t be fired, not so soon after Liam Fox going, but when considered along side that it should put paid to any claims the Tories have to being the party that can be trusted on security.

FABIAN MARXISTS YOU MEAN…

Tom
4 minutes ago
Just go’s to show what Politicians (Of any creed, Conservative, Labour or Liberal) think of the electorate. For many years now immigration & border controls have topped or come close to the top of peoples concerns in poll after poll but our politicians were quite happy to open the gates with out any checks. We are treated with contempt by them.

THEY TREAD ON YOU ALL- BECAUSE YOU LAY DOWN AND ALLOW THEM TO!

daviduk84
9 minutes ago
We all know Labour effectively abolished immigration controls for over a decade, which is why it was so sickening to see them trying to make capital out of it now. Having tried to suggest it was racist to oppose unlimited immigration, they are now trying to claim that the (very slightly) stricter regime this government brought in was inadequate.

They truly are a loathsome group of people the Labour party.

jaquebauer
13 minutes ago
And I thought my government, under the incompetent Barak Obama was run by fools and traitors to the Constitution.
Oh how badly England needs a man like Churchill to bring your country back to sanity. Illegal and uncontrolled immigration is a warning sign of bigger problems within, What else is or has been shortcut or avoided…it does not matter why or for what reason. This deliberate and shortsighted act-for votes or for more sinister means has placed your country at risk for all things bad. Look at the drain on the countries finances by the poor immigrants from all countries–they come because you give them things they dont have to work for. These people do not remain in their own land to fight for improvements to better their homeland–they take the train to the country that gives them the most for free.
You were once the greatest country on the planet…..look at yourselves today. The United States is rapidly following in Englands footsteps. Liberalism, Progressives, Democrats, and Socialists are the cause of our troubles. The reason we became great was because of rigid controls, belief in God, strong work ethic, racial purity, and the Law.
All these have gone by the wayside, replaced by free spirited do what feels good liberals and their self destructive policies and behaviors.
It is us that we should fear, as we have done this to ourselves.

JUST WHAT WE NEED- NOT!
ANOTHER ZIONIST WITH FABIAN SYMPATHIES..AND LIAR!!!

BUT HE COULD SPEAK GOOD- SO DO WIND UP DOLLS.

CLOWARD AND PIVEN STRATEGY FILL THE COUNTRY WITH IMMIGRANTS- OVERWHELM THE SYSTEM- EVENTUALLY IT WILL COLLAPSE!

fibogel
13 minutes ago
This makes a mockery of Tom Watson’s attacks on James Murdock for not knowing that he had just moved into an office full of crooks. If Murdock is guilty of any wrong doing, a succession of Labour Home Secretaries are guilty of complicity in a plot by senior civil servants to undermine the country’s internal security.

NOTE NO MENTION OF MURDOCH RUNNING THE POLITICAL PARTIES- OR HE BEING AN ISRAELI CITIZEN!

rarecockney
14 minutes ago
To all you good people out there the Pseudo-Marxist-Labour- Party are out to wipe the English out. They have done this by Mass immigration.The indigenous British have been chosen for extinction by a corrupt British establishment.There objective is to fill Britain up with people from the third worlders. If you mix people with interbreeding you then have people that are not united, So that means the populas is easily controlled ie mass supply of cheap Labour.

Burma_Zen
15 minutes ago
David Cameron should resign for supporting Theresa May. Theresa May should be pursued in courts for assisting with no reason terrorist to enter this country.

will38
35 seconds ago
What have you to say on Labour’s 13 years during which they opened the doors wide and deliberately allowed millions to enter hoping to get their political votes.

LIKE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE- LIBLABCONS!!

zenitruehe
19 minutes ago
“Nothing is more important than the
integrity of our border…” And still they lie!

2007 UK POPULATION 77 MILLION PLUS- OF COURSE THEY LIE- SAVES THEIR NECKS!

Mary&John
19 minutes ago
If you are one who voted for these Traitors, whether Labour, Tory or the Euro lap dogs the Lib- Dems then don’t complain, this is what you wanted, this is what you’ve got, you should be rejoicing at your chosen parties immigration policies, what else did you expect that they the Lab,Con Lib-Dem coalition, for that is exactly what they are, not a cigarette papers thickness between the three of them, did you ever think that any one of them would put British Peoples concerns first, Labours and Tory party’s “U” turns on E.U referendums of what ever kind should have told you what your chosen party thinks of “YOU” But like sheep you follow the Judas sheep into the slaughterhouse, innocently, trustingly, as our very country and culture is being eroded away from the inside until the British people will no longer have any say in their own country, Just like the 170+ patriots that where arrested on Friday, Arrested for what? being British. For all our sakes, Do not make that political mistake again. THINK,LISTEN,SEE what is before you, before it’s to late.

,,,

ONLY ONE NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED THIS- IGNORED BY THE REST OF THE ZIONIST LACKIES.

Facts on a plate: our population is at least 77 million

Independent on Sunday, The, Oct 28, 2007 by city eye

It is the satatistic that dare not speak its name, though eventually it must. It has huge ramifications for the civil and political life of this country, the health of the equity markets and, most immediately, the residential property market. So don’t forget you read it here first: the population of the UK is presently somewhere between 77 and 80 million.
The 2001 census, already hopelessly out of date and easy to avoid for those who find filling in forms a trifle inelegant, numbered us at a little under 59 million. But as statistics go, that one’s most definitely a damned lie.
My sources for the above statement are good, but scared of admitting the truth for fear of incurring the wrath of Whitehall. It’s like the best way of monitoring illegal drug consumption: forget the pious statements from ministers – the foolproof method is to sample our water and the effluent in it. That’s easily the best way of monitoring what the nation has been consuming.
Consumption – that’s the thing. Based on what we eat, one big supermarket chain reckons there are 80 million people living in the UK. The demand for food is a reliable indicator; as Sir Richard Branson says, you can have all the money in the world but you can only eat onelunch and one dinner.
The supermarket in question was privately lobbying the Competition Commission to let it grow its market share. The argu- ment, reasonably enough, was that the market was far bigger than the regulator realised, so expanding the network was fair.
I have a second, respectable, source. A major, non-commercial agricultural institution reckons there are 77 million of us in the UK. Again, its reckoning is based on what we eat.
That faint background noise you’re hearing as you read this is the sound of everyone slithering off the record. Why? In political terms, standing behind these figures would be to toss a hand grenade into a vat of gasoline. People would be hounded out of a job for scaremongering.
The Office for National Statistics’ figures, published last week, predict a population of 75 million by 2051. It’s an honest estimate but horribly wide of the mark because number counting doesn’t work effectively. If you want to know how many there are of us, ask a food firm.
If the true numbers were revealed, the Little Englanders and xenophobes would come out in force about the evils of immigration. But that’s what made America great in the 19th century, and it’s a driving force of our economy right now. It’s also anti- inflationary.
David Buik, a money manager with broker BGC Partners, was talking of “one million Eastern Europeans unaccounted for in London” on television last week. I suspect he’s right if somewhat conservative in his estimate. How many do you see working in the construction industry and waiting at tables?
And when I say “anti-inflationary”, I mean they are getting rotten wages. Dignified by the term “cheap labour”, the hidden hordes will do well for the services sector, among others. People are assets – to maintain and to be maintained – so we are wealthier as a nation.
All of which is reflected in strong economic demand and markets see-sawing between optimism over what we all see on the streets (that 77 million figure feels right to me) and the possibility of something nasty if the Bank of England credit-crunch prognosis is correct (to echo last week, I think next spring will be unpleasant).
As for housing, property magnates and chief executives of housing associations alike say the expanding population means serious demand for the foreseeable future, credit crunch or no. Next week, I’ll look at the detail of this argument.
martin@ REMOVED!
Copyright c 2007 Independent Newspapers UK Limited. All rights owned or operated by The Independent.
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4159/is_20071028/ai_n21077082

YOUR DESTINY TO BECOME DEBT SLAVES FOREVER- WITHOUT A COUNTRY TO CALL YOUR OWN – UNLIKE ISRAEL!!

ZOG OF BRITAIN…..HOPES YOU CAN ALL SWIM!

LIED TO FOR SO LONG WE CAN’T SEE THE TRUTH ANYMORE!

Ilich Ulin (Vladimir Ilich Ulia-nov or Nikolaus Lenin). President of the Supreme Soviet, Jew on mothers side. His mother was called Blank, a Jewess of German origin.

“Three-quarters of mankind may die if necessary, to ensure the other quarter for Communism.” (V.I. Lenin)

“In principle we have never and can never renounce terror.” (V.I. Lenin)

“We hate Christianity and Christians. Even the best of them must be regarded as our worst enemies. They preach love of one’s neighbour and mercy, which is contrary to our principles. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the revolution. Down with love of one’s neighbour. What we need is hatred; only thus shall we conquer the universe.” (A. Lunacharsky)

“By May, 1st, 1937, there should not be one single church left within the borders of Soviet Russia, and the idea of God will have been banished from the Soviet Union as a remnant of the Middle Ages, which has been used for the purpose of oppressing the working classes.” (Joseph Stalin)

“We Bolsheviks are going to bring the Social Revolution as much to America as to Europe. It is coming systematically, step by step. The struggle will be long, cruel and sanguinary. . . what matters the loss of 90% by executions if 10% of Communists remain to carry on the revolution? Bolshevism is not a seminary for young ladies. All children should be present at the executions and rejoice at the death of the enemies of the proletariat.” (V.I. Lenin)

Many excellent books contain similar conclusive evidence of the true nature of Communism, but the purposes of this particular book is to simply and adequately describe the background to world events at the time in relation to the rise and fall of the Third Reich.

“In April, 1937, Mr. R.A. Butler, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, India Office, reported in the House of Commons that free tuition was available for Indian students returned to India as Bolshevik recruiters and agitators against Britain.”

HITLER’S RESISTANCE TO BOLSHEVISM:

(Condensed from the Fuhrer’s closing speech, Nuremberg Congress of Honour).

“We do not deny the grave concern which we feel at the thought of other nations becoming a victim of Bolshevism towards which we are deadly antagonistic.

This deadly enmity of ours is not based on an obstinate refusal to recognise any ideas that may be contrary to ours. But this enmity is based on a natural feeling of revulsion towards a diabolical doctrine that threatens the world at large and us.

The first phase in the fight of National Socialism against Communism did not take place in Russia. Soviet Communism already tried to poison Germany between the years 1918 and 1920, and its methods of penetration into this country was much the same as its present-day military efforts in moving the Bolshevik military machine closer and closer to our frontiers.

We have stamped out Bolshevism which Moscow’s bloodfiends such as Lewin, Axelroth, Neumann, Bela-Kuhn, etc. tried to introduce into Germany. And it is because we see day by day these efforts of Soviet rulers to meddle in our domestic affairs have not yet ceased, that we are forced to regard Bolshevism beyond our frontiers as our deadly enemy.

We have fought Bolshevism in Germany as a Weltanschaung that is, as a form of philosophy that endeavoured to poison and destroy our people. And Bolshevism will continue to be fought if it attempts to introduce its sordid Spanish methods into Germany.

It is not the aim of Bolshevism to free nations from their ailments. Its object is to exterminate all that is healthy and replace the same by depravity and degenerate elements. . .

. . .we do not want a situation here in Germany, as in Russia, in which 98% of official key positions are held by alien Jews. Under no circumstances do we want our national intelligence debased.

“. . . Communism however cannot deny that in Russia today 98% of all official positions are held by Jews who not only can never be classed as members of the proletariat, but who have never earned an honest penny in their lives.

” . . . we have fought Bolshevism because its leaders had planned for us a slaughter house on Russian and Spanish lines. Such is the difference between the Bolshevik and the National Socialist revolutions. The one transforms prosperous and peaceful countries into a waste of ruin and devastation, whilst the other, re-builds a broken-down and poverty stricken Reich into an economically sound and prosperous state.”

We believe that it is a bigger task to put 5 million people back to work than to burn down houses and churches and allow hundreds of thousands of workers and peasants and others to kill each other. We have also fought Bolshevism on general economic grounds. From time to time the world hears of hunger famines in Russia. Since, 1917, that is, since the victory of Bolshevism, there is no end to this form of distress,

This self-same Russia, starving for close on 20 years, was one of the richest grain countries in the world.

When compared with Germany, Russia possesses 18 times more land per head of population, and yet what a sorry form of economic policy this country must have to deny its people a decent form of livelihood. If Bolshevism in Russia, however, does not succeed in getting nine farmers to produce sufficient to at least support one non-farmer what then would have happened in Germany, where two and a half farmers produce sufficient to support seven and a half non-farmers? What would have happened to Germany and the whole of its economic structure if Jewish-Bolshevik economic malpractice had ever been allowed to take root here?

“We have fought Bolshevism because a victory for it in Germany would have spelt starvation for perhaps 50% of our population. If Russia is incapable of supporting not even eight people per square kilometre, then in Germany under Bolshevik rule, not even ten millions would have had the necessary minimum standard of living. For here in Germany our 68 million people occupy the same area which in Russia would not support more than 5 million.

Bolshevism preaches world revolution, and it would use the German workers as cannon fodder for the attainment of its goal. We National Socialists, however, do not want our military forces to be used for forcing upon other nations something that they do not want. Our Army does not swear an oath that it will carry our National Socialist ideology to other nations.”

British politicians in England have so far not had the opportunity of learning what Communism in one’s own country stands for. But we have. As I am the one who has fought against this Judeo-Soviet teaching in Germany and stamped it out, I flatter myself that I possess more understanding of the true character of Bolshevism than those arm-chair critics who at most have read up on the subject a little. Today, I follow the spread of Bolshevik poison throughout the world just as assiduously as I followed its poisonous trail years ago in Germany, and never lost an opportunity of warning the country.

The abhorrent mass-murders of nationalists, the burning alive of wives of nationalist officers after soaking them in petrol – the revolting murder of children on nationalist parents as for example in Spain, should serve as a warning to help to break down resistance on other countries. . .” (Adolf Hitler)

“If my international opponents reproach me today that I have refused this co-operation with Russia, I make the following declaration: I do not and did not reject co-operation with Russia but with Bolshevism, which lays claim to world rulership.

The German nation has not only wept but has laughed heartily throughout its life and I will not see it descend into the gloom of international communism and the dictatorship of hate. I tremble for Europe at the very thought of what would happen to our old and over-populated continent if this Asiatic concept of the world, which is destructive of all our ideals, should be successful in bringing upon us the chaos of the Bolshevik revolution.” – Adolf Hitler, March, 7th, 1936

“Bolshevism turns flourishing countryside into sinister wastes of ruins; National Socialism transforms a Reich of destruction and misery into a healthy state with a flourishing economic life.” – Adolf Hitler

“Since I have fought against these Jewish-Soviet ideas in Germany, since I have conquered and stamped out this peril, I fancy that I possess a better comprehension of its character than do these men who have only to deal with it in the field of literature.” (Adolf Hitler)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/witness1.htm#2

HE WAS RIGHT OR WRONG TO DEFEND HIS COUNTRY?

MIND WE ALREADY HAD FABIAN COMMIES IN PARLIAMENT…………..THEY AIN’T GONNA START KICKING OFF ARE THEY- UNTIL THE TIME IS RIGHT…………….THEIR MOTTO – WHEN WE STRIKE WE STRIKE HARD!!

HAD OUR POLITICIANS- JUST ONE, ANY BALLS THEN WE’D HAVE A LEADER TO FEEL PROUD OF- INSTEAD OF THE BANKERS HAND PICKED YES MEN WE HAVE TODAY.

RADIO PRESENTOR LBC JUST SAID:

WE COULD HAVE BEEN SPEAKING GERMAN HAD THE NAZIS HAD THEIR WAY……………ABSOLUTE BOLLOCKS!

WE’D BE SPEAKING ENGLISH – EVEN IN OUR MULTI-LANGUAGE SCHOOLS…….OF 100s OF LANGUAGES!

FIGHTING FOR QUEEN AND COUNTRY…………KIDOLOGY.

ISRAEL ISN’T A BRITISH SOLDIERS COUNTRY.

WINSTON CHURCHILL:

“In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War. . . the vanquished are in the process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished. . . whatever else might be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.” – Winston Churchill, 1935

“. . . and the achievement by which the tables have been turned upon the complacent, feckless and purblind victors deserves to be reckoned a prodigy in the history of the world and a prodigy which is inseparable from the personal exertions of life thrust on a single man. . .

Those who have met Hitler face to face in public, business, or on social terms, have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a discerning smile and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism.

Nor is this impression merely the dazzle of power. He exerted it on his companions at every stage in his struggle, even when his fortunes were in the lowest depths. . .

One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I should hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.” – Winston Churchill, ‘Step by Step’, p.143

DOUGLAS REED:

“Germans in their country are not less well cared for than the English people in theirs, but better. You are faced with a country immensely strong in arms and immensely strong in real wealth – not in gold bars in a vault of the national bank, but industry, agriculture, the thrift and energy of the work people, and the conditions of life they enjoy.

In German now they have a mighty organisation, equipped with full powers, for improving the lot of the work people in factories and workshops. Their engineers and social workers and artists go into the factories and see what needs to be done. They say that a shower room, recreation room, a restaurant, a medical clinic, a dental clinic is needed and these ere provided. They have a civic sense, a social conscience, a feeling of the community of German mankind – in spite of the bestial concentration camps – which you lack.”

AND OF THOSE ‘CONCENTRATION CAMPS’ ANOTHER ENGLISHMAN REVEALS ALL:

“In August, 1933 there were seven thousand ‘political prisoners’ (Britain’s prison population is in excess of 50,000) in Germany of which about 700 are Communists. Most were convicted of political crimes as we define them, but rather of anti-social behaviour and crime.

The discipline in the camp was of the robust kind. Every man had some kind of work to do, but this was not always enforced. The camp rose at 6.00am and all lights were out at 9.00pm. The meals consisted of breakfast, dinner, supper with meat served daily except on Fridays. There was a dispensary attached to the camp and a German doctor was in charge. Severe cases of illness were sent to the local hospital.

Various trades were carried on inside the camp such as carpentry, tailoring and shoemaking. Part of the camp was set off for bathing. Shower baths and facilities for sunbathing were shown to me. There was also a splendid sports ground.

The sleeping compartments consisted of wooden beds and straw mattresses, with three blankets for each prisoner. The working hours were from 7.00am to 11.30am and from 1.00pm to 6.00pm. A library was in the course of being introduced.

Visitors were allowed once a week, and were received in the dining room which accommodated some 300 people. There were apartments set apart for music and dramatic performances. In addition to receiving free board and lodging, each prisoner was drawing 10DM to 12DM per week, which represented his unemployment allowance pay.

Instruction in ethics, religion, the new form of government in Germany, history, languages, was given daily to those who desired to attend. There was little or no crime among the men in the camp. Good order prevailed among all classes. The guards ate the same food as the prisoners, and were subject to the same disciplines as the internees, although they were government officials. One of the guards was a prince of the House of Hesse.

Letters and parcels were subject to censorship. In not one case out of many thousands received had it been found necessary to destroy any parcel or letter forwarded. Newspapers were permitted and smoking allowed. When a prisoner desired to light his pipe or cigarette, he had to go to a guard detailed off to supply lights for the prisoners, as no matches were permitted prisoners.

Services were held every Sunday and the majority of the opportunity. No objection was raised by the authorities to my taking photographs of both camps and internees.

The men looked in splendid physical condition. Having heard so may dreadful stories of brutal treatment being meted out to Communists in this particular camp, I asked some of the men to confide in me and tell me the truth of those allegations. Not a few laughed at ‘the bloody capitalist liars in your country.’ I took fifteen men at random and asked them to strip in my presence. I wanted to see if they bore any marks of violence on their persons. I saw nothing indicative of bad treatment.” – G.E.O. Knight, In Defence of Germany, (who was allowed complete freedom of movement in all camps)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/witness2.htm#6

I’D TAKE THE WORDS OF DOUGLAS REED WAR CORRESPONDANT WW2 AND EX SOLDIER WW1 THAN ANY STINKING HIGHLY PAID CORRUPT POLITICIAN- BOUGHT AND PAID FOR ZIONIST SPIV…

I FEEL ANGRY AND SAD TODAY THAT SO MANY BRITISH MEN AND WOMEN- AND EUROPEANS IN GENERAL WENT TO WAR FOR NOTHING THAT WOULD BENEFIT THEM OR THEIR NATIONS- JUST THE OPOSITE INFACT!

2 responses to “Labour dragged into border fiasco over dropped passport checks..Millions of people are feared to have been allowed into Britain without full passport checks in a major new borders scandal.

  1. BOMB IRAN….

    In Mr Netanyahu’s eyes, Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another “Hitler” whose aim is to complete what the Holocaust failed to do by wiping out the Jewish race.

    “People outside Israel don’t understand how profound memories of the Holocaust are, and how they affect future policy making,” said Mr Bergman, the military analyst. “At the end of the day, this policy of ‘never again’ would dictate Israel’s behaviour when intelligence comes through that Iran has come close to a bomb.”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/8886543/Israel-refuses-to-tell-US-its-Iran-intentions.html

    THE RUSSIAN HOLOCAUST…..

    “I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe, and the whole world, as it is organised and worked by Jews, who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. . .” (British Government White Paper, April, 1919 – Russia No.1)

    “It may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of providing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. . . this movement among the Jews is not new. . . it has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” (Winston Churchill. Illustrated Sunday Herald. Feb. 8th, 1920)

    “As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our despicable Press.” (Hilaire Belloc. G.K’s Weekly, Feb., 4th, 1937)

    “The conceptions of Bolshevism are in harmony in most points with the ideas of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, April, 4th, 1919)

    In the front line against the Bolshevik explosion stood defeated Germany, out of which maelstrom emerged Adolf Hitler, a highly decorated soldier of the front lines. Aware of the appalling consequences should the revolutionary communists overthrow Germany, he organised against it and addressed his first public meeting in October, 1919, at Munich’s Hofbrauhaus.

    Of him, Winston Churchill had this to say. “While all those formidable transformations were occurring in Europe, Corporal Hitler was fighting his long, wearing battle for the German heart. The story of that struggle cannot be read without admiration for the courage, the perseverance, and the vital force which enabled him to challenge, defy, conciliate, or overcome, all the authorities or resistance’s which barred his path. He, and the ever increasing legions who worked with him, certainly showed at this time, in their patriotic ardour and love of country, that there was nothing that they would not dare, no sacrifice of life, limb or liberty that they would not make themselves or inflict upon their opponents.” (Winston Churchill. Francis Nielson. (‘Makers of War’ p.101)

    “There must not be lacking in our leadership something of that spirit of the Austrian corporal who, when all had fallen into ruins around him, and when Germany seemed to have fallen into chaos, did not hesitate to march forth against the vast army of victorious nations and has already turned the tables decisively against them.”

    “The German leader with the highest of praise for his accomplishments as no other foreign statesman ever received from an Englishman.” (Winston Churchill, 4th, October, 1938)

    Of contemporary Russia Winston Churchill said: “In Russia, we have a vast, dumb people dwelling under the discipline of a conscripted army in war time; a people suffering in years of peace the rigours and privations of the worst campaigns; a people ruled by terror, fanaticism’s and the Secret Police. Here we have a state whose subjects are so happy that they have to be forbidden to quit its bounds under the direst of penalties; where diplomatists and agents sent on foreign missions have often to leave their wives and children at home as hostages to ensure their eventual return. Here we have a system whose social achievements crowd 5 or 6 people in a single room; whose wages hardly compare in purchasing power with the British dole; whose life is unsafe, where liberty is unknown; where grace and culture are dying, and where armaments and preparations for war were rife. Here is a land where God is blasphemed, and man, plunged in this world’s misery, is denied the hope of money on both sides of the grave. Here we have a power actively and ceaselessly engaged in trying to overturn existing civilisations by stealth and propaganda, and when it dares, by bloody force. Here we have a state, three million of whose subjects are languishing in foreign exile, whose intelligentsia have been methodically destroyed; a state nearly half a million of whose citizens reduced in servitude for their political opinions, are rotting and freezing through the Arctic night; toiling to death in the forests, mines and quarries, many for no more than indulging in that freedom of thought which has gradually raised man above the beast. Decent good-hearted British men and women ought not to be so airily detached from realities that they have no word of honest indignation for such wantonly, callously inflicted pain.” (Winston Churchill. Great Contemporaries)

    “The Soviet system is barbarism worse than the Stone Age.” (Winston Churchill)

    “No faith need be, indeed may be kept with non-communists. Every act of goodwill, of tolerance, of conciliation, of mercy, of magnanimity on the part of governments or statesmen is to be utilised for their ruin. Then, when the time is ripe and the moment opportune, every form of lethal violence, from revolution to private assassination, must be used without stint or compunction. The citadel will be stormed under the banners of Liberty and Democracy; and once the apparatus of power is in the hands of the Brotherhood all opposition, all contrary opinion, must be extinguished by death. Democracy is but a tool to be used and afterwards broken.” (Winston Churchill ‘Great Contemporaries’ 1937, p.168)

    “Many illusions about Soviet Russia have been dispelled in these fierce weeks of fighting in the Arctic Circle. Everyone can see how communism rots the soul of a nation; how it makes abject and hungry in peace and proves it base and abominable in war. . . if the light of freedom which burns so brightly in the frozen north should finally be quenched, it might well herald a return to the Dark Ages when every visage of human progress during 2,000 years would be engulfed.” (Winston Churchill, 20th, January 1940)

    RUDOLF HESS:

    “Jewish influence was one of the chief causes of the disintegration that took place in Germany. If at the decisive hour National Socialism had not stepped in and brought this process of disintegration to a standstill a condition of strife would have resulted, in which everybody would be against everybody else, and then we would have had that state of affairs which goes by the name of Bolshevism. Germany came much nearer to Bolshevism than the outside world believes or will even admit.”

    “When Germany was on the path to ruin a counter movement set in to save the country from a complete break up. One man alone proved himself able to bring this counter movement to a successful issue. This man was, as a matter of course, one of the soldiers who had fought in the trenches, and he had political gifts of an unusually high quality.”

    He countered atheistic blasphemy with the idea of an Almighty Being.”

    “National Socialism is the ruling power in Germany. It has reinvigorated and guaranteed the life of the people. Germany would have fallen to pieces if the one man had not come forward and created National Socialism. That man is Adolf Hitler.”

    “Was it an accident that Hitler came? I do not think so. I believe that a Providence watches over the nations and that when a task is to be fulfilled in the world, this Providence sends the right man at the right time to fulfil and thus save the nation from downfall.”

    THE ENEMY AT THE GATE
    By 1922, the Bolshevik influence on Russia and indeed the world, by what Churchill had described as, ‘this same astounding race’ was almost complete. Many saw events as being the first stage of an international plot, mainly by those of Jewish race, to seize world control. By explanation or defence of these phenomena some will suggest that Jews, intellectually inclined towards all forms of social change, peaceful and otherwise, should naturally find themselves disproportionately represented in such an upheaval.

    Be that as it may, the facts are clear and although often hidden from Gentile eyes, are never disputed. On the contrary, many of the world’s most highly placed and influential Jews have openly boasted of their responsibility for communism; even its crimes.

    “Have we escaped a Pax Germanica only to fall into a Pax Judaeica?” (The Times, May 8th, 1920)

    “I have glimpsed into hell. The Jews are in control.” (Sir Percival Phillips)

    “The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office. They are driving out the Russians.” (Clare Sheriden, Close friend of Leon Trotsky, alias Lev Bronstein)

    POPE PIUS XI:

    “For them (the peoples of the Soviet Union) we cherish the warmest paternal affection. We are well aware that not a few of them groan beneath the yoke imposed upon them by men who are in very large part strangers to the real interests of the country. We recognise that many others were deceived by fallacious hopes. We blame only the system with its authors and abettors who considered Russia the best field for experimenting with a plan elaborated years ago, and who from there continue to spread it from one end of the world to the other.” (Pope Pius XI, Encyclical Letter, Divini Redemptoris)

    “The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people.” (Peuple Juif, February, 8th 1919)

    “The achievement (the Russian Revolution) destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of the world war, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent – of Jewish effort to construct – the Bolshevik Movement is neither polite nor tolerant; in its initial phase it was totally destructive. . .” (Svetozar Tonjoroff. The American Hebrew, September 10th, 1920)

    “The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians . . . they (the Jews) having wrecked and plundered Russia by appealing to the ignorance of the working folk are now using their dupes to set up a new tyranny worse than any the world has ever known.” (Robert Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs)

    “In 1936 we proved by means of a whole series of astounding statistics that in Russia today more than 98% of the leading positions are occupied by Jews. . . Who were the leaders in our Bavarian Workers Republic? Who were the leaders of the Spartacist Movement? Who were the real leaders and financiers of the Communist Party? Jews, every one of them. The position was the same in Hungary and in the Red parts of Spain.” (Adolf Hitler, September 1937)

    “There are few Russians among the Bolshevist wire-pullers; i.e. few men imbued with the all-Russian culture and interests of the Russian people. None of them have been in any way prominent in any stage of former Russian life. . . Besides obvious foreigners, Bolshevism recruited many adherents from among émigrés who had spent many years abroad. Some of them had never been to Russia before. They especially numbered a great many Jews. They spoke Russian badly. The nation over which they had seized power was a stranger to them, and besides, they behaved as invaders in a conquered country. Throughout the revolution generally and Bolshevism in particular, the Jews occupied a very influential position. This phenomenon is both curious and complex. But the fact remains that such was the case in the primarily elected Soviet (the famous trio – Lieber, Dahn, Gotz), and all the more in the second one.” (Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams, From Liberty to Brest-Litovsk. MacMillan, 1919)

    “Over one-third of the Jews in Russia have become officials.” (Jewish Chronicle, January 6th, 1933)

    “The great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of the Jews. There are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as privates are concerned, but in the Committees, and in the Soviet organisation as Commissars, the Jews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol of Jewry has become the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former times was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry.” (M. Cohen, The Communist, April 12th, 1919)

    “The exclusive Comintern. The pretence of the Soviet Government that the Comintern is a body completely beyond the range of its influence and authority, is a masterpiece either of make believe or audacity.” (London Times, January 10th, 1936)

    “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolsheviks, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, April, 4th, 1919)

    “Will you say for me to those present at tonight’s meeting how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we hoped for and striven for these long years! ” (Jacob Schiff of the New York bankers, ‘Kuhn, Loeb & Co, New York Times, March 24th, 1917)

    “Today it is estimated even by Jacob Schiff’s grandson, John Schiff, a prominent member of New York society, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia.” (Cholly Knickerbocker, N.Y American Journal, February 3rd, 1949)

    THE GOVERNMENTS OF BOLSHEVIK RUSSIA

    MR NETTYAHOO….HOW MANY MILLIONS OF RUSSIANS AND UKRANIANS WERE SLAUGHTERED- CAN YOU COUNT WITHOUT THE AID OF AN ABACUS?

    AN AMERICAN VOICE:

    E.B Pierce, the President of the American Chamber of Commerce in Berlin, stated on the occasion of a meeting held at the end of May, 1934, that “it would be impossible to speak any longer of orderly economic conditions in Europe if Germany had not succeeded in saving Europe from the dangers of Bolshevism.”

    Clearly the German nation had fallen to an alien racial minority that in the words of the Daily Mail had ‘insinuated themselves’ into a position whereby they effectively controlled Germany as they did Russia.

    Adolf Hitler determined on a course that would recover German control; of German interests, which many would agree under the circumstances was a perfectly legitimate and noble aim. This however is now dressed up as ‘virulent anti-Semitism.’ One might reflect on the horrors that would have been spared the peoples of Russia and scores of other Christian nations had they taken a similar course of action.

    SOMEONE IN AUTHORITY NEEDS TO TELL THE BLOODY TRUTH AND TELL ISRAEL TO QUIT WHINGING ALL THE TIME!

    VIOLENCE EXAGGERATED:

    Hitler’s antagonism towards sections of the international Jewish community has been deliberately falsified and exaggerated to create the impression that Jews in Germany were treated badly. The determination of 680,000 of them to stay suggests otherwise.

    AN ENGLISHMAN’S OBSERVATIONS:

    “My private conversations with Jews were illuminating. They did not bear out what the British newspapers suggested. Mountains had been made out of molehills; melodrama out of comic opera. The majority of the ‘assaults’ were committed by over-zealous youths, and in nearly every instance consisted of ‘ratting’ unfortunate men who were not particularly respectful of the new regime. Physical harm very little, mental, probably much.

    This is what I learned from my Jewish friends, who are staying in Germany and have no intention of leaving the country, nor have they ever been asked to leave the country. Those who wish to leave and return may do so at their own pleasure. The laws relating to the freedom of Jews are substantially the same as those of other people.

    The trouble that has risen has nothing to do with the domiciled Jew, many of whom are still employed by government in various spheres of usefulness. There are about 80,000 undesirable Jews that Germany wants to get rid of for all time, and willingly would she deport them all to Great Britain or the United States of America if the request was made. These are Jews who since the Armistice have penetrated the country and created a situation that has wrought considerable social and political harm in Germany. Among these undesirables are murderers, ex-convicts, potential thieves, fraudulent bankrupts, white slave traffickers, beggars of every description that beggars description, and political refugees. Many have come from Baltic states, others from Poland, and not an inconsiderable number from Russia.” (G.E.O. Knight, In Defence of Germany) “Before the revolution of last March, the Jews in the Reich overran every government department, and enjoyed the highest privileges in every profession and calling. They were the principle organisers of the Communist Party, and became identified with every one of the seventy-two warring political sects in the country. In every way they proved themselves eminently capable businessmen and politicians. Many had grown very wealthy. Nearly every German war profiteer was a Jew; the native German seems to have regarded with feelings of shame and horror the idea of making money out of his country during times of great stress. . .

    That one per cent of the population of Germany should impose their rule and culture – however eminent that culture may be – on more than sixty-million native born Germans is unreasonable, to use no stronger word. . .

    So when the Nazi worm turned, and the services of many Jews were dispensed with, Jewry throughout the world rose in arms and through the medium of the Press here, and public meetings in London and the provinces, denounced the German Government in violent terms.

    The Germans have assumed control of their country, and for weal or woe they mean to maintain their position. The German people are perfectly entitled to possess what form of government they please; it ill becomes us to dictate to them.” (G.E.O. Knight, In Defence of Germany)

    in the years 1933 – 34 had found their way, legally or illegally, out of Germany into foreign parts. . . almost all of the states of the world hermetically sealed their borders against the Jewish emigrants.’

    “What a fearful, what a bitter and shameful fact! . . . later I read many more interesting facts in these documents.” (J.G. Berg)

    JEWS STILL HEADING FOR GERMANY:

    “That even during the anti-Semitic Hitler period in Germany in the years 1933-37, over 10,000 Jews immigrated to Germany; of about 1,200 in 1937, 97 came directly from Palestine. Considering the Press campaign against National Socialism, that is inexplicable because all immigrants were certainly warned: a special investigation of the reasons for the immigration is certainly necessary.” (Dietrich Bronder. Bevor Hitler Kam.) It is worth remembering that whilst Jews were immigrating to Hitler’s Germany, other countries asked to relieve the German state of this problem, refused to accept them. As late as 1945 the Swedish Government was refusing to accept Jews from Germany.

    NO THANK YOU:

    “Very honoured, Herr Himmler! The Jews are just as unwanted in Sweden as in Germany. Therefore I understand you completely on the Jewish question. As medical officer Kersten told me, you have released 5,000 Jews to him for evacuation to Sweden. I am not pleased with this, because I want to move no Jews. Since I cannot, however, officially refuse, I ask you to, Herr Himmler.” (Count Bernadotte of Sweden to Himmler. March 10th, 1945)

    Note the date. We are told that ‘Nazi’ Germany’s intention was to exterminate Jewry, even at enormous expense to the war effort, shipping them in from France, Russia and suchlike. One wonders then at the contrary – and proven evidence – that in fact the beleaguered country was sparing no expense to assist the emigration of Jews to any country that would take them in.

    “That the German Government at that time, in spite of everything, even when the war of total destruction against Germany was drawing to its tragic close, still did not give way to the correspondingly radical course; indeed, it intervened in individual incidents of persecution (against the Jews), when brought to its attention. Even at the end of 1944, it repeated its previously made suggestions (Madagascar, etc.) to remove the Jews from the whole German area of influence. See the statements of Joel Brand in the Kastner proceedings in Jerusalem.” (Scronn)

    SOLDIERS WERN’T TOLD THE TRUTH!

    Furthermore, severe social deprivation, the effect of the Great Depression, social unrest and economic uncertainty in these countries were in contrast to Germany which was experiencing an economic and social miracle. Germany had to be destroyed.

    Hitler was well aware that Britain and America would seek to resolve their problem by initiating a trade war that would destroy Germany and grab its markets.

    “The war was not just a matter of the elimination of Fascism in Germany, but rather of obtaining German sales markets.” (Winston Churchill. Fulton. March 1946)

    MONEY- MONEY MONEY—-

    “Britain was taking advantage of the situation to go to war against Germany because the Reich had become too strong and had upset the European balance.” (Ralph Franklin Keeling)

    ON WAR BEING DECLARED:

    “Uneasiness ruled in the House of Commons. A delegate of the Labour Party met with the British Foreign Minister Halifax on September 2nd, (1939) in the lobby of Parliament. ‘Do you still have hope?’ he asked. ‘If you mean hope for war,’ answered Halifax, ‘then your hope will be fulfilled tomorrow.’

    ‘God be thanked!’ replied the representative of the British Labour Party. (Professor Michael Freund)

    “In Britain, Lord Halifax was reported as being ‘redeemed’. . . “He ordered beer. We laughed and joked.” (H. Roth. Are We Being Lied To?)

    “Germany is too strong. We must destroy her.” (Winston Churchill, November 1936 to US General Wood.)

    “I believe now that Hitler and the German people did not want war. But we declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of balance of power, and we were encouraged by the ‘Americans’ around Roosevelt.” (Sir. Hartley Shawcross. British Attorney General)

    LIBLABCON..CONNING YOU ALL DAILY- WARMONGERS!!

    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/witness1.htm#1

    HOW DISGUSTING IS THIS- A BRITISH GOVERNMENT IMPORTING FOREIGNERS WHILE SHIPPING REAL BRITISH KIDS TO AUSTRALIA….MAY THEY ROT IN HELLSFIRE!!

    One may also wonder that as late as 1943, three and one half years into the war and eleven years after Hitler was elected, there were still 10,000 Jews living openly and freely in the German capital, and married to German wives. Such facts disprove allied propaganda and so they are hidden carefully from sight. It is also interesting to note that whilst in Hitler’s capital city, such numbers of Jews were allowed to go about their business freely, had they been of Japanese descent and living in the United States, all would have been rounded up; men, women and children; orphans and the offspring of mixed marriages, and confined to concentration camps.

    Clearly it was healthier to be a Jew in Berlin, 1943 than it was to be the unfortunate child product of a Japanese-American marriage!

    “In 1939, six years after Hitler was elected, there were still 120,000 Jews living voluntarily in Germany.” (Heinz Roth. Why Are We Being Lied To?)

    The question increasingly being asked is, if Hitler’s intention was to exterminate the Jews, why had he given them every assistance to emigrate throughout his years of government, and how does it explain that years after the alleged program of extermination was begun, 120,000 having had every opportunity and assistance to leave the country had refused to do so?

    JEWS NOT SERIOUSLY HINDERED:

    “The German Jews were being treated like a humbled minority, out of favour. . . the activity of the Jews was in reality not seriously hindered.” (Heinz Roth. Why Are We Being Lied To? – p. 29, 121)

    What is a matter of public record is that by 1939, 400,000 resident Jews had received every assistance, compensation and indeed training to re-settle elsewhere; Madagascar being the chosen destination. This was done in open collaboration with Jewish organisations. Other countries too had a program of assisted emigration not just for Jews but for their own nationals too. The French long before the outbreak of war were planning the emigration of 10,000 Jews.

    Emigration was a normal means of population dispersal and settlement practiced by most countries of which it can safely be said that Britain led from the front. It is well to remember that at this time and for a long time afterwards, the great shipping companies of the world were making enormous profits from the government-subsidised emigration of British nationals to the United States and the Dominions. These included 130,000 British children, many of them without parents, even babes in arms, taken from orphanages and care wards and against their wishes and often without the knowledge of parents, where they had them, forced to leave their homeland and often settled in institutions where they were to suffer every kind of abuse and deprivation.

    Many were lied to and told that they had no parents; often split from their brothers and sisters. This expulsion of our country’s children, and adults too, is a shameful blot on its history and it is interesting to suppose that the Third Reich’s policy of re-settlement was a great deal more enlightened than was Britain’s. Incredibly, this enforced re-settlement of children without parents continued until 1967 and is still cloaked in a veil of secrecy.

    It is equally interesting to reflect that whilst the British governments of the time by a combination of deception and financial inducements (£10 assisted passages to Australia) were draining orphanages of unwanted British children, they were simultaneously assisting the colonisation of Britain by West Indians and others from far-flung territories.

    COLONISATION OF BRITAIN ….LIBLABCONS!!!!

    1933 JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY….MARCH TO BE EXACT!

    ON WAR BEING DECLARED:

    “Uneasiness ruled in the House of Commons. A delegate of the Labour Party met with the British Foreign Minister Halifax on September 2nd, (1939) in the lobby of Parliament. ‘Do you still have hope?’ he asked. ‘If you mean hope for war,’ answered Halifax, ‘then your hope will be fulfilled tomorrow.’

    ‘God be thanked!’ replied the representative of the British Labour Party. (Professor Michael Freund)

    “In Britain, Lord Halifax was reported as being ‘redeemed’. . . “He ordered beer. We laughed and joked.” (H. Roth. Are We Being Lied To?)

    “Germany is too strong. We must destroy her.” (Winston Churchill, November 1936 to US General Wood.)

    “I believe now that Hitler and the German people did not want war. But we declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of balance of power, and we were encouraged by the ‘Americans’ around Roosevelt.” (Sir. Hartley Shawcross. British Attorney General)

    BRAINWASHED THEN- BRAINWASHED TODAY!

    but if it should ever be used in an impartial investigation of the trials grave embarrassment for the Western leaders would be caused. At the war’s end Communists were everywhere in control of the Nazi concentration camps (as will be shown later in this chapter); in the manner above described they became prosecutors and judges of the very crimes which they had committed!

    Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world’s leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war’s end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.

    Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of “mass-extermination” to posterity. At the war’s end Professor Arnold J. Toynbee was producing his monumental Study of History and in its eighth volume (1954) said that “the Nazis . . . reduced the Jewish population of Continental Europe, west of the Soviet Union, from about 6,5 million to about l,5 million by a process of mass-extermination”. He called this “a bare statistical statement” and then added a footnote showing that it was not a statistical statement: “it is not possible to give exact figures based on accurate statistics and it

    400

    seemed improbable in 1952 that the necessary information would ever be obtainable”. Professor Toynbee explains that his figure was based on Jewish “calculations, in which there were several possible sources of error”. He concludes that “it might be estimated” that five million Continental Jews had been done to death by the Nazis.

    The estimate is historically valueless. The starting-point for consideration of this question is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been “done to death” or caused to “perish”, for the reasons given at the start of this discussion; the very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 825,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.

    The number of Jews who were killed or perished will never be known, for the reasons already stated and partly discovered by Professor Toynbee in his footnote to history. The very term “Jew” is indefinable; Jews are often not isolated in statistics; and at no time can the number of living Jews in the world be ascertained with any approach to accuracy. Indeed, any attempt to reach statistical clarity through census or immigration data is attacked as “discrimination” and “anti-semitism”. For instance:

    READING HARRY POTTER KEEPS KIDS DUMB AND STUPID..THEY NEED HISTORY!!

    The Western masses knew nothing of these happenings in British-American-occupied Germany at the time, and might not have objected violently if they had known, for at that period they were still under the influence of wartime propaganda, particularly in the matter of the Nazi concentration camps. They seemed to me completely to have forgotten that the concentration camp was originally a Communist idea, copied by Hitler, and that the further the Red armies were allowed into Europe the more certain its perpetuation became. Their feelings were inflamed by the horrifying news-reel pictures, shown to them on a million screens as the Allied armies entered Germany, of piles of emaciated corpses stacked like firewood in these camps.

    I was a member of those audiences and heard the comments around me with misgiving. Wartime propaganda is the most insidious poison known to man, and I believe these picturegoers of 1945, deprived of truthful information for years, had lost all ability, perhaps all desire to judge what they saw. I think most of them thought the human remains they saw were those of Jews, for this was the suggestion hammered into their minds by the press day by day. They constantly read of “Nazi gas chambers for Jews. . . Nazi crematoria for Jews”, and few of them in later years troubled to read the stories of inmates and find out who these victims truly were. One instance: a German woman who spent five years in Ravensbruck camp (Frau Margaret Bubers Newmann) says the first victims were the sick or afflicted, or those incapable of work, and the next ones were “the

    406

    inferior races”, among whom the Poles were placed first, and the Czechs, Balts, Hungarians and others next.

    Thus the piles of dead received as little true compassion as the living who were driven back by the Western Allies into the concentration-camp area, and today it may be only a matter of historical interest, pertaining to such a book as this, to show that the “Nazi” concentration camps, at the time when the Anglo-American armies entered Germany, were predominantly under Communist control, that Jews were among the tormentors, and that anti-Communism was a surer qualification for the death-chamber than anti-Hitlerism!

    Ten years ago this statement (which I substantiate below) would have been sunk by mere weight of derision, if it could have been published at all. Today enough has been revealed about the Illuminist Communist method of infiltrating every class, party, church, organization and institution for some people at least to await the proof with open mind; or so I suppose. Lenin’s dictum was that all wars must in their course be turned into revolutionary wars, which means that the members of the conspiracy must fight for the success of the revolution, not for their country’s victory. The capture of the concentration camps was more helpful to this strategy than anything else could have been, because the camps were full of people who, if they survived, would have fought Communism, as they fought Hitlerism, to the death. The world has never understood this aspect of the resistance to Hitler, because it never understood Hitler himself. Those who have persisted with this book may see the deep significance of his words to Hermann Rauschning: “I got illumination and ideas from the Freemasons that I could never have obtained from other sources” (almost exactly Adam Weishaupt’s words) “. . . I have learnt a great deal from Marxism . . . The whole of National Socialism is based on it”.

    http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/TheTalmudicVengeance.htm

    WHAT IS HAPPENING TODAY- WAS PLANNED YEARS AGO – TAKES TIME TO BRING A SYSTEM DOWN!!

    YOU’LL HAVE A LONG TIME TO REGRET DOING NOTHING!

    I think personally that if such action is taken, there will be come kind of consultation with the United States,” said Ilan Mizrahi, Mossad’s former deputy director and Israel’s national security adviser until 2007.

    “If Iran breaks all the rules, then military action will be needed, but definitely not alone by a tiny country like Israel,” added Uzi Eilam, a retired general who held senior positions at the Israeli defence ministry.

    But not everyone is so sure. Mr Obama’s willingness to take on Iran militarily is openly questioned in Israel. And while many Israelis do not believe Iran has any intention of actually firing a nuclear missile at them, the the key question is whether their prime minister is one of them.

    In Mr Netanyahu’s eyes, Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another “Hitler” whose aim is to complete what the Holocaust failed to do by wiping out the Jewish race.

    “People outside Israel don’t understand how profound memories of the Holocaust are, and how they affect future policy making,” said Mr Bergman, the military analyst. “At the end of the day, this policy of ‘never again’ would dictate Israel’s behaviour when intelligence comes through that Iran has come close to a bomb.”
    64 MILLION DEAD RUSSIAN CHRISTIANS?

    IRAN NEEDS A BOMB- WITH YOU BUGGERS AROUND!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s