ONLY EUROPEANS ELECT POLITICIANS TO RID THEM OF THEIR INDUSTRIES- RUIN THEM DUE TO BANKING FRAUD- DESTROY THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE- DESTROY ALL THEIR JOBS- THEN BRING IN THE THIRD WORLD SAYING- WE NEED MORE WORKERS TO DO JOBS THEY WON’T DO THEMSELVES- TALK ABOUT GETTING EXACTLY WHAT IS DESERVED- FROM BRITAIN TO AMERIKA EUROPEAN STOCK SEEM INCAPABLE OF DEFENDING WHAT IS THEIRS- THOSE THAT TRIED WERE BOMBED!
Labour dragged into border fiasco over dropped passport checks
Millions of people are feared to have been allowed into Britain without full passport checks in a major new borders scandal.
BUT WHEN STATS ARE SAID TO BE WRONG RE THE UK POPULATION THE SHYSTERS ARGUE TO THE DEATH THAT THEIRS ARE CORRECT?
LIBLABCONS CLOWARD AND PIVEN STRATEGY IN FULL SWING- WAIT FOR FOOD SHORTAGES- WATER ELECTRICITY ETC- THEN YOU’LL ALL ASK WHY!
The Dover scandal has the potential to be bigger than that at the airports Photo: ALAMY By David Barrett, and Alasdair Palmer
9:00PM GMT 12 Nov 2011
All but the most cursory checks were abandoned on passengers on British-registered coaches as they arrived at Dover, Britain’s biggest port.
Instead of passports being scanned electronically, border guards checked that the picture matched the holder. It means they were not cross-checked to a computer database to establish if the holder was a wanted terrorist, criminal or immigration offender.
The policy was in place for four years after being introduced when Labour was in power, but never disclosed to Parliament.
It was implemented because the French complained about congestion in Calais caused by backlogs at passport control.
Ministers discovered the scheme earlier this month and ended it ten days ago when the Border Agency official in charge of the southern ports was suspended, along with Brodie Clark, the director of the UK Border Force, who was accused of relaxing passport checks at airports on non-European Union citizens without ministers’ permission.
Theresa May dispute is an acid test
12 Nov 2011
May urged to release papers from border checks ‘fiasco’
09 Nov 2011
Border chief quits with broadside against May
08 Nov 2011
Border checks relaxed in second rule change
11 Nov 2011
Border official ‘gave away visas for tens of thousands of pounds’
The Dover scandal has the potential to be bigger than that at the airports and will add to political pressure on Theresa May, the Home Secretary.
It is estimated that up to 17 million coach passengers passed through Dover’s ferry terminal in the last four years, of whom the majority would have been on British-registered coaches.
It was not known last night if the policy was implemented at other ports, and whether it was operated around the clock or at the busiest times.
Relaxing controls at Dover is particularly damaging because the port has been identified as one of the main routes for illegal entry to the country.
Camps of people trying to make their way into Britain have sprung up in the French port, with repeated attempts to close them and stop smugglers using lorries or desperate people climbing onto trains and under vans and coaches to enter the UK.
Last night there were calls for a full statement on the suspension of checks at Dover, and for the Home Office to make clear whether it affected other ports on the south coast of England.
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee said he would ask for detailed information on whether ministers were aware of the changes, when Mr Clark and Rob Whiteman, the UKBA chief executive, appear before MPs this week to be questioned on the airports scandal.
“This information raises serious concerns about the history of checks undertaken by the UKBA [United Kingdom Border Agency],” he said.
“We must ensure our border checks are not compromised and that the UKBA has the resources it needs to thoroughly check every individual coming into Britain.
“The committee will question Rob Whiteman and Brodie Clark this Tuesday on exactly what checks have been used and when and who was notified.”
The relaxed security checks were introduced during 2007. That year Jacqui Smith took over as home secretary from Dr John Reid, now Lord Reid of Cardowan, although it is unclear exactly when the changes were introduced.
The key question will be whether Labour ministers were informed. Coalition ministers were unaware of the policy until this month.
The UKBA’s shelving of full passport checks on coach passengers was understood to have been one of the reasons behind the decision to suspend Carole Upshall, director of the UK Border Force’s south and European operations. She was sent home on the same day as Mr Clark, who resigned last week.
He has denied acting without authorisation when he allowed non-European Union citizens to be let through passport controls without full checks when queues became unwieldy at airports.
Managers at the UKBA encouraged staff not to examine the contents of passport biometric microchips, and also dropped “warnings index checks” – the database of people who should be stopped at the border because they are due to be in limited circumstances.
But the revelation that potentially millions of travellers underwent even less rigorous security will raise yet more questions about the way the Home Office has failed to safeguard Britain’s borders.
An estimated 86,000 coaches pass through Dover every year. The Home Office refused to disclose if the scheme was limited to private hire coaches, which make up a significant proportion of coach traffic at the ports and would be likely to have mostly British passengers on board, or included scheduled services to Britain from destinations in Europe, which would include significant proportions of foreigners.
Mr Clark is due to give evidence on Tuesday to the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee, and the scandal is likely to be reignited as the former civil servant gives his first detailed account of his dealings with Mrs May and other ministers.
Mrs May has consistently denied that she authorised in any fashion the relaxation of controls at airports ordered by Mr Clark. She has been backed by his superior, Mr Whiteman, who issued a statement saying that Mr Clark had “admitted to me on November 2 that on a number of occasions this year he authorised his staff to go further than ministerial instruction”.
However, the emergence of separate relaxations at ports for British coaches may serve to increase political pressure on Mrs May.
Labour refused to comment last night on what its ministers knew when they were in government.
Chris Bryant, shadow immigration minister, said: “Theresa May needs to urgently publish the data we know exists and come clean about the scale of the problem – so we can learn lessons and make sure we stop illegal entrants in future.”
Separately, it has also emerged that security checks at Heathrow were significantly watered down on a previous occasion, leading to a dramatic fall in the number of foreign travellers who were refused permission to enter Britain.
During a two-day strike by immigration officers in October last year managers instituted what they described as “light touch” security with fewer checks.
Documents show 22 people were refused leave to enter on the day before the strike, but over the two day action nine were refused.
A Home Office spokesman said: “Nothing is more important than the integrity of our border in order to protect national security and reduce and control immigration.
“There are ongoing investigations into allegations regarding the relaxation of border controls without ministerial approval.
“UKBA ensured additional trained staff authorised to carry out all necessary checks were in place at the border during the strike last year.”
THIS WAS INTENDED…..
1 minute ago
I feel like a immigrant in my own country because of this!
I wont get council housed because I work and dont have loads of kids I cant afford!
I have to wait 3 weeks before I can see a gp
I barely hear english spoken in the high street
All these things have come in the last 15 yrs
3 minutes ago
I fail to understand all the political fuss about border controls or illegal immigrants or how Labour can be critical on anything this government does or does not, after their dismal years in office. In order to control our borders we have leave the EU and get rid of the Human Rights Act, that way would enable us to stop them coming in and those that managed to get in could be readily removed. We cannot do anything whilst we are in the EU and can’t remove any due to this very stupid Human Rights Act.
3 minutes ago
What surprises me is the fact that a lot of people are surprised by this. A stroll down your local High Street will tell you that the claim by politicians that we have any sort of border control has been a pack of lies. I’m amazed that people still allow themselves to be persuaded by the Guardianista line that there is no problem, that this is in fact something to be celebrated. If you have the intelligence to see through such tripe don’t vote for the mainstream parties, vote UKIP.
LIKE UKIP WOULD BE ALLOWED TO CHANGE A DAMNED THING- FARAGE KNOWS THE 1689 ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS MAKES EU ENTRY ILLEGAL- BUT HE NEVER HAS MENTIONED THIS LITTLE GEM- THAT WOULD REFLECT BAD ON THE POLICE/QUEEN ETC- THEY ALLOW THIS TREASON TO CARRY ON- SO DOES UKIP!!
3 minutes ago
This makes Teressa May’s “showboating” at the Tory conference about the dangers the Human Rights act poses to our security look even more ridiculous. Incompetent hypocrit. Of course she can’t be fired, not so soon after Liam Fox going, but when considered along side that it should put paid to any claims the Tories have to being the party that can be trusted on security.
FABIAN MARXISTS YOU MEAN…
4 minutes ago
Just go’s to show what Politicians (Of any creed, Conservative, Labour or Liberal) think of the electorate. For many years now immigration & border controls have topped or come close to the top of peoples concerns in poll after poll but our politicians were quite happy to open the gates with out any checks. We are treated with contempt by them.
THEY TREAD ON YOU ALL- BECAUSE YOU LAY DOWN AND ALLOW THEM TO!
9 minutes ago
We all know Labour effectively abolished immigration controls for over a decade, which is why it was so sickening to see them trying to make capital out of it now. Having tried to suggest it was racist to oppose unlimited immigration, they are now trying to claim that the (very slightly) stricter regime this government brought in was inadequate.
They truly are a loathsome group of people the Labour party.
13 minutes ago
And I thought my government, under the incompetent Barak Obama was run by fools and traitors to the Constitution.
Oh how badly England needs a man like Churchill to bring your country back to sanity. Illegal and uncontrolled immigration is a warning sign of bigger problems within, What else is or has been shortcut or avoided…it does not matter why or for what reason. This deliberate and shortsighted act-for votes or for more sinister means has placed your country at risk for all things bad. Look at the drain on the countries finances by the poor immigrants from all countries–they come because you give them things they dont have to work for. These people do not remain in their own land to fight for improvements to better their homeland–they take the train to the country that gives them the most for free.
You were once the greatest country on the planet…..look at yourselves today. The United States is rapidly following in Englands footsteps. Liberalism, Progressives, Democrats, and Socialists are the cause of our troubles. The reason we became great was because of rigid controls, belief in God, strong work ethic, racial purity, and the Law.
All these have gone by the wayside, replaced by free spirited do what feels good liberals and their self destructive policies and behaviors.
It is us that we should fear, as we have done this to ourselves.
JUST WHAT WE NEED- NOT!
ANOTHER ZIONIST WITH FABIAN SYMPATHIES..AND LIAR!!!
BUT HE COULD SPEAK GOOD- SO DO WIND UP DOLLS.
CLOWARD AND PIVEN STRATEGY FILL THE COUNTRY WITH IMMIGRANTS- OVERWHELM THE SYSTEM- EVENTUALLY IT WILL COLLAPSE!
13 minutes ago
This makes a mockery of Tom Watson’s attacks on James Murdock for not knowing that he had just moved into an office full of crooks. If Murdock is guilty of any wrong doing, a succession of Labour Home Secretaries are guilty of complicity in a plot by senior civil servants to undermine the country’s internal security.
NOTE NO MENTION OF MURDOCH RUNNING THE POLITICAL PARTIES- OR HE BEING AN ISRAELI CITIZEN!
14 minutes ago
To all you good people out there the Pseudo-Marxist-Labour- Party are out to wipe the English out. They have done this by Mass immigration.The indigenous British have been chosen for extinction by a corrupt British establishment.There objective is to fill Britain up with people from the third worlders. If you mix people with interbreeding you then have people that are not united, So that means the populas is easily controlled ie mass supply of cheap Labour.
15 minutes ago
David Cameron should resign for supporting Theresa May. Theresa May should be pursued in courts for assisting with no reason terrorist to enter this country.
35 seconds ago
What have you to say on Labour’s 13 years during which they opened the doors wide and deliberately allowed millions to enter hoping to get their political votes.
LIKE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE- LIBLABCONS!!
19 minutes ago
“Nothing is more important than the
integrity of our border…” And still they lie!
2007 UK POPULATION 77 MILLION PLUS- OF COURSE THEY LIE- SAVES THEIR NECKS!
19 minutes ago
If you are one who voted for these Traitors, whether Labour, Tory or the Euro lap dogs the Lib- Dems then don’t complain, this is what you wanted, this is what you’ve got, you should be rejoicing at your chosen parties immigration policies, what else did you expect that they the Lab,Con Lib-Dem coalition, for that is exactly what they are, not a cigarette papers thickness between the three of them, did you ever think that any one of them would put British Peoples concerns first, Labours and Tory party’s “U” turns on E.U referendums of what ever kind should have told you what your chosen party thinks of “YOU” But like sheep you follow the Judas sheep into the slaughterhouse, innocently, trustingly, as our very country and culture is being eroded away from the inside until the British people will no longer have any say in their own country, Just like the 170+ patriots that where arrested on Friday, Arrested for what? being British. For all our sakes, Do not make that political mistake again. THINK,LISTEN,SEE what is before you, before it’s to late.
ONLY ONE NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED THIS- IGNORED BY THE REST OF THE ZIONIST LACKIES.
Facts on a plate: our population is at least 77 million
Independent on Sunday, The, Oct 28, 2007 by city eye
It is the satatistic that dare not speak its name, though eventually it must. It has huge ramifications for the civil and political life of this country, the health of the equity markets and, most immediately, the residential property market. So don’t forget you read it here first: the population of the UK is presently somewhere between 77 and 80 million.
The 2001 census, already hopelessly out of date and easy to avoid for those who find filling in forms a trifle inelegant, numbered us at a little under 59 million. But as statistics go, that one’s most definitely a damned lie.
My sources for the above statement are good, but scared of admitting the truth for fear of incurring the wrath of Whitehall. It’s like the best way of monitoring illegal drug consumption: forget the pious statements from ministers – the foolproof method is to sample our water and the effluent in it. That’s easily the best way of monitoring what the nation has been consuming.
Consumption – that’s the thing. Based on what we eat, one big supermarket chain reckons there are 80 million people living in the UK. The demand for food is a reliable indicator; as Sir Richard Branson says, you can have all the money in the world but you can only eat onelunch and one dinner.
The supermarket in question was privately lobbying the Competition Commission to let it grow its market share. The argu- ment, reasonably enough, was that the market was far bigger than the regulator realised, so expanding the network was fair.
I have a second, respectable, source. A major, non-commercial agricultural institution reckons there are 77 million of us in the UK. Again, its reckoning is based on what we eat.
That faint background noise you’re hearing as you read this is the sound of everyone slithering off the record. Why? In political terms, standing behind these figures would be to toss a hand grenade into a vat of gasoline. People would be hounded out of a job for scaremongering.
The Office for National Statistics’ figures, published last week, predict a population of 75 million by 2051. It’s an honest estimate but horribly wide of the mark because number counting doesn’t work effectively. If you want to know how many there are of us, ask a food firm.
If the true numbers were revealed, the Little Englanders and xenophobes would come out in force about the evils of immigration. But that’s what made America great in the 19th century, and it’s a driving force of our economy right now. It’s also anti- inflationary.
David Buik, a money manager with broker BGC Partners, was talking of “one million Eastern Europeans unaccounted for in London” on television last week. I suspect he’s right if somewhat conservative in his estimate. How many do you see working in the construction industry and waiting at tables?
And when I say “anti-inflationary”, I mean they are getting rotten wages. Dignified by the term “cheap labour”, the hidden hordes will do well for the services sector, among others. People are assets – to maintain and to be maintained – so we are wealthier as a nation.
All of which is reflected in strong economic demand and markets see-sawing between optimism over what we all see on the streets (that 77 million figure feels right to me) and the possibility of something nasty if the Bank of England credit-crunch prognosis is correct (to echo last week, I think next spring will be unpleasant).
As for housing, property magnates and chief executives of housing associations alike say the expanding population means serious demand for the foreseeable future, credit crunch or no. Next week, I’ll look at the detail of this argument.
Copyright c 2007 Independent Newspapers UK Limited. All rights owned or operated by The Independent.
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.
YOUR DESTINY TO BECOME DEBT SLAVES FOREVER- WITHOUT A COUNTRY TO CALL YOUR OWN – UNLIKE ISRAEL!!
ZOG OF BRITAIN…..HOPES YOU CAN ALL SWIM!
LIED TO FOR SO LONG WE CAN’T SEE THE TRUTH ANYMORE!
Ilich Ulin (Vladimir Ilich Ulia-nov or Nikolaus Lenin). President of the Supreme Soviet, Jew on mothers side. His mother was called Blank, a Jewess of German origin.
“Three-quarters of mankind may die if necessary, to ensure the other quarter for Communism.” (V.I. Lenin)
“In principle we have never and can never renounce terror.” (V.I. Lenin)
“We hate Christianity and Christians. Even the best of them must be regarded as our worst enemies. They preach love of one’s neighbour and mercy, which is contrary to our principles. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the revolution. Down with love of one’s neighbour. What we need is hatred; only thus shall we conquer the universe.” (A. Lunacharsky)
“By May, 1st, 1937, there should not be one single church left within the borders of Soviet Russia, and the idea of God will have been banished from the Soviet Union as a remnant of the Middle Ages, which has been used for the purpose of oppressing the working classes.” (Joseph Stalin)
“We Bolsheviks are going to bring the Social Revolution as much to America as to Europe. It is coming systematically, step by step. The struggle will be long, cruel and sanguinary. . . what matters the loss of 90% by executions if 10% of Communists remain to carry on the revolution? Bolshevism is not a seminary for young ladies. All children should be present at the executions and rejoice at the death of the enemies of the proletariat.” (V.I. Lenin)
Many excellent books contain similar conclusive evidence of the true nature of Communism, but the purposes of this particular book is to simply and adequately describe the background to world events at the time in relation to the rise and fall of the Third Reich.
“In April, 1937, Mr. R.A. Butler, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, India Office, reported in the House of Commons that free tuition was available for Indian students returned to India as Bolshevik recruiters and agitators against Britain.”
HITLER’S RESISTANCE TO BOLSHEVISM:
(Condensed from the Fuhrer’s closing speech, Nuremberg Congress of Honour).
“We do not deny the grave concern which we feel at the thought of other nations becoming a victim of Bolshevism towards which we are deadly antagonistic.
This deadly enmity of ours is not based on an obstinate refusal to recognise any ideas that may be contrary to ours. But this enmity is based on a natural feeling of revulsion towards a diabolical doctrine that threatens the world at large and us.
The first phase in the fight of National Socialism against Communism did not take place in Russia. Soviet Communism already tried to poison Germany between the years 1918 and 1920, and its methods of penetration into this country was much the same as its present-day military efforts in moving the Bolshevik military machine closer and closer to our frontiers.
We have stamped out Bolshevism which Moscow’s bloodfiends such as Lewin, Axelroth, Neumann, Bela-Kuhn, etc. tried to introduce into Germany. And it is because we see day by day these efforts of Soviet rulers to meddle in our domestic affairs have not yet ceased, that we are forced to regard Bolshevism beyond our frontiers as our deadly enemy.
We have fought Bolshevism in Germany as a Weltanschaung that is, as a form of philosophy that endeavoured to poison and destroy our people. And Bolshevism will continue to be fought if it attempts to introduce its sordid Spanish methods into Germany.
It is not the aim of Bolshevism to free nations from their ailments. Its object is to exterminate all that is healthy and replace the same by depravity and degenerate elements. . .
. . .we do not want a situation here in Germany, as in Russia, in which 98% of official key positions are held by alien Jews. Under no circumstances do we want our national intelligence debased.
“. . . Communism however cannot deny that in Russia today 98% of all official positions are held by Jews who not only can never be classed as members of the proletariat, but who have never earned an honest penny in their lives.
” . . . we have fought Bolshevism because its leaders had planned for us a slaughter house on Russian and Spanish lines. Such is the difference between the Bolshevik and the National Socialist revolutions. The one transforms prosperous and peaceful countries into a waste of ruin and devastation, whilst the other, re-builds a broken-down and poverty stricken Reich into an economically sound and prosperous state.”
We believe that it is a bigger task to put 5 million people back to work than to burn down houses and churches and allow hundreds of thousands of workers and peasants and others to kill each other. We have also fought Bolshevism on general economic grounds. From time to time the world hears of hunger famines in Russia. Since, 1917, that is, since the victory of Bolshevism, there is no end to this form of distress,
This self-same Russia, starving for close on 20 years, was one of the richest grain countries in the world.
When compared with Germany, Russia possesses 18 times more land per head of population, and yet what a sorry form of economic policy this country must have to deny its people a decent form of livelihood. If Bolshevism in Russia, however, does not succeed in getting nine farmers to produce sufficient to at least support one non-farmer what then would have happened in Germany, where two and a half farmers produce sufficient to support seven and a half non-farmers? What would have happened to Germany and the whole of its economic structure if Jewish-Bolshevik economic malpractice had ever been allowed to take root here?
“We have fought Bolshevism because a victory for it in Germany would have spelt starvation for perhaps 50% of our population. If Russia is incapable of supporting not even eight people per square kilometre, then in Germany under Bolshevik rule, not even ten millions would have had the necessary minimum standard of living. For here in Germany our 68 million people occupy the same area which in Russia would not support more than 5 million.
Bolshevism preaches world revolution, and it would use the German workers as cannon fodder for the attainment of its goal. We National Socialists, however, do not want our military forces to be used for forcing upon other nations something that they do not want. Our Army does not swear an oath that it will carry our National Socialist ideology to other nations.”
British politicians in England have so far not had the opportunity of learning what Communism in one’s own country stands for. But we have. As I am the one who has fought against this Judeo-Soviet teaching in Germany and stamped it out, I flatter myself that I possess more understanding of the true character of Bolshevism than those arm-chair critics who at most have read up on the subject a little. Today, I follow the spread of Bolshevik poison throughout the world just as assiduously as I followed its poisonous trail years ago in Germany, and never lost an opportunity of warning the country.
The abhorrent mass-murders of nationalists, the burning alive of wives of nationalist officers after soaking them in petrol – the revolting murder of children on nationalist parents as for example in Spain, should serve as a warning to help to break down resistance on other countries. . .” (Adolf Hitler)
“If my international opponents reproach me today that I have refused this co-operation with Russia, I make the following declaration: I do not and did not reject co-operation with Russia but with Bolshevism, which lays claim to world rulership.
The German nation has not only wept but has laughed heartily throughout its life and I will not see it descend into the gloom of international communism and the dictatorship of hate. I tremble for Europe at the very thought of what would happen to our old and over-populated continent if this Asiatic concept of the world, which is destructive of all our ideals, should be successful in bringing upon us the chaos of the Bolshevik revolution.” – Adolf Hitler, March, 7th, 1936
“Bolshevism turns flourishing countryside into sinister wastes of ruins; National Socialism transforms a Reich of destruction and misery into a healthy state with a flourishing economic life.” – Adolf Hitler
“Since I have fought against these Jewish-Soviet ideas in Germany, since I have conquered and stamped out this peril, I fancy that I possess a better comprehension of its character than do these men who have only to deal with it in the field of literature.” (Adolf Hitler)
HE WAS RIGHT OR WRONG TO DEFEND HIS COUNTRY?
MIND WE ALREADY HAD FABIAN COMMIES IN PARLIAMENT…………..THEY AIN’T GONNA START KICKING OFF ARE THEY- UNTIL THE TIME IS RIGHT…………….THEIR MOTTO – WHEN WE STRIKE WE STRIKE HARD!!
HAD OUR POLITICIANS- JUST ONE, ANY BALLS THEN WE’D HAVE A LEADER TO FEEL PROUD OF- INSTEAD OF THE BANKERS HAND PICKED YES MEN WE HAVE TODAY.
RADIO PRESENTOR LBC JUST SAID:
WE COULD HAVE BEEN SPEAKING GERMAN HAD THE NAZIS HAD THEIR WAY……………ABSOLUTE BOLLOCKS!
WE’D BE SPEAKING ENGLISH – EVEN IN OUR MULTI-LANGUAGE SCHOOLS…….OF 100s OF LANGUAGES!
FIGHTING FOR QUEEN AND COUNTRY…………KIDOLOGY.
ISRAEL ISN’T A BRITISH SOLDIERS COUNTRY.
“In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War. . . the vanquished are in the process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished. . . whatever else might be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.” – Winston Churchill, 1935
“. . . and the achievement by which the tables have been turned upon the complacent, feckless and purblind victors deserves to be reckoned a prodigy in the history of the world and a prodigy which is inseparable from the personal exertions of life thrust on a single man. . .
Those who have met Hitler face to face in public, business, or on social terms, have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a discerning smile and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism.
Nor is this impression merely the dazzle of power. He exerted it on his companions at every stage in his struggle, even when his fortunes were in the lowest depths. . .
One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I should hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.” – Winston Churchill, ‘Step by Step’, p.143
“Germans in their country are not less well cared for than the English people in theirs, but better. You are faced with a country immensely strong in arms and immensely strong in real wealth – not in gold bars in a vault of the national bank, but industry, agriculture, the thrift and energy of the work people, and the conditions of life they enjoy.
In German now they have a mighty organisation, equipped with full powers, for improving the lot of the work people in factories and workshops. Their engineers and social workers and artists go into the factories and see what needs to be done. They say that a shower room, recreation room, a restaurant, a medical clinic, a dental clinic is needed and these ere provided. They have a civic sense, a social conscience, a feeling of the community of German mankind – in spite of the bestial concentration camps – which you lack.”
AND OF THOSE ‘CONCENTRATION CAMPS’ ANOTHER ENGLISHMAN REVEALS ALL:
“In August, 1933 there were seven thousand ‘political prisoners’ (Britain’s prison population is in excess of 50,000) in Germany of which about 700 are Communists. Most were convicted of political crimes as we define them, but rather of anti-social behaviour and crime.
The discipline in the camp was of the robust kind. Every man had some kind of work to do, but this was not always enforced. The camp rose at 6.00am and all lights were out at 9.00pm. The meals consisted of breakfast, dinner, supper with meat served daily except on Fridays. There was a dispensary attached to the camp and a German doctor was in charge. Severe cases of illness were sent to the local hospital.
Various trades were carried on inside the camp such as carpentry, tailoring and shoemaking. Part of the camp was set off for bathing. Shower baths and facilities for sunbathing were shown to me. There was also a splendid sports ground.
The sleeping compartments consisted of wooden beds and straw mattresses, with three blankets for each prisoner. The working hours were from 7.00am to 11.30am and from 1.00pm to 6.00pm. A library was in the course of being introduced.
Visitors were allowed once a week, and were received in the dining room which accommodated some 300 people. There were apartments set apart for music and dramatic performances. In addition to receiving free board and lodging, each prisoner was drawing 10DM to 12DM per week, which represented his unemployment allowance pay.
Instruction in ethics, religion, the new form of government in Germany, history, languages, was given daily to those who desired to attend. There was little or no crime among the men in the camp. Good order prevailed among all classes. The guards ate the same food as the prisoners, and were subject to the same disciplines as the internees, although they were government officials. One of the guards was a prince of the House of Hesse.
Letters and parcels were subject to censorship. In not one case out of many thousands received had it been found necessary to destroy any parcel or letter forwarded. Newspapers were permitted and smoking allowed. When a prisoner desired to light his pipe or cigarette, he had to go to a guard detailed off to supply lights for the prisoners, as no matches were permitted prisoners.
Services were held every Sunday and the majority of the opportunity. No objection was raised by the authorities to my taking photographs of both camps and internees.
The men looked in splendid physical condition. Having heard so may dreadful stories of brutal treatment being meted out to Communists in this particular camp, I asked some of the men to confide in me and tell me the truth of those allegations. Not a few laughed at ‘the bloody capitalist liars in your country.’ I took fifteen men at random and asked them to strip in my presence. I wanted to see if they bore any marks of violence on their persons. I saw nothing indicative of bad treatment.” – G.E.O. Knight, In Defence of Germany, (who was allowed complete freedom of movement in all camps)
I’D TAKE THE WORDS OF DOUGLAS REED WAR CORRESPONDANT WW2 AND EX SOLDIER WW1 THAN ANY STINKING HIGHLY PAID CORRUPT POLITICIAN- BOUGHT AND PAID FOR ZIONIST SPIV…
I FEEL ANGRY AND SAD TODAY THAT SO MANY BRITISH MEN AND WOMEN- AND EUROPEANS IN GENERAL WENT TO WAR FOR NOTHING THAT WOULD BENEFIT THEM OR THEIR NATIONS- JUST THE OPOSITE INFACT!