The Real Libya: What Mainstream Media Won’t Show

6 MILLION POPULATION THE MEDIA SHOW A FEW HUNDRED SELECTED REBELS-AL-QAEDA.

The Real Libya: What Mainstream Media Won’t Show
Rolando SeguraPosted on: November 8, 2011

MANIPULATED BY YOUR MEDIA….

The Real Libya: What Mainstream Media Won’t Show
by grtv
Footage of Libya before, during and after NATO attacks.

Produced by Rolando Segura, correspondent for Telesur in Libya. Presented at the headquarters of the Unión de Periodistas de Cuba on October 7, 2011.

Real clip realizado por Rolando Segura, corresponsal de Telesur en Libia y presentado en la sede de la Unión de Periodistas de Cuba, el 7 de octubre de 2011.

2011 / 11 / 08
Mike Corbeil says:
I just came across the following list of 14 things about Libya we should all know about and they’re all either very good or great. It’s a copy of a list found elsewhere on the Web and was posted by Rafael Ontiveros October 27th.

“Things about Libya you should tell everyone about”
https://www.facebook.com/notes/rafael-ontiveros/things-about-libya-you-s…

Actually, I just tried a Web search to try to find the copy that the list in the above page was copied from and came across the following 4-minute video that presents 16 great things about the Gaddafi-era government.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7bIY2mvJQ0

I’ve heard and read from people like Pepe Escobar and some others who have feature articles at GR that Gaddafi was dictator, and maybe also that the Libyan government sometimes tortured and wrongly imprisoned people. Perhaps it was other people who said the latter about the Libyan government, but Pepe Escobar has admitted that Gaddafi was dictatorial, though without saying really more than that about him in this regard. It didn’t seem like Pepe Escobar was saying that Gaddafi was a wicked, vicious, … dictator, but, instead, only saying he was dicatorial; or, so I believe to recall.

Well, good or reasonably good, fair dictators would still make Washington and NATO leaders look bad when comparing them. I’ld prefer to have a dictator like Gaddafi, rather than what we have with Washington and even Ottawa, which do much less good for their citizens and other residents, rob taxpayers, constantly lie us into wars, and so on.

DEMONISATION- THEN ATTACK….IRAN IN DEMONISATION PHASE!!

YOU’RE BECOMING AKIN TO TOYS- THE ZOG PLAYS A GAME AND YOU PLAY YOUR PART OF THE SUBSERVIENT SERF!

2011 / 11 / 08
Mike Corbeil says:
I just came across the following list of 14 things about Libya we should all know about and they’re all either very good or great. It’s a copy of a list found elsewhere on the Web and was posted by Rafael Ontiveros October 27th.

“Things about Libya you should tell everyone about”
https://www.facebook.com/notes/rafael-ontiveros/things-about-libya-you-s…

Actually, I just tried a Web search to try to find the copy that the list in the above page was copied from and came across the following 4-minute video that presents 16 great things about the Gaddafi-era government.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7bIY2mvJQ0

I’ve heard and read from people like Pepe Escobar and some others who have feature articles at GR that Gaddafi was dictator, and maybe also that the Libyan government sometimes tortured and wrongly imprisoned people. Perhaps it was other people who said the latter about the Libyan government, but Pepe Escobar has admitted that Gaddafi was dictatorial, though without saying really more than that about him in this regard. It didn’t seem like Pepe Escobar was saying that Gaddafi was a wicked, vicious, … dictator, but, instead, only saying he was dicatorial; or, so I believe to recall.

Well, good or reasonably good, fair dictators would still make Washington and NATO leaders look bad when comparing them. I’ld prefer to have a dictator like Gaddafi, rather than what we have with Washington and even Ottawa, which do much less good for their citizens and other residents, rob taxpayers, constantly lie us into wars, and so on.

http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2011/11/real-libya-what-mainstream-media-wont-show

RICH MANS WAR

DEMONISATION OF ISRAEL- NEVER IN A MONTH OF SUNDAYS WILL THAT WARMONGER BE MADE TO PAY!

SHE’S UGLY OUTSIDE AND INSIDE…

Rice says US Must Bring Down Iran Government

8th Nov

Former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says Washington must never take the military option off the table and do everything in its power to bring the Iranian government down.

Rice told This Week political affairs program of ABC television network on Sunday that the US should consider even tougher penalties against Iran’s government and “be doing everything we can to bring it down.”

She stressed that the US should never take the option of military force off the table when it comes to dealing with Iran, AP reported.

The US and its allies have intensified their anti-Iran rhetoric ahead of the IAEA report on the country’s nuclear program.

On November 4, Israeli President Shimon Peres said that an attack on Iran was becoming increasingly more likely.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the Knesset October 31 in an effort to garner support for a military attack on Iran over its nuclear program.

Supported by Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Netanyahu argued that Israel should proceed with efforts to encourage the West to exert more economic and political pressure on Iran.

He also emphasized that any action against Iran should be carried out in full coordination with the United States.

Israel, which is widely believed to possess over 300 atomic warheads, along with the US accuses Tehran of pursuing a military nuclear program.

Under pressure from Washington and Tel Aviv, the UN Security Council has imposed four rounds of sanctions against Tehran. Washington and the European Union have also adopted unilateral measures against Iran’s energy sector.

While Israel refuses to allow inspections of its nuclear facilities or to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty based on its policy of nuclear ambiguity, Iran is a signatory to the NPT and has been subjected to snap International Atomic Energy Agency inspections due to its policy of nuclear transparency.

Israel has recently test fired a new long-range missile capable of carrying nuclear warheads. The test was carried out at the Palmahim air base in central Israel.

This three-stage Jericho-3 missile which is capable of delivering a 750-kilo warhead to a distance, is estimated to have a range of up to 10,000 kilometers.

Paradoxically, the new nuke-capable missile, which can target many parts of the globe, is not considered a threat in the eyes of the West.

AIMING THEM AT EUROPEAN CITIES- ONLY ZOG COLLUDING WITH THE ZIONIST FASCIST STATE OF ISRAEL DON’T CARE ABOUT THE THREAT POSED TO GOYIM NATIONS.

TALMUDIC VENGEANCE IS ALL THAT MATTERS- WW1, WW2, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN,LIBYA PROVES THAT!

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27524

2 responses to “The Real Libya: What Mainstream Media Won’t Show

  1. Like Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln, Muammar Ghadafi was resisting Rothschild world hegemony. An article in The New American, explains how Gadhafi became an outcast after being a “trusted ally” for so long:

    According to more than a few observers, Gadhafi’s plan to quit selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars — demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold) — was the real cause. The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.

    Gadhafi’s Gold-money Plan Would Have Devastated Dollar

    Written by Alex Newman
    Friday, 11 November 2011 10:15
    It remains unclear exactly why or how the Gadhafi regime went from “a model” and an “important ally” to the next target for regime change in a period of just a few years. But after claims of “genocide” as the justification for NATO intervention were disputed by experts, several other theories have been floated.

    Oil, of course, has been mentioned frequently — Libya is Africa‘s largest oil producer. But one possible reason in particular for Gadhafi’s fall from grace has gained significant traction among analysts and segments of the non-Western media: central banking and the global monetary system.

    According to more than a few observers, Gadhafi’s plan to quit selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars — demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold) — was the real cause. The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.

    And it literally had the potential to bring down the dollar and the world monetary system by extension, according to analysts. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a “threat” to the financial security of the world. The “Insiders” were apparently panicking over Gadhafi’s plan.

    “Any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks,” noted financial analyst Anthony Wile, editor of the free market-oriented Daily Bell, in an interview with RT. “So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward [for] removing him from power.”

    According to Wile, Gadhafi’s plan would have strengthened the whole continent of Africa in the eyes of economists backing sound money — not to mention investors. But it would have been especially devastating for the U.S. economy, the American dollar, and particularly the elite in charge of the system.

    “The central banking Ponzi scheme requires an ever-increasing base of demand and the immediate silencing of those who would threaten its existence,” Wile noted in a piece entitled “Gaddafi Planned Gold Dinar, Now Under Attack” earlier this year. “Perhaps that is what the hurry [was] in removing Gaddafi in particular and those who might have been sympathetic to his monetary idea.”

    Investor newsletters and commentaries have been buzzing for months with speculation about the link between Gadhafi’s gold dinar and the NATO-backed overthrow of the Libyan regime. Conservative analysts pounced on the potential relationship, too.

    “In 2009 — in his capacity as head of the African Union — Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi had proposed that the economically crippled continent adopt the ‘Gold Dinar,’” noted Ilana Mercer in an August opinion piece for WorldNetDaily. “I do not know if Col. Gadhafi continued to agitate for ditching the dollar and adopting the Gold Dinar — or if the Agitator from Chicago got wind of Gadhafi’s (uncharacteristic) sanity about things monetary.”

    But if Arab and African nations had begun adopting a gold-backed currency, it would have had major repercussions for debt-laden Western governments that would be far more significant than the purported “democratic” uprisings sweeping the region this year. And it would have spelled big trouble for the elite who benefit from “freshly counterfeited funny-money,” Mercer pointed out.

    “Had Gadhafi sparked a gold-driven monetary revolution, he would have done well for his own people, and for the world at large,” she concluded. “A Gadhafi-driven gold revolution would have, however, imperiled the positions of central bankers and their political and media power-brokers.”

    Adding credence to the theory about why Gadhafi had to be overthrown, as The New American reported in March, was the rebels’ odd decision to create a central bank to replace Gadhafi’s state-owned monetary authority. The decision was broadcast to the world in the early weeks of the conflict.

    In a statement describing a March 19 meeting, the rebel council announced, among other things, the creation of a new oil company. And more importantly: “Designation of the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and appointment of a Governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi.”

    The creation of a new central bank, even more so than the new national oil regime, left analysts scratching their heads. “I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising,” noted Robert Wenzel in an analysis for the Economic Policy Journal. “This suggests we have a bit more than a rag tag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences,” he added. Wenzel also noted that the uprising looked like a “major oil and money play, with the true disaffected rebels being used as puppets and cover” while the transfer of control over money and oil supplies takes place.

    Other analysts, even in the mainstream press, were equally shocked. “Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power?” wondered CNBC senior editor John Carney. “It certainly seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era.”

    Similar scenarios involving the global monetary system — based on the U.S. dollar as a global reserve currency, backed by the fact that oil is traded in American money — have also been associated with other targets of the U.S. government. Some analysts even say a pattern is developing.

    Iran, for example, is one of the few nations left in the world with a state-owned central bank. And Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein, once armed by the U.S. government to make war on Iran, was threatening to start selling oil in currencies other than the dollar just prior to the Bush administration’s “regime change” mission.

    While most of the establishment press in America has been silent on the issue of Gadhafi’s gold dinar scheme, in Russia, China, and the global alternative media, the theory has exploded in popularity. Whether salvaging central banking and the corrupt global monetary system were truly among the reasons for Gadhafi’s overthrow, however, may never be known for certain — at least not publicly.

    Related articles:

    Libya: Now What?

    “Libyan Rebels” Create Central Bank, Oil Company

    Brief History of Gadhafi & His Regime

    U.S. Officials Celebrate Killing of Former Ally Gadhafi

    Waking up to a World Currency

    Al-Qaeda and NATO’s Islamic Extremists Taking Over Libya

    Fed Manipulations in the Crosshairs

    Trackback(0)
    TrackBack URI for this entryComments (7)
    Subscribe to this comment’s feedmaryflny said:

    It explains why the sudden concern that Iran maybe capable of obtaining nuclear weapons. I didnt know what could the sudden concern but I didn’t believe the media hype! I support Ron Paul’s foreign policy.

    November 11, 2011

    Pat Henry said:
    there’s regiome change and then there’s regime change
    Any “monetary system” that can be “brought down” by some people choosing to do business in gold or silver money, or even trading commodities, is inherently an unstable system. Is is smart to play such a supposed “confidence game”?

    November 11, 2011

    Pat Riot said:

    Who would have guessed that the banksters were involved in more murderous scheming! Certainly not me! (That was sarcasm by the way!)

    November 12, 2011

    aubreyfarmer said:

    The Zionist zeal to control the world is going to wind up destroying the world.

    November 13, 2011

    JackD said:
    It’s now official – there’s been no actual shortage
    of Holocaust Survivors :

    Quote from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso in the year 2000:
    ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million.’ (page 83)

    I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.

    In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    November 14, 2011

    S. Wesley Mcgranor said:

    Gadhafi was an iconoclast and genius.

    R.I.P.

    November 14, 2011

    Ken E said:

    Reading this story, and the stories it links to within it’s text, (and even some of the comments) is pretty eye-opening. It would appear there’s a very deadly winner-take-all game being played by the world’s financial giants, kind of like Monopoly and Risk rolled into one. And the ‘one-world’ economic and political system doesn’t seem so very far away.
    Some suggested reading: Daniel, chapters 8-11

    November 14, 2011

    http://thenewamerican.com/economy/markets-mainmenu-45/9743-gadhafis-gold-money-plan-would-have-devastated-dollar

    http://www.henrymakow.com/when_the_united_states_was_lib.html

    According to more than a few observers, Gadhafi’s plan to quit selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars — demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold) — was the real cause. The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.

    And it literally had the potential to bring down the dollar and the world monetary system by extension, according to analysts. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a “threat” to the financial security of the world. The “Insiders” were apparently panicking over Gadhafi’s plan.

    When Abraham Lincoln eschewed the bankers’ exorbitant rates and financed the war by creating “greenbacks,” the bankers panicked.

    Their house organ The London Times, feared that, “if the US furnished its own money without cost, it would be without debt and would have all the money necessary to carry on commerce. It would become prosperous beyond precedent…[It] must be destroyed.”

    Gadhafi was shot down in the dessert like a dog; Abe Lincoln was murdered at Ford theater.

    Both the US Civil War and the Libyan revolution were instigated by the bankers to undercut opposition to their satanic world government agenda.

    The final irony is that now, the US is the Rothschild’s chosen goon menacing Iran, the last hold-out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s