Cultural Marxism and Faux Chivalry

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

Cultural Marxism and Faux Chivalry

One of the most sickening aspects of life today that I see, literally everywhere, is the perverse sense of chivalry that has been fed to our society over the last fifty years and what that leads too. Men’s chivalry has been deliberately and calculatedly twisted, by a bombardment of social messages coming at them from TV, Radio, pop music and music videos, movies and pouring out of the media in millions of articles over that fifty years period. All of which are driven by the precepts of Cultural Marxism.

Chivalry is basically a very noble act of sacrifice. It is putting the welfare of others, especially the weak, before ones own welfare. It is a concept founded upon the Christian principles of loving and serving others.

It is important here to define a term. “Weak” in this context does not just mean someone who is not physically strong. It means someone who is unable to fend for themselves for whatever reason. Thus, a man who is built like Mike Tyson but who is being set upon by a large gang of robbers is, in that situation, weak, out numbered, possibly overwhelmed and in need of assistance. Even, if those giving this big man a beating and robbing him all happen to be little schoolgirls armed with baseball bats. The truly chivalrous man assesses the situation and lends assistance based upon what he perceives the just thing to do is. In another situation, a man with food may happen upon a group without food and give all, or some, of his food to them. That is chivalrous. A fireman rushing up a ladder and risking his own life to save others is acting chivalrously. He is safe (strong) but is going to their aid because they are in danger (weak). Chivalry, as it was meant to be, is a very good thing for society. Widely practised it ensures that everyone looks out for everyone else. Also expressed as, ‘love thy neighbour,’ an idea which to the socialist Statist is anathema, because it implies personal and not collective responsibility.

What is not good for society is the new perverted chivalry that has replaced the old model. Under the new (45 year old) model of chivalry — which is based upon socialist political ideas and not Christian teaching — the new chivalry is almost exclusively something done by the State to the people and not by the good people for society. This removes the element of personal responsibility from everyone except those tasked with being managers of society. The people lose all sense of personal leadership and responsibility and instead, rely upon the leadership of others chosen for them by the State apparatus. The people are thus like children in a classroom, relying upon ‘Sir’ or ‘Miss’ at the front to make all their decisions for them. Of course, the thinking behind this barely disguised totalitarianism is that the people are sheep (sheeple) that need to be led everywhere by an appointed and specially trained ‘leader.’ If you treat society like a bunch of kids who are not grown up, what you get is an immature society that never grows up. You will turn people into sheep and thus your ideology becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, but not because the prophecy was true in the beginning, but because you would like it to be true and so engineered things, that it took on the illusion of truth. So we have the insane position of the State telling us we must be more personally responsible and then imposing methods to ensure we are not! In today’s politics in Britain, both the left and right wings engage in this behaviour. So much so, that the only discernible difference between them much of the time is found in the colour of the ties they wear. So what the right have called in the past, ‘new consensus politics,’ actually means, adopting leftist ideas.

[As an aside, dear reader. I recently had a socialist tell me that Jesus Christ was a socialist too. I looked at him aghast. Not so much because of his stupidity, as the fact that he was the product of a socialist education policy and had been taught that nonsense. When I explained that Socialism is a political perversion of Christianity that attempts to replace Christ with the State, I literally saw the light come on in his eyes as the penny dropped.]

Another disturbing outcome of this ‘new chivalry’ is that the faux chivalrous behaviour of men in society now ONLY applies to females and no longer to ALL of the weak. Neither does it stop there. New socialist chivalrous behaviour insists that strong men attack weak men. Thus turning the whole concept on its head. Remember, “weak” does not just mean someone who is not physically strong.

It should be stressed here that this faux chivalry I am speaking of has also been adopted as the model by many females. This creates in them an astoundingly warped idea of how men should treat them. Basically, the outcome of this warped idea is that females should be given carte blanch to treat men, children and indeed, society itself, in any way they see fit and that men who object if they see this behaviour as bad for society, are somehow, twisted themselves and must hate women simply because they object. To the female (and male) thus infected, any amount of bad behavior she might indulge in must be accepted, simply because she is a female and is thus physically weaker than men. To deny her the right to behave how she chooses is to ‘oppress’ her and ‘abuse’ her. This video perfectly sums up this attitude. Please, watch it carefully and note the outrage of the female onlooker shouting because the police are treating a badly behaved female as, well, badly behaved. Under faux chivalry, this is forbidden. Females are a protected species, exempt from normal social rules. Males following the old rules are seen as oppressive beaters of women and this attitude is, of course, Cultural Marxism in action and sold to us through the political mechanism of feminism.

Did you also notice how the female uses her appeals to faux chivalry as a means to try and stoke and promote violence in the males around her, while acting all the while like an aggressive male herself? This, she no doubt believes, is ‘liberation’ and female ’emancipation.’ In reality, it is neither. Rather, it is political and social manipulation of females of the worst and most cynical kind, but more on that in later posts.

Any man that now tries to curb female excess and bad behaviour is, under faux chivalry, automatically branded as misogynist. Therefore, when females attack the weak (keeping in mind again, that “weak” does not mean, physically weaker) any man seeking to stop them will be viewed by other females and many other men as “attacking” women because he “hates” them. Thus, in this way, men turn against men and real chivalry is destroyed.

We can see how this is applied to our attitudes over male victims of domestic abuse also. Consider the male in the home with an abusive wife or partner. What are some of his options? He may leave, but if he has children that can be legally and socially difficult to do and he may elect to stay to offer them his protection. (True chivalry) He may stay because he feels obligated to help this abusive female (faux chivalry).

Let’s imagine he stays for whatever reason. What can he do, legally, to protect himself from assault? He cannot fight back. If he does, he will be branded the abuser and jailed. (Faux chivalry that has infected the legal and political establishment, as well as society, influenced the writing of those laws that emasculate the male victim). He may restrain her, but if in the process he bruises her, then he may be arrested for domestic violence also. He may just take the abuse passively, but then other men will denigrate him as a wimp. (Faux chivalry). He may call for help from the authorities but that may end in him being excluded from his own home. (Faux chivalry — the strong authorities failing to defend the ‘weak’ man in this situation). Again, this is Cultural Marxism in action, spearheaded by the feminist pressure groups that brought this intolerable and unjust situation about for our male victims of domestic abuse.

We see then that true chivalry is good for society and faux chivalry is divisive and destructive. Once again, Marxist teaching and totalitarian tendencies pervert and twist the true meanings of our Christian heritage while at the same time, pretending to adopt those teachings. Their message is simple. You do not need Christ because the State is your new Messiah. A message that appeals to the most base power hungry politicians of all persuasions, but one which is both dangerous and destructive to the freedoms of liberty loving people everywhere.

All socialist politics are based upon collectivism. To get an overview of the collectivist mindset I recommend watching these three videos. I raise my hat to ‘Aliegory’ on Twitter for pointing them out to me.

Man With A Pen
I am sick and tired of being told the mess we all live in today, created largely by left wing Cultural Marxism, is ‘the norm’ and we all have to just live with it. I am neither hard right or hard left in my politics. Neither am I the traditional middle of the road UK Liberal. I support those politics that make sence to me and are good for my people and my country. In other words, my politics are my own and not those dictated to me by any one party. I loath and detest extremist politics and cannot understand why my country of Britain has adopted so much of the extreme left’s ideology. In particular,I loath Marxist-Feminism because it kills people. It destroys lives. It ruins families and it is totalitarian in nature. The lie that it is about fighting for female rights and “equality” has to be nailed and that is what this Blog is all about… Nailing the lies. After all, if we wait for the media to do it we will all die of old age, because half of the idiots that work in the media are as brainwashed as Pavlov’s dogs!

http://justamanwriting.blogspot.com/2011/08/one-of-most-sickening-aspects-of-life.html

One response to “Cultural Marxism and Faux Chivalry

  1. http://justamanwriting.blogspot.com/2011/08/one-of-most-sickening-aspects-of-life.html

    FROM CRANMER…

    Tuesday, November 08, 2011
    “We will never know how many people entered the country”

    It beggars belief that a party dedicated to lowering immigration and tightening control of the nation’s borders could preside over such a fiasco. It transpires that someone somewhere gave a green light for UK Border Agency staff not to carry out full checks on the passports of hundreds of thousands of people seeking entry into the UK. Home Secretary Theresa May said it wasn’t her; Immigration Minister Damian Green said it wasn’t him.

    So it must either have been rogue Border Agency staff who assume the authority to waive the rules and wave through immigrants when the queues get a bit too long, or the Home Secretary is being economical with the actualité. Either way, she told the House of Commons yesterday: “As a result of these unauthorised actions, we will never know how many people entered the country who should have been prevented from doing so.”

    http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2011/11/we-will-never-know-how-many-people.html

    READ THE REST ABOVE…

    CHANGE THE PEOPLE- YOU CHANGE THE COUNTRY…..

    2011 13:37
    DP111 said…
    Nations are defined by borders, language, and culture”.

    And in the present situation they are being defined by religion (culture), race(ethnicity), and language last. This situation is an order of magnitude more explosive then anything in our history.

    Even if we were not heading to a low grade civil war, a multicultural society based on the present mix, can never have internal cohesiveness. Each segment of society is in competition with others, and politicians by their very nature and requirement, will appease one segment or the other. This leads to ill will and bitterness. It also becomes impossible for a group or individuals to sacrifice their own interest for the common good -thus leading to an end of the nation.

    Multicultural nation may just work as long as there is an abundance of goodies to go around. But once hard times come, as they must, it will lead to increasing competition, leading to low grade civil war, and finally war itself.

    8 November 2011 13:56

    AMERICAN POLITICIAN ON SKY NEWS THIS WEEK…RAILED AGAINST MULTICULTURALISM AND WHAT IT’S DONE TO AMERICA–ADDING EUROPE IS FURTHER AHEAD THAN WE HERE.

    ELECTED POLITICIANS- OWN THE COUNTRY NOT YOU!

    THEY DECIDE HOW IT WILL LOOK……THEY FANCIED A BROWNISH COLOURED PEOPLE BACK IN THE 60s UNDER WILSON- THE FABIAN SET ABOUT HIS WISH…..2011 WE SEE IT CLEARLY.

    BLACKCURRENT INTO THE GLASS OF WATER- EVENTUALLY THE WATER WILL VANISH LEAVING ONLY BLACKCURRENT……………….THATS A GENOCIDE UNDER UN………TO REPLACE AN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES!

    TO CAUSE DAMAGE TO A PEOPLES THAT CAN PUT AN END TO THAT RACE OF PEOPLE. WITH 80 MILLION PLUS HERE SINCE 2007 THE ENGLISH CAN’T BE OFF BEING THE MINORITY POPULATION….WE HAVE LOADS OF OLD FOLK- BUT NOT LOADS OF YOUNG- APPROX 13 MILLION OLD PPL…….STAND IN ANY CAR PARK AND TAKE NOTICE.

    THEY WORK FOR??????????

    NOT YOU!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s