UK military steps up plans for Iran attack amid fresh nuclear fears- Under Isreali Orders!!

US fears Israeli strike on Iran

Many Israelis are concerned that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak decided on an attack on Iran’s nuclear reactors. The US is naturally also concerned over such plans which may send the entire region into a whirlwind. — Ynetnews, 10/31/11

Israel warns West: Time to stop Iran

Israeli ambassadors in Western countries have been instructed to inform high-ranking politicians that the window of opportunity for imposing effective sanctions on Iran is closing, as part of a renewed diplomatic offensive aimed at using new sanctions to stop Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb. — Haaretz, 11/1/11

ANOTHER TALMUDIC WAR ON THE CARDS!!!

Nuclear November: Izzies Want Iran War
CPT MAY. US ARMY!

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/02/nuclear-november-izzies-want-iran-war/

Iran has no weapons pointed at European Cities- ISRAEL HAS!!

UK military steps up plans for Iran attack amid fresh nuclear fears

British officials consider contingency options to back up a possible US action as fears mount over Tehran’s capability

Nick Hopkins guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 2 November 2011 15.21 GMT Article history

Britain’s armed forces are stepping up their contingency planning for potential military action against Iran amid mounting concern about Tehran’s nuclear enrichment programme, the Guardian has learned.

The Ministry of Defence believes the US may decide to fast-forward plans for targeted missile strikes at some key Iranian facilities. British officials say that if Washington presses ahead it will seek, and receive, UK military help for any mission, despite some deep reservations within the coalition government.

In anticipation of a potential attack, British military planners are examining where best to deploy Royal Navy ships and submarines equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles over the coming months as part of what would be an air and sea campaign.

They also believe the US would ask permission to launch attacks from Diego Garcia, the British Indian ocean territory, which the Americans have used previously for conflicts in the Middle East.

The Guardian has spoken to a number of Whitehall and defence officials over recent weeks who said Iran was once again becoming the focus of diplomatic concern after the revolution in Libya.

They made clear that Barack Obama, has no wish to embark on a new and provocative military venture before next November’s presidential election.

But they warned the calculations could change because of mounting anxiety over intelligence gathered by western agencies, and the more belligerent posture that Iran appears to have been taking.

Hawks in the US are likely to seize on next week’s report from the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is expected to provide fresh evidence of a possible nuclear weapons programme in Iran.

The Guardian has been told that the IAEA’s bulletin could be “a game changer” which will provide unprecedented details of the research and experiments being undertaken by the regime.

One senior Whitehall official said Iran had proved “surprisingly resilient” in the face of sanctions, and sophisticated attempts by the west to cripple its nuclear enrichment programme had been less successful than first thought.

He said Iran appeared to be “newly aggressive, and we are not quite sure why”, citing three recent assassination plots on foreign soil that the intelligence agencies say were coordinated by elements in Tehran.

In addition to that, officials now believe Iran has restored all the capability it lost in a sophisticated cyber-attack last year.The Stuxnet computer worm, thought to have been engineered by the Americans and Israelis, sabotaged many of the centrifuges the Iranians were using to enrich uranium.

Up to half of Iran’s centrifuges were disabled by Stuxnet or were thought too unreliable to work, but diplomats believe this capability has now been recovered, and the IAEA believes it may even be increasing.

Ministers have also been told that the Iranians have been moving some more efficient centrifuges into the heavily-fortified military base dug beneath a mountain near the city of Qom.

The concern is that the centrifuges, which can be used to enrich uranium for use in weapons, are now so well protected within the site that missile strikes may not be able to reach them. The senior Whitehall source said the Iranians appeared to be shielding “material and capability” inside the base.

Another Whitehall official, with knowledge of Britain’s military planning, said that within the next 12 months Iran may have hidden all the material it needs to continue a covert weapons programme inside fortified bunkers. He said this had necessitated the UK’s planning being taken to a new level.

“Beyond [12 months], we couldn’t be sure our missiles could reach them,” the source said. “So the window is closing, and the UK needs to do some sensible forward planning. The US could do this on their own but they won’t.

“So we need to anticipate being asked to contribute. We had thought this would wait until after the US election next year, but now we are not so sure.

“President Obama has a big decision to make in the coming months because he won’t want to do anything just before an election.”

Another source added there was “no acceleration towards military action by the US, but that could change”. Next spring could be a key decision-making period, the source said. The MoD has a specific team considering the military options against Iran.

The Guardian has been told that planners expect any campaign to be predominantly waged from the air, with some naval involvement, using missiles such as the Tomahawks, which have a range of 800 miles (1,287 km). There are no plans for a ground invasion, but “a small number of special forces” may be needed on the ground, too.

The RAF could also provide air-to-air refuelling and some surveillance capability, should they be required. British officials say any assistance would be cosmetic: the US could act on its own but would prefer not to.

An MoD spokesman said: “The British government believes that a dual track strategy of pressure and engagement is the best approach to address the threat from Iran’s nuclear programme and avoid regional conflict. We want a negotiated solution – but all options should be kept on the table.”

The MoD says there are no hard and fast blueprints for conflict but insiders concede that preparations there and at the Foreign Office have been under way for some time.

One official said: “I think that it is fair to say that the MoD is constantly making plans for all manner of international situations. Some areas are of more concern than others. “It is not beyond the realms of possibility that people at the MoD are thinking about what we might do should something happen on Iran. It is quite likely that there will be people in the building who have thought about what we would do if commanders came to us and asked us if we could support the US. The context for that is straightforward contingency planning.”

Washington has been warned by Israel against leaving any military action until it is too late.

Western intelligence agencies say Israel will demand that the US act if it believes its own military cannot launch successful attacks to stall Iran’s nuclear programme. A source said the “Israelis want to believe that they can take this stuff out”, and will continue to agitate for military action if Iran continues to play hide and seek.

It is estimated that Iran, which has consistently said it is interested only in developing a civilian nuclear energy programme, already has enough enriched uranium for between two and four nuclear weapons.

Experts believe it could be another two years before Tehran has a ballistic missile delivery system.

British officials admit to being perplexed by what they regard as Iran’s new aggressiveness, saying that they have been shown convincing evidence that Iran was behind the murder of a Saudi diplomat in Karachi in May, as well as the audacious plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington, which was uncovered last month.

“There is a clear dotted line from Tehran to the plot in Washington,” said one.

Earlier this year, the IAEA reported that it had evidence Tehran had conducted work on a highly sophisticated nuclear triggering technology that could only be used for setting off a nuclear device.

It also said it was “increasingly concerned about the possible existence in Iran of past or current undisclosed nuclear-related activities involving military-related organisations, including activities related to the development of a nuclear payload for a missile.”

Last year, the UN security council imposed a fourth round of sanctions on Iran to try to deter Tehran from pursuing any nuclear ambitions.

At the weekend, the New York Times reported that the US was looking to build up its military presence in the region, with one eye on Iran.

According to the paper, the US is considering sending more naval warships to the area, and is seeking to expand military ties with the six countries in the Gulf Co-operation Council: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/02/uk-military-iran-attack-nuclear

JEWS AND ISRAEL QUICKLY LINE UP TO SAY IRAN MADE THREATS TO ISRAEL- ISRAEL MADE THREATS TO THE WHOLE OF EUROPE!!

THEY – THE WESTERN GOVERNMENTS NEVER DID BREAK FREE!!

ZOG

The conclusion cannot be escaped: if any honest explanation of his actions in this matter could be found Mr. Lloyd George would have given it. From this period in 1916-1917 the decay of parliamentary and representative government can be traced, both in England and America. If secret men could dictate major acts of American state policy and major operations of British armies, then clearly “election” and “responsible office” were terms devoid of meaning. Party distinctions began to fade in both countries, once this hidden, supreme authority was accepted by leading Western politicians, and the American and British electors began to be deprived of all true choice. Today this condition is general, and now is public. Leaders of all parties, before elections, make obeisance to Zionism, and the voter’s selection of president, prime minister or party makes no true difference.

In November 1917 the American Republic thus became equally involved with Great Britain in Zionism, which has proved to be a destructive force. However, it was only one agency of “the destructive principle.” The reader will recall that in Dr. Weizmann’s Russian youth the mass of Jews there, under their Talmudic directors, were united in the revolutionary aim, and only divided between revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism.

In the very week of the Balfour Declaration the other group of Jews in Russia

271

achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western politicians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself against the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their policies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revolution, too, was “anti-semitism.” Governments hampered by secret capitulations in any one direction cannot act firmly in any other, and the timidity of London and Washington in their dealings with the world-revolution, during the four decades to follow, evidently derived from their initial submission to “the web of intrigue” spun across the Atlantic between 1914 and 1917.

After 1917, therefore, the question which the remainder of the 20th Century had to answer was whether the West could yet find in itself the strength to break free, or prise its political leaders loose, from this double thrall. In considering the remainder of this account the reader should bear in mind what British and American politicians were induced to do during the First World War.

http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_31.htm

AMERICAN STATE DEPARTMENT- ONLY EMPLOYS JEWS- NOT ONE SINGLE AMERICAN!!

2 responses to “UK military steps up plans for Iran attack amid fresh nuclear fears- Under Isreali Orders!!

  1. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/02/nuclear-november-izzies-want-iran-war/

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/02/uk-military-iran-attack-nuclear

    http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_31.htm

    WHAT WERE WE INDUCED TO DO…….?
    AND ALL THESE YEARS LATER- NOTHING HAS CHANGED- TALMUDIC WAR AFTER TALMUDIC WAR……………………..YOUR TURN WILL COME WHEN THE MIDDLE EAST IS UNDER TOTAL CONTROL!

    SigurdSnakeEyes on 10 Mar 2011

    Kay Griggs speaks freely about the unimagined corruption and extent of the oppressive systems of deception within the leadership nexus of military intelligence with secret society internationalism.

    3 AND 4????

    BUT THIS THE MOST IMPORTANT PART- ISRAEL RUNS US FOREIGN POLICY- AND WE ALL KNOW WHERE THAT HAS GONE- WAR WAR WAR WAR…………………………………………………..TALMUD WARS ON GENTILES!!

  2. We will push the Christians into wars, by a judicious exploitation of their pride and stupidity. They will massacre each other and thus make more space where we can place our own people.”

    “The possession of land has always procured influence and power. In the name of social justice and equality, we will divide the great properties; we will give small fragments of these properties to the peasants who desire them with all their heart, but who will soon be indebted to us by the very exploitation of these properties. Our capital will enable us to become the real masters. In our turn we shall become the great owners of land, and this possession will assure our power.”

    “Let us use all our force to replace the circulation of gold by that of paper: our banks will absorb the gold, and we shall decide then what value the paper money will have, this will make us the masters of every man’s existence.”

    “We have amongst ourselves many fine orators capable of feigning enthusiasm and of convincing the masses! We will send them amongst the nations to announce the changes that will make the happiness and prosperity of mankind.”

    “By gold and by flattery, we will win the proletariat, who will take on their shoulders the job of exterminating Christian capitalism. We will promise to the workers salaries that they have never even dared dream of, but we will also heighten the price of all necessities, so much so, that our profits will be even greater.”

    “In this manner we will prepare the revolutions that the Christians will conduct themselves and out of which we shall collect the fruits. By our jokes and by our attacks we will render their priests ridiculous and eventually odious, their religion as ridiculous, as odious as their priests. We shall become masters of their souls, because our pious attachment to our religion will prove to them the superiority of our souls.”

    “We have already established men of ours in all the key positions. Let us make every effort to furnish the goys with lawyers and doctors. Lawyers get to know about every interest. Doctors, once they cross the threshold of a house, become the confessors and directors of their patient’s conscience. But above all, let us get the control of the education, of the schools. By them we will spread the ideas that are useful for us, and we will mould the children’s brains as we wish. If one of us falls into the claws of justice by misfortune, let us all go to his aid, finding as many witnesses as may be needed to save him from his judges until the moment comes when it will be us who will be judges” (Rzeichorn, published by Sir John Radcliff in 1876).

    The preceding quotation was written in 1943 in John Amery’s England and Europe, to which he adds: We have only to add from the ‘Judisk Tidskrift’ No. 57, 1929, the following short passage we owe to the pen of a certain BLUMENTHAL:

    “Our race has given to the world a new Messiah, but he has two faces and bears two names, on one side he is called ROTHSCHILD, head of the great capitalists, on the other, Karl MARX, the high priest of the enemies of capitalism.”

    BLUMENTHAL could have added now that if his Messiah has two faces he also has two masks, that of ROOSEVELT and American imperialism, and that of STALIN and the Communist paradise. Between the two, the British Empire is indeed trapped.

    How all of the above echoes the preceding Judaic edicts in the Old Testament, according to which Rabbi Rzeichorn is to be considered a righteous man for his strict observance of the Laws of Yahweh: “This day will I begin to put the dread of you and the fear of you upon the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear the report of you, and shall tremble, and be in anguish because of you” (Deuteronomy 2:25). “For the Lord your God blesses you, as He promised you; and you shall lend to many nations, but you shall not borrow; and you shall reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over you” (Deuteronomy 15:6) “Both your male slaves, and your female slaves, which you shall have, shall be of the nations that are around you; of them shall you buy male slaves and female slaves. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall you buy, and of their families that are with you, which they fathered in your land; and they shall be your possession” (Leviticus 25:44-45). “And I will shake all nations, so that the treasures of all nations shall come; and I will fill this house with glory, says the Lord of hosts. The silver is mine, and the gold is mine, says the Lord of hosts” (Tanach – Twelve Prophets – Chagai Chapter 2:7-8).

    And from the Talmudic writings of the Rabbis of the ages, Rzeichorn shows himself to be merely repeating the views of the other self-proclaimed “god-men” of his “tribe”: “Thou shalt not do injury to your neighbor, but it is not said, “Thou shalt not do injury to a goy.” (Mishna Sanhedryn 57). “When you go to war, do not go as the first, so that you may return as the first. Five things did Canaan charge his sons: love one another, love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters, and do not speak the truth” (Pesachim 113b). “A Jew may rob a goy – that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him” (Schulchan ARUCH, Choszen Hamiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4). “Those who do not confess the Torah and the Prophets must be killed. Who has the power to kill them, let them kill them openly, with the sword. If not, let them use artifices, till they are done away with” (Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 424, 5). “All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general” (Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348).

    It was from Jews of these fiercely Talmudic Eastern European and Russian communities that the philosophy of Zionism was launched upon the world political stage at the end of the 19th Century. The fact that the eastern Jews had absolutely no racial ties or rights to this was not taken into account in the later creation of the state of “Israel” by the worldwide cabal of Zionists in 1948. Of course, the concept of Zionism also has sinister implications for the world’s Gentiles, as we have witnessed from the Talmudic passages previously cited. The main excuse used to convince the West that Zionism was desirable, was the mass reporting in the press of terrible persecution of Jews in the homeland. This was essentially press-led propaganda to generate sympathy for the cause.

    At the same time as Zionism was being fermented in the West and continued to gain support there in essentially Protestant (Old Testament biased) political minds, who wished to aid the cause of their religious forebears, so in the East the philosophy of Communism was being developed and began to grow as a substantial political force. The Communist philosophers and leaders were drawn from Talmudic Jewish areas of Russia. The very ideal of Communism was to destroy the existing social order and rule over Russia, then to take that further towards a world revolution. Again, the passages of Deuteronomy, the Talmud and the Protocols illustrate this is the exact same agenda as has been shown to be an ancient conspiracy maintained and executed throughout the past 2,500 years up until this point in question.

    Zionism and Bolshevism succeeded in the same week in 1917. The former in London, when the British government finally committed itself to the establishment of a Jewish Palestine, and the latter in Moscow at the outbreak of the Bolshevik Revolution.

    One bitter irony of this saga was that having conquered Russia under a Judaic government, Bolshevism had destroyed the very reason for which Zionism officially came into being – the alleged persecution of the Jews in Russia. The Communist government, consisting largely of Jews, made anti-semitism illegal. But this was all forgotten as the British and American Zionists ploughed forward on their “Holy” mission.

    Zionism and Communism were undoubtedly two sides of the same coin. The situation is well summarised by the following passage from Douglas Reed: In the tradition of Edmund Burke and John Robison, George Washington and Alexander Hamilton and Disraeli, Mr. Winston Churchill wrote: “It would almost seem as if the Gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti-Christ were designed to originate from the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical. . . From the days of ‘spartacus’ Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others.”

    This is the last candid statement (discoverable by me) from a leading public man on this question. After it the ban on public discussion came down and the great silence ensued, which continues to this day. In 1953 Mr. Churchill refused permission (requisite under English Law) for a photostat to be made of this article (Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920), without saying why.

    “. . . Mr Winston Churchill in 1922 (when he was Colonial Secretary), “Unauthorised statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as “Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English” (a direct rebuke to Dr. Weizmann) “His Majesty’s government regard any such suggestion as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated the disappearance or subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine” (in the Second World War, as Prime Minister, and after it as Opposition leader, Mr. Churchill gave his support to the process here denied). (The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed).

    Of course, Churchill would go on to be one of the pivotal figures of world history, working closely with Jewish and non-Jewish Zionist bankers and politicians such as the Rothschilds. He was undoubtedly an agent of the Illuminati/Elders by then.
    £500 A YEAR FOR POLITICIANS WASN’T ENOUGH TO PAY HIS DEBTS- AFTER A VISIT TO NY- HE PAID OFF HIS £20.000 DEBT AND BINGO HE WAS OWNED!

    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/proof.htm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s