Vietnam War Lie:There were over 58,000 American deaths in Vietnam and more than 150,000 wounded.

The Vietnam War started secretly off the books, like so many of these ventures that have ended disastrously. The CIA got there early, soon after the Vietnamese won their independence from the French in 1954.
President Lyndon Johnson: It is my duty to the American people to report that renewed hostile actions against United States ships on the high seas in the Gulf of Tonkin have today required me to order the military forces of the United States, to take action and reply.
Moyers: This President was not telling the truth either. The action at the Gulf of Tonkin was not unprovoked. South Vietnam had been conducting secret raids in the area against the North and the American destroyer, ordered into the battle zone, had advanced warning it could be attacked. But Johnson seized the incident to stampede Congress into passing the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. He then used it as a blank check for the massive buildup of American forces.

Category:
Education

USS Liberty same President same lies!

Top Essentials to Know About the Vietnam War

58.000 DEAD AMERICANS!!

The Vietnam War was a cause of much controversy in the United States. One of the first things to realize about the war is that it was a progressive thing. What began as a small group of ‘advisors’ under President Dwight Eisenhower ended up with over a total of 2.5 million American troops involved. Here are the top essentials to understanding the Vietnam War.
1. Beginning of American Involvement in Vietnam
America began sending aid to the French fighting in Vietnam and the rest of Indochina in the late 1940s. France was fighting Communist rebels led by Ho Chi Minh. It wasn’t until Ho Chi Minh defeated the French in 1954 that America became officially involved in trying to defeat the Communists in Vietnam. This began with financial aid and military advisors sent to help the South Vietnamese as they fought Northern Communists fighting in the South. The U.S. worked with Ngo Dinh Diem and other leaders to set up a separate government in the South.

2. Domino Theory
With the fall of North Vietnam to the Communists in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower explained America’s stance in a press conference. As Eisenhower stated when asked about the strategic importance of Indochina: “…you have broader considerations that might follow what you would call the ‘falling domino’ principle. You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly….” In other words, the fear was that if Vietnam fell completely to communism, this would spread. This Domino Theory was the central reason for America’s continued involvement in Vietnam over the years.
3. Gulf of Tonkin Incident
Over time, American involvement continued to increase. During the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson, an event occurred that resulted in an escalation in the war. In August 1964, it was reported that the North Vietnamese attacked the USS Maddox in international waters. Controversy still exists over the actual details of this event but the result is undeniable. Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution that allowed Johnson to increase America’s military involvement. It allowed him to “take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack…and to prevent further aggression.” Johnson and Nixon used this as a mandate to fight in Vietnam for years to come.
4. Operation Rolling Thunder
In early 1965, the Viet Cong staged an attack against a Marine barracks that killed eight and injured over a hundred. This was called the Pleiku Raid. President Johnson, using the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution as his authority, ordered the air force and navy forward in Operation Rolling Thunder to bomb. His hope was that the Viet Cong would realize America’s resolve to win and stop it in its tracks. However, it seemed to have the opposite effect. This quickly led to further escalation as Johnson ordered more troops into the country. By 1968, there were more than 500,000 troops committed to fighting in Vietnam.
5. Tet Offensive
On January 31, 1968, the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong launched a major attack on the South during Tet, or the Vietnamese New Year. This was called the Tet Offensive. American forces were able to repel and seriously injure the attackers. However, the effect of the Tet Offensive was severe at home. Critics of the war increased and demonstrations against the war began to occur across the country.
6. Opposition at Home
The Vietnam War caused a great division among the American population. Further, as news of the Tet Offensive became widespread, opposition to the war greatly increased. Many college students fought against the war through campus demonstrations. The most tragic of these demonstrations occurred on May 4, 1970 at Kent State University in Ohio. Four students staging a protest demonstration were killed by national guardsmen. Antiwar sentiment also arose in the media which further fed the demonstrations and protests. Many of the popular songs of the time were written in protest to the war such as “Where Have All the Flowers Gone,” and “Blowing in the Wind.”
7. Pentagon Papers
In June 1971, the New York Times published leaked top-secret Defense Department documents known as the Pentagon Papers. These documents showed that the government had lied in public statements about how the military involvement and progress of the war in Vietnam. This confirmed the worst fears of the anti-war movement. It also increased the amount of public outcry against the war. By 1971, over 2/3 of the American population wanted President Richard Nixon to order troop withdrawals from Vietnam.
8. Paris Peace Accords
During most of 1972, President Richard Nixon sent Henry Kissinger to negotiate a ceasefire with the North Vietnamese. A temporary ceasefire was completed in October 1972 which helped secure Nixon’s reelection as president. By January 27, 1973, America and North Vietnam signed the Paris Peace Accords which ended the war. This included the immediate release of American prisoners and the withdrawal of troops from Vietnam within 60 days. The Accords were to include the end of hostilities in Vietnam. However, soon after America left the country, fighting broke out again eventually resulting in victory for the North Vietnamese in 1975. There were over 58,000 American deaths in Vietnam and more than 150,000 wounded.
Presidents Involved in Vietnam
•Harry S Truman
•Dwight Eisenhower
•John F. Kennedy
Presidents Involved in Vietnam
•Lyndon B. Johnson
•Richard Nixon
Suggested Reading
•Wars with American Involvement
Related Articles
•Vietnam War
•Vietnamization of the Vietnam War – Vietnam War – Vietnam War and the Nixon…
•Seeds of the Vietnam War – American History
•Vietnam War-Introduction to the Vietnam War – Summary of the Vietnam War
•Vietnam War – Overview of the Vietnam War

http://americanhistory.about.com/od/vietnam/tp/vietnam-war.htm

60 MINUTES….GULF OF TONKIN…

LBJ Tapes – Gulf of Tonkin Staged as Pretext to Expand Vietnam War

OLD HABITS DIE HARD!

9-11 caused even more Wars!

7 responses to “Vietnam War Lie:There were over 58,000 American deaths in Vietnam and more than 150,000 wounded.

  1. Centurean, LBJ was a crypto-jew, a Sephardic from South Texas, as was Lady Bird. He was not the first jewish President in occupation of the White House. The American military could have walked all through Viet Nam in two months if they had not had artificial restraints placed upon them. The only real resistence militarily would have been from the well-trained communist troops from the North.

    The Viet-Nam war was prolonged for the jewish moneymakers who also wanted to see White Americans killed. The TET of 1968 wiped out the Viet Cong (South Vietnamese guerillas) as a military force, and was in actuality a huge defeat for the Vietnamese communists. The jewish media presented it as being a communist victory, which it certainly was not, at least in the military sense.

    TET was a communist victory because of the jewish communists in the US media and their change agents who led protests against the war in order to turn public opinion against the war, for the purpose of helping to prolong it. The jews wanted dead White Americans, and White is something that the jews are not (despite the white tone of some of thier skin). The jew objective in causing wars is to make Whites kill each other, or to cause Whites or others whom the jews consider to be jewish enemies to be killed by others, while the jewish international bankers and all of their jewish hangers-on continue making more mone. Indebting the White and other countries to the Rothschild and other jewish bankers is the jews favorite occupation. The big jew, Henry Kissinger, of course, sold the US out at the conference table in Paris.

    The young White people in the American military are indoctrinated before and during military service, so they have no awareness about the reasons behind the wars or who it is who cause those wars. I know that to be a fact because I was one of those young Marines in Viet Nam and as Gung-Ho as one can be. It takes time and independent study away from the controlled media outlets in order to determine true facts, and few people either take or have the time for that, even if they have an inducement to question much of that indoctrination into falsehoods which the general public seems to be able to accept so easily. More than 200 of my former friends from the Viet-Nam era did not have the time for that study or enlightenment since they died there.

    http://www.theforbiddentruth.net/13867-lyndon-baines-johnson-jewish-crypto.html

    See the excerpt from “No Treason” from 1869 for a section explaining the ongoing saga about the jews and the those of the Rothschilds’, “servile, obsequious, fawning dependents and tools”. That follows the Rhodes’ materials.

    http://blog.balder.org/inc/Rhodes-Journal-A-Record-Of-American-Banking-December-1881-Nr-12-Russian-Finance.php

    • Gordon Duff over at Veterans Today, he too is a Vietnam vet, today seeing clearly just who is the enemy of America and her peoples.

      The American population need to wake from their media induced slumber, otherwise they’ll become as downtrodden as the German people became.

      The Iron Curtain Over America

      By John Beaty

      First Printing, December, 1951 Eleventh Printing April 1954

      To the mighty company of American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines whose graves are marked by white crosses far from home this book is dedicated with the solemn pledge that the Christian civilization of which they were the finest flower shall not die.

      Lt. Gen. Edward M. Almond, USA. (ret.), says:

      “It is an inspiration to me to find an author with the courage and energy to research and to secure the publication of such information as you have assembled in order that the poorly informed average American may know wherein the real threats to our Country lurk. Your book is a magnificent contribution to those who would preserve our American ideals.”

      “I think it ought to be compulsory reading in every public school in America.”

      Senator William A. Langer, former Chairman, Judiciary Committee.

      Vice Admiral T. G. W. Settle, U.S.N. (ret.), says:

      “The Iron Curtain Over America” is a most pertinent and excellently presented treatise on the cancer on our national set-up. “I hope this book has had, and will have, the widest possible dissemination, particularly to our leaders-in Washington, and in industry and the press, — and that our leaders who are “uncontaminated” will have their serious attention engaged by it.”

      Lt, General P. A. Del Valle, USMC (ret), says:

      ” I am impelled to write to you to express my admiration of your great service to the Nation in writing this truly magnificent book. No American who has taken the oath of allegiance can afford to miss it, and I heartily recommend it as an honest and courageous dispeller of the fog of propaganda in which most minds seem to dwell.”

      John Beaty

      The author of The Iron Curtain Over America has written, or collaborated on, a dozen books. His texts have been used in more than seven hundred colleges and universities, and his historical novel, Swords in the Dawn, published originally in New York, had London and Australian editions, and was adopted for state-wide use in the public schools of Texas. His education (M.A., University of Virginia; Ph.D., Columbia University; post-graduate study, University of Montpellier, France), his travel in Europe and Asia, and his five years with the Military Intelligence Service in World War II rounded out the background for the reading and research (1946-1951) which resulted in The Iron Curtain Over America.

      Meanwhile two of Germany’s numerous political parties emerged into definite power — the Communists, many of whose leaders were of Khazar stock, and the National Socialist German Workers Party, which was popularly called Nazi from the first two syllables of the German word for “National.” Faced with harsh alternatives (testimony of many Germans to the author in Germany), the Germans chose the native party and Adolf Hitler was elected Chancellor.

      The date was January 30, 1933, five weeks before Franklin Roosevelt’s first inauguration as President of the United States; but it was only after the aged President von Hindenburg’s death (on August 2) that Hitler was made both President and Chancellor (August 19th). Differences between the rulers of the United States and Germany developed quickly. Hitler issued a series of tirades against Communism, which he considered a world menace, whereas Roosevelt injected life into the sinking body of world Communism (Chapter III, above) by giving full diplomatic recognition to Soviet Russia on November 16, 1933, a day destined to be known as “American-Soviet Friendship Day” by official proclamation of the State of New York.

      Sharing the world spotlight with his anti-Communist words and acts, was Hitler’s domestic policy, which in its early stages nay be epitomized as “Germany for the Germans,” of whom in 1933 there were some 62,000,000. Hitler’s opponents, more especially those of non-German stock (510,000 in 1933 according to the World Almanac, 1939), were unwilling to lose by compromise any of their position of financial and other power acquired in large degree during the economic collapse of 1923, and appealed for help to persons of prominence in the city of New York and elsewhere. Their appeal was not in vain.

      In late July, 1933, an International Jewish Boycott Conference (New York Times, August 7, 1933) was held in Amsterdam to devise means of bringing Germany to terms. Samuel Untermeyer of New York presided over the Boycott Conference and was elected President of the World Jewish Economic Federation. Returning to America, Mr. Untermeyer described the planned Jewish move against Germany as a “holy war . . . a war that must be waged unremittingly” (speech over WABC, as printed in New York Times of August 7, 1933). The immediately feasible tactic of the “economic boycott” was described by Mr. Untermeyer as of the “economic boycott” was described by Mr. Untermeyer as “nothing new,” for “President Roosevelt, whose wise statesmanship and vision are the wonder of the civilized world, is invoking it in furtherance of his noble conception of the relations between capital and labor.” Mr. Untermeyer gave his hearers and readers specific instructions:

      It is not sufficient that you buy no goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German made goods or who patronizes German ships and shipping.

      Before the Boycott Conference adjourned at Amsterdam, arrangement was made to extend the boycott to “include France, Holland, Belgium, Britain, Poland and Czechoslovakia and other lands as far flung as Finland and Egypt” (New York Times, August 1, 1933). In connection with the boycott, the steady anti-German campaign, which had never died down in America after World War I, became suddenly violent. Germany was denounced in several influential New York papers and by radio.

      The public became dazed by the propaganda, and the U.S. Government soon placed on German imports the so-called “general” tariff rates as against the “most favored” status for all other nations. This slowed down but did not stop the German manufacture of export goods, and the U.S. took a further step, described as follows in the New York Times (June 5, 1936): “Already Germany is paying general tariff rates because she has been removed by Secretary of State Cordell Hull from the most favored nation list . . . Now she will be required to pay additional duties . . . it was decided that they would range from about 22 to 56 per cent.” There were protests. According to the New York Times (July 12, 1936): “importers and others interested in trade with Germany insisted yesterday that commerce between the two countries will dwindle to the vanishing point within the next six months.” The prediction was correct.

      An effort of certain anti-German international financial interests was also made to “call” sufficient German treasury notes to “break” Germany. The German government replied successfully to this maneuver by giving a substantial bonus above the current exchange rate for foreigners who would come to Germany, exchange their currency for marks, and spend the marks in Germany. Great preparations were made for welcoming strangers to such gatherings as the “World Conference on Recreation and Leisure Time” (Hamburg, August, 1936), one of whose programs, a historic pageant on the Auszen-Alster, was attended by the author (who was visiting northern European museums and coastal areas in the interest of his historical novel, Swords in the Dawn). Special trains brought in school children from as far as northern Norway. Whether from sincerity or from a desire to create a good impression, visitors were shown every courtesy. As a result of the German effort and the money bonus afforded by the favorable exchange, retired people, pensioners, and tourists spent enough funds in the Reich to keep the mark stable.

      But this German financial victory in 1936, though it prevented an immediate currency collapse, did not solve the problem of 62,000,000 people (69,000,000 by 1939) in an area approximately the size of Texas being effectively denied export trade.

      ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

      Censorship, governmental and other (Chapter V), was tight in America by 1937. It had blocked out the reasons for Mr. Roosevelt’s public change of policy between summer and autumn, and it blacked out the fact that the President’s threatening attitude caused Germany to make, and make a second time, an appeal for peace. These appeals did not become known to the American public for more than ten years. Here is the story, summarized from an article by Bertram D. Hulen in the New York Times of December 17, 1948:

      In 1937 and again in 1938 the German government made “a sincere effort to improve relations with the United States, only to be rebuffed.” The U.S. Government’s alleged reason was “a fear of domestic political reactions in this country unfavorable to the Administration.” Germany was told that the American public would not tolerate a conference. Some officials favored exploring the German offer “after the congressional elections in the fall” (1938). The sequel, of course, is that the Roosevelt administration blocked Germany’s further efforts for peace by withdrawing our ambassador from Berlin and thus peremptorily preventing future negotiations. Germany then had to recall her Ambassador “who was personally friendly toward Americans” and, according to the New York Times, “was known in diplomatic circles here at the time to be working for international understanding in a spirit of good will.” Here, to repeat for emphasis, is the crux of the matter: The whole story of Germany’s appeal for negotiations and our curt refusal and severance of diplomatic relations was not published in 1937 or 1938, when Germany made her appeals, but was withheld from the public until ferreted out by the House Committee on Un-American Activities after World War II and by that committee released to the press more than ten years after the facts were so criminally suppressed. Parenthetically, it is because of services such as this on behalf of truth that the Committee on Un-American Activities has been so frequently maligned . In fact, in our country since the 1930’s there seems little question that the best criterion for separating true Americans from others is a recorded attitude toward the famous Martin Dies Committee.

      Economically strangled by an international boycott headed up in New York, and outlawed politically even to the extent of being denied a conference, the Germans in the late 1930’s faced the alternatives of mass unemployment from loss of world trade or working in government-sponsored projects. They accepted the latter. The workers who lost their jobs in export businesses were at once employed in Hitler’s armament industries (see the special edition of the Illustrierte Zeitung for November 25, 1936), which were already more than ample for the size and resources of the country, and soon became colossal.

      Thus by desperate measures, advertised to the world in the phrase “guns instead of butter,” Hitler prepared to cope with what he considered to be the British-French-American-Soviet “encirclement.” Stung by what he considered President Roosevelt’s insulting language and maddened by the contemptuous rejection of his diplomatic approaches to the United States, he made a deal (August, 1939) against Poland with the Soviet Union, a power he had taught the German people to fear and hate! With the inevitability of a Sophoclean tragedy, this betrayal of his own conscience brought him to ruin — and Germany with him. Such is the danger which lurks for a people when they confide their destiny to the whims of a dictator!

      The war which resulted from Franklin D. Roosevelt’s policy is well remembered, especially by those American families whose sons lie beneath white crosses – at home or afar. Its pre-shooting phase, with all the weavings back and forth, is analyzed in Professor Beard’s volume, already referred to. Its causes are the subject of Frederick R. Sanborn’s Design for War (Devin-Adair, New York, 1951). Its progress is surveyed in William Henry Chamberlin’s America’s Second Crusade (Henry Regnery Company, Chicago, 1950). Details cannot be here presented.

      http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/John.Beaty/Iron.Curtain.Over.America.htm#the unnecessary war

      Roosevelt War President with his band of Merry jews….No wonder America entered the War…

      Christopher Jones “performed an easy Google search of “Franklin Roosevelt”+”Jewish ancestry.” My efforts turned up a total 671 hits. There are obviously some people in the world who think that the Roosevelts were of Dutch Jewish ancestry. Not that I could care — I wish to make that perfectly clear. But to start firing “anti-semitic” when what we are talking about is common knowledge appears over-wrought, It appears very clear that FDR surrounded himself with socialist Jews even when he was Governor of New York, and many were appointed to top jobs in the Roosevelt administration:

      1. Bernard M. Baruch — a financier and adviser to FDR.
      2. Felix Frankfurter — Supreme Court Justice; a key player in FDR’s New Deal system.
      3. David E. Lilienthal — director of Tennessee Valley Authority, adviser. The TVA changed the relationship of government-to-business in America.
      4. David Niles — presidential aide.
      5. Louis Brandeis — U.S. Supreme Court Justice; confidante of FDR; “Father” of New Deal.
      6. Samuel I. Rosenman — official speechwriter for FDR.
      7. Henry Morgenthau Jr. — Secretary of the Treasury, “unofficial” presidential adviser. Father of the Morgenthau Plan to re-structure Germany/Europe after WWII.
      8. Benjamin V. Cohen — State Department official, adviser to FDR.
      9. Rabbi Stephen Wise — close pal of FDR, spokesman for the American Zionist movement, head of The American Jewish Congress.
      10. Frances Perkins — Secretary of Labor; allegedly Jewish/adopted at birth; unconfirmed.
      11. Sidney Hillman — presidential adviser.
      12. Anna Rosenberg — longtime labor adviser to FDR, and manpower adviser with the Manpower Consulting Committee of the Army and Navy Munitions Board and the War Manpower Commission.
      13. Herbert H. Lehman — Governor of New York, 1933-1942, Director of U.S. Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations, Department of State, 1942-1943; Director-General of UNRRA, 1944 – 1946, pal of FDR.
      14. Herbert Feis — U.S. State Department official, economist, and an adviser on international economic affairs.
      15. R. S. Hecht — financial adviser to FDR.
      16. Nathan Margold — Department of the Interior Solicitor, legal adviser.
      17. Jesse I. Straus — adviser to FDR.
      18. H. J. Laski — “unofficial foreign adviser” to FDR.
      19. E. W. Goldenweiser — Federal Reserve Director.
      20. Charles E. Wyzanski — U.S. Labor department legal adviser.
      21. Samuel Untermyer — lawyer, “unofficial public ownership adviser” to FDR.
      22. Jacob Viner — Tax expert at the U.S. Treasury Department, assistant to the Treasury Secretary.
      23. Edward Filene — businessman, philanthropist, unofficial presidential adviser.
      24. David Dubinsky — Labor leader, president of International Ladies Garment Workers Union.
      25. William C. Bullitt — part-Jewish, ambassador to USSR [is claimed to be Jonathan Horwitz’s grandson; unconfirmed].
      26. Mordecai Ezekiel — Agriculture Department economist.
      27. Abe Fortas — Assistant director of Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of the Interior Undersecretary.
      28. Isador Lubin — Commissioner of Labor Statistics, unofficial labor economist to FDR.
      29. Harry Dexter White [Weiss] — Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; a key founder of the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; adviser, close pal of Henry Morgenthau. Co-wrote the Morgenthau Plan.
      30. Alexander Holtzoff — Special assistant, U.S. Attorney General’s Office until 1945; [presumed to be Jewish; unconfirmed].
      31. David Weintraub — official in the Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations; helped create the United Nations; Secretary, Committee on Supplies, 1944-1946.
      32. Nathan Gregory Silvermaster — Agriculture Department official and head of the Near East Division of the Board of Economic Warfare; helped create the United Nations.
      33. Harold Glasser — Treasury Department director of the division of monetary research. Treasury spokesman on the affairs of United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration.
      34. Irving Kaplan — U.S. Treasury Department official, pal of David Weintraub.
      35. Solomon Adler — Treasury Department representative in China during World War II.
      36. Benjamin Cardozo — U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
      37. Leo Wolman — chairman of the National Recovery Administration’s Labor advisery Board; labor economist.
      38. Rose Schneiderman — labor organizer; on the advisery board of the National Recovery Administration.
      39. Jerome Frank — general counsel to the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, Justice, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1941-57.
      40. Gerard Swope — key player in the creation of the N.R.A. [National Recovery Administration]
      41. Herbert Bayard Swope — brother of Gerard
      42. Lucien Koch — consumer division, N.R.A. [apparently-Jewish]
      43. J. David Stern — Federal Reserve Board, appointed by FDR
      44. Nathan Straus — housing adviser
      45. Charles Michaelson — Democratic [DNC] publicity man
      46. Lawrence Steinhardt — ambassador to Soviet Union
      47. Harry Guggenheim — heir to Guggenheim fortune, adviser on aviation
      48. Arthur Garfield Hays — adviser on civil liberties
      49. David Lasser — head of Worker’s Alliance, labor activist
      50. Max Zaritsky — labor adviser
      51. James Warburg — millionaire, early backer of New Deal before backing out
      52. Louis Kirstein — associate of E. Filene
      53. Charles Wyzanski, Jr. — counsel, Dept. of Labor
      54. Charles Taussig — early New Deal adviser
      55. Jacob Baker — assistant to W.P.A. head Harry Hopkins; assistant head of W.P.A. [Works Progress Admin.]
      56. Louis H. Bean — Dept. of Agriculture official
      57. Abraham Fox — research director, Tariff Commission
      58. Benedict Wolf — National Labor Relations Board [NLRB]
      59. William Leiserson — NLRB
      60. David J. Saposs — NLRB
      61. A. H. Meyers — NLRB [New England division]
      62. L. H. Seltzer — head economist at the Treasury Dept.
      63. Edward Berman — Dept. of Labor official
      64. Jacob Perlman — Dept. of Labor official
      65. Morris L. Jacobson — chief statistician of the Government Research Project
      66. Jack Levin — assistant general manager, Rural Electrification Authority
      67. Harold Loeb — economic consultant, N.R.P.
      68. William Seagle — council, Petroleum Labor Policy Board
      69. Herman A. Gray — policy committee, National Housing Conference
      70. Alexander Sachs — rep. of Lehman Bros., early New Deal consultant
      71. Paul Mazur — rep. of Lehman Bros., early consultant for New Deal
      72. Henry Alsberg — head of the Writer’s Project under the W.P.A.
      73. Lincoln Rothschild — New Deal art administrator

      When any religio-racial group comes as close as American Jewry has to dominating the financial, cultural and political life of a nation while representing a fraction of its population, it is a cause for concern. The gentlemen listed above participated in a government that literally kowtowed to Josef Stalin. Why? I have pointed out in the past the fact of Israeli dual citizenship and the influence of prominent Zionists in big media. The almost mindless US policies of both Democratic and Republican administration towards Israel against the obvious interests of the whole American population are for me leading the US towards a terrible disaster. I would like repeat that I admire many Jews from Maimonides to Judah Benjamin and Disraeli, but I cannot turn a blind eye to the “special moral standard” that was set in place in 1945. The longer people refuse to recognize the dangers of this situation, the more likely a disaster will take place”.

      Terrible disaster gets closer by the day….

      By

      Dr. Friederich Karl Wiehe

      Published

      for the Institute for studies of the Jewish question, Berlin

      (1938)

      The Western World today 2011 asking the same questions re Sexualisation of children etc etc etc…………..Our highly educated Politicians and Churchmen blame everything and everyone- surely to God they know what happened in Germany?

      Among the writers the following names should be maintained: Dr. Ludwig Lewy-Lenz, Leo Schidrowitz, Dr. Iwan Bloch, Franz Rabinowitsch, Georg Cohen, Dr. Albert Eulenburg, Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld.

      Iwan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld were also the real representatives of sexual research camouflaged as science, that was really nothing but mere pornography and degradation of marriage and family. Their collaborators were Felix Abraham and Lewy-Lenz. However one looks in vain for any known non-Jewish “sexual scientist”!

      The filthy publications of these pseudoscientists speak clearly about what was going on in the “Institue for Sexual Science” and similar enterprises of Magnus Hirschfeld: “Sexual catastrophies”, “Sexual Pathology”, “Aphrodisiacs”, “Contraception” (by Magnus Hirschfeld); “The Perverted”, “Prostitution”, “Sexuality in our Times” (by Iwan Bloch).

      It must be ascribed to their uninhibited sex drive, that the boisterous slogans for free love, the uninhibited right to live out all urges, the impunity of homosexuality and abortion were dragged into public life. Especially an energetic campaign was launched for free abortion and again Jews were leading on: Dr. Max Hodann, Dr. Lothar Wolf, Dr. Lewy-Lenz, Martha Ruben-Wolf, Felix Halle, Alfons Goldschmidt. From the same circles came also numerous writings, which made propagande for birth control and contraception.

      Finally we must not forget the Jewish city medical officer for the capital of Berlin, Dr. Max Hodan. He spread the poison of moral decay in the broad public with his “Worker’s Sexual Chronicle” and thus acquired a certain unlaudable fame by carrying on shameless propaganda for male and female masturbation.

      The Danish ambassador in Haag, Scavenius, was quite right when he said about three years ago in a radio lecture, that Germany at that time had become the pornographic centre of the world. Inspired by a gullible wish to solve the age old Jewish problem through emancipation and assimilation, Germany had accepted the Jews amongst them more readily than many other countries. All barriers had been removed for them, all areas of life had been opened to them and even given them leading positions in areas that were of vital importance to the public and popular life. Judaism, which did not even constitute one percent of the population, had conquered the key positions in the German economic life. The political leadership had for the most part fallen into their hands. The press and the cultural life was under decisive Jewish influence. The income of the Jews were more than three times that of the rest of the population. The Jews had really been given all chances to change exactly that, which the best among them had always found so painful – to let their isolated existence become a constituent part of the German public life.

      But the Jews did not play fair with their gullible German partner. It appears with sufficient clarity from the above outline, that they did not want to become part of the community, because the strangeness of their race was an insurmountable hindrance. During the years with need and disaster they betrayed Germany and shamelessly abused the chances, they had been given, for their own, Jewish purposes and interests. Defeatism and betrayal, political degradation and economic corruption, moral dissoluteness and degradation of all national and religious values – that was the painful experiences, which Germany had to go through under Jewish dominance.

      http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/germany_jewish_question.htm#Immorality

      This after reading Douglas Reeds Controversy of zion made me feel sick to my soul- first chapters to me, was making excuses when there were no excuses possible, the poor powerless jews- the same crap reashed over and over, by this time 65 million Russians lay in their graves and that wasn’t due to Christians!

      http://www.johnsack.com/an_eye_for_an_eye_corroboration.htm

      In February 1997, three days after John Sack was “disinvited” to speak at the U. S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Istvan Deak, Distinguished Professor of History at Columbia, spoke at a conference at UCLA, a conference co-sponsored by UCLA’s Center for Jewish Studies. Deak called the Office of State Security in Poland “a bastion of Jewish communists” and said,

      There were many Jews among the new leaders. [They] controlled the Ministry of Interior and the dreaded Ministry of State Security, as well as nearly all department[s] in this and other organs of state security…

      The misdeeds of the almost entirely Jewish-led Polish political police–torture, murder, the forging of electoral results, deportations, etcetera–were notorious.

      Deak cited An Eye for an Eye and said of it,

      Documents on the Jewish torture and murder of German civilians, including women and children, in Polish concentration camps make for horrendous reading.

      More corroboration came from Professor John Micgiel of Columbia and Professor Arno Mayer of Princeton, the author of Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?

      The revelations in An Eye for an Eye became an accepted part of European history in May 1997, on the publication of Europe: a History by Professor Norman E. Davies of Oxford. Davies wrote,

      Popular knowledge in [Poland] has always insisted that the notorious communist Security Office (UB) contained a disproportionate number of Jews (or rather ex-Jews), and that their crimes were heinous. But few hard facts were ever published, and the stories were dismissed with distaste.

      Recent disclosures, however, have broken the taboo. They are all the more convincing since they were made by a Jewish investigator on evidence supplied by Jewish participants, and in the spirit of Jewish redemption.

      The study…concludes that in 1945…three-quarters of the local agents of the UB were of Jewish origin; that ex-Nazi camps and prisons were refilled with totally innocent civilians, especially Germans; and that torture, starvation, sadistic beatings, and murder were routine. The number of deaths inflicted by the communist regime on the German population is estimated at 60,000 to 80,000.

      In this light, it is difficult to justify the widespread practice whereby the murderers, the victims, and the bystanders of wartime Poland are each neatly identified with specific ethnic groups.

      In 1998, scholars reported finding in the Russian Federal Archives, in Moscow, a report from Lieutenant General Nikolai Sielivanovsky, the Russian secret police adviser to the Ministry of State Security, in Warsaw, to Lavrenti Beria, the chief of the Russian secret police, in Moscow. Sielivanovsky wrote, “In the Ministry of State Security, Jews hold fifty percent of the leadership positions.”

      Sielivanovsky didn’t state if by “Ministry” he meant the Ministry in Warsaw or the Ministry in all of Poland or if by “leadership positions” he meant the top two leaders or the top two thousand leaders. In other contexts “leadership positions” meant the directors in Warsaw, the directors and their deputies in every department in Warsaw, and the directors and their deputies in all of Poland’s provinces. That would be fewer than one hundred people and possibly fewer than fifty people.

      John Sack wrote in An Eye for an Eye that most Jews in the Office of State Security listed themselves as Christians, not Jews. He also wrote that Jews started leaving the Office “as early as June, 1945,” that “hundreds of Jews escaped from the Office” by September, 1945, and that “all but a scattering of Jews returned to the Torah and Talmud and fled from the Office by December, 1945.” Sielivanovsky’s report was dated October 20, 1945.

      In May, 1995, after a six-year investigation, the Provincial Commission (in Katowice) for the Investigation of Crimes Against the Polish Nation, reported on the concentration camp at Swietochlowice, first reported in An Eye for an Eye. The Commission said,

      The camp commander, Salomon Morel, was undoubtedly responsible for not preventing the mass deaths of at least 1,583 people. No matter what they were detained for, the use against them of methods resembling those used in the concentration camps by the Nazis isn’t acceptable. These were extermination methods. For them, the full responsibility rests with Salomon Morel, who not only didn’t prevent them but who personally used them.

      The district attorney for Katowice indicted Morel for crimes against the Polish nation. He sent policemen to Shlomo’s apartment, but Shlomo had fled to Tel Aviv. In December, 1998, the district attorney asked the Minister of Justice in Israel to extradite him, but the Minister replied that the statute of limitations for Shlomo’s crimes had expired in November, 1965. Interpol issued an international warrant for Shlomo, and he must now be arrested if he travels anywhere outside of Israel.

      War Criminals protected by Israel- thats’ all we need to know….

      And that wasn’t all. According to Kroft,

      There’s evidence…beginning with this report of the British Foreign Office, written in 1945, which says, “Prisoners at Swietochlowice who do not die of starvation or aren’t beaten to death are made to stand up to their necks, night after night until they die, in cold water.” A similar report can be found in the U.S. Congressional Record from 1946.
      German civilians!!!!

      Reed in his book- states clearly, at the camps Communists worked hand in hand with the Nazi SS Jews working in the camps- at the side of SS …….
      But say it outloud- you are accused of being an antisemite..Semites????
      A Clever ploy to silence the world…..and walk into their Talmudic NWO, without any idea why.

      Americas Wars?

      Tell the truth and shame the Devil- Israels Wars are what our Soldiers are dying for – Israels!!

    • Cheers!!

      Too much jewish influence in the politics of Western nations- we recall what happened to Germany.

      Christopher Jones “performed an easy Google search of “Franklin Roosevelt”+”Jewish ancestry.” My efforts turned up a total 671 hits. There are obviously some people in the world who think that the Roosevelts were of Dutch Jewish ancestry. Not that I could care — I wish to make that perfectly clear. But to start firing “anti-semitic” when what we are talking about is common knowledge appears over-wrought, It appears very clear that FDR surrounded himself with socialist Jews even when he was Governor of New York, and many were appointed to top jobs in the Roosevelt administration:

      1. Bernard M. Baruch — a financier and adviser to FDR.
      2. Felix Frankfurter — Supreme Court Justice; a key player in FDR’s New Deal system.
      3. David E. Lilienthal — director of Tennessee Valley Authority, adviser. The TVA changed the relationship of government-to-business in America.
      4. David Niles — presidential aide.
      5. Louis Brandeis — U.S. Supreme Court Justice; confidante of FDR; “Father” of New Deal.
      6. Samuel I. Rosenman — official speechwriter for FDR.
      7. Henry Morgenthau Jr. — Secretary of the Treasury, “unofficial” presidential adviser. Father of the Morgenthau Plan to re-structure Germany/Europe after WWII.
      8. Benjamin V. Cohen — State Department official, adviser to FDR.
      9. Rabbi Stephen Wise — close pal of FDR, spokesman for the American Zionist movement, head of The American Jewish Congress.
      10. Frances Perkins — Secretary of Labor; allegedly Jewish/adopted at birth; unconfirmed.
      11. Sidney Hillman — presidential adviser.
      12. Anna Rosenberg — longtime labor adviser to FDR, and manpower adviser with the Manpower Consulting Committee of the Army and Navy Munitions Board and the War Manpower Commission.
      13. Herbert H. Lehman — Governor of New York, 1933-1942, Director of U.S. Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations, Department of State, 1942-1943; Director-General of UNRRA, 1944 – 1946, pal of FDR.
      14. Herbert Feis — U.S. State Department official, economist, and an adviser on international economic affairs.
      15. R. S. Hecht — financial adviser to FDR.
      16. Nathan Margold — Department of the Interior Solicitor, legal adviser.
      17. Jesse I. Straus — adviser to FDR.
      18. H. J. Laski — “unofficial foreign adviser” to FDR.
      19. E. W. Goldenweiser — Federal Reserve Director.
      20. Charles E. Wyzanski — U.S. Labor department legal adviser.
      21. Samuel Untermyer — lawyer, “unofficial public ownership adviser” to FDR.
      22. Jacob Viner — Tax expert at the U.S. Treasury Department, assistant to the Treasury Secretary.
      23. Edward Filene — businessman, philanthropist, unofficial presidential adviser.
      24. David Dubinsky — Labor leader, president of International Ladies Garment Workers Union.
      25. William C. Bullitt — part-Jewish, ambassador to USSR [is claimed to be Jonathan Horwitz’s grandson; unconfirmed].
      26. Mordecai Ezekiel — Agriculture Department economist.
      27. Abe Fortas — Assistant director of Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of the Interior Undersecretary.
      28. Isador Lubin — Commissioner of Labor Statistics, unofficial labor economist to FDR.
      29. Harry Dexter White [Weiss] — Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; a key founder of the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; adviser, close pal of Henry Morgenthau. Co-wrote the Morgenthau Plan.
      30. Alexander Holtzoff — Special assistant, U.S. Attorney General’s Office until 1945; [presumed to be Jewish; unconfirmed].
      31. David Weintraub — official in the Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations; helped create the United Nations; Secretary, Committee on Supplies, 1944-1946.
      32. Nathan Gregory Silvermaster — Agriculture Department official and head of the Near East Division of the Board of Economic Warfare; helped create the United Nations.
      33. Harold Glasser — Treasury Department director of the division of monetary research. Treasury spokesman on the affairs of United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration.
      34. Irving Kaplan — U.S. Treasury Department official, pal of David Weintraub.
      35. Solomon Adler — Treasury Department representative in China during World War II.
      36. Benjamin Cardozo — U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
      37. Leo Wolman — chairman of the National Recovery Administration’s Labor advisery Board; labor economist.
      38. Rose Schneiderman — labor organizer; on the advisery board of the National Recovery Administration.
      39. Jerome Frank — general counsel to the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, Justice, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1941-57.
      40. Gerard Swope — key player in the creation of the N.R.A. [National Recovery Administration]
      41. Herbert Bayard Swope — brother of Gerard
      42. Lucien Koch — consumer division, N.R.A. [apparently-Jewish]
      43. J. David Stern — Federal Reserve Board, appointed by FDR
      44. Nathan Straus — housing adviser
      45. Charles Michaelson — Democratic [DNC] publicity man
      46. Lawrence Steinhardt — ambassador to Soviet Union
      47. Harry Guggenheim — heir to Guggenheim fortune, adviser on aviation
      48. Arthur Garfield Hays — adviser on civil liberties
      49. David Lasser — head of Worker’s Alliance, labor activist
      50. Max Zaritsky — labor adviser
      51. James Warburg — millionaire, early backer of New Deal before backing out
      52. Louis Kirstein — associate of E. Filene
      53. Charles Wyzanski, Jr. — counsel, Dept. of Labor
      54. Charles Taussig — early New Deal adviser
      55. Jacob Baker — assistant to W.P.A. head Harry Hopkins; assistant head of W.P.A. [Works Progress Admin.]
      56. Louis H. Bean — Dept. of Agriculture official
      57. Abraham Fox — research director, Tariff Commission
      58. Benedict Wolf — National Labor Relations Board [NLRB]
      59. William Leiserson — NLRB
      60. David J. Saposs — NLRB
      61. A. H. Meyers — NLRB [New England division]
      62. L. H. Seltzer — head economist at the Treasury Dept.
      63. Edward Berman — Dept. of Labor official
      64. Jacob Perlman — Dept. of Labor official
      65. Morris L. Jacobson — chief statistician of the Government Research Project
      66. Jack Levin — assistant general manager, Rural Electrification Authority
      67. Harold Loeb — economic consultant, N.R.P.
      68. William Seagle — council, Petroleum Labor Policy Board
      69. Herman A. Gray — policy committee, National Housing Conference
      70. Alexander Sachs — rep. of Lehman Bros., early New Deal consultant
      71. Paul Mazur — rep. of Lehman Bros., early consultant for New Deal
      72. Henry Alsberg — head of the Writer’s Project under the W.P.A.
      73. Lincoln Rothschild — New Deal art administrator

      When any religio-racial group comes as close as American Jewry has to dominating the financial, cultural and political life of a nation while representing a fraction of its population, it is a cause for concern. The gentlemen listed above participated in a government that literally kowtowed to Josef Stalin. Why? I have pointed out in the past the fact of Israeli dual citizenship and the influence of prominent Zionists in big media. The almost mindless US policies of both Democratic and Republican administration towards Israel against the obvious interests of the whole American population are for me leading the US towards a terrible disaster. I would like repeat that I admire many Jews from Maimonides to Judah Benjamin and Disraeli, but I cannot turn a blind eye to the “special moral standard” that was set in place in 1945. The longer people refuse to recognize the dangers of this situation, the more likely a disaster will take place”.

      http://wais.stanford.edu/Individuals/wasfranklinroosevelt.htm

      By

      Dr. Friederich Karl Wiehe

      Published

      for the Institute for studies of the Jewish question, Berlin

      (1938)

      2011 …..why are politicians and Churchmen searching for the cause- when it’s there infront of their nose!

      the authentic “Jüdische Lexicon” (Jewish Dictionary) has to admit to a particularly strong, racially determined sexuality in Jews; it states cautiously: “The Bible itself contains sufficient references to the sensual element; the sexual intercourse was sometimes strongly accentuated … The sermons of the prophets resound again and again with complaints of adultery, which are referred to all too often.” (Vol. V, p. 384). This strong sexuality in Jews, chained in the ghetto of the Middle Ages was flooding into the public life of the states as a result of the emancipation. But it didn’t get a completely free line until all barriers in the form of police surveillance and censorship were removed in Germany after the defeat in 1918. Then a flood of immoral litterature, immoral films and theatre plays poured out into Germany, primarily nourished by Jews. Concerning the field of litterature it has already been mentioned, that the publishers and writers of the immoral litterature, that were flooding the book market, was Jews and Jews again. In the hundreds of thousands of volumes that were seized in 1933 we find the same names repeatedly. Aside from publishing houses like Benjamin Harz, Richard Jacobsthal, Leon Hirsch, M. Jacobsohn or Jacobsthal & Co., we mention here above all the Vienna-Jewish “Verlag für Kulturforschung” (Publishing house of Cultural Research), the production of which could fill whole libraries. The names say everything: “Sittengeschichte des Lasters” (The history of morals and vices), “Sittengeschichte der Schamlosigkeit” (The history of morals and shamelessness), “Bilderlexikon der Erotic” (Picture Lexicon of Erotiscism), “Sittengischichte des Geheime und Verbotene” (The history of the secret and the forbitten) etc.

      Among the writers the following names should be maintained: Dr. Ludwig Lewy-Lenz, Leo Schidrowitz, Dr. Iwan Bloch, Franz Rabinowitsch, Georg Cohen, Dr. Albert Eulenburg, Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld.

      Iwan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld were also the real representatives of sexual research camouflaged as science, that was really nothing but mere pornography and degradation of marriage and family. Their collaborators were Felix Abraham and Lewy-Lenz. However one looks in vain for any known non-Jewish “sexual scientist”!

      The filthy publications of these pseudoscientists speak clearly about what was going on in the “Institue for Sexual Science” and similar enterprises of Magnus Hirschfeld: “Sexual catastrophies”, “Sexual Pathology”, “Aphrodisiacs”, “Contraception” (by Magnus Hirschfeld); “The Perverted”, “Prostitution”, “Sexuality in our Times” (by Iwan Bloch).

      It must be ascribed to their uninhibited sex drive, that the boisterous slogans for free love, the uninhibited right to live out all urges, the impunity of homosexuality and abortion were dragged into public life. Especially an energetic campaign was launched for free abortion and again Jews were leading on: Dr. Max Hodann, Dr. Lothar Wolf, Dr. Lewy-Lenz, Martha Ruben-Wolf, Felix Halle, Alfons Goldschmidt. From the same circles came also numerous writings, which made propagande for birth control and contraception.

      Finally we must not forget the Jewish city medical officer for the capital of Berlin, Dr. Max Hodan. He spread the poison of moral decay in the broad public with his “Worker’s Sexual Chronicle” and thus acquired a certain unlaudable fame by carrying on shameless propaganda for male and female masturbation.

      The Danish ambassador in Haag, Scavenius, was quite right when he said about three years ago in a radio lecture, that Germany at that time had become the pornographic centre of the world.

      http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/germany_jewish_question.htm#Immorality

      Mass immigration into the West- now who can it be- behind all that?

      No Prize for correct answer!

      • Money supply…WORLD WAR 2…

        Hitler’s Monetary System
        By Megumi Yamanaka
        7-14-7

        http://rense.com/general77/hitn.htm

        “We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency coverage of gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank.” -Adolf Hitler, 1937 (CC Veith, Citadels of Chaos, Meador, 1949.) “And it proved sound. It worked. In less than ten years Germany became easily the most powerful state in Europe. It worked so magically and magnificently that it sounded the death knell of the entire (Zionist) Jewish money system. World Jewry knew that they had to destroy Hitler’s system, by whatever means might prove necessary, or their own [system of usury] would necessarily die. And if it died, with it must die their dream and their hope of making themselves masters of the world. The primary issue over which World War II was fought was to determine which money system was to survive. At bottom it was not a war between Germany and the so-called allies. Primarily it was war to the death between Germany and the International Money Power.” –William Gayley Simpson, ‘Which Way Western Man’ (p.642)

  2. If you’ll check, Centurean II, I think you will find that the 18 military men recently killed in Kabul (in your other posting) are all White men. The White people are always sent to take the brunt and to be the cannon-fodder. If you find a jew among the fighting military anywhere, those will be among the unluckiest of jews of the world.

    • In later reports it did say that in addition to the soldiers killed there were also some British advisors also killed.
      I agree, one only has to look on the memorial site for dead soldiers, it’s there for all to see which race of people are over-represented.
      Why our soldiers go is beyond me, they themselves are speeding up the demise of their own race.
      I was speaking to an elderly lady at the weekend, she’s in her 70s, and well recalls that within 15 years of the wars end, the then Government was preaching to the indigenous population to think about food shortages and over-population in the world, that it was their duty to restrict their family to two children, at the same time flooding the country with immigrants. it’s good to hear it direct from folk around at the time without the spin politicians and activist put onto it.
      A war that took so many Europeans, and those of European ancestry, it’s then the same group they target to curb their own survival!

      Enoch Powell to the indigenous people was a King, he spoke for them, quickly removed by the traitors that since that time have gradually stolen England from the people too brainwashed to even notice.

      An eye witness account is always the best, to get an idea of history before it’s been re-written!!

      In the weeks that followed, my English newspapers, every day, were filled with outraged cries about the maltreatment of the Jews, with appeals to help them. You would have thought, to read these papers, that Jews everywhere were on the run, being beaten up, robbed, murdered. Here in Prague, an hour from Hitler, I saw them every day and every night, dancing in the more expensive bars, lolling in the arm-chairs of the more expensive hotels, thronging the cafés, enjoying life, no wit less aggressive, monopolistic, loudly self-important, than they had ever been. Is London different? It was not when I was there.

      The contrast between these two pictures, the one I saw with my own eyes and the one my newspapers gave me, was very great. My English newspapers hardly spared a crumb of compassion for the Czech and German refugees from the Sudeten lands, whose numbers were twenty times as great as those of the Jews, and showed little concern for the continued murder of women and children in Spain and China.

      I began to suspect the motives for the outcry about the Jews. Here, it seemed to me, was the fellow-feeling of privileged classes at work again. I was glad when, as one still small voice in all this deafening chorus of generous but ill-apportioned indignation, The Times published a letter from a man who had been its Special Correspondent in China under the heading ‘Brutality and Suffering – The Inconsistencies of Compassion’.

      This letter said that the German Government’s measures against the Jews had ‘revolted the world’. This time, added the letter, the world, so often revolted, had expressed its feelings in action – for once. The British Government was finding territorial asylum for refugees, the American Government had recalled its Ambassador from Berlin, and so on and so on.

      But, said the letter, this made it difficult for people who looked farther afield than Europe to keep a sense of proportion. The sufferings which Hitler had inflicted on half a million people were terrible; but they were negligible compared with the sufferings which the Japanese army was inflicting on the Chinese people. In China nearly a million men had been killed or disabled — killed or disabled, nearly a million men — and the Japanese had butchered several tens of thousands of civilians, and had rendered destitute and homeless some 30,000,000 more. It would be surprising if 2,000,000 or 3,000,000, mostly old people and children, did not die in the winter of 1938-39. The cases of rape and beating were scarcely worth mentioning in this holocaust.

      The obligations of the British Government, by the written word and in the name of humanity, were the same in the one case as the other, said the writer, and he found the world’s conscience ‘a puzzling organism’.

      Does it regard [he asked] 100 dead or destitute Chinese as equivalent to one persecuted Jew, and may we then expect, when Japan’s victims top the 50,000,000 mark, to see Ambassadors withdrawn from Tokyo and international action taken to make life possible for the refugees? Or is it simply that the Jews are near at hand and the Chinese far off and yellow at that?’

      That is the question asked by this man, who knew his subject, on behalf of millions of Chinese, and it is the question I ask on behalf of hundreds of thousands of Czechs, Germans, and Spaniards.

      ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
      The Reds in Spain were infact Judean Communists………

      The democratic Governments, unless their public opinion at last bestirs itself, will unite to deprive the Spanish children of their last hope of life. No compassion for Juanito. No compassion for the hundreds of thousands of Spanish children in like case. No compassion for the two-weeks-old baby that I saw in a Czechoslovak refugee camp. No compassion for English children in the slums. Starve the Spaniards into submission. Another peace with honour.

      But ‘save the Jewish children’. While this maddening tragedy of inhumanity was going on in Spain your Press was monopolized by the clamour for compassion for the Jews. No great British leader arose to plead the cause of those children in Spain. They are Reds. Let them rot, like the children in your own slums. Once some Spanish children were brought to England, away from that Spanish hell, by a committee of English people. Immediately another committee was formed, to get them sent back. An endless and infuriating wrangle arose. What eventually happened to them, I don’t know.

      But now arrangements were made to bring ‘50,000 Jewish children’ to England. 50,000! Lord Baldwin, in a national broadcast, said that those 50,000 Jewish children must be got to England. The first hundreds or thousands have already arrived. You saw their pictures, in the newspapers. These were no starving orphans, with months of bomb-explosions ringing in their ears. These were the children of well-to-do parents, well-fed, well-tended.

      These children will in the next few years grow to manhood and womanhood. If a new war comes, they will not be liable for military service. They will get jobs, open businesses, in England, while Englishmen are at the front. When the Englishmen come back the Jews will be as paramount in England as they were in Germany after the last war. The squeeze-out will be on. They will not be living in the English slums.

      Some Jews themselves recognize that if they make room in their offices and businesses for foreign Jewish refugees by dismissing English employees, they will in the long run be raising a wave of Anti-Semitism in England against themselves and the very people they are trying to assist.

      http://www.controversyofzion.info/long_long_trail.htm

      Reeds words woke me to the zionist Govt we had and still have today!

      That England, which will not care for its own people, which in the last six years has with fair and holy words betrayed the cause of humanity and justice in one foreign country after another, should now throw open wide her gates to this one particular class of suffering humanity, and only to this one, is sinister and menacing.

      Among the people I have seen leaving Czechoslovakia for England since the dismemberment the majority were Jews, a large minority Germans, hardly any were Czechs. They carry with them grave dangers, for England and English people.

      Ask the average English person about this period of our history- and out will come some Hollywood script written by the very same tribe……………………….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s