No Tears For Warmonger Fox

Oct 16th 2011

No Tears For Warmonger Fox

The powerful Israel lobby will no doubt be sad to see their man go.

by Stuart Littlewood

Dangerous beliefs and connections to the political underworld made him unemployable as a British minister.

Britain’s defence secretary Dr Liam Fox decided to jump rather than be thrown from the battlements.

While we wait – not holding our breath of course – for the Cabinet Secretary’s final report on the peculiar relationship between Fox and his special friend Adam Werrity, it’s worth checking what the Ministerial Code – the ‘Bible’ Fox failed to lived by – actually expected of him.

In his foreword to the Code, issued in May 2010, David Cameron wrote: “Though the British people have been disappointed in their politicians, they still expect the highest standards of conduct. We must not let them down.”

The Code’s first words – its General Principles – make it crystal clear that “Ministers of the Crown are expected to behave in a way that upholds the highest standards of propriety… Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or appears to arise, between their public duties and their private interests”.

On overseas visits the Code says ministers should satisfy themselves that they could defend their arrangements in public. Furthermore the relevant Permanent Secretary’s approval must be obtained before a special adviser accompanies a minister overseas.

As Werrity was not officially employed as an adviser and had no security clearance, one is left wondering why senior civil servants didn’t query his frequent presence.

If there’s a breach of the Code and if the Prime Minister, in consultation with the Cabinet Secretary, feels it needs investigation he is supposed to refer the matter to the independent adviser on Ministers’ interests (Sir Philip Mawer). Enforcement, says the Code, is not the job of the Cabinet Secretary.

Yet the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Gus O’Donnell, is conducting the Fox-Werrity inquiry. Why?

An article in The Guardian reveals that the government has refused to set out the terms of reference of the inquiry into Fox and to explain why the issue wasn’t referred to Mawer. It seems Mawer’s website has been shut down, he hasn’t produced an annual report for two years and has conducted only one inquiry since he was appointed in 2008.

The Ministerial Code also spells out the Seven Principles of Public Life, including this one about Integrity… “Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organizations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.”

On the strength of that, ordinary citizens like me expect a person accepting appointment as a Minister of the Crown to be squeaky-clean, a man of honour and an impeccable patriot. How patriotic is Liam Fox though? I ask because he’s the man who said: “In the battle for the values that we stand for…Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together…”

He’s the man The Jewish Chronicle hailed as “a champion of Israel within the government”.

He’s a man who continually rattles the sabre against Iran which, of course, is no threat to Britain but is seen by Israel as a bitter enemy… and by Fox apparently

Let us not forget that Iraq was Israel’s enemy too, not ours, and look what happened. Liam Fox, according to the website, “voted very strongly for the Iraq war”. He’s also an enthusiastic supporter of the war in Afghanistan, and he’s been spoiling for a fight with Iran.

“Not just a sacking offence…”

Reports says that Whitehall sources have been concerned about Fox’s “maverick” foreign policy based on the neocon agenda. Former British diplomat Craig Murray, discussing the possibility that Werrity’s strings, and therefore Fox’s, were being pulled by Mossad, says on his blog: “The real issue here is a British defence secretary who had a parallel advice structure designed expressly to serve the interests of another state and linked to that state’s security services. That is not just a sacking offence, it is treasonable.”

For years Fox has been an Israel flag-waver at the heart of British government, a man with dangerous beliefs and demonstrably weak judgment. It is inconceivable that those who appointed him could not see that he was unemployable as a Minister of the British Crown. Unless they were similarly tainted, that is.

The powerful Israel lobby will no doubt be sad to see their man go.

His Parliamentary colleagues talk of Fox “finding his way back” after a decent interval. Can they be SERIOUS? The fox won’t have changed his spots or purged the stench of Zionism. Common sense says he should have his security clearance revoked and never be allowed near the levers of power again.

As for Libya, he told the Conservative Party Conference earlier this month: “Libya offered us a very clear choice: We could stand by and do nothing… or we could act. In the words of the Prime Minister our action in Libya is ‘necessary, legal and right’.

“David Cameron’s statecraft, leadership and resolve prevented what would have been a humanitarian disaster and we should be proud of what we have accomplished. Libya has shown that Britain remains a global player.”

The RAF, he said, contributed 20% of coalition air strikes. Using high-tech weapon systems “we have prevented civilian causalities and shown that we value human life more than Gaddafi’s brutal regime”. That’s debatable given our casual attitude to innocent lives in Iraq, Afghanistan and Occupied Palestine, and the humanitarian disasters we have helped create there. And it remains to be seen just how “necessary, legal and right” our action has been in Libya. There are deep rumblings about the conduct of the NATO operation, Britain’s role and whether it wasn’t just an ego-trip for the “Three Stooges” Cameron, Hague and Fox. It may be some time before the full truth emerges.

“To represent Britain in war as well as in peace,” Fox told Conference, “is to represent our inherent democratic values, the rule of law and respect for life.” Noble words. But his gangster friends in Israel, whose enemies he wants us to fight, represent none of those fine qualities.

His colleagues are happy to tell the media what a splendid job Fox has been doing at the Ministry of Defence. Nevertheless the MoD remains a mean-spirited shambles, a disgrace that’s not fit to wipe the boots of our troops let alone order them into battle.

And few will forgive Fox for scrapping the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal, along with the entire fleet of Harrier jump-jets and the new Nimrod spy planes, leaving us denuded of capability, stripped of important skills and weakened not just for now but for years, possibly decades to come.

I have just heard a Conservative Party mandarin on the BBC saying that Fox will be missed by the party and by the country. The party, 80 per cent of whose MPs are believed to be Friends of Israel, will of course miss him. And Israel will miss him. But this country is glad to see the back of him.

Calls are now being made for wider enquiries into the underworld connections of all ministers. High time too, but seeing who has the executive power in this land such an idea has a snowball’s chance in hell of being taken seriously.


October 16, 2011 – 7:46 am
werrity was his boy friend… and werritay was the boy of bicom… so after murdoch, now bicom and their puppet, still a long way to go to recover full total sovereignty

Reply rgalton
October 16, 2011 – 3:58 pm
If Fox had been working for any country other than Israel he would be sitting in a cell. As it is he managed to conduct the most blatant espionage against the UK for months in a two-fingered salute to the British public, with a sense of complete invulnerability.

It is time for a complete clean out of the foreign controlled puppets and agents who control the British political system and media.

Reply rgalton
October 16, 2011 – 4:38 pm
Fox’s puppet master, the Jew Michael Hintze, also has a large number of other British Conservative politicans on his payroll. And Hintze is, of course, just one of the Tribe’s many puppet masters in the UK, from Murdoch on down.

Reply Ray O Hope
October 17, 2011 – 9:16 pm
the Rats are jumping ship’s……!

Reply Ken Rechtstein
October 18, 2011 – 12:32 am
A psychopath gone, because of the internal war between psychopaths for POWER. Will be replaced by another psycho. They pick them from the SAME BASKET.

Fox resigned the same day John Moulton blow the whistle about being asked to give money to a company that was financing Werritty’s first class flights and stay in luxury hotels…

A society that prides itself for being “just and fair” but is based on a perverse unjust and unfair system of carrot and stick, Lords-Overlords and Commoners, who pay with their hard work the life in luxury for those in power, can only be fake and false…

Fox is a typical product of that society. Seems that the line is: “Do what you want, but if you get caught, I do not know you anymore”. That’s how it works: Chicken feed-smoke screens and mirrors for the gullible commoners, i.e. taxpayers and cannon fodder.

“Champion of Israel” in UK Cabinet self-destructs

Drove coach and horses through government’s Ministerial Code for mysterious buddy

by Stuart Littlewood

The dodgy relationship between Britain’s defence secretary, Dr Liam Fox, and his friend Adam Werrity has been entertaining the media and public here for the last several days.

Werrity, a onetime flat-mate of Fox’s and best man at his wedding, has been traipsing around the world after the defense secretary, popping up “by amazing coincidence” in the same cities and organizing and appearing at meetings where Fox discussed state business. And he turned up at Fox’s London office so many times that tongues began to wag.

Werrity falsely claimed to be an adviser to the defense secretary and even handed out business cards inscribed with that title.

Fox has now admitted meeting his bosom-buddy on 18 overseas visits and in 22 get-togethers at the Ministry of Defence HQ – altogether 40 times in the 16 months Fox has been in office, even though Werritty has no security clearance and no official position.

Craig Murray, our former ambassador to Uzbekistan sacked for daring to speak out against torture and other human rights abuses, had this to say…

I had presumed that Fox’s “ex-flatmate” Adam Werritty was of his own age, a flatmate from students days or impecunious early employment. I also presumed that Werritty had been Fox’s best man back in a similar period. I am surprised to find that the 40 year old Fox picked up the 24 year old Werritty at a meeting in Edinburgh Unversity only ten years ago, shortly after that Werritty moved into his flat, and after they had known each other just four years, Werrity was apparently Liam’s closest buddy on earth and became his best man.

Fox accommodated Werritty in taxpayer funded accommodation and around the best man period was funding him on his MPs expenses – before the “Atlantic Bridge” fake charity wheeze. Fox was found by the expenses scandal investigation to have “overclaimed” over £20,000 in mortgage payments and was forced to pay it back. It is unclear why Fox was not prosecuted. He also charged mobile phone bills of over £17,000 to the taxpayer. There must now be an investigation of how many of those calls were to Adam Werritty.

The fact that when Liam Fox was shadow health secretary, Werritty ran a health consultancy, and when Fox became defence secretary, Werritty became a defence consultant, tells you all that you need to know about this relationship.

Is this what passes for “the highest standards of propriety”?

The Prime Minister has foolishly declared “full confidence” in Liam Fox and was echoed by Conservative MPs, who closed ranks around their colleague and dutifully spouted the same drivel. But in the foreword to the Ministerial Code, issued in May 2010, David Cameron wrote: “In everything we do – the policies we develop and how we implement them, the speeches we give, the meetings we hold – we must remember that we are not masters but servants. Though the British people have been disappointed in their politicians, they still expect the highest standards of conduct. We must not let them down.”

The Code’s first words – its General Principles – make it clear that “Ministers of the Crown are expected to behave in a way that upholds the highest standards of propriety… Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or appears to arise, between their public duties and their private interests”.

On overseas visits the Code says ministers “should be satisfied that their arrangements could be defended in public”. Furthermore the relevant Permanent Secretary’s approval must be obtained before a special adviser accompanies a minister overseas.

One of the great mysteries is why Fox’s senior civil servants didn’t say: “Who is this guy, what’s he doing hanging around here, get rid of him.”

In the event of an allegation about a breach of the Code and the Prime Minister, having consulted the Cabinet Secretary feels that it warrants further investigation, he will refer the matter to the independent adviser on Ministers’ interests (Sir Philip Mawer). Enforcement “is not the role of the Cabinet Secretary”.

So why is the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Gus O’Donnell, heading enquiries? Did the PM actually stop to read what he was writing a foreword to?

The Ministerial Code also spells out the Seven Principles of Public Life, including the one about Integrity… “Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.”

But they might as well not be there. You see, Liam Fox is a high-ranking Israel flag-waver, a stooge the Zionist lobby doesn’t wish to lose… as are others in the Cabinet.

When he was Shadow Defense Secretary, Fox was proudly quoted on the Conservative Friends of Israel website saying: “…We must remember that in the battle for the values that we stand for, for democracy against theocracy, for democratic liberal values against repression – Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together or we will all fall divided.”

Yesterday The Jewish Chronicle reported: “The Defence Secretary is known as a champion of Israel within the government. Speaking at the Herzliya Conference in February, which Mr Werritty also attended, he urged tougher sanctions against Iran, Mr Werritty’s area of expertise.”

Iran is suddenly Werrity’s area of expertise? Is there no end to the man’s advisory talent?

We simple-minded citizens expect a person accepting appointment as a Minister of the Crown to take the trouble to read and understand the Code and, as a man of honour, live by it. Fox has apologized to Parliament for “blurring” the distinction between his professional responsibilities and personal loyalties. But that’s not enough. He appears to have thrown caution and common sense to the wind and driven a coach and horses through the Code.

Aside from his obvious lack of judgment we have to consider the implications of his distorted reading of the Middle East and infatuation with a foreign military power that poses a nuclear threat to the region and is contemptuous of international law and human rights.

This “champion of Israel” dangles by his finger-nails pending further enquiries. Will he fall on his sword or wait to be tossed over the battlements?


October 12, 2011 – 10:41 am
Tks, Stuart. It’s always welcome to see some wry humor on VT. Reminded me immediately of Julia. Tough to figure why this guy’s being outed now, unless they needed to send a strong message to a person or persons higher up. After all, the media’s normally tasked with covering this sort of thing up, not exposing it. Maybe it’s an APB to all their compromised assets prior to attacking Iran.

Reply Derek
October 12, 2011 – 11:02 am
Liam Fox must be sacked.

October 12, 2011 – 5:59 pm
Traitors should not be sacked, there’s only one punishment befitting those who put a foreign country above their own and that’s public hanging. Tragically the mob are too stupid to grab their pitchforks, grab these fools from their homes, beat them senseless like seals and then hang them for the betrayal of their country.

Reply Colonel Whirly
October 14, 2011 – 6:11 am
Grand Treason,? OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!!

Reply gordon (not duff)
October 14, 2011 – 8:34 am
This is just the tip of the terdberg of UK Tory fawning to Israel. If you would like to see a little more of the power of the Jewish lobby in the UK, and their devious conniving see Channel 4′s Dispatches “inside Britain’s Israel lobby” on You Tube. Of course this program could never have been made by a major broadcaster in the US, so there might be some hope over there for the once Great Britain. Gordon.

Reply Curmudgeon
October 14, 2011 – 8:58 am
“Yesterday The Jewish Chronicle reported: “The Defence Secretary is known as a champion of Israel within the government….”
The oath of office in the UK requires MPs to be loyal to her Majesty the Queen and her heirs. You cannot serve 2 masters. This man is committing treason.

Reply Anthony Clifton
October 15, 2011 – 9:39 am
Now is an Excellent time to point out the fact that the Children of Israel have never been “Jewish”: or “Jews”. *90% of so-called “Jews” are in fact descendents of the Khazar {turko-mongolian} “Proselytes” to Talmudic Judaism. Talmudic Judaism is in fact an Anti-Israelite religion primarily aimed at duping the Israelites {Christian Nations /”The First World Nations”} to be “braindeadgoy” and allow the “Moneychangers” and Pharisees to control the “Money” and the Media…seems to be exactly what has been happening …The Simple fact is 100% of so-called “Jews” simply do not have to be members of the Stool Sculpture Deity Cult that is Talmudic Judaism…Please help free the “Jews” from the Bondage. = [;article=139037;title=APFN] = of Talmudic Judaism….The people who are actually “Israelites” = Christian Nations/First World…should be examining TRUE Information and discarding or eliminating LIES and False information from their decision making processes…simply using Common Sense….The New Testament has an admonition to Know the Truth & Prove all things…Now Who would be opposed to that ?



6 responses to “No Tears For Warmonger Fox

  1. Tuesday
    Nov17 2009


    Britain must de-Zionise Itself Immediately by Gilad Atzmon
    Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 3:07PM Gilad Atzmon
    On Monday the British TV broadcaster, Channel 4 screened Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby, a devastating expose of the Jewish lobby in the UK*. ‘We couldn’t find a conspiracy’ affirmed Peter Oborne the Daily Mail’s political commentator behind the film. He was right. After running the show for so many years, the Jewish lobby’s purchasing of British politicians and media presence is in the open.

    The Guardian reported today that two years ago a controversial study by American academics Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer explored the influence of the Israel lobby over US foreign policy “but Britain’s pro-Israel organisations have been subjected to far too less scrutiny.” This is indeed the case, and as Oborne disclosed, both British politicians and Zionist pressure groups enjoy it to the max.

    In the film Sir Richard Dalton, a former ambassador to Libya and Iran, said: “I don’t believe, and I don’t think anybody else believes these contributions come with no strings attached.” I would suggest that ‘strings attached’ is a very gentle way of putting it. ‘Chained to submission’ would be far closer to the truth.

    Seemingly a British, consensus case against Zionism and Zionist infiltration is piling up.

    The Jewish community is not happy at all. After so many years of setting the tone, bribing UK politicians and controlling the BBC they are used to being untouchable.

    Labor MP Denis MacShane, who operates as the House of Common’s UK equivalent of the ‘anti defamation league’ told the Jerusalem Post “if there is a Jewish /Israel lobby here, it is not very effective, as Israel is almost treated as a pariah state in the media and has few friends in politics.”

    MacShane may be right; one cannot buy friendship with money. But according to Monday’s broadcast one can certainly buy British politician’s subservience for just a few shekels. According to the Guardian 50% of the Shadow Cabinet are now ‘friends of Israel’. In that context one common saying comes to mind. “Tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are”

    I would assume that if there was any public respect left for the British Parliament, British political parties and the BBC, it should be gone by now. Just a few months ago Brits were devastated to find out about their MPs’ personal expenses bills. Yesterday they learned about their leading politician’s affiliation with the darkest possible regime and ideology around. They also learned that their national broadcast corporation is influenced by Zionists pressure groups run from Jerusalem.

    Mark Gardner from the Zionist ‘Community Security Trust’ is not happy either. He complained that Dispatches producers behaved as if they were investigating a “criminal gang rather than various Jewish community-linked organizations,”

    Gardner is also correct. It is indeed tragic to admit that the Jewish lobby is far more worrying than a criminal gang. It is there to serve a murderous state with a devastating record of crimes against humanity. Thanks to the Jewish lobby, we are all complicit in the Zionist crime. Not only are those lobbyists heavily corrupted and removed from any ethical value system, they also corrupt everything they touch. They obviously contaminate every politician who is happy to take their shekels. Consequently they incriminate us all as a society.
    Watching Cannel 4’s Dispatches yesterday I wondered to myself whether this is the ‘democracy’ some British politicians, such as David Miliband insist on spreading around. I also wonder whether this is the governing model that Jewish Chronicle writer Nick Cohen and the Israeli Hasbara committee author David Aaronovitch were trying to promote when they were supporting the invasion of Iraq back in 2003.

    Political commentator Peter Oborne indeed fulfilled his promise. He told us almost everything we want to know about the lobby, “who they are, how they are funded, how they work and what influence they have, from the key groups to the wealthy individuals who help bankroll the lobbying.”

    However, there is a single observation that must be added. People out there must never forget that Britain was taken into a war that cost more than a million Iraqi lives and at the time Lord Levy was the Number 1 Labour fund-raiser. Putting the two together: an illegal war that only serves Israeli interests and Sir Richard Dalton’s observation that Zionist ‘contribution’ comes with ‘strings attached’, leaves a very bitter taste. Due to its heavily corrupted politicians, Britain is now willingly serving the darkest possible racist national ideology and supporting a criminal terrorist state.

    British politicians and media are caught in bed with too many Zionist wolfs. In order to reclaim sovereignty and dignity, Britain must de-Zionise itself immediately.

    *In Britain at least the TV program can be seen here:

    Print Article Email Article Share Article

  2. Gilad is a jew- warning the Goyim..
    Nov18 2009
    The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews
    Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 9:18AM Gilad Atzmon

    Introduction by Gilad Atzmon

    It is rather impossible to grasp the magnitude of the crimes against humanity performed by the Jewish state in the name of the Jewish people unless one elaborates on Jewish culture in the light of Judaic teaching.

    Zionism was founded as a secular movement. It was there to provide the emancipated Diaspora Jew with a ‘national home land’ of his or her own. However, Zionism was rather effective in transforming the Old Testament from a spiritual text into a land registry. As the truth of Israeli barbarism is unfolding a devastating continuum is being established between Israeli murderous policies and Judaic Goy hating.

    It would be fair to argue that Judaic teaching is not monolithic. As we know, one of the only Jewish collectives that stands along the Palestinians call themselves the Torah Jews (Neturei Karta), a Jewish orthodox sect. In other words, the Torah must have a humanist side to it.

    The following is a review of Torat ha-Melekh, a “kind of guide for anyone who ponders the question of if and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew”. It was published by Ma’ariv Israel’s second biggest paper. It is a must read. I would assume that those American and British corrupted politicians who are happy to take donations from Israeli Tycoons and other ‘Friends of Israel’ better start to understand once and for all what kind of Ideology they are aligning themselves with.

    Here is a full translation of an article in the Maariv newspaper of Israel

    Ma’ariv 09.11.09 (p. 2) by Roi Sharon –

    When is it permissible to kill non-Jews? The book Torat ha-Melekh [The King’s Teaching—INT], which was just published, was written by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, the dean of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in the community of Yitzhar near Nablus, together with another rabbi from the yeshiva, Yossi Elitzur. The book contains no fewer than 230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews, a kind of guide for anyone who ponders the question of if and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew.

    Although the book is not being distributed by the leading book companies, it has already received warm recommendations from right-wing elements, including recommendations from important rabbis such as Yitzhak Ginsburg, Dov Lior and Yaakov Yosef, that were printed at the beginning of the book. The book is being distributed via the Internet and through the yeshiva, and at this stage the introductory price is NIS 30 per copy. At the memorial ceremony that was held over the weekend in Jerusalem for Rabbi Meir Kahane, who was killed nineteen years ago, copies of the book were sold.

    Throughout the book, the authours deal with in-depth theoretical questions in Jewish religious law regarding the killing of non-Jews. The words “Arabs” and “Palestinians” are not mentioned even indirectly, and the authours are careful to avoid making explicit statements in favor of an individual taking the law into his own hands. The book includes hundreds of sources from the Bible and religious law. The book includes quotes from Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, one of the fathers of religious Zionism, and from Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli, one of the deans of the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, the stronghold of national-religious Zionism that is located in Jerusalem.

    The book opens with a prohibition against killing non-Jews and justifies it, among other things, on the grounds of preventing hostility and any desecration of God’s name. But very quickly, the authors move from prohibition to permission, to the various dispensations for harming non-Jews, with the central reason being their obligation to uphold the seven Noahide laws, which every human being on earth must follow. Among these commandments are prohibitions on theft, bloodshed and idolatry. [The seven Noahide laws prohibit idolatry, murder, theft, illicit sexual relations, blasphemy and eating the flesh of a live animal, and require societies to institute just laws and law courts—INT]

    “When we approach a non-Jew who has violated the seven Noahide laws and kill him out of concern for upholding these seven laws, no prohibition has been violated,” states the book, which emphasizes that killing is forbidden unless it is done in obedience to a court ruling. But later on, the authors limit the prohibition, noting that it applies only to a “proper system that deals with non-Jews who violate the seven Noahide commandments.”

    The book includes another conclusion that explains when a non-Jew may be killed even if he is not an enemy of the Jews. “In any situation in which a non-Jew’s presence endangers Jewish lives, the non-Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Gentile and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created,” the authors state. “When a non-Jew assists a murderer of Jews and causes the death of one, he may be killed, and in any case where a non-Jew’s presence causes danger to Jews, the non-Jew may be killed.”

    One of the dispensations for killing non-Jews, according to religious law, applies in a case of din rodef [the law of the “pursuer,” according to which one who is pursuing another with murderous intent may be killed extrajudicially] even when the pursuer is a civilian. “The dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly,” the book states. “Even a civilian who assists combat fighters is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Anyone who assists the army of the wicked in any way is strengthening murderers and is considered a pursuer. A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer.”

    Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur determine that children may also be harmed because they are “hindrances.” The rabbis write as follows: “Hindrances—babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”

    In addition, the children of the leader may be harmed in order to apply pressure to him. If attacking the children of a wicked ruler will influence him not to behave wickedly, they may be harmed. “It is better to kill the pursuers than to kill others,” the authors state.

    In a chapter entitled “Deliberate harm to innocents,” the book explains that war is directed mainly against the pursuers, but those who belong to the enemy nation are also considered the enemy because they are assisting murderers.

    Retaliation also has a place and purpose in this book by Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur. “In order to defeat the enemy, we must behave toward them in a spirit of retaliation and measure for measure,” they state. “Retaliation is absolutely necessary in order to render such wickedness not worthwhile. Therefore, sometimes we do cruel deeds in order to create the proper balance of terror.”

    In one of the footnotes, the two rabbis write in such a way that appears to permit individuals to act on their own, outside of any decision by the government or the army.

    “A decision by the nation is not necessary to permit shedding the blood of the evil kingdom,” the rabbis write. “Even individuals from the nation being attacked may harm them.”

    Unlike books of religious law that are published by yeshivas, this time the rabbis added a chapter containing the book’s conclusions. Each of the six chapters is summarized into main points of several lines, which state, among other things: “In religious law, we have found that non-Jews are generally suspected of shedding Jewish blood, and in war, this suspicion becomes a great deal stronger. One must consider killing even babies, who have not violated the seven Noahide laws, because of the future danger that will be caused if they are allowed to grow up to be as wicked as their parents.”

    Even though the authors are careful, as stated, to use the term “non-Jews,” there are certainly those who could interpret the nationality of the “non-Jews” who are liable to endanger the Jewish people. This is strengthened by the leaflet “The Jewish Voice,” which is published on the Internet from Yitzhar, which comments on the book: “It is superfluous to note that nowhere in the book is it written that the statements are directed only to the ancient non-Jews.” The leaflet’s editors did not omit a stinging remark directed at the GSS, who will certainly take the trouble to get themselves a copy. “The editors suggest to the GSS that they award the prize for Israel’s security to the authors,” the leaflet states, “who gave the detectives the option of reading the summarized conclusions without any need for in-depth study of the entire book.”

    One student of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in Yitzhar explained, from his point of view, where RabbisShapira and Elitzur got the courage to speak so freely on a subject such as the killing of non-Jews. “The rabbis aren’t afraid of prosecution because in that case, Maimonides [Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, 1135–1204] and Nahmanides [Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, 1194–1270] would have to stand trial too, and anyway, this is research on religious law,” the yeshiva student said. “In a Jewish state, nobody sits in jail for studying Torah.”


    Iran Rabbi urges Jews to burn controversial book
    Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:57:20 GMT

    Print Article Email Article Share Article


    Professor John Mearsheimer is subject to a Zionist-trans-Atlantic-attack for supporting my latest book The Wandering Who.

    Earlier this year John Mearsheimer, the highly respected international relations theorist and Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, wrote the following preliminary front matter for my book:

    ‘Gilad Atzmon has written a fascinating and provocative book on Jewish identity in the modern world. He shows how assimilation and liberalism are making it increasingly difficult for Jews in the Diaspora to maintain a powerful sense of their ‘Jewishness.’ Panicked Jewish leaders, he argues, have turned to Zionism (blind loyalty to Israel) and scaremongering (the threat of another Holocaust) to keep the tribe united and distinct from the surrounding goyim. As Atzmon’s own case demonstrates, this strategy is not working and is causing many Jews great anguish. The Wandering Who? should be widely read by Jews and non-Jews alike.’

    It seems as if the Zio-cons on both sides of the pond are now in a state of panic — In an obviously orchestrated attack, the Zionist mouthpiece The Jewish Chronicle of London, the Islamophobic Award winning ‘Harry’s Place’ and the ex-Israeli concentration camp guard Jeffrey Goldberg* , all launched a typical Hasbara smear & intimidation campaign, in which they labeled both Professor Mearsheimer and myself anti Semites. I was also called a ‘neo Nazi’, a ‘Hitler apologist,’ a ‘Holocaust denier’ and a ‘hatemonger’.

    To be honest, it is somewhat amusing that an ex concentration camp guard like Goldberg should label me a ‘Hitler apologist’ or a ‘Holocaust denier’: after all, since Goldberg is an ardent pro-war Zionist who openly and enthusiastically supports a Jews-only, racist, expansionist state, it is clear that he is actually the one who is an advocate of a distinctly Nazi-like ideology and practice.

    In addition, I learned from Goldberg that Adam Holland (yet another notorious Zionist zealot), also cannot quite believe that Professor’ Mearsheimer would endorse my book.

    Adam Holland wrote: “I had trouble believing that a distinguished professor at one of the world’s greatest universities would link himself to a hatemonger like Atzmon. So I sent Professor Mearsheimer an email quoting the blurb and asking him to verify its accuracy. I also gave him an opportunity to amend it or add to it. Here’s what he ( Mearsheimer) wrote back:

    “The blurb below is the one I wrote for ‘The Wandering who’ and I have no reason to amend it or embellish it, as it accurately reflects my view of the book.” John J. Mearsheimer

    What is clear to the rest of us is that our Zionist detractors are fighting a lost battle. I really wonder what they hope to achieve: after all, those who have taken the time to actually read my work know very well that there is no hatred, no anti Semitism, and no racism in my entire body of work. Instead, I believe that truth is a dynamic process — I believe in the power of reason and in free debate.

    If Jeffrey Goldberg has any dignity left at all, then he should start again — He should apologise to Professor Mearsheimer, myself, the Palestinians, and to humanity. He would do better to also try to present an argument, and if he actually has anything to say, he would be best advised to then learn how to argue and encounter in debate.

    You can now order Gilad Atzmon’s New Book on or

    * In the light of Goldberg’s smears on both myself and Professor Mearsheimer, it is worth bearing in mind that Jeffrey Goldberg decided to make Aliya when he was eighteen: he left America for Israel, joined the IDF and served as a prison guard in an Israeli concentration camp during the First Intifada.

    Print Article Email Article Share Article

  4. Take it from Gilad

    Learn more about Nato
    Sunday, August 28, 2011 at 12:47AM Gilad Atzmon

    Entries in Britain (15)
    Gilad Atzmon: Israeli War Criminals Are Welcome Here
    Friday, September 16, 2011 at 5:57AM Gilad Atzmon
    Earlier today Britain amended its universal jurisdiction law to the extent that Israeli war criminals can now enter the Kingdom without risk of arrest. British Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould shamelessly called Israeli war criminal Tzipi Livni, against whom an arrest warrant was issued in 2009, and told her that the Queen has signed the amendment “to ensure that the UK’s justice system can no longer be abused for political reasons.”

    Ignoramus ambassador Gould should know that putting a war criminal behind bars is not a political matter, but an ethical necessity.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: The Flag And The Penis
    Thursday, August 25, 2011 at 8:01AM Gilad Atzmon

    The Daily Mail reported this week that young Paul Donnachie was found to have acted in a racially aggravated manner when he defiled an Israeli flag in a supposed political protest.

    “A judge has ruled that a St Andrews University student who defiled an Israeli flag in a supposed political protest was acting in a racially aggravated manner. Donnachie, 19, put his hands down his trousers before he touched the flag belonging to Jewish exchange student Chanan Reitblat in what he claimed was a ‘political statement’.”

    Donnachie, will lose his place at St Andrews University with immediate effect. He is very unhappy with court’s decision.

    The pathetic Scottish sheriff, who was booed loudly by pro-Palestine supporters, upheld the complaints, telling Donnachie: “I consider this to have been an act of malice against Mr Reitblat for his membership of Israel.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: London Riots and the Big Picture
    Sunday, August 14, 2011 at 2:54AM Gilad Atzmon

    It is astonishing to find that the British press that is so quick to tell us about the ‘true’ nature and motivations behind each mass protest in the Arab world, is somehow intellectually lame in its attempt to grasp their own huge scale riots at home. Until now, I have failed to see even a single worthy analytical attempt to understand the full meaning or significance of the current violent events taking place on the streets of cities all over the UK. British papers have been outlining the events as being driven by, associated with, and defined by hooliganism. They talk to the victims, and sometime even manage to interview some protagonists and perpetrators.

    But, amongst such shallow, sensationalist coverage, we are still missing the most important information. What is the demography of the riots? Who is leading it? Does it have any leaders? Is there an ideology behind it all? Why do they loot, what do they loot, and from whom do they loot? And most importantly, what is the meaning of it all?

    The events we saw the past week in London, Birmingham, Liverpool, Bristol and Manchester were possible signs of disintegration within British society. Some sectors within the society were clearly saying “we have had enough of it.” The truth is that these people we see rioting on our streets have been drifting away for quite some time, and no one has shown any concern, and now they are clearly not interested anymore in obedience to any notions of law and order. They do not see any great value in it. And the reason for that may be simple — there is simply not much in it for them.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: Self Reflection in Mondoweiss
    Wednesday, June 29, 2011 at 3:32PM Gilad Atzmon

    I would like to draw your attention to an interesting thread on Mondoweiss, discussing my interview with Philip Weiss.

    To read the Mondoweiss thread, click here.

    It doesn’t take a genius to work out that Philip Weiss didn’t feel very comfortable with the publication of my interview with him — In fact no one, including myself, felt comfortable with it , and some editors told me they were more than a little surprised that Weiss had agreed to my publishing it. But the truth of the matter is that Weiss gave me a green light after reading it all, and I salute him for his courage.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: Beware, Israeli War Criminal Are Using False Identities
    Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 2:13PM Gilad Atzmon
    Israeli Ynet reports today that IDF Spokesperson assumed false name to avoid arrest for ‘war crimes’ in Britain.

    In an interview with the British magazine Defense News, IDF Spokesperson Avi Benayahu revealed he had recently flown to Britain using a pseudonym so as to avoid getting arrested and investigated for war crimes.

    When asked about the fact that IDF officers are threatened with mass protests and arrest warrants even in friendly countries like Britain, Benayahu replied: “It’s true. In my last visit to London, I had to assume a false name because well-funded anti-Israel activists are exploiting universal jurisdiction powers to wage law fare against us.”

    I guess that Israeli political and military leaders start to grasp the possible outcome of their criminal actions. The message to the British immigration authorities is clear; beware, open your eyes, Israeli war criminals are clearly attempting to enter the United Kingdom using false identities.


    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: The Man With The White Yarmulke
    Thursday, February 3, 2011 at 10:21AM Gilad Atzmon

    Three days ago Jerusalem urged its ‘Western allies’ to support Mubarak. Yesterday war criminal Tony Blair complied submissively suggesting that “Mubarak is immensely courageous and a force for good.”

    The former British PM, who lied to us all, launched an illegal war based on a false dossier and made all of us complicit in the murder of 1.5 million Iraqis, praised the Egyptian president over his role in ‘peace negotiations’. Blair seems to follow the Israeli instructions and warns “against a rush to elections that could bring Muslim Brotherhood to power.”

    Blair argued that the west was right to back Mubarak despite his authoritarian regime because he had maintained peace with Israel. In short, according to the former British PM, ‘democratic enthusiasm’ is better pushed aside for the sake of the Jewish State’s interests. No wonder Lord Levy and the Labour Friends of Israel spent so many sheckels keeping Blair and Labour in power.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Melanie Philips: “Israeli Hasbara is a joke”
    Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 8:18AM Gilad Atzmon
    It is almost amusing to hear Philips dismissing Hasbara (Israeli propaganda) in Britain.

    It is also very cheering to learn from rabid Zionist Philips that in spite of the Israeli Lobby, David Aaronovitch, Nick Cohen and herself, the Palestinians are winning the hearts and minds of British public.

    I guess that it is about time Philips gathers the fact that humanism may win after all.

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: Shoah Backfires
    Monday, January 10, 2011 at 1:27PM Gilad Atzmon

    For years Israelis and Zionists have been pumping ‘Shoah’ into our veins by using every possible propaganda outlet: media, education, Hollywood, music, literature, billboards and so on.

    Seemingly they have been very successful : We are all properly ‘ Holocausted ‘. We accept the suffering of the Jewish people — and we have even managed to draw a universal message from it all.

    We do accept that a real Shoah is taking place in front of our eyes in Palestine, where the Jewish state locks millions of Palestinians behind bars: it starves them, it stops medical supplies, food, cement, and educational materials from getting in. But it does not stop there — when the Jewish state feels like it, it also kills Palestinians indiscriminately. It either blitzes them with white phosphorous , or sends in its tank battalions to drive over Gaza.

    In preparation for Holocaust Memorial Day, London Zionist mouthpiece The Jewish Chronicle is very disturbed by a UK-based pro Palestinian web site named The site is obviously dedicated to the Palestinian Holocaust.

    The Jewish paper insists that the Shoah — like Israel — is a ‘Jews only club’. They do not want to ‘let anyone else in’.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Gilad Atzmon: On Jewish Loyalty
    Monday, September 20, 2010 at 11:25AM Gilad Atzmon

    Recognizing Israel as uniquely Jewish is one of the key demands made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the latest talks with the Palestinians. However, Foreign Minister Lieberman took it one step further. He demands all Israelis swear an oath of loyalty to the Jewish state. Liebermann’s campaign slogan is “no loyalty, no citizenship.”

    “We can’t continue to ignore issues like that of Hanin Zuabi, who identifies completely with the other side,” Said Lieberman on Sunday. He was referring to an Israeli Arab member of Knesset who was stripped of her parliamentary privileges after sailing aboard the heroic Mavi Marmara, and being witness to the Israeli massacre in high seas.

    So here we are : Israel is basically a Western liberal ‘multi cultural’ society where all different ethnicities and minorities are demanded to swear loyalty to the ultimate form of chauvinist Jewish tribal practice.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Give History a Chance by Gilad Atzmon
    Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 2:26PM Gilad Atzmon

    A talk given at the “Debunking the War on Terror” Symposium on July 14th

    The War on Terror Within

    1 The more pain we inflict on others the more we become familiar with evil, aggression and brutality.

    1.1 The more cruel we are towards others, the more devastated we are by the possibility that the subjects of our brutality may also be as nasty as we happen to be.

    1.2 According to Freud this is what projection is all about.

    1.2.1 Otto Weininger refines it, ‘we hate in others, that which we don’t like in ourselves’ he says.

    1.3 As it happens, the dynamic of projection is amplified once the subject of our terror is hopeless and defenseless.

    1.3.1 The reason is obvious. The more hopeless the subject of our terror is, the more we are inclined to face our relentless viciousness first hand.

    2 Israeli treatment of the Palestinians is a devastating example of the above. The more hopeless and defenseless the Palestinians are, the more vicious the Israeli becomes.

    2.1 And yet, the more vicious the Israeli is, the more he or she is horrified by ‘terror’.

    3 In reality, the Israelis are actually horrified by their own cruelty which they project onto others.

    4 The recent cold-blooded murder of 11 peace activists in the high seas by Israeli Navy commandos was nothing but a shocking exposure of that lethal dynamic. The more ethically transparent, innocent and harmless the humanitarian mission to Gaza is, the more lethal the Israeli becomes.

    Click to read more …

    Print Article Email Article Share Article
    Page 1 2 Next 10 Entries »

    Listen to Gilads Music here too…..

    The recent change of Britain’s Universal Law of jurisdiction was the outcome of some relentless Israeli Lobby pressure. As it happens, the Jewish Lobby in Britain promotes foreign interests in our midst but it also damages the ethical scope of British legislation. It clearly manages to derail Britain’s ethical stand.

    What British citizens receive in return is indeed an open question. It is about time Britain reinstated its independence. It is about time it is run from London rather than from Jerusalem.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s