Even Miliband Opposes Strikes; It’s A One Party State

WHEN IN CHARGE OF THE THOSE YOU NOW MOAN ABOUT- WHAT DID YOU DO ED- DO TELL?
RELYING ON THE MEMORY SPAN OF A GOLDFISH ED-BIG MISTAKE!!

ED HAS COME OUT TODAY MOANING ABOUT THE RISE IN FUEL BILLS- AS IF ANYONE WOULD BE IN FAVOUR- AFTER 13 YEARS IN GOVERNMENT HE WAS PART OF THE HUNDREDS OF STEALTH TAXES- PENSION ROBBING FABIAN MOB- THESE GOONS REALLY DO THINK WE’RE STUPID- BAA BA BAAA ED!!
EDs A FABIAN, FRIEND OF THE FABIAN BANKING CARTEL, FAT LOT HE CARES ABOUT, WE MERE MORTALS.

Even Miliband Opposes Strikes; It’s A One Party State

Jun 29th, 2011

By Keelan Balderson

More British citizens are coming to the realization that no matter what party they turn to, politicians do not have the people’s best interests at heart. As Labour leader Ed Miliband comes out and declares the public sector strikes “a mistake” and “a sign of failure”, the Unions are finding out the hard way that even Labour are puppets of the bankers and ruling elite.

There is only one party in this country. The Banking & Globalization party, and a lavish party they’re having indeed.

It works a little something like this. The corporate big wigs and financial giants want to expand their empire, so they call on their puppets in Government to declare a war on a foreign nation. It might be sold as a Human Rights mission like Libya, they may claim there are WMDs, or that a bearded man in a cave managed to penetrate the world’s most secure country and bring down three buildings with two planes; but whatever excuse they use, it ends with a corporate takeover. Oil gets snapped up, central banks get installed, and the elite are one step closer to their vision of World domination.

Of course the Government doesn’t have any money of it’s own, it takes our’s through taxes, and when that isn’t enough to cover fees to the EU and all the other illegal wars that came before, where do they turn to? The bankers.

So to fund a war that benefits the bankers and corporations, the Government borrows money from the same bankers…at interest! We are then left to pick up the tab through cuts to public services.

Meanwhile, the bankers love to gamble, so they create worthless financial instruments called derivatives based on risky mortgages, sell them many times over and pocket the cash before it all comes tumbling down. And if they do get in to trouble, they go to their puppets in Government and ask for a bailout. Again the Government doesn’t have any money of it’s own, so who do they turn to? Well, it’s a little confusing, but they turn to the bankers.

In order to bail out the bankers the Government borrows more money from more bankers and then gives it back to them. And then the people are left once again to pick up the tab through further destruction of public services. And to save even more money the Government then sells some of those services to the corporations. It’s a Ponzi scheme, with those at the top sucking everybody else dry.

Unless a political party comes out an challenges this ridiculous system, then by default they are members of the one party state. The Banking & Globalization party.

What about a second party in this country? The People’s Party!

It’s all good marching with a Union, protesting tuition fees or fighting for the elderly, but our problems are the result of one big problem, the one party state. Fighting our own selfish battles, divided in to different sectors of society allows the elite to play us off each other. It’s the classic divide and rule tactic.

It’s time we put our differences aside, joined forces and got to the root of the problem.

As long as growth depends on debt, then we can never grow without displacing that wealth to those that create the money.

http://wideshut.co.uk/even-miliband-opposes-strikes-its-a-one-party-state/

UNIONS TOO ARE FRIENDS OF GLOBALISM- OTHERWISE THEY’D HAVE SCREAMED THE DAY IMMIGRANTS TOOK THE JOBS AWAY FROM BRITISH PEOPLE!

George Osbourne’s Credit Plan Will “Ease” Britain In To Destruction

Chancellor George Osbourne continues to demonstrate his completely ignorant understanding of the economy (or some may say complicity in destroying it) by today announcing a new “multibillion-pound credit-easing plan”, which will really ease Britain in to further debt to the private bankers.

As reported by The Guardian:
The credit will be provided by the Treasury through an arm’s-length operation direct to companies, with the Bank of England acting as the Treasury’s agent. Under the scheme, the Treasury will buy small firms’ corporate bonds, providing cash direct to struggling firms unable to gain funds from the banks.

Lets attempt to cut out the confusion. The Government plans to invest in small businesses because the Banks we bailed out are still refusing to make loans. So where does the Government go to get the money to invest in these businesses?

Well…it has to borrow it at interest. It does this by issuing Government Bonds through the Treasury, which financial institutions, private investors and offshore banks purchase.

How does the Government pay this back? By cutting public services and/or raising taxes.

So in order to get the economy moving again, the Government’s answer is to borrow more money and increase the national debt that currently sits at £4.8 trillion.

The Guardian continues:
Officials insisted the move did not represent a state bank or the start of the government picking winners.

This statement is flawed on many levels and sits within the paradigm that Britain operates under free-market capitalism. This isn’t true at all. Britain operates under crony-capitalism with banker welfare. When the gambling Banks in the city failed, a true free-market would have let them dissolve. Instead the Government wrote them a welfare check (bailed them out) which the people then have to pay for.

Officials are insisting that this new move isn’t socialist and isn’t picking the winners over the free market. But the process of bailing out the banks was exactly that. Picking banks that were too big to fail and giving them a welfare check, just like the teenage mums everyone gets angry about, but to the tune of £850bn rather than barely enough to pay for food.

Like Orwell’s concept of doublethink, officials are reversing the meaning of phrases. What would actually help the country recover right now would be a state bank, one that issued it’s own debt-free currency and invested it in public projects and services that benefit the people. It’s the private banking system and it’s monopoly over issuing currency that forced the Government and therefore the people in to debt. And Osbourne’s answer is to go further in to debt to the same system, in hope that a few small companies can somehow drag us out from beneath it.

The national debt is not the people’s, because the people didn’t illegally invade foreign countries, the people didn’t vote on the EU and the people didn’t crash the economy. The debt was created by our corrupt Governments and has given the Bankers total control over our future because all mainstream political parties vow to pay it back by making us do the paying.

On October 15th disgruntled British citizens will be taking those grievances to the City of London and Stock Exchange. It’s time to null and void the national debt, it’s time arrest the Bankers that knowingly collapsed the economy, it’s time to get our Bailout money back, and it’s time to demand the Government represent the 99%!

http://wideshut.co.uk/george-osbournes-credit-plan-will-ease-britain-in-to-destruction/

FABIANS HAVE KEPT A VERY TIGHT REIGN ON CAPITALISM- THEIR AIM TO MAKE BRITAIN A FULLY FLEDGED SOCIALIST/COMMIE/COMMUNITARIAN STATE…BAILING OUT BANKS ISN’T CAPITALIST- THEY’D HAVE GONE TO THE WALL UNDER CLASSICAL CAPITALISM- PASSING BANK DEBTS ONTO THE PUBLIC, PROFIT ONTO BANKERS- THATS FASCIST ECONOMICS……KEYNES WAS POPULAR WITH MUSSOLINNIS ITALIAN FASCIST REGIME- AS WITH WESTERN POLITICIANS TODAY.

Habler says:
October 5, 2011 at 11:14 pm
From my research i believe a lot of our debt is held by various hedge funds , banks and private investors in the form of bonds etc. So its already been passed on around the world in a financial web. Sometimes i don’t know if i should weep or laugh at the ridiculousness of it. We could do with auditing the bank of England and find out just who exactly is holding those nominee accounts and we need to strip the monarchy of all power , seen and unseen because they are involved.
The Rothschilds are like an octopus controlling many more octopi penetrating the banks , judiciary , The commons and various charities and social engineering groups like common purpose.

John Yates says:
October 11, 2011 at 1:44 am
The ecomic policy of the Condems more suited to the lunatic asylum than to any Country’s economy. The sooner people realise that Milton Friedman was completely wrong and only John Maynard Keynes underdtood the problem the better. Until then we all endure the consequences.

Keelan Balderson says:
October 13, 2011 at 8:57 am
It was Keynes that got us in to the mess in the first place, and the ConDems are certainly not using Friedman’s Free Market philosophy either.

FOLLOWING KEYNES…….ANOTHER FABIAN THAT HAD NOT THE BEST INTEREST OF BRITAIN IN MIND..PAEDOPHILE FILTH!

3 responses to “Even Miliband Opposes Strikes; It’s A One Party State

  1. ED-TAKE YOUR MARXISM AND SHOVE IT!

    HOP IT…THIS IS WHAT IMMIGRATION BROUGHT BRITAIN!

  2. TOOL USED!!

    Multiculturalism: The Agenda of Organized Jewry

    ——————————————————————————–

    “For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power.”

    by E.Michael Jones
    quote

    Associating multiculturalism with Islam is a daring rhetorical move, especially when that rhetorical move is made by a Jew, because Dorothy Rabinowitz must know, even if the dumb goyim who read her columns in the Wall Street Journal do not, that multiculturalism has been a completely Jewish creation from start to finish. For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power.

    In his essay, “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review,” University of California at Long Beach Professor Kevin MacDonald shows in exhaustive detail how Jewish organizations supported multiculturalism almost from the moment when eastern European Jews arrived in significant numbers on these shores.

    According to MacDonald, the “historical record supports the proposition that making the US into a multicultural society has been a major goal of organized Jewry beginning in the 19th century.”

    The main way in which Jews promoted multiculturalism is by changing this nation’s immigration laws.

    “Jews,” according to MacDonald, “have been ‘the single most persistent pressure group favoring a liberal immigration policy’ in the US in the entire immigration debate beginning in 1881.”

    MacDonald goes on to cite one Jewish authority after another to back up his case. According to [Sheldon M] Neuringer: “Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defense and community relations organization. Over the years their spokesmen had assiduously attended congressional hearings and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such nonsectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons.”

    According to Nathan C. Belth: “In Congress, through all the years when the immigration battles were being fought, the names of Jewish legislators were in the forefront of the liberal forces: from Adolph Sabath to Samuel Dickstein and Emanuel Celler in the House and from Herbert H. Lehman to Jacob Javits in the Senate. Each in this time was leader of the ADL and of major organizations concerned with democratic development.”

    The Jewish promotion of multiculturalism in America had two main goals:

    1) “maximizing the number of Jewish immigrants” and

    2) “opening up the US to immigration from all of the peoples of the world.” Both goals paradoxically used “diversity” as a stalking horse to advance Jewish ethnocentrism. The whole point of multiculturalism is not so much the promotion of diversity as it is the demographic dilution of homogeneity.

    Representative Leavitt saw through the diversity ploy when he complained that the Jews were “the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their race throughout centuries because they believe sincerely that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals.”

    The purpose of multiculturalism has always been to subvert coherent cultures, weaken the majority, and thereby enhance the Jews’ power.

    Or, as MacDonald puts it,

    “Ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interest because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. This results in the diffusion of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism. Historically, major anti-Semitic movements have tended to erupt in societies that have been, apart from the Jews, religiously and/or ethnically homogeneous.”

    The early opponents of multiculturalism also feared Jews as agents of cultural subversion: “Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories; they compose and dish out to us our jazz music, they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers.”

    Jewish immigrants were also “widely perceived to be … disproportionately involved in radical political movements,” a fact often acknowledged by the Jewish press. In one of its editorials, The American Hebrew pointed out that “we must not forget the immigrants form Russia and Austria will becoming from countries infested with Bolshevism, and it will require more than a superficial effort to make good citizens out of them.”

    The fact that Jewish immigrants form Eastern Europe were viewed as “infected with Bolshevism. . . unpatriotic, alien, unassimilable” resulted in a wave of anti-Semitism in the 1920s and contributed to the restrictive immigration legislation of the period. Almost a decade after the immigration debate ended with the triumph of the restrictionists in 1924, Jewish immigration was still having consequences for American identity. As MacDonald points out, “In Philadelphia in the 1930s, fully 72.2 percent of the Communist Party members were the children of Jewish immigrants who came to the US in the late 19th and early 20th century.”

  3. Saturday, October 15th, 2011 | Posted by Gordon Duff It’s Time To Say It: Regime Change, Here – Now!

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/10/15/its-time-to-say-it-regime-change-here-now/

    We are Libya, Syria, North Korea and More!
    We Voted To Get America Back, Nothing Happened – Not Good Enough

    By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

    I spent an hour today talking with veterans activist Robert Rosebrock out in Los Angeles.For years, he has been fighting corruption on behalf of homeless veterans.

    During that time, we have discovered massive financial fraud at the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA police have told me they have been ordered to lie in court, arrest the innocent, be themselves criminals.

    We went to the FBI, the police, congress, General Shinseki, even the president. We took witness statements, we have filed two lawsuits and even when courts find our government has committed crimes, the criminals are allowed to continue, to abuse to steal. There is no justice in America, there are no legal courts, no real police.

    I have seen evidence here, I have seen evidence of American complicity in war crimes, election fraud, I have seen one criminal conspiracy after another gain power until I am absolutely convinced that criminals now rule America and make up our government.

    YouTube – Veterans Today –
    OCW, “Occupy Wall Street” has proven quite clearly to all who care to note that our police are no longer ours, are no longer police at all. They are little better than the senators and congressmen, the mayors and assemblymen, the judges, the filth we have let rule our lives.

    I had one friend, a retired police detective, move to Venezuela because he spoke out against the CIA running drugs. He was poisoned there.

    If we have to tear this country in half to save it, so be it.

    It is time for regime change, the one we voted for, the one we fought for. Those hitting the streets know the enemy, no doubt about it anymore. The enemy is here and America is the battleground. The war Americans fear, class war, civil war, has been going on for years.

    We just didn’t know.

    We awaken as slaves if we awaken at all.

    ————————————————–

    This is yesterday in Milan, a protest against the Wall Street Bankster organization known as Goldman Sachs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s