9/11 Film The Government Does Not Want You To See

9/11 Film The Government Does Not Want You To See

Scores of People, facing impending death, peering frantically out of the burning north tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Centre Photo: REUTERS
by Allen L Roland

This is the British made film the Cheney/Bush administration did not want you to see and for good reason. The film THE FALLING MAN explores in depth the human tragedy of that day whereas the Main Stream Media airbrushed the human cost and concentrated instead on selling heroism and a carefully orchestrated false flag terrorist scenario

110 stories high, and a distance of over 1,300ft, it was impossible at first to see what it was that was falling from the north tower at street level. One witness said it looked like confetti but instead it was human beings desperately trying to escape the searing heat and chocking smoke at the top of the north tower ~ many desperately jumping toward fresh air and certain death.

Thomas Dallal, a photojournalist at the time, was on the ground near the North Tower. He put a long lens on his camera and began snapping away at the uppermost floors. One of his photographs, later to be named “Impending Death”, has become an iconic image from that day. It shows scores of figures leaning out of the broken windows of the North Tower shortly before it was obviously imploded by planted explosives.

A nation’s media stroked anger at that time has now,10 years later, turned to sadness and reflection as well as increasing doubt over what really happened on that infamous day ~ and who was really responsible. Americans are no longer satisfied with the discredited 9/11 Commission’s airbrushed official version of events, where both Cheney and Bush were never questioned under oath, and are now seemingly ready to face the brutal truth of that day as well as the true criminal perpetrators and enablers of 9/11.

The first step towards the truth is fully facing the emotional reality and human cost of what happened on that day. In that regard, I watched again last night the brilliant and moving must see (70 minute) video THE FALLING MAN which has still not been released in the U.S. and which can be seen by clicking on ~ Video

■Note also in this video at the 23:48 minute mark ~ detonation flashes are clearly seen below the smoke as the North Tower begins its collapse.
■The video also interviews the recipient of the last known phone call from the north tower whose trapped and frantic husband told her that people were jumping from the burning floors above him as he lay huddled in fear.
■ Finding the falling man humanized 9/11 and helped me feel the full scope of this human tragedy as well as deepened my commitment to find the truth.
Only the truth of 9/11 can rescue us from the moral quagmire we have engaged in for the last ten years but it will take countless Americans demanding that truth.

I’m one of them ~ are you?

This additional brief 9 minute video is a reminder of the two most compelling issues of the 9/11 conspiracy which must still be addressed ~ Video

It is not necessary to bury the truth.
It is sufficient merely to delay it until nobody cares: Napoleon Bonaparte

——————————————————————————–

About the Author: Allen L Roland is a Freelance Alternative Press Online columnist. He is also a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on his web site at AllenRoland.com. He also guest hosts a Truthtalk, a national radio show that airs monthly. He is available for comments, interviews, speaking engagements and private consultations via email at allen@allenroland.com.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/07/911-film-the-government-does-not-want-you-to-see/

Allen L Roland
September 7, 2011 – 12:36 pm
I’m sellin the truth, my truth as I see it as well as millions of others. The film is legit which is not the case of cluesforum.info. So what are you selling?

Reply
Jim
September 7, 2011 – 5:52 pm
Bullcrap is what you’re selling. Read Dr. Judy Wood’s book “Where Did the Towers Go” and you will start to learn the REAL TRUTH of what happened that day to those PEOPLE and buildings.

DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS were used.

Reply DDL
September 7, 2011 – 1:02 pm
Sorry Allen – no classic signs of “controlled demolitions.” Only classic signs of nuclear fission, the core of three skyscrapers being turned into plasma, and then into micronized dust. If these 9/11 disinfo agents insist on “controlled demolition” then why is the tragectory so much of the twin towers mass being blown upwards when supposedly only gravity is pulling it down? Then add the BS thermite crowd, the pancaking theory would have taken 45-70 seconds to commence, not nine seconds. Only a thermo nuclear “event” can cause matter to turn into dust smaller then 1-micron. Only a nuclear event can cause ground hugging pyrolastic debris flows…….it’s about time people woke up to the fact that the US regime nuked it’s on people and can sleep very easily at night.

Reply
Allen L Roland
September 7, 2011 – 1:12 pm
Your preaching to the choir, DDL ~ there very well may have been a small thermo nuclear device planted as part of the demolition . The three towers were obviously brought down by pre-planted explosives which may have involved a thermo nuclear event.

Reply
foo
September 7, 2011 – 4:13 pm
@ DDL

Whereas I agree with you about the twin towers, I take issue with you about WTC7.

Check out footage of known controlled demolitions — the Seattle King Dome and the Las Vegas Sands Hotel immediately come to mind. Then compare them to the footage of the collapse of WTC7.

The twin towers exploded, with fountains of concrete dust from their tops and steel beams and aluminum facing ejected from their sides.

In contrast, WTC7 collapsed straight down into its own footprint — classic controlled demolition. No (thermo) nukes required.

And you’re right: psychopaths have no conscience. They sleep just fine at night.

Reply
wayne pacific
September 8, 2011 – 12:30 am
The psychopaths actually derive great satisfaction from killing and profiting off other people. They get happy and sleep well. They consider honest trusting people as schmucks that should most definitely be cheated.

Reply MK
September 8, 2011 – 8:35 pm
The symptoms of the first responders and the people who worked the debris looking for remains of those who died in the towers were the classic symptoms found among people exposed to high levels of radiation. Given that buildings the height of the world trade centers had “never before been brought down by controlled demolition” (falling man video quote), it seems likely that a nuke in the basement would be required to set things in motion. Doesn’t anybody remember that an attempt was made BEFORE 9/11 to bring down the world trade center? That attempt may well have been a dry run. It established that the towers were pretty darn sturdy.

Interviews with the architects and engineers of the WTC also revelaed that the inner core with its concrete-shrouded steel was “designed to withstand direct hits by airplanes.” Clearly, it was going to take more than some planes and a controlled demolition to bring down these extremely tall and extremely-well-engineered towers. I believe that the nuke, the planes and the demolition actions were insurance to ENSURE that the buildings fell.

Watching the falling man film and the second film about the events of 9/11 has hardened my resolve that the criminals behind these things be taken DOWN and punished for the horror that they caused…regardless of their positions or nationality.

MK

Reply
Allen L Roland
September 8, 2011 – 8:45 pm
Precisely my feelings also, MK ~

Reply DaveE
September 7, 2011 – 4:18 pm
At this point it’s academic. WHO did the deed is far more important than how they did it. That would be Israel, by the way, with a lot of help from their network of traitors in the US.

Israel WANTS us to be at war with ourselves, not with THEM, our true enemy who declared war on US ten tears ago. Arguing about details we can’t prove just plays into Israel’s hands and gives aid and comfort to the enemy.

It could have been BOTH thermite and a bomb, for all we know. Please stop playing into the enemy’s hands, if you’re an American. Otherwise, we’ll have to assume you’re working for the enemy.

Reply
foo
September 7, 2011 – 6:37 pm
@ DaveE

“…Otherwise, we’ll have to assume you’re working for the enemy.”

Your use of the royal we and your casting aspersions on people’s loyalty are way outta line.

Tossing ideas back and forth about the HOW serves a very useful purpose. To get people to examine the holes in the official conspiracy theory, leading with “Israel and the Neocons did it” won’t work.

The first step is to get them to see that jet fuel fires couldn’t have brought down the towers and to make them aware of WTC7 and the fact that it wasn’t even hit by a plane. Offering well-reasoned HOW explanations can do that.

Reply alyon
September 7, 2011 – 5:06 pm
DDL, Wow, Now that is a post. I am awake now. Nicely articulated. Makes perfect sense. But, thermite was used as a cutter right? Lots of cold steal that needed cutting? As were conventional explosives employed in the basement to release the under pinnings? Significant physical evidence of that. But when it was show time…the nukes kicked in and micronized the whole deal in a pyrolastic flow?

Reply james johnson
September 9, 2011 – 1:50 pm
If there were nuclear devices, no matter how small, detonated at the WTC, there should be detectable isotopes fingerprinting the source even today in dust samples.
Where is the analysis?????
otherwise, mini nukes are disinformation. i prefer conventional explosives with a high speed detonation front like c 4 and micronized thermite to explain the collapse.

Reply
Allen L Roland
September 9, 2011 – 2:41 pm
I can agree with that, James ~ the most important point being that they were taken down by planted explosives.

Reply Gordon Duff
September 9, 2011 – 2:45 pm
james
of course, the evidence of what you mention is extensive though you seem not to have looked into it.
keep going
g

Reply jg
September 7, 2011 – 1:02 pm
Thanks for posting this, Mr. Roland.

I have learned that shielding the public from the human cost of our actions is common. Example: photos from Hiroshima were kept from public view for 25 years. And, few know of the 9 million Germans who died from starvation or exposure over ’45-’50 as French, British, Russians, and Americans deliberately withheld food as Poland, Czech., and Russia forcibly expelled racial Germans or worked them to death in slave labor reparation camps.

Terrible, that the U.S. government shields the citizens’ eyes from the human cost of its actions.

Keep up the fine work, sir.

Reply Vox
September 7, 2011 – 1:44 pm
There should be a disclaimer at the end of the movie:

“No jews were harmed during this False Flag Operation”

Reply
Art
September 7, 2011 – 2:19 pm
There was one killed. A visitor who for a strange reason had not got the memo!

Reply
Vox
September 7, 2011 – 5:36 pm
Perhaps he had heard that someone had dropped a shekel in the hallway and he wanted to grab it before it was lost in the rubble.

But seriously though imagine if a few of them had died? There would be memorials sprung up all over America (paid for by the taxpayers with only the jews names on it) to honor their memory and the goyim would be dropping off truckloads full of flowers, cards, teddy bears….. and filming it to show their jewish master back at corporate how they had honored the fallen member of the Master Race.

Reply Vox
September 7, 2011 – 2:13 pm
We are also being shielded from a potential photo. A photo that justice calls for. That photo would be taken from the tail gunner position of an American bomber looking back at a large thermonuclear mushroom cloud as it rises above Tel Aviv.

Reply Charles
September 7, 2011 – 3:51 pm
Anyone notice the flag at 52:12 in the film?

Reply
Allen L Roland
September 7, 2011 – 5:39 pm
Some people think it means you’re anti-American for putting a flag upside down but it really means you are discontented with your country and that it needs help ~ which makes since here.

Reply william f mcdonagh3
September 7, 2011 – 5:31 pm
vox,i second that, drop the big one right on tel aviv,to hell with them

Reply
Vox
September 7, 2011 – 5:43 pm
I’d volunteer to ride the bomb down like in Dr. Strangelove because I’d give my life as a gift to the world just to make sure it was going to be a direct hit. It would be worth it if only I could see the look on a few of their faces right before the moment it exploded. That shitty little two bit fascist criminal stronghold has been a sore on the world’s ass for far too long already.

Reply
foo
September 7, 2011 – 6:43 pm
As much as the idea of nuking Tel Aviv might be a satisfying fantasy, there’s an aspect that you’re ignoring. Their radar would see the bomber or the missile coming, and they would invoke the Samson Option.

That idea is about fifty years too late.

Reply Allen L Roland
September 7, 2011 – 6:00 pm
NIST admits that despite nearly 3,000 people being killed in the 9/11 attacks and explosions (squibs) being clearly visible, as you can see here, they “did not test for the presence of explosive residue.” Most of the 9/11 debris was quickly destroyed by the government before proper testing could be done.
The question is who made those decisions and that will lead you to the true co-conspirators.

Reply AE911truth says…
September 7, 2011 – 8:23 pm
Main Video disabled on mobile. Will check computer later but second video loads fine. Did an extensive YouTube search for it and not there? Censorship anyone?

Reply Vox
September 7, 2011 – 8:48 pm
Alert:

I’m on AT&T’s network. AT&T has been flushing their DNS records to eliminate certain sites that are critical of jews and you receive this error message:

Oops! This link appears broken.DNS error occurred. Server cannot be found.

Suggestion – visit suggested links:

Jewish TV Network Videos

News & Israel Updates Served Daily From The Leading Online Video Site!

JewishTVNetwork.com/Israel – Sponsored Result

Reply
Vox
September 7, 2011 – 8:49 pm
The Revolution Won’t be Televised

Reply foo
September 8, 2011 – 6:16 am
My first post about open DNS servers was deleted, perhaps because I included a link. So here goes again, without the link.

You don’t have to use your ISP’s DNS server. You don’t have to tolerate your ISP’s blocking Web sites that they consider inappropriate, i. e., truthful.

google
open dsl servers

One of the returns will be
Free Fast Public DNS Servers List

Click on it to visit the site. You will find a list of open DNS servers, plus links to plain-English instructions on how to change the DNS.

In addition to escaping your ISP’s censorship, you will also find that ope DNS servers are usually faster than your ISP’s DNS server, meaning that Web pages will load faster.

It is not anywhere as “geeky” as it might sound.

Reply
Vox
September 9, 2011 – 6:53 am
Thanks for the tip. Probably also makes it harder for the jewish thugs to track your internet usage

Reply Zissa Ramani Facebook
September 8, 2011 – 9:49 am
-Propagandist Greedy Racist Zionist Are Hardliners Extremist-

This is what I believe happen for money.

Deal of the Year: World Trade Center, New York, NY

Weighing in at $3.2 billion, the acquisition of the 99-year leasehold of the World Trade Center was the largest of the year. “Notwithstanding the emotional difficulty of celebrating anything related to the World Trade Center is the fact that upon completion of its acquisition by Larry Silverstein, it was clearly the deal of the year for the industry, and now more than ever, a deal of [a] lifetime for Silverstein” said Ken Zakin, managing director at Insignia/ESG. [iiRealEstate]

Silverstein Makes a Huge
Profit off of the 9/11 Attacks

Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center was “privatized” by being leased to a private sector developer. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion. “This is a dream come true,” Larry Silverstein said. “We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights.”

But the World Trade Towers were not the real estate plum we are led to believe.
From an economic standpoint, the trade center — subsidized since its inception — has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. [BusinessWeek]

How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of this?

Also, the towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built.
It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon]

Other New York developers had been driven into bankruptcy by the costly mandated renovations, and $200 million represented an entire year’s worth of revenues from the World Trade Towers.

The perfect collapse of the twin towers changed the picture.

Under a pending agreement, a developer and his investors will get back most of the down payment that they made to lease the World Trade Center just six weeks before a terrorist attack destroyed the twin towers. Developer Larry Silverstein and investors Lloyd Goldman and Joseph Cayre are nearing a deal that would give them about $98 million of their original investment of $124 million, The New York Times reported Saturday. [MontereyHerald 11/22/2003]

Instead of renovation, Silverstein is rebuilding, funded by the insurance coverage on the property which ‘fortuitously’ covered acts of terrorism. Even better, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein’s view, separate attacks. The total potential payout is $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself.

As reported in The Washington Post, the insurance company, Swiss Re, has gone to court to argue that the 9/11 disaster was only one attack, not two and that therefore the insurance payout should be limited to $3.55 billion, still enough to rebuild the complex.

Update: WTC Leaseholder May Collect Up To $4.6B

A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04]

The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks.

Reply
beijingyank
September 9, 2011 – 9:53 pm
Shame on Swiss Re.

Swiss Re didn’t have to pay a dime to the Silverstein thermate gangsters.

Zero Mostel in Mel Brooks’”The Producers” would have had a better insurance claim than “Lucky Pull It” Silverstein. Shame on you Swiss Re!

Reply Doug
September 8, 2011 – 1:57 pm
Thank you, Allen. As we all know, no one, not anywhere, is safe from this criminal organization. All those whom
planned, implemented and covered for this complex operation will be held accountable. 911 is not going away thanks to the efforts of yourself, Veterans Today and others. We may not be sure of all the details of how this operation was carried out, but, we know who many of the players are and now we have to figure out how to get them in front of a citizens grand jury. Doug

Reply Nelson_2008
September 9, 2011 – 9:42 am
Note how new posters “DDL” and “Jim” happen to blow in off the internet, insist that “nukes” or “directed energy weapons” were used, and then disappear back into the ether, likely never to be heard from again…except perhaps under a different pseudonym…on this or another forum…where 9/11 is being discussed.

Just hoping to plant some doubt, create some confusion…induce some fatigue…turn people off…whatever they can do to assist our Masters’ psychological war against us.

Reply Snowy Smith, South Africa
September 9, 2011 – 11:09 am
The ENEMY is the JEW SUPREMACISTS.

The ENEMY is the “The United Nations”.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/07/911-film-the-government-does-not-want-you-to-see/

One response to “9/11 Film The Government Does Not Want You To See

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s