Controversy of Zion; Tragic History

MY FAVOURITE BOOK!

Controversy of Zion; Tragic History
by Tom Valentine

This book was finally published in 1956, and the author, Douglas Reed, closed out the detailed world history and the threat of “Destructive “Talmudism with this line:

“I believe the Jews of the world are equally beginning to see the error of revolutionary Zionism, the twin of the other destructive movement, and, as this century ends, will decide to seek involvement in mankind.”

Throughout this detailed, utterly documented and exhaustive history of civilization, Reed pointed out clearly that many Jews were the implacable enemies of Zionism, and were thereby crushed without mercy.

Talk about beginning at the beginning:

“The true start of this affair occurred on a day in 458 BC, which this narrative will reach in its sixth chapter. On that day the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites) produced a racial creed, the disruptive effect of which on subsequent human affairs may have exceeded that of explosives or epidemics. This was the day on which the theory of the master-race was set up as “the Law”. At the time Judah was a small tribe among the subject-peoples of the Persian king, and what today is known as “the West” could not even be imagined. Now the Christian era is nearly two thousand years old and “Western civilization”, which grew out of it, is threatened with disintegration. The creed born in Judah 2,500 years ago, in the author’s opinion, has chiefly brought this about. The process, from original cause to present effect, can be fairly clearly traced because the period is, in the main, one of verifiable history.”

Those of us today are not conditioned to think so clearly on the true beginning of this destructive power, because we are taught that the”Old Testament” simply precedes and establishes the New in our reading of The Bible. Reed points out this was fatal error, because the Talmud usurped whatever may have been Revelation from God and converted it into a filthy, racist, abominable work of men, who sought only power and the destruction of others.

Gospel preachers today tell the biographies of Jesus without delineating who his mortal enemies were other than Pharisees and scribes in the temple. We are seldom told about the Talmudist Pharisees in detail, and even when admonished famously by Jesus as hypocrites and liars, preachers do not delve into what the “Sanhedrin” really was. Christians want the philosophy of love and salvation, they have seldom in these centuries since hungered for the evil details of Christ’s persecution. I for one never had a “bible study” that explained the power of the “jews” at that time in a true historical perspective; perhaps if we Christians were preached the whole story, we would not have been such dupes throughout western history. Those last thoughts here are mine not necessarily the author’s.

From the beginning with the mysterious tribe of Judah, until today’s quaking world and a nation called Israel is what this history covers. We learn that the very name “Israel” is a Talmudic con Job, because the Biblical Israel ceased to exist about 2500 years ago; and had absolutely nothing to do with today’s “shitty little country.”

I admit to having a big problem with the writers version of ancient history early on, but I am likely one of very few who would react this way. It is because, I have learned to be an implacable enemy of the cult of “British Israel”snd the “Destiny” crowd, who want so badly to be powerful Jews, they have adopted a racial philosophy based on the mythology of the “Lost tribes”The entire premise is false, just as the Talmud is entirely false.

Recently on the Internet I found this statement about the Talmud:

“It would be impossible to find less wisdom, less eloquence, and less high morality, imbedded in a vaster bulk of what is utterly valueless to mankind — to say nothing of those parts of it which are indelicate and even obscene — in any other national literature of the same extent.”

That may be attributed to an Internet favorite Henry Mankow
Not long ago prior to the dawn of the blogger. One never saw or heard about the Talmud, and for good reason, who in their right mind would claim it?

The greatest value of Reed’s detailed research is clearly shown in his weaving the facts behind the manipulations of the American and British governments by the modern Sanhedrin of International Talmudist Elders: On today’s issue of War powers, Reed points to the notorious “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” about which he gives detaled historical background:

“This forecast of 1905 or earlier particularly deserves Lord Sydenham’s tribute of “deadly accuracy”. American presidents in the two wars of this century have acted as here shown. They did take the right of declaring and making war, and it has been used at least once (in Korea) since the Second World War ended; any attempt in Congress or outside to deprive them of this power, or curb them in the use of it meets with violently hostile attack.

“American presidents in the two wars of this century have acted as here shown. They did take the right of declaring and making war, and it has been used at least once (in Korea) since the Second World War ended; any attempt in Congress or outside to deprive them of this power, or curb them in the use of it meets with violently hostile attack.

“So the Protocols continue. The peoples, on their progress “from one disenchantment to another”, will not be allowed “a breathing-space”. Any country “which dares to oppose us” must be met with war, and any collective opposition with “universal war”. The peoples will not be allowed “to contend with sedition” (here is the key to the furious attacks of the 1790s, 1920 and today on all demands for “investigation”, “Witch-hunting”, “McCarthyism” and the like). In the Super-State to come the obligation will fall on members of one family to denounce dissidents within the family circle (the Old Testamentary dispensation earlier mentioned). The “complete wrecking of the Christian religion” will not be long delayed. The peoples will be kept distracted by trivial amusements (“people’s palaces”) from becoming troublesome and asking questions. History will be rewritten for their delusion (another precept since fulfilled in communized Russia), for “we shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the national governments”. “All the wheels of the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine, which is in our hands, and that engine of the machinery of States is Gold”.

“And the end of it all: “What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, beside ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers. . . The recognition of our despot. . .will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence. . .of their rulers, will clamor: ‘Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of discords, frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts, who will give us peace and quiet, which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives.”

From that statement alone it is easy to understsnd why the powerful Talmudists fought so long and so hard to discredit the protocols.

To me, a history buff, so to speak, the revealing chapters in Reed’s massive tomb. explained political manipulation, and how it is done; when he described the “advice”given to Harry Truman that led the president to go against public pressure and literally establish Israel as a nation, Reed told how it came about during election campaigns where the closest advisors are never statesmen, but easily dominated political creatures. Reed’s coverage of the sorry Truman business as well as the sickening manipulations of Woodrow Wilson, along with a detailed history of the mysterious Col. Mandell House are vital reading; not to mention the most thorough coverage of the Balfour Declaration one will find anywhere..

For good measure let me toss in some other pithy jewels

“Republicanism, too, is to be a “cover” for the conspiracy. The Protocols are especially contemptuous of republicanism, in which (and in liberalism) they see the weapon of self-destruction forged out of “the mob”: “. . . then it was that the era of republics became possible of realization; and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government, by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, our slaves. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the peoples”.

Today, we may consider those interminable polls to be the “mob” of the protocols.

Read: The Controversy of Zion

WISH EVERYBODY WOULD- ALLOWS ONE TO SEE THE CHARADE WE TODAY CALL A GOVERNMENT!

9 Comments for “Controversy of Zion; Tragic History”Controversy of Zion; Tragic History « Middle East atemporal
July 29, 2011 – 1:47 pm
[…] http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/29/controversy-of-zion-tragic-history/ Lasă un comentariu LikeBe the first to like this post. […]

Reply Truth Seeker
July 29, 2011 – 3:08 pm
Interesting read, but if one look closer the Torah and the Israelites or Levites are descendants of Akhenaten the only Pharaoh embracing monotheisms . Most all stories in the Torah/Old Testament have been borrowed from the Sumerians spun with their own breef history.

Isn’t it interesting how close Pharisees and Pharaoh are very similar. Pharaoh = Pharasee = Pharisee

Origin of the Rabbis
Being neighbors with Egypt, Israel is very familiar with the Egyptian language and customs. The most central god of Egypt is “Ra” or Re, which is the Egyptian sun god, “the King of the gods” and father of all creation, he is the only god not of this earth, Ra is the protector of the Pharaoh. Ra merged with Horu the two horizons….which is almost identical to the G-d of Abraham.

Combining the gods of Ra with“Av” (meaning father, as within “Av”raham), creating; “Rav”va, Rabba, or in Hebrew Rabbi, thus the Egyptians and Onias IV was worshiping the same god. The Egyptians called the leaders of Abrahams tribe; Ravva (Rabbi), or Revva (Rebbi), a name very familiar to Egyptians. Thus Onias IV was welcome to join mainstream Egyptians.

The derogatory term: “Rabbi” is derived from the Egyptian god “Ra” + “abba” (father) = Rabbi or Rebbi.

As far as Jesus and the Pharisees and Scribes
He felt that what Pharisees were doing was using “The Law” cleverly to control people, instead of what its intent was to aspire to a way of life. He also spoke out about the oral traditions like the Mishnah (man made rules) which combined with the Babylonian Gemara make up what is today known as the Talmud.

Pharisaism became Talmudism which is modern Zionism and if Jesus was alive today he would be fighting Zionism which ultimately equals racism.

Here’s a little history from a Jewish Historian not afraid to tell the truth…

“Facts are Facts” by Benjamin Freedman
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts.htm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts1.htm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts2.htm

Reply Tom Valentine
July 29, 2011 – 4:38 pm
This is a book review of a truly important book, and while one sentence in it told about borrowing the concept of one overall God from Egypt, the use of deuteronomy (second law) by the rabbis of the Talmud provides all the racism and chutzpah needed. I love you guys and gals who respond, but it would be nice to stay on topic. I say if you have not read “controversy”, you don’t know what hit us. I read both Ben Freedman and Jack Bernstein, incidentally very good also. But different. by the way Phariseeism was Talmudism, same thing. Replacing the word of God with opinions of men.

Reply Virg
July 29, 2011 – 5:06 pm
Thank you for this well-written critique of Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion!

To support your claim, may I offer – calling someone “anti-Semitic”

IT’S A TRICK, WE ALWAYS USE IT says former ISRAELI MINISTER (Shulamit Aloni)

Reply Daphne O’Brien
July 29, 2011 – 5:08 pm
It was good to read this. I bought this book some years ago after reading “Under the Sign of the Scorpio – The Rise & Fall of the Soviet Union” by Juri Lina. I then proceeded to buy all the old books on this subject I could find. I knew this knowledge was hidden as it was so very relevant for today.
Just recently I have found out that “200 Years Together” by Solzhentsyn (his last book before his death), which is the history of the Russians and the Jews living together, is translated into several languages, but not into English. You would have to ask why.
I am gradually collecting chapters people have painstakingly translated and posted on the web.

And yet, at the end of all this study, I find that nobody wants to know. The western world is walking blindly into what I see as a future similar to what the Russians experienced and they won’t take heed. I have wondered if this is because of the powerful “anti-semitic” and “politically correct” views we have been taught to live by. Or is it simply that we can’t bear to understand that our leaders are bought and paid for and that the Zionists are already in power? Perhaps it’s very hard to believe this if your worth as a human being is caught up in being on the “good” side in a world where so much is going wrong. Bread and circuses also plays an enormous part. Long working hours and as much play as you can get at the end of the week isn’t conducive to deep study. But until we do understand what is happening, we simply cannot fight back in an effective way in my opinion.

Anyway, thank you very much for an excellent article.

Reply Tom Valentine
July 29, 2011 – 7:11 pm
Thought I would add a graph from the book:commenting on the return to jerusalem by Jews from Babylon “captivity.” It was not a happy or triumphant return for these people, though it was a major political success for the priesthood. The Levites met the same difficulty as the Zionists in 1903, 1929 and 1953: the chosen people did not want to go to the promised land. Moreover, the leaders did not intend to head “the return”; they wished to stay in Babylon (as the Zionist leaders today wish to stay in New York).

Reply Tom Valentine
July 29, 2011 – 7:18 pm
This passage is of especial interest. The term “premier-dictator” would not generally have been understood in 1905, when the peoples of the West believed their elected representatives to express and depend on their approval. However, it became applicable during the First and Second World Wars, when American presidents and British prime ministers made themselves, in fact, “premier-dictators” and used emergency powers in the name of “the welfare of peoples. . . international brotherhood . . . equality of rights”. Moreover, these premier-dictators, in both wars, did tell the peoples that the ultimate end of all this would be “unification” under a world government of some kind. The question, who would govern this world government, was one which never received straightforward answer; so much else of the Protocols has been fulfilled that their assertion that it would be the instrument of the conspiracy for governing the world “by violence and terrorization” deserves much thought.
Then the unknown scribes of some time before 1905 describe the position to which American presidents have been reduced in our century. The passage begins, “In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of presidents”. This, as the sequence shows, means personal responsibility, as distinct from responsibility curbed by constitutional controls; the president is to become one of the “premier-dictators” earlier foreseen, whose function is to be to break down the constitutional defences of states and thus prepare “unification under our sovereign rule”
.
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Douglas.Reed/The.Controversy.of.Zion/06.The.People.Wept.htm

Reply Tom Valentine
July 30, 2011 – 5:59 am
Getting the book from the website “Iamthewitness” is great way to do it at no cost. It is instructive to read the bibliography for his list of sources. Here is a provocative paragraph: “The book of Ezekiel is the most significant of all the Old Testament books. It is more significant than even Deuteronomy, Leviticus and Numbers because it seems to be the fountainhead from which the dark ideas of those books of the Law first sprang. For instance, the student of the curses enumerated in Deuteronomy is bound to suspect that the deity in whose name they were uttered was of diabolic nature, not divine; the name, “God”, in the sense which has been given to it, cannot be coupled with such menaces. In Ezekiel’s book the student finds this suspicion expressly confirmed. Ezekiel puts into the very mouth of God the statement that he had made evil laws in order to inspire misery and fear! This appears in chapter 20 and gives the key to the whole mystery of “the Mosaic Law” .

Reply Debbie Menon
July 30, 2011 – 8:16 am
Thanks Tom, I cottoned onto Douglas Reed via IHR and Mark Weber who also seems to have appreciated him, and his writing.

Yes, writing what he did from the situation as he saw it sixty years ago, he certainly was a prophet of current times. And, it is no wonder why he was disenfranchised, although praised, by his own powerful News organization, the London Times, and subsequently shunned by all the rest of the world’s publishers. Even then the hydra-headed cabal had a strong grip on the power centers which mattered.

No, I shan’t bother reading his book.I am sure it is interesting, but I doubt that it can tell us anything we do not already know, and it would merely be repetitious, or prescient, of everything we read today.

But, he is a good introduction into those dark and mysterious depths for the uninitiated and ignorant public who are just emerging from the sheltered womb in which they have taken refuge for so long, awakening, needing their eyes and ears cleaned of the mess of parturition, and a good sharp whack on the bottom to get them up and shouting.

MY CONCLUSIONS EXACTLY!

Daphne O’Brien
July 29, 2011 – 5:08 pm
It was good to read this. I bought this book some years ago after reading “Under the Sign of the Scorpio – The Rise & Fall of the Soviet Union” by Juri Lina. I then proceeded to buy all the old books on this subject I could find. I knew this knowledge was hidden as it was so very relevant for today.
Just recently I have found out that “200 Years Together” by Solzhentsyn (his last book before his death), which is the history of the Russians and the Jews living together, is translated into several languages, but not into English. You would have to ask why.
I am gradually collecting chapters people have painstakingly translated and posted on the web.

And yet, at the end of all this study, I find that nobody wants to know. The western world is walking blindly into what I see as a future similar to what the Russians experienced and they won’t take heed. I have wondered if this is because of the powerful “anti-semitic” and “politically correct” views we have been taught to live by. Or is it simply that we can’t bear to understand that our leaders are bought and paid for and that the Zionists are already in power? Perhaps it’s very hard to believe this if your worth as a human being is caught up in being on the “good” side in a world where so much is going wrong. Bread and circuses also plays an enormous part. Long working hours and as much play as you can get at the end of the week isn’t conducive to deep study. But until we do understand what is happening, we simply cannot fight back in an effective way in my opinion.

Anyway, thank you very much for an excellent article.

2 responses to “Controversy of Zion; Tragic History

  1. THE VERY SAME TRICK USED TO SILENCE DOUG
    THE EXACT TRICK USED TO SILENCE DOUGLAS REED- HE HAD COURAGE AND CONTINUED TO WRITE HIS BOOKS…..

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/29/controversy-of-zion-tragic-history/

    And yet, at the end of all this study, I find that nobody wants to know. The western world is walking blindly into what I see as a future similar to what the Russians experienced and they won’t take heed. I have wondered if this is because of the powerful “anti-semitic” and “politically correct” views we have been taught to live by. Or is it simply that we can’t bear to understand that our leaders are bought and paid for and that the Zionists are already in power? Perhaps it’s very hard to believe this if your worth as a human being is caught up in being on the “good” side in a world where so much is going wrong. Bread and circuses also plays an enormous part. Long working hours and as much play as you can get at the end of the week isn’t conducive to deep study. But until we do understand what is happening, we simply cannot fight back in an effective way in my opinion.

    Anyway, thank you very much for an excellent article.

    ONE OF REEDS OTHER BOOKS…

    Disgrace Abounding
    by Douglas Reed

    Chapter Twenty Four
    LONG, LONG TRAIL

    Chance had it that when I came to write about the Jews, as I meant to after the criticisms that had been made of Insanity Fair in this respect, I spent much time in places where the wave of anti-Semitism was approaching, and I had opportunity to study them in adversity. I have been in countries on the borders of the anti-Jewish Reich where the Jewish fugitives were gathering, where the native Jews were preparing for the new dispersal. I have seen them in no-man’s-land. I have seen them, in thousands, conferring together in hotels and cafés, thronging airline and steamship offices, besieging influential foreigners, newspaper offices and consulates under the banner of Protektion.

    I have just read the statement of one of these Jewish emigrants, now comfortably situated in London and writing for anti-Nazi newspapers in several countries, ‘Wir Juden sind Stehaufmenschen’.

    You know those toys that children play with, the little men with the rounded and weighted base whom you cannot knock over, they always bob up smiling? It is an exact description. While people in England are lamenting the fate of the Jews in Germany, they do not notice that the Jews in England are becoming more powerful than ever before.

    Everything I have seen has confirmed the opinions I had formed during eleven years of wandering about the Continent, and I have had these opinions confirmed to me by Jews themselves. Now all these Jews are making plans to go to England, to the British Dominions, to America.

    It is not a solution; this new emigration will bring with it the same deterioration of standards in those countries, the same disproportionate and unjustifiable rise in the level of prosperity in the Jews above that of the native population, the same conditions that have played their large part in bringing about the present outburst of anti-Semitism throughout the territories of the German Reich and of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire. These were the promised lands of the Jew, especially Germany, for which all Jews who have lived there hunger to-day. They cannot think to-day of Berlin and Vienna, Frankfurt and Mannheim, without longing and regret creeping into their voices for the countries in which those cities are situated. Were they not largely to blame if they threw away, by immoderate lust for display and wealth and power, the things those lands promised them?

    http://www.controversyofzion.info/long_long_trail.htm

    The major issue, for Englishmen, of our contemporary times needs to be made clear in a vital point. If we are, one day, to fight Germany again, it must not be to put the Jews back on their cushioned pasha’s thrones there. If we want to help the Jews we cannot do it by letting the least valuable of them into England, so that they can make London in 1939 look like Berlin in 1929. If we want to help the Jews the only way is to help them to their National Jewish State – but not by giving them machine-guns to kill Arabs.

    LATER KICKS OUT AT THE ZOG FOR THE WAY IT TREATS THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF ENGLAND—-NOTHING CHANGES UNDER A ZOG!

  2. for one never had a “bible study” that explained the power of the “jews” at that time in a true historical perspective; perhaps if we Christians were preached the whole story, we would not have been such dupes throughout western history. Those last thoughts here are mine not necessarily the author’s.

    MINE TOO….THE BOOK CERTAINLY CHANGED EVERYTHING I’D EVER BEEN BROUGHT UP TO ACCEPT AND BELIEVE—EVERYTHING!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s