Wed 7 Sep 2011
Union for Mediterranean Nightmare Changing into Chaos due to Revolutions, Incompatible Cultures, Corruption. Moroccan UfM Secretary General: West Cannot Dictate Us Its Democracy
Posted by Anders under English, Euromed
Summary The globalist Business Insider 27 July 2011: “A Euro-Mediterranean community has now become an urgent necessity. Europe has technology and provides a secure framework for investment, but it is the southern Mediterranean that increasingly can point to strong economic growth. Europe is aging and will lose 20 million people by 2030, while the southern Mediterranean has a dynamic young population that desperately needs job opportunities.A Euro-Mediterranean monetary system is one goal in a Euro-Mediterranean Union leading to a Euro-African Union. By 2050, Europe and Africa together will have 2.5 billion people (Africans making out the vast majority), a quarter of the global population. With so much human potential, it will be possible to build on shared economic, social, and ecological strengths. Europe must strengthen its economic and political integration, and Africa must improve its governance by fighting corruption and establishing the rule of law more firmly. It may be that a Euro-Mediterranean and Euro-African Union is the only political project that is able to prevent World Government through a G-2 of the United States and China.” This is crazy: they want -just as with the Euro – to jump directly to the globalist goal – although all preconditions are impossible.
The globalists ignore the fact that the EU has now for more than 16 years unsuccessfully attempted to forge the Euro-Mediterranean / Euro-African Union.
It turns out that there existed intimate ties between the Rothschilds, their minions and Gaddafi´s son, Saif. This is embarassing, because prominent British leaders incl. Tony Blair are stated to have been advisers to the Gaddafis – especially on the release of the Lockerbie-bomber in return for oil!
The EU is in an awkward situation: Having built the Union for the Mediterranean on dictators it has now ousted, the EU sees the Union on its deathbed. But it hopes to revive it. Nevertheless, EU Commissioner Stefan Füle forwards such demands in the direction of human rights and democracy to be fulfilled by the partners that they make the Union impossible. For the demands are in contrast with the Koran/Islam. The new secretary general of the Union for the Mediterranean knows better and states that nobody can dictate western democracy to the Muslim countries who want the dictatorial Sharia to govern the entire world.
Today´s Euromediterranean zone is in chaos after the ongoing “Arab Spring” which is rather becoming an icy winter. The US wages war in the whole world against “terrorists” under the generic name of “Al Qaeda” – founded by the CIA as its faithful partner in the role of scapegoat for USA´s false flag operations. NATO and Pres. Obama now recognize the al Qaeda branch, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, as the new Libya´s government – and EU leaders hail the group as well!
Greece is regularly aflame – and after the declaration in western media of the “victory” of the “democratic” (95% want the Sharia) demonstraters in Egypt – the latter have found out that they were deceived, only losing a dying Mubarak, while his henchmen continue to rule. The rebels´victory and liberation in Libya is nothing but corporate New World Order occupation in order to rob this land, too, of resources. Furthermore, it is the beginning of a long bloody guerilla war by Gaddafi´s forces.
The biggest problem of the Union for the Mediterranean is the indiscriminate mass immigration to the EU, legally and in particular illegally. However, the EU keeps nearly everyone streaming into it – even making illegals legal citzens of the Union with a right to employment, if they beget a child, who is atomatically a union citizen (Zembrano Verdict). Danish and British politicians have admitted that the mass immigration has the purpose of tearing our historical roots away in order to change our societies radically, to clear the way for their NWO.
So, the Spiegel 26 Aug. 2011 has the following message on :”Germany´s Unhealty Obsession with Islam”: Not Islam is the problem, but our attitudes towards Islam. It is not the dispute over the phantasm of “Islam” that is productive, but the impartial analysis of the goals of the religio-political parties that are at odds in our country. This would relieve the Muslims and let them feel just like any other religious minority cultivating any other religion. (That they terrorize increasing districts of our cities, declaring them Sharia zones, making them no-go-zones for whites is ignored)Thus, problems relating to education, integration and equality could then be addressed as such, in a nuanced and appropriate manner, without being immediately framed within the context of a culture war. German Muslims would be relieved of the need to justify themselves every time an Islamist suicide bomber commits an attack somewhere in the world! This politically correct attitude is totally blind to the demands of the Koran to conquer the world by the sword (now by means of high birth rates), killing of infidels (sura 9:5 e.g.) , terror (sura 8:60). But does it work!
The Euromediterranean Project – later dubbed the Union for the Mediterranean – was a grand attempt to carry out part of the regionalisation and here programme of the Trilateral Commission/ Zbigniew Brzezinski. This is a survey of today´s situation in the Euromediterranean area: increasing chaos. But first what is going on in sick globalists´minds – for it is the explanation for what is now happening in North Africa. As for Libya and Syria: see here and here and here.
Here is the wishful utopia of the Corporate NWO – unabated in spite of more than 16 years of disproof of the thesis.
Business Insider 27 July 2011: A Euro-Mediterranean community has now become an urgent necessity. Europe has technology and provides a secure framework for investment, but it is the southern Mediterranean that increasingly can point to strong economic growth. Europe is aging and will lose 20 million people by 2030, while the southern Mediterranean has a dynamic young population that desperately needs job opportunities.
To boost investment in both directions, a zone of monetary stability should be created. A Euro-Mediterranean monetary system would avoid the discrepancy between euro- and dollar-denominated trade. Industrial re-deployment might also be the answer to outsourcing by European companies. At the same time, jobs mobility should replace unwanted migration. By 2050, Europe and Africa together will have 2.5 billion people (Africans making out the vast majority), a quarter of the global population. With so much human potential, it will be possible to build on shared economic, social, and ecological strengths. International trade must bring about a rise in social and environmental standards, which requires a multilateral Euro-Mediterranean system. A Euro-Mediterranean Union leading to a Euro-African Union could open the way to balanced mutual development. As Europe knows, constructing an economically and socially integrated zone offers the best opportunity to resolve conflicts and overcome political and cultural enmities. Europe must strengthen its economic and political integration, and Africa must improve its governance by fighting corruption and establishing the rule of law more firmly.
Building a joint future for Europe and Africa, starting with the Mediterranean, will be difficult, but that is no reason to delay. In fact, it may be that a Euro-Mediterranean and Euro-African Union is the only political project that is able to prevent World Government through a G-2 of the United States and China. Comment: This is crazy: they want -just as with the Euro – to jump directly to the globalist goal – although all preconditions are impossible.
They ignore the fact that the EU has now for more than 16 years unsuccessfully attempted to forge the Euro-Mediterranean / Euro-African Union.
Gaddafi´s Rothschild connection
The Daily Mail 23 oct. 2011: Gaddafi´s son, Saif, a former playboy who still owns a £10million house in London, last year described Mr Tony Blair as a ‘personal family friend’ who he said had visited Libya ‘many, many times’ since leaving Downing Street four years ago. He even claimed that Mr Blair had become an adviser to his family, an allegation which the former PM denied. Former EU Commissioner Lord Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Saif could also come under the spotlight. The pair met days before it emerged that Megrahi (Lockerbie bomber) was to be freed. They were both guests of billionaire financiers Jacob and Nat Rothschild at their Corfu villa in the summer of 2009. In a damning transcript of a conversation obtained by a Sunday newspaper between the pair, Saif told the freed bomber that his name had been ‘on the table in all commercial, oil and gas agreements we supervised during this period’. Weeks later Saif and Lord Mandelson attended a shooting party at the Rothschilds’ chateau-style mansion in Buckinghamshire.
Should Saif take the witness box in The Hague, he could even try to include Prince Andrew in his ‘web of friends’. The Duke of York was accused of holding secret ‘detailed discussions’ over the release of the Lockerbie bomber with Saif in 2009.
EU´s demands to the Arab Euromed. partners so unrealistic as to doom the project to its ultimate demise
EU Press Release 14 June 2011 – EU Commissioner Stefan Füle: Providing greater support to partners engaged in building deep and sustainable democracy is one of the cornerstones of the new approach outlined in the ENP Communication adopted on 25 May.
The Communication identifies some elements that are common to building a democracy that is both deep and sustainable. These are: * free and fair elections; * freedom of association, expression and assembly and a free press and media; * the rule of law administered by an independent judiciary and right to a fair trial; * fight against corruption; * security and law enforcement sector reform and the establishment of democratic control over armed and security forces.
These elements are the central benchmarks against which the EU will assess progress and adapt levels of support to its partners:
1. Commitment to human rights and fundamental freedoms 2. Full compliance with their provisions 3. partnership with the Council of Europe, to support some of the countries in the South, starting from Morocco and Tunisia. 4. gender equality, 5. freedom of religion; 6. respect the rights of refugees and beneficiaries of international protection 7. and commitments in yet other areas.
In the next generation of Action Plans, we will suggest to partners that we focus our joint work on a limited number of short and medium-term priorities. The new approach to the ENP is based on mutual accountability and conditionality. Conditionality means that if a partner country wishes to obtain greater support from the EU then it will have to make progress towards significant political reforms, such as greater freedoms of expression and association; judicial reform; or fight against corruption. We will monitor the progress. Non-compliance implicates stop of funds. Comment: If these principles have to be observed – all “partner countries” will remain disqualified – because the principles are in conflict with Islam. Even EU`s pet, Morocco, gruesomely violates EU´s Fundamental Rights – on race, refugees and religion – for they are impossible for Islam to accept.
The Communication proposes two new instruments to channel EU support to civil society: a Civil Society Facility and a European Endowment for Democracy (A parallel to the US National Endowment for Democracy, a driving force behind the US instigated, now bloody revolts in the Arab world and here. The Civil Society Facility will help civil society organisations in our neighbourhood develop their ability to monitor reform and their role in implementing and evaluating EU programmes.
European Investment Bank 30 May 2011: Investment of over EUR 300 billion will be required by 2030 to modernise infrastructure and public services in the Mediterranean region. The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the European Union’s financial institution (and equally corrupt) and the leading financial investor in the Mediterranean via FEMIP, which was established in 2002. At end-2010, this commitment represented a total investment of more than EUR 12 billion. In 2010, FEMIP had already increased its business volume by 60% – to EUR 2.6 billion . Comment: Huge allocations largely disappeared in corruption by means of the incompetent or fraudulent European Investment Bank, which could not account for large sums, which ended with corrupt African “partners” and in taxfree havens.
ANSAmed 29 June 2011 – On the second day of the general strike and of violent demonstrations against the Parliament vote the new economic plan to save Greece from bankruptcy (78 billion euros), the entire centre of Athens has become an enormous battlefield, where smoke and flames are rising from burning rubbish containers amid clouds of teargas.
ANSAmed -29 June 2011 – Five months and one day after the first Friday protests which, on January 28, triggered the revolution that forced Hosni Mubarak to step down, Tahrir Square is once again the stage of clashes between protesters and police (below left) after the riots on April 9 in which two protesters were killed.
Middle East Online 6 July 2011: New head of a 43-nation Mediterranean Union.
Moroccan diplomat Youssef Amrani, new secretary general of the Union for the Mediterranean: ”Neither the UfM nor any other international organization are in a position to give certificates of democracy,” he added.”The time when one could dictate from the West the criteria for a country’s acceptance has gone.” Egypt and France co-chair the union while Spain hosts its headquarters in Barcelona.
An article in Der Spiegel 26 Aug. 2011:”Germany´s Unhealty Obsession with Islam” gives a pseudointellectual, politically correct explanation for the screwed-up view of the EU on Muslim immigrants. It states that not Islam is the problem, but our attitudes towards Islam. “It is not the dispute over the phantasm of “Islam” that is productive, but the impartial analysis of the goals of the religio-political parties that are at odds in our country,” the article states.
“This would remove an enormous burden from the everyday lives of Muslims. They could simply view themselves as a religious minority among others, like the Jews for example. A minority that seeks to practice its religion within the framework of what is legally permissible — nothing more and nothing less (se photos left and right). Problems relating to education, integration and equality could then be addressed as such, in a nuanced and appropriate manner, without being immediately framed within the context of a culture war. German Muslims would be relieved of the need to justify themselves every time an Islamist suicide bomber commits an attack somewhere in the world.
“Terrorism is a problem among culturally uprooted, politically radical angry young men, who are often educated and yet unsuccessful. They are men who rebel against a world in which they no longer feel at home” (so why not go back to where their ideals are being lived?). Therefore, the EU keeps nearly everyone streaming into it – even making illegals legal citzens of the Union with a right to employment, if they beget a child, who is atomatically a union citizen (Zembrano Verdict).
Thus the politically correct system confirms its own cataractous views: It makes Islam a religion just like any other – no more related to violence than other religions. Thereby, the author wilfully? overlooks a fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam: The teachings of Christ, the New Testament, are commands to love your neighbour. The teachings of Mohammed (Koran and Hadiths) are to love other Muslims -but to kill (Sure 9:5, 4:89) the infidels, use terror against them (sura 8:60), wage war on the infidels till they submit to Islam (8:39, 8:69, 9:29) and to conquer their lands and take their houses (33:27), even racistically calling the “blear-eyed” guilty (sura 20:102). While Christ gave people an offer to take up his teachings voluntarily – Islam is to kill or enslave those who refuse. And history shows that is Muslim practice today – as it was Christian practice in former days. “Christian” religion rose after the popes of Rome became politicians (after 250 A.D.) – thus by breaking with the teachings of Christ waging wars by proxies, while orthodox Muslims follow Muhammad by not fighting with sword or high birth rates for the whole world to become Islamic.
The whole Mediterranean Project and the now dying Union for the Mediterranean are not built on ignorance of Islam. On the contrary! Danish and British politicians even actively staked on the incompatibility of the Western world and Islam to destroy its old culture and religious roots entirely. “Chaos out of Order” – but first create chaos – possibly “civil” wars. Depopulationists and see here – and here and here are deeply involved.