Too Many Inconvenient Truths

Too Many Inconvenient Truths
by Guy Somerset

August 26, 2011

Sean Hoare
On July 18, 2011, Sean Hoare was found mysteriously deceased by London police. This is notable for two reasons.

The first reason is that Hoare was a primary whistle-blower in the unfolding crisis at News Corporation. The scandal has implicated multitudes in illegal and immoral electronic eavesdropping on everyone from an abducted teenager to Prince William and his brother.

The second and far more ominous reason is because Sean Hoare’s demise was not suspicious in any way. The London police, though already implicated in the scandal for widespread corruption through bribe-taking and callow complicity in shuttering earlier eavesdropping investigations, assure us it is so.

Naturally, only the pitifully paranoid or unsettlingly obsessed would doubt this claim.

Everyone knows whistle-blowers are by far the most likely people to generally have poor timing in all matters of corporeal termination. At the most inopportune times they are prone to hang themselves, have inconvenient heart attacks, overdose on pills, and get into car accidents in which the other parties mysteriously vanish.

“In novels and films the hero is lauded for his efforts at illuminating this world’s evils. In reality the hero is usually not identified at all, except perhaps by his remains.”Thus, absolutely no one else was involved in Sean Hoare’s accident. It is a certainty that this will be deemed a former narcotics abuser’s drug overdose. Simple as that. We know this because we are told so (and we know to heed the master’s halt). Here are a few historical examples to erase all doubt.


Dr. David Kelly was a British scientist and expert in biological warfare employed by the British Ministry of Defence. He also became a very inconvenient figure when he met for an unauthorized discussion with a BBC reporter about the true state of the government’s dossier concerning Iraq’s supposed stockpiles of chemical weapons.

Dr. Kelly disputed claims that Iraq had the capability to fire biological weapons within 45 minutes, a major British argument for invading Iraq the second time. While Kelly said he believed it likely Iraq secreted some modicum of chemical weapons following international inspections, he was dubious as to their extent and immediate threat. Following his own inspections in Iraq, Kelly became more certain of his suspicions and spoke to a reporter from The Observer to state that Iraq did not possess mobile germ-warfare laboratories and that Iraqi claims of such devices being innocuous hydrogen-balloon production facilities were entirely accurate.

Yet what might have turned into an embarrassment for the British government and a serious impediment to its second war on Iraq was all but erased from memory when Dr. Kelly decided to kill himself. Despite numerous supportive letters and emails, a supposedly despondent Kelly went for his usual evening walk and ingested 29 painkiller tablets. Then for good measure, he cut his wrists. No one saw him do it and his family says they didn’t believe it, but what would they know? Kelly was gone, along with any hope of others in similar positions coming forward to prevent thousands of deaths and billions squandered. Naturally, Dr. Kelly’s keen sense of timing made it a good day for government and gun-sellers the world over.


Ron Brown was United States Secretary of Commerce in the first Clinton Administration, appointed following exceptionally successful fundraising. He perished in a 1996 air crash near Croatia. Weather was claimed to have been the cause, though anyone who took the extra step of investigating would have learned the storms were not nearly so severe as initially stated. Following the accident, no public contact was made for a full 10 hours. Rescuers, much as they would later be during the JFK, Jr., disappearance, were directed toward the opposite direction of the crash site. When they finally reached the scene, a flight attendant was said to be upright and conscious (but died of a broken neck before reaching the hospital).

When additional rescue crews arrived, everyone was dead. Witnesses at Brown’s autopsy claimed he had what appeared to be a bullet hole in his temple region. Obviously, they must have been mistaken. It was merely the age-old “Whistle-Blowers’ Malady” which had struck. Ron Brown (who had already stated if he was going to jail, he wasn’t “going alone”) had been under investigation by US independent counsel and nearing indictment before Congress to answer charges of corruption followed up with widely rumored interrogation regarding the Clintons’ questionable financial dealings.


Karen Silkwood was a woman who worked at the Kerr-McGee nuclear plant near Crescent, Oklahoma. As a member of the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union’s bargaining committee, she was assigned to investigate health and safety issues. Apparently there were innumerable violations at the plant, most notably those of exposing workers to contamination. As a consequence, Silkwood testified before the Atomic Energy Commission. Later that year, she was found to have plutonium contamination 400 times the legal limit. Following decontamination she was deemed to have similar levels of poisoning the next day, despite having been assigned only paperwork at the plant. On a third day her levels of radiation were even higher, to the point she expelled contaminated air from her lungs as she breathed. A decontamination team was sent to her home, which was determined to be heavily exposed to radiation.

Silkwood by then had assembled a wealth of paperwork on the conditions at Kerr-McGee, including her own plutonium poisoning, which was found to have originated from a section of the plant she had not been able to access for at least four months. A meeting was set with a reporter from The New York Times and a national official from her union. Yet that night, as she drove en route from a local union meeting, she had a fatal car accident. Naturally, sleeping pills were found on the scene and the police deemed the cause due to a weary driver. Certainly no official report has ever been altered and no surreptitious injection ever made to a person’s body.

Authorities discounted skid marks on the road, damage on the rear of Silkwood’s auto, and microscopic paint chips belonging to another vehicle. All the documentation she was carrying concerning Kerr-McGee’s supposedly dangerous and criminal operations mysteriously disappeared. Still, only the paranoid regard this case as other than an accident. In no way related to the abuses she helped expose, grounds at the plant were still being decontaminated 25 years on.


Rudolf Hess was the longest-held prisoner of World War II. He was interned at Landau Prison until 1987 when, like all inconvenient figures, he hanged himself with electrical cord. Nothing should be made of the fact that the 93-year-old Hess was physically unable to raise his hands above his head. No mention should be made of the overwhelming evidence that in 1941 he had embarked from Germany on his way to Scotland to meet with members of the highest levels of British establishment after the fall of France in an attempt to end the war before it reached catastrophic levels of devastation. (The earliest period of that conflict was called the “Phoney War.”)

Moreover, one is requested to ignore the verified reports that not long before the incident, even Winston Churchill’s cabinet came quite close (save Winston) in voting to end hostilities and sue for peace before widespread destruction ensued. As to Hess, upon landing short of his destination he requested to be taken to the Duke of Hamilton. Unfortunately for the course of Western Civilization, this was denied and his cache of documents was removed from him. For the next several decades he was held (in isolation) far longer than those who actually committed wartime atrocities. As a possible release neared, he killed himself with no witnesses, though in 2008 Hess’s medical caretaker publicly stated the British SIS had aided Hess in exiting the mortal plane. Though immediately fired for this outrageous act of honesty, that man has thankfully not otherwise suffered.

All of the above people died by accident. Although they knew things that powerful people preferred they did not know, none of them was inconvenient to the powers that be. None of them had millionaires and politicians as enemies.

This is clearly the best of all possible worlds. Neither business nor government has any but the noblest intentions. Decent people are always rewarded justly and richly, and no one ever gets killed for doing the right thing.

Thus, we know that the one man with a semblance of conscience in the Murdoch hacking case had a simple narcotics overdose. Any contrary notion is idiotic, conspiratorial, and laughable.

In novels and films the hero is lauded for his efforts at illuminating this world’s evils. In reality the hero is usually not identified at all, except perhaps by his remains.

And now if the author will be excused, one must need return to bright coloring books, composition of cheerful songs concerning equality, and the reading of fairy tales and fables.

Read more:

•CJAZ 2 weeks ago

Watch your back, Guy! They may come after you next.

**not a threat, just an observation from a concerned reader**
show more show less
11 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • Bernard Brandt 2 weeks ago in reply to CJAZ

While your concern for Mr. Somerset is commendable, CJAZ, I fear it may be misplaced.

The powers-that-be actually appreciate such cautionary tales as those Mr. Somerset has written. They give pause to those who are considering whistle-blowing themselves.

If I were you, CJAZ, I would have more concern for such as Julian Assange, Bradley Manning, and Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
show more show less
12 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • Loedni 5 days ago in reply to Bernard Brandt

Please… Dominique Strauss-Kahn has never been a whistleblower, and never will be. Actually, he’s the very opposite : he’s a Jew, he’s a Freemason, he’s part of France’s most excluvive and influential club (“Le Siècle”). He’s definitely part of the global cosmopolitan “elite”.

About Julian Assange & Bradley Manning : their behaviour has (rightly) angered many governments (especially Washington), but I don’t regard them as “whistleblowers”. They didn’t reveal much that reasonably well informed people didn’t already know, and (at least for the moment) their “whistleblowing” hasn’t had any serious consequence. The former is straight and dreamed of becoming famous…
show more show less
7 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • eddyblog 2 days ago in reply to Loedni

DSK will never be a whistle blower, primarily because he likes having his own whistle blown too much.
show more show less
Reg and 4 more liked this Like ReplyReply • Bernard Brandt 18 hours ago in reply to Loedni

Dear Loedni:

My reason for including DSK in the company of Messrs. Assange and Bradley was not so much that he was a whistle-blower, but that he was a teller of inconvenient truths (which I believe was the original topic of Mr. Somerset’s essay).

In DSK’s case, the inconvenient truth was that the head of the IMF was repeatedly saying that the place of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency should be reduced, and the place of China’s yuan should be increased. Anyone willing to do a search on Lexis/Nexis, Reuters, or Google would be able to verify…
show more show less
Like ReplyReply • robertsgt40 1 day ago in reply to Bernard Brandt

Assange is a Mossad operative. Note, nothing is ever said critical of Israel
show more show less
1 person liked this. Like ReplyReply • Rowan Berkeley 12 hours ago in reply to robertsgt40

There is no evidence that Assange is ‘a Mossad operative’ whatever. And I would not describe his face as ‘rodent-like’.
show more show less
Like ReplyReply • ILOVEMYRACE 2 weeks ago

Wasn’t there some guy who worked for Clinton who mysteriously “comitted suicide” or something in a Washington, DC park just after news of investigations into Clinton corruption in Arkansas? Can someone please provide that information.
show more show less
MofromRo and 5 more liked this Like ReplyReply • donchi 2 weeks ago in reply to ILOVEMYRACE

Vince Foster
show more show less
MofromRo and 3 more liked this Like ReplyReply • SteveM 1 week ago in reply to ILOVEMYRACE

Vince Foster’s corpse was found in Fort Marcy Park off the George Washington Parkway. It was dumped there by parking at the pull-off across Chain Bridge Road from what is known as “The Ay-rab House.” Crimes on National Park property are investigated by the most inept pig squad of all — the Park Police, a branch of the corrupt Dept. of the Interior. Fairfax County’s homicide unit expressed no interest in the case whatsoever.

Foster was rumored to have been Hillary’s lover, and blond hair was found on his suit. I’m not sure the broad-beamed Sectary of State swings that…
show more show less
Pugs Fugly and 13 more liked this Like ReplyReply • Guest 2 weeks ago

Whistle blowers suffer high stress and anxiety – hence their habit of dropping dead. Unless… It’s the same secret society that goes around bumping off 27yr old singers.
show more show less
4 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • eddyblog 2 days ago in reply to Guest

Actually, the majority of whistleblowers admit it was the stress their conscience induced in their health that made them blow the whistle in the first place.
show more show less
Like ReplyReply • Rugby F 1 week ago

I always found it odd that the “DC Madam” hung herself in a storage shed after the news media decided her records of 15,000 Washington call-girl clients wasn’t worthy of publishing.
show more show less
MofromRo and 18 more liked this Like ReplyReply • Wil Madison 1 week ago

“A conspiracy is nothing but a secret agreement of a number of men for the pursuance of policies which they dare not admit in public”

– Mark Twain
show more show less
Pugs Fugly and 8 more liked this Like ReplyReply • SteveM 1 week ago

Daniel Casolaro also died by FBI assisted suicide. He had dirt on Mena, Tysons Chicken, cocaine, Air America, the Destin/Dixie Mafia, Jackson Stevens, Inslaw, PROMIS (a computer program that Dept of Justice stole), and of course Slick Willie. He was the first victim of arkancide.

Which reminds me of a joke: a fisherman dragged a corpse ashore. It had several bullet holes, a slit throat, and had been severely bashed about with a baseball bat. A cop showed up and declared, “this is the worst case of suicide I ever saw.”
show more show less
Bad Fractions and 11 more liked this Like ReplyReply • kostadi1 1 week ago

You may want to add Frank Nugan of Nugan Hand Bank to the list.
Nugan Hand Bank was a front for the laundering of drug money earned from a little conflict that raged in IndoChina over a 30 year period. You may want to ask a certain Richard Armytage for his insight into the matter. That is of course if he can stop laughing his ass off for a minute or gleefully receive another patriotic award, which he has made a career out of doing. Funny this character seems to pop up during the Yugoslavia conflict which was when Ron Brown was killed; sorry committed suicide.
show more show less
6 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • Lozange67 1 week ago

I don’t know why this makes me think of the Rothschilds’s stealth hand on all things governmental and money-making. When the stakes involve obscene wealth, nothing is too low to sink to, even murder. It’s the “raison d’argent”.
show more show less
MofromRo and 7 more liked this Like ReplyReply • Lookaroundu 1 week ago

Hess was kept in Spandau prison (not Landau). He apparently came to Scotland to negotiate peace, but the pig-faced opportunist, criminal and warmonger Churchill would have none of it. A succession of despicable British governments, with Churchill’s connivance and blessing, had conspired to embroil the United States in both world wars. By hook or by crook, London was during these times determined to go to war with Germany. Western Civilization is today reaping the bitter harvest of what these brilliant “leaders” had sewn. Recent third-world flash mob riots across British cities are just the latest example of European meltdown. So long…
show more show less
Bad Fractions and 13 more liked this Like ReplyReply • WonBall 1 week ago

You forgot Vince Foster, Hillary Clinton’s paramour, who was found dead in a park in Washington DC.
show more show less
6 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • curridibat 1 week ago

James Forrestal?…
show more show less
mixplix and 8 more liked this Like ReplyReply • tma_sierrahills 1 week ago

“Mistaken Delivery Causes Traffic Tie-Up”

“An innocent bystander, said to be Guy Somerset, met his demise today in a freak accident, when a heavy bound Sunday edition of a major newspaper accidently slipped and fell from the hands of a media mogul brunching on the edge of his penthouse terrace and scored a direct hit 97 floors below.”

“‘These things happen,’ authorities announced as they closed the case on Monday.”
– – – –
Border Enforcement + Immigration Moratorium = Job, Crime and Eco Sanity
show more show less
3 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • Jack Ruby 2 days ago

You forgot to mention Gary Webb, and Roland Carnaby, and the DC Madam, and likely another 100 or 200 in the past 20 years.
show more show less
6 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • WestCoastCanuck 2 days ago




show more show less
5 people liked this. Like ReplyReply • Daniel Kreppel 2 days ago

Whyat about all the scientists who know about chemical and biological warfare cures to diseases.
show more show less
Wil Madison and 3 more liked this Like ReplyReply • mixplix 1 day ago in reply to Daniel Kreppel

Check this one out yourself, the cure for AIDS was patented in August of 1992 and the patent number is 5,188,738 (Lyman – Kaali) also check modifications 5,328,451 Sure does make me wonder where all this research money goes.
show more show less
1 person liked this. Like ReplyReply • 13Vocals 2 days ago

John Wheeler.
show more show less
Wil Madison and 1 more liked this Like ReplyReply • dudicaldude 2 days ago

What about Obama’s dead gay lover from Reverend Wright’s church choir?
And why is Scooter Libby allowed to live? I want him hanged. He outted an undercover CIA operative. That is treason. Especially during this trumped up “Whore on Terror.” That reminds me of Janet Napolitiano…”Whore on Terror.” I like that.
show more show less
Wil Madison and 1 more liked this Like ReplyReply • weewilly49 1 day ago

There’s a huge list of suspicious deaths from Bush Sr’s time through Clinton’s terms and through Bush Jr.’s 8 yrs. It’s somewhere on the web. An example is the Lockerbie, Scotland crash. Apparently, on the flight headed back to the U.S. were 2 CIA officials who had said they were going to release some really heavy information when they got back. More than 200 innocent people died, but don’t forget, the same people behind this are the ones behind 9/11 (3000 innocent people dead). Illuminati. The PTB.
show more show less
Wil Madison and 1 more liked this Like ReplyReply • Jack Ruby 1 day ago

It’s time for Executive Action
show more show less
Like ReplyReply • Archie1954 1 day ago

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely!
show more show less
Like ReplyReply • Jack Ruby 1 day ago

What about Obama’s dead brain?
show more show less
1 person liked this. Like ReplyReply • Richard Sievert 1 day ago

Police have become idle worshipers where they think with there pen and paper they think with a radio and with flashing lights they think with there gun and there weapons this has all become the way police think idle worship is defined anything that you place above your mind when they get a call it is not a person it is a phone with a phone there is no proof only a space for anything they want to place there this also applies to pens and there ability to read paper that is sent to them in the form of…
show more show less
Like ReplyReply • mick 1 day ago

Add Raymond Lemme to the list of “suicided” …he found election fixing in Florida “going all the way to the top ” before he turned up “bleed out” in a bath tub in the next state …Jeb Bush was Governor at the time .Jeb Bush shut down the investigation into Lemme’s death twice .

google Clinton Curtis ,Tom Feeney and Raymond Lemme

or start here ….

Read more:


4 responses to “Too Many Inconvenient Truths


    Claim Britain dragged America into WW2 kicking and screaming is utter rubbish….

    Then on March 27, 1917 President Wilson asked Mr. House “whether he should ask Congress to declare war or whether he should say that a state of war exists”, and Mr. House “advised the latter”, so that the American people were informed, on April 2, 1917, that a state of war existed. * Between November 1916 and April 1917, therefore, “the web of intrigue”, spanning the ocean, achieved these decisive aims: the overthrow of Mr. Asquith in favour of Mr. Lloyd

    * See footnote on page 264


    George, the commitment of British armies to the Palestinian diversion, the re-election of a president who would be constrained to support that enterprise, and the embroilment of America.

    The statement of existing war made to Congress said the purpose of the war (which Mr. Wilson, a few weeks before, had declared in his draft to be “obscure”) was “to set up a new international order”. Thus a new purpose was openly, though cryptically revealed. To the public masses the words meant anything or nothing. To the initiates they carried a commitment to support the plan, of which Zionism and Communism both were instruments, for establishing a “world federation” founded on force and the obliteration of nationhood, with the exception of one “nation” to be recreated.

    From this moment the power-groups in America and England worked in perfect synchronization, so that the two stories become one story, or one “web”. The apparently powerful men in Washington and London co-ordinated their actions at the prompting of the inter-communicating Zionists on both sides of the ocean. Foreknowledge of what was to happen had earlier been displayed by Dr. Weizmann in London, who in March 1915 wrote to his ally, Mr. Scott of the Manchester Guardian, that he “understood” the British Government to be willing to support Zionist aspirations at the peace conference to come (the event also foretold by Max Nordau in 1903). This was exactly what Mr. Asquith would not consider, so that Dr. Weizmann, in March 1915, was already describing Mr. Asquith’s supplanters of December 1916 as “the British Government”.

    This “British Government”, said Dr. Weizmann, would leave “the organization of the Jewish commonwealth” in Palestine “entirely to the care of the Jews”. However, the Zionists could not possibly, even in a Palestine conquered

    * Lord Sydenham, when he wrote of the “deadly accuracy” of the forecast in the “Protocols” of about 1900, might have had particularly in mind the passage, “. . . We shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal in case of need”. The situation here described became established practice during the present century. In 1950 President Truman sent American troops into Korea. “to check Communist aggression”, without consulting Congress. Later this was declared to be a “United Nations” war and they were joined by troops of seventeen other countries under an American commander, General MacArthur. This was the first experiment in a “world government”-type war and its course produced Senator Taft’s question of 1952. “Do we really mean our anti-Communist policy?” General MacArthur was dismissed after protesting an order forbidding him to pursue Communist aircraft into their Chinese sanctuary and in 1953, under President Eisenhower, the war was broken off, leaving half of Korea in “the aggressor’s” hands. General MacArthur and other American commanders later charged that the order forbidding pursuit was made known to the enemy by “a spy ring responsible for the purloining of my top secret reports to Washington” (Life, Feb. 7, 1956), and the Chinese Communist commander confirmed this (New York Daily News, Feb. 13, 1956). In June 1951 two British Foreign Office officials, Burgess and Maclean, disappeared and in September 1955 the British Government, after refusing information for four years, confirmed the general belief that they were in Moscow and “had spied for the Soviet Union over a long period”. General MacArthur then charged that these two men had revealed the non-pursuit order to the Communist “aggressor” (Life, above-quoted).

    The conclusion cannot be escaped: if any honest explanation of his actions in this matter could be found Mr. Lloyd George would have given it. From this period in 1916-1917 the decay of parliamentary and representative government can be traced, both in England and America. If secret men could dictate major acts of American state policy and major operations of British armies, then clearly “e1ection” and “responsible office” were terms devoid of meaning. Party distinctions began to fade in both countries, once this hidden, supreme authority was accepted by leading Western politicians, and the American and British electors began to be deprived of all true choice. Today this condition is general, and now is public. Leaders of all parties, before elections, make obeisance to Zionism, and the voter’s se1ection of president, prime minister or party makes no true difference.

    In November 1917 the American Republic thus became equally involved with Great Britain in Zionism, which has proved to be a destructive force. However, it was only one agency of “the destructive principle”. The reader will recall that in Dr. Weizmann’s Russian youth the mass of Jews there, under their Talmudic directors, were united in the revolutionary aim, and only divided between revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism.

    In the very week of the Balfour Dec1aration the other group of Jews in Russia


    achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western po1iticians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself against the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their po1icies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revo1ution, too, was “anti-semitism”. Governments hampered by secret capitulations in any one direction cannot act firmly in any other, and the timidity of London and Washington in their dea1ings with the world-revolution, during the four decades to follow, evident1y derived from their initial submission to “the web of intrigue” spun across the Atlantic between 1914 and 1917.

    After 1917, therefore, the question which the remainder of the 20th Century had to answer was whether the West could yet find in itself the strength to break free, or prise its po1itical 1eaders 1oose, from this double thrall. In considering the remainder of this account the reader should bear in mind what British and American politicians were induced to do during the First World War.

    Hence it’s essential to read, read, and read some more- old books before they too are tampered with!




  3. Allied Atrocities by Dr. William L. Pierce



    The Zionist Billionaires Who Control Politics
    February 23, 2011

    [Updated from Sept 2010, by request]

    Lenin: “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it”

    (Libertarian sugar daddy, David Koch)

    Douglas Reed: “The plan, I think, is the old one of world dominion in a new form. The money-power and revolutionary power have been set up and given sham but symbolic shapes (‘Capitalism’ or ‘Communism’) and sharply defined citadels (‘America’ or ‘Russia’). Such is the spectacle publicly staged for the masses. But what if similar men, with a common aim, secretly rule in both camps and propose to achieve their ambition through the clash between those masses? I believe any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case.”

    by Henry Makow Ph.D.

    Bloomberg News has a story today on how the Zionist Koch brothers bankrolled the campaigns of Governors (like Scott Walker) who are cutting union powers. Whether we agree with this policy or not, this shows how these billionaires continue to define the political discourse in left-right terms when they should be defined as people versus Illuminati left and right.

    The Sept 20, 2010 issue of The New Yorker had a profile of David and Charles Koch, “The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama.”

    According to the article by Jane Mayer, the Koch’s bankroll a plethora of Libertarian and “right-wing” lobbies, think tanks and foundations, which in turn fund and direct the “grass roots” Tea Party movement.

    “The anti-government fervor infusing the 2010 elections represents a political triumph for the Kochs,” she writes. “By giving money to “educate,” finance, and organize Tea Party protesters, they have helped turn their private agenda into a mass movement.”

    Mayer neglects to mention that the Koch’s are Jews or crypto Jews; instead she tries to give them a “goy gloss.”

    Patriarch Fred Koch, a founding member of the John Birch Society, was a “real John Wayne type.” He was the son of a “Dutch” printer who emphasized “rugged pursuits.’ He took his four sons “big game hunting in Africa” and made them do “farm labor at the family ranch.”

    Surprising then to learn that Fred and his sons are on lists of Jewish billionaires, and “free-enterprise-Fred” made his fortune building refineries for the genocidal Communist dictator Josef Stalin in the 1930’s.

    Liberals whinge about these nefarious “red necks” who oppose Obamacare and climate change, and lobby for less taxes and government interference. But that’s not the real story here.

    (Sam Newhouse)

    The real story is that Jane Meyer works for another Illuminati Jewish billionaire, publisher Sam Newhouse. Her job is to create the illusion of free democratic discourse. Between the Sam Newhouses and George Soros’ on the Left, and the Koch’s and the Rupert Murdochs on the Right, a dozen Illuminati (Masonic) Jewish billionaires are able to define political discourse in America.

    So while we’re busy arguing about government intervention, we ignore the long list of things these billionaires apparently agree on: Israel, 9-11, the war on terror, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Federal Reserve, trillion dollar bank bailouts, liberal immigration policy and “equal rights” for gays and lesbians, i.e. undermining marriage and family by promoting homosexual norms. You can bet they also secretly agree on world government.

    This is why nothing important changes. This is why crack dealer and bathhouse boy Barack Obama is our President. Why the conservative alternative is Wasilla AK Mayor Sarah Palin. The Billionaires of Zion are laughing up their sleeves at the goyim.


    Koch Industries is the second-largest private company in America after Cargill. “With an annual revenue of $100 billion, the company was just $6.3 billion shy of first place in 2008. Ownership is kept strictly in the family, with the company being split roughly between brothers Charles and David Koch, who are worth about $20 billion apiece…Today, it operates thousands of miles of pipelines in the United States, refines 800,000 barrels of crude oil daily, buys and sells the most asphalt in the nation, is among the top 10 cattle producers, and is among the 50 largest landowners.”

    According to the New Yorker, “the company has grown spectacularly since their father, Fred, died, in 1967, and the brothers took charge. The company expanded at an unreal rate: its revenues increased from $100 million in 1966 to $100 billion in 2008–that’s 1,000-fold growth. The Koch’s operate oil refineries in Alaska, Texas, and Minnesota, and control some four thousand miles of pipeline. Koch Industries owns Brawny paper towels, Dixie cups, Georgia-Pacific lumber, Stainmaster carpet, and Lycra, among other products.”

    According to researcher Yasha Levine, part of this growth was fueled by corruption: “William Koch, the third brother who had a falling-out with Charles and David back in the ’80s over Charles’ sociopathic management style, appeared on “60 Minutes” in November 2000 to tell the world that Koch Industries was a criminal enterprise: “It was – was my family company. I was out of it,” he says. “But that’s what appalled me so much… I did not want my family, my legacy, my father’s legacy to be based upon organized crime.”

    “Charles Koch’s racket was very simple,” explained William. “With its extensive oil pipe network, Koch Industries’ role as an oil middleman–it buys crude from someone’s well and sells it to a refinery–makes it easy to steal millions of dollars worth of oil by skimming just a little off the top of each transaction, or what they call “cheating measurements” in the oil trade. According to William, wells located on federal and Native American lands were the prime targets of the Koch scam.”

    It is estimated they stole $230 million.


    Rich Illuminati Jews and Masons not only created Communism in Russia; they created anti-Communism in the USA.

    Fred Koch (1900-1967) was a chemical engineer who invented a new process for refining oil. Supposedly, he was shut out of the US by the Rockefellers and had to go to work for Stalin. He built many refineries in Soviet Russia and trained Russian engineers to operate them. Supposedly, he became disillusioned with Communism and became a founding member of the John Birch Society in the 1950’s.

    The trouble is that according to the 1964-65, Edition of Who’s Who, this militant anti-Communist was still building refineries in Russia and Eastern Europe. Moreover, the John Birch society was founded by members of the Council on Foreign Relations, many of whom were Masons, and staffed by former Communist writers.

    For example, the founder Robert Welch had been a member of the Communist front “League for Industrial Democracy.” William Grede, for many years Chairman of the Executive Council of the JBS was a Fed banker. Robert Love, member of the Governing Council was a 32nd Degree Mason. William Macmillan was a member of the CFR. Writers Eugene Lyons and Harold Varney used to work for the Communist “Workers World.” (Helen Peters, “Is the JBS Subversive?” July 1970)

    Ralph Epperson was on their speaker’s bureau. But they expelled him from the JBS when he mentioned Freemasonry in one of his speeches somewhere. The JBS strongly does not want Freemasonry mentioned.
    According to Eustace Mullins, the founder Robert Welch was a 32nd Degree Mason.

    Evidently, the same treatment applies to Zionism, which is part of the Masonic fraternity.


    Illuminati insider Harold Rosenthal explained how they pit labor (Left) versus management (Right):

    “In modern industry … capital, which force we represent, is [at] the apex. Both management and labor are on the base of this triangle. They continually stand opposed to each other and their attention is never directed to the head of their problem.”

    “At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands. The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies.”

    Thus the Illuminati have a monopoly over our minds. By controlling both Left and Right, education and the mass media, the Masonic Jewish billionaires ensure that the masses are tractable. As the late great Alan Stang warned, the Tea Party is a psy-op meant to channel the Patriot Movement into the Left VS Right matrix.

    Politics is like a House League in sports. The different teams all are Masons or are beholden to them. Thus, there’s little chance of democratic change. Anyone who wants to play must abide by the “rules.”

    It’s amusing to see “progressives” rail against the Tea Party and their sponsors. They are as much billionaire puppets as the rednecks they condemn.

    The Illuminati Jewish billionaires have used “anti-Semitism” to give themselves immunity from criticism. However, they are responsible for anti-Semitism and for the suffering of their fellow Jews. Therefore, they don’t deserve such consideration.

    Related: Congress Rejects Goldstone Report (Condemning Israel)

    Latest – Koch Industries Fund Union Busting Governors

    Koch Money in Wisconsin

    Linda said (February 23, 2011):

    It is the Agentur and entire network of secret society shabbos goy enablers ( Gentile Masonry ) that have re-egineered society in such a way as to float the the Koch turd and give their Zionist co-ethnics pride of place in the bowl.

    As the flush facility has been removed, the Americans or Canadians who want to be that nationality first – followed by whatever their ethnic origin may be, these are the people who are going to have to identify “that smell” and take plunger, bucket, scouring brush, mop and clean water to the whole mess.


    Linda said (February 23, 2011):

    It is the Agentur and entire network of secret society shabbos goy enablers ( Gentile Masonry ) that have re-egineered society in such a way as to float the the Koch turd and give their Zionist co-ethnics pride of place in the bowl. As the flush facility has been removed, the Americans or Canadians who want to be that nationality first – followed by whatever their eithnic origin may be, these are the people who are going to have to identify “that smell” and take plunger, bucket, scouring brush, mop and clean water to the whole mess.


    David said (September 22, 2010):

    Why isn’t American public affairs not about the 70% caucasian population? Or even about the 14% of Afro-americans? It is always about the 2% minority with 43 elected members in both houses. The Republicans are hijacking the next elections using a counterfeit Tea Party movement. Ron Paul and the true Libertarians have suddenly run out of steam. The zionists in the white house are suddenly leaving one by one. If this isn’t a planned drama I don’t know what is. Hypnotized by the power of fiat money, we all bow to worship those who have it in abundance. And we say that we are not heathen! I feel just like the guy in this video…….


    Mario said (September 22, 2010):

    Real good article on the Koch bros. I knew something was rotten in Denmark when I seen these two funding the tea party. I saw how Palin the protege of the international Jew and elder of zion Kissinger is trying to take over the tea party. Now it all ties together. Good article, I knew you had it in you Henry


    Gary said (September 22, 2010):

    And that is why no political movement would ever be capable of changing the system. It is too entrenched. It must all come crashing down and it will. Then intelligent men, assuming there are any left, can take a good look at the divinely inspired constitution and maybe a light bulb will go off. In the meantime the chaos which results from the crash hopefully will eliminate the satanist bloodsuckers.


    Malachi said (September 22, 2010):

    Is David Duke writing this shit for you? Why don’t you send this to the New American and let them know. Also do a little research on Mullins medical history.


    Dick said (September 22, 2010):

    Really great stuff, Henry. One of your best in a while and sure to tick off some of your libertarian readers. Webster Tarpley provided
    some additional details and analysis of the Koch brothers in this weekend’s “World Crisis Radio.”

    There’s a really good book called “Invisible Hands” by a Jewish NYU prof. about the corporate origins of “anti-communist” (anti-New
    Deal) politics in America. Libertarianism is rife with Jews, crypto-Jews and fellow travelers, from von Mises and Ayn Rand to World Net Daily with its Jerusalem bureau, Michael Weiner Savage, Alex Jones the avoider, and any number of less subtle groups and individuals (Limbaugh, Beck, etc).

    Communism, anti-communism and many other revolutionary movements do tend to start among the intelligensia but are advanced to the
    public by Jewish shock-troops (as E. Michael Jones so thoroughly documents). A Ron Paul fan can claim his movement was “usurped” by
    corporate interests, and the tea party is no longer true to libertarianism. One could also say Marxism was usurped by the Bolsheviks. But does that make Marxism correct, or was Marx just
    laying groundwork to indoctrinate Communism’s ideological vanguard? …

    The Tea Party wouldn’t get anywhere by focusing on fiscal policy – the average person is too unsophisticated, but it can take that
    hard-core of Ron Paul / Alex Jones types, who are opinion shapers among their friends and family, and refocus the messages on immigration, the deficit and various socio-cultural issues. I’d
    probably agree with Sarah Palin’s position on immigration, but it’s the tail, not the dog – and I couldn’t disagree more with her dog.

    The challenge for those of us who buy much of the analysis and not the solutions is to learn the game and use reason. If I sat down to play chess against a superior player, I won’t understand what’s happening to me until I’m in checkmate. Sometimes I’ll think I’ve made progress when I’ve been lured into a trap. Someone like Ron
    Paul doesn’t have to be a liar if he’s credulously advancing a part of the lie – or at least if his agenda is exposed to co-option. If
    we reflexively accept, for example, that Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant because he violates libertarianism, we lose a whole spectrum
    of ideas and the ability to think rationally. We lose our humility and the willingness to examine history and project its available
    choices forward.

    The success of the tea party is a good indication that “pure” libertarianism is a faulty ideology. I continue to look to people like Tarpley, who represent the real traditions of America, for
    more concrete, time-tested and unassailable solutions.


    Dan said (September 22, 2010):

    A research contribution of the late Eustace Mullins was his exposure of Freemasons at the helm of the John Birch Society. Their sugar daddy was none other than Nelson Rockefeller. Astounding, isn’t it?

    Unfortunately all such organizations are provided to shepherd genuine public awareness into a corral. Before the ‘Tea Party Movement’ had a name it was real individuals who had wised up realizing that the ‘right’ wasn’t their friend, and left leaning people who realized the same about the left. There was a time in early 20065 when I realized lots of people were coming out of their political party programming coma.
    Consensus of public opinion is the one word that that fades the smirk from the mouths of Wall Street wizards and Madison Avenue dream merchants alike.

    Thanks for finding out who’s funding the ‘Tea Party’. Just another shepherd pen. Rather than consensus of opinion ‘movements’ are wrapped up in candy coating of the rhetoric that articulates the public perceptions, but they infect it with vitriolic blame of somebody else. My experience with the Tea Party is they’ve been poisoned by directing their blame at ‘Muslims’ and illegal immigrants.


    Ed said (September 22, 2010):

    Would have liked to have seen at least a notation of the other ‘illuminati’ religious branches, ie illuminati catholics, etc religions, but thought it was an Excellent article on the subject. Yes, the illuminati jews are in charge of media control, with other illuminati religious parties doing their part in their ‘specialized’ areas.


    Becky said (September 22, 2010):
    Henry–the above article says it all about Palin. She is the Illuminati’s new ‘chosen one’? In April Canada Post put out a stamp with the Star of David on it.
    In Canada we don’t need a fake tea party movement. We are already slaves.


    WG said (September 22, 2010):

    Once again, an article that needs to be seen by the general public, and understood by them. I remember as a child listening to my Grandfather and his circle of friends discussing such things a fluoride, communist infiltration, and indoctrination, and many other things. These were simple, formally uneducated men, “rednecks” if you will. The difference was “they got it”, they knew things were changing and not for the better, even in the fifties. Yet they weren’t able to get at the “big picture”.

    The beauty if you will of the illuminati, is they are proud of what they do, and seem to revel in “rubbing our faces in it”. Thankfully we are able to see what they are up to, and if we are “proactive” towards their ways and not “reactive” we have a chance of staving off some of what they have planned for us. The Koch’s and Newhouse’s are another part of the illusion that’s presented for us to see. They make themselves in our “benefactors, when in fact they have nothing but our subjugation in mind. I honestly think one of the few things I have in common with these “people” is we both breath oxygen. Aside from that there are few similarities.

    The truth is, we need to see behind the curtain, and understand who and what controls most all of what we see and hear, and what their true agenda is. Perhaps my favorite line in the article was this. “It’s amusing to see “progressives” rail against the Tea Party and their sponsors. They are as much billionaire puppets as the rednecks they condemn.” It pretty much sums up what we see playing out in “politics” today.

    Another great article Dr.Makow, I don’t know how you have time to write so much and so well, but you are appreciated.


    Bob said (September 22, 2010):

    Your newest post hits the nail on the head Henry. I’m happy you covered the Kochs. I was suspicious myself about the Tea Party movement from the day it emerged and when the term was coined by the national networks. Divide and conquer… Create the revolution yourself and then define its parameters (always agreeing on Israel, 9/11, the Fed, Afghanistan and Iraq, etc – BRILLIANT if you think about how well they executed on the protocols; the goy ate it up hook, line and sinker.)

    But oh how the sheep love their “politics.” And however do they enjoy arguing and pointing fingers at each other, pretending to be big men who are the smartest in their pack. They think they are so involved and intelligent and informed and don’t realize they are playing the man’s game.

    You know what? The more I realize what the world really is, the more I believe the Goy have gotten precisely what they deserve. They don’t even deserve freedom. Like the idiot neo-cons say on their bumper stickers (which is really just a pretext for their ravenous blood-thirst and war-mongering borne in racism) “Freedom ain’t Free.” Ain’t that the truth? You have to first have the intelligence to spot your real slave-master and the courage to stand up and fight him.


    Henry Makow is the author of A Long Way to go for a Date. He received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto. He welcomes your feedback and ideas at



    Despite the protests of the responsible American Cabinet officers, Messrs. Hull and Stimson, and the professionals in the British Foreign Office, the Second War ended in “a peace of vengeance”; or rather (as vengeance is the denial of, and can never beget peace) in a vengeance which planted the seeds of new war.

    The two “premier-dictators” of the West, Messrs. Roosevelt and Churchill, took responsibility for the vengeance, for, despite their later disavowals of it, they both signed the document which was its charter: the Protocol of the Yalta Conference. Under this the Christian West joined with the barbaric East to wreak a barbaric vengeance on Europe. The aim of this chapter is to discover where the original responsibility lay (for the avowal that they acted at the promptings or under the pressure of shadowy others, or in ignorance of what they signed, occurs in the statements of both men; here the ultimate powerlessness of these seemingly all-powerful wartime potentates is shown).

    In January 1943 Mr. Roosevelt, at Casablanca, first struck the note of “blind vengeance”, when he “suddenly stated the principle of unconditional surrender” (Mr. Hull). The words, with their Old Testamentary ring, meant that the enemy would not be granted peace at any price whatever, and this was the absolute reversal of all “principles” previously proc1aimed by the Western leaders.


    This period was marked by a series of acts which evidently were deliberately devised to give it a nature of mockery especially humiliating to the Christian West; it was as if captives were made to perform clownish tricks for the amusement of their captors. This was shown at Nuremberg when the Soviet judge was selected to read the part of the judgment which condemned the Germans for taking men and women away from their homes and sending them to distant camps where they worked as slave labour. The British, American and French members of the court listened while Western justice, their inheritance and trust, was mocked. At that time, under the Yalta agreement, Germans, Poles and many more were being taken from their homes and sent to slave-camps; behind the Soviet judge


    loomed the shadow of the Moscow cellars where men were shot without trial and of the vast Siberian prisonland where, for thirty years then, millions of uncharged and untried human beings wasted in slavery.

    So much for the peaks of the vengeance. In the foothills unnumbered smaller deeds were committed which make up the darkest pages in the recent story of the West. It was a reversal to barbarism; where lay the inspiration of it? What directing hand made the Western leaders abet the revolution from the East in a vengeance of the kind practised by savage, primitive tribes? This vengeance was not “the Lord’s” in the Christian interpretation. Whose vengeance was it?

    Certain symbolic deeds were evidently meant to establish the authorship, or nature, of the vengeance. These crowning acts of symbolism were the reproductions, after nearly thirty years, of the similar acts committed during the revolution in Russia: the Talmudic boast left on the wall of the Romanoffs’ death chamber and the canonization of Judas Iscariot. After the Second World War the Nazi leaders were hanged on the Jewish Day of Judgment in 1946, so that their execution was presented to Jewry in the shape of Mordecai’s vengeance on Haman and his sons. Then in the Bavarian village of Oberammergau, where the world-famous Passion Play had been performed for three centuries, the players of the chief parts were put on trial for “Nazi activities” before a Communist court. Those who appeared as Jesus and the apostles were all declared guilty; the one performer acquitted was he who took the part of Judas.

    These things do not happen by accident, and the vengeance on Germany, like the earlier one on Russia, was in this way given the imprint of a Talmudic vengeance (that is, a vengeance on Christendom, the Talmud being the specifically anti-Christian continuation of the pre-Christian Torah). The vengeful writ ran on both sides of the line which by that time was supposed to be an “Iron Curtain” dividing “the free world” from the enslaved Asiatic one; in this matter of vengeance there was no iron curtain. Nuremberg was in the Western zone; Oberammergau in the Soviet one.

    By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of “the Jews”. The shape which the trial took showed the purpose of the immense propaganda of falsification conducted during the war, which I have earlier described. “Crimes against Jews” were singled out as a separate count, as if Jews were different from other human beings (and when the judgment was delivered a hundred million human beings in Eastern Europe had been handed over to the general persecution of all men,

    Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world’s leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war’s end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s