VIDEO: Confusing Reports: Rebels Claim they have entered Gadaffi Compound

Paul Joseph Watson: NATO Hands Terrorists Who Killed U.S. Troops Control of Libya

August 23rd 2011

Financial Enemy of Greece, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal, & America —- Jew

1. Goldman Sachs CEO, Lyold Blankfein – Jew

2. IMF Deputy CEO, John Lisky – Jew

3. Ex IMF CEO, Dominic Strauss - Jew

4. World Bank CEO, Robert Zoellick – Jew

5. Ex World Bank CEO, James Woolfesen – Jew

6. Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke - Jew

7. Ex Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan – Jew

8. Obama Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner – Jew

9. George Bush Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson – Jew

VIDEO: Confusing Reports: Rebels Claim they have entered Gadaffi Compound

by Russia Today

August 23rd 2011


The rebels claim they have entered Gaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziya compound in Tripoli, where Colonel Gaddafi has possibly found shelter for the last three days. Reuters correspondents report they can see Libyan rebels firing into air inside Bab al-Aziziya compounds, celebrating their success. Rebel sources told Al Jazeera they have entered Colonel Gaddafi’s house and raised their flag over it. The claims have not been verified yet.

Sources on the ground say that NATO jets were struck at watch towers, walls and other buildings in the Bab al-Aziziya complex earlier in the day, reports the Daily Telegraph.

NATO could not confirm that it has launched an air strike against the compound, but acknowledged that their aircraft were operating over Tripoli on Tuesday. The Libyan opposition forces now claim to be in control of about 93 per cent of Tripoli, says Al Arabiya news channel. It is believed the fresh shooting in Tripoli has been inspired by the appearance in front of the loyalist public of one of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s sons, Saif al Islam, who yesterday had been reported as captured by loyalist forces. Gaddafi’s son rallied with supporters and disclaimed most of the rebels’ victory claims, insisting Tripoli remains under the government’s control. The sky above the city of two million people is clouded with columns of white and black smoke rising from the ground. The ground is shaking with explosions, mainly from those of bombs dropped by NATO air force supporting the rebels.

NATO-member leaders have persistently demanded that Colonel Muammar Gaddafi step down and smoothly transfer power to the rebels’ National Transitional Council, but the British MP David Cameron has already stated that the very life of the colonel will depend on the goodwill of his opponents, who have openly been calling for his head over the last half-year of civil war. Muammar Gaddafi’s whereabouts are still a matter of speculation. Saif al Islam claimed during his appearance at Rixos Hotel that the Colonel is still in Tripoli.

But NATO said on Tuesday it does not know where Gaddafi is. The bloc also played down the Libyan leader’s importance in the conflict in the North African country, saying “he is not a key player anymore.”

Moreover, Gaddafi’s leaving the country will not interrupt NATO operations in the country, as the bloc’s mission is to protect civilians, added Colonel Roland Lavoie, NATO’s spokesman. Meanwhile, Russian Chess Federation chief Kirsan Ilyumzhinov said he has spoken to Gaddafi on Tuesday afternoon. “I am alive and healthy, I am in Tripoli and do not intend to leave Libya,” Ilyumzhinov quoted the Libyan leader as saying.

Global Research Articles by Russia Today

video in link

one here too from You Tube….


okiraqsite on 2 Mar 2011

This is what happened with the protesters in the Iraqi Cities

News & Politics


994Kide on 26 Jul 2011

Kosovo 26.7.2011 Albanian police shows democracy attacking civilian objects and shooting civilians. EULEX, KFOR , UN, NATO did nothing. Is this democracy ? Albanian special forces “ROSU” tried to take control over strategic important roads on north Kosovo, Serbs pushed them back with rocks!

News & Politics


2 responses to “VIDEO: Confusing Reports: Rebels Claim they have entered Gadaffi Compound


    Communized Eastern Germany contained 17,313,700 people according to the 1946 census, and among these are only between 2,000 and 4,000 Jews, if Jewish “estimates” are correct. Of this tiny minority the Johannesburg Zionist Record in


    1950 reported that “life in the Eastern Zone has brought changes for the better. Not a few of them today occupy high positions in the Government and Administration, positions which no Jew had ever before held in Germany and which, despite all talk of democracy, they cannot even today hold in Western Germany. Several Jews hold important posts in the Ministries of Information, Industry and Justice. The Supreme Judge in the Eastern sector of Berlin is a Jew, and so are several senior judges in the provinces outside Berlin. In the press, too, as well as in the theatre, quite a considerable number of Jews have been given responsible positions.”

    Even four thousand Jews presumably could not occupy all those high places and the same journal in another issue said, “When the Russian occupation authorities were established shortly after the end of the war, there were many Jews occupying key positions and holding high ranks in the Soviet administration. They included Jews who had lived in Russia … and who came to Germany and Austria in the ranks of the Red Army, and Jews from areas annexed by Russia in the last ten years, the Baltic states Latvia and Lithuania.”

    This brings the story nearly down to our present day and what remains will be discussed in a concluding chapter. When the revolution spread outward into the area abandoned to it by the West in 1945 the history of 1917-1918 in Russia was repeated. A Talmudic vengeance was wreaked and Jewish governments were with obvious intent set up everywhere. There was no great change in that state of affairs, either real or apparent, for another eight years. What was done reaffirmed once more the nature of the revolution and of its directing force and Talmudic purpose.

    [29] The number therefore may have been greater than at Hiroshima or Nagasaki, where the new atom-bombs were used, for the first time, on an utterly defenceless civilian population; and this against the protests of both the American and the British military commanders, General MacArthur and Lord Louis Mountbatten, who advised that the defeat of Japan was already effectively imminent. (return)

    [30] Mr. Winston Churchill’s efforts to reduce the area of Soviet incursion into Europe, after the fighting, by an invasion from the South which would have given the Western Allies command at least of Austria and Czechoslovakia and very probably of Hungary and the whole of Germany, were weakened by his insistence on setting up Communism in Yugoslavia. That action, for which his Memoirs give no sufficient explanation, also weakens his post-war argument, recalling his vain attempts to gain American support for the blow from the South and maintaining that the outcome of the war would have been different and better had he been heard. His emissary to the Communist leader, Tito, has recorded his own misgiving in this matter and Mr. Churchill’s instruction to him: “The less you and I worry about the form of government they set up the better.” The effect of Mr. Churchill’s actions was to “set up” the Communist form of government and to abandon the anti-Communist leader and British ally, General Mihailovitch, who was later executed by Tito. (return)

    [31] In this matter, too, the Western masses were hopelessly misled by years of propaganda, presenting “the Nazis” and “our Soviet allies” as opposites, whereas a close affinity always existed. Mr. Karl Stern, a Jew from Germany who migrated to North America and became a convert to Roman Catholicism, records his own misunderstanding of this, during German days when he was on the staff of a psychiatric institute: “A couple of Nazi doctors held forth on the so-called ‘Theory of Permanent Revolution’ of Trotzky. This theory was new to me … but that it should be propounded by these people was something entirely new and quite astonishing … I said, ‘Gentlemen, I understand that you draw a good deal of your theory on political strategy from Trotzky. Does it not strike you as extraordinary that you, Nazis, quote Trotzky, a Bolshevist and a Jew, as if he were your evangelist?’ They laughed and looked at me as one would look at a political yokel, which I was … They belonged to a then quite powerful wing in the Nazi party which was in favour of an alliance of Communist Russia and Nazi Germany against what they called Western Capitalism … When one was not listening very carefully, one was never quite sure whether they were talking Nazism or Bolshevism, and in the end it did not matter much.” (return)




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s