The Popes and the “Prince of the World”. What the Shroud of Turin Also Testifies

Thu 21 Apr 2011

Summary: The Shroud of Turin is likely to be the authentic shroud of Jesus Christ with a 3-dimensional photograph of a roman-crucified man´s front and back sides on quality linen in a texture only known from first century Judäa. All sciences have declared  it is not to be a fake. Only the Catholic Church has been declaring it a forgery since the appearance of the Shroud in 1357 – though it keeps it like what it is: probably the church’s only genuine relic, although the Church has never declared it as such.
A strange story has developed around science and the Shroud. In 1978 the STURP group studied the Shroud and revealed incredible and unique details. But the Catholic Church refused the scientists sampling for C-14 dating of the age of the Shroud. The researchers had made a strict scientific protocol and procedure, if the authorization was to come. Then suddenly in 1988, the Church launched a C-14 analysis on its own initiative without the researchers and their protocol. Samples were taken behind closed doors and handed over to 3 laboratories, which dated the Shroud to between 1260-1390 A.D. – that is, long after Christ. However, the circumstances were so strange that 2 German journalists started a huge detective work. After running into countless refusals and secrecy, being sent away and lied to they managed to obtain photos of the samples from 2 of the 3 laboratories. Europe’s leading textile experts declared that the samples did not come from the Shroud of Turin.

The scientific adviser, Gonella, to the Cardinal of Turin was informed of sloppiness with the publicized sizes of the samples. He flew into a rage, scolding the project leader, who stood beside them, and who on Good Friday in 1989 received 1 million pounds of sterling and a professorship at Oxford from unknown admirers for his commitment to a fake dating result! Gonella said that the laboratory work had been unscientific and unprofessional. Furthermore he told that the church had been blackmailed by a number of people who wanted the church to refuse a scientific C-14 dating. “I called them mafiosi – straight up in their faces”, said Gonella, who also said he considered the Shroud to be authentic. The question is who these people who can subdue the powerful Catholic church and pay 1 million British pounds are.

A hint may be had by looking at the relations of the church with the top of the Illuminati. Since 1823, NM Rothschild & Sons helped the Vatican Bank out with money and is responsible for the management of the bank. Acc. to researchers, the bank is simply merged into the Rothschild banking operations worldwide – and has had relations with the Mafia. Acc. to apparently innocently imprisoned Fritz Springmeyer, the Rothschilds have a setting for Lucifer at their tables. This is perhaps the reason why the Pope is making Satanic hand signs – and for him showing the bent crucifix, a satanic symbol, on his public appearances. Furthermore, the latest 2 popes are praying  annually for 1 – 2 days with leaders of world religions, each to his god, for world peace – because as gnostics they believe that all religions are worshippimg the same God – though  Allah in the Koran commands all who say he has a son to be killed. Thereby, and due to the New Catholic Catechism, which declares Muslims to be saved witout Christ, he eliminates Christ, who says that no one comes to God except through him. With this fundamental position, the Church has declared itself to be non-Christian. Not only that: The Pope declares that even Jews are saved – although their Talmud speaks in the most perverse and obscene manner of Christ and Christians – and seems to be a model for the Koran. Christ had a quite different destination for the Talmudists/Pharisees (Matth. 23:33).

It seems that the public Luciferianism of the Church is spreading in step with the Vatican coming under increasing masonic control after the 2. Vatican Council (1962 – 1965), although the papal desire to serve “The Prince of the World” and themselves dates back to the mid-third century. The Rothschild-Weishaupt 6-point program calls for Christianity and national law and all morality to be eradicated to make way for their new, Luciferian World Order. And how their 68- prophets have been efficient in this respect. But i.a. the Shroud of Turin shows hope ahead.


“ …the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me” (John 14:30). “For there shall arise false Christs, false prophets,… insomuch that, if [it were] possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”

TorinolagenIt is Easter, Christian holidays to commemorate the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ – as shown by the 3–dimensional photo of a roman-crucified man´s front and backside on the Shroud of Turin – and the martyr deaths of his witnesses, his disciples.Kristi-ansigt-3-dim.
This “document” has been declared genuine by all sciences – but not by the Catholic Church, who since its apperance in A.D. 1357 has called it a fake and never acknowledged it as a relic – although it probably is the only genuine relic. Probably at first this was due to the fact that it had been in the possession of the forbidden, gnostic Order of the Knights Templar. That the church in our day has been very much against scientific investigations into the Shroud and done anything to conceal its authenticity is more amazing. I see this as a a change of the churches to Luciferian, globalist religions, which exclude Christ.

Right: 3–dimensional photo of the face of the man on the Shroud of Turin (left). Note the lung oedema flowing from his right nostril: heart failure.

In 1978 the STURP group found very interesting data about the Shroud (The Shroud and the Controversy. By Kenneth E. Stevenson and Gary R. Habermas. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1990). However, the C-14 method dating of the Shroud was denied the research team by its keeper, the Church. Then suddenly in 1988, the Vatican – disregarding all scientifically made protocols for such an event – appointed 3 laboratories (Oxford, Zürich, Iowa) to perform C-14 analyses on “samples of the Shroud”. The sampling was made by the project leader and the Cardinal of Turin behind closed doors, and the result was that the Shroud tissue was said to be dated from between 1260–1390 A.D. Now two German atheist journalists (Holger Kersten & Elmar R. Gruber, Das Jesuss-Komplott, Langen Müller Verlag, München 1992) found the circumstances so strange that they started a tremendous detective work to find the tested samples. Everywhere – by the Church, by the laboratories and elsewhere, they were abruptly brushed off and massively lied to. In the end they succeeded in acquiring photos from 2 of the laboratories. The photos were presented to Europe´s leading textile experts who concluded that the examined tissue samples were not from the Shroud of Turin. Since then, the Church has stubbornly refused to give the hungry scientists samples for C-14 analysis. Even when in 2002 a necessary restoration of the Shroud was performed in deep secrecy by textile experts, the discarded fibres were not given to the scientists. On 24 March (Good Friday!!!) 1989 1 Mio pounds were granted by 45 anonymous admirers to maintain the laboratory established in Oxford to examine the “Shroud samples”. Its first professor was to be the Shroud Radiocarbon Project leader, Michael Tite of the British Museum!!!

In 1989 Prof. Gonella, scientific adviser to the Cardinal of Turin, was presented by the Statistician van Haelst (p. 3) with at least 3 grave divergences  given about the sizes of the 3 strips cut out for analysis. Gonella turned furious and scolded project leader, Mr. Tite, in very coarse words. Mr. Gonella said that “the Church was blackmailed by  a number of persons who did everything to make us say No, we were to say we would be afraid of the result of the analysis”. The laboratories acted very badly. I still protest their absolute lack of scientific professionalism. I have told them in their faces that they are mafiosi!” After his Torino-hroud-outer-imageretirement, Prof. Gonella declared that he considered the Shroud of Turin to be authentic. “The radio carbon testing was done without due care! None of Torino-billeddannelse2the accused persons reacted against these severe accusations.”

Right: On the outer side of the Shroud is a corresponding, weaker 3–dimensional photo of the face of the crucified man. The image formation on the Shroud has taken place by photochemical affection of only the most superficial fibrils. There is no vestige of chemical changes or image formation between the inner and outer images on the Shroud.

To understand the following, one must know that beginning with the Bishops of Rome, Cornelius (A.D. 250) and the relative of Julius Caesar and Augustus, Stephan (251), the Catholic Church made a decisive and fatal choice: It became political – by and by even a spiritual as well as a temporal empire, imitating the emperors of Rome – and demanding submission of the world´s rulers.
Since 1830 the Vatican has been financially dependent on N.M. Rothschild & Sons, and the Vatican Bank has been involved in various economic scandals involving the Mafia. Fritz Springmeyer, who is considered to be so dangerous that he is indefinitely imprisoned for an unproven bank robbery, writes: “The Rothschilds became very strong within Freemasonry. Early in the 19th century the Pope came to the Rothschilds to borrow money.  The Rothschilds in fact over time were entrusted with the bulk of the Vatican’s wealth. The Jewish Ency., Vol. 2, p.497 states, The Rothschilds (1905) are the guardians of the papal treasure.” Researcher Eustice Mullins writes that the Rothschilds took over all the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church in 1823. Today the large banking and financial business of the Catholic Church is an extensive system interlocked with the Rothschilds and the rest of the (Rothschild) International Banking system.” Springmeyer states the Rothschilds to be Satanists. In fact he tells that they Pope_blessing_un-flaghave a setting for Lucifer at their table. These are the masters of the Catholic Church (and all other globalist institutions).Pope-kisses-koran

Left: Pope Benedict kissing the Luciferian and here UN´s New World Order flag. To the right his predecessor, Pope John Paul II kisses the Koran.

The Vatican (and Lutheran Churches as well) are now working for Rothschild/Weishaupt´s inclusive New World Order – not for Christ
The Guardian 2 Jan. 20o4: Pope John Paul II called for a new international order.
The Pope called last month for the reform of world institutions and deplored any failure to respect international law. In his homily, the Pope said the new world order he wanted “would be able to provide …., an integrated development of society, solidarity between rich and poor nations.  With observer status at the UN and a network of diplomats covering 174 countries, the Holy See is in a strong position to lobby for its goals.

And then Pope Benedict XVI National Post 7 July 2009 – called for a “world political authority” to manage the global economy. Such an authority would have to be “regulated by law” and “would need to be universally recognized. Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions and those of international forums!
InterfaithPopesignbigComment: Now Christ said his kingdom was not of this world (John 18:36), while the popes are calling for political New World Order, a world government with the dictatorial power to implement its Antichristian, Luciferian “rule of law”. No doubt on whose side these popes are – they are serving “The prince of the World” (John 14:30), not Christ.
The power elite’s ongoing campaign to establish a socialist totalitarian global government has Luciferianism to thank for both its longevity and frequently violent character. In the mind of the modern oligarch, Luciferianism provides religious legitimacy for otherwise morally questionable plans. Luciferianism represents a radical revaluation of humanity’s ageless adversary: Satan. It is the ultimate inversion of good and evil.

Pope John Paul II started the Interfaith Movement and here in 1986 in Assissi – a gnostic initiative in the service of the New World Order
The 2. Vatican Council (1962–65) produced the New Catholic Cathechism, the article 841 of which declares Muslims to be saved due to Abraham´s blessing, which God in fact denied the ancestor of the Arabs, Ismael, in order to give it to Isaak (Gen. 17:18–21). This made it quite clear that the Vatican is no longer a Christian organisation, since Christ declared that no one comes to God except through him (John 14:6). In fact the Catholic Church thereby declared Christ, his death and resurrection as well as the pope! to be superfluous!! Now Pope Benedict is continuing this unchristian tradition of gathering all possible religions of the world, every one praying to his god – whom even the Pope pretends to be the same, although, e.g., according to the Koran, Allah demands his followers to kill everybody saying he has a son (Christ) – sura 9:5, i.a. This is not Christianity – it is freemasonry and New World Order under the guidance of the “United Religion Initiative” – global religion for global governance acc. to The globalist Aspen Institute Program and the Luci(fer)´s Trust and here which does the UN book printing. This Gnosis is of Jewish origin and the basis of the New World Order and here.

Benedickt-XI-gør-djævletenThe Vatican and freemasonry
Amazon: De Poncins quotes at length from two works by the “progressive Catholic” writer Alec Mellor (_Our Separated Brethren_ and _La Franc-Maconnerie a l’Heure du Choix_) which attempt to legitimize freemasonry and integrate it into Catholicism. Mellor proposes a concocted “progressive Catholicism” against what he regards as …traditionalism. It is this “progressive Catholicism” which has taken over the church by storm in the debacle and confusion following the Second Vatican Council. De Poncins clearly shows that masonry is fundamentally at odds with Roman Catholicism. De Poncins outlines the role of masonry in the French Revolution, the relationships between Judaism and Masonry, and the gnosticism and even Satanism which lurks behind masonry’s supposed rationalistic, atheistic (Enlightenment) worldview.

However, doubt still remains about the validity today of the 1917 Codex Juris Canonici – which forbids Catholics to be freemasons. After the tolerant Second Vatican Council, several groups of bishops began to view the ban on Masonic membership in the light of the particular character of the respective local lodges – and allowed membeship of these. So in 1976 many bishops and cardinals were exposed as masons. Pope John XXIII was himself a mason (1958–1963.

Was pope John Paul II a mason? He was stated to be voted in by a freemason (Cardinal Baggio) and– and given the papal keys by a freemason (Villot)
A great number of
Catholic priests and bishops were excommunicated for freemasonryBent-cross-popebenedict
He refused a strange reward from the Italian freemasons: Vatican City  – “Pope John Paul II will return to the Grand Orient of Italy Masonic Lodge the decoration of the Galileo Galilei Order granted to him for his contribution in spreading the ideals of fraternity and understanding. These ideas, the lodge stresses, are the same ones defended by Freemasonry.” How did they dare? His administration forbade Catholics to be masons – calling it a grave sin.

The Vatican is said to be teeming with influential secret masonic orders like the Jesuits and The Souvereign Military Order of Malta which seems to have an impressive membership list– the real Illuminati. Its grandmaster is said to operate at the behest of the pope – some say its the other way round. I don´t know. But several from this membership list participated in John Paul II´s funeral.

Is Benedict XVI a freemason?
Look at his Satanic handsigns and cunning look. Here is an uncanny anlysis of his Luciferian robe at his installation. He blesses the Antichristian UN Flag – representing the Illuminati and their New World Order – the antagonist of Christ´s New World Order, which shows him as an Illuminatus. And he  states that the Jews are saved without Christ, making him superfluous, nullifying his words: “No one comes to the Father but through me” (John 14:6). Christ had a quite different destination for the Talmudists/Pharisees (Matth. 23:33). He thereby even accepts Judaism/The Talmud´s hateful and perverse platitudes about Christ and Christians, thus confirming the New Catholic Cathechism and corroborating his Dagon_Priests_Hatgnostic Interfaith adolatry.

Above and below right you se 2 popes with a bent crucifix – as though a giant hand has been trying to crush it. This symbol is said to be a Luciferian symbol. Left the mitres of the pope and the priests of the Philistine god, Dagon are identical. Dagon was thought to be fish with human face and hands. His priests are here sprinkling holy water. Acc. to Jdg. 16:23, the blinded Samson killed himself and many Philistines making Dagon´s temple crash.  Whom does the pope really work for?

Benedict_TwistedCrossNow I shall return to the Shroud of Turin. Who are those persons who blackmailed the Church over the radiocarbon dating of the age of the Shroud – as told by Mr. Gonella, scientfic adviser to the Cardinal of Turin? Who were those persons whom Mr. Gonella called mafiosi? Who were those persons so strong that they could make the Church obedient to their will? Who were those 45 “admirers” so rich that they could reward project leader Michael Tite with 1 mio. pounds and and a professorship at Oxford for his forged dating of the Shroud of Turin – on Good Friday? I do not know, but this  is to me the obvious Shroud of Christ on linen in a texture only known from 1. century Judea, with calcium aragonite from the Damascus Gate in Jerusalem, pollen specific for Jerusalem, even imprints of flowers specific for Jerusalem, a shroud with details that have taught scientists long-forgotten things about Roman crucifixion and death on the cross, bleached by the method of antiquity, not that of the Middle Ages – and without vanillin (Miidle Ages fibers still contain plenty of vanillin).

But why would the authenticity of the Shroud apparently be a political problem? The Illuminati of the New World Order are Luciferians – obliged to destroy i.a. Christianity acc. to the Rothschild/Weishaupt´s 6–point program. Imagine what effect it would have on the Illuminati dechristianisation process, if the proof of the deity of Jesus Christ was made public! Imagine how this would ruin the globalist Interfaith Movement – and inhibit the promotion by the Illuminists of the Muslim immigration to destroy Christan faith and culture in the West – bastions against the New World Order. Imagine how the Muslims would break off all “dialogues” with the West, if we said: Christ has been proved to be God´s son. There is no matter for religious, only political dialogue any more.

Being an essential part of the New World Order´s propaganda and corruption machine the Church will not be allowed to let such a bomb explode. The will of the Church lies in Rothschilds safe.





5 responses to “The Popes and the “Prince of the World”. What the Shroud of Turin Also Testifies



  2. Before the history is all written over again..

    Chapter 61: Jews and Communism in the Soviet Union

    Part Three: Winston Churchill on the Jewish Role in Communism

    The preponderance of Jews in the inner sanctum of the Communist revolution in Russia was in fact well known at the time that the revolution took place: it is only in the post Second World War II era that this fact has been suppressed. A good example of the contemporary awareness of the Jewish nature of early Russian Communism can be found in the writing of the young Winston Churchill, later to become prime minister of Great Britain, who, in 1920, was also working as journalist.

    In 1920, Churchill wrote a full page article for the Illustrated Sunday Herald on 8 February 1920 detailing the Jewish involvement in the revolution. Churchill discusses in this article the split between Jews: some are Communists, he wrote, while others are Jewish nationalists. Churchill favored the Jewish nationalists, (and of course they indeed fall foul of the Jewish Communists, eventually becoming bitter enemies) and he appealed to what he called “loyal Jews” to ensure that the Communist Jews did not succeed. Churchill went even further and blamed the Jews for “every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century”, writing :

    “This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new. From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders.” (ibid)

    Churchill also pointedly accused Leon Trotsky (Bronstein) of wanting to establish a “world wide Communistic state under Jewish domination” in this article.

    Winston Churchill, later prime minister of Britain, pointed out the large Jewish involvement in the Communist revolution in an article published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8 February 1920. See in particular under the heading “Terrorist Jews”, enlarged below. For the full article, click here ( NB: large file)

    Churchill was not the only journalist to note the Jewish role in the Russian Revolution: Robert Wilton, the chief correspondent for the London Times, who was stationed in Russia at the time, wrote in his book The Last Days of the Romanovs (Hornton Butterworth, London, 1920, pages 147, 22-28, 81,118, 199, 127, 139-148) that “90 per cent” of the new Soviet government was composed of Jews. The correspondent for the London Morning Post, Victor Marsden, went further and actually compiled a list of names of the top 545 Bolshevik officials: of these, Marsden said, 454 were Jews and only 23 Non-Jewish Russians. (All These Things, A.N. Field, Appendix B pages 274-276).

    Part Four: The US Army’s Telegrams on the Jewish role in Communism

    or back to

    Part One: Jews and Communism

    Part Two: The Encyclopedia Judaica Confirms the Jewish Origin of Communism


    Main Contents Page

    All material (c) copyright Ostara Publications, 1999.

    Re-use for commercial purposes strictly forbidden.

    Chapter 61: Jews and Communism in the Soviet Union

    Part Two: The Encyclopedia Judaica Confirms the Jewish Origin of Communism

    The Encyclopedia Judaica, published in Jerusalem, Israel, by Jews, is available at most large public libraries and is in English. This reference book for all things Jewish is quite open about the Jewish role in Communism, particularly early Communism, and contains a large number of admissions in this regard.

    Above: The front cover of Volume 5 of the 1971 edition of the Encyclopedia Judaica, published in Jerusalem, Israel, from where all of the extracts below have been taken.

    Under the entry for “Communism”: in Volume 5, page 792, the following appears:

    “The Communist Movement and ideology played an important part In Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s and during and after World War II.” (below)

    On page 793, the same Encyclopedia Judaica then goes on to say that “Communist trends became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities. In some countries, Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist Parties..”

    The Encyclopedia Judaica on page 793 then goes on to reveal that the Communist International actually instructed Jews to change their names so as “not confirm right-wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy.” (above).


    The Encyclopedia Judaica then goes on to describe the overwhelming role Jews played in creating the Soviet Union. On page 792 it says : “Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime” (below).

    On page 794 of the Encyclopedia Judaica, this Jewish reference book then goes to list the Jews prominent in the upper command of the Russian Communist party: these included Maxim Litvinov, (Later foreign minister of Soviet Russia); Grigori Zinoviev, Lwev Kamenev, Jacob Sverdlov, Lazar Kaganovich, and Karl Radek, amongst many others. (Below: page 794 of the Encyclopedia Judaica).

    The organizer of the Revolution was Trotsky, who prepared a special committee to plan and prepare the coup which brought the Communists to power. according tot he Encyclopedia Judaica, this committee, called the Military Revolutionary Committee,, had five members – three of whom were Jews. (below)

    The Politburo – the supreme governing body of Russia immediately after the Communist Revolution – had four Jews amongst its seven members, according to page 797 of the Jewish Encyclopedia Judaica (below).

    While many have alleged that Lenin was also Jewish, or at least of part Jewish origin, there is little concrete evidence of this. However, Lenin was ardently pro-Jewish, branding anti-Semitism (correctly) as “counter revolutionary” (Encyclopedia Judaica, page 798). A statement against anti-Semitism was made by Lenin in March 1919 and was “one of the rare occasions when his voice was put on a phonograph record to be used in a mass campaign against the counterrevolutionary incitement against the Jews,” according to the Encyclopedia Judaica, page 798. One of the first laws passed by the new Soviet Communist government was to outlaw anti-Semitism (Encyclopedia Judaica, page 798, extract above).

    Part Three: Winston Churchill on the Jewish Role in Communism

    Part Four: The US Army’s Telegrams on the Jewish role in Communism

    or back to

    Part One: Jews and Communism


    Main Contents Page

    All material (c) copyright Ostara Publications, 1999.

    Re-use for commercial purposes strictly forbidden.

    Chapter 61: Jews and Communism in the Soviet Union

    Part Four: The US Army’s Telegrams on the Jewish role in Communism

    The American Army Intelligence Service had its agents in Russia at the time of the Communist Revolution, and the Jewish nature of that revolution is accurately reflected in those reports.

    An American Senate subcommittee investigation into the Russian Revolution heard evidence, put on congressional record, that “(I)n December 1919, under the presidency of a man named Apfelbaum (Zinovieff) . . . out of the 388 members of the Bolshevik central government, only 16 happened to be real Russians, and all the rest (with the exception of a Negro from the U.S.) were Jews” (U.S. Senate Document 62, 1919).

    Below: Both these telegrams are from official US National Archives: the upper one, State Department document 861.00/1757 was sent on 2 May 1918, from Moscow by US Consul General Summers. The lower one, State Department document 861.00/2205, was sent from Vladivostok on 5 July 1918, by US Consul Caldwell. Both describe the domination of the Bolshevik Communists by Jews, using the words “Fifty per cent of Soviet Government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type…”

    Copies of documents from the US National Archives are freely available to anyone from the Washington DC, USA, office.


    However, none of these authorities quoted above dared to use quite the language of a US Military Intelligence officer, one captain Montgomery Schuyler, who sent two reports to Washington in March and June 1919, describing in graphic detail the Jewish role in the Russian Revolution. Both these reports were only declassified in September 1957 and the originals are still held in the US National Archives in Washington, open for public inspection.

    The first report, sent from Omsk on 1 March 1919, contains the following paragraph:

    “it is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type…”

    The second report, dated 9 June 1919, and sent from Vladivostok, said that of the

    “384 commissars there were 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government.”

    Below: Both these American army military intelligence reports are freely available from the US National Archives in Washington DC. They were written by Captain Montgomery Schuyler, US Army. Schuyler made a point of the heavy Jewish involvement in the Communist revolution. Schuyler writes that “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled but Russians Jews of the greasiest type..” and goes on to point out that of the total 384 commissars running the Soviet Union, more than 300 were Jews.”

    The importance of this information does not need to be overemphasized in the light of the crucial governing role the commissars played in the running the early Soviet society.

    It therefore came as no surprise when anti-Semitism was duly entered into the Soviet law books as a death penalty crime – although latent anti-Semitism simmered even in Communist Party circles, flaring up quite seriously when a Jewish woman, Fanny Kaplan, tried to assassinate Lenin by literally stabbing him in the back.

    Eventually, as outlined earlier, the hardcore Communists were to part ways with the Jewish nationalists, or Zionists, and the two camps were to become bitter enemies, a situation which persisted right until the collapse of the Soviet Union late in the 20the Century.


    Jews were also behind the American Communist Party, which although politically unsuccessful, was very successful in its espionage and infiltration activities, eventually reaching right into the Civil Rights Movement and that group’s leader, Martin Luther King.

    According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, published in Jerusalem, Israel (1971), page 804 (extract below) “the list of Jews who played a prominent role in the leadership and factional infighting of the American Communist Party is a long one . . .Many American Jewish authors and intellectuals, some of whom later recanted, were active in editing Communist publications and spreading party propaganda . . among them Micheal Gold, Howard Fast and Bertram Wolfe.”

    American Jewish Communist Spies gave secrets of Atom Bomb to Soviets

    Many of the Soviet spies arrested by the American government during the Cold War have been Jewish, and none have been more damaging than the group of spies who passed the secret of the Atom Bomb to the Soviet Union.

    This group of Communist spies was all Jewish, from the ringleaders, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, to the actual scientists working at the top secret Los Alamos laboratory, namely David Greenglass and Theodore Hallsberg. The latter actually passed the atomic secrets to the Rosenbergs, who then passed it onto their Soviet handlers, via their Jewish courier, Harry Gold.

    Above: the team of American Jewish Communists who passed the USA’s secrets of the Atom Bomb to the Soviet Union after the Second World War, enabling the latter country to explode its first atom bomb in 1948. From left to right: Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the spy ring leaders, executed at Sing Sing prison; David Greenglass, scientist at Los Alamos; Theodore Hallsberg, scientist at Los Alamos, and Harry Gold, courier for the group to their Soviet handler.

    Despite the overwhelming preponderance of Jews in Communist parties and movements world wide, it would however be incorrect to allege that all Jews were or are Communists, as the millions of Jewish capitalists and as the conflict between Zionist Jews and Communist Jews both attest.. It is however accurate to say that individual Jews, from Karl Marx onwards, have provided the mainspring for Communist activities.

    Part One: Jews and Communism

    Part Two: The Encyclopedia Judaica Confirms the Jewish Origin of Communism

    Part Three: Winston Churchill on the Jewish Role in Communism


    Chapter 62

    Main Contents Page

    All material (c) copyright Ostara Publications, 1999.

    Chapter 61: The Suppressed Link – Jews and Communism

    Part One: The Ideological Origin of Communism

    The creation of the Soviet Union was to impact upon history for the greater part of the 20th Century – and an understanding of the sub-racial and ideological divisions it caused is crucial to understanding not only the events of that century, but also to understanding the flare up of anti-Jewish sentiment which culminated in the creation of the Third Reich in Germany.

    For the Soviet Union’s best kept secret was that the Bolshevik elite had one outstanding characteristic: it had an inordinately large number of Jews in its controlling body.

    Above left and right: Two extracts from the Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 18, page 717, 1984, Chicago, describing Leon Trotsky’s critical role in the creation of the Communist state of the Soviet Union, describing him as the “outstanding leader” of the Russian Communist Revolution. The same article then goes on, above left, to reveal that Trotsky was born Lev Davidovich Bronstein, of a Jewish family from the Ukraine.

    Virtually all of the important Bolshevik leaders were Jews: they included the “father of the revolution,” Leon Trotsky (whose real name was Lev Bronstein: in an attempt to hide his Jewishness, he adopted the name Trotsky); Lev Kamenev, the early Bolshevik leader who later went on to become a leading member of the Politburo, was born with the surname Rosenfeld; Grigori Zinoviev, head of the Petrograd Soviet, was born with the surname Apfelbaum; and many other famous Communists of the time, such as Karl Radek, Lazar Kaganovich; and Moses Urtisky, (the head of the Cheka) who all changed their names for reasons similar to that of Trotsky.

    The Bolshevik’s Party’s Central Committee chairman, Yakov Sverdlov, was also Jewish – and it was he who gave the order to the Jewish Soviet secret policeman, Yurovsky, to murder the Tsar – Yurovsky personally carried out this order.

    Karl Marx – Descendant of a family of rabbis

    As if the Russian Revolution was not enough, the originator of the Communist ideology itself, Karl Marx, was also a Jew, with his family name in reality being Mordechai.

    The large Jewish role in the Russian revolution, combined with the fact that Marx had been born a Jew, was manna from heaven for the European anti-Semitic movement, and the link between Jews and Communism was exploited to the hilt, particularly by Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist (Nazi) movement in Germany during the 1920s.

    Above left: Karl Marx, whose real family name was Mordechai, originator of the Communist ideology. Above right: An extract from the Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 11, page 459, 1984, Chicago, revealing Karl Marx’s Jewish ancestry.

    It was not only in Germany that the association of Jews with Communism was made: all over the world Jews became associated with radical political movements, sometimes justifiably so, other times not. Nonetheless, the presence of so many Jews in the creation of the Soviet Union played a massive role in justifying anti-Jewish sentiment in Europe prior to, and with, the rise of Adolf Hitler.

    Directly after the First World War, there were another three specifically Jewish Communist revolutions in Europe itself:

    • the German Jew, Kurt Eisner, led a short lived communist revolution in Munich, Bavaria from November 1918 to February 1919 (at the same time that Adolf Hitler was an unknown soldier in that city – the effect of being a first hand witness to a Jewish and Communist-led revolution helped to cement Hitler’s anti-Communist and anti-Jewish feelings);

    • the short lived Sparticus uprising in Berlin (September 1918 to January 1919) led by the German Jews, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg; and

    • the short lived Communist tyranny in Hungary led by the Jew, Bela Kun (Cohen), from March to August 1919.

    Above left: The Jewish Communist leader Karl Liebknecht speaks in Berlin; and alongside, his alter ego, the Jewess Rosa Luxembourg. These two leaders of the early German Communist Party helped to cement the association of Jews and Communism in the German publics’ mind.

    These incidents all helped to identify Jews with Communism in the public mind: in this light it becomes perfectly explicable why the Nazi Party was able to win support on an anti-Communist and open anti-Jewish platform.

    Jews in the Later Soviet Union

    Jews retained their leading roles in Soviet society until growing anti-Semitism within the Communist Party itself led to a change in policy. Trotsky was the first major Jewish casualty: he split with Stalin over the issue of international socialism and the need to spread the revolution: he was forced into exile in 1929. He was then assassinated in Mexico City in 1940, allegedly by a Stalinist agent.

    By the middle 1930s, Stalin had started purging the Soviet Communist Party of other important Jews. The period immediately following the end of the Second World War and the creation of the state of Israel saw another rise in Soviet anti-Semitism: by 1953, Stalin had started purging all Jews in the Soviet hierarchy who were also Zionists.

    The Communists, quite correctly, saw Zionism as Jewish nationalism and contrary to the interests of an international socialist brotherhood. Many leading Russian Jews were also fervent Zionists: and it was this group that was then targeted for persecution, and who became famous throughout the rest of the lifetime of the Soviet Union as the victims of Soviet anti-Semitism.

    Zionism, as an expression of Jewish separatism was declared a crime against the Soviet state, and Zionist organizations were forced to close down their operations inside the Soviet Union.

    East Germany, as an official Soviet satellite, was forbidden by Moscow to make any reparations payments to the Zionist created state of Israel for the treatment of Jews by the Nazi government.

    Not all Russian Jews were Zionists: those who were not, were generally left alone and some did achieve prominent positions within the post Stalin Soviet Union.

    Many thousands of Jews did however leave the Soviet Union – estimates putting the total number at over the one million mark, with most settling in Israel or the United States.

    Part Two: The Encyclopedia Judaica Confirms the Jewish Origin of Communism

    Part Three: Winston Churchill on the Jewish Role in Communism

    Part Four: The US Army’s Telegrams on the Jewish role in Communism


    Main Contents Page

    All material (c) copyright Ostara Publications, 1999.

    Re-use for commercial purposes strictly forbidden.




    Redirected into the wrong roads…

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s biographer recounts what it was like to grow up as a Russian Christian child among the children of the Jewish communist elite: By the age of ten he had the cross ripped from his neck by jeering Pioneers and for over a year was held up to ridicule …Solzhenitsyn was, as a boy, exposed to students whose parents had an officially superior status. Most of the members of the Young Pioneers and Komsomol movements, at least in Rostov, were Jewish children…”

    (Michael Scammell, Solzhenitsyn: A Biography, p. 64).

  4. War Is A Racket
    By Major General Smedley Darlington Butler
    • Born: West Chester, Pa., July 30, 1881
    •Educated: Haverford School
    •Married: Ethel C. Peters, of Philadelphia, June 30, 1905
    •Awarded two congressional medals of honor:

    1.Capture of Vera Cruz, Mexico, 1914
    2.Capture of Ft. Riviere, Haiti, 1917
    •Distinguished service medal, 1919
    •Major General – United States Marine Corps
    •Retired Oct. 1, 1931
    •On leave of absence to act as director of Dept. of Safety, Philadelphia, 1932
    •Lecturer — 1930’s
    •Republican Candidate for Senate, 1932
    •Died at Naval Hospital, Philadelphia, June 21, 1940
    For more information about Major General Butler, contact the United States Marine Corps.

    Chapter 1: War Is A Racket

    Chapter 2: Who Makes The Profits?

    Chapter 3: Who Pays The Bills?

    Chapter 4: How To Smash This Racket!

    Chapter 5: To Hell With War!


    War Is A Racket
    WAR is a racket. It always has been.

    It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

    A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

    In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

    How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

    Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few — the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

    And what is this bill?

    This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

    For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.

    Again they are choosing sides. France and Russia met and agreed to stand side by side. Italy and Austria hurried to make a similar agreement. Poland and Germany cast sheep’s eyes at each other, forgetting for the nonce [one unique occasion], their dispute over the Polish Corridor.

    The assassination of King Alexander of Jugoslavia [Yugoslavia] complicated matters. Jugoslavia and Hungary, long bitter enemies, were almost at each other’s throats. Italy was ready to jump in. But France was waiting. So was Czechoslovakia. All of them are looking ahead to war. Not the people — not those who fight and pay and die — only those who foment wars and remain safely at home to profit.

    There are 40,000,000 men under arms in the world today, and our statesmen and diplomats have the temerity to say that war is not in the making.

    Hell’s bells! Are these 40,000,000 men being trained to be dancers?

    Not in Italy, to be sure. Premier Mussolini knows what they are being trained for. He, at least, is frank enough to speak out. Only the other day, Il Duce in “International Conciliation,” the publication of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said:

    “And above all, Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. . . . War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the people who have the courage to meet it.”

    Undoubtedly Mussolini means exactly what he says. His well-trained army, his great fleet of planes, and even his navy are ready for war — anxious for it, apparently. His recent stand at the side of Hungary in the latter’s dispute with Jugoslavia showed that. And the hurried mobilization of his troops on the Austrian border after the assassination of Dollfuss showed it too. There are others in Europe too whose sabre rattling presages war, sooner or later.

    Herr Hitler, with his rearming Germany and his constant demands for more and more arms, is an equal if not greater menace to peace. France only recently increased the term of military service for its youth from a year to eighteen months.

    Yes, all over, nations are camping in their arms. The mad dogs of Europe are on the loose. In the Orient the maneuvering is more adroit. Back in 1904, when Russia and Japan fought, we kicked out our old friends the Russians and backed Japan. Then our very generous international bankers were financing Japan. Now the trend is to poison us against the Japanese. What does the “open door” policy to China mean to us? Our trade with China is about $90,000,000 a year. Or the Philippine Islands? We have spent about $600,000,000 in the Philippines in thirty-five years and we (our bankers and industrialists and speculators) have private investments there of less than $200,000,000.

    Then, to save that China trade of about $90,000,000, or to protect these private investments of less than $200,000,000 in the Philippines, we would be all stirred up to hate Japan and go to war — a war that might well cost us tens of billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of lives of Americans, and many more hundreds of thousands of physically maimed and mentally unbalanced men.

    Of course, for this loss, there would be a compensating profit — fortunes would be made. Millions and billions of dollars would be piled up. By a few. Munitions makers. Bankers. Ship builders. Manufacturers. Meat packers. Speculators. They would fare well.

    Yes, they are getting ready for another war. Why shouldn’t they? It pays high dividends.

    But what does it profit the men who are killed? What does it profit their mothers and sisters, their wives and their sweethearts? What does it profit their children?

    What does it profit anyone except the very few to whom war means huge profits?

    Yes, and what does it profit the nation?

    Take our own case. Until 1898 we didn’t own a bit of territory outside the mainland of North America. At that time our national debt was a little more than $1,000,000,000. Then we became “internationally minded.” We forgot, or shunted aside, the advice of the Father of our country. We forgot George Washington’s warning about “entangling alliances.” We went to war. We acquired outside territory. At the end of the World War period, as a direct result of our fiddling in international affairs, our national debt had jumped to over $25,000,000,000. Our total favorable trade balance during the twenty-five-year period was about $24,000,000,000. Therefore, on a purely bookkeeping basis, we ran a little behind year for year, and that foreign trade might well have been ours without the wars.

    It would have been far cheaper (not to say safer) for the average American who pays the bills to stay out of foreign entanglements. For a very few this racket, like bootlegging and other underworld rackets, brings fancy profits, but the cost of operations is always transferred to the people — who do not profit.


    Who Makes The Profits?
    The World War, rather our brief participation in it, has cost the United States some $52,000,000,000. Figure it out. That means $400 to every American man, woman, and child. And we haven’t paid the debt yet. We are paying it, our children will pay it, and our children’s children probably still will be paying the cost of that war.

    The normal profits of a business concern in the United States are six, eight, ten, and sometimes twelve percent. But war-time profits — ah! that is another matter — twenty, sixty, one hundred, three hundred, and even eighteen hundred per cent — the sky is the limit. All that traffic will bear. Uncle Sam has the money. Let’s get it.

    Of course, it isn’t put that crudely in war time. It is dressed into speeches about patriotism, love of country, and “we must all put our shoulders to the wheel,” but the profits jump and leap and skyrocket — and are safely pocketed. Let’s just take a few examples:

    Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people — didn’t one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war? They were a patriotic corporation. Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn’t much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it. Now let’s look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent.

    Take one of our little steel companies that patriotically shunted aside the making of rails and girders and bridges to manufacture war materials. Well, their 1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6,000,000. Then came the war. And, like loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their profits jump — or did they let Uncle Sam in for a bargain? Well, their 1914-1918 average was $49,000,000 a year!

    Or, let’s take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior to the war were $105,000,000 a year. Not bad. Then along came the war and up went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was $240,000,000. Not bad.

    There you have some of the steel and powder earnings. Let’s look at something else. A little copper, perhaps. That always does well in war times.

    Anaconda, for instance. Average yearly earnings during the pre-war years 1910-1914 of $10,000,000. During the war years 1914-1918 profits leaped to $34,000,000 per year.

    Or Utah Copper. Average of $5,000,000 per year during the 1910-1914 period. Jumped to an average of $21,000,000 yearly profits for the war period.

    Let’s group these five, with three smaller companies. The total yearly average profits of the pre-war period 1910-1914 were $137,480,000. Then along came the war. The average yearly profits for this group skyrocketed to $408,300,000.

    A little increase in profits of approximately 200 per cent.

    Does war pay? It paid them. But they aren’t the only ones. There are still others. Let’s take leather.

    For the three-year period before the war the total profits of Central Leather Company were $3,500,000. That was approximately $1,167,000 a year. Well, in 1916 Central Leather returned a profit of $15,000,000, a small increase of 1,100 per cent. That’s all. The General Chemical Company averaged a profit for the three years before the war of a little over $800,000 a year. Came the war, and the profits jumped to $12,000,000. a leap of 1,400 per cent.

    International Nickel Company — and you can’t have a war without nickel — showed an increase in profits from a mere average of $4,000,000 a year to $73,000,000 yearly. Not bad? An increase of more than 1,700 per cent.

    American Sugar Refining Company averaged $2,000,000 a year for the three years before the war. In 1916 a profit of $6,000,000 was recorded.

    Listen to Senate Document No. 259. The Sixty-Fifth Congress, reporting on corporate earnings and government revenues. Considering the profits of 122 meat packers, 153 cotton manufacturers, 299 garment makers, 49 steel plants, and 340 coal producers during the war. Profits under 25 per cent were exceptional. For instance the coal companies made between 100 per cent and 7,856 per cent on their capital stock during the war. The Chicago packers doubled and tripled their earnings.

    And let us not forget the bankers who financed the great war. If anyone had the cream of the profits it was the bankers. Being partnerships rather than incorporated organizations, they do not have to report to stockholders. And their profits were as secret as they were immense. How the bankers made their millions and their billions I do not know, because those little secrets never become public — even before a Senate investigatory body.

    But here’s how some of the other patriotic industrialists and speculators chiseled their way into war profits.

    Take the shoe people. They like war. It brings business with abnormal profits. They made huge profits on sales abroad to our allies. Perhaps, like the munitions manufacturers and armament makers, they also sold to the enemy. For a dollar is a dollar whether it comes from Germany or from France. But they did well by Uncle Sam too. For instance, they sold Uncle Sam 35,000,000 pairs of hobnailed service shoes. There were 4,000,000 soldiers. Eight pairs, and more, to a soldier. My regiment during the war had only one pair to a soldier. Some of these shoes probably are still in existence. They were good shoes. But when the war was over Uncle Sam has a matter of 25,000,000 pairs left over. Bought — and paid for. Profits recorded and pocketed.

    There was still lots of leather left. So the leather people sold your Uncle Sam hundreds of thousands of McClellan saddles for the cavalry. But there wasn’t any American cavalry overseas! Somebody had to get rid of this leather, however. Somebody had to make a profit in it — so we had a lot of McClellan saddles. And we probably have those yet.

    Also somebody had a lot of mosquito netting. They sold your Uncle Sam 20,000,000 mosquito nets for the use of the soldiers overseas. I suppose the boys were expected to put it over them as they tried to sleep in muddy trenches — one hand scratching cooties on their backs and the other making passes at scurrying rats. Well, not one of these mosquito nets ever got to France!

    Anyhow, these thoughtful manufacturers wanted to make sure that no soldier would be without his mosquito net, so 40,000,000 additional yards of mosquito netting were sold to Uncle Sam.

    There were pretty good profits in mosquito netting in those days, even if there were no mosquitoes in France. I suppose, if the war had lasted just a little longer, the enterprising mosquito netting manufacturers would have sold your Uncle Sam a couple of consignments of mosquitoes to plant in France so that more mosquito netting would be in order.

    Airplane and engine manufacturers felt they, too, should get their just profits out of this war. Why not? Everybody else was getting theirs. So $1,000,000,000 — count them if you live long enough — was spent by Uncle Sam in building airplane engines that never left the ground! Not one plane, or motor, out of the billion dollars worth ordered, ever got into a battle in France. Just the same the manufacturers made their little profit of 30, 100, or perhaps 300 per cent.

    Undershirts for soldiers cost 14¢ [cents] to make and uncle Sam paid 30¢ to 40¢ each for them — a nice little profit for the undershirt manufacturer. And the stocking manufacturer and the uniform manufacturers and the cap manufacturers and the steel helmet manufacturers — all got theirs.

    Why, when the war was over some 4,000,000 sets of equipment — knapsacks and the things that go to fill them — crammed warehouses on this side. Now they are being scrapped because the regulations have changed the contents. But the manufacturers collected their wartime profits on them — and they will do it all over again the next time.

    There were lots of brilliant ideas for profit making during the war.

    One very versatile patriot sold Uncle Sam twelve dozen 48-inch wrenches. Oh, they were very nice wrenches. The only trouble was that there was only one nut ever made that was large enough for these wrenches. That is the one that holds the turbines at Niagara Falls. Well, after Uncle Sam had bought them and the manufacturer had pocketed the profit, the wrenches were put on freight cars and shunted all around the United States in an effort to find a use for them. When the Armistice was signed it was indeed a sad blow to the wrench manufacturer. He was just about to make some nuts to fit the wrenches. Then he planned to sell these, too, to your Uncle Sam.

    Still another had the brilliant idea that colonels shouldn’t ride in automobiles, nor should they even ride on horseback. One has probably seen a picture of Andy Jackson riding in a buckboard. Well, some 6,000 buckboards were sold to Uncle Sam for the use of colonels! Not one of them was used. But the buckboard manufacturer got his war profit.

    The shipbuilders felt they should come in on some of it, too. They built a lot of ships that made a lot of profit. More than $3,000,000,000 worth. Some of the ships were all right. But $635,000,000 worth of them were made of wood and wouldn’t float! The seams opened up — and they sank. We paid for them, though. And somebody pocketed the profits.

    It has been estimated by statisticians and economists and researchers that the war cost your Uncle Sam $52,000,000,000. Of this sum, $39,000,000,000 was expended in the actual war itself. This expenditure yielded $16,000,000,000 in profits. That is how the 21,000 billionaires and millionaires got that way. This $16,000,000,000 profits is not to be sneezed at. It is quite a tidy sum. And it went to a very few.

    The Senate (Nye) committee probe of the munitions industry and its wartime profits, despite its sensational disclosures, hardly has scratched the surface.

    Even so, it has had some effect. The State Department has been studying “for some time” methods of keeping out of war. The War Department suddenly decides it has a wonderful plan to spring. The Administration names a committee —with the War and Navy Departments ably represented under the chairmanship of a Wall Street speculator — to limit profits in war time. To what extent isn’t suggested. Hmmm. Possibly the profits of 300 and 600 and 1,600 per cent of those who turned blood into gold in the World War would be limited to some smaller figure.

    Apparently, however, the plan does not call for any limitation of losses — that is, the losses of those who fight the war. As far as I have been able to ascertain there is nothing in the scheme to limit a soldier to the loss of but one eye, or one arm, or to limit his wounds to one or two or three. Or to limit the loss of life.

    There is nothing in this scheme, apparently, that says not more than 12 per cent of a regiment shall be wounded in battle, or that not more than 7 per cent in a division shall be killed.

    Of course, the committee cannot be bothered with such trifling matters.


    Who Pays The Bills?
    Who provides the profits — these nice little profits of 20, 100, 300, 1,500 and 1,800 per cent? We all pay them — in taxation. We paid the bankers their profits when we bought Liberty Bonds at $100.00 and sold them back at $84 or $86 to the bankers. These bankers collected $100 plus. It was a simple manipulation. The bankers control the security marts. It was easy for them to depress the price of these bonds. Then all of us — the people — got frightened and sold the bonds at $84 or $86. The bankers bought them. Then these same bankers stimulated a boom and government bonds went to par — and above. Then the bankers collected their profits.

    But the soldier pays the biggest part of the bill.

    If you don’t believe this, visit the American cemeteries on the battlefields abroad. Or visit any of the veteran’s hospitals in the United States. On a tour of the country, in the midst of which I am at the time of this writing, I have visited eighteen government hospitals for veterans. In them are a total of about 50,000 destroyed men — men who were the pick of the nation eighteen years ago. The very able chief surgeon at the government hospital; at Milwaukee, where there are 3,800 of the living dead, told me that mortality among veterans is three times as great as among those who stayed at home.

    Boys with a normal viewpoint were taken out of the fields and offices and factories and classrooms and put into the ranks. There they were remolded; they were made over; they were made to “about face”; to regard murder as the order of the day. They were put shoulder to shoulder and, through mass psychology, they were entirely changed. We used them for a couple of years and trained them to think nothing at all of killing or of being killed.

    Then, suddenly, we discharged them and told them to make another “about face” ! This time they had to do their own readjustment, sans [without] mass psychology, sans officers’ aid and advice and sans nation-wide propaganda. We didn’t need them any more. So we scattered them about without any “three-minute” or “Liberty Loan” speeches or parades. Many, too many, of these fine young boys are eventually destroyed, mentally, because they could not make that final “about face” alone.

    In the government hospital in Marion, Indiana, 1,800 of these boys are in pens! Five hundred of them in a barracks with steel bars and wires all around outside the buildings and on the porches. These already have been mentally destroyed. These boys don’t even look like human beings. Oh, the looks on their faces! Physically, they are in good shape; mentally, they are gone.

    There are thousands and thousands of these cases, and more and more are coming in all the time. The tremendous excitement of the war, the sudden cutting off of that excitement — the young boys couldn’t stand it.

    That’s a part of the bill. So much for the dead — they have paid their part of the war profits. So much for the mentally and physically wounded — they are paying now their share of the war profits. But the others paid, too — they paid with heartbreaks when they tore themselves away from their firesides and their families to don the uniform of Uncle Sam — on which a profit had been made. They paid another part in the training camps where they were regimented and drilled while others took their jobs and their places in the lives of their communities. The paid for it in the trenches where they shot and were shot; where they were hungry for days at a time; where they slept in the mud and the cold and in the rain — with the moans and shrieks of the dying for a horrible lullaby.

    But don’t forget — the soldier paid part of the dollars and cents bill too.

    Up to and including the Spanish-American War, we had a prize system, and soldiers and sailors fought for money. During the Civil War they were paid bonuses, in many instances, before they went into service. The government, or states, paid as high as $1,200 for an enlistment. In the Spanish-American War they gave prize money. When we captured any vessels, the soldiers all got their share — at least, they were supposed to. Then it was found that we could reduce the cost of wars by taking all the prize money and keeping it, but conscripting [drafting] the soldier anyway. Then soldiers couldn’t bargain for their labor, Everyone else could bargain, but the soldier couldn’t.

    Napoleon once said,

    “All men are enamored of decorations . . . they positively hunger for them.”

    So by developing the Napoleonic system — the medal business — the government learned it could get soldiers for less money, because the boys liked to be decorated. Until the Civil War there were no medals. Then the Congressional Medal of Honor was handed out. It made enlistments easier. After the Civil War no new medals were issued until the Spanish-American War.

    In the World War, we used propaganda to make the boys accept conscription. They were made to feel ashamed if they didn’t join the army.

    So vicious was this war propaganda that even God was brought into it. With few exceptions our clergymen joined in the clamor to kill, kill, kill. To kill the Germans. God is on our side . . . it is His will that the Germans be killed.

    And in Germany, the good pastors called upon the Germans to kill the allies . . . to please the same God. That was a part of the general propaganda, built up to make people war conscious and murder conscious.

    Beautiful ideals were painted for our boys who were sent out to die. This was the “war to end all wars.” This was the “war to make the world safe for democracy.” No one mentioned to them, as they marched away, that their going and their dying would mean huge war profits. No one told these American soldiers that they might be shot down by bullets made by their own brothers here. No one told them that the ships on which they were going to cross might be torpedoed by submarines built with United States patents. They were just told it was to be a “glorious adventure.”

    Thus, having stuffed patriotism down their throats, it was decided to make them help pay for the war, too. So, we gave them the large salary of $30 a month.

    All they had to do for this munificent sum was to leave their dear ones behind, give up their jobs, lie in swampy trenches, eat canned willy (when they could get it) and kill and kill and kill . . . and be killed.

    But wait!

    Half of that wage (just a little more than a riveter in a shipyard or a laborer in a munitions factory safe at home made in a day) was promptly taken from him to support his dependents, so that they would not become a charge upon his community. Then we made him pay what amounted to accident insurance — something the employer pays for in an enlightened state -and that cost him $6 a month. He had less than $9 a month left.

    Then, the most crowning insolence of all — he was virtually blackjacked into paying for his own ammunition, clothing, and food by being made to buy Liberty Bonds. Most soldiers got no money at all on pay days.

    We made them buy Liberty Bonds at $100 and then we bought them back — when they came back from the war and couldn’t find work — at $84 and $86. And the soldiers bought about $2,000,000,000 worth of these bonds!

    Yes, the soldier pays the greater part of the bill. His family pays too. They pay it in the same heart-break that he does. As he suffers, they suffer. At nights, as he lay in the trenches and watched shrapnel burst about him, they lay home in their beds and tossed sleeplessly — his father, his mother, his wife, his sisters, his brothers, his sons, and his daughters.

    When he returned home minus an eye, or minus a leg or with his mind broken, they suffered too — as much as and even sometimes more than he. Yes, and they, too, contributed their dollars to the profits of the munitions makers and bankers and shipbuilders and the manufacturers and the speculators made. They, too, bought Liberty Bonds and contributed to the profit of the bankers after the Armistice in the hocus-pocus of manipulated Liberty Bond prices.

    And even now the families of the wounded men and of the mentally broken and those who never were able to readjust themselves are still suffering and still paying.


    How To Smash This Racket!
    WELL, it’s a racket, all right.

    A few profit — and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can’t end it by disarmament conferences. You can’t eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can’t wipe it out by resolutions. It can be smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war.

    The only way to smash this racket is to conscript capital and industry and labor before the nations manhood can be conscripted. One month before the Government can conscript the young men of the nation — it must conscript capital and industry and labor. Let the officers and the directors and the high-powered executives of our armament factories and our munitions makers and our shipbuilders and our airplane builders and the manufacturers of all the other things that provide profit in war time as well as the bankers and the speculators, be conscripted — to get $30 a month, the same wage as the lads in the trenches get.

    Let the workers in these plants get the same wages — all the workers, all presidents, all executives, all directors, all managers, all bankers — yes, and all generals and all admirals and all officers and all politicians and all government office holders — everyone in the nation be restricted to a total monthly income not to exceed that paid to the soldier in the trenches!

    Let all these kings and tycoons and masters of business and all those workers in industry and all our senators and governors and majors pay half of their monthly $30 wage to their families and pay war risk insurance and buy Liberty Bonds.

    Why shouldn’t they?

    They aren’t running any risk of being killed or of having their bodies mangled or their minds shattered. They aren’t sleeping in muddy trenches. They aren’t hungry. The soldiers are!

    Give capital and industry and labor thirty days to think it over and you will find, by that time, there will be no war. That will smash the war racket — that and nothing else.

    Maybe I am a little too optimistic. Capital still has some say. So capital won’t permit the taking of the profit out of war until the people — those who do the suffering and still pay the price — make up their minds that those they elect to office shall do their bidding, and not that of the profiteers.

    Another step necessary in this fight to smash the war racket is the limited plebiscite to determine whether a war should be declared. A plebiscite not of all the voters but merely of those who would be called upon to do the fighting and dying. There wouldn’t be very much sense in having a 76-year-old president of a munitions factory or the flat-footed head of an international banking firm or the cross-eyed manager of a uniform manufacturing plant — all of whom see visions of tremendous profits in the event of war — voting on whether the nation should go to war or not. They never would be called upon to shoulder arms — to sleep in a trench and to be shot. Only those who would be called upon to risk their lives for their country should have the privilege of voting to determine whether the nation should go to war.

    There is ample precedent for restricting the voting to those affected. Many of our states have restrictions on those permitted to vote. In most, it is necessary to be able to read and write before you may vote. In some, you must own property. It would be a simple matter each year for the men coming of military age to register in their communities as they did in the draft during the World War and be examined physically. Those who could pass and who would therefore be called upon to bear arms in the event of war would be eligible to vote in a limited plebiscite. They should be the ones to have the power to decide — and not a Congress few of whose members are within the age limit and fewer still of whom are in physical condition to bear arms. Only those who must suffer should have the right to vote.

    A third step in this business of smashing the war racket is to make certain that our military forces are truly forces for defense only.

    At each session of Congress the question of further naval appropriations comes up. The swivel-chair admirals of Washington (and there are always a lot of them) are very adroit lobbyists. And they are smart. They don’t shout that “We need a lot of battleships to war on this nation or that nation.” Oh no. First of all, they let it be known that America is menaced by a great naval power. Almost any day, these admirals will tell you, the great fleet of this supposed enemy will strike suddenly and annihilate 125,000,000 people. Just like that. Then they begin to cry for a larger navy. For what? To fight the enemy? Oh my, no. Oh, no. For defense purposes only.

    Then, incidentally, they announce maneuvers in the Pacific. For defense. Uh, huh.

    The Pacific is a great big ocean. We have a tremendous coastline on the Pacific. Will the maneuvers be off the coast, two or three hundred miles? Oh, no. The maneuvers will be two thousand, yes, perhaps even thirty-five hundred miles, off the coast.

    The Japanese, a proud people, of course will be pleased beyond expression to see the united States fleet so close to Nippon’s shores. Even as pleased as would be the residents of California were they to dimly discern through the morning mist, the Japanese fleet playing at war games off Los Angeles.

    The ships of our navy, it can be seen, should be specifically limited, by law, to within 200 miles of our coastline. Had that been the law in 1898 the Maine would never have gone to Havana Harbor. She never would have been blown up. There would have been no war with Spain with its attendant loss of life. Two hundred miles is ample, in the opinion of experts, for defense purposes. Our nation cannot start an offensive war if its ships can’t go further than 200 miles from the coastline. Planes might be permitted to go as far as 500 miles from the coast for purposes of reconnaissance. And the army should never leave the territorial limits of our nation.

    To summarize: Three steps must be taken to smash the war racket.

    1.We must take the profit out of war.
    2.We must permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether or not there should be war.
    3.We must limit our military forces to home defense purposes.

    To Hell With War!
    I am not a fool as to believe that war is a thing of the past. I know the people do not want war, but there is no use in saying we cannot be pushed into another war.

    Looking back, Woodrow Wilson was re-elected president in 1916 on a platform that he had “kept us out of war” and on the implied promise that he would “keep us out of war.” Yet, five months later he asked Congress to declare war on Germany.

    In that five-month interval the people had not been asked whether they had changed their minds. The 4,000,000 young men who put on uniforms and marched or sailed away were not asked whether they wanted to go forth to suffer and die.

    Then what caused our government to change its mind so suddenly?


    An allied commission, it may be recalled, came over shortly before the war declaration and called on the President. The President summoned a group of advisers. The head of the commission spoke. Stripped of its diplomatic language, this is what he told the President and his group:

    “There is no use kidding ourselves any longer. The cause of the allies is lost. We now owe you (American bankers, American munitions makers, American manufacturers, American speculators, American exporters) five or six billion dollars.

    If we lose (and without the help of the United States we must lose) we, England, France and Italy, cannot pay back this money . . . and Germany won’t.

    So . . . ”

    Had secrecy been outlawed as far as war negotiations were concerned, and had the press been invited to be present at that conference, or had radio been available to broadcast the proceedings, America never would have entered the World War. But this conference, like all war discussions, was shrouded in utmost secrecy. When our boys were sent off to war they were told it was a “war to make the world safe for democracy” and a “war to end all wars.”

    Well, eighteen years after, the world has less of democracy than it had then. Besides, what business is it of ours whether Russia or Germany or England or France or Italy or Austria live under democracies or monarchies? Whether they are Fascists or Communists? Our problem is to preserve our own democracy.

    And very little, if anything, has been accomplished to assure us that the World War was really the war to end all wars.

    Yes, we have had disarmament conferences and limitations of arms conferences. They don’t mean a thing. One has just failed; the results of another have been nullified. We send our professional soldiers and our sailors and our politicians and our diplomats to these conferences. And what happens?

    The professional soldiers and sailors don’t want to disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot be for limitations of arms. And at all these conferences, lurking in the background but all-powerful, just the same, are the sinister agents of those who profit by war. They see to it that these conferences do not disarm or seriously limit armaments.

    The chief aim of any power at any of these conferences has not been to achieve disarmament to prevent war but rather to get more armament for itself and less for any potential foe.

    There is only one way to disarm with any semblance of practicability. That is for all nations to get together and scrap every ship, every gun, every rifle, every tank, every war plane. Even this, if it were possible, would not be enough.

    The next war, according to experts, will be fought not with battleships, not by artillery, not with rifles and not with machine guns. It will be fought with deadly chemicals and gases.

    Secretly each nation is studying and perfecting newer and ghastlier means of annihilating its foes wholesale. Yes, ships will continue to be built, for the shipbuilders must make their profits. And guns still will be manufactured and powder and rifles will be made, for the munitions makers must make their huge profits. And the soldiers, of course, must wear uniforms, for the manufacturer must make their war profits too.

    But victory or defeat will be determined by the skill and ingenuity of our scientists.

    If we put them to work making poison gas and more and more fiendish mechanical and explosive instruments of destruction, they will have no time for the constructive job of building greater prosperity for all peoples. By putting them to this useful job, we can all make more money out of peace than we can out of war — even the munitions makers.

    So…I say,





    I DON’T!!!

  5. Fight With Us


    Audio files
    More articles


    Benjamin Freedman

    Welcome to
    The French Connection
    Daryl Bradford Smith’s
    Zionist Studies Program
    We are the anti-Zionist’s “think tank.” We are an important part of the anti-Zionist’s mission to produce and disseminate ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and how Zionism policy choices are causing serious problems to the American Republic and other nations around the world.

    We do that by thinking, writing, and speaking about a broad range of Zionist issues. We are not racist, xenophobic, homophobic, or prejudiced against any race, creed, or national origin. We are prejudiced only against criminals.

    Daryl Bradford Smith does not discuss or investigate evidence related to the Holocaust. He will, however, speak about free speech issues and our basic human right to freely exchange ideas.




    Your first visit?

    To reduce the Smith Shock Syndrome,
    click here.



    An anti-semite is not someone who hates Jews; it is someone the Zionists hate.


    Do you know what Zionism is, and why so many people — including Orthodox Jews — are complaining about it?
    We have articles and interviews to help you understand it.


    “I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would RISE UP IN ARMS. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.”

    Thomas H. Moorer
    (1912 – 2004)
    US Navy & Chairman,
    Joint Chiefs of Staff during interview on
    24 August 1983.


    “The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.

    In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”

    — Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, ‘La Revue de Paris’, p.574, June 1, 1928


    “It is essential that the sufferings of Jews. . . become worse. . . this will assist in realization of our plans. . .

    I have an excellent idea. . . I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . .

    The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews.

    The anti-Semites shall be our best friends”

    — Theodor Herzl, Founder of Zionism in 1897


    “Hateful views of Jews as being subhuman did not have to be invented by Nazi theorists such as Hitler, Goebbels, Rosenberg and Streicher. This ideology was simply adapted from statements of political Zionists…”



    Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”

    — Menachem Begin – Israeli Prime Minister 1977–1983


    “They are the so-called neo-cons, or neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential newspapers….

    Seemingly, all this is good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of world power.” Uri Avnery, “The Night After,”

    Counterpunch, April 10, 2003.


    If a Gentile exposes Zionism, they are called “anti-semitic” which is nothing more than a smokescreen to hide the Zionists actions.

    But, if a Jew is the person doing the exposing, they resort to other tactics.

    First, they ignore the charges, hoping the information will not be given widespread distribution.

    If the information starts reaching too many people, they ridicule the information and the persons giving the information.

    If that doesn’t work, their next step is character assassination. If the author or speaker hasn’t been involved in sufficient scandal they are adept at fabricating scandal against the person or persons.

    If none of these are effective, they are known to resort to physical attacks.

    But, NEVER do they try to prove the information wrong.

    Jack Bernstein, (assassinated by MOSSAD)


    “Never before in the history of the United States Navy has a Navy Board of Inquiry ignored the testimony of American military eyewitnesses and taken, on faith, the word of their attackers.”

    — Captain Richard F. Kiepfer, Medical Corps, US Navy (retired), USS Liberty Survivor

    Read more…



    Audio file (13,7 MB)


    I Am Who I Say I AmI Am One Of The People

    The ground shaking radio show that will snap your neck in odd directions if you listen for a while

    The French Connection disavows any contact with Nazis, Fascists or Racists in any form.
    More than likely, all of these new groups are Government Psy-Ops.

    “We are not racist, xenophobic, homophobic, or prejudiced against any race, creed, or national origin. We are prejudiced only against criminals”

    zionism Must And Will Be Stopped, Please Help Us By Telling Others About Our Work!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s