They call this Democracy- when it’s BS!
Dictatorial EU (Evasion Union) Fears and Detests Its Citizens – 7 Strong Reasons for It
 Print Post |
Posted by Anders under English, Euromed
Summary: Many statements by European politicians and Eurocrats signify a huge fear of referendums in EU affairs – after French, Dutch and Irish nos to the EU constitution and its cheating edition, the Lisbon Treaty. Therefore the EU is now in a mess because Germany has demanded a Treaty change to extend EU powers in order to direct and control the economy in the eurozone – and probably also in all EU countries. This would be the nation states´ coup de grace by means of the politically and economically enforced totally emotional and badly supported euro. However, this change may – in particular in the Netherlands – lead to a referendum!
But politicians and Eurocrats know that their people detest them as much as they dislike their peoples – and that peoples´ disgust is increasing in step with the EU’s austerity measures and the massive Muslim immigration, which devours about 30% of the Danish and Swedish national budgets. EU politicians and eurocrats know that Europeans are becoming increasingly aware of what it means when Barroso, Sarkozy, Gordon Brown, Chancellor Merkel, etc in the EU Parliament and elsewhere talk about their new world order: their dictatorial corporate and Communist elitist one-world government – which Europeans do not want. They want to keep their nation states which the EU is doing everything possible to abolish.
But politicians and Eurocrats know that their people detest them as much as they dislike their peoples – and that peoples´ disgust is increasing in step with the EU’s austerity measures and the massive Muslim immigration, which devours about 30% of the Danish and Swedish national budgets. EU politicians and eurocrats know that Europeans are becoming increasingly aware of what it means when Barroso, Sarkozy, Gordon Brown, Chancellor Merkel, etc in the EU Parliament and elsewhere talk about their new world order: their dictatorial corporate and Communist elitist one-world government – which Europeans do not want. They want to keep their nation states which the EU is doing everything possible to abolish.
Eurocrats want to increase their amusement account, their canteen quality, their pensions and EU spending in general, why the EU Parliament and the Commission now propose an increase in the EU budget of 5.9% – while many Europeans are losing their jobs and livelihoods due to rigorous EU austerity! But the EU does not lack imagination: the EU now proposes inter alia a direct EU VAT, taxes on financial transactions and air travels to supplement the EU’s own resources for its boundless consumption – even wants a global (UN) tax to be imposed. Besides control of the finances of EU countries, the EU is now engaged in removing the influence of nation states on the EU’s day-to-day decisions – in regard to eg. trade.
All in all not so odd that EU politicians and eurocrats fear the verdict of Europeans. “Europeans are too dangerous for our Europe” as Sarkozy has said! Therefore, the EU and now the German government are preparing for civil war, as the middle class becomes proletarianized. Barroso has called the EU an “empire”. No empire has survived its peoples´ hatred and his own fear of its peoples for an unlimited period of time. The EU probably does not care. For there they know, that the EU is just a transitional stage, to give up its sovereignty to a UN world government. The EU Parliament has since 1994 been working for the establishment of a UN Parliamentary Assembly – the world parliament. Therefore the German Finance Minister proposes not a European institution but Rothschild´s IMF to monitor a European economic crisis mechanism.
All in all not so odd that EU politicians and eurocrats fear the verdict of Europeans. “Europeans are too dangerous for our Europe” as Sarkozy has said! Therefore, the EU and now the German government are preparing for civil war, as the middle class becomes proletarianized. Barroso has called the EU an “empire”. No empire has survived its peoples´ hatred and his own fear of its peoples for an unlimited period of time. The EU probably does not care. For there they know, that the EU is just a transitional stage, to give up its sovereignty to a UN world government. The EU Parliament has since 1994 been working for the establishment of a UN Parliamentary Assembly – the world parliament. Therefore the German Finance Minister proposes not a European institution but Rothschild´s IMF to monitor a European economic crisis mechanism.
The EU lost its last shimmer of democracy with the EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty: The “No”s of France, the Netherlands, and Ireland were disregarded – and through lies, intimidations and corruption a second referendum in Ireland carried the Treaty – a great relief for the EU. As Barroso put it: “It is worth looking back at the negative referenda which derailed the ratification process of the European Constitution. This told us something. It told us that European citizens were worried, about their jobs, their pensions, their education, their quality of life and their environment. And they looked to the EU for answers.” To this, Bruno Waterfield, EUObserver, remarked: “Only in the crooked world of the Evasion Union can no votes to the European Constitution be interpreted as a popular demand for “answers from the EU”. The agony and anxiety is the prospect that changing the EU treaty could lead to popular votes.All leaders are absolutely agreed on one thing: There must be no referendums. This is a terrifying possibility, a frightening nightmare scenario for politicians who have premised their austerity measures and bank bailouts on keeping the public at arm’s length. It is a real horror.
So obviously, the Illuminist (explanatory statement) eurocrats and New World Order politicians (see videos on right margin of this blog) fear the “useless European eaters”. Or rather, they detest them. As Pres. Sarkozy said in 2007, “A referendum now would bring Europe into danger. There will be no Treaty if we had a referendum . There is a cleavage between people and governments”.
BlogActiv 2. Nov. 2010: The EU Commission and Council obviously violate the Lisbon Treaty´s demand for opennenss – e.g. in budgetary planning – and intend to go on doing so – according to EU Pres. van Rompuy! Why?
I. They Fear a new referendum – knowing the EU is the project of the elite against the will of the EuropeansEU Observer 29 Oct. 2010: European leaders have given way to German demands for a change to the European treaties, but the procedure for the change and its size has been calculated explicitly to avoid the danger that it could provoke referendums in some EU states. EU prime ministers and presidents backed “a limited treaty change” to deliver tighter fiscal discipline and allow for the creation of a permanent bail-out fund.
According to diplomats, it is currently unclear whether this new mechanism would involve participation of eurozone members alone or the full 27 EU member states, including those who do not use the euro. Caught between the need for a structural change and their fear of both the activism of Karlsruhe and the growing euroscepticism of citizens, the other leaders signed off on the move only so long as the change envisaged was “the smallest possible … in order to ensure there is no possibility of referendums,” in the words of a Danish diplomat speaking to EUobserver.
Merkel: “Change is quantum leap for the Union – but no referendum”!
The method EU leaders chose to achieve the change will be via what is called the “special revision procedure,” introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, under which the treaty can be amended by the European Council alone, so long as there is unanimity and the changes do not extend the competences of the European Union (which is exactly the case !). In this way, a full Intergovernmental Conference, normally required ahead of a treaty change, was avoided. “This leaves out the Parliament and the possibility that different countries would come to the table with different things they want to add or take away from the treaty,” the Danish diplomat continued. “We had to make sure that we did not open the Pandora’s Box.” However, this unanimity is not there - will have to be be bought!!
Ms Merkel was quite clear however, that the changes will deliver a “quantum leap” for the Union in terms of economic convergence between member states. Asked about concerns in the UK and the Netherlands about a potential referendum on the treaty changes, Ms Merkel explained: “That’s why we have said ‘limited changes,’ limited to the crisis resolution mechanism that will be the object of it.” But, of course the UK has now capitulated to the EU – although outside the euro..
Deutsche Welle 29 Oct. 2010 The leaders asked Van Rompuy to prepare potential changes to the Lisbon Treaty ahead of another EU summit in December. The changes are to be agreed on by 
mid-2013, the expiration date of a 750-billion euro ($1 trillion) fund set up last May to reassure markets about Greece’s debt crisis.
mid-2013, the expiration date of a 750-billion euro ($1 trillion) fund set up last May to reassure markets about Greece’s debt crisis.
EUObserver 2 Nov. 2010: The nightmare scenario of another referendum on a change to the EU treaty in the Netherlands, five years after the country rejected the bloc’s proposed constitution, could return to haunt European leaders, with the hard-right Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) of Geert Wilders on Tuesday (2 November) announcing it is considering proposing just such a vote – days after the opposition Socialist Party also called for a referendum. The SP was one of the leaders of the successful No campaign in 2005 that defeated the EU constitution in the country.
II. The EU wants to carry on enlargement and “legalized” Muslim mass immigration – detested by most Europeans
De Morgen.Be 27 Okt. 2010: 1,3 out of 3,2 mio. (Muslim) Albanians have applied for passports for the EU.
De Morgen.Be 27 Okt. 2010: 1,3 out of 3,2 mio. (Muslim) Albanians have applied for passports for the EU.EU Parliament 7 Oct. 2010 MEPs have welcomed the outcome of a plenary vote which grants visa-free travel to the EU’s Schengen zone for nationals of Albania and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The S&D group said the vote in the mini Brussels plenary brings closer the prospect of EU membership for (Muslim) Albania and Bosnia-Herzegovina. One of its most senior MEPs, Sarah Ludford, said, “It would be a betrayal of a solemn ‘road map’ promise of long standing for any member state now to block it.” Germany welcomes them!
Comment: Also, the EU is setting up recruitment offices in Africa to invite 56 mio Africans + their families into the EU by 2050 – and has granted its Euromediterranean Muslim “partner” citizens the EU´s 4 freedoms in return for democratic and economic progress. Morocco has obtained this status, although it is not at all democratic but suppresses the wish for independence of West Sahara, taken over from Spain in 1975.
Of course, our MSM have “forgotten” to inform us about this disastrous increase in EU immigration and islamisation – for EU politicians have publicly leaked that they want this Muslim immigration to destroy and radically change our old societies. The EU bewails a lack of freedom of the media in these Western Balkan countries – and is itself equally short of free media in the EU !!
Comment: Also, the EU is setting up recruitment offices in Africa to invite 56 mio Africans + their families into the EU by 2050 – and has granted its Euromediterranean Muslim “partner” citizens the EU´s 4 freedoms in return for democratic and economic progress. Morocco has obtained this status, although it is not at all democratic but suppresses the wish for independence of West Sahara, taken over from Spain in 1975.
Of course, our MSM have “forgotten” to inform us about this disastrous increase in EU immigration and islamisation – for EU politicians have publicly leaked that they want this Muslim immigration to destroy and radically change our old societies. The EU bewails a lack of freedom of the media in these Western Balkan countries – and is itself equally short of free media in the EU !!
III. The EU is just an intermediary step on the way to world government – and the Europeans just do not want thatSince 1994 the EU Parliament has worked hard to have a UN Parliamentary Assembly – the one world government
EU Pres. van Rompuy, 29 Oct. 2010: On the G20 agenda is the IMF reform. European countries make a major effort in favour of emerging countries, in order to strengthen global governance.
Right:This Chaillot Paper by the EU Institute for Security Studies suggests that the next frontier in the future’s improvement process is global governance. This paper foresees that a global ‘constitutional moment’ may appear at the beginning of the 2010s.”
EU Press Release 29 Oct. 2010 José Barroso: “We need to have in mind the global context, because the long-term growth of our economy depends also on the health of the global environment. That is why I am glad that the President of the European Council and I, representing the European Union, have received a strong mandate to promote the global governance reforms with our partners in the G20” – the emerging New World Order (Gordon Brown) and the beginning of world governance (EU Pres. van Rompuy).
Earth Times 6 Nov. 2010: German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble on Saturday fleshed out proposals for a two-tier eurozone crisis mechanism – involving private investors but controlled by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) rather than a European institution, similar to the rescue package devised in response to the Greek debt crisis.
Earth Times 6 Nov. 2010: German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble on Saturday fleshed out proposals for a two-tier eurozone crisis mechanism – involving private investors but controlled by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) rather than a European institution, similar to the rescue package devised in response to the Greek debt crisis.
IV. The EU officials and politicians know the Europeans disgust them
Prison Planet 20 Oct. 2010: Nigel Farage in the EU Parliament to José Barroso, Video: “We have not voted for you and we cannot remove you. Let´s have a new Treaty, and let´s put it to a referendum” A clearly infuriated Barroso then only made Farage’s case stronger by reminding him that he was not elected by the people, but rather chosen to head the EC in a “secret” parliament vote – and that Farage belongs to the Parliament.
V. The EU wants to tax Europeans directly and indirectly – even at a global level
V. The EU wants to tax Europeans directly and indirectly – even at a global level
EUObserver 21 Oct. 2010: MEPs have voted by a vast majority to increase next year’s EU budget by 5.9 percent, a move they define as “responsible” despite government spending cuts in member states. The 2011 EU budget proposed by MEPs would include €142.65 billion in commitments and €130.14 billion in payments. Sidonia Jedrzejewska said the EU was being asked to do more under the Lisbon Treaty. A number of member states have already come out against the commission’s proposed list of potential EU self-funding mechanisms that includes an EU tax on aviation and an EU sales tax. Paris declared it was “utterly inappropriate,” London said that it would refuse to consider any new tax, and Berlin similarly refused.
EurActiv Brussels 20 Oct. 2010: The the Commission proposes an EU Value Added Tax (VAT). Currently Brussels applies a levy on national VATs, which brings in something like €14 billion per year. This would bring to the EU coffers something like €41 billion a year. Fortunately, Chancellor Merkel of Germany says NEIN!
EU Press Release 20 Oct. 2010. Barroso: The EU should remain committed to push for a financial transaction tax at global level and an equitable contribution at EU level, such as a financial activities tax.
RTE News 19 Oct. 2010: The European Commission is trying to find new sources of revenue for the next European Union budget. The EU’s executive arm unveiled proposals to collect funds, including taking a share of a financial transaction tax, the auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances or an EU charge related to air transport.
EU Press Release 20 Oct. 2010. Barroso: The EU should remain committed to push for a financial transaction tax at global level and an equitable contribution at EU level, such as a financial activities tax.
RTE News 19 Oct. 2010: The European Commission is trying to find new sources of revenue for the next European Union budget. The EU’s executive arm unveiled proposals to collect funds, including taking a share of a financial transaction tax, the auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances or an EU charge related to air transport.
VI. The EU wants to enjoy life at the cost of the Europeans without having to bother about European´s indignation and democracyThe Mail 22 Oct. 2010: David Cameron was last night under mounting pressure to block a huge rise in the EU budget – as it emerged it will fund a 90 per cent increase in staff jollies for Brussels bureaucrats, as well as a big increase in the subsidies for their canteens and new cash to promote the EU. .
VII. The EU wants to grasp all power and gives democracy a damnn
The EU was founded by the OSS and its successor, the CIA, with Rockefeller/Ford funding, based on Nazi money, and has – according to USSR dissident, Vladimir Bukovsky – all the characteristics of the Soviet union, so he called it the EUSSR, which explains why the EU is so eager to promulgate Maoist Maurice Strong´s and ex-USSR President, Michael Gorbachev´s Agenda 21.
European Parliament 20 Oct. 2010: MEPs call for a strong pan-European and global regulatory and supervisory system which leaves no financial market, instrument or institution off the record book. The resolution on economic governance broadly backs the Commission’s legislative proposals, but goes further: i.a. European monetary fund, so as to make the current European Financial Stability Facility permanent, and European bonds.
EurActiv 5 Nov. 2010: A European Commission proposal to reduce member states’ influence on the EU’s daily decision-making is facing resistance from a group of countries led by Germany and the UK, who are insisting on keeping a say on trade policy.
EurActiv 5 Nov. 2010: A European Commission proposal to reduce member states’ influence on the EU’s daily decision-making is facing resistance from a group of countries led by Germany and the UK, who are insisting on keeping a say on trade policy.
Comment
The EU is a colossus on feet of clay. It is preparing its own dissolution to become a province or region under the corporate world government Ltd.– and it is eroding its inner stability through unlimited Muslim immigration, which devours 30% of Denmark´s and Sweden´s national budgets. This culture is incompatible with the secular EU and it concepts of communist Human Rights and bureaucratic legislation, for Allah has given all necessary laws, the EU thus doing sheer blasphemy! The EU is creating a tremendous lack of cohesion, more and more anarchy with incompatible parallel societies – civil wars are being seen on the horizon – even by the EU itself (the Eurogendfor, EUFOR with Lisbon Treaty permission to shoot into demonstrations) and the German government. An empire that fears and hates its own populations can only survive, if it has thoroughly brainwashed them – which the EU system has been doing for years and here – or through suppression, which can go on for a while, but not eternally. No empire – and Barroso has declared the EU to be an empire – in history has survived for ever.
As long as people love their slavery (their wellfare states are now being dismantled) they will stay peaceful. But what if on a large scale they lose their homes and livelihoods, which the EU is now seeing through by its increasing austerity measures? At least it is obvious that the EU is preparing for what they will then do.
Well, what should poor EU do? Dissolve as soon as possible and let each country cope with its own problems (interest adjustment, devaluation), and let independent politicians find appropriate solutions in informal frameworks - without aiming at world government, which would only multiply EU problems
The EU is a colossus on feet of clay. It is preparing its own dissolution to become a province or region under the corporate world government Ltd.– and it is eroding its inner stability through unlimited Muslim immigration, which devours 30% of Denmark´s and Sweden´s national budgets. This culture is incompatible with the secular EU and it concepts of communist Human Rights and bureaucratic legislation, for Allah has given all necessary laws, the EU thus doing sheer blasphemy! The EU is creating a tremendous lack of cohesion, more and more anarchy with incompatible parallel societies – civil wars are being seen on the horizon – even by the EU itself (the Eurogendfor, EUFOR with Lisbon Treaty permission to shoot into demonstrations) and the German government. An empire that fears and hates its own populations can only survive, if it has thoroughly brainwashed them – which the EU system has been doing for years and here – or through suppression, which can go on for a while, but not eternally. No empire – and Barroso has declared the EU to be an empire – in history has survived for ever.
As long as people love their slavery (their wellfare states are now being dismantled) they will stay peaceful. But what if on a large scale they lose their homes and livelihoods, which the EU is now seeing through by its increasing austerity measures? At least it is obvious that the EU is preparing for what they will then do.
Well, what should poor EU do? Dissolve as soon as possible and let each country cope with its own problems (interest adjustment, devaluation), and let independent politicians find appropriate solutions in informal frameworks - without aiming at world government, which would only multiply EU problems
<!– –>
The Technological Revolution, especially the internet, has fostered an Information Revolution which has fed a global political awakening.
Simultaneously, the Technological Revolution has led to free humanity being faced with the dominating threat of a truly global elite, who have at their hands the technology to impose a truly global system of control: a global scientific dictatorship increasingly having the ability to control the very biology and psychology of the individual .
In 1932, Aldous Huxley wrote his “Brave New World,” in which he looked at the emergence of the scientific dictatorships of the future. In his 1958 essay, “Brave New World Revisited,” Huxley examined how far the world had come in that short period since his book was published, and where the world was heading. Huxley wrote that: In economics, the equivalent of a beautifully composed work of art is the smoothly running factory in which the workers are perfectly adjusted to the machines. Huxley explained that, “The twenty-first century, I suppose, will be the era of World Controllers, the scientific caste system and Brave New World.”
In a 1962 speech at UC Berkeley, Huxley spoke primarily of the ‘Ultimate Revolution’ that focuses on ‘behavioural controls’ of people: If you are going to control any population for any length of time, you must bring in an element of of getting people to consent to what is happening to them. We are in process of developing a whole series of techniques, which will enable the controlling oligarchy – who have always existed and will presumably always exist – to get people to love their servitude…
I think there are going to be scientific dictatorships in many parts of the world. If you can get people to consent to the state of servitude – then you are likely to have a much more stable, a much more lasting society; much more easily controllable society than you would if you were relying wholly on clubs, and firing squads and concentration camps.
In 1952, Bertrand Russell wrote the book, “The Impact of Science on Society. Russell explained that: I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the Press, the cinema and the radio
What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion. I see no reason why a scientific dictatorship’ should be unstable. After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history have had a large class of play an increasing part. slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as it can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.
Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. Russell later proclaimed in his book that, “a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government and here (established 2009 according to EU Pres. van Rompuy).
In 1961, President Eisenhower warned of the dangers to democracy posed by the military-industrial complex: the interconnected web of industry, the military, and politics creating the conditions for constant war. He also warned that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote about “the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society,” in the “technetronic revolution”; explaining: Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control.
Many sciences and large social movements are directed by the same foundations and money that financed the eugenics movement in the early 20th century. The Rockefeller Foundations, Ford, Carnegie, Mellon, Harriman, and Morgan money that flowed into eugenics led directly to ‘scientific racism,’ and ultimately the Holocaust in World War II. Following the Holocaust, Hitler had discredited the eugenics movement he admired so much in America. So the movement branched off into forming several other social engineering projects: population control, genetics, and environmentalism, and here and here and here – as well as mental hygiene.
Major environmental and conservation organizations were founded with Rockefeller and Ford Foundation money which then continued to be central sources of funding to this day; while the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) was founded in 1961 by Sir Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley’s brother, who was also the President of the British Eugenics Society. Sir Julian Huxley also happened to be the first Director-General of the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). In 1946, Huxley wrote a paper titled, “UNESCO: It’s Purpose and its Philosophy.” In it, he wrote that the general focus of UNESCO is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available….It is essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for, as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics. Thus low-grade mental defectives cannot be offered equality of educational opportunity, nor are the insane equal with the sane before the law or in respect of most freedoms. Many of these “genetic inequalities” revolve around the idea of intellectual superiority.” It just so happens that elites who propagate this ideology, also happen to view the masses as intellectually inferior; thus, there can be no social equality in a world with a technological intellectual elite. Eugenics is about the social organization and control of humanity. Ultimately, eugenics is about the engineering of inequality. In genetics, elites found a way to take discrimination down to the DNA.
BERTRAND ANOTHER FABIAN
Russell was a member of the Fabian Society, where he met the pacifist, Clifford Allen. Soon after the outbreak of the First World War Russell, Allen and Fenner Brockway formed the the No-Conscription Fellowship (NCF), an organisation that planned to campaign against the introduction of conscription.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TUrussell.htm
Fabian Society – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
. for the eugenics policy that led to the stolen generations scandal. Plan for Britain: A Collection…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/fabian_society
Francis Galton and the Eugenics Society
In 1905, he wrote about the three stages of eugenics ã first an academic matter, . (The Fabian Society…
http://www.eugenics-watch.com/roots/chap02.html
Fabian GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
TODAYS GEN SEC FABIANS ASKED FOR HIS OPINION ON MAKING FOLK WORK FOR BENEFITS.
SUNDAR A GUEST OF LBC RADIO’S SUNDAY SHOW……..A COMMIE ASKED WHAT HE THINK’S………………..
BY A SUPPOSED RIGHT WINGER ANDREW PEARCE……..COMES OVER MORE OF A LEFT WING PLACEMAN.
EUSSR WILL GIVE FREE PASSES TO AL-QAEDA
Evan F. Kohlmann, author of Al-Qaeda’s Jihad in Europe: The Afghan-Bosnian Network, argues that the “key to understanding Al Qaida’s European cells lies in the Bosnian war of the 1990s. Using the Bosnian war as their cover, Afghan-trained Islamic militants loyal to Osama bin Laden convened in the Balkans in 1992 to establish a European domestic terrorist infrastructure in order to plot their violent strikes against the United States. As the West and the United Nations looked on with disapproval, the fanatic foreign ‘mujahideen’, or holy warriors, wreaked havoc across southern Europe, taking particular aim at UN peacekeepers and even openly fighting with Bosnian Muslims at times. Middle Eastern religious and charitable organizations, largely based in and funded from the Arabian Gulf, were responsible for bankrolling this effort, and providing travel documentation for would-be mujahideen recruits.” Kohlmann adds that “many of the cell members – responsible for some of the most notorious terrorist attacks of the past decade – spent their formative years waging jihad in the unlikely Muslim land of Bosnia.”
Therefore, it is safe to say that the birth of al-Qaeda as a force on the world stage can be traced directly back to 1992, when the Bosnian Muslim government of Alija Izetbegovic issued a passport in the Vienna embassy to Osama bin Laden. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2001 that “for the past 10 years, the most senior leaders of al Qaeda have visited the Balkans, including bin Laden himself on three occasions between 1994 and 1996. The Egyptian surgeon turned terrorist leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri has operated terrorist training camps, weapons of mass destruction factories and money-laundering and drug-trading networks throughout Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Turkey and Bosnia. This has gone on for a decade. Many recruits to the Balkan wars came originally from Chechnya, a jihad in which Al Qaeda has also played a part.”
THE BOSNIA/911 CONNECTION
An AP article of 2002 entitled, “U.N.Lawyer Turns Over Hijacker Info,” reported that “the chief U.N war crimes prosecutor has turned over information about one of the Sept. 11 hijackers to the United States, France and the Netherlands, the U.N. spokesman said Wednesday…The war crimes prosecutor, Carla Del Ponte, said last October that information concerning people with connections to terrorist groups, primarily in Bosnia, was provided to Pierre Prosper, the U.S. ambassador at large for war crimes.
“On Wednesday, [UN Spokesman] Eckhard confirmed for the first time that the information included material related to ‘one of the named terrorists said to have been on one of the hijacked aircraft’ on Sept. 11. Eckhard refused to name the hijacker but said the information was also shared with the French and Dutch governments.”
The report further states that “following the terrorist attacks on the United States, Del Ponte was approached by the U.S. Embassy in The Hague, Netherlands and asked for information in identifying those responsible, Eckhard said. The office of the prosecutor did in fact have some information in relation to one of the named terrorists said to have been on one of the hijacked aircraft, he said. An electronic version of some of the information was then given to Prosper as well as French and Dutch officials, Eckhard said.
“Florence Hartmann, the spokeswoman for Del Ponte, said U.N. investigators may have had information about some Muslim fighters who stayed on in Bosnia after the civil war ended in 1995.”
Moreover, Gregory R. Copley, editor of Defense & Foreign Affairs, writes: “The Islamist-dominated Government of Bosnia & Herzegovina (B-H) is proposing as its new Ambassador to the United States a woman who was one of the founders of the radical Islamist Muslim SDA Party (Party of Democratic Action [Stranka Demokratske Akcije]), which has had, since its foundation, strong links with al-Qaida and a variety of other Islamist terrorist organizations, and to the intelligence and terrorist-training arms of the Iranian Government.”
In his commentary, “We bombed the wrong side?” former Canadian UNPROFOR Commander Lewis MacKenzie wrote, “The Kosovo-Albanians have played us like a Stradivarius. We have subsidized and indirectly supported their violent campaign for an ethnically pure and independent Kosovo. We have never blamed them for being the perpetrators of the violence in the early ’90s and we continue to portray them as the designated victim today in spite of evidence to the contrary. When they achieve independence with the help of our tax dollars combined with those of bin Laden and al-Qaeda, just consider the message of encouragement this sends to other terrorist-supported independence movements around the world.”
I repeat these words of General MacKenzie: “Just consider the message of encouragement this sends to other terrorist-supported independence movements around the world.” (My emphasis)
WE HAD HIM!
In his book, Dereliction of Duty, Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson, chief military aide to President Clinton writes: “The White House Situation Room was buzzing. It was fall 1998 and the National Security Council (NSC) and the ‘intelligence community’ were tracking the wehereabout of Osama bin Laden, the shadowy matermind of terrorist attacks on Americn targets overseas. ‘They successfully triangulated his location,’ yelled a ‘Sit Room’ watch stand. ‘We’ve got him.’ Beneath the West Wing of the White House, behind a vaulted steel door, the Sit Room staff sprang into action. The watch officer notified National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, ‘Sir, we’ve located bin Laden. We have a two-hour window to strike’. Characteristic of the Clinton administration, the weapons of choice would be Tomahawk missiles. After several attempts to first locate President Clinton to receive permission to get Osama bin Laden, Presindent Clinton was nowhere to be found. When the President finally accepted Berger’s call, there was discussion, there were pauses — and no decision. ‘We studied the issue until it was too late — the window of opportunity closed’.”
On 11 March 2004, 190 people were killed at the Madrid Train Station. One of the main terrorists was born in Bosnia yet very little was made of this important connection. However, whenever or if ever information is uncovered of a possible connection of the London terrorists to Bosnia, it will be played down as was the Bosnia connection to the Madrid bombing. It wouldn’t be prudent.
Posted by Robert on July 9, 2005 1:39 PM
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/11/twenty-nine-wars-against-europe.html
Wednesday, November 03, 2010Twenty-Nine Wars Against Europe
In the video below — recorded during last Saturday’s rally for free speech in Amsterdam — the German journalist Michael Mannheimer talks about the history of Islam, describing its bloody history of aggression and conquest in Europe. One of the interesting facts he mentions is that there were twenty-nine wars waged by Islam against Europe in the space of less than five hundred years:
The rest of Michael Mannheimer’s speech may be found in Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4.
Comment
sheik yer’mami said… 1 Its worse, far worse than that.
A quick look into The History of Jihad against the Italians in Rome and Sicily (812 -1571) shows you clearly that the whole of Europe was constantly under attack for more than thousand years. Even Rome was ransacked sometime in the 8th century, and the ongoing raids, occupation and plunder over all is beyond anything imaginable. Why isn’t this taught in our schools?
http://www.historyofjihad.org/italy.html?bl=readerschoice
11/03/2010 7:44 PM