COMMUNIST Mandelson, an oligarch and a £500m deal over dinner that cost 300 British jobs

Mandelson, an oligarch and a £500m deal over dinner that cost 300 British jobs

By Richard Pendlebury

Last updated at 10:50 AM on 22nd May 2010

Comments (115) WHY NOT BEFORE THE ELECTION- SPOIL THE PLANS WOULD IT?

Damning questions about Lord Mandelson’s role in a controversial Russian oligarch’s £500million deal which undermined British manufacturing jobs are raised today.
The former Business Secretary was a ‘valuable extra’ as a dinner guest as billionaire Oleg Deripaska entertained American aluminium executives in Moscow.
The meeting, also attended by British-born financier Nat Rothschild, resulted in a deal to sell two of Deripaska’s giant Russian-based RUSAL factories to a U.S. firm, Alcoa.
Lord Mandelson – who was the EU Trade Commissioner – was in a position to allay ‘concerns’ over tariffs on imports from Eastern Europe at the meeting in 2005

But the 2005 agreement had grave consequences for hundreds of British jobs.
Mandelson – who was the EU Trade Commissioner – was in a position to allay ‘concerns’ over tariffs on imports from Eastern Europe.
Indeed, over the following three years, they were slashed.
This prompted the dumping of cheap aluminium on the European market, forcing at least four British factories to the wall.
Within a year of the Russian deal, Alcoa closed its South Wales aluminium rolling plant with the loss of 300 jobs.
Another Welsh plant at Rogerstone, which used to be the third largest in Europe, shut two years ago with another 400 jobs lost. Plants at Falkirk and Glasgow were also casualties.
Questions were being asked last night about what exactly Mandelson told the Americans and Russians about EU tariffs.

Dining partners: Billionaire Oleg Deripaska and financier Nat Rothschild met with Lord Mandelson at a Moscow dinner

In the past, he has denied ever talking to Deripaska about aluminium or even meeting Deripaska before 2006. His presence at the private dinner has been confirmed to the Mail by eyewitness sources linked to both Alcoa and Rusal.

Russian sources said he had been flown from Switzerland to Moscow in a private jet belonging to Deripaska’s close adviser. Rothschild and Mandelson have been friends for years.
The trip was ‘unplanned’ and made in such haste that Mandelson had no valid visa.
A source close to Rusal said that it needed the intervention of the company’s head of security, a former senior KGB officer, to secure his entry into Russia.
‘It was a big headache,’ said the source last night. ‘But Peter Mandelson’s presence at that dinner was a very valuable extra for Deripaska.’
A source close to Alcoa said: ‘We certainly didn’t expect Mandelson at the dinner, and assumed it would just be folks from Rusal and Alcoa.

‘Nat has known Oleg a long time, and he played match-maker.’
Mandelson was reported to be back in Switzerland, as a guest of Nat Rothschild, last night.
A spokesman for Lord Mandelson declined to comment on the circumstances of his attendance at the dinner.

But he stated: ‘There was no personal intervention by Lord Mandelson in his capacity as Trade Commissioner in favor of Russian aluminum company Rusal.’
Last night a senior spokesman for the EU said: ‘All (tariff) decisions are taken in full transparency.’
But he added: ‘I am totally unaware of this meeting. I suggest your first port of call should be Lord Mandelson himself.’

SPECIAL INVESTIGATION by Richard Pendlebury and Neil BarnettSunday was never the busiest night at Cantinetta Antinori, a fashionable Tuscan restaurant in Moscow. But this one crackled with the electricity that only powerful tycoons and a £500 million deal on the table can generate.
Holding court in a private room upstairs was Oleg Deripaska, controversial oligarch owner of Russia’s giant aluminium producer, Rusal.
He had only just returned to Moscow from the World Economic Forum in Davos. And, according to sources, his dinner had hardly begun when two more people appeared, hotfoot from Switzerland.
Lord Mandelson had wanted to keep his dinner with Deripaska a secret

One of the new arrivals was financier Nat Rothschild, scion of the British banking dynasty and ultra-loyal special adviser to Deripaska.
Rusal executives will tell you that Rothschild liked nothing more than to please his billionaire patron.
And to that end Rothschild had brought with him a ‘surprise’ VIP guest; none other than the European Union’s Trade Commissioner, Peter Mandelson.

Until now, the soiree had been viewed as yet another example of Mandelson’s fatal fascination for the company and lifestyle of the super-rich
By bringing his friend halfway across Europe in his own private jet – and getting him into Russia without a valid visa in his passport – young Rothschild had pulled a very unexpected and also rather useful rabbit out of his hat. How useful we can explain here for the first time.
The bare fact that Mandelson had dinner with Deripaska in Moscow on that Sunday evening in January 2005 was first made public 18 months ago. He had wanted it kept secret.
Until now, the soiree had been viewed, as with similar meals, as yet another example of Mandelson’s fatal fascination for the company and lifestyle of the super-rich; an attraction which in the past has led him into errors of judgment that twice forced him to resign from British ministerial posts.
But we can now reveal that there was much more at stake in the Cantinetta Antinori that night than the chance for Mandelson to break ciabatta with Deripaska.
So important was it that Rothschild was prepared to cause what one former Rusal executive described to the Mail as a ‘serious headache’ by engineering Mandelson’s visa-less arrival to Moscow.
According to the same source, that headache was cured only by Rusal’s head of security, a former senior KGB officer, pulling strings to get Mandelson through passport control.
Why the extraordinary efforts? Deripaska was dining with two of his closest cronies; Gulzhan Moldazhanova, female chief executive of his Basic Element holding company and his Canadian friend and business partner, the gold magnate Peter Munk.
But they were not the only people at that table that night. Eating with them were three senior executives from the American aluminium giant Alcoa.

Alain Belda, chairman of Alcoa, was also present at the meeting

The presence of Alcoa chairman Alain Belda, executive vice-president Barbara Jeremiah and head of communications Jake Siewert, a former Press Secretary to President Clinton (and now an adviser at the U.S. Treasury) is enough to explain the real significance of Rothschild and Mandelson’s helter-skelter trip across Europe.
Alcoa was about to sign a deal to pay £250 million in cash for Rusal’s two Russian aluminium plants, with a similar sum to be invested in them afterwards.
The metals industry has never had a squeaky clean reputation. But this deal now looks particularly grubby.
On one side of the table that night in Moscow sat Deripaska, a man who is denied entry to the United States for reasons officially unexplained but which might have something to do with the alleged involvement of the mafia in Rusal and its victory in the bloody ‘war’ to gain control of the Russian aluminium industry in the 1990s.
On the other was Alcoa, the world’s biggest aluminium producer. It is currently under investigation by the U.S.Department of Justice, for alleged bribery and corruption in the Middle East.
The Alcoa agent who is central to this inquiry is one Victor Dahdaleh. A Canadian- Jordanian international business fixer with a home in London Dahdaleh is, according to a friend who spoke to the Mail, worth ‘about £8-9 billion’. Mr Dahdaleh has denied any wrongdoing.
The 2005 deal, between two firms from the opposing Cold War superpowers, was unprecedented. Under Rusal ownership, the plants were working at only 30 per cent capacity, supplying the ‘saturated’ Russian market, a former executive told the Mail.

In short, it is very hard to believe that by being there Mandelson had not done Deripaska an enormous business favour
Under the Americans, the aluminium products would be exported around the world, including Europe. But another source said ‘there were concerns’ from Alcoa about the level of import tariffs levied by the EU on Russian aluminium.
Alcoa needed the tariff rates to go down – as they subsequently did – or even be abolished completely – as happened.
The same man who was a friend of both Deripaska and Victor Dahdaleh, the Alcoa agent under scrutiny.
As EU trade supremo, Peter Mandelson, president of think-tank Policy Network, to which Dahdaleh donated £15,000 only months later, was a very welcome guest at the ‘close of deal’ dinner that night in Moscow.
By his presence, Mandelson could, at the very least, bless the £500 million union of the metals giants. It also signalled that he was well disposed to their efforts, which were projected to make some £30 million annual profit under the Americans.
In short, it is very hard to believe that by being there Mandelson had not done Deripaska an enormous business favour. Certainly, the Mail has been told, the Americans did not expect him to be there. It is hard to believe that tariffs were not discussed.
Whose interests were Peter Mandelson representing that night? Neither of the companies at the table that night was EU-owned.
One analyst even claims that the deal harmed European industry interests. Last night, a senior EU spokesman said he was ‘totally unaware’ of the meeting.
Why, then, was Mandelson there at all?
It was an infamous holiday on Corfu in the summer of 2008 that first drew public attention to the links between Mandelson and the Russian oligarch.
Former Shadow Chancellor George Osborne also enjoyed the hospitality of Deripaska

The Rothschild family’s holiday villa is on the island, and Deripaska’s super-yacht was moored offshore. That August, Mandelson and the then Shadow Chancellor George Osborne enjoyed the hospitality of both.
The luxury jaunt had a nasty aftermath, however. Osborne and Mandelson – who had just left Brussels to become Gordon Brown’s Business Secretary – began briefing against each other about what had been said or done during the vacation.
Amid the claim and counter-claim, it became clear that the Mandelson-Deripaska association predated Corfu by several years.
But Mandelson did not want the world to know.
His EU spokesman had first stated that the two men met ‘at a few social gatherings in 2006 and 2007’, but had never discussed aluminium. This was not true and, under pressure, Mandelson soon had to admit he first met the Russian in 2004 ‘to the best of my recollection’.
Certainly, the pair were seen together in Moscow in October 2004, just after Mandelson had been appointed EU Trade Commissioner but before he’d taken up the post.
He officially entered office as EU Trade Commissioner on November 22, 2004. And EU records show that on November 23 his department began a review of the anti-dumping tariff imposed by the EU on Russian rolled aluminium imports – of the type which was being produced at the two plants Deripaska’s Rusal was in the process of trying to sell to Alcoa.

An understanding between the two firms had been struck the previous May. But the sale had been delayed, one of the main reasons being the Russian government’s concern over plants that supplied the local defence industry being sold to its former Cold War foe.
Those worries were allayed by the beginning of 2005 and in late January a ‘big team’ of Alcoa executives flew from its Pittsburgh headquarters to look over the plants and close the historic deal.
‘It was the first time American and Russian companies have done a deal like this,’ one former Rusal executive told the Mail. ‘For Alcoa, it was a very attractive proposition.’

The Cantinetta Antinori dinner which followed threw a fascinating light on the dynamics in the relationship between Deripaska, Rothschild and Mandelson.

‘It was the first time American and Russian companies have done a deal like this. For Alcoa, it was a very attractive proposition’
‘The dinner was simply supposed to be a meeting of Rusal executives and their counterparts at Alcoa,’ says the former Rusal executive. ‘ Nat Rothschild bringing the EU Trade Commissioner to the table was a very valuable extra for Deripaska.
‘Mandelson’s sudden arrival was one of the games Rothschild played to impress Deripaska and keep him close.

‘It was all about Nat. You have to see the event through the prism of Nat. Rusal was full of young, ambitious Russians and they did not like Nat taking all the glory. But Nat was literally dictating the colour of the loo paper at Rusal.’
So not everyone was happy to see the British pair arrive. According to sources, there was irritation that the Rusal CEO Alexander Bulygin left the dinner only a few minutes after Rothschild and Deripaska arrived.
Why? ‘Alexander did not like Rothschild,’ explained a former colleague. ‘Once Nat and Mandelson started entertaining the Alcoa people with jokes and small talk, he’d had enough.’
Left at the table was the complex Deripaska network of money and influence.
As we have mentioned, there was Peter Munk, owner of Barrick Gold, the world’s largest gold producer.
Munk also sat on Rusal’s international advisory board. Nat Rothschild sat on the equivalent board at Barrick Gold and Munk has reportedly invested heavily in Nat’s Atticus hedge fund.
Deripaska, Munk and Rothschild were also co-developing Porto Montenegro, a resort for the super-rich near the town of Tivat in the former Yugoslav republic of Montenegro. Deripaska was the largest private employer in Montenegro having snapped up a state-owned aluminium company at a knockdown price.
And, in early 2008, Mandelson would be instrumental in securing a bilateral EU trade agreement with, yes, Montenegro, whose economic progress he described as ‘remarkable’.
Some nexus. On January 31, 2005, fewer than 24 hours after the Moscow dinner attended by Mandelson, the Rusal-Alcoa deal was closed and triumphant press releases sent out.
That night, Rusal and Alcoa executives went off to dine at the Cafe Pushkin, another of Moscow’s high- end restaurants where Deripaska and Mandelson are known to have met in 2004.
This time Mandelson was not present, according to one ex-Rusal executive. The Rothschild-choreographed favour had been done and the Trade Commissioner’s use to Deripaska was at an end, for the moment.
But over the next four years his department in Brussels was to make a series of decisions on tariffs which had huge benefits for those who attended the Cantinetta Antinori dinner.
In December 2005, the tariff on cheap Russian rolled aluminium imports was cancelled, to the benefit of Alcoa’s newly acquired fabricating plants.
In May 2007, the EU Trade Commission under Mandelson lowered the duty on imports of unwrought aluminium (the metal in its basic cast form) from 7.5 per cent to 6 per cent, which benefitted Rusal.
Then, in January last year, the EU quietly gave Russia a 3.5 per cent discount on the import duty for rolled aluminium products. Mandelson had returned to Westminster three months before, but the tariff reduction can be traced back to his time in power in Brussels.
A report last year in a specialist metal industry journal set out just how beneficial this was to Alcoa. It said: ‘In Europe, the company benefits from a preferential import duty introduced on January 1 for rolled aluminium from Russia.
‘Import duty on aluminium flat-rolled products is 7.5 per cent, but Russian imports are taxed at 4.5 per cent. Together with the effect of the weak rouble, Russian rolling mills have a €300-€430 (£260-£373)/tonne advantage.’

An expert on the world aluminium market told the Mail: ‘I don’t know why or how Russia was granted that tariff reduction. It surprises me. Who benefits? Only Alcoa, because of the two plants bought from Rusal.’
He added: ‘This is undermining the position of EU and British producers. Rogerstone in Wales was the third-largest plant in Europe, and it closed at the end of 2008 because the EU has overcapacity for these products.
Falkirk and Glasgow have also closed because of the high cost of primary metal and the lower cost of rolled products from Eastern Europe.
The discount undermines the position of the remaining producers, no one has considered them in drafting this measure.”
Indeed, Rogerstone, which produced wings for the Supermarine Spitfire during World War II, closed for good last year, after 200 years of operations on site. Alcoa’s own Welsh rolling mill, at Waunarlwydd, near Swansea, was closed with the loss of 300 jobs in 2006.
Two years ago, Mandelson said of Deripaska: ‘All I would say about that is that he has never asked for any favours, I have never given him any favours.’
A senior business figure who knows some of the parties present that night disputes that the relationship is without reward: ‘I do not think there is some secret bank account where he has millions of pounds of under the table payments stashed away,’ he said.
‘But the people Mandelson seeks to mix with are able to equip the lifestyle he loves but cannot independently afford. They have the private jets, villas and yachts which they are prepared to put at his disposal.’
There is no evidence that Mandelson orchestrated these tariff reductions specifically to help his Russian friends, but he certainly has many questions to answer.
Once again, his actions have brought his public offices and personal integrity into disrepute and exposed him to accusations of conflict of interest.
By any standard, the desperate race to attend the Cantinetta Antinori dinner was another gross error of judgment.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280326/Mandelson-Russian-oligarch-friend-500m-deal-dinner.html#ixzz0oxIL4x30

SCREWED AGAIN!!

CONCLUSION AFTER READING REPLIES BRITS GET WHAT THEY DESERVE!

We DON’T need this lot in any more!
We NOW have Two Party’s that put BRITAIN FIRST!!
THINK BRITISH!!
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!! and OUR UK!!
– J.Sackless, Newcastle UK, 22/5/2010 6:58

A TRAITOR QUEEN….AND A CON TRICK OF AN ELECTION! GOD CURSE ALL TRAITORS!

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280326/Mandelson-Russian-oligarch-friend-500m-deal-dinner.html#ixzz0oxKJK5Oz

FABIAN COMMIES IN WESTMINSTER THAN FOLK WONDER WHY THE COUNTRY IS FALLING APART……………………BY DESIGN NUMPTIES-BY DESIGN!!

What does it say about our school system when teachers try to control unruly pupils with drugs?
By Rowenna Davis
Last updated at 10:16 AM on 12th May 2010
Comments (29) Add to My Stories
Leon Perry is in trouble for insulting his teacher. Fidgeting on a chair in the assistant head’s office of Queen’s Park Community School in North London, the 13-year-old admits he’d skipped his medication.
‘I can get a bit hyperactive when I come off,’ he says. ‘I’ll be honest, I can be violent. When I’m on my tablet, I think before I act; when I’m off, I think after. If teachers get on my nerves, I’ll say what I want. When I’m on my tablet, I can’t be bothered.’
Leon has been taking Ritalin – known as the ‘chemical cosh’ – since he was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) when he was six.

Pupil control: There has been a 65 per cent increase in spending on drugs to treat ADHD over the past four years
He’s not alone. According to data obtained under Freedom of Information legislation, there has been a 65 per cent increase in spending on drugs to treat ADHD over the past four years. Such treatments now cost the taxpayer more than £31million a year.
The figures do not include private prescriptions, and may include some sufferers of narcolepsy as well as adult ADHD sufferers, but these are only a tiny minority.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1277674/Ritalin-used-control-unruly-pupils.html#ixzz0oxLn669Z

Labour sinks Navy: Warships sold off to foreign powers in deals worth £580m
By Ian Drury
Last updated at 10:39 AM on 4th May 2010
Comments (62) Add to My Stories The once-mighty Royal Navy has become a shadow of its former self under Labour, according to an investigation.
Dozens of warships and submarines have fallen victim to crippling spending cuts – leaving Britain’s naval defences at critically low levels.
In 1997, the Royal Navy had 137 vessels. Today, it boasts only 99.
The sales of HMS London, pictured, and HMS Coventry to Romania are particularly controversial
Figures reveal that 29 ‘floating fortresses’ have been sold to foreign navies keen to bolster their own defences, with the Government pocketing £580million from the deals.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1271352/Labour-sinks-Navy-Warships-sold-foreign-powers-deals-worth-580m.html#ixzz0oxMBSBUz

UNITE UNION- PROTECTING THE LEADERSHIPS OWN BANK ACCOUNTS- WHERE BRITS POUR IN ££££££££££££££££

Now Britain’s railways are taken over… by Germany
By Ray Massey
Last updated at 7:51 AM on 23rd April 2010
Comments (15) Add to My Stories Germany’s state-owned rail company is to take over one of Britain’s biggest train firms.
Deutsche Bahn has agreed a £1.59billion deal to buy Arriva, in a move which marks the loss of yet another key element of Britain’s manufacturing and infrastructure heritage to foreign ownership.
Furious unions yesterday condemned the takeover, saying DB had ‘slashed its workforce by half ‘ since moves to privatise it began in 1994.
Takeover: Arriva – which runs train and bus services in the UK – is being taken over by Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s state-owned railway, in a £1.59bn deal

Double blow: Arriva also runs buses in the UK, including London double deckers
The giant Rail Maritime and Transport union said the firm was ‘aggressively raising capital’ for further foreign takeovers as it seeks to exploit liberalised European transport markets.

More…Billions more for bankers as City workers are handed £6.8bn bonuses
Goldmans banker always asked: Where’s the brothel?
RBS receiving a staggering 1,600 complaints EVERY DAY

It added that it would be seeking urgent meetings with the company.
Britain’s transport ‘crown jewels’ already under German ownership include Rolls-Royce and Mini, which belong to BMW, and Bentley, which is owned by Volkswagen – itself saved from ruin by the British Army after the Second World War.
Many more firms are under wider foreign ownership, such as Jaguar Land Rover which is owned by India’s Tata, and airport operator BAA, which is owned by Spain’s Ferrovial.
DB already runs services such as the Chiltern Railways route between London and Birmingham Snow Hill.
It owns the company which runs the Royal Train and recently won the contract to operate the Tyneside Metro in Newcastle and Gateshead. The firm operates in more than 130 countries.
In contrast, Arriva grew from modest roots as a family motorcycle firm founded more than 70 years ago in Sunderland.

Enlarge

The company runs CrossCountry and Welsh rail services, as well as having a 20 per cent stake in London buses and many businesses across Europe.
Gerry Doherty, leader of the TSSA rail union, said: ‘If Germany believes railways should be run by the state in favour of the passenger, why don’t we do the same here in Britain?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1268112/German-rail-group-1-6bn-takeover-British-bus-rail-firm-Arriva.html#ixzz0oxMqbLpz

WELL WHY NOT THE GERMAN NAZIS RUN NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNCIL?

SLEEP IN PEACE BRITISH PEOPLE YOUR CHOSEN ONES WILL LOOK AFTER YOU- LOOK AFTER IN THE MAFIA SENSE THAT IS!

Thank you Minstrel Boy and I will follow up on your recommended reading. I believe that treason has been, and continues to be, committed. May I recommend that, if you’ve not already done so, you Google and read The UK Column. You will find many people there who are as aware as you are of the global plans for our enslavement. It’s difficult to understand how the intelligent races that comprise the British population have been so utterly duped. Mind you, when you see how badly our education system has been “dumbed down”, it’s a little easier to understand. The sheeple will eventually wake up but will it be too late?
Posted by: Elle | 23/05/2010 at 11:08 AM
Elle.
Thankyou for your comment. I recommend reading,- ‘THE LIMA DECLARATION, THE FOUNDATION OF GLOBALISATION’.
This declaration is proof that the events which are unfolding in Britain, Europe and across the world, were in fact planned and set in motion many years ago. The fact that many sucsessive governments have come and gone, and each one has implemented this declaration without the knowledge or permission of the electorate, can only be seen as an act of betrayal and treason. People have been shot at dawn for lesser crimes! It also raises the question as to who has such power and influence over so many countries, that they can implement such a plan by stealth on a global scale?
Another famous quote.
“The most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Soviet Union in Western Europe.”
Mikhail Gorbachev, Soviet President 1985-1991.

Posted by: Minstrel Boy | 23/05/2010 at 12:58 AM

GORBY IS ACTING MINSTREL BOY- HE KNEW OF THE PLANS…

18 May 2010 10:57 AMSell outs The most revolting thing about the way Cameron and Hague have sold out the British to the European Union isn’t that they’ve done it; though that is revolting enough.
No, the thing which is really sick-making is the eagerness, the enthusiasm with which they’ve done it. What has been revolting is the speed with which they have grabbed any excuse to dump every Conservative policy of resistance to ever-greater control of Britain by the EU institutions.
It has become clear that every word of scepticism ever uttered by Cameron and Hague about the dangers posed to Britain by the EU was fake. They never meant any of it. The coalition negotiations with the loser-Lib-Dems didn’t force them to surrender any of these policies — it is clear now the Tory leadership couldn’t hand them over fast enough.
One policy they’ve dumped with shameless speed is the commitment that a new Tory-led government would repatriate the powers that were handed over to Brussels by Labour in the areas of social and employment laws, and criminal justice.
Now all Cameron and Hague say they will do is ‘examine the balance’ of such powers Brussels now holds in these crucial areas. Which means nothing. Or rather, what it means is that they will fight to repatriate nothing.
And if you ever thought maybe Hague was just a bit more sound on the issue than Clegg-think-a-like Cameron, an article just published under Hague’s byline in an EU-establishment journal will show how wrong you are, and what a euro-luvie he is.
The journal is called Europe’s World, and if you want to know what it’s like I think I can explain in just one line: Glenys Kinnock is on the editorial board.
Part of the article reads like a cut-and-paste from EU propaganda:
‘Europe has never been freer, more stable and more prosperous, and the European Union deserves considerable credit for that…’
Actually, if Hague would look at the figures instead of the Brussels propaganda, he’d see that the EU has created the world’s greatest bloc of economic sclerosis. As for ‘freer,’ you’d think a British Conservative might run down a list of a lot of things, from Nato to the British Army of the Rhine to Polish Solidarity’s facing down of Communist power to Ronald Reagan’s facing down of Soviet power, before he got to giving credit to the Brussels-centralising eurocrats and a load of unprincipled Continental politicians for making Europe ‘freer.’
Then he goes on to writing nothing but Lib-Dem guff:
‘The Europe 2020 Strategy has an important role here. We need it to focus tightly and realistically on the areas where European action can add value,’ writes Hague.
I doubt you have ever heard of the ‘Europe 2020 Strategy.’ It’s a plan put forward by the European Commission to have eurocrats direct the policies of individual member states (‘collectively as a Union’) to achieve ‘a vision of Europe’s social market economy for the 21st century.’
What that means is if the member states will submit to direction by the Commission, then the EU will achieve ‘high levels of employment, productivity and social cohesion.’ Of course. Just like that. The commission, packed with professional bureaucrats who have never even run a corner shop, will lead the member states of the EU onward towards economic success. In the USSR, this was known as ‘command economy.’ It didn’t work there, either.
Then Hague wanders off into odd foreign policy corners, commenting on the Bosnian economy. But nowhere does he mention the most spectacular and potentially-deadly disaster in the history of the EU: the creation of the single currency, which is now threatening to pull a swathe of Mediterranean countries into sovereign debt default and leave banks all over Europe, but especially in France (they’ve got it coming) and Germany, holding hundreds of billions in bad debt.
You know what I keep thinking? That Gordon Brown, despite his joining Tony Blair in the disgraceful behaviour in denying Britain a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, did at least find the backbone to keep Britain out of the euro. Judging by current form, I doubt Cameron or Hague would have shown the same spine.

LOL- THEY’D NO INTENTION OF BRITAIN GOING INTO THE EURO- THATS’ NOT ON THE CARDS!!!
SPINE MY ARSE- DUMB ARSE- HE WAS PAID FOR HIS TREASON, THAT TAKES NO BACKBONE JUST THE SPINE OF A COWARD!!

GERMANY HAS AN OPT OUT CLAUSE-EXIT STRATEGY SHOULD THE GOING GET TOO HOT!!

I GIVE UP………..

One small sign of hope is that a more balanced and less adversarial form of government may – instead of banging away about all things ‘European’ – get down to tackling some of these issues that have been neglected by British governments for decades.

NEGLECT WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT DIM WIT- FREEDOM WHEN IT COMES IN AROUND 100 YEARS TIME- YOU’LL FIND OUT THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED!!
THEY’D TRUST SERFS TO DECIDE?
BILDERBERG’s DON’T TRUST EACH OTHER LET ALONE WE THE PEOPLE……………………..

http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2010/05/sell-outs.html

I’M GOING OUTSIDE TO BANG MY HEAD ON A BRICK WALL!!

4 responses to “COMMUNIST Mandelson, an oligarch and a £500m deal over dinner that cost 300 British jobs

  1. ALL OF BRITAINS INDUSTRIES, MANUFACTURING, SHIP BUILDING, IRON AND STEEL ETC ETC…………

    LEFT BRITAIN…………….THEY DIDN’T LIKE THE WEATHER!

    SIMPLEZ……………..

    SCARY THING IS- SOME WILL ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT!

    OSWALD MOSLEY SAW THIS START — BUT HE WAS A FASCIST…………..SO WE CAN’T BELEVE HIM,,,,,,,,,RESIGNATION SPEECH THOUGH WAS THE TRUTH!

    BUT THE FABIAN FASCIST’S RUN THE WHOLE AGENDA THEY DECIDE JUST WHOM YOU CAN LISTEN TO- VOTE FOR– EAT- SMOKE- DRINK-IN THE MEANTIME CORRUPT LITTLE CHILDREN WITH THEIR SEXUAL PROMOTIONS……………………………WHILE ASKING THE QUESTION………………..WHO IS SEXUALISING OUR YOUNG……………

    “The corner stone of Fabian economic theory became the Ricardian law of rent. Ricardo had demonstrated that the wealth of landlords arose from their monopoly of the soil and from the differences in the productive value of different pieces of land, which enabled the landlord to skim off as rent the difference between the yield of his piece of land and that of the least productive piece in cultivation or use. The Fabians, following up hints in earlier writers, developed this theory of rent to apply not to land only but also to capital and to personal ability. They considered large incomes to be chiefly rents arising from the possession of differential monopolies and maintained that these rents belonged properly not to the monopolists but to the community as a whole. The economic problem was thus presented as a question of the socialization of monopoly incomes through social ownership of the monopolies.”

    – From the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences,
    ed. Edwin R. A. Seligman, 1932

    The social control over distribution of wealth and private property will greatly reduce prosperity for the general populace. This is very worrisome.

    http://www.nolanchart.com/article4425.html

    lyrebirdchannel — 26 February 2008 — Introduction to the book, ‘Ricardo’s Law ~ House Prices and the Great Tax Clawback Scam’ by Fred Harrison: http://www.fredharrison.org

    THE FABIANS- LOVELY BROWN AND COMPANY

    ROBBING THE POOR TO HELP THE SUPER RICH

  2. I agree Walt, the Neo-Cons, a branch of the Trotskites who had formerly infiltrated the Democratic Party in the 40’s and 50’s changed Party affiliation during the late 60’s and early 70’s. I could have indeed gone into depth about Leo Strauss and his rabid ideology of Trotsky’s Continual Revolution and how that has posed a huge threat to our country. The major differences is technique, the RED Neo-Con Trotskites are bold and brash while their RED Fabian cousins are far more subtle in their approach. I consider them all TRAITORS to the Republic!

    Thanks Jake, yeah Obama and McCain are essentially pushing the same program, just with emphasis on different details. The goal is the same no matter which one ends up in the Oval Office: Government of the State, by the State and for the State!

    Yeah, I should gather all my writings into one volume, but I still have a ways to go before I am ready for that step, but thanks for the encouragement…it’s appreciated!

    We have recently seen a greater push toward socialism, though few realize it. The government is assuming more and more responsibility for and authority over the economy, all under the guise of protecting the people from potentially unscrupulous free marketeers. We are being moved yet another step closer to the dream-society of the Fabians. Of course, these are simply steps, essential parts to a much broader agenda, one that is authoritarian in nature and execution, even the centrally planned economy is a mere step, not the end product. It is all carefully crafted, manufactured to ensure the most popular support possible for “people-friendly” solutions while instituting a fraudulent system of central control over the unsuspecting public. The system has been marketed to the public, one specific component at a time, each component essential to the completion of the whole and that is the brilliance of this gradual imposition of Fabian Socialism in this country.

    The greatest bulwark against tyranny in America has always been the system of private ownership and free enterprise, it is the cornerstone of our system of government and without it our freedoms and liberty are in jeopardy. Central economic planning is, in a very basic sense, the keystone to Fabian Socialism, for in order for it to succeed, central State planning and control must replace the system of free enterprise. While it was not necessary for the State to actually own or directly control all the elements in the economy it is enough for the State to have the right to assert itself in any area that it deems necessary. The Fabians called it “the democratization of economic power”, in other words socialized and centralized control over economic direction within the country.

    In 1942, Stuart Chase, in his book “The Road We Are Traveling” spelled out the system of planning the Fabians had in mind; the interesting thing is to look at that plan in comparison to 2008 America.

    1. Strong, centralized government.

    2. Powerful Executive at the expense of Congress and the Judicial.

    3. Government controlled banking, credit and securities exchange.

    4. Government control over employment.

    5. Unemployment insurance, old age pensions.

    6. Universal medical care, food and housing programs.

    7. Access to unlimited government borrowing.

    8. A managed monetary system.

    9. Government control over foreign trade.

    10. Government control over natural energy sources, transportation and agricultural production.

    11. Government regulation of labor.

    12. Youth camps devoted to health discipline, community service and ideological teaching consistent with those of the authorities.

    13. Heavy progressive taxation.

    It should be evident that while Socialist no longer use the name that the plan is Socialism at its heart. The Fabian Socialist Revolution began in earnest in this country in 1933 with the imposition of the Welfare State and has been steadily progressing since. Those who are promoting this system, whether in the Republican Party or Democratic Party, are nothing less than Traitors, guilty of a type of high treason that deserves the most punitive penalty for such treachery. Listen carefully to the propositions of both McCain and Obama; I suspect that you will quickly find both of their positions are not only similar, but propose in essence and detail the Fabian Socialist construct. The system that these marauders are imposing upon us will ultimately alter our system of government beyond recognition.

    It is all accomplished with the utmost respectability of course, they would not dream of such an imposition without popular support and they will make sure that they have popular support.

    In 1933, they proposed that private enterprise had failed leaving the jobless to starve, hope to fade and that the State must step in to save the country and protect the people from the dangers associated with the inherent problems of free enterprise. Today, the call is very similar, the State must step in to protect the people. The Corporate State is, in the minds of Fabians, the ultimate protector of the common man, the provider of security on all fronts, but it requires our complete compliance and the relinquishment of our liberty in exchange. The State is to ultimately be the only one allowed wealth, the problem is that wealth is the people’s wealth confiscated in exchange for their hard labor. It is, in essence, a plan for a modern feudal society of peonage and the people are the peons.

    Proofs of a Conspiracy? Look around…

    In Liberty and Eternal Vigilance,

    TO CALL THE USA OR UK A DEMOCRACY WITH FABIANS RUNNING THE SHOW–THEN WE MUST CALL CHINA, CUBA, ETC DEMOCRACIES ALSO.

    MANDY GAVE A CLUE IN 2007 WE ARE IN A POST DEMOCRATIC ERA……………….THE BBC MUST SPELL IT OUR CLEAR B4 THE SERFS LISTEN…………….NEWS FLASH HALFWAY THROUGH MIDDLEEAST ENDERS.

    http://www.nolanchart.com/article4425.html

  3. CORPORATE STATE- CORPORATIONS- WORKING HAND IN HAND= FASCISM

    SIMPLEZ……………..

    COPS- COUINCILS ETC ETC ETC………………ALL CORPORATIONS NOW!

Leave a Reply to centurean2 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s