Global Warming II. The Fraud Has Dangerous Geopolitical and Expensive Consequences for Us

Global Warming II. The Fraud Has Dangerous Geopolitical and Expensive Consequences for Us

Print Post

Posted by Anders under English, Euromed

Latest news: The Telegraph 12 Oct. 2009: The BBC has made a U-turn on climate, quoting  Prof. Don Easterbrook, Western Washington University, as saying, the Pacific is cooling – and this guarantees us 30 years of climate cooling. Piers Corbyn from Weatheraction, a company specialising in long range weather forecasting, said: “Possibly some people in the BBC have worked out that the whole shooting match will collapse and they had better be ahead of the game.”  More often than not they (the BBC) put forward the brainwashing views of CO2-driven, man-made climate change. He said climate change was a “weapon of mass taxation.”

Summary: The U.S. DoD, prompted by Hillary Clinton and NATO, see great risks in the alleged “global warming”: ice-free Arctic Ocean and conflict with Russia over sea lanes and minerals. Moreover, they eye floods from melting glaciers and rising sea level. This will result in poverty, the toppling of governments, terrorism. So, the military must arm further. Pres. Obama sees this ghost as a central point. However, since the 1800s, periods of peaceable shipping through the Arctic Ocean has taken place in periods. A German warship sailed through during WWII despite the severe winters. Variations in Arctic ice quantity has nothing to do with global warming – but are due to changes in warm sea currents in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans and the associated sea winds. Polar bears seem to thrive splendidly – and the Arctic ice has since 2007 increased by 1 million km2. Satellite photos of the North Pole ice cap is often deceitful, because under the surface of melted water there is plenty of ice. Animated satellite photos show no change 1979-2008. Greenland´s ice sheet is reported to have increased by 63% in 1958-2007. In England, deduction from wages of employees exceeding a fixed limit on total CO2 emissions, is being made by a firm now selling the idea. The Prince of Wales has encouraged big energy companies to require reductions in CO2 emissions globally by 50% in 2050, invites people to not use their cars – and drives around in a 40-year-old fuel guzzler, himself. Cows and sheep must be placed on a diet, in order not to let so much methane out.
David Mayer de Rothschild is now setting out to save the planet and to stuff more into his family´s very roomy wallet – to continue the profitable lie, his relative, Edmund, launched in 1987. David’s only argument is the truthfulness of the IPCC, the nature and basis of which has repeatedly been shown to be a lie. But if a lie is big enough and expensive enough, it is believed by everyone, when it is repeated often enough in the Rothschild / Rockefeller media. “As soon as a coin in the coffer rings/the Planet from purgatory springs.”

This blog has just described McIntyre´s revelation of the non-existent basis of the fraudulent pseudscience/antiscience political climate ideology. The non-existing “global warming” is a dangerous instrument in the hands of unscrupulous politicians and a satanistic UN driven by Luciferian corporations and bankers and highjacked by an illuminist NATO, the self-appointed UN military force, opposing an equally greedy Russia. 

The New York Times 8 Aug., 2009, the flagship of Rockefeller´s illuminist media: Climate-induced crises could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions, say the analysts, experts at the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, who for the first time are taking a serious look at the national security implications of climate change. Recent war games and intelligence studies conclude that over the next 20 to 30 years, vulnerable regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and South and Southeast Asia, will face the prospect of food shortages, water crises and catastrophic flooding driven by climate change that could demand an American humanitarian relief or military response. A growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to the national interest.

The Department of Defense’s assessment of the security issue came about after prodding by Congress to include climate issues in its strategic plans — specifically, in 2008 budget authorizations by Hillary Rodham Clinton and John W. Warner, then senators. The department’s climate modeling is based on sophisticated Navy and Air Force weather programs and other government climate research programs at NASA (fraudulent James Hansen´s GISS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The Obama administration has made it a central policy focus. Arctic melting also presents new problems for the military. The shrinking of the ice cap, which is proceeding faster than anticipated only a few years ago, opens a shipping channel that must be defended and undersea resources that are already the focus of international competition.
 
The National Intelligence Council concluded that climate change by itself would have significant geopolitical impacts around the world and would contribute to a host of problems, including poverty, environmental degradation and the weakening of national governments.
The intelligence community is preparing … a study of alternative fuels and a look at how major power relations could be strained by a changing climate
Gen. Anthony C. Zinni, a retired Marine and the former head of the Central Command, wrote recently in a report: “We will pay to reduce greenhouse gas emissions today, and we’ll have to take an economic hit of some kind. “Or we will pay the price later in military terms,” he warned. “And that will involve human lives”.

Canada.com 29 Jan. 2009  “Responding to the changing environment, several Arctic Rim countries are strengthening their capabilities, and military activity in the High North has been steadily increasing,” NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer told alliance officials attending a meeting in Iceland about the rapidly shifting geopolitics of the Arctic. Russia’s dramatic assertions of its Arctic interests — including increased northern military activity, a series of bold statements about its polar territorial claims and the high-profile planting of a Russian flag on the North Pole sea floor in 2007 — have been the primary source of concern about possible conflicts with other countries in the Arctic region.

The Telegraph 19 Sept., 2009  There was much warmist trumpeting last week, led by The Independent and the BBC, over a German businessman’s claim that two of his ships had managed to sail round the Arctic coast of Russia. “A triumph for man, a disaster for mankind” proclaimed The Independent. It was not long, however, before my colleague Richard North, on his EU Referendum blog, tore the story to shreds. The Arctic journey round the top of Russia, it emerged, had been made scores of times before. These went back at least to 1935 when the trip was made by four Soviet freighters. In 1940 a German raider used it to sink seven merchantmen in the Pacific. Since 1979 the Arctic route has been regularly used by ships sailing between Russia and Vancouver. It turned out that the German shipowner was a rabid warmist. His ships needed the services of a Russian icebreaker and there is no way such a route could be used by any ships larger than 20,000 tons.

Comment: A shipping channel in the Arctic Sea? It happened before, as you see! Scientists see natural causes for receding arctic ice: “Changes of Pacific and Atlantic sea currents without connection with global warming: similar Arctic ‘warmings’ have taken place before, and are recorded for the 1800s, for the 1930s, and for the 1950s. Current warming in Greenland does not appear to have reached the levels of these earlier events. With global cooling now seemingly underway, the media appear to be even more desperate than usual to continue to hype up ‘global warming’, so expect lots more about the Arctic decline, drowning polar bears, and melting ‘tipping points’. It is very complex, and we have very little notion of what is actually happening. Two new studies summarised in a news article in Science magazine point to wind-induced circulation changes in the ocean as the dominant cause of the recent ice losses through the glaciers draining both the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets, not ‘global warming. Satellite photos of the arctic ice are elusive, since  there is often plenty of ice below photographed, melted surface water.” 
The Jakobshavn glacier so often shown by Danish environmental bilderberger, Connie Hedegaard, to foreign politicians as a result of global warming  – is not breaking away due to global warming – but due to a change of the Irminger current, a branch of the Gulf Stream.  Besides, the warmists do not record cooling and expansion of Antarctic ice. At least on Oct. 27 since 1979–2008 there has been no change in the extension of the North Pole ice cap on  this animated survey by the University of Illinois.

NASA´s temperatures, Nuuk, Greenland 1880–2008. Where is Greenland´s warming? Where is the global warming?  The Belfast Telegraph 21 Sept. 2009 The four major global temperature-tracking outlets (Hadley UK, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, University of Alabama-Huntsville and Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa) have released updated information showing 2007 global cooling, ranging from 0.65C to 0.75C, a value which is large enough to erase nearly all the global-warming recorded over the last 100 years. This occurred in a single year. In addition, the alarm of some people over the Arctic ice-caps is misplaced. The extent of the ice now is 500,000 sq km greater than it was this time last year, which was in turn 500,000 sq km more than in September 2007.
As regards Antartica and Greenland, most of their ice sheets are growing, rather than shrinking. TERRI JACKSON Director, Independent Climate Research Group, Bangor.

 

CO2-Science  With respect to the stability/longevity of the Greenland Ice Sheet, Ettema et al. state that “considerably more mass accumulates on the Greenland Ice Sheet than previously thought, adjusting upwards earlier estimates by as much as 63% 1958-2007,” which suggests that the Northern Hemisphere’s largest ice sheet may well hang around a whole lot longer than many climate alarmists have been willing to admit.
(Canadian) Globe And Mail 20 Aug. 2009 Experts say the summer sea ice has lasted longer than it has in years, which has given more than 1,000 bears in the region extra time to hunt, feed and raise healthy cubs.
Paul Watson 20 Aug, 2009:  Greenpeace leader Gerd Leipold has been forced to admit that his organization issued misleading and exaggerated information when it claimed that Arctic ice would disappear completely by 2030, even claiming that “Urgent Action Needed As Arctic Ice Melts.” However, Leipold made no apologies for Greenpeace’s tactic of “emotionalizing issues” as a means of trying to get the public to accept its stance on global warming.

  The Times 14 Sept. 2009: People who emit more than their fair share of carbon emissions are having their pay docked in a trial that could lead to rationing being reintroduced via the workplace, leading to fines deducted from the pay for exceeding the limits. The rationing scheme monitors employees’ personal emissions, including home energy bills, petrol purchases and holiday flights.
The maximum that an employee can earn or be fined has been capped at £100, but is likely to rise once staff have grown accustomed to the idea.

WSP, the global engineering consultancy, has been conducting the rationing scheme among 80 of its British employees for almost two years. In the first year the overall carbon footprint of participants fell by 10 per cent. The company is discussing its scheme with several FTSE 100 companies. The idea of personal quotas for carbon emissions is being advocated by the thinktank, the Institute for Public Policy Research. 

Washington Times 22 Sept. 2009:  Some UN members are envious, arrogant beggars.The most devastating consequences” would be enactment of Al Gore’s nightmare vision, to give the bureaucrats of the world all the taxes they can spend while bankrupting the most productive countries of the West.

None of the delegates here will hear any dissent from the mantra that the sky is falling, that only socking it to the taxpayers of the West can save us from being boiled in saltwater. But  inevitably, verifiable facts are dissolving the fondest fantasies of Al Gore’s hired scientists.

A new book by an Australian geologist, Ian Plimer, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide, argues that scientific fact has overwhelmed the doomsday scenarios of sinking islands, rising temperatures and collapsing ice shelves. He argues that global warming, which has naturally occurred over the billions of years of the Earth’s life, has often been a cycle of wealth and plenty. The Romans grew lemons, limes and oranges as far north as Hadrian’s Wall.

This naturally causes heartburn in certain labs and faculty lounges.

A fact sheet has been produced outlining how farmers can adjust their animals’ diets to reduce methane emissions. In total, methane is thought to contribute about 18 per cent towards the global warming effect, with cattle and sheep the main culprits. The New Zealand government briefly considered taxing farmers on their herds’ methane output but the proposal had to be dropped following opposition. 

The Telegraph 21 Sept., 2009   Shell, BP, the energy suppliers EON and EDF, Coca Cola, eBay, Starbucks and Virgin are among the household name companies which have been persuaded by the Prince (Charles) to sign a communique calling on world leaders to commit to cutting emissions worldwide by at least 50 per cent by 2050. ”
The statement is the latest move by the Prince of Wales to try to ensure the United Nations climate change summit in Copenhagen in December delivers positive results and is not just a talking shop. The Prince has already warned that the world is in the “last chance saloon” in its attempts to prevent catastrophic climate change.

Here the hypocrisy becomes clear: The Prince of Wales is still driving the old, highly petrol consuming Aston Martin given to him by his mother on his 21 st birthday. At the same time he calls on people to give up their cars and walk/use public transport!!!

Reuters 22 Sept. 2009 UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – Czech President Vaclav Klaus sharply criticized a U.N. meeting on climate change on Tuesday at which U.S. President Barack Obama was among the top speakers, describing it as propagandistic and undignified. In his book “Blue Planet in Green Chains: What Is Under Threat — Climate or Freedom?”, Klaus said global warming has turned into a new religion, an ideology that threatens to undermine freedom and the world’s economic and social order.

China View 2 Oct. 2009  GOTHENBURG, Sweden, Oct. 2 (Xinhua) — European Union (EU) finance ministers on Friday discussed the idea of introducing a carbon tax across the 27-nation bloc as a way to help fight climate change.  The new carbon tax is likely to be applied to transport, agriculture, forestry, households and others.

Comment
Actually this speaks for itself. We have seen how the world uncritically accepted the Briffa-Mann global warming deception. How the Prince of Wales demands ofhis underlings what he would never dream of doing himself.  We see how almighty NATO, self-appointed UN military force, is preparing to intervene in the entire world and for war with Russia over the Arctic Sea which was declared by Green Peace to be ice free soon – although its leader doesn´t even believe it himself. It´s just such a profitable lie. We see how any small increase in temperature – sometimes forged – is declared a consequence of global warming, which stopped 11 – years ago or rather much sooner – as a natural recovery from the “little ice age”. We see how polar bears are said to be dying, although they seem to flourish, and we see the farting cows and sheep being made criminals. What about the climatists themselves? Well, Rockefeller´s depopulation programme has a solution for them, too!

I dare hardly speak the name any more: Rothschild! Sir Edmund de Rothschild (1987) – 28.53 Min started the CO2–hoax back in 1987. Now comes David Mayer de Rothschild – left (video) – like Don Qijote setting out to save the planet from the global warming disaster. Asked on what science he bases his belief, he refers to the 2.500 “specialists” of the IPCC. When such distinguished “experts” (paid by Rothschild´s henchmen) say so then it must be correct. He can produce no better arguments!  
Alex Jones then tells him that many of these “specialists” have their names added to IPCC´s statements without ever being asked. Well, isn´t that indifferent when the “experts” are people like pea nut grower Jimmy Carter – only 20% having worked somewhat with climate, and the IPCC chairman alone decides what is true science to be passed on to the politicians?

Fortunately, we taxpayers of the West can save the planet by means of EU´s CO2–taxes and Rockefeller – Rothschild´s ETS/ECX and CCX/CCFX and here according to the Johann Tetzel´s Motto: “As soon as a coin in the coffer rings / the Planet from purgatory springs.” Besides, the communist UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon eyes an opportunity to send our warmth money down to the Muslim world which is sinking more and more deeply into poverty because of its enormous birth surplus and the Koran. I have a suspicion that the money would not go south – but west – into the pockets of David´s family.
What we see here is the New World Order (see videos on right margin of this blog).

 http://euro-med.dk/?p=11097