Islamification of Britain II: Civil Servants Ordered Not to Eat in Front of Muslims….BNP PC Free News!!

MONDAY LBCs RESIDENT DHIMMI NICK FERRARI GAVE UP HIS SAUSAGES FOR RAMADAN-DENIED MUSLIMS DEMAND OTHERS TO FAST—THAT WAS UNTILL A CHRISTIAN GUY FROM PAKISTAN CALLED INTO THEW SHOW-POINTING OUT THAT IN PAKISTAN CHRISTIANS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BREAK THE FAST —-AND MUST OBSERVE RAMADAN!! LESSONS TO LEARN OR SUFFER THEM HERE EVENTUALLY.

 

Islamification of Britain II: Civil Servants Ordered Not to Eat in Front of Muslims

September 20, 2009 by BNP News  
Filed under National News

shariah-law-for-ukThe British state’s subservience to the Islamification process was highlighted once again with an official instruction to Home Office staff not to eat in front of Muslims during the Ramadan fast.

The directive echoes an order issued last year to non-Muslim Tower Hamlets council staff which ordered them to observe the Ramadan fast.

In Manchester, state schools have also been ordered to close during Muslim holy days in an attempt to reduce the truancy rate.

The latest bowing down before the Islamic colonisation process came with a taxpayer-funded Home Office internal memo on how that department’s employees should behave during Ramadan.

During this religious holy month, devout Muslims do not drink or eat from dawn until sunset and must avoid “all obscene and irreligious sights and sounds.”

The Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN) produced the five-page information sheet which says: “In practical terms, please be sensitive when eating lunch near a Muslim colleague who is fasting.

“This can make an individual feel hungrier and make it more challenging to observe the fast.”

The HOIN also urged managers to be flexible over working arrangements. It says: “The most likely need Muslim staff may present to managers during this period is for flexibility around working hours and break times as those fasting will have a slightly different routine from usual.

“Managers and Muslim staff should discuss what their needs are and be responsive and sensitive.”

The document was distributed to staff and posted on the department’s internal intranet system.

A Home Office spokesman said that the Islamic Network was “one of a number of staff faith and equality groups within the Home Office and was paid for by the taxpayer.”

The document also said that “non-Muslims should consider fasting for a day.”

* Last year, the Muslim-controlled Tower Hamlets council in London issued instructions for council meetings during the Ramadan month to be kept to a minimum and for all non-Muslim councillors to observe the Ramadan fast.

Council leader Lutfur Rahman, who was born in Pakistan, and his deputy, Siraj Islam, sent an e-mail to all councillors outlining arrangements for Town Hall committee meetings during Ramadan. The e-mail said that all meetings be kept to a minimum to accommodate fasting councillors, and asked all other councillors to resist eating until the breaking of the fast at sunset.

* In Manchester, schools will be able to close for Islamic holidays under new plans to “reduce high absence rates.”

Almost one in ten of all absence days in the city’s schools are noted as religious observance. In an attempt to improve these figures, schools will be allowed to opt to close if 40 percent of pupils are likely to take time off.

BEST TO REMAIN STUM WHEN MUSLIMS ARE AROUND- OTHERWISE THEY SNITCH!!

Islamification of Britain I: Christians Persecuted for Questioning Colonisers’ Religion

September 20, 2009 by BNP News  
Filed under National News

kill-those-who-insult-islamBritain’s plunge into a fully fledged Islamic state has been underlined again with the news that a Christian couple has been criminally charged for arguing over religion with Muslims in their own private premises.

Media reports have revealed that Ben and Sharon Vogelenzangl, hotel owners in Liverpool, have been charged under public order laws with using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” that were “religiously aggravated.”

Apparently the Christian couple got into a discussion with Muslim residents of their hotel over religion.

During the course of the discussion, it is alleged that Mr and Mrs Vogelenzangl suggested that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was a warlord and that the burka was a form of bondage.

One of the Muslims in the conversation then ran off to the police and complained that she had been offended by these comments, leading to the arrest and charges against the Christians.

This is an act which would only be possible in a theocratic state and is highly reminiscent of Saudi Arabia and other sharia law countries where any sort of criticism is a criminal offence.

The Christians, whose trial has been set for December, face a fine of up to £5,000 and a criminal record if they are convicted.

They deny that their comments were threatening and argue that they had every right to defend and explain their beliefs.

According to media reports, Mrs Vogelenzang said: “Nothing like this has happened to us before. We are completely shocked.”

She and her husband were arrested and charged under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and Section 31 (1) (c) and (5) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

The Christians appeared at Liverpool Magistrates Court on Friday to hear the date of their trial before magistrates, and were granted bail on the condition that they did not approach any of the witnesses expected to appear.

The heavy-handed police action has once again highlighted the state’s subservience to the Islamification process.

The Public Order Act was designed to deal with violence and threatening behaviour in the streets and not to regulate conversations between individuals in private premises.

The Christian Institute has come out in support of the persecuted couple. CI spokesman Mike Judge was quoted as saying that “important issues of religious liberty are at stake.”

“In recent years, we have backed several cases where Christians have suffered unfair treatment because of their faith,” he said.

“We have detected a worrying tendency for public bodies to misapply the law in a way that seems to sideline Christianity more than other faiths.”

ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 DENIED TO BRITONS BUT NOT TO MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT!!

FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE CoE ABOVE ALL OTHERS’!!!

Moral Superiority? — Dehumanising Their Own People

September 21, 2009 by David Morris  
Filed under National News

birmingham-mosque-union-flag

By David Morris — In his review of “The Memoirs of Granville Sharp” in The Edinburgh Review, “Capital Punishments”, of July 1821, William Hazlitt rehearsed an anecdote about Prince Naimbanna:  “If a man should try to kill me, or should try to sell me and my family for slaves, he would do an injury to as many as he might kill or sell; but if any one takes away the character of Black people, that man injures Black people all over the world; and when he has once taken away their character, there is nothing that he may not do to Black people ever after. That man, for instance, will beat Black people and, and say “Oh, it is only a Black man, why should I not beat him?” That man will make slaves of Black people; for when he has taken away their character, he will say,” Oh, they are only Black people, why should I not make them slaves?”

The word which is used to dehumanise us is “racists”, with today’s teacher trainees being told that “only whites can be racist.” It is not to make us slaves as the prince feared for his people, but is a way of excusing the importation of cheap labour or allowing Muslims to take over our country.

In June 2000, Sir David Calvert-Smith, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, did that which had so alarmed Prince Naimbanna. He “took away the character” of white people by describing nearly all white people as racist. He was head of the CPS from 1988 till 3rd November 2003 and is heavily responsible for turning the police into a totalitarian force policing opinions instead of crime. In 2005 he led an inquiry for the Commission for Racial Equality into how the police forces of England and Wales dealt with racism within their ranks. The report on the inquiry was given in March 2005. At a press conference Calvert-Smith said they would not be investigating “racism” because it was a “given.” There his prejudice was laid bare.

When the Establishment attack those they hate, they generalize, but when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties as with the expenses scandals, they treat it as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal affects the parties as a whole, the media focus on individuals.

In an article entitled “Why Sir Ian Blair was right in his fight against racism,” in The First Post 3rd December 2008, novelist William Self repeated mindless ideology and slandered a whole people: “The outgoing Metropolitan Police commissioner had the courage to call wider society out on its more revolting prejudices … he confesses to regretting two or three things that he said to the press, his infamous remarks concerning the Soham murders are not among them. According to Blair, his contention that he couldn’t see what ‘all the fuss was about’ — referring to the media circus that got going in the aftermath of Holly and Jessica’s deaths — is something he’s determined to stand by.

“What Blair meant by this — and he was happy to elaborate — was that a disproportionate amount of attention was paid to these particular murders because the victims were young, white girl children, while the media are considerably less exercised by the death of young, black males.”            

Has Self not heard of Stephen Lawrence or Damilola Taylor? Well, more than he has Kriss Donald. When it comes to the unfashionable issues, these writers talk in mindless clichés.  There is no creativity, no pushing back boundaries when it comes to the Establishment ideology, just robotic repetition.

As for Blair — you would expect that sort of talk from a psychopath who would have an excuse, but these media elites have none. Ian Huntley’s murder of two young girls is not as bad as the imaginary prejudice against ethnics by whites! The elites are prejudiced against whites but that is not “disgusting”?  Police Chief Colin Cramphorn once said concerning Muslim child-rape of young white girls that we must learn to live with it! These comments show the underlying hatred the elites have for white people.

The Telegraph of 10th November 2008 shows how these base minded people prop each other up. Sir Ian Blair will receive a pay-off worth up to £400,000 when he stands down as Metropolitan Police Commissioner in three weeks’ time. The additional sum is on top of the estimated £3.5 million pension pot, worth £160,000 a year, which he is set to receive after 30 years’ service as a policeman.

The traditional elites: the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman, QC, are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider that we’re told that Islam is a ‘Religion of Peace’ — both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have asserted as much. If you care about the future for women under Islam in the west look up The Despatches programme filmed inside mosques

A sick judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam: “You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”

Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.

A consequence of the Macpherson Report is the reduction in legal protection for those under suspicion. Ostensibly, the repeal of Double Jeopardy in 2005 followed a marathon campaign by Ann Ming after her daughter was murdered in 1989. This was a convenient case to use because the removal of Double Jeopardy was a recommendation of the Macpherson Report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and would enable the state to repeatedly try “racists” until they can get a conviction.

Many Labour ministers have extremist links and pasts but the media cover that up. If the media had wanted, they could have exposed Labour, but because they share the same idealogy, they did not.  Don’t blindly trust the media but question every statement and look things up for yourselves in search engines.

The Times, in 1954, gives evidence that even then we were being cleansed from our communities. There were 200 a month arriving without work or accommodation which was causing concern in London, Liverpool and Birmingham.

“On Merseyside, where 121 disembarked on Tuesday from the liner Ascania, there is a coloured population of about 10,000. It is estimated that 2,000 of them are receiving public assistance … all the Government departments concerned say they have no means of assessing how many of the immigrants from the West Indies and to a small extent from the African colonies, are drawing welfare allowances. This is because all the immigrants are recorded as British subjects, and have equal claims.”

When public figures make the usual biased pronouncements on us and racial issues, research their hidden agendas. On Radio Four, Simon Hughes stated that they would have to start exposing the BNP’s argument such as exploding their ‘myth’ that asylum seekers get new houses, etc. He claimed this was not true. Not only is it true, but ‘asylum seekers’ get massively preferential treatment. Hughes was deceiving the public and behind his apparently reasonable words wants to submit us to Islam.

Andrew Marr tells us what he thinks should be done to Britons if we object to being dispossessed:  “Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, threatening them but also creating new opportunities, have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants.

“And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain ‘natural’ beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.”

So it should — but not merely on the police, or the boys with spray-paint cans. The present bunch of elites are the most selfish crowd of beggars on horseback ever to attain influence. They browbeat ordinary people into leading the moral life they themselves advocate but avoid living. Marr is advocating fascism and “ethnocide.”

Where do Paxman and Andrews Neill and Marr live? Not in the middle of Southall or Brixton! Sometimes they do when they are young like Billy Bragg but when it comes to bringing their children up they move to nice areas.

http://bnp.org.uk/

Advertisements

7 responses to “Islamification of Britain II: Civil Servants Ordered Not to Eat in Front of Muslims….BNP PC Free News!!

  1. Christian hotel owners hauled before court after defending their beliefs in discussion with Muslim guest
    By Jonathan Petre
    Last updated at 12:28 PM on 20th September 2009
    Add to My Stories A Christian couple have been charged with a criminal offence after taking part in what they regarded as a reasonable discussion about religion with guests at their hotel.
    Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang were arrested after a Muslim woman complained to police that she had been offended by their comments.
    They have been charged under public order laws with using ‘threatening, abusive or insulting words’ that were ‘religiously aggravated’.

    Facing trial: Christian hoteliers Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang believed the religious discussion was reasonable and deny their comments were threatening
    The couple, whose trial has been set for December, face a fine of up to £5,000 and a criminal record if they are convicted.
    Although the facts are disputed, it is thought that during the conversation the couple were challenged over their Christian beliefs.

    More…Muslim lovers to be caned for trying to have sex in a car
    Jedi church founder thrown out of Tesco for refusing to remove his hood was left ’emotionally humiliated’
    MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: A disturbing use of law
    Christian nurse accuses hospital of discrimination after being removed from frontline duty for wearing cross necklace

    It is understood that they suggested that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was a warlord and that traditional Muslim dress for women was a form of bondage.

    They deny, however, that their comments were threatening and argue that they had every right to defend and explain their beliefs.

    Scene of ‘offence’: The Bounty House Hotel in Liverpool, where a Muslim guest was upset
    Mrs Vogelenzang, 54, who has run the Bounty House Hotel near Aintree racecourse in Liverpool with her husband Ben, 53, for six years, said: ‘Nothing like this has happened to us before. We are completely shocked.’

    She added that the episode had damaged their business and they had been forced to lay off staff and run the nine-bedroom hotel by themselves, leaving them exhausted.
    Sources said that a number of guests staying at the hotel, which charges £92 a night for a double room, were having breakfast in its restaurant on March 20 when comments were made about religion.
    One of those involved was the Muslim woman, who was staying at the hotel while she received treatment at a hospital nearby.
    The couple, who are members of the Bootle Christian Fellowship, and their solicitor, David Whiting, said they could not discuss the content of the conversation for legal reasons. But the independent lobby group, the Christian Institute, which has seen both the prosecution and defence legal papers, is supporting their defence.
    Mr Whiting, who last year successfully defended street preacher Anthony Rollins in Birmingham, said: ‘There is a dispute as to the facts of the allegations, but Ben and Sharon do not accept they were threatening, abusive or insulting.
    ‘They are committed Christians and it is the defence’s contention that they have every right to defend their religious beliefs and explain those beliefs to others who do not hold similar views.’
    After the incident, the couple voluntarily attended St Anne’s Street police station in Liverpool, where they were interviewed under caution.

    In July they were arrested and charged under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and Section 31 (1) (c) and (5) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

    They appeared briefly at Liverpool Magistrates Court on Friday to hear the date of their trial before magistrates, and were granted bail on the condition that they did not approach any of the witnesses expected to appear.
    The use by the police of the Public Order Act to arrest people over offensive comments has dismayed a number of lawyers, who say the legislation was passed to deal with law and order problems in the streets.

    Neil Addison, a prominent criminal barrister and expert in religious law, said: ‘The purpose of the Public Order Act is to prevent disorder, but I’m very concerned that the police are using it merely because someone is offended.

    ‘It should be used where there is violence, yobbish behaviour or gratuitous personal abuse. It should never be used where there has been a personal conversation or debate with views firmly expressed.

    ‘If someone is in a discussion and they don’t like what they are hearing, they can walk away.’
    He added that the police had a legal duty under the Human Rights Act to defend free speech ‘and I think they are forgetting that’.
    A number of Church leaders in Liverpool have written to Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, voicing their concerns and pressing for the case to be dropped.
    Christian Institute spokesman Mike Judge said ‘important’ issues of religious liberty were at stake.

    ‘In recent years, we have backed several cases where Christians have suffered unfair treatment because of their faith,’ he said. ‘We have detected a worrying tendency for public bodies to misapply the law in a way that seems to sideline Christianity more than other faiths.’
    A spokesman for Merseyside Police said: ‘It would be inappropriate to comment as this is an ongoing case.’

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1214666/Christian-hotel-owners-hauled-court-defending-beliefs-discussion-Muslim-guest.html#ixzz0RpwNXRX9

    THIS IS EUSSR NOT ENGLISH LAW AND IS THEREFORE ILLEGAL IN THE UK!!!

    1689 ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS….

    BOLLOCKS TO BRUSSELS AND ALL WHO FOLLOW THEIR THIRD REICH!

    EUMED ISLAMNISATION OF BRITAIN AND EUROPE!!!

  2. THE COURT NEEDS TO GET WITH ISLAMS HISTORY..

    WHAT THOSE CHRISTIANS SAID WASN’T LIES…

    OFFENDED WHEN HEARING THE TRUTH—SAYS MORE ABOUT BRITAINS ISLAMNISATION THAN ANYTHING ELSE!!

    http://www.faithfreedom.org/

  3. Liberal-Islamist Alliance
    Posted by Amil Imani on 7/14/09 • Categorized as Criticism of Islam

    Amil Imani

    Presently, fanatical Islamists are lashing out with mad fury before their own final demise. The “infidel” world has been complicit in the surge of Islamism through its mistakes, complacency, and greed.

    Our academia leftists even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it suits them. Terms such as “Political Islam,” or “Radical Islam,” for instance, are contributions of our leftist intellengtsia. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam itself, simply because they are redundant. Even a cursory study of Islam and its charter—the Quran—will clearly reveal that it is a radical political movement. It is the socialist leftists and paid-for-media and politicians who sanitize Islam and misguide the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate.

    Our liberal professors claim that Islam is inherently good, the majority of Muslims are good and only a small minority has hijacked the good faith of Muhammad by engaging in acts of intolerance, hatred and violence. I agree, it is not uncommon to observe Muslims, anywhere in the world, who are indeed exemplary in many ways. They are kind, generous and much more. But these are the Cultural Muslims who are, in effect, only part Muslim.

    The question is: why is it that the good Islam is not ruling in the world and the bad Islam is engulfing it in fire? Some clear instances of the rule of the real Islam are seen in places such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, parts of Pakistan, Sudan, and Somalia. Iranians are completely suffocated by the real Islam and that is one reason they are revolting against the rule of Sharia (Islamic Law) and that is why they are being butchered by the representative of Allah on earth, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who considers himself the shadow of “Allah.”

    Human nature is also the culprit, in part. We humans are attracted to hate like flies are to honey. Hate is an easy sell. It is appealing and little effort is required to hate. Hate gathers up the person’s or the group’s frustrations, anxieties, fears, paranoia and many other negative emotions in one handy bundle and hurls it at a convenient target. History is replete with instances of hate energizing the masses into commitment of small and large scale atrocities.

    All one has to do is to read the history of Islam and find out the truth for himself. Mainstream Islam has been outright genocidal from inception. Their own historians record that Ali, the first imam of the Shiite and the son-in-law of Muhammad, with the help of another man, beheaded 700 Jewish men in what is known as “massacre of the Banu Qurayza” in the presence of the Prophet himself. The Prophet of Allah and his disciples took the murdered men’s women and children in slavery. Muslims have been, and continue to be, the most vicious and shameless practitioners of slavery. The slave trade, even today, is a thriving business in some Islamic lands where wealthy, perverted sheiks purchase children of the poor from traffickers for their own sadistic gratification.

    The Islamist, with the help of our liberal leftists, take advantage of the provisions of the most benign system known to humanity, democracy, to implode it from within. Islamists, by sheer numbers, will soon be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Quran. Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

    Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses against Allah. Already, in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamofascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden and England and Netherlands where they can control their own populations without accountability. Proposals for Sharia are being taken seriously by Canada. Politicians, hungry for votes and devoted to the practice of political correctness, bend backward to accede to Islamists’ demands.

    At the same time, Muslims will ally with Leftist politicians who will gladly cede some of their power to this group of enforcers, so conservative politicians and Christians who advocate self defense and sane social policies are kept out of office. Money that was once used to build mosques will now be used to buy politicians. On university campuses, Islam will be portrayed as righteous and peaceful, while Christianity will be associated with evil Western and American values. The rebellious American youth will eat it up

    Leftist politicians will continue to hold the Bill of Rights over anyone who dares to accuse this religion of wrongdoing. While crime and threats skyrocket, Islamacized citizens will ignore the wrongdoing. They will look the other way for fear of retribution, honor killings, and punishments from those who uphold the Islamic requirement to seek revenge on anyone who dishonors or disagrees with Islam.

    Don’t our liberal leftists assure us not to worry about Islamization of our country, the United States? After all, Muslims are about a minority of 6-7 million in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason. Even a smaller number of these Muslims are hothead radicals, while the majority is just like everyone else. But small minorities can overwhelm the majority by use of coercion and deadly force. Islamists are notorious for their dedication to the use of force for achieving their aims. The Taliban were a very small minority in Afghanistan, the Islamists were a tiny faction in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran. Both overwhelmed the masses and imposed their reign of terror. The terrorist Hamas is also a “minority” in number, yet it rules the Palestinian Territory. Hizbollah of Lebanon is a minority, yet it has taken the country to the verge of destruction.

    Wait! Should average Americans keep listening to self-styled expert liberal professors and politicians who have aligned themselves with the Islamists?

    Aren’t these the same experts who told us Hitler could not possibly be crazy enough to attack Russia or Britain?
    Aren’t these the same “experts” who tried to cover up Mao Tse Tung’s reign of terror in China, or Pol Pot’s genocide in Cambodia?
    Isn’t this the same “expertise” that assured us in the 1970’s that inflation was good, and could never be accompanied by a recession?
    Aren’t these the same folks who tell us the Saudis are our best friends in the Middle East, that the Titanic was unsinkable, that we should not succumb to our racist impulses by reporting suspicious Muslim men who are learning to fly jumbo jets?
    Didn’t ultra liberal Jimmy Carter call Ayatollah Khomeini, a holy man figure? And his ambassador to Iran, William Sulivan, said, “Khomeini is a Ghandi-like figure.” (Khomeini turned Iran into one of the biggest terror states ever and took American diplomats as hostage for 444 days. This “Ghandi-like” figure executed hundreds of thousands of political prisoners in 1988.)
    Aren’t these the same folks that told us goods imported from China are perfectly safe? Or that if we just “open up dialogue with our enemies,” we can create peace?
    Hmmm…It seems we have much to worry about when the “authorities” begin to disseminate their collective wisdom. And don’t bank on the politicians either. They are the master practitioners of the art of the politically correct.

    Shaming the devil incites the devil, calling the USSR an “evil empire” did not win Ronald Reagan points for diplomacy, but nonetheless, it was an evil empire. Calling Nazis evil did not help endear the Americans to the Germans either, but they were slaughtering the Jewish Poles down to the last child. Calling Islam an evil empire, most likely doesn’t sit well with “moderate Muslims,” but at least in the end will save lives.

    This is also why liberal appeasers in 1938, who refused to call Hitler “evil,” got the world into so much trouble by creating a similar confused intellectual forum about the Nazis. They tried to build bridges to the “moderate” Nazis; they lectured clear thinkers about the dangers of inciting German hatred by pointing out the truth. They accused conservatives of being “just as fascist” as the Nazis (Napolitano called conservatives “right-wing extremists”), they sent ambassadors and made treaties and trusted that the moderates would come out and “reform” their zealous leadership. And they were wrong

    Fascism is exactly what Political Islam was crafted to be. It is no coincidence that Islamism has historically been so cozy with the fascist left. The left habitually underestimates the intelligence of the American people. The left is chronically unhappy about America, because it is looking in the mirror and rightfully sees its own miserable reflection. Any time anyone arises to serve this great nation and aims to keep it on its course toward its glorious destiny, the left recoils.

    In the West, an unholy coalition of mentally-deranged suicidal-homicidal liberals, together with self-aggrandizing Islamic apologists, are doing their level best to assist the Islamists in the destruction of the existing order of freedom and liberty.

    To make matters worse, a vociferous clique of local leftists, “useful idiots,” with a suicide wish, are doing all they can to take the country with them to the grave they so earnestly seek. These self-appointed squatters of the higher-ground are riding so high on their high horse that they are blind to the realities down on earth. The leftists don’t realize that the opponents of Islamism demonize Islamism with Muhammad’s own words and deeds. You cannot be a serial murderer and complain that it is unfair for the DA to constantly harp about all those people you killed!

    The liberal left vows that we cannot win the war on terror only on the battlefield. Yes, but tell that to the Viennese who in 1632 defeated the marauding Muslims to save Christian Europe from slaughter and annihilation. Explain that to the Sudanese Christians of 2007. How about the Coptic Christians in Egypt? Does anyone know where all the Christians and Hindus in Pakistan went? Ask the French and Spanish how Charlemagne and Castile unceremoniously removed the Moors from Spain and France. And what happened in 1948, the day Israel was legally declared a nation? Oh, the battlefield is an ugly place, but it seems to have been the only way militant Islam has been repulsed. Most loving Christians believe that “love conquers all.” Well, rest assured that love does not conquer Islamism.

    I have asserted in the past there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, but we have Muslims who have become Cultural Muslims. This truth is not escaping intellectual blogs because politically correct media cannot bring themselves to rank religions or admit that some things are truly good or bad. They do not want to offend their liberal or Islamic audiences. But in this great argument, they are way behind the curve. The people are anxious for the truth. The people must know the truth so that they can defend themselves against a deadly and powerful adversary.

    I believe this is the most important argument facing us right now, but as long as fence-sitters feel capable of condemning “all forms of extremism” unchecked, most people will not take sides. Only when it is clear that (whether or not people will admit it overtly) Islamism is unjust and dangerous. Will we get support for a number of tough measures that should send Islamism back to its cage where it belongs?

    It is constructive to note how Islamists engage others in discussion. When they don’t like what they hear, they resort to ridicule, accusations and name-calling. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if these people would, for once, abandon their primitive mindset and use a civilized method of dialogue?

    Muslims must be encouraged to reject, if not Islam itself, one of its deadly derivatives, Islamism, which has become a sharp thorn, inflicting huge pain in our civilized society. They must be encouraged to combat radicalism. They must know that the free people of the world eagerly embrace them with open arms once they rise to the occasion and defeat Islamism

    We, in the United States of America must resist Islamism while it is still gathering momentum, unless we wish to end up in the same fix as the Europeans.

    http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/07/14/liberal-islamist-alliance/

  4. Belgium the death of a nation
    by Mindstorm » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:06 am

    Here, undercover police explain how the state actually prevents it’s own institutions from acting against immigrant crime, and how ‘no go zones’ form. The time to stop calling this a ‘youth’ issue is now. The time to call it jihad against the west is well past due. Belgium shows us all how nations die. This is serious. Is it exaggeration? you decide. History will prove you correct or no.

  5. http://www.cpexposed.com/document_library/?cat=BBC and Media#

    ALL THE ENEMIES WITHIN

    CONTROLLED BY CP

    Document Library
    Search by CategoryAdvice on using the Archives
    Association of Police Officers
    Banking Elite
    BBC and Media
    British Transport Police
    Charities
    Civilia
    Conservative Party
    CP Advisory Groups
    CP Chief Executive Officer
    CP Civilia
    CP Company Documents
    CP Corruption
    CP Deception and Lies
    CP EU Data
    CP Fabian Society
    CP Finances
    CP Graduate Lists
    CP Key Documents
    CP Mind Techniques
    CP NLP
    CP Penetration UK
    CP Perversions
    CP Press and Media Reports
    CP Selection Criteria
    CP Training Documents
    CP Trustees
    CP Website
    CP_Madeleine_McCann
    Education
    Fire Service
    IPPR
    Judiciary
    Military
    Mind_Control_Background
    Ministry of Justice
    NHS
    Police
    Political Charities
    Politicians and Civil Servants
    Prisons
    Private Companies
    Public Authorities
    Regional Authorities and Quangos
    UK Government Departments
    United_Nations
    Search by City
    AberdeenBelfastBirminghamBournemouthBradfordBristolCoventryDerbyDublinDundeeDurhamEdinburghExeterGlasgowGloucesterHerefordHullLeedsLeicesterLiverpoolLondonMaidenheadManchesterMilton KeynesNewcastleNewmarketNorwichNottingham OxfordPlymouthPortsmouthPrestonReadingSheffieldSouthamptonWakefieldWorcester
    Search by County
    BedfordshireCambridgeshireCheshireCornwallCumbriaDerbyshireDevonFifeHampshireHumbersideKentLancashireLeicestershireMerseysideNorfolkNorthumbriaNottinghamshireOxfordshireShropshireSomersetStaffordshireSuffolkSurreyThames ValleyWarwickshireWest MidlandsYorkshire
    Search by Country

    COMMUNIST PURPOSE!

    DIPPING INTO YOUR POCKETS!

    LIBLABCON MERCHANTS!

    FRIENDS OF FABIAN BANKING ELITES….FABIAN MINISTERS!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s