MONDAY LBCs RESIDENT DHIMMI NICK FERRARI GAVE UP HIS SAUSAGES FOR RAMADAN-DENIED MUSLIMS DEMAND OTHERS TO FAST—THAT WAS UNTILL A CHRISTIAN GUY FROM PAKISTAN CALLED INTO THEW SHOW-POINTING OUT THAT IN PAKISTAN CHRISTIANS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BREAK THE FAST —-AND MUST OBSERVE RAMADAN!! LESSONS TO LEARN OR SUFFER THEM HERE EVENTUALLY.
Islamification of Britain II: Civil Servants Ordered Not to Eat in Front of Muslims
The British state’s subservience to the Islamification process was highlighted once again with an official instruction to Home Office staff not to eat in front of Muslims during the Ramadan fast.
The directive echoes an order issued last year to non-Muslim Tower Hamlets council staff which ordered them to observe the Ramadan fast.
In Manchester, state schools have also been ordered to close during Muslim holy days in an attempt to reduce the truancy rate.
The latest bowing down before the Islamic colonisation process came with a taxpayer-funded Home Office internal memo on how that department’s employees should behave during Ramadan.
During this religious holy month, devout Muslims do not drink or eat from dawn until sunset and must avoid “all obscene and irreligious sights and sounds.”
The Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN) produced the five-page information sheet which says: “In practical terms, please be sensitive when eating lunch near a Muslim colleague who is fasting.
“This can make an individual feel hungrier and make it more challenging to observe the fast.”
The HOIN also urged managers to be flexible over working arrangements. It says: “The most likely need Muslim staff may present to managers during this period is for flexibility around working hours and break times as those fasting will have a slightly different routine from usual.
“Managers and Muslim staff should discuss what their needs are and be responsive and sensitive.”
The document was distributed to staff and posted on the department’s internal intranet system.
A Home Office spokesman said that the Islamic Network was “one of a number of staff faith and equality groups within the Home Office and was paid for by the taxpayer.”
The document also said that “non-Muslims should consider fasting for a day.”
* Last year, the Muslim-controlled Tower Hamlets council in London issued instructions for council meetings during the Ramadan month to be kept to a minimum and for all non-Muslim councillors to observe the Ramadan fast.
Council leader Lutfur Rahman, who was born in Pakistan, and his deputy, Siraj Islam, sent an e-mail to all councillors outlining arrangements for Town Hall committee meetings during Ramadan. The e-mail said that all meetings be kept to a minimum to accommodate fasting councillors, and asked all other councillors to resist eating until the breaking of the fast at sunset.
* In Manchester, schools will be able to close for Islamic holidays under new plans to “reduce high absence rates.”
Almost one in ten of all absence days in the city’s schools are noted as religious observance. In an attempt to improve these figures, schools will be allowed to opt to close if 40 percent of pupils are likely to take time off.
BEST TO REMAIN STUM WHEN MUSLIMS ARE AROUND- OTHERWISE THEY SNITCH!!
Islamification of Britain I: Christians Persecuted for Questioning Colonisers’ Religion
Britain’s plunge into a fully fledged Islamic state has been underlined again with the news that a Christian couple has been criminally charged for arguing over religion with Muslims in their own private premises.
Media reports have revealed that Ben and Sharon Vogelenzangl, hotel owners in Liverpool, have been charged under public order laws with using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” that were “religiously aggravated.”
Apparently the Christian couple got into a discussion with Muslim residents of their hotel over religion.
During the course of the discussion, it is alleged that Mr and Mrs Vogelenzangl suggested that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was a warlord and that the burka was a form of bondage.
One of the Muslims in the conversation then ran off to the police and complained that she had been offended by these comments, leading to the arrest and charges against the Christians.
This is an act which would only be possible in a theocratic state and is highly reminiscent of Saudi Arabia and other sharia law countries where any sort of criticism is a criminal offence.
The Christians, whose trial has been set for December, face a fine of up to £5,000 and a criminal record if they are convicted.
They deny that their comments were threatening and argue that they had every right to defend and explain their beliefs.
According to media reports, Mrs Vogelenzang said: “Nothing like this has happened to us before. We are completely shocked.”
She and her husband were arrested and charged under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and Section 31 (1) (c) and (5) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.
The Christians appeared at Liverpool Magistrates Court on Friday to hear the date of their trial before magistrates, and were granted bail on the condition that they did not approach any of the witnesses expected to appear.
The heavy-handed police action has once again highlighted the state’s subservience to the Islamification process.
The Public Order Act was designed to deal with violence and threatening behaviour in the streets and not to regulate conversations between individuals in private premises.
The Christian Institute has come out in support of the persecuted couple. CI spokesman Mike Judge was quoted as saying that “important issues of religious liberty are at stake.”
“In recent years, we have backed several cases where Christians have suffered unfair treatment because of their faith,” he said.
“We have detected a worrying tendency for public bodies to misapply the law in a way that seems to sideline Christianity more than other faiths.”
ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 DENIED TO BRITONS BUT NOT TO MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT!!
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE CoE ABOVE ALL OTHERS’!!!
Moral Superiority? — Dehumanising Their Own People
By David Morris — In his review of “The Memoirs of Granville Sharp” in The Edinburgh Review, “Capital Punishments”, of July 1821, William Hazlitt rehearsed an anecdote about Prince Naimbanna: “If a man should try to kill me, or should try to sell me and my family for slaves, he would do an injury to as many as he might kill or sell; but if any one takes away the character of Black people, that man injures Black people all over the world; and when he has once taken away their character, there is nothing that he may not do to Black people ever after. That man, for instance, will beat Black people and, and say “Oh, it is only a Black man, why should I not beat him?” That man will make slaves of Black people; for when he has taken away their character, he will say,” Oh, they are only Black people, why should I not make them slaves?”
The word which is used to dehumanise us is “racists”, with today’s teacher trainees being told that “only whites can be racist.” It is not to make us slaves as the prince feared for his people, but is a way of excusing the importation of cheap labour or allowing Muslims to take over our country.
In June 2000, Sir David Calvert-Smith, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, did that which had so alarmed Prince Naimbanna. He “took away the character” of white people by describing nearly all white people as racist. He was head of the CPS from 1988 till 3rd November 2003 and is heavily responsible for turning the police into a totalitarian force policing opinions instead of crime. In 2005 he led an inquiry for the Commission for Racial Equality into how the police forces of England and Wales dealt with racism within their ranks. The report on the inquiry was given in March 2005. At a press conference Calvert-Smith said they would not be investigating “racism” because it was a “given.” There his prejudice was laid bare.
When the Establishment attack those they hate, they generalize, but when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties as with the expenses scandals, they treat it as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal affects the parties as a whole, the media focus on individuals.
In an article entitled “Why Sir Ian Blair was right in his fight against racism,” in The First Post 3rd December 2008, novelist William Self repeated mindless ideology and slandered a whole people: “The outgoing Metropolitan Police commissioner had the courage to call wider society out on its more revolting prejudices … he confesses to regretting two or three things that he said to the press, his infamous remarks concerning the Soham murders are not among them. According to Blair, his contention that he couldn’t see what ‘all the fuss was about’ — referring to the media circus that got going in the aftermath of Holly and Jessica’s deaths — is something he’s determined to stand by.
“What Blair meant by this — and he was happy to elaborate — was that a disproportionate amount of attention was paid to these particular murders because the victims were young, white girl children, while the media are considerably less exercised by the death of young, black males.”
Has Self not heard of Stephen Lawrence or Damilola Taylor? Well, more than he has Kriss Donald. When it comes to the unfashionable issues, these writers talk in mindless clichés. There is no creativity, no pushing back boundaries when it comes to the Establishment ideology, just robotic repetition.
As for Blair — you would expect that sort of talk from a psychopath who would have an excuse, but these media elites have none. Ian Huntley’s murder of two young girls is not as bad as the imaginary prejudice against ethnics by whites! The elites are prejudiced against whites but that is not “disgusting”? Police Chief Colin Cramphorn once said concerning Muslim child-rape of young white girls that we must learn to live with it! These comments show the underlying hatred the elites have for white people.
The Telegraph of 10th November 2008 shows how these base minded people prop each other up. Sir Ian Blair will receive a pay-off worth up to £400,000 when he stands down as Metropolitan Police Commissioner in three weeks’ time. The additional sum is on top of the estimated £3.5 million pension pot, worth £160,000 a year, which he is set to receive after 30 years’ service as a policeman.
The traditional elites: the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman, QC, are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider that we’re told that Islam is a ‘Religion of Peace’ — both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have asserted as much. If you care about the future for women under Islam in the west look up The Despatches programme filmed inside mosques.
A sick judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam: “You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”
Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.
A consequence of the Macpherson Report is the reduction in legal protection for those under suspicion. Ostensibly, the repeal of Double Jeopardy in 2005 followed a marathon campaign by Ann Ming after her daughter was murdered in 1989. This was a convenient case to use because the removal of Double Jeopardy was a recommendation of the Macpherson Report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and would enable the state to repeatedly try “racists” until they can get a conviction.
Many Labour ministers have extremist links and pasts but the media cover that up. If the media had wanted, they could have exposed Labour, but because they share the same idealogy, they did not. Don’t blindly trust the media but question every statement and look things up for yourselves in search engines.
The Times, in 1954, gives evidence that even then we were being cleansed from our communities. There were 200 a month arriving without work or accommodation which was causing concern in London, Liverpool and Birmingham.
“On Merseyside, where 121 disembarked on Tuesday from the liner Ascania, there is a coloured population of about 10,000. It is estimated that 2,000 of them are receiving public assistance … all the Government departments concerned say they have no means of assessing how many of the immigrants from the West Indies and to a small extent from the African colonies, are drawing welfare allowances. This is because all the immigrants are recorded as British subjects, and have equal claims.”
When public figures make the usual biased pronouncements on us and racial issues, research their hidden agendas. On Radio Four, Simon Hughes stated that they would have to start exposing the BNP’s argument such as exploding their ‘myth’ that asylum seekers get new houses, etc. He claimed this was not true. Not only is it true, but ‘asylum seekers’ get massively preferential treatment. Hughes was deceiving the public and behind his apparently reasonable words wants to submit us to Islam.
Andrew Marr tells us what he thinks should be done to Britons if we object to being dispossessed: “Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, threatening them but also creating new opportunities, have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants.
“And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain ‘natural’ beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.”
So it should — but not merely on the police, or the boys with spray-paint cans. The present bunch of elites are the most selfish crowd of beggars on horseback ever to attain influence. They browbeat ordinary people into leading the moral life they themselves advocate but avoid living. Marr is advocating fascism and “ethnocide.”
Where do Paxman and Andrews Neill and Marr live? Not in the middle of Southall or Brixton! Sometimes they do when they are young like Billy Bragg but when it comes to bringing their children up they move to nice areas.