Thursday 18 June 2009
“…and they divided up my land.” A Muslim US President and Imperialistic EU Fatal to the Euromediterranean
Something decisive is happening around and in the Middle East: The US has seemingly abandoned Israel as its primary ally in the Middle East, choosing Saudi Arabia and Egypt instead – and approaching a nuclear Iran for an ally, too. Since Israel is a member of the Union for the Mediterranean ,and here we are deeply involved in what is to come up down there. At the same time the EU is keen on extending its empire far beyond the borders of Europe. This makes Israel a tiny spot on the map, which is to serve a higher course a higher cause, the New World Order created by other Jews! For this evil movement both its previous and present prime ministers are working through their unususual memberships of the US-Council on Foreign Relations.
Pres. Obama´s speech to the Muslim world at the Cairo University
The Telegraph 4 June, 2009 : “The only resolution (to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security.
The obligations – the obligations that the parties have agreed to under the Road Map are clear. For peace to come, it is time. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. It is time for these settlements to stop.All of us have a responsibility to work for the day …when the holy land of the three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be, when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra – as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed – peace be upon them – joined in prayer.”!!!
This tale is seen by Islam as a confirmation that: 1. Muhammad was said to lead the prayer at the Al-Aqsa Mosque – superior to Christ who is just placed in the 2. lowest of 7 heavens with Abraham quite above!! 2. Islam has a divine right to Jerusalem and the Holy Land according to the prominent Al-Azhari scholar Dr. Ja`far Ahmad At-Tahlawi !!! This Isra story is being used as an argument for the belonging of Jerusalem to the Muslims!! 3. And it confirms the Muslim allegation, that there is just one god, Allah, who is said not to have any son! Obama refers to this unchristian speech and claims to be a Christian!! This kind of “Christianity” is Antichristianity – the usual kind today.
Pres. Obama´s true nature: He tried to show a forged baptism certificate on his website. But he has just one genuine certificate, showing him to be Muslim.
The Telegraph 7 June 2009: Mr Obama’s appropriated the guilt for ancient wars between Islam and Christendom, Western colonialism and America’s support for despotic regimes during the Cold War. Then came the flattering narrative about Islam’s place in history: ignoring the role of Greece, China, India and pre-Islamic Persia, he credited Islam with having invented modern medicine, algebra, navigation and even the use of pens and printing. Believing that flattery will get you anywhere, he put the number of Muslim Americans at seven million, when the total is not even half that number, promoting Islam to America’s largest religion after Christianity.
The President promised to help change the US tax system to allow Muslims to pay zakat, the sharia tax, and threatened to prosecute those who do not allow Muslim women to cover their hair, despite the fact that this “hijab” is a political prop invented by radicals in the 1970s. As if he did not have enough on his plate, Mr Obama insisted that fighting “negative stereotypes of Islam” was “one of my duties as President of the United States”. However, there was no threat to prosecute those who force the hijab on Muslim women through intimidation, blackmail and physical violence, nor any mention of the abominable treatment of Muslim women, including such horrors as “honour-killing”.
Buried within the text, possibly in the hope that few would notice, was an effective acceptance of Iran’s nuclear ambitions: “No single nation should pick and choose which nations should hold nuclear weapons.” Mr Obama did warn that an Iranian bomb could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. However, the Cairo speech did not include the threat of action against the Islamic Republic – not even sanctions. The message was clear: the US was distancing itself from the resolutions passed against Iran by the UN Security Council.
As if all that weren’t enough, Mr Obama dropped words such as “terror” and “terrorism” from his vocabulary. The killers of September 11 were “violent extremists”, not “Islamist terrorists.” (In this case apparently totally justified!!!).
Movements for freedom and human rights are fighting despotic, fanatical and terrorist groups that use Islam as a fascist ideology. It was not surprising that the Muslim Brotherhood lauds him for “acknowledging the justice of our case”
After Mr Obama´s Cairo speech– where he promised the Arabs a Palestinian 2 state solution now – a veritable wrath seems to have seized the Israelis (video).
Debkafile 4 June, 2009: President Obama proposes to gradually minimize America’s strategic ties with Israel. This means that the US president and his advisers intend to start cutting down on their military and intelligence discourse with Israel. Instead of conferring with Israel on its military and undercover moves the Middle East and Muslim world, Washington will make Cairo and Riyadh the crux of its regional teamwork, only turning to Jerusalem when unavoidable.
Administration leaders seek to enter into negotiations with Iran unencumbered by Israeli baggage. Close US ties with the Jewish state are also seen as a burden in Obama’s prospective diplomatic engagements with Arab and Muslim governments such as Syria.
Global Res. 6 June 2009: (Hillary) Clinton has dragged US-Israeli relations into a new trough.
In Washington, the gloves are off. If Netanyahu holds to his defensive, accommodating posture toward on the settlement issue and fails to punch back with demands that the other side … he will find himself inexorably forced back step by step on other vital security interests, including Iran’s accelerated nuclear weapons program.
English People 5 June, 2009: Javier Solana: “It is time to move. “I think that together we — the EU, the U.S. and the countries in the region — can begin to solve the many problems that face us in the Middle East.” “Now, what we cannot do is fail. Now we have to really move, together, and try and to do what has to be done. There is no time to lose. It has been our dream for so many years.” Mr. Solana has declared the year of 2009 will be decisive for the Middle East! After the Gaza war the EU has declared the Palestinians and Hamas its love. Netanyahu´s speech on June 14 does not soften the EU to upgrade its ties with Israel.
But everything comes down to ancient Jerusalem
From an interview in the Middle east Progress 5 June 2009 : “As a result of a long-term study undertaken by the University of Windsor, in which Princeton University participated, we’ve come to the conclusion that all the issues in Jerusalem are resolvable through bilateral negotiations, except for a final determination of the Old City.
Here is a speech delivered by Israeli Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu on 14 June, 2009, on the peace process – wherein he accepted hesitantly and for the first time a division of Palestine into Israel and a demilitarised Palestinian state without real souvereignty.
Mr. Obama seems rather pleased for the moment – although he still demands a stop to the settlements. And Bill Clinton considers Netanjahu´s speech just to be a beginning.
Israeli-Palestinian reaction to the peace process
Debkafile 14 June 2009 Ntanyahu said the reality of the Palestinian people in this land must be recognized, but argued that the conflict is rooted in the Arab world’s refusal to recognize Israel’s right to a state within any borders at all from 1947. Jerusalem will remain Israel’s united capital with freedom of religion for all faiths, the prime minister said.
The Times 14 June 2009: Mr Netanyahu also ruled out a complete halt to settlement activity and said that Palestinian refugees dating from the 1948 creation of Israel, and their descendants, would not be resettled inside Israel’s borders.
The former US President Jimmy Carter told the Israeli daily Haaretz on Sunday that Israel risked a head-on collision with Washington over the settlements
Saeb Erakat, a senior Palestinian negotiator, said Netanyahu’s remarks were “deceptive” and did not constitute acceptance of a two-state solution.“Netanyahu will have to wait 1,000 years to find one single Palestinian who would accept the plans he mentioned in his speech,” Erakat said on Qatar-based Al-Jazeera television.
So, is Israel now being isolated from the USA? By no means!
Global Research 13 June, 2009: (Israeli) Minister-without-Portfolio Yossi Peled proposed Israeli sanctions on the U.S. in a letter to cabinet ministers on Sunday.
“In what may be his most controversial suggestion, Peled recommends intervening in American congressional races to weaken Obama and asking American Jewish donors not to contribute to Democratic congressional candidates. He predicted that this would result in Democratic candidates pressuring Obama to become more pro-Israel.”
Look at all the pro-Israel money that has flowed into the coffers of U.S. congressional candidates,
“It shows Yossi Peled is terribly uninformed about U.S. politics,’ said National Jewish Democratic Council Executive Director Ira Forman.”In short, Peled doesn’t understand that the U.S. Congress has already been bought and sold by pro-Israel money – and that any more cash would be redundant.
Anti-Americanism is on the rise in Israel.
Ehud Olmert (Haaretz 06/03/2009): “There won’t be peace if part of Jerusalem does not become the capital of the Palestinian state,” said Olmert, speaking at Kibbutz Yifat in the Galilee. The demand is highly contentious in Israel, with many rightist politicians stating their total opposition to any division of the city.
The Washington Tines 5 June, 2009:
“Presidential Determination 2009-19, latest in a series of pro forma memos to the Secretary of State entitled “Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act.” This determination is a legally required waiver under said act to continue to delay the May 31, 1999 deadline for moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. In the Bush years the memo contained the sentence, “My Administration remains committed to beginning the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem.” The Obama team has edited that passage out.
So, now the Jewish organisation One Jerusalem feels the threat and has started a petition for an undivided Jerusalem as Israels capital This shows the approaching drama: Jews who would rather die than give up Jerusalem vs. an unconverted Muslim US president to whom friendship with Islam means more than Biblical prophecies.
Pres. Obama and the EU seem set upon seeing substantial progress in the Israeli-Arab conflict this year. Israel presents conditions that the Arabs will not accept. In fact, the Palestinians will accept no less than effacing the state of Israel – possibly by resettling the 1948 refugees and their descendants – which would drown Israel demographically and let Israel sink into poverty as in the remaining Muslim world – the way Islam is being invited to drown Europe with Jewish elitist blessing. So, we are approaching the end of the state of Israel – an end which has probably been planned (Albert Pike) since The Rothschilds founded it: Israel as a national state founded by a dynasty with one goal: To abolish all national states and have a one-world state – and here.
It will be impossible for Israel to ever give up the present status of Jerusalem. Spiegel Online 16 June 2009: “The majority in Netanyahus´s right-wing coalition government and in his own party rejects what Obama is asking him to do. Netanyahu will hardly be able to resist showing at least a modicum of accommodation in the long term, which includes recognizing the so-called road map for peace as a guideline for Middle East policy.”
This may lead to Israel´s fall – through a civil war (Zach. 12:2) and/or a nuclear war – as foretold in numerous biblical prophecies about the fate of the restored Israel in the endtimes (Ezek. 38–39, Zach. 12:1–9, Habakkuk 3, Jeremiah 25, Isajah 13, Matth 24, Luk. 21:20–26). The cause of such disasters? “… and they divided my land”. Joel 3:2