h/t WWW.RUGFISH.COM

IT WAS ALL ACCIDENTAL OF COURSE………PHEW.. WAS THAT A PIG THAT FLEW PAST MY WINDOW?

Yea!

THE ENEMY WITHIN…..

Keynesian Economics
John Maynard Keynes, Fabian Socialist
from pp. 76-77:

John Maynard Keynes, British homosexual and Fabian Socialist, collaborated with Harry Dexter White, Sovietsecret agent, and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, in creating the IMFand the World Bank. A recent review on the Internet of Keynes’ early work, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), said Keynes “unleashed the most terrifying period of government expansion and social experimentation in the history of Western man…one of the greatest threats to our freedom that we have ever weathered. This book was a source of great evil in this century and Keynes must shoulder a significant portion of the blame for the sorry state of the West circa 1976.”

Also on the Internet, a Canadian commentary of recent vintage, remarks:

“It has been nearly sixty years since the Keynesian revolution. The effects of the “short-run” and ”childless” philosophy of Mr. Keynes are clear: nearly all western governments have followed the Keynesian prescription of spending and consumption, and have run large annual budget deficits for decades. In Canada , the federal debt is now approaching a staggering 550 billion dollars, and the country is joining the ranks of Third World nations in terms of its level of public debt (we are just behind Burundi and just ahead of Morocco). Interest payments on the Canadian federal debt are now the largest single government expenditure.

“Our public debt represents our lust to consume today without thought for tomorrow. We have in large measure, spent our children’s inheritance…We have, to put it very bluntly, practiced homosexual economics, but we have not, as Mr. Keynes expected, spent ourselves into prosperity…..”[i]

Justices Frankfurter and Brandeis imported Keynes to the United States through trickery by having him write a letter to the New York Times, ostensibly at the invitation of Times’s editors, rather than theirs. In this way they were able to introduce Keynes’ economic theories to Franklin Roosevelt in the early days of the Depression.

The original acquaintance of all these socialist dreamers and activists had started just after WWI when all had been involved with Wilson and the Versailles Treaty. Any number of Harvardites were included when Wilson brought to Paris about 100 professors and lawyers to draw up a charter for world government, at the instigation of his buddy, E. M. House.[ii]

These relationships continued throughout the ensuing years and though many of the individuals were supposedly of different political parties, they spoke the same language and were dedicated to the same propositions, regardless of party affiliation which was a circumstance used to confuse the electorate, particularly in 1952 at the election of Eisenhower when the electorate clearly wanted a house cleaning, but it was all disguised by verbiage, and no housecleaning or policy changes ever occurred. Even today we are still running on the same global policies, Europe first, America last.

These Paris connections from 1919 continued throughout the next fifty years, – or until time carried away the individuals. Most of the Americanswere Frankfurter’s students. They were disappointed with the negotiations and as a consequence formed the Council on Foreign Relations [iii], the counterpart to the British Fabian society. By 1939 these internationally-minded connivers pretty much dominated the State Department, as well as the office of the President, Treasury, CIA, the authoring of the UN Charter. (If you look at the membership and the policy-making positions held by CFR members in the government, you see another web.)

All polls to the contrary demonstrating the American people did not approve or want to be mixed up with European affairs were ignored by the Frankfurter/Brandeis’ “web” which mixed the U.S. into everything—particularly by writing checks on the Treasury to aid every Socialist government around the world.

Amazing the number of webs which were in existence in Washington : Brandeis/Frankfurter’s, the Soviet spy rings, and the CFR. The policies were the same, only the names and the faces were different. Yet even here there was an interlock.

——————————————————————————–

[i] In The Long Run We Are (not) all Dead, Ken Ewert, The King’s Community Church , 2/6/00

[ii] Once again, the title of “Colonel” was a term of affection bestowed by the successful campaign of a Texas governor House managed. He never served any time in the military and is not entitled to such a designation.

[iii] There are many sources for information on this organization, but I am relying on the 1961 Report of Dan Smoot on our Invisible Government, which series of articles, contains the history and the names of those who were there and still there in the year of the writing, 1961.

————————–

from pp. 79-80:

6

Ropke sums up the UN/Keynes -based plan:

“This sort of international collective planning cannot be brought about by the free cooperation of democratic nations, since international planning presupposes an international state able to give and enforce its orders like a national state. Such an international state is utterly utopian and impractical. For, in order that the plan may work, it is necessary that it be a collectivist international state, whose inevitable centralism cannot tolerate any kind of international federalism. Yet everyone, including the socialists, agree that an international federation is the only way in which, at best, we could hope for an international state in our life-time. So much for the illusion.

“International planning thus becomes possible only under the kind of international dictatorship which Hitlercalled “Grossraum.” Then, however, it would be a nightmare, and surely for the authors of the UN Report no less than for all of us.

“It would, therefore appear that not only the present plan but also any other attempt, however ingeniously contrived, to get out of the impasse of national “full employment” by the machinery of planned international adjustment, is a snare and delusion. There is left only one course:–to admit that “full employment,” in the extreme sense of the Report, is not feasible and to be satisfied with a less ambitious, more reasonable and better balanced program of economic stabilization…….

“….what wrecked the world were the same political and unmoral forces which undermined the liberal international order itself….The first step…is to combat current fallacies on “full employment” and to present convincingly the case for stable high employment, by free, natural, and genuine equilibrium, both nationally and internationally.”

Several years later Joseph Stiglitz, former chief economist with the World Bank, made revelations on its abuse of power and its corruption which, in particular, caused Russia to be stripped of “its industrial assets, with the effect that the corruption scheme cut national output nearly in half causing depression and starvation.” Many say this, not the administration of Ronald Reagan, was responsible for the Russian eclipse. Keynes and White must be turning over in their graves to find their offspring, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have created havoc in the land they both loved so well, though neither of them chose to live in Russia .

Stiglitz made his opinions public in an interview on the often hidden work of the IMF and World Bank and the bank’s 51% owner, the United StatesTreasury. Because of his failure to keep quiet, Stiglitz was in ill repute with the Clinton administration.[i]

Stiglitz was fired in 1999 and not allowed a ‘quiet retirement’. Clinton’s agent, Larry Summers demanded public ex-communication. No wonder the Soviets disappeared from being a major player, calling the tune to which the U. S. State Department’s foreign policies had been dancing pretty much since 1920—despite how much taxpayer money was funneled into the corrupt, sinister, malignant Soviet regime, a tally beyond estimation.

Stiglitzoutlined the techniques used to bankrupt nations in Asia and So. America as well. “interest rates ..driven up to 30, 50 and 80% The result was demolished property values, savaged industrial production and drained national treasuries.” The end result when food and fuel prices soared out of sight was riots. Secret documents of the Bank indicate this result was anticipated!

Journalist Greg Palast interviewed Stiglitz and wrote that IMF- sponsored riots (dispersed with bullets, tanks and teargas) ended with national assets available for picking by foreign corporations. No wonder Stiglitz had to have police protection when he was in the United States!

——————————————————————————–

[i] Free American, May 2002, Greg Palast

http://www.minutewoman.net/Keynesian%20Economics.htm

HIS PAEDO ECONOMICS ARE STILL FOLLOWED TODAY- THE FABIAN DESTRUCTION POLICIES IMPLEMENTED IN BRITAIN DECADES AGO…………….ALSO IN THE USA….NZ…OZ
HENCE VOTE THE SAME- SAME IS WHAT YOU’LL GET!!!
BRITAIN BROUGHT TO HER KNEE’S BY THE WESTMINSTER FABIAN CABAL!!!

FABIANS INFILTRATED EVERY PARTY- RESEARCH HAS SHOWN!!

Wednesday, 30 December 2009
Thatcher and Immigration

Thatcher has to be commended for her staunch resistance to Communism, her defiance over the Falklands and for facing down the Comintern controlled British trades unions during WW3, the Cold War.

Yet all the work she did in the national interest was undone and destroyed by her singing the Single European Act in 1987 that began the process of fully integrating Europe into a European Union and her policy of privatising the British state industries in order to globalise the British economy as part of her Free Market Neo-Liberalist ideology.

British Petroleum was privatised in stages in October 1979, September 1983 and November 1987; British Aerospace in January 1981 and 1985; the government share in British Sugar in July 1981; Cable and Wireless in November 1981; Amersham International and National Freight Corporation in February 1982; Britoil in November 1982 and August 1985; Associated British Ports in February 1983; Jaguar in July 1984; British Telecom in November 1984; the National Bus Company in October 1986; British Gas in December 1986; British Airways in February 1987; the Royal Ordnance in April 1987; Rolls-Royce in May 1987; the British Airports Authority in July 1987; the Rover Group in August 1988; British Steel in December 1988; the Regional Water Authorities in November 1989; Girobank in July 1990; and the National Grid in December 1990.

In 1983 Thatcher also broke up and privatised British Shipbuilders, which had been amalgamated and nationalised by Callaghan in 1977 in the lean times following the 1973 oil crisis, and which still employed 86,000 people building naval and commercial vessels, many in the north-east of England.Few of the privatised shipyards subsequently survived competition against East Asian cheap labour, with the single largest private sector group, BVT, now employing a fraction of the nationalised group’s number, just over 7,000 people working on Navy contracts in the Clyde and Portsmouth yards.

The process of privatisation, especially the preparation of nationalised industries for privatisation, was associated with marked improvements in performance, particularly in terms of labour productivity. But it is not clear how far this can be attributed to the merits of privatisation itself. The “productivity miracle” observed in British industry under Thatcher was achieved not so much by increasing the overall productivity of labour as by reducing workforces and increasing unemployment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher

In other words the Thatcher miracle was built upon ;

1) Cheap and plentiful North Seal oil and the currency flow it created

2) Throwing British workers on the dole in order to lower wages in order for the UK to compete in the global economy

3) The short term financial boost from selling off the nations assets to the private sector.

There was no miracle.

It was simply luck, callousness and cunning.

On immigration she did NOTHING to stop the flood of immigrants into the UK and by signing the SEA in 1987 she commenced the process that led to Eastern European workers being allowed to work in the UK as they part of the EU.

Those who venerate her, venerate a false idol.

She was a nationalist who destroyed her own nation.

She dismantled and sold off the nations silver and turned us into the wage slaves of mammon and the international money markets.

She did nothing to stop immigration or seek to prevent the immigration invasion.

————————————————————–

Margaret Thatcher complained bitterly in private about the numbers of immigrants coming to Britain from south Asia, saying they were being given council houses at the expense of “white citizens”, it was disclosed today.

Papers released to the National Archives at Kew, west London, under the 30-year rule cast fresh light on the former Prime Minister’s attitude towards race and immigration.

http://www.24dash.com/news/Housing/2…housing-policy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher

RESEARCH DOES HOWEVER SHOW- THAT THATCHER TRIED WITH ALL HER MIGHT TO DE-FABIANISE WESTMINSTER- BUT AS LORD HEWART HAD WARNED IN 1928 OF THE FABIAN’S ENTRENCHED IN PARLIAMENT – THEIR FEET ARE WELL AND TRULY UNDER THE CABINET TABLE……….HIS BOOK- THE NEW DESPOTISM- BY THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND- LORD HEWART.

CHECKOUT VIA YOUR SEARCH ENGINE- FABIAN FASCISM- WAKE UP!!

Ron Paul Attacked By Zionist AIPAC Slug

Rent-A-Zionist Jewish AIPAC supporter calls Ron Paul an anti-semite for pointing out that the airplane bomber stated to the police that he attacked the US as payback for the US jets bombing Yemen two weeks ago and that they are at war with us as we are over there.

http://libertymaven.com/2009/12/28/ben-stein-calls-ron-paul-antisemitic-on-larry-king/8440/

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/

THE NHS IS BEING PRIVATISED GRADUALLY IN THAT GOOD OLE FABIAN WAY!!

COMRADE BROWNSKI- WOULD CHOKE ON THE TRUTH!!

MARXIST’S AROUND THE CABINET OFFICE TABLE………………KGB RECOMMENDATION GETS YOU A JOB IN THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT……………HOW SICK IS THAT?

The First Leftist

Mises Daily: Thursday, May 28, 2009 by Dean Russell

[This essay appears in Essays on Liberty, (volume 1, 1952).]

“Liberty Leading the People” (1830)
Eugène Delacroix (1798–1863)The first leftist would not be popular in America today. That is true because the original leftists wanted to abolish government controls over industry, trade, and the professions. They wanted wages, prices, and profits to be determined by competition in a free market, and not by government decree. They were pledged to free their economy from government planning, and to remove the government-guaranteed special privileges of guilds, unions, and associations whose members were banded together to use the law to set the price of their labor or capital or product above what it would be in a free market.

The first leftists were a group of newly elected representatives to the National Constituent Assembly at the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789. They were labeled “leftists” merely because they happened to sit on the left side in the French Assembly.

The legislators who sat on the right side were referred to as the party of the Right, or rightists. The rightists or “reactionaries” stood for a highly centralized national government, special laws and privileges for unions and various other groups and classes, government economic monopolies in various necessities of life, and a continuation of government controls over prices, production, and distribution.

Early American Ideals
The ideals of the party of the Left were based largely on the spirit and principles of our own American Constitution. Those first French leftists stood for individual freedom of choice and personal responsibility for one’s own welfare. Their goal was a peaceful and legal limitation of the powers of the central government, a restoration of local self-government, an independent judiciary, and the abolition of special privileges.

Those leftists, holding a slim majority in the two years’ existence of the National Constituent Assembly, did a remarkable job. They limited the extreme powers of the central government. They removed special privileges that the government had granted to various groups and persons. Their idea of personal liberty with absolute equality before the law for all persons was rapidly becoming a reality. But before the program of those first leftists was completed, a violent minority from their own ranks — the revolutionary Jacobins — grasped the power of government and began their reign of terror and tyranny.

That development seems to have risen from this little-understood and dangerously deceptive arrangement: two groups of persons with entirely different motives may sometimes find themselves allied in what appears to be a common cause. As proof that this danger is not understood even today, we need only examine the results of our own “common cause” alliances with various dictators against various other dictators. So it was among the leftists in France in 1789. The larger faction wanted to limit the powers of government; the leaders of the other group wanted to overthrow the existing rulers and grasp the power themselves.

Separation Of Powers

“The Death of Marat” (1793)
Jacques-Louis David (1748–1825)The majority of the original party of the Left had been opposed to concentrated power regardless of who exercised it. But the violent revolutionists in their midst, led by Robespierre, Danton, and Marat, were opposed to concentrated power only so long as someone else exercised it. Robespierre, who represented himself as spokesman for the people, first said that the division of the powers of government was a good thing when it diminished the authority of the king. But when Robespierre himself became the leader, he claimed that the division of the powers of government would be a bad thing now that the power belonged “to the people.”

Thus, in the name of the people, the ideas of the original leftists were rejected. For all practical purposes, local self-government disappeared completely, the independence of the judiciary was destroyed, and the new leaders became supreme. The program of the first party of the Left was dead.

Most of the original leftists protested. So they too were soon repudiated in the general terror that was called liberty. But since the name leftist had become identified with the struggle of the individual against the tyranny of government, the new tyrants continued to use that good name for their own purposes. This was a complete perversion of its former meaning. Thus was born what should properly be called the new and second Left.

The leaders of this new Left were greatly aided in their program of deceiving the people by using this effective device of changing the meaning of words. The term “tyranny” had been used to describe the powers of the old government. And the term “liberty” had been used to describe the ideas of the original leftists. Well and good. But when the second leftists in turn became tyrannical, they continued to call it liberty! In the name of liberty, mob violence was encouraged, habeas corpus was abolished, and the guillotine was set up!

Look Behind The Label

$15 $12

Anne Robert Jacques Turgot (1727–1781)Now who is opposed to liberty or progress or any of the various other desirable ideals that government officials claim will result from their “unselfish programs for the people”? Probably no one. Thus do the people tend to accept almost any idea — communism, socialism, imperialism, or whatever — if those ideas are advanced under attractive labels such as freedom from want, defense against aggression, welfare, equality, liberty, fellowship, and security. Since most of the world today still suffers from this disease of “word confusion,” it is hardly surprising that the French people in the 1790s were also misled by the same device.

The rallying cry of this new Left was, All power to the people! And, as always, it sounded good to the people. But the point that the French people missed is the same point that haunts the world today. It is this: the people cannot themselves individually exercise the power of government; the power must be held by one or a few persons. Those who hold the power always claim that they use it for the people, whether the form of government is a kingdom, a dictatorship, a democracy, or whatever. If the people truly desire to retain or to regain their freedom, their attention should first be directed to the principle of limiting the power of government itself instead of merely demanding the right to vote on what party or person is to hold the power. For is the victim of government power any the less deprived of his life, liberty, or property merely because the depriving is done in the name of — or even with the consent of — the majority of the people?

It was on this point that Hitler, for instance, misled the Germans, and Stalin deceived the Russians. Both of them hastened to identify themselves as champions of the people. And there appears to be little or no doubt but that the majority of the people approved or acquiesced in the overall programs that were initiated in their names.

As the “leaders” murdered millions of individual persons, their excuse for their deeds was that they were doing them “for the people.”

As they enslaved countless millions of human beings, they brushed all criticism aside by exclaiming: “But the people voted for me in the last election.”

As they confiscated property and income, they claimed to be doing it “for the general welfare” and by “a mandate from the people.”

Hitler and Stalin merely adapted to their time and circumstances the philosophy of the French Jacobins, the new leftists, who declared that power is always too great in tyrannical hands, but that it can never be too great in the hands of the people — meaning Hitler, Stalin, a Jacobin leader, or any other person who wishes to possess and increase the power of government over the individual citizen.

What Is Government?
Here is another illogical reason why the people of France traded the freedom-with-responsibility offered by the policy of the first leftists for the bloody tyranny offered by the policy of the second leftists: They believed that an organized police force — government — could be used to force people to be good and virtuous.

“Since the name leftist had become identified with the struggle of the individual against the tyranny of government, the new tyrants continued to use that good name for their own purposes.”It is true that this organized force of government can be used, and should be used, to restrain and punish persons who commit evil acts — murder, theft, defamation, and such — against their fellow men; but this force that is government cannot be used to force persons to be good or brave or compassionate or charitable or virtuous in any respect. All virtues must come from within a person; they cannot be imposed by force or threats of force. Since that is so, it follows that almost all human relations and institutions should be left completely outside the authority of government, with no government regulation whatever. But this seems to be a difficult idea for most persons to grasp.

The idea of concentrated government power — force against persons — is easy to grasp. And it is easy to imagine that this power can be used to force equality upon unequal persons. Possibly this explains why so many persons believe that the world could be near perfect if only they had the power of government to force other people to do what they think best for them. That concept of government is, however, the direct road to despotism. Any person who holds it is, by definition, a would-be dictator: one who desires to make mankind over in his own image — to force other persons to follow his concepts of morality, economics, social relationships, and government. The fact that such would-be dictators may seem to have fine intentions, and wish only to do good for the people, does not justify their arrogant desire to have authority over others.

Thus it was that the terror of the second leftists reversed the advance of freedom that had begun in France in 1789. And the French Revolution finally became nothing more than a fight among would-be rulers to gain possession of the power of government.

The new leftists — as is the case with all persons who desire authority over other persons — did not fear the power of government. They adored it. Like Hitler, Stalin, and other despots, their primary reason for inciting the people to reject the old order was to get this power for themselves. And the people did not object at first because they did not understand that the power of government is dangerous in any hands. They just thought that it was dangerous in the hands of a king. So they took the power from the king and transferred it to a “leader.” They failed to see that it was a brutal restoration of the very thing they had rebelled against! In fact, those second leftists held far more power than Louis XVI ever had.

“The French Revolution finally became nothing more than a fight among would-be rulers to gain possession of the power of government.”Is there a lesson for present-day America to be learned from this French experiment with a highly centralized “people’s government”?

The majority of the American people voted approval of this “Robespierre philosophy of government” as expressed by the holder of a high political office in 1936:

[I]n 34 months we have built up new instruments of public power. In the hands of a people’s government this power is wholesome and proper. But in the hands of political puppets of an economic autocracy, such power would provide shackles for the liberties of the people.

When translated into simple English, that statement reads, power is a good thing, so long as I am the one who has it.

That concept of increasing the power of the national government seems to have even more support today, by the leaders of both major political parties, than it had in 1936. All of them claim, of course, that they will use the power “for the good of the people.”

Something For Nothing

$15 $12

Claude Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850)Have we fully considered where this road may lead? Have we forgotten the teachings of our forefathers and their warning that the only hope for permanent liberty lies in restricting the power of government itself, regardless of who the government officials are or how they may be selected? Have we forgotten their warning to be especially wary of the demagogues who promise us something for nothing?

Our founding fathers, along with the first leftists who were of the same political faith, were well aware that individual freedom and personal responsibility for one’s own welfare are equal and inseparable parts of the same truth. They knew that history amply supports this truism: when personal responsibility is lost — whether it be taken by force or given up voluntarily — individual freedom does not long endure.

Dean Russel was a member of the staff of The Foundation for Economic Education, where he wrote for The Freeman, promoted the work of Ludwig von Mises, and translated the writings of Frédéric Bastiat. Comment on the blog.

This essay appears in Essays on Liberty, vol. 1 (Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education, 1952), pp. 38–46. It was first published in 1951.

This complete archive of The Freeman (1950–1999) is made possible by a generous grant from Guillermo M. Yeatts, in cooperation with Walter Block, and additional assistance from Gary North.

http://mises.org/daily/3425

It’s a New Year, So of Course It’s Time for a New War
Posted by David Kramer on January 1, 2010 06:49 AM
There are certain things in the world that one does not want to be correct about. Under the guise of retaliating against the alleged Yemen bomber’s plot to blow up a U.S. plane (Perhaps because he was retaliating against the U.S. Government’s criminal involvement in his country? Nah.), our next war zone is in the process of becoming a reality. (As if it hasn’t been long before the above incidents occurred.)

US PLOTS RETALIATORY STRIKES AGAINST AL-QAIDA IN YEMEN OVER PLANE BOMBER

The US is planning retaliatory strikes in Yemen against al-Qaida over its attempt to blow up a transatlantic flight on Christmas Day.

American officials say intelligence efforts are focused on identifying and tracking down those who plotted to put Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on the plane with enough explosive in his underwear to bring down the Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam. But they warn that finding those responsible is unlikely to be swift and say that identifying other “high-value” al-Qaida targets for retaliatory attack would also be a priority.

The official acknowledged that there was likely to be political and public pressure on Barack Obama to strike back at al-Qaida, particularly with Republican opponents breaking with the usual solidarity on national security issues to accuse him of weakness and making America vulnerable to attack. [Just think of all of the soldiers and civilians who are going to die for a lie—so as not to make Obamanable look “weak.”]

Happy New Year?

[Thanks to Chris Ciancio]

CHANGE- WE CAN DO IT- YES WE CAN!

December 16, 2009
We Can Now Add Yemen to Our Nobel Peace Prize President’s War Agenda
Posted by David Kramer on December 16, 2009 07:56 AM
US FIGHTERS POUND SA’ADA, KILL 120

At least 120 Houthis have lost lives and 44 others sustained injuries as US fighter jets took part in air strikes in the northwestern Yemeni province of Sa’ada.

“The US air force perpetrated an appalling massacre against citizens in the north of Yemen as it launched air raids on various populated areas, markets, refugee camps and villages along with Saudi warplanes,” the northern Yemen-based Houthi Shia fighters said.

They added, “The savage crime committed by the US air force shows the real face of the United States. It cancels out much touted American claims of human rights protection, promotion of freedoms of citizens as well as democracy.”

The US military continues its air raids on Yemen’s northern beleaguered regions of Amran, Hajjah and Sa’ada which have already been the target of joint Saudi-Yemen offensive against the Houthi fighters.

I don’t refer to him as President O-bomb-a for nothing, you know.

US fighters pound Sa’ada, kill 120
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:46:08 GMT
Font size :

At least 120 Houthis have lost lives and 44 others sustained injuries as US fighter jets took part in air strikes in the northwestern Yemeni province of Sa’ada.

“The US air force perpetrated an appalling massacre against citizens in the north of Yemen as it launched air raids on various populated areas, markets, refugee camps and villages along with Saudi warplanes,” the northern Yemen-based Houthi Shia fighters said.

They added, “The savage crime committed by the US air force shows the real face of the United States. It cancels out much touted American claims of human rights protection, promotion of freedoms of citizens as well as democracy.”

The US military continues its air raids on Yemen’s northern beleaguered regions of Amran, Hajjah and Sa’ada which have already been the target of joint Saudi-Yemen offensive against the Houthi fighters.

The conflict in northern Yemen began in 2004 between Sana’a and Houthi fighters. The conflict intensified in August 2009 when the Yemeni army launched Operation Scorched Earth in an attempt to crush the fighters in the northern province of Sa’ada.

The Houthis accuse the Yemeni government of violation of their civil rights, political, economic and religious marginalization as well as large-scale corruption.

The Saudi air force has further complicated the conflict by launching its own operations against Shia resistance fighters.

Houthi fighters say that Riyadh pounds their positions and that Saudi forces strike Yemeni villages and indiscriminately target civilians. According to the fighters, Saudis use toxic materials, including white phosphorus bombs, against civilians in northern Yemen.

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees estimates that since 2004, up to 175,000 people have been forced to leave their homes in Sa’ada and take refuge at overcrowded camps set up by the United Nations.

MP/MMA

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=113854&sectionid=351020206

US plots retaliatory strikes against al-Qaida in Yemen over plane bomber

Barack Obama has blamed intelligence failures for allowing the would-be bomber on the plane. Photograph: Alex Brandon/AP

The US is planning retaliatory strikes in Yemen against al-Qaida over its attempt to blow up a transatlantic flight on Christmas Day.

American officials say intelligence efforts are focused on identifying and tracking down those who plotted to put Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on the plane with enough explosive in his underwear to bring down the Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam. But they warn that finding those responsible is unlikely to be swift and say that identifying other “high-value” al-Qaida targets for retaliatory attack would also be a priority.

“First we have to find out who put Abdulmutallab on the plane with the bomb,” said a US official working alongside intelligence organisations. “He’s providing some leads and we’re not dealing with an unknown quantity here. We’ve been watching and listening to what goes on in Yemen and we may have pieces of the puzzle already and just need to fit it together.

“If and when we identify them then we plan how to deal with them. Who they are is one thing, where they are is another.If they’re still in Yemen and we can get a lock on them then it won’t be too difficult to know what to do. But they know who they are and won’t be standing out. After that we can move with the president’s authorisation. I don’t think there’s much doubt that authorisation will be forthcoming, but no one should think all of this is going to happen overnight.”

The official acknowledged that there was likely to be political and public pressure on Barack Obama to strike back at al-Qaida, particularly with Republican opponents breaking with the usual solidarity on national security issues to accuse him of weakness and making America vulnerable to attack.

“The people we want are the ones who put Abdulmutallab on the plane. Until we can get them there are other high-value targets that will make the point that attacking America does not go unpunished,” said the official.

But given the regular attacks against al-Qaida in Yemen, these may have a greater impact on American public opinion than on the extremist group.

The US has been conducting a covert assault with drone attacks on al-Qaida bases for about a year, while CIA agents inside the country help direct ground operations. American special forces have been training the Yemeni military and may have been involved in raids.

General David Petraeus, the American regional commander, and John Brennan, the president’s counterterrorism adviser, both visited Yemen this year.

Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate’s homeland security committee, who visited Yemen in August, described the country this week as a focus of the assault on al-Qaida. “Yemen now becomes one of the centres of that fight. We have a growing presence there – and we have to – of special operations, Green Berets, intelligence,” he said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/30/us-plots-retaliatory-strikes-yemen

COMRADE BROWNSKI- WE’RE IN THE YEMEN TO KEEP AL-QAEDA OFF OUR STREETS….

[Just think of all of the soldiers and civilians who are going to die for a lie—so as not to make Obamanable look “weak.”]

Happy New Year?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/045940.html

Marxism and the Credit Crunch

After the “credit crunch” there has been a lot of talk about Marx being right (BBC News 2008, Landesman 2008). But the people who write these stories seem to know nothing of Marx or communism.

When Marx came to England in the nineteenth century he was impressed by the large corporations that were central to the explosive growth of the economy. He realised that the workers were suffering poor conditions and pay so proposed that there should be a single corporation run by the state. This is Marxism.

We now know that you need several corporations in an economy so that they can compete and so that inefficient corporations can disappear. In Marxist economics there is only one corporation so when this fails, as all corporations inevitably fail, there is no mechanism to revitalise the economy.

We also know that a single corporation focusses all economic and political power in the hands of the corporate CEO or chairman and Marxist countries become de facto dictatorships.

It is peculiar that young people are drawn to Marxism, a Marxist state is like a large school that slowly becomes a prison as it suppresses dissent. Perhaps the young want to stay in school. Or perhaps, in the same way as the Jesuits gained converts by educating impressionable children the communists gain converts by focussing on impressionable students.

The Marxist idea of the world as a giant corporation is well documented in the history of Marx and Engels but is clearest in their manifesto:

“1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents
of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means
of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive
monopoly.

6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport
in the hands of the State.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by
the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and
the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a
common plan.

8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of
industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries;
gradual abolition of the distinction between town and
country, by a more equable distribution of the population
over the country.

10. Free education for all children in public schools.
Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form.
Combination of education with industrial production, &c., &c.”

These aims conceive of a world that is like a strict institution. An appalling vision that is still supported today by some students and academics who are already institutionalised. Even item 10 is tainted by the idea that education is about working as a labourer for the corporate state.

It is sometimes said that “communism is like Christianity because it says that we should all share our wealth”. Firstly Christianity leaves the sharing of wealth to the conscience of the individual, secondly Marxism does not share wealth, it just provides low grade employment for everyone, and forced labour if you don’t want to do what the state tells you to do. Yes, Marxism is so Christian it allows you to participate in “industrial armies”. Lucky you!

But seriously folks, Marxist Communism was responsible for tens of millions of deaths and the establishment of states that oppressed everyone and snuffed out the light of freedom in large areas of the world. The people who support it are either ill-educated or evil or simply weak individuals who enjoy the social life provided by being in a gang. Communism is as bad as fascism and must be resisted by all people who value freedom. If the rampant Capitalism of the past couple of decades has failed then the solution is to improve the regulatory framework for banking, not to look back to some idiotic nineteenth century dystopia. People of good faith want a liberal, free, caring society and must fight the totalitarian nightmare of communism.

Landesman, C. (2008) The credit crunch is bringing Marxism back into fashion. Sunday Times. 13/07/08. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4321671.ece

BBC News. Marx popular amid credit crunch. 20/10/2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7679758.stm

The Communist Manifesto by Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/61)

THERE IS A REASON- WHY THEY DON’T!

The teaching of history
History tells us how our economy, boundaries, religions and cultures came about. History should answer questions such as “why is there a council estate at the end of the road?”, “what stops the police from simply obeying a Home Secretary and arresting all the Members of Parliament?”, “should we trust the Americans?”, “Who has been at war with the Afghans and who won?”

In England the history curriculum for 11 to 16 year olds bears little relation to the reasons why history should be taught. The OCR curriculum is examined through two papers:

Paper 1:

Either:
A. Elizabethan England
B. Britain, 1815-51
C. The American West, 1840-95
D. Germany, c.1919-45
E. South Africa, 1948-c.1995.

Paper 2:

Either:
Medicine through time
Crime and punishment through time

This curriculum means that students can emerge from a history course in the UK knowing about the American West and the development of medicine but with no knowledge whatsoever of British history.

British history should be the most prominent component of history courses in the UK and the curriculum should be examined by two papers:

Paper 1: British history
Paper 2: An amalgam of the existing papers 1 and 2.

British history should be taught with citizenship in mind. This will involve a clear exposition of the Magna Carta and how Parliament evolved, the Civil War and the 1688 Bill of Rights, the Parliament Acts, the evolution of universal suffrage and Common Law and the separation of the judiciary from the executive with emphasis on the abolition of global slavery. The Civil War is of particular importance because it marks the appearance of the modern English view of politics, indeed, coverage of British history without mention of the Putney Debates is laughable.

Teaching the evolution of the British Constitution is crucial for sustaining a vibrant society, without it we will end up with the police marching into Parliament at the whim of the Government.

The suggestions given above are obvious for anyone acting in good faith who wants to improve and preserve British society, which leaves the question of what on earth was going through the minds of the academics and government officials who devised the current curriculum.

See the OCR curriculum for GCSE history at:

http://www.ocr.org.uk/qualifications/subject/history/index.html

http://pol-check.blogspot.com/2008/12/marxism-and-credit-crunch.html

RIP Soldier- God-Bless

“Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt Government risks harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one’s self image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker, but only to give the moral cowards an excuse to think nothing at all.” Michael Rivero>

Did directors deliberately destroy their own banks?

The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) went from assets of plus £88 billion in 1999 to estimated liabilities of minus £1.3 trillion in 2009 (counting toxic assets and derivatives) – equal to a year’s income (GDP) for the whole of Great Britain. If Directors with mental disabilities had been appointed, they might have reduced the bank’s value by half. But to utterly destroy it took real knowledge and determination.

It seems clear the wholesale mismanagement and corruption of banks by their directors was not unbelievable incompetence, but criminal. The government huffs and puffs at bonuses and pensions paid as a reward for failure, but then in every case it lets those corrupt payments, totaling billions of pounds, stand without passing legislation to confiscate.

It looks as though these huge bonuses and pensions were intentionally paid to compensate directors precisely for destroying their own banks, and for a job well done.

HSBC quietly possesses an ethical, Christian board. They are well managed, profitable, and took no part in creating this crisis. Standard Chartered Bank’s profits actually went up, even in 2008/9.

But look at Abbey National. In July 2004 their risk management officer, Richard Chang, may have objected that the run down of the bank by directors was deliberate (it resulted in the Bank’s ownership being transferred to a European Bank, Santander.) The HBOS whistleblower alleged the same.

Anonymous documents then arrived at the board with similar suggestions, with additional evidence of sexual impropriety among Directors. Richard denied he had sent them, but was called in for a two and a half hour interrogation by the directors at the hands of Kroll corporate security, during which he was bullied and threatened, and at the end he was found dead five floors below at the bottom of the internal Atrium in Abbey’s London head office in Euston.

The courts, CPS, coroner, FSA, directors and police have closed ranks to prevent a criminal prosecution or investigation. These services all have large numbers of freemasons in their senior structures.

High ranking Freemasonry runs right through this banking crisis. All the failed banks, Northern Rock, Abbey, RBS, Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) had Freemasonry controlling their boards. Gordon Brown is a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Freemason, as was Tony Blair; there are 400,000 freemasons in Britain.

Brown’s job seems to be to take advantage of the destruction of the banks, by pouring far too much of our economy into those ready made back holes, which will destroy the Pound Sterling.

The crisis was caused by the USA and EU governments deregulating banks in 1999. Massive, self collapsing bubbles predictably formed in every market including housing, stocks, and derivatives. It is deregulation that enabled corrupt boards to wreck their own banks. They now have estimated liabilities of £7.2 trillion or £250,000 per household; they should now go bust; Britain cannot afford to save them.

Freemasonry and Common Purpose are the European Unions’ foot soldiers on the ground in Britain. They know the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong Britain on the doorstep; we stopped them twice before in 1918 and 1945, and Britain has to be destroyed if the dictatorship is to succeed.

These British traitors get their massive payoffs for handing Britain to the EU on a plate, poverty stricken and stripped of democratic defences.

Many of those won’t realise that the initial deflation of the recession they worked so hard to create will, with the trillions Brown is borrowing for the banks, result in super high interest rates, then possible hyper inflation, and in two years they could be starving with the rest of us, their gravy trains and bribe money useless, their houses repossessed, as ours will be, betrayed by their own European Union.

If you wish to avoid this ghastly future, you need to do your part now in talking to people about a General Strike against the EU, our government, Law Lords, and all the senior officials who are so deliberately sabotaging our nation.
David Noakes. eutruth.org.uk. 07974 437 097

In Memoriam,

by Lord Alfred Tennyson

Ring out, wild bells, to the wild sky,
The flying cloud, the frosty light:
The year is dying in the night;
Ring out, wild bells, and let him die.

Ring out the old, ring in the new,
Ring, happy bells, across the snow:
The year is going, let him go;
Ring out the false, ring in the true.

Ring out the grief that saps the mind
For those that here we see no more;
Ring out the feud of rich and poor,
Ring in redress to all mankind.

Ring out a slowly dying cause,
And ancient forms of party strife;
Ring in the nobler modes of life,
With sweeter manners, purer laws.

Ring out the want, the care, the sin,
The faithless coldness of the times;
Ring out, ring out my mournful rhymes
But ring the fuller minstrel in.

Ring out false pride in place and blood,
The civic slander and the spite;
Ring in the love of truth and right,
Ring in the common love of good.

Ring out old shapes of foul disease;
Ring out the narrowing lust of gold;
Ring out the thousand wars of old,
Ring in the thousand years of peace.

Ring in the valiant man and free,
The larger heart, the kindlier hand;
Ring out the darkness of the land,
Ring in the Christ that is to be.

Finnish shopping centre gunman slaughters five – including ex-wife – before ‘turning gun on himself

‘By Mail Foreign Service

Last updated at 2:30 PM on 31st December 2009

Comments (39) Add to My Stories

Ibrahim Shkupolli is on the run following this morning’s attack. He may have since turned the gun on himself
A gunman killed his ex-wife before shooting dead four people at a Finnish shopping centre, before allegedly turning the gun on himself.
At least seven shots were fired at the Sello shopping centre in the town of Espoo, close to the capital Helsinki.
Four people – three men and a women – were killed in the attack, which began at about 8.30am this morning.
A witness claimed the gunman, dressed in black, opened fire on the second floor of the complex.
Another described how one victim was shot twice in the head.

The gunman – identified as 43-year-old Ibrahim Shkupolli – then left the scene.
When police searched a flat linked to the man, they found a body believed to be his ex-wife.
Shkupolli used a 9-millimeter caliber hand gun for the killings.
A sixth body linked to the shooting was discovered in the home of the suspect, and police believe this is the perpetrator.

Police storm into the shopping centre in the southern Finnish city of Espoo, near Helsinki. At least five people are believed to be dead

Police vehicles and ambulances parked outside the Sello shopping centre as the area is evacuated
A policeman guards the entrance to the shopping centre
The ex-girlfriend, a Finnish woman born in 1967, also worked at the mall and had taken out a restraining order against Shkupolli, police said.
Witnesses said panic erupted at the mall, one of the Nordic region’s largest, when the shots rang out.
Hundreds of mall workers were evacuated to a nearby library and firehouse, trains were halted and helicopters brought in as police launched a manhunt for the heavily armed killer.
After several hours, a body was found in Shkupolli’s home, which police believed to be the killer himself. Police refused to confirm the exact identity immediately, but said the cause of the death appeared to be suicide.
Police refused to discuss Shkupolli’s nationality, but Finnish media reported he was an ethnic Albanian from Kosovo.
At a news conference, police officials refused to say whether the four killed at the mall had been targeted by Shkupolli.
The mid-morning slayings shocked hundreds of people who had gone shopping early on New Year’s Eve.
One witness told the state broadcaster YLE that a gunman dressed in black began randomly shooting at people on the second floor of the mall.
‘There were loads of people who were crying, and many vendors who were completely panicked,’ the unnamed witness said.
Another female witness told YLE radio news she saw the suspect carrying a long-barrelled pistol and rushing past the cashier line at Sello’s Prisma supermarket, where the slayings took place.
A forensics team begins work in the Prisma supermarket at the Sello shopping center
A witness who saw the attack told YLE he saw one worker lying on the floor covered in blood.
YLE said shots were fired at about 10:20am (08:20 GMT) and parts of the mall were evacuated. The newspaper Ilta-Sanomat said on its website at least seven shots were fired, but it gave no source for the information.
Another witness who was in the centre at the time told Finnish radio that a panic ensued as the shooting began. ‘There were loads of people who were crying, and many vendors who were completely panicked.
‘It seems like they hadn’t caught the one who shot. No one seemed to know what had happened.’
Inside the Sello shopping centre in Espoo, Finland, where the shooting took place (file picture)
The Sello shopping centre describes itself as one of the Nordic region’s largest with more than 170 shops. It opened in 2005.

Espoo, home of the Nokia phone company, is Finland’s second largest city.
In the last two years there have been massacres by lone gunmen in the country.
This is the third public shooting in as many years, and Finland tightened gun control regulations after school shootings in 2007 and 2008.
In the town of Kauhajoki in September of last year Matti Saari killed ten people at his vocational college and then set their bodies alight. He had posted warnings of his rampage on the internet.

In November, 2007, 18-year-old Pekka-Eric Auvinen, killed eight people and himself at a school in Jokela.
Finland has deep-rooted hunting traditions and ranks – along with the United States – among the top five nations in the world in civilian gun ownership.

The country has 1.6 million firearms in private hands – with a population of 5.3 million.
Politicians, social workers and religious leaders have urged tighter gun laws, more vigilance of Internet sites, and more social bonding in the small Nordic nation, known for its high suicide rates, heavy drinking and domestic violence.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239610/Finland-mall-shooting-Gunman-Ibrahim-Shkupolli-opens-Sello-shopping-centre-Espoo.html#ixzz0bHN60aSv

Mon 28 Dec 2009
“Population Reduction Is The Best Method to Stop Global Warming”

Posted by Anders under English, Euromed

Summary: There are increasingly many who claim that the cause of a non-existent global warming is too strongly growing population of this world – as devised by Rockefeller´s Club of Rome. According to UN projections from 2005 the world population will rise from now nearly 7 billion to 9.1 billion people in 2050. With the exception of the United States, the increase will mainly occur in the developing countries – from 800 million to 1.7 billion, while the population of the developed countries will remain roughly the same or climb – through immigration from developing countries. In this situation, the CO2 alarmism has led to a shift to bio-fuel, thereby causing a doubling of food prices in developing countries. In Haiti, for example. this means that many have to eat mud pies with sugar. Here, the hysteria of the climatists thus has assumed the character of genocide, through increasing starvation. A Chinese vice-Minister for Family Planning says the current population growth is responsible for 40 and 60 percent of emissions growth. With a reduction in fertility through the 1-child policy, China has spared the world 18 million tonnes of CO2 annually – and the population reduction is said to be by far the cheapest way to economize CO2 and promote the holy sustainable development! The UN Population Fund (UNFPA) has just endorsed the same attitude. UNFPAs executive director says mankind is on the brink of the abyss because of overpopulation. The EU has issued a proposal that the number of persons ishould be included in the calculation of CO2 emission quotas. Obama´s science tsar, Holdren, has long supported forced abortions. Even our remnants are suggested to be disposed of in a sterile and sustainable manner: A few hours in soda at 300 degrees C – and you may be used as fertilizer or poured into the sewer! The argument has been presented by the BBC that it would be more effective to reduce the birth rate in Western nations, the populations of developing countries only producing undetectable amounts of CO2. This process is indeed being realized by the running Muslim immigration to Europe – leading to Islamization and so to famine everywhere. For, according to an imam, Muslims cannot or will not work – are not even capable of manufacturing their own needles! In Accordance with the statement on the Georgia Guide Stones, the New World Order is now using CO2 lie as a tool for population reduction.

There have been increasingly many New World Order voices claiming that the main cause of the non-existent “global warming” would be due to overpopulation of the Earth – and that Africa will fry to death – as Bishop Desmond Tutu, a member of Earth-Charter-Gorbachev´s World Political Forum says – unless we reduce the number of people on the planet.

What is the population situation of the Earth?
UNITED NATIONS (CNN) Febr. 2005 — The world’s population will rise from 6.5 billion to 9.1 billion by 2050, according to a United Nations survey. Much of the growth will take place in the least-developed countries, where a high rate of mortality is outweighed by an even higher rate of fertility. Their current collective population of 800 million is projected to swell to 1.7 billion in 2050.

“It is going to be a strain on the world, but it seems feasible,” said Hania Zlotnik, director of the U.N. Population Division. “It doesn’t seem that there is a crisis coming, [but] that doesn’t mean that some countries are not facing a crisis.” Populations will at least triple in some of the poorest nations — Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, East Timor, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger and Uganda. The U.N. report predicts that nine countries will account for half of the 2.6 billion increase: India, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, the DRC, Bangladesh, Uganda, Ethiopia and the United States.

The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050, the report says. Fifty-one countries — including Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia — should have smaller populations in 45 years.”Since 1990-1995, fertility decline has been the rule among most developed countries,” the report says. But the populations of many developed countries with falling fertility rates, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, will increase due to the arrival of migrants. Zlotnik said developed countries will absorb about 2.2 million migrants every year until 2050.

Paul Watson Prison Planet 1o Dec. 2009 The implementation of policies arising out of fraudulent fearmongering and biased studies on global warming is already devastating the third world, with a doubling in food prices causing mass starvation and death – a primary reason why the climategate crooks and their allies should be criminally investigated and hit with the strongest charges possible.
Comment: Which is not possible, as you would then have to prosecute the whole bunch of irresponsible, fraudulent New World Order politicians at the Copenhagen Conference, too.

As Lord Monckton outlined in his recent Alex Jones Show appearance, climate change alarmism and implementation of global warming policies is a crime of the highest nature, because it is already having a genocidal impact in countries like Haiti, where the doubling of food prices is resulting in a substantial increase in starvation, poverty and death. Poor people around the world, “Are being killed in large numbers by starvation as a result of (climate change) policy,” said Monckton, due to huge areas of agricultural land being turned over to the growth of biofuels.

“Take Haiti where they live on mud pie with real mud costing 3 cents each….that’s what they’re living or rather what they’re dying on,” said Monckton, relating how when he gave a speech on this subject, a lady in the front row burst into tears and told him, “I’ve just come back from Haiti – now because of the doubling in world food prices, they can’t even afford the price of a mud pie and they’re dying of starvation all over the place.” Here is the recipe for mud pies: “two cups of mud one cup of any kind of cooking oil..(be creative) or butter (lucky you!) two tablespoons of sugar or sweet substitute mix into paste portion into silver dollar sized rounds on a cookie sheet.. (or the fender of a UNFOR armored personnel carrier on a sunny day) and bake at 350 degrees for thirty minutes – or just in the sun
As a National Geographic Report confirmed, “With food prices rising, Haiti’s poorest can’t afford even a daily plate of rice, and some must take desperate measures to fill their bellies,” by “eating mud,” partly as a consequence of “increasing global demand for biofuels.”

In April last year, World Bank President Robert Zoellick admitted that biofuels were a “significant contributor” to soaring food prices that have led to riots in countries such as Haiti, Egypt, the Philippines, and even Italy. “We estimate that a doubling of food prices over the last three years could potentially push 100 million people in low-income countries deeper into poverty,” he stated.

“That’s how serious this is, these people, by their scientific fraud and financial fraud, they’re profiting enormously….while people die of starvation in a dozen regions of the world….it is a scandal of the worst proportion – our own fellow creatures are being killed by starvation because these people have lied and made up the science and hidden it so nobody else could check,” said Monckton. If the measures currently being debated at the Copenhagen summit in the name of fighting global warming are passed, we can only expect a further assault on the already horrifying plight of the population of the third world.

The fact that policies arising out of the contrived science of global warming are already killing people in vast numbers in the third world further illustrates the fact that the entire climate change movement is a Malthusian offshoot of the profusely stated goal on behalf of the global elite to eliminate a huge chunk of the global population via modern-day eugenics.

This agenda was vehemently argued for by President Obama’s top science advisor and one of the pre-eminent climate change ringleaders, John P. Holdren, in his 1977 book Ecoscience, in which he called for installing a “planetary regime” to enforce draconian population control measures such as forced abortion and mandatory sterilization through the water supply.

Zhao Baige, vice-minister of National Population and Family Planning Commission of China (NPFPC) 10 Dec. 2009 . “Calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 percent of emissions growth,” so stated by the 2009 State of World Population, released earlier by the UN Population Fund. As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400 million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao said. Meanwhile, she said studies have also shown that family planning programs are more efficient in helping cut emissions, citing research by Thomas Wire of London School of Economics that states: “Each $7 spent on basic family planning would reduce CO2 emissions by more than one ton” whereas it would cost $13 for reduced deforestation, $24 to use wind technology, $51 for solar power, $93 for introducing hybrid cars and $131 electric vehicles. This holistic approach that integrates policy on population and development, a strategy promoting sustainable development of population, resources and environment should serve as a model for integrating population programs into the framework of climate change adaptation, she said.

The myth of overpopulation destroying climate
C-Fam 19 Nov, 2009: The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) released its annual State of the World Population Report yesterday, linking efforts to promote “sustainable development” and affect “climate change” to its “reproductive rights” agenda. Critics see the report as a thinly-veiled attempt to harness popular environmental concerns in service of population control. The report, “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate,” asserts that achieving “universal access to reproductive health” (i.e. all kinds of prevention – The Rockefeller Population Council) would both contribute to declines in fertility and “help reduce green-house gas emissions in the long run.” It calls upon nations to “fully fund family planning services and contraceptive supplies.”

Sounding alarmist, UNFPA claims that “The harsh realities of high per capita emissions among industrialized countries and swiftly rising ones among developing countries highlight the urgency of mobilizing all of humanity to stop collectively at the brink of this possible climate disaster zone.” In a statement accompanying the report, UNFPA Executive Director Thoraya Obaid avers that “rapid population growth and industrialization have led to a rapid rise in greenhouse gas emissions. We have now reached a point where humanity is approaching the brink of disaster.”

“Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendents. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.” Further, the report states that “fear of appearing supportive of population control has until recently held back any mention of ‘population’ in the climate debate. Nonetheless, some participants in the debate are tentatively suggesting the need at least to consider the impacts of population growth.” The UNPFA points to an EU proposal “that population trends be among the factors that should be taken into consideration when setting greenhouse-gas mitigation targets.”

Critics also point to the report’s favorable citation of Obama administration’s science czar, John Holdren, as signaling openness to coercive measures. In the 1970s, Holdren called for forced abortion and sterilization in his writings.

Network 7 Dec. 2009 There are an awful lot of people on the planet, and modern methods for disposing of human remains aren’t exactly earth-friendly. A new alternative to cremation and burial could change that — and even increase food production for those still living — if we can get past the ‘ick factor’ of liquefying our dead relatives. Mother Nature “Resomation” is the process of disposing of human corpses through alkaline hydrolysis, which occurs when the body is sealed inside a vault-like tube filled with water and lye and steam-heated to 300 degrees. Three hours later, some powdery bone fragments and 200 gallons of fluid are all that remains.

Essentially, Resomation is just like the natural process of decomposition, but on fast-forward. The fluid can be safely dumped into sewer systems or even used as fertilizer on farms and gardens.
But unlike cremation and traditional burial, alkaline hydrolysis doesn’t lead to toxic chemicals like dioxin and formaldehyde being released into the atmosphere or water supply. It also uses 80 percent less energy than standard cremation.

Diane Francis Financial Post 8 Dec. 2009: The “inconvenient truth” overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world. A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days. The world’s other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity’s soaring reproduction rate.

-Doing nothing, by contrast, will result in an unsustainable population of nine billion by 2050. Humankind has not yet recalibrated its behavior to account for the fact that the world can only accommodate so many people, especially if billions get indoor plumbing and cars.

Comment: This article has met furious reactions. No wonder. In China pregnant women are being kidnapped, drugged and forced to undergo compulsory abortions. Francis has not just one but 2 children.

BBC 3 Dec. 2009: Meeting the demand for family planning in poor nations is a cheap and effective way to cut CO2 emissions, a new website initiative claims. The UK-based Optimum Population Trust says fast-rising population levels lead to growing emissions. The website is urging wealthy people to offset their own CO2 emissions by funding contraception programmes. It says taking such action is better value than spending money on wind turbines, solar power or hybrid cars. Critics would argue the analysis is too simplistic, a BBC correspondent says. The BBC’s environment analyst Roger Harrabin says they could contend that reducing the number of people born in the US would make a big difference in achieving reductions in CO2 levels. Our correspondent added that carbon emissions from people in much of sub-Saharan Africa are so low that they can barely be counted.

Comment
There are many aspects in the warmist movement. There is no doubt that it is a religious substitute for Christianity, which has an individual approach to humanity – while climatism like other communist movements takes a collective, uncaring approach to individual suffering. The myth of manmade CO2 as a cause of the non-existent “global warming” is becoming increasingly criminal. Not only is it being used as a pretext for stealing our democracy for a world government. Now it once again is an argument – not only to stabilize – but to reduce the population of the Earth. This is old Club of Rome policy – another argument for Rockefeller´s depopulation programme – led by Rockefeller´s (De) Population Council. No wonder that climate and depopulation are now being associated: The President of the IPCC, Dr. RK Pachauri, is on the board of the Rockefeller Foundation!!! This movement sees man as the enemy of the planet – who even creates climate problems after death!

I will repeat this: The Georgia Guidestones, built 1979. The text goes: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature* Guide reproduction wisely improving fitness and diversity* Unite humanity with a living new language* Rule passion, faith, tradition, and all things with tempered reason*
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts* Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court* Avoid petty laws and useless officials* Balance personal rights with social duties* Prize truth, beauty, love, seeking harmony with the infinite* Be not a cancer on the earth* Leave room for nature*
A mysterious Mr Christian came into Elberton Granite Finishing Company and ordered the Guidestones. He explained that although his name was a pseudonym with symbolic meaning, he and the group he represented were very serious about erecting these guidestones for “the conservation of the world and to herald the coming age of reason. Should there be a holocaust in the civilized world, the group wished the guidestones to be one of the most enduring things to help humanity start anew.

On 24 May 2009, The Times reported about a secret meeting between David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner (who sees overpopulation as the cause of global warming (lie) and therefore in 1996 wanted a 95% reduction of the Earth´s population – now he just wants to reduce our number to max. 2 billion) etc. A guest stated: “Consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat. This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

What happens in the third world is truly terrible. Although the argument of mankind´s increasing CO2 production as the cause of global warming is mere fraud there is a connection between the population explosion in the third world and poverty/hunger. In the Muslim world, eg., the populations are exploding. Thus, populations in Arab nations will increase to 395 million citizens in 2015, compared to the current 317 million. The birth surplus emigrates to Europe and they are about to destroy our culture and way of life at the invitation of our New World Order politicians. And when they have brought Europe down like all the other Christian territories conquered by Islam – famine and overpopulation will explode worldwide. For Muslims cannot work, they cannot even produce their own needles. The income of the entire arab nations does not even amount to the income of poor Spain – according to the friday sermon of a Muslim imam – video.
If the LDC populations could be developed to use modern technique and agricultural principles, famine would disappear – and we would be spared the suffering to have all their poverty immigrants. But they cannot and they will not. So, it is vital to limit population growth in the Muslim countries. But that is not possible. And you cannot tell such uneducated people about the necessity of population reduction – at least not as long as we feed them. The world is in a critical situation not due to CO2 production, not due to depletion of resources – but due to uneducated cultures that are destructive to themselves and others.
You can only practice the one child policy in a dictatorship. And in the BBC report I see an attitude so stupid that it is unimaginable: Reduce the number of people in the US –and Europe for that matter. That would certainly reduce the harmless CO2 – ie. bring industry to a standstill – and the entire world would starve to death – as after Islamization! Unfortunately this might be a usable idea in the sick minds of the NWO maniacs. Starvation really is a very efficient way to reduce world population – CO2 being one tool, pandemics, wars financial crises, too.

http://euro-med.dk/?p=12673

THE COWARDS THAT SIT IN WESTMINSTER- THE THREE SO CALLED LEADERS-TREAT THE BRITISH PEOPLE LIKE HALF WITTED CHILDREN- WE’VE COMRADE BROWNSKI PROMISING TEN YEARS OF PROSPERITY SHOULD WE BE DAFT ENOUGH TO KEEP THE FABIAN COMMIE IN POWER- ALL THREE TOO AFRAID TO TELL THE TRUTH–BUT WHY BOTHER………IN A SHORT TIME-AFTER THE ELECTION- THE IMF WILL BE TAKING CHARGE- THEY WILL HAVE TO CUT- CUT- CUT -CUT AND CUT AGAIN- THERES’ A MASSIVE DEBT TO SETTLE- OTHERWISE THE SHIP SINKS WITH ALL ONBOARD- LATER ALL THREE NWO GOONS- CAN POINT TO THE IMF- SAYING IT’S NOTHING TO DO WITH US- THE IMF MADE US CUT- CUT- CUT…………………REMEMBER BRITAIN WAS THE FOURTH RICHEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD——-NOW WE’RE BEHIND ITALY–YEP ITALY!!
THE LAST DECADE HAS SEEN THE WORST GROWTH IN BRITAIN IN OVER 80 YEARS……..

VOTE- FOR THEM- I’D RATHER TAR AND FEATHER THE LOT!!

Be Afraid: The New World Order’s Fascist Pedigree
April 3, 2008

(POSTED APRIL 13, 2002; UPDATED APRIL 3 2008)

This 57-cent stamp shows an eagle, which according to Al Martin is an exact copy of the symbol of the Nazi Waffin-SS. The USPS introduced it in February 2001 as the innocuous sounding “art deco” eagle but in light of Sept. 11, its symbolism is ominous.

Similarly, John Ashcroft christened another homeland security force the “Freedom Corps”, evoking the “Freicorps,” the German army’s “irregulars” that cleared the way for Hitler.

These allusions are sinister because the Third Reich was an early attempt at a “New World Order,” and the Anglo American business elite was involved up to its ears. Are these fascist allusions coincidental? Or, is the business elite coming out of the closet?

Economist Robert Brady defined the Nazi state as “a dictatorship of monopoly capitalism. Its ‘fascism’ is that of business enterprise organized on a monopoly basis, and in full command of all the military, police, legal and propaganda power of the state.” (Richard Sasuly, “I.G. Farben,” 1947, p. 128)

[Communist Russia was also a dictatorship of monopoly capital i.e. disguised as public ownership. Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were created by monopoly capital working through secret societies. A Nazi general visiting Russia in the 1930's remarked that Communism was a "mirror-image" of Nazism. They were both socialist. The only difference was that one peddled race while the other peddled class. Indeed both were created by the central banking cartel.]

Nazi Germany was a capitalist paradise. There was a 60-hour workweek, low wages and no unions. Nazi expansionism represented the global ambitions of German cartels that started preparing for war long before they financed Hitler. As countries fell under the Nazi jackboot, they absorbed former competitors at fire sale prices. “For German big business, World War II was a chance to plunder on a scale without precedent in history,” writes Sasuly (p.114).

The key to understanding the elite, and the direction of world events, is to understand the psychology of the cartel. Cartels by definition are a conspiracy. Their purpose is to defraud the public by keeping prices high. They do this by controlling competition, markets, raw materials and new technology. They are by definition meglo maniacal, anti-national, and anti social.

One of the earliest cartels was J. D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, which eliminated the competition by secretly fixing transportation costs. While pretending to profess Christianity, Rockefeller is famous for saying the only sin is competition.

The largest German cartel was the chemical, film and pharmaceutical giant I.G. Farben. Farben produced 85% of Germany’s explosives in World War Two. In 1926, Farben and Standard Oil entered into a cartel agreement in which Farben stayed out of synthetic oil in return for Standard representing Farben in the US. The upshot of this agreement was that Standard Oil supplied the Nazis with petroleum in spite of shortages in the US. It supplied a rare lead additive without which the Luftwaffe could not fly. It suppressed the production of synthetic rubber in the US, which almost cost the Allies the war.

In turn, Rockefeller got a cut of Farben’s other business, which included the many factories that employed slave labor from concentration camps like Auschwitz. (Farben- Rockefeller paid the SS for this labor at bargain rates.) Profits also derived from the poison gas that killed the laborers after their usefulness was expended. This is the real reason the rail lines to Auschwitz were not bombed. Allied bombers hit within 5 miles of Auschwitz but the factories and death camp were off limits. In fact, German industry moved there for this reason. After the war, the CIA established its German headquarters in the undamaged Farben skyscraper in Frankfurt.

The holocaust was very good business. Throughout the 1930’s Wall Street investment banks participated in “aryanization” which meant getting Jewish owned breweries, banks, factories, department stores etc. for 30% of their true value. The gold from the teeth of holocaust victims ended up in their vaults. It is not an exaggeration to say that the Nazi war effort was financed by the Bank of England (which, for example, transferred the Czech gold reserves to the Nazis), Wall Street (Prescott Bush, W’s grandfather was one of the leading Nazi financiers) and Jewish plunder. It was finessed by lawyer John Foster Dulles, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, who later became US Secretary of State.

After the war, Dillon Read banker General William Draper was put in charge of dismantling German industry and distributing it among the allies. Needless to say, this did not happen. His Wall Street cohorts owned too much of it. Nazis businessmen remained in positions of power. War criminals were transported to South America or went to work for the CIA.

The list of US corporations that had the equivalent of $8 billion invested in Nazi Germany include Standard Oil, General Motors, IBM, Ford, the Chase and National City Banks, ITT and many others. As a result, the men of “The Greatest Generation” didn’t know that ITT built the airplanes that dropped bombs on them. They didn’t know that Ford and General Motors built the Nazi’s trucks and tanks. They didn’t know that ball bearings crucial to the Nazi war effort were manufactured in Philadelphia, yet were in short supply in the USA. This was all done with the knowledge and permission of the US government. For details, I recommend Charles Higham’s “Trading with the Enemy”(1983). Christopher Simpson’s “The Splendid Blond Beast”(1993) and “Blowback” (1988) are also useful.
This information is shocking if we assume that cartels owe an allegiance to their native country. This is not so. They live in a financial virtual reality, a spiritual limbo divorced from common sympathy with their fellow man. Their native countries are important only insofar as they provide deluded patriots to die for their financial interests.

If the elite backed the Nazis, why didn’t the Nazis win? As my readers know, I believe the German people were ’set up’ to lose and be destroyed, and finally become the eunuchs they are today The Nazi Party was a stalking horse designed to seduce and betray the German people. (Of course most Nazis were dupes.) All the while, the international business elite made money while the war degraded and demoralized humanity so it will accept banker world government.

In conclusion, the New World Order, and indeed modern history, is the product of the desire of the Illuminati central banking cartel to translate its monopoly over credit into a monopoly over all wealth, politics and culture. The ultimate goal is to wrest humanity from God’s purpose, and deliver the hostage to Lucifer as a sacrifice to Evil.

http://www.savethemales.ca/130402.html

GETTING BETTER COMRADE BROWNSKI?

Source: Global Financial Database.

Another area where we are “surpassing” our forbearers is in destroying trade. World trade is falling much faster now than in 1929-30 (Figure 3). This is highly alarming given the prominence attached in the historical literature to trade destruction as a factor compounding the Great Depression.

Figure 3. The Volume of World Trade, Now vs Then

Sources: League of Nations Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, http://www.cpb.nl/eng/research/sector2/data/trademonitor.html

It’s a Depression alright

To sum up, globally we are tracking or doing even worse than the Great Depression, whether the metric is industrial production, exports or equity valuations. Focusing on the US causes one to minimize this alarming fact. The “Great Recession” label may turn out to be too optimistic. This is a Depression-sized event.

That said, we are only one year into the current crisis, whereas after 1929 the world economy continued to shrink for three successive years. What matters now is that policy makers arrest the decline. We therefore turn to the policy response.

Policy responses: Then and now

Figure 4 shows a GDP-weighted average of central bank discount rates for 7 countries. As can be seen, in both crises there was a lag of five or six months before discount rates responded to the passing of the peak, although in the present crisis rates have been cut more rapidly and from a lower level. There is more at work here than simply the difference between George Harrison and Ben Bernanke. The central bank response has differed globally.

Figure 4. Central Bank Discount Rates, Now vs Then (7 country average)

Source: Bernanke and Mihov (2000); Bank of England, ECB, Bank of Japan, St. Louis Fed, National Bank of Poland, Sveriges Riksbank.

Figure 5 shows money supply for a GDP-weighted average of 19 countries accounting for more than half of world GDP in 2004. Clearly, monetary expansion was more rapid in the run-up to the 2008 crisis than during 1925-29, which is a reminder that the stage-setting events were not the same in the two cases. Moreover, the global money supply continued to grow rapidly in 2008, unlike in 1929 when it levelled off and then underwent a catastrophic decline.

Figure 5. Money Supplies, 19 Countries, Now vs Then

Conclusion
To summarize: the world is currently undergoing an economic shock every bit as big as the Great Depression shock of 1929-30. Looking just at the US leads one to overlook how alarming the current situation is even in comparison with 1929-30.

TEN YEARS OF WHAT COMRADE BULLSHITTER?

econorealist Says:

April 8th, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Our govt is corrupt, our financial system has been completely taken over by greed-mongering criminals, and we have a population of materialists living on credit and who believe the nonsense about this being a natural cycle that just has to work itself out. And we have a news media that has abandoned investigative journalism in favor of sensationalized, watered down clap-trap.

Nevermind that we have no industrial base and that innovation is not sustainable. As soon as new technology is invented it is outsourced to China or India. I pity the poor fools graduating from college this year. Seriously.

ALL BY ACCIDENT TOO………….LOL.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/world-economy-falling-faster-than-in-1929-1930.html

VAT BACK SOON- RISES IN NATIONAL INSURANCE- AFTER ELECTION TAX RATE RISE- BUSINESS TAXES RISE…………..ALL BAD FOR JOBS CREATION………….SO WHERE’S THE TEN YEARS PROSPERITY COMING FROM COMRADE- THIN AIR?

RELYING ON SPENDING TO KEEP THE COUNTRY AFLOAT- WHEN YOUR SAVINGS ARE GONE- CARDS MAXED OUT- JOBS CUT- WAGES CUT- THE TRUTH HURTS- BUT IT’S WHAT’S NEEDED!