Israeli espionage mole exposed in Britain?

Oct 16th 2011

Israeli espionage mole exposed in Britain?

Liam Fox is Not a Useful Idiot

By Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday, Liam Fox the Defence Secretary resigned following revelations about his dubious relationship with Adam Werritty.

Some 17 years younger than Fox, Werrity has been involved with Fox both in business and in the conservative Atlanticist think-tank ‘The Atlantic Bridge’.

While Fox was Defence Minister, Werrity visited Fox at the Ministry on many occasions, accompanied Fox on numerous official trips, attended some of his meetings with foreign dignitaries and used official-looking business cards which announced him as an ‘adviser’ to Fox – and all despite having no official government post whatsoever.

However, it has now also been revealed that Fox and Werritty were heavily financed by the Israeli lobby and ‘beyond’.

In the The Daily Mail Craig Murray wondered whether Mossad was using both Fox and Werritty as ‘useful idiots’.

“Not only was Werritty being paid to act as an unofficial part of the Defence Secretary’s entourage, the money was coming from people who may have been ready to promote the interests of certain foreign governments, particularly the United States, Israel and Sri Lanka,” writes Murray.
“While the United States is a very close ally, its commercial and other interests are not always identical to UK interests. Israel is not a military ally of the UK. There are often tensions between its interests in the Middle East and the UK’s interests, as in the attack on the Gaza Aid convoy which resulted in the death of Turkish citizens. Turkey is an ally of the UK, being a vital member of NATO.”

Murray suggests that “Key funding sources for Werritty were from the Israeli lobby and a rather obscure commercial intelligence agency,” and then wonders, “might Mossad be pulling Werritty’s strings, with or without his knowledge?”

I’m afraid the answer is only too obvious. For a long time I have contended that there are no Jewish conspiracies. Fox and Werritty were not ‘useful idiots’ – individuals who seem to naively support a foreign ideology or thought but in practice are cynically used by a foreign power.

They knew exactly what they were doing and who they were aiding. Fox, who In 2006 said, “Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together or we will all fall divided.” is a strong supporter of Israel and is a member of Conservative Friends of Israel.

Fox also supported the illegal war against Iraq, a war regarded by many as just another Israeli war but fought by American and British soldiers and in 2003 he voted for the invasion of Iraq. He also supports action against Iran.

” By Way of Deception ” – Is It a Lifestyle, Also?
So Fox and Werritty were not naïve. They knew exactly what they were doing and who were their donors. They fully understood their role and willingly did what was required.

And I’m just as convinced that PM David Cameron and his cabinet knew exactly what they were doing when they amended Britain’s jurisdiction laws two weeks ago just so visiting Israeli war criminals could enjoy their stay.

But the tide has changed. The duplicity of our elected politicians and their ties with the Jewish lobby is now being closely scrutinized. The time has come for all of us in this country to put as much distance as we can between ourselves and Jerusalem.

The Wandering Who-read more about the Jewish Lobby, its culture and its subservient operators amongst us- Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/10/16/liam-fox-is-not-a-useful-idiot/

Sunday, October 16th, 2011 | Posted by Gilad Atzmon Israeli espionage mole exposed in Britain?
8Liam Fox is Not a Useful Idiot

By Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday, Liam Fox the Defence Secretary resigned following revelations about his dubious relationship with Adam Werritty.

Some 17 years younger than Fox, Werrity has been involved with Fox both in business and in the conservative Atlanticist think-tank ‘The Atlantic Bridge’.

While Fox was Defence Minister, Werrity visited Fox at the Ministry on many occasions, accompanied Fox on numerous official trips, attended some of his meetings with foreign dignitaries and used official-looking business cards which announced him as an ‘adviser’ to Fox – and all despite having no official government post whatsoever.

However, it has now also been revealed that Fox and Werritty were heavily financed by the Israeli lobby and ‘beyond’.

In the The Daily Mail Craig Murray wondered whether Mossad was using both Fox and Werritty as ‘useful idiots’.

“Not only was Werritty being paid to act as an unofficial part of the Defence Secretary’s entourage, the money was coming from people who may have been ready to promote the interests of certain foreign governments, particularly the United States, Israel and Sri Lanka,” writes Murray.
“While the United States is a very close ally, its commercial and other interests are not always identical to UK interests. Israel is not a military ally of the UK. There are often tensions between its interests in the Middle East and the UK’s interests, as in the attack on the Gaza Aid convoy which resulted in the death of Turkish citizens. Turkey is an ally of the UK, being a vital member of NATO.”

Murray suggests that “Key funding sources for Werritty were from the Israeli lobby and a rather obscure commercial intelligence agency,” and then wonders, “might Mossad be pulling Werritty’s strings, with or without his knowledge?”

I’m afraid the answer is only too obvious. For a long time I have contended that there are no Jewish conspiracies. Fox and Werritty were not ‘useful idiots’ – individuals who seem to naively support a foreign ideology or thought but in practice are cynically used by a foreign power.

They knew exactly what they were doing and who they were aiding. Fox, who In 2006 said, “Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together or we will all fall divided.” is a strong supporter of Israel and is a member of Conservative Friends of Israel.

Fox also supported the illegal war against Iraq, a war regarded by many as just another Israeli war but fought by American and British soldiers and in 2003 he voted for the invasion of Iraq. He also supports action against Iran.

” By Way of Deception ” – Is It a Lifestyle, Also?
So Fox and Werritty were not naïve. They knew exactly what they were doing and who were their donors. They fully understood their role and willingly did what was required.

And I’m just as convinced that PM David Cameron and his cabinet knew exactly what they were doing when they amended Britain’s jurisdiction laws two weeks ago just so visiting Israeli war criminals could enjoy their stay.

But the tide has changed. The duplicity of our elected politicians and their ties with the Jewish lobby is now being closely scrutinized. The time has come for all of us in this country to put as much distance as we can between ourselves and Jerusalem.

The Wandering Who-read more about the Jewish Lobby, its culture and its subservient operators amongst us- Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk

Related Posts:
■No Tears For Warmonger Fox
■Unconditional Support for Israel is Profoundly Damaging to Americans
■Israel’s Dirty Tricks Against Campus Palestine Activists
■United Kingdom False Flag Forecast, Summer 2011
■A Walk on the Dark Side of Israel Politics
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=151467

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by Gilad Atzmon on Oct 16 2011, With 538 Reads, Filed under Britain United Kingdom, Israel, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

13 Comments for “Israeli espionage mole exposed in Britain?”Brian
October 16, 2011 – 9:00 am
Based on what I’ve read about Fox and his friend Werritty it seems Fox is very vulnerable to blackmail. This is how the powerful Israeli lobby operates in the United States of Israel, they put people very vulnerable to blackmail in high government positions and then ask the Mossad to capture them on video tape. They may also set them up for potential prison time via involvement in an illegal activity.

Reply Gilad Atzmon
October 16, 2011 – 9:14 am
I tend to agree with the above…I guess that it was Fox’s support of an attack on Iran that made him dangerous for British security interests, he had to be kicked out of the system. I guess that the MI6 and MI5 were monitoring him and others for a while…

Reply
Shlomo ben Homo
October 16, 2011 – 9:56 am
When have MI6 and MI5 ever been counter to the desires of Israel? And whenever has Britain ever hesitated in involving itself an attack on a Muslim target? In this case its not that ‘he’s’ been found out, but that ‘we’ve’ been found out.

Reply
Gordon Duff
October 16, 2011 – 4:15 pm
good point but a study of britain’s class system will provide a better answer than i can

Reply Gilad Atzmon
October 16, 2011 – 5:09 pm
I think that the rules of the games are changing now. Some people out there do realise that Israel is a ticking bomb and they kick the Mossad agents out of the system.

Reply Derek
October 16, 2011 – 9:42 am
He had to go.

Reply Garibaldi
October 16, 2011 – 10:50 am
Next time around, Livni needs to be burned at the stake in Trafalgar Square.

Reply Ken Rechtstein
October 16, 2011 – 11:45 am
On the top of the nail again, Gilad.

Fact is that not only the US Institutions and Govt have been infiltrated and hijacked by the Zion Talmudic Mafia Dons, but also many European Politician.

Today any Politician, be it in states side or in GB-European continent, who is sailing with the wind 3/4 aft, i.e. comfortable-having success and being praised by the MSM, is, as sure as ‘Amen’ in a Church, financed-supported by Israel-Mossad/Shin Bet or Aman and Big Finance.

The case of Liam Fox and his ‘boyfriend’ Adam Werrity is a good example of it. Before Liam got married, these two were room mates, sharing the flat of Fox, which was payed for by the British taxpayers.

Reply philinnyc
October 16, 2011 – 4:38 pm
We have the identical problems with Israel in the US. With an ally like Israel, who needs enemies?

Reply T . Allinn
October 17, 2011 – 3:42 am
anybody note the simalairities between Sir Lanka & LibIya, the tactic of stand off bombardment, or mirage ?,,,

Reply T . Allinn
October 17, 2011 – 3:52 am
a pre planned agenda, singled out and hipocritically, identified/targeted,,, selected, religously, tribally or ethnically subverted, major on minor, post syko isolation

Reply T . Allinn
October 17, 2011 – 3:55 am
cowardly slaughter & anihilation by insectial tool & proxy

Reply T . Allinn
October 17, 2011 – 4:24 am
all made ,,, “operational” by editorial spin complaiments the info flow control as praticed @the.lsm, then rationilised & plausably denied to the mass conscioussnes, when creepy & contrived, thare it is, the aimming at a paired/equal deterninite will or recognized national identity, by any other word that starts with (a) g, under the authority of ?, ¿ dharma for idiots,,,?, invain principal now certifiabley marketed optional duieh yeeh, yeah what U said,oo, the rank eschaelon seems of electronica mostly, well that fraud uglyness ignarieince, something else, knowing how you say,,, RONG & well just doing it anyway, framed only by the more slithering of reason/s_?

MI5 MI6 Don’t make me laugh!!…..more than likely Israelis!

Gordon Duff
October 16, 2011 – 4:15 pm
good point but a study of britain’s class system will provide a better answer than i can

I HAVE, AND THAT WAS THE FIRST AREA THAT WAS INFILTRATED!!!

LIBLABCONS!

Jewish cash for Jewish Policies continues
under Gordon Brown?

The Mundi Club, December 07, 2007

Introduction

This article is a follow up to ‘Cash for Honours? It’s Jewish Cash for Jewish Policies!’ which highlighted the Jewish funding of the Blair governments. The so-called ‘cash for honours’ controversy was a Zionist euphemism for the more pertinent reality of ‘Jewish cash for Jewish policies’. Blair’s chief fundraiser was Lord Levy, frequently referred to within Labour Party circles as ‘Lord Cashpoint’. Some of the Labour Party’s biggest donors during the Blair years were Jews. Blair led the most rabidly pro-Jewish governments this country has ever witnessed. His government’s foreign policies, which he conducted through his own Jewish advisers to the exclusion of the Foreign Office, were almost wholly favourable to the Jews-only state in Palestine and relinquished any semblance of even handedness between Jews and Palestinians/Arabs/Moslems in the greater Middle East. It is clear that Jewish cash led to Blair’s implementation of Jewish foreign policies. However, the exact mechanism by which cash was transformed into policies is not known. It is possible Jewish donors negotiated with Blair, or his Jewish advisers, for specific donations to be given for the implementation of specific policies. However, it is also possible the relationship was more diffuse. The more Jewish cash that was pumped into Labour’s coffers, the more aware Blair would have been about the party’s dependence on these donations, the more willing he would have been to implement foreign policies to elicit further Jewish donations.

This article explores the revelations over David Abrahams’ secret, and therefore illegal, donations to the Labour Party. It is possible the police investigation into these donations might reveal the mechanism by which the Jewish lobby buys Britain’s foreign policies. It is, however, doubtful: unless someone confesses. But if justice is not merely to be done i.e. punishing those guilty of making illegal donations, but seen to be done this means ending the correlation between Jewish cash and Jewish policies which has now reached the stage where the Labour government supports the Jews’ policies of starving Palestinians into submission and is even hinting about condoning the bombing Iran for having non-existent nuclear weapons. Only when this correlation is abolished could justice be seen to be done.

David Abrahams

The Donor

David Abrahams is, “The son of a former lord mayor of Newcastle ..” (Haroon Siddique ‘Profile: David Abrahams’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,,2217783,00.html November 27, 2007). He is reputedly a wealthy property developer “the director of six property companies in Newcastle.” (Haroon Siddique ‘Profile: David Abrahams’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,,2217783,00.html November 27, 2007).

According to the Jewish Chronicle, Abrahams is, “a member of the Jewish Labour Movement”. (Bernard Josephs ‘A second ‘Jewish scandal’’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=56810&ATypeId=1 November 30, 2007). He was also a member of the Jewish lobby within the Labour Party, ‘Labour Friends of Israel’ until he was removed by Jon Mendelsohn – for which see later.

Did Abrahams’ Donations come from other Donors?

Although Abrahams has been reported in the media as being wealthy there are doubts as to just how wealthy he is. He does not feature in any list of the country’s most wealthy people. Just how wealthy can someone be when, it is alleged, their companies aren’t making profits? “How did Mr Abrahams make enough money from his business interests, he uses different names and dates of birth and has yet to run a company that has declared a profit, to fund his donations?” (George Parker and Jimmy Burns ‘Labour braced for police probe’ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65b73366-9df5-11dc-9f68-0000779fd2ac.html November 28, 2007).

Abrahams hasn’t always acted like a multi-millionaire. Firstly, “And, according to a former senior revenue collection officer at the (Newcastle city) council, he simply refused to pay his rates. “Time and time again we were frustrated by David Abrahams,” the former council official said yesterday. “He was what you’d call a fly boy. He would buy an off-the-shelf company as a vehicle for his property development interests, use it for a while then create another and so on. He racked up rate arrears totalling around £10,000 [about £70,000 in today's money.] “He had a large residence in Gosforth [an up-market area of the city] for which he also failed to pay rates. “We had the option to seek his imprisonment for non-payment of rates and began to do so, but Abrahams must have called down a favour from his father and the instruction came from on high that we were not to pursue it. “I was disgusted but not really surprised. He was quite openly flaunting his family ties and the Labour Party ruled Newcastle.”” (Richard Pendlebury ‘The fantasy world of Labour’s dodgy donor’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496834&in_page_id=1770 November 27, 2007). Secondly, “Neighbours in the road where he has lived alone for years in two houses knocked together report that an almost permanent fixture on the front drive is “a knackered old Volvo”.” (Richard Pendlebury ‘The fantasy world of Labour’s dodgy donor’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496834&in_page_id=1770 November 27, 2007).

Even those who knew him politically have raised doubts about the scale of his wealth and this has led to an intriguing question: whether he was just a front man for another donor or donors. “The Conservatives were asking if Mr Abrahams was a “conduit” for money from another source, although there was no clear evidence for this. The theory was fuelled by Tony Blair’s old election agent, John Burton, who said: “I never thought he had that sort of money.” The Telegraph said his disclosed assets at Companies House amounted to just £144,000. His total known donations exceed £670,000 which Labour intends to repay.” (‘’You’re not up to the job Gordon': Cameron launches blistering attack over donor scandal’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496822&in_page_id=1770 November 28, 2007).

What adds to the suspicion that Abrahams could be a front for other donors (perhaps Jack Abramoff, Boris Berezovsky, Mossad, or even the Jews-only state in Palestine) is his avoidance of giving money directly to the Labour Party. He has stated he wanted to preserve his privacy but this seems at odds with the prominence he seemed to enjoy at the Labour Party’s prestigious, national, fundraising functions. Perhaps the reason he was hiding his role as one of the Labour Party’s biggest donors was that if this had been public knowledge, as it is with Lord Sainsbury, then the electoral commission might have felt the need to investigate his sources of income.

The Telegraph newspaper splashed such speculation on its front page. “Fears are growing within the party that David Abrahams, who hid his identity by using four intermediaries, may himself have been a conduit for another mystery benefactor, after senior Labour figures questioned his personal wealth.” (Robert Winnett and Gordon Rayner ‘Hunt for ‘mystery benefactor’ in Gordon Brown’s donations scandal’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=EJEC3LU1ROPH5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/29/nbrown129.xml November 29, 2007). The photograph accompanying this article showed Abrahams in the company of “the former Israeli ambassador Zvi Heifetz at a London party last year.” It has to be wondered what message the Telegraph was trying to convey with such a photograph especially when the article went on to point out that the ambassador has been cleared of money laundering allegations. “Last year he (Abrahams) was pictured shaking hands with the then Israeli ambassador, Zvi Heifetz, who was questioned then cleared over money-laundering allegations. Mr Heifetz was recently appointed as an adviser to Mr Blair in his role as Middle East peace envoy.” (Robert Winnett and Gordon Rayner ‘Hunt for ‘mystery benefactor’ in Gordon Brown’s donations scandal’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=EJEC3LU1ROPH5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/29/nbrown129.xml November 29, 2007).

Abraham’s Donations

Total Donations to the Labour Party
Since 2003, David Abrahams secretly donated somewhere in the region of £650,000 through four known conduits, Jane Kidd, Ray Ruddick, John McCarthy, and Janet Dunn.

Donations to the Labour Party under Gordon Brown
Abrahams’ secret payments to the Labour Party continued after Brown became Prime Minister. “Between them (Ruddick and Kidd), they are listed as giving the party £222,000 since Brown became leader in June …. Abrahams said he was also responsible for donations to Labour from John McCarthy .. including £90,000 since Brown took office.” (Elizabeth Stewart ‘Abrahams gave money to Benn and Harman’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2217733,00.html November 27, 2007).

The donations given to Labour under Gordon Brown by Ruddick and Kidd make them, “collectively his third biggest donors.” (Elizabeth Stewart ‘Abrahams gave money to Benn and Harman’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2217733,00.html November 27, 2007). So if Abrahams’ payments to Brown’s Labour Party also include those of the other two surrogates, he could well be the party’s second biggest donor. The biggest donor being David Sainsbury.

Who Received Abraham’s Donations?

It seems that in addition to his funding of the Labour Party, Abrahams also funded campaigns run by particular Labour politicians.

Hilary Benn
Janet Kidd offered Abraham’s money to Hilary Benn. This offer was rejected. But when Abraham’s offered the donation directly to Benn, it was accepted. “However, the Benn campaign team turned down the cheque after discovering that the money in fact originated from Abrahams. Abrahams later offered a donation of the same sum in his own name, which was accepted by Benn’s team.” (Elizabeth Stewart ‘Abrahams gave money to Benn and Harman’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2217733,00.html November 27, 2007).

Gordon Brown
Kidd also offered a substantial donation to Gordon Brown but it was refused. “Mr Abrahams, a millionaire property developer .. used his secretary, Ms Kidd, to offer Mr Brown’s leadership campaign team a donation, thought to be around £25,000, but his team turned it down because he did not know her personally.” (Colin Brown ‘The man behind Labour’s troubles’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3201560.ece November 28, 2007).

Harriet Harman
Harriet Harman accepted a donation from Kidd. “It also emerged that Harman also received a £5,000 donation from Kidd towards her victorious campaign for Labour’s deputy leadership. She say she was unaware the money had been funnelled through an intermediary.” (Elizabeth Stewart ‘Abrahams gave money to Benn and Harman’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2217733,00.html November 27, 2007).

The New Labour MP for Sedgefield
“Mr Abrahams partly bankrolled Labour’s campaign for the Sedgefield by-election in Co Durham.” He donated a total of £62,000 in two cheques on the day that Tony Blair announced he was standing down. He used Ms Kidd to pay £38,000 towards the Labour campaign and Mr Ruddick to donate £24,000.” (Colin Brown ‘The man behind Labour’s troubles’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3201560.ece November 28, 2007).

General Secretary’s Resignation

After Gordon Brown heard the allegations about David Abrahams’ secret donations he appointed Peter Watt, the Labour Party’s General Secretary, to investigate. However, Watt was quickly forced to resign after he admitted he’d known for a year that Abrahams had been channelling donations to the Labour Party through intermediaries.

Watt argued he didn’t know the law even though it was his responsibility to ensure financial payments to the party were within the law. “Watt, 37, acknowledged he was legally responsible for reporting details of donations to the Electoral Commission. “As a result of press coverage over the weekend, I sought legal advice on behalf of the party. I was advised that, unbeknown to me, there were additional reporting requirements. Once I discovered this error, I immediately notified the officers of the NEC,” Watt said.” (Elizabeth Stewart ‘Abrahams gave money to Benn and Harman’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2217733,00.html November 27, 2007). It seems beyond belief that he didn’t know the use of proxies was illegal. “Watt quit on Monday claiming he did not know it was unlawful to use conduits to prevent true source of a donation being disclosed.” (Patrick Wintour ‘Harman clings on as donation row escalates’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,,2218149,00.html November 28, 2007); “Watt was said to be “kicking himself” that he had not seen that it was in breach of the Political Parties Act to allow a donor to use an agent or conduit to fund a political party without the information being disclosed. Since the act is largely about ensuring that the true identity of donors is disclosed, his ignorance “was as inexplicable as it was inexcusable”, said one Labour NEC official present.” (Patrick Wintour ‘The ‘usual terms’ that left Labour in a ‘mind-blowing’ mess’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2220149,00.html December 01, 2007).

Those in the know about Labour’s Third Biggest Donor

At first it was argued only peter watt knew about Abrahams’ secret donations. It has since transpired two others also knew.

Baroness Jay
Jay was the trustee of a Labour Party fundraising organisation the ‘thousand club’. “Baroness Jay’s intervention is significant because on Monday, Labour claimed the only party figure who knew Mr Abrahams gave money through intermediaries was Peter Watt, who quit as its General Secretary after admitting the rules were breached.” (Andrew Grice ‘Harman haunted by £5,000 gift as ‘Friends in the North’ row grows’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3201561.ece November 28, 2007). She advised Hilary Benn not to accept a donation from Janet Kidd. “Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary, turned down a £5,000 donation from Ms Kidd for his deputy leadership campaign, because Baroness Jay of Paddington, a former Cabinet Minister on his team, knew she was giving it on behalf of Mr Abrahams.” (Andrew Grice ‘Harman haunted by £5,000 gift as ‘Friends in the North’ row grows’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3201561.ece November 28, 2007). It has been asked. “How did Baroness Jay, a former trustee of the “blind trust” financing Tony Blair’s office, know that Ms Kidd was a front for David Abrahams?” (George Parker and Jimmy Burns ‘Labour braced for police probe’ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65b73366-9df5-11dc-9f68-0000779fd2ac.html November 28, 2007).

Jon Mendelsohn
Soon after Baroness Jay’s admission that she had advised Hilary Benn not to accept a donation from Janet Kidd, Jon Mendelsohn was forced to admit he also knew about Abrahams’ use of intermediaries. “Labour’s struggle to keep back the tide of allegations collapsed in disarray with the astonishing disclosure that one of the Prime Minister’s right-hand men had known about the falsely-declared donations for weeks. Jon Mendelsohn, Mr Brown’s election fundraiser, responded by writing warmly to donor David Abrahams as one of Labour’s “strongest supporters”.” (‘’You’re not up to the job Gordon': Cameron launches blistering attack over donor scandal’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496822&in_page_id=1770 November 28, 2007). Over the last decade or more, Mendelsohn must have seen Abrahams at many of labour’s big fundraising functions. It staggers belief he hadn’t known for years that Abrahams was the Labour Party’s second or third biggest donor. Given that he was such a close friend of Lord Levy this makes such ignorance even more implausible.

Gordon Brown and Jon Mendelsohn

Abrahams recently alleged he’d told Mendelsohn about his use of proxies in april 2007. “The secret donor at the heart of Labour’s funding scandal dramatically pointed the finger of blame at Gordon Brown’s chief fundraiser last night. David Abrahams, who illegally gave more than £600,000 to the party through middlemen, claimed that Jon Mendelsohn knew about the practice months before he even started his job. And he claimed that he told Mr Mendelsohn of his donation method as long ago as April, almost six months before Mr Brown appointed him to the fundraising post.” (James Chapman ‘Secret donor Abrahams: I told Brown’s money man about secret donations EIGHT months ago’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=498879&in_page_id=1770 November 30, 2007); “The two men are understood to have met at a Board of Deputies of British Jews dinner held in April, at which Mr Brown spoke as chancellor. Mr Mendelsohn acknowledges sitting next to Mr Abrahams but denies asking for a donation.” (Alex Barker and Jimmy Burns ‘Labour fundraiser and UK donor at odds’ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b4d0b850-9f8f-11dc-8031-0000779fd2ac.html November 30 2007).

“At ease in the corridors of power, Mendelsohn has the contacts and know-how to advance Israel’s case in his Labour Friends of Israel role.”
– The Jewish Chronicle, April 27, 2007.

In 1995, Jon Mendelsohn became an adviser to Tony Blair. He remained an adviser until Blair’s first General Election victory. During this time he worked closely with Lord Levy. “He is a close friend of Lord Levy, who was at the heart of Labour’s cash for peerages affair.” (Christopher Hope ‘Jon Mendelsohn profile: a real Mr Fix-It’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/28/nbrown1928.xml November 29, 2007).

After Blair’s election victory, Mendelsohn set up a lobbying firm to cash in on the good work he’d done on Blair’s behalf. “It was exactly nine years ago that Mendelsohn and his lobby firm partners were caught trading cash for access. How this Mendelsohn character ended up heading Labour Party fundraising and how he obtained the sobriquet ‘ethical’ is the real shocker. Mendelsohn’s partner Neil Lawson told my recorder that, if I paid LLM £5,000 to £20,000 per month, “We can go to anyone. We can go to Gordon Brown if we have to.” Brown was at the time Chancellor of the Exchequer.” (Greg Palast ‘PM Gordon Brown’s Fixer Explains How It’s Done’ http://www.rense.com/general79/explain.htm November 29, 2007).

In 2002, Mendelsohn, the chair of Labour Friends of Israel, had been involved in a verbal confrontation with Abrahams. “He was formerly chair of Labour Friends of Israel, where his path is said to have crossed that of David Abrahams, who was reportedly asked to leave the organisation five years ago.” (Haroon Siddique ‘Ethical lobbyist caught up in donations row’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2218332,00.html November 28, 2007).

In august 2007 Gordon Brown appointed Mendelsohn as Labour’s Director of General Election Resources. He was alleged to be Brown’s own Mr Cashpoint. “Mr Mendelsohn, described by friends as “a real Mr Fix-It, like Lord Levy [Labour’s former chief fund-raiser] and Matthew Freud [the PR guru] rolled into one ..”” (Christopher Hope ‘Jon Mendelsohn profile: a real Mr Fix-It’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/28/nbrown1928.xml November 29, 2007).

Gordon Brown in deep conversation with his Jewish backer Jon Mendelsohn.
Please notice the Star of David in the background of the two.

Some of Mendelsohn’s admirers have been spinning that he was hired as a new broom to sweep away the sleaze of the Blair regime. “When Jon Mendelsohn was hired to be Gordon Brown’s chief fundraiser he was seen as a new broom who was sure to side-step controversy after his predecessor Lord Levy found himself mired in the cash for honours inquiry.” (Christopher Hope ‘Jon Mendelsohn profile: a real Mr Fix-It’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/28/nbrown1928.xml November 29, 2007). In reality, he’d been a key member of Blair’s advisory team and, as a lobbyist, had become wealthy by trading on cash for access. He was no more of a new broom than Gordon Brown. Not surprisingly, demands have been made for Mendelsohn’s resignation.

Ten Labour Leaders
“A spokesman for Mr Abrahams later said “around 10″ Labour figures had been aware of the use of proxy donors, and Mr Abrahams would supply a list to the police if asked. Mr Abrahams last night stressed that he had not believed he was breaking the law by failing to put his name to all 19 donations. But he pointed the finger at further, unnamed, senior Labour figures, who he claimed had been fully aware of the back channels through which he had been directing his contributions since they began in 2003.” (Brian Brady and James Hanning ‘I accuse: Abrahams and PM’s aide locked in bitter row over donations’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3215844.ece December 02, 2007).

“Labour Friends of Israel is a Westminster based lobby group working within the British Labour Party to promote the State of Israel.”
– From the 2003 homepage of Labour Friends of Israel.

Those who should’ve known about Labour’s Third Biggest Donor

Douglas Alexander
“Mr Mendelsohn works closely with election co-ordinator Douglas Alexander; one of the Prime Minister’s closest Cabinet colleagues. But party sources insisted that Mr Alexander knew nothing of the dodgy donations.” (‘’You’re not up to the job Gordon': Cameron launches blistering attack over donor scandal’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496822&in_page_id=1770 November 28, 2007).

Harriet Harman’s Husband Jack Dromey
“General secretary Peter Watt has admitted that he knew David Abrahams was giving money in secret. Critics said last night that, if Mr Watt knew, it was highly unlikely that Mr Dromey would have had no idea what was going on. As treasurer, Mr Dromey is chairman of Labour’s audit committee and business board, which scrutinises donations to ensure they are within the rules.” (‘’You’re not up to the job Gordon': Cameron launches blistering attack over donor scandal’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496822&in_page_id=1770 November 28, 2007); “Harriet Harman and her husband Jack Dromey were under intense pressure today as new questions were raised over donations to her deputy leadership campaign. The Commons Leader and Labour Treasurer, often dubbed the party’s “golden couple”, refused to comment on the donor affair despite the growing row over the details of how she received a £5,000 gift from a stooge of David Abrahams. Mr Dromey has gone to ground, refusing to answer any questions about his own role. He is deputy general secretary of the T&G section of Unite union, but also Labour’s treasurer and chairman of its business board for high value donors. An analysis of Ms Harman’s campaign funds has found that of the £46,000 donated to her, £33,000 was registered only after she won the deputy leadership on 25 June. Lord Cunningham questioned why Mr Dromey was apparently kept in the dark about Mr Abrahams’s donations, just as he was about the loans which led to the “cash for honours’ inquiry.” (Donor scandal: Deputy Harriet Harman’s future in question as she is axed from debate’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496940&in_page_id=1770 November 28, 2007).

Lord Triesman and Matt Carter
“The money from Mr Abrahams’s conduits was accepted under three different general secretaries: including Lord Triesman (who won a promotion) and Matt Carter.” (Robert Winnett ‘More Labour heads to roll as the story unfolds’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/28/nbrown928.xml November 29, 2007); “What did Lord Triesman, Labour’s general secretary until 2003, and Matt Carter, general secretary from 2004-05, know about Mr Abrahams’ covert donations?” (George Parker and Jimmy Burns ‘Labour braced for police probe’ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65b73366-9df5-11dc-9f68-0000779fd2ac.html November 28, 2007).

Chris Leslie
Chris Leslie was the co-ordinator of Brown’s leadership campaign and a former Junior Minister. He is married to one of Gordon Brown’s former aides. He’s stated: “I did not know who Mr Abrahams or Mrs Kidd were.” (Robert Winnett ‘Labour at war over party donations’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=45UNOP1EGVOU5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/30/nbrown130.xml November 30, 2007).

Leslie became embroiled in a controversy with Harriet Harman over Abrahams’ donations. “The team of the deputy party leader, Harriet Harman, blamed Chris Leslie, Mr Brown’s campaign co-ordinator, for suggesting they should approach Janet Kidd, Mr Abrahams’ secretary and one of his proxy donors, for a donation to her team.” (Colin Brown ‘Brown aide in the frame as police are asked to investigate donations’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3209867.ece November 30, 2007). However, according to Leslie, in late may Mrs Kidd offered a donation to Gordon Brown which he rejected. “He (Leslie) said: “In late May, I received a phone call from a man calling himself David Abrahams referring me to a woman named Janet Kidd who said that she wanted to be a donor to the campaign. I did not know who Mr Abrahams or Mrs Kidd were. “I contacted Mrs Kidd, and unprompted, she sent a cheque for £5,000… she was a permissible donor. I decided not to take up her donation.” (Robert Winnett ‘Labour at war over party donations’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=45UNOP1EGVOU5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/30/nbrown130.xml November 30, 2007). He gave no reason for refusing her donation even though she was a permissible donor. Leslie thus denied giving Harman the go-ahead to accept a donation from Kidd. “When the leadership election was over, I was approached by members of Harriet Harman’s campaign team asking if I knew of any individuals who might donate to her deputy leadership campaign. I passed them the details of Mrs Kidd as someone whose offer of a donation we had not taken up.”” (Robert Winnett ‘Labour at war over party donations’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=45UNOP1EGVOU5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/30/nbrown130.xml November 30, 2007).

Gordon Brown
Brown has placed himself above the sleaze proclaiming he knew nothing. But his initial attempts to divorce himself from this scandal did not go well. Firstly, the scandal got close after Jon Mendelsohn had been forced to admit he had known about these illegal payments for two months. However, Mendelsohn protected Brown by claiming he’d neglected to tell his leader. “Mr Mendelsohn faced demands for his resignation after he admitted that he had been aware of Mr Abrahams’s secret donations, given via four associates, since September. He did not tell Mr Brown, who said that he learned of the situation only on Saturday.” (Robert Winnett and Gordon Rayner ‘Hunt for ‘mystery benefactor’ in Gordon Brown’s donations scandal’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=EJEC3LU1ROPH5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/29/nbrown129.xml November 29, 2007).

Secondly, the scandal came even closer when harriet harmon claimed Chris Leslie, one of Brown’s close aides, had given him the name of an Abrahams’ proxy. “But his attempt to stay above the growing scandal suffered a serious blow as it emerged that a close aide recommended one of Mr Abraham’s proxies to Harriet Harman’s deputy leadership team.” (Colin Brown ‘Brown aide in the frame as police are asked to investigate donations’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3209867.ece November 30, 2007).

Brown’s claim that he knew Abrahams only vaguely have also been undermined. Firstly, Abrahams has hinted he’s had lots of meetings with Brown. “Mr Brown was drawn even further into the scandal after Mr Abrahams suggested that he was close to the Prime Minister. When asked by The Daily Telegraph how many times he had met Mr Brown, Mr Abrahams said: “You don’t remember how many times you’ve eaten porridge for breakfast.” Mr Brown has said it was “entirely possible” he had met Mr Abrahams but did not recall any such meeting.” (Robert Winnett ‘Labour at war over party donations’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=45UNOP1EGVOU5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/30/nbrown130.xml November 30, 2007).

Secondly, it has been claimed Brown met Abrahams at a dinner organized by the British Board of Deputies. “However, last night it was reported that Mr Brown had met Mr Abrahams at a dinner for the British Board of Deputies held last April. Mr Abrahams sat next to Mr Mendelsohn.” (Robert Winnett ‘Labour at war over party donations’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=45UNOP1EGVOU5QFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/11/30/nbrown130.xml November 30, 2007). This organization is the nearest equivalent that Britain has to AIPAC, America’s biggest member of the Jewish lobby.

David Cameron believes Brown must have known what was going on. “Watt and Abrahams said they did not know the system was illegal. David Cameron, the Conservative leader, said yesterday this was “incredible”, as was the claim that “only one or two people knew about it”. It “beggars belief” that Gordon Brown did not know, Cameron said on The Andrew Marr Show on BBC1.” (Will Woodward and Michael White ‘Abrahams: other party figures knew of deals’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2220901,00.html December 3, 2007).

Levy, just behind Blair

Lord Levy
Lord Levy failed to realize Abrahams was using intermediaries. “Between January 2003 and November 2005, more than £150,000 was donated to the Labour Party on behalf of Mr Abrahams by a secretary, a builder, a lawyer and a lollipop lady. Through this period, Lord Levy was Labour’s fundraiser; Matt Carter and Lord Triesman, now a junior minister, were Labour General Secretaries and Jack Dromey and Jimmy Elsby were party treasurers.” (Alex Barker ‘Analysis: three lines of inquiry’ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c8664a20-9fa7-11dc-8031-0000779fd2ac.html December 01, 2007).

Tony Blair
Given Blair’s predilection for charming those with power and money, is it feasible he didn’t know the Labour Party’s third biggest donor was using intermediaries? If Levy knew then it is more than likely he would have told Blair. “Labour MPs have said that their worst fear is that the practice of using third party donors was so widespread under Tony Blair that it went way beyond Mr Abrahams.” (‘Government declares open war as Harman sticks the knife into Brown’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=497554&in_page_id=1770 November 30, 2007). Jack straw pointed the finger at Blair. “This was mind-blowing… it’s true this seems to go back for four years and frankly one of the reasons why all of us are irritated to distraction is that we assumed these historic problems had been sorted out following the so-called cash-for-honours issue.”” (quoted in James Chapman ‘Secret donor Abrahams: I told Brown’s money man about secret donations EIGHT months ago’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=498879&in_page_id=1770 November 30, 2007).

One journalist, a Blairite loyalist, believes Blair may have been enjoying a touch of schadenfreude given Brown’s role in triggering the ‘cash for honours’ scandal. “To the Prime Minister he was agitating to supplant, he directly threatened: ‘I’ll get you over the peerages.’ Did Gordon Brown set up Tony Blair for a fall over cash for coronets? Brown has always denied it; Blair has always believed it. Soon after that confrontation, they did come to get him. Jack Dromey, the Labour Party’s treasurer and husband of Harriet Harman, ally of the then Chancellor, lit the blue touch paper under Mr Blair by going on Channel 4 News and Newsnight to denounce him for raising campaign funds using concealed loans. Soon after that, the police began their 16-month inquiry, the toxic cloud over the twilight days of Tony Blair which helped to push him out of Number 10 earlier than he wanted to leave. This earned him the unenviable distinction of being the first sitting Prime Minister to be interviewed in the course of a criminal corruption inquiry. Tony Blair and his friends cannot help but think this is poetic justice being meted out to Gordon Brown. They take bitter satisfaction from the spectacle of Mr Brown, the self-styled possessor of a moral compass who advertised himself as so ethically superior to his predecessor, floundering in the mire.” (Andrew Rawnsley ‘Brown’s agony gives Blair something to smile about’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2220664,00.html December 2, 2007). But why should Blair take much pleasure in this when he could be just as implicated as Brown?

Lord Levy and Blair
The Minor Issues

Abrahams’ illegal payments to the Labour Party raise a number of issues.

Firstly, is the Labour Party so incompetent that it didn’t know where £660,000 worth of donations came from?

Secondly, even more surprising is that these secret donations continued to be made during the police investigation into the so-called ‘cash for honours’ scandal. Is it possible that, after the failure of this investigation, the Labour Party believed it was untouchable and so made no effort to cover up Abrahams’ secret payments?

Thirdly, it is simply untenable that so few people within the Labour Party knew Abrahams was making illegal donations. How could this be possible when three of Abrahams’ proxies were his employees? Abrahams’ deception might have succeeded if he’d been a howard hughes type recluse. But not when he was continually mingling with Labour’s high fliers. “He has been a frequent visitor to Labour conferences, rubbing shoulders with a host of cabinet ministers including John Hutton, Hazel Blears and David Miliband, whose constituency is South Shields. He is little known by any of those he has met, but that will not lessen the fear in Westminster, where this latest donations scandal is rapidly taking on a toxic quality.” (Colin Brown ‘The man behind Labour’s troubles’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3201560.ece November 28, 2007). Abrahams was also given a highly prestigious, and highly visible, front row seat at Tony Blair’s farewell speech to his Sedgefield constituents. “Abrahams was in the front row when Tony Blair made a speech in June in his former Sedgefield constituency, announcing his decision to stand down.” (Haroon Siddique ‘Profile: David Abrahams’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,,2217783,00.html November 27, 2007). If he didn’t obtain such a seat because of his substantial financial donations then what had he done to deserve such a reward? It is simply improbable that someone who was given such prominence at prestigious Labour Party functions was not known as a major donor.

Fourthly, how is it that Gordon Brown refused to accept a donation from Abrahams whilst Harman did not?

Finally, is it not a little bizarre that Abrahams funded both Hiliary Benn and Harriet Harman in the election contest for the post of deputy leader of the Labour Party? Why would he do this? Only the Jewish lobby in America funds presidential candidates from both major political parties in order to ensure they have a strong influence over the successful candidate.

Abrahams and Britain’s Mainstream Media

The Mainstream Media Portrayal of Abrahams’ Motives

There is no evidence so far that Abrahams tried to get anything for his donations neither material rewards nor the Labour government’s support for Jewish policies in the greater Middle East. The mainstream media has made four suggestions about what Abrahams might have been hoping to gain from donating so much money to the Labour Party.

Business Interests
Haroon Siddique pointed out that whilst Abrahams was making these donations he enjoyed the great good fortune of being given the go-ahead to develop a business park alongside the A1. “It was reported that Abrahams’ multimillion-pound business park development at Bowburn in County Durham was initially blocked by the Highways Agency because of a blanket ban on further development beside the congested A1. But in October last year the agency lifted the ban on the development, and a separate one near Newton Aycliffe further south.” (Haroon Siddique ‘Profile: David Abrahams’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,,2217783,00.html November 27, 2007).

Bafflement
Many journalists and politicians have professed they don’t know what Abrahams’ agenda could have been. The deputy political editor of the Independent newspaper asked. “So what did he want in return for £601,975? David Abrahams and his network of allies, now notorious as Labour’s “Friends in the North”, systematically targeted Gordon Brown and some of his most senior cabinet ministers, offering huge donations by proxy to a cash-strapped party. Last night Labour Party MPs and officials were asking themselves with some trepidation: why?” (Colin Brown ‘The man behind Labour’s troubles’ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3201560.ece November 28, 2007).

Proximity to the Powerful
“No one has produced any evidence yet that these donations actually bought anything other than some proximity to the powerful.” (Andrew Rawnsley ‘Brown’s agony gives Blair something to smile about’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2220664,00.html December 2, 2007).

A Peerage?
“According to the (anonymous senior labour) MP, Mr Abrahams first asked if he could obtain a peerage six years ago in the Central Lobby of the House of Commons, a meeting place, where by long tradition members of the public can lobby MPs. Mr Abrahams started making secret donations to the Labour Party four years ago. Making large financial donations is a well-established means used by wealthy supporters of all three main political parties to enhance their prospects of ennoblement.” (Simon Walters ‘Abrahams asked for a peerage, claims top Labour MP’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=499132&in_page_id=1770 December 02, 2007). This view seems like a bit of spin. If Abrahams was after a peerage why did he shower Gordon Brown with money when he became Prime Minister knowing that after the cash for honours scandal, there was no chance of Brown giving him a title?

The Mainstream Media Portrayal of Abrahams’ Character

The mainstream media portrayed Abrahams as a somewhat strange and quirky character.

Matthew Norman
“Mr Abrahams is clearly an eccentric chap, because a professional political groupie can hardly be anything else. One excuses 14-year-old girls who throw their knickers at Robbie Williams on grounds of age and hormones. For a 51-year-old (or 61; he seems uncertain on the point) to show this level of devotion towards Labour ministers and apparatchiks is unquestionably weird, but harmless for all that. Donating money through acquaintances is dodgy, of course, but no more a genuine outrage than naively accepting it. Both may be unlawful, but with no evidence (yet) that Mr Abrahams intended to buy favours with his £600,000, it should be less major scandal than minor curiosity.” (Matthew Norman ‘For Gordon Brown, this really is terminal’ http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/matthew_norman/article3209843.ece November 30, 2007).

Andrew Rawnsley
“What really staggers Labour MPs, just as it does the rest of us, is how anyone could be so stupid as to take money from a donor who appears to be a cross between Walter Mitty and Zelig.” (Andrew Rawnsley ‘Brown’s agony gives Blair something to smile about’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2220664,00.html December 2, 2007).

The Mainstream Media Portrayal of the Abrahams’ Scandal

The mainstream media even made an effort to diminish the significance of the Abrahams’ scandal. Any objective observer might feel that illegal donations, and a possible criminal conspiracy between Labour Party leaders to cover up these donations, was a major political scandal. But increasingly, the mainstream media is referring to this scandal as ‘dodgy donations’. These donations weren’t dodgy. They were illegal and leading politicians were conspiring to keep them from becoming public.

The Silence of the Zionist Loving Mainstream media over the Jewish Funding of the Labour Government’s Jewish Policies

Despite its alleged diversity of political perspectives, Britain’s mainstream media presented the Abrahams’ scandal in a similar way. It put forward a number of suggestions as to what his motives could have been but completely refused to mention the possibility that he may have made those donations in order to promote the interests of the Jews-only state in Palestine. What reinforces the idea that the mainstream media deliberately avoided exploring this issue is the remarkable fact that it made no attempt to highlight Abrahams’ political opinions. It didn’t bother to find out what his opinions were even though this might have been critical for understanding what led him to making such huge donations. It could have investigated his views by exploring what issues were at stake when Jon Mendelsohn ejected Abrahams from ‘Labour Friends of Israel’. Had Abrahams been trying to promote policies that were too extreme even for ‘Labour Friends of Israel’ or were they too moderate for these Jewish racists? The mainstream media ended up portraying Abrahams as if he didn’t have any political opinions at all. In addition, it focused on Abrahams’ character in order to imply he had no political interests or a political agenda to support the Jews-only state.

The most likely reason for the mainstream media’s attempt to depoliticize what Abrahams was up to, and its denial of the major political significance of the scandal, was to avoid infringing on Jewish taboos. These include: Jews giving cash to encourage the government to promote Jewish foreign policies (in America Jews are much more open about why they offer large donations to politicians): the role played by the Jewish lobby in corrupting British foreign policy; the influence of the Jews-only state in Palestine over British foreign policies; and British Jews acting traitorously against Britain’s national interests. The mainstream media’s coverage of this major political scandal almost totally avoided these Jewish taboos.

The mainstream media permitted only one exception. “David Abrahams, the strange shape-shifter at the centre of the funding furore, was once Mr Big in LFI (Labour Friends of Israel); so is John Mendelsohn, the smart fundraiser picked by Gordon Brown to garner “election resources” to finance the next Labour win. Lord Levy is also a key member of LFI. We witnessed the tortuous police investigation into the peer’s affairs during the cash for honours investigations, but not once was there any scrutiny of Levy’s connection to LFI and how that might have led to the offer of his prestigious position as the Middle East envoy, handed to him by his tennis partner, Tony Blair. Mendelsohn is a passionate Zionist and infamous lobbyist, described by the Jewish Chronicle as “one of the best-connected power brokers”. So we can assume LFI plays a part in shaping our foreign policies in the Middle East, the most inflammable tinderbox in the world today. And that is neither right nor fair. The LFI take, by definition, has to be partisan. It exists to present the official Israeli view; it cannot be nuanced or considerate to “the enemy”. I would venture to suggest that Tony Blair’s abject performance during the last Israeli assault on Lebanon was partly the result of the special relationship he had with LFI.” (Yasmin Alibhai-Brown ‘The shadowy role of Labour Friends of Israel http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/yasmin_alibhai_brown/article3218062.ece December 03, 2007).

The mainstream media seems much too concerned about breeching Jewish taboos to publish Gilad Atzmon’s article on the Abrahams’ scandal. “I find myself wondering how come Labour is so heavily entangled with those ‘Friends of Israel’? However, the most crucial issue here is actually the fact that not a single British media outlet dares to ask the most important questions: what is this cabal of self-declared ‘Friends of Israel’ trying to achieve by pouring money into political parties? What is it that it is trying to buy? Where is the money coming from? Is it their own money or is it delivered by their ‘friends’ in the Israeli embassy or another Zionist apparatus?” (Gilad Atzmon ‘Some People Never Learn the Lesson’ http://peacepalestine.blogspot.com/2007/12/gilad-atzmon-some-people-never-learn.html December 4, 2007). It is highly revealing about the corrupt state of Britain’s mainstream media that it ignores the views of a vehement anti-racist such as Gilad Atzmon whilst frequently providing a platform for the views of hardline supporters of the Jews-only state in Palestine. “Strictly speaking, the ‘Labour Friends of Israel’, “fundamentally” supports an Apartheid racist Jewish state i.e. Israel. If this is not bad enough, they do just that at the heart of British politics. Moreover, they do just that without even respecting the elementary British ethical political norms.” (Gilad Atzmon ‘Some People Never Learn the Lesson’ http://peacepalestine.blogspot.com/2007/12/gilad-atzmon-some-people-never-learn.html December 4, 2007).

In reporting and analyzing the Abrahams’ scandal, the mainstream media deliberately covered up the following realities as if they were irrelevant to British politics.

* No mention that Abrahams is a Jew: he’s just the son of a Russian immigrant. (Of course, if he had been a Moslem this fact would have been given considerable prominence).

* No mention of Abrahams’ political beliefs – he’s depicted as just an eccentric political groupie or party lover who has no political views.

* No mention that Abrahams was part of Britain’s Jewish lobby. Only the small circulation Jewish Chronicle pointed out that Abrahams is, “a member of the Jewish Labour Movement”. (Bernard Josephs ‘A second ‘Jewish scandal’’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=56810&ATypeId=1 November 30, 2007). Presumably this is yet another Jewish organization to police Britain’s civil and political institutions to ensure they abide by Jewish taboos.

* Although the mainstream media mentioned the conflict between Abrahams and Jon Mendelsohn in ‘Labour Friends of Israel’ it did not discuss this organization’s role in advocating and funding Britain’s Jewish foreign policies.

* No mention of Mendelsohn’s important role in promoting the cause of Jewish racism within the heart of the Labour Government. Once again, it was only the Jewish Chronicle that dared to touch this issue. Mendelsohn’s colleagues at the Jewish Chronicle described him in the following way. “At ease in the corridors of power, Mendelsohn has the contacts and know-how to advance Israel’s case in his Labour Friends of Israel role.” (‘Sacks tops our list of the most influential’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11s18s186&SecId=186&AId=51977&ATypeId=1 April 27, 2007).

* Although the mainstream media reported that Peter Hain had been given a £5,000 donation by Mendelsohn it refrained from drawing the political implications of this loan. In effect, Hain was getting a donation from a leading figure within the Jewish Lobby. This donation constituted a Jewish passport for political promotion within the Labour government. Thirty years ago, who would’ve thought such a thing could ever have happened? In the 1970s Hain made a dramatic entrance into British politics as the country’s leading campaigner against the Apartheid state in South Africa. Now he’s accepting donations from one of the country’s most important members of the Jewish lobby and an admirer of the Jewish Apartheid state in Palestine. Such is the appalling political regression being forced on Labour politicians by the almighty power of the Jewish lobby in Britain. But then again, with hindsight perhaps this outcome was not so surprising. In the 1970s, Britain’s anti-Apartheid movement focussed almost exclusively on the Apartheid state in South Africa and virtually ignored the Jewish Apartheid state in Palestine. It would be a matter of considerable political interest to find out who, within the so-called peace and anti-racist movements, was responsible for initiating and sustaining this failure to condemn all forms of Apartheid. Perhaps thirty years ago Hain had helped to push the issue of Jewish racism onto the backburner which is where he seems to have placed the issue by accepting Mendelsohn’s donation?

The stance taken by Britain’s mainstream media suggests that it is either owned, managed, or run, by Zionists i.e. by people who support Jewish racism; the Jews-only Apartheid state in Palestine; the Jews-only state’s lebensraum policies against Palestinians; and Jewish supremacism in the Middle East. These are the people who believe Britain should embark upon a third world war which could have a devastating impact on British lives, treasure, and reputation. It doesn’t matter to them how catastrophic a new world war would be for Britain’s national interests when it would do so much to promote Jewish supremacism in the greater Middle East. Perhaps this is why despite the fact that America’s national intelligence services have stated that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons programme, Ralph Miliband persists in wanting to punish Iran for having such a programme. “NATO members agreed, reaching consensus over a working dinner Thursday that their policy toward Iran “should not change,” .. “There was unanimity around the table that there is a clear choice for Iran,” British Foreign Secretary David Miliband told reporters on Friday. “Iran can see the outstretched hand from the international community if they are willing to join the drive against proliferation. But if Iran persists on defying the will of the United Nations Security Council, then there must be further sanctions,” he said.” (Matthew Lee ‘Rice Seeks Russian Backing on Iran’ http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/12/05/international/i115908S90.DTL December 7, 2007).

The reason the Zionist dominated media and the Jewish lobby in Britain are both so vehemently against state funding for political parties is because this would undermine the role of Britain’s Jewish moneymen in financing the country’s political parties thus putting the Jewish lobby in a strong position to determine the country’s foreign policies no matter what party is in power.

Comparisons between the British Jewish Lobby and the American Jewish Lobby

The way the Jewish lobby operates in America is markedly different from the way it operates in Britain. In America the Jewish lobby is highly conspicuous and highly formalized. It lays out its aims and objectives in gruesome detail. It even writes the legislation which it expects its American minions in Congress and the White House to support.

In Britain, the Jewish lobby is nigh on inconspicuous. It works behind closed doors and in the corridors of power where it leaves behind no trace of its influence. As a consequence this enables the mainstream media to suggest that a Jewish member of the Jewish lobby who gives two-thirds of a million pounds to a political party has no political views and isn’t pursuing a political agenda. As a consequence of this avoidance of publicity, the power of the Jewish lobby can be seen only on the geopolitical level in Blair’s sacrifice of Britain’s national interests to the regional supremacism of the Jews-only state.

Who’s been protecting Abrahams?

Another question which needs to be asked is whether David Triesmann, Levy, and Jon Mendelsohn helped protect Abrahams’ illegal donations because his funds were so critical for the survival of the Blair/Brown governments and their continued promotion of Jewish supremacism in the greater Middle East.

What the Abrahams Scandal says about British Politics

It is beyond question that there has been a close correlation between Jewish donations to the Labour Party and Blair’s total servility to the Jews-only state in Palestine. But there is no evidence as to the mechanism by which Jewish cash was transformed into Jewish policies. This correlation cannot be deemed to be just a coincidence because Blair’s policies ran counter to Britain’s interests. Firstly, Blair’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq have had a disastrous impact on the country’s armed forces, its economic well being and its global reputation. An attack on Iran would be even more detrimental to British interests. Secondly, Blair’s policies ran counter to popular British political principles such as multi-culturalism and anti-racism. Thirdly, Blair’s policies, such as his support for the Jews’ efforts to starve Palestinians into submission, also ran counter to British humanitarian ideals. And, finally, Blair’s policies ran counter to British public opinion. In 2002-2003 two million people went on mass marches through London against the invasion of Iraq and yet Blair just ignored this expression of public opinion in order to pay off his debts to his Jewish donors by promoting Jewish supremacism in the Middle East. It was sometime in 2003 that Abrahams started funding the Labour Party on a substantial scale.

A financial times editorial rather surprisingly expressed the view that British voters do not like sleaze in British politics and do not like the idea of anyone acquiring undue influence. “It is crucial to understanding that voters want to be sure no one is acquiring influence secretly or unfairly. The failure to comprehend this is deeply disquieting, especially in a party that not only passed a law improving the party funding disclosure regime but still bears the scars of the cash-for-honours affair.” (‘Funding firestorm’ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/12f1486a-9de1-11dc-9f68-0000779fd2ac.html November 28 2007). This FT editor thus managed to piously condemn the influence of one man (without mentioning what this influence actually was) whilst ignoring the colossal influence of the Jewish lobby in Britain.

The Abrahams’ scandal raises a number of important political issues. These are, in ascending order. The pervasive sleaze in the Labour government. The involvement of Labour Party leaders in a criminal conspiracy to pretend that a Jewish donor was using proxy donors to hide his identity, perhaps even his ethnic identity. The Zionist dominated mainstream media depoliticization of Abrahams, no matter how damaging this might be to rooting out corruption and sleaze in the country’s political system, in order to protect the interests of the country’s Jewish lobby.

Most importantly, the scandal reveals that vast amounts of Jewish money continue to be lavished on the Labour Party under Brown as they under Blair. Although there is no evidence as to what Abrahams’ money bought, the reality is that the Labour government indulges itself in such extreme pro-Semitic bigotry that it runs counter to Britain’s national interests, its political principles, its humanitarian ideals, and public opinion. The Jewish lobby in Britain pressured the Blair government into wars in the greater Middle East which were not in Britain’s interests but were very much in the interests of the Jews-only state in Palestine. It continues to pressure the Brown government into attacking Iran which would be even more counter to British interests, whilst giving an even greater boost to Jewish supremacism in the greater Middle East, than the two earlier invasions. As regards the Abrahams’ scandal, justice has not merely got to be done but be seen to be done.

Reaction to the Scandal from the Jewish Community

The Jewish Chronicle
“Fears were growing this week of an antisemitic backlash following the latest Labour Party cash scandal involving two prominent Jewish activists. Communal leaders expressed concern that the situation may mirror the cash-for-peerages affair, in which, after a long criminal investigation, Labour fundraiser Lord Levy faced no charges.” (Bernard Josephs ‘A second ‘Jewish scandal’’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=56810&ATypeId=1 November 30, 2007).

Labour MP Andrew Dismore
“But the furore had a “whiff of antisemitism about it”, Labour MP Andrew Dismore told the JC. “People are looking for links to Jewish interests and evidence of a Jewish conspiracy. The press are turning every stone to find one.” The Hendon MP said he did not believe the case would have received such intensive coverage “if it did not involve Jews. The undercurrent of antisemitism is worrying.” Jewish Leadership Council member Brian Kerner said: “I am sure the whole affair will have an effect on the community.” Describing Mr Abrahams as a “good guy”, he warned: “It has an added effect of antisemitism, it won’t do us any good.”” (Bernard Josephs ‘A second ‘Jewish scandal’’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=56810&ATypeId=1 November 30, 2007).

Paul Usiskin co-chair of Peace Now UK
“Paul Usiskin, Labour supporter and co-chair of Peace Now UK, said: “It doesn’t do the reputation of people communally linked to Israel any good to find themselves willingly or unwillingly at the centre of matters to do with politics and money. I hope that, in contrast to previous issues of this kind, people do not link historical relations between Jews and financial affairs.”” (Bernard Josephs ‘A second ‘Jewish scandal’’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=56810&ATypeId=1 November 30, 2007).

Jon Benjamin, Board of Deputies
“Board of Deputies chief executive Jon Benjamin said: “There is wide concern in this story and clearly there is a potential for it to turn against us. We have been there before.”” (Bernard Josephs ‘A second ‘Jewish scandal’’ http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=56810&ATypeId=1 November 30, 2007).

Gordon Brown with Israel´s Tzipi Livni, former Mossad Agent

——————————————————————————–

•More on Jewish influence in Great Britain; politics, media, business

http://radioislam.org/islam/english/jewishp/britain/jew_cash_brown.htm

SPECIAL…..

We are delighted to announce the commencement of the elections phase, and take this opportunity to thank all those of you who have registered themselves, and/or suggested others, as candidates for the European Jewish Parliament.

The European Jewish Parliament is a groundbreaking initiative, as it will, amongst other things, democratically represent European Jewry in West, Central and Eastern Europe.

It is not about representing organisations. It is about enabling, for the first time, the possibility for every Jew in Europe to vote and to be voted for the Parliament. It is also the first time advanced technology is being used for such a process. Indeed exciting and fresh!

The voting process is simple and straight forward; you just need to vote once for your preferred candidate from your country of residence. Voting more than once, and/or voting for a candidate from a country other than your country of residence, will disqualify your vote.

The votes will be counted electronically, and the candidate with the majority of votes will be elected as a Member of The European Jewish Parliament. Where countries have more than one seat in the Parliament, the candidate with the next majority of votes will be elected as the second Member of The European Parliament, and so on.

The list of candidates includes candidates who were suggested by others. We would kindly ask that any such candidates, who do not wish to be elected, send us an email (info@eju.org) to advise us of the same. If such candidate who does not wish to take part is elected, the candidate with the next majority of votes will take his/her seat at the parliament.

We have received numerous emails and phone calls asking us to enable candidates registration to continue. The elections legal advisors have considered this and decided to allow candidates registration until the final day of the elections.

Good luck to all the candidates!

http://www.eju.org/survey?gclid=CLau85-Q8qsCFUxzfAod62neXA

On December 6th, David Cameron is elected leader of the British Conservative party. Cameron is an old favourite of the Rothschilds’ having been special adviser to Norman Lamont, when he collapsed the British economy for them in 1993. Cameron is also related to the British royal family.

Interestingly, the organisation, “Conservative Friends of Israel,” boasts proudly on their website that over two-thirds of Britain’s Conservative Members of Parliament, are members. Indeed they even got David Cameron to complete a questionnaire for them prior to his election as leader, in which he stated the following,

“Israel is in the front line in the international struggle against terrorist violence.”

Another organisation, presumably in complete opposition to the, “Conservative Friends of Israel,” is called the, “Labour Friends of Israel.” They choose not to reveal how many Labour Members of Parliament are members. They do however state, that they have sent at least fifty on expenses paid trips to Israel since 1997.

Despite this intense political lobbying, official government figures reveal that Jews represent less than half of one percent of the British population.

Also on December 6th, President Bush’s wife, Laura Bush, is joined by Rabbi Binyomin Taub, Rabbi Hillel Baron and Rabbi Mendy Minkowitz for the kosherization of the White House kitchen. A photo of this taking place as they stand with staff is shot by Shealah Craighead and subsequently placed on the official White House website.

The United States, under the presidency of the Crypto-Jew, George W. Bush, invade Iraq on March 19th, which this year is when the holy, “Day of Purim,” falls in the Jewish calendar. This, “Day of Purim,” is a day the Jews celebrate their victory over all the goyim (non-Jews) in Ancient Babylon, which is now based within the borders of Iraq, how interesting.
What is also interesting is that the previous United States led invasion of Iraq ended on the Day of Purim ten years earlier with the genocide of 150,000 fleeing Iraqis under the current President’s father, George Herbert Walker Bush. Purim is also the time when the Jews are encouraged to get bloody revenge against the non-Jews.

Iraq, is now one of six nations left in the world who don’t have a Rothschild controlled central bank. However, this war is mainly about stealing Iraq’s water supply for Israel, as Israel has always struggled for fresh water. Indeed, it had to steal the Golan Heights from Syria which provided Israel with one third of its fresh water 36 years before, yet still in Israel water extraction has surpassed replacement by 2.5 billion metres in the last 25 years. This means the water is far more precious to them than even the oil reserves which are the second largest reserves of oil on the planet. Indeed, less than four years ago in 1999 Israel’s Environment Minister, Dalia Itzik, declared a state of emergency in relation to the country’s water supply.

In a rare display of honesty, in June, President Bush puts a Jew, Paul Bremer, in control of Iraq when he names him, the United States Administrator of Iraq. Paul Bremer had been from 1989, managing director at Kissinger and Associates, the worldwide consulting firm founded by Jew, Henry Kissinger.

http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synagogue.of.Satan/2003-2006.ht

WESTERN POLITICIANS FOLLOWING LAWS ALLIEN TO CHRISTIANS!!

Russia: the Talmudic boast left on the wall of the Romanoffs’ death chamber and the canonization of Judas Iscariot. After the Second World War the Nazi leaders were hanged on the Jewish Day of Judgment in 1946, so that their execution was presented to Jewry in the shape of Mordecai’s vengeance on Haman and his sons.

By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of “the Jews”.

SO MANY INCIDENTS ARE CARRIED OUT ON JEW DAYS..,….NOBODY EVER POINTS THIS OUT OR ASKS WHY?

The National Director of the ADL, Abraham H. Foxman, publishes a book entitled, “Never Again? The Threat Of The New Anti-Semitism,” in which he states that the New Testament’s, “lie,” that the ancient Pharisees were responsible for the death of Christ, has been responsible for anti-Semitism throughout the millennia and thus the New Testament of the bible is, “hate speech,” and should be censored or, preferably, banned.

THE TALMUD ABE??????

HELEN HAS A MESSAGE FOR YOU ABE!!

About these ads

6 responses to “Israeli espionage mole exposed in Britain?

  1. “What has been happening over the years is a predictable routine of foreign visitation from the head of the Israeli government. The Israeli puppeteer travels to Washington. The Israeli puppeteer meets with the puppet in the White House, and then moves down Pennsylvania Avenue, and meets with the puppets in Congress. And then takes back billions of taxpayer dollars.”

    http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synagogue.of.Satan/2003-2006.htm

    http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/TheTalmudicVengeance.htm

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/10/16/liam-fox-is-not-a-useful-idiot/

  2. NEVER AGAIN, ABE….

    Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world’s leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war’s end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.

    Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of “mass-extermination” to posterity

    DOUGLAS REED…..THE GUY YOUR MOB TRIED TO SILENCE!!

  3. Mel Gibson releases his film, “The Passion of the Christ.” To preserve its authenticity, the dialogue of the film is presented entirely in Aramaic and Latin with subtitles. However there is one subtitle that does not appear. It is spoken but for some reason the subtitle is removed. This is of course due to pressure from Jewish media. The scene from which the subtitle was removed, was when Pilate was trying to get the Jews to stop calling for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion. And what was it the Jews said in response to Pilate, that the powerful Jewish lobby were so desperate to censor,

    “Let his blood be on us and our children.”

    On June 20th, according to a report in the Jerusalem Post, the Israeli Knesset has now empowered the State of Israel to criminalize anyone in the world who dares to question whether or not six million Jews died in the alleged holocaust, and request their extradition to Israel. Furthermore, the Israeli government can also seize, prosecute and imprison people who harbour such beliefs, should they ever set foot in Israel.

    On September 30th, during his first Presidential debate with the Jew John Kerry, President Bush states, on the subject of Americans dying in the war in Iraq,

    “A free Iraq will help secure Israel.”

    On October 16th, President Bush signs into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act, designed to force the entire world into never being critical of the Jews, whatever their actions. This Act establishes a special department within the United States State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism, which is to report annually to Congress. This Act defines a person as being anti-Semitic if they purport any of the following beliefs:

    1.Any assertion, “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world.”
    2.The expression of, “Strong anti-Israel sentiment.”
    3.Expressing, “Virulent criticism,” of Israel’s leaders, past or present. The State Department gives an example of this occurring when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behaviour of a past or present Zionist leader.
    4.Any criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature with the emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbalah.
    5.Any criticism of the United States Government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community, which would include Jewish organisations such as American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
    6.Any criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism or what some call the, “New World Order.”
    7.Placing any blame on Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ.
    8.Citing any facts that could in any way diminish the, “six million,” figure of holocaust victims.
    9.Claiming that Israel is a racist state.
    10.Making any claim that there exists a, “Zionist Conspiracy.”
    11.Offering proof that Jews and their leaders created Communism and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
    12.Making, “derogatory statements about Jewish persons.”
    13.Asserting that spiritually disobedient Jews do not have the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine.
    14.Making any allegations of Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attack.

    MOSSAD AND BUSH CARRIED OUT 9-11….BIBLCAL RIGHT DO ONE GEORGE YOU IDIOT!

    U.S. Politics

    Since plenty of years the U.S. is de facto run by pro-Israeli Jews either directly, or indirectly through the might of their Jewish lobbies. The Israeli paper Ma´ariv (02.09.1994) even wrote:

    “The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim [Gentiles], but an administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision making at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious law connected with the term ‘government of goyim’ should be re-examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S.”

    In this important section we post articles on Jewish influence in US politics and demonstrate this influence in present and former governments as well as in the candidates to the US presidency.

    Overview
    • Most important articles/documents • The Barack Obama Régime
    Jewish revelations, Farrakhan, Duke Lists of Jews, revealing quotes

    • 2008 election candidates and the Jews • The George W. Bush Régime
    McCain, Hillary, Biden, Palin, Giuliani Lists of Jews, revealing quotes

    • On the 2008 election • The Bill Clinton Régime
    Jewish articles, ”The Daily Show” Lists of Jews, revealing quotes

    • On the 2004 election • On the 2000 election
    Kerry, Dean, Edwards, W. Clark Hillary, Bush, Gore, Lieberman, Lazio, Bradley

    • On the 2000 election
    Hillary, Bush, Gore, Lieberman, Lazio, Bradley

    • Earlier US Politics
    Nixon and Truman quotes, JFK and Mossad
    Reagan

    Read also

    •The cost of Israel – Israel’s Effects on U.S. Interests
    Contains a multitude of key documents on this issue:
    U.S. Aid to Israel — Espionage against the
    U.S./Pollard — The 1967 USS Liberty —
    The 1954 Lavon affair — 9-11 and Israel — Israel’s harming
    of U.S. defense industries — Israeli harassment
    of U.S. Marines — Quotes on Israel´s influence

    •The Jewish Lobby in the U.S.
    Contains a multitude of key documents on this issue:
    AIPAC — Fund Raising — Deceptive methods

    •Media Power of the Jews in U.S. (and the world)
    Contains a multitude of key documents on this issue:
    Jewish Media ownership — Jewish Hollywood
    — Countless shows & movies promoting Israel
    — Countless anti-Arab movies — Jewish ownership of
    News Channels — Murdoch and the Fox News empire
    — MEMRI

    •When Jews Rule… – IMPORTANT DOCUMENT – TO BE SPREAD!
    The most thorough work to this day on Jewish power and influence in the USA.

    •Nation of Islam and the Black Resistance
    Our section on NOI, Jewish racism against Blacks, slavery, and the Resistance Movement spearheaded by Louis Farrakhan

    •Jewish pre-eminence in Communism and the Political “Left”
    By the Jewish Tribal Review

    Most important articles/documents

    •Government (pt. 1)
    [300 Kilobytes] [about 60 paper pages] Jewish pre-eminence in American government; Jewish economic influence, especially within the Democratic Party; money control by a special interest group as the destroyer of true democracy; the dominant Jewish-Israeli lobbying organization: the American Israel Public Action Committee (AIPAC); Jewish lobbying for Israel, Holocaust-related issues, Jewish immigration to America, and other ethnocentric concerns.

    •Government (pt. 2)
    [420 Kilobytes] [about 83 paper pages] Jewish/Zionist domination of the Bill Clinton administration; the Monica Lewinsky case; Israeli spies in the American government; Jewish/Israeli influence in governments throughout the world.

    •Jews and Goverment – big article archives with links
    Archive No 1 and Archive No 2.

    •Jews at the Head of Non-Jewish Organizations in the U.S.
    (including universities)

    •Jewi$h Power
    A huge collection of articles compiled by the Jewish Tribal Review

    •On the Judaization of the U.S.A.
    A huge collection of articles compiled by the Jewish Tribal Review

    •Feel the power
    Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News, boasting about Jewish power

    •From sea to shining sea
    By Joseph Aaron, The Chicago Jewish News Online, more boasting and Ben Bernanke is Jewish

    •Jewish power dominates at “Vanity Fair”
    By Nathan Burstein, The Jerusalem Post

    •How Jewish is Hollywood?
    More Jewish boasting: “I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media,
    Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”
    By Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times

    •American Jews Are Double Agents: Deal With It
    By David Samuels, Jewcy website, revealing insights into the American-Jewish psyche

    •A Jew concedes that Jews act “behind the scenes”
    “…the time-honored role of Jews as behind-the-scenes movers and shakers, who traditionally advance their agenda while letting someone else occupy the public spotlight.”

    •The Jews of Mother Jones’ top 100 Democratic and Republican campaign contributors

    •How cynically Jews analyse American politics
    02-09-2000

    •Hebrew press on US administration´s Jews and Israel

    01-06-2000

    •A Revealing Survey on US Jews
    The Jerusalem Post: “What is particularly striking is that unlike the other groups, the country to which Jews are attached is not one their grandparents came from, but Israel …”

    •Ariel Sharon: “… we, the Jewish people control America …”

    •Israel and the Organized American Jews
    A chapter from Israel Shahak´s book “Open Secrets”

    •Jewish Manipulation of World Leaders – a must see!
    A collection of revealing photos of world leaders bowing to Jewish power

    •US Presidents, Senators & Congressmen, Governors & Mayors, ruled by Jewish power
    Photos of U.S. leaders with their Jewish masters

    •The U.S. elections 2000 – Some Jewish Commentaries
    Quotes from the Jewish Press

    •Nations see Jews as key to winning favor with U.S.
    By Michael J. Jordan (Jewish Telegraphic Agency 09/13/2000)

    •Neoconservatism’s Jewish Origins and Jewish Agenda
    From the Jewish Daily Forward

    •Spy Probe Scans Neocon-Israel Ties
    By Jim Lobe

    •The Plan: Were Neo-Conservatives’ 1998 Memos a Blueprint for Iraq War?
    Article from ABCNews.com

    •”A Clean Break” – A Zionist plan for the Middle East
    Document published by The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies

    •Jewish exploitation of minorities
    Latinos, Native Americans, Japanese-Americans – from the Jewish Tribal Review

    Commentaries and analysis

    •America rules the world but Israel rules America
    A DVD with veteran Congressman Paul Findley about Israel’s virtual dictatorship over America

    •They dare to speak out
    Two excerpts from former US Congressman Paul Findley´s book

    •Former U.S. congressman James Traficant on the power of the Jewish lobby
    Includes a videoclip from his TV-appearance on Greta van Sustern´s show, Fox News, September 10th 2009

    •Whose War?
    By Patrick J. Buchanan, article from The American Conservative

    •Pat Buchanan: In His Own Words On American Jews and the Pro-Israel Lobby
    A collection of quotes allegedly made by the US politician Pat Buchanan
    and taken from the Zionist-Jewish organization ADL:s Homepage

    •US War Without End for Israel?
    Selection of articles on war plans against Iran

    •How Israeli terrorism and American treason caused the September 11 Attacks
    By US politician David Duke

    •How America Keeps its Ally Armed to the Teeth
    By Robert Fisk

    •USA´s Rulers – They Are All Jews!
    What G. Washington and B. Franklin said about the Jews

    •Louis Farrakhan: Why do they hate America?

    •Learning from the September 11 Attacks
    By Mark Weber

    “Every Jew is an Ambassador for Israel”

    – Rabbi Aron Moss, Arutz Sheva, Israel National News, 07/25/2006.

    •Price of supporting Israel
    By David Duke

    •The top five lies about this war

    •Welcome to Amerisraelistan
    By Chad Powers. Massive American support of the crimes of Israel by our Zionist puppet-masters is turning the United States INTO Israel.

    •Ahmed Rami: There will be no war of civilisations…

    •Tell Us the Whole Truth!
    Duke´s letter to President Bush

    •Israel will get war!
    By Russ Granata

    •Why must USA occupy foreign capital cities…?
    Asks black Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. Article from Nation of Islam’s Final Call.

    •”We must cut off the source of terrorism”
    By David Duke

    •”Will Anyone Dare to Ask Why?”
    By David Duke

    •We are all Palestinians now!
    An American perspective on the Gaza onslaught

    •Jewish Extermination Campaign
    By James Petras

    •US Promotes Jewish Genocide of Gaza
    By Professor Francis A. Boyle

    •A Statement on Gaza by NACAZAI
    North American Committee Against Zionism and Imperialism

    •The enduring pattern of Liberal values
    The US writer Gore Vidal, with impressive family connections to high levels in the American political elite (including the Zionist agent Al Gore), has this to say…

    •Midas Ears
    By Israel Shamir. The dark secret of Jewish power is out…

    The Barack Obama Régime

    Don’t be fooled by the Zionist media campaign about the “changes” under Mr. Obama’s reign. It is the same old political sponsors as before, the same old policy advisers and therefore the same Zionist, “Israel-first”, policies – just masked behind a more pleasant package.

    The Israeli paper Ha’aretz writes bluntly (13/11/2008): “Quite a few of Barack Obama’s ‘friends from the past’ have popped up recently. It’s doubtful whether he even knows their names, but in the Chicago Jewish community many people really are long-time friends of the president-elect. Some of the older people in the community say that they ‘raised him,’ while others half-jokingly call Obama ‘the first Jewish president.’ ”

    Rahm Emanuel, son of an Irgun terrorist,
    and Barack Obama

    •Sen. Barack Obama in the Jewish and Israeli Press
    Collection of revealing articles before Obama’s 2008 campaign

    •How Barack Obama learned to love Israel
    By Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 4 March 2007

    •White House Chief of Staff is an Israeli mole! – The Jewish Press boasts of Rahm Emanuel’s pro-Israelism – “Obviously he’ll influence the president to be pro-Israel”
    Revealing material from The Jewish Journal and Ha’aretz

    •Two well informed articles on Rahm Emanuel – the Israeli mole in the White House
    – Obama’s chief-of-staff-designate Rahm Emanuel is the son of a former Zionist terrorist – on Emanuel’s Irgun connection
    – Rahm Emanuel: Ardent Zionist called Obama’s ‘Svengali’

    •Obama’s Jews: Change We Can’t Believe In
    A list of USA:s new Jewish rulers

    •Dennis Ross – Jew and former leader of “mission of four Jews” to handle Iran affairs
    By Freedom Research

    •Richard Holbrooke – new Jewish Viceroy of Afghanistan and Pakistan
    By Freedom Research

    •Obama’s Neocon: The Curious Case of Richard Holbrooke
    By Joshua Frank, CounterPunch

    •Noam Chomsky on Obama´s administration: “…pro-Israeli hawks right down the line”
    Video of an interview with Chomsky

    •The Zionist Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing – A message to the world on the Obama “Inauguration”…Wake Up!
    By David Duke

    •Can Obama escape the Domination of AIPAC and the American Jewish/Zionist Israeli lobby?
    By Debbie Menon

    •No congratulations to Obama
    Life in the Madhouse of “democracy”

    •Obama = Kosher Puppet
    Videoclip from Youtube with revealing Obama and Hillary quotes

    On US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, see articles below.

    On her husband – former US President Bill Clinton – see further below.

    2008 U.S. Presidential candidate John McCain

    •Sen. John McCain in the Jewish and Israeli Press
    Collection of revealing articles

    •John McCain Bows to Jewish Money
    The Jewish Money Men behind McCain

    •Sen. John McCain’s Speech to AIPAC – American Israel Public Affairs Committee
    June 02, 2008

    •Senator John McCain addresses the National Convention of Christians United for Israel
    July 17, 2007, excerpts

    •”Bush, McCain both good for the Jews”
    05-09-2000

    •See also: McCain Addresses AIPAC Annual Policy Conference 2002

    2008 U.S. Presidential candidate Joe Biden

    •Sen. Joe Biden in the Jewish and Israeli Press
    Collection of revealing articles
    •Sen. Joseph R. Biden declares himself “a Zionist” on Jewish “Shalom TV”
    Includes film clip and transcript of the interview
    •Biden and Israel
    By Robert Weitzel, CounterPunch, September 2, 2008

    2008 U.S. Presidential candidate Sarah Palin

    •Gov. Sarah Palin in the Jewish and Israeli Press
    Collection of revealing articles

    2008 U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton

    In July 26, 2000, during Hillary Clinton’s campaign for Congress from New York, Jewish senator Charles Schumer (“a recognized leader in Jewish issues on Capitol Hill”) was recorded on videotape at a fund raiser for the President’s wife. He responded to questions by Jews present about Israel, saying, “My guess is [Ms. Clinton] will vote exactly as I vote on Jewish issues. She will look to me to see how to vote … Is she going to be a leading voice in the Senate? No. Is she going to have the same feeling about it that I do — born Jewish? No. But she will be good.” “Schumer,” noted the Associated Press, “in shirt sleeves, chatted casually with supporters on the tape, seemingly unaware that a camera was rolling.” (Associated Press, 7-27-2000)

    •Sen. Hillary Clinton in the Jewish and Israeli Press
    Collection of revealing articles

    •Hillary Has Jewish Roots – Second Husband Of Grandmother Was Jewish
    By CBS, AP, 1999

    •Giuliani and Clinton: The Best Candidates for Israel
    By Oren Lee-Parritz, The Jewish Post of New York

    •Hillary Clinton and the Israel Lobby
    By Joshua Frank, Antiwar.com, January 23, 2007

    •Unprecedented influence: Almost 10 percent of superdelegates are Jewish
    The Jewish News Weekly of Northern California, March 28, 2008

    •Senator Hillary Clinton’s Remarks to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
    February 1, 2007

    •Entrenched Hypocrisy – Hillary Clinton, AIPAC and Iran
    By Joshua Frank

    •Hillary donates protective gear for settlers
    (Jerusalem Post 04/03/2001)

    •Israel and the Ongoing Holocaust in Congo
    On Jewish operations in the heart of Africa, including those of Obama-Clinton backer Maurice Templesman.

    •Angolagate and the Jewish connection – a collection of articles
    Includes information on how Jewish Clinton-donor Marc Rich helped Apartheid South Africa.

    More articles on Hillary Clinton and the Jewish lobby can be read in the subsection on the US election 2000.

    2008 U.S. Presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani

    •Sen. Rudolph Giuliani in the Jewish and Israeli Press
    Collection of revealing articles
    •Giuliani and Clinton: The Best Candidates for Israel
    By Oren Lee-Parritz, The Jewish Post of New York
    •Video: Rudy Giuliani and Ron Paul bicker over Israel
    By the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, published in The Jerusalem Post, Jan 13, 2008
    •Giuliani’s proposal for endless Middle East wars on behalf of Israel
    By Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com, Sept. 21, 2007

    On the US 2008 elections

    •USA: Members of the Jewish lobby, 36 Jews have shaped 2008 U.S. election
    Published in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, 18 October 2008

    •Tracking Jewish Money – Local givers have yet to crown
    By Eric Fingerhut, Washington Jewish Week – Online Edition, April 26, 2007
    •Giuliani and Clinton: The Best Candidates for Israel
    By Oren Lee-Parritz, The Jewish Post of New York
    •Unprecedented influence: Almost 10 percent of superdelegates are Jewish
    The Jewish News Weekly of Northern California, March 28, 2008
    •Election Power of the Israel Lobby
    By Rob Winder, Al Jazeera Online, Dec 30, 2007

    The Jewish comedian John Stewart´s “The Daily Show” on the Jewish lobby´s influence over the 2008 elections…

    (Click on this image to activate video link)

    The George W. Bush Régime

    A display of how fully Bush was a puppet to his Israeli-Jewish masters:

    “Early Friday morning the secretary of state was considering bringing the [Gaza] cease-fire resolution to a UN [Security Council] vote and we didn’t want her to vote for it,” Olmert said. “I said ‘get President Bush on the phone.’ They tried and told me he was in the middle of a lecture in Philadelphia. I said ‘I’m not interested, I need to speak to him now.’ He got down from the podium, went out and took the phone call.”
    [PM: Rice left embarrassed in UN vote, By Yaakov Lappin, Jerusalem Post, January 12, 2009]

    “Let me see if I understand this,” wrote an American in response to news reports that Israeli Prime Minister Olmert ordered President Bush from the podium where he was giving a speech to receive Israel’s instructions about how the United States had to vote on the UN resolution. “On September 11th, President Bush is interrupted while reading a story to school children and told the World Trade Center had been hit – and he went on reading. Now, Olmert calls about a UN resolution when Bush is giving a speech and Bush leaves the stage to take the call. There exists no greater example of a master-servant relationship.”

    •Jews in the Bush Administration

    •Jews in the Bush Administration – another list

    •The Zionists Who Dominate the White House
    Posted 01/04/2003

    •Partial list of Jews in the Bush Adminstration
    (March 26, 2003)

    •Jews Who control ostensibly non-Jewish Organizations in the US – Important document!

    •The Men From JINSA and CSP
    By Jason A. Vest
    Bush meeting his “gurus”:

    The real government of the USA!

    •The Zionist plan for Iraq
    Document published by the Center for Security Policy (CSP)

    •The Plan: Were Neo-Conservatives’ 1998 Memos a Blueprint for Iraq War?
    Article from ABCNews.com

    •Quick facts on Richard Perle, a security risk

    •New Questions About Feith
    Article on Zionist Jew Douglas Feith, by James Zogby

    •More on Douglas Feith – Zionist Jew and agent of Israel

    •On John Kerry´s and George W. Bush´s Jewish advisors Jay Footlik and Michael Lebovitz
    Article published in Chicago Jewish Community Online

    •Perle, Wolfowitz and Feith, Israel’s Voice In The Department of Defense
    By Tracy Wilkinson

    •Top White House posts go to Jews
    After appointing Joshua Bolten to be the White House chief of staff, US President George W. Bush nominated another Jewish staffer, Joel Kaplan, to serve as Bolten’s deputy, putting him in charge of the daily policy planning.

    •Return of Zionist Extremist Elliott Abrams
    Israel’s Likud Scores Big With White House Appointment

    •Staff change means Mideast policy shift
    A Washington Times article on Zionist Jew Elliott Abrams

    •AJC Urges Senate Committee to Support Daniel Pipes
    The American Jewish Committee (AJC) Press Release

    •Why Daniel Pipes is a Wrong Choice for the U.S. Institute of Peace?
    By Habib Siddiqui

    •GOP Eyes Jewish Vote With Bush Tack on Israel
    from the Washington Post, “White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, who has made appearances at Florida synagogues at the behest of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said in an interview, ‘A door that was previously only open narrowly is now opened wide in terms of Jewish support. There is no telling how wide this door will swing open, but it has a lot of potential.’ ”

    •Orthodox Jew to become US ambassador to Israel
    From The Jerusalem Post

    •The Jewish Week on Zionist Influence in Bush´s New Administration

    •An American Jew Reflects on Bush´s Cabinet and Jewish Power in the U.S.
    Article from The New York Observer

    •The Jewish Chronicle on Zionists in the Bush Administration

    •Neoconservatism’s Jewish Origins and Jewish Agenda
    From the Jewish Daily Forward

    •Colin Powell Kisses Ass At AIPAC
    Transcript of Powell´s speech

    •Jews Positive On Powell Nomination
    Article from The Baltimore Jewish Times

    •Powell Calls U.S. “Judeo-Christian,” Then Amends

    •A Rose By Another Other Name -The Bush Administration’s Dual Loyalties
    By Kathleen and Bill Christison, former CIA political analysts

    •A Bush-Sharon Doctrine?
    By Arnaud de Borchgrave, The Washington Times

    •Act now to stop Sharon and Bush, the mad bomber!

    •Selective Intelligence – Donald Rumsfeld has his own special sources. Are they reliable?
    By Seymour M. Hersh, from The New Yorker

    More revealing articles on George W. Bush and the Jewish lobby can be read in the subsection on the US election 2000.

    George W. Bush at the Wailing Wall

    George W. Bush with the Israeli flag

    2004 U.S. Presidential candidate John Kerry

    The crypto-Jew and U.S. Presidential candidate in the 2004 elections, Senator John Kerry, relies on Jewish-Zionist brains for shaping his foreign policies, especially concerning the Jewish state of Israel and the Middle East with Zionist Jew Martin Indyk as his Middle East Advisor, Zionist Jew Jay Footlik as Kerry’s adviser on Israel and Jewish Affairs and with Zionist Jew Richard Holbrooke as potential Secretary of State in a Kerry administration. John Kerry´s openly Jewish brother Cameron Kerry provides the direct connection to the Zionist state of Israel.

    •John Kerry has Jewish roots — who knew?
    Article from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency

    •An Unwavering Commitment To Reforming the Middle East
    U.S. Presidential candidate John Kerry in Jewish-American paper The Forward

    •”Kerry is now totally aligned with Israel …”
    Article on John Kerry from Israeli Newspaper Ha´aretz

    •Strengthening Israel’s Security and Bolstering the US-Israel Special Relationship
    By U.S. Presidential candidate John Kerry

    •John Kerry position paper outlines support for Israel
    Article from Israeli Newspaper, Ha´aretz

    •Kerry courts Jews with Hebrew slogans, stories of Israel
    Article on John Kerry from Israeli Newspaper, Ha´aretz

    •Kerry Mideast adviser is lauded, but some prefer to wait and see
    Article from Jewish Telegraphic Agency on John Kerry´s Zionist Mideast advisor Mel Levine

    •Kerry and Genocide: Know What You Are Voting For (Link)
    By Joshua Frank on relationship between Zionist Jews John Kerry and Richard Hoolbroke

    •Revealing article from The Forward on John Edwards and Richard Holbrooke

    •On John Kerry´s and George W. Bush´s Jewish advisors Jay Footlik and Michael Lebovitz
    Article published in Chicago Jewish Community Online

    •BergerGate
    Articles on Sandy Berger, Zionist Jew and former National Security Adviser to U.S. Pres. Bill Clinton
    and informal adviser to Jewish Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry’s presidential campaign in 2004,
    caught stealing top secret documents from the National Archives

    •Kerry Relies on Cam, His Jewish Brother
    Article from the Jewish-American Forward Magazine

    •Cam Kerry promises support for Israel, on his brother’s behalf
    Article from Israeli Newspaper, Ha´aretz

    •Kerry’s brother reassures Israel of strong support
    Article from Israeli Newspaper, Ha´aretz

    •Cameron Kerry: Bush too soft on Saudis
    Article from Israeli Newspaper, Jerusalem Post

    •Brother Emphasizes Kerry Israel Support
    Article from The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles

    •John Kerry´s Record in the War Crime called the “Vietnam War”
    Collection of documents and articles on Kerry´s deeds in the Asian country of Vietnam

    •John Kerry: More Pro-Israeli Than Bush?
    By Barbara Ferguson, Arab News

    2004 Presidential candidate Howard Dean

    •Seeking to quiet critics, Dean chooses Fuerth as policy adviser
    Article from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA)

    •Howard Dean’s Jewish Connections
    Collection of articles from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA)

    •Quotes on Howard Dean´s Pro-Israelism
    Revealing article from Jewish-American paper The Forward

    •Democrats Boost Their “Pro Israel” Credentials
    Article on Howard Dean from Jewish Tikkun Magazine

    •Howard Dean: Hawk in Dove’s Clothing?
    By Stephen Zunes

    2004 Presidential candidate John Edwards

    •Text from Jewish Virtual Library on 2004 Presidential Candidate John Edwards´ Views on the Middle East

    •Revealing article from The Forward on John Edwards and Richard Holbrooke

    2004 Presidential candidate Wesley Clark

    •His Family’s Refugee Past Is Said to Inspire NATO’s Commander
    Article on General Wesley Clark´s Jewish background

    Election 2000; Hillary, W. Bush, Gore, Lieberman, etc

    Hillary Clinton and Rick Lazio “supporting Israel” — for their NY Senate Race

    •US First Lady Changes Position on Palestinian Statehood. An example of Israel’s political power within the U.S.
    (Israel Wire 04/22/1999).

    •Hillary Clinton Pressed to Support a Pardon for Pollard
    By Nitzan Horowitz (Ha’aretz 08/15/1999)

    •Hillary Threatens Palestinian Aid
    By Beth J. Harpaz (Associated Press 07/26/2000)

    •Hillary Gets a Shabbat Reprieve
    By Marilyn Henry (Jerusalem Post 07/24/2000)

    •Mrs. Clinton Acts as Candidate on Israel, Not as First Lady
    (Reuters/NYT 08/07/1999). Hillary endorses Jerusalem as the eternal and indivisible capital of Israel and also endorsed moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

    •Lazio Courts Jews With Syria Bill
    By Shannon McCaffrey (Associated Press 07/11/2000)

    •On Al Gore and Joseph Lieberman´s pro-Israelism
    From the Jewish Tribal Review homepage on “Jews and Government” (pt.2).

    •Al Gore Prostitutes Himself in Front of the Israeli Lobby
    Al Gore delivered a speech at the 39th Annual Policy Conference of AIPAC

    •Lieberman’s Record on the Middle East

    •Holy Smoke and Mirrors: The Rise of Centrist Theocrats
    By Norman Solomon (08/10/2000). On the appointment of Lieberman as Gore’s running mate.

    •Sen. Joe Lieberman Erases Ties to Apocalyptic Fundamentalist Group

    •Jews and Lieberman´s nomination – some Jewish commentaries
    13-09-2000

    •Lieberman´s wife and Bush Jr. associated with B´nai B´rith
    06-09-2000

    •Jews on Bush´s pro-Israelism
    05-09-2000, “Bush, McCain both good for the Jews”

    •Bush Will Support Israel Unconditionally
    By Janine Zacharia (Jerusalem Post 08/02/2000)

    •Bush vows to shift embassy to Jerusalem
    By Nitzan Horowitz (Ha’aretz 12/03/1999)

    •Bush campaign steps back from supporter’s criticism of Israel
    By Janine Zacharia (Jerusalem Post 09/27/2000)

    •All’s Fair in Love, War and the NY Senate Race
    By Nitzan Horowitz (Ha’aretz 08/08/1999)

    •Bradley Targets Jews in N.Y.
    By Beth Gardiner (AP 10/1999)

    The Bill Clinton Régime

    •”The American Jews through Israeli Eyes”
    From Israeli newspaper Ma´Ariv translated from Hebrew:

    ◦”The Jews Who Run Clinton´s Court”

    ◦”The Jewish Laundry of Drug Money”

    •Jewish influence in Clinton´s administrations
    From the Jewish Tribal Review homepage on “Jews and Government” (pt.2).

    •United States of Israel?

    •Thoughts on Jewish Power – a White House Jew confesses
    If you have eyes, you can see Jewish power. They are celebrating it right in front of us, and we are being billed for it. They are telling us to our faces that they are in charge.

    •”President Clinton: The best president”…for the Jews!
    Excerpts from Jewish magazines

    •”The mission of four Jews”
    Revealing article on the so-called “American” Peace Initiative. By Israel Shahak.

    •Jewish Numbers Grow at the State Department
    By Jerusalem Post journalist Jonathan Broder

    •”William Cohen: Israel´s Man at the Helm”
    Excerpt from the Jerusalem Post

    •Martin Indyk – USA:s Jewish Ambassador to Israel

    •The Specter of dual-loyalty haunting diaspora Jews — A byproduct of Zionism.
    By Michael J. Jordan (Jewish Telegraphic Agency 09/26/2000). The case of Martin Indyk.

    •The Monica Lewinsky Affair
    From the Jewish Tribal Review homepage on “Jews and Government” (pt.2).

    “I would like it if the Palestinian people felt free and were free to live wherever they like, wherever they want to live,” President Clinton (07/01/1999). Barak “rejected” Clinton’s statement and demanded a a clarification. Then “President Clinton backed down from comments he made during a July 1 news conference supporting the right of Palestinian refugees to return to Israel. Responding in a July 5 letter to the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Clinton said, ‘Let me assure you that there has been no change in U.S. policy on this matter,’ adding that the ‘issue of Palestinian refugees must be dealt with and resolved by the parties themselves.'”

    — From the 07/13/1999 Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Aside from showing that Clinton spits out nice but meaningless words to appease his audience, this shows that Clinton, most likely, backed down under U.S. pro-Israel pressure.

    •US Jewish Policy Maker Rahm Emanuel

    •Jewess Albright Calls Settlements “Legal”
    In an interview with Matt Lauer on NBC’s The Today Show on October 1, 1997, Jewish Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright related to setllement building in Yesha in Israel and said: “I wasn’t happy…I felt that going forward with those kinds of buildings was not helpful. Mr. Lauer pressed her and stated: “ It’s legal.“, and Albright admitted: “It’s legal.”

    •The everlasting Jewish role in the U.S. government
    List of Jews in Clinton´s first administration

    •Clinton´s list: The Jews in Clinton´s Cabinet
    1997 update of the Jews in the present U.S. administration

    •Clinton´s Jews – 01.04.1998

    •The Jewish US. Ambassadors – 22.04.1998

    •Jewish Congressmembers in 2000
    Source: Washtenaw Jewish News, December 2000 – January 2001

    •Hebrew press on US administration´s Jews and Israel
    01-06-2000

    •Clinton Won’t Address the U.N. on Yom Kippur
    (Reuter/Ha’aretz 07/30/1999)

    •Israel redirects Hellfire missiles “after US advice”
    By Robert Fisk

    •Spy vs Spite
    The Clinton administration has praised the Anti-Defamation League for helping shield kids from Internet hate. But should a group that spied on thousands of Californians be allowed to police the Web?

    •Israel Blackmailed Bill Clinton with Monica Tapes By Neal Travis (New York Post 03/03/1999)

    •Why Clinton caved in to Israell By Jonathan Broder (Salon Magazine 07/28/1998)

    •Israeli spies tapped Clinton e-maill By Uzi Mahnaimi (Sunday Times 05/21/2000)

    •Clinton to press for extra aid for Israell By Aluf Benn (Ha’aretz 10/25/2000). That is, more aid DURING Israel’s brutal suppression of the September 2000 uprising. Another nail in the coffin of U.S. “honest brokerage”.

    •Jews Support Clinton’s Call to Boost Foreign Aid (Jewish Telegraphic Agency 01/31/1997)

    •Dear Bill, a call on Bill Clinton from an Israeli peace activist, to toughen up against Netanyahu and “disregard those bought senators” By Uri Avnery (Ma’ariv 08/24/1998)

    •Lantos Controversy
    By Ed Henry (Roll Call). Lantos “… asking everyone in the hearing room to stand for a moment of silence in honor of an Israeli woman who was killed in the latest round of violence in the Middle East”. Lantos – a Hungarian Jew – was co-Chairman for the Congressional Human Rights Caucus when it invited the Kuwaiti “nurse Nayirah” to tell her fake story about the Iraqi soldiers´ “atrocity” with the baby incubators in occupied Kuwait – one of the main lies that paved the way for the war on Iraq in 1991.

    In 2002, long out of the presidency, Bill Clinton made the news for his following outrageous comment:

    “Former President Clinton, who avoided the Vietnam War, told Jewish supporters in Toronto that he would fight and die to protect Israel if Iraq or Iran ever invaded. ‘The Israelis know that if the Iraqi or Iranian army came across the Jordan River, I would personally grab a rifle, get in a ditch, and fight and die,’ Clinton said to cheers at the Hadassah children’s charity fund-rasing dinner last week … Clinton was accused of ducking the draft during the Vietnam era. He received an induction notice but got a deferment when he promised to participate in an ROTC program. He never joined the program.” (Associated Press, 8-4-2002)

    Earlier American politics

    “Sometime in the late 1950s, that world-class gossip and occasional historian, John F. Kennedy, told me how, in 1948, Harry S. Truman had been pretty much abandoned by everyone when he came to run for president. Then an American Zionist brought him two million dollars in cash, in a suitcase, aboard his whistle-stop campaign train. ‘That’s why our recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast.’ As neither Jack nor I was an antisemite (unlike his father and my grandfather) we took this to be just another funny story about Truman and the serene corruption of American politics.
    Unfortunately, the hurried recognition of Israel as a state has resulted in forty-five years of murderous confusion [...].”
    — Taken from famous U.S. establishment politician Gore Vidal’s foreword to “Jewish History, Jewish Religion; The Weight of Three Thousand Years”.

    •Jewish influence in US politics – Mid 20th century and onwards
    From the Jewish Tribal Review homepage on “Jews and Government” (pt.1).
    On Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Hoover, Nixon, LBJ…

    •Pres. Nixon, Rev. Graham and Pres. Truman on the Jews
    Revealing quotes on what they really think

    •President Richard Nixon on the Jews
    Transcripts from tapes

    •Eisenhower Regretted That He Pushed For Sinai Withdrawal
    By Joseph Lerner, (Israel Resource Review 05/05/1997)

    •Kissinger gave Israel tacit approval to flout 1973 truce: documents
    Story from AFP / Matthew Lee

    •Israel, the Golden Triangle, and the Kennedy Assassination
    The book “Opium Lords”, by Salvador Astucia

    “Congress will not formally investigate charges that the Reagan campaign stole the election in 1980, in large part because Israel’s supporters on Capitol Hill do not want to put the spotlight on Israel’s role, which during that period sold weapons to Iran in blatant disregard of President Carter.”
    — Prediction by Newsweek correspondent Eleanor Clift, on the NBC television talk show The McLaughlin Group, May 12, 1991.

    •Reprise of the October Surprise: Is the Worst Surprise Still to Come?
    By Richard Curtiss (Washington Report 05/1991). Israel’s role.

    •The US’s 1940s Decisions to Support Israel
    By Richard Curtiss (Washington Report 05/1991)

    For more on the Iran-Contras affair, please se our section on Iran.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Other sections on the U.S.:

    •The cost of Israel – Israel’s Effects on U.S. Interests

    •The Jewish Lobby in the U.S.

    •Media Power of the Jews in U.S. (and the world)

    •U.S. and World Business and Finance

    •When Jews Rule… – The most thorough work to this day on Jewish power and influence in the USA.

    •Nation of Islam and the Black Resistance

    http://radioislam.org/islam/english/index_uspolitics.htm#obama

    2008 FOLK NOW CATCHING UP…

    KHARZAR JEWS ARE FAKE JEWS……GEORGE, SNUCK INTO AMERIKA WHEN YOU WERE PISSED!

    NOW YOU SEE THE DAMAGE…..HOW STUPID TO ALLOW COMMIES ON MASSE INTO WHAT WAS A CAPITALIST COUNTRY- HANDING OVER THE NATIONS PURSE………..HAVE A DRINK GEORGE!!

  4. The Truth about the Talmud
    A Documented Exposé of Jewish racist Hate Literature

    By Michael Hoffman, foremost scholar of Judaism in the English-speaking world

    Copyright ©2000-2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II All Rights Reserved

    TOO DISGUSTING TO PUT MORE….

    http://radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/talmud2.htm

    Introduction
    The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition): “My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”

    The supremacy of the Talmud over the Bible in the Israeli state may also be seen in the case of the black Ethiopian Jews. Ethiopians are very knowledgeable of the Old Testament. However, their religion is so ancient it pre-dates the Scribes’ Talmud, of which the Ethiopians have no knowledge. According to the N.Y. Times of Sept. 29, 1992, p.4:

    “The problem is that Ethiopian Jewish tradition goes no further than the Bible or Torah; the later Talmud and other commentaries that form the basis of modern traditions never came their way.”

    Because they are not traffickers in Talmudic tradition, the black Ethiopian Jews are discriminated against and have been forbidden by the Zionists to perform marriages, funerals and other services in the Israeli state.

    Rabbi Joseph D. Soloveitchik is regarded as one of the most influential rabbis of the 20th century, the “unchallenged leader” of Orthodox Judaism and the top international authority on halakha (Jewish religious law). Soloveitchik was responsible for instructing and ordaining more than 2,000 rabbis, “an entire generation” of Jewish leadership.

    N.Y. Times religion reporter Ari Goldman described the basis of the rabbi’s authority:

    “Soloveitchik came from a long line of distinguished Talmudic scholars…Until his early 20s, he devoted himself almost exclusively to the study of the Talmud…He came to Yeshiva University’s Elchanan Theological Seminary where he remained the pre-eminent teacher in the Talmud…He held the title of Leib Merkin professor of Talmud…sitting with his feet crossed in front of a table bearing an open volume of the Talmud.” (N.Y. Times, April 10, 1993, p. 38).

    Nowhere does Goldman refer to Soloveitchik’s knowledge of the Bible as the basis for being one of the leading authorities on Jewish law.

    The rabbi’s credentials are all predicated upon his mastery of the Talmud. Other studies are clearly secondary. Britain’s Jewish Chronicle of March 26, 1993 states that in religious school (yeshiva), Jews are “devoted to the Talmud to the exclusion of everything else.”

    The Talmud Nullifies the Bible

    The Jewish Scribes claim the Talmud is partly a collection of traditions Moses gave them in oral form. These had not yet been written down in Jesus’ time. Christ condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (early Talmud) and those who taught it (Scribes and Pharisees), because the Talmud nullifies the teachings of the Holy Bible.

    Shmuel Safrai in The Literature of the Sages Part One (p.164), points out that in chapters 4 and 5 of the Talmud’s Gittin Tractate, the Talmud nullifies the Biblical teaching concerning money-lending: “Hillel decreed the prozbul for the betterment of the world. The prozbul is a legal fiction which allows debts to be collected after the Sabbatical year and it was Hillel’s intention thereby to overcome the fear that money-lenders had of losing their money.”

    The famous warning of Jesus Christ about the tradition of men that voids Scripture (Mark 7:1-13), is in fact, a direct reference to the Talmud, or more specifically, the forerunner of the first part of it, the Mishnah, which existed in oral form during Christ’s lifetime, before being committed to writing. Mark chapter 7, from verse one through thirteen, represents Our Lord’s pointed condemnation of the Mishnah.

    Unfortunately, due to the abysmal ignorance of our day, the widespread “Judeo-Christian” notion is that the Old Testament is the supreme book of Judaism. But this is not so. The Pharisees teach for doctrine the commandments of rabbis, not God.

    The Talmudic commentary on the Bible is their supreme law, and not the Bible itself. That commentary does indeed, as Jesus said, void the laws of God, not uphold them. As students of the Talmud, we know this to be true.

    Jewish scholar Hyam Maccoby, in Judaism on Trial, quotes Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph: “Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible…God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own…anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture.”

    There is a tiny Jewish sect which makes considerable effort to eschew Talmud and adhere to the Old Testament alone. These are the Karaites, a group which, historically, has been most hated and severely persecuted by orthodox Jewish rabbinate.

    To the Mishnah the rabbis later added the Gemara (rabbinical commentaries). Together these comprise the Talmud. There are two versions, the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.

    The Babylonian Talmud is regarded as the authoritative version: “The authority of the Babylonian Talmud is also greater than that of the Jerusalem Talmud. In cases of doubt the former is decisive.” (R.C. Musaph-Andriesse, From Torah to Kabbalah: A Basic Introduction to the Writings of Judaism, p. 40).

    This study is based on the Jewish-authorized Babylonian Talmud. We have published herein the authenticated sayings of the Jewish Talmud. Look them up for yourself.

    We publish the following irrefutable documentation in the hope of liberating all people, including Jewish people, from the corrosive delusions and racism of this Talmudic hate literature, which is the manual of Orthodox and Hasidic Jews the world over.

    The implementation by Jewish supremacists of Talmudic hate literature has caused untold suffering throughout history and now, in occupied Palestine, it is used as a justification for the mass murder of Palestinian civilians. The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals.

    Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud
    Where a Jew Should Do Evil

    Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

    Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis

    Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

    Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God

    Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

    O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews

    Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.

    Jews Have Superior Legal Status

    Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”

    Jews May Steal from Non-Jews

    Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”

    Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews

    Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

    Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”

    Jews May Lie to Non-Jews

    Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.

    Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human

    Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.

    Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

    Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

    Insults Against Blessed Mary

    Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.

    Gloats over Christ Dying Young

    A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?–He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.”

    Jesus in the Talmud:

    Horrible Blasphemies Against Jesus Christ

    While it is the standard disinformation practice of apologists for the Talmud to deny that it contains any scurrilous references to Jesus Christ, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations are more forthcoming and admit that the Talmud not only mentions Jesus but disparages him (as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak). These orthodox Jewish organizations make this admission perhaps out of the belief that Jewish supremacy is so well-established in the modern world that they need not concern themselves with adverse reactions.

    For example, on the website of the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic Lubavitch group–one of the largest in the world–we find the following statement, complete with Talmudic citations:

    “The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene':

    1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).

    2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).

    3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh, which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).

    End quote from http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm (Lubavitch website) June 20, 2000.

    [Note: we have printed and preserved in our files a hard copy of this statement from the Lubavitch"Noah's Covenant Website," as it appeared on their website at http://www.noahide.com on June 20, 2000, in the event that denials are later issued and the statement itself suppressed].

    Let us examine further some of these anti-Christ Talmud passages:

    Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”

    Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus (“Yeshu” and in Soncino footnote #6, Yeshu “the Nazarene”) was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”

    Kallah 51a.”The elders were once sitting in the gate when two young lads passed by; one covered his head and the other uncovered his head. Of him who uncovered his head Rabbi Eliezer remarked that he is a bastard. Rabbi Joshua remarked that he is the son of a niddah (a child conceived during a woman’s menstrual period). Rabbi Akiba said that he is both a bastard and a son of a niddah.

    “They said, ‘What induced you to contradict the opinion of your colleagues?’ He replied, “I will prove it concerning him.” He went to the lad’s mother and found her sitting in the market selling beans.

    “He said to her, ‘My daughter, if you will answer the question I will put to you, I will bring you to the world to come.’ (eternal life). She said to him, ‘Swear it to me.’

    “Rabbi Akiba, taking the oath with his lips but annulling it in his heart, said to her, ‘What is the status of your son?’ She replied, ‘When I entered the bridal chamber I was niddah (menstruating) and my husband kept away from me; but my best man had intercourse with me and this son was born to me.’ Consequently the child was both a bastard and the son of a niddah.

    “It was declared, ‘..Blessed be the God of Israel Who Revealed His Secret to Rabbi Akiba…”

    In addition to the theme that God rewards clever liars, the preceding Talmud discussion is actually about Jesus Christ (the bastard boy who “uncovered his head” and was conceived in the filth of menstruation). The boy’s adulterous mother in this Talmud story is the mother of Christ, Blessed Mary (called Miriam and sometimes, Miriam the hairdresser, in the Talmud).

    “The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah — replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name the author adds piously, ‘May the name of the wicked perish’)… –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21.

    “The Talmud contains a few explicit references to Jesus…These references are certainly not complimentary…There seems little doubt that the account of the execution of Jesus on the eve of Passover does refer to the Christian Jesus…The passage in which Jesus’ punishment in hell is described also seems to refer to the Christian Jesus. It is a piece of anti-Christian polemic dating from the post-70 CE period…” –Hyam Maccoby, Judaism on Trial, pp. 26-27.

    “According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.

    “The more popular accounts–which were nevertheless taken quite seriously–such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name ‘Jesus’ was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists…

    “The Hebrew form of the name Jesus–Yeshu–was interpreted as an acronym for the curse, ‘may his name and memory be wiped out,’ which is used as an extreme form of abuse. In fact, anti-zionist Orthodox Jews (such as Neturey Qarta) sometimes refer to Herzl as ‘Herzl Jesus’ and I have found in religious zionist writings expressions such as “Nasser Jesus” and more recently ‘Arafat Jesus.” –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97- 98, 118.

    Talmud Attacks Christians and Christian Books

    Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.

    Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament (“uncanonical books”) will have no portion in the world to come.

    Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament.

    Dr. Israel Shahak of Hebrew University reports that the Israelis burned hundreds of New Testament Bibles in occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980 (cf. Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).

    Sick and Insane Teachings of the Talmud

  5. ABE….YOU ARE A SICK BUGGER!

    The National Director of the ADL, Abraham H. Foxman, publishes a book entitled, “Never Again? The Threat Of The New Anti-Semitism,” in which he states that the New Testament’s, “lie,” that the ancient Pharisees were responsible for the death of Christ, has been responsible for anti-Semitism throughout the millennia and thus the New Testament of the bible is, “hate speech,” and should be censored or, preferably, banned.

    SEMITE..ARE YOU ABE????????

  6. THE PHARISAIC PHOENIX

    Then comes the familiar, recurrent paradox; the catastrophe of Judea, which followed within a few decades of the death of Jesus, was the triumph of the Pharisees, for it left them supreme in Jewry. By the crucifixion of Jesus they rid themselves of a “prophet and dreamer” who would have cast down their Law. The brief remaining years of Judea rid them of all other parties that contended with them for power under that Law.

    http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/ThePharisaicPhoenix.htm

    ABE AND CO- FAILED,,,, TODAY DOUGLAS REEDs BOOKS ARE BEING READ WORLDWIDE!!!

    THANK GOD!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s