Illuminati Used
Appeasement To Trick
Hitler Into War
British Elite Spied For Stalin
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
10-1-6
In Dec. 1942 Heinrich Mueller, Chief of the Gestapo, rolled up the Soviet spy network in mainland Europe and secured a list of Soviet agents and informants in England that reads like a “who’s who” of the British establishment and lifts the veil from modern history.
Spies include Edward Wood, Lord Halifax, Neville Chamberlain’s Foreign Secretary and an architect of the “Appeasement” policy. Appeasement encouraged Hitler to think England wanted him to expand eastward against the USSR.
In fact, Halifax was working indirectly for the Communists. Appeasement was designed to trap Hitler in a two-front war which would level Germany (and Europe) and kill sixty million people.
Mueller’s list of spies includes Victor Rothschild, the head of the central banking dynasty, long suspected as one of the “Cambridge Five.” Curiously, the other four (Burgess, Maclean, Blunt and Philby) aren’t on this list.
http://www.savethemales.ca/001411.html
It includes Charles Hambro, another banker of Jewish origin who was part of a Bank of England decision to continue financing Nazism in 1934 as a “stabilising influence.” Obviously, as a Soviet asset, this man was not pro-Nazi.
It includes Sir Robert Waley-Cohen and many members of the anti-appeasement “Focus” group that funded Winston Churchill. Waley-Cohen was the Chairman of the Rothschild-controlled Shell Oil and the leader of the British Jewish Community.
Other bankers, banking scions and industrialists include Eugen Spier, Maurice Baring, Leonard Montefiore, Edward Guggenheim, Sir Robert Mond and Sir Phillip Sassoon. All but Baring are of Jewish origin.
Prominent Labor Party and trade union leaders included Ernest Bevin, Harold Laski, Herbert Stanley Morrison and Sir Walter Citrine. Members of ancient aristocratic families include Richard Combe Abdy, Baron Strabogli, and Admiral Reginald Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-Drax. There was press mogul J.S. Elias, cartoonist Victor Weisz and Daily Express Chairman Ralph D. Blumenfeld.
Prominent civil servants include Rex Leeper of the Foreign Office ruling clique and Sir Maurice Hankey, who as cabinet secretary and Clerk of the Privy Council knew all the secrets. There was Slavonic scholar Bernard Pares and Jurist Sir Hirsch Lauterpacht. (The complete agent list is at the end.)
What did this disparate group have in common? About half of them are recognizably Jewish. But the connection that binds them all likely is the Illuminati, the top rung of Freemasonry. Its aim is to weaken mankind through a series of contrived unnecessary wars in order to establish a Masonic or “Illuminist” world dictatorship dedicated to the “light giver” Lucifer (their alter ego.) Bush, Clinton, Kerry etc. are all members.
The Illuminati started Communism. Their common anniversary is May 1; their common symbol is the satanic inverted pentagram. They funded the Bolshevik Revolution and secretly ran the USSR, which was a model for the New World Order. Far from being spies for Stalin, some of these men were probably his superiors.
Soviet Russia was a dummy creation of the London-based Illuminati. The Second World War, the Cold War, and now the “War on Terror” are all their inventions. They are responsible for the neo-pagan assault on Western Civilization, Christianity and Islam (incl. family, nation, race, morality and truth) that we call modernism, humanism and globalism.
The list is in the secret papers of Heinrich Mueller who died in California in 1983.
http://www.savethemales.ca/001699.html
The CIA recruited Mueller in Switzerland in 1948 and paid him $1 million for an Interrogation running 1000-pages. Mueller left his microfilmed archives to his nephew, “Douglas Gregory” who has published a large part.
BAIT AND SWITCH
The Bank of England funded the rise of Adolph Hitler through the Schroder Bank. F.C. Tiarcks, the Managing Director of the Schroder Bank, was also a Director of the Bank of England.
Eustace Mullins writes: “Because his own financial backers, the Schroders, were sponsoring the Appeasement Party, Hitler believed there would be no war [with England.] He did not suspect that the backers of the Appeasement Party, now that Chamberlain had served his purpose in duping Hitler, would cast Chamberlain aside and make Churchill the Prime Minister.” (/The Secrets of the Federal Reserve/ pp.76-78.)
While history portrays Hitler duping the naive Neville Chamberlain and Lord Halifax, it appears Hitler himself was tricked into thinking he could expand eastward with impunity. Neville Chamberlain wasn’t in on the secret. (He died prematurely just months after leaving office.) But as a Soviet informant, Halifax certainly was instrumental.
As an early opponent of British rearmament, Halifax encouraged Hitler’s plans and complimented him for being a “genuine hater of Communism.” In a meeting with Hitler in 1937, Halifax actually offered to make changes in the “European Order” in regard to Danzig, Austria and Czechoslovakia.
*”It was Halifax not Hitler who first mentioned by name the areas where the Versailles Treaty might be reinterpreted to Germany’s benefit,” writes historian Andrew Roberts. “Halifax did the one thing which Eden had told him not to, and which Vansittart warned would ‘bring the European card-castle tumbling down.’ Moreover he did it not once but thrice in the course of the conversations.” (/The Holy Fox: A Biography of Lord Halifax,/ 1991, pp. 67, 70-71.)*
Halifx’s closest adviser was Philip Kerr, Lord Lothian, a member of the Rothschild-Milner-Rhodes Round Table secret society (i.e Illuminati ). According to Roberts, Lothian was “a friend of Halifax’s and had non-parliamentary political influence of a type seldom seen in today’s politics.” (109)
Appeasement was designed to encourage Hitler to take action which would justify a declaration of war by the West. Halifax was responsible for the foolhardy British guarantee of Poland that led to this declaration. Stalin was pre-primed to attack the Nazis in 1941. The whole knuckle-biting drama of war and peace was a charade.
The appeasers and their opponents were two Illuminati house teams pursuing a common goal. Lady Astor’s Cliveden Manor was supposed to be the (pro-Nazi) appeasement headquarters but, as Andrew Roberts points out, arch anti-appeasers like Duff Cooper, Anthony Eden and Russian Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov (nee Meir Finkelstein) were regular guests. (67)
CONCLUSION
Wars are the artificial creation of the Illuminati, a satanic cult that is extending its tentacles over the whole planet. “Muller’s List” provides a glimpse at the composition of this group: bankers, industrialists, aristocrats, military, scholars, trade unionists and media.
There are a lot of Jews but it should be obvious that the Illuminati victimized Jews as much as anyone. Jews have been the canon fodder for Communism, Zionism and Nazism. Instead of defending the Illuminati, Jews should revile it. Otherwise they appear to be in collusion.
Possibly some listees didn’t realize what they were advancing. The Illuminati pretended to be opposed to fascism. Today they pretend to build a humanist utopia, an answer to poverty, disease, prejudice and injustice. Former World Bank President James Wolfensohn had the slogan “Plutocrat for the Poor” on his web site.
The Illuminati starts wars to demoralize and destroy humanity, to consolidate power and produce huge profits and debt slavery. This cult, which has a stranglehold on thought and expression, pretty much defines realty. Our best course is to find our truth from different sources and define reality anew.
———
*”Mueller’s List” from Douglas Gregory, “Gestapo Chief: The 1948
Interrogation of Heinrich Muller Vol. 3 p.107.*
Lt. Col. Frederick William Abbot
Sir Maurice Hankey
Richard Combe Abdy
Eugen Spier
George Dixon Abraham
Baron Strabogli
Frederick Edward Fox Adam
J.S. Elias, Baron Southwood
Admiral Sir Percy Addison
Sir H.L. Rothband
Elkan Nathan Adler
Sir E.L. Goschen
Admiral Oliver Backhouse
Mrs. Blanche Dugdale
John Ball
Sir Robert Wood
Maurice Baring
Sir Robert Mond
Ralph D. Blumenfeld
Jurgen Kuczynski
Sir Harry Robert Boyd
Sir Robert Waley-Cohen
Sir Charles Hambro
Rex Leeper
Edward Wood (Lord Halifax)
Sir Walter Citrine
Walter Rosenhain
Victor Rothschild
Charles Masterman Herz
Sir Philip Sassoon
Victor Weisz
Sir Bernard Pares
Friedrich Saxl
Ernest Bevin
Sir Hirsch Lauterpacht
Herbert Stanley Morrison
Harold Joseph Laski
Sir Reginald Plunkett-Erle-Drax
Edward Armand Guggenheim
–
See aslo my:
Bankers extended WWI By Three Years
http://www.savethemales.ca/001583.html
Bankers Engineered US WW2 Intervention
http://www.savethemales.ca/001449.html
Hitler Didn’t Want World War
http://www.savethemales.ca/000369.html
and articles on Winston Churchill and Lester Pearson.
–
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of “A Long Way to go for a Date.” His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only.
http://www.rense.com/general73/ilum.htm
Still think Churchill was the greatest Englishman?
He was a zionist stooge- bought and paid for!
WE PAY OVER £50 BILLION A YEAR USARY [INTEREST] ON THE NATIONAL DEBT!
IMAGINE WERE WE HAS BEFORE TO PRINT OUR OWN MONEY- OUT OF THE GREEDY HANDS OF PRIVATE BANKERS!
USARY FREE!!!
THEY WORK FOR YOU???????
LIKE HELL THEY DO!!!
Herbert Stanley Morrison- The Minister that wanted Bolshavism across Europe…………….TRAITORS THEN AT WESTMNISTER- AS NOW!!
LADY ASTOR……RELATIVE OF CAMERONS WIFE.
http://www.rense.com/general73/ilum.htm
Douglas Reed and the Jews
http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/reedandthejews.htm
By Knud Eriksen
In Dronten no. 4 (“The Dodo” at the address Patriot.dk) I have dealt with the once world famous foreign correspondent and author, Douglas Reed, who went from being widely known and respected before, during and after the II.nd World War to becoming an expelled and completely forgotten person.
Why was he “forgotten”?
It was simply because he wrote about “The Jewish Question!”
International Jewry responded to his frank description of the problem with total censorship, so that his new books could no longer be printed and the old ones would disappear gradually from the bookstores and even from the library shelves.
After a short period of slandering he was no longer mentioned at all in the world’s media.
As the author Ivor Benson (who has himself written a book on this subject: The Zionist Factor) says in the foreword to Douglas Reeds masterpiece The Controversy of Zion, which had to wait 22 years before it could be published, “the adversity, which Reed encountered, would have made a lesser personality give up. But not he“.
After his expulsion from the zionist-controlled media-world, he found himself free to start this most outstanding work, which all the years as a foreign correspondent in Europe and his earlier books had only been a preparation and an education for. His vision expanded from year to year and from book to book. It was an education, which was not available in any university.”
He spent more than three years away from his family in the early fifties in New York Central Library or in front of his typewriter in modest surroundings in New York and in Montreal. He rewrote the whole book with an epilogue i 1956, where the uprising in Hungary and the Suez-war were scrutinized as further examples of the talmudic co-operation between communism and zionism. Then, as mentioned, the book had to wait 22 years for a possibility of getting published!
It is instructive to observe how Douglas Reed gradually penetrates deeper and deeper into the Jewish problem from that time, when he had hardly even thought about it in 1935 (as he writes in The controversy of Zion) until he delivers his harsh judgement in the shape of The controversy of Zion.
The mood of gloom and doom is not his own, but due to the gloomy character of the subject, as he says in the epilogue to the book. In the cause of his work he has felt the evil as an almost physical presence in the plans, he reveals. As “forces from some dinosaur-lair projected into the twentieth century.” But, he says, it is not for him to judge, what is evil. God must have had an intention, in his wisdom, to allow this evil to exist, possibly for the progress of the soul. But in that case he, himself, feels like being also a part of God’s creation, who has the duty to reveal this evil, so that human beings can be set free from it.
Ivor Benson follows this line of thought in the epilogue to his own book on the subject (1986) The Zionist Factor, as follows: “There is no Jewish problem per se, only a gigantic 20th century problem, in which the fate and responsibility of Jews and Christians are inseperably intertwined”. The irresponsible world power, built on money and dominated by Jews, is, in its outstretched cob-web something, that we have all allowed to grow big and strong through our irresponsibility.
But if this power has now grown so strong, that it cannot be stopped, but must be allowed to continue its predestined course, until, finally, it devours itself like a worldwide wolf, what use is it then to us to get to know and fully understand what goes on in the world?”
Ivor Benson answers this as follows: “a short answer is given in a christian concept with even older sources: “Thou shalt know the truth and the truth shall set you free.”
In 1938 Reed wrote his first major – and world famous – book, Insanity Fair, which was published in at least 35 editions in English and published in danish, also in 1938, in 5 editions. In Danish the title was “Galskabens Kavalkade” (can still be ordered from the library). It is scarcely 400 pages and is a mixture of an autobiography and a political description of Europe up to- and during the Second World War.
His predictions of major political events were for many people surprisingly accurate at a time, when the “responsible politicians” of the West were acting in direct opposition to his advice and interpretations, and the unifying principle of the book is one long warning against the threat from Hitler-Germany.
But simultaneously he had, among other things, a few critical remarks about the jews, which he had observed and come to know during his many travels as a reporter in Europe. In his second book he deals with the subject of the jews a great deal more thoroughly. All of two chapters out of 37 are dedicated to his “becoming clear as crystal“ on the subject, as he says. This book from 1939 had the english title “Disgrace Abounding” and in danish (also 1939) “Grænseløs Skændsel”. (It can still be procured from deposit libraries). The book – almost 500 pages – was also a description of the prewar conditions, as he knew them in his capacity of being one of the leading foreign correspondents in Southeastern Europe, and through his close personal acquaintanceship with many of the leading politicians of the time. It was yet another long warning against Hitler-Germany and a reproach of the erroneous Western politics, in which he could not find the logic.
As far as the Jews are concerned, he is definitely far more crystally clear in this book than in the previous one, where there were actually just a few good-natured teasing remarks about them.
I have, in Dronten no. 6, (danish) reproduced both of these two chapters and a couple of other interesting descriptions of the Jews in Europe, seen through his eyes, under the menu (in Dronten): “Grænseløs Skændsel” (“Disgrace Abounding”).
By this time he no longer holds any doubt, that there is most certainly a serious Jewish problem. From the on he would get to study the problem thoroughly through the following ten years.
His well-intentioned advice, that the Jewish problem could only be solved by the Jews getting their own nation (but not by killing arabs), was abandoned by him again, when his studies of talmudic zionism, and the eventual establishment of Israel, demonstrated to him, that the Jewish question implied much more than just that, and was now so much bigger.
Also, he discovered, it had in reality been laid down in an ancient plan for world-conquest.
He wrote a few more books which he managed to get published somehow (see the list in Dronten no. 4, under the menu “Bibliography”- and now (in english) the homepage Douglas Reed Books, red.).
After the books Somewhere South of Suez (1949) and Far and Wide (1951), which are not translated into danish, Reed was practically banned by the most important publishers and bookstorechains because of his ever more clear description of the Jewish problem. He does not end up by being optimistic concerning the solution to the problem, as he actually thinks that only God can solve it – in time. Nevertheless, it is also his opinion, that the suffering of mankind, including the Jews, which will result in the meantime, until this solution will appear, may be reduced and shortened by people learning the truth about “The Contorversy of Zion”. In this issue of Dronten (no. 6), I have translated, into danish, two more chapters of this – in my opinion – vital work. With the knowledge, which the book gives the reader, he understands the real background of the invasion of foreigners in The West, the globalisation and the break-down of nations, culture and morals. Here, finally, I will relay Douglas Reeds own description of the problems of the banning of Disgrace Abounding – “Aftertale” in the book), and in this way introduce this, his encyclopaedic masterpiece, The Controversy of Zion”:
………”Chance, and possibly my own sense of timing, enabled me to write additional chapters for Insanity Fair immediately after publication, and this time the same thing has happened again. But on this occasion chance has enabled me, in the additional chapter, to give you the best possible example of the way organized world-Jewry works and of the immense power it wields in goading world-opinion against Germany. I imagine anybody who has read these two books will realize that I hold Germany to be a menace to England, but that I do not identify the cause of England with that of the foreign Jews.
After I wrote Insanity Fair I was swamped by offers from American publishers for my next book. I signed a contract with one firm. When I began Disgrace Abounding I did not know that it would be an anti-Semitic book. The anti-Semitic part is the result of my observation of the Jews in the last year and of my conviction that the mass influx of Jews to England is a political mistake and a national misfortune.
The American publisher, after reading Disgrace Abounding, declined to publish on the ground that the Semitic part was ‘slanderous and libellous’. Read the Jewish part for yourself and see if this is true. I, for my part, declined to have the book published anywhere without the Jewish chapters. The real meaning of that decision is that, in America, you may ‘slander and libel’ Germany as much as you like, and be paid for it, but you must not discuss the Jewish problem, you must not assert that there is a Jewish problem. Other American publishers declined the book on the grounds that they could not publish the Jewish chapters. One of them, not a Jew, said that an American publisher would court misfortune by publishing it, because 90 per cent of the American newspapers are Jewish, and the Jewish influence extends in similar proportion throughout the whole ring of trades connected with publishing.
I see very little difference between the Jewish and the Hitlerist method, in this matter of free speech and free discussion. The Jews are for free attacks on Germany, nothing else. The same thing happened in some of the Scandinavian countries, where Insanity Fair had great success and where publishers were clamouring for the next book – until they saw the Jewish chapters. They asked to be allowed to publish the book without them. I refused. The same thing happened in France even with Insanity Fair, where a publisher contracted for the book who apparently could not read English and only realized when he saw the French translation that there was a few passages in it which he did not consider sufficiently favourable to the Jews. He demanded their excision, I refused, and he sold the contract to another firm.
So only in England, as yet, and possibly in France — although I do not yet know whether this book will appear in France — may a non-Jew openly discuss the for and against of the Jewish question.
The importance of this, for you, is that you should realize that what is presented to you as ‘American approval’ or ‘American disapproval’ of this or that action of British policy is not American but Jewish opinion, and that this puts quite another face on the matter. If you are to fight Germany again, you must do it for England’s sake. You must not allow yourselves to be egged on by Jews masquerading to-day as ‘German public opinion’, to-morrow as ‘Czechoslovak public opinion’, the day after as ‘English public opinion’, and the next day as ‘American public opinion’. If England suffers disaster in coming years, the Jews who have come to England in these latter years will not suffer that misfortune in like measure; they will not feel it as Englishmen will feel it, they will prosper in chaos, and when they feel that a lean time is coming for them they will make up their minds to sail away.
As I came up the Thames I wondered what my own future would be. I had promised myself to decide within a very few days whether I would continue to write about the daily European scene or whether I would cut loose [ed: altogether?] together, go to Polynesia, Patagonia or Peking, write about other things than Hitler’s eternal invasions.
I wondered whether, the next time I left England, I should go in one of those steamers white and gold to some far distant foreign clime. The decision lay before me. I had a few days’ time. While I was locked up in the Legation at Prague, Disgrace Abounding was published – the most curious things happen to my books. After my departure from Prague I read the first reviews of it. Somebody spoke compassionately of my inferiority complex. I never knew, until I wrote Insanity Fair, what an inferiority complex was, or that I had one. To understand these things you have to sit at the feet of some venerable Jewish professor in Vienna, who soothes you by telling you that your faults are not your own but the products of your ancestors’ hereditary alcoholism, or something of that sort, and this wise counsel gives you new strength. The gins of the fathers. – Kraft durch Freud.
I have no inferiority complex, but only the most normal longings for England to be better. I have a heavy foreboding for England, whose rulers have made every mistake they could. I want to see England safe at home and abroad. Safe at home for the British Derelict Aryans, not for the Foreign Non-Aryans. Safe abroad from Germany.
Neither of these things is being done. The danger of a German ultimatum has been drawing daily nearer. What shall it profit Britain if she lose her whole Empire and gain only the Jews? Now, at the last moment, a faint hope offers that a stand will be made – over Poland. Then why not for Czecho-Slovakia? Why have we handed over the Czech Army, the Czech Air Force, the Skoda Works, the Czech gold, to Germany? If we were from the beginning prepared to make this stand, we should have made it years ago. Then you would have had none of this trouble. You could have satisfied Germany’s just grievances – but you could have compelled her to keep the peace…….”
Knud Eriksen, feb. 1998
(A translation from a danish article in my internet-site Dronten, no. 6 (“The Dodo”) – a sub-site on Patriot.dk
Home
WE CAN ALL SEE TODAY- WHERE IT’S GOTTEN AMERICA……….TO HER DEMISE!
International Zionism Exposed (Pt. 10) DOCUMENTARY
TODAY- WARS…..HERE THEY STIR UP RACE HATE- BE AWARE!
DON’T PLAY THEIR GAMES ANYMORE!!