“The Infantile Constitutions Away”: The Undermining Key Role of Civil Society for the Open NWO Society

BRITISH TROOPS ARE ON STANDBY READY FOR DEPLOYMENT TO LIBYA- TROOPS STANDING BY ” THE BLACKWATCH- HUMANITARIAN REASON OF COURSE- THE SAME REASON GIVEN FOR TROOPS TO BE SENT INTO AFGHANISTAN!!

THE NWO IS CLOSING IN- TIME TO WAKE UP!!

Euromediterranien – Euromediterranean – Euromediterranien

 LATEST. The Washington Post 4 March 2011: The Obama administration is preparing for the prospect that Islamist governments will take hold in North Africa and the Middle East, acknowledging that the popular revolutions there … could give way to more religious forces. Some within the U.S. intelligence community, foreign diplomatic circles and the Republican Party say Obama’s readiness to accept Islamist movements… fails to take into consideration the methodical approach many such parties adopt toward gradually transforming secular nations into Islamic states at odds with U.S. policy goals.

Summary: A little known phenomenon is the “civil society”, composed of globalist paid hirelings in the form of non-government organizations (NGOs), institutions, etc. Their real job is to deliver desired responses to the UN, EU (“at the heart of EU enlargement”), individuals like George Soros – who has himself founded an NGO, “The Open Society” and is paying large sums to the henchmen of subservient civil society. Soros and his NGOs cooperate with the EU, especially The EU Economic and Social Council. The civil society answers are called the will of the people, although civil society is utterly undemocratic. Civil society is also being used  to prepare the ground for revolutions, for example in North Africa and the Middle East. The CIA is widely using civil society in order to foment revolutions and influence public opinion in the desired direction in target countries. Perhaps the most dangerous (quasi-) NGO is the U.S. Federal Reserve / “National Bank”, which is currently in the process of destroying world economy (hyperinflation) again through rampant issuing of banknotes.

Soros is a Rothschild agent, and his Open Society works to ensure that there is free access for this illuminati gang to plunder all the resources of a country. If a country resists globalization / opening by wanting to retain its natural resources and keep and develop its own workforce by means of duties and rules of its own, or control its immigration, the Soros, EU, UN, CIA civil society police function comes into force and summons such a “closed country” before the globalists´ courts that they pay with our tax money and out of their own pockets. In “bad” cases of obstinacy, the UN, IMF, World Bank come up with sanctions. This is now happening to disobedient, closed Libya and Iran. NGOs are energetic lobbyists for dramatic changes in the UN mission and structure to achieve world government. They pretend they’re on the side of the masses. Most NGOs are also members of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). In Egypt the Kmara Flag – a special fist – used first in the revolution against Milosevitch –  as well as by the US State Department, and then in the Georgian Revolution in 2003 – has appeared in the Egyptian Revolutions, the leading “6 April”  first being advised by the US State Department – and then sent to Belgrade´s  Otpor/ now CANVAS to learn the state of the art of demonstrations.

Now the Rothschild publication, The Economist, calls Constitution supporters “mentally ill”. “Indeed, there is something infantile in constitutional worshipers believing that complex political arguments today can be solved by simple fidelity to a document that was written in the 18th century.” And the CIA supporter, The Foreign Policy, does not believe that the old Constitutions can handle such complicated issues as homosexual marriages!! Another player in this direction is America’s invisible government, the Council on Foreign Relations: The CFR wants “to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR, warned. In order to realize their one-world government scheme, the CFR and the ruling elite must undermine the sovereignty of the United States.
For this purpose, civil society is particularly suited – and it will acc. The CFR´s magazine, ”Foreign Affairs”, play a very important role in the future.
The U.S. and the CIA´s subversive efforts now extend to the EU Parliament, too, by means of the Colombian Intelligence Service (DAS) funded by the U.S. It is now being reconstructed by the CIA to be called The Columbian CIA! And the government of the people, for the people by the people? This phrase was already killed long ago.


From the days of Spartacus (= Weiskopf), Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenburg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century. ” Winston Churchill 1920.

EU Commission Pres. Barroso 2 March 2011: “We can only contribute to open societies if we further encourage mobility. We should be ready to offer mobility partnerships to countries that meet certain conditions…so that mobility can be increased among those countries themselves and with Europe. We will support non-state actors such as NGOs, trade unions, women organizations and media.”
*

In the perverted universe of the New World order (NWO), the opinion of the stupid peoples does count. NWO democracy is based on civil society – built up of New World Order  institututions  and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) paid by whosoever may need their services – unknown to and not at all elected by the ordinary people. Such funders may be the UN, the EU, national George-soros-2governments, intelligence services – or private people like George Soros, who especially supports East European and Asian NGOs. The point is that when these  NGOs are being asked to do what they are paid for, it is called the will of the people. These NGOs are per definition good guys fighting for justice – and when they take over, democracy and the “rule of (NWO) law” will prevail! It is very clever, take North Africa: The Egyptian and Tunisian peoples were declared to be victorious in their “revolutions”, which were no revolutions at all – but peaceful demonstrations to let the steam out and bringing no freedom at all  – a few persons disappearing, but the old system continuing to rule. Now this is becoming clear to the peoples, who are again taking to the streets in Tunisia and Egypt. This is NWO control of the peoples – who are being betrayed by their “civil societies”: NGOs, the Arab League´s Amr. Moussa, ElBaradei of George Soros´and Brzezinski´s “Crisis Group”. On an EU level, the European Economic and Social Council (EESC – and here) is responsible for the contatct to the “civil society”, which is at the “heart of EU enlargement” (Olli Rehn, EU Commissioner). And Further, Mr. Olli Rehn said on 17 Apr. 2008: “In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Open Society Institute – whose founder George Soros will speak right after me – opened 12 centres around the country to support NGOs in their networking and communication activities. EU financed 8 of those centres.” Which means that the EU closely cooperates with George Soros and his NGOs.
This civil society was confided with the Islamisation of Europe. But the world´s most dangerous NGO is the US Federal Reserve, which is destroying the world´s economy. I will not here enter upon the 2 safest NWO ways to create chaos: The economical crisis and here and the “war on terror”.

1. The CIA and civil society
Philip Agee, former CIA agent: Since its founding in 1947, the CIA had been deeply involved in secretly funding and manipulating foreign non-governmental voluntary organisations. These vast operations circled the globe and targeted political parties, trade unions and business associations, youth and student organisations, women’s groups, civic organisations, religious communities, professional, intellectual and cultural societies, and the public information media. The network functioned at local, national, regional and global levels. Over the years, the CIA exerted phenomenal influence behind the scenes in country after country, using these powerful elements of civil society to penetrate, divide, weaken and destroy organisations on the left, and indeed to impose regime change by toppling governments.

Open-society12. Rothschild agent, George Soros and his “Open Society” – an NGO.
The Soros Dossier 4 July 2008, p.71: Soros explains that the ideal open society would suppress particular national interests, while an international political and financial structure takes responsibility for the so-called common good.
Accordingly, Soros arms his philanthropic organizations with cash, buying up key sectors within the population who are then let loose to overthrow a government that tries to maintain a “closed society.” If a nation wishes to control its own natural resources, it’s a closed society. If a nation wants to develop its economy and power of labor through tariffs and regulations, it’s a closed society. Any nation that rejects globalization (i.e., British imperialism), is a closed society and subject to attacks from Soros and his shadow government of national agents

The Open Society Institute (OSI), Human Rights Watch, the Soros Foundation, the Extractive Industries Transparency Institute, are all British-style intelligence outfits under the supervision of Soros. In 2002, Soros admitted to personally spending over $2.1 billion in five years on his philanthropic ventures. Of his organizations, he writes, “They work with the government when they can and independently of the government when they cannot; sometimes they are in outright opposition.
When foundations can cooperate with the government, they can be more effective; when they cannot, their work is more needed. As a general rule, the worse the government, the better the foundation because it enjoys the commitment and support of civil society.”

Whatever they view as “closed society” behavior is brought before the tribunal of the paid-for demos; or, if the behavior seriously threatens imperial interests, the UN, World Bank, IMF, WTO, etc., can be mobilized to implement sanctions.This process of subjecting a sovereign nation to a fixed international standard of behavior is called, “transparency.” The fixed relationship among those subject nations is called Empire.

Soros ally, Tony Blair explicitly stated his vision for such international institutions in a speech before the UN World Summit in September 2005: “For the first time at this Summit we are agreed that states do not have the right to do what they will within their own borders, but that we, in the name of humanity, have a common duty to protect people where their own governments will not.”

 NGO-network3. The NGOs (non-government organizations) already unleashed in France, Germany, England and Greece will soon be taking to the streets in America, a state George Soros-described as “the biggest obstacle to One World Government” – Patriots for America 11 Nov. 2011.

NGOs, long fomenting for revolution, and on the payrolls of the One World Order deadly duo George Soros and Maurice Strong, are not the good guys. The political, strategic spawn of Soros and Strong, they are the paid agents of change, looking to Barack Obama to get the job done. It was Strong who long ago came up with the blueprint for coupling the money from “philanthropists” and business with the objectives of government.

No one describes the NGOs better than Phyllis Schlafly who has watched them for decades: “The NGOs are energetic lobbyists for dramatic changes in the mission and structure of the UN to achieve global governance. Most NGOs are also members of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which originated many of the global environmental polices set forth in the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on Climate Change, and Agenda 21. The most prominent NGOs are the radical environmental groups such as the Sierra  Club and the feminist and population-control groups such as Planned Parenthood.”

But the NGO members, both cunning and conniving, make like they are on the side of the masses. They are the next door neighbour, the cantor singing at Sunday service, the babysitter who teaches your children that evil capitalism must be stomped out; that Mommy and Daddy are polluting the Planet.
Here is a list of Soros supported NGOs and institutions.

Otpor-canvas-fistInfowars 20 Febr. 2011 Serbia’s Otpor, or the “resistance,” was funded to the tune of millions by the US National Endowment for Democracy. Its signature clenched fist logo adorned flags, signboards, and t-shirts carried by the US State Department-laid astro-turf until the ousting of Slobodan Milošević in 2000.The exact same logo would turn up 11 years later across the Mediterranean Sea in the streets of Cairo, illustrating further the foreign-backed nature of the Egyptian uprisings. After its success, Serbia’s Otpor would continue receiving funds from the West and become a “CIA-coup college” of sorts, under the name CANVAS, or “Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies.” It appears that after the Egyptian April 6 Youth Movement finished attending the US State Department funded confab in New York City in 2008, it would make a trip to visit Otpor/ now CANVAS in 2009. From there, it took CANVAS’s “curriculum” and apparently their logo, and began assembling a US-funded mob in Egypt. In fact, this fist is the flag of Kmara: Kmara (Georgian -”Enough!”) was founded by Sakashvili´s Liberty Institute and funded by the US and George Soros to oust Georgian President, Edward Shevardnadze, in 2003, because he opposed the US.

The Arab riots
Prison Planet 27 Febr. 2011: As Washington plunges the Middle East and North Africa into chaos, and city by city collapses into the hands of globalist stooges, many have mistakenly interpreted this “change” as a positive transformation.
On the contrary, the regimes that will replace the embattled nationalistic dictators in each nation the globalists despoil will interface not with the national governments in the service of their people, but will interface with the “civil society” underlay the Western backed NGOs have meticulously built up over decades. This “civil society” will in turn answer to corporate serving globalist institutions, like the IMF, WTO, World Bank and the UN, instituting crushing economic “liberalization.”

The following lists contain the corporations and institutions that constantly turn up behind the most heinous atrocities unfolding today. From the millions murdered in the misadventure in Vietnam, to the millions dying or maimed in the global “War on Terror,” and of course the the chaos unfolding during the premeditated reordering of the Middle East and North Africa that will indefinitely affect millions of lives and their future, these are the people responsible:
CFR Corporate Membership – the Chatham House Major Corporate Membership – The Chatham House Standard Corporate Membership – The International Crisis Group Supporters Movements.org

We have been given a prepackaged ideal of what “revolution” is supposed to look like. So when we see people in the streets battling security forces, waving flags, all within the backdrop of their burning society, we are satisfied that “revolution” is taking place. But the reality is, this is not a revolution by any stretch of the imagination. It is a high-tech, high-speed invasion and Consulesrpsubjugation, a corruption of the sovereign state similar to what Tacitus described in Roman conquered Britannia. From HistoryWorld.net: ‘His object was to accustom them to a life of peace and quiet by the provision of amenities. He therefore gave official assistance to the building of temples, public squares and good houses. He educated the sons of the chiefs in the liberal arts, and expressed a preference for British ability as compared to the trained skills of the Gauls. The result was that instead of loathing the Latin language they became eager to speak it effectively. In the same way, our national dress came into favour and the toga was everywhere to be seen. And so the population was gradually led into the demoralizing temptation of arcades, baths and sumptuous banquets. The unsuspecting Britons spoke of such novelties as ‘civilization’, when in fact they were only a feature of their enslavement.” Tacitus Annals of Imperial Rome, translated Michael Grant, Penguin 1956, 1975, page 72
As we can see, “civil society” is not a new idea, nor is the concept of lulling a population into decadence and complacency while rolling them into a corrupt, exploitative domineering empire.

Some may be skeptical of whether or not boycotting and replacing the elitist system that currently domineers mankind is even possible, however it is already taking place. The alternative media is one such example, where people fed up with being lied to by obnoxious propagandists have decided to turn off the TV and report the news themselves. It has become a self-sustaining industry with exponential growth, where reputation and accuracy is replacing the slick graphics and 500 dollar suits that used to represent “legitimacy.”

 Obama_shreds_constitutionForeign Affairs: ”The World Ahead,” a special issue of Foreign Affairs: non-state actors (NGOs) playing a large role.

4. The editors of the Economist  have declared constitutionalists mentally ill. “Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century,” the editors wrote on September 23. “When history is turned into scripture and men into deities, truth is the victim.” –  Infowars 25 Sept. 2010 :
The Economist is owned by members of the Rothschild banking family of England. It is run by the Economist Group, a known CIA front. The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry? Soon after the Economist article appeared, the establishment publication Foreign Policy  posted an article slamming the idea that we should follow the Constitution. Joshua Keating writes that he suspects “most Americans don’t realize quite how old the Constitution is by world standards,” that is to say globalist standards. In 2008, Foreign Policy was bought by the Washington Post Company. The Washington Post is the crown jewel of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird  to subvert the free press in the United States.

The CFR wants “to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR, warned. In order to realize their one-world government scheme, the CFR and the ruling elite must undermine the sovereignty of the United States.

 

Comments
Here is a list of the most important owners of The Feeral Reserve as quoted from Representative Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency for 12 years as quoted from the Congressional Record (He was murdered because of his outspokenness). See these names – and you will know who want to get rid of our constitutions, using other NGOs to undermine  nation states.

Subversive activity is the NWO way of creating “chaos out of order”! Their best tool is their “civil society” – a well paid body of vampire-bitten blind idealists who think they can save the world on the basis of lies (CO2–lies, multiculturalism etc.). Of course, some of them deliver fine analyses. But they are paid to deliver ideological answers to be used in the sense: “The people thinks”. They replace both elections and independent opinion polls.
And not only that: Vicious Rothschild agents call themselves “philanthropists”, using NGOs as watchdogs to report on countries that will not open up to the globalists´ looting. Then the Illuminati turn their economic, perhaps. military thumbscrews until the “closed country” complies and opens up. Libya’s and Iran’s rulers are such obstinate (and unsympathetic) rulers in closed countries. Therefore, they are to be removed – at any costs! Thus the Illuminist (explanatory statement, p. 29)  world dictatorship is working – because we allow them to!

In North Africa the CIA is now using civil society to stage “revolutions” – with no real changes at all. Now the NGOs have the possibility to become the bedding of a new dictatorial rule. However, this will not be possible beyond the limit set by the Muslim fundamentalists, cf. the Muslim Brotherhood and the military. For it is true: The choice in Muslim countries is secular military  – or Muslim Sharia rule – in both cases dictatorship. The NGOs will have to seek support with one side or the other – are just puppets in this situation, too, also to be won by ancient Roman decadence methods.
President-Alvaro-Uribe-meets-CIA-Director-Leon-PanettaAnd why do they want to starve mankind into despair and rebellion? And why does the CIA spy on the EU, the US NWO partner? Maybe the answer lies in their declared contempt for the US (and others´) Constitution – the backbone of the USA. They want one world government – order out of chaos – but first chaos!

A group of MEPs is calling for action as further details of an alleged covert operation conducted by the Colombian intelligence agency (DAS), a very criminal, US-funded organisation,  continue to emerge, with one of its reported aims being to undermine the authority of the European Parliament. The close ties between Washington and Bogota are well known EUOBSERVER 26 June 2010.
Columbian Pres. Alvaro Uribe and CIA Director, Leon Panetta. The DAS is now being restrucured by the US CIA – to be called the Columbian CIA!

However, except in Libya, perhaps, there has been no revolution. No real change has taken place. This frustration of peoples feeling betrayed may lead to revolutions in the sense of civil war.

http://euro-med.dk/?p=21302

YOU THINK YOUR VOTE COUNTS FOR ANYTHING?

2008

Euromediterranien – Euromediterranean – Euromediterranien

No Opt-outs. What we want to do is make this place better. (Monica Frasssoni, member of an EU deputation to the Irish Parliament on Oct. 29, 2008, on the Lisbon treaty. 

European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) Oct. 29, 2008 on the EU Year of Intercultural Dialogue. 

Giving immigrants and minorities a voice, L’Orchestra di Piazza Vittorio- video  has become the new face of a multicultural Europe in which people of all origins mix…it has overcome all social barriers and united people of the most diverse cultures and backgrounds.  It has given…a combative spirit and the desire to have fun.”

Comment:To me this music is monotonous, totally featureless, and boring – without any melody – like the New World Order and bleak like Islam – but it embraces Islam – which makes the EU very happy!

There is a little known
EU Institution called the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC. It is the speaker of Civil Society to the EU Commission.
Here is a video interview with its Secretary General, Martin Westlake, who states that this institution is not to be well known to the publicalthough we are paying them! as well as paying the NGOs behind the EESC for the EU to buy their loyalty: This is the EU way of hearing the “people” and thus practising “democracy” without public votes: The EU always gets the answers it wants to hear from these clients.

In a letter dated 24 July 2007, Ms Margot Wallström and Mr Franco Frattini asked the EESC to draw up an exploratory opinion on the“

Elements for the structure, organisation and functioning of a platform for the greater involvement of civil society in the EU-level promotion of policies for the integration of third-country nationals.”

Which the EESC did as of 9 July 2008 :The European Integration Forum .
The Following  was strongly supported by the EU on Nov. 2, 2008 by the European Ministerial Conference 
(as always unanimously without dissense!!)

“The Forum’s ability to work together with the EU institutions and to influence policy drafting and development was considered to be a key task.

The non-profit sector should be given training on how to access European funding and in particular the European Fund for Integration.

A number of participants emphasised the need to include other migrants, specifically undocumented migrant workers and EU citizens, who also have integration needs.

Another participant noted the situation of failed asylum seekers and stated that despite 650 000 returns decisions in 2004, only 164 000 were actually returned to their home countries, leaving nearly 500 000 non-nationals in a de facto illegal situation. These migrants should be included in discussions.
 
The Integration Forum should take a broad conceptual approach, embracing issues related to social inclusion, diversity and anti-discrimination policies.

What is integration of immigrants?
Enabling migrants to contribute as much as possible to their host societies and making the best use of diversity in the labour market.
The EU-CBPs (Common Basic Principles) …are based on the aim of “civic integration“, which, as the Committee proposed  consists of “bringing immigrants’ rights and duties, as well as access to goods, services and means of civic participation progressively into line with those of the rest of the population, under conditions of equal opportunities and treatment”-  that guarantees respect for the EU’s basic rights and values, and  upholds the  principle of non-discrimination.

Comment: And If you can or will not contribute anything you just have all the rights. The duties then fall on the hosts solely!! 

Strengthening of integration policies in the EU by promoting “unity in diversity.”

To this end, a European Integration Forum is proposed.
“There is a complementary and indissoluble link between integration and immigration.

The EESC considered that active cooperation with civil society and the social partners was a key aspect of promoting European integration policies.
The  EESC emphasised the importance of the role played by the social partners, human rights organisations, immigrants’ organisations, cultural and sports associations, faith communities, neighbourhood associations, educational communities, schools and universities, the media, etc. in the integration processes at the national, regional levels.
Establishing reception and integration policies and programmes for immigrants should go hand in hand with the widespread participation and direct involvement of social organisations and immigrant  associations.
 
The European Fund for the Integration of Third-country Nationals  will help to develop national policies based on the CBPs and produce a new EU policy on the integration of immigrants.

The Reform Treaty adopted in Lisbon on 18 October 2007

- The “Lisbon Treaty” …. gives  the European Union  for the first time a legal base (Article 63 a4, the new Article 79.4) on which …to integrate third-country nationals .

When the Lisbon Treaty is ratified, the EU will have better   political and legal instruments necessary to implement this framework!!

Bearing in mind the new legal base that is the Lisbon Treaty, the EESC will draw up new opinions containing proposals and political recommendations to encourage and support Member States’ action in the field of integration.

Three roles for the Integration Forum were quickly identified: advisor, monitor and advocate.
The Forum should not only be able to feed into EU policy development, but also do this at the national level.

As a monitor, the Forum should be capable of following integration policies at both the national and European levels, and offer input as to their relative success.

The Forum needs formal mechanisms for reporting to other EU institutions, such as the Commission, Council and Parliament.

EESC proposal to establish the European Integration Forum
The tasks of the European Integration Forum

The Commission, Parliament and the Council could consult the Forum on European integration policies. The Forum could draw up own-initiative reports for the EU institutions in order to improve the integration of third-country nationals.

The Forum could contribute to the Conferences on the Handbook on Integration and to National Contact Point meetings.

The Forum’s activities, reports and conclusions will be published on the EESC website.  

Membership of the Forum
The Forum will have a maximum of 100 members and will meet twice a year.

The Commission considers that “Its added value would be to assemble a range of stakeholders active in the area of integration at EU level”.

One-third of the Forum’s members will represent EU organisations which work in the field of immigrant integration, and this could include the social partners.
The remaining participants will come from consultative bodies from the Member States

The EESC considers that immigrants’ organisations must be encouraged to become involved in the European Integration Forum.

The draft proposal leaves Member States in charge, should national forums not be available, and some participants questioned whether this was the most appropriate method: some civil society representatives did not trust their government to pick fairly

The EESC proposes that the European Commission, at the proposal of the EESC, appoint the Forum’s members.

The Forum should be funded by economic resources provided by the EU institutions

 REPORT FROM WORKSHOP NO 1: PREPATORY MEETING –  EUROPEAN INTEGRATION FORUM – BRUSSELS 29-30 APR. 2008. DRAWN UP BY PASCALE CHARHON, DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN NETWORK AGAINST RACISM (ENAR).
The chairman and other speakers wished to point out that the work of the European Integration Forum, in line with its legal base, would be to focus specifically on the situation of third-country nationals residing legally in EU Member States.

Comment
Integration Forum or not: The Koran leaves but 2 options: Submission – the Muslim perception of integration – or war. And every comma of the Koran is said to come down from Allah!

This farreaching manipulations, nay cultural theft, are done by stealth, largely. No debate, no popular vote on whether the peoples of Europe accept this! It is simply agreed upon by eurocratic officials of the EU Institutions – and then the accept and betrayal of corrupt, economically EU-dependent NGOs is presented as the “democratic”  basis for selling us all off to the New World Order and Islam, these two having the vision of a one-world – ruled by the Luciferian illuminists – or the dictatorial Caliphate as the Muslims think.

For the first time, so it is said, a legal basis for EU integration is at hand: The Lisbon Treaty!
This is to say that anything the EU has so far done and is doing in this field has been illegal, criminal, punishable!! Good to finally see it confirmed by the EU itself!


The EU Parliament? Forget it. According to MEP Jens P. Bonde, Jyllands-posten, Nov. 9, 2008, 85 % of our laws are made by eurocratic officials in 300 secret working groups (secret dinners- note the head of the candlestich under a magnifying glass!). The Parliament is only advisory – without legislative power!!!

The EU-illuminists – explanatory statement – don´t care – as long as we are all slaves they can plunder.

<!– –>  

Euromediterranien – Euromediterranean – Euromediterranien

No Opt-outs. What we want to do is make this place better. (Monica Frasssoni, member of an EU deputation to the Irish Parliament on Oct. 29, 2008, on the Lisbon treaty. 

European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) Oct. 29, 2008 on the EU Year of Intercultural Dialogue. 
Giving immigrants and minorities a voice, L’Orchestra di Piazza Vittorio- video  has become the new face of a multicultural Europe in which people of all origins mix…it has overcome all social barriers and united people of the most diverse cultures and backgrounds.  It has given…a combative spirit and the desire to have fun.”Comment:To me this music is monotonous, totally featureless, and boring – without any melody – like the New World Order and bleak like Islam – but it embraces Islam – which makes the EU very happy!

There is a little known
EU Institution called the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC. It is the speaker of Civil Society to the EU Commission.
Here is a video interview with its Secretary General, Martin Westlake, who states that this institution is not to be well known to the publicalthough we are paying them! as well as paying the NGOs behind the EESC for the EU to buy their loyalty: This is the EU way of hearing the “people” and thus practising “democracy” without public votes: The EU always gets the answers it wants to hear from these clients.

In a letter dated 24 July 2007, Ms Margot Wallström and Mr Franco Frattini asked the EESC to draw up an exploratory opinion on the“Elements for the structure, organisation and functioning of a platform for the greater involvement of civil society in the EU-level promotion of policies for the integration of third-country nationals.”Which the EESC did as of 9 July 2008 :The European Integration Forum .
The Following  was strongly supported by the EU on Nov. 2, 2008 by the European Ministerial Conference 
(as always unanimously without dissense!!)

“The Forum’s ability to work together with the EU institutions and to influence policy drafting and development was considered to be a key task.

The non-profit sector should be given training on how to access European funding and in particular the European Fund for Integration.

A number of participants emphasised the need to include other migrants, specifically undocumented migrant workers and EU citizens, who also have integration needs.

Another participant noted the situation of failed asylum seekers and stated that despite 650 000 returns decisions in 2004, only 164 000 were actually returned to their home countries, leaving nearly 500 000 non-nationals in a de facto illegal situation. These migrants should be included in discussions.
 
The Integration Forum should take a broad conceptual approach, embracing issues related to social inclusion, diversity and anti-discrimination policies.

What is integration of immigrants?
Enabling migrants to contribute as much as possible to their host societies and making the best use of diversity in the labour market.
The EU-CBPs (Common Basic Principles) …are based on the aim of “civic integration“, which, as the Committee proposed  consists of “bringing immigrants’ rights and duties, as well as access to goods, services and means of civic participation progressively into line with those of the rest of the population, under conditions of equal opportunities and treatment”-  that guarantees respect for the EU’s basic rights and values, and  upholds the  principle of non-discrimination.

Comment: And If you can or will not contribute anything you just have all the rights. The duties then fall on the hosts solely!! 

Strengthening of integration policies in the EU by promoting “unity in diversity.”

To this end, a European Integration Forum is proposed.
“There is a complementary and indissoluble link between integration and immigration.

The EESC considered that active cooperation with civil society and the social partners was a key aspect of promoting European integration policies.
The  EESC emphasised the importance of the role played by the social partners, human rights organisations, immigrants’ organisations, cultural and sports associations, faith communities, neighbourhood associations, educational communities, schools and universities, the media, etc. in the integration processes at the national, regional levels.
Establishing reception and integration policies and programmes for immigrants should go hand in hand with the widespread participation and direct involvement of social organisations and immigrant  associations.
 
The European Fund for the Integration of Third-country Nationals  will help to develop national policies based on the CBPs and produce a new EU policy on the integration of immigrants.

The Reform Treaty adopted in Lisbon on 18 October 2007 – The “Lisbon Treaty” …. gives  the European Union  for the first time a legal base (Article 63 a4, the new Article 79.4) on which …to integrate third-country nationals .When the Lisbon Treaty is ratified, the EU will have better   political and legal instruments necessary to implement this framework!!Bearing in mind the new legal base that is the Lisbon Treaty, the EESC will draw up new opinions containing proposals and political recommendations to encourage and support Member States’ action in the field of integration.

Three roles for the Integration Forum were quickly identified: advisor, monitor and advocate.
The Forum should not only be able to feed into EU policy development, but also do this at the national level.

As a monitor, the Forum should be capable of following integration policies at both the national and European levels, and offer input as to their relative success.

The Forum needs formal mechanisms for reporting to other EU institutions, such as the Commission, Council and Parliament.

EESC proposal to establish the European Integration Forum
The tasks of the European Integration Forum

The Commission, Parliament and the Council could consult the Forum on European integration policies. The Forum could draw up own-initiative reports for the EU institutions in order to improve the integration of third-country nationals.

The Forum could contribute to the Conferences on the Handbook on Integration and to National Contact Point meetings.

The Forum’s activities, reports and conclusions will be published on the EESC website.  

Membership of the Forum
The Forum will have a maximum of 100 members and will meet twice a year.

The Commission considers that “Its added value would be to assemble a range of stakeholders active in the area of integration at EU level”.

One-third of the Forum’s members will represent EU organisations which work in the field of immigrant integration, and this could include the social partners.
The remaining participants will come from consultative bodies from the Member States

The EESC considers that immigrants’ organisations must be encouraged to become involved in the European Integration Forum.

The draft proposal leaves Member States in charge, should national forums not be available, and some participants questioned whether this was the most appropriate method: some civil society representatives did not trust their government to pick fairly

The EESC proposes that the European Commission, at the proposal of the EESC, appoint the Forum’s members.

The Forum should be funded by economic resources provided by the EU institutions

 REPORT FROM WORKSHOP NO 1: PREPATORY MEETING –  EUROPEAN INTEGRATION FORUM – BRUSSELS 29-30 APR. 2008. DRAWN UP BY PASCALE CHARHON, DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN NETWORK AGAINST RACISM (ENAR).
The chairman and other speakers wished to point out that the work of the European Integration Forum, in line with its legal base, would be to focus specifically on the situation of third-country nationals residing legally in EU Member States.

Comment
Integration Forum or not: The Koran leaves but 2 options: Submission – the Muslim perception of integration – or war. And every comma of the Koran is said to come down from Allah!

This farreaching manipulations, nay cultural theft, are done by stealth, largely. No debate, no popular vote on whether the peoples of Europe accept this! It is simply agreed upon by eurocratic officials of the EU Institutions – and then the accept and betrayal of corrupt, economically EU-dependent NGOs is presented as the “democratic”  basis for selling us all off to the New World Order and Islam, these two having the vision of a one-world – ruled by the Luciferian illuminists – or the dictatorial Caliphate as the Muslims think.

For the first time, so it is said, a legal basis for EU integration is at hand: The Lisbon Treaty!
This is to say that anything the EU has so far done and is doing in this field has been illegal, criminal, punishable!! Good to finally see it confirmed by the EU itself!


The EU Parliament? Forget it. According to MEP Jens P. Bonde, Jyllands-posten, Nov. 9, 2008, 85 % of our laws are made by eurocratic officials in 300 secret working groups (secret dinners- note the head of the candlestich under a magnifying glass!). The Parliament is only advisory – without legislative power!!!

The EU-illuminists – explanatory statement – don´t care – as long as we are all slaves they can plunder.

<!– –>

About these ads

One response to ““The Infantile Constitutions Away”: The Undermining Key Role of Civil Society for the Open NWO Society

  1. MY OWN AWAKENING- WHEN SEEING BROWNSKIS’ EVER RISING STEALTH TAXES- TOGETHER WITH OUR BASIC FREEDOMS BEING DESTROYED – THE 1984 STYLE OF THE WATCHING STATE.
    THIS PARAGRAPH CANNOT BE DENIED!!

    The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists take your house by directly sending in the “secret police” to knock your front door down Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly and cleverly by “gradually” taking your individual rights away, by “gradually” increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you can’t pay them, they send in their regional “council tax inspectors” to take your house away but the end result is the same.

    PETROL, EXPECTED TO RISE AGAIN- 7/8 POUND A GALLON- FOOD RISING ACROSS THE BOARD- PARKING FINES UP- VAT UP- EVERYWHERE YOU TURN- THE GOVERNMENT IMPOSES MORE AND MORE WAYS OF TAKING YOUR CASH!!
    HANDING OUR CASH OVER TO PRIVATE COMPANIES BY WAY OF PPPs ETC- IS CORPORATE FASCISM!!
    TRIBALISM IS THERE TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER YOU NOTHING ELSE!
    THERE IS ONLY ONE PARTY- WAKE UP!!

    http://www.abeldanger.net/2010/12/city-of-london-fabian-society-history.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 132 other followers

%d bloggers like this: