In Profile : Princess Diana, the Whole Story

In Profile : Princess Diana, the Whole Story

Posted by admin on October 30th, 2010

The Murder of a Princess

Introduction

The following information comes from many sources, it is the information which came to the fore in the aftermath of the murder, un censord.

I present this today after 10 years of media de-construction of all things Diana, which has helped people forget the real facts as they came forth in the times after the tragic event in 1997.

The Complete Chronology of an Evil Event

PART I

 

 

With the major attempt by the elite to destroy your connection to the Queen of Hearts Diana, I feel compelled to offer you not just the conspiracy facts you have heard and seen on the TV, but give you the full occult symbolism. Of course this will make better sense to those of you who are involved in the seeking of secret knowledge, but for any intelligent mind one can see the relevance and connection of such symbolic facts. I shall also offer you background information to the bloodline she was born into. Is it not a bit strange they give us a memorial service in which Camilla at the request of the two Princes was asked to attend, first accepting then declining for very good reason, call me a cynic but is this an attempt to have us warm to Camilla? I think yes… with the TV premier of the sordid and complete fabrication docu/film “the Queen” two days after the commemorative service, and their not desperate for you to believe their lies? Either way I leave it to you to make your own choice.

life…

Diana Frances Spencer was born at Park House on the Queens Sandringham estate in Norfolk on July 1st 1961, the third and youngest daughter of Viscount Althorp, later the 8th Earl Spencer, and his first wife Frances Roche, below. Her parents separated when she was six which is relevant to the trauma these families instil to a child up to the age of six as the heart chakra begins to activate in the natural growth of the human form. They eventually divorced in 1969. Diana’s mother then married the wallpaper tycoon Peter Shand-Kidd.

Diana had a younger brother, Charles, the present Earl Spencer, and two sisters, Jane and Sarah. There was a son born before Diana, but he died which by the rules of the elite could well have been the sacrifice as he was the first born son which for Diana’s father would be the necessary ritual to enter the utmost levels. Diana had always believed that her parents wished she had been a boy to give them a son and heir.

This is classic installation of underdog, unwanted feelings pushed into the mind of a chosen child which creates the lowered vibration for access by the negative energies into the being of the child. Diana had always maintained her childhood was very unhappy; this leads to a craving for love and warm affection she continued to crave until the end of her short life. Living at Sandringham she knew the Queen from being a small child, and played with the Royal children.

She always remembered with less than affection, being shunted over to the Queens residence during the holidays year after year to watch the film ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’. This in itself would seem not really relevant yet from a small age the fear created by such a satanic film, of which it is, would form the patterns of her subconscious fears that would be manipulated as she grew older. This film was written by the intelligence agent Ian Flemming, friend to Aleister Crowley and author of the James Bond films. The story is satanic symbolism for what really happens, a King and Queen who hate children and employ a child catcher to lure children, abduct them, and put them in a cage, take them to the castle and place them in a dungeon; of course they exclude the end for these children which of course is ritual sacrifice. I remember when I first learnt of this ritual sacrifice, I was constantly in fear that it could happen to my children, believe me it keeps you in terror and extremely controllable. Why would the Windsor’s keep playing this film constantly to a child who was a guest in their home? She told Andrew Morton for his book, Diana : Her True Story,

 

“the atmosphere was always very strange when we went there and I used to kick and fight anyone who tried to make us go”.

When Diana was age 13, she moved from Norfolk to live at Althorp in Northamptonshire, the Spencer family’s ancestral home, after her father married Raine, the daughter of the novelist Barbara Cartland. Diana had a deep loathing for her. Diana said again in the book Diana Her True Story that in September 1989 she had unleashed her years of frustration on Raine : “I told her what I thought about her, and I’ve never known such anger in me. I remember really going for her gullet”.

I said “If you only knew how much we all hated you for what you have done, you’ve ruined the house (Althorp), you spend all daddies money, and for what?” if you remember the information in a previous phase from the close confidant of Diana, Christine Fitzgerald, how she explained the deep empathy Diana had for others who were emotionally distressed, this is a consequence of emotional distress in herself from her childhood.

The Spencer’s are an elite bloodline family. They are cousins of the Spencer Churchills and related to the Marlborough family at Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, the birthplace of Winston Churchill. Other forebears included the Duke of Marlborough, Sir Robert Walpole, and the Spencer family inherited a considerable fortune from Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough. They also married into the Cavendish family, the Dukes of Devonshire at Chatsworth House, that offshoot became known as Spencer – Cavendish. Diana shared common ancestors with Prince Charles in the third Duke of Devonshire and, most significantly, King James I, the first Stuart King of England and Scotland and sponsor of Francis Bacon, but the truth is James was at the emotional mercy of Buckingham, but that is a story in itself and has direct connections to the John Adam Street Gang around Adelphi House. It was King James who played a highly influential role in the expansion of the Statute Empire, the formation of the Virginia Company through which still today, controls the United States of America, he also began the removal of Britain’s psychic’s, seer’s and mystics with the King James version of the Bible which was translated with over 36.000 translation errors, he also created the rules on how to seek, determine and murder those he called witch’s. Diana was also descended through several lines from the Stuart Kings, Charles II and James II, which connected her bloodline as it did with James I, to the Carolingian bloodline in France, which parades itself as the Merovingians.

Charles II had so many children out of wedlock who knows how many offshoots exist today; one thing is for sure the elite know all of them. As elite bloodlines go, the Spencer’s line is important; Diana’s blood was related to countless aristocratic lines, including the Earls of Lucan. Further afield the Spencer’s have blood ties with many leading American families and are distantly related to the Rockefellers. The bloodline has a long history of serving the monarch and the tradition continued with Diana’s father. He was equerry to King George VI (the one married to the Queen Mother) and to Queen Elizabeth. Diana’s sister, Jane, is married to Sir Robert Fellowes; the Queens private secretary at the time of Diana’s death (makes perfect sense for extra cover). Both Diana’s grandmothers, the Countess Spencer and Ruth Lady Fermoy, right, were inner circle members of the Queen Mothers Court, as were four of her great aunts.

The Spencer’s and the Queen Mother were extremely close and it was the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy who manipulated Diana into her marriage with Prince Charles. The countdown to marriage began when Diana met Charles at Althorp while he was having a relationship with her sister Sarah, in 1977. Diana was 16; it was three years later that the Windsor’s really made their move on her. It was Lady Fermoy and the Queen Mother who were manipulating behind the scenes, Diana was invited to a dance at Buckingham Palace to celebrate the 30th Birthday of Charles. Then in July 1980, a friend of Charles, Philip de Pass, asked Diana to stay with them while the Prince was there, in Diana’s own words, Charles was all over me and, “he leapt on me practically”. He asked her to accompany him to Buckingham Palace the next day and an invitation followed to join the Windsor’s in the September at Balmoral, their residence in Scotland. Eventually Charles asked her to marry him, she accepted. “I love you so much” Diana said to him, “whatever love is” replied Charles. If nothing else this reply speaks volumes about the state of the man who is to be king or probably not, but speaks even more about the current Queen and her consort as the parents of the cold, cold Charles.

The elite bloodlines have no idea what love is, none of them ever received it and thus can not express it, sad really, but this is the ancient reality for the elite born children, we need to demolish the ruling of the world by beings that have no understanding of what love is, for their own sakes as much as the rest of us. During some of the interviews after the break up of the marriage, Diana had stated that in looking back she could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection towards her, and even before the wedding she had realised she would be having a relationship with his true love and consort Camilla Parker Bowles, which of course became more apparent as the marriage continued. One should not be too judging on why Diana stayed with Charles as long as she did, for many ladies they feel they can change their chosen partner, in fact that is the basis of many females when they chose their husbands, as it is for many males also. During the marriage Charles and Camilla communicated with the code ‘Gladys and Fred’. Camilla like the Windsor’s, is close to the Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Diana’s death, she was on the Ionian island of Corfu enjoying the hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild, who just happens to have spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencer’s 18th century mansion overlooking Green Park in London close to Buckingham Palace. It’s funny in that once you have played ball with the elite they give you everything, the Rothschilds are about money, the Imperial Empires money as they act as the front for the 13 elect families, they give nothing not a penny to anyone who has not served them well. At the core of this whole saga is the fact the Windsor’s, required heirs from the Spencer genes to continue the ‘acceptable’ monarchy.

A week after her engagement to Charles , Diana’s bulimia began, this is an eating disorder in which you make yourself sick every time you eat food, Diana was throwing up three or four times a day and became desperately thin. This condition is a direct result from the satanic upbringing of children and in this case was triggered when Charles put his hand on her waist and said, “Oh a bit chubby here, aren’t we?” she stated. What we have here is the start of another character assassination of the Queen of Hearts to ensure you all by the time of her murder, saw her as a nutcase; of course this did not work, good on you. Bulimia is a dis-ease of the emotions, as most diseases are, and Diana had been an emotional wreck since the break up of her father and mother’s marriage and the standard upbringing of bloodline offspring.

She described the attitude of Charles thus :

“He found the virgin, the sacrificial lamb, and in a way he was obsessed with me. But it was hot and cold, hot and cold. You never knew what mood it was going to be, up and down, up and down… He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his father, and I was always the third person in the room.”

 

She met her sisters and told them she couldn’t go through with the marriage, especially with Camilla still on the scene, but they said she had no choice (classic form of control) because “your face is on the tea towels and you’re too late to chicken out”.

 

Before the wedding Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother. When she arrived no-one was there to welcome her, she said, it was like going to a hotel. Are these the type of people we wish to have representing the pinnacle of what it means to be British? Because I for one do not wish the world to feel this is how the average Brit functions!

Diana and Charles were married in St Paul’s Cathedral on July 29th 1981, the numbers here are very significant, but more importantly this just precedes the sacrificial ritual and feast of Lammas. That morning at Clarence House she said she felt calm, deathly calm: “I felt I was a lamb to the slaughter, I knew it, I couldn’t do anything about it”.

How prophetic would these feeling turn out to be?

They spent their first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten (Battenberg) family estate at Broadlands in Hampshire, before sailing around the Greek Islands in the Royal Yacht Britannia.  The Bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness, this within the first year of the marriage. “My husband made me feel to inadequate in every possible way, each time I came up for air he pushed me down again. I hated myself so much”. One of Diana’s royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, herself a victim of murder by the elite when the brakes on her car failed.

Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly, ran the Monaco branch of the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband, Prince Rainier. The Windsor’s got what they wanted when Prince William was conceived. Diana was told that the birth had to be induced to fit in with Charles’ polo playing programme, and William was born on June 21st 1982 which just happens to be the summer solstice. Again what kind of people, held as the pinnacle of Britishness, would induce a child’s birth to fit in with the fathers polo programme, what kind of people have we got here? Well of course the inducement was to ensure the birth concluded on the solstice, this is the occult showing itself here, to which the elite are so obsessed. The summer solstice esoterically represents the height of the suns power in that in the northern hemisphere it is at its highest point in the solar year. One can even predict what colour cloths the Queen will wear each day such is their obsession with esoteric principles.

He was christened William, after the bloodline William the Conqueror, Arthur, after the sun god symbol, King Arthur, Philip, after the Duke of Edinburgh, Louis, after Louis Mountbatten. William’s first serious girlfriend, according to the British press, was Emma Parker Bowles, the niece of his then father’s lover, Camilla. Prince Harry was born in 1984 and thus Diana’s role was over.

“Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain”, she told Andrew Morton. Diana and Charles separated in 1992 and divorced on August 28th 1996, almost one year later, she was dead.

Diana lived in apartments in Kensington Palace or KP as she called it. Prince Michael of Kent, the Grand Master of English Freemasonry, also has his home there. From this time the elite manipulated character assassination towards Diana took off in earnest, believe me this is easily accomplished while you are a slave to your emotions and DNA in that the elite know exactly the programming of all their targets, I have learnt this in recent years, which is why especially for those of you under the control via secret societies and the Evangelical Nonconformist religions, need to understand how only by the overriding of your DNA programming through ascension, can you hope to counter attack the operations against you by the elite.

A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between Diana and the car dealer, James Gilbey, was released through the media in 1992. On the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torture. She told Gilbey :

“I’ll go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind”.

The great thing about the character assassination by the Windsor’s against her was that it worked in her favour, her popularity grew. Of course this shows that the elite have no idea what love is, as Charles himself has stated, and could never combat what they do not understand, for how could they war against an enemy unseen to them, Love. With Diana’s combination of enormous heart, her global public profile, and her intense desire to prove the Windsor’s to be the cold heartless minds they surely are, threatened the very survival of royalty in all its forms.

With the information I have thus given throughout this work you can further see that the royal families are but the public face of something much worse and far bigger than could have been imagined, it is to this now exposed bunch of criminals and there ancient deceitful pacts and agreements we must focus, and take apart, if this world is to cease to be the cold heartless imagination or rather nightmare it has been all the while the same bloodlines have reigned supreme.

Her natural compassion and empathy on a one to one basis with people exposed the Windsor’s and all those like unto them as irrelevant in the eyes of the people, yet while they hold the reigns of power we have to see them as relevant in order we can remove such loveless people from their current position as dictators to the true humanity, the people. The shy and gullible child, whom the Windsor’s calculatingly and coldly enticed into their world of pain, became a woman who realised her true power and was not afraid to use it, what a girl! She brought the issue of landmines from obscurity full on into the minds of the masses, what a danger to evil this lady became. She also knew many intimate secrets within the establishment and was prepared to expose them.

She had called a chap in March 1997, a few months before she died, he was amazed when she told him she was the Princess of Wales, astounded at first he did not believe her, especially when she told him she was calling from a ‘supermarket phone in England. Diana and this man had a mutual friend. A close friend of Diana has stated that she often rang people from public phones, particularly from a department store in Kensington, when she wanted to be certain the conversation would not be tapped.

Diana admired the man she had rang for his wisdom and knowledge, she told him she had something to reveal that would shake the world and she wanted his advise on how best to do it. He will not reveal what she told him, yet one researcher rang this man and asked him if it was her awareness of the Windsor’s connection to drug trafficking, his reply was “Oh no, it was much worse than that”. So to lower initiates or outer circle operatives, the fact she was to reveal something would be the understanding they have of why she was killed, but there is another level of this event which would have been planned long before. Diana because of the quality of her soul, and to which bloodline she chose to be born, was the reason she was chosen as the incubator and breeding partner for the House of Windsor to create a more acceptable genetic cloak, the cold old bloodline with this scenario could continue to hide behind the more acceptable genetic, thus keeping the monarchy alive and well into the new cycle, and thus continuing to hide the real power brokers of the world yet again.

To the higher initiates or fully illuminated operatives this ritual was the killing of the moon Goddess in the middle earth, Diana in her highest form, the same with Kennedy, to lower initiates it was because of the policies he was pursuing, to the highest initiates it was a ritual known as the killing of a King, and a Catholic King at that.

The final sequence of events which led to her ritual murder involves at almost every turn, the man called Mohamed Al Fayed, the Egyptian former owner of Harrods, which just happens to be the shop for the top of the social strata, he is also do not forget, the father of one of the other victims of this ritual killing. It makes sense that Fayed’s role in this aftermath is as it is. What I mean by this is that many people high in British society see Al Fayed as an enemy of the establishment, proved with his long battle with Lonrho tycoon and mass murderer in Africa, Tiny Roland. This works into the psyche of people who would believe it is him and only him who is trying to keep the conspiracy alive, and of course those who also believed it to be murder, would, they hope, join with him, which would give the elite a line in yo the many who believe the same.  Fayed would ensure the conspiracy stays within the boundaries of the hu ha already released through the TV and media, and no other information would come out via the elite controlled leader in all things conspiracy…. Mr Al Fayed.

It’s the Nick Brown tactic used in the top up fees debate only this time while you the people hold on to the truth of Diana’s death, Al Fayed will continue to weep for them and claim conspiracy, yet as the feelings of this event wane, he will be seen to be defeated (now accomplished) which in the minds of the sick creatures should finally bring into form the symbolism of the four black swans; sealed never to return.

During the takeover of Harrods there was a Department of Trade and Industry inquiry, but the lies so easily spewed from Al Fayed and the elites ability to gag the press, that as far as the press is concerned, “lies are the truth and the truth is a lie.

The report also added he had lied about his background, claiming to be from a wealthy family, when he was not. This man wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked him in the mouth. Al Fayed’s main media mouthpiece is the Daily Mirror, and when he was editor, Piers Morgan was the man who would interview Al Fayed every time.

This for me explains how important it is for the establishment to have all believe Fayed is against them, even Morgan was used perhaps without his knowledge to add to this deceit, in that when he was fired those at higher level of society would believe it to be because of his ties with Fayed.

In presenting himself as an anti establishment figure, the elite control both truth and the lie as they are presented  through the TV and media, suggesting the role as given to an initiate having sacrificed his son as the Old Testament demands.

Al Fayed is well known as a sexual deviant, and has escaped prosecution for a growing number of sexual assaults on female staff working at Harrods. One girl Samantha Jane Ramsey, said, when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Al Fayed, the supervisor sighed, “another one”. She was sacked for making the complaint which he does to all those who speak out about his molestation and style of business management. John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, stated, “There was a regime of fear and terror”.

When Samantha Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone Police Station, she said that the officer told her : “you are not the first to come to us. We have files inch’s high on Mr Al Fayed, but no proof, it would be your word against his”. What garbage, if this was you or I, we would be on the sex register pronto especially given the fact ‘he is supposed to be against the establishment, they would have him quick smart. This shows beyond reasonable doubt that Fayed operates for an agenda of the establishment.

With this in mind what I would ask you to consider is that this man was in total control of all security on the day and night of the 31st August 1997…

Al Fayed become close to the Spencer family through Diana’s father, Earl ‘Johnny’ Spencer, and stepmother Raine. He helped Johnny through financial difficulties and said he considered the Earl to be a brother. He had given Raine whom Diana could not stand, a place on the Harrods board. Al Fayed sponsored prestigious royal events like the Royal Windsor Horse Show and polo competitions, but he especially made sure he supported the charities and causes of the Princess.

Bob Loftus, the head of security at Harrods between 1987 and 1996, told Channel 4 programme, ‘dispatches, in June 1998 that he was ordered to tell Al Fayed immediately if Diana came into the store. Al Fayed would then go to the department where she was shopping and ‘accidentally meet her. Every Christmas a green Harrods van would call at Diana’s home, Kensington Palace, with gifts for her and the boys from ‘uncle Mohamed’.

When you look at all the evidence, he made it his business to court the friendship of the Princess of Wales in every way possible. On June 3rd 1997, he invited her to join him for a summer holiday at his beach-side villa in San Tropez in the South of France. On June 11th he got the breakthrough he had worked so hard for, she accepted. The following day he completed the purchase of a £15 million yacht, the Jonikal, through his (or rather the Sultan of Brunei’s) Bermudan company Mohafa Shipping. This was the boat on which Diana and Dodi’s relationship would blossom. On July 11th Diana arrived in San Tropez with her sons, William and Harry, to stay in the eight-bedroomed luxury apartment on the ten acre Al Fayed estate on the exclusive Le Parc development. At this time Dodi was still at his apartment in Paris with his fiancée Kelly Fisher, the American model.

The 41 year old Dodi was a ‘gofer’ for his father and lived on his father’s wealth, although he had enjoyed some success in the movie industry at one time as the hands off producer of the British film Chariots of Fire, again thanks to his father’s money. He had a playboy reputation and was a very big spender, famously running up a $100.000 bill in two months on his Amex card. He was dominated by his father and even in his film operation every decision had to be approved by his father. Dodi did whatever his father told him to do. He had been engaged to Kelly Fisher for eight months and she was expecting to spend her holiday on the Jonikal, but on the evening of July 14th, Dodi took a phone call from his father who ordered him to go immediately to San Tropez to be with Diana. Kelly Fisher describes what happened next in an interview with the Dispatches programme:

Dodi said he was going to London and he’d be back and then we were going to San Tropez. That evening he didn’t call me and I finally got him on his portable phone. I said Dodi where are you? And he said he was in London. I said ‘Ok’, I’ll call you right back at your apartment. He said No, no, don’t call me back. So I said ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he admitted he was in the South of France. His father had asked him to come down and not bring me, I know now.”

 

Two days later Dodi sent a private plane to fly Kelly to San Tropez. But while he stayed with Diana, Kelly was kept aboard another Al Fayed boat. “I’m sitting here stuck” she said. “So he had me in my little boat cage and he was, I know now, seducing Diana.” On July 31st, Diana returned to San Tropez for a second holiday with Dodi, this time alone. Kelly Fisher was back in Los Angeles preparing for her marriage to Dodi which she said was due to take place on August 9th. But two days before that, the story broke in the worlds media of the romance between Diana and Dodi. Kelly heard from a friend who saw a picture in the paper, she recalls :

“I started calling him in London because at this time I was expecting his arrival in a day. I called his private line, but there was no answer, so then I called the secretary and asked to speak to him and she wouldn’t put me on. So Mohamed got on and in so many horrible words told me never to call back again. I said ‘he’s my fiancé, what are you talking about? He hung up on me and I called back and the secretary said don’t ever call here again, your calls are no longer to be put through. It was so horrible.”

 

At this stage Diana had Kensington Palace swept constantly for bugging devices set by the intelligence operations, this on the advice of her body guards, and for the irony, she now placed herself in the hands of a man obsessed with bugging and video recording of all people around him. The Al Fayed villa in San Tropez was bugged, as were all properties and vehicles within the clutches of Fayed and his personal army of security. Everything Diana said while in the hands of this man was heard. Bob Loftus, the former head of security at Harrods said the bugging at Harrods was ‘a very extensive operation’ and was always under the direction of Al Fayed.

Henry Porter, the London editor of the magazine Vanity Fair, had spent two years investigating Al Fayed and he said they came across his obsessive use of eavesdropping devices to tape telephone calls, bug rooms, and film people. Through mutual friends, Porter warned Diana about Al Fayed’s background and activities “Because we thought this was quite dangerous for her for obvious reasons”. But Diana apparently felt she could handle it and although she knew Al Fayed could “sometimes be a rogue”, he was no threat to her, she thought.  She apparently told friends, “I know he’s naughty, but that’s all.” The Dispatches programme said they had written evidence that Al Fayed bugged the Ritz hotel and given his background and the deals that are hatched at the Ritz, it would be staggering if he did not. Kelly Fisher said that the whole time she was in Fayed property; she just assumed everything was bugged. It was known, she said, and Dodi had told her everywhere was bugged. She went on, “as a matter of fact, when I confronted him about Diana, he said, “I can’t talk to you on the phone.” He said, “I’ll talk to you in LA”. I knew what that meant”. Diana was under the protection of the Al Fayed security machine and even her most private conversations were being monitored. Diana went with Dodi to Al Fayed’s Elizabethan-style mansion called Barrow Green Court at Oxted in Surry, formerly owned by fellow Satanist Lord McAlpine. Throughout the house Al Fayed had placed statues of semi naked Greek Goddesses. One can see the symbolism with this ritual beginning.

On August 21st, despite Henry Porter’s warning, Diana returned once again to San Tropez for another holiday with Dodi. Al Fayed was milking the situation, briefing journalists and photographers, also enlisting the advice of the publicist Max Clifford.

After the announcement by ex Metropolitan police commissioner Lord Stevens, on Thursday 14th December 06, that the death of Diana was an accident, we had once again Max Clifford dragged out on the TV to operate for Al Fayed, see the game people, don’t let Al Fayed and his merry bunch hijack the conspiracy or allow Fayed to become ‘Nick Brown’, they will lead ultimately down a path of even more confusion than is already existent, that is the plan. The Al Fayed machine was leaking the couple’s whereabouts to ensure maximum publicity. Al Fayed complained after the crash that photographers and journalists would not leave Diana alone, that statement given the circumstances, beggars belief, yet as always the elite make use of every possible outcome of all events they manipulate, and this was an attempt to instil the anti stalking laws to prevent journalists and investigators from tracking the movements of elite operatives, they use most proficiently ‘celebrities’ to instil this agenda. The Diana Dodi romance by this time was in full swing, with Al Fayed forcing Dodi to intensify the relationship. What Al Fayed said, Dodi did. Nothing was left to chance. Diana’s favourite music, the theme from the English Patient, was played over and over as the couple cruised on the Jonikal. Diana and Dodi had much In common, both had been born into wealthy families and there fathers were distant figures. Both had experienced the breakdown of their parents marriages as their mothers left home. They even attended finishing schools in close proximity to each other in Switzerland. But we should not rule out the possibility of mind manipulation being used on both parties. My own experience of such manipulation would conclude outright, this to be the case. One of the main abilities created via mind control techniques is to make two people fall madly in love with each other, just look at the world of celebrity for the proof. Magic spells and black arts of all kinds are used in this way.

They tried this technique on me using a satanic female operative who out of no where gave me a kiss in a place well known to me as a satanic centre, of course me being me played along to see where it was to go, yet at no point did this spell work, which has been the case most often during my time around these black magicians, when they did, there was always another female to break the spell, thank goodness. Scientist Brian Desborough, states the feeling of being in love is dependant upon the brain producing Phenylethylamine.

This is a chemical which also diminishes the ability to discriminate effectively, hence the term ‘love is blind’. Production of this chemical is sustained by the release of  endorphins, a naturally occurring chemical linked to memory, learning, pain suppression, sex drive and hormone regulation. If these chemicals can be stimulated in both parties they would instantly fall in love.

The talk of engagement I feel was rubbish, this whole escapade was to create the idea that something had to be done in that to have a Muslim as step father to the future King, was abhorrent. I suppose for some people this manipulation worked, but as stated the heart connection most had with Diana overwhelmed any backward thinking relating to any possible reasoning this had to be done. All who accepted this need to kill, would benefit to look hard at themselves, you are ill.

Diana and Dodi left the South of France from Olbia airport at 1.30pm on August 30th bound for Paris on Al Fayed’s gulfstream jet. They apparently intended to stay one night at Dodi’s apartment, which looks out on the Arc de Triomphe, before going on to London where Diana was due to meet her sons. The plane touched down at Le Bourget airport in Paris at 3.20 pm and they were met by 20 or so celebrity photographers known as the paparazzi (from the Italian word meaning buzzing insects). A Mercedes was waiting for the party and a green Range Rover was to follow on behind. This is normal security procedure and the very minimum you would expect to protect a Princess. With Diana and Dodi in the Mercedes was Dodi’s bodyguard, Trevor Reece Jones, the former 29 year old member of the Paras. Along with the SAS the Paras are the most highly trained regiment in the British forces. In the Range Rover was the driver Henry Paul, Al Fayed’s acting head of security at the Ritz, and another bodyguard, Kes Wingfield. They drove from the airport to the villa Windsor on the Bois de Boulogne, the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor (formerly King Edward VIII who abdicated). Al Fayed stated he was to give this villa to the couple as a wedding gift, and that they were at the Villa discussing décor, but the bodyguard Kes Wingfield stated they were at the Villa Windsor no more than ten minutes. The whole idea of engagement and wedding was the fabrication of Al Fayed. From here they were driven to the Ritz hotel where they arrived at 4.20pm.

The Ritz (right) is in the Place Vendome and all around that square at the first floor level are the symbols of the Sun and the cross, very like the symbols used by the ancients to symbolise the ‘journey’ of the sun through the year.

This is very symbolic and is important within the full ritual that would end in their death. The same kind of symbolism was all around the final journey of JFK. These symbols relate to King Louis XIV, who was known as the Sun King. At his palace at Versailles in the 17th century he decorated rooms in honour of Apollo, the sun god, and Diana, the goddess of the moon. There was also a statue of the goddess Diana at Versailles.

In the centre of the Vendome Square is an immense pillar with the statue of Napoleon on the top mirroring the famous Nelson’s column in Trafalgar Square in London. Pillars of this type represent masculine energy, phallic symbolism.

Unusually Diana at this stage still had the same level of security she’d had since the airport. Usually security for VIP’s is increased beyond the airports with a request to the French High Protection Police Security Service (SPHP), but it was not requested. This meant that the whole security operation around Diana in Paris was under the control of Al Fayed and his people from start to finish. Had they requested the SPHP, they would both still be alive. The SPHP operate a car in front and behind, together with two motorcycle police on each side of the vehicle the VIP occupies. The cars are driven by professional drivers carrying armed security men.

According to reports immediately after the crash, which always give a truer account of both eye witnesses and footage, as was seen directly after 911, the SPHP made three possibly four, offers to protect Diana, each one refused by Dodi. Bet I know who told him to refuse? An officer of the SPHP told Dodi, “if you will not use our car, we recommend that two police cars accompany you on your excursions around the city.” This advice too was ignored. Diana and Dodi went straight to the $6000 a night 18th century Imperial Suite at the Ritz. The couple booked a table at the Chez Benoit restaurant for 8.45pm and they intended to spend the night at Dodi’s apartment. At 6.30pm Dodi went across the Place Vendome to a jeweller, Repossi, to buy a diamond ring for Diana which was later delivered to the Ritz. A little after 7pm, the couple were driven in the Mercedes along the Champs Elysees to Dodi’s apartment on Rue Arsene-Houssaye close to the Arc de Triomphe. Here they unpacked and prepared for dinner. Again the back up Range Rover was there and so was another car carrying bodyguards for added protection. Why was this level of security thought necessary in the evening, but not in the early hours of the morning at the time of the crash? Dodi’s apartment is known as the Etoile flat, after the Place de L’Etoile, the Sun or the Star circle road around the Arc de Triomphe. The route they took to the apartment was out of the Place Vendome onto the Rue de Rivoli, and half way round the Place de la Concorde they turned right into the Champs Elysees and drove straight up that famous avenue to Dodi’s apartment. See below:

 

 

The journey taken to Dodi’s apartment during the early evening of August 30th is marked by the white line. It is a straightforward journey; why then in the early hours of August 31st did they take the ludicrous detour to the Pont de L’Alma tunnel? If it was to avoid the paparazzi, one would think you would still go the shortest journey and not a journey whereby the paparazzi had plenty of time to find and follow.

Remember that route, it is critically important. As they arrived at the apartment at 7.15 pm, bodyguards were seen to rush from their car to hold back six paparazzi. Diana and Dodi became concerned about eating at the unprotected Chez Benoit restaurant and decided to head back to the Ritz to eat. They took the same route back, down the Champs Elysees and around the Place de La Concorde. There is much more traffic in the early evening than in the early hours, there would have been better reason to avoid the same route at this point than in the early hours. The couple with bodyguards Wingfield and Rees-Jones, walked into the Ritz captured by the now famous video pictures, at 9.47pm, also at this time the paparazzi gather in numbers outside amid rumours of an engagement announcement.

The fact we know Al Fayed himself was manipulating the press all that day and evening, it is obvious to me the build up of the press was what he wanted. Why? To create the tale of marriage to enable the elite to change the route in the early hours because of the discomfort for Diana Al Fayed had created in his press leaks and manipulation, and because the Windsor’s foolishly believed this nation loved them, hoping it would seem reasonable to kill her save having a Muslim at the heart of the establishment, and no big deal. This of course before they realised in the heart connected outpouring of the world for Diana after the event. How out of touch they realised they are in that time. This more than anything else terrified the Windsor’s and the elite in general. The Crown is the enemy of humankind do not lose sight of this fact as they force upon the world the New World Order which serves not the human race but the Crown.

The Ritz security video also identified a number of people who had been outside among the onlookers for most of the day and were still there on the edge of the crowd.

Now the plot seriously thickens. After speaking on the phone with his father who was at his estate in Oxted, Surry, Dodi Fayed announced a quite ludicrous plan. To avoid the paparazzi, the Mercedes that had been transporting them all that day together with the back up Range Rover were to be taken around the front of the hotel and used as a decoy for the paparazzi. At the same time another Mercedes would be brought around the back entrance of the hotel to whisk the couple away to the apartment on the Champs Elysees. Henry Paul, the 41 year old acting head of security at the Ritz, was called on his mobile phone by Dodi and told to report back to the hotel. He went off duty at 7pm and by the time he returned it was 10pm. No one has established were Paul was in those three hours. Dodi said that his father, Mohamed Al Fayed, had personally authorised that Henri Paul should drive the Mercedes. What we are seeing here is that the whole of the changed plan was given to Dodi as full and complete orders from his father, those who know Al Fayed would be astonished if this was not the case, Dodi did not think or act for himself ever. Henry Paul was not a qualified chauffeur and had no hire car permit.

L. Fletcher Prouty

L. Fletcher Prouty, a former Colonel in the US Air force who worked closely with the intelligence agencies, once said :

“No one has to direct an assassination – it happens. The active role is played secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions?”

 

If we apply Prouty’s rule to the ritual killing of Diana, and asked who had the power. and used that power… to reduce the usual security precautions for Diana that night, we have a rather interesting answer: Mohamed Al Fayed. Given these circumstances he must answer the obvious question :

why was this security reduced?

When JFK was assassinated, there were no bodyguards standing on his car which is the usual protocol, they were instead on the car immediately behind. When Martin Luther King was assassinated the black police officer In charge of security for King was sent home against his will before the shooting.

When Bobby Kennedy was assassinated, again the security arrangements were tampered with in that he was to walk of the stage and exit through the crowd, but his aids told him to exit via the kitchen, and was met by Sirhan Sirhan, who had been on a Rosicrucian mind expansion course in the weeks before the murder (mind control course more like in which he was the victim). Frank Mankiewics, the aid who guided Bobby into the kitchen was a former public relations man for the Mossad front in America, the Anti Defamation League. Interestingly this same chap turned up as head of publicity for the Oliver Stone movie JFK, which was supposed to be an exposé the assassination of Jack Kennedy.  So to  apply Prouty’s rule to all assassinations, you get the picture without necessarily requiring the long winded details.

With Diana we have last minute changes to the security arrangements, change of cars and removal of the Range Rover with no back up support whatever, then a change to the route, all on the orders of Mohamed Al Fayed, a man obsessed with security at least for himself! Bob Loftus, the former head of security at Harrods, said :

“Compared with the protection that Al Fayed affords himself, which is very professional, of a very high standard; that which is afforded to the mother of the future King of England was a Mickey Mouse operation.”

 

He added that “Al Fayed was absolutely paranoid about his personal protection.” Just for him to walk around his own store, there would be three or four plain clothes members of his personal protection team who travelled with him all the time, plus another four uniformed security who would act as ‘outriders’ to create two rings of security around him, that’s in his own store! One could ask is it paranoia which I see as another form of awareness, the worse it is the denser the energies are around you, or is it the knowledge of the seedy cesspit world of arms dealing and being part of the elite in general, to which Al fayed, is involved. Of course his fantasies of grandeur must also play a part in this!

Al Fayed in the main, recruits former members of the SAS and the Parachute Regiment for his close security, which makes good sense apart from the fact that their loyalties belong to the Crown, always. He uses the elite operation, Control Risks, to make recommendations. Tom Bower tells in his book about AL Fayed of how armed guards at the Oxted estate hide behind bushes wearing full combat uniform and blacked out faces.

Whenever Al Fayed travelled in his Mercedes there was always a back up Range Rover carrying emergency medical equipment and security staff, yet he withdrew that protection from Diana and his son. More than that a new car was introduced for her, another Mercedes which was sent to the rear entrance to the Ritz, supplied by a car hire company called Etoile Limousines, the same name as Dodi’s flat. Etoile Limousines is based at the Ritz and depends for its entire income on contracts with the hotel and its guests. In other words, it is controlled entirely by Mohamed Al Fayed or rather the Sultan of Brunei, that great friend to the House of Windsor and the Bush’s.

The new Mercedes was an S-280 lighter in weight than the 600 series they had used all day and without the dark tinted windows. Other cars where available, but this one was chosen instead. A director at Etoile, Niels Siegel, told the inquiry into Diana’s death that he delivered the car to the rear entrance of the Ritz, but the dispatches programme shows that this is a lie. It was delivered by a driver called Frederic Lucard and he can be seen doing so on the security video. Lucard said he found it was very strange that Etoile would allow Henry Paul, a man not qualified as a chauffeur, to drive one of their cars. So why did they do it? Because Mohamed Al Fayed told them to, obviously. Brian Dodd, the former Head of Security for Al Fayed in the 1980’s, gave his assessment of the situation to dispatches :

“It’s a new car that has come into the system. They wouldn’t have had time to check that car out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a bomb on that car, for instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldn’t have even been considered. The back up vehicle is there, not just to avert the paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a pillion rider to pull up and shoot, or put a magnetised bomb on top of the car. God only knows. (I think we all know why)

 

“I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional bodyguards who I would have had on that job and Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes Wingfield, after what I have seen happened, would not have been in Paris that night.”

 

The Mercedes with Henry Paul (below) at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of the Ritz at 12.20 am with Paul telling the paparazzi not to bother following because they would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and in the front was Trevor Rees-Jones, the former Para, with the reputation for being fearless. Rees-Jones says he disagreed with the change of plan. He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal practice in built up areas because body guards need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at speed down the Rue Cambon and turned right down the Rue de Rivoli into the Place de la Concorde where it stopped briefly at the lights.

The paparazzi photographer, Romuald Rat, on the back of the motorcycle drew up alongside them here, but he says that Henry Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual carriageway along side the river Seine called the Cours la Reine. The car went down one tunnel, came back to the surface, and almost immediately went down into the short tunnel at the Pont de L’Alma. Here it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of the tunnel which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers. Henry Paul and Dodi Fayed died immediately.

According to the autopsy report Diana was clinically dead within 20 minutes and this was long before she arrived at the hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash because he was wearing his seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing his seat belt when they left the Ritz in accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a photograph at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did not have a seat belt on. But a little more than a minute later when the car struck the pillar, he was wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the seat belt because for some reason he sensed danger, why did he not scream at Diana and Dodi to put their seat belts on? After all it only takes a second and this was his sole reason for being in the car, to protect the two in the back. Rees-Jones has some serious questions to answer here and he is giving none and continues to give none. Rees-Jones stated he didn’t know why he strapped himself in. all he says is they were followed by two cars one of them white and a motor cycle, these answers fit within the smokescreen. I watched the news reports just after the crash for the whole day too, I definitely saw two people, a man and a woman who were together, state that the white car was parked in the tunnel, and that from this car came a massive flash. These two people were shown stating this quite a few times, then never again. This for me is the only reason they incorporated the white car in the official version, yet slowly changed in relation to its position to further the idea it was the paparazzi to blame. After the crash neither a single TV nor tabloid report showed the detour from the route they had taken twice that day from the Ritz to Dodi’s flat and back again. This detour was not at all in the first reports; it was only after researchers brought this to our attention that they incorporated it into the ‘Official’ version of what happened. As already stated, why did they take this detour when to travel to Dodi’s flat you travel to the Place de la Concorde and, half way round, you turn right into the Champs Elysees and drive straight up to Dodi’s flat? To go a longer way gives the paparazzi even more time to hound you and more time for them to arrive outside Dodi’s flat?

The one thing this alternative route ensures is that they went through the Pont de L’ Alma tunnel the relevance of which will become apparent via occult knowledge later.

In the same way as with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and James Earl Ray, Henry Paul is the scapegoat. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused media and public attention to the story in the days after the crash, they stick to it like a mantra, the same with the 911 story, the Russian building bombing, they tell us what happened and keep on telling the same fairy story over and over again. It was announced that Henry Paul was three to four times over the limit, and that his blood contained traces of anti-depressant drugs, including Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of Prozac. “The cause of the crash was simple” so we are told again and again, “the driver was drunk”. Tampering with blood samples or incorporating alcohol in the blood is child’s play especially when everything is being carried out in the strictest secrecy, the insertion of tiny balloons which release alcohol into the blood stream in stages. There was certainly no sign of inebriation as he drove away from the Ritz, and it has been exposed that there was a chap died that day who did have all the symptoms in his blood they attribute to Henry Paul, this man  committed suicide by sticking a hose from the exhaust into the car.. According to his blood tests, he drank the equivalent of eight scotches on an empty stomach. A behavioural psychologist on the ITV documentary, Diana – Secrets of the Crash, could find no evidence that he was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but there could be an explanation to this we shall look at later. Only two days earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his pilot’s licence and there was no sign of the alcohol abuse the post crash propaganda claimed, one of his close friends has also stated he was no big drinker. There was another strange anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henry Paul’s blood was found to contain 20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide content halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen. Debbie Davis of the carbon Monoxide Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henry Paul would not have known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. Dr Alistair Hay, an expert in carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that should have been evident:

“I find it difficult to rationalise everything. A blood carbon monoxide level of 20% and a high blood alcohol level suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction time, certainly be someone who would be slowed up in the way he did things, would probably also be somebody who was in some pain, but none of those things appear to be evident from the pictures that we see of him. It’s a bit of an enigma.”

 

There is a lot more to know about Henry Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts with the French and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men for the top hotels, and the Ritz, with its VIP clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing would have been a prime target. Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income. He earned around £20-25.000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at about £300 per hour. He had a string of bank accounts; there were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and four deposit accounts at the Caisse D’Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash, sums of £4000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In total he had £122.000 (1.2 million Francs) and no one knows where it came from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours between 7pm when he went off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his mobile and told him to return to the Ritz. His whereabouts in this period are a mystery, a very significant mystery at that.

To understand how the Illuminati operates requires detailed research over a vast array of interconnecting subjects. Everything from ancient history, but especially relating to satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earth’s magnetic grid, the power of the sun, the banking system, and mind control, all these subjects I have breached with you in this operation. Hopefully you will be able to grasp the occult knowledge thus given in order you can better understand the ritual sacrifice of the Queen of Hearts. When you consider all the journalists that have produced articles and documentaries about the crash are operating without the knowledge of the occult, it makes the whole reality of conspiracy a mystery because of course they are dealing with only half of the picture and thus mystery surrounds the event, they only operate with information within the five sense reality. This is the same with all major events throughout history, only to initiates is the true picture of man clear and true. When you deal within the five sense reality you are unable to see that there are organisations within organisations which give the ability for one force to operate through apparently unconnected agencies like British and French intelligence, the Paris Police and medical services, and most importantly of all, the inquiry investigating the cause of the crash.

In Britain we had an investigation into the crash by John Stalker, the former deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester police in which he dismissed all idea that Diana was murdered. Ironically, Stalker claimed, quite rightly, that he was the victim of a conspiracy to remove him from the police force after he identified a policy by the Northern Ireland police, the RUC, to shoot people they believed to be terrorists and ask questions later. This was the so-called shoot to kill policy. In the late 1990’s the chosen property of the local elite to inflict their arts against me was in Manchester road Baxenden. It was a cottage situated over an underground river, the property number added to 13, (the point at which consciousness determines the physical reality). With the rushing water and the house number made this property a major point of energy and was chosen by the Freemasons to act as a vortex to ensure I became ritually plugged into the Illuminati vibration. Just a few houses up from this cottage, was a large detached property in which lived a scapegoat from this Stalker affair. This man lived in absolute fear of his former colleagues, and died not to long ago.

They then tried to re-manoeuvre the situation to another property this time a flat in the centre of Accrington town centre. In this flat they tried there best to have me sorted, but again they were unsuccessful. It was during these periods they used Bradford also to attempt their machinations against me.

Pushing aside every suggestion of conspiracy to kill Diana, Stalker asked; “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?” well I think I answered that in an earlier phase in showing how the British and French elite operate together using the takeover of the USA as the example. You can see that operatives at Stalkers level understand nothing save the illusory outer circle knowledge within Freemasonry, nor do they understand the true nature of the Crown. At the same time Stalker did ask some very pertinent questions about the crash and its aftermath; “why was the Fayed security around the princess reduced to one wholly inadequate man with no back up? Why did the police not appeal for help from the public? Why was there no post mortem-autopsy on Dodi Fayed’s body?” I would offer this answer to Mr Stalker, “because it is one hall of a conspiracy, one that dwarfs your knowledge of the conspiracy against yourself when you where removed.”

I have already breached the subject of mind control throughout this work, because it is essential to understand the occult knowledge and potential of it to be used in such operations, I will offer some examples to better help you realise its operational use.

In the 1980’s the best part of 30 scientists working on top secret projects, mostly computer programmers, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances. Marconi was the major company involved, but there were others like Plessey and British Aerospace. In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with which he had no connection, and threw himself off the famous suspension bridge there. A few months before, Arshad Sharif, a computer programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged himself. Why Bristol? Bristol is a former Knights Templar port and before that a Phoenician port. Its name has evolved from Barati; the Phoenician goddess. It just so happens that an elite unit of British intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they use the runway of the British Aerospace complex to fly British and foreign agents in and out of the country. In that period of the 1980’s there were strange deaths galore of people at the cutting edge of development in the defence industries.

What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Bristol suspension bridge, and jump off?

A CIA scientist told a researcher he was put through forms of mind control to stop him recalling his knowledge once a project was completed. To give another example, one which is similar to the situation in Paris: David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working on a very sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and changing his lifestyle. (Never tell anyone what you propose to do, just do it). He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six and a three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances, although they are not so mysterious when you understand mind control. He worked for Easams who in turn, were operating contracts for the Ministry of Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special Branch.

Then, on Saturday March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t return for six hours. No one has any idea where he was. His wife Anna called the police and Constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.20pm. Asked the obvious question; “where have you been?” he said he had been driving and thinking. His wife said it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she didn’t think he realised how long he had been out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days later, on Monday, March 30th, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin Maestro and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester, to Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about his demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good. But about 30 minutes into his journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke, he suddenly did a U-turn across the dual carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, sands then drove his car straight into a disused café building killing himself in an explosion of flame. There were no skid marks; he had not even tried to stop. When you understand the methods of mind programming, an initiate would know that in the time he was missing, he had his mind re-programmed to act in a certain way with some kind of trigger, which could be a word via mobile phone, a particular sign or symbol on the road, a particular sound, a light or some kind of action outside of his vehicle. Whatever was programmed into his mind would be activated via one of these methods. At that point he would have switched from his normal self to a man focused only to driving into the café building being unaware of the consequences. In effect the subconscious programming overpowers the conscious mind and the programme takes over to replace the human. This can also be achieved via attachment to your electromagnetic field (Aura) of an entity which forces a play into your subconscious which you then carry out against your conscious intention…casting a spell. This is operated within the Special Forces, to turn humans into killing machines.

In the three hours Henry Paul went missing, this programming or possession, is what any initiate would know to have happened to him in Paris. This is the occult or hidden reason and not a coincidence, that Henry Paul drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de L’Alma tunnel in Paris. The elite networks of which Al Fayed played a major role were operating through many agencies to ensure Diana was in Paris that night, because at its foundation, the plan was to perform a specific satanic ritual of the utmost calibre under which the timing and circumstances and the place of death had to be arranged in intricate detail. Diana was under Fayed’s security web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of the time during the last few days. All her conversations were heard and monitored throughout the Al Fayed bugging system, so if Al fayed was, as he claims a victim of the elite, why does he not publish them? During those missing hours, Henry Paul, the asset of British and French intelligence would have had the final aspect of his programming set into place on top of the full programming already placed in there. Diana’s ritual death was arranged from the very top of the Illuminati, the Queen Mother being the chieferoony, Prince Philip at the time was subordinate to her, Al Fayed for all his wealth is nothing other than a puppet of the Black Magicians carrying out his role as dictated by the Illuminati, himself probably never aware of the full consequences of his role save through hindsight.

The Mercedes brought to the back of the Ritz had itself been stolen some weeks earlier – before the Diana Dodi relationship began, stolen from Etoile Limousines,  and when it was recovered from the theft it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing outside the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the driver’s door was flung open and the chauffeur pulled out by three Arabic-speaking men with handguns. The vehicle was missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels were missing, the door ripped off, and the electronic system and equipment controlling the braking system, had gone. This car would have been written off by any insurance company, but of course this was the cover for the extensive Illuminati repairs which would install remote control and much other electronic wizardry. Al Fayed controls the Etoile Limousine company which supplied the vehicle, is it any wonder the French authorities refused the offer by experts at Mercedes to examine the car after the crash?

When Henry Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to most observers. The programming lies deep within the psyche until the arranged trigger which would have activated his fast driving and route change. We have already seen the technology relating to remote control with its use by the American Airliners for the event 911; it would make more sense that this was the real cause of precision 13th pillar direct hit with the loss of brakes too. It does come back to the white car which in the first reports was clearly stated to have been parked in the tunnel and not as they now claim, travelling in the tunnel in the same direction. From this car came a white flash and I would strongly suggest those within this car where operating the remote control, it could even have been a computer controlled precision operation from this white vehicle. Then the cover for the white flash is simple, the paparazzi did it. The reason I have written the number 13 in bold, is to show how often in the occult numerology it enters this ritual, because it has massive significance to the elite and it would be essential to the ritual for the car to hit the 13th pillar because this marks the centre of the ancient spot of worship to the dark aspect of the goddess, Hecate. The tunnel itself would have been constructed in this way. Diana had an aversion to the number 13; she would not allow a thirteenth lot in her dress auction at Christies in the June before she died.

A chap named Mark Phillips helped to de-programme a mind controlled victim named Cathy O’ Brien, who was a mind controlled slave operating for the CIA. This woman has detailed many incidents involving father George Bush, Bill Clinton Gerald Ford, Dick Cheney and many others, who systematically sexually brutalised her and her daughter for many years.

Mark Phillips has worked in these fields for many years, in fact most of his adult life; he states it is absolutely possible to have programmed Henry Paul to have actually hit the 13th pillar with precision without the need for remote control.

Personally having studied the remote control technology available to Intelligence, I am compelled to see it as the Modus Operandi for the crash, but I keep an open mind. To further re-enforce the remote aspect I will offer this:

Randulph Fiennes, famous for his Polar Expeditions, was an officer in the Royal Scots Greys and attached to the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a secret group of assassins called the clinic and how they murdered people while making it look like an accident. The death of Major Michael Marman is particularly relevant to what I would suggest happened in Paris. He was driving a Citroen “CV along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW coming the other way careered across the carriageway and killed him instantly. Fiennes says that the BMW had been tampered with and the braking system was operated by remote control which could override the normal system via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving cylinder hidden in the engine compartment. (This is why in the main they use Mercedes and BMW’s for death on the road; there is a lot of space within the engine compartment to add such things as cylinders and such). The remote control equipment was operated from a Volvo which followed the BMW, Fiennes reported. The BMW was driven by Sir Peter Horsley, a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash. Fiennes says that the Clinic knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as their target. In his Autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. You will note this is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it hit the 13th pillar, Horsley was desperately trying to maintain control, he went on:

“Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation mounted the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split second the drivers horror stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream.”

 

So we can see in this event, the brakes, acceleration and steering where acting under remote control.

Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The first thing is to name the ‘scapegoat’ or ‘patsy’. Then there are diversions galore created incorporating eye witness testimonies obviously because they have seen the light of day, but most importantly the tale they have pre-invented and made to seem reasonable in the planning. Once the initial reports have aired they have time then to either remove initial testimonies from the airwaves for good, or miss-use true testimonies to create false leads for investigators removing them from the line of truth.

In the first act of the play, they make an immediate arrest, or expose the person to blame, which cancels out further need for investigation, because we all know who is responsible?

The second act, diversion, ensures that in those critical hours and days after the event are wasted as people chase a mass of false leads and stories.

The next stage is, wait for the ‘Official investigation’. They have had the time to incorporate all that was picked up on, in the initial moments after the event, and to add them to the pre-planned version of events, and thus they give out the ‘Official version. This ‘Official version’ is then played like a mantra for months and months as they produce the evidence to fit with the ‘Official story. They then prevent via complete control at editor level anything other than the ‘Official version from seeing the light of day within the media and hey presto the event heads down in history as one of those mysteries.

After the murder of Diana it was made more difficult for the elite in the sense that they did not fully control ITV, and we had alternative points of view put out on the TV and then the media. They now stand in the position whereby they almost control all media and TV outlets in this nation, as they have accomplished in the USA completely.

With the most recent investigation carried out by former chief constable, Stevens, released in December 06, what baffles me is it claims to have interviewed 400 people!

What the hell were 400 people doing hanging around the Pont de L’Alma tunnel at 12.25 in the morning? There is nothing there save a maze of roads and tunnels and a couple of nearby restaurants. It is also strange that in the first couple of years after the event, there was never a mention of 400 witnesses, in fact to the contrary; there was a lack of credible witnesses. Although there did seem to be more than a believable amount of American so called witnesses. In the same way as 911 was cleared away so quickly, this scene of a major accident involving the most famous lady in the world was treated in less time than they clear up minor accidents in the UK! Of course this makes perfect sense when you consider as with 911, they were clearing up quick smart to prevent actual investigation into the incident. Everything relating to this murder stinks to high heaven.

Not only that, with the CCTV cameras being everywhere one would better accept this monumentus lie as possible had we witnessed the whole journey via the footage taken from these cameras. But of course when you are intelligence, controlling all personnel in all these organisations involved in the event, whichever city you may be in, you can get away with anything.

There are 17 cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de L’Alma tunnel, including those inside the tunnel itself. What kind of idiots do they take us for in having us believe that on that particular night in only that particular part of Paris, the cameras were switched off!! On that alone anyone who involves themselves with the findings of all the inquiries had so far, and agrees with the findings, is either in, or so dementedly stupid, it beggars belief.

The cameras are controlled by the police and are powered by an independent power supply, yet they will not explain why the cameras were off in that particular place and time on that particular night. Never before has this happened in Paris. A letter to the Daily Mail said the cameras in the tunnel were pointing towards the wall in the morning after the crash. Without a doubt the police would have noticed this interrupted view to their own cameras?

Worse than that, at the same time as the journey and crash, all the police communication frequencies in central Paris went off! Simon Reagan in his book, Who Killed Diana, quotes a contact called Andre, who like many people enjoys listening to police radio messages. Andre was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from the tunnel, on the night Diana died. He was as is usual for him, using a receiver to monitor the police communications. But suddenly at 12.20am, all the lines went down. There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then, Andre said, the signal came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once.

When the lines went down at 12.20am Diana was leaving the Ritz!

 

By the time they came back on Diana was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the Emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few minutes of clinical death. So at this point in the expose, according to the Stevens report, there is not a shred of evidence that there is a conspiracy surrounding the death of Diana, the true Queen of the peoples hearts, bollocks.

Now we enter another vital point. According to a source from within British intelligence, causing the crash is easy for the powers involved, but of course you cannot be sure you will kill your target. Therefore you have your people controlling the medical team, because although your target hasn’t yet died, there is now a credible reason for them to do so. This I can vouch for. The first time this was attempted was against my wife, and involved the traveller I spoke about in an earlier phase. My wife was enticed to go to the girlfriend of this chap’s brother’s house.. They tried to poison my wife in order they could call an ambulance, which was manned by local satanic operatives. This failed. This was to be attempted again while we lived in my current area of Spring Hill. This time they had set one of the local operatives to petrol bomb my house, this was with all my children present in the house, again they would finish the job with the ambulance operatives. Remember also certain members of the police were involved in this.

I hope this helps you to understand that what I write about in this work relevant to the operations and methods of intelligence via their underworld networks, I have gained through extreme experience.

So the medical team’s job is to ensure the target does not survive, no matter what condition they are in after the incident. Even those who dismiss the idea Diana was murdered, question the astonishing delay in getting her to hospital, when according to the ‘Official’ medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery. The Doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and that this was filling her lungs with blood. So what they are saying here is that Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death, if that is correct, the only way to save her life would be with immediate surgery. So why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at hospital?

Doctor Frederic Mailliez with an American ‘friend’ Mark Butt drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private investigator has and is making extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt, so far his findings strongly suggest there is more to this pair than the elite would want you to know. The crash happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive, and had also rang the emergency services. This chap must be as fast as superman! He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU the French emergency ambulance service. And yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says all he had in his car to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU emergency team arrived to take over. He claims that Diana did not say anything to him, but this contradicts his comments to the London Times when he said she kept saying how much “she hurt” as he put a resuscitation mask over her mouth. Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also says he has flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of the car: “first it’s a groan, then Dodi’s name was called…And that can only be Princess Diana’s voice”, he told the Daily Mirror.

What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious when Mailliez arrived. He told the CNN chat show host, Larry King, that, “she looked pretty fine. But inside you know, the internal injury was already starting… its really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only part, which was still intact.” eh?

Mailliez on the one hand told a French medical magazine that; “I thought her life could be saved”, and yet said another time that “it was hopeless there was nothing we could do to save her.”  He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed lady in the world, and, that the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel, he had no idea that she was the Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning. What kind of an idiot is this man, more to the point how stupid does he think you are? When the emergency team arrived, Mailliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do. Confused, me too…

The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage. This is complete and utter bullshit. One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi knocked out, but conscious… she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured “Oh my God” several times.” The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on September 11th 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up. Another excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion. This again is a lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would not know the victims blood type. When the ambulance did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles to the La Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate interventions’, one of them within sight of the hospital.

Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.10am, an hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened. By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay is completely ludicrous, of course ludicrous unless it was supposed to be this way because they were performing horrendous occult practices. It doesn’t take a genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been NO inquiry into the medical response that night, the answer in Stevens report stating they could not go at speed because of her injury, is absolute nonsense, 1 hour and 45 minutes?

Waiting at the hospital was a surgical team headed by Professor Brumo Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are told, first heard about the crash while doing his rounds, is that not a strange enough sentence, a renowned surgeon doing his rounds in the early hours of the morning? Never! Waiting with him when Diana arrived was professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart specialist, and professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told they opened Diana’s chest cavity, repaired the vein, and battled to save her for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. This is remarkable because the autopsy report shows Diana was clinically dead at 12.45am while still lying in the tunnel. She was therefore clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having the body examined at a location you control is vital in such assassinations. This similar game was played with JFK

So who was behind Diana’s assassination? Well of course those who gave the order and those who carried out the deed would be rather different. We are looking at the Illuminati here, a spider’s web, and while the order will have come from the spider or spiders in the centre, it in the main would have been carried out by flies. It is highly unlikely it would have been carried out by British intelligence directly, because of course that would be too obvious. Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put them at arms length from the incident and allow them to plausibly deny that they were responsible. Not only that, the nationality of the victim’s intelligence agency can be seen to be acting to find out who was responsible.

For instance, there is considerable evidence to show JFK was shot by members of an elite rifle team within the French intelligence called OAS, along with Israeli Mossad. Olof Palme, the Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the orders of among others, Father George Bush. The killing itself was carried out by members of BOSS, the South African intelligence agency.

I had members of BOSS around me late 1990’s, I wonder why? They continued to try and keep contact with me up to 2005. The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13, more than that British intelligence has a very long history of political and economic assassinations. British intelligence consists of MI5 – Military Intelligence Five, which is responsible officially for domestic intelligence security and MI6 which deals with overseas matters. MI5 announced in 1998 that they do not assassinate people. No they hire other branches of the intelligence family to do it. This rather weak denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MI5 agent, David Shayler, who stated MI6 had organised a plot to assassinate Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi. The attempt had failed because the bomb had been put under the wrong car. Shayler was head of the ‘Libyan Desk’ at MI5 and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the then Foreign Secretary, stated, he had been assured that no such event took place. The Attorney General banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana – Secrets of the crash.

We can look at the most likely organisation to have been involved in the Death of Diana at operational level. A secret group called the ‘Pinay Circle or Le Cercle’ which has among its ranks a number of British establishment figures. Le Cercle is an offshoot of the even more elite ‘Safari Club’, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the director during the 1970’s of the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage. It was the Safari Club that arranged  for the alliance between a French intelligence front-company called ‘Group Bull’ and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be surprised to know, the worlds biggest manufacturer of landmines. This alliance supplied landmines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a consortium of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in the arms trade and supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cercle, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who attended the first Bilderberg meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cercle included the Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le Cercle membership has included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at MI6; William Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence; Stefano Della Chiaie, leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti, the former Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the man who gave the Mafia ‘Official Protection’; Silva Munoz, a former Minister for the fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the elite secret society, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German Defence Minister; and Monsignor Brunello, and agent to the Vatican. In America, one of the Le Cercle fronts is the CIA – backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Just look at the potential for such an organisation to be the co-ordinating force between countless different agencies and countries, all aiming to a common operation. The Safari Club – Le Cercle network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary to arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn, the assassination to be carried out, and most importantly, those involved to get away with it. So when you look again at the statement of outer initiate John Stalker, and his comment “why would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?” the answer is quite simple, because of Illuminated elite level interconnection via organisations such as the Safari Club and Le Cercle! Simon Regan in his book, who killed Diana?, says that it was Le Cercle that destabalised the Gough Whitlam government in Australia in 1975, and as already stated the Queen of England was involved in this too, via her control of her Governor of Australia, Philip Kerr, who removed Whitlam. If the Crown through the Windsor’s and Le Cercle worked together to bring down an elected Australian government, it’s a fact they would work together to eliminate Diana the peoples Princess?

When you study the history of assassination, Paris comes up as one of the major cities for assassination going back centuries. Amschel Rothschild from the English branch of the family was murdered there in 1996 in what many claim to have been part of an inter-Illuminati war which litters the history of the Illuminati. For an organisation like Le Cercle, or its many mirrors in London, it would have been very easy to place its people in the right places. Mohamed Al Fayed’s security operation is full of ex British elite military and police units, who know the consequences of saying NO. Remember all these operatives belong to the crown and certainly not to whichever individual company or organisation that would be foolish enough to hire them. To do so places a spy of the Crown directly into your company in which ever position you hire them. There will always be the exception, but for those who join the Field Lodges, the Oath continues into Civy Street.

If we look at Al Fayed’s personal investigation into Diana and Dodi’s death we find it was headed by Pierre Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department of French police. This is the same organisation that is also responsible for the ‘Official Investigation’. Al Fayed’s chief lawyer in Paris is a former French Justice Minister, and in overall charge in London at the time was John Macnamara, his head of security and former Chief-Superintendent at the headquarters of London’s Metropolitan police, Scotland Yard. In the spring of 1998, Macnamara was part of a sting operation involving the FBI, CIA and possibly the Israeli (Rothschild) intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67 year old American born in Austria. Le Winter contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of MI6 and the CIA in the murder of Diana. He was asking $10 million and after meeting with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15.000. A further meeting was arranged in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed over. In the meantime however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA. Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on Wednesday April 22nd, where with support from the Austrian police a combination of FBI, CIA and Mossad agents pounced on him.

If Al Fayed was the grieving father, why would he ensure the man who would give him the proof he required, was offered up to his enemies?

If Le Winter was offering a hoax, why would so many agencies spend so much money, time and effort, to prevent him leaking information that was as they put it, a lie? When this would prove that MI6 was not involved to many people?

This story would have remained a secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the ‘Kurier’ newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le Winters hotel room was searched, four documents two of them in code were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents. The CIA has since admitted tapping Diana’s phone calls in, and to America and passing the contents to British Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Grolig’s story forced Al Fayed to admit that it was true. Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident. Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s MI6, gave evidence to the French enquiry into Diana’s death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the official secrets act for trying to sell his memoirs. In 1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British government who were concerned at his association in that city with MI5 whistleblower, David Shayler, (now a fruitcake) who was also arrested and jailed in Paris. Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the ‘inquiry’, that Diana was murdered. According to a report on the BBC’s news service, Ceefax, on August 29th 1998, he told the judge that Henry Paul was an asset of British Intelligence and so was one of the bodyguards, which one was not named. So with all this information given to the inquiry Here, Stephan an Illuminati placeman concluded, ‘it was an accident.

In the words of the Roman writer Seneca :

“He who most benefits from the crime is the one most likely to have committed it”.

For sure the Windsor’s as a family benefited the most. No longer is there an inside threat to their secrets and actions.

No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the Monarchy as a credible force able to own and influence the path of this nation.

No longer is she there to influence in the upbringing of her sons William and Harry. The Windsor’s have full and total control in the moulding of these two Princes, giving total ability to form them into their own sick image.

It paved the way for Charles to marry Camilla

Of course the House of Windsor is just a public face of a much larger power structure, ‘The Crown Temple.’ Which no longer has Diana demolishing there secret holocaust against the populations of the world with landmines, as she certainly would not have stopped there. The Roman Illuminati Church and its subordinate, the Knights Templar Church, benefited at the highest possible level on all levels down, save the fact that now we all know what the Crown is. This is the sacrifice of Princess Diana; only because of her death have many of you the masses, allowed yourselves to look at what is termed ‘conspiracy theory’. There is no theory about the overall conspiracy, it is FACT.

Part II

Related Links:

  • GOODINFO

 

Pages: 1 2

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=17175

About these ads

One response to “In Profile : Princess Diana, the Whole Story

  1. http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=17175

    VIDEO FROM USA TV! FRENCH FIREFIGHTER NEW WITNESS STEPPED UP……BLEW SOME LIES AWAY……………….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s