Here They Come, Right on Time: Third World “Climate Change” Refugees

Here They Come, Right on Time: Third World “Climate Change” Refugees
Like clockwork, they have emerged from the wood: the first of what promises to be an ever increasing wave of Third World “climate change” refugees seeking asylum in the First World.

The inhabitants of some islands in east Papua New Guinea have appealed for “funds to enable them to flee” and have expressed the hope that “decisions made by leaders at the forthcoming climate change negotiations in Copenhagen will offer them hope,” according to the Environment Times news outlet.

The implication of the appeal is that the industrialised world is somehow responsible for “global warming” and that these nations are therefore obliged to take in yet another wave of “refugees” under the excuse of “climate change.”

According to the Environment Times, the relocation effort is headed by Ursula Rakova, a Papua New Guinea islander who quit a job with Oxfam in Bougainville three years ago to set up Tulele Peisa, an organisation that “raises money and campaigns for social justice on behalf of her people.”

Ms Rakova told an audience in Melbourne, Australia: “We have a feeling of anxiety, a feeling of uncertainty because we know that we will be losing our homes. It is our identity. It is our whole culture at stake.”

There is however no firm evidence that the land to which she refers, the Carteret Islands, are being affected by “climate change.” At the best of times, these islands are no more than four or five feet above sea level and are thus always prone to tidal movements.

Even the Environment Times, which is slavishly pro-“climate change,” is forced to admit in its coverage of the “asylum” claim that “Probabaly (sic) due to climate change, the Carteret Islands in north east Papua New Guinea are being submerged by the sea. However, another suggestion is that tectonic movement may be causing the gradual subsidence of the atoll.

“Historically other populated islands, for example Tuanaki in the Cook Islands, are known to have sunk entirely and relatively suddenly from causes that might be unrelated to rising sea levels.”

Nonetheless, the Environment Times continues to say that, “As a result, the people that live on these tiny atoll islands have unwillingly found themselves on the front line of climate change and dependent upon the success or failure of the UN’s climate negotiations in Copenhagen.”

The article goes on to point out that “one problem making their plight all the more pressing is the fact the 1951 Geneva Convention, does not protect environmental refugees, such as those displaced by climate change.

“Sadly, this technicality means that communities such as the Carteret’s cannot, as yet, be granted refugee status under the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and they have subsequently found themselves excluded from the international community’s social welfare, protection and asylum systems.”

In other words, the push will now be on to create a new category of “climate change refugees” which will be yet another channel through which the overpopulated Third World will be able to invade Europe and other First World nations.

As the Environment Times article concludes: “With many millions predicted to be displaced by climate change, supporters of the Islanders have highlighted that the world needs to establish fair, realistic and funded policies which recognise that many of those most affected by climate change include those least able to fund adaptation and those least responsible for humanity’s production of greenhouse gases. Tulele Peisa believe they should not need to sail the waves alone and calls on the leaders of the world to provide moral and political leadership in Copenhagen.”

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/12/here-they-come-right-on-time-third-world-%e2%80%9cclimate-change%e2%80%9d-refugees/ IMAGINE THESE WALKING DOWN OUR STREETS SPEARS N ALL!

SO TRANSPARENT…..GET YOUR FAMILY PREPARED FOR HANDING OVER ALL YOUR CASH….AFTER ALL MONEY WILL STOP CLIMATE CHANGE COMRADE BROWNSKI SAYS’ THE DEBATE IS ENDED……………………LAWFUL REBELLION HASN’T EVEN STARTED YET COMRADE!!

BRITISH JOBS FOR FOREIGNERS!

British Jobs for Foreign Workers: Another 80 Illegals Found at London Olympic Site
Yet another 80 illegals have been detained for working at the London Olympic site — despite promises from the Government that the work would boost jobs for British workers.

Many of the latest arrests are of illegal migrants using stolen passports, according to media reports. Others were “asylum seekers” who are officially banned from working as they receive taxpayer-funded cash handouts and benefits.

Yet more were visitors who had entered Britain as tourists. As such they would have been unable to produce any sort of valid documentation giving them the right to work in Britain. Either the Olympic site authorities do not check a thing or there is some underhand work afoot.

The largest number of illegals were from India, whose nationals accounted for 32 of the total. There were 12 Nigerians, seven Ukrainians, four Brazilians, four Kosovans, three Moldovans, and two each from Sierra Leone, Albania and Zimbabwe. The remainder were described as ‘others’.

Officials found workers using the genuine passports of others which were either stolen or borrowed. Some were caught with fake UK visas or had substituted pages in their passports.

When added to statistics of arrests in previous years, the latest set of detentions raises to over 200 the total number of illegals uncovered working at the site since its launch.

In 2006 the Serious Organised Crime Agency warned that up to 50,000 illegal immigrants could be smuggled into Britain through eastern Europe to work on the 2012 Olympic site.

Soca told the Olympic Delivery Authority it needed to be prepared for an epidemic of illegals being brought in by gangsters. FABIAN GOVERNMENT THAT REFERS TO!

Officers said the main routes into the UK would be through eastern Europe, which criminal overlords consider the easiest way into the EU.

House of Treason Passes Anti-White “Equality Bill”

The House of Commons has passed the “Equality Act” which will legally entrench anti-white discrimination in Britain. The law was passed by 338 votes to eight — which means that the majority of Tories in the House supported the bill.

The law, which will now go before the House of Lords, will legally empower all government bodies and private companies to employ less-qualified non-whites over whites.

While this policy will not be legally obligatory for private companies, it will no doubt become the standard for government institutions. Private companies which employ more than 250 workers will however be obliged to publish employment data so that the Government can monitor how “diverse” their workforce is.

Government bodies and companies will be allowed to give preference in employment to candidates who have a “protective characteristic” (i.e. are not white males) over white males in all cases.

The law states that if, by 2013, “sufficient progress” has not been made by private companies in enforcing the anti-white measures, legal requirements will be put in place to force them to do so. This is nothing but blackmail designed to force private companies to adopt this anti-white policy.

In addition to these measures, the law will also prohibit political parties from restricting membership on racial grounds for any reason whatsoever. It is this law which is being used to force the British National Party to change its membership criteria and constitution.

The law does, of course, make an exception for the Government’s darling Muslim community, and has a special clause in its gender equality section which gives “religious bodies” exemption from the rule outlawing discrimination on the basis of sex.

Conveniently, this allows Muslims to continue to segregate women in their mosques — while at the same time the law makes it illegal for any other private club to discriminate in any way.

The law will also allow political parties to use what it calls “positive action” (which is code for anti-white discrimination) to force non-white candidates onto local constituency organisations.

Prior to this law, a white candidate pushed aside for a non-white interloper might well have had legal recourse to assert his or her position. This law makes such a move impossible.

Tory shadow work and pensions secretary Theresa May said the Conservative Party “backed most of the Bill” but had concerns over some aspects of it.

The parts to which the Tories objected were, she said, the “failure to tackle all the issues that caused inequality, the failure to improve educational outcomes or tackle family breakdown.”

Furthermore, Mrs May said, the real problem with the bill is that it “needs to contain real action to actually clamp down on discrimination, rather than exercises in box-ticking without proper enforcement.”

In other words, the Tories have absolutely no objection to the vicious anti-white aspects of the legislation. On the contrary, they endorse and support them.

Apart from its overt anti-white measures, the bill also has implications for businesses across the board. According to Nick Starling, the ABI’s director of general insurance and health, the “outlawing the use of age” as an insurance consideration will “lead to higher insurance costs for all customers, as insurers would have insufficient information to fully assess the risk, and less choice for consumers.”

FABIAN TEXT OF OLD WANTS VEGITARIANISM IMPLEMENTED….I’M A VEGGIE HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS’ THAT WAS MY CHOICE- NOT A FABIAN FASCIST ORDER-HITLER WAS A VEGGIE ANOTHER NAZI POLICY EH BROWNSKI?

Copenhagen Countdown: Hey Paul, there are families in Liverpool that don’t eat meat for a week!
“Telling impressionable young schoolchildren that unless they stop eating meat, polar bears are going to drown, is irresponsible at best and psychological child abuse at worse,” Nick Griffin told journalists as he left a hearing in the European Parliament’s plenary chamber addressed by Sir Paul McCartney.

“When young girls are already susceptible to eating disorders because of the popular press’s infatuation with ‘looking slim’, it’s cavalier to say the least, to put further stipulations on what they should eat.”

The British National Party MEP for the North West of England was unhappy that McCartney was allowed to push his “Less Meat=Less Heat” line without taking any questions.

“His hypothesis is based on information out of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. The credibility of this research is now being questioned by academics after accusations that data has been massaged to support the case for man-made climate change,” he said.

“Sir Paul McCartney and his ilk are out of touch with reality. This morning he called for people to stop eating meat for just one day. Maybe he isn’t aware that there are families in his former home town of Liverpool that go for weeks without eating meat simply because they can’t afford it.

“And that’s because the climate change lobby is implementing measures that are pushing up the price of food. Across America nearly a third of agricultural land is now given over to producing biofuels – these fields should be growing crops and grazing cattle to help feed the people of our planet.”

2010 WILL SEE MASSIVE RISES IN FOOD PRICES- NOW HOW DO I KNOW THAT- BUY WAIT AND SEE!

HE LIED OVER YUGOSLAVIA -LIED OVER AFGHANISTAN SO WHY THE SUPRISE HE LIED OVER IRAQ—BUT HE’S EARNED £14 MILLION SINCE 2007 THATS’ ALRIGHT THEN FABIANS LOVE MONEY—OURS!

Tony Blair Lied Over Iraq, says Labour’s Defence Minister Bob Ainsworth
Tony Blair lied over the reasons for the Iraq War, Labour Party Defence Minister Bob Ainsworth told a public meeting at Aldermoor Farm Primary School in Coventry last night.

Mr Ainsworth made the startling confession after being confronted at the meeting by BNP official and Coventry North East parliamentary candidate, Tom Gower.

Mr Gower used the public meeting to ask Mr Ainsworth, who became Secretary of State for Defence in June this year, “Now that it has been proven that there were never any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, do you accept that you and the whole of your wretched party are nothing but war criminals and have the blood of hundreds of British soldiers on your hands?”

Mr Ainsworth, clearly taken aback at the question, then told the public gathering that the reason why his party sent so many British soldiers to their deaths was because they were “fed lies by Tony Blair.”

Mr Ainsworth’s remarks will come as a huge embarrassment for the Labour Party, which has so far stuck by Mr Blair and even tried to get him elected as president of the European Union.

The public accusation by a cabinet minister that Mr Blair lied to the country and the world over the reasons for the Iraq war will no doubt cause more than a ripple through the labour Party and could even impact upon Mr Ainsworth’s future career.

The visibly shocked audience were then further amazed when Mr Ainsworth pleaded innocence by claiming that he did not know the truth because he “is an ordinary man from a council estate in Coventry. I don’t sit in ivory towers,” Mr Ainsworth said, adding that he was “sorry” about the deaths of the British soldiers in that illegal war.

Mr Gower said even he, as a firm opponent of the Labour Party and their illegal war, was taken aback at Mr Ainsworth’s remarks. “Why on earth do we have this man as our Defence Secretary?” Mr Gower asked.

“This is a man who uses his council estate roots as an excuse to send hundreds of soldiers to their deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan. To make matters worse, when I pressed him about defence cuts, Mr Ainsworth completely ignored the issue and just went on with the next question.”

* Mr Gower also asked Mr Ainsworth if he thought it was “fair that we’re being dictated to by unelected bureaucrats” in Brussels. Mr Ainsworth replied that he fully supported the EU and claimed that Britain could not survive without it.

Mr Gower also grilled Mr Ainsworth on the issue of uncontrolled immigration. “How do you feel about the projections that the population of Britain is set to reach 70 million by the year 2030? Do you think this is ludicrous considering Britain is the third most overpopulated country in the world and the most overcrowded country in Europe?” he asked.

At this point Mr Gower got cheers of support from the audience. Embarrassed and clearly shaken by these projections, Mr Ainsworth stated he was happy that the population is growing, provided living conditions remain the same and that he has met many immigrants who are from war-torn countries who would rather set fire to themselves then go back to their homelands.

Mr Gower then asked, “Surely all the different countries they’ve come through to get to Britain are safe enough. Will you admit these people are only coming here to take advantage of soft touch Britain, with our free NHS and liberal benefits systems?”

Mr Ainsworth replied that he was so proud that these people are coming to Britain and refused to discuss the matter any further.

Total cost for having Bob Ainsworth as a Labour puppet and scapegoat:

Salary: £104,050

Total second home claims

2004-05: £19,275

2005-06: £18,911

2006-07: £18,878

2007-08: £23,083

Total cost to have Bob Ainsworth humiliated in front of his constituents:

03rd Dec 2009: Priceless

http://bnp.org.uk/