UN´s Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change: Communist World Government without Steaks and Global Unity Religion without God
Print Post
Posted by Anders under English, Euromed
Summary: The UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on 7th-13th December is only a make-believe climate matter, although the EU is considering the introduction of CO2 taxes in addition to the farce of the CO2 emission trading at the London Climate Exchange (ECX). It is about agreeing a framework for a world government, as the UN Secretary General clearly says. To this end the Dalai Lama’s disciple in the World Commission on Global Consciousness and Spirituality, Al Gore, is unfolding training programs for the gullible leaders of major religions. First they will quarrel externally on redistributing wealth of more than 100 billion. euros. Prior secret meetings are taking place between ministers at regular intervals (just as the Danish Parliament did when debating the Lisbon Treaty in order to cheat us of a referendum). The mendacious political – not scientific – NGO, the IPCC, is to outline the CO2 policy. Especially Africans, who have very small CO2 emissions, must have the reallocated money for allegedly becoming “climate refugees”. Westerners have to become vegetarians, says Lord Stern, former chief economist of the World Bank and a Fabian socialist. For after Copenhagen, meat wil become so expensive that it can not be bought. Reason: Animals emit too much methane! And that´s the new gospel from Al Gore, who states that CO2 is inly responsibele for 40% of global warming – much to the annoyance of tax-hungry globalists
The New World Order program for the 21st century is called the “Agenda 21″. It is described as the most radical transformation the world has seen. It is sustainable (Communist), inclusive, consensus-based (anti-democratic), will redistribute wealth globally (CO2 taxes, since it connects environment and economy), partnership, banishes large areas from human activity, lumps us together in small areas along motorways and railways in skyscrapers in order to monitor people, kidnaps a generation of children to indoctrinate them into the sustainability religion (environmental Communism). Every country is to be disarmed and there will be a standing UN army to crush rebellions, a global central bank and a one world currency. Democracy and freedom already belong to the past. The illuminist, CFR member George Soros, now demands UN world government afte Communist Chinese model.
The UN Copenhagen Climate Change conference has above all a political aim: world government. The Wall Street Journal 28 Oct. 2009: The developed countries will send a flow of money to the LDCs via the UN – a 2 % tax being levied on financial transactions… This (climate) treaty appears to have been subject to unusual attempts to conceal its convoluted contents. And …there are plenty of draft clauses described as “alternatives” and “options” that should raise the ire of free and democratic countries concerned about preserving their sovereignty.
Lord Christopher Monckton only became aware of the extraordinary powers to be vested in this new world government when a friend found an obscure U.N. Web site with a document that was labelled a “Note by the Secretariat.” The illuminist, CFR member George Soros, now demands UN world government afte Communist Chinese model.
But in order to achieve this goal, an appeal to the religions of the world is held necessary by the Luciferian climate religion pope, Al Gore, to become the world´s first CO2–billionaire through his own CO2–policies.
The Guardian 2 Nov. 2009: Al Gore: “I’ve done a Christian [-based] training program; I have a Muslim training program and a Jewish training program coming up, also a Hindu program coming up. I trained 200 Christian ministers and lay leaders here in Nashville in a version of the slide show that is filled with scriptural references. And then he keeps silent about him being Dalai Lama´s disciple in the
THE WORLD COMMISSION ON GLOBAL CONSCIOUSNESS & SPIRITUALITY/ Global Council on Spiritual Politics & Global Citizenship , where he is in the company of one of the authors of his bible, the , Earth Charter, viz. Mikhael Gorbachev. However, the CO2-faith is now scuppered by – Al Gore, who states that CO2 is only responsible for 40% of global warming. So what is the rationale of CO2-taxation? Nevertheless, A British judge has just made CO2–faith comparable with religion!
Behind the world communist idea of redistribution through climate tax stands Rockefellers Club of Rome. Edmund de Rothschild (from 28:40 min.) in 1987 enriched the plan through the CO2–scam. “It is about money,” as he says on this video. In the UK average housholds will be loaded with 541 pounds a year due to EU´s CO2–tax – and this is just the beginning!! That is the real agenda. The climate change is the biggest lie and scientific scandal and here in history. UN´s secretary general confirms the plan with unusual clarity.
But the real aim of the climate scam is to create the framework of world govenment through the UN, without which – so they try to scare us – the end of the world in global warming is certain within the near future!
New World Order Climate policy is just – conspiracy and lie. Here is how it is knitted together
COP15 UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen 7-18 Dec. 2009: “Ministers from more than 20 countries gathered in the summer of 2005 in Greenland in order to see with their own eyes some of the consequences of climate change.” Comment: This political tourism goes to the Jakobshavn glacier melting because of a change of direction of the Irminger Stream – a branch of the Gulf Stream. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the non-existing global warming.
“At the same time the meeting was supposed to provide a haven for the politicians to talk to one another without restrictions. Accordingly a code of conduct was put forward: there were to be no consultation documents, no press, only one official per minister, no conclusions were to be made on anything, and subsequently nothing of what the participants had said was to be reported.
This haven for dialogue was a success, and therefore it has been followed by similar dialogue meetings in South Africa in 2006, in Sweden in 2007 and in Argentina in 2008.
Star Tribune. com. 16. Oct. 2009 On Friday, the National Weather Service confirmed that there has never been a colder first two weeks of the month of October. It breaks the old mark of 52 degrees set back in 1875.
The road to Copenhagen as seen from Colorado in early Oct. 2009.
Excerpts from The Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Draft
37. National inventories shall be:
(a) Undertaken in accordance with the latest agreed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
Page 122, item 17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.
The Times 27 Oct. 2009 People will need to turn vegetarian if the world is to conquer climate change,
according to a leading authority on global warming. In an interview with The Times, Lord Stern of Brentford said: “Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases.”
Direct emissions of methane from cows and pigs is a significant source of greenhouse gases. Lord Stern, the author of the influential 2006 Stern Review on the cost of tackling global warming, said that a successful deal at the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December would lead to soaring costs for meat and other foods that generate large quantities of greenhouse gases. He predicted that people’s attitudes would evolve until meat eating became unacceptable. Lord Stern is a former chief economist of the World Bank and now I. G. Patel Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics (i.e. fabian-socialist). UN figures suggest that meat production is responsible for about 18 per cent of global carbon emissions.
See this eyeopening video with Lord Christopher Monckton, who has mathematically clear proved the global warming swindle in a speech to the House of Lords. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon agrees: The New York Times 25 Oct, 2009: A deal must include an equitable global governance structure.
No World System 20 Oct. 2009: Lord Christopher Monckton, the man who warned many this week of the treaty, appeared on the Glenn Beck radio program, he makes it clear that the treaty will create a World Government Dictatorship that will have complete authority over all nations by intervening in the economies and environment of any individual country in the world without consent. The treaty will also allow the distribution of wealth from developed countries like the U.S. to Third World Countries like Africa. America is already under the thumb of World Government in more ways than one. To understand what is about to take place in America we have to understand what Agenda 21 is, it’s the blueprint for the New World Order agenda for the 21st century.
Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment take place.
You can read the entire UN document here.
Excerpt: “Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced, a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into
individual and collective decision-making at every level.”
Agenda 21: “The Land of the Free”: Red zones are not for ordinary human activity. Yellow zones for highly regulated use.
Here is a further excerpt: In this UN Environment programme is stated: 2.1. In order to meet the challenges of environment and development, States decided to establish a new global partnership.This partnership commits all States to engage in a continuous and constructive dialogue, inspired by the need to achieve a more efficient and equitable world economy, keeping in view the increasing interdependence of the community of nations, and that sustainable development should become a priority item on the agenda of the international community. It is recognized that, for the success of this new partnership, it is important to overcome confrontation and to foster a climate of genuine cooperation and solidarity. It is equally important to strengthen national and international policies and multinational cooperation to adapt to the new realities.
2.4. Governments recognize that there is a new global effort to relate the elements of the international economic system and mankind’s need for a safe and stable natural environment. in consensus.
Comment: No discussion! Robotlike discipline! The bold words give the programme of this communist New World Order agenda: Mandatory redistribution of wealth in forced concensus in the name of environmental necessity.
Here is a terrible video on the UN´s agenda 21, which has previously been decribed on this blog. It is the Brave New World Oder, to abolish private property, family, national borders and souvereigntyas well as to introduce restrictions on mobility. You are guilty until proven otherwise. People will be concentrated on small spots along railway tracks and highways in skyscrapers. Children are educated by the state to the sustainability religion (Earth Charter as the “10 Commandments of our time”– Gorbachev). A generation are stolen to be indoctrinated. What is right is decided by consensus – not by mathematics.
Left: The agenda 21 has occupied the island where I live
Here is another video on the one world government. Its no longer a conspiracy theory – but practice being established. In “Our Global Neighbourhood” it becomes reality: A Global standing army under the UN secr. gen, economic security council with WTO and IMF, a world wide currency. Agenda 21 has been signed by more than 100 heads of state. Global Biodiversity Assessment: Protected areas: 382 wilderness areas aruund the world are the core wilderness areas. 50% of Americans are to be given over to off-limit wildland – connected by wildland corridors and surrounded by buffer zones with limited human activity. Humans are to be resettled in “sustainable” communities. Governmental ecosystem is to be enforced.
Government propaganda methods
The Daily Mail 21 Oct. 2009: The Advertising Standards Authority is to probe a controversial Government climate change TV advert which featured a drowning puppy and rabbits dying of thirst.The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) launched the commercial as part of its Act on CO2 campaign.
The campaign, in the form of a bedtime story, begins with a father reading to his daughter but turns into a terrifying account of the impact of climate change. The father is seen explaining that scientists say the strange weather ‘was being caused by too much CO2, which went up into the sky when grown-ups used energy’. He is heard adding that ’some places could even disappear under the sea’ adding that ‘children would have to live with the horrible consequences’.
EurActiv 18 Sept, 2009: “All countries, except the least developed, should contribute,” the statement said, “with finance allocated according to need so that developing countries receive more than they are contributing”. The European Commission estimates that total funding to help developing nations “could amount to about EUR 100 billion annually by 2020″ (EurActiv 11/09/09). However developing countries feel upwind and demand 700bn dollars! France and Germany will tax goods from countries who do not join the the Copenhagen Conference goals.
Comment
…concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.” This is the recipe of total control of the individual in the name of the climate religion – but really by the illuminist bankers and their corporations. This is total loss of freedom. They try to make us believe that we owe the LDCs an insignificant CO2–debt, as we were previously told we owed them for the colonial days (without the LDCs would still have been at the stone age stage).
Angela Merkel seems be the one to scupper the Copenhagen New World Order hoax – something which really worries the bilderberg globalist José Barroso, as he said before his masters, the Council on Foreign Relations.
The Copenhagen Conference is not about saving the planet from climate disaster. It is about the Idea, which Karl Marx according to Friedrich Engels had from the French Revolution illuminist, Babeuf, who had his sick revolutionary ideas from Adam Weishaupt´s 6 point programme.
The agenda 21 is clearly aiming at enslaving mankind, concentrating them on small areas and and taking away the reward of the diligent and wise to give it to the bankers – and a little bit to the unwise and lazy. They will rule by “consensus” and disarm all coutries and leave it to a world army to rule the world along communist principles and here
The redistribution of wealth is to take place through the CO2–tolls, traded at London´s ECX Climate Exchange – Rockefeller, Rothschild and Al Gore being the kingpins hoping to soon be able to enrich themselves even more at the Chicago Climate Exchange. Furthermore through planned CO2–taxes and here, and here – as Daniel Estulin learned at the Bilderberg-meeting in 2005.
link also in comment section easier access to links provided by Anders.
http://euro-med.dk/?p=11495
8 responses so far ↓
centurean2 // November 8, 2009 at 11:35 am |
http://euro-med.dk/?p=11495
centurean2 // November 8, 2009 at 11:39 am |
Humanity Needs A Universal Carbon Tax
Posted by Eberhard Rhein on 24/09/09
Tags: C02 emissions, Carbon Tax, Copenhagen Climate Conference, Michel Rocard, ossil energy tax, Pittsburgh G20
Whatever the outcome of the Copenhagen Climate Conference, humanity will need a simple and effective tool for making fossil energy increasingly more expensive and renewable energies relatively cheaper.
An excise tax on coal, oil and gas would constitute such a tool.
• The tax should be specific and not ad valorem, levied at the import or the production stage.
• It should reflect the C02 contents of these three fossil energies. Thus it would have to be highest on coal and lowest on gas.
• It should be introduced at low rates to start with, say no more than € 10 per ton of C02, corresponding to about five cent per litre gasoline, but rise automatically, say every two years, to attain at least € 40 in 2030 and € 60 – 100 in 2050. This progression is extremely important in order to send the right signals to investors and users of fossil energy: prepare for a continuous price rise of fossil energies and invest in energy efficiency and renewable energies.
For all countries involved in international trade fossil fuel taxation would have to be mandatory; and they should apply roughly the same rates, independent of their level of development in order to put all economic operators on the same competitive footing.
The least developed countries with per capita C02 emissions of less than 1.5 ton and minimal international merchandise trade might obtain derogation for the first 20 years.
continues below
http://rhein.blogactiv.eu/2009/09/24/humanity-needs-a-universal-carbon-tax/
centurean2 // November 8, 2009 at 11:42 am |
TAX-TAX-AND TAX…
EU mulls carbon tax to fight climate change
http://www.chinaview.cn 2009-10-03 06:45:59 Print
GOTHENBURG, Sweden, Oct. 2 (Xinhua) — European Union (EU) finance ministers on Friday discussed the idea of introducing a carbon tax across the 27-nation bloc as a way to help fight climate change.
“Today, there were few reactions, but all the reactions were positive,” Laszlo Kovacs, EU Commissioner for Taxation and Customs Union, told reporters after presenting the idea to EU finance ministers at an informal meeting in the Swedish port city of Gothenburg.
Swedish Finance Minister Anders Borg, whose country holds the EU rotating presidency, said there had been a constructive exchange of views and that the European Commission was encouraged to make a formal proposal, possibly next year.
He said a number of ministers welcomed the idea of introducing a carbon tax to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from sectors outside the EU Emission Trading Scheme.
The EU currently runs the world’s largest Emission Trading Scheme, which imposes emission caps on certain EU industries, including power generators and some heavy industrial plants, and requires them to buy extra permit if they want to emit more.
The new carbon tax is likely to be applied to transport, agriculture, forestry, households and others.
In fact, several EU member states have already introduced such tax on national basis.
Borg said Sweden’s carbon tax had proved “very successful” since it was introduced at the start of the 1990s.
Denmark, Finland and Slovenia also have taxes on household carbon emissions resulting from heating and electricity use. France is planning to introduce a carbon tax on gasoline or diesel fuel for cars next year, hoping it can bring more revenue for the government.
But Kovacs admitted it would not be easy to reach a deal since taxation is reserved for national sovereignty under EU rules and any change requires unanimity among 27 member states.
“Introducing a new tax in the EU has never been easy, and particularly it is not easy in the time of a financial and economic crisis,” he said.
“But it is evident that the climate change is an even more disastrous global challenge than the current financial and economic crisis. It’s a question of life or death for the population of the globe,” he added.
Kovacs said the tax would not only help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the EU, but also its revenues could be used in financing the fight against climate change in the developing world.
The revenues “should be used for climate change purposes (and) to finance the climate change efforts of the developing countries, because they need some support and we need revenues to support them,” he said.
EU finance ministers also had an “active and constructive” discussion on the issue of climate financing today, according to the Swedish EU presidency.
World governments are expected to reach a new deal on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to replace the Kyoto Protocol after it expires in 2012 at a United Nations conference on climate change in Copenhagen this December, but current negotiations have been deadlocked, with climate financing proving to be a stumbling block.
Developing countries have called for generous financial support from rich countries to help them cut greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impact of global warming, for which industrialized nations are historically responsible.
In early September, the European Commission unveiled a blueprint for scaling up international finance to help poor nations, proposing that the EU would contribute some 2 to 15 billion euros (2.9 to 22 billion U.S. dollars) a year by 2020, a sum criticized by developing countries as not enough.
Editor: Mu Xuequan
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-10/03/content_12175533.htm
centurean2 // November 8, 2009 at 11:48 am |
UK NEWS
SECRET PLAN FOR EURO INCOME TAX
Plans for the EU budget reform could cost every British family at least £155 a year
Wednesday October 28,2009
By Gabriel Milland Have your say(30)
SECRET plans to seize more than £4billion a year from Britain and make its citizens pay taxes direct to Europe emerged last night.
The leaked proposals, seen by the Daily Express, state that Britain should lose the billions of pounds in rebate that was agreed by Margaret Thatcher 25 years ago.
The plans – with a foreword by European Union Commissioner Jose Manuel Barroso – would cost every British family at least £155 a year.
They would also mean Brussels being given the power to dip straight into taxpayers’ pockets.
The proposals prompted fury last night.
EXPOSED: LABOUR’S LIES ON MIGRANTS
Shadow Europe Minister Mark Francois vowed they would be resisted by a Tory government.
He said: “The idea of an EU tax is a non-starter. LOL LIARS’
“Britain is a major net contributor to the EU and it is important that we do not pay more than our share.
“A Conservative Government would defend that position robustly.”
LOL..
Possible taxes suggested in the report – which could be discussed as soon as the start of the European summit in Brussels tomorrow – include levies on phone calls, flights, financial transactions or carbon emissions.
They would have to raise about £6.4billion a year – the net cost of belonging to the EU and equivalent to about £260 for every household in the UK. Mats Persson, of think-tank Open Europe, warned the plans would “rightly cause concern among British taxpayers”.
Jim McConalogue of the European Foundation, which wants to renegotiate European treaties, said: “It is clear from its so-called ‘reform’ agenda that Brussels is committed to the daylight robbery of the British taxpayer.”
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, branded the idea of direct taxation from Brussels an “outrage”.
He added: “Control of taxation must rest solely in the hands of democratically elected politicians who answer to British taxpayers.
“The EU has shown time and time again it is greedy for power. This is another sign they will never stop trying to grab it.”
Ruth Lea of Eurosceptic think-tank Global Vision said: “People need to wake up to the fact we are now in a superstate.
“Year by year we are living in an integrated United States of Europe and this is just part of it.” The plan, dated October 6, would see huge reforms of the EU’s £110billion-a-year budget.
In his preface, Mr Barroso writes that the report “presents the Commission’s vision for the EU budget reform” that “should form the basis for further debate with the European Parliament and the Council”. The current budget deal runs until 2013.
The proposals would see big cuts to programmes like the Common Agricultural Policy which sees tens of billions of pounds paid to small farmers in countries like France.
But in return Britain would be expected to give up its £4.1billion a year rebate, first agreed by Mrs Thatcher in 1984. Other options being considered include taxes on communications and banks and a carbon tax which would push up the cost of fuel, flights and heating.
A spokeswoman for the European Commission said that the draft report seen by the Daily Express was a “work in progress” that will be presented by the end of the year.”
A huge majority of readers backs Britain leaving the EU, the Daily Express phone poll revealed last night. Asked whether the UK should get out, an astonishing 99 per cent said yes.
Of the thousands who voted, just a few readers said the UK ought to stay in.
THE BIGGER PICTURE
04.11.09, 8:41am
Just reading the comments pages and would just like to say, please don’t expect the Queen to dissolve parliament – there’s a much bigger picture here.
In the plans for the USSEU, UK will be the banking region (why our cars, manufacturing and fishing industries have been devastated), Germany for manufacturing etc etc, all the regions have their own speciality. This has all been planned long ago and is part of an ongoing bigger plan to join all the Unions together (Asia Union, Africa Union, European Union and Nth American Union) to form a world government.
Research it for yourselves, if you have a strong stomach, no president, head of state or royal can do anything about it. Only we can, if you watch the Michael Moore films you’ll see Tony Benn say that govts like to keep the population stupid and unhealthy, that way they are easier to control. Then look around at how you’re encouraged to watch X Factor and eat processed/pesticided pap, and you can see they’ve been doing a good job.
Bresinski has said that the PTB are ‘disturbed’ by the unprecedented mass global awakening – the power is in our hands people…we have to stop in-fighting and stand together to beat this.
• Posted by: Wraith •
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/136641
centurean2 // November 8, 2009 at 11:50 am |
May 27, 2005
“Murio la Verdad”
Infiltrating Bilderberg 2005
By DANIEL ESTULIN
The annual secret meeting of the Bilderberg group determines many of the headlines and news developments you will read about in the coming months. But the Establishment media completely black it out. With the exception of half-a-dozen high ranking members of the press who are sworn to secrecy, few have ever heard of the exclusive and secretive group called The Bilderbergers.
Mainstream news organizations boastful about their no-holds barred investigative exploits, have been strangely reluctant to lift the blackout curtain hiding a major event: the Bilderberg group’s secret annual meeting for the world’s most powerful financiers, industrialists, and political figures.
2005 was a bad year for Bilderberg and its future looks gloomy. Herculean efforts to keep their meetings secret in Rottach-Egern failed miserably. Bilderberg’s grief is free world´s glory-and hope for further restraining the power grabbers in the dawn of a new millennium.
One certainty is that although Bilderberg Group has lost some of its past luster, it is meeting under its usual secrecy that makes freemasonry look like a playgroup. Staff at the hotel are photographed and put through special clearance. From porters to senior managers, the employees are warned (under the threat of never working in the country again) about the consequences of revealing any details of the guests to the press.
International and national media are said to be welcome only when an oath of silence has been taken, news editors are held responsible if any of their journalists ‘inadvertently’ report on what takes place.
While Bush, Blair, Chirac, Berlusconi and Company attended the G8 summits of the world’s foremost democratically elected leaders, they were accompanied by the massed ranks of the world media. In stark contrast, the comings and goings at Bilderberg take place under cover of a virtual publicity black-out.
The discussions they will engage in this year from deciding how the world should deal with European-American relations, the Middle East powder keg, the Iraq war, the global economy and how to stave off war in Iran, and the consensus they reach, will influence the course of Western civilization and the future of the entire planet. This meeting takes place behind closed doors in total secrecy, protected by a phalanx of armed guards.
What was on Bilderberg´s 2005 agenda?
After three straight years of open hostilities and tension amongst the European, British and American Bilderbergers caused by the war in Iraq, the aura of complete congeniality amongst them has returned. Bilderbergers have reaffirmed and remain united in their long-term goal to strengthen the role the UN plays in regulating global conflicts and relations.
However, it is important to understand that Americans are no more the “Hawks” than the European Bilderbergers the “Doves”. Europeans joined in supporting the 1991 invasion of Iraq by President Bush father, celebrating, in the words of one notable Bilderberg hunter the end of “America’s Vietnam syndrome.” Europeans also supported former President Bill Clinton’s invasion of Yugoslavia, bringing NATO into the operation.
A much-discussed subject in 2005 at Rottach-Egern was the concept of imposing a direct UN tax on people worldwide through a direct tax on oil at the wellhead. This, in fact, sets a precedent. If enacted, it will be the first time, when a non-governmental agency, read the United Nations, directly benefits from a tax on citizens of free and enslaved nations.
Bilderberger proposal calls for a tiny UN levy at the outset which the consumer would hardly notice. Jim Tucker of the court-killed Spotlight magazine years ago wrote “establishing the principle that the UN can directly tax citizens of the world is important to Bilderberg. It is another giant step toward world government. Bilderbergers know that publicly promoting a UN tax on all people on Earth would meet with outrage. But they are patient; it first proposed a direct world tax years ago and celebrates the fact that it is now in the public dialogue with little public attention or concern.”
Bilderberg wants “tax harmonization” so high-tax countries could compete with more tax-friendly nations-including the United States-for foreign investment. They would “harmonize” taxes by forcing the rate in the United States and other countries to rise so that socialist Sweden’s 58-percent level would be “competitive.”
NGOs
The rise of the NGOs, a development former President Clinton suddenly [one day after it was discussed at Rottach-Egern] calls one of “the most remarkable things that have happened since the fall of the Berlin Wall.” Ironically, Clinton´s statement was picked up by The Wall Street Journal, a paper always represented at the Bilderberg meetings by Robert L. Bartley, its Vice President and Paul Gigot, editorial page editor.
The Bilderbergers have been vigorously debating to have, for the first time, unelected, self-appointed, environmental activists be given a position of governmental authority on the governing board of the agency which controls the use of atmosphere, outer space, the oceans, and, for all practical purposes, biodiversity. This invitation for “civil society” to participate in global governance is described as expanding democracy.
According to sources within Bilderberg, the status of NGOs would be elevated even further in the future. The NGO activity would include agitation at the local level, lobbying at the national level, producing studies to justify global taxation through UN organizations such as Global Plan, one of Bilderberg´s pet projects for over a decade. The strategy to advance the global governance agenda specifically includes programs to discredit individuals and organizations that generate “internal political pressure” or “populist action” that fails to support the new global ethic. The ultimate objective, according to the source, being to suppress democracy.
The United Nations Environment Programme, along with all the environmental treaties under its jurisdiction, would ultimately be governed by a special body of environmental activists, chosen only from accredited NGOs appointed by delegates to the General Assembly who are themselves appointed by the President of the United States, who is controlled by the Rockefeller-CFR-Bilderberg interlocking leadership
This new mechanism would provide a direct route from the local, “on-the-ground” NGO affiliates of national and international NGOs to the highest levels of global governance. For example: The Greater Yellowstone Coalition, a group of affiliated NGOs, recently petitioned the World Heritage Committee of UNESCO asking for intervention in the plans of a private company to mine gold on private land near Yellowstone Park. The UNESCO Committee did intervene, and immediately listed Yellowstone as a “World Heritage Site in Danger.” Under the terms of the World Heritage Convention, the United States is required to protect the park, even beyond the borders of the park, and onto private lands if necessary.
The ideas being discussed, if implemented, will bring all the people of the world into a global neighbourhood managed by a world-wide bureaucracy, under the direct authority of a minute handful of appointed individuals, and policed by thousands of individuals, paid by accredited NGOs, certified to support a belief system, which to many people – is unbelievable and unacceptable.
Elections in Britain
Bilderbergers are celebrating the result it wanted. The return of a much humbled Tony Blair to 10 Downing Street with a much reduced parliamentary majority. European Bilderbergers are still angry at him for supporting America´s war in Iraq. While teaching Blair a useful lesson in international politics, Bilderbergers feel he is a far safer candidate to continue on the path of European integration than his conservative rival Michael Howard.
Neo-conservative agenda
In full force was that faction known as the so-called “neo-conservatives”–those who have determined that Israel’s security should come at the expense of the safety to the United States and be central to all U.S. foreign policy decisions.
Most notable among this group is the Israeli spy Richard Perle, who was investigated by the FBI for espionage on behalf of Israel. Perle played the critical role in pushing the United States into the war against Iraq. He was forced to resign from the Pentagon´s Defense Policy Board, on March 27, 2003 after it was learned that he had been advising Goldman Sachs International, a habitual Bilderberg attendee, on how it might profit from the war in Iraq.
Another neo-conservative figure on hand was Michael A. Ledeen, an “intellectual´s intellectual.” Ledeen serves for the American Enterprise Institute, a think-tank founded in 1943, with which Richard Perle has long been associated. AEI and the Brookings Institution operate a Joint Center for Regulatory Studies (JCRS) with the purpose of holding lawmakers and regulators “accountable for their decisions by providing thoughtful, objective analyses of existing regulatory programs and new regulatory proposals.” The JCRS pushes for cost-benefit analysis of regulations, which fits with AEI’s (and Bilderberger) ultimate goal of deregulation.
These neo-conservatives were also joined this year at Bilderberg by a handful of other top former Washington policy makers and publicists known for their sympathies for Israel, including former State Department official Richard N. Haas, president of the CFR, former Assistant Secretary of State and “father” of the Dayton accord, Richard Holbrooke, and Dennis Ross of the pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy, effectively an offshoot of the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and JINSA as well as the newly elected World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz.
Dennis Ross, Richard N. Perle, and company are itching to “transfer” translation: to ethnically cleanse as many Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza as possible. “Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories,” former Prime Minister Netanyahu told students at Bar-Ilan University in 1989. The residents of the European Community may be clueless about the intentions of Zionists toward the Palestinians, but in Israel, to my astonishment, ethnic cleansing is a popular subject of discussion. Fifty percent or more of Israelis think ethnic cleansing is a good idea. This from a nation that supposedly remembers the Holocaust. Fiction, is indeed stranger than the truth.
Energy
An American Bilderberger expressed concern over the sky-rocketing price of oil. One oil industry insider at the meeting remarked that growth is not possible without energy and that according to all indicators, world’s energy supply is coming to an end much faster than the world leaders have anticipated. According to sources, Bilderbergers estimate the extractable world’s oil supply to be at a maximum of 35 years under current economic development and population. However, one of the representatives of an oil cartel remarked that we must factor into the equation, both the population explosion and economic growth and demand for oil in China and India. Under the revised conditions, there is apparently only enough oil to last for 20 years. No oil spells the end of the world’s financial system. So much has already been acknowledged by The Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times, two periodicals who are regularly present at the annual Bilderberg conference.
Conclusion: Expect a severe downturn in the world’s economy over the next two years as Bilderbergers try to safeguard the remaining oil supply by taking money out of people’s hands. In a recession or, at worst, a depression, the population will be forced to dramatically cut down their spending habits, thus ensuring a longer supply of oil to the world’s rich as they try to figure out what to do.
During the afternoon cocktail, European Bilderberger noted that there is no plausible alternative to hydrocarbon energy. One American insider stated that currently the world uses between four and six barrels of oil for every new barrel it finds and that the prospects for a short term break through are slim, at best.
Someone asked for an estimate to the world´s accessible conventional oil supply. The amount was quoted at approximately one trillion barrels. As a side note of interest, the planet consumes a billion barrels of oil every 11.5 days.
Another Bilderberger asked about hydrogen alternative to the oil supply. The US government official agreed gloomily that hydrogen salvation to the world´s eminent energy crisis is a fantasy.
This confirms public statement made in 2003 by HIS, the world´s most respected consulting firm cataloguing oil reserved and discoveries that for the first time since the 1920s there was not a single discovery of an oil field in excess of 500 million barrels.
The oil industry at the 2005 Bilderberg conference was represented by John Browne, BP´s Chief Executive Officer, John Kerr, Director Royal Dutch Shell, Peter D. Sutherland, BP Chairman and Jeroen van der Veer, Chairman Committee of Managing Directors Royal Dutch Shell.
It should be remembered that in late 2003, oil giant Royal Dutch Shell, announced that it had overstated its reserved by as much as 20 percent. Queen Beatrix of Holland, Royal Dutch Shell´s principal shareholder is a full fledged member of the Bilderbergers. Her father, prince Bernhard was one of the founders of the group back in 1954. The Los Angeles Times reported that “For petroleum firms, reserves amount to nothing less that ´the value of the company´. In fact, Shell cut its reserve estimates not once, but three times, prompting the resignation of its co-chairman. At Rottach-Egern, in May 2005, industry’s top executives tried to figure out how to keep the truth about diminishing oil reserves from reaching the public. Public knowledge of the diminishing reserved directly translates into lower share prices, which could destroy financial markets, leading to a collapse of the world economy.
EU referendum in France
The first day of secret meetings at Bilderberg 2005 was dominated by talk of EU referendum in France and whether Chirac can persuade France to vote Yes on May 29. A Yes vote, according to sources within Bilderberg would put a lot of pressure on Tony Blair to finally deliver Britain into the waiting arms of the New World Order through their own referendum on the treaty scheduled for 2006. Matthias Nass wondered out load that a No vote in France could undoubtedly cause political turmoil in Europe and overshadow Britain’s six-month EU presidency starting on July 1. Bilderbergers, hope that Blair and Chirac, whose at times open animosity has spilled into a public arena on more than one occasion, can work together for mutual benefit and political survival. Another European Bilderberger added that both leaders must put behind them as quickly as possible all past disputes on such topics as Iraq, the liberalization of Europe´s economy and the future of budget rebate Britain receives from the EU and work towards complete European integration, which could desintigrate if France´s often “hard-headed and obstinate people”, in the words of a British Bilderberger, do not do the right thing, meaning give up voluntarily their independence for the “greater good” of a Federal European super state!
A German Bilderberger insider said that France´s Yes vote is in trouble because of the “outsourcing of jobs. Jobs in Germany and France are going to Asia and Ukraine,” [to take advantage of cheap labour.] Ukraine is one of the former Soviet republics that have been admitted to the European Union bringing the total membership to 25 nations. A German politician wondered out loud how Tony Blair shall go about convincing Britons to embrace the European Constitution when due to the outsourcing of jobs, both Germany and France are suffering a 10% unemployment while Britain is doing well economically.
USA criminals
A USA law called Logan Act, states explicitly that it is against the law for federal officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public policies. Although Bilderberg 2005 was missing one of its luminaries, US State Department official John Bolton who was testifying before Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the American government was well represented in Rottach-Egern by Alan Hubbard, assistant to the president for economic policy and director of the National Economic Council; William Luti, deputy under secretary of defence; James Wolfensohn, outgoing president of the World Bank and Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of state, an ideologue of the Iraq war and incoming president of the World Bank. By attending Bilderberg 2005 meeting, these people are breaking Federal laws of the United States.
Auna Telecomunicaciones
At a Saturday night cocktail [May 7] at the luxurious Dorint Sofitel Seehotel Überfahrt in Rottach-Egern, Bavaria, Munich, several Bilderbergers sharing the standing bar with Queen Beatrix of Holland and Donald Graham, Washington Post´s CEO were discussing the up-coming sale of Spanish telecommunications and cable giant Auna. Auna operates fixed line telephone services, a mobile-phone network, cable television system and is also an Internet provider. One of the Bilderbergers familiar with the matter [believed to be Henry Kravis, based on the physical description of the source at the meeting] stated that Auna´s mobile operations could bring in some 10 billion euros including debt, while another Bilderberger, a tall man with a receding hairline added that its fixed-line assets could fetch some 2.6 billion euros. Sources close to the Bilderbergers have stated off-the-record that Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co, a private-equity firm is interested in buying all of Auna. An abundance of cheap credit and low interest rates have made Auna an appetising target for private-equity buyers.
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co is represented at Bilderberg meetings by its luminary billionaire Henry Kravis and his small town Quebec-born wife Marie Joseé Kravis, a Senior Fellow at the neoconservative organization Hudson Institute.
Conclusions: Expect favourable coverage and support for Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co from Grupo Prisa whose Consejero Delegado Juan Luis Cebrian always attends super secret Bilderberg meetings. In case Kravis fails to put together a competitive bid, then expect the same favourable coverage for Goldman Sachs Group, whose Martin Taylor is Bilderbergers Honorary Secretary General and whose other Bilderberger, Peter Sutherland is Goldman Sachs´ Chairman as well as Trilateral Commission´s European Chairman. In the past, exposing Bilderberg meetings has provided advance warning-months ahead of the mainstream media-of U.S. Iraqi invasion, tax increases, and the downfall of Margaret Thatcher as prime minister of Britain.
Indonesia-Malaysia stand-off
A political and military confrontation between these two nations in the petroleum-rich Sulawesi Sea [both claim the oil-rich area of Ambalat as their territorial rights] was the topic of a much animated discussion amongst several American and European Bilderbergers during an afternoon cocktail. An American Bilderberger waving his cigar suggested using the UN to “further a peace policy in the region”. In fact, Bilderbergers at the lounge table all agreed that such a conflict might well give them an excuse to garrison the disputed area with UN “Peacekeepers” and thus ensure their ultimate control over the exploitation of this treasure, meaning untapped oil reserves.
China
European and American Bilderbergers realising the most urgent of needs to expand into developing markets in order to help sustain the illusion of endless growth have agreed to name Pascal Lamy, a French Socialist and a fanatical supporter of a European super state as the next WTO President. It will be remembered that Washington gave a conditional support to Lamy´s nomination in exchange to European support of Paul Wolfowitz as head of the World Bank. According to insider sources within the Bilderberger group, Lamy was chosen to help steer the global trading system through a time of rising protectionist sentiment in rich countries such as France and Germany, both reeling from high unemployment and reticent to increasingly muscular demands for market assess from emerging economies. Third World states, for example, are insisting on cuts to EU and US farm subsidies. The WTO liberalization drive collapsed in acrimony in Seattle in 1999 and again in Cancun in 2003. The Bilderbergers have secretly agreed on the need to force the poor countries into a globalized market for cheap goods while simultaneously forcing the poor into becoming customers. The current rift with China is a good example, as the Chinese have flooded the Western countries with cheap goods, amongst them textiles, driving down prices. As a trade off, the Bilderbergers have entered into an emerging market ripe and vulnerable to superior western know-how. Similar develop-ing countries are slowly acquiring more purchasing power and the industrialized world is gaining a foothold in their domestic economies by targeting them for cheap exports.
* * *
One can’t help but wonder, when the Bilderberg organisers, Rockefeller, Kissinger, Queen Beatrix and the rest have completed their project of enclosing all global goods and services into their own hands. What then?
Francisco Goya´s Plate 79 of Disasters shows the fair maid of Liberty flat on her back, bosom exposed. Ghostly figures play about the corpse while monks dig her grave. Truth has died. Murió la verdad. How is that for an alternative? Forewarned is forearmed. We will never find the right answers if we can’t ask the proper questions.
Daniel Estulin is a political commentator living in Madrid, author of four books on communication skills. He can be reached at: d.estulin@ctconsultoria.com
http://www.counterpunch.org/estulin05272005.html
centurean2 // November 14, 2009 at 3:53 pm |
HoL….. Fabian Fascist.
Westerners have to become vegetarians, says Lord Stern, former chief economist of the World Bank and a Fabian socialist. For after Copenhagen, meat wil become so expensive that it can not be bought. Reason: Animals emit too much methane! And that´s the new gospel from Al Gore, who states that CO2 is inly responsibele for 40% of global warming – much to the annoyance of tax-hungry globalists
centurean2 // November 14, 2009 at 4:06 pm |
prices are set to rise across the board- thats’ the Fabian way of taking whats yours!
houses-cars- whatever!
billions of years- long before humans were here- Animals farted and no doubt will long after we are gone.
WE AIN’T ALL THAT IMPORTANT.
NEITHER ARE THER FABIAN SCUMBAGS THAT ARE PUSHING FOLK TOO FAR!
TICK TOCK…
CLIMATE CHANGE– NORMAL-NATURAL- BEYOND THE CONTROL OF EVEN THE COMMIE LYING FABIANS!!
REVENUE THIEVES!!
AFTER COPENHAGEN—–THATS’ WHEN THE NWO KICKS IN!!
WHEN WE STRIKE- WE STRIKE HARD………………
TAX STRIKE SHOULD CURE THAT!!!
centurean2 // December 10, 2009 at 12:59 pm |
washingtonpost.com
One World Government? Globe may not be big enough.
By Dana Milbank
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
The New World Order came into being at 4:25 Tuesday afternoon.
It arrived at the Capitol, until that moment the seat of American government, in the form of the stooped and bespectacled figure of Ban Ki-moon, who as U.N. secretary general is the de facto leader of what conspiracy theorists call the One World Government. One floor beneath the Senate chamber, Ban, a South Korean national, took his place behind a lectern bearing the Senate seal and spelled out his demands.
“I would certainly expect the Senate to take the necessary action; that’s what I have encouraged the senators,” he told reporters as a trio of lawmakers stood at his side. He added an admonition for the chamber to deliver “as soon as possible.”
The One World Government has specific requirements, Ban added, namely a “legally binding” commitment to “25 to 40 percent greenhouse gas reduction . . . as recommended by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”
Uh-oh. A U.N. official standing in the Capitol telling U.S. lawmakers what binding commitments intergovernmental authorities expect from them? Glenn Beck was going to burst a blood vessel.
But the man who orchestrated this putsch by the New World Order, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-Switzerland), did not appear concerned by the imagery. He called the secretary general “Your Excellency.” Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana (a Republican, but he drives a Prius) was equally deferential as he spoke of “the privilege of this distinguished visitor.”
And Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) hailed Ban for “the accelerated leadership role” that the United Nations has taken. “Your vision, that in Copenhagen there can be a politically binding agreement that will lead to a legally binding agreement to follow . . . is a very reasonable, sensible and hopeful course.”
Somewhere in Manhattan, Sean Hannity was tearing up his script for the night’s broadcast.
Kerry invited Ban to lecture the Foreign Relations Committee, but it’s not clear what the chairman hoped to gain from the photos of him standing with Ban in the Capitol’s Brumidi Corridors. Indeed, it seemed quite possible that a U.N. endorsement of Kerry’s climate efforts would embolden its foes, who like the world body even less than they like cap-and-trade. In the pantheon of conspiracy theories, the United Nations is right up there with the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, the Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations — which, as it happens, Kerry addressed a couple of weeks ago.
Even Americans who don’t come from the grassy-knoll tradition tend not to regard the United Nations with great confidence. A Gallup poll earlier this year found that 65 percent of respondents thought it was doing a bad job, compared with 26 percent who think it is doing a good job. Ban himself is not terribly nefarious, if only because he is unknown. A Wall Street Journal poll found that 81 percent of those surveyed didn’t know who he was. The others may have confused him with the Unification Church’s Rev. Sun Myung Moon.
Ban’s profile could become much higher, and not in a good way, if Americans start to perceive him as meddling in Senate consideration of climate legislation. Even before he stormed the Capitol, Fox News was drawing a connection between global warming talks in Copenhagen next month and One World Government.
“America, if you believe this country is great but you’re not really into that whole One World Government thing, watch out,” Fox News Channel’s Beck warned a couple of weeks ago. His guest, Lord Christopher Monckton of Britain, told Beck that “at Copenhagen, a treaty will be signed that will, for the first time, create a world government with powers to intervene directly in the economy and in the environmental affairs of individual nations.” Earlier on Fox News, Dick Morris informed Hannity that President Obama “believes in One World Government.” And author Jerome Corsi went on Hannity’s show to warn about a One World Government in which “our sovereignty would be subject to the dictates” of the United Nations and other international organizations.
The One World Government was on open display at the Capitol on Tuesday, as international U.N. staffers waited outside the room where Ban spoke to the senators. The secretary general had come with his own world government (armed?) security detail, who stood alongside the Capitol police.
Ban, wearing a gold U.N. lapel pin, unfolded his speech. “Less than a month from now, the leaders of the world will gather in Copenhagen,” he said. “They must conclude a robust global agreement,” that is “comprehensive, binding, equitable and fair.”
Speaking softly but firmly, the South Korean cautioned the Americans that “the world is not standing still,” and that “all the eyes of the world are looking to the United States.”
After a few minutes, Kerry cut off questioning. “Folks, the secretary general has to get to the airport.”
Ban needed to catch the U.S. Airways shuttle to New York. The One World Government Air Force isn’t what it’s cracked up to be.
Washington Post