Friday, July 17, 2009
by Baron Bodissey
Below is another guest-essay by Paul Weston about the indoctrination of children, this one concerning the educational system in the UK.
Other recent essays by Paul Weston include:
Wilders in Wonderland
Who is Lord Ahmed?
Temporary Peace Trumps Freedom of Speech
Muslims, Mosques and Mosquitoes
Islam, the BBC, and Young Children
Review of “A Bridge Too Far”
Socialist Propaganda in British Education
By Paul Weston
If one were sound of mind, moral of character and decent at heart, which of the following two men would you like to see involved in the education of your children?
The first, Mr Ray Honeyford, ex-headmaster of a multi-ethnic school in Bradford, England, considered his primary role to be that of producing academically well qualified and colour-blind children who could be integrated into Western society whilst retaining a respect and affection for their own cultural heritage.
The second, a certain Professor Chris Mullard had the following to say with regard to the education of black children:
“Already we have started to rebel, to kick out against our jailers…As more black Britons leave school disgruntled, as more black Britons discard their yoke of humility, the ultimate confrontation will become clearer…Blacks will fight with pressure, leaflets, campaigns, demonstrations, fists and scorching resentment which, when peaceful means fail, will explode into street fighting, urban guerrilla warfare, looting, burning and rioting.”
“Why does race matter so much? …I think part of the answer is that we mirror the horribleness and inhumanity of white society. We remind white society of the horrible things that were done in the name of whiteness. They see in us the devil in themselves. That goes deep down in popular consciousness.”
So a white man wanted to improve black and brown children, whilst a black man wanted to destroy the white race. If the two should clash, then the outcome in a sane country should be obvious. But Britain is not sane. It is sick. When Professor Mullard joined the ravening attack pygmies ranged against the moral giant that was Ray Honeyford, there was only ever going to be one winner. Mr Honeyford was chased from office amid accusations of racism in one of the most vicious campaigns ever mounted in British academia, to the total indifference of what was then a Conservative government under Margaret Thatcher.
Mr Honeyford, a working class man who had pulled himself up by his bootstraps to attain a masters degree and the headship of a large school was brutalised by the experience. He never taught again. Indeed, he was not allowed to ever teach again.
Professor Mullard on the other hand has gone from strength to strength. Where once he merely advised teacher training colleges on political indoctrination, he has now — no doubt off the back of the destruction of Ray Honeyford — been awarded the CBE (Commander of the British Empire) for services to British education and currently sells his racist ideology to European governments and agencies as well as international organisations such as the OECD and UNESCO.
Mr Honeyford, a good, decent and non-racist man became an enemy of the state. Professor Mullard, an evil, racist Marxist was the state, and although it breaks my heart to have to say this, the state personified by Mullard in 1984 in now far, far worse after twelve years of Socialist government and the non-stop propaganda to which socialism is inherently wedded.
Propaganda is the most powerful tool in Socialism’s obsessive and perpetual quest for social control and absolute power. Fear of the state is nowhere near as powerful as love of the state, and none more so than when love is conditioned from an early age.
During the Iraq/Iran war of 1980-1988, brainwashed parents happily sent brainwashed children to run through mine fields, thereby clearing a path for the less expendable adult soldiers with weapons.
In World War II Japanese Kamikaze pilots were mentally programmed to die for Shintoism and the Emperor Hirohito, much akin to the Islamic suicide bombers of today who self-detonate for Allah and Islamic imperialism, albeit with the guarantee of eternal leg-over in the afterlife.
Western peoples have also been conditioned to die. Not for Allah or Hirohito, but for the new religion of Liberalism. We have surrendered any hope of a decent future for our children and grandchildren because we do not wish to be labelled racist, intolerant, xenophobic, nationalistic or illiberal. Such a suicidal ideology is wholly unnatural and can only be inculcated through propaganda every bit as powerful as Shintoism once was, and Islam is today.
The Jesuit maxim “Give me a child for his first seven years and I will give you the man“ is perfectly in tune with Aldous Huxley’s introduction to Brave New World:
- – - - – - – - -
“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers could control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love is the task assigned in present day totalitarian states to ministries of propaganda, newspapers and schoolteachers.”
To make them love; isn’t this exactly what to celebrate diversity means? It is not enough we stoically accept the colonisation of our culture and country, not enough that some, perversely, do not seem to mind, we must actively celebrate our dispossession, despite the unnatural and pathological mind-set such celebration demands.
And because it is unnatural and pathological, it can only be overcome by extreme and perpetual propaganda. The British Labour Party, a motley collection of ex-Maoists, Marxists, Communists, Communist sympathisers and a mandated clutch of aesthetically challenged quota harridans who were never much fancied at school know this only too well, which is why they concentrate so heavily on the unformed and innocent minds of children, hence Universities Minister John Denham’s chilling statement: “Education is the most powerful tool we have in achieving social justice.”
And it is never too young to start. The Orwellian sounding Department for Children, Schools and Families, run by the equally Orwellian Ed Balls has an Early Years department geared toward developing “a strong and culturally diverse workforce” with a specific focus on “recruiting staff from black and minority ethnic communities.”
I may well be old-fashioned, indeed almost out of the Ark at the ripe old age of forty-five, but such statements appal me. Surely the point of education is to produce a cohesive and exemplarily educated citizenship, with the specific focus being the recruitment of teachers who could facilitate this, not buggering about noting the colour of their skin above the content of their character?
But as I say, I am out of the Ark. Teachers are now employed specifically due to their pigmentation or religion, just as teachers were once denied work and ultimately their lives in another Socialist regime, based on their religion and the length of their nose.
In 2007, Ms Baljeet Ghale, a member of the Socialist Teachers Alliance was elected as the first black President of the National Union of Teachers. No sooner was she ensconced in her equal opportunity office chair, which revolved in ever increasing circles but did little else, had she taken up her anti-British cudgels with which to bash the indigenous racists.
Her main gripe was the apparently ludicrous suggestion by Education Secretary Alan Johnson that in order to develop “better community relations” schools should promote core British values such as free speech, tolerance and respect for the law.
In Baljeet Ghale’s keynote address at her inauguration as perhaps the nuttiest of NUT Presidents, she derided the idea that such values were intrinsically British, and went on to say:
“I have no doubt that for some, behind notions of what it means to be British, stands the shadow of racism.”
Followed by:
“To demand that people conform to an imposed view of Britishness only fuels that racism.”
Her unorthodox views were reinforced by leading black academic Professor Gus John who stated:
…all schools must assume they are institutionally racist.”
and then added for good measure:
“I would like someone to define what British values are. I want nothing at all to do with the values of the BNP which are quintessentially British.”
Whilst “quintessentially British” conjures up images of standing alone against totalitarianism in 1939, or even hazy summer days, village greens, the thwack of leather on willow and tipsy vicars on bicycles with wicker baskets, it clearly means something else entirely to professor John.
As the BNP are promoted as bigoted, racist neo-Nazis by the liberal/left, then what the good professor is intimating here is both racist and slanderous. There are monuments and graveyards everywhere one looks in this once great country, testimony to the hundreds of thousands of young men killed fighting against precisely the ideology that Gus John has now turned around and levelled against us as typifying the entire British race.
Baljeet Ghale and Gus John are correct that values such as free speech are not exclusively British, even if they originally emanated from England, but they are exclusively Western, and should be taught as such, rather than pretending that Nigeria, Iran, Pakistan, Kenya, Saudi Arabia or Bangladesh are the moral or cultural equivalents of the West, and by default, Britain. And while they’re at it, instead of traducing the evils of the British Empire they should dwell on the fact that, as Mark Steyn points out, of the world’s fifty most free nations, half were once ruled by Britain and have since adopted our democracy and our rule of law. This is something most countries would be proud of, not an issue to be taught as the shameful legacy of oppression.
There is no use whatsoever in merely opining that the gross insubordination and ingratitude shown by Ghale and John should merit an instantaneous return from whence they came, which in Ms Ghale’s case was Kenya, not exactly a hot bed of free speech, tolerance and respect for the law. Or, should she be unenamoured by Kenya, that then perhaps Cuba, a country she greatly admires and one known throughout the deluded liberal world today as a Utopian society where homosexuals and aids sufferers march unmolested through the streets of Havana calling for their right to a same sex marriage.
I say no use, because they are absolutely typical of those in charge of formulating the ideology that British schools will subsequently teach our children, backed up by Socialist MPs from the Labour-dominated Education and Skills Committee who have demanded that compulsory citizenship lessons, which include politics, voting, the Human Rights Act and the importance of diversity, should not endorse British values or history, and should instead concentrate on universal themes such as the acknowledgement and acceptance of homosexuality and abortion.
The committee urged teachers not to dwell on the Monarchy, British freedoms, military successes or the empire, but should “touch on what is distinctive in the inheritance and experience of contemporary Britain and the values of our society today”
although this should
“not be taken to imply an endorsement of any single explanation of British values or history”.
Not even babies in nappies are exempt from these twisted people. Lord (Lord help us) Herman Ousely, ex-Chairman of The Commission for Racial Equality, believes three-year-olds should unlearn racist ideology acquired heaven knows where, and nursery staff should report any racial incidents they encounter to the relevant race department at the local council, even over such trivialities as a toddler saying “yuk“ when presented with a foreign dish, as outlined in a 366 page report entitled Young Children and Racial Justice.
In the event that four-year-old Simon Cholmondeley-Warner expresses an extreme racist reaction to curried goat, then Sharon Rasp, the barely-educated Early Years Knowledge Facilitation Officer, may well consider reporting him to the Council Thought Crime Department.
But hold on, won’t such a report, indeed the tenth one that day, send out the message that Sharon’s classroom is infested with rather Patrician junior racists — an odious situation that will reflect badly upon Sharon and her Diversity Awareness Outreach And Equality Team?
Silly Sharon. Her mind would be set at ease if she discarded her Teen Fanzine magazine and listened instead to the National Children’s Bureau, who thoughtfully broadcast the following message on the hour, every hour, from a conveniently sited TeleScreen.
“Some people think that if a large number of racist incidents are reported, this will reflect badly on the institution. In fact, the opposite is the case.”
I’ll bet. (The TeleScreen bit I made up, the rest is true.) The more cases of racial prejudice shown the more they can proclaim Britain a hot bed of toddler racists, thus enabling them to claim more money with which to recruit more Equality Officers who have strict orders to “cure us.”
These people are quite mad, of course. I sometimes wonder if there is some kind of dark sexual tension underpinning behaviour that is so incomprehensibly perverse, just as it was with the Nazis, or National Socialists, to give them their full title.
And the madness continues. Children are now taught race relations and multiculturalism in every subject they study, after advice from education adviser Sir Keith Ajegbo who stated:
“Teachers will be expected to make explicit references to cultural diversity in as many subjects as possible.”
In music and art, children learn Indian and Chinese songs and instruments along with West African anti-racist bongo drumming. In maths and science, key Muslim contributions such as algebra and the number zero are emphasised to counter Islamophobia, and in English, pupils study literature on the experiences of migration — such as Zadie Smith’s novel White Teeth, or Brick Lane, by Monica Ali.
Toddlers under the age of five would also learn about Human Rights, including their right to a glass of water or toy, whenever they wanted it, in addition to the gross inequalities between the First World and the “Developing Countries.”
Words associated with the Monarchy, Christianity or just Ye Olde Merrie England reminiscent of church bells on wet and windy Sunday mornings in villages across the land, the aroma of damp earth overpowered by the intoxicating fragrance of recently deluged roses, have been removed from school dictionaries.
Vineeta Gupta, the head of children’s dictionaries at Oxford University Press, said:
“We are limited by how big the dictionary can be — little hands must be able to handle it — but we produce 17 children’s dictionaries with different selections and numbers of words.
“When you look back at older versions of dictionaries, there were lots of examples of flowers for instance. That was because many children lived in semi-rural environments and saw the seasons. Nowadays, the environment has changed. We are also much more multicultural. People don’t go to Church as often as before. Our understanding of religion is within multiculturalism, which is why some words such as “Pentecost” or “Whitsun” would have been in 20 years ago but not now.”
It is no longer necessary to burn books in these multicultural times. One can achieve the same result simply by “disappearing” words within them. It is interesting to note how many words relating to Christianity have been disappeared. Here are just a few:
Abbey, aisle, altar, bishop, chapel, christen, disciple, minister, monastery, monk, nun, nunnery, parish, pew, psalm, pulpit, saint, sin, devil, vicar, carol, cracker, holly, ivy, mistletoe.
This is not really surprising. In 2004 a labour think tank released a report entitled “What is Religious Education For?” which recommended that children learn less about Jesus and the Ten Commandments and more about atheism:
“Pupils would be actively encouraged to question the religious beliefs they bring with them into the classroom”
But learning about atheism and questioning one’s heritage was confined only to Christianity:
“A heavy emphasis would be given to educating children about Islam.”
We have seen the result of this in my earlier article The BBC, Islam & Young Children which paints Christianity, indeed all indigenous Europeans, as a bunch of enslaving, sexist, racist murderers, whilst giving Islam a cute and cuddly clean bill of health. This happily complied-with instruction comes directly from the Department for Children, Schools and Families who have also decreed that the teaching of the Holocaust be dropped by some schools to avoid upsetting Muslim sensibilities, even though Holocaust denial is a criminal offence — as long as the offender is not a Muslim of course.
Such reverence for religion is unreciprocated toward non-Muslims, however, where indigenous schoolteachers are advised to wash their hands before touching the Koran with their filthy, infidel, ape-like digits, and indigenous school children are instructed to copy the Shahadah from within it, which states:
“There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger.”
The Shahadah, clearly not coincidentally, is the first of the five pillars of Islam, and the only statement one needs to recite in order to convert to Islam. It is the most important sentence in the Islamic world and as it is the only part of the Koran teachers are advised to tell their pupils to copy, one has to question the allegiance of Britain’s current rulers.
This assault upon indigenous British schoolchildren is beyond my comprehension. As a result it is no surprise to discover that white working class boys bear the brunt of this warped and sinister experiment in the Cultural Cleansing of the British, and languish at the very bottom of educational league tables.
The socialists Baljeet Ghales, Herman Ouselys, Vineeta Guptas, Keith Ajegbos and Chris Mullards have done their jobs well. Their hatred of whites, Europeans, the English and capitalism has been succoured and encouraged by white Socialists of the same bent, who now control all of our institutions and government and such is their influence they can even get to those outside their state sector remit, leading to the following quote from a privately educated girl on a BBC Have Your Say page:
“A lot of people around me think that Britain is some amazing, rich, beautiful country. I think learning about the horrible things we have done help us to learn that our country isn’t as amazing as we make out.” — Jess. Year 10.
It is a shame that even privately educated children such as Jess appear not to have heard of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who knew a thing or two about totalitarianism and whose following observation might give Jess and her Year 10 friends pause for thought:
“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.“
And that is exactly what is occurring in British schools today. This is not some collective suicide though. In an unprecedented act of the greatest evil ever perpetrated upon the British people, these racist Socialist bastards are murdering us, and it is with anguish, anger and despair that one watches the cultural cleansing of a great civilisation.
Compare and contrast the two photographs of Mr Honeyford and Professor Mullard, both of whom serve as a microcosm of what has happened to Great Britain. The good man looks completely and utterly beaten by what “Great” Britain has done to him. The evil and racist Professor Mullard looks extraordinarily happy, as indeed he should, having benefitted enormously from the treacherous ruling elites in his war against traditional Britain. Professor Mullard and the other Mullard manqués who control us have achieved their long march through the institutions. They have completed their revolution. They are the New Establishment. They are the State. They have won. Our only hope now is counterrevolution.
The final words should come from Mr Dennis O’Keefe. His critique of teacher training in Britain entitled The Wayward Elite should be required reading for anyone who doubts the extent to which Communist ideology has permeated mainstream education:
“What, after decades of anxiety, I still cannot reconcile myself to is the fact that anyone should want to do this to fellow citizens. Are those who say that every civilisation has its imminent nemesis correct? Is there a sinister doppelganger behind every great culture, counting off its numbered days? Sometimes one is almost aware of their mocking laughter somewhere just off-stage, scorning our achievements, cheering our enemies intent on spreading misanthropy and despair.”
“Our educational tragedy is part of the wider tragedy of Socialism which has betrayed so many hopes. The destruction of our education has been mediated by the same collectivist phenomenon which has ruined half the world’s economic life… Socialism is a wrong theory, its results as disastrous in education as elsewhere, indeed more so since education is the pursuit of truth and moral excellence and therefore the highest secular activity of the human race.”
part 2-3 and 4 here.http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/07/to-kill-tree-part-one.html
.Fabians steal our money-culture – country!
Recall- Geofrey Howe MP Tory-came over as such a nice guy—-he too was a FABIAN!
“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.“
To Kill A Tree : Part One.
By Philip Jones 26th May 2009.
Introduction:
The saying goes thus : “To kill a tree, sever its roots`, or as the Russian philosopher Alexander Solzhenitsyn put it: “To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots,” and that is precisely what has been done to our societies here in the West. How does one sever a people’s roots? First you destroy its memory of itself through rewritten history, then you depopulate it.
The Usual Suspects:
Two days ago on May 26th, the Times Online published a report entitled “Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation. America’s richest people meet to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social and industrial threat”. The article went on to say that “Some of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population and speed up improvements in health and education. The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change. Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.” (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6350303.ece)
Many of you reading this will be familiar with the term `Depopulation Agenda.’ I had already begun composing this article when the above story hit the headlines, which makes what I am about to write all the more relevant and necessary. There is a wealth of information out there on this subject, and here in this article I can only begin to `scratch the surface` of what is a deeply involved and complex aspect of the plan for a `New World Order.` In this and the essays which follow, I shall attempt to put the pieces of the puzzle together, join the dots if you will, and illustrate how many diverse and seemingly unconnected factors are in fact interlinked, and are being used by a nefarious cabal of Luciferians, of which the above named `Philanthropists` are most certainly members, in order to cull a large percentage of the global population.
A day or so back, I was skimming through the headlines on Rense when one in particular grabbed my attention. It read “Annually 46 Million Abortions Worldwide” (Annually-46-million-abortions-worldwide-Catholic-Church) . The sheer scale of this legalised and socially accepted mass murder of innocents is bewildering and difficult to consume. In all of nature, no other animal intentionally destroys its young in this way and in such overwhelming numbers.
Although now global in scale, this destructive trend has been accelerating here in in the West since the 1960′s, and combined with a plethora of other methods all intended to reduce human reproduction, has resulted in a below-replacement level birthrate in all the so-called developed nations. In Europe, for instance, only Muslim Albania is reproducing itself. The question begs to be asked, why are Western women having fewer children than their mothers or often now none at all ? Women in the West have had access to contraception for many decades, and also to legal abortion for over thirty years, but unlike Chinese women, they have the choice. No law compels them to abort their unborn offspring. Yet these women are terminating their pregnancies at a rate which Patrick James Buchanan, in his book, `The Death Of The West,` rightly terms `Auto genocide.`
So why are children no longer valued as they once were? What brought about this paradigm shift in the hearts and minds of men and women, to turn their backs on their own posterity? As I have written above, in this and the following articles I will attempt to prove my assertions that there is a deliberate culling of the global population under-way, and that a Cabal of Luciferians known as the Illuminati is responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions of innocents, and for the wreckage that we term human civilisation.
In this first part, we will look at the cold reality of the demographic situation along with the intentional undermining of western culture.
The Demographics:
The `Old World` is dying. Its nations have seemingly `given up the ghost` and ceased reproducing. Now, in this first decade of the 21st Century, the traditional genetic make-up of the populations in Europe, America, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have stopped growing and are in steep decline. In Denmark, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Russia, there are now more burials than births.
In 1960, people of European Ancestry accounted for a quarter of the earth’s population, numbering around 750 million of the 3 billion alive at the time. While the global population has since then more than doubled, Europeans and their overseas cousins have stopped reproducing sufficiently to ensure continuation of their line. The forecast is not pretty either. In `The Death Of The West,`we read that between now and mid-century, the world population will grow to over 9 billion people, but this 50% increase will come entirely from Asia, Africa and South America while, at the same time, 100 million people of European Stock will vanish unreplaced.. Put another way, as the West declines, the population in the developing world adds 100 million people every fifteen months. That’s like forty more Mexico’s by 2050, while in Europe alone, the equivalent of Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Sweden, Norway and Germany will have ceased to exist.
Western peoples today constitute only a sixth of the global populace, and, by 2050, this figure is expected to be closer to one tenth. As Mr. Buchanan writes, “These are the statistics of a vanishing
race.”
The Western nations and Europe in particular are facing a stark and unpleasant mathematical reality. If we accept that the likelihood of Western women developing a desire to have large families is zero, and we wish to maintain the current ratio of around 4.8 workers for every senior citizen, then the choice lies between ever higher taxation, or massive immigration from the developing world on a culturally destructive scale. Either option will change the way we and our children (if we have any) live in perpetuity.
The Secret War:
“And ye shall be left few in numbers, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldst not obey the voice of the Lord thy God.” Deuteronomy XXVIII : 28 KJV.
For decades now, demographers have been warning of an impending demographic disaster in the `developed world,` but there haven’t been too many ready to listen. Western governments, even though fully aware of the catastrophe approaching their nations, have either hidden the facts from their people, or downplayed the forecasts as being exaggerated or even erroneous. But we have now reached that point in time where the mathematics speak for themselves.
In 2007, the United Nations casually proclaimed the seemingly inevitable `Death of the West` which it expected to occur by mid century: “The world population is expected to grow by 3 billion more by 2050, the UN Population Division reports. Africa and Asia will be the home of almost all the world’s people, with Europe dwindling to a tiny minority. In 2050, 90% of the world’s population will live in the Third World … the population of Africa is expected to triple in the next 50 years.”
Many here in the West reading this will perhaps breathe a sigh of relief and look forward to a time without overcrowded cities and traffic jams. They will reason that since they do not live in the Third World but in Europe, North America, Australia etc. that the issue does not concern them. But it does, and the former UN Population Division director Joseph Chamie outlined why in graphic detail when the 2001 report was first published:
“The policies of Europe will have to change, since it will have to pay for the costs of this population growth and cannot be allowed [emphasis added]not to share its wealth with the growing number of poor in the world. Chamie noted that there will be declining countries which become dependent on migrants to sustain their economy. … In 1950, Europe was 22% of the world population, Africa 8%. In 2050, Africa will be three times as populous as Europe. Without accelerated migration, by 2003, total European population will start its final, catastrophic contraction. By 2050, the population of Ukraine is expected to fall by 40%, Russia by 27%, and Italy by 25%.”
The European Commission joined in with its own `doomsday` statement when it appealed for an end to the ‘fortress Europe’ policy and encouraged Europeans to embrace racial pluralism and admit a controlled flow of legal immigrants each year. The German Institute of Economic Research has warned Germans that the country will have to accept a major increase in immigration if it hopes to avoid a crippling long‐term labour shortage. It said that net immigration would soon have to be pegged at more than 600,000 annually.
Most of us have learned in schools and universities that World War II was fought in the cause of democracy, liberalism, and equality. But since the end of that most terrible of human events, another war has been raging, not against any great military adversary, but against humankind in general and the people of the West in particular.
Almost immediately after hostilities ceased, a massive program of “re‐education” was imposed on the victors and the victims alike. The public and social institutions of the Western world, now firmly controlled by the architects of “equality,” began a campaign of social engineering that laid waste to the cultural awareness of Europeans and their cousins abroad. In this new campaign, there was no neutral territory. Nothing escaped its merciless `scorched earth` policy. No aspect of our history, culture, or science was left untouched, or not twisted and turned inside out by the proponents of “democracy, liberalism, and equality.”
Our self appointed inquisitors taught us that there was not a single achievement of our culture and people that was worthy of being left in `situ.` In this all‐out onslaught against Western consciousness, the so called “moral authorities” enlisted the support of our youth and turned them against us. In London, the premier Illuminati agency of human manipulation and control, the Tavistock Institute, in concert with the Intelligence Agencies and the Frankfurt School’s Marxist `thinkers` instigated the student revolts of the 1960′s, which dealt a series of fatal blows to Western culture. Bombarded with Cultural Marxist Neo-Communist ideas, pseudo‐psychology (based on the Kabbalah), Eastern New Age spirituality and adolescent idealism, a generation of Western youth rebelled against the “establishment” and joined ranks with the enemies of our people ‐‐ all supposedly in the cause of “democracy, liberalism, and equality.” The impact of this `movement`, which rejected virtually all our Christian values, on the Western world cannot be overemphasized.
The sixties generation began what Antonio Gramsci, a pre-war Italian Marxist whose radical anti-western ideas had by then been externalised in society, termed the ” Long March Through the Institutions”. It is the descendants of this generation who having seized all the major positions of social influence, have knowingly and willingly directed and controlled the Auto genocide being perpetrated against their own people.
“Destroy the family and you destroy society.” Lenin.
One of the primary tenets of Marxism is the eradication of the nuclear family, and it is no coincidence that a major thrust of the `sixties cultural revolution` was directed against the family, the very soul of nations and communities. Subsequently, all aspects of that traditional and most natural core of the human condition have been attacked and vilified throughout all avenues of education and information. Can anyone remember the last time they saw a film which extolled marriage and family values? Make no mistake here, all the ridicule, derision and hatred directed towards matrimony and child‐rearing was and is a major part in the play called `The Depopulation Agenda`. It is irrefutable that our present sorry condition in which women reject motherhood, children often know only one parent, and only homosexuals it seems are attracted by marriage, was carefully prepared by the engineers who planned and plotted their long‐term strategy for the culling of our population. Destroy the nucleus of society, and society will fall apart.
Destroy The Culture:
They told us that after centuries of imperialism and colonialism by European powers, the non‐White peoples have accumulated so many grievances that we supposedly have a “moral obligation” for turning over vast proportions of our wealth to them by means of foreign aid. The reasoning is that our high standard of living only came into being due to the “manifold crimes” our ancestors allegedly perpetrated against the rest of mankind. The paradox to this is that without an ever increasing influx of immigrant labour into our countries, due to the calamitous drop in the birth rate here in the West, our bloated welfare systems will all but collapse in the near future. Unless we experience some form of miraculous turnaround and soon, the only way by which our taken for granted high standard of living can be sustained is by the contributions of immigrants from the Third World.
But there is counter side to this. As ever more people from vastly different cultures to our own arrive, set up home and form communities of their own, our own way of life becomes diluted. Many in the West have grave misgivings regarding what amounts to a human tidal wave crashing upon our shores. Yet our politicians seem totally impotent, or even negligent in finding a solution and persist in what they tell us to believe is the only recourse available to them: Mass Immigration. Any questioning, request for open debate or opposition to this “reasoning” is summarily dismissed and denounced as “racism and bigotry.” Several European countries, plus Canada, have even penalized the public expression of disagreement to “diversity” ‐‐ just like Jean Raspail predicted in his 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints.
Survival Of The Fittest?
If we accept that the thesis of `Natural Selection` provides for the survival of those who struggle for it, not for those who take it for granted. That immigrants seize the opportunities provided to them is both reasonable and understandable. The evil lies not with those coming here to seek a better life, but with those eternal adversaries of humankind, the Luciferian Illuminists, who have planned, orchestrated and also seemingly conditioned the European race into mild acceptance of it’s own its extinction. They, the schemers and movers behind the scenes, have declared war on us, as we in the West were seen as the biggest obstacle to their plans. In her 1979 pamphlet,`A World Coup Is Planned,` Dr. Kitty Little writes:
“By 1963, the UN Convention on Racial Discrimination had provided for the massive movements of population that would in turn provide for the interbreeding of culturally incompatible peoples, and for the positive discrimination against the native populations of European decent who were considered to be the greatest obstacle to their plans. A parallel UNESCO Convention against `discrimination` in education had provided the impetus for race, sex, parentage, local and national loyalties and all denominations of religion as well as ability, to be regarded as forms of `discrimination` and therefore to be abolished. Children were deemed to have a `human right` to be protected from religious indoctrination. All this, in addition to the encouragement of oral contraceptives (that lead to physical, mental and moral degeneration), vasectomy, drug abuse, and the current fashion for genetic engineering with artificial insemination and `test tube` babies, was designed for the debasing of the white race.”
It is the Illuminists, in utter thrall as they are to their `Dark Lord,` who have plotted the demise of Western man. After two fratricidal wars that pitched European nation against European nation, both instruments in their own way of driving humanity towards world government, they then turned on the civil populations of the west by manipulating the decline in birthrates. They achieved their goals within the space of barely half a century, using a multitude of means (to be dealt with more fully later), thereby creating the situation where it is now necessary for the nations of the West to import huge numbers of immigrants in order to maintain the greatest means of ensuring human dependency ever invented; the Welfare State!
Payback Time?
The great majority of immigrants who arrive at the borders of the West do so looking for a better life for themselves and their families. But there are among them a small minority of politically motivated stooges, mesmerised by carefully crafted stories at home of past colonial oppression, all carefully calculated to instill as much resentment as possible, creating a form of “reverse colonialism.” They do not come looking for “democratic freedoms” ‐‐ they come for plunder and pillage (in a manner of speaking). The First World is attractive to the Third World for one reason only: our out of control materialism and consumerism. Our middle‐class standard of living appears, to such people, a luxurious lifestyle they can only dream of, and they reason: why shouldn’t they get a `piece of the pie` too?
About 90% of all illegal immigrants who pour into Western nations do so to escape poverty. However, in effect they are bringing their own poverty with them. Harvard economist George Borjas writes that “the present wave of immigrants is less educated and at an income level lower than was the case of previous immigrants.” … The net effect, he says, is that we are currently “importing poverty.” With the economic and social conditions in the Third World deteriorating ever more, and the United Nations calling on the Western countries to open their borders, immigration into the First World will become an avalanche in the future and will wreak havoc on our economic and social conditions.
The 2000 Census in the USA showed Hispanic and Asian populations were the fastest growing groups in the country, and for the first time, nearly half of the nation’s 100 largest cities are home to more Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and other minorities than Whites. Have a look at these inner city areas where “diversity” runs rampant, and then dare to question the destructive and dis-integrative consequences we are facing. And much of this is courtesy of the “liberals” who have themselves moved to wealthy neighbourhoods long ago!
Our unique civilisation is at stake, yet the Illuminati-controlled media and our `elected` governments either ignore this peril or behave as if there is no problem. Of course, those at the top of the pile know exactly what the plan is, and, to them it must seem as if every thing’s going exactly according to plan. Back down on planet earth, nobody has the courage it seems to confront women in the West with this one issue alone: Unless they start conceiving children and lots of them, our civilisation will vanish. European civilization is the engine of progress in the world. With our civilization gone, the Malthusian principle will most assuredly catch up with the rest of mankind. “Diversity” means the death of the West, but this death will not be limited to us. At least this much can be predicted.
The show will be over once we become a minority in our own lands, which mathematically seems guaranteed absent divine intervention. It will then be only a matter of time until the forces of disintegration have finished their destructive work and erased all traces of Western civilization. That not only can, but will, happen to our nations once Western peoples, by virtue of the democratic process, lose their political power to the newcomers.
The death of the West is imminent. It is a bitter irony that those men who went to war against the Axis powers during WWII earnestly believed it would be they who prevented the death of the West. Instead, they were being used as mere pawns to bring about the beginning of the end of Western culture and civilization, and then, to add salt to the wound, their children were enlisted in the counter culture of the sixties which continued the death blows.
There can be no doubt about the grave danger our civilisation and nations have been manoeuvred into. It is a danger that has been spelled out by every institution dealing with population growth. If current trends persist, after 2050, the native population in the West will gradually shrink and become a minority.. This is a danger that can only be faced collectively.
In order to avert this calamity, our welfare states must be dismantled, and the traditional family restored to its rightful and premier place as the bedrock of society. The ideology of feminism has to be recognised as the `siege gun` and a primary agent agenda for our race’s auto genocide, and then universally refuted and denounced. The only social construct that protects and nurtures human beings is the nuclear family unit and thereafter, that of the extended family, whereby children learn from not only their parents, but their grandparents, aunties and uncles also. The passing down of knowledge and tradition in this way kept people grounded and gave a sense of natural belonging and security. This is the divine God-given order of the world. The violators of this order are enemies of mankind who not only want the European race to perish, but want every indigenous population on earth to perish along with it.
To be Continued in Part Two.
Ref: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-3515-Denver-Political-Issues-Examiner~y2009m5d16-
http://www.whale.to/b/genocide_q.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_fertility_rate
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/5245757/Europes-age-crisis-begins-to-bite.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm Essential Reading!!
The Death Of The West by Senator Patrick James Buchanan,
http://catholicinsight.com/online/features/article_882.shtml Frankfurt School
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci
http://www.gillistriplett.com/rel101/articles/destruction.html
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml
Be Wise As Serpents – Fritz Springmeier P 399 Re Freud. Today, psychiatrists, our primary recognized authorities on people, are taught principles that are derived from the teachings of theSatanic Sabbatai. Freud took his ideas from the Zohar and some of the ideas of the Sabbatai. It might surprise some people that Freud got his ideas from the Satanic Jewish sect of Frankist-Illuminati. The depraved behavior of the Frankist-Illuminati was the beginning of what has become the everyday perversions of the ungodly American Society. Psychiatrists using Freud’s teachings have been granted unquestioned power over many people lives.